Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Construction and Characterization of an Escherichia coli Mutant Producing Kdo2-Lipid A
Previous Article in Journal
Carotenoids of Sea Angels Clione limacina and Paedoclione doliiformis from the Perspective of the Food Chain
Previous Article in Special Issue
Structural Studies of the Lipopolysaccharide from the Fish Pathogen Aeromonas veronii Strain Bs19, Serotype O16
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/md12031471
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Role of Biophysical Parameters in the Antilipopolysaccharide Activities of Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Fish

by
Ramamourthy Gopal
1,
Chang Ho Seo
2 and
Yoonkyung Park
1,3,*
1
Research Center for Proteineous Materials, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea
2
Department of Bioinformatics, Kongju National University, Kongju 314-701, Korea
3
Department of Biotechnology, Chosun University, Gwangju 501-759, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2014, 12(3), 1471-1494; https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031471
Submission received: 10 February 2014 / Revised: 3 March 2014 / Accepted: 3 March 2014 / Published: 13 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Lipopolysaccharides)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Numerous antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) from marine fish have been identified, isolated and characterized. These peptides act as host defense molecules that exert antimicrobial effects by targeting the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria. The LPS-AMP interactions are driven by the biophysical properties of AMPs. In this review, therefore, we will focus on the physiochemical properties of AMPs; that is, the contributions made by their sequences, net charge, hydrophobicity and amphipathicity to their mechanism of action. Moreover, the interactions between LPS and fish AMPs and the structure of fish AMPs with LPS bound will also be discussed. A better understanding of the biophysical properties will be useful in the design of AMPs effective against septic shock and multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, including those that commonly produce wound infections.

1. Introduction

Recent research has shown that certain marine peptides possess antimicrobial, antifungal, antiviral, anticoagulant and/or antifreeze properties; indeed, the number of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) isolated from marine organisms and which are effective against pathogenic bacteria continues to grow. These AMPs are found in a wide range of phyla, including Crustacea, Cnidaria, Mollusca and Porifera, as well as in a number of fish species [1,2,3,4,5]. These include various marine fish species expressing anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs), so named because of their ability to specifically inhibit lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-mediated activation of the Limulus coagulation system [6,7].
ALFs were initially isolated from hemocytes of the horseshoe crabs (chelicerates) Tachypleus tridentatus and Limulus polyphemus [6,7] and were later identified in various other crustacean species, especially penaeid shrimp [2,8]. Crustacea and penaeidae species now known to express ALFs include L setiferus [9], P. monodom [10], F. chinensis [11], M. japonicas [12,13], L. vannamei [14,15], F. paulensis, L. schmitti [16] and L. styrirostris [17]. In addition, several ALF isoforms have been identified in P. monodon based on findings from the expressed sequence tag database [18]. Many of these ALFs exhibit similar antimicrobial and anti-LPS activities, and their amino acid sequences differ from those of other marine AMPs [19]. In marine fish, ALFs comprise an important part of the innate immune system that acts as the first line of defense against a broad spectrum of pathogens [20,21], especially Gram-negative bacteria, which express LPS. Furthermore, because LPS plays an important role in pathophysiological processes in humans [4,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], identifying and characterizing AMPs that are able to bind and/or neutralize LPS is a particularly attractive target in the effort to control Gram-negative bacterial disease.
LPS is the major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative marine bacteria. Part of the function of LPS is to protect marine bacteria from harmful environmental factors. A major component of LPS is lipid A, also known as endotoxin. Lipid A molecules are the main pathogens responsible for septic shock in both fish and humans. When Gram-negative marine bacteria enter the body of a marine fish, Lipid A triggers the innate immune system via Toll-like receptors, which activates inflammatory signaling pathways that lead to septic shock. ALFs from marine fish are able to bind and neutralize lipid A, thereby preventing the inflammatory signaling [31,32]. These characteristics make ALFs a promising class of molecules for use in the development of drugs for the treatment of viral and bacterial diseases. In this review, we discuss the LPS binding domain of ALFs expressed in marine fish species as well as their structural amphipathicity (net cationicity and hydrophobicity) and other biological features, including their LPS binding/neutralization and antibacterial activity.

2. Anti-LPS Factors

2.1. StALF and PpALF2

The ALF isoform Scylla tranquebarica ALF (StALF) was isolated from hemocytes from the mud crab Scylla tranquebarica, while Portunus pelagicus ALF (PpALF2) was isolated from the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus. Comparison of their sequences with those of previously characterized ALFs showed that both contain an LPS-binding domain [33]. The sequences of PpALF2 and StALF are rich in positively charged amino acid residues: both PpALF2 and StALF contain 12.4% lysine (Lys) and also contain 5.2% and 6.2% arginine (Arg), respectively. In addition, they contain substantial percentages of hydrophobic amino acids. Like other ALF molecules, PpALF2 and StALF exhibit a repeat pattern of cationic and hydrophobic amino acids within a disulfide loop, which suggests they share the same functional domain. Previous studies also reported that alternating hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids are characteristic of molecules with antimicrobial and LPS binding activities [34,35,36], and that hydrophobic amino acids are essential for the interaction between the peptide and LPS [37]. Moreover, the LPS binding domain of ALFs shows LPS neutralizing activity [12], and synthetic peptides corresponding to the crustacean ALF sequence show antimicrobial activity [38].
The 38 residues of the PpALF2 N-terminal region include 10 hydrophobic residues and 17 positively charged amino acids. Similarly, the 35 residues of the StALF N-terminal region contain 10 highly hydrophobic amino acids and 20 positively charged amino acids. The LPS binding domain is formed within a 22-residue disulfide loop (PpALF2L: CHFFRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC, StALF: CHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC). The sequences of the loops are similar with the PpALF2 loop containing seven positively charged amino acids and a tryptophan (Trp) and the StALF loop containing nine positively charged amino acids and a Trp. The identical residues include C1, H2, R5, K6, P7, K8, F9, R10, K11, F12, K13, L14, Y15, H16, E17, G18, K19, F20, W21 and C22. However, residues 3 and 4 differ between the two loops: FF in PpALF vs. IR in StALF. Based on this difference in the LPS binding domain, the two molecules differ with respect to their molecular weights, net cationicity and percent hydrophobicity (Table 1). Nonetheless, the diagram in Figure 1 shows that the LPS binding domains of both PpALF2 and StALF are displaying cationicity, hydrophobicity and clustering of the cationic and hydrophobic motifs which are attributable to peptide’s amphipathic character. In addition, given their high similarity to other ALFs, the structural model of PpALF2 and StALF created using the SWISS-MODEL server consisted of two α-helices crowded against a four-strand β-sheet, like PpALF1 [39]. Importantly, an amphipathic loop is formed from the LPS binding domain situated between two β-strands [40]. This is an important factor conferring LPS-binding activity to ALFs [12].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g001 1024
Figure 1. The surface of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PpALF2 and StALF. The PpALF2 and StALF have a repeat pattern of cationic and hydrophobic amino acids within a disulfide loop, which suggests they share the same functional domain. (+ = Basic residues; ●= Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 1. The surface of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PpALF2 and StALF. The PpALF2 and StALF have a repeat pattern of cationic and hydrophobic amino acids within a disulfide loop, which suggests they share the same functional domain. (+ = Basic residues; ●= Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g001
Table
Table 1. Cationic antimicrobial peptides within marine fish anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs).
Table 1. Cationic antimicrobial peptides within marine fish anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs).
Name of the Gene or SourceLPS Binding DomainNet ChargeHydrophilicity (%)Hydrophobicity (%)Molecular Weight
PpALF2CHFFRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC845362933.56
StALFCHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC950322908.55
ALFSpCHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC950322908.55
SpALF1CHFRRRPKVRKFKLYHEGKFWC950322922.54
SpALF2CHIRRRPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC950322936.57
SsALFCHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC950322908.55
PtALFCYFRRRPKIRRFKLYHEGKFWC950322990.63
PtALF6CNFRVMPRLRSWELYFRGDVWC227452834.37
ALFPm1CRYSQRPSFYRWELYFNGRMWC323322949.43
ALFPm3CKFTVKPYLKRFQVYYKGRMWC627362845.51
ALFPm6CSFNVTPKFKRWQLYFRGRMWC523412854.44
MjALF1CNFYVEPKFRNWQLRFKGRMWC427412909.47
MjALF2CRYSQRPTFYRWELYFRGSMWC323322936.44
ALFFcCKFTVKPYIKRFQLYYKGRMWC627362859.54
MrALF5CSFQVKPRIKRWELYFRGTMWC427412835.44
MrALF6CIYKRTGYFYKWELHYKAEVRC436272857.38
MrALF7CTYNMRPFFKNWKLYYSASVIC314412735.27
ALFHa1CRFSVKPTVRRFQLYFKGRMWC627412809.45
ALFHa2CNFQVKPKIRRWQLYFVGSMWC418452790.38
ALFMolfCQYSVTPRIKKLELWFKGRMWC427412773.4
EsALFCNTRVMPTIKKFELYFRGRVWC427412748.36
LALFCRKPTFRRLKWKIKFKFKC947372514.2
CRP19-1CRKPTFRRLKWKIKGKFKC947322424.07
CRP19-2CRKPTFRRLKWKYKGKFKC947262474.09
PardaxinGFFALIPKIISSPLFKTLLSAVGSALSSSGGQE19523323.9
TachyplesinKWCFRVCYRGICYRRCR635242268.82
Sushi 1GFKLKGMARISCLPNGQWSNFPPKCIRECAMVSS418443757.53
Sushi 3HAEHKVKIGVEQKYGQFPQGTEVTYTCSGNYFLM224293891.42
NRC-16GWKKWLRKGAKHLGQAAIK737422176.61

2.2. ALFSp

An ALF from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain was identified and cloned using a cDNA library [38]. Designated ALF Scylla paramamosai (ALFSp), it contains a 24-amino acids LPS binding site (TCHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWCP) with a disulfide-bonded loop region spanning residues 54–77 of the protein. Moreover, a synthetic 24-amino acid peptide consisting of the residues in the predicted LPS binding region exhibits bactericidal activity towards several species [38]. The ALFSp disulfide loop region contains a number of highly conserved basic amino acids (H56, R58, R59, K60, K62, R64, K65, K67, H70 and K73) and is situated in the middle of the protein sequence. In addition, there is a clustering of hydrophobic amino acids, including W75, in the N-terminal region of the protein [38]. This gives ALFSp an amphipathic character (Figure 2).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g002 1024
Figure 2. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFSp. Designated ALFSp, it contains a 24-amino acids LPS binding site with a disulfide-bonded loop region the protein. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 2. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFSp. Designated ALFSp, it contains a 24-amino acids LPS binding site with a disulfide-bonded loop region the protein. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g002

2.3. SpALF1 and SpALF2

The full-length cDNAs encoding SpALF1 (JQ069030) and SpALF2 (JQ06931) from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain have been produced [41] (Figure 3), and the encoded proteins were expressed in Pichia pastris. Comparative analysis of the recombinant proteins (rSP-ALF1 and rSp-ALF2) indicates the presence of a putative LPS binding loop, and synthetic peptide fragments of the LPS binding domain ((sSP-ALF1 (Acetylated-HTCHFRRRPKVRKFKLYHEGKFWCPG-aminated) and sSp-ALF2 (Acetylated-HTCHIRRRPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWCPG-aminated) as well as the recombinant proteins (rSP-ALF1 and rSp-ALF2), themselves, exhibit strong bactericidal activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [41].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g003 1024
Figure 3. The surface of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic SpALF1 and SpALF2. SpALF1 and SpALF2 from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain have been produced and the encoded proteins were expressed in Pichia pastris. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 3. The surface of the hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic SpALF1 and SpALF2. SpALF1 and SpALF2 from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain have been produced and the encoded proteins were expressed in Pichia pastris. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g003

2.4. SsALF

Scylla serrata ALF (SsALF) has been cloned, expressed with a Histag in E. coli, and characterized [42]. Sequence analysis showed that SsALF has up to 92% similarity with the ALFs from Scylla paramamosain and about 33%–53% amino acid sequence identify with other known ALFs. Expressed and purified recombinant SsALF exhibits both LPS neutralization and antimicrobial activity that involves bacterial membrane disruption [42]. Moreover, analysis of the putative LPS binding domain (CHIRRKPKFRKFKLYHEGKFWC) exhibited a strong positive charge of +9 with 32% hydrophobicity and an amphipathic structure (Figure 4). This structure is consistent with the idea that the highly cationic LPS binding domain binds to the highly anionic lipid A.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g004 1024
Figure 4. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic SsALF. SsALF has about 92% similarity with the ALFs and about 33%–53% amino acid sequence identify with other known ALFs. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 4. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic SsALF. SsALF has about 92% similarity with the ALFs and about 33%–53% amino acid sequence identify with other known ALFs. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g004

2.5. PtALF

Portunus trituberculatus ALF (PtALF) from the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus was first identified in a hemocyte cDNA library [43]. However, in response to infection with Vibrio alginolyticus, PtALF mRNA is ubiquitously expressed in muscle, stomach, heart, gill, hepatopancreas and hemocytes, suggesting it play an essential role in the animal’s innate immune response [43]. PtALF also contains a clustering of hydrophobic and positively charged amino acid residues within a disulfide loop (CYFRRRPKIRRFKLYHEGKFWC), giving the sequence the amphipathicity needed to bind and neutralize LPS [44] (Figure 5). In addition, the 22-residue of disulfide loop in which nine amino acids are positively charged residues and this peptide also contained a various hydrophobic residues Y56, F57, I63, F66 L68, Y69, F74 W75 [43]. Multiple alignment of the deduced amino acid sequence of PtALF showed 76%, 76%, 52% and 46% identity with the reported ALFs from Scylla serrata, S. paramamosain, P. leniusculus and P. monodon, respectively [43]. It is therefore likely that PtALF will share the anti-LPS and antibacterial activities of other ALFs [38,42].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g005 1024
Figure 5. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PtALF. PtALF has a clustering of hydrophobic and positively charged amino acid residues within a disulfide loop, giving the sequence the amphipathicity needed to bind and neutralize LPS. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 5. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PtALF. PtALF has a clustering of hydrophobic and positively charged amino acid residues within a disulfide loop, giving the sequence the amphipathicity needed to bind and neutralize LPS. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g005

2.6. PtALF6

Another ALF from Portunus trituberculatus, Portunus trituberculatus ALF6 (PtALF6), was identified in an eyestalk cDNA library [45]. Like other ALFs, PtALF6 is composed of a signal peptide containing an LPS-binding domain within a disulfide loop. Following expression and purification of recombinant PtALF6, the protein showed antimicrobial activity, and the time-dependent expression of PtALF6 was accelerated after injection of V. alginolyticus into hemocytes, again indicating PtALF6 is significantly involved in the elimination of invasive pathogens [45]. Interestingly PtALF6 shares 84% sequence identity with ALFSp2, but there is only 10% amino acid identity between PtALF6 (27CNFRVMPRLRSWELYFRGDVWC48) and PtALF (CYFRRRPKIRRFKLYHEGKFWC) [45]. The LPS binding loop of PtALF6 contains four Arg residues, two Trp residues and a Lys residue, but unlike other LPS binding loops, it lacks a histidine (His). PtALF6 shows a net cationicity (+2) and 45% hydrophobicity with an amphipathic structure (Table 1 and Figure 6). The predicted tertiary structure of PtALF6 obtained using the SWISS MODEL showed a four-stranded anti-parallel β-sheet, an α-helix at the N-terminal and two α-helices at the C-terminal, including a hairpin loop formed by a disulfide bond (C27 and C48) between strands 2 and 3 of the anti-parallel β-sheet [45].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g006 1024
Figure 6. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PtALF6. PtALF6 is composed of a signal peptide containing an LPS-binding domain within a disulfide loop. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 6. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic PtALF6. PtALF6 is composed of a signal peptide containing an LPS-binding domain within a disulfide loop. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g006

2.7. ALF-Pm3

Through nucleotide sequence analysis, two groups of ALFs have been derived from different genomic loci from the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon: Group A includes Penaeus monodon ALF1 (ALFPm1) and Penaeus monodon ALF2 (ALFPm2), while group B contains Penaeus monodon ALF3-5 (ALFPm3-5) [46]. Nearly all known mature ALF peptides contain about 100 amino acids, except ALFPm2, which contains only about 60 amino acids. Nonetheless, all ALFPms share the common features of being more hydrophobic at the N-terminal region than the C-terminal, and a conserved disulfide loop contains a positively charged cluster as the putative LPS-binding domain [47]. Of the five isoforms, the 98-residue ALFPm3, first identified in hemocytes [48], is the most abundantly expressed isoform of P. monodon. Earlier findings that ALFPm3 exerts its antibacterial effects by binding to LPS, which is why it is known as an ALF [49]; however, recombinant ALFPm3 exhibits bactericidal activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [48]. Furthermore, recombinant ALFPm3 also shows bactericidal activity against Vibrio harveyi cells, acting through a membrane disruption mechanism [50], and is also able to eliminate white spot syndrome virus from P. monodom [51]. Tissue expression of both ALFPm2 and 3 was increased in response to V. harveyi infection, which is indicative of the important function of ALFs against bacterial invasion [46]. ALFPm3 also exerts an antiviral effect against human herpes virus (HSV-1) [52]. Interestingly, a synergistic effect was observed against bacterial strains exposed to a combination of ALFPm3 and shrimp lysozyme [53].
Biophysical techniques such as SPR indicate that rALFPm3 binds lipid A of LPS and OM-174, the water-soluble analogue of lipid A [54]. However, the structure of the complex formed by lipid A and the LPS binding site of rALFPm3 could not be determined using NMR due to their size. The secondary structure of ALFPm3 consists of three α-helices and a four-stranded β-sheet [54]. ALFPm3 and ALF-L have similar secondary structures, which include one disulfide bridge, although sequence identity between ALFPm3 and ALF-L is only 38.2% [47,54]. The disulfide bridge in ALFPm3 is essential for its structural stability; when the bridge is removed from ALFPm3 or ALF-L stability is lost [54]. To determine the lipid A-binding site in ALFPm3 and ALF-L, their structures were compared with that of FhuA. This analysis showed that ALFPm3, the ALF-L and FhuA share similar clusters of positively charged and hydrophobic residues gathered on their β-sheet surfaces. It is noteworthy that the entire β-sheet surface of FhuA is essential for lipid A-binding, which suggests that the lipid A-binding site (CKFTVKPYLKRFQVYYKGRMWC) of ALF-Pm3 and ALF-L are also β-sheet surfaces [54].
The ALFPm3 protein #35–51 contains part of a putative LPS-binding region (KPYLKRFQVYYKGRMWC) and shows some antimicrobial activity, but does not contain a disulfide bond. On the other hand, the synthetic LPS binding peptide clearly shows less antimicrobial activity towards Gram-negative bacteria than intact rALFPm3. It is noteworthy that reduction of the disulfide bond in the LPS-binding region of ALFPm3 protein #35–51 does not completely eliminate its antimicrobial activity; its effect on LPS binding activity is not yet known [48].
The amino acid composition of the putative LPS-binding domains of ALFPms differs somewhat. There are clear differences in the total numbers of positively charged amino acid residues (Arg and Lys) among the ALFPms. ALFPm1 (CRYSQRPSFYRWELYFNGRMWC) and ALFPm2 (CRYSQRPSFYRWELYFNGRMWC) contain four Arg, while ALFPm3 (CKFTVKPYLKRFQVYYKGRMWC), ALFPm4 (CKFTVKPYLKRFQVYYKGRMWC) and ALFPm6 (CSFNVTPKFKRWQLYFRGRMWC) contain two Lys and two Arg. Moreover, the LPS binding domain of ALFPm1, 2 and 6 contains two Trp residues, while those of ALFPm3 and 4 have only one Trp residue. Consequently, the degree of amphipathicity varies among ALFPms which is mainly based on the balance of the sizes of their cationicity and hydrophobicity (Figure 7).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g007 1024
Figure 7. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFs. ALFs: Group A includes ALF1 (ALFPm1) and ALF2 (ALFPm2), while group B contains ALF3-5 (ALFPm3-5). All ALFPms share the common features of being more hydrophobic at the N-terminal region than the C-terminal, and a conserved disulfide loop contains a positively charged cluster as the putative LPS-binding domain. ALFPm6 contain two Lys and two Arg. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 7. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFs. ALFs: Group A includes ALF1 (ALFPm1) and ALF2 (ALFPm2), while group B contains ALF3-5 (ALFPm3-5). All ALFPms share the common features of being more hydrophobic at the N-terminal region than the C-terminal, and a conserved disulfide loop contains a positively charged cluster as the putative LPS-binding domain. ALFPm6 contain two Lys and two Arg. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g007

2.8. MjALF1and MjALF2

cDNA encoding an ALF-like peptide (Marsupenaeus japonicus ALF (MjALF)) was isolated from the kuruma prawn Marsupenaeus japonicus. The deduced amino acid sequence of MjALF1 has 42% homology with the Japanese horseshoe crab T. tridentatus ALF, and Clustal W alignment showed 36.6% homology with L-ALF from the Atlantic horseshoe crab L. polyphemus [12]. MjALF1 mRNA is expressed in hemocytes, lymphoid organ, heart, intestine, muscle, stomach, hepatopancreas and gill. In one study, MjALF2 gene expression was found to be highest in heart and gill tissue [13]. By contrast, MjALF1 was more strongly expressed in hemocytes than other organs [12]. In addition, expression of MjALF1 mRNA in lymphoid organs was increased within 1.5–3 h after LPS administration, and then declined to baseline within 6 h. It thus appears that Mj-ALF1 is involved in the elimination of pathogens in vivo [12].
The LPS binding sites of MjALF1 (CNFYVEPKFRNWQLRFKGRMWC) and MjALF2 (CRYSQRPTFYRWELYFRGSMWC) share identical amino acids at C1, P7, F9, W12, L14, F16, G18, M20, W21 and C22. In addition, synthetic peptides containing amino acids C30 to C51, corresponding to the LPS-binding domain, efficiently neutralize LPS and inhibit NO production in RAW264.7 cells [12]. This suggests an amphipathic β-hairpin loop with an alternative pattern of hydrophilic (mainly basic amino acids K and R) and hydrophobic residues between C30 and C51 are able to bind LPS in a manner similar to other ALFs (Figure 8).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g008 1024
Figure 8. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic MjALF 1 and 2. MjALF1 and MjALF2 gene expression was found to be the highest in different sections. By contrast, the LPS binding sites of MjALF1 and MjALF2 share identical amino acids at C1, P7, F9, W12, L14, F16, G18, M20, W21 and C22. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Figure 8. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic MjALF 1 and 2. MjALF1 and MjALF2 gene expression was found to be the highest in different sections. By contrast, the LPS binding sites of MjALF1 and MjALF2 share identical amino acids at C1, P7, F9, W12, L14, F16, G18, M20, W21 and C22. (+ = Basic residues; ● = Hydrophobic uncharged residues).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g008

2.9. ALFFc

The full-length cDNA encoding ALF Fenneropenaeus chinensis (ALFFc) was cloned from hemocytes from the Chinese fleshy prawn Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Multiple alignments showed the amino acid sequence of ALFFc shares 56% homology with the sequences of ALFs from Tachypleus tridentatus and L. polyhemus. ALFFc contains a disulfide loop (CKFTVKPYIKRFQLYYKGRMWC) that binds LPS and neutralizes its septic effects [12,55,56,57,58,59]. ALFFc transcripts are mainly detected in hemocytes, gill and intestine, and ALFFc expression is significantly enhanced in response to V. anguillarum infection [11] (Figure 9).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g009 1024
Figure 9. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFFc. ALFFc showed the amino acid sequence of ALFFc shares 56% homology with the sequences of ALFs from Tachypleus tridentatus and L. polyhemus. ALFFc contains a disulfide loop that binds LPS and neutralizes its septic effects.
Figure 9. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFFc. ALFFc showed the amino acid sequence of ALFFc shares 56% homology with the sequences of ALFs from Tachypleus tridentatus and L. polyhemus. ALFFc contains a disulfide loop that binds LPS and neutralizes its septic effects.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g009

2.10. MrALF5, MrALF6 and MrALF7

Multiple isoforms of Macrobrachium rosenbergii ALF (MrALF) have been identified in the giant freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Of them, MrALF5 (CSFQVKPRIKRWELYFRGTMWC), MrALF6 CIYKRTGYFYKWELHYKAEVRC and MrALF7 (CTYNMRPFFKNWKLYYSASVIC) have been characterized [60]. MrALF5 is expressed mainly in the hepatopancreas, gills and heart, whereas MrALF6 was mainly distributed in the intestine and hepatopancreas, and MrALF7 is strongly expressed in the hepatopancreas. MrALF6 and MrALF7 were downregulated by E. coli challenge. By contrast, MrALF5-7 gene expression is upregulated by Vibrio or white spot syndrome virus challenge, suggesting MrALF5-7 may participate in the immune response to the bacteria and virus. Importantly, MrALF5-7 contain a LPS-binding domain with two conserved Cys residues and eight conserved hydrophobic amino acids; however, their amino acid compositions, balance of net charge and hydrophobicity and degree of amphipathicity all differ from one another (Table 1 and Figure 10).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g010 1024
Figure 10. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic MrALF. Multiple isoforms of MrALF have MrALF5, MrALF6 and MrALF7. The isoforms of MrALF, MrALF5-7 contain a LPS-binding domain with two conserved Cys residues and eight conserved hydrophobic amino acids; but, their amino acid compositions, and degrees of amphipathicity all differ from one another.
Figure 10. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic MrALF. Multiple isoforms of MrALF have MrALF5, MrALF6 and MrALF7. The isoforms of MrALF, MrALF5-7 contain a LPS-binding domain with two conserved Cys residues and eight conserved hydrophobic amino acids; but, their amino acid compositions, and degrees of amphipathicity all differ from one another.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g010

2.11. ALFHa1 and ALFHa2

ALF Homarus americarius1 (ALFHa1) and ALF Homarus americarius2 (ALFHa2) were identified from the American lobster Homarus americarius [61]. The sequences of both contain an N-terminal signal peptide and Cys residues participating in a disulfide bridge. The gene expression of ALFHa1 was increased by Vibrio fluvialis in the gill, hemocytes and hepatopancreas, whereas expression of ALFHa2 was not significantly affected by Vibrio in any of the three tissues tested [61]. The LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 (CRFSVKPTVRRFQLYFKGRMWC) contains four Arg and two Lys, while that of ALFHa2 (CNFQVKPKIRRWQLYFVGSMWC) has two Arg and two Lys (Figure 11). Consequently, the LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 is considerably more cationic than that of ALFHa2. The LPS binding/neutralization activities of the two LPS binding domains have not yet been determined using synthetic peptides under in vitro assay conditions.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g011 1024
Figure 11. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFHa1 and ALFHa2. The LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 contains four Arg and two Lys, while that of ALFHa2 has two Arg and two Lys. Consequently, the LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 is considerably more cationic than that of ALFHa2.
Figure 11. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFHa1 and ALFHa2. The LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 contains four Arg and two Lys, while that of ALFHa2 has two Arg and two Lys. Consequently, the LPS binding domain of ALFHa1 is considerably more cationic than that of ALFHa2.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g011

2.12. ALFMolf

The sequence of an ALF Macrobrachium olfersi (ALFMolf) was identified in hemocytes from the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium olfersi [16]. The amino acid sequence encoded by the ALFMolf cDNA showed homology to other ALFs from limulids and crustaceans. The LPS binding domain of ALFMolf (CQYSVTPRIKKLELWFKGRMWC) contained two Arg and three Lys as well as a number of hydrophobic amino acids, including two Trp [16] (Figure 12). Early studies indicated that LPS binding motifs in host defense proteins were formed by amphipathic sequences rich in cationic and hydrophobic residues [47,55]. The KGRMWC sequence in the LPS binding domain of ALFMolf showed homology to those from ALFFc, ALFPm3 and MjALF.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g012 1024
Figure 12. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFMolf. The LPS binding domain of ALFMolf contained two Arg and three Lys including two Trp.
Figure 12. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic ALFMolf. The LPS binding domain of ALFMolf contained two Arg and three Lys including two Trp.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g012

2.13. EsALF

The cDNA encoding Eriocheir sinensis ALF (EsALF) was identified in the Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis [62]. The mature EsALF peptide was expressed in E. coli, and the recombinant EsALF exhibited bactericidal activity towards a spectrum of bacterial strains that was similar to recombinant ALFs from P. monodon [47] and T. tridentatus [63]. EsALF mRNA was mainly expressed in hemocytes, heart and gonad, and less strongly in gill, eyestalk and muscle, and expression of EsALF mRNA was increased in response to Vibrio anguillarum infection. The sequence of the LPS binding domain in EsALF (CNTRVMPTIKKFELYFRGRVWC) contains several cationic (three Arg and two Lys) and hydrophobic residues for LPS binding activity (Figure 13).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g013 1024
Figure 13. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic EsALF. The LPS binding domain in EsALF contains three Arg and two Lys.
Figure 13. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic EsALF. The LPS binding domain in EsALF contains three Arg and two Lys.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g013

2.14. LALF

The Limulus Anti-LPS factor was identified in hemocytes from the marine chelicerates Tachypleus tridentatus and Limulus polyphemus. The sequence between amino acids 31 and 52 (CRKPTFRRLKWKIKFKFKC) comprises the LBS binding domain [64]. CLP19 is a synthetic peptide derived from Limulus ALF, which neutralizes LPS toxicity, inhibits LPS-induced TNF-α production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and protects mice from LPS-induced shock in vivo [65]. It has also been reported that CLP19 is able to reduce secretion of TNF-α from PBMCs stimulated with LPS in the presence of human serum [65], and to block LPS induced phosphorylation of the MAPK signaling proteins p38, ERK1/2, ABD and JNK1/2 in PBMCs [65]. In addition, two analogs of CRP19, CRP19-1 (CRKPTFRRLKWKIKGKFKC) and CRP19-2 (CRKPTFRRLKWKYKGKFKC), were synthesized to assess the effect of altering the hydrophobicity of the parent molecule [66]. The order of hydrophobicity was CRP-19 > CRP19-1 > CRP19-2. When the ability of the three molecules to neutralize LPS, inhibit TNF-α release from LPS-simulated RAW 264.7 cells, and protect mice from endotoxemia were compared, CRP19-2 showed less activity than CRP19-1, which in turn showed less activity than CRP-19. Clearly then, reducing hydrophobicity reduces the peptides ability to inhibit LPS [66], which is consistent with the idea that the hydrophobicity of the factor is important for binding LPS [37,55] (Figure 14).
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g014 1024
Figure 14. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic LALF, CRP19-1 and CRP19-2. CLP19 is a synthetic peptide derived from Limulus ALF, which neutralizes LPS toxicity, inhibits LPS-induced TNF-α production in PBMCs and protects mice from LPS-induced shock in vivo. Furthermore, two analogs of CRP19, CRP19-1 and CRP19-2, were synthesized to assess the effect of altering the hydrophobicity of the parent molecule.
Figure 14. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic LALF, CRP19-1 and CRP19-2. CLP19 is a synthetic peptide derived from Limulus ALF, which neutralizes LPS toxicity, inhibits LPS-induced TNF-α production in PBMCs and protects mice from LPS-induced shock in vivo. Furthermore, two analogs of CRP19, CRP19-1 and CRP19-2, were synthesized to assess the effect of altering the hydrophobicity of the parent molecule.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g014

2.15. Pardaxin

Pardaxin is an amphipathic polypeptide composed of 33 amino acid residues (GFFALIPKIISSPLFKTLLSAVGSALSSSGGQE) which was identified in the pacific peacock sole fish Pardachirus pavoninus [67] and the red sea moses sole fish Pardachirus marmoratus [68] (Figure 15). Later, pardaxins (Pa1, Pa2, Pa3 and Pa4) showing a broad spectrum of antibacterial activities were also found in the mucous glands of sole fish [69]. The three dimensional structure of Pa4 with LPS has been resolved using NMR [69], which showed the horseshoe structure of Pa4 in LPS micelles. The Lys residues present at positions 8 and 16 of Pa4 interact with the lipid A moiety of LPS via a salt bridge or hydrogen bond. Lys8 is located in a N-terminal short helix (residues Leu5-Ser12) and Lys16 is in a C-terminal longer helix (residues Lys16-Ser28). Residues Pro13, Leu14 and Phe 15 form a short loop between the short helix and the longer helix. Other residues, Phe2-Ala4 and Ser29-Glu33, fall into extended conformations in the LPS micelle [69]. This characteristic helix loop helix structure formed in the LPS micelle is essential for interaction with LPS. Moreover, deleting the charged residues Lys8/Lys16 or the aromatic residue Phe15 from Pa4 reduces its interaction with the bacterial membrane and its antibacterial activities [70,71]. Thus Lys8/Lys16 and phe15 with the helix loop helix configuration are important for membrane disruption and the antibacterial activity of Pa4. Another recent study showed that the pardaxin GE33 protects against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection in mice with skin injuries. GE33 reduced the amounts of two pro-inflammatory mediators, TNF-α and IL-6, released during wound healing, thereby promoting the wound healing process [72].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g015 1024
Figure 15. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic pardaxin. Pardaxin is an amphipathic polypeptide composed of 33 amino acid residues showing a broad spectrum of antibacterial activities were also found in the mucous glands of sole fish.
Figure 15. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic pardaxin. Pardaxin is an amphipathic polypeptide composed of 33 amino acid residues showing a broad spectrum of antibacterial activities were also found in the mucous glands of sole fish.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g015

