Next Article in Journal
α-Conotoxin TxID and [S9K]TxID, α3β4 nAChR Antagonists, Attenuate Expression and Reinstatement of Nicotine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference in Mice
Next Article in Special Issue
Fucoidan and Lung Function: Value in Viral Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Microalgae Encapsulation Systems for Food, Pharmaceutical and Cosmetics Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Morphogenetic (Mucin Expression) as Well as Potential Anti-Corona Viral Activity of the Marine Secondary Metabolite Polyphosphate on A549 Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioactivity Potential of Marine Natural Products from Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and In Silico Anti-SARS-COV-2 Evaluation

by
Eman Maher Zahran
1,†,
Amgad Albohy
2,†,
Amira Khalil
2,
Alyaa Hatem Ibrahim
3,
Heba Ali Ahmed
1,
Ebaa M. El-Hossary
4,
Gerhard Bringmann
5,* and
Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen
1,6,*
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, Universities Zone, New Minia City 61111, Egypt
2
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, The British University in Egypt (BUE), El-Sherouk City 11837, Egypt
3
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt
4
National Centre for Radiation Research & Technology, Egyptian Atomic Energy Authority, Ahmed El-Zomor St. 3, El-Zohoor Dist., Nasr City, Cairo, 11765, Egypt
5
Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
6
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors have equally contributed to this work.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(12), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120645
Submission received: 16 November 2020 / Revised: 6 December 2020 / Accepted: 9 December 2020 / Published: 16 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Natural Products against Coronaviruses)

Abstract

:
Marine organisms and their associated microbes are rich in diverse chemical leads. With the development of marine biotechnology, a considerable number of research activities are focused on marine bacteria and fungi-derived bioactive compounds. Marine bacteria and fungi are ranked on the top of the hierarchy of all organisms, as they are responsible for producing a wide range of bioactive secondary metabolites with possible pharmaceutical applications. Thus, they have the potential to provide future drugs against challenging diseases, such as cancer, a range of viral diseases, malaria, and inflammation. This review aims at describing the literature on secondary metabolites that have been obtained from Scleractinian-associated organisms including bacteria, fungi, and zooxanthellae, with full coverage of the period from 1982 to 2020, as well as illustrating their biological activities and structure activity relationship (SAR). Moreover, all these compounds were filtered based on ADME analysis to determine their physicochemical properties, and 15 compounds were selected. The selected compounds were virtually investigated for potential inhibition for SARS-CoV-2 targets using molecular docking studies. Promising potential results against SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and methyltransferase (nsp16) are presented.

1. Introduction

Marine ecosystems harbor numerous, still unexplored and taxonomically diverse micro- and macro-organisms. These marine organisms have the ability to produce novel compounds, as secondary metabolites, with a wide structural diversity and various important pharmacological potentials [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Among marine organisms, coral reefs are considered to be the biologically most diverse ecosystem on earth. Moreover, it is recognized as an important source of bioactive secondary metabolites [7]. Scleractinia is the order involving stony corals, which are a clade of cnidarians that build a calcium carbonate skeleton. It includes 31 families, about 240 genera and over 1500 species [8,9]. Corals usually harbor vast communities of beneficial microbes [10]. The coral holobiont is composed from the coral animal and its associated microorganisms consisting of bacteria and fungi, complemented by symbiont unicellular organisms known as zooxanthellae [11]. The coral holobiont is a very dynamic ecosystem, where the members vary according to environmental conditions and their daily requirements [12]. Coral-associated microbes are existing in a number of habitats related to corals, including mucus on coral surfaces, intracellular spaces within coral tissues, areas within coral skeletons, and the surrounding seawater [13]. Each of these habitats is believed to harbor different bacterial populations [14]. Despite high microbial diversity, corals have been reported to host species-specific microbial communities for beneficial effects [15,16]. Microbial associations over evolutionary time scales are likely to contribute to genome differentiation in both the host and its associated microbial partners, a process referred to as hologenome evolution [14]. Evidence that metabolic interaction between holobiont members shaped genome evolution may be in the form of genetic systems acquired by the host genome by horizontal gene transfer [17]. Meanwhile it has been proven that the survival of Scleractinia against dramatic environmental changes over time, its adaption to new environmental conditions, in addition to its resistance to coral-specific pathogens is linked to coral-associated microbes [18]. For several decades, marine microorganisms have been drawing research attention, as many new and potent bioactive compounds have been discovered from bacteria and fungi residing on many marine macro-organisms, especially on corals [19,20]. Researchers are still investigating the associations that occur among microbes, their hosts, and the individuals of the community sharing the same habitat. Now, it is becoming evident that these associations involve the sharing of complex chemical signals either they are competitive or mutually advantageous, which may be reflected in the genome composition of the partners eventually leading to the observed variety of bioactive secondary metabolites [21,22].
Scleractinia-associated organisms have been attracting the attention as a potential source of bioactive compounds during the past decade, reflecting the great increase in the number of the isolated compounds over the past ten years (Figure 1).
The associated micro-organisms showed diverse geographical distribution. Associated bacteria and fungi are mainly collected from regions of East Africa up to the Southern East of Asia, as well as the East of Australia with bacterial strains being more abundant in the North Atlantic Ocean at the North of Southern America (Figure 2).
The most studied Scleractinian family was Pocilloporidae with 51 isolated compounds, 80% of which were isolated from different fungal strains, while the least studied one was Oculinidae, which was confined only to Zooxanthellates and gave rise to six compounds (Figure 3).
Many classes of Scleractinian-associated microorganisms were cultivated and identified but with no further chemical investigation. The bacteria attained the largest portion (86%), with the class γ-Proteobacteria being the most easily culturable one (21%), α-Proteobacteria (16%), Actinobacteria (14%), Cyanophyceae (8%), and the others being equally distributed between the respective genera. The Scleractinian-associated fungi were less easily cultivated (14%), with the two most reported classes, Dothideomycetes (9%) and Eurotiomycetes (7%) (Figure 4).
Although the largest portion of Scleractinian-associated microorganisms were only identified, a vast number was also subjected to chemical investigation and led to the isolation and structural elucidation of 134 compounds up to date. From different fungal strains, 84 compounds (63% of the total number) were obtained, 61 of them were received from those belonging to Sordariomycetes, with most of them (46 compounds) isolated from the genus Scopulariopsis, the other 15 compounds were obtained from the genus Gliomastix. The remaining 23 compounds were found in Aspergillus (18 compounds) and Talaromyces (five compounds), both belonging to the Eurotiomycetes.
On the other hand, more bacterial strains were studied though producing a smaller number of metabolites (44 compounds). From Actinobacteria, 21 compounds were isolated, with 14 metabolites from Streptomyces, six from Pelmonas and only one from Nesterenkonia. This was followed by the class α-Proteobacteria, from which twelve compounds were obtained from Erythrobacter, and the class Cyanophyceae, from which eight metabolites were obtained (four from Synechocystis sp., and the other four compounds isolated from both Roseofilum sp. and Phormidium sp.). The least studied bacterial class was the γ-Proteobacteria with only three isolated compounds from the two studied species Pseudoalteromonas (two constituents) and Microalbu (one compound). The zooxanthellae were the least studied Scleractinian-associated microorganisms with only six isolated compounds (5%) (Figure 5).
Diverse classes of compounds were isolated from Scleractinia-associated microorganisms, with xanthones and anthraquinones being the most abundant metabolites (15%), all of which were isolated from fungal strains (Figure 6).
The metabolites isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms exhibited diverse biological activities, with more than 50% of the isolated compounds having cytotoxic properties (33%), followed by antibacterial (22%) potencies (Figure 7).

