Next Article in Journal
Microalgae: A Promising Source of Bioactive Phycobiliproteins
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolite Profile Characterization of Cyanobacterial Strains with Bioactivity on Lipid Metabolism Using In Vivo and In Vitro Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
Drug Delivery through Epidermal Tissue Cells by Functionalized Biosilica from Diatom Microalgae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Barbamide Displays Affinity for Membrane-Bound Receptors and Impacts Store-Operated Calcium Entry in Mouse Sensory Neurons
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Review of Marine Cyanobacteria and the Aspects Related to Their Roles: Chemical, Biological Properties, Nitrogen Fixation and Climate Change

1
International Research Center for Food Nutrition and Safety, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
2
International Joint Research Laboratory of Intelligent Agriculture and Agri-Products Processing, Jiangsu University, Jiangsu Education Department, Nanjing 210024, China
3
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah 42351, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom 32512, Egypt
5
Chemistry Department of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, Research Institute of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants (RIMAP), Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
6
China Light Industry Key Laboratory of Food Intelligent Detection & Processing, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
7
Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Sham Private University, Damascus 0100, Syria
8
College of Marine Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
9
Bioenergy Research Center, Department of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
10
School of Food Science and Technology, National Engineering Research Center of Seafood, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China
11
Department of Pharmacy, University of Napoli Federico II, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy
12
Psychiatry and Psychology Department, Capio Saint Göran’s Hospital, Sankt Göransplan 1, 112 19 Stockholm, Sweden
13
Second Clinical Medical College, Jinhua Academy, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(8), 439; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21080439
Submission received: 1 June 2023 / Revised: 27 July 2023 / Accepted: 27 July 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Product from Marine Cyanobacteria)

Abstract

:
Marine cyanobacteria are an ancient group of photosynthetic microbes dating back to 3.5 million years ago. They are prolific producers of bioactive secondary metabolites. Over millions of years, natural selection has optimized their metabolites to possess activities impacting various biological targets. This paper discusses the historical and existential records of cyanobacteria, and their role in understanding the evolution of marine cyanobacteria through the ages. Recent advancements have focused on isolating and screening bioactive compounds and their respective medicinal properties, and we also discuss chemical property space and clinical trials, where compounds with potential pharmacological effects, such as cytotoxicity, anticancer, and antiparasitic properties, are highlighted. The data have shown that about 43% of the compounds investigated have cytotoxic effects, and around 8% have anti-trypanosome activity. We discussed the role of different marine cyanobacteria groups in fixing nitrogen percentages on Earth and their outcomes in fish productivity by entering food webs and enhancing productivity in different agricultural and ecological fields. The role of marine cyanobacteria in the carbon cycle and their outcomes in improving the efficiency of photosynthetic CO2 fixation in the chloroplasts of crop plants, thus enhancing the crop plant’s yield, was highlighted. Ultimately, climate changes have a significant impact on marine cyanobacteria where the temperature rises, and CO2 improves the cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation.

1. Introduction

Cyanobacteria may be described as the pioneers of the planet Earth and are a one-of-a-kind gift of nature. The historical record dates the existence of cyanobacteria back to over 3.5 million years ago (MYA). They possess a number of natural qualities that make them suitable for several biotechnological applications [1,2,3]. Cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) are Gram-negative eubacteria. They are widely distributed throughout terrestrial, fresh water, wastewater, and marine habitats due to their immense morphological and physiological diversity [2,4]. Cyanobacteria come in a wide variety of morph types, such as species that are unicellular, surface-attached, as well as filamentous colony- and mat-forming. In the last few decades, the advent of ultrastructural and molecular methods has been evident as per the progress in taxonomic classification, the dominant tool for evaluating cyanobacterial diversity. These methods explain many yet unclear structures, adaptations, and phylogenetic relations within different clusters. The molecular methods rely on 16S rRNA gene sequencing as a standard, notably at the genus level. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing clusters closely correlate with traditional cyanobacterial taxa, which can be identified by various phenotypic characteristics [5,6]. Several species form significant symbiotic relationships with other micro- and macro-eukaryotes [7,8]. As life evolved on Earth, cyanobacteria played a pivotal role as the first organisms to engage in oxygenic photosynthesis [9]. In addition to their evolutionary niche, cyanobacteria have also played vital roles in the biogeochemical cycle of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N). An estimated 20–30% of the organic carbon present on Earth is derived from photosynthetic carbon fixation by cyanobacteria. Cyanobacteria also represent the primary N2-fixing microorganisms in marine environments [10,11,12].
Natural products have historically been used to inspire and develop new medications, and this remains one of the most successful methods for the discovery of small molecules for drug development [13]. Cyanobacteria are a unique source of small molecules, since they are thought to be one of the oldest forms of life on Earth and may thus constitute chemical factories with highly evolved secondary metabolite synthesis machinery. They have also been demonstrated to influence the biosynthesis of chemicals in marine invertebrates, such as sponges, ascidians, and shell-less mollusks, via endosymbiosis or diet-derived enrichment [13,14,15,16]. To date, more than 2000 secondary metabolites have been identified from marine cyanobacteria, especially Moorea, Lyngbya, and Okeania spp. [17,18]. Marine cyanobacteria have attracted the attention of many scientists in the fields of medicinal chemistry and pharmacology [19], as they demonstrate powerful biological activities such as antibacterial [20], antifungal [21], anticancer [22], and cytotoxic activities [23], as well as immunosuppression [24], anti-inflammatory [25], and antioxidant properties [26]. For instance, apratoxin D is a potent bioactive compound that is isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Lyngbya sp. and has demonstrated significant cytotoxicity against human lung cancer cells [27]. Four bioactive compounds, Dudawalamides A-D, isolated from Moorea producens were proven to be effective antiparasitic agents. All four of these compounds demonstrated potent activity, with IC50 ≥ 10 mM [28].
In terms of biological properties, cyanobacteria are dominant agents in the Earth’s nitrogen cycle. They use nitrogenase enzymes to reduce N2 to NH3 [29]. Because the nitrogenase enzyme complex is O2-sensitive, cyanobacteria spatially separate CO2 fixation from N2 fixation. Some cyanobacteria have developed specialized cellular structures known as heterocyst, which contain the activity of the nitrogenase enzyme and prevent it from being inactivated by O2 interaction during photosynthesis [30]. Accordingly, Trichodesmium, one of the marine cyanobacteria, is considered the dominant N2-fixing organism in the ocean. It accounts for around 50% of global natural N2 fixation [31]. While various studies have explained the mechanism of Trichodesmium N2 fixation, the mechanism of N2 fixation for other marine cyanobacteria is still unexplained. As part of our ongoing projects on chemical and pharmacological studies of marine natural products [32,33,34,35], we hereby summarize the historical and existence records of marine cyanobacteria, based on fossil documentation through the different eras, and their historical evolutionary records. We also screened for potent secondary metabolites from marine cyanobacteria, reported as possessing significant pharmacological activities in the 2017–2022 period, making note of any ongoing clinical trials during the said period. Finally, we highlighted the role of different groups of marine cyanobacteria in both nitrogen fixation and their outcomes, along with carbon fixation and in correlation to climate changes.

2. History and Existence

The organized structure and differentiation in the morphology of cyanobacteria, and their dominance in paleontological history [36], are due to the vital role that the unique cyanobacterial metabolism played in ancient ecosystems. This is also influenced by the selectivity of preservation and fossilization for particular environments or cyanobacterial taxa. The cyanobacterial fossil record is one of the oldest, reaching back to approximately 3500 Ma [37]. Fossil identification occurs by comparing old samples (established specimens existing in the herbarium) with modern forms in the natural population [37,38]. Scientists have devoted their efforts to documenting cyanobacteria across different eras (Figure 1). Several studies have documented that the most ancient in disputable fossil cyanobacteria were recorded in the Proterozoic Eon. Eoentophysalis belcherensis Hofmann was the first colonial coccoid microfossil present in this period. Their existence has been reported in intertidal and shallow subtidal environments on a carbonate platform in Canada [38,39]. Other fossils were recorded by Lanier (1989) as dating back to the Paleoproterozoic era. These fossils include vertically and horizontally oriented filaments, viz. Gunflintiaminuta, suggesting photoautotrophic cyanobacteria [40]. During the early Mesoproterozoic era, the cyanobacterial population, including entophysalidacean, oscillatoriacean, and nostocalean cyanobacteria, were widely spread across all possible ecological niches, from supratidal flats to open shelf marine environments [41,42]. The formation of distinct carbonate precipitates in this era helped fossilize a member of what was named the Archaeoellipsoides cyanobacterial genus in India [43]. Although they share many similarities with the extant Synechococcus genus, the samples show residues of akinetes resembling cyanobacteria Nostoc or Stigonema [36,44]. The late Mesoproterozoic era shows evidence of the existence of mat-dwelling and planktic chroococcacean cyanobacteria, with some cyanobacteria recognizable today dating back to the early Mesoproterozoic era. A distinctive feature of the evolution of cyanobacteria is the presence of a stalked cyanobacterium Polybessurus bipartitus [41]. The diversification of protists represents a critical event for developing the biosphere, and this has been documented as occurring in the era now named the Neoproterozoic era. Some new morphological varieties of cyanobacterial fossil debuted in this era, i.e., the remains of the stalked cyanobacterium Polybessurus Fairchild ex Green et al., which can sometimes be found in sediments [36]. In the near past, morphological criteria were solely used to classify cyanobacteria taxonomically; however, in the modern taxonomy, more adequate and complementary tools have been employed [45]. In the last few decades, the criteria of cyanobacterial taxonomic classification have radically changed after applying data obtained from electron microscopic studies along with phylogenetic analyses, mainly derived from molecular sequencing [46]. Modern techniques, such as the molecular method combined with traditional cyanobacterial morphological and ecological diversity studies, as well as the re-evaluation and redefinition of contemporary typical characters and markers of cyanobacterial entities in various biotopes, are inevitable taxonomic criteria for the primary classification. The molecular method used 16S rRNA gene sequencing as a standard, particularly at the genus level. The 16S rRNA gene sequencing clusters correspond to the traditional cyanobacterial taxa, which are identified by distinctive phenotypic features [5,6]. The combination of molecular methods with cyanobacterial taxonomy advanced important key aspects of cyanobacterial systematics as follows: Firstly, regarding various taxonomic units, the morphological characters should concur with their phylogenetic position. Secondly, phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria were discovered using combining molecular and phenotypic analyses, and a highly genetic variety was identified, particularly in coccoid and simple filamentous and pseudo-filamentous types [47]. Finally, a number of studies concluded that the fossil record of cyanobacteria, along with the modern methods of re-evaluation and redefinition of contemporary typical characters, helped scientists understand the complexity and diversity present in the history of evolution.

3. Bioactive Compounds Isolated from Marine Cyanobacteria

Marine cyanobacteria have valuable potent secondary metabolites, possessing significant pharmacological activities [13]. Here, we survey the different recently isolated compounds with various biological targets, i.e., cytotoxic activity, antiparasitic activity, serine protease inhibition, anticancer and cell proliferation activity, anti-quorum sensing activity, and antibacterial activity of the period between 2017 and 2022 as illustrated in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7 and Figure 2 and Figure 3. It is noteworthy to mention that we described in more detail the highly bioactive compounds.
Of approximately 83 compounds screened in the last six years, most of them are of peptide origin (Figure 2), and 43% of them showed significant cytotoxicity, with about 8% showing potency in anti-trypanosomal activity as shown in Figure 3.

3.1. Cytotoxic Activity

Samoamide A (1), a natural cyclic octapeptide, was isolated from marine cyanobacteria cf. Symploca sp. It showed a significant cytotoxic effect against H460 and H116 cells, as confirmed by the MTT assay. Compound (1) exhibited IC50 values of 1.1 µM and 4.5 µM for H460 and H116 cells, respectively, in comparison with the positive control (doxorubicin with IC50 value of 0.2 µM). The mechanism of action was explained by the inhibition of the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase (CD26, DPP4) at a reported allosteric binding site [48]. In another study, the marine cyanobacteria Okeania sp. yielded a bioactive compound named Odobromoamide (2). This study assessed cytotoxic activity against human lung carcinoma (H-460) in-vitro using an MTT assay. Bioactive compound (2) shows a significant effect on HeLa S3 cells with IC50 value 0.31 μM. The cytotoxicity associated with this compound was dependent on the caspase family of proteins [49]. Nine new swinholide-related compounds, named Samholide A–I (311), were isolated from cf. Phormidium sp. The cytotoxic activity of these new compounds was tested against a human lung cancer cell line (H-460). All nine compounds demonstrated obvious activity, with IC50 lower than 1 µM. Compounds (3, 6, 7, and 8) show potent IC50s of 0.17 ± 0.01, 0.17 ± 0.06, 0.17 ± 0.01, and 0.17 ± 0.00 µM in comparison with the positive control (doxorubicin IC50 of 0.30 ± 0.02 µM) [50]. Nakamura and his colleagues (2018) isolated the bioactive compound Kakeromamide A (18) from the marine cyanobacteria Moorea bouillonii. This study assessed the molecular mechanism of (18) on cytotoxic activity using HeLa cell lines. The findings reported that compound (18) had a significant effect with IC50 of 10 μM. The mechanism of action of kakeromamide A displays the differentiation of neural stem cells into astrocytes [51]. Nine bioactive compounds, Microcolin E–M (1725), were isolated from the marine cyanobacteria Moorea producens. Cytotoxic activity was tested in-vitro using human lung carcinoma (H460). The results reported that compounds (18, 20, and 22) have potent activity with IC50 ranged between 37 ± 4 nM and 69 ± 10 nM against human lung carcinoma (H460). Significant cancer cell cytotoxic activity supports the investigation of the mechanism of cytotoxic action [52]. We conclude that the most potent bioactive compounds with potent cytotoxic activity as shown in Table 1, Scheme 1 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S1 are in need of more in-depth investigation. In-vivo studies are also highly recommended for obtaining promising lead compounds as anticancer drugs.
Table 1. Screening for bioactive compound cytotoxicity targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 1. Screening for bioactive compound cytotoxicity targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DATESeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
Samoamide A, cyclic octapeptide (1)cf. Symploca sp./Vatia Bay, American Samoa (July 2014)HPLC, SPE and VLCCytotoxic activity
Model: H460 cells and H116 cells.
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 1.1 mM for H460 cells
IC50 = 4.5 mM for H116 cells
PC: Doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.2 µM
NC: DMSO
[48]
Odobromoamide, cyclo-depsipeptide (2)Okeania sp./Odo, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan (May 2009)HPLC and ODS-CCCytotoxic activity
Model: HeLa S3 cells
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.31 µM
[49]
Samholide A, swinholide (3)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.17 ± 0.01 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide B, swinholide (4)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.52 ± 0.02 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide C, swinholide (5)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.21 ± 0.08 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide D, swinholide (6)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.17 ± 0.06 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide E, swinholide (7)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.17 ± 0.01 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide F, swinholide (8)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.17 ± 0.00 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide G, swinholide (9)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.21 ± 0.01 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide H, swinholide (10)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.47 ± 0.04 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Samholide I, swinholide (11)Phormidium sp./Fagaalu Park in American Samoa, U.S. (July 2014)VLC, SPE, RP-HPLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Human lung carcinoma (H-460)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50 = 0.91 ± 0.05 µM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.02 µM)
[50]
Kakeromamide A, cyclic pentapeptide (12)Moorea bouillonii/Kakeroma Island in Kagoshima, JapanRP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: HeLa cells
IC50 = 10 µM
PC: Not reported
[51]
Dragocin A, uniquehybrid structural class (13)Symploca-like morphology/Boca del Drago, PanamaVLC and RP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Lung cancer cells (H460)
Survival:
At 3 µg/mL concentration = 23%
At 30 µg/mL concentration = 10%
PC: doxorubicin (EC50 = 0.0236–0.0078 µM)
[53]
Dragocin B, uniquehybrid structural class (14)Symploca-like morphology/Boca del Drago, PanamaVLC and RP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Lung cancer cells (H460)
Survival:
At 3 µg/mL concentration > 140%
At 30 µg/mL concentration ≃ 60%
PC: doxorubicin (EC50 = 0.0236–0.0078 µM)
[53]
Dragocin C, uniquehybrid structural class (15)Symploca-like morphology/Boca del Drago, PanamaVLC and RP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Lung cancer cells (H460)
Survival:
At 3 µg/mL concentration ≃ 136%
At 30 µg/mL concentration ≃ 100%
PC: doxorubicin (EC50 = 0.0236–0.0078 µM)
[53]
Dragocin D, uniquehybrid structural class (16)Symploca-like morphology/Boca del Drago, PanamaVLC and RP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Lung cancer cells (H460)
Survival:
At 3 µg/mL concentration ≃ 77%
At 30 µg/mL concentration ≃ 15%
PC: doxorubicin (EC50 = 0.0236–0.0078 mM)
[53]
Microcolin E, linear lipopeptide (17)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 1000 ± 20 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin F, linear lipopeptide (18)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 37 ± 4 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin G, linear lipopeptide (19)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 160 ± 20 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin H, linear lipopeptide (20)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 47 ± 5 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin I, linear lipopeptide (21)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 550 ± 50 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin J, linear lipopeptide (22)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 69 ± 10 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin K, linear lipopeptide (23)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 200 ± 50 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin L, linear lipopeptide (24)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = not tested
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Microcolin M, linear lipopeptide (25)Moorea producens/Playa Kalki, Curaçao (September 1997)VLC and HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: lung carcinoma (H460)
Assay: MTT
IC50 = 510 ± 60 nM
PC: doxorubicin (IC50 = 180 ± 10 nM)
[52]
Oscillatoxin I, aplysiatoxin (26)Moorea producens/Kuba Beach, Nakagusuku,
Okinawa, Japan (July 2010)
RP-HPLCCytotoxic activity
Model: Mouse leukemia cells (L1210)
IC50 = 4.6 µg/mL
Assay: XTT
Concentration: 10 µg/mL
[54]

3.2. Antiparasitic Activity

Four bioactive compounds, Dudawalamide A–D (2730), were isolated from the marine cyanobacteria Moorea producens. The antiparasitic activity was tested in-vitro against malaria, Leishmaniasis, and Chagas disease. The results reported that compounds have potent activity against malaria, with IC50 ranged between 3.5 and 10 µM, and significant activity against Leishmaniasis, with IC50 > 10 µM. The mechanism of action for all compounds needs further investigation [28]. Ogawa and his colleagues isolated a bioactive compound named Hoshinolactam (31) from marine cyanobacteria. This compound showed a potent effect against Trypanosoma brucei with an IC50 value of 6.1 nM in comparison with the positive control (pentamidine with an IC50 value of 4.7 nM). We also assessed the cytotoxicity of human fetal lung fibroblast MRC-5 cells. The findings showed an acceptable IC50 value > 25,000 nM in comparison with the positive control (pentamidine with an IC50 value of 16,800 nM) [55]. Bioassay-guided fractionation in isolating the lipopeptide mabuniamide (32) from Okeania sp. Evaluation of antimalarial activity was conducted on a Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 clone in vitro. The results reported that compound (32) exhibits a good effect with an IC50 of 1.4 ± 0.2 µM when compared with the positive control (chloroquine; IC50 7.6 ± 0.5 nM). This study did not report the mode of action for the evaluated compound [56]. Kakeromamide B (33), a new cyclic peptide, was isolated from marine cyanobacteria Moorea producens. It showed a significant antimalarial effect against blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum and liver-stage P. berghei. Findings reported that (33) exhibited high EC50 values of 0.89 and 1.1 µM in comparison with the positive control (atovaquone with EC50 values of 0.0061 and <0.00028 µM) for the blood stage and liver stage, respectively. Its mode of action was suggested to be binding to several Plasmodium actin-like proteins and a sortilin protein, providing possible interference with the invasion of the parasite to host cells. In addition, cytotoxic activity was evaluated using HEK293T and HepG2 human cell lines as models. Compound (33) has potent cytotoxicity with the same IC50 > 2.3 µM for both human cell lines, when compared with the positive control atovaquone IC50 values > 2.0 µM for HEK293T. The compounds were not tested for HepG2 [57]. Kurisawa et al. (2020) isolated three new linear peptides from Dapis sp., named iheyamides A (34), B (35), and C (36). These new compounds were evaluated for cytotoxicity and anti-trypanosomal activity using normal human cells (WI-38) (Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense and Trypanosoma brucei brucei) as models. Their findings showed that (34) has a potent anti-trypanosomal and cytotoxicity to the parasite with IC50 values of 1.5 and 18 µM, respectively, compared with pentamide as a positive control, with IC50 ranging between 0.001 and 0.005 µM, while (35) and (36) have low activity with IC50 > 20 µM. The mechanism of action of compound (34) was determined owing to its growth-inhibitory activities against T. b. rhodesiense and T. b. brucei. [58]. Finally, from the survey, shown in Table 2, Scheme 2 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S2 we conclude that a highly potent bioactive compound, i.e., (34), may be a promising lead compound for a new drug.
Table 2. Screening for bioactive compound antiparasitic targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 2. Screening for bioactive compound antiparasitic targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DateSeparation ToolsPharmacological ActivityReference
Dudawalamide A, cyclic depsipeptide (27)Moorea producens/Dudawali Bay in
Papua New Guinea (in
April 2006)
SPE, VLC and RP-HPLCAntiparasitic activity
Models:
Malaria (Plasmodium falciparum)
IC50: 3.6 µM
PC: chloroquine
leishmaniasis (Leishmania donovani)
IC50: >10 µM
PC: amphotericin B
Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi)
GI: 12% µg/mL
PC: benznidazole
Concentrations: 10, 2, 0.4, and 0.08 µg/mL
[28]
Dudawalamide B, cyclic depsipeptide (28)Moorea producens/Dudawali Bay in
Papua New Guinea (in
April 2006)
SPE, VLC and RP-HPLCAntiparasitic activity
Models:
Malaria (Plasmodium falciparum)
IC50: 8.0 µM
PC: chloroquine
leishmaniasis (Leishmania donovani)
IC50: >10 µM
PC: amphotericin B
Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi)
GI: 7% µg/mL
PC: benznidazole
Concentrations: 10, 2, 0.4, and 0.08 µg/mL
[28]
Dudawalamide C, cyclic depsipeptide (29)Moorea producens/Dudawali Bay in
Papua New Guinea (in
April 2006)
SPE, VLC and RP-HPLCAntiparasitic activity
Models:
Malaria (Plasmodium falciparum)
IC50: 10 µM PC: chloroquine
leishmaniasis (Leishmania donovani)
IC50 = Not tested
PC: amphotericin B
Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi)
GI = Not tested
PC: benznidazole
Concentrations: 10, 2, 0.4, and 0.08 µg/mL
[28]
Dudawalamide D, cyclic depsipeptide (30)Moorea producens/Dudawali Bay in
Papua New Guinea (in
April 2006)
SPE, VLC and RP-HPLCAntiparasitic activity
Models:
Malaria (Plasmodium falciparum)
IC50: 3.5 µM
PC: chloroquine
leishmaniasis (Leishmania donovani)
IC50: 2.6 µM
PC: amphotericin B
Chagas disease (Trypanosoma cruzi)
GI: 60 µg/mL
PC: benznidazole
Concentrations: 10, 2, 0.4, and 0.08 µg/mL
[28]
Hoshinolactam, contain cyclopropane ring and a γ-lactam ring system (31)Not reported/Hoshino, OkinawaRP-HPLCAnti-trypanosomal activity
Model: Trypanosoma brucei
IC50: 6.1 nM
PC: pentamidine (IC50: 4.7 nM)
[55]
Mabuniamide, lipopeptide (32)Okeania sp./Odo, Okinawa, Japan (May 2018)HPLCAntimalarial activity
Model: P. falciparium (3D7 clone)
IC50: 1.4 ± 0.2 μM
PC: chloroquine (IC50: 7.6 ± 0.5 nM)
[56]
Kakeromamide B, cyclic peptide (33)Moorea producens/Tuvuca Island in Fiji (September 2007)VLC, SPE and HPLCAntimalarial activity
Model: Asexual blood-stage Plasmodium falciparum (EC50 = 0.89 µM)
PC: Atovaquone (EC50 = 0.0061 µM)
Liver-stage P. berghei (EC50 = 1.1 µM)
PC: Atovaquone (EC50: <0.00028 µM)
[57]
Iheyamide A, linear peptide (34)Dapis sp./Noho Island, Iheya Village, Okinawa, Japan (August 2019)RP-HPLCAnti-trypansomal
Model: Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense
IC50:1.5 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.005 μM)
Trypanosoma brucei brucei
IC50: 1.5 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.001 μM)
[58]
Iheyamide B, linear peptide (35)Dapis sp./Noho Island, Iheya Village, Okinawa, Japan (August 2019)RP-HPLCAnti-trypansomal
Model: T. brucei rhodesiense
IC50: >20 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.005)
T. b. brucei
IC50: >20 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.001)
[58]
Iheyamide C, linear peptide (36)Dapis sp./Noho Island, Iheya Village, Okinawa, Japan (August 2019)RP-HPLCAnti-trypansomal
Model: T. b. rhodesiense
IC50: >20 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.005)
T. b. brucei
IC50: >20 μM
PC: Pentamide (IC50: 0.001)
[58]
Bromoiesol sulfate A, polyhalogenated aryl sulfate (37)Salileptolyngbya
sp./Ie-Island, Okinawa, Japan (September 2020)
HPLCAnti-trypansomal activity
Model: bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei Rhodesiense
Assay: Anti-trypansomal assay
IC50: 8.8 ± 1.3 μM
PC: NR
NC: NR
[59]
Bromoiesol sulfate B, polyhalogenated aryl sulfate (38)Salileptolyngbya
sp./Ie-Island, Okinawa, Japan (September 2020)
HPLCAnti-trypansomal activity
Model: bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei Rhodesiense
Assay: Anti-trypansomal assay
IC50: 7.9 ± 1.8 μM
PC: NR
NC: NR
[59]
Bromoiesol A, polyhalogenated aryl (39)Salileptolyngbya
sp./Ie-Island, Okinawa, Japan (September 2020)
HPLCAnti-trypansomal activity
Model: bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei Rhodesiense
Assay: Anti-trypansomal assay
IC50: 1.2 ± 0.1 μM
PC: NR
NC: NR
[59]
Bromoiesol B, polyhalogenated aryl (40)Salileptolyngbya
sp./Ie-Island, Okinawa, Japan (July 2020)
HPLCAnti-trypansomal activity
Model: bloodstream Trypanosoma brucei Rhodesiense
Assay: Anti-trypansomal assay
IC50: 0.70 ± 0.23 μM
PC: NR
NC: NR
[59]
Motobamide, cyclic peptide (41)Leptolyngbya sp./Bise, Okinawa Island, Okinawa Prefecture, Japan (April 2018)HPLCAnti-trypansomal activity
Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense strains IL-1501
Assay: Anti-trypansomal
Model: bloodstream
IC50: 2.3 μM
[60]

3.3. Serine Proteases Inhibitory Effect

Three bioactive compounds, grassystatin D and F (4244), were isolated from marine cyanobacteria coded with VPG 14-61. Three compounds were tested for protease inhibitory activity using cathepsin D and E. The findings revealed that compound (44) exhibits a potent effect with IC50 values of 50 nM and 0.5 nM for cathepsin D and E, respectively. The mechanism of action occurs by inhibiting cleavage of cystatin C and PAI-1 [61]. Gallegos and his colleagues isolated five bioactive compounds named Jizanpeptin A-E (4549) from marine cyanobacteria Symploca sp. The five bioactive compounds were tested for inhibition of serine protease activity using trypsin and chymotrypsin. The most potent bioactive compound (47) exhibits activity with IC50 72 ± 17 nM and 1400 ± 700 nM for trypsin and chymotrypsin, respectively. The cytotoxicity of the five compounds was also assessed using HeLa cervical and NCI-H460 lung cancer. The findings recorded the absence of any significant cytotoxicity to two human cancer cell types [62]. Another three cyclic peptide bioactive compounds, namely tutuilamides A–C (5052), were isolated from Schizothrix sp. and Coleofasciculus sp. by Keller and co-authors (2020). These compounds were tested as protolytic inhibitors for the S1 family (elastase, chymotrypsin, trypsin) and the S8 family (proteinase K) of serine proteases. The most dominant inhibitors of elastase were (50 and 51), with IC50 in the 1–2.05 nM range. Regarding chymotrypsin, the potency of (50–52) presented IC50 values ranging from 542 nM to 1014 nM. As expected, no inhibition of trypsin was detected, while compounds (50 and 51) showed significant activity for proteinase K inhibition, with IC50 values of 103.7 and 87.6 nM, respectively. The mode of action was explained as binding to active sites in a substrate-like manner. Cytotoxicity was also tested using the H-460 human lung cancer cell line as a model. IC50 values of the compounds ranged between 0.53–4.78 µM. The only flaw in this study was the absence of positive or negative controls [63]. We recommend the most bioactive compounds that screened in Table 3, Scheme 3 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S3 need further assessment and are considered promising leads for infectious diseases.
Table 3. Screening for bioactive compound serine protease inhibition targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 3. Screening for bioactive compound serine protease inhibition targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DateSeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
Grassystatin D, peptide (42)VPG 14-61/Cetti Bay, Guam (June 2014)SPE and RP-HPLCProtease inhibitory activity
Assays: Cell viability and inhibition assay
Model: Breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231)
Cathepsin D
IC50: 2000 nM
Cathepsin E
IC50: 30 nM
NC: DMSO
[61]
Grassystatin E, peptide (43)VPG 14-61/Cetti Bay, Guam (June 2014)SPE and RP-HPLCProtease inhibitory activity
Assays: Cell viability and inhibition assay
Model: Breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231)
Cathepsin D
IC50: 900 nM
Cathepsin E
IC50: 5 nM
NC: DMSO
[61]
Grassystatin F, peptide (44)VPG 14-61/Cetti Bay, Guam (June 2014)SPE and RP-HPLCProtease inhibitory activity
Assays: Cell viability and inhibition assay
Model:Breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231)
Cathepsin D
IC50: 50 nM
Ccathepsin E
IC50: 0.5 nM
NC: DMSO
[61]
Jizanpeptin A, depsipeptide (45)Symploca sp./Red Sea, coast of Jizan, Saudi Arabia (2013)HPLC, NP-VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Trypsin
IC50: 160 ± 30 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: >10,000 nM
[62]
Jizanpeptin B, depsipeptide (46)Symploca sp./Red Sea, coast of Jizan, Saudi Arabia (2013)HPLC, NP-VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Trypsin
IC50: 190 ± 20 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: >10,000 nM
[62]
Jizanpeptin C, depsipeptide (47)Symploca sp./Red Sea, coast of Jizan, Saudi Arabia (2013)HPLC, NP-VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Trypsin
IC50: 72 ± 17 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: 1400 ± 700 nM
[62]
Jizanpeptin D, depsipeptide (48)Symploca sp./Red Sea, coast of Jizan, Saudi Arabia (2013)HPLC, NP-VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Trypsin
IC50: 1000 ± 250 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: >10,000 nM
[62]
Jizanpeptin E, depsipeptide (49)Symploca sp./Red Sea, coast of Jizan, Saudi Arabia (2013)HPLC, NP-VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Trypsin
IC50: 150 ± 20 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: >10,000 nM
[62]
Tutuilamide A, cyclic peptide (50)Schizothrix sp./Island of Tutuila in American Samoa
(2016)
HPLC, VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Elastase
IC50: 1.18 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: 1014 nM
Trypsin
IC50: >20,000 nM
Proteinase K
IC50: 103.7 nM
[63]
Tutuilamides B, cyclic peptide (51)Schizothrix sp./Island of Tutuila in American Samoa
(2016)
HPLC, VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Elastase
IC50: 2.05 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: 576.6 nM
Trypsin
IC50: >20,000 nM
Proteinase K
IC50 = 87.6 nM
[63]
Tutuilamide C, cyclic peptide (52)Coleofasciculus sp./Island of Tutuila in American Samoa
(2016)
HPLC, VLC, and SPEInhibitory activity of Serine Proteases
Such as:
Elastase
IC50: 4.93 nM
Chymotrypsin
IC50: 542.0 nM
Trypsin
IC50: >20,000 nM
Proteinase K
IC50: 5000 nM
[63]

3.4. Antiproliferative and Anticancer Activity

Lagunamide D (54), a natural macrocyclic depsipeptide, was isolated from a collection of marine cyanobacteria (Dichothrix sp., Lyngbya sp., Ceramium sp., and Rivularia sp.). It showed significant antiproliferative activity against human lung adenocarcinoma using A549 as an in-vitro model. Compound (54) exhibited IC50 values of 7.1 ± 1.7 nM. The mechanism of action needs further investigation [64]. Another study reported two secondary metabolites: Portobelamide A and B (55 and 56), purified from the marine cyanobacteria Caldora sp. Two compounds were evaluated as anticancer using H-460 cells. The findings of compound (55) showed 33% survival at a concentration of 0.9 μM [23]. Another carboxylic acid named Dysidazirine carboxylic acid (58) was isolated from marine cyanobacteria Caldora sp. by Gunasekera and co-authors (2022). The anticancer activity was evaluated against human colon cancer cells (HCT116) in-vitro. Compound (58) shows an acceptable effect with IC50 values of 79.7 μM, in comparison with the positive control (Gatorbulin-1 with IC50 values of 0.8 μM) [25]. Finally, we conclude that in-deep studies require potent bioactive compounds shown in Table 4, structured in Scheme 4 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S4 that may be lead compounds for anticancer drugs.
Table 4. Screening for bioactive compounds has antiproliferation and anticancer targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 4. Screening for bioactive compounds has antiproliferation and anticancer targets isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DateSeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
Benderamide A, cyclic depsipeptide (53)Lyngbya sp./John’s Island, Singapore (June 2016)HPLC and VFCAntiproliferative activity
Model: MCF-7 breast and PA1 ovarian cancer cell lines
NC: DMSO
PC: Nutlin
Concentration of PC: 10 µM
[65]
Lagunamide D, macrocyclic depsipeptide (54)Collection of marine cyanobacteria (Dichothrix sp., Lyngbya sp., Ceramium sp. and Rivularia sp.)/Loggerhead Key in the Dry Tortugas, Florida (May 2015)HPLC, FCL and SPEAntiproliferative activity
Model: Human lung adenocarcinoma
cells (A549)
Assay: MTT assay
IC50: 7.1 ± 1.7 nM
NC: cells + medium + solvent control
[64]
Portobelamide A, cyclic depsipeptide (55)Caldora sp./Portobelo, Panama: (June 2012)VLC and HPLCAnticancer activity
Model: Human lung Cancer Cell (H-460 cells)
Cytotoxicity: (33% survival at 0.9 μM)
PC: (doxorubicin)
NC: (DMSO in RPMI 1640 medium)
[23]
Portobelamide B, cyclic depsipeptide (56)Caldora sp./Portobelo, Panama: (June 2012)VLC and HPLCAnticancer activity
Model: Human lung Cancer Cell (H-460 cells)
Cytotoxicity: Not cytotoxic
PC: (doxorubicin)
NC: (DMSO in RPMI 1640 medium)
[23]
Caciqueamide, long chain lipopeptide (57)Caldora sp./Portobelo, Panama (June 2012)VLC and HPLCAnticancer activity
Model: Human lung Cancer Cell (H-460 cells)
Cytotoxicity: Not cytotoxic
PC: (doxorubicin)
NC: (DMSO in RPMI 1640 medium)
[23]
Dysidazirine carboxylic acid, carboxylic acid (58)Caldora sp./Fort Lauderdale, Florida (July 2017)RP-HPLCAnticancer activity
Assay: Cell Viability
Model: Human colon cancer cells (HCT116)
IC50: 79.7 µM
Positive control: Gatorbulin-1
IC50 for PC: 0.80 µM
NC: 0.5% DMSO
[25]

3.5. Anti-Quorum Sensing Activity

Three bioactive compounds, Trikoramide (B–D) (5961), extracted from the marine cyanobacteria Symploca hydnoides, were evaluated for their potential as anti-quorum-sensing activity. Compound (61) exhibited a significant effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 lasB-gfp and rhlA-gfp strains, with IC50 values of 19.6 µM and 7.3 µM, respectively. Cytotoxicity of three compounds was assessed using the Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cell Line. Compound (61) exhibited a significant effect, with IC50 values of 4.7 µM [66]. Another three bioactive compounds, Trikoveramide (A–C) (6264), extracted from the marine cyanobacteria Symploca hydnoides, were evaluated for their potential as anti-quorum-sensing activity. Compound (62) exhibited a significant effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 lasB-gfp and rhlA-gfp strains, with an inhibition value of 8%. The cytotoxicity of three compounds was assessed against the MOLT-4 human leukemia cell line. Compound (63) exhibited a significant effect, with IC50 values of 9.32 µM [67]. We recommend that the researcher investigate for the anti-quorum-sensing activity of marine cyanobacteria bioactive compounds as screened in Table 5, Scheme 5 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S5 that may be a lead compound.
Table 5. Screening for bioactive compounds has anti-quorum-sensing activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 5. Screening for bioactive compounds has anti-quorum-sensing activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DateSeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
Trikoramide B, decapeptide (59) Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)RP-HPLC, VLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
lasB-gfp and rhlA-gfp strains
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
IC50 for (lasB-gfp): No dose-dependent response observed
IC50 for (rhlA-gfp): No dose-dependent response observed
[66]
Trikoramide C, decapeptide (60)Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)RP-HPLC, VLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
lasB-gfp and rhlA-gfp strains
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
IC50 for (lasB-gfp): No dose-dependent response observed
IC50 for (rhlA-gfp): No dose-dependent response observed
[66]
Trikoramide D, decapeptide (61)Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)RP-HPLC, VLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1
lasB-gfp and rhlA-gfp strains
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
IC50 for (lasB-gfp): 19.6 µM
IC50 for (rhlA-gfp): 7.3 µM
[66]
Trikoveramide A, cyclic depsipeptide (62)Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)NP-VLC, RP-HPLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1-lasB-gfp
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
Inhibition: 8%
[67]
Trikoveramide B, cyclic depsipeptide (63)Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)NP-VLC, RP-HPLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1-lasB-gfp
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
Inhibition: 26%
[67]
Trikoveramide C, cyclic depsipeptide (64)Symploca hydnoides/Trikora beach, Bintan Island (April 2018)NP-VLC, RP-HPLCAnti-quorum-sensing activity
Model: Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PAO1-lasB-gfp
Assay: Anti-quorum-sensing assay
Inhibition: 45%
[67]

3.6. Antibacterial Activity

The bioactive compound, namely 2-hydroxyethyl-11-hydroxyhexadec-9-enoate (65) isolated from marine cyanobacteria Leptolyngbya sp. The compound was evaluated as an antibacterial activity using Vibrio harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus as a model. The results reported that compounds exhibit a potent effect with MIC 250–1000 µg/mL−1 and 350–1000 µg/mL−1, respectively, compared with the positive control (ampicillin; MIC 500 µg/mL−1) [68]. Levert et al. (2018) isolated three bioactive compounds: Tiahuramides A–C (6668) from marine cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscule. The findings showed that compound (68) has potent effects against Aeromonas salmonicida with a MIC value of 6.7 µM. The mechanism of action moderately inhibited bacterial growth. The same compound exhibits a significant cytotoxic effect against human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) with an IC50 value of 6.0 ± 2.7 µM [69]. We recommend more investigation for bioactive compounds shown in Table 6, structured in Scheme 6 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S6 with a potent effect for new lead compounds as antibacterial activity.
Table 6. Screening for bioactive compounds have antibacterial activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 6. Screening for bioactive compounds have antibacterial activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/Compound DescriptionSource/Place and DateSeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
2-hydroxyethyl-11-hydroxyhexadec-9-enoate, not reported (65)Leptolyngbya sp./Gulf of Thailand, Chumpon and Chonburi
provinces
CCAntibacterial activity
Models: Vibrio harveyi and V. parahaemolyticus
Assay: agar plate diffusion
Concentrations: 0, 100, 125, 250, 350, 500, 650, 800 and 1000 µg/mL−1
MIC: 250–1000 µg/mL−1 for V. harveyi
MIC: 350–1000 µg/mL−1 for V. parahaemolyticus
PC: ampicillin (500 µg/mL−1)
NC: penicillin (800 µg/mL−1)
[68]
Tiahuramide A, cyclic depsipeptide (66)Lyngbya
majuscule Harvey ex Gomont/Tiahura sector, Moorea Island in French Polynesia
TLC and HPLCAntibacterial activity
Assay: 96-well plates
Model:
Aeromonas salmonicida (MIC: 27 µM)
Vibrio anguillarum (MIC: 33 µM)
Shewanella baltica (MIC: >50 µM)
Escherichia coli (MIC: 35 µM)
Micrococcus luteus (MIC: 47 µM)
[69]
Tiahuramide B, cyclic depsipeptide (67)Lyngbya
majuscule Harvey ex Gomont/Tiahura sector, Moorea Island in French Polynesia
TLC and HPLCAntibacterial activity
Assay: 96-well plates
Model:
Aeromonas salmonicida (MIC: 9.4 µM)
Vibrio anguillarum (MIC: 8.5 µM)
Shewanella baltica (MIC: 22 µM)
Escherichia coli (MIC: 12 µM)
Micrococcus luteus (MIC: 29 µM)
[69]
Tiahuramide C, cyclic depsipeptide (68)Lyngbya
majuscule Harvey ex Gomont/Tiahura sector, Moorea Island in French Polynesia
TLC and HPLCAntibacterial activity
Assay: 96-well plates
Model:
Aeromonas salmonicida (MIC: 6.7 µM)
Vibrio anguillarum (MIC: 7.4 µM)
Shewanella baltica (MIC: 16 µM)
Escherichia coli (MIC: 14 µM)
Micrococcus luteus (MIC: 17 µM)
[69]

3.7. Other Activities

Iwasaki and his colleagues isolated three bioactive compounds named Biseokeaniamide A–C (6971) from marine cyanobacteria Okeania sp. Sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitory activity was assessed for three compounds using two different assays. This compound (69) showed a potent effect regarding cell-based assay with IC50 values 1.8 µM for SOAT1 and IC50 1.3 µM for SOAT2. While regarding Enzyme-based assay shows IC50 values 1.8 µM for SOAT1 and 9.6 µM for SOAT2. Cell growth inhibition was assessed for three compounds. Compound (70) shows a potent effect with IC50 value of 4.5 µM for HeLa cells and 19 µM for HL60 cells [70]. Another two bioactive compounds, Lyngbyabellin O and B (74 and 75), were isolated from marine cyanobacteria Okeania sp. as shown in Table 7, structured in Scheme 7 and their spectral analysis reviewed in Table S7. In-vitro, a study showed significant antifouling activity against Amphibalanus amphitrite larvae. The findings reported that (74 and 75) exhibited high EC50 values of 0.38 μM and 0.73 μM, respectively [71]. Han et al. (2018) isolated two bioactive compounds named Neo-debromoaplysiatoxin A and B (8182) from marine cyanobacteria Lyngbya sp. The blocking activity against Kv1.5 was evaluated for two compounds using a Chinese hamster ovary. The two compounds exhibit a highly potent effect, with IC50 values of 6.94 ± 0.26 µM and 0.30 ± 0.05 µM, respectively. The mechanism of action displayed provides modulating ionic channels, and links between the DAT target, protein kinase C, and cell regulation [72].
Table 7. Screening for bioactive compounds has different activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Table 7. Screening for bioactive compounds has different activity isolated from marine cyanobacteria between 2017 and 2022.
Compound Name/ClassSource/Place and DateSeparation
Tools
Pharmacological ActivityReference
Biseokeaniamide A, linear lipopeptide (69)Okeania sp./Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2015)
RP-HPLC and OSD-CCCell growth-inhibitory activity
Model: HeLa and HL60 cells
Assay: MTT assay
IC50: 29 µM for HeLa cells
IC50: 30 µM for HL60 cells
PC: Tunicamycin
Sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitory activity
Model: CHO cells of African green monkey
Assays:
Cell-based assay
IC50: 1.8 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 2.5 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: 1.3 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.5 µM for SOAT2)
Enzyme-based assay
IC50: 1.8 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 0.9 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: 9.6 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.8 µM for SOAT2)
[70]
Biseokeaniamide B, linear lipopeptide (70)Okeania sp./Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2015)
RP-HPLC and OSD-CC Cell growth-inhibitory activity
Model: HeLa and HL60 cells
Assay: MTT assay
IC50: 4.5 µM for HeLa cells
IC50: 19 µM for HL60 cells
PC: Tunicamycin
Sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitory activity
Model: CHO cells of African green monkey
Assays:
Cell-based assay
IC50: 6.9 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 2.5 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: 2.5 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.5 µM for SOAT2)
Enzyme-based assay
IC50: 6.8 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 0.9 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: 9.9 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.8 µM for SOAT2)
[70]
Biseokeaniamide C, linear lipopeptides (71)Okeania sp./Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2015)
RP-HPLC and OSD-CCCell growth-inhibitory activities
Model: HeLa and HL60 cells
Assay: MTT assay
IC50: 43 µM for HeLa cells
IC50: >100 µM for HL60 cells
PC: Tunicamycin
Sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitory activity
Model: CHO cells of African green monkey
Assays:
Cell-based assay
IC50: >12 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 2.5 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: 9.6 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.5 µM for SOAT2)
Enzyme-based assay
IC50: 11 µM for SOAT1
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 0.9 µM for SOAT1)
IC50: >32 µM for SOAT2
PC: Purpactin A (IC50: 1.8 µM for SOAT2)
[70]
Serinolamide C, fatty acid amide (72)Okeania sp./Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (April 2015)RP-HPLCAntifouling activity
Model: Amphibalanus amphitrite larvae
EC50: Not reported
Cytotoxic activity
Model: Breast cancer cells (MCF7)
GI50: Not reported
[71]
Serinolamide D, fatty acid amide (73)Okeania sp./Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (April 2015)RP-HPLCAntifouling activity
Model: Amphibalanus amphitrite larvae
EC50: Not reported
Cytotoxic activity
Model: Breast cancer cells (MCF7)
GI50: Not reported
[71]
Lyngbyabellin O, Not reported (74)Okeania sp./Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (April 2015)RP-HPLCAntifouling activity
Model: Amphibalanus amphitrite larvae
EC50: 0.38 µM
Cytotoxic activity
Model: Breast cancer cells (MCF7)
GI50: >160 µM
[71]
Lyngbyabellin P, Not reported (75)Okeania sp./Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (April 2015)RP-HPLCAntifouling activity
Model: Amphibalanus amphitrite larvae
EC50: 0.73 µM
Cytotoxic activity
Model: Breast cancer cells (MCF7)
GI50: 9 mM
[71]
Columbamide D, chlorinated fatty acid amide (76)Moorea bouillonii/Mantanani Island in
Sabah, Malaysia
OSD-CC and HPLCThe biological activity could not be assessed because of highly cytotoxictrace amounts[73]
Columbamide E, chlorinated fatty acid amide (77)Moorea bouillonii/Mantanani Island in
Sabah, Malaysia
OSD-CC and HPLCThe biological activity could not be assessed because of highly cytotoxic trace amounts[73]
6,8-di-O-acetylmal-yngamide 2, Malyngamide serie (78)Moorea producens/Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2016)
OSD-CC and HPLCStimulation of glucose uptake
Model: L6 myotubes
Concentration: (10–40 µM)
PC: Nepodin
NC: DMSO
[74]
6-O-acetylmal-yngamide 2, Malyngamide series (79)Moorea producens/Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2016)
OSD-CC and HPLCStimulation of glucose uptake
Model: L6 myotubes
Concentration: (10–40 µM)
PC: Nepodin
NC: DMSO
[74]
N-demethyl-isomal-yngamide I, Malyngamide series (80)Moorea producens/Bise, Okinawa
Prefecture, Japan (April 2016)
OSD-CC and HPLCStimulation of glucose uptake
Model: L6 myotubes
Concentration: (10–40 µM)
PC: Nepodin
NC: DMSO
[74]
Neo-debromoaplysiatoxin A, polyketide (81)Lyngbya sp./Hainan Island, China (November of 2016)UPLC and HPLCBlocking activity against Kv1.5
Model: Chinese hamster ovary
IC50 = 6.94 ± 0.26 µM
PC: Not reported
[72]
Neo-debromoaplysiatoxin B, polyketide (82)Lyngbya sp./Hainan Island, China (November of 2016)UPLC and HPLCBlocking activity against Kv1.5
Model: Chinese hamster ovary
IC50 = 0.30 ± 0.05 µM
PC: Not reported
[72]
Croissamide, cyclic peptide (83)Symploca sp./Minna Island, OkinawaRP-HPLC and RP-CCDid not show any significant activities for antimalarial activity, protease inhibitory activity and antibacterial activity[75]
Cyanobacteria are prolific bioactive secondary metabolite producers. These bioactive compounds fall under the main classes i.e., alkaloids, peptides, linear-, cyclic peptides, depsipeptides, and fatty acid amides. Some bioactive compounds identified from freshwater, marine, and terrestrial cyanobacteria share similarities in the exoskeleton. For example, dragonamides a group of linear peptides isolated from freshwater cyanobacteria Lyngbya aestuarii share similarities of exoskeleton and pharmacological effects as antiparasitic activity with linear peptides iheyamides isolated from marine cyanobacteria Dapis sp. [58,76]. Another example of similarities is a cyclic depsipeptide named nostopeptins A isolated from cultured freshwater cyanobacteria Nostoc minutum and dudawalamides a group of cyclic depsipeptides isolated from marine cyanobacteria Moorea producens [28,76]. A group of macrocyclic depsipeptides for example microviridin isolated from the freshwater cyanobacteria, Planktothrix agardhii, and Nostoc minutum collected from several geographical regions, has similarity in skeleton with lagunamide D isolated from collection of marine cyanobacteria (Dichothrix sp., Lyngbya sp., Ceramium sp., and Rivularia sp.) [64,76]. Finally, we conclude that fresh, marine and terrestrial cyanobacteria share some of similarities in the exoskeleton which lead to similarities in the pharmacological targets.

4. Marine Cyanobacteria in Clinical Trials

Recently, marine cyanobacteria have passed into the various phases of clinical trials, and some are still under study, as shown in Table 8. For example, Apomivir® extracted from marine cyanobacteria, passed into phase 2 clinical trials. Based on preclinical studies it shows antiviral activity, especially for seasonal influenza viruses (In-fluenza virus A and B). Apomivir®, is being tested for treating influenza, with a placebo as a control. It can be administered as a capsule with a dosage of 1 capsule twice daily for 5 days. The age group of the study ranges between 20 years to 65 years (https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT01677689). Another example, water-soluble Extract of the cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon Flos-aquae (AFA), under assessing the Congestive Heart Failure Chronic. Doses were administered orally: 2 capsules 3 time a day. The findings reporting that the improvement in patient’s quality of life after 12 months of trial admission (https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT04515537).

5. Chemical Property Space

The introduction of new computational tools supports scientists in the precise and detailed investigation of data [77]. The chemical property of all the bioactive compounds in this review was investigated using the Chemical Global Positioning System—Natural product Web Chem GPS-NP Web (http://chemgps.bmc.uu.se (accessed on 2 April 2023). Analysis of 35+ physiochemical properties resulted in the identification of eight principal components [78]. The three-dimensional chemical property space was constructed using the first three principal components for each compound, as shown in Figure 4. The advantage of using these three components is that they provide maximum variations among the available eight components. The bioactive compounds were spread across the first dimension, indicating a wide-ranging distribution in molecular weight, shape, and size (X axis in red; Y axis in yellow and Z axis in green), but with the majority of compounds lying right across the middle of the range. Two compounds (Bromoiesol A and Bromoiesol B) showed unevenness in the second dimension, indicating unique aromatic and conjugation-related properties, while four compounds (Dragocin derivatives) showed disproportional opposite positioning on the third dimension, describing lipophilicity, polarity, and H-bond capacity. Crossing the cyanobacterial natural compound chemical property space with the bioactive compound cyanobacterial chemical property space presented in this review confirms the unique space occupied by cyanobacterial bioactive compounds. The cyanobacterial compound chemical property space provides a comprehensive overview of the structural diversity and chemical characteristics of bioactive compounds originating from cyanobacteria. Cyanobacterial bioactive property space is a good tool for fishing (comparison) for similar compounds with similar properties and activities [79,80]. This new approach of exploring the cyanobacterial compounds based on their physicochemical properties and comparing them with other groups of compounds (with certain biological activities) confirms the diversity in compounds and activities. The criteria for similarity to an intended compound or group of compounds from any source can be calculated using Euclidian distance (ED) in eight-dimensional space as follow:
d p , q = ( p 1 q 1 ) 2 + ( p 2 q 2 ) 2 + + ( p i q i ) 2 + + ( p n q n ) 2
where d (distance) and p, q (points): points p = (p1, p2, …, pn) and q = (q1, q2, …, qn) in Euclidean n-space. In this case the shorter is the distance the higher is the similarity.
It aids in revealing novel chemical scaffolds, discovering structure-activity relationships, and expediting the usage of bioactive compounds within therapeutic or biotechnological applications. This strategy can boost the identification of leading compounds with target functions and hold promise for further research and discovery in the field of natural products.

6. Biological Properties

6.1. Mechanism of Marine Cyanobacteria in Nitrogen Fixation

Cyanobacteria are recognized as the main N2-fixing microorganisms in the marine environment that participate in the universal nitrogen cycle [10,81]. N2-fixing cyanobacteria are grouped into filamentous non-heterocyst, unicellular cyanobacteria, and filamentous heterocyst-forming symbionts Figure 5 [10]. Regarding filamentous non-heterocyst, the genus Trichodesmium represents the most conspicuous marine organisms in terms of N2 fixing [82]. They are estimated to be responsible for approximately 50% of the global natural N2 fixation. Their nitrogen fixation process occurs during the day at temperatures ranging between 24–30°C, but stops at night due to inactivation and degradation of the nitrogenase enzyme [31,83]. Where N2 fixation occurs in differentiated cells of Trichodesmium spp., these cells consistently remain in clusters of about 3 to 20 [84]. The N products, such as ammonia (NH3), ammonium (NH4+), or the amino acid glutamine, are directly produced as a result of the reduction of N2 [85,86]. The following synthesis of glutamine and glutamate by a glutamine synthetase/glutamine oxoglutarate aminotransferase (GS/GOGAT) reaction also requires energy in the form of 1 ATP and 1 NADPH + H+. Thus, Trichodesmium’s capacity to fix nitrogen is highly reliant on the bioavailability of energy [87]. Unicellular N2-fixing cyanobacteria were first discovered through the amplification of nitrogenase genes and gene transcripts (mRNAs) from oceanic water samples [88]. According to recent studies, unicellular cyanobacteria (UCYN) have a high ability to fix N2 within a cell-size fraction below 10 μm. These unicellular cyanobacteria have been classified into three groups based on their nifH gene phylogeny: UCYN-A, UCYN-B, and UCYN-C [88,89,90]. In the UCYN-A group, cyanobacterial nitrogenase gene sequences were most tightly linked to sequences from the marine unicellular cyanobacterium Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC 51142 [91]. Despite numerous attempts, UCYN-A cyanobacteria have not been successfully cultivated [92]. UCYN-A cyanobacteria have genotypes that have not previously been identified in free-living cyanobacteria, and they lack the genetic ability for oxygenic photosynthesis. Furthermore, nitrogenase genes are most abundant in UCYN-A during the light period, and thus can fix N2 during daylight [90]. UCYN-B is a group of free-living unicellular cyanobacteria that fix N2 [93]. By studying the geographical populations of these free-living creatures, it may be concluded that they significantly contribute to the global N2 fixation process [94]. UCYN-B have only been identified in surface water and at 25% light depths (14 m) and is small in size (<10 μm) [95,96]. They fix N2 during the night [10]. In UCYN-B (Crocosphaera watsonii), nitrogenase enzyme synthesis begins just before nightfall to prepare for the upcoming N2 fixing activity during the night [97]. UCYN-C is a group of unicellular free-living cyanobacteria that fix N2 during the night [94,98]. It includes several cultivated cyanobacteria, such as Cyanothece sp. strain ATCC51142 and TW3 [99,100]. By 1993, Reddy and colleagues isolated a unicellular cyanobacterium, Cyanothece sp. ATCC51142, on the intertidal sands of the Texas Gulf Coast [101]. Their symbiotic associations play vital roles in chemical defense, as well as supplying partners with energy and organic products of carbon or nitrogen fixation [102]. In numerous oceanic diatom taxa, heterocyst-forming cyanobacterial symbionts are frequently observed [103]. In the microenvironment of a photosynthetic symbiotic partner cell, such as diatoms, heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria have a beneficial effect, where the oxygen-sensitive nitrogenase protein is inhibited as a result of O2 concentrations [10]. Richelia intracellularis J. Schmidt 1901 is a filamentous cyanobacteria frequently found either free-living or in symbiosis with the diatoms Rhizosolenia Brightwell 1858 and Chaetoceros Ehrenberg 1844 in the plankton of the warm oceans [102]. Cyanobacteria nitrogen fixation has various impacts that can be explained as follows: firstly, cyanobacteria are significant bioavailable nitrogen suppliers to the pelagic and benthic food webs that support fish productivity by fixing dissolved N2. The food web benefits from bioavailable nitrogen in addition to the fresh or decaying filamentous cyanobacteria to nourish various invertebrates and release more nitrogen by cyanobacterial cells. Secondly, their ability to get beyond summertime nitrogen limitation by the fixation of dissolved nitrogen. Thirdly, they can contribute to enhancing productivity in different agricultural and ecological situations by building up soil fertility and increasing yield [104,105,106]. We conclude that only filamentous non-heterocyst cases have contributed to the explanation of the mechanism of nitrogen fixation. On the other hand, there are limitations in the data related to unicellular cyanobacteria, and filamentous heterocyst-forming symbionts, as there are no papers explaining the role of the nitrogen fixation mechanism in these cases. Taken together, nitrogen fixation has important impacts in various fields, i.e., agriculture and ecology, reflecting a potential benefit on the economy.

6.2. Mechanism of Marine Cyanobacteria in CO2 Fixation

Industrialization and the burning of fossil fuels are to blame for the alarmingly high CO2 levels in the atmosphere. CO2 concentrations in surface waters have increased with the rise in atmospheric CO2 during the past century. Cyanobacteria are one of the most promising organisms for CO2 capture [107,108,109]. The most common photoautotrophic lineage on Earth comprises cyanobacteria. Their effectiveness in photoautotrophism relies on a collection of adaptations known as the CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM). The CCM aims to increase the efficiency of CO2 fixation by promoting the carboxylase reaction through improving the chemical conditions around the main CO2-fixing enzyme, D-ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO), and suppressing the oxygenase reaction [110]. In cyanobacteria, RubisCO is enclosed within a class of protein-rich structures known as carboxysomes. The selectively permeable protein shell of the carboxysomes contains the CO2-fixation enzyme, as well as the carbonic anhydrase enzyme, which provides CO2 from a cytoplasmic bicarbonate pool [110,111]. The carboxysomes have two main types, α-cyanobacteria, which are found in marine water and β-cyanobacteria, present in fresh water [111]. In α-cyanobacteria, the RubisCO is categorized as (RuBisCO Form IA) [112]. In α-cyanobacteria, up to two different types of plasma membrane-associated bicarbonate transporters, SbtA2 (high-affinity Na+/HCO3) and BicA2 (medium to low-affinity Na+/HCO3) promote CO2 fixation [110]. In the first stage of the (CCM), bicarbonate is concentrated inside the cell via transporters in the cell membrane. In the second stage of (CCM), the carboxysome plays a vital role in the enhancement of CO2 fixation by co-localizing the two enzymes (CA) and (RuBisCO). Bicarbonate is assumed to enter the carboxysome through proteinaceous shell pores, and once inside, it is converted to CO2 and used by RuBisCO. The conversion of HCO3 to CO2 is catalyzed by the CA enzyme. After CO2 fixation, some of it exits into the cytosol, while some promptly combines with RuBP to form phosphoglycolate Figure 6 [111,113]. The components of the cyanobacterial CO2-concentrating mechanism (CCM) have a vital role in the improvement of the efficiency of photosynthetic CO2 fixation in the chloroplasts of crop plants via specific cyanobacterial transporters, accordingly leading to better crop yields [114]. Finally, we conclude that the importance of CO2 revolves around the conversion of inorganic carbon to organic carbon through vital processes.

7. Effect of Climate Changes on Marine Cyanobacteria

Planet Earth and its aquatic ecosystems are being drastically altered by climate change [115]. Climate changes manifest as rising CO2, temperature, and salinization. Cyanobacteria have some features that can adapt to the altered aquatic environmental conditions, i.e., efficient CO2 and nutrient uptake mechanisms, and are well protected from light and UV radiation [116]. The rise in atmospheric CO2 levels makes marine surface waters more acidic. Levitan et al. (2007) reported that an elevation in CO2 concentration was shown to enhance C:N ratios and N2 fixation in the open ocean by using the cyanobacterium Trichodesmium erythraeum [107,116]. Additionally, a factor contributing to the enhancement of nitrogen fixations is the reduction in O2 levels caused by climate change, which is explained by the notion that nitrogenase enzymes responsible for N2 fixation are strongly inhibited by oxygen. In agreement and according to the literature, Trichodesmium N2 fixation takes place during the day along with oxygenic photosynthesis [95]. Similarly, and with high temperatures, some marine cyanobacteria species exhibit optimal growth [117]. Otherwise, the structure of planktonic and benthic microalgal communities is also significantly impacted by rising salinity levels. Some common cyanobacterial species, such as Anabaena, Anabaenopsis, Microcystis, and Nodularia, are tolerant to salt. For example, the growth of Microcystis aeruginosa is unaffected by 30% salinity in seawater [116,118]. On the other hand, the increase of the vertical density stratification is one impact of salinization, and buoyant CyanoHABs benefit from this stratification, as reported earlier. The existence of CyanoHABs resulting from climate change promotes the turbidity of aquatic environments and hence restricts light penetration into ecosystems, thus being considered an adverse but negligible effect. According to the literature, the creatures most affected by this turbidity are macrophytes and microalgae, where their growth is suppressed somehow [116]. All in all, marine cyanobacteria seem to be one of the lifeguards as they combat the severity of climate change.

8. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

Marine cyanobacteria are arguably one of the most important groups of creatures ever to appear on our planet. Their morphological differentiation and organized structures have led them to occupy important ecological niches since their first appearance in ancient ecosystems. Cyanobacteria have appeared in the fossil record since Eoentophysalis belcherensis Hofmann, early in the Proterozoic Eon, and their appearances throughout multiple eras have been keenly documented by scientists, assisting in understanding the complexity and diversity of evolutionary history. Today, marine cyanobacteria represent a significant source of structurally varied and powerful pharmaceutical agents. Herein, we screened studies on 83 bioactive compounds conducted between 2017 and 2022. In this article, the collected compounds are reported as possessing potent activities, such as cytotoxic activity, anti-trypanosomal activity, antibacterial activity, serine protease inhibition, and anticancer activity. These compounds belong to various classes, such as cyclic peptides, linear lipopeptides, depsipeptides, and cyclodepsipeptides, which have been isolated from different sources, such as Schizothrix, Moorea, Okeania, and Lyngbya genera. From the statistical findings conducted on the screened bioactive compounds, we conclude that about 43% of these have cytotoxic activity with an IC50 > 10 µM, and about 8% have anti-trypanosomal effects with IC50 values > 10 µM, compared with the positive control. We also found that most of the bioactive compounds isolated are from peptides, particularly depsipeptides.
Clinically, we discovered that marine cyanobacteria have been the subject of various clinical studies at differing stages, some of which were inapplicable, and others were still being studied. Some of these studies, such as those on Spirulina platensis, Aphanizomenon Flos-aquae, Apomivir®, and Phycocare® have been experimented with to treat various disorders, such as hepatitis B virus, seasonal influenza viruses, metastatic gastric cancer, and congestive heart failure. Nitrogen fixation is one of the main biological properties of marine cyanobacteria. Trichodesmium is the dominant nitrogen fixer on the planet and amounts to approximately 50% of global natural N2 fixation. It has differentiated cells that can fix nitrogen by reducing N2 to ammonia (NH3) or ammonium (NH4+). Other groups of marine cyanobacteria, including unicellular cyanobacterium and filamentous heterocyst-forming symbionts, are unable to fix nitrogen on their own. Furthermore, their fixation processes remain unclear, as does the role that marine cyanobacteria play in fixing atmospheric carbon. The effects of climate change on marine cyanobacteria require further investigation. Climate change plays a role in cyanobacteria, increasing their production of CO2 and enhancing nitrogen fixation. Therefore, cyanobacteria are considered one of the saviors for the planet from climate changes.
In this regard, and to expand on the exploration of cyanobacteria, a database of the newly identified marine cyanobacterial organisms, and their inclusion as a part of modern taxonomy, would help the understanding of their evolutionary pathway. The recognition of the most potent bioactive compounds with cytotoxic effects and their potential to be tested in clinical studies will require more in-depth investigation and preclinical trials, including in-vivo and in situ experimental designs. Ultimately, more studies will be needed to explain the mechanisms underlying nitrogen fixation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md21080439/s1, Table S1: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with cytotoxicity targets between (2017 to 2022); Table S2: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with antiparasitic targets between (2017 to 2022); Table S3: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with serine protease inhibition targets between (2017 to 2022); Table S4: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with antiproliferation and anticancer targets between (2017 to 2022); Table S5: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with anti-quorum-sensing activity between (2017 to 2022); Table S6: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with antibacterial activity between (2017 to 2022); Table S7: Spectral analysis of isolated bioactive compounds with different activity between (2017 to 2022).

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, S.A.M.K., M.F.E.-M. and H.R.E.-S.; investigating and writing chemical property space, M.A.; interpretation of the data and visualization, M.F.E.-M., C.Z., M.A.M. and H.U.; writing—review and editing, S.A.M.K. and H.R.E.-S.; revising and reviewing, M.D. (Ming Du)., Z.G., N.Y., M.D (Maria Daglia). and Q.S.; idea and project administration, S.A.M.K., M.F.E.-M. and H.R.E.-S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82174026, 82274175, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (LQ23H280007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, S.; Shi, N.; Huang, M.; Tan, X.; Yan, X.; Wang, A.; Huang, Y.; Ji, R.; Zhou, D.; Zhu, Y.-G.; et al. MoS2 Nanosheets–Cyanobacteria Interaction: Reprogrammed Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 16344–16356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Azeez, R.; Dhanalakshmi, P.K.; Surenirakumar, K.; Nallamuthu, T. Growth and biochemical parameters of selective cultured cyanobacteria and exploiting antibacterial potency against human bacterial pathogens. Elixer. Appl. Bot. 2014, 72, 25537–25543. [Google Scholar]
  3. Altermann, W.; Kazmierczak, J.; Oren, A.; Wright, D.T. Cyanobacterial calcification and its rock-building potential during 3.5 billion years of Earth history. Geobiology 2006, 4, 147–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bishoyi, A.K.; Sahoo, C.R.; Padhy, R.N. Recent progression of cyanobacteria and their pharmaceutical utility: An update. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 41, 4219–4252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jirí, K.; Kastovský, J. Coincidences of structural and molecular characters in evolutionary lines of cyanobacteria. Algol. Stud. 2003, 109, 305–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Komárek, J. A polyphasic approach for the taxonomy of cyanobacteria: Principles and applications. Eur. J. Phycol. 2016, 51, 346–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Freeman, C.J.; Thacker, R.W. Complex interactions between marine sponges and their symbiotic microbial communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2011, 56, 1577–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mazard, S.; Penesyan, A.; Ostrowski, M.; Paulsen, I.T.; Egan, S. Tiny Microbes with a Big Impact: The Role of Cyanobacteria and Their Metabolites in Shaping Our Future. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lyons, T.W.; Reinhard, C.T.; Planavsky, N.J. The rise of oxygen in Earth’s early ocean and atmosphere. Nature 2014, 506, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zehr, J.P. Nitrogen fixation by marine cyanobacteria. Trends Microbiol. 2011, 19, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Waterbury, J.B.; Watson, S.W.; Guillard, R.R.L.; Brand, L. Widespread occurrence of a unicellular, marine, planktonic, cyanobacterium. Nature 1979, 277, 293–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sigman, D.M.; Boyle, E.A. Glacial/interglacial variations in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Nature 2000, 407, 859–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Salvador-Reyes, L.A.; Luesch, H. Biological targets and mechanisms of action of natural products from marine cyanobacteria. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2015, 32, 478–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ridley, C.P.; Bergquist, P.R.; Harper, M.K.; Faulkner, D.J.; Hooper, J.N.A.; Haygood, M.G. Speciation and Biosynthetic Variation in Four Dictyoceratid Sponges and Their Cyanobacterial Symbiont, Oscillatoria spongeliae. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Donia, M.S.; Hathaway, B.J.; Sudek, S.; Haygood, M.G.; Rosovitz, M.J.; Ravel, J.; Schmidt, E.W. Natural combinatorial peptide libraries in cyanobacterial symbionts of marine ascidians. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Luesch, H.; Harrigan, G.G.; Goetz, G.; Horgen, F.D. The cyanobacterial origin of potent anticancer agents originally isolated from sea hares. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 1791–1806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Perera, R.M.T.D.; Herath, K.H.I.N.M.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Jayawardena, T.U. Recent Reports on Bioactive Compounds from Marine Cyanobacteria in Relation to Human Health Applications. Life 2023, 13, 1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kultschar, B.; Llewellyn, C. Secondary Metabolites in Cyanobacteria; Vijayakumar, R., Raja, S.S.S., Eds.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2018; ISBN 978-1-78923-643-9. [Google Scholar]
  19. Uzair, B.; Tabassum, S.; Rasheed, M.; Rehman, S.F. Exploring Marine Cyanobacteria for Lead Compounds of Pharmaceutical Importance. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 179782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bhuyar, P.; Rahim, M.H.A.; Maniam, G.P.; Ramaraj, R.; Govindan, N. Exploration of bioactive compounds and antibacterial activity of marine blue-green microalgae (Oscillatoria sp.) isolated from coastal region of west Malaysia. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Singh, U.; Singh, P.; Singh, A.K.; Laxmi; Kumar, D.; Tilak, R.; Shrivastava, S.K.; Asthana, R.K. Identification of antifungal and antibacterial biomolecules from a cyanobacterium, Arthrospira platensis. Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mondal, A.; Bose, S.; Banerjee, S.; Patra, J.K.; Malik, J.; Mandal, S.K.; Kilpatrick, K.L.; Das, G.; Kerry, R.G.; Fimognari, C.; et al. Marine Cyanobacteria and Microalgae Metabolites—A Rich Source of Potential Anticancer Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Demirkiran, O.; Almaliti, J.; Leão, T.; Navarro, G.; Byrum, T.; Valeriote, F.A.; Gerwick, L.; Gerwick, W.H. Portobelamides A and B and Caciqueamide, Cytotoxic Peptidic Natural Products from a Caldora sp. Marine Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 2081–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Oh, D.-C.; Strangman, W.K.; Kauffman, C.A.; Jensen, P.R.; Fenical, W. Thalassospiramides A and B, Immunosuppressive Peptides from the Marine Bacterium Thalassospira sp. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1525–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gunasekera, S.P.; Kokkaliari, S.; Ratnayake, R.; Sauvage, T.; dos Santos, L.A.H.; Luesch, H.; Paul, V.J. Anti-Inflammatory Dysidazirine Carboxylic Acid from the Marine Cyanobacterium Caldora sp. Collected from the Reefs of Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Molecules 2022, 27, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Renugadevi, K.; Valli Nachiyar, C.; Sowmiya, P.; Sunkar, S. Antioxidant activity of phycocyanin pigment extracted from marine filamentous cyanobacteria Geitlerinema sp. TRV57. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 16, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gutiérrez, M.; Suyama, T.L.; Engene, N.; Wingerd, J.S.; Matainaho, T.; Gerwick, W.H. Apratoxin D, a Potent Cytotoxic Cyclodepsipeptide from Papua New Guinea Collections of the Marine Cyanobacteria Lyngbya majuscula and Lyngbya sordida. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 1099–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Almaliti, J.; Malloy, K.L.; Glukhov, E.; Spadafora, C.; Gutiérrez, M.; Gerwick, W.H. Dudawalamides A–D, Antiparasitic Cyclic Depsipeptides from the Marine Cyanobacterium Moorea producens. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1827–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mishra, A.K.; Kaushik, M.S.; Tiwari, D.N. Chapter 8—Nitrogenase and Hydrogenase: Enzymes for Nitrogen Fixation and Hydrogen Production in Cyanobacteria; Mishra, A.K., Tiwari, D.N., Rai, A.N.B.T.-C., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 173–191. ISBN 978-0-12-814667-5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Berman-Frank, I.; Lundgren, P.; Falkowski, P. Nitrogen fixation and photosynthetic oxygen evolution in cyanobacteria. Res. Microbiol. 2003, 154, 157–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stal, L.J. Nitrogen Fixation in Cyanobacteria. eLS 2015, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Shedid, E.S.; Saied, E.M.; Jassbi, A.R.; Jamebozorgi, F.H.; Rateb, M.E.; Du, M.; Abdel-Daim, M.M.; Kai, G.-Y.; Al-Hammady, M.A.M.; et al. Cyanobacteria—From the Oceans to the Potential Biotechnological and Biomedical Applications. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Elias, N.; Farag, M.A.; Chen, L.; Saeed, A.; Hegazy, M.-E.F.; Moustafa, M.S.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; Al-Mousawi, S.M.; Musharraf, S.G.; et al. Marine Natural Products: A Source of Novel Anticancer Drugs. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Farag, M.A.; Fekry, M.I.; Al-Hammady, M.A.; Khalil, M.N.; El-Seedi, H.R.; Meyer, A.; Porzel, A.; Westphal, H.; Wessjohann, L.A. Cytotoxic Effects of Sarcophyton sp. Soft Corals—Is There a Correlation to Their NMR Fingerprints? Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yosri, N.; Khalifa, S.A.M.; Guo, Z.; Xu, B.; Zou, X.; El-Seedi, H.R. Marine organisms: Pioneer natural sources of polysaccharides/proteins for green synthesis of nanoparticles and their potential applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 193, 1767–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sergeev, V.N.; Gerasimenko, L.M.; Zavarzin, G.A. The Proterozoic History and Present State of Cyanobacteria. Microbiology 2002, 71, 623–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Golubic, S.; Seong-Joo, L. Early cyanobacterial fossil record: Preservation, palaeoenvironments and identification. Eur. J. Phycol. 1999, 34, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Golubic, S.; Hofmann, H.J. Comparison of Holocene and mid-Precambrian Entophysalidaceae (Cyanophyta) in stromatolitic algal mats: Cell division and degradation. J. Paleontol. 1976, 50, 1074–1082. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hofmann, H.J. Precambrian Microflora, Belcher Islands, Canada: Significance and Systematics. J. Paleontol. 1976, 50, 1040–1073. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lanier, W.P. Interstitial and peloid microfossils from the 2.0 Ga Gunflint Formation: Implications for the paleoecology of the Gunflint Stromatolites. Precambrian Res. 1989, 45, 291–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sharma, M.; Shukla, Y. The evolution and distribution of life in the Precambrian eon-global perspective and the Indian record. J. Biosci. 2009, 34, 765–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sharma, M. Palaeobiology of Mesoproterozoic Salkhan Limestone, Semri Group, Rohtas, Bihar, India: Systematics and significance. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 2006, 115, 67–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sharma, M.; Sergeev, V.N. Genesis of carbonate precipitate patterns and associated microfossils in Mesoproterozoic formations of India and Russia—A comparative study. Precambrian Res. 2004, 134, 317–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Knoll, A.H.; Sergeev, V.N. Taphonomic and evolutionary changes across the Mesoproterozoic-Neoproterozoic transition. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaontol. Abh. 1995, 195, 289–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Castenholz, R.W. Species usage, concept, and evolution in the cyanobacteria (blue green algae). J. Phycol. 1992, 28, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Komárek, J. Review of the cyanobacterial genera implying planktic species after recent taxonomic revisions according to polyphasic methods: State as of 2014. Hydrobiologia 2016, 764, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Komárek, J. Recent changes (2008) in cyanobacteria taxonomy based on a combination of molecular background with phenotype and ecological consequences (genus and species concept). Hydrobiologia 2010, 639, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naman, C.B.; Rattan, R.; Nikoulina, S.E.; Lee, J.; Miller, B.W.; Moss, N.A.; Armstrong, L.; Boudreau, P.D.; Debonsi, H.M.; Valeriote, F.A.; et al. Integrating Molecular Networking and Biological Assays to Target the Isolation of a Cytotoxic Cyclic Octapeptide, Samoamide A, from an American Samoan Marine Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Sueyoshi, K.; Kudo, T.; Yamano, A.; Sumimoto, S.; Iwasaki, A.; Suenaga, K.; Teruya, T. Odobromoamide, a terminal alkynyl bromide-containing cyclodepsipeptide from the marine cyanobacterium Okeania sp. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 90, 436–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tao, Y.; Li, P.; Zhang, D.; Glukhov, E.; Gerwick, L.; Zhang, C.; Murray, T.F.; Gerwick, W.H. Samholides, Swinholide-Related Metabolites from a Marine Cyanobacterium cf. Phormidium sp. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 3034–3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Nakamura, F.; Maejima, H.; Kawamura, M.; Arai, D.; Okino, T.; Zhao, M.; Ye, T.; Lee, J.; Chang, Y.-T.; Fusetani, N.; et al. Kakeromamide A, a new cyclic pentapeptide inducing astrocyte differentiation isolated from the marine cyanobacterium Moorea bouillonii. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 2206–2209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yu, H.-B.; Glukhov, E.; Li, Y.; Iwasaki, A.; Gerwick, L.; Dorrestein, P.C.; Jiao, B.-H.; Gerwick, W.H. Cytotoxic Microcolin Lipopeptides from the Marine Cyanobacterium Moorea producens. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2608–2619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Choi, H.; Engene, N.; Byrum, T.; Hwang, S.; Oh, D.-C.; Gerwick, W.H. Dragocins A−D, Structurally Intriguing Cytotoxic Metabolites from a Panamanian Marine Cyanobacterium. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 266–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Nagai, H.; Sato, S.; Iida, K.; Hayashi, K.; Kawaguchi, M.; Uchida, H.; Satake, M. Oscillatoxin I: A New Aplysiatoxin Derivative, from a Marine Cyanobacterium. Toxins 2019, 11, 366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ogawa, H.; Iwasaki, A.; Sumimoto, S.; Iwatsuki, M.; Ishiyama, A.; Hokari, R.; Otoguro, K.; Omura, S.; Suenaga, K. Isolation and total synthesis of hoshinolactam, an antitrypanosomal lactam from a marine cyanobacterium. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 890–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Ozaki, K.; Iwasaki, A.; Sezawa, D.; Fujimura, H.; Nozaki, T.; Saito-Nakano, Y.; Suenaga, K.; Teruya, T. Isolation and Total Synthesis of Mabuniamide, a Lipopeptide from an Okeania sp. Marine Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2019, 82, 2907–2915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Sweeney-Jones, A.M.; Gagaring, K.; Antonova-Koch, J.; Zhou, H.; Mojib, N.; Soapi, K.; Skolnick, J.; McNamara, C.W.; Kubanek, J. Antimalarial Peptide and Polyketide Natural Products from the Fijian Marine Cyanobacterium Moorea producens. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kurisawa, N.; Iwasaki, A.; Jeelani, G.; Nozaki, T.; Suenaga, K. Iheyamides A–C, Antitrypanosomal Linear Peptides Isolated from a Marine Dapis sp. Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 1684–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ebihara, A.; Iwasaki, A.; Miura, Y.; Jeelani, G.; Nozaki, T.; Suenaga, K. Isolation and Total Synthesis of Bromoiesol sulfates, Antitrypanosomal arylethers from a Salileptolyngbya sp. Marine Cyanobacterium. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 11763–11770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Takahashi, H.; Iwasaki, A.; Kurisawa, N.; Suzuki, R.; Jeelani, G.; Matsubara, T.; Sato, T.; Nozaki, T.; Suenaga, K. Motobamide, an Antitrypanosomal Cyclic Peptide from a Leptolyngbya sp. Marine Cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 1649–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Al-Awadhi, F.H.; Law, B.K.; Paul, V.J.; Luesch, H. Grassystatins D–F, Potent Aspartic Protease Inhibitors from Marine Cyanobacteria as Potential Antimetastatic Agents Targeting Invasive Breast Cancer. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 2969–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gallegos, D.A.; Saurí, J.; Cohen, R.D.; Wan, X.; Videau, P.; Vallota-Eastman, A.O.; Shaala, L.A.; Youssef, D.T.A.; Williamson, R.T.; Martin, G.E.; et al. Jizanpeptins, Cyanobacterial Protease Inhibitors from a Symploca sp. Cyanobacterium Collected in the Red Sea. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 1417–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Keller, L.; Canuto, K.M.; Liu, C.; Suzuki, B.M.; Almaliti, J.; Sikandar, A.; Naman, C.B.; Glukhov, E.; Luo, D.; Duggan, B.M.; et al. Tutuilamides A–C: Vinyl-Chloride-Containing Cyclodepsipeptides from Marine Cyanobacteria with Potent Elastase Inhibitory Properties. ACS Chem. Biol. 2020, 15, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Luo, D.; Putra, M.; Ye, T.; Paul, V.; Luesch, H. Isolation, Structure Elucidation and Biological Evaluation of Lagunamide D: A New Cytotoxic Macrocyclic Depsipeptide from Marine Cyanobacteria. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ding, C.Y.; Ong, J.F.; Goh, H.C.; Coffill, C.R.; Tan, L.T. Benderamide A, a Cyclic Depsipeptide from a Singapore Collection of Marine Cyanobacterium cf Lyngbya sp. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Phyo, M.Y.; Goh, T.M.; Goh, J.X.; Tan, L.T. Trikoramides B–D, Bioactive Cyanobactins from the Marine Cyanobacterium Symploca hydnoides. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Phyo, M.Y.; Katermeran, N.P.; Goh, J.X.; Tan, L.T. Trikoveramides A-C, cyclic depsipeptides from the marine cyanobacterium Symploca hydnoides. Phytochemistry 2021, 190, 112879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Maneechote, N.; Yingyongnarongkul, B.; Suksamran, A.; Lumyong, S. Inhibition of Vibrio spp. by 2-Hydroxyethyl-11-hydroxyhexadec-9-enoate of Marine Cyanobacterium Leptolyngbya sp. LT19. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 2088–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Levert, A.; Alvariño, R.; Bornancin, L.; Abou Mansour, E.; Burja, A.M.; Genevière, A.-M.; Bonnard, I.; Alonso, E.; Botana, L.; Banaigs, B. Structures and Activities of Tiahuramides A–C, Cyclic Depsipeptides from a Tahitian Collection of the Marine Cyanobacterium Lyngbya majuscula. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Iwasaki, A.; Tadenuma, T.; Sumimoto, S.; Ohshiro, T.; Ozaki, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Teruya, T.; Tomoda, H.; Suenaga, K. Biseokeaniamides A, B, and C, sterol O-acyltransferase inhibitors from an Okeania sp. marine cyanobacterium. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Petitbois, J.G.; Casalme, L.O.; Lopez, J.A.V.; Alarif, W.M.; Abdel-Lateff, A.; Al-Lihaibi, S.S.; Yoshimura, E.; Nogata, Y.; Umezawa, T.; Matsuda, F.; et al. Serinolamides and Lyngbyabellins from an Okeania sp. Cyanobacterium Collected from the Red Sea. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 2708–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Han, B.-N.; Liang, T.-T.; Keen, L.J.; Fan, T.-T.; Zhang, X.-D.; Xu, L.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, S.-P.; Lin, H.-W. Two Marine Cyanobacterial Aplysiatoxin Polyketides, Neo-debromoaplysiatoxin A and B, with K+ Channel Inhibition Activity. Org. Lett. 2018, 20, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lopez, J.A.V.; Petitbois, J.G.; Vairappan, C.S.; Umezawa, T.; Matsuda, F.; Okino, T. Columbamides D and E: Chlorinated Fatty Acid Amides from the Marine Cyanobacterium Moorea bouillonii Collected in Malaysia. Org. Lett. 2017, 19, 4231–4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sueyoshi, K.; Yamano, A.; Ozaki, K.; Sumimoto, S.; Iwasaki, A.; Suenaga, K.; Teruya, T. Three new malyngamides from the marine cyanobacterium Moorea producens. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Iwasaki, K.; Iwasaki, A.; Sumimoto, S.; Sano, T.; Hitomi, Y.; Ohno, O.; Suenaga, K. Croissamide, a proline-rich cyclic peptide with an N-prenylated tryptophan from a marine cyanobacterium Symploca sp. Tetrahedron Lett. 2018, 59, 3806–3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Huang, I.-S.; Zimba, P. V Cyanobacterial bioactive metabolites—A review of their chemistry and biology. Harmful Algae 2019, 86, 139–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rosén, J.; Lövgren, A.; Kogej, T.; Muresan, S.; Gottfries, J.; Backlund, A. ChemGPS-NPWeb: Chemical space navigation online. J. Comput. Aided. Mol. Des. 2009, 23, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Alajlani, M.M.; Backlund, A. Evaluating Antimycobacterial Screening Schemes Using Chemical Global Positioning System-Natural Product Analysis. Molecules 2020, 25, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Alajlani, M.M. The Chemical Property Position of Bedaquiline Construed by a Chemical Global Positioning System-Natural Product. Molecules 2022, 27, 753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Alajlani, A.M.B. Predicting the mechanism of action of antituberculosis agents using chemical global positioning system—Natural product. Planta Med. 2016, 82, P47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Díez, B.; Bergman, B.; El-Shehawy, R. Marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria: Out of the blue. Plant Biotechnol. 2008, 25, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Capone, D.G.; Burns, J.A.; Montoya, J.P.; Subramaniam, A.; Mahaffey, C.; Gunderson, T.; Michaels, A.F.; Carpenter, E.J. Nitrogen fixation by Trichodesmium spp.: An important source of new nitrogen to the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2005, 19, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Breitbarth, E.; Oschlies, A.; LaRoche, J. Physiological constraints on the global distribution of Trichodesmium—Effect of temperature on diazotrophy. Biogeosciences 2007, 4, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. El-Shehawy, R.; Lugomela, C.; Ernst, A.; Bergman, B. Diurnal expression of hetR and diazocyte development in the filamentous non-heterocystous cyanobacterium Trichodesmium erythraeum. Microbiology 2003, 149, 1139–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wannicke, N.; BP, K.; Voss, M. Release of fixed N2 and C as dissolved compounds by Trichodesmium erythreum and Nodularia spumigena under the influence of high light and high nutrient (P). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 57, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Mulholland, M.R.; Capone, D.G. The nitrogen physiology of the marine N2-fixing cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Kranz, S.A.; Eichner, M.; Rost, B. Interactions between CCM and N2 fixation in Trichodesmium. Photosynth. Res. 2011, 109, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Zehr, J.P.; Waterbury, J.B.; Turner, P.J.; Montoya, J.P.; Omoregie, E.; Steward, G.F.; Hansen, A.; Karl, D.M. Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature 2001, 412, 635–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zehr, J.P.; Mellon, M.T.; Zani, S. New Nitrogen-Fixing Microorganisms Detected in Oligotrophic Oceans by Amplification of Nitrogenase (nifH) Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3444–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zehr, J.P.; Bench, S.R.; Carter, B.J.; Hewson, I.; Niazi, F.; Shi, T.; Tripp, H.J.; Affourtit, J.P. Globally distributed uncultivated oceanic N2-fixing cyanobacteria lack oxygenic photosystem II. Science 2008, 322, 1110–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Prechtl, J.; Kneip, C.; Lockhart, P.; Wenderoth, K.; Maier, U.-G. Intracellular Spheroid Bodies of Rhopalodia gibba Have Nitrogen-Fixing Apparatus of Cyanobacterial Origin. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2004, 21, 1477–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zehr, J.P.; Montoya, J.P.; Jenkins, B.D.; Hewson, I.; Mondragon, E.; Short, C.M.; Church, M.J.; Hansen, A.; Karl, D.M. Experiments linking nitrogenase gene expression to nitrogen fixation in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2007, 52, 169–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Stenegren, M.; Caputo, A.; Berg, C.; Bonnet, S.; Foster, R.A. Distribution and drivers of symbiotic and free-living diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the western tropical South Pacific. Biogeosciences 2018, 15, 1559–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Thompson, A.W.; Zehr, J.P. Cellular interactions: Lessons from the nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria. J. Phycol. 2013, 49, 1024–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sohm, J.A.; Webb, E.A.; Capone, D.G. Emerging patterns of marine nitrogen fixation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 9, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Shiozaki, T.; Ijichi, M.; Kodama, T.; Takeda, S.; Furuya, K. Heterotrophic bacteria as major nitrogen fixers in the euphotic zone of the Indian Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2014, 28, 1096–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Dron, A.; Rabouille, S.; Claquin, P.; Le Roy, B.; Talec, A.; Sciandra, A. Light–dark (12:12) cycle of carbon and nitrogen metabolism in Crocosphaera watsonii WH8501: Relation to the cell cycle. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 967–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Compaoré, J.; Stal, L.J. Oxygen and the light–dark cycle of nitrogenase activity in two unicellular cyanobacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 12, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Turk-Kubo, K.A.; Frank, I.E.; Hogan, M.E.; Desnues, A.; Bonnet, S.; Zehr, J.P. Diazotroph community succession during the VAHINE mesocosm experiment (New Caledonia lagoon). Biogeosciences 2015, 12, 7435–7452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Taniuchi, Y.; Chen, Y.L.; Chen, H.-Y.; Tsai, M.-L.; Ohki, K. Isolation and characterization of the unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacterium Group C TW3 from the tropical western Pacific Ocean. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 641–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Reddy, K.J.; Haskell, J.B.; Sherman, D.M.; Sherman, L.A. Unicellular, aerobic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria of the genus Cyanothece. J. Bacteriol. 1993, 175, 1284–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Andreeva, N.A.; Melnikov, V.V.; Snarskaya, D.D. The Role of Cyanobacteria in Marine Ecosystems. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2020, 46, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Foster, R.A.; Subramaniam, A.; Zehr, J.P. Distribution and activity of diazotrophs in the Eastern Equatorial Atlantic. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Mishra, U.; Pabbi, S. Cyanobacteria: A potential biofertilizer for rice. Resonance 2004, 9, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Karlson, A.M.L.; Duberg, J.; Motwani, N.H.; Hogfors, H.; Klawonn, I.; Ploug, H.; Barthel Svedén, J.; Garbaras, A.; Sundelin, B.; Hajdu, S.; et al. Nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria stimulates production in Baltic food webs. Ambio 2015, 44, 413–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Pandey, S.N.; Verma, I.; Kumar, M. Chapter 23—Cyanobacteria: Potential Source of Biofertilizer and Synthesizer of Metallic Nanoparticles; Singh, P.K., Kumar, A., Singh, V.K., Shrivastava, A.K., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2020; pp. 351–367. ISBN 978-0-12-819311-2. [Google Scholar]
  107. Levitan, O.; Rosenberg, G.; Setlik, I.; Setlikova, E.; Grigel, J.; Klepetar, J.; Prasil, O.; Berman-Frank, I. Elevated CO2 enhances nitrogen fixation and growth in the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Case, A.E.; Atsumi, S. Cyanobacterial chemical production. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 231, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Zhang, A.; Carroll, A.L.; Atsumi, S. Carbon recycling by cyanobacteria: Improving CO2 fixation through chemical production. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Rae, B.D.; Long, B.M.; Badger, M.R.; Price, G.D. Functions, Compositions, and Evolution of the Two Types of Carboxysomes: Polyhedral Microcompartments That Facilitate CO2 Fixation in Cyanobacteria and Some Proteobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013, 77, 357–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  111. Yeates, T.O.; Kerfeld, C.A.; Heinhorst, S.; Cannon, G.C.; Shively, J.M. Protein-based organelles in bacteria: Carboxysomes and related microcompartments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 6, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Turmo, A.; Gonzalez-Esquer, C.R.; Kerfeld, C.A. Carboxysomes: Metabolic modules for CO2 fixation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2017, 364, fnx176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Cannon, G.C.; Bradburne, C.E.; Aldrich, H.C.; Baker, S.H.; Heinhorst, S.; Jessup, M. Shively Microcompartments in Prokaryotes: Carboxysomes and Related Polyhedra. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 5351–5361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Price, G.D.; Pengelly, J.J.L.; Forster, B.; Du, J.; Whitney, S.M.; von Caemmerer, S.; Badger, M.R.; Howitt, S.M.; Evans, J.R. The cyanobacterial CCM as a source of genes for improving photosynthetic CO2 fixation in crop species. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 753–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Silvarrey Barruffa, A.; Sposito, V.; Faggian, R. Climate change and cyanobacteria harmful algae blooms: Adaptation practices for developing countries. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2021, 72, 1722–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Paerl, H.W.; Paul, V.J. Climate change: Links to global expansion of harmful cyanobacteria. Water Res. 2012, 46, 1349–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Paerl, H.W.; Huisman, J. Climate change: A catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Tonk, L.; Bosch, K.; Visser, P.M.; Huisman, J. Salt tolerance of the harmful cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 46, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Timeline of the different cyanobacterial fossils recorded through different eras, mainly over the period ranging from 2500 to 542 million years ago, using a geological time scale.
Figure 1. Timeline of the different cyanobacterial fossils recorded through different eras, mainly over the period ranging from 2500 to 542 million years ago, using a geological time scale.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g001
Figure 2. Flowchart showing classes of screened bioactive compounds and their derivatives.
Figure 2. Flowchart showing classes of screened bioactive compounds and their derivatives.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g002
Figure 3. Flowchart reporting percentage of each pharmacological target for screened compounds in the last six years.
Figure 3. Flowchart reporting percentage of each pharmacological target for screened compounds in the last six years.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g003
Scheme 1. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with cytotoxicity targets.
Scheme 1. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with cytotoxicity targets.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch001aMarinedrugs 21 00439 sch001b
Scheme 2. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with anti-trypansomal activity.
Scheme 2. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with anti-trypansomal activity.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch002aMarinedrugs 21 00439 sch002b
Scheme 3. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with serine proteases inhibitory effect.
Scheme 3. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with serine proteases inhibitory effect.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch003aMarinedrugs 21 00439 sch003b
Scheme 4. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with antiproliferative and anticancer activity.
Scheme 4. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with antiproliferative and anticancer activity.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch004
Scheme 5. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with anti-quorum-sensing activity.
Scheme 5. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with anti-quorum-sensing activity.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch005
Scheme 6. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with antibacterial activity.
Scheme 6. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with antibacterial activity.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch006
Scheme 7. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with different activities.
Scheme 7. Structures of isolated cyanobacterial compounds from 2017 to 2022 with different activities.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 sch007
Figure 4. Chemical property Space for cyanobacterial bioactive compounds constructed in three dimensions: PC1 (x = red), PC2 (y = yellow), and PC3 (green).
Figure 4. Chemical property Space for cyanobacterial bioactive compounds constructed in three dimensions: PC1 (x = red), PC2 (y = yellow), and PC3 (green).
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g004
Figure 5. Flowchart for the different types of nitrogen-fixative cyanobacteria with their mechanisms of action.
Figure 5. Flowchart for the different types of nitrogen-fixative cyanobacteria with their mechanisms of action.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g005
Figure 6. Flow chart explaining the carbon cycle in marine cyanobacteria.
Figure 6. Flow chart explaining the carbon cycle in marine cyanobacteria.
Marinedrugs 21 00439 g006
Table 8. Survey of marine cyanobacteria passed into different phases of clinical trials between 2017 and 2022.
Table 8. Survey of marine cyanobacteria passed into different phases of clinical trials between 2017 and 2022.
Intervention or Treatment/FormCondition or/DiseaseType of the Study/Clinical Trials Phase/No. of ParticipantsDoseAdministration Route/EffectsReferences
ClinicalTrials.GovIdentifier
Apomivir®/CapsuleInfluenzaInterventional/Phase 2/196 participantsApomivir®: (120 mg b.i.d.) 1 capsule twice daily
Placebo: 1 capsule twice daily
Orally after meal/Apomivir® has been proven to have excellent broad-spectrum antiviral ability, especially for seasonal influenza viruses (Influenza virus A and B)(https://clinicaltrials.gov (accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT01677689)
Dietary Supplement: Water-soluble Extract of the cyanobacteria Aphanizomenon Flos-aquae (AFA)/CapsulesCongestive heart failure, chronicObservational/Not reported/15 participants2 capsules 3 time a dayOral/The improvement in patient’s quality of life after 12 months of trial admission(https://clinicaltrials.gov accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT04515537)
Phycocyanin (Phycocare®)
Other: Placebo/Not reported
Metastatic gastric cancerInterventional/Not Applicable/110 participantsPhycocare: Every day for 9 months (except days of chemotherapy: no Phycocare)
Placebo: Every day for 9 months (except days of chemotherapy = no Placebo)
Not reported/phycocyanin may give protection against oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy(https://clinicaltrials.gov accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT05025826)
Dietary Supplement: Immulina TM
Dietary Supplement: Placebo/Capsules
Post-acute COVID-19 syndromeInterventional/Not Applicable/120 participantsImmulina TM: (200 mg per capsule) 2–200 mg capsules given by mouth in the morning and 2–200 mg capsules given by mouth in the evening for 8 weeks durationPlacebo: As the sameOral/Not reported(https://clinicaltrials.gov accessed on 15 April 2023), NCT05524532)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Seedi, H.R.; El-Mallah, M.F.; Yosri, N.; Alajlani, M.; Zhao, C.; Mehmood, M.A.; Du, M.; Ullah, H.; Daglia, M.; Guo, Z.; et al. Review of Marine Cyanobacteria and the Aspects Related to Their Roles: Chemical, Biological Properties, Nitrogen Fixation and Climate Change. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21080439

AMA Style

El-Seedi HR, El-Mallah MF, Yosri N, Alajlani M, Zhao C, Mehmood MA, Du M, Ullah H, Daglia M, Guo Z, et al. Review of Marine Cyanobacteria and the Aspects Related to Their Roles: Chemical, Biological Properties, Nitrogen Fixation and Climate Change. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(8):439. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21080439

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Seedi, Hesham R., Mohamed F. El-Mallah, Nermeen Yosri, Muaaz Alajlani, Chao Zhao, Muhammad A. Mehmood, Ming Du, Hammad Ullah, Maria Daglia, Zhiming Guo, and et al. 2023. "Review of Marine Cyanobacteria and the Aspects Related to Their Roles: Chemical, Biological Properties, Nitrogen Fixation and Climate Change" Marine Drugs 21, no. 8: 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21080439

APA Style

El-Seedi, H. R., El-Mallah, M. F., Yosri, N., Alajlani, M., Zhao, C., Mehmood, M. A., Du, M., Ullah, H., Daglia, M., Guo, Z., Khalifa, S. A. M., & Shou, Q. (2023). Review of Marine Cyanobacteria and the Aspects Related to Their Roles: Chemical, Biological Properties, Nitrogen Fixation and Climate Change. Marine Drugs, 21(8), 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21080439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop