Myostatin/Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASM) Ratio, Not Myostatin, Is Associated with Low Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Women
by
, , and
Soo Jeong Choi
1, 
Min Sung Lee
2,
Duk-Hee Kang
2,
Gang Jee Ko
3,
Hee-Sook Lim
4,
Byung Chul Yu
1,
Moo Yong Park
1,
Jin Kuk Kim
1,
Chul-Hee Kim
5,
Seung Duk Hwang
1,
Jun Chul Kim
6,
Chang Won Won
7,*,† and
Won Suk An
8,*,†
1
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14584, Korea
2
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07804, Korea
3
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Korea
4
Department of Food Sciences and Nutrition, Yeonsung University, Anyang 14011, Korea
5
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon 14854, Korea
6
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA University School of Medicine, Gumi 39295, Korea
7
Department of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul 02447, Korea
8
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan 49201, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-corresponding authors.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(14), 7344; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147344
Submission received: 11 June 2021
/
Revised: 4 July 2021
/
Accepted: 6 July 2021
/
Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Novel Tools and Technologies for Monitoring Healthy Ageing)
Abstract
:Background/Aims: Elevated levels of serum myostatin have been proposed as a biomarker for sarcopenia. Recent studies have shown that elevated level of serum myostatin was associated with physical fitness and performance. This study aimed to examine the significance of myostatin in the association between muscle mass and physical performance in the elderly. Methods: This cross-sectional study is based on the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort study involving 1053 people aged 70 years or over. Anthropometric, physical performance, and laboratory data were collected. Results: The mean age of the participants was 75.8 years, and 50.7% of them were female. Serum myostatin levels in men (3.7 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1 ng/mL, p < 0.001) were higher compared with that in women. Serum myostatin level was associated with appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) index and eGFR by cystatin C. Serum myostatin/ASM ratio was associated with handgrip strength in women. Conclusion: Higher serum myostatin levels were related with higher muscle mass and better physical performances in the elderly. Serum myostatin/ASM ratio may be a predictor for physical performance rather than myostatin.
1. Introduction
Myostatin is a member of the transforming growth factor–β (TGF-β) super family that is predominantly produced in skeletal muscle [1], synovia, adipose tissue, cardiac muscle [2], and brain [3]. Myostatin suppresses growth of skeletal muscle [4], and myostatin-null mice show a dramatic gain in skeletal muscle mass because of an increase in the number and thickness of muscle fibers (hyperplasia + hypertrophy) [5]. Accordingly, myostatin has been proposed as a biomarker for sarcopenia [6]. However, recent studies showing that higher serum myostatin levels are associated with better physical fitness and performance have led to a debate about the relationship between myostatin and these conditions [7,8,9,10]. There are some suggestions that higher serum myostatin levels simply reflect skeletal muscle mass [7,10,11]. Moreover, there are sex differences in the correlations of circulating myostatin and muscle mass and physical performance [9,10,12].
The exact roles of serum myostatin as a biomarker of sarcopenia and its relationship with sarcopenia components (muscle mass and physical function) are uncertain, especially in the community-dwelling elderly. Seo et al. [13] revealed that myostatin was not associated with sarcopenia among 59 elderly female participants. In addition, myostatin levels may reflect skeletal muscle mass, though it functions as suppressing the growth of skeletal muscle. Therefore, myostatin/appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) ratio may present real myostatin activities with skeletal muscle mass corrected. Our aims are (i) to investigate the association between myostatin level and sarcopenia (and its components such as handgrip strength and walking speed) in community-dwelling older adults according to gender; and (ii) to investigate the relationship between myostatin divided by skeletal muscle mass with sarcopenia (and its components such as handgrip strength and walking speed).
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Data Collection
The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS) was designed as a multicenter, longitudinal study with the aim of identifying and ameliorating the factors that contribute to aging in community-dwelling individuals aged 70 years or older [14,15]. KFACS conducted multicenter-based sampling in 10 centers (8 medical centers and 2 public health centers) in urban and rural regions across Korea. The sample consisted of ambulatory people who were recruited among age- and sex-stratified community residents around 10 centers. Each center recruited participants using quota sampling stratified by age (70–74, 75–79 and 80–84 years with a ratio of 6:5:4, respectively) and sex (male and female), with the aim of recruiting 1500 men and 1500 women. Participants were recruited from diverse settings (local senior welfare centers, community health centers, apartments, housing complexes, and outpatient clinics) to minimize selection bias.
Out of a total of 3014 participants in a baseline survey which was conducted from January 2016 to December 2017, a total of 2403 participants at the eight hospital centers underwent DXA. All participants gave peripheral blood samples at 7–10 AM, after a 10 h overnight fast. Serum level of myostatin was measured by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay kit (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Only four centers measured serum cystatin C and myostatin. The KFACS protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Kyung Hee University Medical Center, and all participants provided written informed consent (IRB number: 2015-12-103).
2.2. GFR Estimation
To calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), we used the Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)-Epidemiology Collaboration (EPI) Equation [16,17].
- (1)
- By serum creatinine:
For women with a serum creatinine level ≤ 0.7 mg/dL, GFR = 144 × (serum creatinine/0.7)−0.329 × (0.993)Age; for women with a serum creatinine level > 0.7 mg/dL, GFR = 144 × (serum creatinine/0.7)−1.209 × (0.993)Age;
for men with a serum creatinine level ≤ 0.9 mg/dL, GFR = 141 × (serum creatinine/0.9)−0.411 × (0.993)Age; for men with a serum creatinine level > 0.9 mg/dL, GFR = 141 × (serum creatinine/0.9)−1.209 × (0.993)Age.
- (2)
- By serum cystatin C:
For women with a serum cystatin C level ≤ 0.8 mg/dL, GFR = 133 × (serum cystatin C/0.8)−0.499 × (0.996)Age × 0.932; for women with a serum cystatin C level > 0.8 mg/L, GFR = 133 × (serum cystatin C/0.8)−1.328 × (0.996)Age × 0.932;
for men with a serum cystatin C level ≤ 0.8 mg/dL, GFR = 133 × (serum cystatin C/0.8)−0.499 × (0.996)Age; for men with a serum cystatin C level > 0.8 mg/L, GFR = 133 × (serum cystatin C/0.8)−1.328 × (0.996)Age.
2.3. Body Composition Measurements
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA; Lunar iDXA; GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA) was conducted in a standardized manner according to procedures recommended by the manufacturer. The arm, leg, and trunk segments were separated manually according to anatomical landmarks by the DXA analysis software. ASM was calculated as the sum of the lean mass of both arms and legs under the assumption that all non-fat and non-bone tissues are skeletal muscle [18]. The ASM index was defined as ASM (kg)/height2 (m²) [19].
2.4. Muscle Strength Measurement
A digital hand grip gauge (Takei TKK 5401; Takei Scientific Instruments, Tokyo, Japan) was used to measure handgrip strength. The grip strength of each hand was measured once, one at a time. Following a 3-min wait, a second round of measurements was performed. The highest value for each hand was included in the analysis.
2.5. Physical Performance
Physical performance was evaluated by usual gait speed. The subject walked a total of 7 m at a usual pace, and the time taken to walk the 4 m in the middle (1.5–5.5 m point) was measured. The test was repeated twice, and the mean of the two trials was used for analysis [20].
2.6. Definition of Sarcopenia
Sarcopenia has been defined as low muscle mass [19], low strength [21], or both [22]. According to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) 2019, the condition can be diagnosed when these two criteria are present [22]. AWGS 2019 defines persons with a low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and low physical performance as having “severe sarcopenia.” Low muscle mass was defined as an ASM index value < 7 kg/m2 for men and < 5.4 kg/m2 for women. Handgrip strength < 28 kg for men and < 18 kg for women was defined as low muscle strength. Slow gait speed was defined as a gait speed ≤ 1.0 m/s.
2.7. Myostatin/ASM Ratio
Myostatin/ASM ratio is defined to know relative serum myostatin level compared to skeletal muscle mass; serum myostatin level (ng/mL) was divided by ASM (kg).
2.8. Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS statistical software version 24.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation or absolute and relative frequencies. We used an independent t-test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and a chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables to evaluate differences by group. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to identify the significant variables for myostatin level. Then, these significant variables were included in the analysis of covariance models with adjustment for multiple covariates to identify the independent variables. Multiple linear regressions were performed for each gender to indicate the proportion of variance in the serum myostatin level or myostatin/ASM ratio explained by those parameters.
3. Results
3.1. Baseline Characteristics of the Participants
A total of 1053 participants was enrolled (Figure S1). Their mean age was 75.8 ± 3.9 years. Among the participants, 15.3% were ≥80 years, and women represented 50.7%. Mean serum myostatin was 3.4 ± 1.2 ng/mL. Higher BMI, higher creatinine, higher cystatin C, lower free T4, lower high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), higher total ASM, and higher ASM index were more common according to myostatin quartiles in men. Women with lower myostatin quartiles had lower cystatin C, higher free T4, and lower ASM index compared with the others (Table 1).
3.2. Related Factors of Serum Myostatin Level
Myostatin was negatively correlated with eGFR and positively correlated with ASM index (Figure 1). Multiple linear regression analyses identified independent predictive factors for myostatin level (Table 2). Hs-CRP, eGFR by cystatin C, and ASM index were associated with serum myostatin level in men, while diabetes, eGFR by cystatin C and ASM index in women were associated with serum myostatin level.
3.3. Comparison of Sarcopenia According to Myostatin Level
A total of 158 (15.0%) and 36 (3.4%) subjects were diagnosed with sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia by AWGS criteria 2019, respectively. While the proportion of subjects with sarcopenia decreased with higher myostatin quartile, those with chronic kidney disease (CKD) defined as eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 increased.
3.4. Comparison of Characteristics According to Myostatin/ASM Ratio Quartile
Because myostatin and ASM index were positively correlated, we classified subgroups according to myostatin/ASM ratio quartile (mean 215.0 ± 76.3 pg/mL/kg; Table 3). The highest quartile group of myostatin/ASM ratio in both sexes had higher cystatin C, lower eGFR by cystatin C, and a lower ASM index. The lowest quartile group of myostatin/ASM ratio in women had higher BMI and greater handgrip strength.
Myostatin/ASM ratio was negatively associated with eGFR by cystatin C in both sexes. Myostatin/ASM ratio was negatively associated with hs-CRP in men, while Myostatin/ASM ratio in women was negatively associated with diabetes and handgrip strength. In addition, vitamin D was associated with myostatin/ASM ratio (Table 4).
4. Discussion
We found higher serum myostatin level and myostatin/ASM ratio to be associated with muscle mass and physical performance in elderly Koreans. Mean serum myostatin level in our cohort was similar to that of a previous Japanese study [23]. Similar to our study, a positive relationship between serum myostatin and muscle mass was reported in 463 Taiwanese healthy community-dwelling elderly [11], 151 Swedish CKD elderly [8] and 112 Spanish nursing home elderly residents [7]. A recent report suggested that higher serum myostatin levels in Korean patients on hemodialysis (HD) simply reflects muscle mass [24]. Similar findings regarding a positive association between serum myostatin levels and lean body mass measured by bioelectrical impedance have been reported in patients with HD [25] and peritoneal dialysis [10].
Serum myostatin levels were associated with ASM index and eGFR by cystatin C in both sexes. Hs-CRP was associated with serum myostatin levels in men, while diabetes in women was associated with serum myostatin levels. Sex differences in the relationship between myostatin and physical performance was similar to previous reports [7,9,10,12]. Considering that myostatin is mainly synthesized and secreted into circulation by skeletal muscle [6], it is conceivable that serum myostatin levels might only be a surrogate marker of muscle mass [10]. Therefore, we introduced myostatin/ASM ratio as myostatin levels corrected for muscle mass (Table 3). A higher myostatin/ASM ratio reflects relatively higher myostatin levels in comparison with muscle mass because participants with lower muscle mass can secret less myostatin. That is why we used myostatin/ASM (kg) and not myostatin/ASM index (kg/m2). We wanted to present the relationship between myostatin and sarcopenia and its components after adjusting the skeletal muscle mass (kg). Myostatin/ASM ratio in women was negatively associated with handgrip strength in multiple linear regression, while that in men was not associated with handgrip strength (Table 4). Fife et al. [26] reported that myostatin levels were not associated with muscle mass, but negatively with handgrip strength in 56 older women.
