Next Article in Journal
Condom and Substance Use at Last Sex: Differences between MSMO and MSWO High School Youth
Next Article in Special Issue
Reconciling the Entomological Hazard and Disease Risk in the Lyme Disease System
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Factors Influencing the Bioaccessibility of Triazolone in Cherry Tomatoes Using a Static SHIME Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Using Landscape Analysis to Test Hypotheses about Drivers of Tick Abundance and Infection Prevalence with Borrelia burgdorferi
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph15050994
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia

by
Michal Chvostáč
1,
Eva Špitalská
2,
Radovan Václav
1,
Tatiana Vaculová
1,
Lenka Minichová
2 and
Markéta Derdáková
1,*
1
Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 06 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Institute of Virology, Biomedical Research Center, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 05 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(5), 994; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050994
Submission received: 28 February 2018 / Revised: 11 May 2018 / Accepted: 11 May 2018 / Published: 15 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emergence of Tick-Borne Diseases Resulting from Human Landscape Change)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In Europe, Ixodes ricinus is the most important vector of tick-borne zoonotic bacteria. It transmits spirochaetes from the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. Although spatial differences in the prevalence of tick-borne pathogens have been intensively studied, seasonal (within-year) fluctuations in the prevalence of these pathogens within sites are often overlooked. We analyzed the occurrence and seasonal dynamics of Ixodes ricinus in an urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia. Furthemore, we examined temporal trends in the community structure of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in questing and bird-feeding ticks. The total prevalence for B. burgdorferi s.l. in questing I. ricinus was 6.8%, involving six genospecies with the dominance of bird-associated B. garinii and B. valaisiana. A. phagocytophilum, R. helvetica and R. monacensis occurred in 5.9%, 5.0% and 0.2% of questing ticks, respectively. In total, 12.5% and 4.4% of bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks carried B. burgdorferi s.l. and R. helvetica. The total prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in our study site was two times lower than the mean prevalence for Europe. In contrast, A. phagocytophilum prevalence was significantly higher compared to those in other habitats of Slovakia. Our results imply that tick propagation and the transmission, suppression and seasonal dynamics of tick-borne pathogens at the study site were primarily shaped by abundance and temporal population fluctuations in ruminant and bird hosts.

1. Introduction

Ixodes ricinus (Linnaeus 1758) is the most widespread tick species in Europe. It widely occurs in sylvatic as well as in urban habitats with ample vegetation such as parks, recreational areas, gardens and urban forests. Emergence of ticks in urban areas is associated with a higher risk of tick-borne diseases for humans and companion animals [1]. Occurrence of ticks in urban parks is significantly influenced by vegetation that maintains adequate humidity for ticks as well as the abundance and species composition of hosts [2,3,4].
I. ricinus ticks transmit several bacterial agents. The most common ones are spirochetes from the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex. This bacterial complex consists of 21 known genospecies [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Five out of eight genospecies that are present in Europe are potentially infectious for humans and can cause Lyme disease.
Reported mean prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l., detected by various detection methods including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), cultivation in BSK medium, dark-field microscopy and immunofluorescence assays, in ticks in Europe is 12.3–13.7% [13,14]. In Slovakia, the prevalence ranges from 4.5%, detected in questing I. ricinus in a suburban forest in northern Slovakia [15], to 46.1% for a mountain region of central Slovakia [16]. Prevalences of this bacterial group in urban and suburban forests across various cities in Slovakia were recorded to reach 20.5% [15,17,18]. Genetic variability within and between Borrelia genospecies is linked to different clinical symptoms as well as different associations to reservoir hosts. Rodents, especially from genera Myodes and Apodemus act as the reservoirs of B. afzelii, B. burgdorferi s.s., B. bavariensis, and B. spielmanii [19,20,21,22,23]. The circulation of B. afzelii in natural foci of urban parks and forests is also associated with squirrels and hedgehogs [20,24], while B. spielmanii is associated with hedgehogs [24] and dormice [25]. Birds are the reservoirs of B. garinii, B. valaisiana [26] and in a low degree also for B. lusitaniae [27] for which the main reservoir hosts are the lizards [28].
Anaplasma phagocytophilum is another important bacterial agent transmitted by I. ricinus in Europe. It causes granulocytic anaplasmosis of humans, horses and dogs, as well as tick-borne fever of domestic ruminants. In Slovakia, the prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in questing I. ricinus ticks varies between 1.1% and 8% [15,29,30,31,32]. In Europe, Anaplasma circulates in two different cycles. The most important reservoir hosts in Europe are wild cervids, sheep, cattle and goats [29,33,34,35,36]. Rodents are reservoir hosts of A. phagocytophilum genotypes that are transmitted by I. trianguliceps, but not by I. ricinus ticks [36,37,38,39]. In areas with abundant populations of wild cervids, the prevalence of Anaplasma is usually higher [34,39].
Ixodes ricinus ticks are also known to carry some species of Rickettsia, obligate, aerobic, gram-negative, intracellular bacterial parasites of eukaryotes with a worldwide occurrence, which can cause rickettsial diseases. Rickettsia helvetica and Rickettsia monacensis transmitted by I. ricinus are rickettsial species associated with human cases of rickettsiosis [40,41]. The prevalences vary from 0.5% in an island in the Baltic Sea to 66% in the Netherlands for R. helvetica, and from 0.5% in Germany to 34.6% in Turkey for R. monacensis [42]. In Slovakia, rickettsial prevalence in I. ricinus ticks were recorded up to 20%, with R. helvetica being a dominant species [43,44]. The role of vertebrates in their circulation is still not clear. Rickettsiae have been identified in a few randomly selected samples of the spleens of small rodents and ungulates [45,46].
All of I. ricinus stages are obligate parasites. Immature stages of ticks feed most frequently on small mammals and birds. Howeverd, the most important host of adult ticks are large mammals, such as deer and wild boar. Immature ticks can compensate for the absence of birds and small mammals by feeding on larger animals, but their abundance may decrease [47,48].
The population structure of tick hosts in different sites and habitats can affect the abundance of tick-borne pathogens such as Borrelia and Anaplasma due to differences in host competence [49,50,51]. For example, roe deer commonly acts as the main host for adult ticks and in a lower degree for immature ticks [52]. The increase of roe deer abundance may cause a decrease in Borrelia prevalence in a given habitat [39], possibly due to the borreliacidal effects of deer blood-complement [53]. Variation in the abundance and diversity of tick hosts has been suggested as a crucial determinant of the prevalence and density of tick-borne pathogens [54]. For example, some might suggest that densities of infected ticks should be lower at sites with higher tick-host biodiversity [55], but see [56]. However, the abundance and diversity of tick hosts and, consequently, the abundance and diversity of tick-borne pathogens, may not only vary spatially, but also temporally within sites, e.g., due to fluctuating densities of bird tick hosts. Despite its importance for epidemiology, seasonality and its causes in the prevalence and community structure of vector-borne pathogens within sites have been scarcely studied (e.g., [57] for prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum during May and August).
The aim of this study was to examine the seasonal dynamics in I. ricinus abundance as well as the prevalence and community structure of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an urban forest in Slovakia. A recent metaanalysis has revealed a strong negative correlation between the two most prevalent Borrelia genospecies in Europe—B. afzelii and B. garinii [14], suggesting that small rodents and birds represent the main alternative hosts for immature I. ricinus ticks in the region. Given the abundance of temperate-zone birds undergoes abrupt seasonal changes corresponding to their reproductive period (e.g., [58]), we hypothesized that the seasonal pattern in the prevalences of tick-borne pathogens at the study site would reflect the phenology of bird abundance. Consequently, we predicted that the prevalence of the commonest Borrelia genospecies associated with bird hosts (B. garinii) and small rodent hosts (B. afzelii) should show divergent seasonal patterns, reflecting the breeding phenology of temperate-zone birds.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area, Tick Sampling and Host Trapping

The study area (app. 0.15 km2) was located in NW Bratislava, Slovakia (48°10′11.303″ N; 17°4′2.255″ E), in the Sitina urban forest. The forest is a part of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAS) campus. It is largely separated from the Bratislava ZOO and from the surrounding urban area by the fence. The study site is characterized by a low abundance of small rodents [59]. On the other hand, many temperate-zone bird species, mainly passerines, which harbour the majority of Borrelia-infected ticks [60], such as tits (Paridae) and thrushes (Turdidae) are seasonally abundant there during their reproductive period (April–July). The local breeding populations of these passerine species are migratory (wintering in Western Europe and the Mediterranean region [61]) and show higher numbers during the breeding period compared to the winter season. Some large vertebrates, particularly roe deer C. capreolus, are also permanently present at the site. In addition, a population of app. 35 feral cats resides in the study area. Hornbeams Carpinus betulus and oaks Quercus spp. dominate the forest.
Questing ticks were collected by standardized flagging method [62] in monthly intervals from March 2011 until December 2012 on a single 100 m transect. Various types of vegetation were covered during flaging. Birds were caught during four trappings throughout the summer season in 2012 by mist-nets [60], and feeding ticks were removed from birds with forceps. To confirm the presence or absence of small mammals, five two-night trappings with 50 Swedish bridge metal traps [63] were conducted during 2011–2012. All the questing and feeding ticks were stored in 70% ethanol until the DNA extraction. Only nymphal and adult stages were used for the investigation. Ticks were identified to species and life stages using available taxonomic keys [64]. Meteorological data for the days of tick collection were acquired from the station of the Hydrometeorological Institute (Bratislava, Mlynská dolina) that is located 2 km away from the study site.

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Detection of Bacteria

A total of 543 questing ticks and 295 bird-fed I. ricinus ticks were tested for the prevalence of tick-borne bacteria. DNA was isolated from ticks individually. For questing ticks, alcaline-hydrolysis method [65] was used. DNA from bird-fed ticks was isolated with the commercial extraction kit (DNAeasy tissue kit, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA samples were stored at −20 °C. A 620 bp fragment of tick mitochondrial gene cytochrome b was amplified in each extracted tick DNA to confirm the presence of tick DNA [66]. Only positive samples were further analyzed for the presence of tick borne agents.

2.3. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.

B. burgdorferi s.l. was detected by the amplification of 222–255 bp fragment of rrfA-rrlB intergenic spacer using IGSA (5′-CGACCTTCTTCGCCTTAAAGC-3′) and IGSB (5′-AGCTCTTATTCGCTGATGGTA-3′) primers [67]. PCR (polymerase chain reaction) amplifications were performed in a total reaction mixture of 25 µL. The PCR reaction mixture per each sample contained 2.5 µL of PCR buffer, 1 µL of MgCl2, 0.125 µL of polymerase (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 0.5 µL of both primers, 0.5 µL of dNTP (Thermofisher, Dreieich, Germany), 14.875 µL of nuclease-free water (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and 5 µL of tick DNA as template. Touch-down PCR program consisted of these steps: Initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 61 °C (−0.2 °C per cycle) for 25 s and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s. It was followed by 5 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 60 °C (−0.4 °C per cycle) for 25 s and elongation at 72 °C for 30 s. Then followed 30 cycles of denaturation (94 °C, 15 s), annealing (58 °C, 25 s) and elongation (72 °C, 30 s). The program was terminated by elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel. Than it was stained with GoodView (Ecoli, Bratislava, Slovakia) and visualized on UV transiluminator Vilber-Lourmant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Positive samples were further typed to Borrelial genospecies by Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) [67]. For each of 13 µL of positive PCR product 0.5 µL of TruI restriction enzyme (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuainia) and 1.5 µL of buffer (Fermentas, Thermo Scientific, Vilnius, Lithuania) were mixed and digested for 5 min at 65 °C. The electrophoresis was performed in electrophoresis system Origins (Elchrom Scientific, Cham, Switzerland) using Spreadex EL300 mini gel (Elchrom Scientific, Cham, Switzerland) at 120 V for 150 min. After the electrophoresis, the gel was stained by SYBR green (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 45 min and visualized by UV transiluminator.

2.4. Detection of A. phagocytophilum

Samples were tested for the presence of A. phagocytophilum by real-time PCR using primers ApMSP2f (5′-ATGGAAGGTAGTGTTGGTTATGGTATT-3′) and ApMSP2r (5′-TTGGTCTTGAAGCGCTCGTA-3′) and the TaqmanProbe ApMSP2p (5′-TGGTGCCAGGGTTGAGCTTGAGATTG-3′, labeled with FAM targeted 77 bp fragment of msp2 gene [68]. As master mix, 12.5 µL of Bioron SuperHot Master Mix was mixed with 0.3 µL of probe, 2.6 µL of MgCl2 (Bioron, Ludwigshafen, Germany) and 2.3 µL of both primers. 5 µL of DNA was added into each sample. The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min, followed by 39 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annelation at 60 °C for 1 min. Real-time PCR was calibrated using serial dilution of standard reference sample. Based on the results, a standard curve was defined. Samples were considered positive with threshold cycles (CT) level less than 35 cycles and the amplified products at the same dissociation temperature as the positive control. CT value observed in positive samples ranged from 30 to 35 cycles.

2.5. Detection of R. helvetica and R. monacensis

Samples were tested for the presence of rickettsiae using the genus-specific primers RpCS.877p (5′-GGGGACCTGCTCACGGCGG-3′) and RpCS.1258n (5′-ATTGCAAAAAGTACAGTGAACA-3′) amplifying a 381 bp part of gltA gene [69]. PCR amplifications were carried out using DyNAzymeTM PCR MAster Mix (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finland) on thermocycler PTC-119 200 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Saint Bruno, Canada). Master mix composed of following reagents: 10 µL of 2× DyNAzymeTM II PCR Master Mix, 2 µL of both primers, and 5 µL of nuclease-free water (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). 3 µL of DNA was used for PCR. The DNA from uninfected ticks and sterile water, and DNA from R. helvetica were used as negative and positive controls, respectively. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel, stained with GelRedTM (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA) and visualized with the UV transilluminator. Rickettsia-positive tick samples were screened for the presence of R. helvetica using TagMan PCR assay targeting a 65-bp fragment of the 23S rRNA gene [70] using DyNAmoTM Probe qPCR (Finnzymes, Espoo, Finnland) on Bio-Rad CFX96TM Real-Time System. As master mix, 10 µL of 2× Master Mix was mixed with 0.25 µL of TaqMan probe (5′-AACCGTAGCGTACACTTA-3′ labeled with TAMRA) and 0.5 µL of both primers Rickhelv.147f (5′-TTTGAAGGAGACACGGAACACA-3′) and Rickhelv.211r (5′-TCCGGTACTCAAATCCTCACGTA-3′). 3 µL of DNA was added into each sample. The PCR program consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 15 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 15 s and annelation at 60 °C for 1 min. Each run of TaqMan PCR reactions included a negative template control, a positive control, and DNA standards containing 3 × 100–3 × 106 target copies with a sensitivity of 3 copies of the DNA. R. helvetica-negative samples by TagMan PCR assay were purified using a QIAquick Spin PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described by the manufacturer and analyzed by sequencing both DNA strands by Marcogen Inc., (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). The DNA sequences were compared with those available in GenBank using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (Blast) on http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Ordination analysis is a suitable approach to examine multivariate data [71]. In order to examine how seasonality (within-year temporal variation) contributes to explaining the variation in the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens, we used the partial redundancy analysis (partial RDA). The month when I. ricinus ticks were collected represented the explanatory variable (constraint) while the life-cycle stage (nymph or adult), the sex of adult ticks, and the year of sampling represented the conditioning (random) variable. In partial RDA, each I. ricinus tick represented a unique site (n = 542) at which the presence or absence of selected pathogens was studied. The presence-absence data of pathogen occurrence were Hellinger-transformed before the partial RDA analysis [71]. R. monacensis, B. burgdorferi s.s., and B. spielmanii were excluded from RDA analysis because they occurred rarely (in less than four ticks). The significance of partial RDA parameters (RDA axes and the constraint, i.e., month) was tested by permutation tests (999 permutations). The vegan package v. 2.4-1 [72] was used for partial RDA analysis within the R software [73]. Contingency tables with the prevalence data of different pathogens were examined with the likelihood-ratio (G) test, using the RVAideMemoire package v. 0.9-62 [74].

2.7. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The GenBank accession numbers for the nucleotide sequences of R. helvetica and R. monacensis obtained in this study are: MF673859-MF673863.

3. Results

In total, 559 questing ticks were collected in 2011 and 2012. Sixteen ticks were determined as Haemaphysalis concinna Koch, 1844 and these were not included in further analyses. 543 ticks were identified as Ixodes ricinus; 249 and 294 I. ricinus ticks were collected in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Of these, 484 (89.1%) individuals were nymphs and 59 (10.9%) were adults. Adult ticks represented 2.4% of collected ticks in 2011, while it was 17.7% in 2012.
During 5 trappings (500 trap-nights), we did not catch any rodent. Out of total 34 mist-netted birds, 309 feeding I. ricinus ticks (20 nymphs and 289 larvae) were collected; 295 (20 nymphs and 275 larvae) of them were tested for the presence of bacterial DNA (Table 1 and Table 2). We have readily observed, but not sampled, other vertebrates, particularly roe deer, feral cats and hedgehogs, which can act as hosts of I. ricinus ticks in the study area.

3.1. Pathogens in Questing I. ricinus

Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. was detected in 37 (6.8%) out of 543 questing I. ricinus ticks. Two (3.4%) of 58 I. ricinus adults and 35 (7.2%) of 485 nymphs were positive for B. burgdorferi s.l. (Table 3).
In 37 borrelia-positive samples, we have detected the presence of six genospecies with the dominance of B. garinii (13 ticks, 35.1%) and B. valaisiana (9 ticks, 24.3%). B. afzelii was present in six ticks (16.2%). B. lusitaniae was a less prevalent genospecies (4 ticks, 10.8%), followed by B. burgdorferi s.s. (2 ticks, 5.4%) and B. spielmanii (1 tick, 2.7%). Mixed infection was recorded in two cases. One tick was infected with B. afzelii and B. spielmanii and the other one with B. afzelii and B. burgdorferi s.s. (Figure 1).
A. phagocytophilum was detected in 32 (5.9%) out of 543 questing ticks (Table 3). A. phagocytopphilum prevalence in 2011 was 4.4% (11 ticks), while in 2012 it was 7.1% (21 ticks) (Table 3). The infection rate of adult I. ricinus was comparable (3 ticks; 5.2%) with the A. phagocytophilum prevalence in nymphal I. ricinus (29 ticks; 6%).
R. helvetica and R. monacensis were identified in 27 (5.0%) and one (0.2%) questing tick, respectively (Table 3). R. helvetica was found in 15 specimens (6%; CI: 3.4–9.7) out of ticks collected in 2011 and in 12 (7.5%; CI: 4.7–11.1) out of ticks collected in 2012. R. monacensis was recorded in one female collected in June 2012. The prevalence in 2012 was 0.3%, while the total prevalence of R. monacensis was 0.18% (CI: 0.0–1.0). All R. helvetica-positive adults were recorded in 2012 only, while 8.0% (14/176) and 3.7% (9/242) of nymphs were positive for the pathogen in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Co-infections involving R. helvetica were recorded with A. phagocytophilum, B. lusitaniae, B. garinii, and B. valaisiana in four nymphs collected in 2011 and with A. phagocytophilum and B. valaisiana in two nymphs collected in 2012.

3.2. Pathogens in Bird-Feeding I. ricinus

In total, 12.5% (37/295) bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks were borrelia-positive (Table 1 and Table 2), with the dominance (97%) of B. garinii. A single nymph, collected from Parus major carried B. afzelii. Borrelia prevalence in nymphs and larvae was 15% (3/20) and 12.4% (34/275), respectively.
None of the bird-feeding ticks carried A. phagocytophilum. Thirteen (4.4%) out of 295 tested bird-feeding ticks carried R. helvetica. One (5%) out of 20 nymphs and 12 (4.4%) out of 275 larvae were positive. R. monacensis was not detected in any of the ticks feeding on birds (Table 1 and Table 2).

3.3. Seasonality in Tick Abundance and Pathogen Occurrence

The seasonal dynamics of tick questing activity showed a bimodal pattern with the first peak in April–May and the second peak in July (Figure 2). The highest abundance of ticks was recorded in April, which corresponed with the highest prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l in questing ticks (Figure 3). Despite a relatively low abundance of questing ticks during September, B. burgdorferi s.l. was still present in questing ticks (Figure 3). The prevalence of A. phagocytophilum peaked in April (Figure 3). Rickettsiae were most prevalent in May and July (Figure 3).
The partial redundancy analysis (partial RDA) revealed a significant effect of season in terms of month of sampling on the occurrence of selected pathogens in questing I. ricinus ticks (month of sampling, F = 1.78, df = 7, p < 0.01). A. phagocytophillum was more likely to occur in March and April than in other months (Figure 4). While B. afzelii more likely occurred in September and less likely in October and November, this was just the opposite for B. valaisiana (Figure 4). B. garinii occurrence was particularly likely in May and less likely in April (Figure 4). R. helvetica typically occurred in July, but also in September. Variation in the occurrence of pathogens in questing ticks was significantly arranged along two distinct gradients (i.e., constrained axes). The partial RDA suggests that the occurrence of A. phagocytophilum diverged from that of B. garinii (RDA1, F = 7.68, df = 1, p < 0.001), and the occurrence of R. helvetica and B. afzelii was dissociated from that of B. valaisiana (RDA2, F = 2.93, df = 1, p = 0.018; Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Changes in biotic and abiotic conditions can increase or decrease the transmission of zoonotic diseases [4]. Variation in tick-borne pathogen prevalence is traditionally viewed in the context of spatial variation in climatic and weather conditions [75] or spatial variation, at different scales, in tick-host community structure [54]. In this study we have investigated questing activity of ticks and their infection with three groups of tick-borne pathogens—Borrelia, Anaplasma and Rickettsia. For an urban temperate forest, we examined whether the prevalence of different tick-borne pathogens varies temporally within a season. We hypothesized that the occurrence of the commonest Borrelia genospecies in questing ticks should vary non-randomly in time with respect to the reproductive period of birds. This hypothesis is relevant because our study site is known to have a low abundance of small rodents [53], thus stressing the role of bird hosts for local immature I. ricinus ticks. We found that the occurrence of different tick-borne pathogens varied non-randomly with time of season.
Tick questing activity showed a bimodal seasonal pattern. In both years, the first peak was recorded in April–May and the second one in July. This bimodal seasonal tick activity with one bigger peak in spring and the second one in early fall has been described for various tick habitats in Central Europe [76,77,78,79]. The overall prevalence of tick-borne pathogens followed the temporal trend in tick abudance. However, by focusing on specific tick-borne pathogens, we detected distinct seasonal trends in the occurrences of the most common pathogens (Figure 4). First, the early season (March–May) was characterised by the diverging occurrence of A. phagocytophilum and B. garinii. Second, the late season (September–November) was characterised by the divergent occurrence of B. afzelii and B. valaisiana. Hence, even though B. afzelii and B. garinii typically occurred at different parts of the year, our results do not support a divergent occurrence of B. afzelii and B. garinii at our study site. We suggest that this finding is due to a locally lower importance of small rodent hosts during the part of the year with the highest tick abundance (see below). Nevertheless, this study indicates that small rodents may still be important alternative tick hosts during some periods, because we found a divergent occurrence of B. afzelii and B. valaisiana during the late season. Importantly, our results lend support to our hypothesis that temporary increases in the abundance of bird hosts during their reproductive period can be reflected by the seasonal trends in the occurrence of the pathogens associated with these hosts, namely, B. garinii. Intriguingly, the occurrence of B. garinii in questing ticks was most likely in May, i.e., during the peak reproductive period of birds. Even though we do not possess knowledge of the duration of tick molt at our study site, our results suggest that the cohorts of questing I. ricinus ticks infected by bird-associated B. garinii are likely to transmit this pathogen to the same host group. Further research is necessary to address how seasonal fluctuations in abiotic factors, such as temperature and humidity, contribute to the seasonal trends in tick-borne pathogen occurrence and, specifically, to the synchronisation between the occurrence of infected ticks and the corresponding host reservoirs of infection.
A. phagocytophilum was detected in 5.9% of questing ticks. Prevalences of A. phagocytophilum in questing I. ricinus ticks in Slovakia and neigbouring European countries vary between 0.57% and 13.1% [30,37,59,80,81,82]. As compared to recent works on A. phagocytophilum prevalence for various urban and sylvatic habitats in Slovakia [30,37,59], the pathogen prevalence was significantly higher for our urban forest study area (Table 4).
Anaplasma phagocytophilum shows a considerable genetic variability [83], which is partly explained by reservoir host specificity. In Europe, A. phagocytophilum consists of two genetically distinct ecotypes that circulate in two enzootic cycles—one involving rodents and I. trianguliceps ticks and the other involving ungulates, carnivores, and insectivores and I. ricinus ticks [37,84,85,86]. Moreover, Blaňárová et al. [37] showed that I. ricinus ticks could not contract A. phagocytophilum while feeding on infected rodents, though I. trianguliceps ticks could contract the pathogen from infected rodents. Consequently, roe deer and hedgehogs do not only appear to represent the main host group for ticks, but also the main reservoir hosts of A. phagocytophilum in the study area.
The circulation of the causative agents of Lyme borreliosis, spirochetes of B. burgdorferi s.l. complex, depends on the presence of vector ticks and competent reservoir hosts. In our study we detected the presence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in 6.8% (37/543) ticks. The prevalence of this pathogen complex for questing ticks in our study was significantly lower than those detected for various habitats in Slovakia including urban as well as natural sites [26,87] (Table 5).
In addition, the mean prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in I. ricinus across Europe (12.3–13.7%) [13,14] is about twice as high as that detected in our study area. Finally, our results on the pathogen prevalence are at the lower range limit for prevalences reported for neighbouring countries (4–25.7%) [67,88,89,90,91,92].
The low prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. was perhaps the best reflected by the low prevalence of B. afzelii; this rodent-associated genospecies was present only in 16.2% of borrelia-positive questing ticks. For example, at a different site in Slovakia, Derdáková et al. [67] detected the presence of B. afzelii in 56.5% of positive ticks. Rauter and Hartung [13] revealed that on average 38% of borrelia-positive ticks across Europe are infected with B. afzelii. Rodents represent the most important host group for the maintenance of juvenile I. ricinus in Central and Eastern Europe [93] and the key reservoir hosts for B. afzelii, B. spielmanii, B. bavariensis and B. burgdorferi s.s. [19,21,22,25]. Importantly, the presence of B. afzelii, B. burgdorferi s.s. or B. spielmanii can also be maintained in reservoirs, such as hedgehogs and squirrels, especially in urban areas [20,24]. Consequently, the low infection rate of B burgdorferi s.l., and particularly low prevalences of B. afzelii, B. spielmanii, and B. burgdorferi s.s., support the findings of a previous study [53] about a low abundance of small mammals at our study site. In fact, given the pattern of B. garinii vs. A. phagocytophilum and B. valaisiana vs. B. afzelii occurrences (RDA1 and RDA2 axes in Figure 4), our results indicate that birds and roe deer represented main tick hosts at our study site. Morevover, given the pattern of RDA1 axis, reptiles appear to have served as alternative tick hosts during the periods of low bird abundance (Figure 4). Importantly, ruminants such as roe deer may not only be an incompetent reservoir host for borrelia, but due to the borreliacidal effect of their blood complement, they can eliminate borrelia in feeding ticks [39,53,94]. Overall, the low prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. points to locally low densities of rodents, but also to the fact that birds and other small vertebrate hosts were not able to compensate for the lack of small rodents. Thus, roe deer appear to constitute one of the main host groups for I. ricinus ticks and an important biotic factor behind the abundance and community structure of tick-borne pathogens at the study area.
B. garinii (35.1% prevalence) and B. valaisiana (24.3% prevalence), which are associated with bird reservoirs, were found to be the locally dominant genospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. in questing ticks. Of trapped birds, 12.5% of bird-feeding ticks carried B. burgdorferi s.l. (Table 1) with the almost exclusive occurrence of B. garinii. Tarageľová et al. [26] detected 9.4% to 31.1% prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in bird-feeding ticks for different natural habitats in Slovakia. In that study, only 44% of borrelia-positive bird-feeding ticks carried B. garinii, which was significantly less than we detected at our study site (Table 6). This result confirms that birds represent the main Borrelia reservoir at the study site. Our results, with respect to the prevalences of A. phagocytophilum and B. lusitaniae, also suggest that birds may not be available as hosts to questing tick cohorts during certain parts of the season when ruminants and reptiles seem to serve as the main tick hosts. These findings are consistent with the results by Tarageľová et al. [16] who found for a montane habitat that B. lusitaniae could be locally dominant Borrelia genospecies under a shortage of tick hosts.
R. helvetica and R. monacensis were recorded in 5.9% (28/477) of questing I. ricinus ticks with R. helvetica being the dominant Rickettsia species. This prevalence value is again at the lower range limit of Rickettsia prevalences detected in Slovakia and other European countries (0.5–66%) [42,43,44]. The role of vertebrates in the life cycle of R. helvetica is still unclear. Rickettsiae were identified in ticks feeding on rodents and birds [95,96,97,98], but also in blood and tissue samples from birds, rodents, roe deer, sika deer and wild boar [46,95,98,99,100]. Rickettsia spp. is transmitted transovarially and transstadially. We can only speculate that rickettsial infections of attached ticks are the result of either a vertical route of infection (transovarial and/or transstadial transmission) in ticks or a very short rickettsiaemia in hosts or ticks co-feeding. While I. ricinus can be considered as the most important reservoir host for Rickettsiae [100], we found that the occurrence of R. helvetica coincided with the occurrence of B. afzelii (Figure 4). Therefore, the enzootic cycle of R. helvetica may be related to that of rodent-associated B. afzelii. Moreover, our findings on a relatively low prevalence of Rickettsia and B. burgdorferi s.l. and a high prevalence of A. phagocytophilum are consistent with the results by Václav et al. [101]. Václav et al. [101] found that Anaplasma prevalence was negatively assotiated with the prevalences of Rickettsia and Borrelia. Thus, our study indicates that (1) Rickettsia and Borrelia circulate in similar hosts and (2) hosts responsible for Anaplasma circulation contribute not only to the dillution of Borrelia but also of Rickettsia pathogens in feeding ticks.

5. Conclusions

This study implies that structure and seasonality in tick host communities may have an important role in the transmission potential and seasonal dynamics of different Borrelia genospecies. While birds acted as the main alternative hosts for questing ticks, based on B. garinii and B. valaisiana prevalences, they were not able to compensate for the low abundance of small rodents generally serving as the major Borrelia reservoirs. The biotic effects imposed by the dominant tick host, roe deer, appear to have had the most influential role in tick propagation as well as the transmission or suppression of specific tick-borne pathogens at the study area. Distinct seasonality in the density of tick hosts, such as temperate-zone birds, has the potential to shape the phenology of different Borrelia genospecies within sites, particularly, as our study suggests, under low abundances of alternative small vertebrate hosts. We propose that more attention should be given to the role of temporally fluctuating host communities within sites in order to understand the circulation of tick-borne pathogens and the seasonality of infection risk.

Author Contributions

M.D. and M.C. designed the study and wrote the manuscript. M.C. and T.V. collected the questing ticks and trapped the rodents, extracted DNA of ticks, analyzed the presence of B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum. R.V. perfomed statistical analyses and helped with the writing of the manuscript. L.M. collected the ticks from birds. L.M. and E.S. analyzed the ticks for the presence of Rickettsia spp. and helped with the writing of the manuscript. R.V. and M.D. edited the manuscript. All authors read and agreed with the content of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zuzana Hamšíková for sample collection and Lenka Mahríková, Veronika Rusňáková Tarageľová and Diana Selyemová for laboratory work. We also thank the Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute for the meteorological data. This study was financially supported by the Scientific Grant Agency of Ministry of Education and Slovak Academy of Sciences, by the projects VEGA No. 2/0068/17; 2/0119/17, and by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (grant number APVV-16-0463). Rodent and bird trappings were approved by the Regional Environmental Office in Bratislava under licence ZPO-594/2012-SAB and under permission of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic, No. 9368/2011-2.2.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rizzoli, A.; Silaghi, C.; Obiegala, A.; Rudolf, I.; Hubalek, Z.; Foldvari, G.; Plantard, O.; Vayssier-Taussat, M.; Bonnet, S.; Spitalska, E.; et al. Ixodes ricinus and Its Transmitted Pathogens in Urban and Peri-Urban Areas in Europe: New Hazards and Relevance for Public Health. Front. Public Health 2014, 2, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Foldvari, G.; Rigo, K.; Jablonszky, M.; Biro, N.; Majoros, G.; Molnar, V.; Toth, M. Ticks and the city: Ectoparasites of the Northern white-breasted hedgehog (Erinaceus roumanicus) in an urban park. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2011, 2, 231–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Foldvari, G.; Jahfari, S.; Rigo, K.; Jablonszky, M.; Szekeres, S.; Majoros, G.; Toth, M.; Molnar, V.; Coipan, E.C.; Sprong, H. Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in urban hedgehogs. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 496–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Keesing, F.; Belden, L.K.; Daszak, P.; Dobson, A.; Harvell, C.D.; Holt, R.D.; Hudson, P.; Jolles, A.; Jones, K.E.; Mitchell, C.E.; et al. Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 2010, 468, 647–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Casjens, S.R.; Fraser-Liggett, C.M.; Mongodin, E.F.; Qiu, W.G.; Dunn, J.J.; Luft, B.J.; Schutzer, S.E. Whole genome sequence of an unusual Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolate. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1489–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ivanova, L.B.; Tomova, A.; Gonzalez-Acuna, D.; Murua, R.; Moreno, C.X.; Hernandez, C.; Cabello, J.; Cabello, C.; Daniels, T.J.; Godfrey, H.P.; et al. Borrelia chilensis, a new member of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex that extends the range of this genospecies in the Southern Hemisphere. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 16, 1069–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Margos, G.; Vollmer, S.A.; Cornet, M.; Garnier, M.; Fingerle, V.; Wilske, B.; Bormane, A.; Vitorino, L.; Collares-Pereira, M.; Drancourt, M.; et al. A new Borrelia species defined by multilocus sequence analysis of housekeeping genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 5410–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Margos, G.; Hojgaard, A.; Lane, R.S.; Cornet, M.; Fingerle, V.; Rudenko, N.; Ogden, N.; Aanensen, D.M.; Fish, D.; Piesman, J. Multilocus sequence analysis of Borrelia bissettii strains from North America reveals a new Borrelia species, Borrelia kurtenbachii. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2010, 1, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Postic, D.; Garnier, M.; Baranton, G. Multilocus sequence analysis of atypical Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato isolates—Description of Borrelia californiensis sp. nov., and genomospecies 1 and 2. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 297, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Richter, D.; Postic, D.; Sertour, N.; Livey, I.; Matuschka, F.R.; Baranton, G. Delineation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species by multilocus sequence analysis and confirmation of the delineation of Borrelia spielmanii sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Grubhoffer, L.; Oliver, J.H., Jr. Borrelia carolinensis sp. nov., a new (14th) member of the Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato complex from the southeastern region of the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rudenko, N.; Golovchenko, M.; Lin, T.; Gao, L.; Grubhoffer, L.; Oliver, J.H., Jr. Delineation of a new species of the Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato Complex, Borrelia americana sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 3875–3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rauter, C.; Hartung, T. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies in Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe: A metaanalysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 7203–7216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Strnad, M.; Honig, V.; Ruzek, D.; Grubhoffer, L.; Rego, R.O.M. Europe-Wide Meta-Analysis of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu lato Prevalence in Questing Ixodes ricinus Ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e00609-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pangracova, L.; Derdakova, M.; Pekarik, L.; Hviscova, I.; Vichova, B.; Stanko, M.; Hlavata, H.; Petko, B. Ixodes ricinus abundance and its infection with the tick-borne pathogens in urban and suburban areas of Eastern Slovakia. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Taragelova, V.R.; Mahrikova, L.; Selyemova, D.; Vaclav, R.; Derdakova, M. Natural foci of Borrelia lusitaniae in a mountain region of Central Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bazovska, S.; Durovska, J.; Derdakova, M.; Taragelova, V.; Pancak, J.; Zaborska, M.; Traubner, P. The genospecies B. burgdorferi s.l., isolated from ticks and from neurological patients with suspected Lyme borreliosis. Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2011, 32, 491–495. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Lencakova, D.; Hizo-Teufel, C.; Petko, B.; Schulte-Spechtel, U.; Stanko, M.; Wilske, B.; Fingerle, V. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. OspA types in Ixodes ricinus ticks from selected localities in Slovakia and Poland. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296 (Suppl. 40), 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Hanincova, K.; Schafer, S.M.; Etti, S.; Sewell, H.S.; Taragelova, V.; Ziak, D.; Labuda, M.; Kurtenbach, K. Association of Borrelia afzelii with rodents in Europe. Parasitology 2003, 126, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Humair, P.F.; Gern, L. Relationship between Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species, red squirrels (Sciurus vulgaris) and Ixodes ricinus in enzootic areas in Switzerland. Acta Trop. 1998, 69, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Humair, P.F.; Rais, O.; Gern, L. Transmission of Borrelia afzelii from Apodemus mice and Clethrionomys voles to Ixodes ricinus ticks: Differential transmission pattern and overwintering maintenance. Parasitology 1999, 118, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huegli, D.; Hu, C.M.; Humair, P.F.; Wilske, B.; Gern, L. Apodemus species mice are reservoir hosts of Borrelia garinii OspA serotype 4 in Switzerland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 4735–4737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Richter, D.; Schlee, D.B.; Allgower, R.; Matuschka, F.R. Relationships of a novel Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia spielmani sp. nov., with its hosts in Central Europe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6414–6419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Skuballa, J.; Petney, T.; Pfaffle, M.; Oehme, R.; Hartelt, K.; Fingerle, V.; Kimmig, P.; Taraschewski, H. Occurrence of different Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies including B. afzelii, B. bavariensis, and B. spielmanii in hedgehogs (Erinaceus spp.) in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 8–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Richter, D.; Schlee, D.B.; Matuschka, F.R. Reservoir competence of various rodents for the lyme disease Spirochete Borrelia spielmanii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3565–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Taragelova, V.; Koci, J.; Hanincova, K.; Kurtenbach, K.; Derdakova, M.; Ogden, N.; Literak, I.; Kocianova, E.; Labuda, M. Blackbirds and song thrushes constitute a key reservoir of B. garinii, the causative agent of borreliosis in central Europe. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1289–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Poupon, M.A.; Lommano, E.; Humair, P.F.; Douet, V.; Rais, O.; Schaad, M.; Jenni, L.; Gern, L. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in ticks collected from migratory birds in Switzerland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 976–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Majlathova, V.; Majlath, I.; Derdakova, M.; Vichova, B.; Pet’ko, B. Borrelia lusitaniae and green lizards (Lacerta viridis), Karst Region, Slovakia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 1895–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Derdakova, M.; Stefancikova, A.; Spitalska, E.; Taragelova, V.; Kostalova, T.; Hrklova, G.; Kybicova, K.; Schanilec, P.; Majlathova, V.; Varady, M.; et al. Emergence and genetic variability of Anaplasma species in small ruminants and ticks from Central Europe. Vet. Microbiol. 2011, 153, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Derdakova, M.; Vaclav, R.; Pangracova-Blanarova, L.; Selyemova, D.; Koci, J.; Walder, G.; Spitalska, E. Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis and its co-circulation with Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Ixodes ricinus ticks across ecologically different habitats of Central Europe. Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Subramanian, G.; Sekeyova, Z.; Raoult, D.; Mediannikov, O. Multiple tick-associated bacteria in Ixodes ricinus from Slovakia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vichova, B.; Majlathova, V.; Novakova, M.; Stanko, M.; Hviscova, I.; Pangracova, L.; Chrudimsky, T.; Curlik, J.; Petko, B. Anaplasma infections in ticks and reservoir host from Slovakia. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 22, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Massung, R.F.; Levin, M.L.; Miller, N.J.; Mather, T.N. Reservoir competency of goats for Anaplasma phagocytophilum. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1078, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Stuen, S. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—The most widespread tick-borne infection in animals in Europe. Vet. Res. Commun. 2007, 31 (Suppl. 1), 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stuen, S.; Pettersen, K.S.; Granquist, E.G.; Bergstrom, K.; Bown, K.J.; Birtles, R.J. Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants in sympatric red deer (Cervus elaphus) and sheep in southern Norway. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2013, 4, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stuen, S.; Granquist, E.G.; Silaghi, C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—A widespread multi-host pathogen with highly adaptive strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Blanarova, L.; Stanko, M.; Carpi, G.; Miklisova, D.; Vichova, B.; Mosansky, L.; Bona, M.; Derdakova, M. Distinct Anaplasma phagocytophilum genotypes associated with Ixodes trianguliceps ticks and rodents in Central Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 928–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bown, K.J.; Begon, M.; Bennett, M.; Woldehiwet, Z.; Ogden, N.H. Seasonal dynamics of Anaplasma phagocytophila in a rodent-tick (Ixodes trianguliceps) system, United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rosef, O.; Paulauskas, A.; Radzijevskaja, J. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in relation to the density of wild cervids. Acta Vet. Scand. 2009, 51, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Jado, I.; Oteo, J.A.; Aldamiz, M.; Gil, H.; Escudero, R.; Ibarra, V.; Portu, J.; Portillo, A.; Lezaun, M.J.; Garcia-Amil, C.; et al. Rickettsia monacensis and human disease, Spain. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2007, 13, 1405–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Nilsson, K.; Lindquist, O.; Pahlson, C. Association of Rickettsia helvetica with chronic perimyocarditis in sudden cardiac death. Lancet 1999, 354, 1169–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Oteo, J.A.; Portillo, A. Tick-borne rickettsioses in Europe. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Spitalska, E.; Boldis, V.; Derdakova, M.; Selyemova, D.; Rusnakova Taragelova, V. Rickettsial infection in Ixodes ricinus ticks in urban and natural habitats of Slovakia. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 161–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Spitalska, E.; Stanko, M.; Mosansky, L.; Kraljik, J.; Miklisova, D.; Mahrikova, L.; Bona, M.; Kazimirova, M. Seasonal analysis of Rickettsia species in ticks in an agricultural site of Slovakia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 68, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Spitalska, E.; Boldis, V.; Kostanova, Z.; Kocianova, E.; Stefanidesova, K. Incidence of various tick-borne microorganisms in rodents and ticks of central Slovakia. Acta Virol. 2008, 52, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Stefanidesova, K.; Kocianova, E.; Boldis, V.; Kostanova, Z.; Kanka, P.; Spitalska, E. Evidence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia helvetica infection in free-ranging ungulates in central Slovakia. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2008, 54, 519–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Matuschka, F.R.; Fischer, P.; Musgrave, K.; Richter, D.; Spielman, A. Hosts on which nymphal Ixodes ricinus most abundantly feed. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991, 44, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mejlon, H.A.; Jaenson, T.G.T. Questing behaviour of Ixodes ricinus ticks. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1997, 21, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Norman, R.; Bowers, R.G.; Begon, M.; Hudson, P.J. Persistence of tick-borne virus in the presence of multiple host species: Tick reservoirs and parasite mediated competition. J. Theor. Biol. 1999, 200, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Begon, M. Effects of Host Diversity on Disease Dynamics; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ogden, N.H.; Tsao, J.I. Biodiversity and Lyme disease: Dilution or amplification? Epidemics 2009, 1, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Jaenson, T.G.T.; Talleklint, L. Incompetence of Roe Deer as Reservoirs of the Lyme Borreliosis Spirochete. J. Med. Entomol. 1992, 29, 813–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kurtenbach, K.; De Michelis, S.; Etti, S.; Schafer, S.M.; Sewell, H.S.; Brade, V.; Kraiczy, P. Host association of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato—The key role of host complement. Trends Microbiol. 2002, 10, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Wood, C.L.; Lafferty, K.D. Biodiversity and disease: A synthesis of ecological perspectives on Lyme disease transmission. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ostfeld, R.S.; Keesing, F. Biodiversity and disease risk: The case of Lyme disease. Conserv. Biol. 2000, 14, 722–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Randolph, S.E.; Dobson, A.D. Pangloss revisited: A critique of the dilution effect and the biodiversity-buffers-disease paradigm. Parasitology 2012, 139, 847–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Mysterud, A.; Easterday, W.R.; Qviller, L.; Viljugrein, H.; Ytrehus, B. Spatial and seasonal variation in the prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks in Norway. Parasites Vectors 2013, 6, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Gill, F.B. Ornithology, 3rd ed.; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  59. Svitalkova, Z.; Harustiakova, D.; Mahrikova, L.; Berthova, L.; Slovak, M.; Kocianova, E.; Kazimirova, M. Anaplasma phagocytophilum prevalence in ticks and rodents in an urban and natural habitat in South-Western Slovakia. Parasites Vectors 2015, 8, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Taragelova, V.; Koci, J.; Hanincova, K.; Oleksak, M.; Labuda, M. Songbirds as hosts for ticks (Acari, Ixodidae) in Slovakia. Biologia 2005, 60, 529–537. [Google Scholar]
  61. Cepák, J. Atlas Migrace Ptáků: České a Slovenské Republiky; Aventinum: Prague, Czech Republic, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  62. Falco, R.C.; Fish, D. A comparison of methods for sampling the deer tick, Ixodes dammini, in a Lyme disease endemic area. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1992, 14, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Stanko, M. Small mammals communities of windbreaks and adjacent fields in the eastern Slovakian lowlands. Folia Zool. 1994, 43, 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  64. Slovak, M. Pictorial key to the adults of ticks (Acari: Ixodida) of the Slovakia fauna. Entomofauna Carpath. 2010, 22, 8–13. [Google Scholar]
  65. Guy, E.C.; Stanek, G. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi in patients with Lyme disease by the polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44, 610–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Black, W.C.; Roehrdanz, R.L. Mitochondrial gene order is not conserved in arthropods: Prostriate and metastriate tick mitochondrial genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1998, 15, 1772–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Derdakova, M.; Beati, L.; Pet’ko, B.; Stanko, M.; Fish, D. Genetic variability within Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies established by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis of the rrfA-rrlB intergenic spacer in Ixodes ricinus ticks from the Czech Republic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Courtney, J.W.; Kostelnik, L.M.; Zeidner, N.S.; Massung, R.F. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection of Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3164–3168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Regnery, R.L.; Spruill, C.L.; Plikaytis, B.D. Genotypic identification of rickettsiae and estimation of intraspecies sequence divergence for portions of two rickettsial genes. J. Bacteriol. 1991, 173, 1576–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Boretti, F.S.; Perreten, A.; Meli, M.L.; Cattori, V.; Willi, B.; Wengi, N.; Hornok, S.; Honegger, H.; Hegglin, D.; Woelfel, R.; et al. Molecular Investigations of Rickettsia helvetica infection in dogs, foxes, humans, and Ixodes ticks. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75, 3230–3237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Legendre, P.; Legendre, L.F. Numerical Ecology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 24, p. 1006. [Google Scholar]
  72. Oksanen, J.; Guillaume, B.F.; Friendly, M.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; McGlinn, D.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Henry, M.; et al. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 2.4-1. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 15 April 2018).
  73. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.R-project.org/ (accessed on 15 April 2018).
  74. Hervé, M. RVAideMemoire: Diverse Basic Statistical and Graphical Functions. R Package Version 0.9-62. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RVAideMemoire (accessed on 15 April 2018).
  75. Estrada-Peña, A.; Ortega, C.; Sánchez, N.; DeSimone, L.; Sudre, B.; Suk, J.E.; Semenza, J.C. Correlation of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato prevalence in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks with specific abiotic traits in the western Palearctic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3838–3845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kurtenbach, K.; Hanincova, K.; Tsao, J.I.; Margos, G.; Fish, D.; Ogden, N.H. Fundamental processes in the evolutionary ecology of Lyme borreliosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tagliapietra, V.; Rosa, R.; Arnoldi, D.; Cagnacci, F.; Capelli, G.; Montarsi, F.; Hauffe, H.C.; Rizzoli, A. Saturation deficit and deer density affect questing activity and local abundance of Ixodes ricinus (Acari, Ixodidae) in Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 183, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Li, S.; Heyman, P.; Cochez, C.; Simons, L.; Vanwambeke, S.O. A multi-level analysis of the relationship between environmental factors and questing Ixodes ricinus dynamics in Belgium. Parasites Vectors 2012, 5, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Cayol, C.; Koskela, E.; Mappes, T.; Siukkola, A.; Kallio, E.R. Temporal dynamics of the tick Ixodes ricinus in northern Europe: Epidemiological implications. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Tomasiewicz, K.; Modrzewska, R.; Buczek, A.; Stanczak, J.; Maciukajc, J. The risk of exposure to Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in Mid-Eastern Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2004, 11, 261–264. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Skotarczak, B.; Rymaszewska, A.; Wodecka, B.; Sawczuk, M.; Adamska, M.; Maciejewska, A. PCR detection of granulocytic Anaplasma and Babesia in Ixodes ricinus ticks and birds in west-central Poland. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2006, 13, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Rigo, K.; Gyuranecz, M.; Toth, A.G.; Foldvari, G. Detection of Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in small mammals and ectoparasites in Hungary. Vector Borne Zoon. Dis. 2011, 11, 1499–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Massung, R.F.; Mauel, M.J.; Owens, J.H.; Allan, N.; Courtney, J.W.; Stafford, K.C., 3rd; Mather, T.N. Genetic variants of Ehrlichia phagocytophila, Rhode Island and Connecticut. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bown, K.J.; Lambin, X.; Ogden, N.H.; Begon, M.; Telford, G.; Woldehiwet, Z.; Birtles, R.J. Delineating Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes in coexisting, discrete enzootic cycles. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1948–1954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Silaghi, C.; Skuballa, J.; Thiel, C.; Pfister, K.; Petney, T.; Pfaffle, M.; Taraschewski, H.; Passos, L.M. The European hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus)—A suitable reservoir for variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum? Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2012, 3, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Barakova, I.; Derdakova, M.; Carpi, G.; Rosso, F.; Collini, M.; Tagliapietra, V.; Ramponi, C.; Hauffe, H.C.; Rizzoli, A. Genetic and ecologic variability among Anaplasma phagocytophilum strains, northern Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 1082–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Hanincova, K.; Taragelova, V.; Koci, J.; Schafer, S.M.; Hails, R.; Ullmann, A.J.; Piesman, J.; Labuda, M.; Kurtenbach, K. Association of Borrelia garinii and B. valaisiana with songbirds in Slovakia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 2825–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Didyk, Y.M.; Blanarova, L.; Pogrebnyak, S.; Akimov, I.; Petko, B.; Vichova, B. Emergence of tick-borne pathogens (Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ricketsia raoultii and Babesia microti) in the Kyiv urban parks, Ukraine. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017, 8, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Glatz, M.; Mullegger, R.R.; Maurer, F.; Fingerle, V.; Achermann, Y.; Wilske, B.; Bloemberg, G.V. Detection of Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato genospecies and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in a tick population from Austria. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Skotarczak, B.; Rymaszewska, A.; Wodecka, B.; Sawczuk, M. Molecular evidence of coinfection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent, and Babesia microti in ticks from northwestern Poland. J. Parasitol. 2003, 89, 194–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Stanczak, J.; Kubica-Biernat, B.; Racewicz, M.; Kruminis-Lozowska, W.; Kur, J. Detection of three genospecies of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in different regions of Poland. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2000, 290, 559–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Stunzner, D.; Hubalek, Z.; Halouzka, J.; Postic, D.; Pierer, K.; Marth, E. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi s.I. in Ixodes ricinus ticks from Styria (Austria) and species identification by PCR-RFLP analysis. Zent. Bakteriol. 1998, 288, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Mihalca, A.D.; Sandor, A.D. The role of rodents in the ecology of Ixodes ricinus and associated pathogens in Central and Eastern Europe. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Perkins, S.E.; Cattadori, I.M.; Tagliapietra, V.; Rizzoli, A.P.; Hudson, P.J. Localized deer absence leads to tick amplification. Ecology 2006, 87, 1981–1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Berthova, L.; Slobodnik, V.; Slobodnik, R.; Oleksak, M.; Sekeyova, Z.; Svitalkova, Z.; Kazimirova, M.; Spitalska, E. The natural infection of birds and ticks feeding on birds with Rickettsia spp. and Coxiella burnetii in Slovakia. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2016, 68, 299–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Biernat, B.; Stanczak, J.; Michalik, J.; Sikora, B.; Wierzbicka, A. Prevalence of infection with Rickettsia helvetica in Ixodes ricinus ticks feeding on non-rickettsiemic rodent hosts in sylvatic habitats of west-central Poland. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016, 7, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Burri, C.; Schumann, O.; Schumann, C.; Gern, L. Are Apodemus spp. mice and Myodes glareolus reservoirs for Borrelia miyamotoi, Candidatus Neoehrlichia mikurensis, Rickettsia helvetica, R. monacensis and Anaplasma phagocytophilum? Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014, 5, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Franke, J.; Fritzsch, J.; Tomaso, H.; Straube, E.; Dorn, W.; Hildebrandt, A. Coexistence of pathogens in host-seeking and feeding ticks within a single natural habitat in Central Germany. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 6829–6836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Inokuma, H.; Seino, N.; Suzuki, M.; Kaji, K.; Takahashi, H.; Igota, H.; Inoue, S. Detection of Rickettsia helvetica DNA from peripheral blood of Sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) in Japan. J. Wildl. Dis. 2008, 44, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Sprong, H.; Wielinga, P.R.; Fonville, M.; Reusken, C.; Brandenburg, A.H.; Borgsteede, F.; Gaasenbeek, C.; van der Giessen, J.W. Ixodes ricinus ticks are reservoir hosts for Rickettsia helvetica and potentially carry flea-borne Rickettsia species. Parasites Vectors 2009, 2, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Vaclav, R.; Ficova, M.; Prokop, P.; Betakova, T. Associations between coinfection prevalence of Borrelia lusitaniae, Anaplasma sp., and Rickettsia sp. in hard ticks feeding on reptile hosts. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 61, 245–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 15 00994 g001 550
Figure 1. Proportions of different genospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. detected in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Figure 1. Proportions of different genospecies of B. burgdorferi s.l. detected in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Ijerph 15 00994 g001
Ijerph 15 00994 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundance of I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, during individual months over two study years, 2011–2012. Relative abundance means the proportion (%) of ticks collected during a certain month divided by the total number of collected ticks. Note that ticks were not sampled during January and February.
Figure 2. Relative abundance of I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, during individual months over two study years, 2011–2012. Relative abundance means the proportion (%) of ticks collected during a certain month divided by the total number of collected ticks. Note that ticks were not sampled during January and February.
Ijerph 15 00994 g002
Ijerph 15 00994 g003 550
Figure 3. Relative prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum, Rickettsia sp. in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, during individual months over two study years, 2011–2012. Relative prevalence means the proportion (%) of positive ticks for the given pathogen during a certain month divided by the total number of collected ticks. Note that ticks were not sampled during January and February.
Figure 3. Relative prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l., A. phagocytophilum, Rickettsia sp. in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, during individual months over two study years, 2011–2012. Relative prevalence means the proportion (%) of positive ticks for the given pathogen during a certain month divided by the total number of collected ticks. Note that ticks were not sampled during January and February.
Ijerph 15 00994 g003
Ijerph 15 00994 g004 550
Figure 4. Partial redundancy analysis (partial RDA) examining the occurrence of selected tick-borne pathogens constrained by the effect of seasonality (month of sampling). The partial RDA biplot (scaling 2) shows the scores of pathogens (black letters and red arrows) and the centroids of the months of the year (blue letters). The contribution (unadjusted proportions) of three components of the partial RDA to total inertia explained: Conditioning variables (tick life-cycle stage, sex, and year) = 0.003, constraining variable (month of sampling) = 0.02, and unconstrained variables = 0.97. Pathogens shown in the biplot are Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ana.pha), Rickettsia helvetica (Ric.hel), Borrelia lusitaniae (Bor.lus), B. afzelii (Bor.afz), B. garinii (Bor.gar), and B. valaisiana (Bor.val).
Figure 4. Partial redundancy analysis (partial RDA) examining the occurrence of selected tick-borne pathogens constrained by the effect of seasonality (month of sampling). The partial RDA biplot (scaling 2) shows the scores of pathogens (black letters and red arrows) and the centroids of the months of the year (blue letters). The contribution (unadjusted proportions) of three components of the partial RDA to total inertia explained: Conditioning variables (tick life-cycle stage, sex, and year) = 0.003, constraining variable (month of sampling) = 0.02, and unconstrained variables = 0.97. Pathogens shown in the biplot are Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Ana.pha), Rickettsia helvetica (Ric.hel), Borrelia lusitaniae (Bor.lus), B. afzelii (Bor.afz), B. garinii (Bor.gar), and B. valaisiana (Bor.val).
Ijerph 15 00994 g004
Table
Table 1. Number of I. ricinus ticks collected from single bird species and B. burgdorferi s.l.- and R. helvetica-infection rates for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Table 1. Number of I. ricinus ticks collected from single bird species and B. burgdorferi s.l.- and R. helvetica-infection rates for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Bird SpeciesNumber of BirdsB. burgdorferi s.l.-Positive/Examined (%)R. helvetica-Positive/Examined (%)
Parus major1828/255 (11%)13/255 (5.1%)
Sitta europaea53/9 (33.3%)0/9 (0%)
Turdus merula25/9 (55.6%)0/9 (0%)
Erithacus rubecula21/15 (6.7%)0/15 (0%)
Dendrocopos major200
Parus montanus20/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)
Fringilla coelebs100
Parus caeruleus100
Muscicapa striata10/2 (0%)0/2 (0%)
Total3437/295 (12.5%)13/295 (4.4%)
Table
Table 2. Prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. and R. helvetica in bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Table 2. Prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. and R. helvetica in bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
B. burgdorferi s.l. Positive/Examined (%)R. helvetica Positive/Examined (%)
larvae34/275 (12.4%)12/275 (4.4%)
nymphs3/20 (15%)1/20 (5%)
Total37/295 (12.5%)13/295 (4.4%)
Table
Table 3. Prevalence of pathogens in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Table 3. Prevalence of pathogens in questing I. ricinus ticks for the urban forest in Bratislava, Slovakia, 2011–2012.
Total Examined TicksB. burgdorferi s.l. Positive (%)Rickettsia sp. Positive (%)A.P. Positive (%)
TotalB.G.B.V.B.A.B.L.B.B.S.S.B.S.MixedR.H.R.M.
Nymphs48535 (7.21%)12 (2.47%)8 (1.65%)6 (1.24%)4 (0.83%)2 (0.41%)1 (0.21%)2 (0.41%)23 (4.75%)023 (6%)
Adults582 (3.38%)1 (1.69%)1 (1.69%)000004 (6.78%)1 (1.69%)3 (5.08%)
Total54337 (6.81%)13 (2.39%)9 (1.66%)6 (1.1%)4 (0.74%)2 (0.37%)1 (0.18%)2 (0.37%)27 (4.97%)1 (0.18%)32 (5.89%)
B.G.—B. garinii, B.V.—B. valaisiana, B.A.—B. afzelii, B.L.—B. lusitaniae, B.B.S.S.—B. burgdorferi s.s., B.S.—B. spielmanii, R.H.—R. helvetica, R.M.—R. monacensis, A.P.—A. phagocytophilum.
Table
Table 4. Prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in questing I.ricinus ticks in Slovakia. Overall test for differences among all sites: G = 116.85, df = 9, p < 0.001.
Table 4. Prevalence of A. phagocytophilum in questing I.ricinus ticks in Slovakia. Overall test for differences among all sites: G = 116.85, df = 9, p < 0.001.
Study Site (Type)Year of Tick CollectionA. phagocytophilum in Questing I. ricinus TicksAuthor
Bratislava (urban forest)2011–20125.9% (32/543)This study
Fugelka (natural forest)2011–20133.1% (71/2257) n.s.[59]
Bratislava (urban forest)2011–20137.2% (153/2117) n.s.[59]
Košice (urban forest)20104.5% (10/224) n.s.[30]
Bardejov (suburban forest)20081.7% (3/179) n.s.[30]
Bratislava (suburban/urban)2009–20124% (10/248) n.s.[30]
Čermeľ (natural forest)2011–20120.9% (2/220) *[37]
Hýľov (natural forest)2011–20120.8% (2/266) **[37]
Košice (suburban forest)2011–20121.1% (2/176) n.s.[37]
Rozhanovce (natural forest)2011–20120.6% (4/714) **[37]
Asterisks inform about post-hoc pair-wise comparisons between the study site and other sites; **/* denote statistically significant differences at α = 0.01/0.05 after the Holm p-adjustment. n.s.: non-significant.
Table
Table 5. Prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in questing I. ricinus nymphs in Slovakia. Overall test for differences among all sites: G = 62.62, df = 7, p < 0.001.
Table 5. Prevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in questing I. ricinus nymphs in Slovakia. Overall test for differences among all sites: G = 62.62, df = 7, p < 0.001.
Study Site (Type)Year of Ticks CollectionB.b.s.l. Prevalence (%) in Questing I. ricinus NymphsAuthor
Bratislava (urban forest)2011–20127.2% (35/485)This study
Šúr (natural forest)2001–200227.8% (57/205) **[26]
Malacky (urban park)2001–200214.4% (31/215) n.s.[26]
Brzotín (natural forest)2001–200220% (14/70) *[26]
Biskupice (natural forest)199921.5% (28/130) **[87]
Malacky (urban park)199918.7% (37/198) **[87]
Záhorská Ves (natural forest)199927.8% (15/54) **[87]
Záhorská Ves (natural forest)200019% (33/174) **[87]
Asterisks inform about post-hoc pair-wise comparisons between the study site and other sites; **/* denote statistically significant differences at α = 0.01/0.05 after the Holm p-adjustment. n.s.: non-significant.
Table
Table 6. Prevalence of B. garinii in bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks in Slovakia. Overall test: G = 47.00, df = 1, p < 0.001.
Table 6. Prevalence of B. garinii in bird-feeding I. ricinus ticks in Slovakia. Overall test: G = 47.00, df = 1, p < 0.001.
Study Site (Type)Year of Tick CollectionB. garinii Prevalence in Bird-Feeding I. ricinus TicksAuthor
Bratislava (urban forest)2011–201297% (36/37) This study
All localities (natural forest) 2001–200244% (155/352) **[26]
** Denotes statistically significant difference at α = 0.01.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chvostáč, M.; Špitalská, E.; Václav, R.; Vaculová, T.; Minichová, L.; Derdáková, M. Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050994

AMA Style

Chvostáč M, Špitalská E, Václav R, Vaculová T, Minichová L, Derdáková M. Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018; 15(5):994. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050994

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chvostáč, Michal, Eva Špitalská, Radovan Václav, Tatiana Vaculová, Lenka Minichová, and Markéta Derdáková. 2018. "Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15, no. 5: 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050994

APA Style

Chvostáč, M., Špitalská, E., Václav, R., Vaculová, T., Minichová, L., & Derdáková, M. (2018). Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(5), 994. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050994

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop