The Influence of the COVID-19 Event on Deviant Workplace Behavior Taking Tianjin, Beijing and Hebei as an Example
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Basis and Research Hypotheses
2.1. Event System Theory
2.2. The Event Strength Has Positive Effect on Emotional Exhaustion
2.3. The Mediating Effect of Emotional Exhaustion between Event Strength and Deviant Behavior
2.4. The Emotional Exhaustion Has Positive Effect on Deviant Behavior
3. Research Design
3.1. Research Sample
3.2. Measuring Tools
4. Result Analysis
4.1. Homologous Deviation Test
4.2. Reliability and Validity Test
4.3. Factor Analysis
4.4. Correlation Analysis
4.5. Analysis on the Difference of Demographic Variables
4.6. Hypothesis Testing
4.6.1. Testing the Effect of Event Strength on Emotional Exhaustion
4.6.2. Testing the Mediating Effect
4.6.3. Testing the Effect of Emotional Exhaustion on Deviant Behavior
5. Conclusions and Discussions
5.1. Research Conclusions
5.2. Discussions
5.3. Management Implications
5.3.1. Establish “Employee Care Plan” to Relieve Employees’ Negative Emotions
5.3.2. Open a Long-Term Communication Channel to Give Employees the Space of Independent Decision-Making
5.4. Research Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Morgeson, F.P.; Mitchell, T.R.; Liu, D. Event System Theory: An Event-Oriented Approach to the Organizational Sciences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2015, 40, 515–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bacharach, S.B.; Bamberger, P. 9/11 and New York City Firefighters’ Post Hoc Unit Support and Control Climates: A Context Theory of the Consequences of Involvement in Traumatic Work-Related Events. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 849–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ashforth, B.E.; Schinoff, B.S. Identity Under Construction: How Individuals Come to Define Themselves in Organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2016, 3, 111–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maslach, C.; Leiter, M.P.; Jackson, S.E. Making a significant difference with burnout interventions: Researcher and practitioner collaboration. J. Organ. Behav. 2011, 33, 296–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galperin, B.L. Exploring the Nomological Network of Workplace Deviance: Developing and Validating a Measure of Constructive Deviance. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 42, 2988–3025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashforth, B.E. Distinguished Scholar Invited Essay: Exploring Identity and Identification in Organizations: Time for Some Course Corrections. J. Leadersh. Org. Stud. 2016, 23, 61–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barteit, S.; Sié, A.; Yé, M.; Depoux, A.; Louis, V.R.; Sauerborn, R. Lessons learned on teaching a global audience with massive open online courses (MOOCs) on health impacts of climate change: A commentary. Glob. Health 2019, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xia, W.; Fu, L.; Liao, H.; Yang, C.; Guo, H.; Bian, Z. The Physical and Psychological Effects of Personal Protective Equipment on Health Care Workers in Wuhan, China: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J. Emerg. Nurs. 2020, 46, 791–801.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zvolensky, M.J.; Garey, L.; Rogers, A.H.; Schmidt, N.B.; Vujanovic, A.A.; Storch, E.A.; Buckner, J.D.; Paulus, D.J.; Alfano, C.; Smits, J.A.; et al. Psychological, addictive, and health behavior implications of the COVID-19 pandemic. Behav. Res. Ther. 2020, 134, 103715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsing, S.-C.; Jin, Y.-T.; Tzeng, N.-S.; Chung, C.-H.; Chen, T.-Y.; Chang, H.-A.; Kao, Y.-C.; Chien, W.-C. Is Agomelatine Associated with Less Sedative-Hypnotic Usage in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder? A Nationwide, Population-Based Study. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2020, 16, 1727–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aquino, K.; Galperin, B.L.; Bennett, R.J. Social Status and Aggressiveness as Moderators of the Relationship Between Interactional Justice and Workplace Deviance. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 34, 1001–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Malik, P.; Lenka, U. Exploring the Impact of Perceived AMO Framework on Constructive and Destructive Deviance Mediating Role of Employee Engagement. Int. J. Manpower 2019, 40, 94–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Jensen, J.M. The Effects of Active Constructive and Passive Corrective Leadership on Workplace Incivility and the Mediating Role of Fairness Perceptions. Group Organ. Manag. 2014, 39, 416–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, R.J.; Robinson, S.L. Development of a measure of workplace deviance. J. Appl. Psychol. 2000, 85, 349–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lita, S.; Scrieciu, D.; Tintea, G. EPA-0820—Assessment of deviant workplace behaviour in military setting: Development and validation of interpersonal deviance scale. Eur. Psychiatry 2014, 29, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clark, J.P.; Hollinger, R.C.; National Institute of Justice (U.S.). Theft by Employees in Work Organizations: Executive Summary; U.S. Department of Justice: Washington, DC, USA, 1983.
- Schaufeli, W.; Bakker, A.B.; Van Rhenen, W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J. Organ. Behav. 2009, 30, 893–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiao, Z.; Wu, D.; Liao, Z. Job Insecurity and Workplace Deviance: The Moderating Role of Locus of Control. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2018, 46, 1673–1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Beehr, T.A. Self-Efficacy and Psychological Ownership Mediate the Effects of Empowering Leadership on Both Good and Bad Employee Behaviors. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 2017, 24, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, W.; Recker, J.; Kummer, T.-F.; Kohlborn, T.; Viaene, S. Constructive deviance as a driver for performance in retail. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2016, 30, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertens, W.; Recker, J.C.; Kohlborn, T.; Kummer, T.-F. A Framework for the Study of Positive Deviance in Organizations. Deviant Behav. 2016, 37, 1288–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grawitch, M.J.; Munz, D.C.; Kramer, T.J. Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dyn. Theory Res. Pract. 2003, 7, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, H.; Kim, H. Customer aggression and workplace deviance: The moderating role of psychological ownership. Soc. Behav. Pers. Int. J. 2017, 45, 1761–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mackey, J.D.; McAllister, C.P.; Maher, L.P.; Wang, G. Leaders and followers behaving badly: A meta-analytic examination of curvilinear relationships between destructive leadership and followers’ workplace behaviors. Pers. Psychol. 2019, 72, 3–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durá, L.; Perez, L.; Chaparro, M. Positive Deviance as Design Thinking: Challenging Notions of Stasis in Technical and Professional Communication. J. Bus. Tech. Commun. 2019, 33, 376–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eissa, G.; Lester, S.W.; Gupta, R. Interpersonal Deviance and Abusive Supervision: The Mediating Role of Supervisor Negative Emotions and the Moderating Role of Subordinate Organizational Citizenship Behavior. J. Bus. Ethic 2020, 166, 577–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Proyer, R.; Egander, F.; Ewellenzohn, S.; Eruch, W. Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: A randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths—vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pivaral, C.E.C.; Cruz, L.K.R.; Perez, G.J.G.; Lopez, M.G.V.; Figueroa, I.V. Effect of A Psycho-Educative Intervention to Decrease Burnout Syndrome on Confidence Employees Working for The CFE (Federal Electric Comission). Salud. Ment. 2009, 32, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
- Mayer, D.M.; Thau, S.; Workman, K.M.; Van Dijke, M.; De Cremer, D. Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: Integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2012, 117, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martinko, M.J.; Harvey, P.H.; Sikora, D.; Douglas, S.C. Perceptions of abusive supervision: The role of subordinates’ attribution styles. Leadersh. Q. 2011, 22, 751–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinko, M.J.; Harvey, P.; Brees, J.R.; Mackey, J.D. A review of abusive supervision research. J. Organ. Behav. 2013, 34, S120–S137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Douglas, S.C.; Kiewitz, C.; Martinko, M.J.; Harvey, P.; Kim, Y.; Chun, J.U. Cognitions, Emotions, and Evaluations: An Elaboration Likelihood Model for Workplace Aggression. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2008, 33, 425–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.-L.; Hsieh, M.-W.; Hsiao, C.; Lin, C.-P.; Yang, C. Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance in technology industry: The main and moderating effects of happiness. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2020, 14, 587–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madrid, H.P. Emotion Regulation, Positive Affect, and Promotive Voice Behavior at Work. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Z.; He, B.; Sun, X. Does Work Stressors Lead to Abusive Supervision? A Study of Differentiated Effects of Challenge and Hindrance Stressors. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020, 13, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, L.; Ren, Y. Moral Obligation, Public Leadership, and Collective Action for Epidemic Prevention and Control: Evidence from the Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Emergency. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Finell, E.; Vainio, A. The Combined Effect of Perceived COVID-19 Infection Risk at Work and Identification with Work Community on Psychosocial Wellbeing among Finnish Social Sector and Health Care Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mazza, C.; Ricci, E.; Biondi, S.; Colasanti, M.; Ferracuti, S.; Napoli, C.; Roma, P. A Nationwide Survey of Psychological Distress among Italian People during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Items | Options | Quantity | Percentage | Items | Options | Quantity | Percentage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 289 | 46.1% | Income | 1–2 K | 56 | 8.94% |
Female | 339 | 53.9% | 3–5 K | 319 | 50.84% | ||
Age | <30 | 254 | 40.50% | 6–10 K | 212 | 33.80% | |
30–40 | 138 | 21.79% | >10 K | 41 | 6.42% | ||
40–50 | 96 | 15.36% | Industry | Student | 63 | 10.06% | |
>50 | 140 | 22.35% | Teacher | 82 | 13.13% | ||
Education | College | 161 | 25.70% | Civil servant | 96 | 15.36% | |
Bachelor | 312 | 49.72% | Institutions | 109 | 17.32% | ||
Master | 95 | 15.08% | Enterprise | 253 | 40.22% | ||
PhD | 60 | 9.50% | Freelance | 25 | 3.91% |
Scales | Dimensions | Items |
---|---|---|
Event Strength | Event Novelty | There is a clear, known way to respond to this event (R) |
There is an understandable sequence of steps that can be followed in responding to this event (R) | ||
Can rely on established procedures and practices in responding to the events (R) | ||
Had rules, procedures, or guidelines to follow when this event occurred (R) | ||
Event Criticality | This event is critical for the long-term success of my company | |
Dealing with emergencies is the primary event of my company | ||
Dealing with emergencies is an important event of my company | ||
Event Disruption | This emergency destroyed the original work capacity (performance) of my company, making the work unable to be completed. | |
This emergency made our company stop to think about how to deal with it. | ||
This emergency has changed our company’s usual response to emergencies. | ||
The occurrence of this emergency needs our company to change the previous working mode. | ||
Emotional Exhaustion | Emotional Exhaustion | I feel emotionally drained from my work |
I feel used up at the end of the workday | ||
Working with people all day is really a strain for me | ||
I feel burned out from my work | ||
I feel I’m working too hard on my job | ||
I feel like I’m at the end of my rope | ||
Destructive Deviance | Interpersonal Destructive Deviance | Made fun of someone at work |
Said something hurtful to someone at work | ||
Made an ethnic, religious, or racial remark at work | ||
Cursed at someone at work | ||
Played a mean prank on someone at work | ||
Acted rudely toward someone at work | ||
Publicly embarrassed someone at work | ||
Organizational Destructive Deviance | Taken property from work without permission | |
Spent too much time fantasizing or daydreaming instead of working | ||
Falsified a receipt to get reimbursed for more money than you spent on business expenses | ||
Taken an additional or longer break than is acceptable at your workplace | ||
Come in late to work without permission | ||
Littered your work environment | ||
Neglected to follow your boss’s instructions | ||
Intentionally worked slower than you could have worked | ||
Discussed confidential company information with an unauthorized person | ||
Used an illegal drug or consumed alcohol on the job | ||
Put little effort into your work | ||
Dragged out work in order to get overtime | ||
Constructive Deviance | Innovative Constructive Deviance | Developed creative solutions to problems |
Searched for innovative ways to perform day to day procedures | ||
Decided on unconventional ways to achieve work goals | ||
Departed from the accepted tradition to solve problems | ||
Introduced a change to improve the performance of your work group. | ||
Challenging Constructive Deviance | Sought to bend or break the rules in order to perform your job | |
Violated company procedures in order to solve a problem | ||
Departed from organizational procedures to solve a customer’s problem | ||
Bent a rule to satisfy a customer’s needs | ||
Departed from dysfunctional organizational policies or procedures to solve a problem | ||
Departed from organizational requirements in order to increase the quality of services or products | ||
Interpersonal Constructive Deviance | Reported a wrong-doing to co-workers to bring about a positive organizational change | |
Did not follow the orders of your supervisor in order to improve work procedures | ||
Disagreed with others in your work group in order to improve the current work procedures | ||
Disobeyed your supervisor’s instructions to perform more efficiently | ||
Reported a wrong-doing to another person in your company to bring about a positive organizational change |
Variables | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Gender | 1 | |||||||
2. Age | 0.02 | 1 | ||||||
3. Education | 0.03 | 0.02 | 1 | |||||
4. Income | 0.05 | 0.48 * | 0.721 ** | 1 | ||||
5. Event strength | 0.55 * | −0.614 ** | 0.788 ** | 0.488 * | 1 | |||
6. Emotional exhaustion | 0.587 ** | −0.738 ** | 0.756 ** | 0.516 * | 0.424 ** | 1 | ||
7. Construction deviance | −0.567 * | −0.776 ** | 0.621 ** | 0.639 ** | 0.612 ** | 0.731 ** | 1 | |
8. Destructive deviance | 0.631 * | −0.816 ** | −0.796 *** | −0.677 ** | 0.517 ** | 0.432 * | 0.06 | 1 |
Dependent Variable | Path | Independent Variable | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotional exhaustion | <--- | Event novelty | 0.524 | 0.047 | 11.149 | *** |
Emotional exhaustion | <--- | Event criticality | 0.574 | 0.051 | 11.255 | *** |
Emotional exhaustion | <--- | Event disruption | 0.593 | 0.059 | 10.051 | *** |
Dependent Variable. | Path | Independent Variable | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emotional exhaustion | <--- | Event strength | 0.624 | 0.054 | 11.556 | *** |
Constructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.205 | 0.055 | 3.727 | 0.001 |
Destructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.139 | 0.068 | 2.044 | 0.019 |
Constructive deviance | <--- | Event strength | 0.435 | 0.049 | 8.878 | *** |
Destructive deviance | <--- | Event strength | 0.512 | 0.062 | 8.258 | *** |
Dependent Variable | Total Effect | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Constructive deviance | 0.571 | 0.471 | 0.655 | 0.470 | 0.655 |
Destructive deviance | 0.521 | 0.408 | 0.627 | 0.408 | 0.627 |
Dependent Variable | Indirect Effect | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds |
Constructive deviance | 0.059 | 0.006 | 0.125 | 0.003 | 0.122 |
Destructive deviance | 0.087 | 0.018 | 0.168 | 0.016 | 0.167 |
Dependent Variable | Direct Effect | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds | Lower Bounds | Upper Bounds |
Constructive deviance | 0.512 | 0.397 | 0.609 | 0.402 | 0.611 |
Destructive deviance | 0.435 | 0.310 | 0.542 | 0.310 | 0.541 |
Dependent Variable | Path | Independent Variable | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Innovative constructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.408 | 0.057 | 7.158 | *** |
Challenging constructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.672 | 0.072 | 9.333 | *** |
Interpersonal constructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.232 | 0.064 | 3.625 | 0.015 |
Organizational destructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | −0.711 | 0.053 | −13.415 | *** |
Interpersonal destructive deviance | <--- | Emotional exhaustion | 0.482 | 0.052 | 9.269 | *** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhao, H. The Influence of the COVID-19 Event on Deviant Workplace Behavior Taking Tianjin, Beijing and Hebei as an Example. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010059
Liu Y, Zhang Z, Zhao H. The Influence of the COVID-19 Event on Deviant Workplace Behavior Taking Tianjin, Beijing and Hebei as an Example. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(1):59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010059
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Yingyan, Zaisheng Zhang, and Heng Zhao. 2021. "The Influence of the COVID-19 Event on Deviant Workplace Behavior Taking Tianjin, Beijing and Hebei as an Example" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 1: 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010059
APA StyleLiu, Y., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2021). The Influence of the COVID-19 Event on Deviant Workplace Behavior Taking Tianjin, Beijing and Hebei as an Example. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010059