Myostatin has been proposed as a main mediator for sarcopenia, especially in CKD [27]. Myostatin can also act as autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine factors [1,27]. Circulating myostatin might be associated with muscle mass and may exert negative feedback in regulating muscle mass. Bergen et al. [9] suggested that myostatin acts as a homeostatic regulator of muscle mass in men. Previous studies have shown that muscular [4] or circulating myostatin [10,24,28,29] increased in CKD. This myostatin activation in CKD is caused by low physical activity [30], inflammation [31], uremia [32], angiotensin II [33], metabolic acidosis and glucocorticoid [34]. There was a positive association between serum myostatin level and handgrip strength in 178 CKD patients (data not shown). Because we had only 16.7% patients with lower kidney function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/m2), we could not see the difference between serum myostatin levels and physical performance according to the CKD stage. Kang et al. [35] reported a positive association between handgrip strength and ASM index in HD patients, although they did not measure serum myostatin level. Further studies regarding improving or maintaining muscle mass and myostatin levels are necessary in elderly and CKD patients.
Negative association between hs-CRP and myostatin level was observed in 355 liver cirrhosis patients [36] like the present results. Recent reports point out a decreased concentration of serum myostatin in the acute phase and a reverse effect in the chronic phase of burn patients [37,38]. Zhao et al. [39] revealed that serum myostatin levels are higher in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Baczek et al. [40] pointed out the difficulties in interpreting myostatin levels in various disease statuses and in understanding the interrelationship between physiological variables (such as age, sex and physical activity).
Myostatin/ASM ratio may show the alterations in myostatin activation (upregulation) in skeletal muscle mass. Because participants of this study were stable community-dwelling elderly and had better kidney function, physical performance and myostatin levels may be influenced by total ASM rather than other confounding factors. Further prospective studies are necessary to confirm the role of myostatin/ASM ratio for prediction of sarcopenia or physical performance.
The strengths of our study include an evaluation of serum myostatin and anthropometric and the physical performance of a community-dwelling older Korean cohort. We demonstrated that serum myostatin level is associated with higher muscle mass and better physical performance. In addition, we introduced myostatin/ASM ratio as a potential indicator of myostatin activity considering muscle mass. Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes recommend using serum creatinine for initial eGFR assessment. Cystatin C for confirmatory testing in specific circumstances when eGFR is based on serum creatinine is less accurate. Therefore, authors used creatinine and cystatin C for eGFR assessment. We showed the influence of kidney function on the association between myostatin and muscle mass using the CKD-EPI equation based on serum creatinine and cystatin C. Using cystatin C, we overcame the limitation of the creatinine-based eGFR equation because creatinine was mainly associated with muscle mass.
However, several limitations should be mentioned. First, serum myostatin measurement has not been standardized and shows an inter-observer difference. Yano et al. [23] suggested removing the myostatin pro-peptide and other myostatin-binding proteins for the accurate measurement of myostatin. Second, we could not differentiate between the origins of myostatin because we did not perform muscle biopsy. Third, we checked serum myostatin level in only 4 of 10 centers. Fourth, selection bias could not be excluded. Although the distribution of sample characteristics (age, sex, education, place of residence) of KFACS participants was similar to the estimates of the older (70–84 years) population drawn from the national census [14], the participants were not completely representative of the Korean general population. Fifth, we could not examine any longitudinal association to conclude on a cause-and-effect relationship. Follow-up studies will provide a more definite conclusion because KFACS was conducted from January 2016 to December 2017 initially and has continued to be followed up annually. Finally, we did not adjust the cohort center as a confounding factor. Although the sampling methods were the same across the cohort centers, the different characteristics related with each center could be a bias. Finally, adjusted R squares for myostatin or myostatin/ASM in both sexes were relatively low, and this means that there seems to be more explanatory factors not included in this study. For example, myostatin was reported to increase after physical exercise, depending on the time elapsed between the physical exercise and the sampling [41].
5. Conclusions
Serum myostatin level was associated with muscle mass and eGFR by cystatin C in the Korean elderly. While serum myostatin levels were not associated with physical performance in the elderly, serum myostatin/ASM ratio was negatively associated with handgrip strength in women.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph18147344/s1, Figure S1: Cohort construction. DEXA, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Figure S2: Comparison of proportions (%) with sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia by Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) according to serum myostatin quartile.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: S.J.C., C.W.W., and W.S.A. Data curation and formal analysis: S.J.C., B.C.Y., M.Y.P., J.K.K., C.-H.K., and S.D.H. Investigation: M.S.L., D.-H.K., G.J.K., H.-S.L., and J.C.K. Writing: S.J.C., C.-H.K., C.W.W., and W.S.A. Writing—review and editing: S.J.C., C.-H.K., C.W.W. and W.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund and a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korean Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI15C3153).
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Kyung Hee University Medical Center, and all participants provided written informed consent (IRB number: 2015-12-103).
Informed Consent Statement
All participants gave written informed consent in order to participate.
Data Availability Statement
All databases are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
We thank the dedicated members of Study Association of Sarcopenia and Frailty for Chronic Kidney Disease Population (SATISFACTION).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Verzola, D.; Milanesi, S.; Bertolotto, M.; Garibaldi, S.; Villaggio, B.; Brunelli, C.; Balbi, M.; Ameri, P.; Montecucco, F.; Palombo, D.; et al. Myostatin mediates abdominal aortic atherosclerosis progression by inducing vascular smooth muscle cell dysfunction and monocyte recruitment. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, S.L.; Chang, A.C.; Huang, C.C.; Tsai, C.H.; Lin, C.C.; Tang, C.H. Myostatin promotes interleukin-1beta expression in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts through inhibition of miR-21-5p. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McPherron, A.C.; Lawler, A.M.; Lee, S.J. Regulation of skeletal muscle mass in mice by a new TGF-beta superfamily member. Nature 1997, 387, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verzola, D.; Procopio, V.; Sofia, A.; Villaggio, B.; Tarroni, A.; Bonanni, A.; Mannucci, I.; De Cian, F.; Gianetta, E.; Saffioti, S.; et al. Apoptosis and myostatin mRNA are upregulated in the skeletal muscle of patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2011, 79, 773–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Breitbart, A.; Auger-Messier, M.; Molkentin, J.; Heineke, J. Myostatin from the heart: Local and systemic actions in cardiac failure and muscle wasting. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 300, H1973–H1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- White, T.A.; LeBrasseur, N.K. Myostatin and sarcopenia: Opportunities and challenges—A mini-review. Gerontology 2014, 60, 289–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrieta, H.; Hervás, G.; Pardo, C.R.; Ruiz-Litago, F.; Iturburu, M.; Yanguas, J.J.; Gil, S.M.; Rodriguez-Larrad, A.; Irazusta, J. Serum myostatin levels are higher in fitter, more active, and non-frail long-term nursing home residents and increase after a physical exercise intervention. Gerontology 2019, 65, 229–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Hellberg, M.; Hellmark, T.; Höglund, P.; Clyne, N. Muscle mass and plasma myostatin after exercise training: A substudy of Renal Exercise (RENEXC)-a randomized controlled trial. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2021, 36, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bergen, H.R., 3rd; Farr, J.N.; Vanderboom, P.M.; Atkinson, E.J.; White, T.A.; Singh, R.J.; Khosla, S.; LeBrasseur, N.K. Myostatin as a mediator of sarcopenia versus homeostatic regulator of muscle mass: Insights using a new mass spectrometry-based assay. Skelet. Muscle 2015, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yamada, S.; Tsuruya, K.; Yoshida, H.; Tokumoto, M.; Ueki, K.; Ooboshi, H.; Kitazono, T. Factors associated with the serum myostatin level in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: Potential effects of skeletal muscle mass and Vitamin D receptor activator use. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2016, 99, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, L.N.; Lee, W.J.; Liu, L.K.; Lin, M.H.; Chen, L.K. Healthy community-living older men differ from women in associations between myostatin levels and skeletal muscle mass. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2018, 9, 635–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schafer, M.J.; Atkinson, E.J.; Vanderboom, P.M.; Kotajarvi, B.; White, T.A.; Moore, M.M.; Bruce, C.J.; Greason, K.L.; Suri, R.M.; Khosla, S.; et al. Quantification of GDF11 and myostatin in human aging and cardiovascular disease. Cell Metab. 2016, 23, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Seo, M.-W.; Jung, S.-W.; Kim, S.-W.; Jung, H.C.; Kim, D.-Y.; Song, J.K. Comparisons of muscle quality and muscle growth factor between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic older women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Won, C.W.; Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Chon, D.; Kim, S.; Kim, C.-O.; Kim, M.K.; Cho, B.; Choi, K.M.; Roh, E.; et al. Korean frailty and aging cohort study (KFACS): Cohort profile. BMJ Open 2020, 10, e035573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Won, C.W.; Lee, Y.; Choi, J.; Kim, K.W.; Park, Y.; Park, H.; Oh, I.-H.; Ga, H.; Kim, Y.S.; Jang, H.C.; et al. Starting Construction of Frailty Cohort for Elderly and Intervention Study. Ann. Geriatr. Med. Res. 2016, 20, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levey, A.S.; Stevens, L.A.; Schmid, C.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Castro, A.F., 3rd; Feldman, H.I.; Kusek, J.W.; Eggers, P.; Van Lente, F.; Greene, T.; et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 150, 604–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Inker, L.A.; Schmid, C.; Tighiouart, H.; Eckfeldt, J.H.; Feldman, H.I.; Greene, T.; Kusek, J.W.; Manzi, J.; Van Lente, F.; Zhang, Y.L.; et al. Estimating glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine and cystatin C. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Cawthon, P.M.; Peters, K.W.; Shardell, M.D.; McLean, R.R.; Dam, T.-T.L.; Kenny, A.M.; Fragala, M.S.; Harris, T.B.; Kiel, D.; Guralnik, J.M.; et al. Cutpoints for low appendicular lean mass that identify older adults with clinically significant weakness. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2014, 69, 567–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Baumgartner, R.N.; Koehler, K.M.; Gallagher, D.; Romero, L.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Ross, R.R.; Garry, P.J.; Lindeman, R.D. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998, 147, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Jeong, M.J.; Yoo, J.; Song, D.Y.; Won, C.W. Calf circumference as a screening tool for cognitive frailty in community-dwelling older adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS). J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lauretani, F.; Russo, C.R.; Bandinelli, S.; Bartali, B.; Cavazzini, C.; Di Iorio, A.; Corsi, A.M.; Rantanen, T.; Guralnik, J.M.; Ferrucci, L. Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: An operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 1851–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, L.-K.; Woo, J.; Assantachai, P.; Auyeung, T.-W.; Chou, M.-Y.; Iijima, K.; Jang, H.C.; Kang, L.; Kim, M.; Kim, S.; et al. Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 300–307.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yano, S.; Nagai, A.; Isomura, M.; Yamasaki, M.; Kijima, T.; Takeda, M.; Hamano, T.; Nabika, T. Relationship between blood myostatin levels and kidney function:shimane CoHRE study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.M.; Kim, S.E.; Lee, J.Y.; Jeong, H.J.; Son, Y.K.; An, W.S. Serum myostatin levels are associated with abdominal aortic calcification in dialysis patients. Kidney Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 38, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Delanaye, P.; Bataille, S.; Quinonez, K.; Buckinx, F.; Warling, X.; Krzesinski, J.-M.; Pottel, H.; Burtey, S.; Bruyère, O.; Cavalier, E. Myostatin and insulin-like growth factor 1 are biomarkers of muscle strength, muscle mass, and mortality in patients on hemodialysis. J. Ren. Nutr. 2019, 29, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fife, E.; Kostka, J.; Kroc, Ł.; Guligowska, A.; Pigłowska, M.; Sołtysik, B.; Kaufman-Szymczyk, A.; Fabianowska-Majewska, K.; Kostka, T. Relationship of muscle function to circulating myostatin, follistatin and GDF11 in older women and men. BMC Geriatr. 2018, 18, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verzola, D.; Barisione, C.; Picciotto, D.; Garibotto, G.; Koppe, L. Emerging role of myostatin and its inhibition in the setting of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2019, 95, 506–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koyun, D.; Nergizoglu, G.; Kir, K.M. Evaluation of the relationship between muscle mass and serum myostatin levels in chronic hemodialysis patients. Saudi. J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2018, 29, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.S.; Chen, Y.M.; Lin, S.Y.; Chang, H.H.; Huang, T.M.; Chi, Y.C.; Yang, W.S. Serum myostatin levels and grip strength in normal subjects and patients on maintenance haemodialysis. Clin. Endocrinol. 2011, 75, 857–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shad, B.J.; Thompson, J.; Holwerda, A.M.; Stocks, B.; Elhassan, Y.; Philp, A.; van Loon, L.J.; Wallis, G.A. One week of step reduction lowers myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in young men. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2019, 51, 2125–2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Pan, J.; Dong, Y.; Tweardy, D.J.; Dong, Y.; Garibotto, G.; Mitch, W.E. Stat3 activation links a C/EBPdelta to myostatin pathway to stimulate loss of muscle mass. Cell Metab. 2013, 18, 368–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Wang, D.-T.; Yang, Y.-J.; Huang, R.-H.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Lin, X. Myostatin activates the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems contributing to muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 684965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, B.-W.; Chang, H.; Kuan, P.; Shyu, K.-G. Angiotensin II activates myostatin expression in cultured rat neonatal cardiomyocytes via p38 MAP kinase and myocyte enhance factor 2 pathway. J. Endocrinol. 2008, 197, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, R.; Jiao, H.; Zhao, J.; Wang, X.; Lin, H. Glucocorticoids enhance muscle proteolysis through a myostatin-dependent pathway at the early stage. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Lee, S.; Cho, J.-H.; Kim, J.C. Comparison of muscle mass indices using computed tomography or dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting physical performance in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2017, 42, 1119–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skladany, L.; Koller, T.; Molcan, P.; Vnencakova, J.; Zilincan, M.; Jancekova, D.; Kukla, M.; Skladany, L.; Koller, T.; Molcan, P.; et al. Prognostic usefulness of serum myostatin in advanced chronic liver disease: Its relation to gender and correlation with inflammatory status. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2019, 70, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Wallner, C.; Wagner, J.M.; Dittfeld, S.; Drysch, M.; Lehnhardt, M.; Behr, B. Myostatin serum concentration as an indicator for deviated muscle metabolism in severe burn injuries. Scand. J. Surg. 2019, 108, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Åkerfeldt, T.; Helmersson-Karlqvist, J.; Gunningberg, L.; Swenne, C.L.; Larsson, A. Postsurgical acute phase reaction is associated with decreased levels of circulating myostatin. Inflammation 2015, 38, 1727–1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; Shao, Y.; Lin, C.; Zeng, C.; Fang, H.; Pan, J.; Cai, D. Myostatin serum concentrations are correlated with the severity of knee osteoarthritis. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2017, 31, e22094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baczek, J.; Silkiewicz, M.; Wojszel, Z.B. Myostatin as a biomarker of muscle wasting and other pathologies-state of the art and knowledge gaps. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arrieta, H.; Rodriguez-Larrad, A.; Irazusta, J. Myostatin as a biomarker for diagnosis or prognosis of frailty and sarcopenia: Current knowledge. Gerontology 2019, 65, 385–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
The correlations of myostatin level with cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (a) and height-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) index (■ male, ○ female) (b).
Figure 1.
The correlations of myostatin level with cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (a) and height-adjusted appendicular skeletal muscle mass (ASM) index (■ male, ○ female) (b).
Table 1.
Characteristics according to serum myostatin level quartiles in 519 men and 534 women.
| Variables | Men | p-Value | Women | p-Value | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (<2.6 ng/mL) | Q2 (2.6–3.3 ng/mL) | Q3 (3.3–4.1 ng/mL) | Q4 (>4.1 ng/mL) | Q1 (<2.6 ng/mL) | Q2 (2.6–3.3 ng/mL) | Q3 (3.3–4.1 ng/mL) | Q4 (>4.1 ng/mL) | |||
| (n = 100) | (n = 117) | (n = 137) | (n = 165) | (n = 163) | (n = 146) | (n = 127) | (n = 98) | |||
| Age, years | 76.3 ± 3.6 | 76.2 ± 3.8 | 76 ± 3.9 | 76.4 ± 3.8 | 0.820 | 75.1 ± 3.9 | 75.6 ± 3.8 | 75 ± 3.9 | 75.9 ± 4.2 | 0.343 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.9 ± 2.8 | 23.9 ± 2.9 | 23.5 ± 2.7 | 23.9 ± 2.9 | 0.024 | 24.8 ± 3.1 | 24.9 ± 2.8 | 24.6 ± 3 | 25 ± 2.7 | 0.835 |
| Smoker, n (%) | 79 (79.0) | 93 (79.5) | 105 (76.6) | 119 (72.1) | 0.447 | 7 (4.3) | 1 (0.7) | 7 (5.5) | 3 (3.1) | 0.140 |
| Drinker, n (%) | 93 (93.0) | 8 (6.8) | 13 (9.5) | 15 (9.1) | 0.815 | 100 (61.6) | 86 (58.9) | 81 (63.8) | 65 (66.3) | 0.667 |
| Diabetes mellitus, n (%) | 25 (25.0) | 27 (231) | 33 (24.1) | 35 (21.2) | 0.894 | 45 (27.6) | 31 (21.2) | 20 (15.7) | 18 (18.4) | 0.082 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 48 (48) | 65 (55.6) | 67 (48.9) | 75 (45.5) | 0.411 | 95 (58.3) | 82 (56.2) | 72 (56.7) | 56 (57.1) | 0.985 |
| Osteoporosis, n (%) | 2 (2) | 3 (2.56) | 4 (2.92) | 6 (3.64) | 0.884 | 31 (19.0) | 39 (26.7) | 31 (24.4) | 15 (15.3) | 0.124 |
| At least one medication, n (%) | 80 (80) | 98 (83.76) | 116 (84.67) | 124 (75.15) | 0.148 | 141 (86.5) | 123 (84.25) | 105 (82.68) | 83 (84.69) | 0.842 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 0.741 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 0.373 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.92 ± 0.21 | 0.93 ± 0.22 | 0.95 ± 0.20 | 1.02 ± 0.31 | 0.003 | 0.71 ± 0.19 | 0.71 ± 0.17 | 0.70 ± 0.17 | 0.75 ± 0.16 | 0.195 |
| Cystatin C, ng/mL | 0.98 ± 0.31 | 0.98 ± 0.28 | 0.97 ± 0.23 | 1.05 ± 0.33 | 0.023 | 0.85 ± 0.24 | 0.89 ± 0.26 | 0.87 ± 0.20 | 0.95 ± 0.21 | 0.003 |
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 14.1 ± 1.4 | 14.1 ± 1.3 | 14.1 ± 1.2 | 13.9 ± 1.4 | 0.316 | 12.8 ± 1.2 | 12.7 ± 1.1 | 12.8 ± 1.1 | 12.7 ± 1.3 | 0.777 |
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D, ng/mL | 24.8 ± 8.5 | 24.6 ± 7.4 | 25.6 ± 8.5 | 24 ± 8.5 | 0.382 | 20.7 ± 10.2 | 20.3 ± 9.4 | 22.9 ± 10.9 | 22 ± 8.7 | 0.107 |
| Free T4, ng/dL | 1.30 ± 0.21 | 1.27 ± 0.24 | 1.27± 0.25 | 1.21 ± 0.24 | 0.019 | 1.27 ± 0.18 | 1.19 ± 0.19 | 1.20 ± 0.19 | 1.17 ± 0.21 | <0.001 |
| Free testosterone, pg/mL | 9.2 ± 3.8 | 9.5 ± 3.3 | 9.6 ± 3.5 | 9.1 ± 3.2 | 0.321 | 0.8 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.781 |
| Hs-CRP,(mg/dL) | 1.94 ± 3.30 | 1.39 ± 1.88 | 1.20 ± 1.35 | 1.03 ± 1.20 | 0.015 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 1.3 ± 1.7 | 1.1 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 1.5 | 0.416 |
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCr, mL/min/m2 | 78.4 ± 12.2 | 78.2 ± 13.4 | 76.7 ± 13.7 | 72.8 ± 16.5 | 0.016 | 81.1 ± 13.9 | 80.6 ± 12.6 | 81 ± 13 | 77.1 ± 13.9 | 0.082 |
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCystC, mL/min/m2 | 80.8 ± 21.8 | 79.9 ± 20.1 | 79.3 ± 19.5 | 74.1 ± 21.3 | 0.025 | 85.5 ± 19.8 | 81.2 ± 18.3 | 82.6 ± 17.6 | 75.1 ± 18.3 | <0.001 |
| Total ASM, kg | 18.7 ± 2.4 | 19.4 ± 2.5 | 19.3 ± 2.4 | 20.1 ± 2.5 | <0.001 | 13.4 ± 1.7 | 13.7 ± 1.7 | 13.6 ± 1.7 | 13.9 ± 1.8 | 0.206 |
| ASM index, kg/m2 | 6.9 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 7.3 ± 0.8 | <0.001 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 6.0 ± 0.7 | 0.038 |
| Walking speed, m/s | 1.27± 0.30 | 1.28 ± 0.30 | 1.27 ± 0.33 | 1.31 ± 0.31 | 0.594 | 1.15 ± 0.23 | 1.15 ± 0.25 | 1.20 ± 0.31 | 1.19 ± 0.29 | 0.338 |
| Handgrip strength, kg | 30.5 ± 5.6 | 31.8 ± 5.6 | 31.8 ± 5.2 | 32.1 ± 5.6 | 0.111 | 20.2 ± 4 | 20.3 ± 3.8 | 20.7 ± 3.9 | 20.4 ± 4.3 | 0.790 |
All values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%). BMI, body mass index; sCr, serum creatinine; sCyst, serum cystatin C; Hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass. The p-value was calculated by one-way analysis of variance and Pearson’s Chi-square test.
Table 2.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses for serum myostatin level in 519 men and 534 women.
Table 2.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses for serum myostatin level in 519 men and 534 women.
| Univariate | Multivariate | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95% CI | p-Value | B | 95% CI | p-Value | |||
| Men a | ||||||||
| Age (years) | −0.003 | −0.031 | 0.024 | 0.817 | ||||
| Non-smoker | 0.207 | −0.038 | 0.452 | 0.098 | ||||
| Never drinker | 0.072 | −0.308 | 0.451 | 0.711 | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | −0.074 | −0.301 | 0.153 | 0.521 | ||||
| Hs-CRP | −0.104 | −0.156 | −0.052 | <0.001 | −0.101 | −0.152 | −0.051 | <0.001 |
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D | −0.007 | −0.020 | 0.006 | 0.282 | ||||
| Free testosterone | −0.014 | −0.045 | 0.017 | 0.372 | ||||
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCystC | −0.012 | −0.018 | −0.005 | 0.001 | −0.013 | −0.018 | −0.008 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed (m/sec) | 0.269 | −0.066 | 0.604 | 0.116 | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 0.025 | 0.006 | 0.044 | 0.009 | 0.016 | −0.004 | 0.036 | 0.126 |
| ASM index (kg/m2) | 0.350 | 0.222 | 0.478 | <0.001 | 0.312 | 0.178 | 0.447 | <0.001 |
| Women b | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 0.013 | −0.010 | 0.036 | 0.266 | ||||
| Non-smoking | 0.019 | −0.485 | 0.523 | 0.941 | ||||
| never drinker | −0.067 | −0.254 | 0.121 | 0.485 | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | −0.257 | −0.478 | −0.037 | 0.022 | −0.309 | −0.527 | −0.092 | 0.005 |
| Hs-CRP | −0.019 | −0.078 | 0.040 | 0.531 | ||||
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D | 0.007 | −0.002 | 0.016 | 0.147 | ||||
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCystC | −0.010 | −0.015 | −0.006 | <0.001 | −0.013 | −0.019 | −0.008 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed (m/sec) | 0.210 | −0.126 | 0.547 | 0.220 | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | 0.005 | −0.017 | 0.028 | 0.640 | ||||
| ASM index (kg/m2) | 0.240 | 0.098 | 0.382 | 0.001 | 0.229 | 0.084 | 0.373 | 0.002 |
CI, confidence interval; sCr, serum creatinine; sCystC, serum cystatin C; Hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass. a In men, adjusted R2 and constant of the multivariate model were 0.115 and 2.259, respectively. b In women, adjusted R2 and constant of the multivariate model were 0.073 and 2.682, respectively.
Table 3.
Characteristics according to plasma myostatin/ASM ratio in 519 men and 534 women.
| Men | Women | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (<184) (n = 179) | Q2 (184–226) (n = 151) | Q3 (226–289) (n = 116) | Q4 (>289) (n = 73) | p-Value | Q1 (<184) (n = 84) | Q2 (184–226) (n = 112) | Q3 (226–289) (n = 148) | Q4 (>289) (n = 190) | p-Value | |
| Age, years | 74.3 ± 4.0 | 75.5 ± 3.5 | 75.7 ± 3.9 | 75.6 ± 3.9 | 0.054 | 74.7 ± 3.9 | 75.3 ± 3.7 | 75.2 ± 3.8 | 76.2 ± 4.2 | 0.014 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.9 ± 2.9 | 23.9 ± 2.7 | 23.3 ± 2.6 | 23.2 ± 3.0 | 0.084 | 25.5 ± 3.3 | 24.9 ± 2.8 | 24.5 ± 2.5 | 24.4 ± 3.0 | 0.012 |
| Smoker, (%) | 143 (79.9) | 114 (75.5) | 90 (77.6) | 49 (67.1) | 0.184 | 3 (3.6) | 2 (1.8) | 8 (5.4) | 5 (2.6) | 0.38 |
| Drinker, (%) | 170 (95.0) | 137 (90.7) | 106 (91.4) | 63 (86.3) | 0.137 | 49 (58.3) | 70 (62.5) | 88 (59.5) | 125 (65.8) | 0.56 |
| Diabetes, (%) | 40 (22.3) | 45 (29.8) | 17 (14.7) | 18 (24.7) | 0.035 | 30 (35.7) | 17 (15.2) | 35 (23.6) | 32 (16.8) | 0.001 |
| Hypertension, (%), | 93 (52.0) | 78 (51.7) | 55 (47.4) | 29 (39.7) | 0.299 | 50 (59.5) | 61 (54.5) | 88 (59.5) | 106 (55.8) | 0.804 |
| Osteoporosis, (%) | 3 (1.7) | 6 (4.0) | 3 (2.6) | 3 (4.1) | 0.573 | 14 (16.7) | 23.0 (20.5) | 42 (28.4) | 37 (19.5) | 0.123 |
| At least one medication, (%) | 147 (82.1) | 127 (84.1) | 87 (75.0) | 57 (78.1) | 0.255 | 75 (89.3) | 90.0 (80.4) | 127 (85.8) | 160 (84.2) | 0.368 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 4.32 ± 0.28 | 4.34 ± 0.23 | 4.31 ± 0.23 | 4.32 ± 0.25 | 0.734 | 4.33 ± 0.25 | 4.31 ± 0.20 | 4.35 ± 0.24 | 4.32 ± 0.24 | 0.519 |
| Creatinine, mg/dL | 0.92 ± 0.19 | 0.94 ± 0.21 | 0.99 ± 0.28 | 1.02 ± 0.28 | 0.005 | 0.71 ± 0.20 | 0.70 ± 0.15 | 0.73 ± 0.19 | 0.73 ± 0.16 | 0.427 |
| Cystatin C, ng/mL | 0.96 ± 0.29 | 0.97 ± 0.24 | 0.99 ± 0.33 | 1.07 ± 0.29 | 0.006 | 0.85 ± 0.24 | 0.87 ± 0.22 | 0.89 ± 0.26 | 0.94 ± 0.20 | 0.015 |
| Hemoglobin | 14.2 ± 1.3 | 14.1 ± 1.2 | 13.9 ± 1.3 | 13.7 ± 1.4 | 0.034 | 13.0 ± 1.2 | 12.6 ± 1.1 | 12.8 ± 1.1 | 12.7 ± 1.2 | 0.176 |
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D, ng/mL | 24.8 ± 8.0 | 25.2 ± 8.3 | 25.3 ± 8.6 | 23.6 ± 7.9 | 0.351 | 20.3 ± 8.2 | 19.7 ± 10.8 | 21.9 ± 10.6 | 22.3 ± 9.5 | 0.094 |
| Free T4, ng/dL | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.157 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | <0.001 |
| Hs-CRP, mg/dL | 1.8 ± 3.0 | 1.3 ± 1.8 | 1.2 ± 1.3 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | 0.016 | 1.3 ± 1.3 | 1.2 ± 1.7 | 1.3 ± 1.8 | 1.1 ± 1.4 | 0.854 |
| eGFR by CKD_EPI sCr, ml/min/m2 | 79.2 ± 11.7 | 76.1 ± 15.0 | 74.4 ± 16.0 | 71.3 ± 15.5 | 0.001 | 79.7 ± 14.9 | 82.2 ± 12.5 | 80.3 ± 13.6 | 79.1 ± 13.0 | 0.27 |
| eGFR by EKD_EPI sCystC, ml/min/m2 | 81.1 ± 20.0 | 80.2 ± 21.0 | 74.9 ± 20.5 | 71.0 ± 20.8 | 0.001 | 85.7 ± 20.3 | 83.2 ± 18.8 | 81.7 ± 17.9 | 76.4 ± 17.6 | 0.013 |
| Myostatin, ng/ml | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 3.9 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 1.1 | <0.001 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 2.8 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 4.5 ± 0.9 | <0.001 |
| Total ASM, kg | 19.8 ± 2.5 | 19.7 ± 2.3 | 19.1 ± 2.6 | 18.6 ± 2.5 | 0.001 | 14.2 ± 1.7 | 13.8 ± 1.6 | 13.6 ± 1.6 | 13.0 ± 1.7 | <0.001 |
| ASM Index, Kg/m2 | 7.2 ± 0.8 | 7.2 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 0.7 | 6.9 ± 0.8 | 0.001 | 6.0 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.7 | 0.001 |
| Walking speed m/s | 1.28 ± 0.30 | 1.29 ± 0.33 | 1.28 ± 0.31 | 1.28 ± 0.33 | 0.945 | 1.19 ± 0.25 | 1.15 ± 0.24 | 1.15 ± 0.26 | 1.18 ± 0.31 | 0.621 |
| Handgrip strength, kg | 32.0 ± 5.7 | 31.8 ± 5.7 | 31.1 ± 4.7 | 31.2 ± 6.0 | 0.459 | 21.7 ± 4.0 | 20.3 ± 3.7 | 20.2 ± 4.0 | 20.1 ± 4.0 | 0.013 |
All values are presented as mean ± SD or number (%). sCr, serum creatinine; sCystC, serum cystatin C; Hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass. The p-value was calculated by one-way ANOVA and Pearson’s chi-square test.
Table 4.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses for serum myostatin/ASM ratio in 519 men and 534 women.
Table 4.
Simple and multiple linear regression analyses for serum myostatin/ASM ratio in 519 men and 534 women.
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95% CI | p-Value | B | 95% CI | p-Value | |||
| Men a | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 1.254 | −0.142 | 2.650 | 0.078 | ||||
| Non-smoker | 0.116 | −8.604 | 8.837 | 0.979 | ||||
| Never drinker | −5.996 | −16.190 | 4.197 | 0.248 | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | −0.717 | −13.263 | 11.828 | 0.911 | ||||
| Hs-CRP | −4.842 | −7.483 | −2.201 | <0.001 | −5.450 | −8.045 | −0.350 | <0.001 |
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D | −0.452 | −1.094 | 0.190 | 0.168 | ||||
| Free testosterone | −0.809 | −2.361 | 0.743 | 0.306 | ||||
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCystC | −0.909 | −1.266 | −0.552 | <0.0001 | −0.984 | −1.342 | −0.627 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed (m/sec) | 1.629 | −15.362 | 18.620 | 0.851 | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | −0.668 | −1.625 | 0.290 | 0.171 | ||||
| Women b | ||||||||
| Age (years) | 2.891 | 1.145 | 4.636 | 0.001 | 1.674 | −0.322 | 3.669 | 0.100 |
| Non-smoker | −2.969 | −23.875 | 17.937 | 0.780 | ||||
| Never drinker | 5.335 | −6.602 | 17.271 | 0.380 | ||||
| Diabetes mellitus | −17.396 | −34.246 | −0.547 | 0.043 | −25.377 | −39.748 | −6.642 | 0.006 |
| Hs-CRP | −0.804 | −5.310 | 3.702 | 0.726 | ||||
| 25-hydroxy vitamin D | 0.811 | 0.117 | 1.505 | 0.022 | 0.878 | 0.197 | 1.558 | 0.012 |
| Free testosterone | −1.026 | −9.126 | 7.074 | 0.804 | ||||
| eGFR by CKD-EPI sCystC | −0.886 | −1.245 | −0.527 | <0.001 | −0.982 | −1.366 | −0.0598 | <0.001 |
| Walking speed (m/sec) | −7.277 | −32.956 | 18.403 | 0.578 | ||||
| Handgrip strength (kg) | −2.879 | −4.610 | −1.148 | 0.001 | −2.785 | −4.608 | −0.9630 | <0.001 |
CI, confidence interval; sCystC, serum cystatin C; Hs-CRP, high sensitivity C-reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CKD-EPI, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration; ASM, appendicular skeletal muscle mass. a In men, adjusted R2 and constant of the multivariate model were 0.082 and 275.2, respectively. b In women, adjusted R2 and constant of the multivariate model were 0.074 and 337.7, respectively.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Choi, S.J.; Lee, M.S.; Kang, D.-H.; Ko, G.J.; Lim, H.-S.; Yu, B.C.; Park, M.Y.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, C.-H.; Hwang, S.D.; et al. Myostatin/Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASM) Ratio, Not Myostatin, Is Associated with Low Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Women. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 7344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147344
AMA Style
Choi SJ, Lee MS, Kang D-H, Ko GJ, Lim H-S, Yu BC, Park MY, Kim JK, Kim C-H, Hwang SD, et al. Myostatin/Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASM) Ratio, Not Myostatin, Is Associated with Low Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(14):7344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147344
Chicago/Turabian StyleChoi, Soo Jeong, Min Sung Lee, Duk-Hee Kang, Gang Jee Ko, Hee-Sook Lim, Byung Chul Yu, Moo Yong Park, Jin Kuk Kim, Chul-Hee Kim, Seung Duk Hwang, and et al. 2021. "Myostatin/Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASM) Ratio, Not Myostatin, Is Associated with Low Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Women" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 14: 7344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147344
APA StyleChoi, S. J., Lee, M. S., Kang, D. -H., Ko, G. J., Lim, H. -S., Yu, B. C., Park, M. Y., Kim, J. K., Kim, C. -H., Hwang, S. D., Kim, J. C., Won, C. W., & An, W. S. (2021). Myostatin/Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass (ASM) Ratio, Not Myostatin, Is Associated with Low Handgrip Strength in Community-Dwelling Older Women. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(14), 7344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147344
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