2.16. Tachyplesin

Anti-LPS tachyplesin was isolated from the hemocytes of the horseshoe crab [73]. Using NMR, the structure of tachyplesin-1 (KWCFRVCYRGICYRRCR-NH2) with LPS was shown to contain a disulfide-stabilized β-hairpin. Another study of the NMR structure showed that a tachyplesin-analog (KWFRVYRGIYRRR-NH2) was stabilized in LPS micelles through the interaction between the aromatic ring of W2 and the side chain of the nonpolar amino acid V5 and the cationic side chain of R11 [74]. Apart from the structure of the β-hairpin, the tachyplesin-analog displays an extended positively charged surface patch composed of residues R4, R7, R12 and R13 (Figure 16). Salt bridges, electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds would be expected between these residues and the anionic phosphate groups of LPS, which would stabilize the β-hairpin structure of the tachyplesin-analog [74], while the hydrophobic residues of tachyplesin-1 would interact with the acyl chains of LPS [75]. It is noteworthy that despite the absence of a disulfide bond, the tachyplesin-analog retained the ability to bind LPS and disrupt the bacterial cell membrane [74].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g016 1024
Figure 16. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic tachyplesin. The NMR structure showed that a tachyplesin-analog was stabilized in LPS micelles through the interaction between the aromatic ring of W2 and the side chain of the nonpolar amino acid V5 and the cationic side chain of R11. Furthermore, the tachyplesin-analog displays an extended positively charged surface patch composed of residues R4, R7, R12 and R13.
Figure 16. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic tachyplesin. The NMR structure showed that a tachyplesin-analog was stabilized in LPS micelles through the interaction between the aromatic ring of W2 and the side chain of the nonpolar amino acid V5 and the cationic side chain of R11. Furthermore, the tachyplesin-analog displays an extended positively charged surface patch composed of residues R4, R7, R12 and R13.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g016

2.17. Sushi Peptides

Sushi 1 (S1, GFKLKGMARISCLPNGQWSNFPPKCIRECAMVSS) and Sushi 3 (S3, HAEHKVKIGVEQKYGQFPQGTEVTYTCSGNYFLM) were derived from the LPS-binding domain of an LPS-sensitive serine protease, Factor C, from the horseshoe crab [76,77] (Figure 17). Both peptides interact significantly with LPS. Sequence analysis indicates that S1 and S3 have larger numbers of Lys and Arg at their N-terminal and more hydrophobic residues at their C-terminal. The positively charged Lys and Arg residues contribute to electrostatic interactions with the diphosphoryl head groups of the LPS, while the hydrophobic residues most likely interact with the hydrophobic acyl chains of the LPS though hydrophobic interactions. Another study also explained that the extra two Lys residues at the N-terminus of the peptide likely increase the peptide’s LPS-neutralizing activity [77]. The disulfide bond is highly important in the S3 peptide, as its reduction makes S3 incapable of LPS binding. In addition, fluorescence COSY assays showed that the disulfide bond in the dimeric S3 peptide has detergent-like properties and is involved in the disruption of LPS micelles [24].
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g017 1024
Figure 17. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic Sushi 1 (S1) and Sushi 3 (S3). S1 and S3 peptides were interact significantly with LPS. Sequence analysis indicates that S1 and S3 have larger numbers of Lys and Arg at their N-terminal and more hydrophobic residues at their C-terminal.
Figure 17. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic Sushi 1 (S1) and Sushi 3 (S3). S1 and S3 peptides were interact significantly with LPS. Sequence analysis indicates that S1 and S3 have larger numbers of Lys and Arg at their N-terminal and more hydrophobic residues at their C-terminal.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g017
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g018 1024
Figure 18. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic NRC-16. NRC-16 contains four polar uncharged amino acids, seven polar charged residues and eight hydrophobic residues. These amino acids have enough potential to provide the amphipathicity necessary for LPS binding.
Figure 18. The surface of hydrophobic and hydrophilic faces of the amphipathic NRC-16. NRC-16 contains four polar uncharged amino acids, seven polar charged residues and eight hydrophobic residues. These amino acids have enough potential to provide the amphipathicity necessary for LPS binding.
Marinedrugs 12 01471 g018

2.18. Pleurocidin-Like Cationic AMP

The NRC-16 peptide (GWKKWLRKGAKHLGQAAIK-NH2) [78] is a truncated form of NRC-17 (GWKKWLRKGAKHLGQAAIKGLAS), which was identified in the witch flounder Glyptocephalus cynoglossus [79]. NRC-16 contains four polar uncharged amino acids, seven polar charged residues (five Lys, one Arg and one His) and eight hydrophobic residues (two Trp, three Ala, two Leu and one Ile) (Figure 18). These amino acids have enough potential to provide the amphipathicity necessary for LPS binding [78]. This peptide thus binds LPS and exhibits a helical structure in the LPS micelles [80], which is consistent with other AMPs that adopt helical structures in LPS lipids [69,81,82,83,84,85].

3. Functions of Cationic ALFs

The cationic ALFs with various potentials to form amphipathic α-helices, β-sheet and loop are rich in cationic and hydrophobic side chains. Particularly, the LPS binding domain of ALFs mostly adopt β-sheet with amphipathic loop. The other ALFs (NRC-16 and pardaxin) adopted amphipathic α-helices with LPS. This clearly explains that the cationic and hydrophobic residues, hydrophobicity, amphipathic property and secondary structures are needed for the LPS binding domain of the ALFs. Moreover, some of the ALFs discussed in this review bind LPS and exhibit both anti-LPS and antimicrobial activity, but are not sufficient to neutralize LPS-induced macrophage activation. Others were capable of binding to pathogens and killing bacteria, exhibiting both LPS sequestering and neutralization, though their mechanism of action is not yet known. It is believed that AMPs (e.g., cathelicidins and HPA3P2) are able to tightly bind LPS and break its aggregates [86,87], which blocks the binding of LPS to its carrier, LPS binding protein, or to its receptor, CD14, thereby suppressing the production of cytokines by RAW264.7 cells or bone marrow-derived primary macrophages. ALFs have also been shown to suppress LPS-induced pro-inflammatory responses in vivo, and to protect against sepsis in animal models [87]. Atlantic salmon cathelicidin (asCATH2), for example, exhibits antimicrobial action at the site of pathogen invasion (e.g., epithelial surfaces) without inducing hemolysis and stimulates expression of the chemokine IL-8, which suggests cathelicidins may play an immunomodulatory role in fish [88].
LPS also contributes directly and indirectly to bacterial biofilm formation [89,90] and is involved in mediating the cohesion and stabilization of bacterial biofilms. Indeed, the absence of LPS alters biofilm formation and reduces adhesion [91], as compared to biofilms from LPS-producing strains [92,93,94]. For instance, LPS is essential for colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana hydathodes by Xanthomonas campestris, a Gram-negative bacterium that is a common plant pathogen [95].
It is clear that ALFs are essential components of innate immunity in fish, contributing to the first line of defense against a wide range of pathogens. AMPs and ALFs are capable of binding and neutralizing LPS and promoting angiogenesis and wound healing [96,97]. It has been reported that rationally designed new synthetic anti-LPS peptides (SALPs) based on the Limulus anti-LPS factor, showed LPS binding/neutralization and blockade of its immunopathological consequences in vitro and in vivo. In addition, these peptides exhibit very low cytotoxicity under physiological conditions, making SALPs promising candidates for application as therapeutic agents for the prevention and treatment of septic shock [98].

4. Conclusions

Because of their antimicrobial, antibiofilm, anti-inflammatory, and pro-angiogenesis and wound healing activities, there is growing interest in the therapeutic potential of ALFs. It is anticipated that the design of new AMPs based on the LPS binding domain of ALFs will enable development of novel synthetic peptides with antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anti-biofilm activities in a wound environment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MEST) (No. 2011-0017532).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed as the same for the manuscript preparation and design.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Diaz, G.A. Defensins and cystein rich peptides: Two types of antimicrobial peptide in marine molluscs. Invert. Surviv. J. 2010, 7, 157–164. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rosa, R.D.; Barracco, M.A. Antimicrobial peptides in crustaceans. Invert. Surviv. J. 2010, 7, 262–284. [Google Scholar]
  3. Matsunaga, S.; Fusetani, N.; Konosu, S. Bioactive marine metabolites, IV. Isolation and the amino acid composition of discodermin A, an antimicrobial peptide, from the marine sponge Discodermia kiiensis. J. Nat. Prod. 1985, 48, 236–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Otero-González, A.J.; Magalhães, B.S.; Garcia-Villarino, M.; López-Abarratequi, C.; Sousa, D.A.; Dias, S.C.; Franco, O.L. Antimicrobial peptides from marine invertebrates as a new frontier for microbial infection control. FASEB J. 2010, 24, 1320–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Noga, E.J.; Ullal, A.J.; Corrales, J.; Fernandes, J.M. Application of antimicrobial polypeptide host defenses to aquaculture: Exploitation of downregulation and upregulation responses. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2011, 6, 44–54. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tanaka, S.; Nakamura, T.; Morita, T.; Iwanaga, S. Limulus anti-LPS factor: An anticoagulant which inhibits the endotoxin-mediated activation of Limulus coagulation system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1982, 105, 717–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Muta, T.; Miyata, T.; Tokunaga, F.; Nakamura, T; Iwanaga, S. Primary structure of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from American horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus. J. Biochem. 1987, 101, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tassanakajon, A.; Amparyup, P.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Supungul, P. Cationic antimicrobial peptides in penaeid shrimp. Mar. Biotechnol. 2011, 13, 639–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gross, P.S.; Bartlett, T.C.; Browdy, C.L.; Chapman, R.W.; Warr, G.W. Immune gene discovery by expressed sequence tag analysis of hemocytes and hepatopancreas in the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei, and the Atlantic white shrimp, L. setiferus. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2001, 25, 565–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Supungul, P.; Klinbunga, S.; Pichayakura, R.; Jitrapakdee, S.; Hirono, I.; Aoki, T.; Tassanakajon, A. Identification of immune related genes in hemocytes of the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Mar. Biotechnol. 2002, 4, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, F.S.; Liu, Y.C.; Li, F.H.; Dong, B.; Xiang, J.H. Molecular cloning and expression profile of putative antilipopolysaccharide factor in Chinese shrimp (Fenneropenaeus chinensis). Mar. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nagoshi, H.; Inagawa, H.; Morii, K.; Harada, H.; Kohchi, C.; Nishizawa, T.; Taniguchi, Y.; Uenobe, M.; Honda, T.; Kondoh, M.; et al. Cloning and characterization of a LPS regulatory gene having an LPS binding domain in kuruma prawn Marsupenaeus japonicus. Mol. Immunol. 2006, 43, 2061–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mekata, T.; Sudhakaran, R.; Okugawa, S.; Kono, T.; Sakai, M.; Itami, T. Molecular cloning and transcriptional analysis of a newly identified anti-lipopolysaccharide factor gene in kuruma shrimp, Marsupenaeus japonicus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 50, 112–119. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiménez-Vega, F; Vargas-Albores, F. Isoforms of Litopenaeus vannamei anti-lipopolysaccharide and its expression by bacterial challenge. J. Shellfish Res. 2007, 26, 1169–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. de-la-Re-Vega, E.; O’Leary, N.A.; Shockey, J.E.; Robalino, J.; Payne, C.; Browdy, C.L.; Warr, G.W.; Gross, P.S. Anti-lipopolysaccharide factor in Litopenaeus vannamei (LvALF): A broad spectrum antimicrobial peptide essential for shrimp immunity against bacterial and fungal infection. Mol. Immunol. 2008, 45, 1916–1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rosa, R.D.; Stoco, P.H.; Barranco, M.A. Cloning and characterisation of cDNA sequences encoding for anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs) in Brazilian palaemonid and penaeid shrimps. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 25, 693–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tassanakajon, A.; Amparyup, P.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Supungul, P. Cationic antimicrobial peptides in penaeid shrimp. Mar. Biotechnol. 2010, 12, 487–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tassanakajon, A.; Klinbunga, S.; Paunglarp, N.; Rimphanitchayakit, V.; Udomkit, A.; Jitrapakdee, S.; Sritunyalucksana, K.; Phongdara, A.; Pongsomboon, S.; Supungul, P.; et al. Penaeus monodon gene discovery project: The generation of an EST collection and establishment of a database. Gene 2006, 384, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sperstad, S.V.; Haug, T.; Blencke, H.M.; Styrvold, O.B.; Li, C.; Stensvåg, K. Antimicrobial peptides from marine invertebrates: Challenges and perspectives in marine antimicrobial peptide discovery. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 519–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Magnadóttir, B. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006, 20, 137–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, Y.; Hou, F.; He, S.; Qian, Z.; Wang, X.; Mao, A.; Sun, C.; Liu, X. Identification, characterization and functional analysis of a serine protease inhibitor (Lvserpin) from the Pacific white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014, 43, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.; Ng, M.L.; Zhu, Y.; Ho, B.; Ding, J.L. Tandom repeats of sushi3 peptide with enhanced LPS-binding and-neutralizing activities. Protein Eng. 2003, 16, 629–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jerala, R.; Porro, M. Endotoxin Neutralizing Peptides. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2004, 4, 1173–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, P.; Wohland, T.; Ho, B.; Ding, J.L. Perturbation of Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Micelles by Sushi 3 (S3) antimicrobial peptide. The importance of an intermolecular disulfide bond in S3 dimer for binding, disruption, and neutralization of LPS. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 50150–50156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Iliev, D.B.; Roach, J.C.; Mackenzie, S.; Planas, J.V.; Goetz, F.W. Endotoxin recognition: in fish or not in fish? FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 6519–6528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Papo, N.; Shai, Y. A molecular mechanism for lipopolysaccharide protection of Gram-negative bacteria from antimicrobial peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 10378–10387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pristovsek, P.; Fehér, K.; Szilágyi, L.; Kidric, J. Structure of a synthetic fragment of the LALF protein when bound to lipopolysaccharide. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 1666–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hancock, R.E.; Brown, K.L.; Mookherjee, N. Host defense peptides from invertebrates- emerging antimicrobial strategies. Immunobiology 2006, 211, 315–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xian, L.X.; Peng, B.; Dong, W.R.; Yang, Z.F.; Shao, J.Z. Lipopolysaccharide induces apoptosis in Carassius auratus lymphocytes, a possible role in pathogenesis of bacterial infection in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2008, 32, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sepulcre, M.P.; Alcaraz-Pérez, F.; López-Muñoz, A.; Roca, F.J.; Meseguer, J.; Cayuela, M.L.; Mulero, V. Evolution of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) Recognition and signaling: Fish TLR4 does not recognize LPS and negatively regulates NF-kappaB activation. J. Immunol. 2009, 182, 1836–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kaisho, T.; Akira, S. Pleiotropic function of Toll-like receptors. Microbes Infect. 2004, 6, 1388–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weiss, C.A.; Wasiluk, K.R.; Kellogg, T.A.; Dunn, D.L. Bactericidal and rndotoxin neutralizing activity of a peptide derived from limulus antilipopolysaccharide factor. Surgery 2000, 128, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Afsal, V.V.; Antony, S.P.; Chaithanya, E.R.; Singh, I.S.; Philip, R. Two isoforms of anti lipopolysaccharide factors identified and characterized from the hemocytes of portunid crabs, Portunus pelagicus and Scylla tranquebarica. Mol. Immunol. 2012, 52, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nagaoka, I.; Hirota, S.; Niyonsaba, F.; Hirata, M.; Adachi, Y.; Tamura, H.; Tanaka, S.; Heumann, D. Augmentation of the lipopolysaccharide-neutralizing activities of human cathelicidin CAP18/LL-37-derived antimicrobial peptides by replacement with hydrophobic and cationic amino acid residues. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2002, 9, 972–982. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gopal, R.; Seo, C.H.; Song, P.I.; Park, Y. Effect of repetitive lysine-tryptophan motifs on the bactericidal activity of antimicrobial peptides. Amino Acids 2013, 44, 645–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Frecer, V.; Ho, B.; Ding, J.L. De novo design of potent antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 3349–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wasiluk, K.R.; Leslie, D.B.; Vietzen, P.S.; Mayo, K.H.; Dunn, D.L. Structure/function studies of an endotoxin-neutralizing peptide derived from bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein. Surgery 2004, 136, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Imjongjirak, C.; Amparyup, P.; Tassanakajon, A.; Sittipraneed, S. Antilipopolysaccharides factor (ALF) of mud crab scylla paramamosain: molecular cloning, genomic organization and the antimicrobial activity of its synthetic LPS binding domain. Mol. Immunol. 2007, 44, 3195–3203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Afsal, V.V.; Antony, S.P.; Sanjeevan, V.N.; Anil Kumar, P.R.; Bright Singh, I.S.; Philip, R. A new isoform of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor identified from the blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus: Molecular characteristics and phylogeny. Aquaculture 2012, 356–357, 119–122. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhu, L.; Lan, J.F.; Huang, Y.Q.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, J.F.; Fang, W.H.; Yao, X.J.; Wang, H.; Li, X.C. SpALF4: A newly identified anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 36, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, H.P.; Chen, R.Y.; Zhang, Q.X.; Wang, Q.Y.; Li, C.R.; Peng, H.; Cai, L.; Zheng, C.Q.; Wang, K.J. Characterization of two isoforms of antiliopolysacchride factors (Sp-ALFs) from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yedery, R.D.; Reddy, K.V. Identification, cloning, characterization and recombinant expression of an antilipopolysaccharide factor from the hemocytes of Indian mud crab, Scylla serrata. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2009, 27, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yue, F.; Pan, L.; Miao, J.; Zhang, L.; Li, J. Molecular cloning, characterization and mRNA expression of two antibacterial peptides: Crustin and Anti-lipopolysaccharide factor in swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2010, 156, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Warren, H.S.; Glennon, M.L.; Wainwright, N.; Amato, S.F.; Black, K.M.; Kirsch, S.J.; Riveau, G.R.; Whyte, R.I.; Zapol, W.M.; Novitsky, T.J. Binding and neutralization of endotoxin by Limulus antilipopolysaccharide factor. Infect. Immun. 1992, 60, 2506–2513. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Li, X.; Song, C.; Shi, G. A newly identified anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 34, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tharntada, S.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Rimphanitchayakit, V.; Tassanakajon, A. Anti-lipopolysaccharide factors from the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, are encoded by two genomic loci. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2008, 24, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hoess, A.; Watson, S.; Siber, G.R.; Liddington, R. Crystal structure of an endotoxin-neutralizing protein from the horseshoe crab, Limulus anti-LPS factor, at 1.5 A resolution. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 3351–3356. [Google Scholar]
  48. Somboonwiwat, K.; Marcos, M.; Tassanakajon, A.; Klinbunga, S.; Aumelas, A.; Romestand, B.; Gueguen, Y.; Boze, H.; Moulin, G.; Bachère, E. Recombinant expression and anti-microbial activity of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor (ALF) from the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2005, 29, 841–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Somboonwiwat, K.; Bachère, E.; Rimphanitchayakit, V.; Tassanakajon, A. Localization of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor (ALFPm3) in tissues of the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, and characterization of its binding properties. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2008, 32, 1170–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jaree, P.; Tassanakajon, A.; Somboonwiwat, K. Effect of the anti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 3 (ALFPm3) from Penaeus monodon on Vibrio harveyi cells. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2012, 38, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tharntada, S.; Ponprateep, S.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Liu, H.; Söderhäll, I.; Söderhäll, K.; Tassanakajon, A. Role of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from the black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon, in protection from white spot syndrome virus infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 1491–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Carriel-Gomes, M.C.; Kratz, J.M.; Barracco, M.A.; Bachére, E.; Barardi, C.R.; Simões, C.M. In vitro antiviral activity of antimicrobial peptides against herpes simplex virus 1, adenovirus, and rotavirus. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz. 2007, 102, 469–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hikima, S.; Hikima, J.; Rojtinnakorn, J.; Hirono, I.; Aoki, T. Characterization and function of kuruma shrimp lysozyme possessing lytic activity against Vibrio species. Gene 2003, 316, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, Y.; Boze, H.; Chemardin, P.; Padilla, A.; Moulin, G.; Tassanakajon, A.; Pugnière, M.; Roquet, F.; Destoumieux-Garzón, D.; Gueguen, Y.; et al. NMR structure of rALF-Pm3, an anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from shrimp: Model of the possible lipid A-binding site. Biopolymers 2009, 91, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ried, C.; Wahl, C.; Miethke, T.; Wellnhofer, G.; Landgraf, C.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Hoess, A. High affinity endotoxin-binding and neutralizing peptides based on the crystal structure of recombinant Limulus anti-lipopolysaccharide factor. J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 28120–28127. [Google Scholar]
  56. Andrä, J.; Garidel, P.; Majerle, A.; Jerala, R.; Ridge, R.; Paus, E.; Novitsky, T.; Koch, M.H.; Brandenburg, K. Biophysical characterization of the interaction of Limulus polyphemus endotoxin neutralizing protein with lipopolysaccharide. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 27, 2037–2046. [Google Scholar]
  57. Andrä, J.; Lamata, M.; Martinez de Tejada, G.; Bartels, R.; Koch, M.H.; Brandenburg, K. Cyclic antimicrobial peptides based on Limulus anti-lipopolysaccharide factor for neutralization of lipopolysaccharide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2004, 68, 1297–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Leslie, D.B.; Vietzen, P.S.; Lazaron, V.; Wasiluk, K.R.; Dunn, D.L. Comparison of endotoxin antagonism of linear and cyclized peptides derived from limulus anti-lipopolysaccharide factor. Surg. Infect. 2006, 7, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vallespi, M.G.; Alvarez-Obregón, J.C.; Rodriguez-Alonso, I.; Montero, T.; Garay, H.; Reyes, O.; Araña, M.J. A Limulus anti-LPS factor-derived peptide modulates cytokine gene expression and promotes resolution of bacterial acute infection in mice. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2003, 3, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ren, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, X.C.; Du, J.; Hui, K.M.; Zhang, C.Y.; Wang, W. Three different anti-lipopolysaccharide factors identified from giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Beale, K.M.; Towle, D.W.; Jayasundara, N.; Smith, C.M.; Shields, J.D.; Small, H.J.; Greenwood, S.J. Anti-lipopolysaccharide factors in the American lobster Homarus americanus: Molecular characterization and transcriptional response to Vibrio fluvialis challenge. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 2008, 3, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  62. Li, C.; Zhao, J.; Song, L.; Mu, C.; Zhang, H.; Gai, Y.; Qiu, L.; Yu, Y.; Ni, D.; Xing, K. Molecular cloning, genomic organization and functional analysis of an anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2008, 32, 784–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wang, D.N.; Chen, L.; Liu, J.W.; He, Z.Y.; Wu, X.F. The native gene of anti-LPS factor Tachypleus tridentatus: Cloning, expression and its bacteriostatic activity in vitro. Protein Pept. Lett. 2001, 8, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Morita, T.; Ohtsubo, S.; Nakamura, T.; Tanaka, S.; Iwanaga, S.; Ohashi, K.; Niwa, M. Isolation and biological activities of limulus anticoagulant (anti-LPS factor) which interacts with lipopolysaccharide (LPS). J. Biochem. 1985, 97, 1611–1620. [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu, Y.; Ni, B.; Ren, J.D.; Chen, J.H.; Tian, Z.Q.; Tang, M.; Li, D.; Xia, P. Cyclic Limulus anti-lipopolysaccharide (LPS) factor-derived peptide CLP-19 antagonizes LPS function by blocking binding to LPS binding protein. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2011, 34, 1678–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ren, J.; Gao, H.; Tang, M.; Gu, J.; Xia, P.; Xiao, G. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) detoxification of analogue peptides derived from limulus anti-LPS factor. Peptides 2010, 31, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Thompson, S.A.; Tachibana, K.; Nakanishi, K.; Kubota, I. Melittin-like peptides from the shark-repelling defense secretion of the sole Pardachirus pavoninus. Science 1986, 233, 341–343. [Google Scholar]
  68. Shai, Y.; Fox, J.; Caratsch, C.; Shih, Y.L.; Edwards, C.; Lazarovici, P. Sequencing and synthesis of pardaxin, a polypeptide from the Red Sea Moses sole with ionophore activity. FEBS Lett. 1988, 242, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bhunia, A.; Domadia, P.N.; Torres, J.; Hallock, K.J.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Bhattacharjya, S. NMR structure of pardaxin, a pore-forming antimicrobial peptide, in lipopolysaccharide micelles: Mechanism of outer membrane permeabilization. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 3883–3895. [Google Scholar]
  70. Shai, Y.; Bach, D.; Yanovsky, A. Channel formation properties of synthetic pardaxin and analogues. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 20202–20209. [Google Scholar]
  71. Saberwal, G.; Nagaraj, R. Conformations of peptide fragments comprising the amino-terminal, central, and carboxyl-terminal regions of a membrane-active polypeptide. Build-up of secondary structure in pardaxin. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 14081–14089. [Google Scholar]
  72. Huang, H.N.; Pan, C.Y.; Chan, Y.L.; Chen, J.Y.; Wu, C.J. Use of the antimicrobial peptide pardaxin (GE33) to protect against MRSA infection in mice with skin injuries. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 1538–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Desch, C.E.; O’Hara, P.; Harlan, J.M. Antilipopolysaccharide factor from horseshoe crab, Tachypleus tridentatus, inhibits lipopolysaccharide activation of cultured human endothelial cells. Infect Immun. 1989, 57, 1612–1614. [Google Scholar]
  74. Saravanan, R.; Mohanram, H.; Joshi, M.; Domadia, P.N.; Torres, J.; Ruedl, C.; Bhattacharjya, S. Structure, activity and interactions of the cysteine deleted analog of tachyplesin-1 with lipopolysaccharide micelle: Mechanistic insights into outer-membrane permeabilization and endotoxin neutralization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1818, 1613–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kushibiki, T.; Kamiya, M.; Aizawa, T.; Kumaki, Y.; Kikukawa, T.; Mizuguchi, M.; Demura, M.; Kawabata, S.I.; Kawano, K. Interaction between tachyplesin I, an antimicrobial peptide derived from horseshoe crab, and lipopolysaccharide. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2014, 1844, 527–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ding, J.L.; Navas, M.A.; Ho, B. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of factor C cDNA from the Singapore horseshoe crab, Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1995, 4, 90–103. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tan, N.S.; Ng, M.L.; Yau, Y.H.; Chong, P.K.; Ho, B.; Ding, J.L. Definition of endotoxin binding sites in horseshoe crab factor C recombinant sushi proteins and neutralization of endotoxin by sushi peptides. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 1801–1813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Gopal, R.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, Y.G.; Kim, M.S.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y. Anti-microbial, anti-biofilm activities and cell selectivity of the NRC-16 peptide derived from witch flounder, Glyptocephalus cynoglossus. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 1836–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Patrzykat, A.; Gallant, J.W.; Seo, J.K.; Pytyck, J.; Douglas, S.E. Novel antimicrobial peptides derived from flatfish genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 2464–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Gopal, R.; Park, J.S.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y. Applications of circular dichroism for structural analysis of gelatin and antimicrobial peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 3229–3244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Domadia, P.N.; Bhunia, A.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Bhattacharjya, S. Structure, interactions, and antibacterial activities of MSI-594 derived mutant peptide MSI-594F5A in lipopolysaccharide micelles: Role of the helical hairpin conformation in outer-membrane permeabilization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18417–18428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Bhunia, A.; Ramamoorthy, A.; Bhattacharjya, S. Helical hairpin structure of a potent antimicrobial peptide MSI-594 in lipopolysaccharide micelles by NMR spectroscopy. Chemistry 2009, 15, 2036–2040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Fazio, M.A.; Oliveira, V.X., Jr.; Bulet, P.; Miranda, M.T.; Daffre, S.; Miranda, A. Structure-activity relationship studies of gomesin: Importance of the disulfide bridges for conformation, bioactivities, and serum stability. Biopolymers 2006, 84, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Chandrababu, K.B.; Ho, B.; Yang, D. Structure, dynamics, and activity of an all-cysteine mutated human beta defensin-3 peptide analogue. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 6052–6061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bhunia, A.; Saravanan, R.; Mohanram, H.; Mangoni, M.L.; Bhattacharjya, S. NMR structures and interactions of temporin-1Tl and temporin-1Tb with lipopolysaccharide micelles: Mechanistic insights into outer membrane permeabilization and synergistic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 24394–24406. [Google Scholar]
  86. Lee, J.K.; Park, S.C.; Hahm, K.S.; Park, Y. A helix-PXXP-helixpeptide with antibacterial activity without cytotoxicity against MDRPA-infected mice. Biomaterials 2014, 35, 1025–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Giuliani, A.; Pirri, G.; Rinaldi, A.C. Antimicrobialpeptides: the LPSconnection. Methods Mol. Biol. 2010, 618, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bridle, A.; Nosworthy, E.; Polinski, M.; Nowak, B. Evidence of an antimicrobial-immunomodulatory role of atlantic salmon cathelicidins during infection with Yersinia ruckeri. PloS One 2011, 6, e23417. [Google Scholar]
  89. Beloin, C.; Michaelis, K.; Lindner, K.; Landini, P.; Hacker, J.; Ghigo, J.M.; Dobrindt, U. The transcriptional antiterminator RfaH represses biofilm formation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1316–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Hori, K.; Matsumoto, S. Bacterial adhesion: From mechanism to control. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48, 424–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lau, P.C.; Lindhout, T.; Beveridge, T.J.; Dutcher, J.R.; Lam, J.S. Differential lipopolysaccharide core capping leads to quantitative and correlated modifications of mechanical and structural properties in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 6618–6631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Benitez, J.A.; Spelbrink, R.G.; Silva, A.; Phillips, T.E.; Stanley, C.M.; Boesmann Finkelstein, M. Adherence of Vibrio cholerae to cultured differentiated human intestinal cells: An in vitro colonization model. Infect. Immunol. 1997, 65, 3474–3477. [Google Scholar]
  93. Bandara, H.M.; Lam, O.L.; Watt, R.M.; Jin, L.J.; Samaranayake, L.P. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides variably modulate in vitro biofilm formation of Candida species. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010, 59, 1225–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rendueles, O.; Kaplan, J.B.; Ghigo, J.M. Antibiofilm polysaccharides. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Hugouvieux, V.; Barber, C.E.; Daniels, M.J. Entry of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris into hydathodes of Arabidopsis thaliana leaves: A system for studying early infection events in bacterial pathogenesis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 1998, 11, 537–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Steinstraesser, L.; Koehler, T.; Jacobsen, F.; Daigeler, A.; Goertz, O.; Langer, S.; Kesting, M.; Steinau, H.; Eriksson, E.; Hirsch, T. Host defense peptides in wound healing. Mol. Med. 2008, 14, 528–537. [Google Scholar]
  97. Duplantier, A.J.; van Hoek, M.L. The human cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide LL-37 as a potential treatment for polymicrobial infected wounds. Front Immunol. 2013, 4, 143–156. [Google Scholar]
  98. Gutsmann, T.; Razquin-Olazaran, I.; Kowalski, I.; Kaconis, Y.; Howe, J.; Bartels, R.; Hornef, M.; Schurholz, T.; Rossle, M.; Sanchez-Gomez, S.; et al. New antiseptic peptides to protect against endotoxin-mediated shock. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3817–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gopal, R.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y. The Role of Biophysical Parameters in the Antilipopolysaccharide Activities of Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Fish. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 1471-1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031471

AMA Style

Gopal R, Seo CH, Park Y. The Role of Biophysical Parameters in the Antilipopolysaccharide Activities of Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Fish. Marine Drugs. 2014; 12(3):1471-1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gopal, Ramamourthy, Chang Ho Seo, and Yoonkyung Park. 2014. "The Role of Biophysical Parameters in the Antilipopolysaccharide Activities of Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Fish" Marine Drugs 12, no. 3: 1471-1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031471

APA Style

Gopal, R., Seo, C. H., & Park, Y. (2014). The Role of Biophysical Parameters in the Antilipopolysaccharide Activities of Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Fish. Marine Drugs, 12(3), 1471-1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/md12031471

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop