Next Article in Journal
Inhibition of N-Type Calcium Channels by Fluorophenoxyanilide Derivatives
Previous Article in Journal
Two Novel Antioxidant Nonapeptides from Protein Hydrolysate of Skate (Raja porosa) Muscle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/md13042010
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Marine Natural Products as Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitors

by
Lilia Cherigo
1,†,
Dioxelis Lopez
2,3,† and
Sergio Martinez-Luis
3,*
1
Department of Organic Chemistry, Chemistry School, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Exact and Technology, University of Panama, Panama City P.O. Box 3366, Panama
2
Department of Biotechnology, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar, Guntur 522510, India
3
Center for Drug Discovery and Biodiversity, Institute for Scientific Research and Technology Services (INDICASAT), Clayton, Panama City P.O. Box 0843-01103, Panama
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2015, 13(4), 2010-2029; https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042010
Submission received: 20 February 2015 / Revised: 19 March 2015 / Accepted: 24 March 2015 / Published: 3 April 2015
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) is a protein belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily that has clinical relevance due to its multi-drug resistance properties in cancer. BCRP can be associated with clinical cancer drug resistance, in particular acute myelogenous or acute lymphocytic leukemias. The overexpression of BCRP contributes to the resistance of several chemotherapeutic drugs, such as topotecan, methotrexate, mitoxantrone, doxorubicin and daunorubicin. The Food and Drugs Administration has already recognized that BCRP is clinically one of the most important drug transporters, mainly because it leads to a reduction of clinical efficacy of various anticancer drugs through its ATP-dependent drug efflux pump function as well as its apparent participation in drug resistance. This review article aims to summarize the different research findings on marine natural products with BCRP inhibiting activity. In this sense, the potential modulation of physiological targets of BCRP by natural or synthetic compounds offers a great possibility for the discovery of new drugs and valuable research tools to recognize the function of the complex ABC-transporters.

1. Introduction

1.1. Breast Cancer Resistance Protein

Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2/MXR/ABCP) is an ATP-dependent efflux transporter, which belongs to the large ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family present on cell membranes, and it is classified into the G subfamily of these transporters [1,2,3,4,5,6]. BCRP, which is a transmembrane protein encoded by the ABCG2 gene, was originally isolated from adriamycin-resistant breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7/AdrVp) [7]. Almost simultaneously, BCRP cDNA sequences were also cloned from mitoxantrone-resistant human cancer cell lines (MXR) [8] and human placenta (ABCP) [9]. BCRP is composed of 655 amino acids (72-kDa) and organized into six transmembrane α-helices, containing only one nucleotide-binding domain (NBD) near its N-terminal and one membrane-spanning domain (MSD) (Figure 1) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. It is one of the smallest human ABC proteins reported so far, which per se is a half transporter that becomes a functional efflux pump when a disulfide bridge at Cys 603 of two proteins is homodimerized. It is important to note that although the minimal functional unit of this transporter is a dimer, higher oligomeric forms (up to homododecamers) have also been reported [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g001 1024
Figure 1. Structure of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).
Figure 1. Structure of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP).
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g001

1.2. Functions of BCRP

BCRP works as an efflux transporter for unwanted substances at the plasma membrane of many cells in normal tissues such as placenta, brain, prostate, small intestine, testes, ovaries, liver, adrenal gland, uterus and the central nervous system [1,2,3,4,5,6]. BCRP is expressed all over the body, but it expresses at a higher frequency in the placenta, which suggests that BCRP plays a role in protecting the fetus by preventing potentially harmful substances from entering the uterus [10]. BCRP is found in the apical membrane of epithelial cells, intestines, kidneys, placenta and the blood-brain barrier. It is well know that BCRP restricts drug accumulation in the central nervous system [1,11]. In summary, physiological distribution, including the presence of BCRP on cell barriers, reveals its important role in cellular protection against toxic substances [1,2,3,4,5,6,10].

1.3. Importance in Therapy

BCRP may actively pump substances out of the cells affecting the absorption, distribution and secretion of several drugs and endogenous substrates such as estrogens, folic acid and protoporphyrin. Among the therapeutic drugs, which are substrates of BCRP are antibiotics, antivirals, chemotherapeutic agents, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, steroids and phytoestrogens [1,2,3,4,5]. The Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) has already recognized that BCRP is clinically one of the most important drug transporters, mainly because it is well known that this protein plays an important role in drug-drug interactions in humans as well that it participates in drug resistance [12]. ABC transporter proteins are fundamental molecules in the multidrug-resistant phenotype of cancer cells, in particular acute myelogenus or acute lymphocytic leukemias [1,2,3,4]. The overexpression of BCRP is involved in the resistance to several chemotherapeutic drugs, such as topotecan, methotrexate, mitoxantrone, doxorubicin and daunorubicin [1,2,3,4,5]. This indeed shows that BCRP could reduce clinical efficacy of several anticancer drugs, and this will be an important tool to success in cancer treatment [9].

1.4. BCRP Inhibitors

It has been shown that the number of compounds described as inhibitors of BCRP as well as their structural diversity is large (Table 1). Recently it has been established that some of BCRP substrates are also substrates for P glycoprotein (P-gp). This information has been used to develop specific and non-competitive inhibitors for BCRP. [1,13].
Table
Table 1. Selected examples of classical BCRP inhibitors.
Table 1. Selected examples of classical BCRP inhibitors.
InhibitorSubstrateCell LineATPase ActivityPhotoaffinity LabelingSpecificity
FTC [14,15]MXS1-M1-3.2InhibitedXXYes
Novobiocin [16]TPTPC6/SN2-5H2XXXXYes
Elacridar [17,18,19]MXMCF-7 MXInhibitedUnaffectedNo
Reserpine [20,21]H33342SPXXInhibitedNo
Cyclosporin A [22,23,24]PhA, MXHEK/482RInhibitedUnaffectedNo
Tariquidar [25]MXH460/MX20StimulatedXXNo
Ortataxel [26]MX8226/MR20DecreasedXXNo
Gefitinib [27]H33342PLB-ABCG2Inhibited aXXNo
MX: Mitoxantrone; PhA: Pheophorbide A; TPT: Topotecan; H33342: Hoechst 33342 dye; a: At high concentration; XX: Not yet reported.

1.5. In Silico Studies with BCRP Inhibitors

Based on the clinical importance of BCRP in drug resistance, its use as a target for the development of new effective molecules, which may possess improved pharmacokinetics parameters, better levels of efficacy and be safer, is unquestionable. Therefore, application of in silico models could be an alternative for obtaining valuable information that allows the development of more specific BCRP inhibitors based on the marine inhibitors so far described.
From its assessment in drug discovery, in silico prediction models have allowed the detection and selection of promising molecules from libraries or databases [28,29]. Moreover, these models also provide information regarding the possible mechanisms of protein-ligand interactions [30].
A useful tool for in silico prediction is the existence of a high-resolution structures of proteins because it allows to predict the structures and physicochemical characteristics of the complex formed between a specific protein and its ligands. Unfortunately, the high-resolution structure of BCRP is still not available. Currently, there are only models of the BCRP structure, based on the crystalline structures of related proteins such as the transporter Sav1866 from Staphylococcus aureus [31,32,33] and the lipid flippase MsbA from Vibrio cholerae (VC-MsbA) [33,34]. These models predict the BCRP topology based on theoretical computer calculations and they are consistent with several experimental features, for instance, the presence of multidrug sites in a large central cavity binding [31,32,34]. Predicted structures can be used to perform docking analysis and/or the interpretation of some biochemical parameter. However, it is important to highlight that the obtained results may be unreliable for drug design and screening.
On the other hand, there are methods based on structural similarity of ligands for known substrates, which usually give more accurate comparisons than those based on the protein structure. One example is the structure-activity relationship analysis, SAR and QSAR, focused on establishing a correlation between descriptors that represent information of molecular structures of ligands and their biological activities [35,36,37]. With these models it is possible to detect the specific substituents or the parts of a molecule (pharmacophore) that are essential or not for a previously recognized biological function [35,36,37]. For instance, the SAR analysis of 54 chalcones with different degrees of substitution and their evaluation in BCRP-transfected HEK293 cells resulted in the identification of a flavonoid-specific inhibitory site, which seems to be polyspecific because when the original phenyl A-ring was replaced by long-chain substituents, its biological effect was not affected. From all evaluated substituents, 2′-naphthyl and 3′, 4′ methylene-dioxy-phenyl were the most effective (Figure 2). Also, the substitution at position 4 of ring B is critical; in this position an O-benzyl residue is the most effective substituent for the inhibition and cytotoxicity [38]. Many other studies have demonstrated that chalcones are promising selective BCRP inhibitors [4,39,40,41], such as Compounds 1 and 2 (Figure 3), which have now become good candidates for preclinical experiments [4].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g002 1024
Figure 2. Structure-activity relationship of chalcones for BCRP inhibition.
Figure 2. Structure-activity relationship of chalcones for BCRP inhibition.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g002
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g003 1024
Figure 3. Structure of the most promising chalcone derivatives as BCRP inhibitors.
Figure 3. Structure of the most promising chalcone derivatives as BCRP inhibitors.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g003
Another study displayed the potential of the 4,6-dimethoxy aurones derivatives as BCRP inhibitors. Aurones were found to re-sensitize BCRP expressing cancer cells to mitoxantrone and showed low antiproliferative activity against cell lines. Structure-activity analysis showed that substitution of ring B had the best P-gp inhibition, with a preference for position 3′ (Figure 4). In contrast, substitution of the benzylidene portion of ring B was less important for the BCRP inhibition, showing a low variation of activity. In conclusion, aurones derivatives with good BCRP inhibitory activity are poor P-gp inhibitors and vice versa [42].
As a final example, we have the chromone type compounds, which have proved to be selective and potent BCRP inhibitors. Boudmendjel, et al. synthesized several benzopyrones derivatives in order to perform a SAR study with this type of compounds [43]. His work demonstrated the impact of the hydrophobic chains, the steric hindrance by bulky groups and the role of methoxy groups (lipophilicity) in the inhibition of BCRP function. Furthermore, a QSAR study with 34 chromones showed that hydrophobicity and shape are key physicochemical parameters to improve the BCRP inhibition, while hydrogen bond donor capacity is an unfavorable feature for this activity [44]. The most potent chromones as BCRP inhibitors resulted from coupling 6-substituted-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxylic acid with tryptamine, leading to MBL-II-141 (3) and N-(2-(1H-Indol-3-yl)ethyl)-6-bromo-4-oxo-4H-chromene-2-carboxamide (4), (Figure 5) [45,46]. MBL-II-141 led a potent sensitization of ABCG2 positive xenografts to irinotecan through an in vivo ABCG2 inhibition [47]. Compound 4 showed potency, selectivity and very low toxicity in vitro. Therefore this compound is being considered for in vivo evaluation.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g004 1024
Figure 4. Structure-activity relationship of dimethoxyaurones for BCRP inhibition.
Figure 4. Structure-activity relationship of dimethoxyaurones for BCRP inhibition.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g004
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g005 1024
Figure 5. Structure of the most promising chromone derivatives as BCRP inhibitors.
Figure 5. Structure of the most promising chromone derivatives as BCRP inhibitors.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g005

2. BCRP Inhibitors from Marine Sources

Oceans are a vast reservoir of bioactive natural products, some of which exhibit important and unique biological properties. Thus, many compounds isolated from marine sources are currently used in clinical trials or as prototypes for the design and synthesis of new therapeutic agents [48,49,50].
In the past 30 years, at least seven marine compounds or their derivatives have been approved for clinical use, mainly in cancer therapy, which is the fourth leading cause of death in middle- and high-income countries. Cancer is responsible for more than 8.2 million deaths per year worldwide, and its incidence is increasing, giving an estimate that for the next two decades there will be an annual average of 22 million of new cancer cases [48,51]. Undoubtedly, compounds derived from marine sources have marked a milestone in cancer treatment. However, there are still many obstacles for overcoming this disease, in particular the fact that many types of cancer develop resistance to several important drugs, as well as the devastating side effects that result from their use. For these reasons, it is necessary to continue with the search of novel drugs with more efficacy and safety [52,53].
As part of a series of reviews focused on the description of marine natural products with inhibitory properties on transporters belonging to the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily [54], in this paper we describe a review of marine natural products and derivatives as BCRP inhibitors. As mentioned earlier, BCRP plays an important role in the drug resistance of cancer treatments, therefore the potential modulation of physiological targets of BCRP by natural or synthetic compounds offers great possibilities for the discovery of new anticancer drugs and valuable research tools for the study of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters complex.

2.1. Fumitremorgin C

Fumitremorgin C (FTC, 5) is a prenylated indole alkaloid derived from the amino acids l-tryptophan and l-proline, and it was isolated from several strains of both marine and terrestrial fungi [55,56,57,58]. FTC (Figure 6) is the first strong and specific BCRP inhibitor, and its value as a research tool is widely reported. Several studies have proved that 5 reverts resistance to topotecan, mitoxantrone and doxorubicin, on S1-M1-3.2 cells that over express BCRP [59,60,61]. However, FTC induces some severe side effects such as tremors or convulsions in mice and other animals, which are associated with toxicity in the central nervous system [62]. Such results led to the exclusion of this compound from further clinical studies. Its strong specificity and potency was the basis for the design of less toxic related compounds. One of the earliest efforts to detect 5 analogues with BCRP inhibitor properties was the evaluation of a combinatorial panel of 42 indolyl diketopiperazine FTC derivatives, with Ko132 (6), Ko134 (7) and Ko143 (8) [63,64,65] being the most promising leads.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g006 1024
Figure 6. Structure of fumitremorgin (FTC) and related compounds.
Figure 6. Structure of fumitremorgin (FTC) and related compounds.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g006

2.2. Tryprostatin A

Tryprostatin A (9) is a natural analog of FTC isolated from the marine fungus Aspergillus fumigatus BM939 along with tryprostatin B [66,67,68]. Both molecules are formed by the condensation of a proline unit and an isoprenyl tryptophan residue, leading to a diketopiperazine unit. Both compounds stop cell cycle progression of tsFT210 cancer cells in the G2/M phase [67]. In the experiments to reverse a mitoxantrone-resistant phenotype and inhibit the cellular BCRP-dependent mitoxantrone accumulation using the displayed BCRP-mediated MDR cells EPG85-257RNOV (human gastric carcinoma cell line) and MCF-7/AdrVp (human breast cancer cells), only tryprostatin A (Figure 7) showed activity in a concentration range of 10–50 µM and did not exhibit cytotoxicity at evaluated concentrations [69].

2.3. Harmine

Harmine (10) is a beta-carboline alkaloid with an extensive distribution in nature [37], which is isolated from marine brown alga, some cyanobacteria and marine animals [70,71,72]. Harmine (Figure 7) possesses some biological properties including antimicrobial, antiplasmodial, antifungal, antioxidant, antitumoral, antimutagenic, cytotoxic and hallucinogenic activity [70,71,72].
A study employing MDA-MB-231 cells, a breast cancer cell line that overexpresses BCRP, showed that this alkaloid inhibits BCRP. Harmine significantly decreases resistance to the anticancer drugs such as mitoxantrone and camptothecin mediated by BCRP. The effect of 10 against MDR cells appears to be specific against BCRP because this compound does not show inhibition of P-gp overexpressing cells [73].
Although 10 was efficient as a reversal MDR agent, its neurotoxicity and cytotoxicity have hindered its clinical development, although it constitutes a good lead for the development of BCRP reversal agents [73].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g007 1024
Figure 7. Structure of Tryprostatin A and Harmine.
Figure 7. Structure of Tryprostatin A and Harmine.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g007

2.4. Botryllamides

Botryllamides (11–19) compose a large group of compounds isolated from several species of Ascidian genus Botryllus [74,75,76]. These metabolites belong to the first class of marine molecules containing a dehydrotyrosine residue. Botryllus extracts showed interesting activity in a screening performed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) against the most common transporters (BCRP, P-gp and MDR-1) in MDR cells. From these extracts, botryllamides (Figure 8) were identified as the active constituents, and they were shown to be selective BCRP inhibitors. The effect of botryllamides against BCRP was evaluated as their capacity for inhibiting the BCRP-mediated BODIPY-prazosin efflux in BCRP transfected HEK293 cells, competition of [125I]-iodoarylazidoprazosin labeling of BCRP and promoting BCRP-associated ATPase activity [77].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g008 1024
Figure 8. Structure of Botryllamides.
Figure 8. Structure of Botryllamides.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g008
Because of their relatively low cytotoxicity, these compounds could be useful clinically. In addition, a series of botryllamide derivatives, including botryllamide F and G, were achieved in order to establish a possible structural basis for their activity. The BCRP inhibitory activity suggests that the presence of a 2-methoxy-p-coumaric acid moiety conjugated with a double bound is essential; but extended conjugation at C10-C17 (variations in the substituents on the aryl groups) is not crucial (Figure 9). Finally, this SAR study proposed two binding interactions between botryllamides and BCRP [78].

2.5. Lamellarin O

Lamellarins are natural compounds isolated from several marine invertebrates (mainly ascidians and sponges) and are made up of an unusual heterocyclic ring system [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. Many of these natural products exhibit some biological activities including antitumoral and anti-HIV activity [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87]. According to the substituted pyrrole, these marine alkaloids are classified into three subgroups: Lamellarins characterized by the presence of the pyrrole ring fused with adjacent aromatic rings (forming a pentacyclic core), a central pyrrole ring unfused to adjacent aromatic rings and a quinoline ring instead of pyrrole [87].
Lamellarin O (20) isolated from the southern Australian marine sponge Ianthella sp. displayed a potent and selective BCRP inhibition. A mitoxantrone efflux assay based on flow cytometry and NCI-H460/ MX20 cells (mitoxantrone resistant human lung cancer) was used to evaluate the inhibitory properties of 20 (Figure 10). Furthermore, SAR analysis and in silico studies have established that the pharmacophoric group of 20 is composed of a methoxy-acetophenone, carboxylic ester and phenolic moieties [88].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g009 1024
Figure 9. Structure-activity relationship of Botryllamides for BCRP inhibition.
Figure 9. Structure-activity relationship of Botryllamides for BCRP inhibition.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g009

2.6. Indolocarbazole Alkaloids

Indolocarbazole alkaloids are a class of natural compounds, which possess a wide range of biological properties, especially anticancer activity [89,90,91]. From the EtOAc extract of a marine-derived actinomycete strain Z039-2 collected on the coast of Qingdao, China, two indolocarbazole alkaloids (Figure 10) with anticancer properties, K252c (staurosporine aglycon, 21) and arcyriaflavin A (22), were obtained [92]. A group of indolocarbazoles (including 21 and 22) were evaluated, using a wild-type of BCRP-transfected HEK-293 cells, in order to detect BCRP inhibition. Several of the tested compounds showed important inhibitory activity against the BCRP-mediated efflux of pheophorbide A, 21 and 22 were the most potent. In photoaffinity labeling experiments, K252c and arcyriaflavin A were able to prevent the [125I]-iodoarylazidoprazosin labeling of BCRP with IC50 values of 0.37 and 0.23 mmoL/L, respectively. K252c and arcyriaflavin A showed low cytotoxicity on BCRP-transfected cells in a sulforhodamine B assay, and reduced the relative resistance to SN-38 (7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin) [93].
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g010 1024
Figure 10. Structure of lamellarin O, K252C and arcyriaflavin A.
Figure 10. Structure of lamellarin O, K252C and arcyriaflavin A.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g010

2.7. Terrein

Terrein (23) is a metabolite isolated from some marine strains of Aspergillus terreus (mainly PF-26 and PT06-2) and Emericella variecolor [94,95,96]. Terrein (Figure 11) exhibited interesting properties including antibacterial and antiinflammatory activities, as well as melanogenesis, angiogenin secretion and proteasome inhibition properties [95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102]. Regarding its anticancer properties, 23 displayed strong cytotoxicity (100-fold more potent than paclitaxel) against breast (MCF-7), pancreatic (PANC-1) and liver (HepG2) cancer cells. Terrein also showed a significant reduction in BCRP-expressing cells through the activation of the caspase-7 pathway and the inhibition of the Akt signaling pathway [102].

2.8. Secalonic Acid D

Secalonic acid D (SAD) is a mycotoxin produced by Penicillium oxalicum, which also has been obtained from a lichen marine-derived fungus and other mangrove endophytic fungus [103,104,105,106,107]. SAD (24) has been widely investigated for its anticancer properties and it is well known that 24 acts as a DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor. SAD (Figure 11) also displayed significant cytotoxic activity and provoked apoptosis in K562 and HL60 myeloid leukemia cell lines by blocking the G1 phase of the cell cycle in the GSK-3β/β-catenin/c-Myc pathway. Furthermore, 24 is an inhibitor of murine pituitary adenoma GH3 cells in a dose-dependent manner promoting apoptosis [106,107]. Regarding cancer resistance, 24 showed potent cytotoxicity on MDR cells (P-gp-, MRP1- and BCRP-overexpressing multidrug resistance cells) and their parental cells through an MTT assay. In these cells, 24 could down-regulate the expression of BCRP protein by activation of calpain 1. SAD could down-regulate the expression of BCRP and decrease the percentage of side population cells in lung cancer cells. All these findings have proved that 24 is an interesting molecule that possesses a potent cytotoxic activity by a mechanism of inducing BCRP degradation of the activation of calpain 1 [108]. Unfortunately, 24 has a high toxicity, making clinical usage difficult, but it could be considered as a leading compound for the development of new BCRP inhibitors.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g011 1024
Figure 11. Structure of Terrein and Secalonic acid D (SAD).
Figure 11. Structure of Terrein and Secalonic acid D (SAD).
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g011

2.9. Naphthopyrones

Some organic extracts prepared from marine crinoids Capillaster multiradiatus, Comanthus parvicirrus and a unidentified crinoid of the Comasteridae family, showed activity in a high throughput assay measuring accumulation of the BCRP specific substrate pheophorbide A in BCRP-overexpressing NCI-H460 MX20 cells [109]. Bioassay-guided fractionation of the extracts led to the isolation of five new naphthopyrones along with six known compounds. The isolates were divided into two groups: Linear and angular. This difference in structure was important for the activity against BCRP since only the angular naphthopyrones (25–29) showed significant activity (ranging from 27% to 59%) [109]. Although active naphthopyrones (Figure 12) showed moderate activity against BCRP- overexpressing cells, it is an example for the role of marine natural products as a reservoir of molecules with inhibitory activity of the MDR transporters.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g012 1024
Figure 12. Structure of naphthopyrones actives against BCRP.
Figure 12. Structure of naphthopyrones actives against BCRP.
Marinedrugs 13 02010 g012

3. Conclusions

BCRP can expel a broad range of structurally different metabolites out of cells. In this context, a very active BCRP transporter could potentially diminish drug delivery to the target organ and lead to treatment resistance, despite peripheral drug concentrations being within their therapeutic range. The development of compounds with BCRP inhibitory properties from marine sources is one of the most important approaches in drug discovery due to the fact that the marine ecosystem has shown a unique chemical diversity. In recent years, several marine compounds with BCRP inhibitor properties have been isolated, most of them belonging to a group of alkaloids. These types of molecules (alkaloids) have shown potent and selective MDR activity against certain cancer cells, but unfortunately they have some toxicity, which has limited their pharmaceutical development. All these agents represent new research tools for the discovery and development of efficient BCRP inhibitors, which may have potential use, per se or in combination, for the treatment of cancer and for the design of rational analogues with higher activity, less toxicity and fewer pharmacokinetic interactions.

Acknowledgments

D.L. was supported by funds from the National Secretariat of Science, Technology and Innovation (SENACYT) doctoral grant 270-2011-154. L.C. and S.M.-L. were supported by funds from the National Research System (SNI, SENACYT) [L.C. (SNI­28­2014) and S.M.-L. (SNI­32­2014)].

Author Contributions

S.M.-L. contributed to the design of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to the manuscript preparation. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lecerf-Schmidt, F.; Peres, B.; Valdameri, G.; Gauthier, C.; Winter, E.; Payen, L.; di Pietro, A.; Boumendjel, A. ABCG2: Recent discovery of potent and highly selective inhibitors. Future Med. Chem. 2013, 5, 1037–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Natarajan, K.; Xie, Y.; Baer, M.R.; Ross, D.D. Role of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in cancer drug resistance. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 83, 1084–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Noguchi, K.; Katayama, K.; Sugimoto, Y. Human ABC transporter ABCG2/BCRP expression in chemoresistance: Basic and clinical perspectives for molecular cancer therapeutics. Pharmgenomics Pers. Med. 2014, 7, 53–64. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Mao, Q.; Unadkat, J.D. Role of the breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in drug transport-an update. AAPS J. 2015, 17, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Doyle, L.; Ross, D.D. Multidrug resistance mediated by the breast cancer resistance protein BCRP (ABCG2). Oncogene 2003, 22, 7340–7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Stacy, A.E.; Jansson, P.J.; Richardson, D.R. Molecular pharmacology of ABCG2 and its role in chemoresistance. Mol. Pharmacol. 2013, 84, 655–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Doyle, L.A.; Yang, W.; Abruzzo, L.V.; Krogmann, T.; Gao, Y.; Rishi, A.K.; Ross, D.D. A multidrug resistance transporter from human MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 15665–15670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Miyake, K.; Mickley, L.; Litman, T.; Zhan, Z.; Robey, R.; Cristensen, B.; Brangi, M.; Greenberger, L.; Dean, M.; Fojo, T.; et al. Molecular cloning of cDNAs which are highly overexpressed in mitoxantrone-resistant cells: Demonstration of homology to ABC transport genes. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Allikmets, R.; Schriml, L.; Hutchinson, A.; Romano-Spica, V.; Dean, M. A human placenta-specific ATP-binding cassette gene (ABCP) on chromosome 4q22 that is involved in multidrug resistance. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5337–5339. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Wang, H.; Zhou, L.; Gupta, A.; Vethanayagam, R.R.; Zhang, Y.; Unadkat, J.D.; Mao, Q. Regulation of BCRP/ABCG2 expression by progesterone and 17 beta-estradiol in human placental BeWo cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 290, E798–E807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Loscher, W.; Potska, H. Drug resistance in brain diseases and the role of drug efflux transporters. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2005, 6, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. König, J.; Müller, F.; Fromm, M.F. Transporters and drug-drug interactions: Important determinants of drug disposition and effects. Pharmacol. Rev. 2013, 65, 944–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Szakacs, G.; Paterson, J.K.; Ludwig, J.A.; Booth-Genthe, C.; Gottesman, M.M. Targeting multidrug resistance in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2006, 5, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Robey, R.W.; Honjo, Y.; van de Laar, A.; Miyake, K.; Regis, J.T.; Litman, T.; Bates, S.E. A functional assay for detection of the mitoxantrone resistance protein, MXR (ABCG2). Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2001, 1512, 171–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ozvegy, C.; Litman, T.; Szakács, G.; Nagy, Z.; Bates, S.; Váradi, A.; Sarkadi, B. Functional characterization of the human multidrug transporter, ABCG2, expressed in insect cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 285, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Shiozawa, K.; Oka, M.; Soda, H.; Yoshikawa, M.; Ikegami, Y.; Tsurutani, J.; Nakatomi, K.; Nakamura, Y.; Doi, S.; Kitazaki, T.; et al. Reversal of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2)-mediated drug resistance by novobiocin, a coumermycin antibiotic. Int. J. Cancer 2004, 108, 146–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Pick, A.; Müller, H.; Wiese, M. Structure-activity relationships of new inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2). Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 8224–8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ahmed-Belkacem, A.; Pozza, A.; Muñoz-Martínez, F.; Bates, S.E.; Castanys, S.; Gamarro, F.; di Pietro, A.; Pérez-Victoria, J.M. Flavonoid structure-activity studies identify 6-prenylchrysin and tectochrysin as potent and specific inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein ABCG2. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4852–4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pozza, A.; Perez-Victoria, J.M.; Sardo, A.; Ahmed-Belkacem, A.; Di Pietro, A. Purification of breast cancer resistance protein ABCG2 and role of arginine-482. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 1912–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Zhou, S.; Schuetz, J.D.; Bunting, K.D.; Colapietro, A.M.; Sampath, J.; Morris, J.J.; Lagutina, I.; Grosveld, G.C.; Osawa, M.; Nakauchi, H.; et al. The ABC transporter Bcrp1/ABCG2 is expressed in a wide variety of stem cells and is a molecular determinant of the side-population phenotype. Nat. Med. 2001, 7, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Alqawi, O.; Bates, S.; Georges, E. Arginine482 to threonine mutation in the breast cancer resistance protein ABCG2 inhibits rhodamine 123 transport while increasing binding. Biochem. J. 2004, 382, 711–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gupta, A.; Dai, Y.; Vethanayagam, R.R.; Hebert, M.F.; Thummel, K.E.; Unadkat, J.D.; Ross, D.D.; Mao, Q. Cyclosporin A, tacrolimus and sirolimus are potent inhibitors of the human breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) and reverse resistance to mitoxantrone and topotecan. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2006, 58, 374–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mao, Q.; Conseil, G.; Gupta, A.; Cole, S.P.; Unadkat, J.D. Functional expression of the human breast cancer resistance protein in Pichia pastoris. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 320, 730–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ejendal, K.F.; Hrycyna, C.A. Differential sensitivities of the human ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCG2 and P-glycoprotein to cyclosporin A. Mol. Pharmacol. 2005, 67, 902–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kannan, P.; Telu, S.; Shukla, S.; Ambudkar, S.V.; Pike, V.W.; Halldin, C.; Gottesman, M.M.; Innis, R.B.; Hall, M.D. The “specific” P-glycoprotein inhibitor Tariquidar is also a substrate and an inhibitor for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2011, 2, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Minderman, H.; Brooks, T.A.; O’Loughlin, K.L.; Ojima, I.; Bernacki, R.J.; Baer, M.R. Broad-spectrum modulation of ATP-binding cassette transport proteins by the taxane derivatives ortataxel (IDN-5109, BAY 59-8862) and tRA96023. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2004, 53, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ozvegy-Laczka, C.; Hegedus, T.; Várady, G.; Ujhelly, O.; Schuetz, J.D.; Váradi, A.; Kéri, G.; Orfi, L.; Német, K.; Sarkadi, B. High-affinity interaction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with the ABCG2 multidrug transporter. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 65, 1485–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Jacob, L.; Hoffmann, B.; Stoven, V.; Vert, J.P. Virtual screening of GPCRs: An in silico chemogenomics approach. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Ding, Y.L.; Shih, Y.H.; Tsai, F.Y.; Leong, M.K. In silico prediction of inhibition of promiscuous breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Villoutreix, B.O.; Kuenemann, M.A.; Poyet, J.L.; Bruzzoni-Giovanelli, H.; Labbé, C.; Lagorce, D.; Sperandio, O.; Miteva, M.A. Drug-like protein—Protein interaction modulators: Challenges and opportunities for drug discovery and chemical biology. Mol. Inform. 2014, 33, 414–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Hazai, E.; Bikádi, Z. Homology modeling of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2). J. Struct. Biol. 2008, 162, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Polgar, O.; Ierano, C.; Tamaki, A.; Stanley, B.; Ward, Y.; Xia, D.; Tarasova, N.; Robey, R.W.; Bates, S.E. Mutational analysis of threonine 402 adjacent to the GXXXG dimerization motif in transmembrane segment 1 of ABCG2. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 2235–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ni, Z.; Bikadi, Z.; Rosenberg, M.F.; Mao, Q. Structure and function of the human breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). Curr. Drug Metab. 2010, 11, 603–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, Y.F.; Polgar, O.; Okada, M.; Esser, L.; Bates, S.E.; Xia, D. Towards understanding the mechanism of action of the multidrug resistance-linked half-ABC transporter ABCG2: A molecular modeling study. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2007, 25, 837–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Guha, R. On exploring structure-activity relationships. Methods Mol. Biol. 2013, 993, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Peltason, L.; Bajorath, J. Systematic computational analysis of structure-activity relationships: Concepts, challenges and recent advances. Future Med. Chem. 2009, 1, 451–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Erić, S.; Kalinić, M.; Ilić, K.; Zloh, M. Computational classification models for predicting the interaction of drugs with P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2014, 25, 955–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rangel, L.P.; Winter, E.; Gauthier, C.; Terreux, R.; Chiaradia-Delatorre, L.D.; Mascarello, A.; Nunes, R.J.; Yunes, R.A.; Creczynski-Pasa, T.B.; Macalou, S.; et al. New structure-activity relationships of chalcone inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein: Polyspecificity toward inhibition and critical substitutions against cytotoxicity. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2013, 7, 1043–1052. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Han, Y.; Riwanto, M.; Go, M.L.; Ee, P.L. Modulation of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) by non-basic chalcone analogues. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 35, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, X.L.; Tee, H.W.; Go, M.L. Functionalized chalcones as selective inhibitors of P-glycoprotein and breast cancer resistance protein. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Juvale, K.; Pape, V.F.; Wiese, M. Investigation of chalcones and benzochalcones as inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2012, 20, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sim, H.M.; Lee, C.Y.; Ee, P.L.; Go, M.L. Dimethoxyaurones: Potent inhibitors of ABCG2 (breast cancer resistance protein). Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2008, 35, 293–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Boumendjel, A.; Nicolle, E.; Moraux, T.; Gerby, B.; Blanc, M.; Ronot, X.; Boutonnat, J. Piperazinobenzopyranones and phenalkylaminobenzopyranones: Potent inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2). J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 7275–7281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nicolle, E.; Boccard, J.; Guilet, D.; Dijoux-Franca, M.G.; Zelefac, F.; Macalou, S.; Grosselin, J.; Schmidt, J.; Carrupt, P.A.; di Pietro, A.; et al. Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2): New inhibitors and QSAR studies by a 3D linear solvation energy approach. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2009, 38, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Valdameri, G.; Genoux-Bastide, E.; Peres, B.; Gauthier, C.; Guitton, J.; Terreux, R.; Winnischofer, S.M.; Rocha, M.E.; Boumendjel, A.; di Pietro, A. Substituted chromones as highly potent nontoxic inhibitors, specific for the breast cancer resistance protein. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 966–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Valdameri, G.; Genoux-Bastide, E.; Gauthier, C.; Peres, B.; Terreux, R.; Winnischofer, S.M.; Rocha, M.E.; di Pietro, A.; Boumendjel, A. 6-halogenochromones bearing tryptamine: One-step access to potent and highly selective inhibitors of breast cancer resistance protein. Chem. Med. Chem. 2012, 7, 1177–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Honorat, M.; Guitton, J.; Gauthier, C.; Bouard, C.; Lecerf-Schmidt, F.; Peres, B.; Terreux, R.; Gervot, H.; Rioufol, C.; Boumendjel, A.; et al. MBL-II-141, a chromone derivative, enhances irinotecan (CPT-11) anticancer efficiency in ABCG2-positive xenografts. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 11957–11970. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Gerwick, W.H.; Moore, B.S. Lessons from the past and charting the future of marine natural products drug discovery and chemical biology. Chem. Biol. 2012, 19, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Martins, A.; Vieira, H.; Gaspar, H.; Santos, S. Marketed marine natural products in the pharmaceutical and cosmeceutical industries: Tips for success. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 1066–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rocha-Martin, J.; Harrington, C.; Dobson, A.D.; O’Gara, F. Emerging strategies and integrated systems microbiology technologies for biodiscovery of marine bioactive compounds. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3516–3559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Siegel, R.; DeSantis, C.; Virgo, K.; Stein, K.; Mariotto, A.; Smith, T.; Cooper, D.; Gansler, T.; Lerro, C.; Fedewa, S.; et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer. J. Clin. 2012, 62, 220–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Saraswathy, M.; Gong, S. Different strategies to overcome multidrug resistance in cancer. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1397–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kibria, G.; Hatakeyama, H.; Harashima, H. Cancer multidrug resistance: Mechanisms involved and strategies for circumvention using a drug delivery system. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2014, 37, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lopez, D.; Martinez-Luis, S. Marine natural products with P-glycoprotein inhibitor properties. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 525–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Wang, F.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, M.; Lin, A.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, W. Seven new prenylated indole diketopiperazine alkaloids from holothurian-derived fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7986–7991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, Y.; Li, Z.L.; Bai, J.; Zhang, L.M.; Wu, X.; Zhang, L.; Pei, Y.H.; Jing, Y.K.; Hua, H.M. 2,5-diketopiperazines from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus fumigatus YK-7. Chem. Biodivers. 2012, 9, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhang, M.; Wang, W.L.; Fang, Y.C.; Zhu, T.J.; Gu, Q.Q.; Zhu, W.M. Cytotoxic alkaloids and antibiotic nordammarane triterpenoids from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sydowi. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 985–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhao, W.Y.; Zhang, Y.P.; Zhu, T.J.; Fang, Y.C.; Liu, H.B.; Gu, Q.Q.; Zhu, W.M. Studies on the indolyl diketopiperazine analogs produced by marine-derived fungus A-f-11. Chin. J. Antibiot. 2006, 31, 749–752. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rabindran, S.K.; He, H.; Singh, M.; Brown, E.; Collins, K.I.; Annable, T.; Greenberger, L.M. Reversal of a novel multidrug resistance mechanism in human colon carcinoma cells by fumitremorgin C. Cancer Res. 1998, 58, 5850–5858. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Hazlehurst, L.A.; Foley, N.E.; Gleason-Guzman, M.C.; Hacker, M.P.; Cress, A.E.; Greenberger, L.W.; de Jong, M.C.; Dalton, W.S. Multiple mechanisms confer drug resistance to mitoxantrone in the human 8226 myeloma cell line. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Rabindran, S.K.; Ross, D.D.; Doyle, L.A.; Yang, W.; Greenberger, L.M. Fumitremorgin C reverses multidrug resistance in cells transfected with the breast cancer resistance protein. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 47–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Plate, R.; Hermkens, P.H.H.; Behm, H.; Ottenheijm, H.C.J. Application of an isoxazolidine in a stereoselective approach to the fumitremorgin series. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 560–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Van Loevezijn, A.; Allen, J.D.; Schinkel, A.H.; Koomen, G.J. Inhibition of BCRP-mediated drug efflux by fumitremorgin-type indolyl diketopiperazines. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Van Maarseveen, J.H. Solid phase synthesis of heterocycles by cyclization/cleavage methodologies. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 1998, 1, 185–214. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  65. Allen, J.D.; van Loevezijn, A.; Lakhai, J.M.; van der Valk, M.; van Tellingen, O.; Reid, G.; Schellens, J.H.; Koomen, G.J.; Schinkel, A.H. Potent and specific inhibition of the breast cancer resistance protein multidrug transporter in vitro and in mouse intestine by a novel analogue of fumitremorgin C. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2002, 1, 417–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Cui, C.B.; Kakeya, H.; Okada, G.; Onose, R.; Ubukata, M.; Takahashi, I.; Isono, K.; Osada, H. Tryprostatins A and B, novel mammalian cell cycle inhibitors produced by Aspergillus fumigatus. J. Antibiot. 1995, 48, 1382–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Cui, C.B.; Kakeya, H.; Okada, G.; Onose, R.; Osada, H. Novel mammalian cell cycle inhibitors, tryprostatins A, B and other diketopiperazines produced by Aspergillus fumigatus. I. Taxonomy, fermentation, isolation and biological properties. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cui, C.B.; Kakeya, H.; Osada, H. Novel mammalian cell cycle inhibitors, tryprostatins A, B and other diketopiperazines produced by Aspergillus fumigatus. II. Physico-chemical properties and structures. J. Antibiot. 1996, 49, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Woehlecke, H.; Osada, H.; Herrmann, A.; Lage, H. Reversal of breast cancer resistance protein-mediated drug resistance by tryprostatin A. Int. J. Cancer 2003, 107, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Patel, K.; Gadewar, M.; Tripathi, R.; Prasad, S.K.; Patel, D.K. A review on medicinal importance, pharmacological activity and bioanalytical aspects of beta-carboline alkaloid “Harmine”. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Khan, A.M.; Noreen, S.; Imran, Z.P.; Choudhary, M.I. A new compound, jolynamine, from marine brown alga Jolyna laminarioides. Nat. Prod. Res. 2011, 25, 898–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zaker, F.; Oody, A.; Arjmand, A. A study on the antitumoral and differentiation effects of Peganum harmala derivatives in combination with ATRA on leukaemic cells. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007, 30, 844–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ma, Y.; Wink, M. The beta-carboline alkaloid harmine inhibits BCRP and can reverse resistance to the anticancer drugs mitoxantrone and camptothecin in breast cancer cells. Phytother. Res. 2010, 24, 146–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. McDonald, L.A.; Swersey, J.C.; Ireland, C.M.; Carroll, A.R.; Coll, J.C.; Bowden, B.F.; Fairchild, C.R.; Cornell, L. Botryllamides A-D, new brominated tyrosine derivatives from styelid ascidians of the genus Botryllus. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 5237–5244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rao, M.R.; Faulkner, D.J. Botryllamides E–H, four new tyrosine derivatives from the ascidian Botrylloides tyreum. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67, 1064–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. McKay, M.J.; Carroll, A.R.; Quinn, R.J. Perspicamides A and B, quinolinecarboxylic acid derivatives from the Australian ascidian Botrylloides perspicuum. J. Nat. Prod. 2005, 68, 1776–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Henrich, C.J.; Robey, R.; Takada, K.; Bokesch, H.R.; Bates, S.E.; Shukla, S.; Ambudkar, S.V.; McMahon, J.B.; Gustafson, K.R. Botryllamides: Natural product inhibitors of ABCG2. ACS Chem. Biol. 2009, 4, 637–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Takada, K.; Imamura, N.; Gustafson, K.R.; Henrich, C.J. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of botryllamides that block the ABCG2 multidrug transporter. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 1330–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Andersen, R.J.; Faulkner, D.J.; He, C.H.; van Duyne, G.D.; Clardy, J. Metabolites of the marine prosobranch mollusk Lamellaria sp. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 5492–5495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lindquist, N.; Fenical, W.; van Duyne, G.D.; Clardy, J. New alkaloids of the lamellarin class from the marine ascidian Didemnum chartaceum (Sluiter, 1909). J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4570–4574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Davis, R.A.; Carroll, A.R.; Pierens, G.K.; Quinn, R.J. New lamellarin alkaloids from the Australian ascidian, Didemnum chartaceum. J. Nat. Prod. 1999, 62, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Urban, S.; Butler, M.S.; Capon, R.J. Lamellarins O and P: New aromatic metabolites from the Australian marine sponge Dendrilla cactos. Aust. J. Chem. 1994, 47, 1919–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Urban, S.; Hobbs, L.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Capon, R.J. Lamellarins Q and R: New aromatic metabolites from an Australian marine sponge Dendrilla cactos. Aust. J. Chem. 1995, 48, 1491–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Carroll, A.R.; Bowden, B.F.; Coll, J.C. Studies of Australian ascidians. I. Six new lamellarin-class alkaloids from a colonial ascidian, Didemnum sp. Austr. J. Chem. 1993, 46, 489–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Urban, S.; Capon, R.J. Lamellarin S: A new aromatic metabolite from an Australian tunicate Didemnum sp. Aust. J. Chem. 1996, 49, 711–713. [Google Scholar]
  86. Reddy, M.V.R.; Faulkner, D.J.; Venkateswarlu, Y.; Rao, M.R. New lamellarin alkaloids from an unidentified ascidian from the Arabian Sea. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 3457–3466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bailly, C. Lamellarins, from A to Z: A family of anticancer marine pyrrole alkaloids. Curr. Med. Chem. Anticancer Agents 2004, 4, 363–378. [Google Scholar]
  88. Huang, X.C.; Xiao, X.; Zhang, Y.K.; Talele, T.T.; Salim, A.A.; Chen, Z.S.; Capon, R.J. Lamellarin O, a pyrrole alkaloid from an Australian marine sponge, Ianthella sp., reverses BCRP mediated drug resistance in cancer cells. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3818–3837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Tsubotani, S.H.; Tanida, S.; Harada, S. Structure determination of indolocarbazole alkaloids by NMR spectroscopy. Tetrahedron 1991, 47, 3565–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Sánchez, C.; Zhu, L.; Braña, A.F.; Salas, A.P.; Rohr, J.; Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A. Combinatorial biosynthesis of antitumor indolocarbazole compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Sánchez, C.; Méndez, C.; Salas, J.A. Indolocarbazole natural products: Occurrence, biosynthesis, and biological activity. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2006, 23, 1007–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Liu, R.; Zhu, T.; Li, D.; Gu, J.; Xia, W.; Fang, Y.; Hongbing, L.; Zhu, W.; Gu, Q. Two indolocarbazole alkaloids with apoptosis activity from a marine-derived actinomycete Z(2)039-2. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2007, 30, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Robey, R.W.; Shukla, S.; Steadman, K.; Obrzut, T.; Finley, E.M.; Ambudkar, S.V.; Bates, S.E. Inhibition of ABCG2-mediated transport by protein kinase inhibitors with a bisindolylmaleimide or indolocarbazole structure. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2007, 6, 1877–1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Yin, Y.; Xu, B.; Li, Z.; Zhang, B. Enhanced production of (+)-terrein in fed-batch cultivation of Aspergillus terreus strain PF26 with sodium citrate. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wang, Y.; Zheng, J.; Liu, P.; Wang, W.; Zhu, W. Three new compounds from Aspergillus terreus PT06–2 grown in a high salt medium. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 1368–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Malmstrøm, J.; Christophersen, C.; Barrero, A.F.; Oltra, J.E.; Justicia, J.; Rosales, A. Bioactive metabolites from a marine-derived strain of the fungus Emericella variecolor. J. Nat. Prod. 2002, 65, 364–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kim, D.S.; Cho, H.J.; Lee, H.K.; Lee, W.H.; Park, E.S.; Youn, S.W.; Park, K.C. Terrein, a fungal metabolite, inhibits the epidermal proliferation of skin equivalents. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2007, 46, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Phattanawasin, P.; Pojchanakom, K.; Sotanaphun, U.; Piyapolrungroj, N.; Zungsontiporn, S. Weed growth inhibitors from Aspergillus fischeri TISTR 3272. Nat. Prod. Res. 2007, 21, 1286–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lee, J.C.; Yu, M.K.; Lee, R.; Lee, Y.H.; Jeon, J.G.; Lee, M.H.; Jhee, E.C.; Yoo, I.D.; Yi, H.K. Terrein reduces pulpal inflammation in human dental pulp cells. J. Endodont. 2008, 34, 433–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Arakawa, M.; Someno, T.; Kawada, M.; Ikeda, D. A new terrain glucoside, a novel inhibitor of angiogenin secretion in tumor angiogenesis. J. Antibiot. 2008, 61, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Lee, Y.H.; Lee, N.H.; Bhattarai, G.; Oh, Y.T.; Yu, M.K.; Yoo, I.D.; Jhee, E.C.; Yi, H.K. Enhancement of osteoblast biocompatibility on titanium surface with terrein treatment. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2010, 28, 678–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Liao, W.Y.; Shen, C.N.; Lin, L.H.; Yang, Y.L.; Han, H.Y.; Chen, J.W.; Kuo, S.C.; Wu, S.H.; Liaw, C.C. Asperjinone, a nor-neolignan, and terrein, a suppressor of ABCG2-expressing breast cancer cells, from thermophilic Aspergillus terreus. J. Nat. Prod. 2012, 75, 630–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Steyn, P.S. The isolation, structure and absolute configuration of secalonic acid D, the toxic metabolite of Penicillium oxalicum. Tetrahedron 1970, 26, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zhang, J.Y.; Tao, L.Y.; Liang, Y.J.; Yan, Y.Y.; Dai, C.L.; Xia, X.K.; She, Z.G.; Lin, Y.Ch.; Fu, L.W. Secalonic acid D induced leukemia cell apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of G1 with involvement of GSK-3β/β-catenin/c-Myc pathway. Cell Cycle 2009, 8, 2444–2450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Guo, Z.; Shao, C.; She, Z.; Cai, X.; Liu, F.; Vrijimoed, L.L.; Lin, Y. 1H and 13C NMR assignments for two oxaphenalenones bacillosporin C and D from the mangrove endophytic fungus SBE-14. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2007, 45, 439–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Ren, H.; Tian, L.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, W. Secalonic acid D; A cytotoxic constituent from marine lichen-derived fungus Gliocladium sp. T31. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2006, 29, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Hong, R. Secalonic acid D as a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor from marine lichen-derived fungus Gliocladium sp. T31. Pharm. Biol. 2011, 49, 796–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hu, Y.P.; Tao, L.Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, J.Y.; Liang, Y.J.; Fu, L.W. Secalonic acid D reduced the percentage of side populations by down-regulating the expression of ABCG2. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2013, 85, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Bokesch, H.R.; Cartner, L.K.; Fuller, R.W.; Wilson, J.A.; Henrich, C.J.; Kelley, J.A.; Gustafson, K.R.; McMahon, J.B.; McKee, T.C. Inhibition of ABCG2-mediated drug efflux by naphthopyrones from marine crinoids. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 3848–3850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cherigo, L.; Lopez, D.; Martinez-Luis, S. Marine Natural Products as Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitors. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2010-2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042010

AMA Style

Cherigo L, Lopez D, Martinez-Luis S. Marine Natural Products as Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitors. Marine Drugs. 2015; 13(4):2010-2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042010

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cherigo, Lilia, Dioxelis Lopez, and Sergio Martinez-Luis. 2015. "Marine Natural Products as Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitors" Marine Drugs 13, no. 4: 2010-2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042010

APA Style

Cherigo, L., Lopez, D., & Martinez-Luis, S. (2015). Marine Natural Products as Breast Cancer Resistance Protein Inhibitors. Marine Drugs, 13(4), 2010-2029. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13042010

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop