Next Article in Journal
Spatial Structure of Lectin from the Mussel Mytilus trossulus: In-Sights from Molecular Modelling and Practical Proof
Next Article in Special Issue
Structures and Anti-Allergic Activities of Natural Products from Marine Organisms
Previous Article in Journal
A Hotspot of TTX Contamination in the Adriatic Sea: Study on the Origin and Causative Factors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemosensory-Related Genes in Marine Copepods
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exploring Oceans for Curative Compounds: Potential New Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Molecules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

1
Department of Ecosustainable Marine Biotechnology, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Via Ammiraglio Ferdinando Acton 55, 80133 Naples, Italy
2
Département des Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Université de Caen Normandie, Boulevard Maréchal Juin CS, CEDEX, 14032 Caen, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010009
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 16 December 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemical Defense in Marine Organisms II)

Abstract

:
Although several antibiotics are already widely used against a large number of pathogens, the discovery of new antimicrobial compounds with new mechanisms of action is critical today in order to overcome the spreading of antimicrobial resistance among pathogen bacteria. In this regard, marine organisms represent a potential source of a wide diversity of unique secondary metabolites produced as an adaptation strategy to survive in competitive and hostile environments. Among the multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is undoubtedly one of the most important species due to its high intrinsic resistance to different classes of antibiotics on the market and its ability to cause serious therapeutic problems. In the present review, we first discuss the general mechanisms involved in the antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa. Subsequently, we list the marine molecules identified up until now showing activity against P. aeruginosa, dividing them according to whether they act as antimicrobial or anti-virulence compounds.

1. Introduction

The emergence and rapid global dissemination of antibiotic resistance in pathogenic bacteria represent one of the greatest challenges in clinical practice that needs coordinated approaches at regional, national, and international levels [1,2].
The increasing number of these pathogens is closely correlated with nosocomial infections worldwide, which account for 7 and 10% in developed and developing countries, respectively [3], resulting in significant implications on healthcare systems and important global economic costs. It is estimated that by 2050 there will be approximately 10 million deaths a year due to multi-drug resistance (MDR) bacteria and an economic loss of around 100 trillion USD [4]. Moreover, even more alarming is the increasing number of infections caused by pathogens resistant to many (if not all) antibiotics currently available today. Due to the growing gap between clinical need and the limited number of new drugs in development, the existence of these MDR bacteria could lead back to a pre-antibiotic era, leading to devastating consequences to the health of patients [2]. This problem is even more severe for Gram-negative bacteria, as highlighted by the World Health Organization reports, which underline the pressing need for new antibiotics to treat these bacterial infections [5]. One of the most important species among MDR Gram-negative bacteria is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a member of γ –proteobacteria, due to its high intrinsic resistance to several classes of antibiotics and capability to cause serious therapeutic problems, with significant levels of morbidity and mortality [6,7]. According to the Infectious Diseases Society of America, P. aeruginosa is part of a faction of antibiotic-resistant bacteria called ‘ESKAPE’ (Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.), characterized by different drug resistance mechanisms that represent new paradigms in pathogenesis, transmission, and resistance [8].
Therefore, it is urgent to identify novel antibiotics with new chemical structures and other approaches to combat MDR Gram-negative bacteria. To date, the antibiotics commonly used on the market have been isolated from terrestrial organisms or derived synthetically from fermentation products. On the contrary, marine organisms may lead to the discovery of new and unique structures when compared to their terrestrial counterparts. In fact, the marine habitats represent the largest ecosystem on Earth still underexplored. They are characterized by extremely variable and hostile physico-chemical parameters, including low temperature, limited access to light, high salinity, and high pressure, which push marine organisms to produce an extraordinary secondary metabolites diversity, with unmatched structures and excellent biological activities (e.g., antimicrobials), to cope with such extreme conditions.
To fight MDR bacteria, it is also imperative to understand the resistance mechanisms that pathogens have developed and their contribution to bacterial virulence. In the present review, we first discuss general mechanisms involved in P. aeruginosa antibiotic resistance. Subsequently, we emphasize the critical need to identify new natural antibiotics and/or anti-virulence agents, focusing the attention on the molecules of marine origin identified up until now, showing activity against P. aeruginosa.

2. Pseudomonas aeruginosa

P. aeruginosa was isolated for the first time in 1882 by Gessard and identified as a pathogenic strain in 1890 by Charrin [9]. Similar to other bacteria of the Pseudomonas genus, it is well known for its considerable metabolic versatility and ubiquitous distribution. P. aeruginosa is usually aerobic, but it also can grow in an anaerobic condition if nitrate, citrate, and arginine are present [10]. Moreover, it is able to colonize a wide range of environmental niches [11], including terrestrial and aquatic habitats, as well as the surface of animate (insects, plants, animals, and humans) and inanimate (generally hospital environment, such as distilled water, disinfectants, sinks, medical devices, and equipment) hosts. In fact, P. aeruginosa is the most frequent colonizer of medical devices (e.g., catheters, nebulizers, humidifiers), causing nosocomial infections, such as ventilator-associated pneumonia, meningoencephalitis, and sepsis [12].
This bacterium is the major opportunistic pathogen for humans, typically affecting immunocompromised patients, giving rise to airway and urinary tract infections, bloodstream infections, burn injury infections, hot-tub dermatitis, and outer ear infections (known as swimmer’s ear).
P. aeruginosa commonly infects the respiratory tract of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients [13], resulting in an accelerated decline of pulmonary function. It colonizes approximately 70% of adult CF patients, representing the most common pathogen isolated from these infections [14,15]. CF is a monogenic disease caused by a mutation on chromosome 7 in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. This mutation affects the chloride channel inducing the formation of a thicker and dry mucus layer on the lung wall, increasing the viscosity due to hyposecretion and hyperabsorption of electrolytes and water in the airways [16]. This alteration causes problems in antimicrobial immunity, creating a perfect environment for infection and growth of P. aeruginosa [17].
The treatment of infections caused by this pathogen is particularly problematic because of its natural and acquired resistance to multiple antibiotics, including aminoglycosides, quinolones, and β-lactams [18,19]. It is interesting that P. aeruginosa evolved the ability to find new ways to resist several compounds while simultaneously developing strategies for exchanging genetic materials, enabling other bacteria to also become drug-resistant (Figure 1) [20]. Its intrinsic resistance is commonly due to synergistic factors, including the impermeability of the outer membrane in Gram-negative bacteria, and the resistance developed through mutations in the genome or acquired from other organisms via plasmids, transposons, or bacteriophages [21]. Moreover, the pathogen can survive and adapt to several environments thanks to the signaling pathway that mediates antibiotic resistance, cell permeability, and the ability to form biofilm, as well as the production of different virulence factors such as cell-associated determinants (e.g., lipopolysaccharide, pili, and flagellum) and secreted molecules (e.g., extracellular polysaccharides, exotoxins, pigments, and proteases) [15,22,23]. These multiple resistance mechanisms represent potential drug targets that could guide the discovery of novel antibiotic adjuvants (i.e., compounds which do not directly kill bacteria but enhance antibiotic activity). Their action can block resistance, enhance the intracellular antibiotic accumulation and complementary bactericidal mechanisms, inhibit signaling and regulatory pathways, or boost the host response to bacterial infection [24,25].

3. Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

To establish an infection, P. aeruginosa has developed many drug resistance mechanisms, including biofilm formation, modification of drug binding sites/targets, drug inactivation/alteration, and changes in cell permeability (Figure 1) [26].

3.1. Biofilm Production

Biofilm consists of a consortium of microorganisms that can live as a thin and slimy layer on biotic or abiotic surfaces or form aggregates without adhering to a surface, as seen in P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, and some other bacteria. It is established in a matrix of extracellular polymeric substances composed mainly of polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA (eDNA) [27]. The biofilm can represent a physical barrier or alter the chemical microenvironment (e.g., low O2, low pH, high CO2, and low water availability) to slow the diffusion and attenuate the action of antibiotics. Moreover, it allows the bacteria to resist adverse environmental conditions (e.g., starvation, desiccation) and makes them capable of causing a wide range of chronic infections [25,26,28].
The involvement of biofilm in drug resistance was highlighted by Ciofu and collaborators showing that the mucoid nature of biofilm was responsible for a high resistance toward Tobramycin in the pathogen P. aeruginosa [29]. Biofilm protects the pathogens increasing their tolerance against common antibiotics approximately 1000-fold [30]. Therefore, a high concentration of antibiotics would be required to treat biofilm infections, which cannot be utilized in vivo without causing toxicity [31], making the antibiotic treatment less adequate. In several cases, antibiotics (e.g., imipenem, colistin) can only reduce the biofilm without eliminating it. For this reason, the development of new antibiotic adjuvants that could eliminate the biofilm and that are effective when combined with antibiotics, represents a promising strategy for new therapies to prevent and treat bacterial infections. In this direction, it is interesting that Triclosan, a broad-spectrum antimicrobial [32], increased the efficacy of tobramycin against the pathogen by eradicating P. aeruginosa biofilm. The synergistic treatment of these two compounds caused a 100-fold reduction of viable persistent cells in 8 h and complete eradication by 24 h [33]. However, other anti-biofilm agents used as potential antibiotic adjuvants and their mechanisms of action have been previously reported [28].
Biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa represents an integral part of infections and is governed mainly by exopolysaccharides Pel and Psl [34,35,36]. Psl is enables to start the biofilm production and the maturation with the development of cell–cell communication, while Pel enhances the biofilm growth thanks to the cell–cell interaction [37,38]. P. aeruginosa can also synthesize alginate, which plays a key role in biofilm formation. The protein composition of the P. aeruginosa biofilm matrix has also been described, including type IV pili, Cup fimbria, CdrA adhesins, LecAB lectins, and Fap amyloid fibers [39]. In addition, it has been shown that eDNA represents a fundamental component in the matrix of the P. aeruginosa biofilm [40,41], together with rhamnolipids which are involved in the formation of microcolonies [42].
The biofilm formation involves several regulatory mechanisms (reviewed in [43]), including intracellular and intercellular signaling via secondary messengers (e.g., cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP)) and quorum sensing (QS) molecules (e.g., homoserine lactones, quinolone), which are involved in initiating the transition to sessile development. A high internal concentration of c-di-GMP induces the production of adhesins and extracellular matrix compounds, allowing biofilm formation. On the contrary, the decrease in c-diGMP level causes biofilm dispersal [44,45]. Moreover, the acyl homoserine lactone-based system Rhl regulates rhamnolipid production and the tolerance of P. aeruginosa biofilms to immune cells [42,46], whereas the quinolone-based QS system, called the Pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS), controls the production of the eDNA matrix component positively [41].
The mechanisms involved in the biofilm-associated tolerance of P. aeruginosa against the different classes of antibiotics are reviewed by Ciofu and collaborators [39]. Beta-lactams have little anti-biofilm effect, mainly due to the slow growth of bacteria in biofilms [39]. On the contrary, fluoroquinolones are frequently used to treat biofilm infections because they show good anti-biofilm effects and tissue penetration [47,48]. However, the low oxygen level in biofilms appears to be the main aspect affecting the bactericidal effect of quinolones, together with adaptive responses, including SOS and the stringent response [49]. Several mechanisms appear to have an important role in the tolerance of P. aeruginosa biofilms toward aminoglycoside antibiotics, such as the interaction of the aminoglycosides with different components of the biofilm matrix (e.g., alginate, Pel, Psl, eDNA) and the expression of specific genes that confer aminoglycoside tolerance of P. aeruginosa biofilm [39] and reference within.

3.2. Drug Inactivation

One of the principal intrinsic resistance mechanisms of P. aeruginosa, allowing cells to overcome the effect of antibiotic molecules, is the production of enzymes that can degrade antibiotics’ chemical bonds susceptible to hydrolysis, such as amides or esters [50,51,52].
Aminoglycosides are a group of bactericidal antibiotics whose mechanism of action involves the inhibition of protein synthesis. Structurally, aminoglycosides contain an aminocyclitol ring linked to amino sugars by glycosidic bonds [53]. Resistance to aminoglycosides is based on a series of different mechanisms, and the antibiotic degradation by enzymes is one of the principals. P. aeruginosa has been shown to produce the three different classes of enzymes known to degrade aminoglycosides: aminoglycoside acetyl-transferase (AAC), aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase (ANT), and aminoglycoside phosphotransferase (APH) [53,54]. Each class of enzyme has a specific antibiotic selectivity and a different mechanism of action. AACs are responsible for the inactivation of tobramycin, netilmicin, gentamicin, kanamycin, and amikacin by transferring an acetyl group to an amino group of the target molecules [51]. APHs inactivate neomycin, streptomycin, and kanamycin, transferring a phosphoryl group to the 3′-hydroxyl of aminoglycosides [51,55,56]. ANTs confer resistance to gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin by transferring an adenylyl group to either the amino or hydroxyl group of the antibiotics [57,58].
P. aeruginosa strains have developed several strategies for resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. The most common is represented by the expression of hydrolytic β-lactamase, an enzyme able to break the amide bond of the β-lactam ring. These enzymes are divided into four classes (A to D) based on their amino acid sequence. P. aeruginosa strains produce a class C β-lactamase that hydrolyze the cephalosporins β-lactam ring through an active site serine [59]. Other isolates have shown the production of a class A enzyme (same mechanisms of the C class) with a high degree of resistance for many β–lactam, defined extended-spectrum-β-lactamases (ESBLs). ESBLs confer resistance to penicillin, cephalosporins, and aztreonam [60,61]. Moreover, some OXA-type ESBLs were isolated in P. aeruginosa, and their name refers to their oxacillin-hydrolyzing abilities [61]. The overexpression of antibiotic-inactivating enzymes due to their mutation is another mechanism of acquired resistance used in P. aeruginosa [62]. An example is given by clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa in which the overproduction of β-lactamase caused by mutations in a β-lactamase inducible gene ampC significantly increased the resistance to cephalosporins [59]. Furthermore, mutations that inactivate the ampD gene encode a cytosolic N-acetyl-anhydromuramyl-1-alanine amidase and act as a repressor of ampC expression, led to an overproduction of β-lactamase in P. aeruginosa [63].

3.3. Modification of Drug Binding Sites/Targets

Interference with antibacterial targets is a strategy commonly used by pathogenic resistant bacteria to avoid the antimicrobial action of antibiotics. It can happen by securing targets or modifying the target sites [62]. In particular, mutational modifications of the target sites is an important strategy to contribute to P. aeruginosa antibiotic resistance.
One of the well-studied examples is the modification of the target sites of quinolones. Mutations in genes encoding for DNA gyrase (gyrA and gyrB) and/or topoisomerase IV (parC and parE) in P. aeruginosa can reduce the binding affinity of encoded proteins to quinolones, which generally inhibit the replication of the bacterial DNA, resulting in reduced susceptibility of the pathogen to quinolones [64].
High levels of resistance of P. aeruginosa to aminoglycosides have been reported in the presence of ribosomal mutations, as the antibiotic inhibits protein translation by targeting the 30S ribosomal subunit [65]. Similarly, it has been shown that modifications of P. aeruginosa penicillin-binding proteins (PBP) increase resistance to pan-β-lactam antibiotics [66].
Furthermore, it has been shown that resistance to polymyxin in P. aeruginosa is related to the modification of the polymyxin-binding partner lipopolysaccharides (LPS) by the addition of 4-amino-L-arabinose (L-Ara4N) to the phosphate groups of the lipid A moiety of LPS [67]. In addition, mutations in the two-component regulatory systems of PhoPQ and PmrAB promoted this modification, resulting in increased resistance to polymyxin [68,69].

3.4. Changes in Cell Permeability

Most antibiotics used to fight P. aeruginosa need to penetrate the cell membrane to reach their targets. This is the case of aminoglycosides (inhibition of protein synthesis), but also quinolones (inhibition of DNA gyrase and DNA replication) and β-lactam (inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis) [70,71,72]. P. aeruginosa possesses different mechanisms to counteract antibiotics internalizations. The principal mechanism is represented by the membrane itself. P. aeruginosa has low membrane permeability (12- to 100- fold lower than that of Escherichia coli) [73] due to the relatively low number of porins, β-barrel protein channels responsible for the import of a broad range of molecules [74].
The most abundant porine is OprF which is present in two forms, the highly-abundant two-domain closed channel and the single-domain open channel. The open conformation occurs only in <5% of the OprF protein population [75], and this low incidence contributes to the low permeability of P. aeruginosa [76]. OprF is also implicated in quorum sensing and biofilm formation [74]. It was reported that some clinical OprF deficient mutants of P. aeruginosa have shown increased antibiotic resistance, although its role in antibiotic resistance still needs to be completely unraveled [77].
The second major P. aeruginosa porin is OprD which is involved in the recognition and entrance of carbapenem antibiotics [78,79]. In addition, mutations causing a downregulation of oprD have been connected to carbapenem resistance in some isolates [80].
However, if an antibiotic succeeds to reach the cell cytoplasm, other resistance mechanisms are activated. Bacterial efflux pumps play a fundamental role in expelling compounds out of the cell and are classified into the five following families: resistance-nodulation-division (RND) family, major facilitator superfamily (MFS), ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily, small multidrug resistance (SMR) family, and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family [81]. P. aeruginosa possesses many efflux pumps belonging to the RND family to counteract antibiotics [82]. These proteins comprise a cytoplasmic and periplasmic component, named multidrug efflux (Mex), and an outer membrane porine (Opr). Four of the twelve Pseudomonas RND family efflux pumps, specifically MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, MexEF-OprN, and MexXY-OprM, contribute to antibiotic resistance [83]. MexAB-OprM is responsible for the efflux of β-lactams and quinolones [84]. MexCD-OprJ is able to pump out β-lactams [85]. MexEF-OprN can extrude quinolones [86], while MexXY-OprM expels aminoglycosides [84,87]. It has been reported that many P. aeruginosa strains present in the clinical environment showed an overexpression of many RND, underlining the importance of these mechanisms for antibiotic resistance [88,89,90].

4. Marine Natural Products against P. aeruginosa

Although medical procedures have limited the development and spread of pathogens through the use of antibiotic therapies, this has led to a global increase in resistant populations. Among them, a troubling example is the treatment of P. aeruginosa infection, which is complicated by the intrinsic resistance of the pathogen to a wide variety of antimicrobials. Furthermore, it acquires novel resistance mechanisms through lateral gene transfer, which probably also led to the emergence of carbapenemase-expressing strains of P. aeruginosa [91]. For this reason, P. aeruginosa is in the “critical” category of the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) priority list of pathogens for which research and development of new antibiotics is urgent [92].
Taking into account the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance, it is imperative to focus research not only on new antimicrobials discovery, but also on the development of innovative therapeutic approaches against the pathogen. Currently, a promising strategy appears to be targeting the virulence factors to suppress its ability to inflict damage, helping to slow down pathogenic mechanisms and facilitate bacterial clearance [93,94]. Anti-virulence compounds are based on inhibiting bacterial virulence and interrupting colonization processes and bacterial infections, but do not affect bacterial growth. They can be given in combination with antibiotic treatment, thus reducing the selective pressure on bacteria and preventing the development of resistance to these antibiotics [95]. In particular, QS and biofilm are the most frequently targeted virulence systems in P. aeruginosa.
Bacterial biofilm production represents one of the most relevant virulence factors, which can make pathogens up to 1000-times more resistant than their planktonic form [96]. Nowadays, the percentage of biofilm-mediated MDR infections is very high and growing. For this reason, the research for new therapeutic agents capable of counteracting biofilms formation is increasingly urgent. Likewise, the QS system represents an attractive target for developing novel antimicrobial drugs [97], as it plays an important role in establishing successful P. aeruginosa infections. Compared to conventional antibiotics that kill or inhibit bacterial growth, QS inhibitors prevent QS-regulated pathogenic processes [98,99], including biofilm formation, but also virulence factor expression (such as protease, exotoxin A, pyocyanin, pili, and flagella), bacterial migration and secretion regulation, putting less selective pressure on bacteria, thus barely inducing drug resistance mutations [100,101].
Therefore, the development of new molecules directed toward virulence targets could increase the therapeutic arsenal available for treating MDR pathogens.
In this context, marine organisms represent potential sources of novel therapeutic agents as they produce a wide diversity of bioactive compounds with pharmacological applications. They are adapted to survive in complex communities and in competitive and hostile habitats, producing unique secondary metabolites in response to ecological pressures, including competition for space, predation, and tide changes. Among these, many antimicrobial and/or anti-virulence compounds have been reported, which inhibit or limit the development and growth of other competitive marine organisms or inhibit virulence factors preventing the colonization of microorganisms and representing a further important therapeutic approach against pathogens.
For this reason, here we list natural bioactive metabolites of marine origin which may represent important compounds against P. aeruginosa, dividing them according to whether they act as antimicrobial (Table 1) or anti-virulence (Table 2) compounds.

4.1. Antimicrobials

4.1.1. Peptides and Proteins

The strong activity of the proteins/peptides makes them good drugs for the treatment of several diseases, although their instability remains a major problem for the therapeutic use. For this reason, the effective delivery of these drugs to the body represents an important challenge. However, many efforts have been made by scientists to find effective proteins/peptide drug delivery, including the stabilization of proteins and peptides in delivery devices and/or the design of appropriate target-specific protein transporters, as reviewed by [179].
A significant type of marine compounds able to counteract P. aeruginosa is represented by the antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), a class of small peptides with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity that are components of the innate immune response widespread in the life kingdoms [180].
Mussels represent a relevant source of marine AMPs active against P. aeruginosa. Recently, four myticalins with MIC ranging from 4 to 8 µM were isolated from marine mussels belonging to the Mytilus genus, but their mode of action is still unclear [102]. Peptides from mussels can also be a valid starting point for the design of derived AMPs. For example, Oh and collaborators designed a short AMP from the immune-related AMP myticusin-beta produced by the Mytilus coruscus mussel in response to infections. The derived AMP showed increased antimicrobial action in the ultrasensitive radial diffusion assay (URDA) against a broad spectrum of human pathogens, including P. aeruginosa [103]. Among AMP from mussels, the polypeptide cgUbiquitin isolated from the oyster Crassostrea gigas gill showed potent bacteriostatic activity against P. aeruginosa, with a minimal effective concentration (MEC) value of 0.6 µM by URDA [104]. Mussels are also able to produce proteins with antimicrobial activity. This is the case of the escapin, a broadly antimicrobial protein of 60 kDa isolated from the ink of the sea hare Aplysia californica, that can inhibit P. aeruginosa with a MIC value of 0.31 µg/mL [121].
Edible sea urchin also represents a source of AMPs. In fact, three AMPs with strong antimicrobial activity were isolated from the Echinus esculentus collected from sub-Antarctic waters. In particular, the molecules EeCentrocin 1 and EeCentrocin 2 showed MIC of 0.78 µM against P. aeruginosa, while the EeStrongylocin 2 showed a MIC value of 1.56 µM [105].
Among invertebrates, crabs could also be important for producing marine AMPs. In this regard, the AMP crustin was purified from the hemolymph of the blue crab Portunus pelagicus, and its antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa was assessed by resazurin, which showed a MIC value of 50 µg/mL [106]. In addition, other three AMPs with a peculiar eight cysteines motif were isolated for the first time from the red king crab Paralithodes camtschaticus. These compounds, named paralithocin 1-3, have shown weak antimicrobial activity towards P. aeruginosa, with MIC value > 100 µM [107].
Sphistin, a histone-derived 38-amino acid peptide isolated from the mud crab Scylla paramamosain and its truncated fragment Sph12–38, exhibited broad anti-microbial activities [181,182]. A recent study demonstrated that low doses of AMPs Sphistin and Sph12-38 in combination with rifampicin and azithromycin have in vivo significant synergistic activity against P. aeruginosa, probably due to the binding of these AMPs with LPS of P. aeruginosa with the subsequent promotion of the rifampicin and azithromycin intracellular uptake [108].
All D-amino acid analogue of tachyplesin I (TPI), a 14-amino acid AMP isolated for the first time from Tachypleus tridentatus [109] (commonly known as horseshoe crab), was synthesized by Yu and collaborators and named TPAD. It retained the TPI anti-microbial activity against P. aeruginosa with MIC values of approximately 8 μg/mL, but it showed significantly improved stability against enzymatic degradation and decreased hemolytic activity, suggesting better therapeutic potential [183].
Among marine organisms, vertebrates also represent a valid source of AMPs effective against P. aeruginosa. For example, a novel AMP with high homology with the C-terminus of hemoglobin β-chain was extracted from the liver of the skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis. This AMP, which the authors designated as Skipjack Hemoglobin β chain-related Antimicrobial Peptide (SHβAP), showed broad spectrum bacteriostatic activity with an MEC value of 19 µg/mL towards P. aeruginosa [110].
Epinecidin-1, a 20-amino-acid peptide identified by orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides), revealed an important role in protecting fish against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria destroying membranes, probably thus preventing or delaying the development of microbial resistance [184]. In particular, this peptide inhibited in vivo the growth of P. aeruginosa ATCCS19660 and MDR P. aeruginosa R strains, with MIC90 (90% growth inhibition) values of 50 and 3.12 μg/mL, respectively. Importantly, the survival rate of mice after epinecidin-1 treatment was significantly higher than that of untreated controls or mice treated with imipenem [111].
Strong antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa (MIC value of 0.52 µg/mL) was also shown by the piscidin-like AMP named TP-4, which was isolated from the teleost fish Oreochromis niloticus [112]. Teleosts also represent a source of synthetic AMPs. In fact, three peptides (oreoch 1–3) with broad spectrum antimicrobial activity were synthesized using as guide the DNA of Oreochromis niloticus, two of which exhibited moderate activity against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values of 35 and 6.67 µM [113].
Besides teleosts, a novel cathelicidin (Hc-CATH) was identified and characterized from the sea snake Hydrophis cyanocinctus. This molecule has potent and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, showing a MIC value of 5.17 µM towards P aeruginosa [114]. Moreover, an AMP from the epidermal mucus of the hagfish Myxine glutinosa L. was able to completely inhibit the growth of two P. aeruginosa strains with MBCs of 7 and 10 µg/mL [115].
Marine microorganisms also represent a valid source of AMPs able to counteract the growth of P. aeruginosa. Among fungi, a cyclic dipeptide (L-Tyr-L-Pro) able to inhibit P. aeruginosa PAO1, with a MIC value of 6.2 mg/mL, was isolated from Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1; moreover, anti-QS activity was also demonstrated (see Section 4.2.1) [116]. Moreover, cyclodepsipeptide was isolated from the ascidian-derived fungus Aspergillus clavatus AS-107. This compound showed potent antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, with a MIC value of 8.8 µM [117].
Among marine-derived bacteria, three gageostatins (A–C) with antimicrobial activity were isolated from a Bacillus subtilis strain. Gageostatins A and B showed moderate antibacterial activity towards P. aeruginosa with a MIC value of 16 µg/mL when tested individually. Interestingly, the activity increased when combined with a MIC value of 8 µg/mL [118]. Moreover, two cyclic AMPs, hololitaralin A and B, previously isolated from the marine-derived Halobacillus litoralis YS3016, were synthesized, and their biological activities were evaluated by disk diffusion assay (DDA). The synthetic compounds showed activity against P. aeruginosa with 24 and 17 mm diameters, at 50 µg/mL for hololitaralin A and B, respectively [119,120].
Dusane and collaborators evaluated the antimicrobial activity of the protein BL-DZ1 produced by the bacterium B. licheniformis D1 isolated from the surface of the green mussel Perna viridis. This compound inhibited the growth of P. aeruginosa PAO1 at a MIC value of 3.12 µg/mL [122].
Gageotetrins A−C are rare bioactive linear lipopeptides consisting of a Leu-rich di- or tetrapeptide backbone and a new 3-hydroxy fatty acid (HDDA) isolated from a marine-derived Bacillus subtilis strain that showed anti-microbial activities against P. aeruginosa with MIC values of 0.02-0.06 mM [123].

4.1.2. Terpenes and Terpenoids

Terpenes represent the major class of secondary metabolites and are constituted of isoprene units linked in different ways. Terpenoids are a modified class of terpenes widespread in nature, with a huge range of structures and different biological activities (including mainly anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and anti-viral activities), that can be found in bacteria, fungi, plants, and several invertebrates [185].
Among marine terpenes, only the conidiogenone B isolated from the marine-derived endophytic fungus P. chrysogenum QEN-24S exhibited antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, with a MIC value of 8 µg/mL [124]. Likewise, a new ophiobolin sesterterpenoid and three new farnesylated phthalide derivatives, farnesylemefuranones, together with two known ophiobolin analogues, were also isolated from the deep-sea-derived fungus Aspergillus insuetus SD-512, collected from cold seep sediments in the north-east of the South China Sea, at a depth 1331 m. They demonstrated good anti-microbial activities against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values between 8 and 16 μg/mL [125].
Marine terpenoids with antimicrobial activity towards P. aeruginosa were also found in eukaryotes. For example, two terpenoids with antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa were purified from the marine seaweed Dictyoata acutiloba, showing MIC values of 0.9 and 0.89 µg/mL in the microdilution assay [126]. Moreover, a new antimicrobial terpenoid was isolated from the red sea soft coral Sarcophyton trocheliophorum. This compound gave 8 mm of inhibition halo at 1 mg/mL against P. aeruginosa in the DDA [127]. Finally, three terpenoids were isolated from the marine sponge Axinella infundibuliformis, of which one exhibited very strong activity against P. aeruginosa, giving 24 mm of a diameter of the halo of inhibition in the DDA [128].

4.1.3. Polyketides

Another relevant class of bioactive secondary metabolites is represented by polyketides (PKs). These molecules are produced by condensing short-chain fatty acids, typically acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) and malonyl-CoA, by polyketide synthases [186].
Two novel aromatic PKs, stremycin A and B, belonging to the angucycline antibiotic class, were isolated and chemically characterized from the bacterium Streptomyces pratensis strain NA-ZhouS1. Both molecules showed broad spectrum antimicrobial activity, with a MIC value of 16 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa [129]. Similarly, four new aromatic PKs, penipyranicins A−C and isopyrenulin, were isolated together with the known compound kojic acid from Penicillium sp. RO-11, collected from the sediments of a hydrothermal spring in Saudi Arabia. These compounds showed antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa; in particular, penipyranicin C had the most potent antimicrobial activity with a MIC value of 1.4 μg/mL [130].
Mollemycin A, a glyco-hexadepsipeptide PK containing two piperazic acids, was isolated from a marine-derived Streptomyces sp. CMB-M0244. It showed broad growth inhibitory activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including P. aeruginosa (IC50 value of 50 nM) [131]. Moreover, new polyene pyrone PKs were purified from a marine fungus, Penicillium sp. BB1122, collected from the Zhoushan coast by applying the “metal-stress” strategy, which refers to the use of different concentrations of particular heavy metals that can induce the expression of cryptic gene clusters, with the consequent production of new secondary metabolites. They displayed considerable antibiotic activity against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values of approximately 4 μg/mL [132].
Microorganisms associated with marine invertebrates, such as sponges and algae, are also a well-known source of natural products, including antimicrobial PKs. From the marine Streptomyces sp. strain HB202 isolated from the sponge Halichondria panicea, a new cytotoxic PK was purified and characterized. This PK, a benz[a]anthracene derivative, was named mayamycin and showed promising antimicrobial activities with an IC50 value of 2.5 μM against P. aeruginosa [133]. Two of the three new PKs, ketidocillinones B–C, extracted from an Antarctica sponge-derived fungus Penicillium sp. HDN151272 exhibited inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values of 1.56 and 6.25 mg/mL, respectively [134].
Recently, two antimicrobial macrocyclic PKs were isolated from Shewanella algae MTCC 12715, a symbiotic bacterium of the red macroalga Hypnea valentiae. The molecules were chemically characterized as 14-(14b,14c-dimethylbutyl)-12-methoxy-18-oxo-11,15-dioxacyclododecan-8-yl 1-((50-hydroxyfuran-10-yl)oxy)benzoate (1), and 14-(sec-butyl)-12-methoxy-12-methyl-18-oxo-11,15-dioxacyclododecan-8-yl1-((50-hydroxyfuran-10-yl)oxy)benzoate (2). Compounds 1 and 2 showed antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa with an inhibition halo of 21 and 24 mm diameter in DDA and MIC values of 1.5 and 3 µg/mL, respectively [135].
Recently, three elansolid-type of PK spanned macrolides isobenzofuranyl and furopyranyl, were obtained from the marine Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MTCC 12716 isolated from the intertidal red alga H. valentiae. They showed high antimicrobial activities against MDR strains, including P. aeruginosa, with a MIC value less than 1.0 μg/mL for the most active compound. Interestingly, the positive antibiotics such as ampicillin and chloramphenicol had the MIC values more than 12.5 μg/mL against P. aeruginosa [136]. Similarly, macrobrevin analogues were isolated by bioactivity-guided purification from B. amyloliquefaciens MTCC 12713 associated with an intertidal red macroalga Kappaphycus alvarezii collected along the south-east coast of India [137]. These molecules identified as trihydroxy-decahydro-37-methyl-macrobrevin, hexahydro-macrobrevin, hexahydro-41- hydroxy-macrobrevin-31-acetate, and hexahydro-28-nor-methyl-5-methoxy-macrobrevin, showed considerable antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa with a range of MIC values from 1.56 to 6.25 μg/mL. In comparison, the antibiotic chloramphenicol used as a positive control exhibited a MIC value of 12.5 μg/mL. In addition, three of these four purified compounds also showed a wider inhibition zone against P. aeruginosa (19–23 mm using 30 μg of each sample on disc) than the positive controls chloramphenicol and ampicillin (11 mm). In particular, the macrobrevin molecule encompassing hexahydro-41-hydroxy-macrobrevin-31-acetate functionality showed the highest antimicrobial activity compared to the others [137]. Moreover, from the same bacterium, 21-membered macrocyclic lactones, identified as difficidin analogues, were also isolated showing important antimicrobial properties [138]. They exhibited inhibition zones between 17 and 26 mm against P. aeruginosa (using 30 μg of each sample on disc) and MIC values of about 2–6 × 10−3 μM, compared to 11 mm (inhibitory zone) and 4.9 × 10−2 μM (MIC value) obtained with chloramphenicol [138].
The pentacyclic PK RF-3192C was purified from the fungus Aspergillus niger ASSB4 isolated from the marine red algae Laurencia obtuse. This compound revealed high activity against P. aeruginosa ATCC27853 in the DDA with 15 mm of inhibition zone [139]. Microketides A and B are new C-11 epimeric PKs purified from the gorgonian-derived fungus Microsphaeropsis sp. RA10-14 sampled in the South China Sea. They showed marked antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values of 0.19 and 1.56 μg/mL, respectively. In particular, microketide A exhibited the same MIC value of the positive control ciprofloxacin (0.19 μg/mL) [140].

4.1.4. Alkaloids

Alkaloids represent another huge class of natural products with a wide range of biological activities mainly produced by plants but also found in microorganisms and marine organisms [187]. For instance, the alkaloids caerulomycin A and C, isolated from a marine-derived actinomycete Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus WH1-2216, were active against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values of 21.8 μM and 38.6 μM, respectively [141]. Moreover, a potent antimicrobial alkaloid, crambescidin 800, isolated from the sponge Clathria cervicornis, showed a MIC value of 1 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa [142]. Bromoageliferin, a known alkaloid isolated from the sponge Agelas dilatata, showed significant growth inhibition of P. aeruginosa, with MICs of 8–32 μg/mL (11.45–45.83 µM); moreover, the inhibition of biofilm production was also observed (see Section 4.2.3) [143]. The cyclostellettamines also represent a group of strong bioactive alkaloids. Three different cyclostellettamines isolated from the marine sponge Pachychalina sp. showed high activity against P. aeruginosa, with MIC values depending on the size of their alkyl-chain size. Cyclostellettamine C showed a MIC value of 8.6 µg/mL against an antibiotic sensitive strain of P. aeruginosa and 18.8 µg/mL against two MDR P. aeruginosa strains. Similarly, cyclostellettamine E showed activity ranging from 9.4 to 18.8 µg/mL against sensitive and MDR P. aeruginosa strains. Finally, cyclostellettamine F exhibited strong activity towards MDR strains with MIC values ranging from 4.7 to 9.4 µg/mL [144]. The Red Sea sponge Callyspongia siphonella led to the discovery of two brominated oxindole alkaloids (1 and 2), which showed MIC values of 256 µg/mL against P. aeruginosa and considerable anti-biofilm activity (see Section 4.2.3) [145].
From the marine sponge Dendrilla nigra, three new alkaloids named denigrins A–C were isolated. The new molecules, characterized by a 3,4-diaryl pyrrole structure, possessed strong antimicrobial activities against a panel of human pathogen bacteria. In particular, the strains were able to inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa with MIC values of 100, 25, and 12.5 µg/mL for A, B, and C forms, respectively [146]. The lack of the p-hydroxyphenyl group at C-2 of compound A may be responsible for the differences in the activities. In addition, Zhidkov and collaborators have recently synthesized new brominated fascaplysins, bis-indole alkaloids endowed with many biological activities originally isolated from the sponge. In particular, the 14-bromoreticulatine derivative showed selective activity against P. aeruginosa with a clearance zone of more than 35 mm at the concentration of 0.2 mg/disc in the Disk Diffusion Soft Agar Assay [188,189].
Beside sponges, other marine organisms are good sources of new antimicrobial compounds against P. aeruginosa. For example, from the arctic bryozoan Tegella cf. spitzbergensis, the compound ent-eusynstyelamide B, the enantiomer of the known brominated tryptophan metabolite eusynstyelamide, was isolated together with three new derivatives, eusynstyelamides D, E, and F. These molecules displayed antimicrobial activities with MIC values between 25 and 12.5 µg/mL [147].

4.1.5. Miscellaneous

Beyond the four major classes of natural products described above (peptides/proteins, terpenes/terpenoids, PKs, and alkaloids), many other different marine compounds were able to inhibit P. aeruginosa in vitro assays.
On one side, from higher marine organisms, the flavone Velutin, extracted from the marine algae Acanthophora spicifera, revealed antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa in the DDA with an inhibition halo of 26.8 mm using 0.1 mg [148]. Moreover, the steroid Siphonocholin (Syph-1) isolated from the marine sponge Siphonochalina siphonella inhibited the growth of P. aeruginosa at the MIC value of 64 µg/mL. In addition, anti-biofilm and anti-QS activities were reported (see Section 4.2.4) [149]. Finally, a polybrominated diphenyl ether, 2-(20,40-dibromophenoxy)-3,5-dibromophenol, was isolated from the marine sponge Dysidea granulosa and showed a strong and broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, including an important activity against P. aeruginosa with a MIC value of 4 mg/L [150].
On the other side, among the metabolites produced by marine microorganisms, two diphenylether derivatives from a marine algae-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor OUCMDZ-2738 were able to inhibit P. aeruginosa with MIC values lower than 18 µM [151]. In addition, ecteinamycin, a polyether antibiotic isolated from a marine-derived Actinomadura sp. collected from the ascidian Ecteinascidia turbinate, showed strong antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa with a MIC value of 8.0 μg/mL [152]. Finally, from the red algae H. valentiae associated B. amyloliquefaciens MTCC 12716, three homologue members of the 24-membered macrocyclic lactone family were isolated and named bacvalactones 1–3. Each compound bears peculiar chemical functionalities and revealed potential inhibitory effects on several pathogens. Specifically, the three molecules were able to inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa in vitro with MIC ≤ 3.0 μg/mL, lower than the MICs of standard antibiotic molecules [158].
Moreover, the genus Bacillus was revealed to be an important source of bioactive molecules against P. aeruginosa, such as the phthalate derivative di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) from a marine B. subtilis active at the MIC value of 8 µg/mL [153], the two novel glycolipids (ieodoglucomide C and ieodoglycolipid) isolated from B. licheniformis 09IDYM23, active at the MIC value of 0.01 and 0.03 µM, respectively [154], and the compound PAGI264 produced by Bacillus sp. REB264, able to inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa in microdilution assay with a MIC of 15 µg/mL [155]. Moreover, macrolactines are a class of compounds mainly produced by Bacillus strains and show antimicrobial activity because of their unique chemical architecture. From the ethyl acetate extract of a marine Bacillus sp., isolated from sediment samples collected from Chuuk, Federated States of Micronesia and Ieodo, Republic of Korea’s southern reef, two new glycosylated macrolactins A1 and B1 were isolated and characterized. These molecules showed uncommon structural features and antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa with MIC values of 0.055 μM [156]. In addition, from Korean marine sediments, a new Bacillus subtilis strain was isolated producing new macrolactine derivatives. These new molecules, named gageomacrolactins 1–3, were characterized by the presence of sugar moieties and possessed antimicrobial activities against P. aeruginosa with MIC of 0.03 μM for compound 1 and 0.05 μM for compounds 2–3 [157].
A peculiar type of macrolactine was isolated from Bacillus subtilis MTCC 10403 isolated from brown seaweed Anthophycus longifolius. The molecule was defined as aryl-crowned macrolactine and displayed antimicrobial activities with siderophore-like mechanisms with a MIC < 13 μg/mL against P. aeruginosa [159].

4.2. Anti-Virulence Compounds

4.2.1. Proteins and Peptides

Enzymatic disruption of the biofilm or the QS signal molecules is a promising therapeutic strategy for treating P. aeruginosa infections.
The alginate lyase (AlyP1400, 200 U/mL) purified from a marine bacterium of the genus Pseudoalteromonas was able to degrade around 90% of the alginate isolated from a mucoid P. aeruginosa clinical isolate CF27 and disrupted in vitro the biofilm grown in a dose-dependent manner. On the contrary, the heat-inactivated AlyP1400 lost those abilities. Moreover, the authors demonstrated that the synergy of the enzymatic activity of AlyP1400 with antibiotics reduced the CF27 biofilm biomass and enhanced the bactericidal activity of antibiotics, suggesting a potential therapeutic activity for the combinational use of alginate lyase and antibiotics to treat P. aeruginosa biofilm-related infections [160,161]. Interestingly, biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa PAO1 was remarkably reduced by 0.01 mg/mL of the extracellular alkaline protease produced by marine bacteria Pseudoalteromonas sp. 129-1, and almost entirely abolished with the concentration of 1 mg/ml. The purified protease also showed high tolerance to salt and organic solvents, indicating its promising prospect as an additive in laundry detergent and non-toxic anti-biofilm agents [162]. In addition, it has recently been identified an antibiofilm protein, Alterocin, secreted by the non-pigmented marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain 3J6 isolated from the Morbihan Gulf, Brittany, France, active against marine and terrestrial bacteria, including P. aeruginosa clinical strains [163].
An AdiC-like quorum quenching enzyme, YtnP, was cloned from a deep-sea probiotic bacterium, Bacillus velezensis (DH82 strain), isolated from the Western Pacific Yap trench and heterologously expressed in E. coli to investigate its applications on the improvement of hygiene problems caused by biofilm infection of P. aeruginosa in dental units. The results showed that YtnP was able to interrupt the QS of the pathogen by degrading the N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHL), thus inhibiting the P. aeruginosa EPS generation, biofilm formation, and virulence factors production (pyocyanin and rhamnolipid) significantly, and therefore, increasing the efficiency of antifouling against P. aeruginosa [164]. Similarly, the gene ahaP, encoding the enzyme AHL-acylase responsible for the quorum quenching activity against several synthetic AHLs, was identified in Psychrobacter sp. M9-54-1 isolated from the microbiota of holothurians. In vivo results showed that the heterologous expression of ahaP in P. aeruginosa PAO1 reduced the expression of the QS-controlled gene lecA, encoding for a cytotoxic galactophilic lectin and swarming motility protein, confirming its interference with the QS systems of the pathogen [165].
The Nesfactin lipopeptide, produced by marine bacteria Nesterenkonia sp. MSA31, was recently isolated and characterized by Kiran and collaborators [166]. The protease, esterase, lipase, and phospholipase activities, representing virulence phenotypes, were significantly reduced in both P. aeruginosa PAO1 and FSPA02 when treated with 50 µg/mL of Nesfactin. In addition, the production of the virulence factors pyocyanin, alginate, elastase, and rhamnolipid in PAO1 and FSPA02 was also reduced by 70%, 65%, 79%, and 75%, respectively, in the presence of 50 µg/mL of the lipopeptide. Finally, Nesfactin at 100 µg/mL disrupted 85–90% of the biofilm of both P. aeruginosa strains [166].
Cyclic dipeptides have been reported to exhibit different biological activities and are therefore considered promising building blocks of drug candidates [190,191]. As they contain endogenous amino acids, peptides generally exhibit high activity and low toxicity. However, they have a short half-life and low oral bioavailability. On the contrary, the advantage of using cyclic dipeptides over linear oligopeptides is their stability and oral bioavailability due to the lack of target bounds for exopeptidases.
A cyclic dipeptide, isolated from the marine fungus P. chrysogenum DXY-1 discovered from sediments surrounding the Taiwan Strait and identified as cyclo(L-Tyr-L-Pro), showed anti-QS activity against P. aeruginosa PA01. After treatment with this cyclic dipeptide at sub-MIC concentration (0.5 mg/mL), the production of pyocyanin and activities of proteases and elastase activity of P. aeruginosa PA01 were inhibited by 41%, 20%, and 32%, respectively. Furthermore, at the same concentration of cyclic dipeptide, a reduction of the biofilm of 48% and a decreased QS gene expression were observed [116]. It has also been shown that P. chrysogenum produces another compound with anti-QS activity, identified as tyrosol, which decreased QS-regulated pyocyanin production, elastase activity, and proteolytic activity by 63.3%, 57.8%, and 9.9%, respectively, and inhibited the biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA01, at a concentration of 0.5 mg/mL, without an effect on cell growth [167].
Moreover, a diketopiperazine (DKPs) identified as cyclo(Trp-Ser) was extracted from the marine bacterium Rheinheimera aquimaris QSI02 isolated from a dredge of the Yellow Sea. It showed anti-quorum sensing (anti-QS) activity, decreasing QS-regulated pyocyanin production, elastase activity, and biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PA01 by 65%, 40%, and 59.9%, respectively, at a sub-MIC concentration (0.2 mg/mL) [168].

4.2.2. Polyketides

Recently, Wang et al. investigated the ability of the PK cladodionen, produced by the marine fungus Cladosporium sp. Z148, to reduce the production of virulence factors in P. aeruginosa PAO1 [170]. The production of elastase, pyocyanin, and rhamnolipid was reduced by 36%, 24%, and 35%, respectively, when PAO1 was treated with 400 µM cladodionen. Moreover, this compound also reduced biofilm production by 52% at 400 µM. The authors related the reduction of these virulence factors to the reduction in the mRNA levels of their regulator systems: las, rhl, and PQS [170].
Zhang et al. isolated for the first time the PK equisetin from a marine fungus, Fusarium sp. Z10, assessing its anti-QS inhibitory activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1. This compound reduced the biofilm formation by 58% at 300 µM and the production of pyocyanin, rhamnolipid, and elastase by 60%, 56%, and 46% at 300 µM, respectively. In addition, equisetin also downregulated the expression of las, rhl, and PQS systems at 300 µM [171].

4.2.3. Alkaloids

Bromoageliferin, a known alkaloid, was isolated from an organic extract of the sponge Agelas dilatata from the coastal area of the Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico) [143]. It showed significant activity against clinical strains of P. aeruginosa, inhibiting growth (see Section 4.1.4) and biofilm production of approximately 30–40% at concentrations of 8 or 16 mg/L (11.45 or 22.9 µM). Moreover, the in vivo efficacy was tested in the Galleria mellonella model of infection. The assay showed an increased survival time in larvae infected with the P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 strain when treated with Bromoageliferin (2 mg/kg) [143].
In addition, LC-HRESIMS-assisted chemical investigation along with bioactivity-guided fractionation of the Red Sea sponge Callyspongia siphonella led to targeting two brominated oxindole alkaloids (1 and 2), not isolated from natural sources before, which showed considerable anti-biofilm activity in P. aeruginosa (49.32 + 1.18 % and 41.76 + 1.33% inhibition, respectively) [145].

4.2.4. Miscellaneous

Other molecules not belonging to the classes mentioned above were also found to disrupt P. auruginosa QS systems and biofilm formation and virulence. From the extract of the seagrass Halodule pinifolia, 4-methoxybeanzoic acid (4-MBA) was isolated and evaluated for its potential. At the concentration of 62.5 μg/mL, it was able to prevent biofilm formation and also downregulate QS-mediated transcript and virulence factors [173].
Other low molecular weight molecules showed similar activities. Cyclo(-Leu-Pro) and 4-Hydroxyphenylacetamide (4-HPA) were isolated from the marine fungus Pestalotiopsis sydowiana. They were found to dramatically downregulate biofilm formation and virulence factors transcription at sub-optimal MIC concentration (125 μg/ml and 62.5 μg/ml, respectively) [169]. From a marine strain belonging to Vibrio alginolyticus species, tyramine and N-acetyltyramine were identified as responsible for reducing virulence factors of P. aeruginosa. Particularly, the production of pyoverdine, a siderophore linked to virulence, was reduced by 65% at the concentration of 1 mg/mL for both molecules [165].
The marine steroid Syph-1 isolated from the sponge S. siphonella was evaluated for biofilm and pellicle formation inhibition and anti-QS property against P. aeruginosa. At selected sub-MICs (>64 µg/mL), Syph-1 significantly decreased the production of QS regulated many virulence functions of PAO1 (elastase, total protease, pyocyanin, chitinase, exopolysaccharides, and swarming motility) as well as biofilm formation [149].
From the marine strain Oceanobacillus sp. XC22919, three molecules were identified as 2-methyl-N-(2′-phenylethyl) butyramide, 3-methyl-N-(2′-phenylethyl)-butyramide, and benzyl benzoate and evaluated for the ability to reduce virulence factors of P. aeruginosa PA01. Results showed that all three compounds, despite having no effect on the growth rate of the pathogen, were able to significantly decrease the pyocyanin production as well as the proteolytic and elastase effect at the concentration of 100 µg/mL. Furthermore, 2-methyl-N-(2′-phenylethyl) butyramide and benzyl benzoate were also able to inhibit biofilm formation of 50% and 37%, respectively, at the concentration of 100 µg/mL [172].
The lactone butenolide (5-octylfuran-2(5H)-one) was isolated from a marine Streptomices sp. and was known for its antifouling activities [192]. Yin and collaborators have then recently evaluated this compound for its antibiofilm activities. Interestingly, this molecule was able to inhibit biofilm formation and eradicate mature P. aeruginosa PA01 biofilm at the concentration of 800 µg/mL [174].
From a coral symbiont, a Gram-positive bacterium was isolated and identified as Staphylococcus hominis. This strain was selected for its ability to inhibit the biofilm formation of C. violaceum. From its extract, the compound responsible for the activity was identified as DL-homocysteine thiolacton, an analogue of acyl-homoserine lactones. Tested against P. aeruginosa, this molecule was able to inhibit biofilm formation at the concentration of 10 µg/mL. Furthermore, the expression analysis showed that DL-homocysteine thiolacton was able to downregulate many genes involved in QS regulation [175].
Balan and collaborators characterized a new glycolipid produced by a marine Staphylococcus saprophyticus SBPS-15 with anti-biofilm activity. This compound, staphylosan, showed 96% biofilm inhibition and 100% biofilm dislodging against P. aeruginosa BHKH 19 at 400 µg/mL [176]. Similarly, a glycolipid produced by a tropical marine strain Serratia marcescens was characterized. It showed anti-adhesive activity, inhibiting the attachment of P. aerugnosa PAO1 of 75% at 50 µg/mL. The authors also investigated the ability of this biosurfactant in removing the biofilm of P. aerugnosa PAO1 on both polystyrene plates and glass surfaces, achieving 62% and 71% of biofilm disruption at 50 µg/mL, respectively [177].
Kwan and collaborators investigated the quorum quenching activity of the lyngbyoic acid isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscola. This fatty acid reduced the production of the virulence factors pyocyanin and elastase in P. aeruginosa PAO1, inhibiting the expression of the genes required for their biosynthesis. Moreover, lyngbyoic acid directly inhibited in vitro purified elastase precursor LasB [178].

4.2.5. β-Lactamases and Efflux Pump Inhibitors

As reported above (see paragraphs 3.2 and 3.4), the production of β-lactamases and the expression of efflux pumps belonging to the RND family are two important resistance mechanisms and, therefore, two potential targets to cope with AMR [193,194]. These molecules are supposed to work in combination with antibiotics, lowering their MICs. At the moment of writing, there is just one example of a marine-derived molecule with these activities against P. aeruginosa, 3,4-dibromopyrrole-2,5-dione, isolated from the marine pathogen Pseudoalteromonas piscicida. This molecule acts effectively as an Efflux Pump Inhibitor (EPI) by decreasing the MICs of several antibiotics up to 16-fold in E. coli strains overexpressing P. aeruginosa RND transporter MexAB-OprM/MexXY-OprM. Nowadays, EPIs and β-lactamase inhibitors discovery is principally done using chemical libraries looking for analogue molecules of already known inhibitors. This first result represents a fundamental finding, proving that marine habitat represents a valid source of new molecules and prompts the better exploitation of marine extracts to identify novel inhibitors.

5. Conclusions

To date, MDR bacterial infections are a severe global health problem [195], causing approximately 700,000 deaths each year worldwide. If the increase in antibiotic resistance is not reversed in the coming years, this could result in the deaths of 10 million people every year and a huge negative impact on the economy, with a reduction of about 1% of the gross domestic product (GDP) worldwide and a 5-7% loss in developing countries by 2050 [196].
Therefore, the need for new therapies to treat infections caused by MDR pathogens is indisputable. For this reason, growing attention has recently been given to the development of innovative projects for the design of new antimicrobial drugs, the identification of promising species, the isolation/characterization of compounds, and the evaluation of their safety, as well as the evaluation of synergistic effects between the components, are needed. Moreover, new strategies targeting microbial virulence factors or resistance mechanisms, are emerging as promising approaches to deal with the infections of MDR bacteria. For this purpose, oceans, thanks to their unique habitats, including high-pressure, high-salt, low-temperature, hypoxic, and oligotrophic ecological environments, provide marine organisms with unique metabolic strategies, considerably increasing the probability of new lead compounds discovery. Moreover, we have explored just 5% of the ocean, meaning its hidden treasure of new bioactive compounds is still available for human uses. For this reason, this review highlights the great potential of marine organisms for discovering new molecules to cope with the MDR threat.

Author Contributions

D.C. and D.d.P. conceptualized the idea and provided the framework for the document. D.C., C.B., M.P., P.T. and D.d.P. gave an important contribution to searching for the available bibliographic information and to prepare the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli for partial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kupferschmidt, K. Resistance Fighters; American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Fernández, J.; Bert, F.; Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H. The challenges of multi-drug-resistance in hepatology. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 1043–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Khan, H.A.; Baig, F.K.; Mehboob, R. Nosocomial infections: Epidemiology, prevention, control, and surveillance. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2017, 7, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. O’Neill, J. Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations; Government of the United Kingdom: London, UK, 2016.
  5. Tacconelli, E. Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Development; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. De Bentzmann, S.; Plésiat, P. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa opportunistic pathogen and human infections. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Silva, L.V.; Galdino, A.C.M.; Nunes, A.P.F.; dos Santos, K.R.; Moreira, B.M.; Cacci, L.C.; Sodré, C.L.; Ziccardi, M.; Branquinha, M.H.; Santos, A.L. Virulence attributes in Brazilian clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 304, 990–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Pendleton, J.N.; Gorman, S.P.; Gilmore, B.F. Clinical relevance of the ESKAPE pathogens. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2013, 11, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bodey, G.P.; Bolivar, R.; Fainstein, V.; Jadeja, L. Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Rev. Infect. Dis. 1983, 5, 279–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vasil, M.L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Biology, mechanisms of virulence, epidemiology. J. Pediatr. 1986, 108, 800–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jayaseelan, S.; Ramaswamy, D.; Dharmaraj, S. Pyocyanin: Production, applications, challenges and new insights. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 1159–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bassetti, M.; Vena, A.; Croxatto, A.; Righi, E.; Guery, B. How to manage Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Drugs Context 2018, 7, 212527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bendiak, G.N.; Ratjen, F. The Approach to Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis; Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2009; Thieme Medical Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 587–595. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sousa, A.M.; Pereira, M.O. Pseudomonas aeruginosa diversification during infection development in cystic fibrosis lungs—A review. Pathogens 2014, 3, 680–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oliver, A.; Mulet, X.; López-Causapé, C.; Juan, C. The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug Resist. Updates 2015, 21, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rafeeq, M.M.; Murad, H.A.S. Cystic fibrosis: Current therapeutic targets and future approaches. J. Transl. Med. 2017, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Pang, Z.; Raudonis, R.; Glick, B.R.; Lin, T.-J.; Cheng, Z. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 177–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Breidenstein, E.B.; de la Fuente-Núñez, C.; Hancock, R.E. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: All roads lead to resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hancock, R.E.; Speert, D.P. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Mechanisms and impact on treatment. Drug Resist. Updates 2000, 3, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Ghodhbane, H.; Elaidi, S.; Sabatier, J.-M.; Achour, S.; Benhmida, J.; Regaya, I. Bacteriocins active against multi-resistant gram negative bacteria implicated in nosocomial infections. Infect. Disord. Drug Targets (Former. Curr. Drug Targets-Infect. Disord.) 2015, 15, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. El Zowalaty, M.E.; Al Thani, A.A.; Webster, T.J.; El Zowalaty, A.E.; Schweizer, H.P.; Nasrallah, G.K.; Marei, H.E.; Ashour, H.M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Arsenal of resistance mechanisms, decades of changing resistance profiles, and future antimicrobial therapies. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 1683–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Balasubramanian, D.; Schneper, L.; Kumari, H.; Mathee, K. A dynamic and intricate regulatory network determines Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kung, V.L.; Ozer, E.A.; Hauser, A.R. The accessory genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010, 74, 621–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Gill, E.E.; Franco, O.L.; Hancock, R.E. Antibiotic adjuvants: Diverse strategies for controlling drug-resistant pathogens. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2015, 85, 56–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Xiao, X.; Wang, Z. Antibiotic adjuvants: An alternative approach to overcome multi-drug resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2019, 45, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Santajit, S.; Indrawattana, N. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in ESKAPE pathogens. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 2475067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Sharma, G.; Rao, S.; Bansal, A.; Dang, S.; Gupta, S.; Gabrani, R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm: Potential therapeutic targets. Biologicals 2014, 42, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Roy, R.; Tiwari, M.; Donelli, G.; Tiwari, V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 2018, 9, 522–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Ciofu, O.; Mandsberg, L.F.; Wang, H.; Høiby, N. Phenotypes selected during chronic lung infection in cystic fibrosis patients: Implications for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 65, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Macia, M.; Rojo-Molinero, E.; Oliver, A. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in biofilm-growing bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2014, 20, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Hengzhuang, W.; Wu, H.; Ciofu, O.; Song, Z.; Høiby, N. In vivo pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of colistin and imipenem in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 2683–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Yang, X.; Lu, J.; Ying, M.; Mu, J.; Li, P.; Liu, Y. Docking and molecular dynamics studies on triclosan derivatives binding to FabI. J. Mol. Model. 2017, 23, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Maiden, M.M.; Hunt, A.M.A.; Zachos, M.P.; Gibson, J.A.; Hurwitz, M.E.; Mulks, M.H.; Waters, C.M. Triclosan is an aminoglycoside adjuvant for eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00146-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Jackson, K.D.; Starkey, M.; Kremer, S.; Parsek, M.R.; Wozniak, D.J. Identification of psl, a locus encoding a potential exopolysaccharide that is essential for Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2004, 186, 4466–4475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Matsukawa, M.; Greenberg, E. Putative exopolysaccharide synthesis genes influence Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 2004, 186, 4449–4456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Wozniak, D.J.; Wyckoff, T.J.; Starkey, M.; Keyser, R.; Azadi, P.; O’Toole, G.A.; Parsek, M.R. Alginate is not a significant component of the extracellular polysaccharide matrix of PA14 and PAO1 Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 7907–7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Colvin, K.M.; Gordon, V.D.; Murakami, K.; Borlee, B.R.; Wozniak, D.J.; Wong, G.C.; Parsek, M.R. The pel polysaccharide can serve a structural and protective role in the biofilm matrix of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1001264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Vogeleer, P.; Tremblay, Y.D.; Mafu, A.A.; Jacques, M.; Harel, J. Life on the outside: Role of biofilms in environmental persistence of Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ciofu, O.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Tolerance and resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to antimicrobial agents—How P. aeruginosa can escape antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Whitchurch, C.B.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Ragas, P.C.; Mattick, J.S. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 2002, 295, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Allesen-Holm, M.; Barken, K.B.; Yang, L.; Klausen, M.; Webb, J.S.; Kjelleberg, S.; Molin, S.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 59, 1114–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pamp, S.J.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Multiple roles of biosurfactants in structural biofilm development by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 2531–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Thi, M.T.T.; Wibowo, D.; Rehm, B.H. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fazli, M.; Almblad, H.; Rybtke, M.L.; Givskov, M.; Eberl, L.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Regulation of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1961–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hengge, R. Principles of c-di-GMP signalling in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Van Gennip, M.; Christensen, L.D.; Alhede, M.; Phipps, R.; Jensen, P.Ø.; Christophersen, L.; Pamp, S.J.; Moser, C.; Mikkelsen, P.J.; Koh, A.Y. Inactivation of the rhlA gene in Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevents rhamnolipid production, disabling the protection against polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Apmis 2009, 117, 537–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Høiby, N.; Bjarnsholt, T.; Moser, C.; Bassi, G.L.; Coenye, T.; Donelli, G.; Hall-Stoodley, L.; Holá, V.; Imbert, C.; Kirketerp-Møller, K.; et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21 (Suppl. S1), S1–S25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ciofu, O.; Rojo-Molinero, E.; Macià, M.D.; Oliver, A. Antibiotic treatment of biofilm infections. Apmis 2017, 125, 304–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Stewart, P.S.; Franklin, M.J.; Williamson, K.S.; Folsom, J.P.; Boegli, L.; James, G.A. Contribution of stress responses to antibiotic tolerance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 3838–3847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wright, G.D. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: Enzymatic degradation and modification. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2005, 57, 1451–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Poole, K. Aminoglycoside resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 479–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wolter, D.J.; Lister, P.D. Mechanisms of β-lactam resistance among Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ratjen, F.; Brockhaus, F.; Angyalosi, G. Aminoglycoside therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis: A review. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2009, 8, 361–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramirez, M.S.; Tolmasky, M.E. Aminoglycoside modifying enzymes. Drug Resist. Updates 2010, 13, 151–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hainrichson, M.; Yaniv, O.; Cherniavsky, M.; Nudelman, I.; Shallom-Shezifi, D.; Yaron, S.; Baasov, T. Overexpression and initial characterization of the chromosomal aminoglycoside 3′-O-phosphotransferase APH (3′)-IIb from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 774–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Hächler, H.; Santanam, P.; Kayser, F.H. Sequence and characterization of a novel chromosomal aminoglycoside phosphotransferase gene, aph (3′)-IIb, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996, 40, 1254–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Subedi, D.; Vijay, A.K.; Willcox, M. Overview of mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An ocular perspective. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2018, 101, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Jacoby, G.A.; Blaser, M.; Santanam, P.; Hächler, H.; Kayser, F.; Hare, R.; Miller, G. Appearance of amikacin and tobramycin resistance due to 4′-aminoglycoside nucleotidyltransferase [ANT (4′)-II] in gram-negative pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1990, 34, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Berrazeg, M.; Jeannot, K.; Ntsogo Enguéné, V.Y.; Broutin, I.; Loeffert, S.; Fournier, D.; Plésiat, P. Mutations in β-lactamase AmpC increase resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates to antipseudomonal cephalosporins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 6248–6255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Paterson, D.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 657–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Rawat, D.; Nair, D. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases in Gram Negative Bacteria. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2010, 2, 263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Munita, J.M.; Arias, C.A. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Spectr. 2016, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Juan, C.; Maciá, M.D.; Gutiérrez, O.; Vidal, C.; Pérez, J.L.; Oliver, A. Molecular mechanisms of β-lactam resistance mediated by AmpC hyperproduction in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49, 4733–4738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Bruchmann, S.; Dötsch, A.; Nouri, B.; Chaberny, I.F.; Häussler, S. Quantitative contributions of target alteration and decreased drug accumulation to Pseudomonas aeruginosa fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013, 57, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. El’Garch, F.; Jeannot, K.; Hocquet, D.; Llanes-Barakat, C.; Plésiat, P. Cumulative effects of several nonenzymatic mechanisms on the resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 1016–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Moyá, B.; Beceiro, A.; Cabot, G.; Juan, C.; Zamorano, L.; Alberti, S.; Oliver, A. Pan-β-lactam resistance development in Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains: Molecular mechanisms, penicillin-binding protein profiles, and binding affinities. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 4771–4778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Boll, M.; Radziejewska-Lebrecht, J.; Warth, C.; Krajewska-Pietrasik, D.; Mayer, H. 4-Amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose in LPS of enterobacterial R-mutants and its possible role for their polymyxin reactivity. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1994, 8, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Miller, A.K.; Brannon, M.K.; Stevens, L.; Johansen, H.K.; Selgrade, S.E.; Miller, S.I.; Høiby, N.; Moskowitz, S.M. PhoQ mutations promote lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa found in colistin-treated cystic fibrosis patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5761–5769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Owusu-Anim, D.; Kwon, D.H. Differential role of two-component regulatory systems (phoPQ and pmrAB) in polymyxin B susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Adv. Microbiol. 2012, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Mingeot-Leclercq, M.-P.; Glupczynski, Y.; Tulkens, P.M. Aminoglycosides: Activity and resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 727–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Aldred, K.J.; Kerns, R.J.; Osheroff, N. Mechanism of quinolone action and resistance. Biochemistry 2014, 53, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Poole, K. Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS 2004, 61, 2200–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bellido, F.; Martin, N.L.; Siehnel, R.J.; Hancock, R. Reevaluation, using intact cells, of the exclusion limit and role of porin OprF in Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane permeability. J. Bacteriol. 1992, 174, 5196–5203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Chevalier, S.; Bouffartigues, E.; Bodilis, J.; Maillot, O.; Lesouhaitier, O.; Feuilloley, M.G.; Orange, N.; Dufour, A.; Cornelis, P. Structure, function and regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa porins. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 41, 698–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sugawara, E.; Nagano, K.; Nikaido, H. Alternative folding pathways of the major porin OprF of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEBS J. 2012, 279, 910–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Nestorovich, E.M.; Sugawara, E.; Nikaido, H.; Bezrukov, S.M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa porin OprF: Properties of the channel. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 16230–16237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Piddock, L.; Hall, M.; Bellido, F.; Bains, M.; Hancock, R. A pleiotropic, posttherapy, enoxacin-resistant mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1992, 36, 1057–1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Trias, J.; Nikaido, H. Protein D2 channel of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane has a binding site for basic amino acids and peptides. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15680–15684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Yoneyama, H.; Yamano, Y.; Nakae, T. Role of porins in the antibiotic susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Construction of mutants with deletions in the multiple porin genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 213, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Richardot, C.; Plésiat, P.; Fournier, D.; Monlezun, L.; Broutin, I.; Llanes, C. Carbapenem resistance in cystic fibrosis strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a result of amino acid substitutions in porin OprD. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2015, 45, 529–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sun, J.; Deng, Z.; Yan, A. Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: Mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 453, 254–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Li, X.-Z.; Nikaido, H. Efflux-mediated drug resistance in bacteria. Drugs 2009, 69, 1555–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Dreier, J.; Ruggerone, P. Interaction of antibacterial compounds with RND efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Masuda, N.; Sakagawa, E.; Ohya, S.; Gotoh, N.; Tsujimoto, H.; Nishino, T. Substrate specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-oprM efflux pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 3322–3327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Okamoto, K.; Gotoh, N.; Nishino, T. Extrusion of penem antibiotics by multicomponent efflux systems MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2696–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Llanes, C.; Köhler, T.; Patry, I.; Dehecq, B.; Van Delden, C.; Plésiat, P. Role of the MexEF-OprN efflux system in low-level resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 5676–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Hocquet, D.; Vogne, C.; El Garch, F.; Vejux, A.; Gotoh, N.; Lee, A.; Lomovskaya, O.; Plésiat, P. MexXY-OprM efflux pump is necessary for adaptive resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to aminoglycosides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 1371–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Llanes, C.; Hocquet, D.; Vogne, C.; Benali-Baitich, D.; Neuwirth, C.; Plésiat, P. Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1797–1802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  89. Shigemura, K.; Osawa, K.; Kato, A.; Tokimatsu, I.; Arakawa, S.; Shirakawa, T.; Fujisawa, M. Association of overexpression of efflux pump genes with antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains clinically isolated from urinary tract infection patients. J. Antibiot. 2015, 68, 568–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Llanes, C.; Pourcel, C.; Richardot, C.; Plésiat, P.; Fichant, G.; Cavallo, J.-D.; Mérens, A.; Group, G.S.; Vu-Thien, H.; Leclercq, R. Diversity of β-lactam resistance mechanisms in cystic fibrosis isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: A French multicentre study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2013, 68, 1763–1771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Botelho, J.; Grosso, F.; Peixe, L. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa–Mechanisms, epidemiology and evolution. Drug Resist. Updates 2019, 44, 100640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: The WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Starkey, M.; Lepine, F.; Maura, D.; Bandyopadhaya, A.; Lesic, B.; He, J.; Kitao, T.; Righi, V.; Milot, S.; Tzika, A. Identification of anti-virulence compounds that disrupt quorum-sensing regulated acute and persistent pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kang, D.; Zhang, L.; Kirienko, N.V. High-throughput approaches for the identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa antivirulents. mBio 2021, 12, e02240-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Rasko, D.A.; Sperandio, V. Anti-virulence strategies to combat bacteria-mediated disease. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Potera, C. Antibiotic Resistance: Biofilm Dispersing Agent Rejuvenates Older Antibiotics; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences: Durham, NC, USA, 2010.
  97. Whiteley, M.; Diggle, S.P.; Greenberg, E.P. Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research. Nature 2017, 551, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Geske, G.D.; Wezeman, R.J.; Siegel, A.P.; Blackwell, H.E. Small molecule inhibitors of bacterial quorum sensing and biofilm formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12762–12763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. O’Loughlin, C.T.; Miller, L.C.; Siryaporn, A.; Drescher, K.; Semmelhack, M.F.; Bassler, B.L. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 17981–17986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Marx, V. Stop the microbial chatter. Nature 2014, 511, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Jurado-Martín, I.; Sainz-Mejías, M.; McClean, S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: An audacious pathogen with an adaptable arsenal of virulence factors. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Leoni, G.; De Poli, A.; Mardirossian, M.; Gambato, S.; Florian, F.; Venier, P.; Wilson, D.N.; Tossi, A.; Pallavicini, A.; Gerdol, M. Myticalins: A Novel Multigenic Family of Linear, Cationic Antimicrobial Peptides from Marine Mussels (Mytilus spp.). Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Oh, R.; Lee, M.J.; Kim, Y.-O.; Nam, B.-H.; Kong, H.J.; Kim, J.-W.; Park, J.-Y.; Seo, J.-K.; Kim, D.-G. Myticusin-beta, antimicrobial peptide from the marine bivalve, Mytilus coruscus. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 99, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Seo, J.-K.; Lee, M.J.; Go, H.-J.; Kim, G.D.; Jeong, H.D.; Nam, B.-H.; Park, N.G. Purification and antimicrobial function of ubiquitin isolated from the gill of Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Mol. Immunol. 2013, 53, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Solstad, R.G.; Li, C.; Isaksson, J.; Johansen, J.; Svenson, J.; Stensvåg, K.; Haug, T. Novel Antimicrobial Peptides EeCentrocins 1, 2 and EeStrongylocin 2 from the Edible Sea Urchin Echinus esculentus Have 6-Br-Trp Post-Translational Modifications. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0151820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Rekha, R.; Vaseeharan, B.; Ishwarya, R.; Anjugam, M.; Alharbi, N.S.; Kadaikunnan, S.; Khaled, J.M.; Al-Anbr, M.N.; Govindarajan, M. Searching for crab-borne antimicrobial peptides: Crustin from Portunus pelagicus triggers biofilm inhibition and immune responses of Artemia salina against GFP tagged Vibrio parahaemolyticus Dahv2. Mol. Immunol. 2018, 101, 396–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Moe, M.K.; Haug, T.; Sydnes, M.O.; Sperstad, S.V.; Li, C.; Vaagsfjord, L.C.; de la Vega, E.; Stensvåg, K. Paralithocins, Antimicrobial Peptides with Unusual Disulfide Connectivity from the Red King Crab, Paralithodes camtschaticus. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 140–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Liu, J.; Chen, F.; Wang, X.; Peng, H.; Zhang, H.; Wang, K.-J. The Synergistic Effect of Mud Crab Antimicrobial Peptides Sphistin and Sph12−38 With Antibiotics Azithromycin and Rifampicin Enhances Bactericidal Activity Against Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 572849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Kawano, K.; Yoneya, T.; Miyata, T.; Yoshikawa, K.; Tokunaga, F.; Terada, Y.; Iwanaga, S. Antimicrobial peptide, tachyplesin I, isolated from hemocytes of the horseshoe crab (Tachypleus tridentatus). NMR determination of the beta-sheet structure. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 15365–15367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Seo, J.K.; Lee, M.J.; Jung, H.G.; Go, H.J.; Kim, Y.J.; Park, N.G. Antimicrobial function of SHbetaAP, a novel hemoglobin beta chain-related antimicrobial peptide, isolated from the liver of skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2014, 37, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Pan, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-C.; Sheen, J.-F.; Lin, T.-L.; Chen, J.-Y. Epinecidin-1 has immunomodulatory effects, facilitating its therapeutic use in a mouse model of Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 4264–4274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Peng, K.-C.; Lee, S.-H.; Hour, A.-L.; Pan, C.-Y.; Lee, L.-H.; Chen, J.-Y. Five Different Piscidins from Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus: Analysis of Their Expressions and Biological Functions. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e50263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Acosta, J.; Montero, V.; Carpio, Y.; Velázquez, J.; Garay, H.E.; Reyes, O.; Cabrales, A.; Masforrol, Y.; Morales, A.; Estrada, M.P. Cloning and functional characterization of three novel antimicrobial peptides from tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2013, 372–375, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wei, L.; Gao, J.; Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Xie, Z.; Ling, G.; Kuang, Y.-Q.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H.; Wang, Y. Identification and Characterization of the First Cathelicidin from Sea Snakes with Potent Antimicrobial and Anti-inflammatory Activity and Special Mechanism *. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 16633–16652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Subramanian, S.; Ross, N.W.; MacKinnon, S.L. Myxinidin, A Novel Antimicrobial Peptide from the Epidermal Mucus of Hagfish, Myxine glutinosa L. Mar. Biotechnol. 2009, 11, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Yu, X.; Li, L.; Sun, S.; Chang, A.; Dai, X.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, H. A cyclic dipeptide from marine fungus Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1 exhibits anti-quorum sensing activity. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 7693–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Song, Q.; Li, X.-M.; Hu, X.-Y.; Li, X.; Chi, L.-P.; Li, H.-L.; Wang, B.-G. Antibacterial metabolites from Ascidian-derived fungus Aspergillus clavatus AS-107. Phytochem. Lett. 2019, 34, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tareq, F.S.; Lee, M.A.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Shin, H.J. Gageostatins A–C, Antimicrobial Linear Lipopeptides from a Marine Bacillus subtilis. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 871–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Dahiya, R.; Pathak, D. First total synthesis and biological evaluation of halolitoralin A. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 2007, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dahiya, R.; Pathak, D. Synthesis, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Halolitoralin B—A Natural Cyclic Peptide. Asian J. Chem. 2007, 19, 1499–1505. [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang, H.; Johnson, P.M.; Ko, K.C.; Kamio, M.; Germann, M.W.; Derby, C.D.; Tai, P.C. Cloning, characterization and expression of escapin, a broadly antimicrobial FAD-containing L-amino acid oxidase from ink of the sea hare Aplysia californica. J. Exp. Biol. 2005, 208 Pt 18, 3609–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Dusane, D.H.; Damare, S.R.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Ramaiah, N.; Venugopalan, V.P.; Kumar, A.R.; Zinjarde, S.S. Disruption of Microbial Biofilms by an Extracellular Protein Isolated from Epibiotic Tropical Marine Strain of Bacillus licheniformis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Tareq, F.S.; Lee, M.A.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Lee, J.S.; Hasan, C.M.; Islam, M.T.; Shin, H.J. Gageotetrins A–C, noncytotoxic antimicrobial linear lipopeptides from a marine bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 928–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Gao, S.S.; Li, X.M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, C.S.; Wang, B.G. Conidiogenones H and I, two new diterpenes of Cyclopiane class from a marine-derived endophytic fungus Penicillium chrysogenum QEN-24S. Chem. Biodivers. 2011, 8, 1748–1753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chi, L.-P.; Li, X.-M.; Wan, Y.-P.; Li, X.; Wang, B.-G. Ophiobolin sesterterpenoids and farnesylated phthalide derivatives from the deep sea cold-seep-derived fungus Aspergillus insuetus SD-512. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 3652–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Jebakumar, S.; Velayudhan, S.S. Purification of bioactive natural product against human microbial pathogens from marine sea weed Dictyota acutiloba J. Ag. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Gomaa, M.N.; Soliman, K.; Ayesh, A.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; Hamza, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Khalifa, S.A.; Mohd Ali, H.B.; El-Seedi, H.R. Antibacterial effect of the red sea soft coral Sarcophyton trocheliophorum. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 729–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lutta, K.; Bii, C.; Akenga, T.; Cornelius, W. Antimicrobial Marine Natural Products from the Sponge, Axinella infundibuliformis. Rec. Nat. Prod. 2008, 2. [Google Scholar]
  129. Akhter, N.; Liu, Y.; Auckloo, B.N.; Shi, Y.; Wang, K.; Chen, J.; Wu, X.; Wu, B. Stress-Driven Discovery of New Angucycline-Type Antibiotics from a Marine Streptomyces pratensis NA-ZhouS1. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Orfali, R.; Perveen, S.; Al-Taweel, A.; Ahmed, A.F.; Majrashi, N.; Alluhay, K.; Khan, A.; Luciano, P.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Penipyranicins A–C: Antibacterial Methylpyran Polyketides from a Hydrothermal Spring Sediment Penicillium sp. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 3591–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Raju, R.; Khalil, Z.G.; Piggott, A.M.; Blumenthal, A.; Gardiner, D.L.; Skinner-Adams, T.S.; Capon, R.J. Mollemycin A: An antimalarial and antibacterial glyco-hexadepsipeptide-polyketide from an Australian marine-derived Streptomyces sp. (CMB-M0244). Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 1716–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Auckloo, B.N.; Pan, C.; Akhter, N.; Wu, B.; Wu, X.; He, S. Stress-driven discovery of novel cryptic antibiotics from a marine fungus Penicillium sp. BB1122. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Schneemann, I.; Kajahn, I.; Ohlendorf, B.; Zinecker, H.; Erhard, A.; Nagel, K.; Wiese, J.; Imhoff, J.F. Mayamycin, a cytotoxic polyketide from a Streptomyces strain isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria panicea. J. Nat. Prod. 2010, 73, 1309–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Shah, M.; Sun, C.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, G.; Che, Q.; Gu, Q.; Zhu, T.; Li, D. Antibacterial polyketides from antarctica sponge-derived fungus Penicillium sp. HDN151272. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Chakraborty, K.; Kizhakkekalam, V.K.; Joy, M. Macrocyclic polyketides with siderophore mode of action from marine heterotrophic Shewanella algae: Prospective anti-infective leads attenuate drug-resistant pathogens. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2021, 130, 1552–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Kizhakkekalam, V.K.; Chakraborty, K.; Joy, M. Oxygenated elansolid-type of polyketide spanned macrolides from a marine heterotrophic Bacillus as prospective antimicrobial agents against multidrug-resistant pathogens. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Chakraborty, K.; Kizhakkekalam, V.K.; Joy, M. Polyketide-derived macrobrevins from marine macroalga-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as promising antibacterial agents against pathogens causing nosocomial infections. Phytochemistry 2022, 193, 112983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chakraborty, K.; Kizhakkekalam, V.K.; Joy, M.; Dhara, S. Difficidin class of polyketide antibiotics from marine macroalga-associated Bacillus as promising antibacterial agents. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2021, 105, 6395–6408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Mahmoud, M.M.; Abdel-Razek, A.S.; Hamed, A.; Soliman, H.S.M.; Ponomareva, L.V.; Thorson, J.S.; Shaaban, K.A.; Shaaban, M. RF-3192C and other polyketides from the marine endophytic Aspergillus niger ASSB4: Structure assignment and bioactivity investigation. Med. Chem. Res. 2021, 30, 647–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Liu, Y.-F.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Shao, C.-L.; Cao, F.; Wang, C.-Y. Microketides A and B, polyketides from a gorgonian-derived Microsphaeropsis sp. fungus. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1300–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Fu, P.; Wang, S.; Hong, K.; Li, X.; Liu, P.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, W. Cytotoxic Bipyridines from the Marine-Derived Actinomycete Actinoalloteichus cyanogriseus WH1-2216-6. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 1751–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Sun, X.; Sun, S.; Ference, C.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, K. A potent antimicrobial compound isolated from Clathria cervicornis. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Pech-Puch, D.; Pérez-Povedano, M.; Martinez-Guitian, M.; Lasarte-Monterrubio, C.; Vázquez-Ucha, J.C.; Bou, G.; Rodríguez, J.; Beceiro, A.; Jimenez, C. In vitro and in vivo assessment of the efficacy of bromoageliferin, an alkaloid isolated from the sponge Agelas dilatata, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. De Oliveira, J.H.H.L.; Seleghim, M.H.R.; Timm, C.; Grube, A.; Köck, M.; Nascimento, G.G.F.; Martins, A.C.T.; Silva, E.G.O.; De Souza, A.O.; Minarini, P.R.R.; et al. Antimicrobial and Antimycobacterial Activity of Cyclostellettamine Alkaloids from Sponge Pachychalina sp. Mar. Drugs 2006, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. El-Hawary, S.S.; Sayed, A.M.; Mohammed, R.; Hassan, H.M.; Rateb, M.E.; Amin, E.; Mohammed, T.A.; El-Mesery, M.; Bin Muhsinah, A.; Alsayari, A. Bioactive brominated oxindole alkaloids from the Red Sea sponge Callyspongia siphonella. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Murali Krishna Kumar, M.; Devilal Naik, J.; Satyavathi, K.; Ramana, H.; Raghuveer Varma, P.; Purna Nagasree, K.; Smitha, D.; Venkata Rao, D. Denigrins A–C: New antitubercular 3, 4-diarylpyrrole alkaloids from Dendrilla nigra. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 888–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tadesse, M.; Tabudravu, J.N.; Jaspars, M.; Strøm, M.B.; Hansen, E.; Andersen, J.H.; Kristiansen, P.E.; Haug, T. The antibacterial ent-eusynstyelamide B and eusynstyelamides D, E, and F from the Arctic bryozoan Tegella cf. spitzbergensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2011, 74, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Hassan, S.; Hamed, S.; Almuhayawi, M.; Hozzein, W.; Selim, S.; AbdElgawad, H. Bioactivity of Ellagic Acid and Velutin: Two Phenolic Compounds Isolated from Marine Algae. Egypt. J. Bot. 2021, 61, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Alam, P.; Alqahtani, A.S.; Mabood Husain, F.; Tabish Rehman, M.; Alajmi, M.F.; Noman, O.M.; El Gamal, A.A.; Al-Massarani, S.M.; Shavez Khan, M. Siphonocholin isolated from red sea sponge Siphonochalina siphonella attenuates quorum sensing controlled virulence and biofilm formation. Saudi. Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Sun, S.; Canning, C.B.; Bhargava, K.; Sun, X.; Zhu, W.; Zhou, N.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, K. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers with potent and broad spectrum antimicrobial activity from the marine sponge Dysidea. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2015, 25, 2181–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Wang, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Lan, M.; Zhu, W.; Sun, K. Diketopiperazine and Diphenylether Derivatives from Marine Algae-Derived Aspergillus versicolor OUCMDZ-2738 by Epigenetic Activation. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Wyche, T.P.; Alvarenga, R.F.R.; Piotrowski, J.S.; Duster, M.N.; Warrack, S.R.; Cornilescu, G.; De Wolfe, T.J.; Hou, Y.; Braun, D.R.; Ellis, G.A. Chemical genomics, structure elucidation, and in vivo studies of the marine-derived anticlostridial ecteinamycin. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12, 2287–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Lotfy, W.A.; Mostafa, S.W.; Adel, A.A.; Ghanem, K.M. Production of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate by Bacillus subtilis AD35: Isolation, purification, characterization and biological activities. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Tareq, F.S.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, J.S.; Shin, H.J. Ieodoglucomide C and Ieodoglycolipid, New Glycolipids from a Marine-Derived Bacterium Bacillus licheniformis 09IDYM23. Lipids 2015, 50, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ebrahimi, R.; Pournejati, R.; Karbalaei-Heidari, H.R. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Growth Inhibitor, PAGI264: A Natural Product from a Newly Isolated Marine Bacterium, Bacillus sp. Strain REB264. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. A: Sci. 2021, 45, 1165–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mondol, M.A.M.; Shin, H.J. Antibacterial and antiyeast compounds from marine-derived bacteria. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 2913–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Tareq, F.S.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, M.A.; Lee, H.-S.; Lee, J.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Shin, H.J. Antimicrobial gageomacrolactins characterized from the fermentation of the marine-derived bacterium Bacillus subtilis under optimum growth conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 3428–3434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Chakraborty, K.; Kizhakkekalam, V.K.; Joy, M.; Chakraborty, R.D. Moving away from traditional antibiotic treatment: Can macrocyclic lactones from marine macroalga-associated heterotroph be the alternatives? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 7117–7130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chakraborty, K.; Thilakan, B.; Kizhakkekalam, V. Antibacterial aryl-crowned polyketide from Bacillus subtilis associated with seaweed Anthophycus longifolius. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 124, 108–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Daboor, S.M.; Rohde, J.R.; Cheng, Z. Disruption of the extracellular polymeric network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by alginate lyase enhances pathogen eradication by antibiotics. J. Cyst. Fibros. 2021, 20, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Daboor, S.M.; Raudonis, R.; Cohen, A.; Rohde, J.R.; Cheng, Z. Marine bacteria, a source for alginolytic enzyme to disrupt Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Wu, S.; Liu, G.; Zhang, D.; Li, C.; Sun, C. Purification and biochemical characterization of an alkaline protease from marine bacteria Pseudoalteromonas sp. 129-1. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 55, 1427–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Jouault, A.; Gobet, A.; Simon, M.; Portier, E.; Perennou, M.; Corre, E.; Gaillard, F.; Vallenet, D.; Michel, G.; Fleury, Y. Alterocin, an antibiofilm protein secreted by Pseudoalteromonas sp. strain 3J6. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00893-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Sun, X.; Hill, P.; Liu, J.; Qian, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhou, S. Marine-Source Quorum Quenching Enzyme YtnP to Improve Hygiene Quality in Dental Units. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Reina, J.C.; Pérez-Victoria, I.; Martín, J.; Llamas, I. A quorum-sensing inhibitor strain of Vibrio alginolyticus blocks Qs-controlled phenotypes in Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Kiran, G.S.; Sajayan, A.; Gopal, P.; Balakrishnan, A.; Prathiviraj, R.; Sabu, A.; Selvin, J. A novel anti-infective molecule nesfactin identified from sponge associated bacteria Nesterenkonia sp. MSA31 against multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 157, 104923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chang, A.; Sun, S.; Li, L.; Dai, X.; Li, H.; He, Q.; Zhu, H. Tyrosol from marine Fungi, a novel Quorum sensing inhibitor against Chromobacterium violaceum and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Bioorganic Chem. 2019, 91, 103140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Sun, S.; Dai, X.; Sun, J.; Bu, X.; Weng, C.; Li, H.; Zhu, H. A diketopiperazine factor from Rheinheimera aquimaris QSI02 exhibits anti-quorum sensing activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  169. Parasuraman, P.; Devadatha, B.; Sarma, V.V.; Ranganathan, S.; Ampasala, D.R.; Reddy, D.; Kumavath, R.; Kim, I.-W.; Patel, S.K.; Kalia, V.C. Inhibition of microbial quorum sensing mediated virulence factors by Pestalotiopsis sydowiana. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 30, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Wang, M.; Zhao, L.; Wu, H.; Zhao, C.; Gong, Q.; Yu, W. Cladodionen Is a Potential Quorum Sensing Inhibitor Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Zhang, M.; Wang, M.; Zhu, X.; Yu, W.; Gong, Q. Equisetin as potential quorum sensing inhibitor of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 40, 865–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Chen, X.; Chen, J.; Yan, Y.; Chen, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, H. Quorum sensing inhibitors from marine bacteria Oceanobacillus sp. XC22919. Nat. Prod. Res. 2019, 33, 1819–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Danaraj, J.; Mariasingarayan, Y.; Ayyappan, S.; Karuppiah, V. Seagrass Halodule pinifolia active constituent 4-methoxybenzioic acid (4-MBA) inhibits quorum sensing mediated virulence production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 147, 104392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Yin, Q.; Liang, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, L.; Hu, Z.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Y. Butenolide, a marine-derived broad-spectrum antibiofilm agent against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria. Mar. Biotechnol. 2019, 21, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  175. Ma, Z.-P.; Song, Y.; Cai, Z.-H.; Lin, Z.-J.; Lin, G.-H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, J. Anti-quorum sensing activities of selected coral symbiotic bacterial extracts from the South China Sea. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2018, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  176. Balan, S.S.; Mani, P.; Kumar, C.G.; Jayalakshmi, S. Structural characterization and biological evaluation of Staphylosan (dimannooleate), a new glycolipid surfactant produced by a marine Staphylococcus saprophyticus SBPS-15. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2019, 120, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dusane, D.H.; Pawar, V.S.; Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Venugopalan, V.P.; Kumar, A.R.; Zinjarde, S.S. Anti-biofilm potential of a glycolipid surfactant produced by a tropical marine strain of Serratia marcescens. Biofouling 2011, 27, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Kwan, J.C.; Meickle, T.; Ladwa, D.; Teplitski, M.; Paul, V.; Luesch, H. Lyngbyoic acid, a “tagged” fatty acid from a marine cyanobacterium, disrupts quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Biosyst. 2011, 7, 1205–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Jain, A.; Jain, A.; Gulbake, A.; Shilpi, S.; Hurkat, P.; Jain, S.K. Peptide and protein delivery using new drug delivery systems. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carr. Syst. 2013, 30, 293–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Semreen, M.H.; El-Gamal, M.I.; Abdin, S.; Alkhazraji, H.; Kamal, L.; Hammad, S.; El-Awady, F.; Waleed, D.; Kourbaj, L. Recent updates of marine antimicrobial peptides. Saudi Pharm. J. 2018, 26, 396–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Ma, X.-W.; Hou, L.; Chen, B.; Fan, D.-Q.; Chen, Y.-C.; Yang, Y.; Wang, K.-J. A truncated Sph12-38 with potent antimicrobial activity showing resistance against bacterial challenge in Oryzias melastigma. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2017, 67, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Chen, B.; Fan, D.-Q.; Zhu, K.-X.; Shan, Z.-G.; Chen, F.-Y.; Hou, L.; Cai, L.; Wang, K.-J. Mechanism study on a new antimicrobial peptide Sphistin derived from the N-terminus of crab histone H2A identified in haemolymphs of Scylla paramamosain. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2015, 47, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Yu, R.; Wang, J.; So, L.-Y.; Harvey, P.J.; Shi, J.; Liang, J.; Dou, Q.; Li, X.; Yan, X.; Huang, Y.-H. Enhanced activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria through coapplication of an analogue of Tachyplesin I and an inhibitor of the QseC/B signaling pathway. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 3475–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Pan, C.-Y.; Chen, J.-Y.; Cheng, Y.-S.E.; Chen, C.-Y.; Ni, I.-H.; Sheen, J.-F.; Pan, Y.-L.; Kuo, C.-M. Gene expression and localization of the epinecidin-1 antimicrobial peptide in the grouper (Epinephelus coioides), and its role in protecting fish against pathogenic infection. DNA Cell Biol. 2007, 26, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Perveen, S. Introductory Chapter: Terpenes and Terpenoids; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  186. Yang, S.-T.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y. Chapter 4–Metabolic Engineering—Applications, Methods, and Challenges. In Bioprocessing for Value-Added Products from Renewable Resources; Yang, S.-T., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 73–118. [Google Scholar]
  187. Verpoorte, R. ALKALOIDS. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Science, 2nd ed.; Worsfold, P., Townshend, A., Poole, C., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2005; pp. 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  188. Bharate, S.B.; Manda, S.; Mupparapu, N.; Battini, N.; Vishwakarma, R.A. Chemistry and biology of fascaplysin, a potent marine-derived CDK-4 inhibitor. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2012, 12, 650–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhidkov, M.E.; Smirnova, P.A.; Tryapkin, O.A.; Kantemirov, A.V.; Khudyakova, Y.V.; Malyarenko, O.S.; Ermakova, S.P.; Grigorchuk, V.P.; Kaune, M.; von Amsberg, G. Total syntheses and preliminary biological evaluation of brominated fascaplysin and reticulatine alkaloids and their analogues. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. de Carvalho, M.P.; Abraham, W.-R. Antimicrobial and biofilm inhibiting diketopiperazines. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 3564–3577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Borthwick, A.D. 2,5-Diketopiperazines: Synthesis, reactions, medicinal chemistry, and bioactive natural products. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 3641–3716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Zhang, Y.-F.; Zhang, H.; He, L.; Liu, C.; Xu, Y.; Qian, P.-Y. Butenolide inhibits marine fouling by altering the primary metabolism of three target organisms. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Docquier, J.-D.; Mangani, S. An update on β-lactamase inhibitor discovery and development. Drug Resist. Updates 2018, 36, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Durães, F.; Palmeira, A.; Cruz, B.; Freitas-Silva, J.; Szemerédi, N.; Gales, L.; da Costa, P.M.; Remião, F.; Silva, R.; Pinto, M. Antimicrobial activity of a library of thioxanthones and their potential as efflux pump inhibitors. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Dolgin, E. Sequencing of superbugs seen as key to combating their spread. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Dadgostar, P. Antimicrobial resistance: Implications and costs. Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 3903–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic overview of acquired resistance and resistance mechanisms. Gene transfer via transposons (A), plasmids (B), bacteriophages (C); genome mutations (D); drug inactivation or alteration (E); modification of drug binding site (F); changes in cell permeability (G); biofilm production (H).
Figure 1. Schematic overview of acquired resistance and resistance mechanisms. Gene transfer via transposons (A), plasmids (B), bacteriophages (C); genome mutations (D); drug inactivation or alteration (E); modification of drug binding site (F); changes in cell permeability (G); biofilm production (H).
Marinedrugs 21 00009 g001
Table 1. List of marine antimicrobial compounds against P. aeruginosa.
Table 1. List of marine antimicrobial compounds against P. aeruginosa.
Producer
Organism
Type of
Organism
CompoundClass aActivityAssay bP. aeruginosa StrainRef.
Mytilus spp.MusselMyticalin A5
Myticalin A8
Myticalin C9
Myticalin D2
AMP<8 µM
8 µM
8 µM
4 µM
MDAATCC27853[102]
Mytilus coruscusMusselMyticusin-betaAMP9.2 mmURDAKCTC1636[103]
Crassostrea gigasPacific
oyster
cgUbiquitinAMP0.6 µMURDAKCTC2004[104]
Echinus esculentusSea urchinEeCentrocin 1
EeCentrocin 2
EeStrongylocin 2
AMP0.78 µM
0.78 µM
1.56 µM
MDAATCC27853[105]
Portunus pelagicusCrabCrustinAMP50 µg/mLResazurinHQ4006631[106]
Paralithodes camtschaticusKing crabParalithocin 1-3AMP>100 µMMDAATCC25853[107]
Scylla
paramamosain
Mud crabSphistinAMP24 µMMDAATCC 9027[108]
Tachypleus
tridentatus
Horseshoe crabTPADAMP8 μg/mL
8–16 μg/mL
MDABAA 2108
ATCC 27853
[109]
Katsuwonus pelamisTunaSHbAPAMP19 µg/mLMDAKCTC2004[110]
Epinephelus coioidesTeleost fishEpinecidin-1AMP50 µg/mL
3.12 µg/mL
MDAATCC 19660
R
[111]
Oreochromis
niloticus
Teleost fishTP-4AMP0.52 µg/mLMDAATCC19660[112]
Oreochromis
niloticus
Teleost fishOreoch-1
Oreoch-2
AMP35 µM
6.67 µM
MDANS*[113]
Hydrophis
cyanocinctus
Sea snakeHc-CATHAMP5.17 µMMDAATCC27853[114]
Myxine glutinosa L.HagfishMyxinidinAMP<10 µg/mLMDAZ61; K799[115]
Penicillium
chrysogenum DXY-1
Funguscyclo(L-Tyr-L-Pro)AMP6.2 mg/mLMDAPAO1[116]
Aspergillus clavatus AS-107FungusCyclodepsipeptideAMP8.8 µMMDANS*[117]
Bacillus subtilisBacteriumGageostatin A, B
Gageostatin A+B
AMP16 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
MDANS*[118]
Halobacillus litoralis YS3016BacteriumHololitaralin A
Hololitaralin B
AMP24 mm
17 mm
DDANS*[119,120]
Aplysia californicaSea hareEscapinProtein0.31 µg/mLMDAPAO1[121]
Bacillus licheniformis D1BacteriumBL-DZ1Protein3.12 µg/mLMDAPAO1[122]
Bacillus subtilisBacteriumGageotetrins A
Gageotetrins B
Gageotetrins C
Lipopeptides0.06 µM
0.04 µM
0.02 µM
MDANS*[123]
Penicillium chrysogenum QEN-24SFungusConidiogenone BDiterpene8 µg/mLMDANS*[124]
Aspergillus
insuetus SD-512
Fungus(5S,6S)-16,17-dihydroophiobolin H
(6α)-21,21-O-dihydroophiobolin G
Farnesylemefuranone D
Farnesylemefuranone E
Farnesylemefuranone F
Terpenoid8 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
16 µg/mL
16 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
MDAa QDIO-2[125]
Dictyoata acutilobaSeaweedA1
C1
Terpenoid0.9 µg/mL
0.89 µg/mL
MDAMTCC741[126]
Sarcophyton
trocheliophorum
Soft coral(5S)-3-[(3E,5S)-5-hydroxy-3-hepten-6-yn-1-yl]-5-methyl-2(5H)-furanoneTerpenoid8 mmDDANS*[127]
Axinella
infundibuliformis
Sponge3β-Hydroxylup-20(29)-ene
3β-Hydroxylup-20(29)-en28-oic acid
3-oxo-lup-20(29)-en-28-oic acid
Terpenoid24 mm
7 mm
10 mm
DDAATCC27853[128]
Streptomyces
pratensis
NA-ZhouS1
BacteriumStremycin A-BPK16 µg/mLMDANS*[129]
Penicillium sp.
RO-11
FungusPenipyranicins A
Penipyranicins B
Penipyranicins C
Isopyrenulin
PK18.4 µg/mL
5.2 µg/mL
1.4 µg/mL
4.7 µg/mL
MDANR-117678.1[130]
Streptomyces sp. CMB-M0244BacteriumMollemycin APKIC50 50 nMMDAATCC 27853[131]
Penicillium sp. BB1122FungusNeocitreoviridin
Penicillstressol
Isopenicillstressol
10Z-isocitreoviridinol
PK4 µg/mL
4 µg/mL
4 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
MDACMCC(B)10104[132]
Streptomyces sp. HB202BacteriumMayamycinPKIC50 2.5 µg/mLMDADSM 50071[133]
Penicillium sp. HDN151272FungusKetidocillinone B
Ketidocillinone C
PK1.56 mg/mL
6.25 mg/mL
MDANS*[134]
Shewanella algae MTCC 12715Bacterium14-(14b,14c-dimethylbutyl)-12-methoxy-18-oxo-11,15-dioxacyclododecan-8-yl 1-((50-hydroxyfuran-10-yl)oxy)benzoate;PK21 mm–1.5 µg/mLDDA; MDAATCC27853[135]
14-(sec-butyl)-12-methoxy-12-methyl-18-oxo-11,15-dioxacyclododecan-8-yl1-((50-hydroxyfuran-10-yl)oxy)benzoate24 mm–3 µg/mL
Bacillus
Amyloliquefacien MTCC 12716
BacteriumMethyl 1′-((2E,4E,14E)-9,12-dihydroxy-15-isopropyl-1,6- dioxohexadecahydro [1]oxacyclononadecino[3,4-f]isobenzofuranyl) benzoate;PK3.12 µg/mLMDAATCC27853[136]
E)-Ethyl 15-ethyl-9,12-dihydroxy-25-(2-hydroxy-3-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl)-1-oxo-octadecahydro-1 H -furopyrano[2,3- c]oxacyclononadecine-6-carboxylate;0.75 µg/mL
((E)-Ethyl 15-ethyl-12-hydroxy-25-(2 -hydroxy-3-(methoxycarbonyl)phenyl)-24-methyl-1-oxo-icosahydro-1 H-furopyrano[2,3-c]oxacyclononadecine-6-carboxylate1.50 µg/mL
Bacillus
amyloliquefacien MTCC 12713
Bacterium4,27,39-Trihydroxy-7,8,10,11,16,17,25,26,27,28-decahydro-37-methyl-macrobrevin;PK3.12 µg/mL–19 mm MDA, DDAATCC27853[137]
7,8,16,17,25,26-Hexahydro-macrobrevin;6.25 µg/mL–13 mm
7,8,16,17,25,26-Hexahydro-41-hydroxy-macrobrevin-31-acetate;1.56 µg/mL–23 mm
7,8,16,17,25,26-Hexahydro-28-nor-methyl-5-methoxy-macrobrevin3.12 µg/mL–22mm
Bacillus
amyloliquefacien MTCC 12713
Bacterium18,19-Dihydro-6-hydroxy-8-propyl carboxylate difficidinPK0.006 µM–17 mm MDA, DDAATCC27853[138]
5-Ethoxy-28-methyl-(9-methyl-19-propyl dicarboxylate) difficidin0.004 µM–26 mm
(6-Methyl-9-propyl dicarboxylate)-19-propanone difficidin0.002 µM–23 mm
20-Acetyl-(6-methyl-9-isopentyl dicarboxylate) difficidin0.002 µM-25 mm
Aspergillus niger ASSB4FungusRF-3192CPK15 mmDDAATCC27853[139]
Microsphaeropsis sp. RA10-14FungusMicroketides A
Microketides B
PK0.19 µg/mL
1.56 µg/mL
MDANS*[140]
Actinoalloteichus
cyanogriseus
WH1-2216
BacteriumCaerulomycin A
Caerulomycin C
Alkaloid21.8 µg/mL
38.6 µg/mL
ADANS*[141]
Clathria cervicornisSpongeCrambescidin 800Alkaloid1 µg/mLMDAATCC 10145[142]
Agelas dilatataSpongeBromoageliferinAlkaloid32 µg/mL
8 µg/mL
MDAPAO1
ATCC 27853
[143]
Pachychalina sp.SpongeCyclostellettamine CAlkaloid8.6 µg/mL
18.8 µg/mL
MDAATCC27853
Pa13, PaP1
[144]
Cyclostellettamine E18.8 µg/mL
18.8 µg/mL
9.4 µg/mL
ATCC27853, PaP1
Pa13
Cyclostellettamine F4.7 µg/mL
9.4 µg/mL
PaP1
Pa13
Callyspongia
siphonella
Sponge5-bromo trisindoline
6-bromo trisindoline
Alkaloid256 µg/mL
256 µg/mL
MDAPAO1[145]
Dendrilla nigraSpongeDenigrins A
Denigrins B
Denigrins C
Alkaloid100 µg/mL
25 µg/Ml
12.5 µg/mL
MDAATCC 27853[146]
Tegella cf.
spitzbergensis
BryozoanEnt-eusynstyelamide B
Eusynstyelamide D
Eusynstyelamide E
Eusynstyelamide F
Alkaloid25 µg/mL
25 µg/mL
25 µg/mL
12.5 µg/mL
MDAATCC 27853[147]
Acanthophora
spicifera
SpongeVelutinFlavone26.8 mmDDAATCC9027[148]
Siphonochalina
siphonella
SpongeSiphonocholinSteroid64 µg/mLMDAPAO1[149]
Dysidea granulosaSponge2-(20,40-dibromophenoxy)-3,5-dibromophenolDiphenylether derivative4 µg/mLMDANS*[150]
Aspergillus versicolor OUCMDZ-2738Fungusbrevianamide K
Diorcinol C
Diorcinol E
Diorcinol J
Diorcinol
Methyl diorcinol-4-carboxylate
Diphenylether derivativeIC50 92.2 µM
IC50 46.2 µM
IC50 101.9 µM
IC50 50.9 µM
IC50 17.4 µM
IC50 13.9 µM
MDAATCC10145[151]
Ecteinascidia
turbinate
AscidianEcteinamycinPolyether8.0 μg/mLMDAATCC 27853[152]
Bacillus subtilisBacteriumDEHPPhthalate
derivative
8 µg/mLMDAATCC 9027[153]
Bacillus licheniformis 09IDYM23BacteriumIeodoglucomide C
Ieodoglycolipid
Glycolipid0.01 µM
0.03 µM
MDANS*[154]
Bacillus sp. REB264BacteriumPAGI264NS15 µg/mLMDANS*[155]
Bacillus sp.BacteriumMacrolactins A1
Macrolactins B1
Macrolide0.055 µM
0.055 µM
MDANS*[156]
Bacillus subtilisBacteriumGageomacrolactins 1
Gageomacrolactins 2
Gageomacrolactins 3
Macrolide0.03 µM
0.05 µM
0.05 µM
MDANS*[157]
B. amyloliquefaciens MTCC 12716BacteriumBacvalactones 1
Bacvalactones 2
Bacvalactones 3
Macrolide3.12 µg/mL
3.00 µg/mL
1.5 µg/mL
MDAATCC 27853[158]
Bacillus subtilis MTCC 10403Bacterium7-O-6′-(2″-acetylphenyl)-5′-hydroxyhexanoate-macrolactinMacrolide12.5 µg/mLMDAMTCC 429[159]
a AMP: antimicrobial peptides; PK: polyketide; b MDA: microdilution assay; URDA: radial diffusion assay; DDA: disk diffusion assay; *NS: not specified.
Table 2. List of marine anti-virulence compounds against P. aeruginosa.
Table 2. List of marine anti-virulence compounds against P. aeruginosa.
Producer OrganismType of OrganismCompoundClassActivityAssayP. aeruginosa StrainRef.
Pseudoalteromonas sp. 1400BacteriumAlyP1400ProteinAntibiofilmBiofilm disruptionCF27
PA14
[160,161]
Pseudoalteromonas sp. 129-1BacteriumProteaseProteinAntibiofilmBiofilm inhibitionPAO1[162]
Pseudoalteromonas sp. 3j6BacteriumAlterocinProteinAntibiofilmBiofilm inhibitionPAO1[163]
Bacillus velezensis DH82BacteriumYtnPProteinAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[164]
Psychrobacter sp. M9-54-1BacteriumAHL-AcylaseProteinAnti-QSQS genes downregulationPAO1[165]
Nesterenkonia sp. MSA31BacteriumNesfactinLipopeptideAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm disruption
PAO1
FSPA02
[166]
Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1Funguscyclo(L-Tyr-L-Pro)DipeptideAnnt-QS
Antibiofilm
las and rhl reduced expression
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[116]
Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1FungusTyrosolDipeptideAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[167]
Rheinheimera aquimaris QSI02BacteriumCyclo(Trp-Ser)DipeptideAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[168]
Pestalotiopsis sydowiana PPRFungusCyclo(Leu-Pro)DipeptideAnti-QSInhibition of virulence factorsPAO1[169]
Cladosporium sp. Z148FungusCladodionenPKAnti-QSInhibition of virulence factorsPAO1[170]
Fusarium sp. Z10FungusEquisetinPKAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[171]
Agelas dilatataSpongeBromoageliferinAlkaloidAntibiofilm
Anti-virulence
Biofilm inhibition
G. mellonella survival assay
PAO1
ATCC 27853
[143]
Callyspongia siphonellaSponge5-bromo trisindoline
6-bromo trisindoline
AlkaloidAntibiofilmBiofilm inhibitionPAO1[145]
Oceanobacillus sp. XC22919Bacterium2-methyl-N-(2′-phenylethyl) butyramide;
3-methyl-N-(2′-phenylethyl)-butyramide
AlkaloidAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[172]
Halodule pinifoliaSeagrass4-methoxybeanzoic acid (4-MBA)Benzoic acid derivativeAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[173]
Pestalotiopsis sydowiana PPRFungus4-Hydroxyphenylacetamidephenylacetic acid derivativeAnti-QSInhibition of virulence factorsPAO1[169]
Vibrio alginolyticusBacteriumTyramine
N-acetyltyramine
AmineAnti-QSInhibition of virulence factorsPAO1[165]
Siphonochalina siphonellaSpongeSyph-1SteroidAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[149]
Oceanobacillus sp. XC22919BacteriumBenzyl benzoateBenzoic acid derivativeAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
Inhibition of virulence factors
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[172]
Streptomyces sp.Bacterium5-octylfuran-2(5H)-oneLactone
butenolide
AntibiofilmBiofilm degradation
Biofilm disruption
PAO1[174]
Staphylococcus hominisBacteriumDL-homocysteine
thiolacton
LactoneAnti-QS
Antibiofilm
QS genes downregulation
Biofilm inhibition
PAO1[175]
Staphylococcus saprophyticus SBPS-15BacteriumStaphylosanGlycolipidAntibiofilmBiofilm degradation
Biofilm disruption
BHKH[176].
Serratia marcescensBacterium-GlycolipidAntibiofilmAttachment inhibition
Biofilm degradation
Biofilm disruption
PAO1[177]
Lyngbya majuscolaCyanobacteriumLyngbyoic acidFatty AcidAnti-QSInhibition of virulence factorsPAO1[178]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Coppola, D.; Buonocore, C.; Palisse, M.; Tedesco, P.; de Pascale, D. Exploring Oceans for Curative Compounds: Potential New Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Molecules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010009

AMA Style

Coppola D, Buonocore C, Palisse M, Tedesco P, de Pascale D. Exploring Oceans for Curative Compounds: Potential New Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Molecules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Coppola, Daniela, Carmine Buonocore, Morgan Palisse, Pietro Tedesco, and Donatella de Pascale. 2023. "Exploring Oceans for Curative Compounds: Potential New Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Molecules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa" Marine Drugs 21, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010009

APA Style

Coppola, D., Buonocore, C., Palisse, M., Tedesco, P., & de Pascale, D. (2023). Exploring Oceans for Curative Compounds: Potential New Antimicrobial and Anti-Virulence Molecules against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Marine Drugs, 21(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21010009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop