Next Article in Journal
Bioactivity Screening and Gene-Trait Matching across Marine Sponge-Associated Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Marine-Source Quorum Quenching Enzyme YtnP to Improve Hygiene Quality in Dental Units
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of Survivin Inhibitors Part 1: Screening the Harbor Branch Pure Compound Library
Previous Article in Special Issue
AhaP, A Quorum Quenching Acylase from Psychrobacter sp. M9-54-1 That Attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Vibrio coralliilyticus Virulence
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 19
Issue 2
10.3390/md19020074
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibition Strategies to Control Microfouling

by
Andrea Muras
1,
Ana Parga
1,
Celia Mayer
1,2 and
Ana Otero
1,*
1
Departamento de Microbioloxía e Parasitoloxía, Facultade de Bioloxía-CIBUS, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
2
National Biofilms Innovations Centre, Biodiscovery Institute and School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(2), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020074
Submission received: 18 December 2020 / Revised: 21 January 2021 / Accepted: 27 January 2021 / Published: 30 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quorum Sensing Bacterial Communication Systems and Interference Strategies in Marine Environments)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Interfering with the quorum sensing bacterial communication systems has been proposed as a promising strategy to control bacterial biofilm formation, a key process in biofouling development. Appropriate in vitro biofilm-forming bacteria models are needed to establish screening methods for innovative anti-biofilm and anti-microfouling compounds. Four marine strains, two Pseudoalteromonas spp. and two Vibrio spp., were selected and studied with regard to their biofilm-forming capacity and sensitivity to quorum sensing (QS) inhibitors. Biofilm experiments were performed using two biofilm cultivation and quantification methods: the xCELLigence® system, which allows online monitoring of biofilm formation, and the active attachment model, which allows refreshment of the culture medium to obtain a strong biofilm that can be quantified with standard staining methods. Although all selected strains produced acyl-homoserine-lactone (AHL) QS signals, only the P. flavipulchra biofilm, measured with both quantification systems, was significantly reduced with the addition of the AHL-lactonase Aii20J without a significant effect on planktonic growth. Two-species biofilms containing P. flavipulchra were also affected by the addition of Aii20J, indicating an influence on the target bacterial strain as well as an indirect effect on the co-cultured bacterium. The use of xCELLigence® is proposed as a time-saving method to quantify biofilm formation and search for eco-friendly anti-microfouling compounds based on quorum sensing inhibition (QSI) strategies. The results obtained from these two in vitro biofilm formation methods revealed important differences in the response of biosensor bacteria to culture medium and conditions, indicating that several strains should be used simultaneously for screening purposes and the cultivation conditions should be carefully optimized for each specific purpose.

1. Introduction

Biofilms are made of microbial sessile communities characterized by cells that are attached to a substratum or other surfaces, are embedded in a self-produced matrix of extracellular polymeric substances, and exhibit an altered phenotype compared to planktonic cells [1]. Besides their consequences for human health, bacterial biofilms are based on important processes such as biocorrosion and constitute the initial step in the biofouling process of submerged surfaces, serving as the substratum on which other micro- and macro-organisms settle and grow. Biofouling control is a global economic problem due to its negative impact not only on the shipping industry (biocorrosion, cleaning, transport delay, increased fuel consumption) but also on environmental pollution (increased carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and sulfur dioxide emissions) [2]. There is increasing concern about the toxicity of biocides used to control marine biofouling since the biocide tributyltin (TBT) and other herbicides such as irgarol and diuron were banned because of their harmful impact on the marine ecosystem [3]. Most current commercially available antifouling paints contain compounds that are toxic to marine life, hence we need to search for new, less aggressive, eco-friendly substances to control biofouling and marine biofilm formation. Within that search, compounds targeting the inhibition of bacterial biofilm without affecting bacterial growth are of special interest.
Understanding the mechanisms that control the bacterial adhesion process is essential to prevent the attachment of microorganisms onto surfaces [4]. Biofilm formation, as well as many other important biological processes in bacterial populations, is often coordinated through a cell density-dependent gene regulation system known as quorum sensing (QS) [5]. The QS system can induce changes in the production of exopolysaccharides, lipids, nucleic acids, and proteins that are components of the biofilm matrix. Furthermore, this bacterial communication system is integrated with other environmental signals, such as temperature, pH, salinity, oxidative stress, and nutrient availability, to improve the bacterial adaptation to the ecosystem and optimize their probability of survival [6,7]. Different types of QS signaling molecules have been described, and in some cases, several QS systems are present in the same species, making these cell-to-cell communication mechanisms highly specific and accurate. Moreover, acyl-homoserine-lactones (AHLs), the principal QS signals produced by Gram-negative bacteria that dominate marine biofilms, have been reported to modulate the settlement of zoospores of the marine alga Ulva intestinalis [8] and the cyprid Balanus improvisus [9] and promote the formation of diatom-biofilm [10], and are therefore involved in the macrofouling processes.
Over the last years, interfering with QS bacterial communication systems has been proposed as a promising mechanism to prevent the development of different types of bacterial biofilms [11,12,13,14,15]. Commonly, the term “quorum quenching” (QQ) refers to the enzymatic inactivation of QS processes [16], while the more general term “quorum sensing inhibition” (QSI) is preferred to describe the chemical disruption of the cell-to-cell communication system caused by QS inhibitory compounds [17]. Blocking the bacterial QS systems to avoid bacterial colonization is a widespread strategy already used in nature by different kinds of organisms [16,17,18,19,20]. It has been demonstrated that eukaryotic organisms such as the red alga Delisea pulchra have developed cheating molecules that mimic the QS to avoid bacterial fouling of the algal surface [20]. Also, many bacteria have developed QQ enzymes that degrade QS signals [21,22,23,24], and this is the most-studied QS interference strategy. Using QQ enzymes that can degrade the AHLs produced by Gram-negative bacteria has been suggested as a novel anti-biofouling strategy [25,26,27], and a few studies have evaluated the effect of QQ enzymes on the ecology of multispecies biofilms [14,28,29,30]. QQ strategies have been successfully applied to control biofouling in membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for wastewater treatment [11,15] and to reduce biocorrosion [28], as they are associated with deep changes in the microfouling community [28]. This effect could be observed even in in vitro oral biofilm models dominated by Gram-positive species [14]. Moreover, QQ enzymes have been proposed as an interesting alternative to antimicrobial compounds because the probability of inducing tolerance or resistance against these mechanisms is lower [31,32], since the strategies based on silencing QS systems do not directly interfere with bacterial growth, therefore their use constitutes an eco-friendly strategy.
Since the fact that QS-related genes are required for the successful establishment of marine microbial communities is generally accepted [33], and increasing evidence is being accumulated regarding the role of QS in marine bacteria involved in biocorrosion [34], appropriate in vitro marine bacterial biofilm models are needed to screen innovative anti-biofilm and anti-microfouling compounds based on QSI. Most in vitro models are based on monospecific biofilms, and the choice of bacterial strains depends on the objective of the bioassay [35,36,37]. Species of the genus Pseudoalteromonas, Cobetia, or Shewanella have been used as models for marine biofilms [36,38,39,40,41,42], although little information is available on the role of QS in biofilm formation in these species. Moreover, it should be taken into account that the culture conditions can have a significant impact on QS-QQ systems, biofilm formation, and/or surface attachment [12,22,23]. Due to this complexity, new methods are needed to understand and characterize bacterial biofilms [43] and identify novel anti-biofilm compounds.
Most common biofilm assays are based on spectrophotometric methods that quantify total biofilm formation in 96-well microtiter plates. Although these biofilm assays are simple and do not require specialized equipment [44], the formation of biofilm in the microtiter plates is weak and highly variable and the quantification technique is quite time-consuming. Recently, the real-time monitoring system xCELLigence®, based on the measurement of impedance with sensors located on the bottoms of the wells of special microtiter plates, has been successfully applied to measure biofilm formation in the human Gram-positive pathogens Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and Streptococcus mutans [13,45,46]. While the traditional biofilm quantification methods, such as the staining assays using crystal violet, the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium reduction assay, or the colony forming unit (CFU) estimation are end-point techniques, the xCELLigence® system allows the continuous analysis of bacterial cell adhesion based on single-frequency impedance spectroscopy. However, the system is not suitable for measuring biofilms formed in the liquid/air interphase and has demonstrated low sensitivity for strictly aerobic human pathogens such as Acinetobacter baumannii compared to other biofilm measurement systems [12]. The xCELLigence® system allows simple, high-throughput screening for novel anti-biofilm compounds, but it is necessary to assess whether it is suitable for accurate measurement of marine biofilms, since impedance could be affected by the high salinity required for marine bacteria cultivation.
In the present study, we compare the xCELLigence® real-time measurement system with the attachment model [14], a modification of the Amsterdam Active Attachment biofilm model [47,48], in which glass coverslips (18 × 18 mm) are immersed vertically in the culture medium in 12-well cell-culture plates. The attachment model allows refreshment of the culture medium without disturbing the biofilm, provides a higher adhesion surface (up to 1.62 cm2), and allows direct observation of structural changes in the biofilm, addressing some disadvantages of the use of 96-well microtiter plates [12].
The aim of this study was to evaluate biofilm formation by different marine bacteria and their sensitivity to QS inhibitors using these two in vitro cultivation systems with different culture conditions, in order to select suitable biosensor strains and establish a screening methodology for the identification of new anti-microfouling compounds based on QQ and QSI strategies.

2. Results

2.1. Selection of Marine Bacterial Biofilm-Forming Strains and Validation of xCELLigence® Screening Method

A literature search was carried out to identify the marine bacterial strains most commonly used as model organisms in marine microfouling studies and/or reported to produce biofilm and AHLs. The search yielded a list of seven marine species: Cobetia marina (formerly Halomonas marina), Shewanella putrefaciens, Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra, P. maricaloris, Vibrio anguillarum, V. aestuarianus, and V. tubiashii [36,38,39,40,41,42,49,50,51]. Strains were also selected based on the ability to grow on Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) medium (NaCl concentration 0.5%), since initial experiments demonstrated that Marine Broth (MB), which has high salinity (total salt 3.4%, NaCl 1.9%), interferes with the sensors of the xCELLigence® equipment.
In order to select the best candidate marine strains to be used as biosensors for detecting anti-microfouling compounds, a preliminary biofilm quantification experiment was performed. Among the seven strains identified in the literature as models for biofouling studies that can grow in (Tryptic Soy Agar/Broth) TSA/TSB, V. aestuarianus and V. tubiashii had the best performance regarding biofilm formation in TSB as measured by xCELLigence® (Figure 1A). A sharp decrease in cell index (CI) values, a unitless parameter correlated with an increase in the number of cells adhering to the bottoms of wells, of P. flavipulchra was observed at the end of the cultivation period (hours 34 to 36), indicating a biofilm detachment process. No significant biofilm formation could be detected by xCELLigence® for C. marina, S. putrefaciens, and V. anguillarum in TSB (Supplementary Figure S1). Intermediate CI values were obtained for P. maricaloris and P. flavipulchra in TSB. Since high CI values are correlated with an increased number of cells adhering to the bottoms of wells in the xCELLigence® system, P. flavipulchra, P. maricaloris, V. aestuarianus, and V. tubiashii were selected for further study. The use of TSB-2 (TSB supplemented with NaCl to a final concentration of 2%) caused a clear increase in the biofilm formed by V. aestuarianus as detected by the xCELLigence® system, but lower CI values were observed for P. flavipulchra (Figure 1B), and the other two strains showed similar results. The biofilms cultivated with the MB-2 marine culture medium produced the lowest CI values in the xCELLigence® system (Figure 1C).

2.2. AHL Production by Marine Bacterial Biofilm-Forming Strains

In order to assess the production of AHLs by the four selected biofilm-forming marine strains, a qualitative analysis was performed first using the engineered Chromobacterium violaceum biosensors (Supplementary Figure S2). The production of violacein by the sensor C. violaceum VIR07 was activated by the supernatants of V. aestuarianus cultures, indicating the production of at least one long-chain AHL in high concentration (Supplementary Figure S2C). The induction of violacein production by VIR07 was not affected by the culture medium used for the cultivation of V. aestuarianus (MB, MB-2, TSB, and TSB-2). No activation of the long-chain AHL biosensor VIR07 was observed for any of the other bacteria in any of the culture media used (Supplementary Figure S2A,B,D). None of the bacterial strains were able to activate the short-chain biosensor CV026 in the plate assay (data not shown).
Since the C. violaceum-based biosensor plate assay presented some limitations, such as a high detection threshold and an inability to detect any 3-hydroxy-substituted AHLs [52], HPLC-MS analysis of the supernatants of the four strains cultured in MB was performed. The production of AHL was confirmed in all bacterial strains (Table 1). P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris species presented similar AHL profiles, with the synthesis of six and five different AHLs, respectively. C4-HSL was the main AHL produced by both Pseudoalteromonas strains, reaching 374 and 347 ng/mL for P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris, respectively. Both strains produced OC6, C8, and OC10-HSL. Slightly higher concentrations of OC6-HSL and OC10-HSL were found in P. flavipulchra. In accordance with the observed activation of the C. violaceum VIR07 biosensor strain, V. aestuarianus synthetized a broad variety of AHLs (11 different types) of different lengths, from C4-HSL to C16-HSL, with OC10-HSL as the main QS signal (2958 ng/mL). On the contrary, V. tubiashii only produced short-chain C4-HSL (503 ng/mL).

2.3. Characterization of Quorum Quenching Activity of Marine Bacterial Biofilm-Forming Strains

The capacity of the four biofilm-forming marine strains to interfere with short-chain (C6-HSL) and long-chain (C12-HSL) AHLs was tested using a C. violaceum-based bioassay. The ability to quench C12-HSL was observed in P. flavipulchra in the four different culture media used (Figure 2). However, P. maricaloris was able to interfere with C12-HSL only when it was cultured in MB and MB-2, losing this QQ activity in TSB and TSB-2 culture media. V. tubiashii was also able to quench C12-HSL, but only in MB. None of the four selected bacteria were able to degrade C6-HSL in the tested conditions.

2.4. Effect of QS Inhibitors and QQ Enzymes on Biofilm Formation Measured using xCELLigence®

In order to check if the xCELLigence® equipment was able to detect changes in the biofilm formation and/or structure caused by QS inhibitors in the selected strains, different inhibitors of AHL-mediated QS were used. The effect of the wide-spectrum QQ enzyme Aii20J [21,22] and the extract from the marine bacterium Tenacibaculum sp. 20J, presenting wide-spectrum QQ activity [13], was tested (Figure 3). The QS inhibitors furanone C30 (0.1 µM) [20] and kojic acid (1 mM) [27], used in previous studies, were also tested.
Different responses to QSI compounds were found in the two Pseudoalteromonas strains (Figure 3A,B). The AHL-lactonase Aii20J caused a significant reduction of biofilm formed by P. flavipulchra (79.47 ± 7.13% and 65.40 ± 17.63% compared with the control biofilm for 24 and 40 h measurements, respectively). Aii20J also inhibited, to a lower extent, biofilm formation in P. maricaloris (84.58 ± 5.37% and 86.12 ± 4.63%). The growth inhibition caused by Aii20J in these strains does not seem to be responsible for this biofilm inhibition, since no significant differences were found in planktonic growth between control and treated wells (Figure 4A,B). On the contrary, the furanone only reduced biofilm formation in P. maricaloris (73.09 ± 12.23% and 78.27 ± 0.89% for 24 and 40 h measurements, respectively). Despite the high production of AHLs in shaken cultures, the biofilm formed by V. aestuarianus was not affected by any of the tested QS inhibitory compounds as measured by xCELLigence®. Kojic acid produced significantly increased biofilm formation in most cases, except for V. tubiashii, for which significant biofilm inhibition was recorded at 40 h (61.80 ± 1.02%) (Figure 3D), which was probably the result of the planktonic growth inhibition observed (Figure 4D). Since the best specific anti-biofilm results were obtained with the QQ lactonase Aii20J, which reduced the environmental biofilm in two of the four bacterial strains as measured by the xCELLigence®, this QQ enzyme was selected for the next experiments.

2.5. Effect of the AHL-lactonase Aii20J on Marine Biofilm Formation in the Attachment Model

With the aim of comparing the results obtained with the xCELLigence® system, biofilm formation and response to the QQ lactonase Aii20J were assessed with the attachment model for the four selected marine biofilm-forming strains. In this system, biofilm formation was clearly higher in MB than in TSB medium for all species. Confirming the results obtained with the xCELLigence® system, a clear reduction of biofilm formation was observed in P. flavipulchra in both MB (81.05 ± 4.01%) and TSB (66.2 ± 27.78%) in the presence of Aii20J (Figure 5A, Supplementary Figure S3). However, no effect was observed in the other bacterial biofilms (Figure 5B–D).

2.6. Effect of the AHL-lactonase Aii20J on Mixed-Species Biofilm Models

The effect of adding the AHL-lactonase Aii20J was assessed on biofilms formed by combinations of the four selected bacteria in pairs using the xCELLigence® monitoring system. The addition of Aii20J (0.57 mM) clearly inhibited biofilms containing P. flavipulchra (Figure 6). These data could indicate not only the influence of Aii20J on biofilm formation in the target strain, P. flavipulchra, but also an indirect effect of the QQ enzyme Aii20J on the other co-cultured bacteria. However, no effect was observed when the four marine bacteria were cultured together. The co-cultures of various strains were not directly related with higher CI values.

2.7. Effect of AHL-lactonase Aii20J on Motility

Since surface attachment and biofilm formation are known to be related to surface-associated motility [12], we explored the response of this phenotype to the QQ enzyme Aii20J in order to compare it to the effect observed on biofilm formation. A preliminary experiment was performed to observe the capability of the four selected strains for surface-associated motility in the different culture medium plates (Supplementary Figures S4 and S5). Only V. aestuarianus showed a slight surface-associated tentacle-like motility phenotype in MB plates. The addition of the AHL-lactonase (0.57 mM) to the culture medium caused a slightly different motility pattern at 18 and 42 h of incubation, as the tentacle-like type motility observed in the control plates disappeared when the cultures were treated with the QQ enzyme (Figure 7).

3. Discussion

Since biofilm formation is the first step in the biofouling process, numerous reports have evaluated the inhibition of bacterial biofilms for the identification of anti-biofouling compounds [25,36,53,54,55]. An understanding of the mechanisms that can be used as targets to interfere with the bacterial adhesion process and biofilm growth and maturation is essential to develop new non-toxic strategies for the control of microfouling. QS has been proposed as an important target for the development of anti-biofilm strategies, but little information is available regarding its role in marine bacterial strains of environmental origin. It is necessary to identify suitable marine biosensor species models and to validate biofilm cultivation and quantification methods that allow the evaluation of QQ strategies for the inhibition of marine biofilms.
Most of the biofilm quantification methods present several limitations. In this sense, the xCELLigence® system is unable to work at salinity concentrations higher than 3%. Therefore, two Vibrio strains (V. aestuarianus CECT625 and V. tubiashii CECT631) and two Pseudoalteromonas strains (P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris) were selected due to their capacity for biofilm formation at different salinity levels, as measured with xCELLigence®. Strong differences in the responses of the tested bacterial strains to culture medium and NaCl concentration were observed with this biofilm measurement system. The influence of culture medium on biofilm thickness, surface coverage, and morphology was previously reported in the marine bacterium Shewanella algae [56]. The presence of salts can also affect protein adsorption on material surfaces, promoting the establishment of the extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) that form the biofilm matrix [57]. The availability of specific cations is also important. For example, the presence of Ca2+ is needed for the maintenance of biofilm integrity in certain marine Vibrio species [58] and plays an important role in the synthesis of class II proteins in Pseudoalteromonas sp., which are expressed only in biofilm cells [59]. Moreover, culture medium and salinity can also influence the production of QS molecules [12,22,23], therefore their impact on QS-regulated phenotypes should receive more attention.
Surprisingly, the four marine strains showed the lowest biofilm formation in MB-2 using the xCELLigence® system. On the other hand, in the attachment model, higher biofilm formation was observed in MB compared to TSB. The different characteristics and attachment substrates used in the two biofilm monitoring systems (polystyrene in xCELLigence® and glass in the active attachment system) could also be involved in the observed differences in biofilm formation depending on the culture medium. xCELLigence® uses gold biosensors placed in the bottoms of the wells of special polystyrene plates, therefore biofilm that forms on the walls and the liquid-air interface cannot be measured. On the contrary, the attachment model quantifies all biofilm that forms on the glass coverslip vertically submerged in the culture medium. Furthermore, the substrate can also affect the adhesion process in relation to culture medium composition. Peptone has been reported to increase bacterial adhesion to polystyrene [60], which may explain the higher response obtained with TSB in the xCELLigence® system, since the concentration of peptone in this culture medium is four times higher than in MB and MB-2. Moreover, the use of a specific culture medium could promote a particular biofilm structure and/or biomass accumulation in the well bottom or liquid–air interface, by changes in pH or other physicochemical parameters, indicating that the appropriate selection of culture conditions and substrates is needed before the screening procedure can be established.
In order to understand the possible effects of QQ and QSI compounds on biofilm formation in these four marine bacteria, the production of AHL-type QS signals was evaluated, revealing that all of them produced AHLs. V. aestuarianus showed the richest AHL profile and very high production of OC10-HSL, which could be detected by the long-chain AHL biosensor C. violaceum VIR07. However, V. tubiashii only produced short-chain C4-HSL when cultured in MB. Numerous studies described Vibrio species in which different AHLs regulate multiple functions and, depending on the strain, QS can be involved in biofilm formation but also in biofilm repression and dispersion [61,62]. Moreover, temperature also affected AHL production in different Vibrio strains, with a pattern of decreased synthesis with increased temperature [63].
HPLC analysis showed that the marine isolates P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris produced six and five different AHLs respectively, and four of them were synthesized by both strains (C4, OC6, C8, and OC10-HSL). Other Pseudoalteromonas strains isolated from marine environments were reported to produce AHLs [64,65,66,67]. While the Pseudoalteromonas genus is considered a major AHL-producing group [38], the relationship of this type of QS molecule with biofilm formation in these species is not clear and more studies are needed. Moreover, QQ activity against long-chain AHLs was found in both strains; in the case of P. maricaloris, it changed depending on the culture medium used (Figure 3). The simultaneous production and degradation of AHLs has been reported in several bacteria and has been related to either self-regulation of the QS system or a competitive strategy by removing non-cognate AHLs produced by other bacteria [22].
Although it is known that culture conditions can have a high impact on QS-QQ systems, biofilm formation, and/or surface attachment [12,22,23], little attention is usually paid to this important factor when a methodology is established. Although the QQ activity in Pseudoalteromonas species is not new and the presence of QQ genes has been reported in previous studies [64,68,69,70], the effect of the culture medium on QQ capability in this genus has not yet been described, to the best of our knowledge, and deserves more attention. Regarding the Vibrio strains, V. tubiashii also interfered with C12-HSL, but only when cultured in MB. The effect of the environmental conditions on QQ was also described in Vibrio strains. For example, in a previous study, interference with AHLs when using LB as culture medium could only be observed when V. harveyi R-21446 was grown at 25 and 30 °C [63]. A better understanding of the role of the environmental factors in QS and QQ activity will help to improve the efficiency and specificity of screening methods, therefore more studies are required to confirm the role of environmental factors in AHL-mediated processes.
Previous studies proposed the use of QS inhibitors as potential anti-biofouling agents [25,26,27] and confirmed the control of biofouling [11,15] as well as other types of biofilm [12,13,14,15] using QQ activity strategies. In order to assess the sensitivity of the four biofilm-forming marine bacteria against different agents with the ability to intercept the QS system, compounds such as PCE20J [71], Aii20J [21], furanone C30 [20], and kojic acid [27] were tested in the xCELLigence® system. Although the four bacteria used as biofilm-forming models produce AHLs, the relationship between AHL synthesis and biofilm formation in these marine strains is not clear. Since adding the QQ enzyme Aii20J had no significant effect on the biofilm formed by V. aestuarianus and V. tubiashii in any of the monitoring systems and culture media used, our results seem to indicate that in these Vibrio strains, AHLs do not have a crucial role in the tested conditions. It should be noted that the Aii20J affected the surface-associated tentacle-type motility in the high AHL-producer V. aestuarianus observed in MB supplemented with 0.25% Eiken agar. Motility in Vibrio species is needed for surface attachment as a previous step to biofilm formation and allows the signal transduction that regulates the development of the biofilm structure [72]. Therefore, QQ may be effective mainly to prevent the initial bacterial attachment stages in Vibrio spp., which may explain the lack of activity observed in mature biofilms.
On the contrary, the AHL-lactonase Aii20J caused significant biofilm inhibition in P. flavipulchra and, to a lesser extent, P. maricaloris, as measured with the xCELLigence® system. However, the effect of Aii20J on biofilm formed by P. maricaloris was not observed in the active attachment model. The different environmental conditions and the characteristics of these biofilm formation systems could be responsible for the different response of P. maricaloris to the addition of the AHL-lactonase Aii20J. In this sense, besides the different attachment materials, the active attachment model allows refreshment of the culture medium with additional nutrients, therefore the biofilm cells that form in this system can mature faster, changing their response to the QQ compounds. Despite these differences in biofilm quantification between the xCELLigence® and active attachment systems, the former seems to be slightly more sensitive, with the ability to detect the important biofilm reduction in P. flavipulchra caused by the AHL-lactonase Aii20J, and a reduction in P. maricaloris biofilm that could not be detected in the active attachment model. Therefore, the results confirm that the xCELLigence® technology can be reliably used to identify novel anti-biofilm compounds also in marine bacteria, although attention should be paid to the culture medium and incubation conditions selected. Still, the use of several strains and/or different culture media is recommended for screening purposes.
In the xCELLigence® experiments, the furanone C30 had a significant effect only on P. maricaloris biofilm. Halogenated furanones are the most studied QS inhibitor compounds, and they can block both AI-2 and AHL QS systems by accelerating LuxR turnover [73,74]. Furanones produced by Delisea pulchra [20] are able not only to intercept QS signals in biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 10 µM [75] and biofilms of C. violaceum at 100 µM [76], but also to inhibit a mixed assemblage of marine bacteria at 10 mM [77]. The slight effect of the furanone on biofilm formation observed in this study could be explained by the low concentration of furanone used (0.1 µM), since toxicity was reported at higher concentrations [78].
Kojic acid only affected biofilm formation in V. tubiashii after 40 h, while the other QQ/QSI inhibitors had no effect on biofilm formation in this strain, but this effect could be a result of the strong growth inhibition observed (Figure 4) instead of more specific action on the QS system. In this sense, despite the fact that kojic acid’s capacity to inhibit biofilm formation has been associated with QS interference [27], our results indicate that it could be caused by its antibacterial properties [79], as previously described regarding other antimicrobial compounds at sub-MIC concentrations [80,81].
Single-species in vitro biofilm models are only partially representative of the complexity of marine microbial communities in which less than 1–5% are cultivable bacteria [40], therefore the use of mixed-species biofilms would be desirable. Despite it being generally accepted that QS-related genes are required for the successful establishment of complex marine microbial communities, the knowledge about their role in symbiosis or competition processes in mixed biofilms is still limited. Recently, treatment of 9-day natural biofilms with different QS signals (C6 and C12-HSL, Pseudomonas quinolone signal, and cyclic di-GMP) caused a signal-specific change in the community composition through the promotion of specific species with interrelated signal transduction genes [33]. Also, little is known about the effect of the interference of QS systems on the microbial composition of multispecies biofilms. The use of the QQ enzyme SsoPox as a coating additive was recently reported to significantly decrease biocorrosion in steel coupons after 8 weeks of submersion in water, and this effect was associated with a deep change in the microfouling community [28]. In the present work, adding the AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) clearly inhibited the mixed biofilms containing the QQ-sensitive P. flavipulchra strain. These data indicate not only the influence on biofilm formation in the target strain, P. flavipulchra, but also an indirect effect of the QQ enzyme on the co-cultured bacteria. Although in our case all model species were AHL producers, we cannot disregard a possible effect of the QQ strategies on complex biofilms in which not all bacteria are AHL producers. Some bacteria that do not produce their own AHL can respond to the addition of AHLs or AHL analogues because of the presence of signal receptors, known as LuxR orphans, that are widespread in marine bacteria [23]. In this sense, the AHL-lactonase Aii20J has been reported to be active against AHL producers [12,22,23], but also against bacterial strains that are not [21]. Moreover, previous studies indicated that the external addition of QQ enzymes that degrade AHLs into complex biofilm could affect both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [14,28,29,30].
Although little attention is usually paid to the culture conditions, this study demonstrates the importance of this crucial factor in QS-QQ systems, biofilm formation, and/or surface attachment. The use of xCELLigence® is proposed as a time-saving method to quantify biofilm formation and search for eco-friendly anti-microfouling compounds based on QS and QSI strategies. However, the use of only low-salinity culture medium is a limitation that should be taken into account and could be overcome by combining methodologies and strains. Additionally, the results of this study reveal important differences in the response of biofilm formation in different AHL producers, suggesting that several strains should be used simultaneously for screening purposes. Further studies are required to ascertain the effect of QS and QSI on natural marine biofilms and their impact on bacterial ecology.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Cobetia marina CECT4278, Shewanella putrefaciens CECT5346, Vibrio aestuarianus CECT625, and Vibrio tubiashii CECT631 were obtained from the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT). The isolates P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris were kindly provided by Prof. Juan Barja at the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, and Vibrio anguillarum 90-11-287 was provided by Prof. Lone Gram at the Technical University of Denmark. All marine bacteria used in this study were routinely cultured at 22 °C on Marine Agar/Broth (MA/MB) at pH 7.0 (Laboratorios Conda S.A., Madrid, Spain) and/or Tryptone Soy Agar/Broth (TSA/TSB) (Scharlau S.L., Barcelona, Spain). TSB (NaCl concentration 0.5%) was supplemented with NaCl to achieve a concentration of 2% (TSB-2) (total salt concentration 2.25%). Modified Marine Broth (MB-2) was prepared by diluting standard MB with distilled water to adjust the total salt concentration to 2.25%, and peptone and yeast extract were added to maintain the original nutrient concentration. The QQ Tenacibaculum sp. strain 20J CECT7426, isolated in our lab from a marine sample [82], was routinely cultured at 22 °C on Marine Agar/Broth at pH 7.0.
The AHL biosensor strains Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 [83] and VIR07 [84] were used for AHL production and quorum quenching activity bioassays in solid plates, as explained below. These strains were routinely cultured on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) at 30 °C.

4.2. Bioassay for Detection of AHL Production in Marine Cultures

The marine bacterial strains were screened for their capability to activate the AHL biosensors C. violaceum CV026 [83] and VIR07 [84]. The strains were cultured in Eppendorf tubes in 500 μL of MB, MB-2, TSB, or TSB-2 for 24 h. The cultures were centrifuged (Galaxy 7D microcentrifuge, VWR, Radnor, PA, USA), and the supernatants were transferred to TSA plates covered with an overnight culture of C. violaceum CV026 or VIR07 diluted in soft (0.8%) agar (1:5). The plates were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C, and the production of purple coloration around the wells was checked. PBS at pH 6.5 with the corresponding AHL (10 μM) was used as control.

4.3. Extraction and Identification of AHLs by HPLC-MS

AHL production was also assessed by HPLC-MS (6495C Triple Quadrupole LC/MS, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) analysis from supernatants of V. aestuarianus CECT625, V. tubiashii CECT631, P. flavipulchra, and P. maricaloris cultured in MB at 22 °C and 200 rpm for 24 h. Culture samples of 40 mL were taken and centrifuged (9000× g, 10 min) to obtain the supernatants. Remaining AHLs in supernatants were extracted twice with 40 mL of dichloromethane, and this solvent was evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator system at 40 °C. AHLs produced by the bacteria were reconstituted in 1 mL of acetonitrile and quantified by HPLC-MS [14,85]. Pure AHLs, both C3 hydroxy- and oxo-substituted and un-substituted, were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and the University of Nottingham and used as external standard for quantification.

4.4. Quorum Quenching Activity Assay

The QQ activity of the 4 selected marine strains was tested using solid plate assays [71] carried out with the AHL biosensors C. violaceum CV026 [83] and VIR07 [84]. The marine strains were cultured in Eppendorf tubes in 500 μL of MB, MB-2, TSB, or TSB-2 for 24 h. The cultures were centrifuged, the supernatants were removed, and the pellets were washed with 500 μL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at pH 6.5 and resuspended in another 500 μL of the same buffer in order to avoid spontaneous lactonolysis of the exogenous AHLs by high pH values [86]. These cell suspensions were used for a live-cell AHL degradation assay by adding C6-HSL (10 µM) or C12-HSL (10 µM) and incubating for 24 h at 22 °C. After the incubation period, the live-cell suspensions were centrifuged, and the presence of AHLs in the supernatants was tested as explained above.

4.5. Quorum Sensing Inhibitors

Purified cell extract (PCE) from Tenacibaculum sp. 20J, which has broad QQ activity against AHL and AI-2 [13,71], was obtained from a 50 mL MB culture that was centrifuged for 5 min at 2000× g in order to separate the biomass from the culture medium. The pellet was washed with PBS at pH 6.5, resuspended in 1.5 mL of the same buffer, sonicated for 5 min in ice, and centrifuged at 16,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C. The PCE was filtered through a 0.22 μm filter and stored at 4 °C [87] until it was used at a final concentration of 100 μg/mL.
The QQ enzyme Aii20J was produced and purified as previously described [21]. Briefly, the E. coli BL21(DE3) plysS strain expressing recombinant protein was inoculated into fresh LB medium with kanamycin (25 µg/mL) at 37 °C. Protein expression was induced when the culture reached an optical density (OD) of 0.6 by the addition of 0.1 M isopropyl-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), followed by further incubation for 5 h. Then, the culture was centrifuged, and the pellet was resuspended with 20 mL of PBS buffer, lysed by sonication on ice, and centrifuged again. Aii20J was purified using the His GraviTrap affinity column (GE Healthcare) protein purification kit and dialyzed in a d-Tubes Dialyzer Mega MWCM 6–8 KDA (GE Healthcare).
The QS inhibitors furanone [20] and kojic acid [27], purchased from Sigma, were dissolved in PBS at pH 6.5 and checked at final concentrations of 0.1 and 1 mM, respectively.

4.6. Biofilm Quantification

In order to determine the ability of the xCELLigence® System RTCA DP (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) to quantify the biofilm formed by the marine bacteria, 24 h cultures of the bacteria V. anguillarum 90-11-287, V. aestuarianus CECT625, V. tubiashii CECT631, C. marina CECT4278, S. putrefaciens CECT5346, P. flavipulchra, and P. maricaloris in MB were adjusted to 0.05 OD600 in the appropriate culture medium (TSB, TSB-2, or MB-2) and mixed well, and then 180 μL was added into E-plates 16 (ACEA Biosciences Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). In the biofilm inhibition experiments, a volume of 20 μL of the adequate dilution of compounds PCE20J, Aii20J, furanone, and kojic acid was added to the cultures to achieve 100 µg/mL, 0.57 mM, 0.1 μM, and 1 mM, respectively. The mixture was incubated at 22 °C and cell index data were recorded for 40 h. As controls, culture media inoculated with biofilm-forming bacteria and 20 μL of PBS were used. Experiments were performed in triplicate.
Biofilms were also grown in the attachment model [48], a modification of the Amsterdam Active Attachment (AAA) model [47,48], assembled with glass coverslips (18 × 18 mm). Quickly, coverslips were vertically submerged in 3 mL of culture medium inoculated with 24 h shaken cultures of the selected marine strains at an optical density of 0.05 (OD600 nm) in 12-well culture plates. Biofilms were grown at 22 °C for 24 h, with medium refreshment (12 h) as described previously [48]. The QQ enzyme Aii20J at a final concentration of 0.57 mM was added to the cultures. Wells with only culture medium were incubated in the same conditions as negative growth controls. Three replicates were performed for each strain or treatment. For biofilm biomass quantification, the coverslips were removed after incubation, deposited in clean 12-well culture plates, and allowed to dry. Once dried, the wells were filled with crystal violet solution (0.04%, Gram-Hucker, Panreac), and after 20 min, the excess dye was removed, and coverslips were washed several times with distilled water. Bound crystal violet was released by adding 33% acetic acid. The absorbance (Helios Omega UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was measured at 590 nm [88].

4.7. Motility Assays

Surface-associated motility assays were performed as described by Mayer et al. [22]. Petri dishes were prepared with MB, MB-2, TSB, and TSB-2 supplemented with 0.25% Eiken agar (Eiken Chemical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The AHL-lactonase Aii20J was mixed with the culture media at a concentration of 0.57 mM. One microliter from shaken overnight cultures at 0.3 optical density (OD600 nm) was inoculated in the center of the plates. Plates were incubated at 22 °C in the dark, and surface-associated motility was inspected after 18 and 42 h. Three plates were prepared for each condition.

4.8. Statistical Methods

Student’s t-test (p < 0.05) was applied for all statistical analyses using GraphPad Prism (Version 8.3.0, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/19/2/74/s1, Figure S1. Biofilm formation of the marine bacterial biosensor measured by xCELLigence® system using the culture media TSB. Figure S2. Capability of the four selected strains (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus and (D) V. tubiashii to activate the quorum sensing-regulated violacein production by C. violaceum VIR07 using different culture media. Figure S3. Effect of the addition of the AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on biofilm formation by P. flavipulchra using the attachment model. Figure S4. Effect of the culture media on surfacce-associated motility in P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris. Figure S5. Effect of the culture media on surfacce-associated motility in V. aestuarianus and V. tubiashii.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and A.O.; Formal analysis, A.M.; Funding acquisition, A.O.; Investigation, A.M., A.P., and C.M.; Methodology, A.M., C.M., and A.O.; Project administration, A.O.; Resources, A.O.; Supervision, A.O.; Visualization, A.M.; Writing—original draft, A.M. and A.P.; Writing—review and editing, A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the European project BYEFOULING “Low-toxic cost-efficient environment-friendly antifouling materials” (FP7-OCEAN-2013 612717) and the project PID2019-104439RB-C21/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 of the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain), and co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund of the European Union: A Way to Making Europe (FEDER). A.M. and A.P. were supported by predoctoral fellowships from the Consellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de Galicia (ED481A-2015/311 and ED481A-2019/194). C.M. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Xunta de Galicia (IN606B-2019/010).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Paul Williams at the University of Nottingham and Tomohiro Morohoshi at Utsunomiya University for kindly providing us with Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and VIR07 biosensor strains, respectively. Also, we would like to thank Lone Gram at the Technical University of Denmark and Juan Barja at the Universidade de Santiago de Compostela for kindly providing us with V. anguillarum 90-11-287 and P. flavipulchra and P. maricaloris strains used in this study, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The anti-biofilm activity of Tenacibaculum sp. strain 20J (CECT 7426) is protected by the following patents: Otero, A., Romero, M., Roca, A. Use of bacteria of the genus Tenacibaculum for quorum quenching, WO2010/012852, and Otero, A., Romero, M., Mayer, C. 2016. Peptide with quorum-sensing inhibition activity, polynucleotide that encodes said peptide, and the uses thereof, PCT/ES2014/070569.

References

  1. Donlan, R.M.; Costerton, J.W. Biofilms: Survival Mechanisms of Clinically Relevant Microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 167–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chapman, J.; Hellio, C.; Sullivan, T.; Brown, R.; Russell, S.; Kiterringham, E.; Le Nor, L.; Regan, F. Bioinspired Synthetic Macroalgae: Examples from Nature for Antifouling Applications. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2014, 86, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yebra, D.M.; Kiil, S.; Dam-Johansen, K. Antifouling Technology-Past, Present and Future Steps towards Efficient and Environmentally Friendly Antifouling Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2004, 50, 75–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caruso, G. Microbial Colonization in Marine Environments: Overview of Current Knowledge and Emerging Research Topics. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Fuqua, W.C.; Winans, S.C.; Greenberg, E.P. Quorum Sensing in Bacteria: The LuxR-LuxI Family of Cell Density-Responsive Transcriptional Regulators. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Muras, A.; Otero, A. Breaking bad: Understanding how bacterial communication regulates biofilm-related oral diseases. In Trends in Quorum Sensing and Quorum Quenching: New Perspectives and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor & Francis Group: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Williams, P.; Winzer, K.; Chan, W.C.; Cámara, M. Look who’s Talking: Communication and Quorum Sensing in the Bacterial World. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 1119–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Wheeler, G.L.; Tait, K.; Taylor, A.; Brownlee, C.; Joint, I. Acyl-Homoserine Lactones Modulate the Settlement Rate of Zoospores of the Marine Alga Ulva intestinalis via a Novel Chemokinetic Mechanism. Plant. Cell Environ. 2005, 29, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tait, K.; Havenhand, J. Investigating a Possible Role for the Bacterial Signal Molecules N-Acylhomoserine Lactones in Balanus improvisus Cyprid Settlement. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 2588–2602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yang, J.-L.; Li, Y.-F.; Guo, X.-P.; Liang, X.; Xu, Y.-F.; Ding, D.-W.; Bao, W.-Y.; Dobretsov, S. The Effect of Carbon Nanotubes and Titanium Dioxide Incorporated in PDMS on Biofilm Community Composition and Subsequent Mussel Plantigrade Settlement. Biofouling 2016, 32, 763–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, S.; Park, S.K.; Kwon, H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, K.; Nahm, C.H.; Jo, S.J.; Oh, H.S.; Park, P.K.; Choo, K.H.; et al. Crossing the Border between Laboratory and Field: Bacterial Quorum Quenching for Anti-Biofouling Strategy in an MBR. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 1788–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mayer, C.; Muras, A.; Parga, A.; Romero, M.; Rumbo-Feal, S.; Poza, M.; Ramos-Vivas, J.; Otero, A. Quorum Sensing as a Target for Controlling Surface Associated Motility and Biofilm Formation in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC® 17978TM. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 565548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Muras, A.; Mayer, C.; Romero, M.; Camino, T.; Ferrer, M.D.; Mira, A.; Otero, A. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans Biofilm Formation by Extracts of Tenacibaculum sp. 20J, a Bacterium with Wide-Spectrum Quorum Quenching Activity. J. Oral. Microbiol. 2018, 10, 1429788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Muras, A.; Otero-Casal, P.; Blanc, V.; Otero, A. Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Quorum Sensing in the Oral Cavity: A Paradigm Revisited. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 9800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Soler, A.; Arregui, L.; Arroyo, M.; Mendoza, J.A.; Muras, A.; Álvarez, C.; García-Vera, C.; Marquina, D.; Santos, A.; Serrano, S. Quorum Sensing versus Quenching Bacterial Isolates Obtained from MBR Plants Treating Leachates from Municipal Solid Waste. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dong, Y.-H.; Zhang, L.-H. Quorum Sensing and Quorum-Quenching Enzymes. J. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
  17. Grandclément, C.; Tannières, M.; Moréra, S.; Dessaux, Y.; Faure, D. Quorum Quenching: Role in Nature and Applied Developments. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 40, 86–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Camps, J.; Pujol, I.; Ballester, F.; Joven, J.; Simó, J.M. Paraoxonases as Potential Antibiofilm Agents: Their Relationship with Quorum-Sensing Signals in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gao, M.; Teplitski, M.; Robinson, J.B.; Bauer, W.D. Production of Substances by Medicago truncatula That Affect Bacterial Quorum Sensing. Mol. Plant. Microbe Interact. 2003, 16, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Givskov, M.; de Nys, R.; Manefield, M.; Gram, L.; Maximilien, R.; Eberl, L.; Molin, S.; Steinberg, P.D.; Kjelleberg, S. Eukaryotic Interference with Homoserine Lactone-Mediated Prokaryotic Signalling. J. Bacteriol. 1996, 178, 6618–6622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Mayer, C.; Romero, M.; Muras, A.; Otero, A. Aii20J, a Wide-Spectrum Thermostable N-Acylhomoserine Lactonase from the Marine Bacterium Tenacibaculum sp. 20J, Can Quench AHL-Mediated Acid Resistance in Escherichia coli. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 9523–9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mayer, C.; Muras, A.; Romero, M.; López, M.; Tomás, M.; Otero, A. Multiple Quorum Quenching Enzymes Are Active in the Nosocomial Pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC17978. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 9523–9539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Muras, A.; López-Pérez, M.; Mayer, C.; Parga, A.; Amaro-Blanco, J.; Otero, A. High Prevalence of Quorum-Sensing and Quorum-Quenching Activity among Cultivable Bacteria and Metagenomic Sequences in the Mediterranean Sea. Genes 2018, 9, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Romero, M.; Mayer, C.; Muras, A.; Otero, A. Silencing Bacterial Communication through Enzymatic Quorum-Sensing Inhibition. In Quorum Sensing vs Quorum Quenching: A Battle with No End in Sight; Kalia, V.C., Ed.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 219–236. ISBN 978-81-322-1981-1. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dobretsov, S.; Dahms, H.-U.; YiLi, H.; Wahl, M.; Qian, P.-Y. The Effect of Quorum-Sensing Blockers on the Formation of Marine Microbial Communities and Larval Attachment: Antifouling Activity of QS Blockers. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2007, 60, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dobretsov, S.; Teplitski, M.; Paul, V. Mini-Review: Quorum Sensing in the Marine Environment and Its Relationship to Biofouling. Biofouling 2009, 25, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dobretsov, S.; Teplitski, M.; Bayer, M.; Gunasekera, S.; Proksch, P.; Paul, V.J. Inhibition of Marine Biofouling by Bacterial Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Biofouling 2011, 27, 893–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Huang, S.; Bergonzi, C.; Schwab, M.; Elias, M.; Hicks, R.E. Evaluation of Biological and Enzymatic Quorum Quencher Coating Additives to Reduce Biocorrosion of Steel. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jo, S.J.; Kwon, H.; Jeong, S.-Y.; Lee, S.H.; Oh, H.-S.; Yi, T.; Lee, C.-H.; Kim, T.G. Effects of Quorum Quenching on the Microbial Community of Biofilm in an Anoxic/Oxic MBR for Wastewater Treatment. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 26, 1593–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schwab, M.; Bergonzi, C.; Sakkos, J.; Staley, C.; Zhang, Q.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Aksan, A.; Elias, M. Signal Disruption Leads to Changes in Bacterial Community Population. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. García-Contreras, R.; Maeda, T.; Wood, T.K. Can Resistance against Quorum-Sensing Interference Be Selected? ISME J. 2016, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Guendouze, A.; Plener, L.; Bzdrenga, J.; Jacquet, P.; Rémy, B.; Elias, M.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Daudé, D.; Chabrière, E. Effect of Quorum Quenching Lactonase in Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Comparison with Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, R.; Ding, W.; Long, L.; Lan, Y.; Tong, H.; Saha, S.; Wong, Y.H.; Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; et al. Exploring the Influence of Signal Molecules on Marine Biofilms Development. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 571400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Scarascia, G.; Lehmann, R.; Machuca, L.L.; Morris, C.; Cheng, K.Y.; Kaksonen, A.; Hong, P.-Y. Effect of Quorum Sensing on the Ability of Desulfovibrio vulgaris To Form Biofilms and To Biocorrode Carbon Steel in Saline Conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 86, e01664-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kwong, T.F.N.; Miao, L.; Li, X.; Qian, P.Y. Novel Antifouling and Antimicrobial Compound from a Marine-Derived Fungus Ampelomyces sp. Mar. Biotechnol. 2006, 8, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Leroy, C.; Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Ghillebaert, F.; Rochet, M.J.; Compère, C.; Combes, D. A Marine Bacterial Adhesion Microplate Test Using the DAPI Fluorescent Dye: A New Method to Screen Antifouling Agents. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wilsanand, V.; Wagh, A.B.; Bapuji, M. Antibacterial Activities of Anthozoan Corals on Some Marine Microfoulers. Microbios 1999, 99, 137–145. [Google Scholar]
  38. Huang, Z.; Meric, G.; Liu, Z.; Ma, R.; Tang, Z.; Lejeune, P. LuxS-Based Quorum-Sensing Signaling Affects Biofilm Formation in Streptococcus mutans. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 17, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jellali, R.; Campistron, I.; Pasetto, P.; Laguerre, A.; Gohier, F.; Hellio, C.; Pilard, J.-F.; Mouget, J.-L. Antifouling Activity of Novel Polyisoprene-Based Coatings Made from Photocurable Natural Rubber Derived Oligomers. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 1203–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ortega-Morales, B.O.; Chan-Bacab, M.J.; Miranda-Tello, E.; Fardeau, M.-L.; Carrero, J.C.; Stein, T. Antifouling Activity of Sessile Bacilli Derived from Marine Surfaces. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Plouguerné, E.; Hellio, C.; Cesconetto, C.; Thabard, M.; Mason, K.; Véron, B.; Pereira, R.C.; da Gama, B.A.P. Antifouling Activity as a Function of Population Variation in Sargassum vulgare from the Littoral of Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). J. Appl. Phycol. 2010, 22, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Plouguerné, E.; Ioannou, E.; Georgantea, P.; Vagias, C.; Roussis, V.; Hellio, C.; Kraffe, E.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V. Anti-Microfouling Activity of Lipidic Metabolites from the Invasive Brown Alga Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. Mar. Biotechnol. 2010, 12, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Franklin, M.J.; Chang, C.; Akiyama, T.; Bothner, B. New Technologies for Studying Biofilms. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Allkja, J.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Coenye, T.; Cos, P.; Fallarero, A.; Harrison, J.; Lopes, S.; Oliver, A.; Pereira, M.; Ramage, G.; et al. Minimum Information Guideline for Spectrophotometric and Fluorometric Methods to Assess Biofilm Formation in Microplates. Biofilm 2019, 2, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferrer, M.D.; Rodriguez, J.C.; Álvarez, L.; Artacho, A.; Royo, G.; Mira, A. Effect of Antibiotics on Biofilm Inhibition and Induction Measured by Real-Time Cell Analysis. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 122, 640–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gutiérrez, D.; Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C.; Rodríguez, A.; García, P.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Monitoring in Real Time the Formation and Removal of Biofilms from Clinical Related Pathogens Using an Impedance-Based Technology. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Exterkate, R.A.M.; Crielaard, W.; Ten Cate, J.M. Different Response to Amine Fluoride by Streptococcus mutans and Polymicrobial Biofilms in a Novel High-Throughput Active Attachment Model. Caries. Res. 2010, 44, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Muras, A.; Mayer, C.; Otero-Casal, P.; Exterkate, R.A.M.; Brandt, B.W.; Crielaard, W.; Otero, A.; Krom, B.P. Short Chain N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Quorum Sensing Molecules Promote Periodontal Pathogens in in vitro Oral Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, e01941-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Buchholtz, C.; Nielsen, K.F.; Milton, D.L.; Larsen, J.L.; Gram, L. Profiling of Acylated Homoserine Lactones of Vibrio anguillarum in vitro and in vivo: Influence of Growth Conditions and Serotype. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 29, 433–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cicirelli, E.M.; Williamson, H.; Tait, K.; Fuqua, C. Acylated Homoserine Lactone Signaling in Marine Bacterial Systems. In Chemical Communication among Bacteria; Winans, S.C., Bassler, B.L., Eds.; ASM Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; pp. 251–272. ISBN 978-1-68367-149-7. [Google Scholar]
  51. Izzati Mohamad, N.; Yin, W.-F.; Chan, K.-G. Whole-Genome Sequence of Quorum-Sensing Vibrio tubiashii Strain T33. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, e01362-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Rai, N.; Rai, R.; Venkatesh, K.V. Quorum Sensing Biosensors. In Quorum Sensing vs Quorum Quenching: A Battle with No End in Sight; Kalia, V.C., Ed.; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 173–183. ISBN 978-81-322-1982-8. [Google Scholar]
  53. D’Souza, F.; Bruin, A.; Biersteker, R.; Donnelly, G.; Klijnstra, J.; Rentrop, C.; Willemsen, P. Bacterial Assay for the Rapid Assessment of Antifouling and Fouling Release Properties of Coatings and Materials. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 37, 363–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Santopolo, L.; Marchi, E.; Frediani, L.; Decorosi, F.; Viti, C.; Giovannetti, L. A Novel Approach Combining the Calgary Biofilm Device and Phenotype MicroArray for the Characterization of the Chemical Sensitivity of Bacterial Biofilms. Biofouling 2012, 28, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shakeri, S.; Kermanshahi, R.K.; Moghaddam, M.M.; Emtiazi, G. Assessment of Biofilm Cell Removal and Killing and Biocide Efficacy Using the Microtiter Plate Test. Biofouling 2007, 23, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Martín-Rodríguez, A.J.; González-Orive, A.; Hernández-Creus, A.; Morales, A.; Dorta-Guerra, R.; Norte, M.; Martín, V.S.; Fernández, J.J. On the Influence of the Culture Conditions in Bacterial Antifouling Bioassays and Biofilm Properties: Shewanella algae, a Case Study. BMC Microbiol. 2014, 14, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Poleunis, C.; Rubio, C.; Compère, C.; Bertrand, P. Role of Salts on the BSA Adsorption on Stainless Steel in Aqueous Solutions. II. ToF-SIMS Spectral and Chemical Mapping Study. Surf. Interface Anal. 2002, 34, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kierek, K.; Watnick, P.I. The Vibrio cholerae O139 O-Antigen Polysaccharide Is Essential for Ca2+-Dependent Biofilm Development in Sea Water. PNAS 2003, 100, 14357–14362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Patrauchan, M.A.; Sarkisova, S.; Sauer, K.; Franklin, M.J. Calcium Influences Cellular and Extracellular Product Formation during Biofilm-Associated Growth of a Marine Pseudoalteromonas sp. Microbiology 2005, 151, 2885–2897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zeraik, A.E.; Nitschke, M. Influence of Growth Media and Temperature on Bacterial Adhesion to Polystyrene Surfaces. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2012, 55, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Milton, D.L. Quorum Sensing in Vibrios: Complexity for Diversification. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Solano, C.; Echeverz, M.; Lasa, I. Biofilm Dispersion and Quorum Sensing. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2014, 18, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Tait, K.; Hutchison, Z.; Thompson, F.L.; Munn, C.B. Quorum Sensing Signal Production and Inhibition by Coral-Associated Vibrios. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2010, 2, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Huang, W.; Lin, Y.; Yi, S.; Liu, P.; Shen, J.; Shao, Z.; Liu, Z. QsdH, a Novel AHL Lactonase in the RND-Type Inner Membrane of Marine Pseudoalteromonas byunsanensis Strain 1A01261. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Huang, Y.; Ki, J.; Case, R.; Qian, P. Diversity and Acyl-Homoserine Lactone Production among Subtidal Biofilm-Forming Bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2008, 52, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Wang, Y.; Ikawa, A.; Okaue, S.; Taniguchi, S.; Osaka, I.; Yoshimoto, A.; Kishida, Y.; Arakawa, R.; Enomoto, K. Quorum Sensing Signaling Molecules Involved in the Production of Violacein by Pseudoalteromonas. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2008, 72, 1958–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yu, Z.; Yu, D.; Mao, Y.; Zhang, M.; Ding, M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, S.; Qiu, J.; Yin, J. Identification and Characterization of a LuxI/R-Type Quorum Sensing System in Pseudoalteromonas. Res. Microbiol. 2019, 170, 243–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, N.; Yu, M.; Zhao, Y.; Cheng, J.; An, K.; Zhang, X.-H. PfmA, a Novel Quorum-Quenching N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Acylase from Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra. Microbiology 2017, 163, 1389–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Pan, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yan, X.; Liu, C.; Wu, B.; He, X.; Liang, Y. Quorum Quenching Enzyme APTM01, an Acylhomoserine-Lactone Acylase from Marine Bacterium of Pseudoalteromonas tetraodonis Strain MQS005. Curr. Microbiol. 2019, 76, 1387–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, T.-N.; Guan, Q.-T.; Pain, A.; Kaksonen, A.H.; Hong, P.-Y. Discovering, Characterizing, and Applying Acyl Homoserine Lactone-Quenching Enzymes to Mitigate Microbe-Associated Problems under Saline Conditions. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Romero, M.; Muras, A.; Mayer, C.; Buján, N.; Magariños, B.; Otero, A. In vitro Quenching of Fish Pathogen Edwardsiella tarda AHL Production Using Marine Bacterium Tenacibaculum sp. Strain 20J Cell Extracts. Dis Aquat. Organ. 2014, 108, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Echazarreta, M.A.; Klose, K.E. Vibrio Flagellar Synthesis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kuehl, R.; Al-Bataineh, S.; Gordon, O.; Luginbuehl, R.; Otto, M.; Textor, M.; Landmann, R. Furanone at Subinhibitory Concentrations Enhances Staphylococcal Biofilm Formation by LuxS Repression. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4159–4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Manefield, M.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Henzter, M.; Andersen, J.B.; Steinberg, P.; Kjelleberg, S.; Givskov, M. Halogenated Furanones Inhibit Quorum Sensing through Accelerated LuxR Turnover. Microbiology 2002, 148, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Hentzer, M.; Wu, H.; Andersen, J.B.; Riedel, K.; Rasmussen, T.B.; Bagge, N.; Kumar, N.; Schembri, M.A.; Song, Z.; Kristoffersen, P.; et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Virulence by Quorum Sensing Inhibitors. EMBO J. 2003, 22, 3803–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Martinelli, D.; Grossmann, G.; Séquin, U.; Brandl, H.; Bachofen, R. Effects of Natural and Chemically Synthesized Furanones on Quorum Sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum. BMC Microbiol. 2004, 4, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Maximilien, R.; de Nys, R.; Holmström, C.; Gram, L.; Givskov, M.C.; Crass, K.; Kjelleberg, S.; Steinberg, P. Chemical Mediation of Bacterial Surface Colonisation by Secondary Metabolites from the Red Alga Delisea pulchra. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 1998, 15, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Rasch, M.; Buch, C.; Austin, B.; Slierendrecht, W.J.; Ekmann, K.S.; Larsen, J.L.; Johansen, C.; Riedel, K.; Eberl, L.; Givskov, M.; et al. An Inhibitor of Bacterial Quorum Sensing Reduces Mortalities Caused by Vibriosis in Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Walbaum). Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 27, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wu, Y.; Shi, Y.-G.; Zeng, L.-Y.; Pan, Y.; Huang, X.-Y.; Bian, L.-Q.; Zhu, Y.-J.; Zhang, R.-R.; Zhang, J. Evaluation of Antibacterial and Anti-Biofilm Properties of Kojic Acid against Five Food-Related Bacteria and Related Subcellular Mechanisms of Bacterial Inactivation. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2019, 25, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bala, A.; Kumar, R.; Harjai, K. Inhibition of Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by Azithromycin and Its Effectiveness in Urinary Tract Infections. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 300–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Tateda, K.; Comte, R.; Pechere, J.C.; Köhler, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Van Delden, C. Azithromycin Inhibits Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45, 1930–1933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Romero, M.; Martín-Cuadrado, A.B.; Roca-Rivada, A.; Cabello, A.M.; Otero, A. Quorum Quenching in Cultivable Bacteria from Dense Marine Coastal Microbial Communities: Quorum Quenching in Marine Bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2011, 75, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. McClean, K.H.; Winson, M.K.; Fish, L.; Taylor, A.; Chhabra, S.R.; Cámara, M.; Daykin, M.; Lamb, J.H.; Swift, S.; Bycroft, B.W.; et al. Quorum Sensing and Chromobacterium Violaceum: Exploitation of Violacein Production and Inhibition for the Detection of N-Acylhomoserine Lactones. Microbiology 1997, 143, 3703–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Morohoshi, T.; Kato, M.; Fukamachi, K.; Kato, N.; Ikeda, T. N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Regulates Violacein Production in Chromobacterium violaceum Type Strain ATCC 12472. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 279, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Romero, M.; Avendaño-Herrera, R.; Magariños, B.; Cámara, M.; Otero, A. Acylhomoserine Lactone Production and Degradation by the Fish Pathogen Tenacibaculum maritimum, a Member of the Cytophaga-Flavobacterium-Bacteroides (CFB) Group. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 304, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Yates, E.A.; Philipp, B.; Buckley, C.; Atkinson, S.; Chhabra, S.R.; Sockett, R.E.; Goldner, M.; Dessaux, Y.; Cámara, M.; Smith, H.; et al. N-Acylhomoserine Lactones Undergo Lactonolysis in a PH-, Temperature-, and Acyl Chain Length-Dependent Manner during Growth of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 5635–5646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Romero, M.; Diggle, S.P.; Heeb, S.; Cámara, M.; Otero, A. Quorum Quenching Activity in Anabaena sp. PCC 7120: Identification of AiiC, a Novel AHL-Acylase. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2008, 280, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Peeters, E.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Comparison of Multiple Methods for Quantification of Microbial Biofilms Grown in Microtiter Plates. J. Microbiol. Methods 2008, 72, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g001 550
Figure 1. Biofilm formation of marine bacterial strains Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra, P. maricaloris, V. aestuarianus, and V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system using (A) Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) culture medium, (B) TSB with an NaCl concentration of 2% (TSB-2), and (C) Marine Broth (MB) adjusted to a total salinity of 2% (MB-2).
Figure 1. Biofilm formation of marine bacterial strains Pseudoalteromonas flavipulchra, P. maricaloris, V. aestuarianus, and V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system using (A) Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) culture medium, (B) TSB with an NaCl concentration of 2% (TSB-2), and (C) Marine Broth (MB) adjusted to a total salinity of 2% (MB-2).
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g001
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g002 550
Figure 2. Quorum quenching activity of four selected biofilm-forming marine strains cultured in different media (MB, MB-2, TSB, and TSB-2) against short-chain signal C6-HSL and long-chain C12-HSL.
Figure 2. Quorum quenching activity of four selected biofilm-forming marine strains cultured in different media (MB, MB-2, TSB, and TSB-2) against short-chain signal C6-HSL and long-chain C12-HSL.
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g002
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of purified cell extracts, expressed in percentage (%), from Tenacibaculum sp. 20J (PCE20J at 100 μg/mL), AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM), furanone C30 (0.1 µM), and kojic acid (1 mM) on bacterial biofilm of (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Effect of purified cell extracts, expressed in percentage (%), from Tenacibaculum sp. 20J (PCE20J at 100 μg/mL), AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM), furanone C30 (0.1 µM), and kojic acid (1 mM) on bacterial biofilm of (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g003
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g004 550
Figure 4. Effect of purified cell extracts from Tenacibaculum sp. 20J (PCE20J at 100 μg/mL), AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM), furanone C30 (0.1 µM), and kojic acid (1 mM) on planktonic bacterial growth during biofilm formation of (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Effect of purified cell extracts from Tenacibaculum sp. 20J (PCE20J at 100 μg/mL), AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM), furanone C30 (0.1 µM), and kojic acid (1 mM) on planktonic bacterial growth during biofilm formation of (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii measured by xCELLigence® system (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g004
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g005 550
Figure 5. Biofilm production by (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii in attachment model, measured by crystal violet staining assay. Effect of AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on MB and TSB was tested (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Biofilm production by (A) P. flavipulchra, (B) P. maricaloris, (C) V. aestuarianus, and (D) V. tubiashii in attachment model, measured by crystal violet staining assay. Effect of AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on MB and TSB was tested (n = 3). (*) indicates statistically significant differences (Student’s t-test, p < 0.05).
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g005
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g006 550
Figure 6. Effect of AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on two-species and multispecies biofilm formation. Biofilm formation was monitored using xCELLigence® system. Cultures were carried out in TSB. Represented values correspond to cell index after 40 h of incubation (n = 2).
Figure 6. Effect of AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on two-species and multispecies biofilm formation. Biofilm formation was monitored using xCELLigence® system. Cultures were carried out in TSB. Represented values correspond to cell index after 40 h of incubation (n = 2).
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g006
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of adding AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on surface-associated motility in V. aestuarianus. Plates were prepared in MB with 0.25% Eiken agar and incubated at 22 °C for 18 and 42 h.
Figure 7. Effect of adding AHL-lactonase Aii20J (0.57 mM) on surface-associated motility in V. aestuarianus. Plates were prepared in MB with 0.25% Eiken agar and incubated at 22 °C for 18 and 42 h.
Marinedrugs 19 00074 g007
Table
Table 1. HPLC-MS quantification (ng/mL) of acyl-homoserine-lactones (AHLs) produced by biofilm-forming bacteria cultured in MB using HPLC-MS. (-): not detected in the sample.
Table 1. HPLC-MS quantification (ng/mL) of acyl-homoserine-lactones (AHLs) produced by biofilm-forming bacteria cultured in MB using HPLC-MS. (-): not detected in the sample.
P. flavipulchraP. maricalorisV. aestuarianus CECT625V. tubiashii CECT631
C4-HSL374347626503
OC6-HSL2.310.490.8-
C7-HSL1.06---
C8-HSL0.740.6639.2-
OC8-HSL-0.4615-
C10-HSL0.68-34.3-
OC10-HSL5.791.132958-
HC10-HSL--26.47-
C12-HSL--2.97-
OC12-HSL--41.66-
HC12-HSL--3.32-
C16-HSL--2.2-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muras, A.; Parga, A.; Mayer, C.; Otero, A. Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibition Strategies to Control Microfouling. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020074

AMA Style

Muras A, Parga A, Mayer C, Otero A. Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibition Strategies to Control Microfouling. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(2):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muras, Andrea, Ana Parga, Celia Mayer, and Ana Otero. 2021. "Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibition Strategies to Control Microfouling" Marine Drugs 19, no. 2: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020074

APA Style

Muras, A., Parga, A., Mayer, C., & Otero, A. (2021). Use of Quorum Sensing Inhibition Strategies to Control Microfouling. Marine Drugs, 19(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop