Next Article in Journal
Marine Compounds and Cancer: Updates 2020
Next Article in Special Issue
Rapid Sorting of Fucoxanthin-Producing Phaeodactylum tricornutum Mutants by Flow Cytometry
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Molecules from Extreme Environments
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Intestinal Absorption of Dietary Halocynthiaxanthin, a Carotenoid from the Sea Squirt Halocynthia roretzi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 18
Issue 12
10.3390/md18120642
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dietary Supplementation of Astaxanthin Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Ability and Immune Response of Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Fed High-Fat Diet

by
Shiwei Xie
1,2,†,
Peng Yin
1,3,†,
Lixia Tian
1,
Yingying Yu
4,
Yongjian Liu
1 and
Jin Niu
1,*
1
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Improved Variety Reproduction in Aquatic Economic Animals, Institute of Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
2
Laboratory of Aquatic Animal Nutrition and Feed, Fisheries College, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
3
Institute of Marine Research (IMR), NO-5817 Bergen, Norway
4
Guangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Molecular Design and Precision Breeding, School of Life Science and Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528527, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this article.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(12), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120642
Submission received: 10 November 2020 / Revised: 9 December 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published: 15 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Carotenoids)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
High-fat diet (HFD) usually induces oxidative stress and astaxanthin is regarded as an excellent anti-oxidant. An 8-week feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on growth performance, lipid metabolism, antioxidant ability, and immune response of juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) fed HFD. Four diets were formulated: the control diet (10.87% lipid, C), high-fat diet (18.08% lipid, HF), and HF diet supplemented with 75 and 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin (HFA1 and HFA2, respectively). Dietary supplementation of astaxanthin improved the growth of fish fed HFD, also decreased hepatosomatic index and intraperitoneal fat ratio of fish fed HFD, while having no effect on body fat. Malondialdehyde content and superoxide dismutase activity were increased in fish fed HFD, astaxanthin supplementation in HFD decreased the oxidative stress of fish. The supplementation of astaxanthin in HFD also reduced the mRNA levels of Caspase 3, Caspase 9, BAD, and IL15. These results suggested that dietary astaxanthin supplementation in HFD improved the growth performance, antioxidant ability and immune response of largemouth bass.

1. Introduction

The largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, is one of the most important economical freshwater fish in China, and its production in 2019 reached more than 470,000 tons [1]. Recent research revealed that largemouth bass has a limited ability to utilize starch, the starch content in the feed usually below 10% [2,3], so dietary lipids serve as the main provider of energy in the diet.
Besides the energy, dietary lipid provides other important substances such as essential fatty acids, phospholipids and sterols for maintaining cell normal structure and biological function [4]. Due to the protein-sparing effect of dietary lipids in aquatic feeds, high-fat diet (HFD) is widely used to save costs and reduce nitrogen waste in aquaculture recently [5,6,7]. However, excessive dietary lipid may lead to abnormal lipid accumulation in liver, abdominal adipose tissues and muscle. In many studies, long-term intake of HFD induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, oxidative stress and inflammation to fish, and finally negatively affected the growth performance and health of fish [8,9,10]. Previous research indicated that lipid accumulation of largemouth bass increased with the increasing dietary lipid levels [11], and several studies revealed that high dietary lipid (18–20%) impaired the growth and health of largemouth bass [12,13].
Astaxanthin is a potent lipid-soluble marine keto-carotenoid with auspicious effects on human and animal health [14]. It is found widely in aquatic animals and some other organisms, but its de novo synthesis is limited to several bacteria, protists, fungi, algae and plants, and synthetic astaxanthin accounts for >95% of the world market currently [15]. Astaxanthin is an important colorant in the crustacean and salmonid feed industry [16,17], and is also an additive with auspicious effects on egg quality [18]. More importantly, astaxanthin acts as a safeguard against oxidative stress through different mechanisms such as scavenging of radicals and neutralizing of singlet oxygen, and astaxanthin also plays a critical role in anti-inflammatory response through modulating the cytokines production, NF-κB signaling pathway and apoptotic pathways [14,15,19,20]. Dietary supplementation of astaxanthin has been shown to improve the growth performance, anti-oxidative capacity and immune response of shrimp, crab and a variety of fish [16,21,22,23,24]. Astaxanthin has been reported to alleviate the oxidative stress of rats induced by HFD [25,26], while there is no research evaluating the effect of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on fish fed HFD.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of HFD and astaxanthin supplementation on growth performance, lipid metabolism, anti-oxidative ability and immune response of juvenile largemouth bass.

2. Results

2.1. Growth Performance, Feed Utilization and Somatic Parameters

Dietary astaxanthin supplementation on growth performance, feed utilization and somatic parameters of juvenile largemouth bass fed HFD are shown in Table 1. Results showed that there were no differences in final body weight (FBW), weight gain rate (WG) and specific growth rate (SGR) among fish fed diet C and HF. Dietary supplementation of 75 mg kg−1 astaxanthin in HF diet significantly increased FBW, WG and SGR of fish (p < 0.05). Protein efficiency ratio (PER) of fish fed diet C and HF were significantly lower compared with those fed diets supplemented with 75 and 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin (p < 0.05). Viscerosomatic index (VSI) was lower in fish fed the control diet compared to those fed other diets (p < 0.05). Hepatosomatic index (HSI) and intraperitoneal fat ratio (IPF) were significantly higher in fish fed HF diet compared to those fed control diet. Compared to fish fed HFD, dietary supplementation of 75–150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin decreased the HSI of fish (p < 0.05), and dietary supplementation of 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin decreased the IPF of fish (p < 0.05).

2.2. Whole Body and Muscle Proximate Composition

The moisture content in whole-body and ash content in muscle was significantly higher in fish fed diet C than those fed other diets (p < 0.05) (Table 2). In contrast, the lipid content in the whole body and muscle was lower in fish fed diet C compared to those fed the other three diets (p < 0.05). The protein contents of the whole body showed no differences among the four treatments (p > 0.05). Likewise, no differences were found in moisture and crude protein contents of muscle (p > 0.05).

2.3. Plasma and Hepatic Biochemical Indexes

The results of biochemical parameters in plasma and liver are presented in Table 3. Triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) in plasma were significantly higher in fish fed diet HF than those fed the control diet (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation of 75 and 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin significantly decreased the TG content in plasma (p < 0.05). Fish fed diet HFA2 obtained a higher HDL/LDL ratio compared to those fed diets HF and HFA1. Dietary lipid levels and astaxanthin had no effect on LDH activity in the plasma.
Fish fed diet HFA1 showed higher TG content in the liver compared to those fed diet C (p < 0.05). Fish fed diet HF showed higher TC content in the liver than those fed diet C and HFA1 (p < 0.05). The lipase activity in the liver was similar among fish fed the four diets (p > 0.05).

2.4. Lipid Accumulation in the Liver

To evaluate the lipid accumulation in the liver, oil red O staining was performed and shown in Figure 1. Lipid droplets and nuclei are dyed in red and blue, respectively. In this study, there are fewer lipid droplets in fish fed diet C compared to fish fed other diets. Dietary supplementation of astaxanthin had no effect on hepatic lipid accumulation of largemouth bass.

2.5. Lipid Metabolism Related Gene Expression in Liver

Figure 2 shows the expression of lipid metabolism-related gene expression. The mRNA level of peroxisome proliferator activating receptor α (PPARα) and lipoprotein binding protein (HBP) were significantly higher in fish fed diet HF than those fed diet C (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with 150 mg kg−1 and 75–150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin decreased the PPARα and HBP expression of fish fed HFD, respectively (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation with 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin also down-regulated the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) expression in fish fed HFD (p < 0.05). The mRNA levels of farnesoid X receptor (FXR), retinoid X receptor (RXR) and proliferator activating receptor γ (PPARγ) in the liver were similar between fish fed the four diets (p > 0.05).

2.6. Oxidative Stress and Anti-Oxidative Related Parameters in Liver and Plasma

The MDA contents in liver and plasma were significantly increased in fish fed diet HF compared with the fish fed control diet (Figure 3), and dietary supplementation with 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin in HFD significantly reduced the MDA content in plasma (p < 0.05). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in plasma of fish fed diet HF was significantly higher than fish fed other diets (p < 0.05). No difference was observed in SOD activity in the liver among the four treatments (p > 0.05). The mRNA level of GPx in the liver was higher in fish fed the diet HF than those fed diet C and HFA2 (p < 0.05). The expressions of SOD in the liver were similar among fish fed the four diets.

2.7. Immune Response Related Gene Expression in Liver

The immune response-related gene expressions in the liver of fish fed different diets are shown in Figure 4. The mRNA levels of Caspase 3, Caspase 9, Bcl-2-associated death protein (BAD), IL15 and heat stress protein 70 (HSP70) were significantly higher in the liver of fish fed diet HF compared to those fed the diet C (p < 0.05). Dietary supplementation of 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin significantly decreased the mRNA levels of Caspase 3, Caspase 9 and BAD. Dietary supplementation of 75–150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin also significantly decreased the mRNA levels of IL15 in the liver. The gene expression of transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) was significantly higher in fish fed diet C than those fed the other diets (p < 0.05). The P53 mRNA levels were significantly higher in the liver of fish fed diet HFA1 compared to those fed the diets C and HFA2 (p < 0.05). There were no differences in the gene expression of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) among the four groups (p > 0.05).

3. Discussion

HFD has been shown to impair the growth performance of grass carp, giant croaker, tilapia, blunt snout bream and other aquatic animals [27,28,29,30]. In this study, at the end of the feeding trial, WG, survival and SGR were similar in fish fed diet C and HF, which indicated that HFD (18.08%) did not impair the growth performance of largemouth bass. Our previous research indicated 18.08% of dietary lipid impaired the growth of largemouth bass, Zhou et al. (2020) also reported that largemouth bass fed 20% dietary lipid showed lower WG than those fed 10% dietary lipid [13]. Meanwhile, in another study, the optimal lipid requirement of largemouth bass was 18.42% [31]. The different results in lipid requirement of largemouth bass may result from the differences in diet formulation and environmental factors. Present results showed that dietary supplementation of 75 mg kg−1 astaxanthin significantly improved the growth performance of fish fed the HFD. Previous studies also reported that dietary supplementation with astaxanthin enhanced the growth of kuruma shrimp, golden pompano and red porgy [22,23,32]. Most of those studies evaluated the effects of astaxanthin supplementation in normal aquatic feeds, this is the first study that reveals the beneficial effects of astaxanthin supplementation on growth performance of fish fed HFD.
HFD usually induces the abnormal accumulation of lipid, and finally causes oxidative stress and inflammation. In this study, we investigated the HFD and astaxanthin on lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism firstly. When largemouth bass fed HFD, higher VSI, HSI and IPF were observed, higher lipid contents in muscle, liver and whole body also were observed. These results indicated HFD induced more lipid accumulation in several tissues (viscera and muscle) of largemouth bass, similar results were found in our previous research [12] and several studies in largemouth bass [31], giant croaker [28] and cobia [10]. The supplementation of astaxanthin in HFD decreased the HSI and IPF of largemouth bass, while having no effects on lipid contents in the whole body, muscle and liver. These results indicate that astaxanthin only reduced the fat deposition of largemouth bass to a certain extent. Similar results were reported in red porgy; dietary supplementation of 100 mg kg−1 astaxanthin decreased the lipid contents in the whole body and liver [32]. Meanwhile, 100 mg kg−1 dietary astaxanthin had no effects on VSI, HSI and whole-body lipid content of golden pompano [23], and 200–1600 mg kg−1 astaxanthin did not affect the whole body lipid content of kuruma shrimp [22]. In the research of mice, Yang et al. (2014) reported that 0.3–3 mg astaxanthin/kg body weight had no effects on body fat of mice [25], Ikeuchi et al. (2007) reported that 6–30 mg astaxanthin/kg body weight decreased the liver weight [33]. These previous research studies indicated that dietary astaxanthin supplementation may have larger effects on liver weight than body fat, which revealed that astaxanthin products may have limited effect to control body fat in humans and other animals.
Although astaxanthin has a limited effect on body lipid deposition, it still affected the lipid metabolism of animals and humans in many previous studies. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials revealed that astaxanthin supplementation is associated with an increase in HDL [34]. Similar results were found in the present study; the ratio of HDL/LDL increased when fish fed diet supplemented with 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin. HFD also induced high TG and TC in plasma and liver in this study, astaxanthin supplementation reduced the TG in plasma and TC in the liver. In previous studies, astaxanthin had no effects on TG and TC levels when a normal diet was adopted [34,35]. When mice were fed an HFD, astaxanthin supplementation also showed similar TG and TC lowering effects as in this study [25,26,33]. Jia et al. (2016) reported that astaxanthin modulates the lipid accumulation of high-fat-fed mice via activation of PPARα and inhibition of PPARγ [26]. In this study, the PPARα expression in the liver of largemouth bass showed the opposite tendency as in mice. PPARα is essential in the regulation of genes encoding fatty acid transport, metabolism and fatty acid oxidation in the liver [36]. The lower expression of PPARα in the HFA2 group compared to the HF group indicated the lower lipid content in the liver, which was positively correlated with the HSI results. HMGCR is the rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis of largemouth bass [37], the low HMGCR expression may associate with the high hepatic TC content. In this study, dietary astaxanthin supplementation enhanced the hepatic mRNA expression of HMGCR, similar results were found in mice [33]. In this study, the mRNA expression of lipid metabolism-related gene expressions was consistent with the results of plasma lipids and body fat, which clearly showed that the gene revealed that dietary astaxanthin supplementation may affect the hepatic fatty acid oxidation and cholesterol synthesis of high-fat-fed largemouth bass.
Some previous studies suggested HFD inducing ROS production, inflammatory response, and apoptosis in fish and mammals [31,38,39,40]. Excessive production of ROS will cause damage to the organism, and antioxidant enzymes such as SOD and GPx are the main participators for eliminating ROS [41]. As a powerful antioxidant, astaxanthin also has been shown to enhance the anti-oxidative ability of animals under stress or pathological state [19,21,42,43]. In this study, SOD activity in plasma and GPx mRNA level in the liver were increased in fish fed HF diet to eliminate the excessive ROS, and dietary supplementation of astaxanthin restored the hepatic redox state of largemouth bass. Excessive production of ROS usually leading to oxidative stress, MDA, a product of lipid peroxidation, is considered a critical marker of oxidative stress [44]. In this study, MDA contents in plasma and liver were higher in high-fat-fed fish, which revealed that HFD induced oxidative stress in largemouth bass. Dietary supplementation of 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin reduced the MDA content in plasma of largemouth bass, which indicated that suitable astaxanthin alleviated the oxidative stress brought by HFD. The gene expression and activity of anti-oxidative enzymes and MDA contents clearly indicated the antioxidant system of largemouth bass was damaged by HFD, and the damage was alleviated by astaxanthin supplementation. Similar results were reported by Yang et al. (2014) [25], the anti-oxidative ability of mice fed HFD was enhanced by astaxanthin supplementation. Bhuvaneswari et al. (2014) also reported astaxanthin supplementation decreased the ROS induced by HFD [45].
Besides the anti-oxidative ability, the immune response of fish also was affected by HFD and astaxanthin. IL 15 and TGF-β are two critical inflammatory cytokines [12], HFD increased the mRNA expression of IL15 and decreased the mRNA expression of TGF-β in this study, which indicated hepatic inflammation of largemouth bass may be induced by HFD. Dietary supplementation of astaxanthin reduced the expression of IL15, but could not enhance the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokines TGF-β. In previous studies, astaxanthin supplementation reduced the TNFα and IL6 of mice fed HFD [25,26], astaxanthin also modulating the immune response of animals through regulating the expression of cytokines. Apoptosis is a necessary condition for the development and homeostasis of cells [46]. In response to a death signal, activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway results in altered expression of the genes including anti-apoptotic (Bcl-2, Bcl-xl and BAG) and pro-apoptotic (Bax, and BAD) [46,47,48]. The caspase family is also critical in mediating apoptosis, with Caspase 3 being the key executive molecule, and Caspase 9 being the upstream signaling of Caspase 3 [49,50]. Activated caspase triggers compensatory proliferation, referred to as apoptosis-induced proliferation which maintains tissue homeostasis following massive stress-induced cell death, regenerating damaged structures [51]. In the present study, gene expression of BAD, Caspase 3 and Caspase 9 in the liver of largemouth bass fed HFD were significantly elevated, suggesting HFD may induce apoptosis of largemouth bass. Similar results had been reported in blunt snout bream fed HFD [30]. The high expression of Caspase3, Caspase 9 and BAD were reduced by the supplementation of 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin, which indicating that HFD-induced apoptosis was alleviated by astaxanthin. These results are consistent with research reported in mice that dietary astaxanthin supplementation could inhibit apoptosis induced by HFD [45]. Although protein expression samples failed to further verify the apoptosis, the present results from gene expression is still robust enough to suggest that astaxanthin supplementation may inhibit apoptosis in largemouth bass by the down-regulation of pro-apoptotic genes.
Overall, our results firstly proved that astaxanthin supplementation decreased the liver weight and alleviated the oxidative stress and inflammation of fish fed HFD, which was similar to many studies in mice. These results revealed the therapeutic potential of astaxanthin to liver inflammation induced by HFD in humans and other animals.

4. Materials and Methods

All the experiments were conducted according to the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. The study protocol and all experimental procedures were approved by the Experimental Animal Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University (EAEC201809122).

4.1. Diet Preparation

Four isonitrogenous diets were formulated (Table 4), a control diet (10.87% lipid, C), a high-fat diet (18.08% lipid, HF), and the HF diet supplemented with 75 and 150 mg kg−1 astaxanthin (HFA1 and HFA2, respectively). The synthetic astaxanthin (Carophyll Pink, 10%) was obtained from DSM (Heerlen, Netherlands). The lipid levels were adopted according to our previous study [12]. The ingredients were smashed and well mixed, the 2.5 mm diameter pellets were extruded using a twin-screw cooking extruder (HQ, Zhaoqing, China). The diets were air-dried to approximately 10% moisture and stored at −20 °C until used.

4.2. Fish Rearing and Experimental Conditions

Largemouth bass were provided by a local hatchery (Foshan, China). Fish were firstly acclimated in an indoor recirculating aquaculture system for two weeks. Before the experiment, 480 fish of similar size (15.25 ± 0.02 g) were randomly allocated to 16 fiberglass tanks (300 L), each tank with 30 fish. Each diet was distributed to four tanks, fish were fed twice (8:30 and 16:30) daily to visual satiation for 8 weeks. During the experiment, the water temperature was 26.6 ± 1.3 °C and pH was 7.74 ± 0.06. Total ammonia nitrogen was 0.12 ± 0.02 mg L−1, and dissolved oxygen was 8.23 ± 0.33 mg L−1. Natural light–dark cycle was employed during the experiment.

4.3. Sample Collection and Biochemical Composition Analysis

Fish fasted for 24 h after the last meal, then were counted and weighted. Twelve fish per tank were randomly selected and anesthetized in MS-222 (Sigma, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 10 mg L−1) for sampling. Two fish per tank were randomly selected as the whole-body samples. Six fish per tank were collected blood from caudal vein with heparinized syringes, and weighed the whole fish, viscera and liver. Blood was freeze centrifuged at 3000× g for 10 min (Centrifuge MR23i, Jouan, Paris, France), then supernatant was collected, immediately frozen and stored at −80 °C before analysis. Liver samples were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. The whole body and muscle samples were stored at −20 °C. Livers from two fish per tank were collected for oil red O staining.

4.4. Proximate Analysis of Diets and Body Composition

Moisture, crude protein, crude lipid, and ash contents in the diets, muscle and whole body were determined by standard methods [52]. Moisture was determined by oven drying at 105 °C until a constant weight was obtained. Crude protein content (N × 6.25) was determined according to the Kjeldahl method and using an Auto Kjeldahl System (1030-Autoanalyzer; Tecator, Helsingborg, Sweden). Crude lipid was exacted and determined by Soxtec extraction System HT (Soxtec System HT6, Tecator). Ash content was determined at 550 °C for 6 h in a muffle furnace (M110, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Antioxidative Related Parameters Analysis and Biochemical Index Assays

Liver samples were homogenized in ice-cold saline (8.6 g L−1 NaCl in ddH2O, 1:9 dilution), then freeze centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatants were collected and stored at −80 °C until analyzed. The SOD activity and the contents of MDA, TG, TC, HDL-C and LDL-C were measured by commercial kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China). MDA was measured by thiobarbituric acid method [53]. SOD was measured by hydroxylamine method [54]. TG and TC contents were determined by enzymatic hydrolysis method [55] and cholesterol oxidase–peroxidase method [56]. LDL-C and HDL-C contents were measured by the method described by Liu et al. (2002) [57]. Protein concentrations of the hepatic suspension were measured by folin phenol method [58].

4.6. Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Quantitative real-time PCR analysis method was described in a previous study [38]. Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara, Japan) and quantified on the LightCycler 480 (Roche Applied Science, Basel, Switzerland). An amount of 400 nM of forward and reverse specific primers, 10 ng of cDNA template and nuclease-free water to a final volume of 10 μL, then using the following program: denaturation step at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles of 5 s denaturation at 95 °C, 15 s annealing at 60 °C and 20 s extension at 72 °C, followed by a melt-curve analysis and cooling to 4 °C. The efficiency of primers was evaluated by serial dilutions and all of them were close to 100% (Table 5).
Relative expression levels of target genes were calculated based on the equation of 2−ΔΔCT [59], and elongation factor 1α (EF1α) and β-actin were used as the reference genes. Three technical replicates were conducted for each sample.
Table
Table 5. Real-time PCR primer sequences.
Table 5. Real-time PCR primer sequences.
GenePrimer SequenceProductsSources
EF1α FGGCTGGTATCTCCAAGAACG239[60]
EF1α RGTCTCCAGCATGTTGTCWCC
GSH-px FGGGGCTCCACCTGCTTCTTG/FJ030930
GSH-px RACCCCTCTGCTCAGGCATTT
SOD FTGGCAAGAACAAGAACCACA167FJ030929
SOD RCCTCTGATTTCTCCTGTCACC
FXR FAGAAATGGCAACAAGTCAA77KT827789.1
FXR RCACGGTCCAGAGAGAGAAA
PPARα FCCACCGCAATGGTCGATATG161[61]
PPARα RTGCTGTTGATGGACTGGGAAA
HBP FAAATCCAAATCCCACGAC134KF652241.1
HBP RCACCCTCTCTACAGCACG
PPAR-γ FCCTGTGAGGGCTGTAAGGGTTT118[61]
PPAR-γ RTTGTTGCGGGACTTCTTGTGA
IL-15 FGTATGCTGCTTCTGTGCCTGG82[61]
IL-15 RAGCGTCAGATTTCTCAATGGTGT
TGF-β FGCTCAAAGAGAGCGAGGATG118[61]
TGF-β RTCCTCTACCATTCGCAATCC
Caspase3 FGCTTCATTCGTCTGTGTTC98[61]
Caspase3 RCGAAAAAGTGATGTGAGGTA
Caspase9 FCTGGAATGCCTTCAGGAGACGGG125[61]
Caspase9 RGGGAGGGGCAAGACAACAGGGTG
Caspase10 FCAAACCACTCACAGCGTCTACAT146[61]
Caspase10 RTGGTTGGTTGAGGACAGAGAGGG
HSP 70 FCAGTGATGAAGACAAGCAGAAGA163[62]
HSP 70 RGCCACCAGCACTCTGATACA
Bcl-2 FCCATCCACGACGAACCTG75/
Bcl-2 RGGCGTATCGCTGCTCAAACT
Bcl-xL FCATCCTCCTTGGCTCTGG141/
Bcl-xL RGGGTCTGTTTGCCTTTGG
RXRα FAGCAGAGCAGGCAGTGGA144KT827793.1
RXRα RCGTTGGGCGAGTTGGAT
HMGCR FGGTGGAGTGCTTAGTAATCGG125/
HMGCR RACGCAGGGAAGAAAGTCAT
BAD FCACATTTCGGATGCCACTAT116/
BAD RTTCTGCTCTTCTGCGATTGA
P53 FAGATTGAATGGTGGTGGG144/
P53 RGTTCTGGCGGACTGGA
EF1α, elongation factor 1α; GSH-px, glutathione peroxidase; SOD, superoxide dismutase; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; Caspase 3, cysteine-aspartic proteases-3; Caspase 9, cysteine-aspartic proteases-9; Caspase 10, cysteine-aspartic proteases-10; IL 15, interleukin 15; TGFβ, transforming growth factor-β; Bcl-2, B-cell lymphoma-2; Bcl-xl, B-cell lymphoma-xl; RXRα, retinoid X receptor α; HMGCR, 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase; Bad, Bcl-2 associated death protein. PPARα, peroxisome proliferator activating receptor α; PPAR-γ, peroxisome proliferator activating receptor γ; HBP, high density lipoprotein binding protein; HSP 70, heat stress protein 70.

4.7. Oil Red O Staining

Oil red O staining was performed to determine the number of neutral lipids deposited in the liver, the method was described as Yin et al. (2021) [12]. Liver samples were firstly fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and then frozen with liquid nitrogen. Secondly, the sectioned slides (6–10 μm thickness) were stained with oil red O solution (3 g L−1, Servicebio, Wuhan, China) for 8–10 min. Then, the nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin solution (Servicebio, Wuhan, China) for 3–5 min. After staining, the slides were washed and a cover glass was fixed to the slide with glycerol jelly mounting medium (Servicebio, Wuhan, China). The lipid droplets were observed using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ni-U, Tokyo, Japan) at 100× magnification.

4.8. Calculations and Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as means ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 19.0 (SPSS). All data were checked for normality and homogeneity of variance before analysis. When there were significant differences (p < 0.05), the group means were further compared using Duncan’s multiple range test. When data did not have a homogeneous variation, the non-parameter Kruskal–Wallis test was applied, and followed by all pairwise multiple comparisons if the results showed a significant difference (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study firstly indicated that dietary astaxanthin enhanced the growth performance of largemouth bass fed HFD. The supplementation of astaxanthin improved the lipid metabolism of largemouth bass fed HFD, as well as reduced the oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by HFD in fish. The suitable supplemental level of astaxanthin based on the growth of largemouth bass fed HFD is 75 mg kg−1, while based on anti-oxidative ability and immune response largemouth bass fed HFD is 150 mg kg−1.

Author Contributions

The authors thank the participants who gave their time to this manuscript. S.X., Y.L. and L.T. designed this study, P.Y. and S.X. conducted this experiment, P.Y. and J.N. did the analysis, P.Y. and S.X. wrote this manuscript and Y.Y. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 31672665), Agriculture Science and Technology Project of Zhuhai Doumen District (2018110809).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

BADBcl-2-associated death protein
Bcl-2B-cell lymphoma-2
Caspase3cysteine-aspartic proteases-3
Caspase9cysteine-aspartic proteases-9
Caspase10cysteine-aspartic proteases-10
CFcondition factor
EF1αelongation factor 1α
FBWfinal body weight
FXRfarnesoid X receptor
HDL-Chigh-density lipoprotein cholesterol
HFDhigh fat diet
HIShepatosomatic index
HBPlipoprotein binding protein
HMGCR3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase
HSP70Heat shock protein 70
IBWinitial body weight
IPFintraperitoneal fat ratio
LDL-Clow-density lipoprotein cholesterol
IL15interleukin 15
MDAmalondialdehyde
PERprotein efficiency ratio
PPARαperoxisome proliferator activating receptor α
PPARγproliferator activating receptor γ
RXRretinoid X receptor
SODsuperoxide dismutase
TCtotal cholesterol
TGtotal triglyceride
TGFβtransforming growth factor-β
VSIviscerosomatic index
WGweight gain

References

  1. Ministry of Agriculture Fishery and Fishery Administration Bureau. China Fisheries Statistics Yearbook; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 2020.
  2. Zhang, Y.; Xie, S.; Wei, H.; Zheng, L.; Liu, Z.; Fang, H.; Xie, J.; Liao, S.; Tian, L.; Liu, Y.; et al. High dietary starch impaired growth performance, liver histology and hepatic glucose metabolism of juvenile largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Aquac. Nutr. 2020, 26, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, H.-J.; Mou, M.-M.; Pu, D.-C.; Lin, S.-M.; Chen, Y.-J.; Luo, L. Effect of dietary starch level on growth, metabolism enzyme and oxidative status of juvenile largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Aquaculture 2019, 498, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Glencross, B.D. Exploring the nutritional demand for essential fatty acids by aquaculture species. Rev. Aquac. 2009, 1, 71–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Huang, D.; Wu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Chen, J.; Karrow, N.; Ren, X.; Wang, Y. Dietary Protein and Lipid Requirements for Juvenile Largemouth Bass, Micropterus salmoides. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2017, 48, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sagada, G.; Chen, J.; Shen, B.; Huang, A.; Sun, L.; Jiang, J.; Jin, C. Optimizing protein and lipid levels in practical diet for juvenile northern snakehead fish (Channa argus). Anim. Nutr. 2017, 3, 156–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, L.; Zhang, W.; Gladstone, S.; Ng, W.-K.; Zhang, J.; Shao, Q. Effects of isoenergetic diets with varying protein and lipid levels on the growth, feed utilization, metabolic enzymes activities, antioxidative status and serum biochemical parameters of black sea bream (Acanthopagrus schlegelii). Aquaculture 2019, 513, 734397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chatzifotis, S.; Panagiotidou, M.; Papaioannou, N.; Pavlidis, M.; Nengas, I.; Mylonas, C.C. Effect of dietary lipid levels on growth, feed utilization, body composition and serum metabolites of meagre (Argyrosomus regius) juveniles. Aquaculture 2010, 307, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Morais, S.; Bell, J.; Robertson, D.A.; Roy, W.J.; Morris, P.C. Protein/lipid ratios in extruded diets for Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.): Effects on growth, feed utilisation, muscle composition and liver histology. Aquaculture 2001, 203, 101–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.-T.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tian, L.-X.; Mai, K.-S.; Du, Z.-Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, H.-J. Effect of dietary lipid level on growth performance, lipid deposition, hepatic lipogenesis in juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Aquaculture 2005, 249, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bright, L.A.; Coyle, S.D.; Tidwell, J.H. Effect of Dietary Lipid Level and Protein Energy Ratio on Growth and Body Composition of Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2005, 36, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yin, P.; Xie, S.; Zhuang, Z.; He, X.; Tang, X.; Tian, L.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J. Dietary supplementation of bile acid attenuate adverse effects of high-fat diet on growth performance, antioxidant ability, lipid accumulation and intestinal health in juvenile largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Aquaculture 2021, 531, 735864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhou, Y.-L.; Guo, J.-L.; Tang, R.-J.; Ma, H.-J.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lin, S.-M. High dietary lipid level alters the growth, hepatic metabolism enzyme, and anti-oxidative capacity in juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 46, 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fakhri, S.; Abbaszadeh, F.; Dargahi, L.; Jorjani, M. Astaxanthin: A mechanistic review on its biological activities and health benefits. Pharmacol. Res. 2018, 136, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fang, N.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.; Zhao, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, X.; Du, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H. De novo synthesis of astaxanthin: From organisms to genes. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 92, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yi, X.; Xu, W.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, W.; Mai, K. Effects of dietary astaxanthin and xanthophylls on the growth and skin pigmentation of large yellow croaker Larimichthys croceus. Aquaculture 2014, 433, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choubert, G.; Mendes-Pinto, M.M.; Morais, R. Pigmenting efficacy of astaxanthin fed to rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss: Effect of dietary astaxanthin and lipid sources. Aquaculture 2006, 257, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Palma, J.; Andrade, J.; Bureau, D. The impact of dietary supplementation with astaxanthin on egg quality and growth of long snout seahorse (Hippocampus guttulatus) juveniles. Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 23, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.; Sun, L.; Niu, X.; Chen, X.; Tian, J.; Kong, Y.; Wang, G.Q. Astaxanthin protects lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in Channa argus through inhibiting NF-κB and MAPKs signaling pathways. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 86, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xie, S.; Fang, W.; Wei, D.; Liu, Y.; Yin, P.; Niu, J.; Tian, L.-X. Dietary supplementation of Haematococcus pluvialis improved the immune capacity and low salinity tolerance ability of post-larval white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 452–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, X.; Zu, L.; Wang, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wu, X. Micro-algal astaxanthin could improve the antioxidant capability, immunity and ammonia resistance of juvenile Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 102, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Ishikawa, M.; Koshio, S.; Yokoyama, S.; Hossain, S.; Moss, A.S. Effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on juvenile kuruma shrimp, Marsupenaeus japonicus. Aquaculture 2018, 491, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xie, J.; Fang, H.; He, X.; Liao, S.; Liu, Y.; Tian, L.; Niu, J. Study on mechanism of synthetic astaxanthin and Haematococcus pluvialis improving the growth performance and antioxidant capacity under acute hypoxia stress of golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) and enhancing anti-inflammatory by activating Nrf2-ARE pathway to antagonize the NF-κB pathway. Aquaculture 2020, 518, 734657. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lim, K.C.; Yusoff, F.M.; Shariff, M.; Kamarudin, M.S.; Nagao, N. Dietary supplementation of astaxanthin enhances hemato-biochemistry and innate immunity of Asian seabass, Lates calcarifer (Bloch, 1790). Aquaculture 2019, 512, 734339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Y.; Pham, T.X.; Wegner, C.J.; Kim, B.; Ku, C.S.; Park, Y.-K.; Lee, J.-Y. Astaxanthin lowers plasma TAG concentrations and increases hepatic antioxidant gene expression in diet-induced obesity mice. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 112, 1797–1804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Jia, Y.; Wu, C.; Kim, J.; Kim, B.; Lee, S.-J. Astaxanthin reduces hepatic lipid accumulations in high-fat-fed C57BL/6J mice via activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and inhibition of PPAR gamma and Akt. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 28, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Du, Z.-Y.; Liu, Y.-J.; Tian, L.-X.; Wang, J.-T.; Wang, Y.; Liang, G.-Y. Effect of dietary lipid level on growth, feed utilization and body composition by juvenile grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquac. Nutr. 2005, 11, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, T.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Hu, S.; Jiang, Y.; Zhong, X. Effect of dietary lipid level on growth, feed utilization and body composition of juvenile giant croaker Nibea japonica. Aquaculture 2014, 434, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jia, R.; Cao, L.-P.; Du, J.-L.; He, Q.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Jeney, G.; Xu, P.; Yin, G. Effects of high-fat diet on antioxidative status, apoptosis and inflammation in liver of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) via Nrf2, TLRs and JNK pathways. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 104, 391–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dai, Y.-J.; Cao, X.-F.; Zhang, D.-D.; Li, X.-F.; Liu, W.-B.; Jiang, G. Chronic inflammation is a key to inducing liver injury in blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) fed with high-fat diet. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2019, 97, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Guo, J.-L.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Zhao, H.; Chen, W.-Y.; Chen, Y.-J.; Lin, S.-M. Effect of dietary lipid level on growth, lipid metabolism and oxidative status of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Aquaculture 2019, 506, 394–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalinowski, C.T.; Robaina, L.E.; Izquierdo, M. Effect of dietary astaxanthin on the growth performance, lipid composition and post-mortem skin colouration of red porgy Pagrus pagrus. Aquac. Int. 2011, 19, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ikeuchi, M.; Koyama, T.; Takahashi, J.; Yazawa, K. Effects of Astaxanthin in Obese Mice Fed a High-Fat Diet. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 893–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Xia, W.; Tang, N.; Kord-Varkaneh, H.; Low, T.Y.; Tan, S.C.; Wu, X.; Zhu, Y. The effects of astaxanthin supplementation on obesity, blood pressure, CRP, glycemic biomarkers, and lipid profile: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 161, 105113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ursoniu, S.; Sahebkar, A.; Serban, M.-C.; Banach, M. Lipid profile and glucose changes after supplementation with astaxanthin: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Med. Sci. AMS 2015, 11, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Ning, L.-J.; He, A.-Y.; Li, J.-M.; Lu, D.-L.; Jiao, J.-G.; Li, L.-Y.; Zhang, M.-L.; Chen, L.; Du, Z.-Y. Mechanisms and metabolic regulation of PPARα activation in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2016, 1861, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xie, S.; Yin, P.; Tian, L.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J. Lipid metabolism and plasma metabolomics of juvenile largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides were affected by dietary oxidized fish oil. Aquaculture 2020, 522, 735158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vial, G.; Dubouchaud, H.; Couturier, K.; Cottet-Rousselle, C.; Taleux, N.; Athias, A.; Galinier, A.; Casteilla, L.; Leverve, X.M. Effects of a high-fat diet on energy metabolism and ROS production in rat liver. J. Hepatol. 2011, 54, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weihong, C.; Bin, C.; JianFeng, Y. Transmembrane protein 126B protects against high fat diet (HFD)-induced renal injury by suppressing dyslipidemia via inhibition of ROS. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 509, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, T.; Hu, Y.; Peng, M.; Chu, W.; Hu, Y.; Zhong, L. Effects of high-fat diet on growth performance, lipid accumulation and lipid metabolism-related MicroRNA/gene expression in the liver of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 234, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lesser, M.P. Oxidative Stress in Marine Environments: Biochemistry and Physiological Ecology. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2006, 68, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Jagruthi, C.; Yogeshwari, G.; Anbazahan, S.M.; Mari, L.S.S.; Arockiaraj, J.; Mariappan, P.; Sudhakar, G.R.L.; Balasundaram, C.; Harikrishnan, R. Effect of dietary astaxanthin against Aeromonas hydrophila infection in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 41, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yin, P.; Zhou, W.; Tian, L.-X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, D.; Niu, J. Astaxanthin Attenuates Fish Oil-Related Hepatotoxicity and Oxidative Insult in Juvenile Pacific White Shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei). Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Koruk, M.; Taysi, S.; Savas, M.C.; Yilmaz, O.; Akçay, F.; Karakök, M. Oxidative stress and enzymatic antioxidant status in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2004, 34, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Bhuvaneswari, S.; Yogalakshmi, B.; Sreeja, S.; Anuradha, C.V. Astaxanthin reduces hepatic endoplasmic reticulum stress and nuclear factor-κB-mediated inflammation in high fructose and high fat diet-fed mice. Cell Stress Chaperones 2014, 19, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kumar, S.; Stokes, J.; Singh, U.P.; Gunn, K.S.; Acharya, A.; Manne, U.; Mishra, M.K. Targeting Hsp70: A possible therapy for cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016, 374, 156–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Breckenridge, D.G.; Xue, D. Regulation of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization by BCL-2 family proteins and caspases. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cheng, E.H.-Y.; Wei, M.C.; Weiler, S.; Flavell, R.; Mak, T.W.; Lindsten, T.; Korsmeyer, S.J. BCL-2, BCL-XL Sequester BH3 Domain-Only Molecules Preventing BAX- and BAK-Mediated Mitochondrial Apoptosis. Mol. Cell 2001, 8, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fridman, J.S.; Lowe, S.W. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 2003, 22, 9030–9040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Riedl, S.J.; Shi, Y. Molecular mechanisms of caspase regulation during apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fogarty, C.E.; Bergmann, A. Killers creating new life: Caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease. Cell Death Differ. 2017, 24, 1390–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Latimer, G.E.; Horwitz, W. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; AOAC International: Rockville, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  53. Janero, D.R. Malondialdehyde and thiobarbituric acid-reactivity as diagnostic indices of lipid peroxidation and peroxidative tissue injury. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 9, 515–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ōyanagui, Y. Reevaluation of assay methods and establishment of kit for superoxide dismutase activity. Anal. Biochem. 1984, 142, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bucolo, G.; David, H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin. Chem. 1973, 19, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Allain, C.C.; Poon, L.S.; Chan, C.S.; Richmond, W.; Fu, P.C. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin. Chem. 1974, 20, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, K.-Z.; Shaw, R.A.; Man, A.; Dembinski, T.C.; Mantsch, H.H. Reagent-free, Simultaneous Determination of Serum Cholesterol in HDL and LDL by Infrared Spectroscopy. Clin. Chem. 2002, 48, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lowry, O.H.; Rosebrough, N.J.; Farr, A.L.; Randall, R.J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. [Google Scholar]
  59. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, N.; Jin, L.; Zhou, H.; Qiu, X. Effects of dietary arginine levels and carbohydrate-to-lipid ratios on mRNA expression of growth-related hormones in largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2012, 179, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yu, L.; Yu, H.; Liang, X.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Li, F.; Wu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Xue, M. Dietary butylated hydroxytoluene improves lipid metabolism, antioxidant and anti-apoptotic response of largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 72, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Martyniuk, C.J.; Feswick, A.; Spade, D.J.; Kroll, K.J.; Barber, D.S.; Denslow, N.D. Effects of acute dieldrin exposure on neurotransmitters and global gene transcription in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) hypothalamus. Neurotoxicology 2010, 31, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g001 550
Figure 1. Effect of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on hepatic lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass. Lipid droplets and nuclei are dyed in red and blue by oil red O staining, respectively (100 × magnification). (a), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed control diet; (b), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed high fat diet (HF); (c), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed HFA1; (d), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed HFA2.
Figure 1. Effect of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on hepatic lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass. Lipid droplets and nuclei are dyed in red and blue by oil red O staining, respectively (100 × magnification). (a), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed control diet; (b), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed high fat diet (HF); (c), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed HFA1; (d), the lipid accumulation of juvenile largemouth bass fed HFA2.
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g001
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on the relative expression of hepatic lipid metabolism-related mRNAs of largemouth bass. (a), the mRNA level of peroxisome proliferator activating receptor α (PPARα) in liver; (b), the mRNA level of peroxisome proliferator activating receptor γ (PPARγ) in liver; (c), the mRNA level of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) in liver; (d), the mRNA level of 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase (HMGCR) in liver; (e), the mRNA level of retinoid X receptor α (RXRα); (f), the mRNA level of lipoprotein binding protein (HBP) in liver. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on the relative expression of hepatic lipid metabolism-related mRNAs of largemouth bass. (a), the mRNA level of peroxisome proliferator activating receptor α (PPARα) in liver; (b), the mRNA level of peroxisome proliferator activating receptor γ (PPARγ) in liver; (c), the mRNA level of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) in liver; (d), the mRNA level of 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase (HMGCR) in liver; (e), the mRNA level of retinoid X receptor α (RXRα); (f), the mRNA level of lipoprotein binding protein (HBP) in liver. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g002
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on hepatic anti-oxidative ability and oxidative stress of largemouth bass. (a), the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in plasma; (b), the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in plasma; (c), the SOD activity in liver; (d), the MDA content in plasma; (e); the mRNA level of SOD in liver; (f), the mRNA level of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-px) in liver. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significantly differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on hepatic anti-oxidative ability and oxidative stress of largemouth bass. (a), the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in plasma; (b), the malondialdehyde (MDA) content in plasma; (c), the SOD activity in liver; (d), the MDA content in plasma; (e); the mRNA level of SOD in liver; (f), the mRNA level of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-px) in liver. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significantly differences (p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g003
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g004 550
Figure 4. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on the relative expression of immune response-related mRNAs in the liver of largemouth bass. (a), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-3 (Caspase3) in fish fed different diets; (b), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-9 (Caspase9) in fish fed different diets; (c), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-10 (Caspase10) in fish fed different diets; (d), the mRNA level of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) in fish fed different diets; (e), the mRNA level of Bcl-2-associated death protein (BAD) in fish fed different diets; (f), the mRNA level of P53 in fish fed different diets; (g), the mRNA level of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) in fish fed different diets; (h), the mRNA level of interleukin 15 (IL15) in fish fed different diets; (i), the mRNA level of Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in fish fed different diets. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effects of high-fat diet and astaxanthin on the relative expression of immune response-related mRNAs in the liver of largemouth bass. (a), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-3 (Caspase3) in fish fed different diets; (b), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-9 (Caspase9) in fish fed different diets; (c), the mRNA level of cysteine-aspartic proteases-10 (Caspase10) in fish fed different diets; (d), the mRNA level of B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2) in fish fed different diets; (e), the mRNA level of Bcl-2-associated death protein (BAD) in fish fed different diets; (f), the mRNA level of P53 in fish fed different diets; (g), the mRNA level of transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ) in fish fed different diets; (h), the mRNA level of interleukin 15 (IL15) in fish fed different diets; (i), the mRNA level of Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in fish fed different diets. Values were presented as means ± SEM of four replicates, and mean values with unlike letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 18 00642 g004
Table
Table 1. Effects of dietary supplementation of astaxanthin on growth performance, feed utilization and somatic parameters of juvenile largemouth bass fed high-fat diets (HFDs).
Table 1. Effects of dietary supplementation of astaxanthin on growth performance, feed utilization and somatic parameters of juvenile largemouth bass fed high-fat diets (HFDs).
CHFHFA1HFA2
IBW (g)15.26 ± 0.0215.26 ± 0.0115.25 ± 0.0215.23 ± 0.03
FBW (g)64.45 ± 1.21 a,b62.24 ± 1.17 a67.04 ± 1.34 b64.91 ± 1.13 a,b
WG (%)322.88 ± 8.05 a,b307.92 ± 7.43 a339.53 ± 8.26 b326.34 ± 8.42 a,b
SR (%)96.67 ± 1.6796.25 ± 2.3996.25 ± 3.7595 ± 2.89
SGR (% day−1)2.57 ± 0.04 ab2.51 ± 0.03 a2.64 ± 0.03 b2.56 ± 0.04 a,b
PER2.08 ± 0.03 a2.19 ± 0.06 a2.36 ± 0.03 b2.38 ± 0.04 b
CF (g cm−3)2.31 ± 0.042.3 ± 0.052.27 ± 0.032.29 ± 0.06
VSI (%)8.06 ± 0.16 a8.98 ± 0.2 b9.12 ± 0.18 b8.89 ± 0.17 b
HSI (%)2.3 ± 0.06 a2.53 ± 0.06 b2.29 ± 0.07 a2.1 ± 0.09 a
IPF (%)1.31 ± 0.13 a2.09 ± 0.09 c1.88 ± 0.16 b,c1.58 ± 0.18 a,b
Initial body weight (IBW); Final body weight (FBW, g) = final body weight/final number of fish; Weight gain rate (WG, %) = 100 × (final body weight − initial body weight)/initial body weight; Survival rate (SR,%) = 100 × (final number of fish)/(initial number of fish); Specific growth rate (SGR, % day−1) = 100 × (Ln final individual weight − Ln initial individual weight)/number of feeding days; Protein efficiency ratio (PER) = total weight gain(g)/protein intake (g); Condition factor (CF, g cm−3) = 100 × (body weight, g)/(body length, cm)3; Viscerosomatic index (VSI, %) = 100 × (viscera weight, g)/(whole bodyweight, g); Hepatosomatic index (HSI, %) = 100 × (liver weight, g)/(whole body weight, g); Intraperitoneal fat ratio (IPF) = 100 × (intraperitoneal fat weight/whole body weight). Results were presented as “mean ± SEM” of four replicates, and mean values on the same line with different letters indicate significantly different (p < 0.05), while with the same letter or no letter mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on whole-body and muscle proximate composition of largemouth bass fed HFD (wet weight %).
Table 2. Effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on whole-body and muscle proximate composition of largemouth bass fed HFD (wet weight %).
CHFHFA1HFA2
Whole-body
Moisture70.38 ± 0.22 b69.24 ± 0.11 a69.01 ± 0.19 a68.65 ± 0.26 a
Crude Protein17.30 ± 0.1516.97 ± 0.1217.10 ± 0.1617.32± 0.15
Crude Lipid7.32 ± 0.81 a9.20± 0.21 b9.08 ± 0.66 b9.64 ± 0.31 b
Ash3.87 ± 0.11 b3.74 ± 0.08 a,b3.69 ± 0.05 a,b3.61 ± 0.05 a
Muscle
Moisture78.01 ± 0.1877.92 ± 0.1177.72 ± 0.0977.66 ± 0.10
Crude Protein19.90 ± 0.1919.73 ± 0.1719.92 ± 0.0619.76 ± 0.23
Crude Lipid0.76 ± 0.11 a1.46 ± 0.19 b1.30 ± 0.05 b1.40 ± 0.15 b
Ash2.87 ± 0.04 b2.68 ± 0.06 a2.65 ± 0.06 a2.57 ± 0.03 a
Results were presented as “mean ± SEM” of four replicates, and mean values on the same line with different letters indicate significantly different (p < 0.05), while with the same letter or no letter mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on Biochemical parameters of plasma and liver in juvenile largemouth bass fed high-fat diets.
Table 3. Effects of dietary astaxanthin supplementation on Biochemical parameters of plasma and liver in juvenile largemouth bass fed high-fat diets.
CHFHFA1HFA2
Plasma----
TG (mmol L−1)5.1 ± 0.43 a8.51 ± 1.07 b5.62± 0.38 a4.57± 0.82 a
TC (mmol L−1)15.63 ± 0.95 a19.68 ± 0.58 b16.17 ± 0.37 a,b16.45 ± 0.99 a,b
HDL/LDL0.32 ± 0.02 a,b0.24 ± 0.02 a0.27 ± 0.03 a0.37 ± 0.03 b
LDH (U L−1)615.37 ± 14.07681.88 ± 41.96626.67 ± 19.97628.24 ± 23
Liver----
Lipase (U g prot−1)0.17 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.020.20 ± 0.02
TG (mmol g prot−1)0.06 ± 0.00 a0.07 ± 0.01 a,b0.08 ± 0.01 b0.07 ± 0.0 a,b
TC (mmol g prot−1)0.04 ± 0.01 a0.08 ± 0.01 b0.05 ± 0.01 a0.05 ± 0.01 a,b
TG, total triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; Lipase. Results were presented as “mean ± SEM” of four replicates, and mean values on the same line with different letters indicate significantly different (p < 0.05), while with the same letter or no letter mean no significant difference (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets (% dry matter).
Table 4. Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets (% dry matter).
Ingredients (%)CHFHFA1HFA2
Fish meal50505050
Wheat flour10.910.910.82510.75
Chicken meal6.006.006.006.00
Microcrystalline cellulose7000
Beer yeast3333
Shrimp meal3333
Soy protein concentrate1111
Soybean oil2999
Fish oil3.003.003.003.00
Choline chloride (50%)0.50.50.50.5
Monocalcium phosphate1.501.501.501.50
Vitamin mixture a1111
Mineral mixture b1111
Vc phosphonate0.10.10.10.1
Astaxanthin c0.000.000.0750.15
Soybean protein concentrate10101010
Proximate composition (%)----
Moisture6.606.546.345.68
Crude protein49.0748.4849.0749.18
Crude lipid10.8718.0818.0618.21
Ash15.5915.4015.6216.84
a Vitamin premix (IU or mg kg−1 diet): vitamin B1, 800; vitamin B2, 1600; vitamin B6, 1200; nicotinic acid, 3800; D-Ca pantothenate, 2500; myo-inositol, 4000; d-biotin, 40; folic acid, 320; vitamin A, 400,000 IU; vitamin E, 16,000; vitamin K3, 600; vitamin D3, 80,000 IU; vitamin B12, 4; vitamin C, 35,000. b Mineral premix (mg kg−1 diet): magnesium, 3000; iron, 1800; manganese, 800; iodine, 250; copper, 350; zinc, 6500; selenium, 15; cobalt, 60. c The synthetic astaxanthin (Carophyll Pink, 10%) was obtained from DSM (The Netherlands).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xie, S.; Yin, P.; Tian, L.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Niu, J. Dietary Supplementation of Astaxanthin Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Ability and Immune Response of Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Fed High-Fat Diet. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120642

AMA Style

Xie S, Yin P, Tian L, Yu Y, Liu Y, Niu J. Dietary Supplementation of Astaxanthin Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Ability and Immune Response of Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Fed High-Fat Diet. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(12):642. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120642

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xie, Shiwei, Peng Yin, Lixia Tian, Yingying Yu, Yongjian Liu, and Jin Niu. 2020. "Dietary Supplementation of Astaxanthin Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Ability and Immune Response of Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Fed High-Fat Diet" Marine Drugs 18, no. 12: 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120642

APA Style

Xie, S., Yin, P., Tian, L., Yu, Y., Liu, Y., & Niu, J. (2020). Dietary Supplementation of Astaxanthin Improved the Growth Performance, Antioxidant Ability and Immune Response of Juvenile Largemouth Bass (Micropterus salmoides) Fed High-Fat Diet. Marine Drugs, 18(12), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120642

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop