Next Article in Journal
Mojabanchromanol Isolated from Sargassum horneri Attenuates Particulate Matter Induced Inflammatory Responses via Suppressing TLR2/4/7-MAPK Signaling in MLE-12 Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Chlorinated 3-Phenylpropanoic Acid Derivatives from the Red Sea Marine Actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor LY001
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactive Polyphenols from Southern Chile Seaweed as Inhibitors of Enzymes for Starch Digestion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Induction of Antibacterial Metabolites by Co-Cultivation of Two Red-Sea-Sponge-Associated Actinomycetes Micromonospora sp. UR56 and Actinokinespora sp. EG49
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thalassosterol, a New Cytotoxic Aromatase Inhibitor Ergosterol Derivative from the Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum

by
Reda F. A. Abdelhameed
1,†,
Eman S. Habib
1,†,
Marwa S. Goda
1,
John Refaat Fahim
2,
Hashem A. Hassanean
1,
Enas E. Eltamany
1,
Amany K. Ibrahim
1,
Asmaa M. AboulMagd
3,
Shaimaa Fayez
4,5,
Adel M. Abd El-kader
6,7,
Tarfah Al-Warhi
8,
Gerhard Bringmann
4,*,
Safwat A. Ahmed
1,* and
Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen
2,6
1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Minia University, Minia 61519, Egypt
3
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Nahda University, BeniSuef 62513, Egypt
4
Institute of Organic Chemistry, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
5
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain-Shams University, Cairo 11566, Egypt
6
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Deraya University, New Minia 61111, Egypt
7
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, Assiut 71524, Egypt
8
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh 13414, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Equal contributions.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(7), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18070354
Submission received: 18 June 2020 / Revised: 28 June 2020 / Accepted: 7 July 2020 / Published: 8 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Natural Products from the Red Sea)

Abstract

:
Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forssk.) Den Hartog is a seagrass belonging to the plant family Cymodoceaceae with ubiquitous phytoconstituents and important pharmacological potential, including antioxidant, antiviral, and cytotoxic activities. In this work, a new ergosterol derivative named thalassosterol (1) was isolated from the methanolic extract of T. ciliatum growing in the Red Sea, along with two known first-reported sterols, namely ergosterol (2) and stigmasterol (3), using different chromatographic techniques. The structure of the new compound was established based on 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HR-MS) and by comparison with the literature data. The new ergosterol derivative showed significant in vitro antiproliferative potential against the human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa) and human breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines, with IC50 values of 8.12 and 14.24 µM, respectively. In addition, docking studies on the new sterol 1 explained the possible binding interactions with an aromatase enzyme; this inhibition is beneficial in both cervical and breast cancer therapy. A metabolic analysis of the crude extract of T. ciliatum using liquid chromatography combined with high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-HR-MS) revealed the presence of an array of phenolic compounds, sterols and ceramides, as well as di- and triglycerides.

1. Introduction

Seagrasses are marine flowering plants that grow underwater along temperate and tropical coastlines, providing shelter or food for other marine organisms. They are important components of the near-shore ecosystem and are used as biological indicators of environmental quality [1]. In East Africa, seagrasses are used as fertilizers and medicinally for the management of fever and skin diseases [2]. Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forssk.) Den Hartog (Family Cymodoceaceae) is a sub-tidal or shallow-depositional seagrass species that is generally found in extensive and monotonous meadows. This sickle-leaved cymodocea, commonly known as "Majani kumbi", grows in the Red Sea, the western Indian Ocean, and the Indo-Pacific region [3]. T. ciliatum has both horizontal and vertical rhizomes, with a cluster of leaves at the top of each living stem [4]. The leaves of T. ciliatum are characterized by the presence of many tannin-containing cells and are rich in phenolic constituents [5]. Pharmacological studies showed that T. ciliatum possesses antioxidant, antiviral, and cytotoxic activities, which are highly correlated to its flavonoid content [6,7,8]. Several flavonoids were reported from T. ciliatum such as quercetin 3-O-β-d-xylopyranoside, asebotin, 3-hydroxyasebotin, rutin, and racemic catechin [6]. Recently, a new diglyceride ester and asebotin were isolated from T. ciliatum, showing antiviral activities against the H5N1 virus through inhibition of the virus titre by 67.26% and 53.81%, respectively [7]. A new dihydrochalcone diglycoside was also identified from T. ciliatum, exhibiting anti-influenza A virus activity [9]. In 2018, our group isolated a cytotoxic phytosphingosine-type ceramide from T. ciliatum of the Red Sea in addition to different sterols with anti-inflammatory effects [10]. Gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry analysis (GC-MS coupling) was performed for identification of the lipoidal matter of the n-hexane fraction of T. ciliatum, revealing the presence of saturated and unsaturated long-chain fatty acids, such as tetradecanoic acid, eicosanoic acid, 9,12-hexadecadienoic acid, and 8,11,14- eicosatrienoic acid, in addition to other volatile compounds, as well as 1-heneicosanol, 2,6-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol, and 1-tridecanol [11]. Some genera of Cymodoceaceae showed different steroidal profiles, among them compounds like cholesterol, ß-sitosterol, stigmasterol, campesterol, and 22,23-dihydrobrassicasterol. Four 3-ketosteroids with a 24-ethyl cholestane side chain were also isolated from Cymodocea nodosa [12,13]. A comparative study on five seagrasses of different families revealed a high percentage of stigmasterol and ß-sitosterol in both Cymodocea serrulate and Halodule uninervis [14]. Our previous study was the only one that reported on the isolation of different steroids from T. ciliatum with anti-inflammatory effects, including 7β-hydroxy cholesterol, 7β-hydroxysitosterol, stigmasterol glucoside, and β-sitosterol glucoside [10]. Therefore, we herein continue our chemical and biological investigation on T. ciliatum growing in the Red Sea, along with high-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-HR-MS)-assisted metabolic profiling of this important seagrass.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Metabolic Profiling

Metabolic profiling of the crude extract of T. ciliatum using the LC-ESI-HR-MS technique (Figures S1 and S2) revealed the presence of a broad variety of metabolites such as flavonoids, chalcones, phenolic acids, sterols, fatty acids, anthraquinones, and terpenoids. The LC-ESI-HR-MS profiling for the rapid identification of natural metabolites resulted in the annotation of 20 compounds identified by comparison of their data, particularly their accurate masses, with those from some databases, e.g., the Dictionary of Natural Products (DNP) and the Metabolite and Chemical Entity (METLIN) database, as shown in Figure 1. Mass accuracy was calculated as [measured mass-expected mass/expected mass] × 106 and expressed in parts per million (ppm) error [15]. The herein-characterized metabolites of T. ciliatum were found to be in accordance with those obtained in previous phytochemical studies, which reported the isolation of several phenolic compounds and sterols [6,10]. From Table 1, protocatechuic acid, butein, kaempferol, catechin, 1,4,5-trihydroxy-7-methoxy-3-methyl anthraquinone, quercetin, 2-ω-dihydroxy emodin, isorhamnetin, quercetin-3-O-β-d-xylopyranoside, asebotin, and rutin were reported to have antioxidant activity that can protect from cardiovascular diseases, liver damage, and proliferation of abnormal cells [6,16,17,18,19,20]. Butein showed an aromatase inhibition activity that can be effective in breast cancer treatment [21]. A long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid, namely 6E,8E,10E,12E-octadecatetraenoic acid, as well as the diterpene linearol, exhibited antimicrobial and anticancer activities [22,23]. Likewise, both sphaerollane I and ergosterol inhibited proliferation of various malignant cell lines [24,25]. Linearol and rutin were reported to have antioxidant, cytotoxic and antiviral activities [18,23]. It is worth noting that the aforementioned antioxidant, antiviral, and cytotoxic activities of the crude extract of T. ciliatum may be correlated to the activities of the identified metabolites.

2.2. Identification of the Isolated Metabolites

Compound 1 (Figure 2) was obtained as a white powder and its molecular formula was determined by ESI-HR-MS as C30H49O5 (found at m/z 489.3573 [M − H] (Figure S3), calculated for 489.3579), indicating the presence of six degrees of unsaturation in the molecule. The NMR spectral data of compound 1 (Table 2) (Figures S4–S7) also closely matched those reported in the literature for ergostane-type steroids [27,37], showing signals characteristic of four secondary methyl groups resonating at δH 1.06 (CH3-21), 0.92 (CH3-28), 0.877 (CH3-27), and 0.873 (CH3-26), as well as one tertiary methyl group at δH 1.03 (CH3-19), along with their carbon resonances at δC 19.9, 18.4, 22.9, 23.1, and 14.1, respectively. The two geminally coupled (J = 12.2 Hz) one-proton doublets at δH 3.75 and 3.65, and the corresponding oxygenated methylene carbon at δC 60.6 were indicative of the presence of a hydroxy group at C-18, which was corroborated by the observed Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) correlations of H2-18 with C-12, C-13, and C-17 (Figure 3) (Figure S8). Additionally, the NMR data of compound 1 displayed two one-proton doublets of doublets at δH 5.12 (J = 15.2, 6.5 Hz) and 5.23 (J = 15.2, 7.2 Hz), ascribable to the olefinic protons H-22 and H-23, together with their corresponding methine carbons at δC 137.5 and 133.1, respectively.
The position of this double bond between C-22 and C-23 was also supported by the obtained Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) cross peaks of H-22/C-17 and H-22/C-24, as well as by the proton/proton Correlation Spectroscopy (1H-1H COSY) of H-22/H-23 and H-23/H-24 (Figure 3 and Figure S9), whereas the large coupling constant (15.2 Hz) between H-22 and H-23 typically indicated a trans-configuration of that double bond. Moreover, the 1H NMR signals at δH 4.71 (1H, br. d, J = 2.2 Hz) and 4.74 (1H, br. d, J = 2.2 Hz) were attributed to H-2 and H-3, respectively, suggesting that the hydroxylation in ring A of this sterol should be at C-2 and C-3, which was also confirmed by Heteronuclear Single Quantum Correlation (HSQC). These assignments were also substantiated with the aid of 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, and HMBC analyses (Figure 3).
The β-configuration of the hydroxy groups at C-2 and C-3 was clearly deduced from the observed chemical shifts of both carbons (δC 75.9 and 76.3, respectively) [38], as well as through the Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY) correlations observed between H-2/H-3, H-2/H-5, H-2/H-4a, H-3/H-1a, H-3/H-2, and H-3/H-5 (Figure 4 and Figure S10). On the other hand, the three-proton singlet at δH 2.0, along with its corresponding carbon resonating at δC 21.2 and the quaternary carbonyl signal at δC 172.6 were consistent with the presence of an acetoxy group, which was unambiguously allocated at C-15 based on the marked downfield shift of both H-15 (δH 4.98) and C-15 (δC 74.3) in comparison with ergosterol (2) and other related ergostane derivatives [25,37]. The noticed HMBC correlation of H-15 with the carbonyl carbon of this acetoxy group, in addition to its three-bond connectivities to both C-13 and C-17, were also in good agreement with the acetylation of compound 1 at C-15, while the observed NOESY correlations between H-15 and both H-7b and H-8 verified the α-orientation of that acetoxy group (Figure 4). Based on the above-mentioned assignments, which were totally supported by the DEPT-135, 1H-1H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and NOESY experiments, compound 1 was identified as 2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol, or, in other words, as (2β,3β-dihydroxy-13β-hydroxymethyl-10β-methyl-17β-(1,4,5-trimethyl-hex-2E-enyl)-hexadecahydro-cyclopenta[α]phenanthren-15α-yl acetate) (Figure 2). To the best of our knowledge, this molecule is a new compound, henceforth named thalassosterol.
Compounds 2 and 3 (Figure 5) were identified as the known steroids ergosterol (2) and stigmasterol (3), respectively, by comparing their spectral data with those reported in the literature [25,37,39,40]. Both compounds were also detected in the metabolic analysis of T. ciliatum. It is worth mentioning that it is the first time to report on the isolation of both ergosterol and stigmasterol from the seagrass T. ciliatum.

2.3. Docking Study

It can be observed generally through looking at the best score poses that binding of the new ergosterol, thalassosterol (1), at the active site is similar to that of the endogenous aromatase substrate, exemestane [41]. The binding interaction shows that the steroidal nucleus, overlapped with the hydrophobic environment of the binding pocket with ring D, is oriented towards the Met 374 residue and the β-face positioned towards the heme moiety. It can be clearly noticed that, while the hydroxy group of the ring A engages one hydrogen bond donor with the backbone amide of Met 374 as reported (3.82 Å) [42], the C15-keto oxygen atom of ring D acts as a hydrogen bond acceptor from Arg 115 (3.12 Å). Moreover, three extra hydrogen bond donors were involved via the interaction with Cys 417 residue with binding interaction score −8.219 kcal/mol (Figure 6). It is worth to mention that the H-bond interaction of the targeted new compound with Met 374 represents the selectivity of the latter with the active site of the aromatase. Moreover, the binding interactions of the target ergosterol derivative with different amino acids of the binding site of the aromatase did not only confirm the selectivity but also the possible binding interactions when compared with exemestane.

2.4. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity

The SRB assay is a rapid, sensitive, and inexpensive method for screening for antitumor activities of chemical agents against different malignant cell lines [43]. The antitumor effects of the isolated compounds were assessed by determination of the concentration required for 50% of growth inhibition (IC50). The cytotoxic potentials of the new compound 1 and of doxorubicin as a positive control are shown in Table 3 against different malignant cell lines, including the human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), a human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7), and a human liver cancer cell line (HepG2). The efficacy of compound 1 follows the order of HeLa > MCF-7 > HepG2 malignant cell lines. The IC50 of compound 1 is 8.13 ± 0.21 µM (mean ± SD) against the HeLa cell line and this result is closely related to the one obtained with doxorubicin as a positive control (Table 3). Moreover, compound 1 showed a weak antiproliferative activity on cells of the normal Vero cell line (> 90 µM).
According to the US NCI (National Cancer Institute) plant screening program guidelines, a crude extract is considered to have in vitro antiproliferative activity if the IC50 value after incubation between 48 and 72 h is smaller than 20 µg/mL, and less than 4 µg/mL for pure compounds [44]. Based on these NCI guidelines, the new compound 1 exhibited a high cytotoxic potential against the HeLa cell line, with an IC50 value of 8.13 ± 0.21 µM (less than 8.17 µM, equivalent to 4 µg/mL of the US NCI guidelines). On the other hand, compound 1 showed a weak cytotoxic activity against the HepG2 cell line, with an IC50 value of 48.64 ± 0.22 µM. Moreover, it was found to have a moderate cytotoxic activity against the breast cancer cell line MCF-7, with an IC50 value of 14.26 ± 0.40 µM when compared with doxorubicin as a positive control (8.65 ± 0.03 µM). This cytotoxic activity against the mentioned types of estrogen-responsive cancers, cervical cancer and breast cancer [41] was confirmed by the previously discussed docking study by blocking the aromatase enzyme that synthesizes estrogens.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Plant Material

The seagrass T. ciliatum was collected from Sharm El Sheikh at the Egyptian Red Sea, then air-dried and stored at a low temperature (‒24 °C) until further processing. The plant was identified by Dr. Tarek Temraz, Marine Science Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt. A voucher sample (no. SAA-41) was deposited in the herbarium section of Pharmacognosy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.

3.2. General Experimental Procedures

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained with a Bruker Avance III HD 400 spectrometer operating at 400 MHz for 1H and 100 MHz for 13C. Both 1H and 13C NMR chemical shifts are expressed in δ values in regard to the solvent peaks δH 3.3 and δC 49 ppm for CD3OD, and coupling constants are given in Hertz (Hz). Thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was carried out on aluminum-backed plates pre-coated with silica gel F254 (20 × 20 cm; 200 µm; 60 Å (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), while silica gel 60/230–400 µm mesh size (Whatman, Sanford, ME, USA) was used for column chromatography. Sephadex® LH-20 (Sigma Aldrich, Bremen, Germany), and reversed-phase octadecyl silica (ODS) gel (YMC, Kyoto, Japan) were also utilized.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation

The air-dried material of T. ciliatum (90 g) was ground and extracted with a 1:1 mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (2 L × 3) at room temperature. The combined extracts were concentrated under vacuum to afford a dark-green residue (Tc, 21 g), which was then chromatographed over an open silica gel column using n-hexane/ethyl acetate (EtOAc) as the eluent (95:5‒0:100) and EtOAc/methanol (90:10‒50:50), with gradient elution giving seven fractions, Tc-A~Tc-G. The second fraction eluted using 25% EtOAc in hexane, Tc-B, was concentrated to afford a green residue (5 g) and was purified on silica gel using hexane/EtOAc (95:5) giving nine subfractions, Tc-B-1~Tc-B-9. Among them, subfractions Tc-B-2~Tc-B-4, having similar TLC patterns, were combined (Tc-B-1′, 90 mg) and re-chromatographed on silica gel using hexane-EtOAc (95:5) giving four sub-subfractions, Tc-B-1′-1~Tc-B-1′-4. One of the resulting sub-subfractions, Tc-B-1′-2, afforded compound 3 (11 mg). Another sub-subfraction, Tc-B-1′-3 (30 mg), was also applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column and eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (1:1) to afford compounds 1 (14 mg, white powder) and 2 (16 mg). Compound 1 was finally purified on an open ODS column using MeOH/H2O (8:2).

3.4. Metabolic Profiling

The metabolic study was performed using LC-ESI-HR-MS for dereplication purposes according to the literature [45]. An aliquot of 10 μL of the methanolic extract of T. ciliatum (1 mg/mL) was injected to an Accela HPLC (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) using an ACE C18 column of 75 mm × 3 mm having 5 μm internal diameter (Hichrome Limited, Reading, UK) and equipped with an Accela UV-visible detector. This compartment was coupled to an Exactive (Orbitrap) mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The gradient elution was done using purified water (total organic carbon 20 ppb) and acetonitrile; each containing 0.1% formic acid with a flow rate of 300 μL/min at ambient temperature. The gradient elution technique was assessed by increasing the concentration of acetonitrile from 10% to 100% within 30 min, followed by an isocratic period of 5 min and then reducing the concentration of acetonitrile to 10% within 1 min. ESI-HR-MS analysis was performed in both positive and negative ionization modes, with a spray voltage of 4.5 kV and a capillary temperature of 320 °C. The ESI-MS mass range was set at m/z 100–2000 using in-source collision-induced dissociation (CID) mechanism and m/z 50–1000. The raw HR-MS data were imported and analyzed using MZmine 2.12. Excel macros were also employed to dereplicate each m/z ion peak with metabolites in the database, using the retention time and an m/z threshold of ± 5 ppm, to attain the tentative identification of the compounds. A chemotaxonomic filter was applied to the obtained hits in order to limit the number of identities per metabolite and to only include the relevant ones. The compounds were identified by a comparison of their data, particularly their accurate masses, with those from some databases, e.g. DNP and METLIN. The retention time, m/z, molecular weight, molecular formula, MZmine ID, name, and biological source were determined.

3.5. Modeling Study on the Binding Between the New Ergosterol Derivative 1 and the Aromatase Binding Site

Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) was adopted for docking calculations. The structures of the compounds were generated by ChemDraw Ultra 11.0. Molecular docking calculations were applied on human placental aromatase (PDB code 3S7S, http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/home/home.do). Since the aromatase enzyme is complexed with the steroid exemestane as an inhibitor, this model was chosen for steroidal scaffold inhibitors. Docking simulation was done on the test compounds with the following protocol. Structure arrangement process was used to revise the protein errors, and a reasonable protein structure was set up on default rules on MOE. Finally, the Gasteiger methodology was used to calculate the partial charges of the protein [46]. The ligands were protonated and the correction of atom and bond types were defined, hydrogen atoms were added, and finally minimization was performed (MMFF94x, gradient: 0.01).
The default Triangle Matcher placement method was selected for docking. The GBVI/WSA dG scoring function that determines the free energy of binding of the ligand from a given pose, was chosen to rank the final poses. The ligand complex with the enzyme having the lowest S-score was selected. The redocking of ligand with its target revealed an RMSD of 0.98 Å, which confirmed that the ligand binds to the same pocket and assured the dependability of parameters of docking.

3.6. In Vitro Antiproliferative Assay

3.6.1. In Vitro Cell Culture

Human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7), cervical cancer (HeLa), and liver carcinoma (HepG2) cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Alexandria, MN, USA). The tumor cell lines were preserved at the National Cancer Institute, Cairo, Egypt, by serial sub-culturing. The cells were sub-cultured on RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum [47].

3.6.2. Sulforhodamine B Assay

The antiproliferative activity was determined by the sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay. SRB is a fluorescent aminoanthracene dye with two sulfonic acid groups that bind to the amino groups of intracellular proteins under mildly acidic conditions to provide a sensitive index of cellular protein content. The test was performed as previously described in detail [48,49]. Cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates at an initial concentration and left for 24 h to attach to the plates. Then, the three isolated compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and added at different concentrations of 0, 5, 12.5, 25, and 50 µg/mL. After incubation for 48 h, 50 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid were added and incubated for 60 min at 4 °C to fix the attached cells. The plates were washed and stained with 50 μL of 0.4% SRB dissolved in 1% acetic acid for 30 min at room temperature. The plates were then air-dried, and the dye was solubilized with 100 μL/well of 10 M tris base of pH 10.5 (AppliChem®, Darmstadt, Germany). Optical density (OD) was measured spectrophotometrically at 570 nm using an ELISA microplate reader (Sunrise Tecan reader, Crailsheim, Germany). The experiment was repeated three times and IC50 values (concentration that causes 50% decrease in cell viability) were calculated. Doxorubicin served as a positive control at the same concentration range.

4. Conclusions

From the CH2Cl2/MeOH extract of the Red Sea grass T. ciliatum, a new ergosterol derivative, compound 1, was isolated. It was identified as 2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol and named thalassosterol. The new compound displayed a significant cytotoxic activity against cervical (HeLa) and breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7), with IC50 values of 8.12 and 14.24 µM, respectively. In addition, docking studies with compound 1 explained how it works as an aromatase inhibitor, serving a protocol of cervical and breast cancer treatment. LC-MS based metabolic analysis of T. ciliatum furthermore revealed the presence of phenolic compounds, sterols, ceramides, and di- and triglycerides. Therefore, the presented work highlights T. ciliatum as an important marine source of bioactive secondary metabolites that should attract further chemical and pharmacological investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/18/7/354/s1, Figures S1–S2: LC-ESI-HR-MS of the crude extract (positive and negative modes), Figures S3–S10: ESI-HR-MS, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, DEPT-135, HSQC, HMBC, COSY and NOESY of compound 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, U.R.A., S.A.A., R.F.A.A., G.B., H.A.H., A.K.I.; methodology, M.S.G., R.F.A.A., E.S.H.; data curation, R.F.A.A., M.S.G., J.R.F., E.E.E., A.M.A., S.F., A.M.A.E.-k., T.A.-W.; original draft preparation, M.S.G., U.R.A.; writing, review, and editing, all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and supported by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Wuerzburg.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Tarek A. Temraz, Marine Science Department, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Egypt, for his taxonomical identification of the Red Sea seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. S.F. thanks the German Academic Exchange Service (Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, DAAD) for a generous scholarship grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pergent-Martini, C.; Leoni, V.; Pasqualini, V.; Ardizzone, G.D.; Balestri, E.; Bedini, R.; Belluscio, A.; Belsher, T.; Borg, J.; Boudouresque, C.F.; et al. Descriptors of Posidonia oceanica meadows: Use and application. Ecol. Indic. 2005, 5, 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bandeira, S. Dynamics, biomass and total rhizome length of the seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum at Inhaca Island, Mozambique. Plant Ecol. 1997, 130, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Short, F.; Carruthers, T.; Dennison, W.; Waycott, M. Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2007, 350, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kamermans, P.; Hemmingaa, M.A.; Marbàa, N.; Mateoa, M.A.; Mtolerab, M.; Stapel, J. Leaf production, shoot demography, and flowering of Thalassodendron ciliatum along the east African coast. Aquat. Bot. 2001, 70, 243–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lipkin, Y. Thalassodendron ciliatum in Sinai (northern Red Sea) with special reference to quantitative aspects. Aquat. Bot. 1998, 31, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hamdy, A.A.; Mettwally, W.S.A.; El Fotouh, M.A.; Rodriguez, B.; El-Dewany, A.I.; El-Toumy, S.A.A.; Hussein, A.A. Bioactive Phenolic Compounds from the Egyptian Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Z. Naturforsch. 2012, 67, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ibrahim, A.K.; Youssef, A.I.; Arafa, A.S.; Foad, R.; Radwan, M.M.; Ross, S.; Hassanean, H.A.; Ahmed, S.A. Anti-H5N1 virus new diglyceride ester from the Red Sea grass Thallasodendron ciliatum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2013, 27, 1625–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ramah, S.; Etwarysing, L.; Auckloo, N.; Gopeechund, A.; Bhagooli, R.; Bahorun, T. Prophylactic antioxidants and phenolics of seagrass and seaweed species: A seasonal variation study in a Southern Indian Ocean Island, Mauritius. IJMU 2014, 9, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mohammed, M.M.D.; Hamdy, A.A.; El-Fiky, N.M.; Mettwally, W.S.A.; El-Beih, A.A.; Kobayashi, N. Anti-influenza A virus activity of a new dihydrochalcone diglycoside isolated from the Egyptian seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum (Forsk.). Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Abdelhameed, R.F.; Ibrahim, A.K.; Yamada, K.; Ahmed, S.A. Cytotoxic and anti-inflammatory compounds from Red Sea grass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Med. Chem. Res. 2018, 27, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Goda, M.S.; Eltamany, E.E.; Habib, E.S.; Hassanean, H.A.; Ahmed, A.A.; Abdelhameed, R.F.A.; Ibrahim, A.K. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Marine Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum Collected from Red Sea. Rec. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2020, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sica, D.; Piccialli, V.; Masullo, A. Configuration at C-24 of sterols from the marine phanerogames Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2609–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kontiza, I.; Abatis, D.; Malakate, K.; Vagias, C.; Roussis, V. 3-Keto steroids from the marine organisms Dendrophyllia cornigera and Cymodocea nodosa. Steroids 2006, 71, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gilian, F.T.; Hogg, R.W.; Drew, E.A. The sterol and fatty acid compositions of seven tropical seagrasses from North Queensland, Australia. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 2817–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lu, W.; Clasquin, M.F.; Melamud, E.; Amador-Noguez, D.; Caudy, A.A.; Rabinowitz, J.D. Metabolomic Analysis via Reversed-Phase Ion-Pairing Liquid Chromatography Coupled to a Stand Alone Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3212–3221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Liu, J.; Meng, C.; Liu, S.; Kan, J.; Jin, C. Preparation and characterization of protocatechuic acid grafted chitosan films with antioxidant activity. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 63, 457–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, Z.; Kuo, S.; Chan, S.; Ko, F.; Teng, C. Antioxidant properties of butein isolated from Dalbergia odorifera. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1392, 291–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goda, M.S.; Ahmed, S.A.; El Sherif, F.; Hassanean, H.A.; Ibrahim, A.K. Genetically stable plants with boosted flavonoids content after in vitro regeneration of the endangered Capparis spinosa L. Glob. Drugs Ther. 2017, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kirakosyan, A.; Mitchell Seymour, E.; Noon, K.R.; Urcuyo Llanes, D.E.; Kaufman, P.B.; Warber, S.L.; Bolling, S.F. Interactions of antioxidants isolated from tart cherry (Prunus cerasus) fruits. Food Chem. 2010, 122, 78–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yen, G. Antioxidant activity of anthraquinones and anthrone. Food Chem. 2000, 70, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, Y.; Chan, F.L.; Chen, S.; Leung, L.K. The plant polyphenol butein inhibits testosterone-induced proliferation in breast cancer cells expressing aromatase. Life Sci. 2005, 77, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Asif, M. Health effects of omega- 3,6,9 fatty acids: Perilla frutescens is a good example of plant oils. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2011, 11, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kilic, T.; Carikci, S.; Topcu, G.; .Aslan, I.; Goren, A.C. Diterpenoids from Sideritis condensata. Evaluation of chemotaxonomy of Sideritis species and insecticidal activity. Chem. Nat. Compd. 2009, 45, 918–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Smyrniotopoulos, V.; Vagias, C.; Bruyère, C.; Lamoral-Theys, D.; Kiss, R.; Roussis, V. Structure and in vitro antitumor activity evaluation of brominated diterpenes from the red alga Sphaerococcus coronopifolius. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1321–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, S.; Yong, T.; Zhang, Y.; Su, J.; Jiao, C.; Xie, Y. Anti-tumor and anti-angiogenic ergosterols from Ganoderma lucidum. Front. Chem. 2017, 5, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Osman, M.; Sazalli, N.N.H.; Willium, D.; Golam, F.; Nezhadahmadi, A. Potentiality of Roselle and On-ion (Allium cepa) peel as Raw Materials for Producing Protocatechuic Acid in Tropical Malaysia: A Comparative Study. INDJST 2014, 7, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sebolai, O.M.; Kock, J.L.F.; Pohl, C.H.; Botes, P.J.; Nigam, S. Report on the discovery of a novel 3-hydroxy oxylipin cascade in the yeast Saccharomycopsis synnaedendra. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2004, 74, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mikhailova, M.V.; Bemis, D.L.; Wise, M.L.; Gerwick, W.H.; Norris, J.N.; Jacobs, R.S. Structure and biosynthesis of novel conjugated polyene fatty acids from the marine green alga Anadyomene stellate. Lipids 1995, 30, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Seeram, N.P.; Lee, R.; Feng, L.; Heber, D. The Isolation and Identification of Isolation and Identification of Strawberry Phenolics with Antioxidant and Human Cancer Cell Antiproliferative Properties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, S.; Li, X.M.; Teuscher, F.; Li, D.L.; Diesel, A.; Ebel, R.; Proksch, P.; Wang, B.G. Chaetopyranin, a benzaldehyde derivative, and other related metabolites from Chaetomium globosum, an endophytic fungus derived from the marine red alga Polysiphonia urceolata. J. Nat. Prod. 2006, 69, 1622–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paranjape, S.R.; Chiang, Y.M.; Sanchez, J.F.; Entwistle, R.; Wang, C.C.; Oakley, B.R.; Gamblin, T.C. Inhibition of Tau aggregation by three Aspergillus nidulans secondary metabolites: 2,ω-dihydroxyemodin, asperthecin, and asperbenzaldehyde. Planta Med. 2014, 80, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Cao, X.; Wei, Y.; Ito, Y. Preparative Isolation of Isorhamnetin from Stigma maydis using High Speed Countercurrent Chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2008, 32, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Smyrniotopoulos, V.; Vagias, C.; Roussis, V. Sphaeroane and Neodolabellane Diterpenes from the Red Alga Sphaerococcus coronopifolius. Mar. Drugs 2009, 7, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nieto, I.; Avila, I. Determination of fatty acids and triterpenoid compounds from the fruiting body of Suillus luteus. Rev. Colomb. Quim. 2008, 37, 297–304. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang, W.; Che, C. Isomalabaricane-Type Nortriterpenoids and Other Constituents of the Marine Sponge Geodia japonica. J. Nat. Prod. 2001, 64, 1489–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, Y. Dietary Chinese Herbs, 1st ed.; Springer: Vienna, Austria, 2015; pp. 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goad, L.J.; Akihisa, T. Analysis of Sterols, 1st ed.; Blackie Academic and Professional: London, UK, 1997; pp. 1–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ványolòs, A.; Béni, Z.; Dékány, M.; Simon, A.; Báthori, M. Novel Ecdysteroids from Serratula wolffii. Sci. World J. 2012, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Shady, N.H.; Abdelmohsen, U.R.; Ahmed, S.; Fouad, M.; Kamel, M.S. Phytochemical and biological investigation of the red sea marine sponge Hyrtios sp. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2017, 6, 241–246. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ghosh, T.; Maity, T.K.; Singh, J. Evaluation of antitumor activity of stigmasterol, a constituent isolated from Bacopa monnieri Linn. aerial parts against Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma in mice. Orient. Pharm. Exp. Med. 2011, 11, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roleira, F.M.F.; Varela, C.; Amaral, C.; Costa, S.C.; Correia-da-Silva, G.; Moraca, F.; Costa, G.; Alcaro, S.; Teixeira, N.A.A.; Tavares da Silva, E.J. C-6α- vs C-7α-Substituted Steroidal Aromatase Inhibitors: Which Is Better? Synthesis, Biochemical Evaluation, Docking Studies, and Structure–Activity Relationships. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 3636–3657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rampogu, S.; Ravinder, D.; Pawar, S.C.; Lee, K.W. Natural Compound Modulates the Cervical Cancer Microenvironment—A Pharmacophore Guided Molecular Modelling Approaches. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kumar, S.; Bajaj, S.; Bodla, R.B. Preclinical screening methods in cancer. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Ibrahim, R.S.; Seif El-Din, A.A.; Abu-Serie, M.; Abd El Rahman, N.M.; El-Demellawy, M.; Metwally, A.M. Investigation of In-Vitro Cytotoxic and Potential Anticancer Activities of Flavonoidal Aglycones from Egyptian Propolis. Rec. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 2017, 2, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Abdelhafez, O.H.; Othman, E.M.; Fahim, J.R.; Desouky, S.Y.; Pimentel-Elardo, S.M.; Nodwell, J.R.; Schirmeister, T.; Tawfike, A.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Metabolomics analysis and biological investigation of three Malvaceae plants. Phytochem. Anal. 2020, 31, 204–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol. 1990, 3, 537–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Skehan, P.; Strong, R.; Scudiero, D.; Monks, A.; McMahon, J.; Vistica, D.; Warren, J.T.; Bokesch, H.; Kenney, S.; Boyd, M.R. New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer drug screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990, 82, 1107–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Vichai, V.; Kirtikara, K. Sulforhodamine B colorimetric assay for cytotoxicity screening. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 1112–1116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Abu-Dahab, R.; Afifi, F. Antiproliferative activity of selected medicinal plants of Jordan against a breast adenocarcinoma cell line (MCF7). Sci. Pharm. 2007, 75, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the detected metabolites listed in Table 1.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of the detected metabolites listed in Table 1.
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g001
Figure 2. Chemical structure of the new ergosterol derivative 1 (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol), named thalassosterol.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of the new ergosterol derivative 1 (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol), named thalassosterol.
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g002
Figure 3. Key 1H-1H COSY ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i001) and Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i002) interactions in thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol). Blue bold line represents 1H-1H COSY correlations between H1/H2, H2/H3, H3/H4, H14/H15, H15/H16, H16/H17, H22/H23 and H23/H24, while red single-head arrow represents HMBC correlations between H1/C19, H1/C3, H2/C3, H2/C5, H15/C13, H15/C17, H15/CO, H18/C12, H18/C17, H18/C13, H22/C17, H22/C24, H27/C24 and H28/C23.
Figure 3. Key 1H-1H COSY ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i001) and Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation (HMBC) ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i002) interactions in thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol). Blue bold line represents 1H-1H COSY correlations between H1/H2, H2/H3, H3/H4, H14/H15, H15/H16, H16/H17, H22/H23 and H23/H24, while red single-head arrow represents HMBC correlations between H1/C19, H1/C3, H2/C3, H2/C5, H15/C13, H15/C17, H15/CO, H18/C12, H18/C17, H18/C13, H22/C17, H22/C24, H27/C24 and H28/C23.
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g003
Figure 4. Key Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY) ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i003) correlations of thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol). Green double-head arrow represents NOESY correlations between H2/H3, H2/H5, H2/H4a, H3/H1a, H3/H2, H3/H5, H15/H7b and H15/H8.
Figure 4. Key Nuclear Overhauser Effect Spectroscopy (NOESY) ( Marinedrugs 18 00354 i003) correlations of thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol). Green double-head arrow represents NOESY correlations between H2/H3, H2/H5, H2/H4a, H3/H1a, H3/H2, H3/H5, H15/H7b and H15/H8.
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g004
Figure 5. Chemical structures of the known metabolites ergosterol (2) and stigmasterol (3) isolated from T. ciliatum.
Figure 5. Chemical structures of the known metabolites ergosterol (2) and stigmasterol (3) isolated from T. ciliatum.
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g005
Figure 6. (a) The 2D caption of thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol), binding to the active site of aromatase. (b) Binding pattern of compound 1 colored by element into the receptor binding site showing five interactions (dotted lines).
Figure 6. (a) The 2D caption of thalassosterol (1), (2β,18-dihydroxy-15α-acetoxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydroergosterol), binding to the active site of aromatase. (b) Binding pattern of compound 1 colored by element into the receptor binding site showing five interactions (dotted lines).
Marinedrugs 18 00354 g006
Table 1. Metabolic analysis of a crude extract of Thallasodendron ciliatum.
Table 1. Metabolic analysis of a crude extract of Thallasodendron ciliatum.
Polarity ModeRetention Time (min)MZmine IDm/z * Measured MassExpected MassMass Error (ppm)NameMolecular Formula **SourceRef.
1positive1.519930155.0347154.0274154.02665.2Protocatechuic acid C7H6O4Allium cepa[26]
2negative11.29382271.2269272.2342272.2351−3.33R-Hydroxypalmitic acidC16H32O3Saccharomycopsis sp.[27]
3positive5.079019273.0748272.0675272.0685−3.7ButeinC15H12O5Dalbergia odorifera[17]
4positive5.639699277.2153276.2080276.2089−3.36E,8E,10E,12E-Octadecatetraenoic acidC18H28O2Anadyomene stellata[28]
5negative4.463937285.0393286.0466286.0477−3.8Kaempferol C15H10O6Fragaria chiloensis[29]
6negative2.183954289.0705290.0778290.0790−4.1CatechinC15H14O6T. ciliatum[6]
7negative5.434767299.0551300.0623300.0634−3.71,4,5-Trihydroxy-7-methoxy-3-methylanthraquinoneC16H12O6Chaetomium globosum[30]
8negative5.074942301.0341302.0414302.0427−4.3Quercetin C15H10O7Fragaria chiloensis[29]
9positive3.379298303.0503302.0430302.04270.92-ω-DihydroxyemodinC15H10O7Aspergillus nidulans[31]
10negative4.764129315.0497316.0570316.0583−4.1IsorhamnetinC16H12O7Stigma maydis[32]
11negative13.904382347.2581348.2654348.2664−2.9Sphaerollane IC22H36O3Sphaerococs coronopifolis[33]
12positive8.6612289353.2706352.2634352.26145.7LinearolC21H36O4Sideritis condensata[23]
13positive12.719842397.3452396.3379396.3392−3.3Ergosterol (2)C28H44OGanoderma lucidum[25]
14positive13.6010050403.3528402.3456402.3498−10.47β-HydroxycholesterolC27H46O2T. ciliatum[10]
15positive12.498715407.3677406.3604406.36000.923-Methylstigmasta-3Z,5Z,7Z,22E-tetraeneC30H46Suillus luteus[34]
16positive10.468941427.3572426.3499426.34980.226-Methylergosta-5,24(28)-diene-7-one-3-olC29H46O2Geodia japonica[35]
17positive15.43320429.3732428.3659428.36541.224R-Stigmasta-5,28-diene-3β,24 -diolC29H48O2Sargassum fusiforme[36]
18negative3.374110433.0765434.0838434.0849−2.5Quercetin-3-O-β-D-xylopyranosideC20H18O11T. ciliatum[6]
19positive6.10705451.1642450.1570450.15269.8AsebotinC22H26O10T. ciliatum[6]
20negative2.335311609.1466610.1539610.15340.8RutinC27H30O16T. ciliatum[6]
* m/z is expressed in negative or positive formula; ** Molecular formula is expressed in a neutral formula.
Table 2. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectroscopic data of compound 1 (CD3OD, δ in ppm, J in Hz).
Table 2. 1H (400 MHz) and 13C (100 MHz) NMR spectroscopic data of compound 1 (CD3OD, δ in ppm, J in Hz).
No.δHδC
11.42, 2.09, m39.1
24.72, br. d (J = 2.2)76.0
34.75, br. d (J = 2.2)76.3
41.60, 1.80, m30.4
51.59, m40.2
61.25, 1.50, m28.9
70.96, 1.59, m32.3
81.74, m32.4
90.83, m56.8
10----36.5
111.37, 1.56, m21.8
120.96, 2.62, m36.2
13---48.8
141.20, m59.8
154.99, m74.4
161.30, 2.46, m39.9
171.14, m58.1
183.65, d (J = 12.2)
3.75 d (J = 12.2)
60.6
191.03, br. s14.2
201.72, m36.6
211.06, d (J = 6.4)19.9
225.15, dd (J = 15.2, 6.5)137.5
235.21, dd (J = 15.2, 7.2)133.2
241.84, m44.4
251.51, m29.2
260.873, d (J = 6.64)23.2
270.877, d (J = 6.64)23.0
280.92, d (J = 6.8)18.4
-CO-CH32.00, s21.2
-CO-CH3----172.6
Table 3. IC50 values (µM) of thalassosterol (1) and doxorubicin against different human cell lines, HeLa, human liver cancer cell line (HepG2), and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7).
Table 3. IC50 values (µM) of thalassosterol (1) and doxorubicin against different human cell lines, HeLa, human liver cancer cell line (HepG2), and human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7).
Human Cancer Cell Lines
HeLa
IC50 (µM)
HepG2
IC50 (µM)
MCF-7
IC50 (µM)
Thalassosterol (1)8.13 ± 0.21 *48.64 ± 0.22 *14.26 ± 0.40 *
Doxorubicin6.77 ± 0.079.02 ± 0.068.65 ± 0.03
Human cervical cancer cell line (HeLa), human liver cancer cell line (HepG2), human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7). * Significantly different from doxorubicin as the positive control. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments (significant differences at p < 0.05).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdelhameed, R.F.A.; Habib, E.S.; Goda, M.S.; Fahim, J.R.; Hassanean, H.A.; Eltamany, E.E.; Ibrahim, A.K.; AboulMagd, A.M.; Fayez, S.; El-kader, A.M.A.; et al. Thalassosterol, a New Cytotoxic Aromatase Inhibitor Ergosterol Derivative from the Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18070354

AMA Style

Abdelhameed RFA, Habib ES, Goda MS, Fahim JR, Hassanean HA, Eltamany EE, Ibrahim AK, AboulMagd AM, Fayez S, El-kader AMA, et al. Thalassosterol, a New Cytotoxic Aromatase Inhibitor Ergosterol Derivative from the Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(7):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18070354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdelhameed, Reda F. A., Eman S. Habib, Marwa S. Goda, John Refaat Fahim, Hashem A. Hassanean, Enas E. Eltamany, Amany K. Ibrahim, Asmaa M. AboulMagd, Shaimaa Fayez, Adel M. Abd El-kader, and et al. 2020. "Thalassosterol, a New Cytotoxic Aromatase Inhibitor Ergosterol Derivative from the Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum" Marine Drugs 18, no. 7: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18070354

APA Style

Abdelhameed, R. F. A., Habib, E. S., Goda, M. S., Fahim, J. R., Hassanean, H. A., Eltamany, E. E., Ibrahim, A. K., AboulMagd, A. M., Fayez, S., El-kader, A. M. A., Al-Warhi, T., Bringmann, G., Ahmed, S. A., & Abdelmohsen, U. R. (2020). Thalassosterol, a New Cytotoxic Aromatase Inhibitor Ergosterol Derivative from the Red Sea Seagrass Thalassodendron ciliatum. Marine Drugs, 18(7), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18070354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop