Argenziano, M.; Bressan, B.; Luganini, A.; Finesso, N.; Genova, T.; Troia, A.; Giribaldi, G.; Banche, G.; Mandras, N.; Cuffini, A.M.;
et al. Comparative Evaluation of Different Chitosan Species and Derivatives as Candidate Biomaterials for Oxygen-Loaded Nanodroplet Formulations to Treat Chronic Wounds. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020112
AMA Style
Argenziano M, Bressan B, Luganini A, Finesso N, Genova T, Troia A, Giribaldi G, Banche G, Mandras N, Cuffini AM,
et al. Comparative Evaluation of Different Chitosan Species and Derivatives as Candidate Biomaterials for Oxygen-Loaded Nanodroplet Formulations to Treat Chronic Wounds. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(2):112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020112
Chicago/Turabian Style
Argenziano, Monica, Bruno Bressan, Anna Luganini, Nicole Finesso, Tullio Genova, Adriano Troia, Giuliana Giribaldi, Giuliana Banche, Narcisa Mandras, Anna Maria Cuffini,
and et al. 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Different Chitosan Species and Derivatives as Candidate Biomaterials for Oxygen-Loaded Nanodroplet Formulations to Treat Chronic Wounds" Marine Drugs 19, no. 2: 112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020112
APA Style
Argenziano, M., Bressan, B., Luganini, A., Finesso, N., Genova, T., Troia, A., Giribaldi, G., Banche, G., Mandras, N., Cuffini, A. M., Cavalli, R., & Prato, M.
(2021). Comparative Evaluation of Different Chitosan Species and Derivatives as Candidate Biomaterials for Oxygen-Loaded Nanodroplet Formulations to Treat Chronic Wounds. Marine Drugs, 19(2), 112.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020112