2. Scleractinia-Associated Fungi

In the aqueous methanol extract of solid rice culture of Scopulariopsis sp., which had been isolated from the inner tissue of the host coral Stylophora collected from the Red Sea in Egypt, 29 different compounds were detected. They comprised of eleven xanthones (compounds 111), five sesquiterpene derivatives 1216, four phenyl ethers 1720, five alkaloids 2125, and four miscellaneous compounds 2629 (Figure 8). Compounds 1, 2, 15, 16, 21, and 26 were new, while 6 and 14 had previously been isolated from the host coral Stylopora itself. Remarkably, the isolation of compounds 6 and 14 from the Stylophora extract evidences that production of congeneric compounds may go on when the fungus is restricted within its host [23]. The ethyl acetate extract of this fungus cultivated on solid rice medium was found to display cytotoxicity against the mouse lymphoma cell line L5178Y [23]. Cytotoxicity investigations of the isolated compounds against the mouse lymphoma cell line (L5178Y) highlighted compounds 3, 17, 18, and 24 as significant with IC50 values of 1.5, 9.5, 9.2, and 1.2 µM, respectively, compared to that of kahalalide F with an IC50 value of 4.3 µM as a reference drug. The remaining compounds were not cytotoxic to mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells.
Structure activity relationship (SAR) studies showed that the cytotoxicity of AGI-B4 (3) and the lack of activity for the remaining xanthone derivatives 12 and 411, indicated that both the dihydroxanthenone nucleus and a C-12 free hydroxy group are operational landscapes that are imperative for the cytotoxic activity. Comparison between scopularide A (24) and scopularide B (25) suggested that the length of the aliphatic side chain and hence possibly the lipophilicity are also important for the activity. Concerning the cytotoxicity of the biphenyl ether derivatives violaceol I (17) and violaceol II (18) and the absence of such activity for diorcinol (19), led to the hypothesis that increasing the number of hydroxy groups in these molecules boosted the cytotoxic activity [24].
In an earlier study, pinselin (5) exhibited significant immunosuppressive activity against Con-A induced (T cell) and LPS-induced (B cell) proliferations of mouse splenic lymphocytes, with IC50 values of 5.1 and 7.4 µg/mL, respectively (azathioprine was the reference drug with IC50 value of 2.7 µg/mL in both types). A comparable study investigated the immunosuppressive activity of sydowinin A (9) and sydowinin B (6) revealed the strong potency of sydowinin A (9), with IC50 values of 6.5 and 7.1 µg/mL, respectively, while sydowinin B (6) was moderately active with IC50 values of 19.2 and 20.8 µg/mL, respectively [25]. SAR studies suggested that the presence of the free OH group at position 2 in pinselin (5) [26] might be important for the appearance of the activity. It was already known that the suppressive effects of substituted xanthones against the proliferation of human lymphocytes were ascribable to the positions of substituents on the xanthone nucleus [26].
4-Methylcandidusin A (30), aspetritone A (31), and aspetritone B (32), as well as 15 known compounds including prenylcandidusin derivatives, terphenyllin analogues, and anthraquinone congeners (compounds 3347) were detected from the ethyl acetate extract of the culture of the coral-derived fungus Aspergillus tritici SP2-8-1 (Figure 9). The fungus was isolated from the Scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis (family: Euphylliidae) collected at Port Dickson, Malaysia, and identified by ITS sequence homology [27]. Aspetritone A (31), aspetritone B (32), and 3-prenylterphenyllin (39) showed significant cytotoxicity against HeLa, A549, and HepG2 cell lines. Compound 31 attained IC50 values of 2.67, 3.13, and 3.87 µM, respectively. Compound 32 reached IC50 values of 10.57, 4.67, and 8.57 µM, while compound 39 achieved IC50 values of 3.23, 3.87, and 2.1 µM, respectively. The cytotoxic activities of compounds 31, 32, and 39 were compared with those of doxorubicin as a reference drug (IC50 values of 0.5, 0.09, and 1.06 µM, respectively). The other compounds showed moderate cytotoxicity, with IC50 values ranging from 13 to 19.7 µM except for compounds 3,4-dimethylcandidusin A (35), 4,4′-deoxyterphenyllin (37), 3-hydroxy-3″-deoxyterphenyllin (42), 3-hydroxy-2-hydroxymethyl-1-methoxyanthracene-9,10-dione (46) and 1,2,3-trimethoxy-7-hydroxy- methylanthracene-9,10-dione (47), which were totally inactive. Compound 31 and 4-methyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (34) were significantly active against two strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) (including ATCC 43300 and CGMCC 1.12409 strains), with MIC values of 7.53 and 7.63 µg/mL, 3.8 and 3.8 µg/mL, respectively, compared to chloramphenicol as a reference drug, with MICs of 7.67 and 7.87 µg/mL, respectively. Compound 33 was strongly active against the methicillin-resistant CGMCC 1.12409 strain, but moderately active against MRSA ATCC 43300 strain with MICs of 7.57 and 15.67 µg/mL, respectively. Compounds 32 and 39 as well as emodin (44) were moderately active against both strains of MRSA, with MIC values ranging around 15 µg/mL. Compound 30, candidusin A (36), 4″-deoxyterphenyllin (38), compound 40, 3-hydroxyterphenyllin (41), 3″-prenylterphenyllin (43), and 3-hydroxy-1,2,5,6-tetramethoxyanthracene-9,10-dione (45) were inadequately active while other compounds totally lacked such an activity.
SAR studies indicated that prenylation of terphenyllin or candidusin and the cyclohexene moiety in anthraquinone derivatives may influence their bioactivity. C-prenylation, which plays an important role in diversification of natural bio compounds in polyhydroxy-p-terphenyl analogues, as 3,4-dimethyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (33), 4-methyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (34), 3-prenylterphenyllin (39) and 3″-prenylterphenyllin (43), critically influences their cytotoxicity and antibacterial activities, compared to the un-prenylated terphenyllin and candidusin derivatives. Additionally, the special cyclohexene moiety positioned within compounds 31, 32, and 4447 also significantly affected their relatively strong bioactivity [28].
A complementary study on the fungus Scopulariopsis sp., isolated from the hard coral Stylophora sp. collected near the Egyptian coastline of Ain El-Sokhna in the Red Sea, was constructed to explore its metabolic potential when grown on white beans. This growth condition was chosen due to the fact that switching the culture media from rice to white beans had already in the past caused significant changes of fungal metabolites [29]. This approach was rewarding because the metabolites isolated in that study had not been detected when the fungus was cultivated on rice medium, which strongly supports the one strain many compounds (OSMAC) approach [30]. Two new terpenoids, 3β,7β,15α,24-tetrahydroxyolean-12-ene-11,22-dione (48) and 15α,22β,24-trihydroxyolean-11,13-diene-3-one (49) as well as 14 known compounds, 5064 (Figure 10), were isolated, including triterpenoids, coumarins, sesquiterpenoids, and polyketides. When all compounds were investigated for cytotoxicity against mouse lymphoma cells L5178Y, and for antibacterial and antitubercular activities, none of them displayed significant activity even up to a dose of 10 µg/mL [31].
Soyasapogenol B (52), which had originally been isolated from soybean, showed hepatoprotective effects in vitro against aflatoxin B-induced HepG2 cells at a dose of 10 µg/mL, where the considered SAR studies revealed that both the OH group and the oxygen atom at C-3 and C-24 are crucial for the hepatoprotective potential [32]. Soyasapogenol B (52) has also been documented to attain antimutagenic, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities [33]. 6-Hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromene (56) can be prepared via many pathways including microwave-assisted synthesis and oxidative cyclization. It proved to exhibit antioxidant and cancer protecting effects [34].
Eight new hydroquinone derivatives, gliomastins A–D (6568), 9-O-methylgliomastin C (69), acremonin A 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (70), gliomastin E 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (71), and 6′-O-acetyl-isohomoarbutin (72), together with seven identified analogues (7379) were spotted in the crude extract of the solid rice culture of the marine-derived fungus Gliomastix sp., which was isolated from the scleractinian coral Stylophora sp. (family: Pocilloporidae), collected from the Red Sea in Egypt (Figure 11) [35]. This extract displayed cytotoxic potential against the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line with an inhibition of 69.1% at a dose of 10 µg/mL.
Performing TDDFT-ECD (Time-dependent density functional theory-electrostatic discharge) and OR (odds ratio) calculations to determine the absolute configurations of the new compounds emphasized the novelty of compound 65 as biogenetically derived from a Diels–Alder reaction between derivatives of compounds acremonin A (75) and F-11334A1 (77), and gliomastin B (66) as a sporadically occurring sulfur-containing alkaloid derived from the identified hydroquinone, sydonic acid (13). The compounds gliomastin A (65), 2-methyl-1,4-benzenediol (74), prenylhydroquinone (76), and F-11334A1 (77) exhibited potent cytotoxicity against the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell line, with IC50 values of 1.8, 1, 1.1, and 3 µM, respectively, while compound 75 was moderately active with IC50 value of 9.6 µM, compared to kahalaide F as a reference drug, with a IC50 value of 4.3 µM (Figure 11).
Compounds 74 and 75 exerted strong cytotoxicity while their glycosides 72, 73, and 70 were completely inactive. The ether bridge in 78 and 79 led to an entire loss of cytotoxicity compared to the parent compound 77. When tested for antitubercular activity, compounds 67, 74, 76, and 77 showed moderate activity with MIC value of 12.5 µM, while compound 75 was weekly active with a MIC value of 25 µM (rifampin was used as a reference drug, with a MIC value of <0.64 µM). SAR examination showed the importance of both, the furan ring and the free hydroxy group in compound 67 (which lacked cytotoxicity) compared to compounds 68, 78, and 79, which lacked anti-tubercular activity. Testing the antibacterial potential revealed that compounds 74 and 76 were significantly active, with MICs ranging from 6.25 to 10.12 µM, compared to moxifloxacin as a reference drug, with a MIC value of 1.56 µM [35]. Remarkably, although compound 73 lacked any reported biological activity, it has long been used in traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of heart diseases (Figure 11) [36].
Two oligophenalenone dimers, verruculosin A (80) and verruculosin B (81), along with three known analogues, bacillisporin F (82), duclauxin (83), and xenoclauxin (84), all of which possess a unique octacyclic skeleton, were obtained from the marine-derived fungus Talaromyces verruculosus, which was isolated from Goniopora sp. (family: Poritidae) (Figure 12) [37]. Interestingly, despite the structural resemblance between all the heptacyclic polyketides 8084, they displayed remarkable variances in their activity spectra. In the research for novel anti-tumor agents, compounds 80, 82, 83, and 84 showed potent CDC25B (a specific tyrosine phosphatase) inhibitory activities, with IC50 values of 0.38, 0.4, 0.75 and 0.26 µM, respectively; as a reference compound, Na3VO4 was used with an IC50 value of 0.52 µM. The outcomes designated oligophenalenone dimers as a tool for screening of the new natural CDC25B inhibitor candidates.
Exploring the anti-EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) activity as a new target for the same purpose, all compounds showed moderate potential, except for compound 84, which exhibited the strongest activity, with an IC50 value of 0.24 µg/mL, compared to afatinib as a reference drug of 0.0005 µg/mL [37]. Remarkably, both compound 83 and its analogue 84 showed high potency against murine leukemia L-120 cells and exhibited strong inhibition on mitochondrial respiration [38,39].
Following the biosynthetic pathway of duclauxin (83) from Talaromyces stipitatus, a cascade of redox transformations was characterized to start with the dioxygenase DuxM, to proceed via redox enzymes, and to end with oxidative coupling catalyzed by a P450 monooxygenase [40].

3. Scleractinia-Associated Bacteria

Erythrobacter flavus strain KJ5 (formerly called Erythrobacter sp. strain KJ5) is a yellowish aerobic marine bacterium, which was isolated from the hard coral Acropora nasuta (family: Acroporidae) in the Karimunjawa Islands, Central Java Province, Indonesia. It is worth to mention that previous phylogenetic analysis utilizing 16S rDNA sequence had shown that this species has a genetic similarity of 96% to E. flavus [41]. The genus Erythrobacter was first classified by Shiba and Simidu [42], and found to compromise aerobic marine photosynthetic bacteria that have bacteriochlorophyll, carotenoids as well as non-sulphated carotenoids. Analyses using HPLC, UV–VIS, and FTIR spectrophotometers, and MS/MS with electrospray ionization were employed to identify carotenoids isolated from this strain including compounds 8596 (Figure 13), with caloxanthin sulfate (88) and nostoxanthin (89) as the most abundant representatives. An enzyme activity assay was performed to investigate the unique existence of such compounds, leading to the discovery of sulfotransferases that catalyze the conversion of carotenoids into carotenoid sulfates using the cell-free extract as well as incubation, which may be responsible for the antithrombotic, antifouling, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory activities [43,44,45]. Although hydrogen sulfide is toxic to a wide range of eukaryotic organisms and has also led to the commencement of the coral black band disease, some studies have suggested that the co-existence of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria might convert sulfide to sulfate, which leads to coral health benefits, including corals belonging to the genus Acropora [46].
A bioassay-guided fractionation study of the culture extracts of Streptomyces sp. SCSIO 41399, cultivated from the Scleractinian coral, Porites sp. collected from the Wenchang (Hainan Province, China), led to isolation and identification of eight compounds using spectroscopic data and ECD calculations. These compounds included one new anthracycline, aranciamycin K (97), one new tirandamycin analogue, isotirandamycin B (98), as well as known four anthracycline derivatives, γ-rhodomycinone (99), β-rhodomycinone (100), compound 262-6 (101), and β-rhodomycin-II (102), besides the two known tirandamycin derivatives tirandamycin A (103) and tirandamycin B (104) (Figure 14). In view of the necessity to treasure new antibiotics, and due to the finding that tirandamycins had demonstrated activity against vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, the compounds were tested against Streptococcus agalactiae. Compounds 98, 103, and 104 were highlighted as potent bacteriostatic leads, with MIC values of 5, 2.5, and 2.5 μg/mL, respectively (erythromycin is a reference drug with an IC50 value of 5 μg/mL) [47].
Investigation of compounds 97104 for their in vitro cytotoxicity against the K562 cell lines revealed that compound 101 showed high potency, with an IC50 value of 1.8 μM, while compounds 99 and 102 exhibited moderate cytotoxic activities, with IC50 values of 22 and 12.1 μM, respectively (Paxlitaxel is a reference drug with an IC50 of 0.21 μM). However, when these compounds were tested against five pathogenic fungi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, C. asianum, C. acutatum, Fusarium oxysporum, and P. oryza, no activity was spotted [48].
Remarkably, the first example of bacterial biosynthetic P450 enzymes (TAM I and TAM L) with a versatile activity was reported after revealing that they catalyze a multi-step oxidative cascade of tailoring tirandamycin antibiotics. The cascade starts with tirandamycin C, passes through tirandamycins E and D, followed by successive hydroxylation and epoxidation, to give tirandamycin A (103) and tirandamycin B (104) [49]. Such follow-up modifications in the tirandamycin pathway contribute pointedly to the antibiotic potency, where the SAR found that the MIC of tirandamycin C was 110 µM, far weaker than that of tirandamycin A (MIC = 2.25 µM) [47]. This makes the previously mentioned tailoring steps biologically significant, and tunes towards the production of tirandamycin A, the most potent among all the tirandamycin antibiotics [49].
The new imidazole alkaloid pelopuradazole (105), the three known imidazole alkaloids 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid 106, 2-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid 107, and 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid 108, as well as the two known cyclo-dipeptides pelopurin A (109) and pelopurin B (110) were isolated from a culture of Pelmonas puraquae sp. associated with the coral Acropora sp. (family: Acroporidae) (Figure 15) [50].
Compound 108 showed strong antibacterial inhibition against Ralstonia solanacearun with a MIC value of 2 µg/mL [51]. Markedly, this is the first time to isolate compounds 109 and 110 as natural products after they had previously been reported as merely synthetic compounds prepared from amino acids [52].
A chemical investigation was conducted on a culture of the marine derived bacterium Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus M-157, isolated from a solitary coral belonging to the order Scleractinia, collected at 2000 m depth in the Aviles Canyon, Cantabrian Sea (Biscay Bay, Northeast Atlantic). From the fermentation culture of that strain, five hydroxyquinaldic acid derivatives were isolated, compounds 111115 and their absolute stereostructures were determined by advanced Marfey’s analysis followed by HPLC showing that the α-amino acid building blocks were L-serine, L-glutamine, and L-cysteine (Figure 16). Cytotoxic evaluation of these compounds against the human tumor cell line HepG2 highlighted 3-hydroxyquinaldic acid amide (115) and compound 111 as having moderate and weak activities with IC50 values of 15.6 and 51.5 µM, respectively, while the other compounds did not show activity even up to a concentration of 20 µg/mL [53].
Biosynthetically, compound 113 is most probably comes from compound 111, by elongation of the peptide sequence with an L-cysteine residue and post-translational hetero-cyclization of the serine portion onto the carbonyl group of quinaldic acid to form an oxazole ring. Moreover, compounds 111113 were found to possess structural features that are compatible with being biosynthetic precursors of larger chromodepsipeptides, similar to known antibacterial or cytotoxic agents, such as the luzopeptins, quinaldomycin, sandramycin, or thiochoraline, whose presence in traces in the extract would explain its antimicrobial properties [53].
From time to time, marine algal outgrowths indicate a destructive contributing factor leading to disintegration of hard coral communities. Large and concentric zones of Synechocystis sp. overgrowth were discovered at a depth of 1 to 2 m in the waters off Yonaine at Nakijin Village (Okinawa), on dark, dead, and necrotic branches of Acropora sp. (family: Acroporidae). Four new cyclic C11 compounds were isolated from this microalgal-coral assemblage nakienone A (116), nakitriol (117), nakienone B (118), and nakienone C (119), which are assumed to be responsible for the chemical ecology of such a necrotic interaction (Figure 16). Nakienone A (116) was found to be cytotoxic to both KB and HCT 116 cell lines, with LD50 values of 5 and 20 µg/mL, respectively, while nakitriol (117) displayed non-selective cytotoxicity to DNA repair defective cell lines EM9, XRS-6, UV20, and BRI at LD50 of 20 µg/mL [54].
In the same context, the new fatty acid amides pitiamide A (120) and 1E-pitiamide B (121) were purified following a bioassay-guided fractionation from Phormidium corallyticum (a mixed cyanobacterial infection) recovered from Porites cylindrica (family: Poritidae). The cyanobacterium was collected from the shallow reef flat at Piti Bomb Holes (Guam, Mariana Islands) (Figure 17). The black band disease infection was detected in Micronesia on the tops of the reef-building coral in the form of a thin blue-gray tuft-forming assemblage of both Lyngbya majuscule and Microcoleus sp. [55].
Both pitiamide A (120) and 1E-pitiamide B (121) exhibited significant antiproliferative activities towards HCT116 colorectal cancer cells with IC50 values of 1.1 and 5.1 µM, respectively, and by comparison with vinblastine as a reference drug (IC50 = 1.2 nM). Interestingly, the dose-response curves of 1E-pitiamide B (121) were consistently rightward shifted 4 to 5-fold compared with that of pitiamide A (120), signifying a SAR between the two of them. It was found that either the absence of an α-ketone methyl or the increase in the span of the methylene chain triggered an increase of the IC50 to a higher value [55]. Many fatty acid amides from marine cyanobacteria exhibit various neuro-modulatory activities, possibly owing to their structural features, which may modify ion channels or receptors on cell membranes [56,57]. Consequently, pitiamide A (120) was further evaluated for its effects on the plasma membrane potential and on intracellular calcium in HCT116, causing plasma membrane hyperpolarization at 32 µM and 1 µM, with no effect being observed at 32 nM [58]. Petiamide A (120) was synthesized by applying Evans’ oxazolidinone alkylation, a novel water-accelerated modification of Negishi’s zirconocene-catalyzed carbometallation as well as Mitsunobu’s alkylation of a nosyl-activated amide [59].
Looekeyolide A (122), a new 20-membered macrolide, and its autoxidation product looekeyolide B (123) were first identified from lipophilic extracts of black band disease (BBD), a lethal, polymicrobial disease consortium dominated by the cyanobacterium Roseofilum reptotaenium, isolated from Montastraea (family: Montastraeidae), collected at Looe Key Reef (Florida Keys, USA) and known to kill many coral types worldwide (Figure 17). The biosynthesis of the two compounds is presumed to occur through the well conserved nonribosomal peptide (NRP)/polyketide (PK) hybrid biosynthetic cluster, which was detected in four Roseofilum metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) previously analyzed and is predicted to produce looekeyolide A (122) [60]. Looekeyolide A (122) is easily autoxidized to give looekeyolide B (123), making it challenging to assess its natural functions. Thus, compound 123 was tested directly in various assays, where it did not show any cytotoxic or antibacterial activity [61]. Looekeyolide A (122) may play a role in reducing H2O2 and other reactive oxygen species (ROS) that could occur in the BBD layer as it overgrows and causes bleaching of both inner and outer layers of coral tissue as well as destruction as previously occurred in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata (family: Pocilloporidae) [62]. Over 20 μmol/L H2O2 has been detected in the immediate coral diffusive boundary layer, which may aid corals in removing some of the internal H2O2 produced by their endosymbiotic algae and possibly have a self-protective function. Looekeyolide A (122) may allow Roseofilum to cope with this coral-produced source of H2O2 as it migrates across the coral colony, and reduces the H2O2 concentration to nearly zero when being incubated with a 1 mM looekeyolide mixture [61].
The first attempt for isolation and identification of antagonistic bacteria resulted in the isolation of Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain S1 from Montipora digitate collected from shallow water reefs (<1 m) around the Tropical Biosphere Research Center Sesoko, Station of University of the Ryukyus in the Okinawa Islands (Japan). Two tetracyclic alkaloids, alteramides A (124) and B (125) were obtained and identified, although alteramide A (124) was originally obtained from the chloroform/methanol extract of the bacterium Alteromonas sp. associated with the marine sponge Halichondria okadai collected off Nagai (Kanagawa, Japan), and grown statically in PYG broth, which suggested that the Montipora coral might not be the actual producer (Figure 17) [63]. Alteramide A (124) exhibited cytotoxicity against murine leukemia P388 cells, murine lymphoma L1210 cells, and against human epidermoid carcinoma KB cells in vitro, with IC50 values of 0.1, 1.7, and 5 µg/mL, respectively [64]. Both of the compounds, 124 and 125, showed  similar  antifungal  activity, using the paper disk method, against Mucor hiemalis (inhibition zones 9 and 8 mm, respectively) and Dichotomomyces cejpii (inhibition zones 8 and 7 mm, respectively) at 10 µg/disk, but only alteramide A (124) showed antifungal activity against Colletotrichum acutatum (inhibition zone 7 mm) [64].
(2Z,4E)-3-Methyl-2,4-decadienoic acid (126) is a new fatty acid, detected as a major metabolite in a butanol culture broth extract of a marine bacterium Microbulbifer sp. C46, isolated from the stony coral Porites sp. (family: Poritidae), obtained from an aquarium vendor in Nagasaki (Japan, Figure 17) [65]. When tested for antimicrobial activity, it was inactive against a wide range of bacterial strains (MIC > 100 μg/mL) but weakly active against Saccharomyces cerevisiae S100 (MIC = 100 μg/mL). Remarkably, it was known as a synthetic compound [66], and this was the first time to be naturally isolated, besides being a biosynthetically unique metabolite. It attains an uncommon methylation pattern in its carbon chain, derived from the C-methylation with L-methionine at a carbon originating from a carbonyl carbon of acetate [65].
A novel, intriguing cage-like polyhemiacetal, nesteretal A (127), was obtained by large scale fermentation from the coral-derived actinomycete Nesterenkonia halobia, isolated from Platygyra, (family: Merulinidae) (Figure 17). Its biosynthesis is projected to comprise a thermodynamically favorable cascade cyclization process including an intramolecular aldol reaction, which is followed by three well-organized hemiacetalization steps. Nesteretal A (127) was investigated, at 10–40 μM concentration, for its RXRα transcriptional activity by using the reporter gene assay. It revealed a weak potential but showed an interesting competitive effect when tested with 9-cisretinoic acid, a natural RXRα ligand, at a high-dose level. When tested against five tumor cell lines of BIU-87, ECA-109, Hela-S3, PANC-1, and BEL-7402 at a concentration of 40 μM, it was totally inactive [67].
A new member of the lobophorin family, lobophorin K (128), was obtained from cultures of Streptomyces sp. M-207, previously isolated from the sclaractinian coral Lophelia pertusa, (family: Caryophylliidae) collected at the Cantabrian Sea at a depth of 1800 m (Figure 17). The compound exhibited a strong cytotoxicity against a human immortalized hepatocyte cell line (THLE-2), with an IC50 value of 6.3 µM, and a moderate one against both a human breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF-7) and a human pancreatic carcinoma cell line (MiaPaca-2), with IC50 values of 23 and 34 µM, respectively. When tested at a maximum concentration of 42.6 µM against colon (HT-29), lung (A-549), and hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) cell lines, it was completely inactive. It displayed moderate and selective activity against the Gram-positive bacteria methicillin-sensitive S. aureus EPI167 MSSA, with a MIC90 value of 40–80 µg/mL [68].

4. Scleractinia-Associated Zooxanthellae

An early American study firstly isolated 23-methylated dinoflagellate sterols from zooxanthellae, and stated that the patterns of synthesized sterols can be used as taxonomic markers for the strains of gorgonian zooxanthellae. A number of marine sterols with a cyclopropyl side chain was recognized from cultured zooxanthellae isolated from Oculina diffusa (family: Oculinidae) from Permuda. The study revealed that an asymbiotic algae can synthesize the unique marine sterols, gorgosterol (129) (which can be derived biosynthetically from 5-dehydrodinosterol) and 23-desmethylgorgosterol (130), together with dinosterol (131), cholesterol (132), 4α-(24S)-dimethylcholesta-3β-ol (133) and 4α-(24R)-dimethylcholesta-22-en-3β-ol (134) (Figure 18) [69]. In an attempt to explain the biosynthetic pathway of gorgosterol, cell-free extracts of the dinoflagellates Cryptothecodinium cohnii, Peridinium foliaceum, and the cultured zooxanthella symbiont of Cassiopea xamachana were analyzed for sterol methyltransferases using [8H]-S-adenosylmethionine via radiochemical conversions. The results demonstrated that the attenuation of gorgosterol production in aposymbiotic zooxanthellae is linked to an increase in dimethylpropiothetin biosynthesis through a decrease in S-adenosylmethionine concentration [70].

5. Diversity of the Reported Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and Their Secondary Metabolites

Phylogenetic analysis of the strain M-157 was performed by PCR via amplification of the 16S rDNA of strain M-157. After Basic Logic Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) sequence comparison, strain M-157 showed 100% identity to Streptomyceces cyaneofuscatus and was sequenced being designated as Streptomyceces cyaneofuscatus M-157. The phylogenetic tree revealed the evolutionary relationship of strain M-157 with a group of known Streptomyces species [53].
Investigating bacterial strains isolated from different Scleractinian species, Scopulariopsis belonging to class Sordariomycetes is considered as the most heavily studied fungal strain which has been isolated from Stylophora sp. From this species, 46 compounds have been isolated, of which only 20 are biologically active. The compounds included eleven xanthones, five triterpenes, seven sesquiterpenes, four phenylether derivatives, three alkaloids, two cyclodepsipeptides, two α-pyrones, one chromone, one sterol, three polyketides and seven nitrogenous compounds, most of which exerted antibacterial, cytotoxic and immunosuppressive potencies. The fungus Aspergillus belonging to class Eurotiomycetes is isolated from Galaxea sp., from which 18 compounds were isolated including: two prenylcandidusins, three candidusins, seven terphenyllin derivatives, and six anthraquinones, from which only 13 compounds were biologically active, mostly with antibacterial and cytotoxic activities. The fungus Gliomastix belonging to class Sordariomycetes was isolated from Stylophora sp., from which 15 hydroquinone derivatives were isolated from its fungus, only six of which were bioactive exhibiting cytotoxic and antitubercular activities.
Moreover, investigating some bacterial strains isolated from different Scleractinian species, as Erythrobacter sp., belonging to class Alphaproteobacteria, which was isolated from Acropora sp., is chemically investigated to give twelve carotenoids, of which only three were active with cytotoxic and radioprotectant potencies. The class Actinomycetes was intensely investigated, where Streptomyces isolated from Porites sp. led to isolation of eight compounds (five anthracyclines and three tirandamycine), all of which showed antibacterial and cytotoxic activities. The same bacterial strain, isolated from Lophelia sp. and other different corals led to isolation of the cytotoxic compounds, lobophorin and 5-hydroxyquinaldic acid derivatives, two of which were cytotoxic. Moreover, the chemical investigation of Nesterenkonia isolated from Platygyra sp. led to the isolation of a polyhemiacetal with RXRα activity. The class Betaproteobacteria has rarely been investigated. As an example, Pelmonas sp. was isolated from Acropora sp. and subjected to chromatographic analysis to give four imidazole alkaloids and two cyclopeptides, most of them were inactive. The class Gammaproteobacteria has been studied relatively less intensively, here both Pseudoalteromonas sp. and Microbulbifer sp. were isolated from Montipora sp. and Porites sp., giving rise to the isolation of two cytotoxic compounds and one antibacterial fatty acid, respectively. The class Cyanophyceae was also investigated, and both Synechocystis sp. and Phormidium corallyticum were isolated from Acropora sp. and Porites sp., to give two active cytotoxic cyclic C11 compounds and two antiproliferative fatty acid amides, respectively. From the same class, Roseofilum reptotaenium was isolated from Montastraea and investigated to result in the identification of two inactive macrolides.
Furthermore, the zooxanthellae, isolated from Oculina sp., were also investigated, leading to the isolation of six sterols, which were found to be cytotoxically inactive.
In Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials, all the reported marine natural products isolated from Scleractinia-associated microbes (compounds 1134) are presented, together with their chemical categories and their biological sources (marine organisms), as well as the locations of collection of the studied marine organisms.

6. ADME Analysis and Molecular Docking of Scleractinia-Associated Microbial Metabolites

Physicochemical properties of the investigated compounds were studies using SwissADME [71] and a boiled-egg diagram [72] was generated using the same server. Based on the ADME results, compounds were selected for further docking studies to investigate their potential effects on five SARS-COV-2 targets using Autodock Vina [73]. Compounds that showed oral absorption, which is an important criterion for a drug that is intended for mass treatment, were selected. In addition, compounds that crosses the blood brain barrier could cause several adverse effects and were excluded. Binding to P-glycoprotein (PGP+) was also studied and plotted (Figure 19) but was not used as a selection criterion to simplify the process. Investigated SARS-COV-2 targets included viral main protease (6LU7), viral methyltransferase (nsp16, 6W4H), viral RNA dependent RNA polymerase (nsp12, 7BV2), viral spike protein (6M0J), and human ACE2, which is the viral recognition protein (6VW1). Compounds and targets were prepared as reported earlier [74]. In brief, compounds were drawn or downloaded from PubChem and then were energy minimized using 1000 steps of steepest descent and conjugate gradient algorithms. Compounds were then converted to pdbqt using Autodock tools. For targets, they were retrieved from protein data bank then water molecules were removed, hydrogens and Gasteiger charges were added and non-polar hydrogens were merged. The grid box was centered on the co-crystallized ligand when available and the grid box size was adjusted to 25 × 25 × 25 Å3. In all cases the co-crystallized ligand was redocked to validate the docking method and its score was used as a reference to compare the tested compounds. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) between docked and crystallized ligand in the validation step was accepted when it was less than 2 Å using the DockRMSD server [75].
From the 134 compounds investigated, ADME highlighted the compounds that can be absorbed orally but without crossing the blood brain barrier (BBB) to avoid possible side effects. These target compounds are found in the egg white in the following boiled-egg diagram (Figure 19).
Based on the above criteria, 15 compounds were selected for investigating their potential effect against the above mentioned SARS-CoV-2 targets. The results of the docking are shown in Table S2 in the Supplementary Materials.
The first target was the SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro) (Figure 20). Main protease (3C-like protease) is responsible for the release of functioning peptides from the expressed polyprotein through protease activity at various locations. Mpro is considered as a promising target against SARS-CoV-2 due to its importance in the viral life cycle and because of the absence of human homologues [76]. The crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (6LU7 pdb code) contains a peptide-like inhibitor called N3. The co-crystallized ligand forms hydrogen bonds with F140, G143, H163, H164, E166, D187, and T190 residues. To validate the docking method, the co-crystallized ligand was redocked in the active site and the docking algorithm was able to predict the co-crystalized ligand pose as the 3rd pose, with energy score of −7.1 kcal/mol. This pose showed the least RMSD compared to the co-crystalized ligand while the pose with best docking energy followed a similar orientation with an energy score of −7.9 kcal/mol but has larger RMSD. Among the tested compounds, compounds 39 and 103 showed the same docking energy of −7.9 kcal/mol. They were both docked in the same pocket of the co-crystallized ligand N3 and formed hydrogen bonds that involved the same amino acids interacting with N3 (Figure 20). These results suggested that these two compounds, 39 and 103, might be promising potential leads for the design of new inhibitors for viral main protease and deserve further investigation.
Another important SARS-CoV-2 target is the non-structural protein 16 (nsp16). Nsp16 forms a complex with another protein, nsp10, which is resposible for the methylation of the viral RNA ribose at the 2′-O position. This modification helps to hide the viral RNA from the host immunity, with the methyl donor being S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) [77]. A crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nsp16 complexed with nsp10 and co-crystallized with SAM is available at the protein data bank (6W4H pdb code). The authors’ group investigated the potential affinity of the tested compounds towards the nsp16/10 complex. Initially, SAM was redocked in the active site to validate the docking procedure and the correct pose was detected (first pose with −8.1 kcal/mol energy). Among the tested compounds, 18, 103, 98, 104, and 124 attained docking energies better than that of SAM.
The top 3 compounds 103, 98, and 104 are closely similar in structure and their binding poses were also found to be very similar, which suggested the selective recognition of nsp16/10 towards this class of compounds. The docking pose of this compound in the active site of nsp16/10 is shown in Figure 21.
The third investigated target is the SARS-CoV-2 RNA dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp, nsp12). This enzyme, in a complex form with nsp7 and nsp8, plays a key role in the replication of the positive strand viral RNA. Remdesivir in its triphosphate form is a known inhibitor to this class of enzymes [78]. Nsp12, complexed with nsp7, nsp8, remdesivir triphosphate and a short RNA sequence have been crystallized (7BV2 pdb code). This crystal structure was used to study the ability of the tested compounds to be docked in the active site of RdRp, which is the same position occupied by remdesivir triphosphate. Redocking of remdesivir triphosphate resulted in a similar pose to the crystal structure and attained an energy score of −7.0 kcal/mol.
The co-crystallized ligand as well as the highest-docked compounds 124, 103, and 104 were docked in the same pocket which is formed at the interface between nsp12 and the RNA sequence as seen in Figure 22. Among these compounds, 124 exhibited noticeably good bonding energy (−9.0 kcal/mol) and several hydrogen bonds with the active site residues, which include T687, S759, D760, R555, and with Mg2+.
On the other hand, compounds 103 and 104 showed similar binding behavior, but flipped binding poses (Figure 22). The high stability of the complex of 124 formed in the active site of RdRp, and the formation of several other hydrogen bonds suggest that this compound might also be a good lead as an inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp and should be further subjected to future investigation.
In addition to the above-mentioned targets, the authors’ group also studied the docking behavior of the investigated compounds in the active sites of both SARS-CoV-2 S-protein and human ACE2 receptors, which are involved in the viral recognition by human cells prior to infection, but none of them obtained a good docking energy.

7. Conclusions

Scleractiniae and their associated microorganisms have so far been largely studied as a promising source of metabolites with varied new chemical structures displaying a variety of interesting biological activities. These compounds present an enormous potential for the discovery of new therapeutic leads for drug development to fight the current global health problems with increasing numbers over the past years (Figure 1). Interestingly, many of these secondary metabolites show potent cytotoxic, anticancer, or antibacterial activities (Figure 7), with the major activity being cytotoxic. A docking study of selected compounds based on their physicochemical properties was done to investigate potential effects on SARS-CoV-2 targets. Among them, the tirandamycins 98, 103, and 104 showed potential inhibition against SARS-CoV-2 methyltransferase nsp16/10 suggesting that such class can be a good start for the design of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors. In addition, alteramide A (124) has shown promising results against RdRp, which further implicate the importance of natural products repository as a source of new leads for the design of inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2. Scientific efforts should be continued for the purpose of exploring the stony coral environment in the search for new bioactive compounds for the development of new drugs getting benefit of the rising development of oceanographic science and metabolome screening techniques.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/18/12/645/s1, Table S1: Marine natural products isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms; Table S2: Docking energies (kcal/mol) of investigated compounds with different SARS-CoV-2 targets.

Author Contributions

E.M.Z. searched the literature; A.A. and A.K. performed the in silico study; E.M.Z., A.A., A.K., A.H.I., H.A.A., E.M.E.-H. and U.R.A. contributed to analyzing the collected data and writing the manuscript; E.M.E.-H., G.B. and U.R.A. contributed to reviewing and editing the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Würzburg.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Minia University and Deraya University for supporting this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. El-Hossary, E.M.; Cheng, C.; Hamed, M.M.; Hamed, A.N.E.-S.; Ohlsen, K.; Hentschel, U.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Antifungal potential of marine natural products. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 126, 631–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liu, M.; El-Hossary, E.M.; Oelschlaeger, T.A.; Donia, M.S.; Quinn, R.J.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Potential of marine natural products against drug-resistant bacterial infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, e237–e245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Shady, N.H.; El-Hossary, E.M.; Fouad, M.A.; Gulder, T.A.M.; Kamel, M.S.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Bioactive Natural Products of Marine Sponges from the Genus Hyrtios. Molecules 2017, 22, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Balasubramanian, S.A.; Oelschlaeger, T.; Grkovic, T.; Pham, N.B.; Quinn, R.J.; Hentschel, U. Potential of marine natural products against drug-resistant fungal, viral, and parasitic infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, e30–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Bayer, K.; Hentschel, U. Diversity, abundance and natural products of marine sponge-associated actinomycetes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2014, 31, 381–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. El-Hossary, E.M.; Abdel-Halim, M.; Ibrahim, E.S.; Pimentel-Elardo, S.M.; Nodwell, J.R.; Handoussa, H.; Abdelwahab, M.F.; Holzgrabe, U.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Natural Products Repertoire of the Red Sea. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Moeller, M.; Nietzer, S.; Schupp, P.J. Neuroactive compounds induce larval settlement in the scleractinian coral Leptastrea purpurea. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, D.; Roy, K. The future of evolutionary diversity in reef corals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2015, 370, 20140010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kitahara, M.V.; Fukami, H.; Benzoni, F.; Huang, D. The New Systematics of Scleractinia: Integrating Molecular and Morphological Evidence In The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future: The World of Medusa and Her Sisters; Goffredo, S., Dubinsky, Z., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 41–59. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bosch, T.C.; McFall-Ngai, M.J. Metaorganisms as the new frontier. Zoology 2011, 114, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Huang, D.; Benzoni, F.; Fukami, H.; Knowlton, N.; Smith, N.D.; Budd, A.F. Taxonomic classification of the reef coral families Merulinidae, Montastraeidae, and Diploastraeidae (Cnidaria: Anthozoa: Scleractinia). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 171, 277–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ainsworth, T.; Wasmund, K.; Ukani, L.; Seneca, F.; Yellowlees, D.; Miller, D.; Leggat, W. Defining the tipping point. A complex cellular life/death balance in corals in response to stress. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Rohwer, F.; Breitbart, M.; Jara, J.; Azam, F.; Knowlton, N. Diversity of bacteria associated with the Caribbean coral Montastraea franksi. Coral Reefs 2001, 20, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rosenberg, E.; Kellogg, C.; Rohwer, F. Coral Microbiology. Oceanography 2007, 20, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Raina, J.-B.; Tapiolas, D.; Willis, B.L.; Bourne, D.G. Coral-Associated Bacteria and Their Role in the Biogeochemical Cycling of Sulfur. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 3492–3501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Morrow, K.M.; Moss, A.G.; Chadwick, N.E.; Liles, M.R. Bacterial Associates of Two Caribbean Coral Species Reveal Species-Specific Distribution and Geographic Variability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 6438–6449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Shoguchi, E.; Shinzato, C.; Kawashima, T.; Gyoja, F.; Mungpakdee, S.; Koyanagi, R.; Takeuchi, T.; Hisata, K.; Tanaka, M.; Fujiwara, M.; et al. Draft Assembly of the Symbiodinium minutum Nuclear Genome Reveals Dinoflagellate Gene Structure. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23, 1399–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Thompson, J.R.; Rivera, H.E.; Closek, C.J.; Medina, M. Microbes in the coral holobiont: Partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2015, 4, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, S.-K. Marine Microbiology: Bioactive Compounds and Biotechnological Applications; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ibrahim, A.H.; Desoukey, S.Y.; Fouad, M.A.; Kamel, M.S.; Gulder, T.A.M.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Natural Product Potential of the Genus Nocardiopsis. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schinke, C.; Martins, T.; Queiroz, S.C.; Melo, I.S.; Reyes, F.G.R. Antibacterial Compounds from Marine Bacteria, 2010–2015. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1215–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gerardo, N.M. The give and take of host-microbe symbioses. Cell Host Microbe 2013, 14, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Elnaggar, M.S.; Ebada, S.S.; Ashour, M.L.; Ebrahim, W.; Müller, W.E.G.; Mándi, A.; Kurtán, T.; Singab, A.; Lin, W.H.; Liu, Z.; et al. Xanthones and sesquiterpene derivatives from a marine-derived fungus Scopulariopsis sp. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 2411–2419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Little, A.; Porco, J.A., Jr. Total syntheses of graphisin a and sydowinin b. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2862–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Liu, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, W.; Liu, Y.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Polyketides with Immunosuppressive Activities from Mangrove Endophytic Fungus Penicillium sp. ZJ-SY2. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Fujimoto, H.; Asai, T.; Kim, Y.-P.; Ishibashi, M. Nine Constituents Including Six Xanthone-Related Compounds Isolated from Two Ascomycetes, Gelasinospora santi-florii and Emericella quadrilineata, Found in a Screening Study Focused on Immunomodulatory Activity. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 54, 550–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, W.; Liao, Y.; Tang, C.; Huang, X.; Luo, Z.; Chen, J.; Cai, P. Cytotoxic and Antibacterial Compounds from the Coral-Derived Fungus Aspergillus tritici SP2-8-1. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Chen, X.; Mukwaya, E.; Wong, M.-S.; Zhang, Y. A systematic review on biological activities of prenylated flavonoids. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 655–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bara, R.; Aly, A.H.; Wray, V.; Lin, W.; Proksch, P.; Debbab, A. Talaromins A and B, new cyclic peptides from the endophytic fungus Talaromyces wortmannii. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1686–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bode, H.B.; Bethe, B.; Höfs, R.; Zeeck, A. Big effects from small changes: Possible ways to explore nature’s chemical diversity. ChemBioChem 2002, 3, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Elnaggar, M.S.; Ebada, S.S.; Ashour, M.L.; Ebrahim, W.; Singab, A.; Lin, W.; Liu, Z.; Proksch, P. Two new triterpenoids and a new naphthoquinone derivative isolated from a hard coral-derived fungus Scopulariopsis sp. Fitoterapia 2017, 116, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sasaki, K.; Minowa, N.; Kuzuhara, H.; Nishiyama, S.; Omoto, S. Synthesis and hepatoprotective effects of soyasapogenol B derivatives. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1997, 7, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Amin, H.A.; Elsoud, M.M.A.; Sahab, A. Whole Cell Biocatalyst for Soyasapogenol B Production from Soybean Saponin. Open Conf. Proc. J. 2016, 7, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Babu, K.S.; Raju, B.C.; Praveen, B.; Kishore, K.H.; Murty, U.S.; Rao, J.M. Microwave assisted synthesis and antimicrobial activity of 2, 2-dimethyl chromenes. Heterocycl. Commun. 2003, 9, 519–526. [Google Scholar]
  35. Elnaggar, M.S.; Ebrahim, W.; Mándi, A.; Kurtán, T.; Müller, W.E.G.; Kalscheuer, R.; Singab, A.; Lin, W.; Liu, Z.; Proksch, P. Hydroquinone derivatives from the marine-derived fungus Gliomastix sp. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 30640–30649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cai, W.; Chen, J. Herbs Used in Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treatment of Heart Diseases. In Bioactive Food as Dietary Interventions for Cardiovascular Disease; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, M.; Yang, L.; Feng, L.; Hu, F.; Zhang, F.; Ren, J.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, Z. Verruculosins A–B, New Oligophenalenone Dimers from the Soft Coral-Derived Fungus Talaromyces verruculosus. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Kawai, K.; Nozawa, Y.; Ito, T.; Yamanaka, N. Effects of xanthomegnin and duclauxin on culture cells of murine leukemia and Ehrlich ascitic tumor. Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 1982, 36, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Kawai, K.; Shiojiri, H.; Nakamaru, T.; Nozawa, Y.; Sugie, S.; Mori, H.; Kato, T.; Ogihara, Y. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of xenoclauxin and desacetyl duclauxin from Penicillium duclauxii (delacroix). Cell Biol. Toxicol. 1985, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gao, S.-S.; Zhang, T.; Garcia-Borràs, M.; Hung, Y.-S.; Billingsley, J.M.; Houk, K.N.; Hu, Y.-C.; Tang, Y. Biosynthesis of Heptacyclic Duclauxins Requires Extensive Redox Modifications of the Phenalenone Aromatic Polyketide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 6991–6997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Setiyono, E.; Heriyanto; Pringgenies, D.; Shioi, Y.; Kanesaki, Y.; Awai, K.; Brotosudarmo, T.H.P. Sulfur-Containing Carotenoids from A Marine Coral Symbiont Erythrobacter flavus Strain KJ5. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shiba, T.; Simidu, U. Erythrobacter longus gen. nov., sp. nov., an Aerobic Bacterium Which Contains Bacteriochlorophyll a. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1982, 32, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Teles, Y.C.F.; Souza, M.D.F.V.D. Sulphated Flavonoids: Biosynthesis, Structures, and Biological Activities. Molecules 2018, 23, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Almeida, J.R.; Correia-Da-Silva, M.; Sousa, E.; Antunes, J.; Pinto, M.; Vasconcelos, V.; Cunha, I. Antifouling potential of Nature-inspired sulfated compounds. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, srep42424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Mourão, P. Perspective on the Use of Sulfated Polysaccharides from Marine Organisms as a Source of New Antithrombotic Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2770–2784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Raina, J.; Tapiolas, D.; Motti, C.A.; Foret, S.; Seemann, T.; Tebben, J.; Willis, B.L.; Bourne, D.G. Isolation of an antimicrobial compound produced by bacteria associated with reef-building corals. PeerJ 2016, 4, e2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Carlson, J.C.; Li, S.; Burr, D.A.; Sherman, D.H. Isolation and characterization of tirandamycins from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2009, 72, 2076–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cong, Z.; Huang, X.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, P.; Liao, S.; Yang, B.; Zhou, X.; Huang, D.; Wang, J. Cytotoxic anthracycline and antibacterial tirandamycin analogues from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. SCSIO 41399. J. Antibiot. 2019, 72, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Carlson, J.C.; Li, S.; Gunatilleke, S.S.; Anzai, Y.; Burr, D.A.; Podust, L.M.; Sherman, D.H. Tirandamycin biosynthesis is mediated by co-dependent oxidative enzymes. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 628–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. He, X.-X.; Chen, X.-J.; Peng, G.-T.; Guan, S.-Y.; Lei, L.-F.; Yao, J.-H.; Liu, B.-X.; Zhang, C.-X. Pelopuradazole, a new imidazole derivative alkaloid from the marine bacteria Pelomonas puraquae sp. nov. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 680–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gao, H.-F.; Zhang, D.-J.; Wei, H.-G.; Shen, G.-M.; Chen, B.; Li, Y.-G. Studies on the chemical constituents of the fermentation broth from antarctic Marinomonas sp. Bsw10005 strain. Chin. J. Mar. Drugs 2008, 27, 14–17. [Google Scholar]
  52. Haeusler, J.; Jahn, R.; Schmidt, U. Abstract: Amino Acids and Peptides, XXIV. Radically and Photochemically Initiated Oxidation of Amino Acid Derivatives. Chem. Inform. 1978, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ortiz-López, F.J.; Alcalde, E.; Sarmiento-Vizcaíno, A.; Diaz, C.; Cautain, B.; García, L.A.; Blanco, G.; Reyes, F. New 3-Hydroxyquinaldic Acid Derivatives from Cultures of the Marine Derived Actinomycete Streptomyces cyaneofuscatus M-157. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Nagle, D.G.; Gerwick, W.H. Nakienones A-C and nakitriol, new cytotoxic cyclic C11 metabolites from an okinawan cyanobacterial (Synechocystis sp.) overgrowth of coral. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 849–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cai, W.; Matthews, J.H.; Paul, V.J.; Luesch, H. Pitiamides A and B, Multifunctional Fatty Acid Amides from Marine Cyanobacteria. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Han, B.; McPhail, K.L.; Ligresti, A.; Di Marzo, V.; Gerwick, W.H. Semiplenamides A-G, fatty acid amides from a Papua New Guinea collection of the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya semiplena. J. Nat. Prod. 2003, 66, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Williamson, R.; Singh, I.P.; Gerwick, W.H. Taveuniamides: New chlorinated toxins from a mixed assemblage of marine cyanobacteria. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 7025–7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kleyman, T.R.; Yulo, T.; Ashbaugh, C.; Landry, D.; Cragoe, E.; Karlin, A.; Al-Awqati, Q. Photoaffinity labeling of the epithelial sodium channel. J. Biol. Chem. 1986, 261, 2839–2843. [Google Scholar]
  59. Ribe, S.; Kondru, R.K.; Beratan, D.N.; Wipf, P. Optical Rotation Computation, Total Synthesis, and Stereochemistry Assignment of the Marine Natural Product Pitiamide A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4608–4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Meyer, J.; Paul, V.J.; Raymundo, L.J.; Teplitski, M. Comparative Metagenomics of the Polymicrobial Black Band Disease of Corals. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Gunasekera, S.P.; Meyer, J.; Ding, Y.; Abboud, K.A.; Luo, D.; Campbell, J.E.; Angerhofer, A.; Goodsell, J.L.; Raymundo, L.J.; Liu, J.; et al. Chemical and Metagenomic Studies of the Lethal Black Band Disease of Corals Reveal Two Broadly Distributed, Redox-Sensitive Mixed Polyketide/Peptide Macrocycles. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Armoza-Zvuloni, R.; Schneider, A.; Sher, D.; Shaked, Y. Rapid Hydrogen Peroxide release from the coral Stylophora pistillata during feeding and in response to chemical and physical stimuli. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Shigemori, H.; Bae, M.A.; Yazawa, K.; Sasaki, T.; Kobayashi, J. Alteramide A, a new tetracyclic alkaloid from a bacterium Alteromonas sp. associated with the marine sponge Halichondria okadai. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57, 4317–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moree, W.J.; McConnell, O.J.; Nguyen, D.D.; Sanchez, L.M.; Yang, Y.-L.; Zhao, X.; Liu, W.-T.; Boudreau, P.D.; Srinivasan, J.; Atencio, L.; et al. Microbiota of Healthy Corals Are Active against Fungi in a Light-Dependent Manner. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9, 2300–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Sharma, A.R.; Harunari, E.; Zhou, T.; Trianto, A.; Igarashi, Y. Isolation and biosynthesis of an unsaturated fatty acid with unusual methylation pattern from a coral-associated bacterium Microbulbifer sp. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2327–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Rousset, S.; Thibonnet, J.; Abarbri, M.; Duchêne, A.; Parrain, J.-L. Halolactonisation of (2Z, 4E)-dienoic acids. A novel approach to γ-alkylidene butenolides. Synlett 2000, 2000, 260–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Xie, C.-L.; Chen, R.; Yang, S.; Xia, J.-M.; Zhang, G.-Y.; Chen, C.-H.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X.-W. Nesteretal A, A Novel Class of Cage-Like Polyketide from Marine-Derived Actinomycete Nesterenkonia halobia. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 8174–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Braña, A.F.; Sarmiento-Vizcaíno, A.; Osset, M.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Martín, J.; De Pedro, N.; De la Cruz, M.; Díaz, C.; Vicente, F.; Reyes, F. Lobophorin k, a new natural product with cytotoxic activity produced by Streptomyces sp. M-207 associated with the deep-sea coral Lophelia pertusa. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 144. [Google Scholar]
  69. Withers, N.W.; Kokke, W.C.M.C.; Fenical, W.; Djerassi, C. Sterol patterns of cultured zooxanthellae isolated from marine invertebrates: Synthesis of gorgosterol and 23-desmethylgorgosterol by aposymbiotic algae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1982, 79, 3764–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Giner, J.L.; Djerassi, C. Biosynthetic studies of marine lipids. 33. Biosynthesis of dinosterol, peridinosterol and gorgosterol: Unusual patterns of bioalkylation in dinoflagellate sterols. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 2357–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. Swissadme: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 42717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Daina, A.; Zoete, V.A. A boiled-egg to predict gastrointestinal absorption and brain penetration of small molecules. ChemMedChem 2016, 11, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Trott, O.; Olson, A.J. Autodock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 31, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ebada, S.S.; Al-Jawabri, N.A.; Youssef, F.S.; Albohy, A.; Aldalaien, S.M.; Disi, A.M.; Proksch, P. In vivo antiulcer activity, phytochemical exploration, and molecular modelling of the polyphenolic-rich fraction of Crepis sancta extract. Inflammopharmacology 2019, 28, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bell, E.W.; Zhang, Y. Dockrmsd: An open-source tool for atom mapping and RMSD calculation of symmetric molecules through graph isomorphism. J. Cheminformatics 2019, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Jin, Z.; Du, X.; Xu, Y.; Deng, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Peng, C. Structure of M pro from SARS-CoV-2 and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 2020, 582, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Lin, S.; Chen, H.; Ye, F.; Chen, Z.; Yang, F.; Zheng, Y.; Cao, Y.; Qiao, J.; Yang, S.; Lu, G. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 nsp10/nsp16 2′-O-methylase and its implication on antiviral drug design. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2020, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yin, W.; Mao, C.; Luan, X.; Shen, D.-D.; Shen, Q.; Su, H.; Wang, X.; Zhou, F.; Zhao, W.; Gao, M. Structural basis for inhibition of the RNA-dependent rna polymerase from SARS-CoV-2 by remdesivir. Science 2020, 368, 1499–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Number of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms according to the year of publication.
Figure 1. Number of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms according to the year of publication.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g001
Figure 2. Geographical distribution of isolated hard corals-associated organisms.
Figure 2. Geographical distribution of isolated hard corals-associated organisms.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g002
Figure 3. Number of compounds isolated from different studied Scleractinian families-associated organisms.
Figure 3. Number of compounds isolated from different studied Scleractinian families-associated organisms.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g003
Figure 4. Scleractinia-associated organisms studied genera without isolated compounds.
Figure 4. Scleractinia-associated organisms studied genera without isolated compounds.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g004
Figure 5. Scleractinia-associated organisms studied genera with isolated compounds.
Figure 5. Scleractinia-associated organisms studied genera with isolated compounds.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g005
Figure 6. Chemical skeletons of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms.
Figure 6. Chemical skeletons of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g006
Figure 7. Biological activity spectrum of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms.
Figure 7. Biological activity spectrum of compounds isolated from Scleractinia-associated organisms.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g007
Figure 8. 12-Dimethoxypinselin (1), 12-O-acetyl-AGI-B4 (2), AGI-B4 (3), hyperxanthone C (4), pinselin (5), sydowinin B (6), 13-O-acetyl-sydowinin B (7), compound 8, sydowinin A (9), compound 10, compound 11, sydowic acid (12), sydonic acid (13), 11-hydroxysydonic acid (14), 11,12-dihydroxysydonic acid (15), 1-hydroxyboivinianic acid (16), violaceol I (17), violaceol II (18), diorcinol (19), rikuzenol (20), scopulamide (21), lumichrome (22), WIN 64821 (23), scopularide A (24), scopularide B (25), scopupyrone (26), pyrenochaetic acid (27), 7-OH-2,5-dimethylchromone (28) and ergosterol (29).
Figure 8. 12-Dimethoxypinselin (1), 12-O-acetyl-AGI-B4 (2), AGI-B4 (3), hyperxanthone C (4), pinselin (5), sydowinin B (6), 13-O-acetyl-sydowinin B (7), compound 8, sydowinin A (9), compound 10, compound 11, sydowic acid (12), sydonic acid (13), 11-hydroxysydonic acid (14), 11,12-dihydroxysydonic acid (15), 1-hydroxyboivinianic acid (16), violaceol I (17), violaceol II (18), diorcinol (19), rikuzenol (20), scopulamide (21), lumichrome (22), WIN 64821 (23), scopularide A (24), scopularide B (25), scopupyrone (26), pyrenochaetic acid (27), 7-OH-2,5-dimethylchromone (28) and ergosterol (29).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g008
Figure 9. 4-Methylcandidusin A (30), aspetritone A (31), aspetritone B (32), 3,4-dimethyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (33), 4-methyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (34), 3,4-dimethylcandidusin A (35), candidusin A (36), 4,4′-deoxyterphenyllin (37), 4″-deoxyterphenyllin (38), 3-prenylterphenyllin (39), terphenyllin (40), 3-hydroxyterphenyllin (41), 3-hydroxy-3″-deoxyterphenyllin (42), 3″-prenyl-terphenyllin (43), emodin (44) and compounds 4547.
Figure 9. 4-Methylcandidusin A (30), aspetritone A (31), aspetritone B (32), 3,4-dimethyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (33), 4-methyl-3″-prenylcandidusin A (34), 3,4-dimethylcandidusin A (35), candidusin A (36), 4,4′-deoxyterphenyllin (37), 4″-deoxyterphenyllin (38), 3-prenylterphenyllin (39), terphenyllin (40), 3-hydroxyterphenyllin (41), 3-hydroxy-3″-deoxyterphenyllin (42), 3″-prenyl-terphenyllin (43), emodin (44) and compounds 4547.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g009
Figure 10. 3β,7β,15α,24-Tetrahydroxyolean-12-ene-11,22-dione (48), 15α,22β,24-trihydroxyolean-11,13-diene-3-one (49), 7β,15α,24-trihydroxyolean-12-ene-3,11,22-trione (50), 15α,24-dihydroxyolean-12-ene-3,11,22-trione (51), soyasapogenol B (52), (2E, 4E)-4′-dihydrophaseic acid (53), (2Z, 4E)-4′-dihydrophaseic acid (54), 6-hydroxy-2,7-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (55), 6-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromene (56), scoparone (57), 5-methyluracil (58) and compounds 5964.
Figure 10. 3β,7β,15α,24-Tetrahydroxyolean-12-ene-11,22-dione (48), 15α,22β,24-trihydroxyolean-11,13-diene-3-one (49), 7β,15α,24-trihydroxyolean-12-ene-3,11,22-trione (50), 15α,24-dihydroxyolean-12-ene-3,11,22-trione (51), soyasapogenol B (52), (2E, 4E)-4′-dihydrophaseic acid (53), (2Z, 4E)-4′-dihydrophaseic acid (54), 6-hydroxy-2,7-dimethyl-1,4-naphthoquinone (55), 6-hydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-chromene (56), scoparone (57), 5-methyluracil (58) and compounds 5964.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g010
Figure 11. Gliomastin A (65), gliomastin B (66), gliomastin C (67), gliomastin D (68), 9-O-methylgliomastin C (69), acremonin A 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (70), gliomastin E 1-O- β-D-glucopyranoside (71), 6′-O-acetyl-isohomoarbutin (72), isohomoarbutin (73), 2-methyl-1,4-benzenediol (74), acremonin A (75), prenylhydroquinone (76), F-11334A1 (77), compound 78 and compound 79.
Figure 11. Gliomastin A (65), gliomastin B (66), gliomastin C (67), gliomastin D (68), 9-O-methylgliomastin C (69), acremonin A 1-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (70), gliomastin E 1-O- β-D-glucopyranoside (71), 6′-O-acetyl-isohomoarbutin (72), isohomoarbutin (73), 2-methyl-1,4-benzenediol (74), acremonin A (75), prenylhydroquinone (76), F-11334A1 (77), compound 78 and compound 79.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g011
Figure 12. Verruculosin A (80), verruculosin B (81), bacillisporin F (82), duclauxin (83) and xenoclauxin (84).
Figure 12. Verruculosin A (80), verruculosin B (81), bacillisporin F (82), duclauxin (83) and xenoclauxin (84).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g012
Figure 13. Erythroxanthin sulfate (85), ketonostoxanthin (86), nostoxanthin sulfate (87), caloxanthin sulfate (88), nostoxanthin (89), zeaxanthin sulfate (90), caloxanthin (91), bacteriorubixanthinal (92), zeaxanthin (93), β-cryptoxanthin (94), bacteriochlorophyll (95) and β-carotene (96).
Figure 13. Erythroxanthin sulfate (85), ketonostoxanthin (86), nostoxanthin sulfate (87), caloxanthin sulfate (88), nostoxanthin (89), zeaxanthin sulfate (90), caloxanthin (91), bacteriorubixanthinal (92), zeaxanthin (93), β-cryptoxanthin (94), bacteriochlorophyll (95) and β-carotene (96).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g013
Figure 14. Aranciamycin K (97), isotirandamycin B (98), γ-rhodomycinone (99), β-rhodomycinone (100), 262-6 (101), β-rhodomycin-II (102), tirandamycin A (103) and tirandamycin B (104).
Figure 14. Aranciamycin K (97), isotirandamycin B (98), γ-rhodomycinone (99), β-rhodomycinone (100), 262-6 (101), β-rhodomycin-II (102), tirandamycin A (103) and tirandamycin B (104).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g014
Figure 15. Pelopuradazole (105), 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (106), 2-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (107), 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid (108), pelopurin A (109) and pelopurin B (110).
Figure 15. Pelopuradazole (105), 3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (106), 2-methyl-3H-imidazole-4-carboxylic acid (107), 1H-pyrrole-2-carboxylic acid (108), pelopurin A (109) and pelopurin B (110).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g015
Figure 16. Compounds 111113, 3-hydroxyquinaldic acid (114), 3-hydroxyquinaldic acid amide (115), nakienone A (116), nakitriol (117), nakienone B (118) and nakienone C (119).
Figure 16. Compounds 111113, 3-hydroxyquinaldic acid (114), 3-hydroxyquinaldic acid amide (115), nakienone A (116), nakitriol (117), nakienone B (118) and nakienone C (119).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g016
Figure 17. Pitiamide A (120), 1E-pitiamide B (121), looekeyolide A (122), looekeyolide B (123), alteramide A (124), alteramide B (125), (2Z,4E)-3-methyl-2,4-decadienoic acid (126), nesteretal A (127) and lobophorin K (128).
Figure 17. Pitiamide A (120), 1E-pitiamide B (121), looekeyolide A (122), looekeyolide B (123), alteramide A (124), alteramide B (125), (2Z,4E)-3-methyl-2,4-decadienoic acid (126), nesteretal A (127) and lobophorin K (128).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g017
Figure 18. Gorgosterol (129), 23-desmethyl-gorgosterol (130), dinosterol (131), cholesterol (132), 4α-(24S)-dimethyl-cholesta-3β-ol (133) and 4α-(24R)-dimethyl-cholesta-22-en-3β-ol (134).
Figure 18. Gorgosterol (129), 23-desmethyl-gorgosterol (130), dinosterol (131), cholesterol (132), 4α-(24S)-dimethyl-cholesta-3β-ol (133) and 4α-(24R)-dimethyl-cholesta-22-en-3β-ol (134).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g018
Figure 19. Boiled-egg diagram of the investigated compounds. BBB, passively permeate blood brain barrier; HIA, Human intestinal absorption; PGP+, compounds that effluated from central nervous system by the P-Glycoprotein; PGP-, compounds that is not binding to P-Glycoprotein.
Figure 19. Boiled-egg diagram of the investigated compounds. BBB, passively permeate blood brain barrier; HIA, Human intestinal absorption; PGP+, compounds that effluated from central nervous system by the P-Glycoprotein; PGP-, compounds that is not binding to P-Glycoprotein.
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g019
Figure 20. Docking results of investigated compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (6LU7). (a) Validation of docking procedure showing good matching between crystallized (blue) and docked (pink) ligands. (b) Docking pose and interactions of 39 (yellow). (c) Docking pose and interactions of 103 (orange).
Figure 20. Docking results of investigated compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (6LU7). (a) Validation of docking procedure showing good matching between crystallized (blue) and docked (pink) ligands. (b) Docking pose and interactions of 39 (yellow). (c) Docking pose and interactions of 103 (orange).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g020
Figure 21. Docking results of the investigated compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 methyltransferase (6W4H). (a) Validation of the docking procedure showing good matching between crystallized (blue) and docked (pink) ligands. (b) Docking pose and interactions of 103 (brick-red). (c) Docking pose and interactions of 98 (white). (d) Docking pose and interactions of 104 (orange).
Figure 21. Docking results of the investigated compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 methyltransferase (6W4H). (a) Validation of the docking procedure showing good matching between crystallized (blue) and docked (pink) ligands. (b) Docking pose and interactions of 103 (brick-red). (c) Docking pose and interactions of 98 (white). (d) Docking pose and interactions of 104 (orange).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g021
Figure 22. Docking results of the tested compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (7BV2). (a) Binding position of remdesivir. (b) Binding position of the docked ligands including 124 (green), 103 (blue), and 104 (pink). (c) Interactions between co-crystallized ligand with amino acids in the active site of RdRp. (d) Interactions of 124 (green). (e) Interactions of 103 (blue) and 104 (pink).
Figure 22. Docking results of the tested compounds in the active site of SARS-CoV-2 RdRp (7BV2). (a) Binding position of remdesivir. (b) Binding position of the docked ligands including 124 (green), 103 (blue), and 104 (pink). (c) Interactions between co-crystallized ligand with amino acids in the active site of RdRp. (d) Interactions of 124 (green). (e) Interactions of 103 (blue) and 104 (pink).
Marinedrugs 18 00645 g022
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zahran, E.M.; Albohy, A.; Khalil, A.; Ibrahim, A.H.; Ahmed, H.A.; El-Hossary, E.M.; Bringmann, G.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Bioactivity Potential of Marine Natural Products from Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and In Silico Anti-SARS-COV-2 Evaluation. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120645

AMA Style

Zahran EM, Albohy A, Khalil A, Ibrahim AH, Ahmed HA, El-Hossary EM, Bringmann G, Abdelmohsen UR. Bioactivity Potential of Marine Natural Products from Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and In Silico Anti-SARS-COV-2 Evaluation. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(12):645. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zahran, Eman Maher, Amgad Albohy, Amira Khalil, Alyaa Hatem Ibrahim, Heba Ali Ahmed, Ebaa M. El-Hossary, Gerhard Bringmann, and Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen. 2020. "Bioactivity Potential of Marine Natural Products from Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and In Silico Anti-SARS-COV-2 Evaluation" Marine Drugs 18, no. 12: 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120645

APA Style

Zahran, E. M., Albohy, A., Khalil, A., Ibrahim, A. H., Ahmed, H. A., El-Hossary, E. M., Bringmann, G., & Abdelmohsen, U. R. (2020). Bioactivity Potential of Marine Natural Products from Scleractinia-Associated Microbes and In Silico Anti-SARS-COV-2 Evaluation. Marine Drugs, 18(12), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18120645

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop