Next Article in Journal
Towards a HR Framework for Developing a Health-Promoting Performance Culture at Work: A Norwegian Health Care Management Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of the Admission System for Mental Disorders in South Korea
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 24
10.3390/ijerph17249165
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Air Pollutants Interaction and Gender Difference on Bone Mineral Density T-Score in Taiwanese Adults

by
Yu-Hsuan Lin
1,
Chen-Feng Wang
2,
Hsuan Chiu
1,
Bo-Cheng Lai
2,
Hung-Pin Tu
3,
Pei-Yu Wu
4,5,
Jiun-Chi Huang
4,5,6 and
Szu-Chia Chen
4,5,6,7,*
1
Department of General Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
2
Institute of Electronics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan
3
Department of Public Health and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
4
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
5
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan
6
Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
7
Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(24), 9165; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249165
Submission received: 1 November 2020 / Revised: 3 December 2020 / Accepted: 5 December 2020 / Published: 8 December 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue. Previous studies have reported associations between air pollution and lower bone mineral density; however, few studies have investigated the association between air pollution and osteoporosis. In this study, we combined two databases, the first including 5000 individuals registered in the Taiwan Biobank, and the second containing detailed daily data on air pollution. After multivariable adjustments, ozone (O3) (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.015; p = 0.008) was significantly positively associated with T-score, whereas carbon monoxide (CO) (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.809; p < 0.001), sulfur dioxide (SO2) (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.050; p = 0.005), nitric oxide (NO) (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.040; p < 0.001), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.023; p < 0.001), and nitrogen oxide (NOx) (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.017; p < 0.001) were significantly negatively associated with T-score. The interactions between CO and NOx (p = 0.001) and SO2 and NO2 (p = 0.004) on T-score were statistically significant. An increase in exposure to CO, NO and NOx was associated with a faster decline in T-score in the female participants compared to the male participants. In addition, an increase in O3 was associated with a faster increase in T-score in the female participants compared to the male participants. In conclusion, the air pollutants CO, SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx were associated with osteoporosis. In addition, there were interaction and synergetic effects between CO and NOx and SO2 and NO2 on T-score. We also observed differences in the associations between air pollutants and T-score between the female and male participants.

1. Introduction

Osteoporosis is defined as a systemic skeletal disease characterized by a reduction in bone mass and microarchitectural deterioration of bone tissue resulting in increased bone fragility and a higher risk of fractures [1]. Fractures of the vertebrae and hip are associated with increased morbidity and mortality and are the most serious consequences of osteoporosis [2]. Lifestyle factors such as vitamin D deficiency, inadequate physical activity, low calcium intake, smoking, and alcohol abuse have been associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis and fractures [3]. Due to changes in hormone levels during menopause and aging, women have a higher prevalence of osteoporosis than men [4]. Previous studies have reported associations between air pollution and lower bone mineral density (BMD), increased BMD loss, and an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures [5,6]. However, few studies have investigated the association between air pollution and osteoporosis.
Air pollution has decreased or stabilized in many countries; however, it remains high in Taiwan [7], mostly caused by the burning of fossil fuels [8]. Increased risks of cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity and mortality have been associated with acute and chronic exposure to air pollution [9,10,11,12,13,14]. In addition, several studies have indicated that air pollution can also induce systemic and tissue-specific inflammation [15,16,17]. Recent studies have demonstrated that exposure to air pollution such as particles with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is associated with arthritis [18], osteoporosis [19], reduction in BMD [5] and fractures [20,21]. Particulate matter has also been shown to cause systemic oxidative damage [22], increase in osteoclasts [23] and inflammation [24], which can result in a faster rate of bone loss and higher risk of bone fractures in older individuals. According to recent review article, potential mechanisms behind the association between outdoor air pollution, especially particulate matter, and bone damage included (1) several different atmospheric pollutants can induce low-grade systemic inflammation, which affects bone metabolism through a specific effect of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 on osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation and function; (2) some pollutants, particularly certain gas and metal compounds, can cause oxidative damage in the airway and bone cells; (3) different groups of pollutants can act as endocrine disruptors when binding to the receptors in bone cells, changing their functioning; and (4) air pollution can directly and indirectly cause vitamin D deficiency [25].
In this study, we combined two databases. The first included 5000 individuals registered in the Taiwan Biobank (TWB), and the second was the Taiwan Air Quality Monitoring Database (TAQMD), which includes detailed daily data on air pollution in Taiwan. We evaluated the correlations between air pollutants and bone marrow T-score, and explored whether there were interaction and synergetic effects between various air pollutants. Furthermore, we also explored sex differences in these associations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

TWB received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board on Biomedical Science Research/IRB-BM, Academia Sinica, Taiwan, and from the Ethics and Governance Council of the TWB, Taiwan. Written informed consent was obtained from each participant in accordance with institutional requirements and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. In addition, this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20180242).

2.2. The Taiwan Biobank

The TWB is the largest government-supported biobank in Taiwan, and it was established to record genomic and lifestyle data of Taiwanese residents [26,27]. The TWB includes the data of community-based volunteers aged 30 to 70 years with no history of cancers. All participants sign informed consent forms, provide blood samples and information via questionnaires in face-to-face interviews with TWB researchers and physical examinations. In this study, we included 5000 individuals registered in the TWB until April 2014.
The TWB includes data on body height and weight, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2. The information obtained from the questionnaires included both personal and lifestyle factors. Regular exercise was defined as participating in leisure activities such as hiking, cycling, jogging, playing basketball, swimming, yoga, and playing console/computer-based exercise games for at least 30 min three times a week. Occupational activities such as heavy manual and physical work were not included as “exercise” in this study.

2.3. Collection of Demographic, Medical, and Laboratory Data

The following baseline variables were recorded: demographic features (age and sex), smoking history, medical history (diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension), examination findings (systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP)) and laboratory data (fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and uric acid). EGFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4-variable equation [28].

2.4. Assessment of Bone Mineral Density

The BMD (g/cm2) of the calcaneus in the non-dominant foot was measured using an Achilles InSight ultrasound device (Achilles InSight, GE, Fort Myers, FL, USA). The T-score was defined as follows: (individual’s BMD—young-adult mean BMD)/standard deviation of the young-adult normal population. A T-score > −1.0 was defined as normal BMD, osteopenia as between −1.0 and −2.5, and osteoporosis as <−2.5.

2.5. Assessment of Air Pollutants

The TAQMD was established by the Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan and includes daily concentrations of air pollutants from 74 ambient air quality monitoring stations distributed around Taiwan. The TWB and TAQMD were linked by the area of residence of the participants and the location of the air quality monitoring stations. Outdoor air pollution exposure was estimated at the residential address of each participant. The average concentrations of air pollutants, including PM2.5, particles with an aerodynamic diameter of ≤10 μm (PM10), O3, CO, SO2, nitric oxide (NO), NO2, and nitrogen oxide (NOx) during the enrolled year were calculated. We determined average yearly data using the following three-step method: (1) Obtain the corresponding longitude and latitude of the address using Google geocoding; (2) For an interpolation point, we identified the nearest air quality monitoring station from that point; (3) From the mapped station data, we filtered the data from the survey date to the previous year, and computed the average of each air pollution metric. Four hundred and five participants without complete air pollution measurements during the enrollment period were excluded, and the remaining 4595 participants (mean age 49.7 ± 10.7 years, 2118 males) were included in this study.

2.6. Example of Nearest Neighbor Interpolation

To illustrate our interpolation method and dataset distribution, we plotted the locations of the monitoring stations (large circles) and participants (small circles) (Figure 1). The figure shows that we mapped the participants to the nearest station. Hence, the color of the participants is the same as the mapped station.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc. Chicago, USA). Data were expressed as percentage, mean ± standard deviation, or median (25th–75th percentile) for triglycerides. Differences between groups were analyzed using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the independent t test for continuous variables. Linear regression analysis was used to identify the association between each air pollutant and BMD T-score. Interactions between air pollutants and BMD T-scores were analyzed using a generalized linear model. Figures for the synergistic effect of air pollutants on T-score were plotted using the LOESS procedure, which is a nonparametric method used to estimate regression surfaces. The LOESS procedure was performed using SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A p value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

The mean age of the 4595 participants was 49.7 ± 10.7 years and included 2118 males and 2477 females. The participants were stratified into two groups according to a BMD T-score of either ≥−1.0 (n = 2870, 62.5%) or <−1 (n = 1725, 37.5%). A comparison of the clinical characteristics between these two groups is shown in Table 1. Compared to the participants with a T-score ≥ −1.0, those with a T-score < −1 were older, more predominantly male, had higher rates of smoking history, hypertension and regular exercise, higher SBP, DBP, fasting glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin and uric acid, and lower HDL-cholesterol, eGFR, and BMI. Regarding air pollutants, the participants with a T-score < −1 had lower exposure to PM2.5, PM10 and O3, and higher exposure to CO, NO, NO2, and NOx.

3.1. Correlations between Air Pollutants and BMD T-Score

We performed univariable linear regression analysis to survey the determinants of BMD T-score in the study participants. PM2.5 (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.007; p = 0.003), PM10 (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.007; p < 0.001), and O3 (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.016; p = 0.007) were significantly positively associated with T-score, whereas CO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.841; p < 0.001), NO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.043; p < 0.001), NO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.017; p < 0.001), and NOx (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.016; p < 0.001) were significantly negatively associated with T-score.
Table 2 shows the determinants of BMD T-score in the study participants using multivariable linear regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, smoking history, DM, hypertension, BMI, SBP, DBP, fasting glucose, log triglycerides, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin, eGFR, uric acid, and regular exercise. The results showed that O3 (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.015; p = 0.008) was significantly positively associated with T-score, and that CO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.809; p < 0.001), SO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.050; p = 0.005), NO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.040; p < 0.001), NO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.023; p < 0.001), and NOx (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.017; p < 0.001) were significantly negative associated with T-score.

3.2. Interaction between Air Pollutants on BMD T-Score

Analysis of the interactions between air pollutants and BMD T-score using a generalized linear model is shown in Table 3. The interactions between CO and NOx (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.026; p = 0.001) and SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.007; p = 0.004) were statistically significant. However, the interaction of other combinations did not achieve significance. Figure 2 and Figure 3 illustrate synergistic effects of CO and NOx and SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score. Synergistic effects of CO and NOx and SO2 and NO2 on the association with BMD T-score were observed. This was a combined analysis trying to model air pollution effect to BMD T-score based on levels of CO and NOX (Figure 2; p for interaction = 0.001, see Table 4) or levels of NO2 and SO2 (Figure 3; p for interaction = 0.004, see Table 4).

3.3. Correlation between Air Pollutants and BMD T-Score in Male and Female Participants

Table 4 shows the determinants of BMD T-score in the male and female participants using multivariable linear regression analysis. In the male participants, CO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.562; p = 0.002), NO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.025; p = 0.003), NO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.016; p = 0.004), and NOx (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.012; p = 0.001) were significantly negatively associated with T-score. In the female participants, O3 (unstandardized coefficient β, 0.023; p = 0.003) was significantly positively associated with T-score, and CO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.870; p < 0.001), SO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.074; p = 0.002), NO (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.043; p < 0.001), NO2 (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.026; p < 0.001), and NOx (unstandardized coefficient β, −0.019; p < 0.001) were significantly negative associated with T-score. The interactions between sex and PM2.5 (p < 0.001), PM10 (p = 0.001), O3 (p = 0.021), CO (p = 0.033), NO (p = 0.007), and NOx (p = 0.049) on T-score were statistically significant. Figure 4 illustrates the associations between the air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, O3, CO, SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx, and T-score in the male and female participants. An increase in exposure to CO, NO, and NOx was associated with a slower decline in T-score in the male participants compared to the female participant. In addition, an increase in O3 with a faster increase in T-score in the female participants compared to the male participants.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

In this analysis of 5000 individuals registered in the TWB, we found evidence of a positive association between O3 and T-score and a negative association between other air pollutants including CO, SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx and T-score. Furthermore, we found that CO and NOx, SO2 and NO2 had a synergetic effect on T-score. We also found differences in the associations between air pollutants and T-score between the male and female individuals.
The first important finding of this study is that we observed a positive association between O3 and T-score. Ozone is the main photochemical component of polluted air, and it has been shown to cause dose-dependent oxidative stress by producing free radicals through cell membrane lipoperoxidation, protein oxidation, the inactivation of enzymes, destruction of DNA, and ultimately cell apoptosis [29]. However, O3 therapy has increasingly been used for the treatment of herniated discs, jaw osteonecrosis, and pain management [30,31], and it has been shown to enhance complete healing of bisphosphonate-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw through the restoration of normal bone physiology [30]. An animal study of rat calvarial defects demonstrated that O3 had a positive effect on bone formation [32]. In addition, a randomized study of 48 rats in which topical ozone was injected at the premaxillary suture indicated that O3 therapy can increase osteoclasts and osteoblasts, and also stimulate bone regeneration [33]. These studies indicate that ozone may be a protective factor against osteoporosis.
In this study, CO was negatively associated with T-score, indicating that CO may be a risk factor for osteoporosis. Environmental CO is as a common component of air pollution, cigarette, and wood smoke, and its systemic toxicity is well known [34,35]. A previous study reported that an increase in exposure to CO was associated with an increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis from 13.58 to 22.25 per 1000 person–years [19]. The binding affinity for CO is high for many ferrous heme-containing proteins, and so CO causes hypoxia by reducing the capacity to carry oxygen and reducing the release of O2 into tissues [36]. Hypoxia has been shown to reduce the growth of osteoblasts, thereby leading to bone thinning and osteoporosis [37]. Chang et al. reported an association between exposure to CO and NO2 and osteoporosis [19]; however, a recent in vivo study demonstrated that CO suppresses osteoclast differentiation by inhibiting the activation of PPAR-γ induced by RANKL [38]. Therefore, further studies are warranted to explore the role of CO in osteoporosis.
Another important finding of the present study is that SO2 was negatively associated with T-score. SO2 is a common air pollutant that is toxic to various organs. These toxic effects have been studied extensively, and include oxidative damage, DNA damage and inflammation [39]. Several studies have reported significantly increased levels of serum sulfite (SO2 derivative) in patients with acute pneumonia and chronic renal failure, suggesting that sulfite may be a mediator of inflammatory [40,41]. Increases in the levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-αhave been reported in the lungs of mice exposed to SO2 [42]. IL-6 has been proposed to contribute to both localized and systemic osteoclast-mediated bone destruction associated with chronic inflammation [43]. In the current study, NO, NO2, and NOx were also negatively associated with T-score, suggesting that they may be potential risk factors for osteoporosis. The induction of NO production in bone by proinflammatory cytokines suggests that NO may act as a mediator of bone disease in patients with cytokine-associated disorders such as postmenopausal osteoporosis, tumor-associated osteolysis and rheumatoid arthritis [44]. NO has dose-dependent and biphasic effects on the skeletal system, with low concentrations (due to eNOS activity) being associated with osteocyte and osteoblast activity to mediate osteoclast bone resorption. Higher concentrations (due to iNOS activation or exogenous administration of higher doses of NO donors) may lead to bone loss [45]. An ecological retrospective cohort study based on data obtained from three databases demonstrated that NO2 and SO2 exposure was associated with hospital admissions due to hip fractures [21]. In addition, a population-based retrospective cohort study that evaluated the risk of osteoporosis in Taiwanese residents showed that NO2 exposure was associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis [19]. Moreover, a 1 μg/m3 increase in NO2 has been associated with a 16.5% elevated risk of osteoporosis [46]. Furthermore, a cross-sectional analysis of middle-aged adults demonstrated serum IL-6 responses to pollution-related NO2 exposure, whereas such responses were not seen for other pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-8 and TNF-α [47]. Inflammatory processes can be affected by SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx, and they can harm the skeleton [48]. Taken together, we suggest that SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx cause osteoporosis through inflammation, and thus they may be potential risk factors for osteoporosis.
We also found interactions and synergetic effects between CO and NOx and SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score. At the molecular level, the toxic effects of NOx and CO have been shown with regards to hemoglobin binding, which then reduces the efficiency of O2 transport and the reversible (NO) or irreversible (CO) inhibition of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation by reversible binding to the heme aa3 site of cytochrome c oxidase [49]. Low concentrations of NO have been shown to specifically and reversibly inhibit cytochrome c oxidase in competition with oxygen in several tissues and cells in culture [50]. Therefore, we hypothesize that NOx can enhance the hypoxia caused by CO and worsen osteoporosis. NO2 can promote the formation of sulfate, which due to hygroscopicity can create an aqueous layer over particles of mineral oxides, thereby leading to further adsorption and reaction of other pollutants under ambient atmospheric conditions, including SO2 [51]. As a result, we hypothesize that the synergistic effect of SO2 and NO2 may be a risk factor for osteoporosis due to the further adsorption of other pollutants.
The last important finding of this study is that increased exposure to the air pollutants CO, NO, and NOx resulted in a faster decline in T-score in the female participants compared to the male participants. In addition, increased exposure to O3 resulted in a faster increase in T-score in the female participants comparted to the male participants. These findings indicate that there are differences in the associations between air pollutants and T-score between males and females. Hormone factors also significantly influence the loss of bone mass. Estrogen regulates RANKL, and this is mediated by the production of cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF [52]. Therefore, we hypothesize that women may be more vulnerable than men to develop osteoporosis upon exposure to air pollution.
In this study, osteoporosis was confirmed using an Achilles InSight ultrasound device instead of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The Achilles InSight has been shown to be able to identify osteoporosis defined by axial BMD using DXA in Chinese women [53]. The QUS t-score at the left heel was positively correlated with the DXA t-score at the right heel (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) in eighty women, aged 53–73 years, with osteoporosis and/or fractures were followed repeatedly for 7 years [54]. In addition, QUS may be an improved predictor of fractures in comparison with DXA [55,56,57,58]. Although, the most widely validated technique to measure BMD is DXA, and diagnostic criteria based on the T-score for BMD are a recommended entry criterion for the development of pharmaceutical interventions in osteoporosis. However, quantitative ultrasound has several advantages over DXA, including that radiation is not required, the low cost and portability.
There are several limitations to this study. First, this is a cross-sectional study, and therefore we could not evaluate the association between air pollution and bone loss over time or the incidence of osteoporotic fractures. Follow-up studies are needed to confirm our results. Second, the estimates of air pollutants at the participants’ home addresses are crude measures of exposure to air pollution. Although outdoor air pollution is a substantial contributor to indoor/personal exposure, it may not accurately reflect actual personal exposure, and we had no additional information about air quality indoors. Third, further studies are needed to assess eventually the correlation between QUS and the gold standard technique for diagnosing osteoporosis, based on DXA or Quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Finally, it takes enough time for air pollution to cause osteoporosis. However, we don’t have the resident time in the area or where they stayed before in these participants. Therefore, we use the average concentrations of air pollutants during the enrolled year as representative. Further study is needed to confirm the relationship between exposure time and osteoporosis.
In summary, we found that exposure to air pollutants such as CO, SO2, NO, NO2, and NOx was associated with osteoporosis, and O3 may be a protective factor against osteoporosis. In addition, there were interaction and synergetic effects between CO and NOx and SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score. Furthermore, women were more vulnerable than men to develop osteoporosis upon exposure to air pollution. Despite the research limitations, our findings highlight the importance of air pollution on osteoporosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-H.L. and S.-C.C.; methodology, H.C. and S.-C.C.; software, C.-F.W. and B.-C.L.; validation, P.-Y.W., J.-C.H. and S.-C.C.; formal analysis, H.-P.T. and S.-C.C.; investigation, Y.-H.L. and S.-C.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-H.L.; writing—review and editing, S.-C.C.; supervision, S.-C.C.; project administration, S.-C.C.; funding acquisition, S.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Research Center for Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and The APC was funded by Kaohsiung Medical University Research Center Grant (KMU-TC108A01).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kanis, J.A. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report. Osteoporos. Int. 1994, 4, 368–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ensrud, K.E.; Crandall, C.J. Osteoporosis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017, 167, itc17–itc32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cosman, F.; de Beur, S.J.; LeBoff, M.S.; Lewiecki, E.M.; Tanner, B.; Randall, S.; Lindsay, R. Clinician’s Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2014, 25, 2359–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Rapado, I.; Shulman, L.E.; Fleisch, H.A.; Stern, P.H.; Gennari, C.; Morita, R.; Genant, H.; Burckhardt, P.; Christiansen, C.; Peck, W.; et al. Consensus development conference: Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am. J. Med. 1993, 94, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Alvaer, K.; Meyer, H.E.; Falch, J.A.; Nafstad, P.; Søgaard, A.J. Outdoor air pollution and bone mineral density in elderly men—The Oslo Health Study. Osteoporos. Int. 2007, 18, 1669–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prada, D.; Zhong, J.; Colicino, E.; Zanobetti, A.; Schwartz, J.; Dagincourt, N.; Fang, S.C.; Kloog, I.; Zmuda, J.M.; Holick, M.; et al. Association of air particulate pollution with bone loss over time and bone fracture risk: Analysis of data from two independent studies. Lancet Planet. Health 2017, 1, e337–e347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Anderson, H.R.; Frostad, J.; Estep, K.; Balakrishnan, K.; Brunekreef, B.; Dandona, L.; Dandona, R.; et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: An analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1907–1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lin, L.F.; Lee, W.J.; Li, H.W.; Wang, M.S.; Chang-Chien, G.P. Characterization and inventory of PCDD/F emissions from coal-fired power plants and other sources in Taiwan. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 1642–1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lisabeth, L.D.; Escobar, J.D.; Dvonch, J.T.; Sánchez, B.N.; Majersik, J.J.; Brown, D.L.; Smith, M.A.; Morgenstern, L.B. Ambient air pollution and risk for ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack. Ann. Neurol. 2008, 64, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Oftedal, B.; Brunekreef, B.; Nystad, W.; Madsen, C.; Walker, S.E.; Nafstad, P. Residential outdoor air pollution and lung function in schoolchildren. Epidemiology 2008, 19, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Turin, T.C.; Kita, Y.; Rumana, N.; Nakamura, Y.; Ueda, K.; Takashima, N.; Sugihara, H.; Morita, Y.; Ichikawa, M.; Hirose, K.; et al. Ambient air pollutants and acute case-fatality of cerebro-cardiovascular events: Takashima Stroke and AMI Registry, Japan (1988–2004). Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2012, 34, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Amini, H.; Trang Nhung, N.T.; Schindler, C.; Yunesian, M.; Hosseini, V.; Shamsipour, M.; Hassanvand, M.S.; Mohammadi, Y.; Farzadfar, F.; Vicedo-Cabrera, A.M.; et al. Short-term associations between daily mortality and ambient particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and the air quality index in a Middle Eastern megacity. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gaio, V.; Roquette, R.; Dias, C.M.; Nunes, B. Ambient air pollution and lipid profile: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 254, 113036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Liu, X.; Tu, R.; Qiao, D.; Niu, M.; Li, R.; Mao, Z.; Huo, W.; Chen, G.; Xiang, H.; Guo, Y.; et al. Association between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and obesity in a Chinese rural population: The Henan Rural Cohort Study. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 260, 114077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Block, M.L.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, L. Air pollution: Mechanisms of neuroinflammation and CNS disease. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Künzli, N.; Jerrett, M.; Garcia-Esteban, R.; Basagaña, X.; Beckermann, B.; Gilliland, F.; Medina, M.; Peters, J.; Hodis, H.N.; Mack, W.J. Ambient air pollution and the progression of atherosclerosis in adults. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e9096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Wang, Y.; Mao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Huang, P.; Liu, Q.; Ma, Y.; Yao, Y.; Yang, Z.; et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis reveals significant impact of long-term ambient air pollution exposure on biological functions related to mitochondria and immune response. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 264, 114707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shepherd, A.; Mullins, J.T. Arthritis diagnosis and early-life exposure to air pollution. Environ. Pollut. 2019, 253, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chang, K.H.; Chang, M.Y.; Muo, C.H.; Wu, T.N.; Hwang, B.F.; Chen, C.Y.; Lin, T.H.; Kao, C.H. Exposure to air pollution increases the risk of osteoporosis: A nationwide longitudinal study. Medicine 2015, 94, e733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alver, K.; Meyer, H.E.; Falch, J.A.; Søgaard, A.J. Outdoor air pollution, bone density and self-reported forearm fracture: The Oslo Health Study. Osteoporos. Int. 2010, 21, 1751–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mazzucchelli, R.; Crespi Villarias, N.; Perez Fernandez, E.; Durban Reguera, M.L.; Garcia-Vadillo, A.; Quiros, F.J.; Guzon, O.; Rodriguez Caravaca, G.; Gil de Miguel, A. Short-term association between outdoor air pollution and osteoporotic hip fracture. Osteoporos. Int. 2018, 29, 2231–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Møller, P.; Loft, S. Oxidative damage to DNA and lipids as biomarkers of exposure to air pollution. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 1126–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Saha, H.; Mukherjee, B.; Bindhani, B.; Ray, M.R. Changes in RANKL and osteoprotegerin expression after chronic exposure to indoor air pollution as a result of cooking with biomass fuel. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2016, 36, 969–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Bind, M.A.; Baccarelli, A.; Zanobetti, A.; Tarantini, L.; Suh, H.; Vokonas, P.; Schwartz, J. Air pollution and markers of coagulation, inflammation, and endothelial function: Associations and epigene-environment interactions in an elderly cohort. Epidemiology 2012, 23, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Prada, D.; López, G.; Solleiro-Villavicencio, H.; Garcia-Cuellar, C.; Baccarelli, A.A. Molecular and cellular mechanisms linking air pollution and bone damage. Environ. Res. 2020, 185, 109465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, C.H.; Yang, J.H.; Chiang, C.W.K.; Hsiung, C.N.; Wu, P.E.; Chang, L.C.; Chu, H.W.; Chang, J.; Song, I.W.; Yang, S.L.; et al. Population structure of Han Chinese in the modern Taiwanese population based on 10,000 participants in the Taiwan Biobank project. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 5321–5331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fan, C.T.; Hung, T.H.; Yeh, C.K. Taiwan Regulation of Biobanks. J. Law Med. Ethics A J. Am. Soc. Law Med. Ethics 2015, 43, 816–826. [Google Scholar]
  28. Levey, A.S.; Bosch, J.P.; Lewis, J.B.; Greene, T.; Rogers, N.; Roth, D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999, 130, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Cross, C.E.; Reznick, A.Z.; Packer, L.; Davis, P.A.; Suzuki, Y.J.; Halliwell, B. Oxidative damage to human plasma proteins by ozone. Free Radic. Res. Commun. 1992, 15, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agrillo, A.; Ungari, C.; Filiaci, F.; Priore, P.; Iannetti, G. Ozone therapy in the treatment of avascular bisphosphonate-related jaw osteonecrosis. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2007, 18, 1071–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ripamonti, C.I.; Maniezzo, M.; Boldini, S.; Pessi, M.A.; Mariani, L.; Cislaghi, E. Efficacy and tolerability of medical ozone gas insufflations in patients with osteonecrosis of the jaw treated with bisphosphonates-Preliminary data: Medical ozone gas insufflation in treating ONJ lesions. J. Bone Oncol. 2012, 1, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Kazancioglu, H.O.; Ezirganli, S.; Aydin, M.S. Effects of laser and ozone therapies on bone healing in the calvarial defects. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2013, 24, 2141–2146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Buyuk, S.K.; Ramoglu, S.I.; Sonmez, M.F. The effect of different concentrations of topical ozone administration on bone formation in orthopedically expanded suture in rats. Eur. J. Orthod. 2016, 38, 281–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Calafat, A.M.; Polzin, G.M.; Saylor, J.; Richter, P.; Ashley, D.L.; Watson, C.H. Determination of tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields in the mainstream smoke of selected international cigarettes. Tob. Control. 2004, 13, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Zhong, Q.; Huang, Y.; Shen, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Huang, T.; Zeng, E.Y.; Tao, S. Global estimates of carbon monoxide emissions from 1960 to 2013. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2017, 24, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rose, J.J.; Wang, L.; Xu, Q.; McTiernan, C.F.; Shiva, S.; Tejero, J.; Gladwin, M.T. Carbon Monoxide Poisoning: Pathogenesis, Management, and Future Directions of Therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 195, 596–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chen, Y.L.; Weng, S.F.; Shen, Y.C.; Chou, C.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Wang, J.J.; Tien, K.J. Apnea and risk of osteoporosis: A population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 2441–2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Tseng, F.J.; Chia, W.T.; Wang, C.H.; Shyu, J.F.; Gou, G.H.; Shui, H.A.; Sytwu, H.K.; Pan, R.Y.; Weng, C.F. Carbon Monoxide Inhibits Receptor Activator of NF-κB (RANKL)-Induced Osteoclastogenesis. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 36, 1250–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, X.B.; Du, J.B.; Cui, H. Sulfur dioxide, a double-faced molecule in mammals. Life Sci. 2014, 98, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mitsuhashi, H.; Ikeuchi, H.; Yamashita, S.; Kuroiwa, T.; Kaneko, Y.; Hiromura, K.; Ueki, K.; Nojima, Y. Increased levels of serum sulfite in patients with acute pneumonia. Shock 2004, 21, 99–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, J.; Meng, Z. The role of sulfur dioxide as an endogenous gaseous vasoactive factor in synergy with nitric oxide. Nitric Oxide 2009, 20, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Meng, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wu, D. Effect of sulfur dioxide inhalation on cytokine levels in lungs and serum of mice. Inhal. Toxicol. 2005, 17, 303–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Benedetti, F.; Rucci, N.; Del Fattore, A.; Peruzzi, B.; Paro, R.; Longo, M.; Vivarelli, M.; Muratori, F.; Berni, S.; Ballanti, P.; et al. Impaired skeletal development in interleukin-6-transgenic mice: A model for the impact of chronic inflammation on the growing skeletal system. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54, 3551–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Evans, D.M.; Ralston, S.H. Nitric oxide and bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1996, 11, 300–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wimalawansa, S.J. Nitric oxide and bone. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1192, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Qiao, D.; Pan, J.; Chen, G.; Xiang, H.; Tu, R.; Zhang, X.; Dong, X.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Z.; Tian, H.; et al. Long-term exposure to air pollution might increase prevalence of osteoporosis in Chinese rural population. Environ. Res. 2020, 183, 109264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Perret, J.L.; Bowatte, G.; Lodge, C.J.; Knibbs, L.D.; Gurrin, L.C.; Kandane-Rathnayake, R.; Johns, D.P.; Lowe, A.J.; Burgess, J.A.; Thompson, B.R.; et al. The Dose-Response Association between Nitrogen Dioxide Exposure and Serum Interleukin-6 Concentrations. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Smith, B.J.; Lerner, M.R.; Bu, S.Y.; Lucas, E.A.; Hanas, J.S.; Lightfoot, S.A.; Postier, R.G.; Bronze, M.S.; Brackett, D.J. Systemic bone loss and induction of coronary vessel disease in a rat model of chronic inflammation. Bone 2006, 38, 378–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Brown, G.C. Nitric oxide regulates mitochondrial respiration and cell functions by inhibiting cytochrome oxidase. FEBS Lett. 1995, 369, 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Poderoso, J.J.; Helfenberger, K.; Poderoso, C. The effect of nitric oxide on mitochondrial respiration. Nitric Oxide 2019, 88, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, C.; Ma, Q.; Liu, Y.; Ma, J.; He, H. Synergistic reaction between SO2 and NO2 on mineral oxides: A potential formation pathway of sulfate aerosol. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 1668–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Eghbali-Fatourechi, G.; Khosla, S.; Sanyal, A.; Boyle, W.J.; Lacey, D.L.; Riggs, B.L. Role of rank ligand in mediating increased bone resorption in early postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jin, N.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F. Assess the discrimination of Achilles InSight calcaneus quantitative ultrasound device for osteoporosis in Chinese women: Compared with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010, 76, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Trimpou, P.; Bosaeus, I.; Bengtsson, B.A.; Landin-Wilhelmsen, K. High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. Eur. J. Radiol. 2010, 73, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Damilakis, J.; Papadokostakis, G.; Perisinakis, K.; Maris, T.G.; Karantanas, A.H. Hip fracture discrimination by the Achilles Insight QUS imaging device. Eur. J. Radiol. 2007, 63, 59–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Stewart, A.; Kumar, V.; Reid, D.M. Long-term fracture prediction by DXA and QUS: A 10-year prospective study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2006, 21, 413–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moayyeri, A.; Kaptoge, S.; Dalzell, N.; Bingham, S.; Luben, R.N.; Wareham, N.J.; Reeve, J.; Khaw, K.T. Is QUS or DXA better for predicting the 10-year absolute risk of fracture? J. Bone Miner. Res. 2009, 24, 1319–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hans, D.; Baim, S. Quantitative Ultrasound (QUS) in the Management of Osteoporosis and Assessment of Fracture Risk. J. Clin. Densitom. 2017, 20, 322–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 09165 g001 550
Figure 1. Example of nearest neighbor interpolation: Big circles stand for monitoring station, small ones for participants.
Figure 1. Example of nearest neighbor interpolation: Big circles stand for monitoring station, small ones for participants.
Ijerph 17 09165 g001
Ijerph 17 09165 g002 550
Figure 2. Synergistic effect of CO and NOx on BMD T-score. The interaction between CO and NOx on BMD T-score was statistically significant (p = 0.001).
Figure 2. Synergistic effect of CO and NOx on BMD T-score. The interaction between CO and NOx on BMD T-score was statistically significant (p = 0.001).
Ijerph 17 09165 g002
Ijerph 17 09165 g003 550
Figure 3. Synergistic effect of SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score. The interaction between SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score was statistically significant (p = 0.004).
Figure 3. Synergistic effect of SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score. The interaction between SO2 and NO2 on BMD T-score was statistically significant (p = 0.004).
Ijerph 17 09165 g003
Ijerph 17 09165 g004 550
Figure 4. Association of air pollutants (A) PM2.5, (B) PM10, (C) O3, (D) CO, (E) SO2, (F) NO, (G) NO2, (H) NOx with BMD T-score in male and female participants. The interaction between sex and PM2.5 (p < 0.001), PM10 (p = 0.001), O3 (p = 0.021), CO (p = 0.033), NO (p = 0.007), and NOx (p = 0.049), in the value of T-score were statistically significant.
Figure 4. Association of air pollutants (A) PM2.5, (B) PM10, (C) O3, (D) CO, (E) SO2, (F) NO, (G) NO2, (H) NOx with BMD T-score in male and female participants. The interaction between sex and PM2.5 (p < 0.001), PM10 (p = 0.001), O3 (p = 0.021), CO (p = 0.033), NO (p = 0.007), and NOx (p = 0.049), in the value of T-score were statistically significant.
Ijerph 17 09165 g004
Table
Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics among participants according to bone mineral density (BMD) T score ≥ −1.0 or < −1.
Table 1. Comparison of clinical characteristics among participants according to bone mineral density (BMD) T score ≥ −1.0 or < −1.
CharacteristicsAll
(n = 4595)		T-Score ≥ −1.0
(n = 2870)		T-Score < −1
(n = 1725)		p
Age (year)49.7 ± 10.747.6 ± 10.353.2 ± 10.5<0.001
Male gender (%)46.140.754.9<0.001
Smoking history (%)27.123.832.6<0.001
DM (%)5.04.65.60.160
Hypertension (%)11.19.214.1<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)24.2 ± 3.524.3 ± 3.524.1 ± 3.50.023
SBP (mmHg)115.6 ± 17.1114.1 ± 17.1118.2 ± 17.0<0.001
DBP (mmHg)71.5 ± 11.171.0 ± 10.972.3 ± 11.5<0.001
Laboratory parameters
Fasting glucose (mg/dL)96.7 ± 19.795.6 ± 18.298.5 ± 21.8<0.001
Triglyceride (mg/dL)97 (69–140)94 (66–136)100 (72–145)<0.001
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)195.5 ± 35.8193.0 ± 35.4199.7 ± 36.2<0.001
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)54.3 ± 13.454.8 ± 13.553.6 ± 13.30.003
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)122.5 ± 32.2120.6 ± 31.6125.6 ± 33.0<0.001
Hemoglobin (g/dL)14.0 ± 1.613.9 ± 1.614.2 ± 1.5<0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)108.0 ± 25.1109.0 ± 25.0106.2 ± 25.1<0.001
Uric acid (mg/dL)5.6 ± 1.55.5 ± 1.55.7 ± 1.5<0.001
Regular exercise habits (%)45.243.148.6<0.001
Air pollutants
PM2.5 (μg/m3)37.7 ± 10.838.0 ± 10.737.0 ± 10.80.003
PM10 (μg/m3)67.8 ± 17.068.6 ± 17.366.5 ± 16.3<0.001
O3 (ppb)30.9 ± 3.931.0 ± 3.730.7 ± 4.10.044
CO (ppm)0.45 ± 0.180.44 ± 0.160.47 ± 0.21<0.001
SO2 (ppb)3.7 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.23.7 ± 1.20.479
NO (ppb)4.2 ± 4.13.9 ± 3.54.7 ± 4.8<0.001
NO2 (ppb)15.1 ± 5.714.8 ± 5.515.4 ± 5.90.001
NOx (ppb)19.3 ± 9.018.7 ± 8.220.2 ± 10.1<0.001
Abbreviations. BMD, bone marrow density; DM, diabetes mellitus; BMI, body mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; PM2.5, particle with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 μm or less; PM10, particle with aerodynamic diameter of 10 μm or less; O3, ozone; CO, carbon monoxide; SO2; sulfur dioxide; NO, nitric oxide; NO2, nitrogen dioxide; NOx, nitrogen oxide.
Table
Table 2. Association of air pollutants with BMD T-score using multivariable linear regression analysis.
Table 2. Association of air pollutants with BMD T-score using multivariable linear regression analysis.
Air PollutantsMultivariable
Unstandardized Coefficient β (95% CI)p
PM2.5 (per 1 μg/m3)−0.002 (−0.006, 0.002)0.311
PM10 (per 1 μg/m3)0.001 (−0.002, 0.004)0.491
O3 (per 1 ppb)0.015 (0.004, 0.026)0.008
CO (per 1 ppm)−0.809 (−1.043, −0.576)<0.001
SO2 (per 1 ppb)−0.050 (−0.085, −0.015)0.005
NO (per 1 ppb)−0.040 (−0.050, −0.029)<0.001
NO2 (per 1 ppb)−0.023 (−0.030, −0.015)<0.001
NOx (per 1 ppb)−0.017 (−0.022, 00.012)<0.001
Values expressed as unstandardized coefficient β and 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations are the same as in Table 1. Multivariable model: adjusted for age, sex, smoking history, DM, hypertension, BMI, SBP, DBP, fasting glucose, log triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin, eGFR, uric acid, and regular exercise.
Table
Table 3. The interaction between air pollutants on BMD T-score using generalized linear model.
Table 3. The interaction between air pollutants on BMD T-score using generalized linear model.
Air PollutantsInteraction
Unstandardized Coefficient β (95% CI)p
CO × SO2−0.041 (−0.229, 0.147)0.670
CO × NO−0.036 (−0.097, 0.025)0.251
CO × NO2−0.004 (−0.055, 0.047)0.880
CO × NOx−0.026 (−0.043, −0.010)0.001
SO2 × NO0.006 (−0.008, 0.021)0.385
SO2 × NO2−0.007 (−0.012, −0.002)0.004
SO2 × NOx−0.002 (−0.005, 0.001)0.181
NO × NO20.002 (−0.003, 0.006)0.447
NO × NOx0.000 (−0.002, 0.002)0.795
NO2 × NOx0.001 (0.000, 0.002)0.146
Values expressed as unstandardized coefficient β and 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations are the same as in Table 1.
Table
Table 4. Association of air pollutants with BMD T-score using multivariable linear regression analysis in male and female participants.
Table 4. Association of air pollutants with BMD T-score using multivariable linear regression analysis in male and female participants.
ParametersMaleFemaleInteraction p
Unstandardized Coefficient β (95% CI)pUnstandardized Coefficient β (95% CI)p
PM2.5 (per 1 μg/m3)−0.005 (−0.011, 0.000)0.060−0.001 (−0.007, 0.005)0.689<0.001
PM10 (per 1 μg/m3)0.000 (−0.004, 0.003)0.7730.001 (−0.002, 0.005)0.5250.001
O3 (per 1 ppb)0.002 (−0.014, 0.017)0.8320.023 (0.008, 0.038)0.0030.021
CO (per 1 ppm)−0.562 (−0.916, −0.207)0.002−0.870 (−1.175, −0.565)<0.0010.033
SO2 (per 1 ppb)−0.016 (−0.066, 0.034)0.522−0.074 (−0.121, −0.027)0.0020.498
NO (per 1 ppb)−0.025 (−0.042, −0.009)0.003−0.043 (−0.057, −0.030)<0.0010.007
NO2 (per 1 ppb)−0.016 (−0.027, −0.005)0.004−0.026 (−0.036, −0.016)<0.0010.254
NOx (per 1 ppb)−0.012 (−0.019, −0.005)0.001−0.019 (−0.025, −0.013)<0.0010.049
Values expressed as unstandardized coefficient β and 95% confidence interval (CI). Abbreviations are the same as in Table 1. Multivariable model: adjusted for age, smoking history, DM, hypertension, BMI, SBP, DBP, fasting glucose, log triglyceride, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, hemoglobin, eGFR, uric acid and regular exercise.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-F.; Chiu, H.; Lai, B.-C.; Tu, H.-P.; Wu, P.-Y.; Huang, J.-C.; Chen, S.-C. Air Pollutants Interaction and Gender Difference on Bone Mineral Density T-Score in Taiwanese Adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249165

AMA Style

Lin Y-H, Wang C-F, Chiu H, Lai B-C, Tu H-P, Wu P-Y, Huang J-C, Chen S-C. Air Pollutants Interaction and Gender Difference on Bone Mineral Density T-Score in Taiwanese Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(24):9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249165

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Yu-Hsuan, Chen-Feng Wang, Hsuan Chiu, Bo-Cheng Lai, Hung-Pin Tu, Pei-Yu Wu, Jiun-Chi Huang, and Szu-Chia Chen. 2020. "Air Pollutants Interaction and Gender Difference on Bone Mineral Density T-Score in Taiwanese Adults" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 24: 9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249165

APA Style

Lin, Y. -H., Wang, C. -F., Chiu, H., Lai, B. -C., Tu, H. -P., Wu, P. -Y., Huang, J. -C., & Chen, S. -C. (2020). Air Pollutants Interaction and Gender Difference on Bone Mineral Density T-Score in Taiwanese Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249165

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop