Next Article in Journal
Anti-Lymphangiogenesis Components from Zoanthid Palythoa tuberculosa
Previous Article in Journal
New Antibacterial Phenone Derivatives Asperphenone A–C from Mangrove-Derived Fungus Aspergillus sp. YHZ-1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Toxicology of Gambierdiscus spp. (Dinophyceae) from Tropical and Temperate Australian Waters
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 16
Issue 2
10.3390/md16020046
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment

by
Jimmy Alarcan
1,
Ronel Biré
2,
Ludovic Le Hégarat
1 and
Valérie Fessard
1,*
1
Toxicology of Contaminants Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, ANSES, 35300 Fougères, France
2
Marine Biotoxins Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health and Safety, ANSES, 94706 Maisons-Alfort, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2018, 16(2), 46; https://doi.org/10.3390/md16020046
Submission received: 6 December 2017 / Revised: 18 January 2018 / Accepted: 29 January 2018 / Published: 31 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Algal Toxins II, 2017)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lipophilic phycotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by phytoplanktonic species. They accumulate in filter-feeding shellfish and can cause human intoxication. Regulatory limits have been set for individual toxins, and the toxicological features are well characterized for some of them. However, phycotoxin contamination is often a co-exposure phenomenon, and toxicological data regarding mixtures effects are very scarce. Moreover, the type and occurrence of phycotoxins can greatly vary from one region to another. This review aims at summarizing the knowledge on (i) multi-toxin occurrence by a comprehensive literature review and (ii) the toxicological assessment of mixture effects. A total of 79 publications was selected for co-exposure evaluation, and 44 of them were suitable for toxin ratio calculations. The main toxin mixtures featured okadaic acid in combination with pectenotoxin-2 or yessotoxin. Only a few toxicity studies dealing with co-exposure were published. In vivo studies did not report particular mixture effects, whereas in vitro studies showed synergistic or antagonistic effects. Based on the combinations that are the most reported, further investigations on mixture effects must be carried out.

1. Introduction

1.1. Problematic of Phycotoxins Contamination

Marine biotoxins are secondary metabolites produced by approximately 100 phytoplanktonic species [1]. From a chemical point of view, hydrophilic, lipophilic and amphiphilic toxins are distinguished. Among the group of lipophilic toxins, several main families have been depicted: okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxins (DTXs), pectenotoxins (PTXs), yessotoxins (YTXs), azaspiracids (AZAs) and, finally, cyclic imines (spirolides (SPXs), pinnatoxins (PnTXs), pteriatoxins and gymnodimines (GYMs)). To prevent human intoxications, the European Union (EU) has set regulatory limits in shellfish [2] (Table 1).
However, several gaps exist in the current management of phycotoxins risk. For instance, no regulatory limits have been set up for cyclic imines, though these toxins are frequently detected and found to be very potent in vivo [3]. Regarding mixtures, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) opinion was only stated in the case of analogues based on toxicological equivalent factors (TEF) established from acute toxicity in rodents [2]. Although some publications reported the combined effects of a few binary mixtures of phycotoxins, a proper setting of regulation limits that would take into account risk when toxins co-occur is missing. Besides, it is noteworthy to investigate to which mixtures of phycotoxins the consumers can be exposed and to which respective levels. It is well known that some species can produce different analogues belonging to the same family, but also toxins of different families (Table 2). Moreover, as the conditions favoring the proliferation of deleterious phytoplankton, such as harmful algal bloom (HAB), can be similar for one species to another, several toxins are likely to co-occur.

1.2. Methodology for Mixture Hazard Assessment

Investigation of mixture effects is certainly one of the greatest challenges for hazard characterization nowadays. Hazard evaluation based on a single compound has restricted application since chemical contamination is often multiple and the interaction of compounds could result in a non-additive toxicity (whether higher or lower than expected). The combined effects of mixtures have been well established and classified [15]. This categorization relies on compounds sharing or not the same mode of action (MOA). Three different scenarios have been thus defined: (i) when compounds share the same MOA (analogues), the “dose addition” approach is employed: it considers that all these compounds behave as if they were a simple dilution of each other and the concentrations of each analogue are pondered using TEFs when available; (ii) when compounds have different MOAs, but no interaction is observed, the “response addition” approach is employed, and the global toxicity is calculated as the sum of each individual toxicity; (iii) when compounds interact, neither dose addition nor response addition are suitable approaches. Interaction is considered when the effect of a mixture differs from additivity based on the dose-response relationships of each individual compound. Then, effects are classified as lower (antagonism, inhibition, masking) or greater (synergism, potentiation) than additive. Figure 1 summarizes the different cases.
Such strategies have been successfully employed to characterize the mixture effects of pesticides, dioxins or heavy metals [16,17,18].

1.3. Toxicological Features of Phycotoxins

Okadaic acid and dinophysistoxins were first reported as responsible for diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP), causing various symptoms in humans, such as diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pain or vomiting [19]. OA is a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and to a lesser extent of PP1 [20]. The group of pectenotoxins, especially PTX-2, its main representative, used to be associated with DSP, but they were further removed from the diarrhetic toxins due to the lack of evidence for their implication in gastro-intestinal symptoms [21]. Nevertheless, according to the regulation, OA, DTXs and PTX-2 are summed together for the established limit of 160 µg of OA equivalent per kg of shellfish. The major deleterious effect of PTX-2 involves actin depolarization leading to cytoskeleton disruption [22]. The group of yessotoxins has not been reported to affect humans, but in vivo studies showed potent toxicity in rodents with intra-peritoneal administration and specific cardiotoxic effects with oral administration [23,24]. Many studies also claimed in vitro toxicity [25,26]. The mechanism of action is unknown, but YTX has been shown to interfere with the autophagy pathway [27]. Although the group of azaspiracids displays symptoms similar to DSP [28], in vivo studies in mice showed more severe effects than OA toxins [29]. AZAs were found to act as potassium channel blockers [30]. No food intoxication related to the group of cyclic imines has been reported so far. Still, cyclic imines have been shown to exert neurological effects in mice [31], and most spirolides including SPX-1 were shown to selectively inhibit nicotinic acetylcholine receptors [32].

2. Exposure Data

2.1. Case Study of Multi-Phycotoxins Contamination in Shellfish

For this review, we analyzed the literature dealing with multi-phycotoxins contamination using the Scopus and PubMed databases. One thousand one hundred seventy one references were retrieved from the Scopus database using the keywords dinophysistoxin, pectenotoxin, spirolide and yessotoxin. In PubMed, a total of 686 references was retrieved using the same keywords. Only studies including shellfish contamination with the different toxin-groups were considered for analysis excluding contamination data with different analogues of the same group (Table 3). Among these papers, only some were suitable for a case study analysis so as to estimate toxin ratios when co-exposure occurred. The papers for which toxin ratios were not reported or could not be determined were considered as unsuitable. The grey literature was not included in the search strategy, neither were the data collected from the national monitoring programs.
A total of 79 publications dealing with the co-occurrence of toxins in shellfish was retrieved. The mixtures reported depend on the toxins that were investigated. Table 3 sums the information on the toxin mixtures that were investigated in these studies. Among these 79 publications, only 44 were suitable for analysis. Geographical repartition is depicted in Figure 2.
According to Table 3, many studies did not investigate the presence of spirolides in shellfish. For instance, no data from the U.S., Japan or Korea were available. In Europe also, among the 36 references, 23 did not investigate the presence of spirolides. Similarly, the presence of azaspiracids or yessotoxins was not investigated in any of the studies.
When establishing a toxin ratio A/B, A always corresponds to the toxin found in the highest concentration. For instance, in their paper, Pavela-Vrancic et al., 2002 [65], reported 0.133 and 0.090 µg/g hepato-pancreas (HP) of OA and 7-epi-PTX-2SA, respectively. Therefore, the ratio OA/7-epi-PTX-2SA equals 1.5 (= 0.133/0.090). When multiple analogues of the same toxin-group were reported, they were arithmetically summed without taking into account TEF values when available and named as equivalent to the corresponding toxin leader (OA, PTX-2, AZA-1, YTX and SPX-1). This choice was made to circumvent the fact that TEFs are not available for all of the toxins. Furthermore, one cannot be sure that the TEFs would still be valid for mixtures of toxins belonging to different groups. For instance, data for OA, DTX-1 and DTX-2 were summed and called OA equivalent (OA eq.). The complete and detailed analysis of each publication is supplied in the Supplementary Data Table S1.
From these analyses, it appears that OA was the most often recorded lipophilic toxin in mixtures, as well as the predominant toxin (amount) whatever the mixture. Binary and trinary mixtures were also reported and sometimes even more complex cocktails (up to five toxins). In order to give a global view of mixtures, data from all publications were compiled and gathered according to shellfish species and geographic localization (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6). Data in Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5 and Figure 6 depict only the ratios for binary combinations. For instance, a trinary mixture OA/YTX/SPX-1 (OA being the predominant toxin) is represented by two dots considering the predominant toxin: one dot for OA/YTX and the other for OA/SPX-1. For each binary combination, the toxin ratios and their median values were calculated and presented by dots and horizontal lines, respectively. Different patterns were used to depict data and are solely meant to ease the reading of the figures, without specific correspondences.
Figure 3 shows the data regarding the contamination of mussels. In Asia, six combinations were reported: OA/YTX with a median ratio of eight and all the other combinations (OA/PTX-2, YTX/OA, PTX-2/OA, PTX-2/GYM and GYM/PTX-2) with a median ratio between one and five. In America, ten combinations were reported: OA/YTX, OA/STX, YTX/OA, PTX-2/OA with similar median ratios of 3–4, OA/PTX-2 with a median ratio of 15, OA/AZA-1 and STX/OA with median ratios between 5 and 8, STX/AZA-1 with a ratio around 28, YTX/PTX-2 with a ratio of 60, and STX/YTX with a ratio around 90. In Europe, 18 combinations were reported: OA/SPX-1 and PTX-2/OA with similar median ratios of 16, OA/PTX-2 and YTX/PTX-2 with similar median ratios of 8–9, STX/OA with a median ratio of 33, OA/DA with a median ratio of 58, STX/DA with a median ratio of 200, SPX-1/PTX-2 with a ratio of 350 and all other combinations (OA/YTX, OA/STX, YTX/OA, PTX-2/SPX-1, OA/AZA-1, YTX/SPX-1, YTX/AZA-1, PTX-2/YTX, AZA-1/OA and AZA-1/YTX) with median ratios between 1 and 7. In Oceania, seven combinations were reported: YTX/PTX-2 and PTX-2/YTX with median ratios between 1 and 4, YTX/OA and PTX-2/OA with similar median ratios of 13–14, YTX/GYM with a median ratio of 21, YTX/DA with a median ratio of 60 and PTX-2/GYM with a median ratio around 750.
Figure 4 shows the data regarding the contamination of oysters. In Asia, six combinations were reported: OA/GYM, GYM/PTX-2 and SPX-1/PTX-2 with ratios between 1 and 4, PTX-2/OA with a median ratio of 16, PTX-2/GYM with a ratio of 125 and GYM/OA with a ratio around 200. In America, three combinations were reported: OA/YTX and PTX-2/OA with similar median ratios of 3–4 and OA/PTX-2 with a median ratio of eight. In Europe, 10 combinations were reported: OA/PTX-2 with a ratio around 16, STX/DA with a ratio of 21, STX/OA with a ratio of 60 and all the other combinations (OA/SPX-1, SPX-1/PTX-2, PTX-2/OA, YTX/OA, YTX/PTX-2, YTX/SPX-1 and YTX/AZA-1) with a median ratio between 2 and 6. In Oceania, only the mixture PTX-2/OA with a ratio of six was reported.
Figure 5 shows the data regarding the contamination of scallops. In Asia, five combinations were reported: PTX-2/YTX and YTX/PTX-2 with similar median ratios of 3, YTX/OA and OA/PTX-2 with similar median ratios of 5 and PTX-2/OA with a median ratio of 6. In America, only the mixture YTX/OA with a ratio around two was reported. In Europe, nine combinations were reported: OA/PTX-2 with a ratio of 29 and all the other combinations (OA/AZA-1, YTX/OA, OA/STX, OA/DA, STX/OA, STX/DA, DA/OA and DA/STX) with a median ratio between 2 and 6. In Oceania, only the mixture PTX-2/OA with a ratio around 30 was reported.
Figure 6 shows the data regarding the contamination of clams. In Asia, three combinations were reported: PTX-2/SPX-1 with a ratio of 3, STX/SPX-1 with a ratio of 34 and PTX-2/OA with a ratio of 225. In America, three combinations were reported: OA/YTX and PTX-2/OA with similar median ratios of three and OA/PTX-2 with a median ratio of 11. In Europe, two combinations were reported: OA/PTX-2 with a median ratio of 13 and OA/SPX-1 with a median ratio of 20. No mixtures were reported in Oceania in this particular matrix.
From our cases study, it appears that shellfish contamination by mixtures depends on the location. For instance, mixtures involving SPX-1 were often reported in Europe and in several shellfish types (mussel, oyster, clam, scallop and cockle), whereas it was scarcely described in Asia. In fact, in Japan and Korea, neither SPXs, nor AZAs were investigated. In Oceania, OA was found to be minor in mixtures, whereas it was predominant in mixtures reported in Europe and America. As for the ratios, Figure 7 shows box plots for the main reported combinations. Except in Asia, the median value ratio for the combination OA/PTX-2 is superior to 10 and higher in Europe compared to America. The median value ratio for the combination OA/YTX is around 3.5, except in Asia, where it yields six. For the combination OA/SPX-1, it reaches 11.5, but this combination is only reported in Europe. The combinations PTX-2/OA and YTX/OA share a similar value of the median ratios for a defined zone, but these ratios are continent-dependent (around 2 for America, 4–5 in Europe and 14 in Oceania). In Asia, median values ratios for PTX-2/OA and YTX/OA combinations are around 3–4. Besides, data also show that the distribution of the ratio values can be very wide for some combinations, with an upper extreme value more than 10-times higher than the median value for other combinations.
Regarding the other publications that describe multi-toxins contamination, but which were not selected for the case study, the information is reported in Table 3. In Africa, most of the data concern Morocco. The main mixtures featured OA, DTXs and AZAs. In America, the mixtures featured often OA or DTX-1 with PTX-2, YTX and traces of spirolides and AZAs. In Asia, OA was found predominantly in association with PTX-2. In Europe, the main mixtures featured OA, DTXs and PTX-2 or YTX.

2.2. Multi-Phycotoxins Contamination in Other Matrices

Throughout our literature analysis, we found some papers describing multi-phycotoxin contamination in matrices other than shellfish (Table 4). Most of the time, the matrix was gastropods. Compared to shellfish, new combinations were described such as OA/PnTXs, OA/ciguatoxin (CTX) or OA/DA/Brevetoxin 3 (PbTx-3).

2.3. Conclusions and Perspectives Regarding Multi-Phycotoxins Contamination in Shellfish

Multi-phycotoxins contamination of seafood has been detected worldwide. The variability of analogues and bivalve filtering species, as well as discrepancies between geographical areas make it very challenging to establish a proper picture of multi-toxin contamination. From our literature analysis, it appears that the most frequent mixtures imply OA in combination with PTX-2 or YTX. If OA/PTX-2 mixtures depicted a median value ratio superior to 10 in America and Europe, a lower median ratio (inferior to five) was observed for PTX-2/OA mixtures. On the contrary, OA/YTX and YTX/OA mixtures share a similar ratio-value (around 3–4). Finally, even if OA/SPX-1 was only reported in Europe with a median value ratio of 11.5, the occurrence of this mixture could be underestimated since SPX-1 was not often included in the monitoring of non-European countries. In our review, the focus was on lipophilic toxins, but mixtures of both lipophilic and hydrophilic toxins have been also observed in a few cases. As depicted in Table 3, many studies did not investigate the presence of toxins such as spirolides, azaspiracids and even sometimes yessotoxins. Consequently, some of the mixtures that were described may not be fully accurate. For the purposes of this work, the toxins belonging to the same group were expressed as the equivalent of the main analogue. Besides, all the mixtures featuring more than two compounds were converted into binary mixtures. Most of the data were obtained from shellfish sampling in a short period that does not reflect any seasonal variability. In order to improve toxin mixtures’ identification, it could be worth creating a network to analyze phycotoxin contamination with a shared database between institutes in charge of toxin monitoring. The better our knowledge on data exposure, the better we will be able to assess mixture effects. Indeed providing sufficient exposure data will enable selecting the most relevant mixtures (concentrations and ratios) before performing in vitro and in vivo assays, especially as in vivo investigations are toxin and money-consuming.

3. Toxicological Assessment

3.1. In Vivo Studies

So far, only a few studies have been conducted regarding possible mixture effects. Two of them consisted of one single dose treatment, whereas a third one mimicked a short-term repeated exposure. For all studies, the oral route was the way of administration. Table 5 summarizes the experimental conditions and the results.
In the study of Aasen et al. [118], female NMRI mice were given by gavage 1 or 5 mg/kg YTX, either alone or together with 200 mg/kg AZA-1. The results indicated no particular mixture effects in regards to clinical effects and pathological changes of internal organs. However, an increase in YTX levels was observed in stomach tissue suggesting higher YTX absorption in stomach when YTX was combined with AZA-1. After determination of the lethal doses of OA or AZA-1 by gavage to female NMRI mice, Aune et al. [119] examined the combined toxicity of OA and AZA-1 when given at both LD10 and LD50/LD10 doses. No combined effects on lethality when AZA-1 and OA were given together were reported. Similarly, the pathological effects along the gastro-intestinal tract were not increased. The absorption of OA and AZA-1 from the GI tract was very low for each toxin separately, and it was reduced when toxins were given together. The in vivo toxicity by repeated oral exposure to a combination of YTX and OA (1 mg YTX/kg and 0.185 mg OA/kg, daily for seven days) was investigated in female CD-1 mice [120]. The results indicated no mortality, signs of toxicity, diarrhea and hematological changes, neither with the toxins alone, nor when co-administration. Thus, the co-exposure of YTX and OA did not show any combined toxic effects in mice. Franchini et al., 2005 [121], also featured mixtures of toxins (OA/YTXs), but since the effects of YTXs alone were not investigated, it is not possible to conclude about any mixture effect.

3.2. In Vitro Studies

Data concerning in vitro effects of toxins mixtures are scarce. Nevertheless, it has been pinpointed that a combination of toxins can result in greater or lower toxicity compared to toxins alone. For example, Sala et al., 2009 [122], showed a synergistic effect on the protein expression of heat shock protein β-1 isoforms and superoxide dismutase in human breast adenocarcinoma cells after 24 h of co-treatment with OA and gambierol (50/50 nM). Nonetheless, the characterization of those interactions using a mathematical model is missing in order to fully conclude about a mixture effect.
Ferron et al., 2016 [123], used the combination index-isobologram equation developed by Chou and Talalay [124] in order to deeply characterize the interactions between binary mixtures of phycotoxins incubated with human intestinal cells (Table 6).
All kinds of mixture effects, i.e., synergism, additivity and antagonism, were depicted in this study. Although Rodriguez et al. [103] showed a greater toxicity in human neuroblastoma cells when OA was co-incubated with YTX or DTX-2, only an additive effect could be concluded from their results, as they did not take into account the additivity of the effects.

3.3. Conclusions and Perspectives Regarding Multi-Phycotoxins’ Toxicological Assessment

Except some modification in the absorption of toxins, no particular in vivo combined effects have been depicted so far. On the contrary, in vitro studies reported synergism, antagonism and additivity. Interestingly, the mixtures that failed to induce any in vivo combined effects were potent on cell lines. At least one of the most common mixtures OA/YTX showed a panel of responses from antagonism to synergism depending on the molar ratios. In vitro models are certainly the most suitable tools for screening combined effects as a large range of toxins concentrations and ratios can be investigated. Surprisingly, no in vivo studies featuring mixtures of OA/SPX-1 and OA/PTX-2 were conducted, although these two combinations were commonly found in contaminated seafood.

4. Conclusions

The purpose of this review was to summarize the knowledge about published data dealing with seafood contamination by mixtures of lipophilic phycotoxins. Since mixtures can modulate the toxicity, the combined effects are worth investigating to identify the mixtures with higher potencies that may affect human health. For this purpose, relevant combinations (toxin composition and ratios between the toxins) must be established before performing toxicological surveys. As stated before, giving a complete overview of the occurrence of phycotoxins mixtures is challenging. Nevertheless, this review points out which combinations were most reported in the literature and which ratios were displayed. Additional data on mixtures of lipophilic phycotoxins, both on exposure and on toxicity, are required to state if the current regulations are sufficient and relevant to protect consumers’ health.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/16/2/46/s1: Table S1: Calculation of ratio mixtures for each publication from the case study.

Acknowledgments

This work did not receive any financial support.

Author Contributions

Jimmy Alarcan, Ronel Biré, Valérie Fessard and Ludovic Le Hégarat conceived of and designed the review. Jimmy Alarcan analyzed the data. Jimmy Alarcan, Ronel Biré, Valérie Fessard and Ludovic Le Hégarat wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Visciano, P.; Schirone, M.; Berti, M.; Milandri, A.; Tofalo, R.; Suzzi, G. Marine biotoxins: Occurrence, toxicity, regulatory limits and reference methods. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cravedi, J.-P.; Di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; Farmer, P.; et al. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the European Commission on Marine Biotoxins in Shellfish—Summary on regulated marine biotoxins. EFSA J. 2009, 1306, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cravedi, J.-P.; Di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; Farmer, P.; et al. Scientific Opinion on marine biotoxins in shellfish—Cyclic imines (spirolides, gymnodimines, pinnatoxins and pteriatoxins). EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lee, J.-S.; Igarashi, T.; Fraga, S.; Dahl, E.; Hovgaard, P.; Yasumoto, T. Determination of diarrhetic shellfish toxins in various dinoflagellate species. J. Appl. Phycol. 1989, 1, 147–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. An, T.; Winshell, J.; Scorzetti, G.; Fell, J.W.; Rein, K.S. Identification of okadaic acid production in the marine dinoflagellate Prorocentrum rhathymum from Florida Bay. Toxicon 2010, 55, 653–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Draisci, R.; Lucentini, L.; Giannetti, L.; Boria, P.; Poletti, R. First report of pectenotoxin-2 (PTX-2) in algae (Dinophysis fortii) related to seafood poisoning in Europe. Toxicon 1996, 34, 923–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Suzuki, T.; Beuzenberg, V.; Mackenzie, L.; Quilliam, M.A. Liquid chromatographymass spectrometry of spiroketal stereoisomers of pectenotoxins and the analysis of novel pectenotoxin isomers in the toxic dinoflagellate Dinophysis acuta from New Zealand. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 992, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. MacKenzie, L.; Beuzenberg, V.; Holland, P.; McNabb, P.; Suzuki, T.; Selwood, A. Pectenotoxin and okadaic acid-based toxin profiles in Dinophysis acuta and Dinophysis acuminata from New Zealand. Harmful Algae 2005, 4, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Luisa Fernández, M.; Reguera, B.; González-Gil, S.; Míguez, A. Pectenotoxin-2 in single-cell isolates of Dinophysis caudata and Dinophysis acuta from the Galician Rías (NW Spain). Toxicon 2006, 48, 477–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Satake, M.; Ichimura, T.; Sekiguchi, K.; Yoshimatsu, S.; Oshima, Y. Confirmation of yessotoxin and 45,46,47-trinoryessotoxin production by Protoceratium reticulatum collected in Japan. Nat. Toxins 1999, 7, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pistocchi, R.; Guerrini, F.; Pezzolesi, L.; Riccardi, M.; Vanucci, S.; Ciminiello, P.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Forino, M.; Fattorusso, E.; Tartaglione, L.; et al. Toxin levels and profiles in microalgae from the north-Western Adriatic Sea—15 years of studies on cultured species. Mar. Drugs 2012, 10, 140–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tillmann, U.; Elbrächter, M.; Krock, B.; John, U.; Cembella, A. Azadinium spinosum gen. et sp. nov. (Dinophyceae) identified as a primary producer of azaspiracid toxins. Eur. J. Phycol. 2009, 44, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cembella, A.D.; Lewis, N.I.; Quilliam, M.A. The marine dinoflagellate Alexandriumostenfeldii (Dinophyceae) as the causative organism of spirolide shellfish toxins. Phycologia 2000, 39, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Touzet, N.; Franco, J.M.; Raine, R. Morphogenetic diversity and biotoxin composition of Alexandrium (dinophyceae) in Irish coastal waters. Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 782–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Leblanc, J.-C.; Hougaard-Bennekou, S.; Dorne, J.-L.; Binaglia, M.; Castoldi, A.; Chiusolo, A.; Cortinas-Abrahantes, J.; Heraud, F.; et al. European Food Safety Authority, 2013. International Frameworks Dealing with Human Risk Assessment of Combined Exposure to Multiple Chemicals. EFSA J. 2013, 11, 3313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Takakura, N.; Sanders, P.; Fessard, V.; Le Hégarat, L. In vitro combined cytotoxic effects of pesticide cocktails simultaneously found in the French diet. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 52, 153–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Walker, N.J.; Crockett, P.W.; Nyska, A.; Brix, A.E.; Jokinen, M.P.; Sells, D.M.; Hailey, J.R.; Easterling, M.; Haseman, J.K.; Yin, M.; et al. Dose-additive carcinogenicity of a defined mixture of “dioxin-like compounds”. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 113, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, Y.X.; Xu, J.; Zhang, X.; Xu, S.; Du, Q. Combined toxic effects of heavy metals and antibiotics on a pseudomonas fluorescens strain zy2 isolated from swine wastewater. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 2839–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Valdiglesias, V.; Prego-Faraldo, M.V.; Pásaro, E.; Méndez, J.; Laffon, B. Okadaic acid: More than a diarrheic toxin. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 4328–4349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Takai, A.; Murata, M.; Torigoe, K.; Isobe, M.; Mieskes, G.; Yasumoto, T. Inhibitory effect of okadaic acid derivatives on protein phosphatases. A study on structure-affinity relationship. Biochem. J. 1992, 284 Pt 2, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ito, E.; Suzuki, T.; Oshima, Y.; Yasumoto, T. Studies of diarrhetic activity on pectenotoxin-6 in the mouse and rat. Toxicon 2008, 51, 707–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Allingham, J.S.; Miles, C.O.; Rayment, I. A Structural Basis for Regulation of Actin Polymerization by Pectenotoxins. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 371, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Aune, T.; Aasen, J.A.B.; Miles, C.O.; Larsen, S. Effect of mouse strain and gender on LD50 of yessotoxin. Toxicon 2008, 52, 535–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tubaro, A.; Giangaspero, A.; Ardizzone, M.; Soranzo, M.R.; Vita, F.; Yasumoto, T.; Maucher, J.M.; Ramsdell, J.S.; Sosa, S. Ultrastructural damage to heart tissue from repeated oral exposure to yessotoxin resolves in 3 months. Toxicon 2008, 51, 1225–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Korsnes, M.S. Yessotoxin as a Tool to Study Induction of Multiple Cell Death Pathways. Toxins 2012, 4, 568–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tubaro, A.; Dell’Ovo, V.; Sosa, S.; Florio, C. Yessotoxins: A toxicological overview. Toxicon 2010, 56, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fernández-Araujo, A.; Alfonso, A.; Vieytes, M.R.; Botana, L.M. Key role of phosphodiesterase 4A (PDE4A) in autophagy triggered by yessotoxin. Toxicology 2015, 329, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. McMahon, T.; Silke, J. West coast of Ireland; winter toxicity of unknown aetiology in mussels. In Harmfull Algae News; The Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Paris, France, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kilcoyne, J.; Jauffrais, T.; Twiner, M.J.; Doucette, G.J.; Aasen-Bunes, J.A.; Sosa, S.; Krock, B.; Séhet, V.; Nulty, C.; Salas, R.; et al. Azaspiracids—Toxicological Evaluation, Test Methods and Identification of the Source Organism (ASTOX II). Available online: http://oar.marine.ie/handle/10793/970 (accessed on 19 February 2017).
  30. Twiner, M.J.; Doucette, G.J.; Rasky, A.; Huang, X.-P.; Roth, B.L.; Sanguinetti, M.C. Marine Algal Toxin Azaspiracid Is an Open-State Blocker of hERG Potassium Channels. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2012, 25, 1975–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Munday, R.; Quilliam, M.A.; LeBlanc, P.; Lewis, N.; Gallant, P.; Sperker, S.A.; Ewart, H.S.; MacKinnon, S.L. Investigations into the Toxicology of Spirolides, a Group of Marine Phycotoxins. Toxins 2011, 4, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Molgó, J.; Marchot, P.; Aráoz, R.; Benoit, E.; Iorga, B.I.; Zakarian, A.; Taylor, P.; Bourne, Y.; Servent, D. Cyclic imine toxins from dinoflagellates: A growing family of potent antagonists of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. J. Neurochem. 2017, 142 (Suppl. S2), 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Taleb, H.; Vale, P.; Amanhir, R.; Benhadouch, A.; Sagou, R.; Chafik, A. First detection of azaspiracids in mussels in North West Africa. J. Shellfish Res. 2006, 25, 1067–1070. [Google Scholar]
  34. Elgarch, A.; Vale, P.; Rifai, S.; Fassouane, A. Detection of Diarrheic Shellfish Poisoning and Azaspiracids Toxins in Moroccan Mussels: Comparison of LC-MS Method with the Commercial Immunoassay Kit. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ben Haddouch, A.; Amanhi, R.; Amzil, Z.; Taleb, H.; Rovillon, G.-A.; Adly, F.; Loutfi, M. Lipophilic Toxin Profile in Mytilus galloprovincialis from the North Atlantic Coast of Morocco: LC-MS/MS and Mouse Bioassay Analyses. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2017, 6, 186. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pitcher, G.C.; Krock, B.; Cembella, A.D. Accumulation of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins in the oyster Crassostrea gigas and the mussel Choromytilus meridionalis in the southern Benguela ecosystem. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 2011, 33, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Turner, A.D.; Goya, A.B. Occurrence and profiles of lipophilic toxins in shellfish harvested from Argentina. Toxicon 2015, 102, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. McCarron, P.; Wright, E.; Quilliam, M.A. Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry of Domoic Acid and Lipophilic Shellfish Toxins with Selected Reaction Monitoring and Optional Confirmation by Library Searching of Product Ion Spectra. J. AOAC Int. 2014, 97, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Álvarez, G.; Uribe, E.; Ávalos, P.; Mariño, C.; Blanco, J. First identification of azaspiracid and spirolides in Mesodesma donacium and Mulinia edulis from Northern Chile. Toxicon 2010, 55, 638–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Garcia, C.; Rodriguez-Unda, N.; Contreras, C.; Barriga, A.; Lagos, N. Lipophilic toxin profiles detected in farmed and benthic mussels populations from the most relevant production zones in Southern Chile. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2012, 29, 1011–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zamorano, R.; Marín, M.; Cabrera, F.; Figueroa, D.; Contreras, C.; Barriga, A.; Lagos, N.; García, C. Determination of the variability of both hydrophilic and lipophilic toxins in endemic wild bivalves and carnivorous gastropods from the Southern part of Chile. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2013, 30, 1660–1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Alves-de-Souza, C.; Varela, D.; Contreras, C.; de La Iglesia, P.; Fernández, P.; Hipp, B.; Hernández, C.; Riobó, P.; Reguera, B.; Franco, J.M.; et al. Seasonal variability of Dinophysis spp. and Protoceratium reticulatum associated to lipophilic shellfish toxins in a strongly stratified Chilean fjord. Deep-Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2014, 101, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. García, C.; Pérez, F.; Contreras, C.; Figueroa, D.; Barriga, A.; López-Rivera, A.; Araneda, O.F.; Contreras, H.R. Saxitoxins and okadaic acid group: Accumulation and distribution in invertebrate marine vectors from Southern Chile. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2015, 32, 984–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. García, C.; Oyaneder-Terrazas, J.; Contreras, C.; del Campo, M.; Torres, R.; Contreras, H.R. Determination of the toxic variability of lipophilic biotoxins in marine bivalve and gastropod tissues treated with an industrial canning process. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2016, 33, 1711–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. García-Mendoza, E.; Sánchez-Bravo, Y.A.; Turner, A.; Blanco, J.; O’Neil, A.; Mancera-Flores, J.; Pérez-Brunius, P.; Rivas, D.; Almazán-Becerril, A.; Peña-Manjarrez, J.L. Lipophilic toxins in cultivated mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from Baja California, Mexico. Toxicon 2014, 90, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Trainer, V.; Moore, L.; Bill, B.; Adams, N.; Harrington, N.; Borchert, J.; da Silva, D.A.; Eberhart, B.T. Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxins and Other Lipophilic Toxins of Human Health Concern in Washington State. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 1815–1835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Hattenrath-Lehmann, T.K.; Marcoval, M.A.; Berry, D.L.; Fire, S.; Wang, Z.; Morton, S.L.; Gobler, C.J. The emergence of Dinophysis acuminata blooms and DSP toxins in shellfish in New York waters. Harmful Algae 2013, 26, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Eberhart, B.-T.; Moore, L.; Harrington, N.; Adams, N.; Borchert, J.; Trainer, V. Screening Tests for the Rapid Detection of Diarrhetic Shellfish Toxins in Washington State. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 3718–3734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Wu, J.-Y.; Zheng, L.; Wang, J.-H. Contamination of shellfish from Shanghai seafood markets with paralytic shellfish poisoning and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins determined by mouse bioassay and HPLC. Food Addit. Contam. 2005, 22, 647–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Liu, R.; Liang, Y.; Wu, X.; Xu, D.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L. First report on the detection of pectenotoxin groups in Chinese shellfish by LC–MS/MS. Toxicon 2011, 57, 1000–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Li, A.; Ma, J.; Cao, J.; McCarron, P. Toxins in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) associated with diarrhetic shellfish poisoning episodes in China. Toxicon 2012, 60, 420–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Guo, M.; Tan, Z.; Wu, H.; Li, Z.; Zhai, Y. Simultaneous determination of okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin, pectenotoxin and yessotoxin in shellfish by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chin. J. Chromatogr. 2012, 30, 256–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, X.; Cai, X. Isolation and identification of shellfish toxins from contaminated blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) from the East China Sea. J. Hyg. Res. 2012, 41, 819–823. [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, A.; Sun, G.; Qiu, J.; Fan, L. Lipophilic shellfish toxins in Dinophysis caudata picked cells and in shellfish from the East China Sea. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 3116–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fang, L.; Yao, X.; Wang, L.; Li, J. Solid-Phase Extraction-Based Ultra-Sensitive Detection of Four Lipophilic Marine Biotoxins in Bivalves by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2015, 53, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, H.; Guo, M.; Tan, Z.; Cheng, H.; Li, Z.; Zhai, Y. Liquid chromatography quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometry for multiclass screening and identification of lipophilic marine biotoxins in bivalve mollusks. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1358, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, X.-Z.; Cheng, Y.; Li, N.; Wen, H.-M.; Liu, R.; Shan, C.-X.; Chai, C.; Wu, H. Occurrence and Seasonal Variations of Lipophilic Marine Toxins in Commercial Clam Species along the Coast of Jiangsu, China. Toxins 2016, 8, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Wu, H.; Yao, J.; Guo, M.; Tan, Z.; Zhou, D.; Zhai, Y. Distribution of Marine Lipophilic Toxins in Shellfish Products Collected from the Chinese Market. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 4281–4295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Li, A.; Chen, H.; Qiu, J.; Lin, H.; Gu, H. Determination of multiple toxins in whelk and clam samples collected from the Chukchi and Bering seas. Toxicon 2016, 109, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Jiang, T.; Liu, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Tan, Z.; Wu, H.; Jiang, T.; Lu, S. Occurrence of marine algal toxins in oyster and phytoplankton samples in Daya Bay, South China Sea. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 80–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Suzuki, T.; Yasumoto, T. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of the diarrhetic shellfish-poisoning toxins okadaic acid, dinophysistoxin-1 and pectenotoxin-6 in bivalves. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 874, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ito, S.; Tsukada, K. Matrix effect and correction by standard addition in quantitative liquid chromatographic–mass spectrometric analysis of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 943, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Suzuki, T.; Jin, T.; Shirota, Y.; Mitsuya, T.; Okumura, Y.; Kamiyama, T. Quantification of lipophilic toxins associated with diarrhetic shellfish poisoning in Japanese bivalves by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry and comparison with mouse bioassay. Fish Sci. 2005, 71, 1370–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hashimoto, S.; Suzuki, T.; Shirota, Y.; Honma, M.; Itabashi, Y.; Chyounan, T.; Kamiyama, T. Lipophilic toxin profiles associated with diarrhetic shellfish poisoning in scallops, Patinopecten yessoensis, collected in Hokkaido and comparison of the quantitative results between LC/MS and mouse bioassay. J. Food Hyg. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 47, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Suzuki, T.; Quilliam, M.A. LC-MS/MS analysis of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins, okadaic acid and dinophysistoxin analogues, and other lipophilic toxins. Anal. Sci. 2011, 27, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Matsushima, R.; Uchida, H.; Nagai, S.; Watanabe, R.; Kamio, M.; Nagai, H.; Kaneniwa, M.; Suzuki, T. Assimilation, Accumulation, and Metabolism of Dinophysistoxins (DTXs) and Pectenotoxins (PTXs) in the Several Tissues of Japanese Scallop Patinopecten yessoensis. Toxins 2015, 7, 5141–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.J.; Suzuki, T.; Kang, Y.S.; Ho Kim, P.; Song, K.C.; Lee, T.S. Seasonal Variability of Lipophilic Shellfish Toxins in Bivalves and Waters, and Abundance of Dinophysis spp. in Jinhae Bay, Korea. J. Shellfish Res. 2010, 29, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lee, K.J.; Mok, J.S.; Song, K.C.; Yu, H.; Jung, J.H.; Kim, J.H. Geographical and Annual Variation in Lipophilic Shellfish Toxins from Oysters and Mussels along the South Coast of Korea. J Food Prot. 2011, 74, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Vershinin, A.; Moruchkov, A.; Morton, S.L.; Leighfield, T.A.; Quilliam, M.A.; Ramsdell, J.S. Phytoplankton composition of the Kandalaksha Gulf, Russian White Sea: Dinophysis and lipophilic toxins in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis). Harmful Algae 2006, 5, 558–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Morton, S.L.; Vershinin, A.; Smith, L.L.; Leighfield, T.A.; Pankov, S.; Quilliam, M.A. Seasonality of Dinophysis spp. and Prorocentrum lima in Black Sea phytoplankton and associated shellfish toxicity. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Orellana, G.; Van Meulebroek, L.; De Rijcke, M.; Janssen, C.R.; Vanhaecke, L. High resolution mass spectrometry-based screening reveals lipophilic toxins in multiple trophic levels from the North Sea. Harmful Algae 2017, 64, 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Pavela-Vrančič, M.; Meštrović, V.; Marasović, I.; Gillman, M.; Furey, A.; James, K.K. The occurrence of 7-epi-pectenotoxin-2 seco acid in the coastal waters of the central Adriatic (Kaštela Bay). Toxicon 2001, 39, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Pavela-Vrančič, M.; Meštrović, V.; Marasović, I.; Gillman, M.; Furey, A.; James, K.J. DSP toxin profile in the coastal waters of the central Adriatic Sea. Toxicon 2002, 40, 1601–1607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pavela-Vrančić, M.; Ujević, I.; Ninčević Gladan, Ž.; Furey, A. Accumulation of Phycotoxins in the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Central Adriatic Sea. Croat. Chem. Acta 2006, 79, 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  75. Ninčević-Gladan, Ž.; Skejić, S.; Bužančić, M.; Marasović, I.; Arapov, J.; Ujević, I.; Bojanić, N.; Grbec, B.; Kušpilić, G.; Vidjak, O. Seasonal Variability in Dinophysis spp. Abundances and Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning Outbreaks Along the Eastern Adriatic Coast. Bot. Mar. 2008, 51, 449–463. Available online: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bot.2008.51.issue-6/bot.2008.067/bot.2008.067.xml (accesssed on 14 September 2017).
  76. Gladan, Ž.N.; Ujević, I.; Milandri, A.; Marasović, I.; Ceredi, A.; Pigozzi, S.; Arapov, J.; Skejić, S.; Orhanović, S.; Isajlović, I. Is Yessotoxin the Main Phycotoxin in Croatian Waters? Mar. Drugs 2010, 8, 460–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Čustović, S.; Orhanović, S.; Skejić, S.; Pavela-Vrančič, M. The predominant occurrence of YTX in the Eastern-mid Adriatic sea (Vranjic basin, Croatia). Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2014, 23, 3453–3458. [Google Scholar]
  78. Amzil, Z.; Sibat, M.; Royer, F.; Masson, N.; Abadie, E. Report on the first detection of pectenotoxin-2, spirolide-A and their derivatives in French shellfish. Mar. Drugs 2007, 5, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Amzil, Z.; Sibat, M.; Royer, F.; Savar, V. First report on azaspiracid and yessotoxin groups detection in French shellfish. Toxicon 2008, 52, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Picot, C.; Roudot, A.-C. A Practical Example of Risk Assessment—Risk Assessment to Phycotoxins in a Recreational Shellfish Harvester’s Subpopulation. In Novel Approaches and Their Applications in Risk Assessment; InTech: Lexington, KY, USA, 2012; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/download/pdf/35499 (accesssed on 2 August 2017).
  81. Puente, P.F.; Sáez, M.J.F.; Hamilton, B.; Lehane, M.; Ramstad, H.; Furey, A.; James, K.J. Rapid determination of polyether marine toxins using liquid chromatography-multiple tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1056, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fux, E.; Bire, R.; Hess, P. Comparative accumulation and composition of lipophilic marine biotoxins in passive samplers and in mussels (M. edulis) on the West Coast of Ireland. Harmful Algae 2009, 8, 523–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Campbell, K.; McNamee, S.E.; Huet, A.C.; Delahaut, P.; Vilarino, N.; Botana, L.M.; Poli, M.; Elliott, C.T. Evolving to the optoelectronic mouse for phycotoxin analysis in shellfish. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 6867–6881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ciminiello, P.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Magno, S.; Poletti, R.; Satake, M.; Viviani, R.; Yasumoto, T. Yessotoxin in mussels of the northern Adriatic Sea. Toxicon 1997, 35, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Draisci, R.; Ferretti, E.; Palleschi, L.; Marchiafava, C.; Poletti, R.; Milandri, A.; Ceredi, A.; Pompei, M. High levels of yessotoxin in mussels and presence of yessotoxin and homoyessotoxin in dinoflagellates of the Adriatic Sea. Toxicon 1999, 37, 1187–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Draisci, R.; Palleschi, L.; Giannetti, L.; Lucentini, L.; James, K.J.; Bishop, A.G.; Satake, M.; Yasumoto, T. New approach to the direct detection of known and new diarrhoeic shellfish toxins in mussels and phytoplankton by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 847, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ciminiello, P.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Fattorusso, E.; Forino, M.; Tartaglione, L.; Boschetti, L.; Rubini, S.; Cangini, M.; Pigozzi, S.; Poletti, R. Complex toxin profile of Mytilus galloprovincialis from the Adriatic sea revealed by LC-MS. Toxicon 2010, 55, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Nincevic Gladan, Z.; Ujevic, I.; Milandri, A.; Marasovic, I.; Ceredi, A.; Pigozzi, S.; Arapov, J.; Skejic, S. Lipophilic Toxin Profile in Mytilus galloprovincialis during Episodes of Diarrhetic Shellfish Poisoning (DSP) in the N.E. Adriatic Sea in 2006. Molecules 2011, 16, 888–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Buratti, S.; Franzellitti, S.; Poletti, R.; Ceredi, A.; Montanari, G.; Capuzzo, A.; Fabbri, E. Bioaccumulation of algal toxins and changes in physiological parameters in Mediterranean mussels from the North Adriatic Sea (Italy): Effects of Algal Toxins on Marine Mussels. Environ. Toxicol. 2013, 28, 451–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Bacchiocchi, S.; Siracusa, M.; Ruzzi, A.; Gorbi, S.; Ercolessi, M.; Cosentino, M.A.; Ammazzalorso, P.; Orletti, R. Two-year study of lipophilic marine toxin profile in mussels of the North-central Adriatic Sea: First report of azaspiracids in Mediterranean seafood. Toxicon 2015, 108, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Gerssen, A.; van Olst, E.H.W.; Mulder, P.P.J.; de Boer, J. In-house validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method for the analysis of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish using matrix-matched calibration. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 397, 3079–3088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Van den Top, H.J.; Gerssen, A.; McCarron, P.; van Egmond, H.P. Quantitative determination of marine lipophilic toxins in mussels, oysters and cockles using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: Inter-laboratory validation study. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2011, 28, 1745–1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Gerssen, A.; Mulder, P.P.J.; de Boer, J. Screening of lipophilic marine toxins in shellfish and algae: Development of a library using liquid chromatography coupled to orbitrap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 685, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lee, J.S.; Tangen, K.; Yasumoto, T.; Dahl, E.; Hovgaard, P.; Yasumoto, T. Diarrhetic shellfish toxins in norwegian mussels. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 1988, 54, 1953–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ramstad, H.; Hovgaard, P.; Yasumoto, T.; Larsen, S.; Aune, T. Monthly variations in diarrhetic toxins and yessotoxin in shellfish from coast to the inner part of the Sognefjord, Norway. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1035–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Torgersen, T.; Sandvik, M.; Lundve, B.; Lindegarth, S. Profiles and levels of fatty acid esters of okadaic acid group toxins and pectenotoxins during toxin depuration. Part II: Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) and flat oyster (Ostrea edulis). Toxicon 2008, 52, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Vale, P. Differential dynamics of dinophysistoxins and pectenotoxins between blue mussel and common cockle: A phenomenon originating from the complex toxin profile of Dinophysis acuta. Toxicon 2004, 44, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Vale, P. Differential dynamics of dinophysistoxins and pectenotoxins, part II: Offshore bivalve species. Toxicon 2006, 47, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Gago-Martinez, A.; Rodriguez-Vazquez, J.A.; Thibault, P.; Quilliam, M.A. Simultaneous occurrence of diarrhetic and paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins in Spanish mussels in 1993. Nat. Toxins 1996, 4, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. González, A.V.; Rodríguez-Velasco, M.L.; Ben-Gigirey, B.; Botana, L.M. First evidence of spirolides in Spanish shellfish. Toxicon 2006, 48, 1068–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Villar-González, A.; Rodríguez-Velasco, M.L.; Ben-Gigirey, B.; Botana, L.M. Lipophilic toxin profile in Galicia (Spain): 2005 toxic episode. Toxicon 2007, 49, 1129–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. De la Iglesia, P.; Gago-Martínez, A. Determination of yessotoxins and pectenotoxins in shellfish by capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2009, 26, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rodríguez, L.; González, V.; Martínez, A.; Paz, B.; Lago, J.; Cordeiro, V.; Blanco, L.; Vieites, J.M.; Cabado, A.G. Occurrence of Lipophilic Marine Toxins in Shellfish from Galicia (NW of Spain) and Synergies among Them. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1666–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. García-Altares, M.; Casanova, A.; Fernández-Tejedor, M.; Diogène, J.; de la Iglesia, P. Bloom of Dinophysis spp. dominated by D. sacculus and its related diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) outbreak in Alfacs Bay (Catalonia, NW Mediterranean Sea): Identification of DSP toxins in phytoplankton, shellfish and passive samplers. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016, 6, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Stobo, L.A.; Lacaze, J.-P.C.; Scott, A.C.; Gallacher, S.; Smith, E.A.; Quilliam, M.A. Liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry—Detection of lipophilic shellfish toxins. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 1371–1382. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  106. Stobo, L.A.; Lacaze, J.-P.C.L.; Scott, A.C.; Petrie, J.; Turrell, E.A. Surveillance of algal toxins in shellfish from Scottish waters. Toxicon 2008, 51, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Madigan, T.L.; Lee, K.G.; Padula, D.J.; McNabb, P.; Pointon, A.M. Diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) toxins in South Australian shellfish. Harmful Algae 2006, 5, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Takahashi, E.; Yu, Q.; Eaglesham, G.; Connell, D.W.; McBroom, J.; Costanzo, S.; Shaw, G.R. Occurrence and seasonal variations of algal toxins in water, phytoplankton and shellfish from North Stradbroke Island, Queensland, Australia. Mar. Environ. Res. 2007, 64, 429–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ajani, P.; Harwood, D.; Murray, S. Recent Trends in Marine Phycotoxins from Australian Coastal Waters. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. MacKenzie, L.; Holland, P.; McNabb, P.; Beuzenberg, V.; Selwood, A.; Suzuki, T. Complex toxin profiles in phytoplankton and Greenshell mussels (Perna canaliculus), revealed by LC-MS/MS analysis. Toxicon 2002, 40, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. McNabb, P.; Selwood, A.I.; Holland, P.T. Multiresidue method for determination of algal toxins in shellfish: Single-laboratory validation and interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 2005, 88, 761–772. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Ganal, C.A.; Asahina, A.Y.; Hokama, Y.; Miyahara, J.T. Characterization of marine toxin(s) in Myripristis sp. by immunological, mouse toxicity, and guinea pig assays. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 1993, 7, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Fire, S.E.; Wang, Z.; Byrd, M.; Whitehead, H.R.; Paternoster, J.; Morton, S.L. Co-occurrence of multiple classes of harmful algal toxins in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) stranding during an unusual mortality event in Texas, USA. Harmful Algae 2011, 10, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wang, Z.; Broadwater, M.H.; Ramsdell, J.S. Analysis of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning toxins and pectenotoxin-2 in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1416, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kim, J.H.; Lee, K.J.; Suzuki, T.; Mok, J.S.; Park, K.; Kwon, J.Y.; Son, K.T.; Song, K.C. First report of contamination of the abalone Haliotis discus hannai by okadaic acid and yessotoxin. J. Shellfish Res. 2012, 31, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Lee, K.J.; Mok, J.S.; Song, K.C.; Yu, H.; Lee, D.S.; Jung, J.H.; Kim, J.H. First Detection and Seasonal Variation of Lipophilic Toxins Okadaic Acid, Dinophysistoxin-1, and Yessotoxin in Korean Gastropods. J. Food Prot. 2012, 75, 2000–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. MacKenzie, L.A.; Selwood, A.I.; McNabb, P.; Rhodes, L. Benthic dinoflagellate toxins in two warm-temperate estuaries: Rangaunu and Parengarenga Harbours, Northland, New Zealand. Harmful Algae 2011, 10, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Aasen, J.A.B.; Espenes, A.; Miles, C.O.; Samdal, I.A.; Hess, P.; Aune, T. Combined oral toxicity of azaspiracid-1 and yessotoxin in female NMRI mice. Toxicon 2011, 57, 909–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Aune, T.; Espenes, A.; Aasen, J.A.B.; Quilliam, M.A.; Hess, P.; Larsen, S. Study of possible combined toxic effects of azaspiracid-1 and okadaic acid in mice via the oral route. Toxicon 2012, 60, 895–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Sosa, S.; Ardizzone, M.; Beltramo, D.; Vita, F.; Dell’Ovo, V.; Barreras, A.; Yasumoto, T.; Tubaro, A. Repeated oral co-exposure to yessotoxin and okadaic acid: A short term toxicity study in mice. Toxicon 2013, 76, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Franchini, A.; Marchesini, E.; Poletti, R.; Ottaviania, E. Swiss mice CD1 fed on mussels contaminated by okadaic acid and yessotoxins: Effects on thymus and spleen. Eur. J. Histochem. 2005, 49, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  122. Sala, G.L.; Ronzitti, G.; Sasaki, M.; Fuwa, H.; Yasumoto, T.; Bigiani, A.; Rossini, G.P. Proteomic Analysis Reveals Multiple Patterns of Response in Cells Exposed to a Toxin Mixture. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 1077–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ferron, P.-J.; Dumazeau, K.; Beaulieu, J.-F.; Le Hégarat, L.; Fessard, V. Combined Effects of Lipophilic Phycotoxins (Okadaic Acid, Azapsiracid-1 and Yessotoxin) on Human Intestinal Cells Models. Toxins 2016, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Chou, T.-C. Theoretical Basis, Experimental Design, and Computerized Simulation of Synergism and Antagonism in Drug Combination Studies. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 621–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g001 550
Figure 1. Methodology tree for mixture effect classification established according to the EFSA report [15].
Figure 1. Methodology tree for mixture effect classification established according to the EFSA report [15].
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g001
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g002 550
Figure 2. Case study of toxin-mixture contaminations. Countries where contaminations were reported are shown as [x]. A total of 44 publications considered as suitable was analyzed.
Figure 2. Case study of toxin-mixture contaminations. Countries where contaminations were reported are shown as [x]. A total of 44 publications considered as suitable was analyzed.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g002
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g003a 550Marinedrugs 16 00046 g003b 550
Figure 3. Mixture ratios found in mussels based on the analysis of 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Figure 3. Mixture ratios found in mussels based on the analysis of 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g003aMarinedrugs 16 00046 g003b
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g004a 550Marinedrugs 16 00046 g004b 550
Figure 4. Mixture ratios found in oysters based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Figure 4. Mixture ratios found in oysters based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g004aMarinedrugs 16 00046 g004b
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g005a 550Marinedrugs 16 00046 g005b 550
Figure 5. Mixture ratios found in scallops based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Figure 5. Mixture ratios found in scallops based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America, (c) for Europe and (d) for Oceania.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g005aMarinedrugs 16 00046 g005b
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g006a 550Marinedrugs 16 00046 g006b 550
Figure 6. Mixture ratios found in clams based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America and (c) for Europe.
Figure 6. Mixture ratios found in clams based on the analysis of the 44 publications. (a) Data for Asia, (b) for America and (c) for Europe.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g006aMarinedrugs 16 00046 g006b
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g007 550
Figure 7. Box and whisker plots of phycotoxins ratios calculated for the main reported mixtures according to the location. The minimum, the lower quartile, the median, the upper quartile and the maximum are shown in the box and whisker plots.
Figure 7. Box and whisker plots of phycotoxins ratios calculated for the main reported mixtures according to the location. The minimum, the lower quartile, the median, the upper quartile and the maximum are shown in the box and whisker plots.
Marinedrugs 16 00046 g007
Table
Table 1. Current EU limits, exposure levels resulting from consumption of shellfish on the EU market and acute reference doses (ARfDs) set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (taken from EFSA Report #1306, [2]).
Table 1. Current EU limits, exposure levels resulting from consumption of shellfish on the EU market and acute reference doses (ARfDs) set by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (taken from EFSA Report #1306, [2]).
Toxin GroupCurrent EU Limits in Shellfish Meat Exposure by Eating a 400-g Portion at the EU LimitARfD
OA and analogues160 µg OA eq./kg SM64 µg OA eq./person0.3 µg OA eq./kg b.w.
AZA160 µg AZA eq./kg SM64 µg AZA1 eq./person0.2 µg AZA1 eq./kg b.w.
PTX160 µg OA eq./kg SM64 µg PTX2 eq./person0.8 µg PTX2 eq./kg b.w.
YTX1 mg YTX eq./kg SM400 µg YTX eq./person25 µg YTX eq./kg b.w.
STX800 µg PSP/kg SM320 µg STX eq./person0.5 µg STX eq./kg b.w.
DA20 mg DA/kg SM8 mg DA/person30 µg DA/kg b.w.
SM: shellfish meat; eq.: equivalents; b.w.: body weight; ARfD: acute reference dose; PSP: paralytic shellfish poison; EU: European Union; OA: okadaic acid; PTX: pectenotoxin; YTX: yessotoxin; STX: saxitoxin; DA: domoic acid; AZA: azaspiracid.
Table
Table 2. Global overview of the key phytoplanktonic species producing the main lipophilic phycotoxins. SPX, spirolide.
Table 2. Global overview of the key phytoplanktonic species producing the main lipophilic phycotoxins. SPX, spirolide.
PhycotoxinsSpeciesRef.
OA/DTXsDinophysis mitra, Dinophysis tripos, Prorocentrum lima, Prorocentrum concavum[4,5]
OA/DTXs and PTXsDinophysis fortii, Dinophysis acuta, Dinophysis acuminata, Dinophysis norvegica, Dinophysis rotundata[4,6,7,8,9]
YTXsProtoceratium reticulatum, Lingulodinium polyedrum, Gonyaulax spinifera[10,11]
AZAsAzadinium spinosum[12]
SPXsAlexandrium ostenfeldii, Alexandrium peruvianum[13,14]
Table
Table 3. List of publications where multi-phycotoxins contamination in shellfish were reported. Red color indicates that the data were unsuitable for analysis.
Table 3. List of publications where multi-phycotoxins contamination in shellfish were reported. Red color indicates that the data were unsuitable for analysis.
AuthorsRef.AreaToxins InvestigatedToxins Mixtures Reported
Taleb et al., 2006[33]MoroccoOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3mixtures of OA, DTX-2, AZA-2 and AZA-1
Elgarch et al., 2008[34]MoroccoOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, AZAsmixtures of OA, DTX-2 and traces of AZA-2. OA found in highest concentrations
Ben Haddouch et al., 2015[35]MoroccoOA, DTXs, PTXs, AZAs, GYMs, SPXs, YTXsmixtures of OA, DTXs, YTX, PTXs, AZA-2 and sometimes GYM
Pitcher et al., 2011[36]South AfricaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, AZA-1, GYM, SPXs, YTX, DAmixtures of OA, DTX-1 and traces of PTXs
Turner et al., 2015[37]ArgentinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-11, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, 20 Me SPX-G, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXYTX/OAs
McCarron et al., 2014[38]CanadaDA, OA, DTXs, AZAs, PTXs, YTXs, GYMs, SPXs, PnTXs.mixtures of high levels of DTX-1, PTXs, YTXs and trace levels of cyclic imines
Alvarez et al., 2010[39]ChileOA, DTX-1, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, AZA-1, SPX-1, YTXmixtures of AZA-1 and SPX-1; levels were below LOQ
Garcia et al., 2012[40]ChileOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, YTX, AZA-1DTX-1/PTX-2/YTX
Zamorano et al., 2013[41]ChileOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, STX, neo-STX, GTXsOAs/PTX-2/AZA-1/YTX/STXs
Alves de Souza et al., 2014[42]ChileOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, PTX-2, YTX, 45-OH-YTXmixture of 45-OH-YTX and traces of PTX-2
García et al., 2015[43]ChileOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, STX, neo-STX, GTXsmixtures of STXs and OA/DTX-1; hydrophilic toxins were subjected to shellfish metabolism
Garcia et al., 2016[44]ChileOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, homoYTX, COOH-YTXOAs/PTX-2/YTX and OAs/YTX
García-Mendoza et al., 2014[45]MexicoOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-11, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXmixtures mainly of OA, PTX-2, YTX and low levels of SPX-1 and AZA-1
Trainer et al., 2013[46]U.S.OA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTXOA/YTX/PTX-2 and OA/PTX-2 and OA/YTX and OA/PTX-2/AZA-2 and OA/YTX/PTX-2/AZA-2
Hattenrath-Lehmann et al., 2013[47]U.S.OA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-11OAs/PTXs
Eberhart et al., 2013[48]U.S.OA, DTX-1, DTX-2, YTXmixtures of DTX-1 and YTX
Wu et al., 2005[49]ChinaOA, DTX-1, STX, neo-STX, GTXsmixtures of OA and GTX-2/3
Liu et al., 2011[50]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, SPX-A, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXGYM/OA and PTX-2s/OA
Li et al., 2012[51]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTX, 45-OH-YTXOAs/PTX-2s
Guo et al., 2012[52]ChinaOA, DTX-1, PTX-2, YTXOAs/PTX-2
Zhang et al., 2012[53]ChinaOA, DTX-1, PTXsmixture of OA, DTX-1, 7-epi-PTX-2sa and PTX-2sa
Li et al., 2014[54]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-3, PTXs, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTXPTX-2s/GYM and PTX-2s/GYM/OAs and PTX-2s/OAs
Fang et al., 2014[55]ChinaPTX-2, AZA-2, GYM, SPX-1SPX-1/PTX-2
Wu et al., 2014[56]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTX, PbTXsmixtures of OA, SPX-1, PTX-2, AZAs, PbTx-3 and traces of YTX
Wang et al., 2015[57]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTXmixtures of OA, DTX-1, PTX-2 and GYM
Wu et al., 2015[58]ChinaOA, PTX-2, AZA-1, GYM, SPX-1OA/PTX-2/GYM/SPX-1 and OA/AZA-1/PTX-2/GYM/SPX-1 and OA/PTX-2/GYM
Li et al., 2016[59]ChinaOA, DTX-1, PTXs, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTXsSTXs/SPXs/YTXs and PTX-2/SPXs and STX/SPXs and OA/didesMe-SPX-C
Jiang et al., 2017[60]ChinaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTXs, DAPTX-2s/OA/GYM and DTX-1/GYM
Suzuki et al., 2000[61]JapanOA, DTX-1, PTX-6PTX-6/OAs
Ito et al., 2001[62]JapanOA, DTX-1, PTX-6, YTXmixtures constituted of OA, DTX-1, YTX and PTX-6
Suzuki et al., 2005[63]JapanOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, YTXsPTX-2s/OAs/YTXs and OAs/YTXs
Hashimoto et al., 2006[64]JapanOA, DTX-1, DTX-3, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-6, YTX, 45-OH-YTXPTX-2s/YTXs/OAs
Suzuki et al., 2011[65]JapanOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, YTXsPTX-2s/OAs/YTXs and OAs/YTXs
Matsushima et al., 2015[66]JapanOA, DTX-1, DTX-3, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-3, PTX-6mixtures mainly of PTX-6 and DTX-3
Kim et al., 2010[67]KoreaOA, DTX-1, PTX-2, YTXmixtures of OA, DTX-1 and traces of PTX-2, YTX
Lee et al., 2011[68]KoreaOA, DTX-1, PTX-2, YTXmixtures mainly constituted of OA and DTX-1; DSP toxin content 10-times higher in mussels than in oysters
Vershinin et al., 2006[69]RussiaOA, DTX-1, PTXs, YTXs, AZAs, SPX-1OAs/PTXs/YTXs
Morton et al., 2009[70]RussiaOA, DTX-1, PTXsmixtures of OA, DTX-1, PTX-2 and PTX-2 sa
Orellana et al., 2017[71]BelgiumOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, SPX-1, YTXmixtures of OA, DTX-2, SPXs and their ester metabolites
Pavela-Vrancic et al., 2001[72]CroatiaOA, DTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 samixtures of OA and 7-epi-PTX-2sa
Pavela-Vrancic et al., 2002[73]CroatiaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 saOA/7-epi-PTX-2SA
Pavela-Vrancic et al., 2006[74]CroatiaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 saOA/7-epi-PTX-2SA
Ninčević Gladan et al., 2008[75]CroatiaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, PTX-6, AZAs, GYM, SPX, YTX, COOHYTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXYTXs/OA and OA/YTXs
Ninčević Gladan et al., 2010[76]CroatiaOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, YTXs, GYM, SPX-1YTXs/OA and OA/YTXs/PTX-2s and OA/PTX-2s
Čustović et al., 2014[77]CroatiaOA, DXT-3, YTX, PSPYTX/OAs
Amzil et al., 2007[78]FranceOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, PTXs, AZAs, YTXs, SPXs, GYMsOA/PTX-2/SPXs and OA/SPXs and PTX-2/OA
Amzil et al., 2008[79]FranceOA, DTXs, PTXs, PTX-6, AZAs, GYMs, SPXs, YTXsmixtures of OA, AZA-1 and AZA-2
Picot et al., 2012[80]FranceOA, SPX-1OA/SPX-1
Fernandez Puente et al., 2004[81]IrelandOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 saOAs/PTX-2s
Fux et al., 2009[82]IrelandOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, YTX, SPX, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3AZAs/OAs and OAs/AZAs and OAs/AZAs/YTX
Campbell et al., 2014[83]IrelandOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DA, STX, palytoxinPSP/OAs/DA
Ciminiello et al., 1997[84]ItalyOA, YTXYTX/OA
Draisci et al., 1999[85]ItalyOA, YTX, homoYTXOA/YTX
Draisci et al., 1999[86]ItalyOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, YTXmixture of YTX, PTXs and OA
Ciminiello et al., 2010[87]ItalyOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTXs, SPXs, DASPXs/PTX-2sa
Nincevic Gladan et al., 2011[88]ItalyOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 sa, PTX-6, GYM, SPX-1, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXOA/homoYTX and OA/homoYTX/PTX-2sa and OA/PTX-2sa
Buratti et al., 2011[89]ItalyOA, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, COOH-YTXmixtures mainly of YTX and homoYTX. HomoYTX found in highest concentrations
Bacchiocchi et al., 2015[90]ItalyOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXmixtures mainly of OA and YTX plus traces of AZA-2
Gerssen et al., 2010[91]The NetherlandsOA, PTX-2, AZA-1, YTX, SPX-1YTX/OA/AZA-1/PTX-2/SPX-1
Van den Top et al., 2011[92]The NetherlandsOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, 45-OH-YTXOAs/AZAs/YTXs/PTX-2 and YTXs/OAs and YTXs/OAs/AZAs
Gerssen et al., 2011[93]The NetherlandsOA, DTXs, PTXs, AZAs, YTXsOAs/AZAs/PTX-2s and OAs/AZAs/YTXs/PTX-2s and PTX-2s/OAs/YTXs
Lee et al., 1988[94]NorwayOA, DTX-1, PTX-2, YTXmixtures of DTX-1 and YTX
Ramstad et al., 2001[95]NorwayOA, DTX-1, YTXmixtures constituted of OA/DTX-1 and YTX
Torgersen et al., 2008[96]NorwayOA, DTXs, PTXsmixtures of PTXs, OA and DTXs
Vale et al., 2004[97]PortugalOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 samixtures of OA/DTX-2 and PTX-2/PTX-2sa
Vale et al., 2006[98]PortugalOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, 7-epi-PTX-2 samixtures of OA/DTX-2 and PTX-2/PTX-2sa
Gago-Martinez et al., 1996[99]SpainOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, STXs, GTXs, neo-STXsmixtures mainly of OA, DTX-2, GTXs and traces of STX
Villar Gonzalez et al., 2006[100]SpainOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, SPX-1mixtures of OA, DTX-2 and traces of SPX-1
Villar Gonzalez et al., 2007[101]SpainOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, AZA-1, YTX, SPX-1OA/PTX-2sa and OA/PTX-2sa/SPX-1
de la Iglesia et al., 2009[102]SpainPTX-6, YTX, 45-OH-YTXmixtures of PTX-6 and YTXs
Rodriguez et al., 2015[103]SpainOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXYTX/OA and OAs/YTX and YTXs/OA/PTX-2
García-Altares et al., 2016[104]SpainOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, GYM, SPX-1, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXmixtures of OA and PTX-2
Stobo et al., 2005[105]UKOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXYTX/OA and OA/AZA-1 and OA/YTX/PTX-2 and OA/PTX-2 and OA/YTX
Stobo et al., 2008[106]UKOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, DTX-3, PTX-1, PTX-2, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, 45-OH-homoYTXmixtures of OA, DTXs, PTXs and DA
Madigan et al., 2006[107]AustraliaOA, PTX-2, GYM, YTX, DAPTX-2s/OA
Takahashi et al., 2007[108]AustraliaOA, DTXs, PTX-2, PTX-2 sa, GYM, DAGYM/DA/PTX-2 and PTX-2s/OA/DA/GYM and PTX-2/OA
Ajani et al., 2017[109]AustraliaOA, PTX-2, GYM, YTX, DAPTX-2s/OA
MacKenzie et al., 2002[110]New ZealandOA, DTX-1, PTXs, AZA-1, GYM, YTX, 45-OH-YTX, homoYTX, DAYTXs/OA/PTX-2s/GYM/DA
McNabb et al., 2005[111]New ZealandOA, DTX-1, DTX-2, PTXs, AZA-1, AZA-2, AZA-3, YTXs, GYM, SPXs, DAPTX-2s/OA/YTXs/GYM and DA/OAs/PTX-2 and OAs/GYM/PTX-2/AZA-1/YTX
AZAs: azaspiracids; DTXs: dinophysistoxins; GTXs: gonyautoxins; GYMs: gymnodimines; PnTXs: pinnatoxins; PTXs: pectenotoxins; SPXs: spirolides; STXs: saxitoxins; YTXs: yessotoxins.
Table
Table 4. Contamination with phycotoxin mixtures in other matrices.
Table 4. Contamination with phycotoxin mixtures in other matrices.
AuthorsAreaToxin MixturesMatrixRef.
Zamorano et al., 2013ChileOAs/PTX-2/AZA-1/YTX/STXsGastropods[41]
García et al., 2015ChileSTXs/OA/DTX-1Gastropods[43]
García et al., 2016ChileOAs/PTX-2/YTX and OAs/YTXGastropods[44]
Ganal et al., 1993HawaiiOA/CTX Fish[112]
Fire et al., 2011U.S.OA/DA/PbTx-3 Bottlenose dolphin[113]
Wang et al., 2015U.S.OA/DTXs/PTX-2Bottlenose dolphin[114]
Kim et al., 2012KoreaOA/YTXGastropods[115]
Lee et al., 2012KoreaOA/YTXGastropods[116]
MacKenzie et al., 2011New ZealandOA/PnTxsGastropods[117]
Table
Table 5. Summary of in vivo studies.
Table 5. Summary of in vivo studies.
Ref.AnimalTreatmentToxin (mg/kg b.w.)Results Toxins aloneResults Mixtures
Distribution in Internal Organs a,bMacro- and Micro-Scopical ExaminationDistribution in Internal OrgansMacro- and Micro-Scopical Examination
Aasen et al., 2011 [118]Female NMRI micesingle intake by gavageYTX: 1 or 5
AZA-1: 200
YTX/AZA-1: 1/200 or 1/500
-
Highest levels of AZA-1 found in stomach, duodenum and jejunum
-
Highest levels of YTX found in duodenum, jejunum, ileum and colon
YTX: no effects
AZA-1: retention of material in the stomach and dilatation of the upper 1/3 of the small intestine with increased fluidity; contraction and bluntness of villi from duodenum, extension of cryptal compartments and extensive infiltration of neutrophils in lamina propria
-
Enhanced levels of YTX and AZA-1 in stomach
-
Enhanced levels of YTX in duodenum, jejunum and colon
-
Reduced level of YTX in liver
No mixture effect
Aune et al., 2012 [119]Female NMRI micesingle intake by gavageOA: 0.6; 0.82; 0.9; 0.98 or 1.14
AZA-1: 0.42; 0.54; 0.6; 0.66 or 0.78
OA/AZA-1 *: LD10/LD10 or LD50/LD10
-
Highest levels of OA in GI tract
-
Highest levels of AZA-1 in stomach
OA: dilatation of stomach; shortened villi in the duodenum and jejunum and infiltration of neutrophils in lamina propria
AZA-1: severe increase amount of content in stomach and dilatation of small intestine; shortened villi in the duodenum and infiltration of neutrophils in lamina propria		lower level for both toxinsNo mixture effect
Sosa et al., 2013 [120]Female CD-1 micerepeated intake for 7 days by gavageYTX: 1
OA: 0.185
YTX/OA: 1/0.185		Not investigatedYTX: ultrastructural changes in cardiomyocytes/OA: inflammation of the forestomach submucosa and ultrastructural changes in cardiomyocytesNot investigatedNo mixture effect
a Brain, heart, lungs, thymus, liver, spleen, kidneys, stomach, small intestine (duodenum, middle and lower jejunum) and colon. * Lethal doses (LD) were estimated from individual toxin experiments. b Brain, heart, lungs, thymus, liver, spleen, kidneys, stomach, small intestine (duodenum, middle and lower jejunum) and colon.
Table
Table 6. Summary of the study by Ferron et al., 2016 [123].
Table 6. Summary of the study by Ferron et al., 2016 [123].
Cell ModelTreatmentEndpointToxin Mixture (nM)Mixture Effect
MixtureMolar Ratio *
Caco-224-h incubationNeutral red uptakeAZA-1/YTX1:0.8additive
1:1.3synergistic
1:2.4
1:3.6
AZA-1/OA1:51antagonistic
1:27.2
1:15.3
1:8.2
YTX/OA1:26.5antagonistic
1:14.1additive
1:7.9
1:4.2
Human intestinal epithelial crypt-like HIEC24-h incubationNeutral red uptakeAZA-1/YTX1:0.8synergistic
1:1.3
1:2.4
1:3.6additive
AZA-1/OA1:51antagonistic
1:27.2additive
1:15.3
1:8.2antagonistic
YTX/OA1:26.5synergistic
1:14.1antagonistic
1:7.9additive
1:4.2
* Molar ratios were based on IC50 values established for each toxin alone (OA: 78.52 nM, AZA-1: 4.03 nM and YTX: 4.08 nM).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alarcan, J.; Biré, R.; Le Hégarat, L.; Fessard, V. Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16020046

AMA Style

Alarcan J, Biré R, Le Hégarat L, Fessard V. Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment. Marine Drugs. 2018; 16(2):46. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16020046

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alarcan, Jimmy, Ronel Biré, Ludovic Le Hégarat, and Valérie Fessard. 2018. "Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment" Marine Drugs 16, no. 2: 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16020046

APA Style

Alarcan, J., Biré, R., Le Hégarat, L., & Fessard, V. (2018). Mixtures of Lipophilic Phycotoxins: Exposure Data and Toxicological Assessment. Marine Drugs, 16(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/md16020046

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop