Next Article in Journal
Clogging and Water Quality Change Effects of Typical Metal Pollutants under Intermittent Managed Aquifer Recharge Using Urban Stormwater
Next Article in Special Issue
Associations between Sex and Risk Factors for Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Journal
A SEM-NCA Approach towards Social Networks Marketing: Evaluating Consumers’ Sustainable Purchase Behavior with the Moderating Role of Eco-Friendly Attitude
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Patient-Perceived Hospital Service Quality and Sentiment in Malaysian Public Hospitals Using Machine Learning and Facebook Reviews
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices

by
Alberto Garcés-Jiménez
1,2,
Huriviades Calderón-Gómez
3,4,
José M. Gómez-Pulido
3,5,
Juan A. Gómez-Pulido
6,
Miguel Vargas-Lombardo
4,*,
José L. Castillo-Sequera
3,5,
Miguel Pablo Aguirre
7,
José Sanz-Moreno
1,
María-Luz Polo-Luque
5,8 and
Diego Rodríguez-Puyol
9
1
Foundation for Biomedical Research, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
2
Center for Studies and Innovation in Knowledge Management, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, 28223 Madrid, Spain
3
Department of Computer Science, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
4
E-Health and Supercomputing Research Group, Technological University of Panama, Panama City 0819-07289, Panama
5
Ramón y Cajal Institute for Health Research, 28034 Madrid, Spain
6
Department of Technologies of Computers and Communications, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
7
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Technological Institute of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires C1437FBG, Argentina
8
Department of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
9
Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, Research Foundation of the University Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, IRYCIS, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(24), 13278; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413278
Submission received: 4 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 12 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disease Prediction, Machine Learning, and Healthcare)

Abstract

:
Background: treating infectious diseases in elderly individuals is difficult; patient referral to emergency services often occurs, since the elderly tend to arrive at consultations with advanced, serious symptoms. Aim: it was hypothesized that anticipating an infectious disease diagnosis by a few days could significantly improve a patient’s well-being and reduce the burden on emergency health system services. Methods: vital signs from residents were taken daily and transferred to a database in the cloud. Classifiers were used to recognize patterns in the spatial domain process of the collected data. Doctors reported their diagnoses when any disease presented. A flexible microservice architecture provided access and functionality to the system. Results: combining two different domains, health and technology, is not easy, but the results are encouraging. The classifiers reported good results; the system has been well accepted by medical personnel and is proving to be cost-effective and a good solution to service disadvantaged areas. In this context, this research found the importance of certain clinical variables in the identification of infectious diseases. Conclusions: this work explores how to apply mobile communications, cloud services, and machine learning technology, in order to provide efficient tools for medical staff in nursing homes. The scalable architecture can be extended to big data applications that may extract valuable knowledge patterns for medical research.

1. Background and Objectives

The world’s older population is growing at a significant rate. Today, 8.5% of the population is aged 65 and over; this will increase to 17% by 2050 [1]. Infectious diseases are common (and serious) in this group, often requiring the use of emergency services, degrading their efficiency, and sometimes overburdening them to the point of collapse [2].
The use of digital technology for health supports a patient-centric approach, based on communication, empathy, and collaboration between patients and practitioners [3]. eHealth provides mobility with portable devices, wearables or smartphones, ubiquitous services, and adaptive resources with the cloud. eHealth research addresses electronic records, computerized order entries, e-prescribing, clinical decision support systems (CDSS), telemedicine, health knowledge management, triage, virtual healthcare teams, and medical mobility services (mHealth). eHealth is supported by advanced IT, such as big data, machine learning, artificial intelligence, cloud services, mobile devices, and the internet of things (IoT) [4,5,6].
However, technology implementations could clash with practitioners and nurses in some cases, as they entail additional workloads. In addition, eHealth decision support systems do not absolve doctors from their accountability [7]. Data-based systems also face the challenge of scarce and poor-quality data in regard to training the model, sometimes becoming unaffordable due to ignoring procedures [8]. The long learning curve of a new eHealth system slows deployment; changes can also be seen as a threat to existing job conditions.
The hypothesis is that anticipating an infectious disease diagnosis by a few days could improve a patient’s well-being, alleviate the health system’s resources, and result in relatives having a “better perception”. Cost-effectiveness is an important driver for national health systems, i.e., to improve medical services for citizens [9]. The evolution of an infectious process is characterized by changes in vital signs. These data could be used to determine the probability of developing an infectious disease [10].
Machine learning (ML) techniques can be used for predictive modeling [11]. They provide pattern recognition and forecast the evolution of a disease, improving the protocols of control and care. ML is an area of computer science derived from artificial intelligence. It provides satisfactory results in eHealth and medicine [12].
This research presents the application of mobile communications, cloud services, and machine learning technology to provide efficient tools to medical staff in nursing homes in order to predict the development of infectious diseases. The approach taken by our study makes it somewhat different from other proposals, due to its particular characteristics. The patients were not cared for in usual health centers, but were elderly people living in nursing homes. Three particular infectious diseases were considered: acute respiratory, urinary tract, and skin and soft tissue infections; a customized biosensor system was developed for the project; the communications infrastructure for data collection, storage, and analysis ws based on microservices; and machine learning algorithms were integrated into the microservices for prediction purposes.
To this end, vital signs from the residents were taken daily and transferred to a database in the cloud by means of an experimental data capture system. Classifiers were used to recognize patterns in the spatial domain process of the collected data. In this context, this research found the importance of certain clinical variables in the identification of infectious diseases, as we will discuss later. These vital signs were selected because they may change due to the pathophysiological adaptations that take place in infectious diseases. Thus, the infection-related inflammation process, stress induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system, and modifications of the activities of the nuclei that regulate heart and lung functioning may modify body temperature, electrodermal activity, oxygen saturation, heart beat rate, and blood pressure.

2. Related Work

The references listed below were selected in relation to the underlying problem of this study: the possibility of early diagnosis by collecting and processing medical data that were further analyzed by advanced hardware and software architectures and tools.

2.1. Early Diagnosis

Given the importance of anticipating the diagnoses of infectious diseases, it is surprising that this concept remains a novelty. Similar approaches for high-risk and very severe cardiopathies [13] or pneumopathies [14] have been proposed. However, anticipating respiratory and urinary infections has not yet been practicable or sustainable, even after considering the high prevalence. The selected infectious diseases based on their prevalence in elderly individuals, are acute respiratory infection (ARI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI).

2.2. Collecting and Processing Medical Data

Sensors used to capture medical signs can be placed in public or private spaces, such as cameras, barometers, microphones, passive infrared (PIR), ultrasound motion detectors, or radio frequency identification (RFID). They can also be embedded in mobile devices, such as accelerometers, magnetometers, or gyroscopes (A/M/G), and be worn, such as smartwatches or alert necklaces [15]. The last category of sensors are those expressly applied on the body of the patient, such as body thermometers, pulse oximeters, tensiometers, electrocardiograms (ECGs), or electroencephalograms (EEGs). The sensors can be networked through wireless sensor networks (WSNs) or body area sensor networks (BASNs).
Once heterogeneous clinical data are collected, they are cleaned, filtered, individualized, and combined. The use of ML, deep learning (DL), artificial intelligence (AI), or ambient intelligence (AmI) in this context [16] motivates research on the automatic identification of the basic activities of daily living. Service provisioning requires self-contention to ensure nonintrusive technology [17].
The information gathered by large sensor networks, such as the IoT [18], makes the utilization of multi-agent management integration [19] and pervasive mobile communications [20], known as mHealth in the medical field, advisable. This allows for delivering new advanced services, such as ECG wearable devices [21], accepted portable mobile applications [22], mobile advisors for drug dosage and adverse reactions [23], medical recommenders for different medical specialties [24,25,26], fast automatic triage [27], professional medical education programs [28], and telecare systems [29], among many others.

2.3. Hardware and Software Architectures and Tools

The cloud supplies computing power and data storage on demand as scalable commodities under three layers of service: infrastructure (IaaS), platform (PaaS), and software (SaaS). Security and privacy are key requirements for the cloud due to the sensitive information in medical records [5,30].
Microservice architecture is derived from service-oriented architecture (SOA) [31] to provide flexible and scalable execution properties in the cloud. Each microservice plays specific roles depending on the database (DB) requirements [32]. External configuration, microservice discovery, load balancing, central login, metrics, or autoscaling require attention. There are powerful software tools available for delivering applications rapidly by adopting the microservice paradigm [33].
With regard to software tools, ML provides a good approach for data-based predictive analysis [11]. Many algorithms provide knowledge pattern recognition and forecasting, suggesting the possibility of anticipating the diagnosis of diseases from monitored medical data. ML has techniques that have been widely applied, with satisfactory results in eHealth [12].
Some unsupervised learning techniques used in eHealth are K-means, density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN), self-organized maps (SOMS), similarity network fusion (SNF), perturbation clustering for data integration and disease subtyping (PINS), and cancer integration via multikernel learning (CIMLR), among others. Common supervised learning algorithms in this domain are support vector machine (SVM), iterative dichotomizer 3 (ID3), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Bayesian networks, linear regression, and logistic regression for classification [34].

3. Materials and Methods

This research provides a complete experimental system for gathering medical information from elderly individuals, analyzing the data with predictive ML models.
The experiments performed follow a holistic view, where the data gathering requires defining the scope of the experiment, the protocol or workflow for the medical personnel, the mobile set of instruments, the software platform, and the data analysis techniques.

3.1. Participants, Procedure, and Ethical Considerations

This proposal is intended to be applied for institutional residents in nursing homes that are susceptible to developing infectious diseases. A workflow is defined for nurses to collect vital signs on a daily basis from their assigned residents. Doctors must report any infectious disease detected in any of these residents.
The protocol requires that residents or relatives approve its use beforehand due to normative restrictions and to protect the individual’s privacy.
The assigned nurses must follow the following protocol: seated in front of the resident, they (1) turn on the app (on the tablet); (2) switch the hub on, as well as the app connection; (3) select the patient’s ID; (4) deploy the medical sensors on the arms and hands; (5) press the start button to start the readings; (6) save the data locally once the measurements are verified; (7) and upload the data to the Cloud DB as soon as the tablet is connected to the internet (WiFi or telephony). Finally, nurses place the devices back into the cases for the next residents. Figure 1 shows the workflow of the procedure.
The nurses are to ensure that the batteries of the active sensors, hub, and tablet, are fully charged for the next day, and to promptly report any incidents observed that could compromise the data acquisition.
Finally, ethical consideration for setting clear limits for the research and protecting people’s privacy was implemented at the beginning of this project, following the instructions of the founders by means of private statements in their hands.

3.2. Instruments

The nurses use a portable set of biosensors to take the required medical signs from the residents. The equipment must be comfortable to carry and fast to deploy. The different components must be resistant to manipulation, and the application must be robust to perturbances and anomalous events. For general deployment, the equipment must receive approval from the respective health systems.
It is necessary that the equipment be seen as comfortable to operate by the assigned personnel and allow for a warm relationship with the resident. The mobile application that operates the equipment must be fully functional online and offline, avoiding delays in the process.
The field equipment used by the nurses are small cases with customized sets of four sensors obtained from a commercial vendor [35], prepared for the devices and the tablets used for the mobile applications, as shown in Figure 2.
The four biosensors collected five vital signs, taking (1) the average, maximum, and minimum values of the electrodermal activity (EDA) and heart beat rate; (2) the maximum and minimum oxygen saturation (SPO2); (3) the body temperature when stable; and (4) both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure. A hub quantifies and multiplexes the signals and sends them as a mobile application (app) via Bluetooth, as shown in Figure 3.
After preprocessing the signals, the android-based apps check that the values are within the expected ranges, store them in the tablet, and try to connect to the internet when WiFi is available to upload the outstanding records asynchronously to the cloud DB. The operation does not stop when there is no internet coverage. If there are 19 variables (means, dates, flags, etc.), and the device needs to reserve memory, considering the same size for all residents (double precision), and each device is used with 100 residents monitored daily, the local memory required over 2 years would be 84 MB. The current version of the app requires 50 M, which is far less the resources of the tablet, i.e., 11 GB [36], or any current mobile phone.
The hub autonomy is 10 h in streaming mode, and the tablet has a 5000 mAh battery that lasts approximately 3 h, which is enough for one day if it is fully charged overnight. Cables are a problem, however, and the main cause of failure, as they are too thin, and the nurses are in a hurry. Wireless connections for the sensors should work better.

3.3. System Design

This project requires special attention to the software platform, implemented by cloud services and microservice architecture. The software platform must provide flexibility in computation resources and functionality to quickly adopt new services and applications. Collaboration among different teams must be ubiquitous, and the nature of the data leads to a need for special attention to its security. The cloud suits the requirements well, but it is necessary to respond to security, availability, maintainability, and normative issues [37].
Two main scenarios must inspire the deployment of the software platform: (1) for offline applications, such as medical decision assistants, and (2) for online applications, such as remote real-time monitoring telecare, which encompass the need for immediate actions triggered by the alerts [38].
The data stored in the mobile application are exported in CSV format to a database in the cloud and then remain available for the micro-service-based data analysis tasks.
The SaaS database is asynchronously nurtured from quasi-unlimited concurrent uploading sessions set with each mobile application. A small cloud storage package of 100 GB would support 1190 mobile applications, monitoring 100 residents each, uploading data for 2 years, yielding a total of 119,000 residents. The cloud provides [39] (1) efficient multitenancy; (2) sharing data for different goals; (3) elastic scalability, allowing rapid deployments of complete scenarios, in nonstop ongoing synchronization and self-adapting to the new demands of resources; and (4) data privacy.
The cloud software [40] is implemented in a layered microservice architecture [41], because of [42] (1) the low-cost implementation; (2) the options available to develop different levels of software quality; (3) the scalable and adaptable resource configuration on demand—each component can be individually duplicated; and (4) the compatibility with smart devices and several communication protocols. Mobile devices access the API gateway and user PCs with the web UI. Users call the microservices with their credentials (“nurse”, “doctor”, or “administrator”). The microservices interconnect themselves to build a single application for users.
The microservices are classified into three groups, all sharing the data via JSON request/response HTTP for (1) interfacing with the physical biosensor application; (2) managing the access policies; and (3) synchronously recording the reports by doctors about patients developing infectious diseases. The architecture uses the representational state transfer (REST) API for data integration, transference, and storage [43]. The software applications are split into small purpose-specific programs with UIs for different domains or APIs to interconnect with third-party applications [44] throughout the infrastructure layer [32], as shown in Figure 4.
The “things” layer connects the hardware to the network layer and validates the signals. The network layer opens connections to mobile applications for asynchronous data transference [45]. The processing layer assigns each device the corresponding access privileges for their methods to the microservices. The microservices layer provides the service respontses to the specific queries. The infrastructure layer delivers availability, scalability, and data integrity for the upper layers, with networking, processing, and storage resources [46]. It manages data with MapReduce in distributed computing [44] and stores data with Apache Hadoop in Cassandra NoSQL DB [47] to improve the error tolerance. This layer also accepts complex computation tasks from upper layers—authentication or interoperability—to alleviate their resources for their primary operations [48].

3.4. Analysis by Machine Learning Classifiers

The daily medical data gathered from residents can be treated with ML techniques in time or spatial domains, also known as longitudinal or cross-sectional studies. The time approach studies the evolution of certain variables using time series, while the spatial approach considers the relations among the medical variables of a sample, finding patterns and making classifications, according to all samples. Time series are good for predicting, but are not essential. In fact, the spatial domain is more precise for pattern recognition analysis. The spatial domain works complementarily with the time domain approach.
In this work, we approached the analysis of the clinical data under a spatial approach. The absence of the time component prevents a predictive approach, but the spatial dimension allows for a more precise pattern recognition analysis. In this way, it is possible to classify a sample measured from an individual as a sample recognized as possibly indicating an infectious disease. In addition, the information obtained with this approach will allow us to perform a better predictive analysis based on time series in the future.
The learning phase allows us to know the relative weight of each direct or transformed feature in the classification or prediction of an infectious disease. The performance of the classifier can be measured with error performance and the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ).
This analysis is coded with an API of the Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) [49], Java-based ML software implemented in the Apache Spark development environment [50], Java Servlet (JS), and Java Server Pages (JSP) [51] for handling the data entries of the microservices. The Java web service is in Apache Maven [52].
The goal of applying these ML methods was not to compare the prediction rate with the true incidence, but to be a first approach for data classification integrated on the web service, to experiment with the influence of the clinical variables on the predictable yielding success with regard to each type of infection.

4. Results

Spanish health authorities approved running this project in two nursing homes in Madrid. The main population and resources of these institutions are shown in Table 1. The data in the table refer to residents participating, where the inclusion criterion was the ability to understand the purpose of the experiment and volunteering.
The medical team selected the variables listed in Table 2 and indicated their expected ranges.
The mobile application attaches the date and time of the sample and the patient identification code to the collection of signals; this is manually anonymized by the nurse assigning the code, and the nurse sets flags to indicate if the record has been successfully uploaded.

4.1. Protocol and Acceptance

The healthcare personnel (doctors and nurses) are trained to know the process, look after the equipment, and fix minor incidents. The learning process was conducted with 18 volunteers until they could proceed autonomously. After that, they were requested to simulate, more than once, the process for taking samples and recording the duration. The purpose of this small experiment was to improve the data collection protocol, not only to facilitate the work of the personnel, but also to increase the potential number of residents susceptible to monitoring. Table 3 shows the results.
Learning the process takes only 7 min on average. The vital sign collection, on the other hand, only takes 4 min and 15 s on average, yielding the possibility for one nurse to monitor 54 patients in 4 h. Greetings and moving to the next room, along with any other activity could slow down that rate, although practice would compensate and speed up the process.
The experiment also recorded the volunteers’ ages, ranging from 20 to 70 years, and digital competency with a self-graded scale from 1 (IT illiterate) to 5 (digital native). Older volunteers spent slightly more time learning than younger volunteers, but the Kruskal–Wallis (KWT) [53] test gave a p-value of 0.428, showing that this result is not conclusive. The KWT—applied for the need to be IT skilled—gave a p-value of 0.088, confirming that the personnel do not need to be IT literate.
The process is fast and comfortable, as only the arms and hands of the residents are exposed to the daily test, not requiring undressing or intimate contact. Additionally, the presence of the nurse helps to generate a friendly environment for caregivers and residents.
The protocol for the doctors does not require anything other than reporting when the resident is developing a disease, which infection the symptoms are compatible with, the date of the alert, and if there was a referral to the emergency services.

4.2. System Efficiency

The software architecture attempts to check its efficiency, integration, compatibility, and performance, counting errors when the components interact [54]. The testbed has two Docker containers (1 vCPU, 4 GB, 120 GB Disk, Ubuntu 16.04.6 LTS); Apache for the endpoint and Nginx as the frontend proxy and load balancer. Nginx receives the user queries and forwards them to the microservices; Apache JMeter measures the workload [55]. BlazeMeter servers (US East—Virginia, AWS) simulate the workload [54,56]. Microservice #1 (MS1) provides a search of over 6297 records, and Microservice #2 (MS2) requests 138 records of residents with infectious diseases for 20 and 50 concurrent virtual users. ALL is the sum of MS1 and MS2. There are two scenarios: EIM-1-FB with frontend–backend “full stack”, shown in Table 4, and EIM-2-F, frontend-only, shown in Table 5 and two workload tests of 20 min each with 20 and 50 virtual users (threads), respectively, which gradually increase the queries per second, reaching 14,602 on average.

4.3. Data Analysis

This research analyzed the performance of three space-based ML algorithms: (1) naive Bayes (NB) [56], which is easy to implement and is widely used for medical diagnosis and disease prediction; (2) filtered classifier (FC) [57], which classifies previously filtered or preprocessed data; and (3) random forest (RF) [58], a supervised classifier that is used for this work the random tree (RT) technique to build decision trees for the classification. The reason for choosing these three algorithms is that they allow modifications of the weight of the attributes. In this way, the medical personnel can assign different significance levels to the clinical parameters for diagnostic purposes; for example, we can assign more relevance to body temperature in the classification and analyze how the corresponding results improve (or not) in other cases. The basic settings of these algorithms were those provided by default in WEKA to handle problems of similar complexity.
The analysis starts with a web service for NB and FC as a first approach for data classification, and then a software application to experiment with the weights of the variables for the RF is developed. The next figures help to visualize the data of patients developing infections. Figure 5 depicts the vital signs of one resident developing IRA, Figure 6, one developing a UTI and Figure 7, another developing an SSTI.
The WEB service for NB and FC classifies an input sample as a possible ARI, UTI, or SSTI infection. First, the user selects the algorithm and then uploads the medical data record of any resident. The trained model classifies the test data into the three types of infection, providing, as a result, the success rate of the classification (% for the patient developing any of the infectious processes and identifying which one it is) and the weight of each medical parameter affecting the prediction. The model has been trained with other residents who have developed these diseases.

5. Discussion

The obtained results are quite satisfactory, but they are not accurate enough due to the short period for sampling. To obtain more accuracy, it is necessary to either extend the period of the experiment or apply certain techniques for small datasets, such as including context variables, such as the season, holidays, and weather [59].
With RF, the type of infectious disease is deduced from the independent variables, considering low entropy, a measure of the amount of possible information disorder or randomness. All available samples (6277) from all patients (60) are split 95% for the training dataset (5963) and 5% for the validation dataset (314). Only 129 developed ARI, 95 UTIs, and 90 SSTI infections. The process is repeated up to 11 times, changing the weights of the variables according to their importance in the classification. Thus, it is possible to determine which of the 11 variables is better for medical personnel to concentrate on when monitoring the patients. With the available data, the minimum heartbeat rate (HBR) provided the best success rate (%), followed by the average HBR, as shown in Figure 8.
Although these figures do not show an impressive performance prediction in general, the results present a significant difference in predictability for each infection. Figure 9 shows the true positives (%) with respect to the variables for each of the diseases.
ARI infection is significantly more predictable, yielding 100% success for some variables. On the other hand, SSTI infections are harder to predict with the selected variables. It is necessary to note that there are fewer SSTI training records than for ARI, and the former model was less trained than the latter, again indicating the need to extend the period of sampling.
Finally, the most important variable for all of the diseases is the average HBR.

6. Conclusions

This research proposes a comfortable, flexible, accessible, and cost-effective eHealth monitoring system for residents in nursing homes, and analyzes the predictability of infectious diseases based on the vital signs collected in the pilot study. Its cost-effective implementation allows disadvantaged areas and less accessible populations to be reached.
This paper has demonstrated that the system is easy to use and that there is no need for IT skills for nurses. In addition, the protocol is especially resident-friendly, improving relationships with caregivers.
The microservice-implemented architecture is cost-effective and scalable. The stress tests indicate when the system experiences saturation. The functionality of the microservices to carry out the optimal service has been tested. The mobile application is an open standard that can be installed in any android device with minimum changes.
The problems of the cable organization are under research, with a new design of wireless biosensors ported in a suitcase or a tray. The active elements will be charged on a contactless surface, releasing the nurses or replacing the exhausted batteries. The equipment will be approved by the authorities.
Regarding the data analysis, the main contribution of this work lies in the findings of the importance of certain clinical variables in the identification of infectious diseases. There was no variable with significant relevance for predicting all of the selected infectious diseases. However, among these diseases, the HBR showed a higher impact in the classification. Moreover, the ARI was proven to be better detected than the others. The size of the scenario conditions the classification results. Other factors that affect the predictions are the repeatability of the biosensors, the awareness of the medical personnel, and the type of infection (among other factors). However, this study shows some valuable results and is a good starting point for further research.
Other space- and time-based machine learning techniques will follow this study. In particular, it is interesting to tackle the clinical data analysis under a time series approach. Moreover, larger datasets should be collected to improve the classifier training and the time series accuracy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.R.-P.; data curation, H.C.-G., J.M.G.-P., M.V.-L., J.L.C.-S., M.P.A., J.S.-M. and M.-L.P.-L.; formal analysis, A.G.-J., J.M.G.-P. and J.A.G.-P.; funding acquisition, J.A.G.-P., M.V.-L. and J.S.-M.; investigation, A.G.-J., H.C.-G., J.M.G.-P. and J.A.G.-P.; methodology, A.G.-J., J.M.G.-P., J.A.G.-P. and J.S.-M.; project administration, J.M.G.-P., J.A.G.-P., M.V.-L., M.P.A. and J.S.-M.; resources, H.C.-G., J.M.G.-P., M.V.-L., J.L.C.-S. and M.P.A.; software, H.C.-G. and J.L.C.-S.; Supervision, J.A.G.-P., M.V.-L., M.P.A., J.S.-M. and M.-L.P.-L.; validation, M.P.A.; writing—review and editing, D.R.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EU Member States and Associated Countries and the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (LAC) within the 7th Framework Programme for Research and Technology Development (FP7-INCO) grant number ELAC2015/T09-0819 (project SPIDEP: “Design and implementation of a low-cost smart system for pre-diagnosis and telecare of infectious diseases in elderly people”) and by the Government of Extremadura (Spain) grant number IB16002.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to methodology approved by the research project.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend special thanks to all of the clinical and healthcare staff of the nursing homes for the elderly, the Francisco de Vitoria and Cisneros centers of the Department of Social Policies and Family of the Community of Madrid in Spain, and Ntra. Sra del Carmen and Carls George in the Dominican Republic, who generously worked with us to obtain the medical data of the residents. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge the support given by Carlos III Health Institute, Spain (ISCIII), Fundación para la Investigación Biomédica del Hospital Universitario Príncipe de Asturias (FIBHUPA), and the National Secretariat of Science, Technology and Innovation of Panama (SENACYT), under the National Research System (SNI).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
AmIAmbient Intelligence
ARIAcute Respiratory Infection
BADLBasic Activities of Daily Living
BASNBody Area Sensor Networks
CDSSClinical Decision Support Systems
CIMLRCancer Integration via Multi-kernel Learning
DBDatabase
DBSCANDensity-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise
DIADiastolic Blood Pressure
DLDeep Learning
ECGElectrocardiogram
EDAElectrodermal Activity
EEGElectroencephalogram
FCFiltered Classifier
HBRHeart Beat Rate
IaaSInfrastructure as a Service
IADLInstrumental Activities of Daily Living
ID3Iterative Dichotomizer 3
JSJava Servlet
JSPJava Server Pages
KNNK-Nearest-Neighbor
KWTKruskal–Wallis
mHealthMedical Mobility Services
MLMachine Learning
MSEMean Squared Error
NBNaive Bayes
NISTNational Institute of Standards and Technology
PaaSPlatform as a Service
PINSPerturbation Clustering Approach for Data Integration and Disease Subtyping
PIRPassive Infrared
RESTRepresentational State Transfer
RFRandom Forest
RFIDRadio Frequency Identification
SaaSSoftware as a Service
SNFSimilarity Network Fusion
SOAService Oriented Architecture
SOMSSelf-Organized Maps
SPO2Oxygen Saturation
SSTISkin and Soft Tissue Infection
SVMSupport Vector Machine
SYSSystolic Blood Pressure
UTIUrinary Tract Infection
WEKAWaikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis
WSNWireless Sensor Networks

References

  1. Kontis, V.; Bennett, J.; Li, G.; Foreman, K.; Ezzati, M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: Projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet 2017, 389, 1323–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gardner, G. The use and abuse of the emergency ambulance service: Some of the factors affecting the decision whether to call an emergency ambulance. Arch. Emerg. Med. 1990, 7, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Adaji, A.; Melin, G.; Campbell, R.; Lohse, C.; Westphal, J.; Katzelnick, D. Patient-Centered Medical Home Membership Is Associated with Decreased Hospital Admissions for Emergency Department Behavioral Health Patients. Popul. Health Manag. 2017, 21, 172–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Liu, Y.; Ren, W.; Qiu, Y.; Liu, J.; Yin, P.; Ren, J. The Use of Mobile Phone and Medical Apps among General Practitioners in Hangzhou City, Eastern China. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2016, 4, e64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fan, L.; Buchanan, W.; Thuemmler, C.; Lo, O.; Khedim, A.S.; Uthmani, O.; Lawson, A.; Bell, D. DACAR platform for eHealth services cloud. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing, Washington, DC, USA, 4–9 July 2011; pp. 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Souza, P.; Hochhegger, B.; Cavalcanti da Silveira, J.; Pretto, C.; Moralles, C.; Tronchoni, A. MediCloud—Telemedicine System Based on Software as a Service (SaaS). J. Telemed. EHealth Russ. 2016, 1, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  7. Keen, J. Digital health care: Cementing centralisation? Health Inform. J. 2014, 20, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kargl, F.; Lawrence, E.; Fischer, M.; Lim, Y. Security, Privacy and Legal Issues in Pervasive eHealth Monitoring Systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 7th International Conference on Mobile Business, Barcelona, Spain, 7–8 July 2008; pp. 296–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wishner, J.B.; Solleveld, P.A.; Rudowitz, R.; Paradise, J.; Antonisse, L. A Look at Rural Hospital Closures and Implications for Access to Care: Three Case Studies. Kais. Comm. Medicaid Uninsured 2016, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  10. Nishiura, H. Early efforts in modeling the incubation period of infectious diseases with an acute course of illness. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 2007, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Alpaydin, E. Introduction to Machine Learning, 3rd ed.; Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. Deo, R.C. Machine Learning in Medicine. Circulation 2015, 132, 1920–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Ong, M.; Romano, P.; Edgington, S.; Aronow, H.; Auerbach, A.; Black, J.; Marco, T.; Escarce, J.; Evangelista, L.; Hanna, B.; et al. Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Failure. JAMA Intern. Med. 2016, 176, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chatwin, M.; Hawkins, G.; Panicchia, L.; Woods, A.; Hanak, A.; Lucas, R.; Baker, E.; Ramhamdany, E.; Mann, B.; Riley, J.; et al. Randomised crossover trial of telemonitoring in chronic respiratory patients (TeleCRAFT trial). Thorax 2016, 71, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Cornacchia, M.; Ozcan, K.; Zheng, Y.; Velipasalar, S. A Survey on Activity Detection and Classification Using Wearable Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 17, 386–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Esch, J.; Rashidi, P. A Survey on Ambient Intelligence in Healthcare. Proc. IEEE 2013, 101, 2467–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Mohammed, F.; Idries, A.; Mohamed, N.; Al-Jaroodi, J.; Jawhar, I. UAVs for smart cities: Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), Orlando, FL, USA, 27–30 May 2014; pp. 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uddin, M.Z.; Khaksar, W.; Torresen, J. Ambient Sensors for Elderly Care and Independent Living: A Survey. Sensors 2018, 18, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Shakshuki, E.; Reid, M. Multi-Agent System Applications in Healthcare: Current Technology and Future Roadmap. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 52, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kamel Boulos, M.; Brewer, A.; Karimkhani, C.; Buller, D.; Dellavalle, R. Mobile medical and health apps: State of the art, concerns, regulatory control and certification. Online J. Public Health Inform. 2014, 5, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Rachim, V.P.; Chung, W.Y. Wearable Noncontact Armband for Mobile ECG Monitoring System. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 2016, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Uqaili, A. Smartphone Use among Young Doctors and Their Impact on Patients of Liaquat University Hospital Jamshoro. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. (IJIR) 2017, 3, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  23. Apidi, N.; Murugiah, M.; Muthuveloo, R.; Soh, Y.; Caruso, V.; Patel, R.; Ming, L.C. Mobile Medical Applications for Dosage Recommendation, Drug Adverse Reaction, and Drug Interaction: Review and Comparison. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 2017, 51, 216847901769626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bourouis, A.; Feham, M.; Hossain, M.; Zhang, L. An Intelligent Mobile based Decision Support System for Retinal Disease Diagnosis. Decis. Support Syst. 2014, 59, 341–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Biswas, A.; Roy, R.; Bhattacharyya, S.; Khaneja, D.; Bhattacharya, S.; Mukhopadhyay, J. Android application for therapeutic feed and fluid calculation in neonatal care—A way to fast, accurate and safe health-care delivery. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM), Shenzhen, China, 15–18 December 2016; pp. 938–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rozati, H.; Shah, S.; Shah, N. Smartphone Applications for the Clinical Oncologist in UK Practice. J. Cancer Educ. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Educ. 2014, 30, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Medina, J.; Castillo Martínez, A.; Gutiérrez Escolar, A.; de Marcos, L.; Sanchez-Pardo, L. Framework for development triages through mobile applications. In Proceedings of the 24thInternational Conference on Information Systems Development, Harbin, China, 25–27 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
  28. Franko, O.; Tirrell, T. Smartphone App Use Among Medical Providers in ACGME Training Programs. J. Med Syst. 2011, 36, 3135–3139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Muessig, K.; Pike, E.; LeGrand, S.; Hightow-Weidman, L. Mobile Phone Applications for the Care and Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Diseases: A Review. J. Med Internet Res. 2013, 15, e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhang, R.; Liu, L. Security Models and Requirements for Healthcare Application Clouds. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, Miami, FL, USA, 5–10 July 2010; pp. 268–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Newman, S. Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems, 1st ed.; O’Reilly Media: Sebastopol, CA, USA, 2015; p. 280. [Google Scholar]
  32. Francesco, P.; Lago, P.; Malavolta, I. Architecting with Microservices: A Systematic Mapping Study. J. Syst. Softw. 2019, 150, 77–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Trihinas, D.; Tryfonos, A.; Dikaiakos, M.D.; Pallis, G. DevOps as a Service: Pushing the Boundaries of Microservice Adoption. IEEE Internet Comput. 2018, 22, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Caballé, N.; Castillo-Sequera, J.; Gomez-Pulido, J.A.; Gómez, J.; Polo-Luque, M. Machine Learning Applied to Diagnosis of Human Diseases: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Biosignalplux. 2019. Available online: https://www.biosignalsplux.com/en/ (accessed on 17 January 2019).
  36. Leotec, “User Manual Version 1.5: Tablet Supernova Qi16 10.1” Quad Core Tablet. 2019. Available online: http://www.leotec.com/ (accessed on 1 December 2019).
  37. Dillon, T.; wu, C.; Chang, E. Cloud Computing: Issues and Challenges. In Proceedings of the 2010 24th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Perth, Australia, 20–23 April 2010; pp. 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wu, P.L.; Nam, M.Y.; Choi, J.; Kirlik, A.; Sha, L.; Berlin, R. Supporting Emergency Medical Care Teams with an Integrated Status Display Providing Real-Time Access to Medical Best Practices, Workflow Tracking, and Patient Data. J. Med. Syst. 2017, 41, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Curino, C.; Jones, E.; Popa, R.; Malviya, N.; Wu, E.; Madden, S.; Balakrishnan, H.; Zeldovich, N. Relational Cloud: A Database-as-a-Service for the Cloud. In Proceedings of the 5th Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR 2011), Asilomar, CA, USA, 9–12 January 2011; pp. 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  40. Vilaplana, J.; Solsona, F.; Abella, F.; Filgueira, R.; Rius, J. The Cloud Paradigm Applied to e-Health. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2013, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Manoj Kumar, N.; Mallick, P.K. The Internet of Things: Insights into the building blocks, component interactions, and architecture layers. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2018, 132, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lewis, G.; Lago, P.; Procaccianti, G. Architecture Strategies for Cyber-Foraging: Preliminary Results from a Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Software Architecture, Vienna, Austria, 25–29 August 2014; pp. 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Glushkova, D.; Jovanovic, P.; Abelló, A. MapReduce Performance Model for Hadoop 2.x. Inf. Syst. 2017, 79, 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kramer, M.; Frese, S.; Kuijper, A. Implementing secure applications in smart city clouds using microservices. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 99, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Simmhan, Y.; Ravindra, P.; Chaturvedi, S.; Hegde, M.; Ballamajalu, R. Towards a data-driven IoT software architecture for smart city utilities. Softw. Pract. Exp. 2018, 48, 1390–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Choudhary, V. Comparison of Software Quality Under Perpetual Licensing and Software As a Service. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2007, 24, 141–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hernandez, R.; Becerra, Y.; Torres, J.; Ayguadie, E. Automatic Query Driven Data Modelling in Cassandra. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015, 51, 2822–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bello, O.; Zeadally, S. Intelligent Device-to-Device Communication in the Internet of Things. IEEE Syst. J. 2014, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Witten, I.H.; Frank, E.; Hall, M.A. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems; Morgan Kaufmann: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zaharia, M.; Xin, R.; Wendell, P.; Das, T.; Armbrust, M.; Dave, A.; Meng, X.; Rosen, J.; Venkataraman, S.; Franklin, M.; et al. Apache spark: A unified engine for big data processing. Commun. ACM 2016, 59, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Poo, D.; Kiong, D.; Ashok, M. Java Servlets; Springer: London, UK, 2008; pp. 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Miller, F.P.; Vandome, A.F.; McBrewster, J. Apache Maven; Alpha Press: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  53. Kruskal, W.; Wallis, W. Errata: Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lonetti, F.; Marchetti, E. Emerging Software Testing Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Calderón-Gómez, H.; Mendoza-Pitti, L.; Vargas-Lombardo, M.; Gómez, J.; Castillo-Sequera, J.; Sanz-Moreno, J.; Sencion-Martinez, G. Telemonitoring system for infectious disease prediction in elderly people based on a novel microservice architecture. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 118340–118354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Murty, M.N.; Devi, V.S. Pattern Recognition—An Algorithmic Approach; Undergraduate Topics in Computer Science; Springer: Zürich, Switzerland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Chandrika, G.; Reddy, E. An Efficient Filtered Classifier for Classification of Unseen Test Data in Text Documents. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC), Coimbatore, India, 14–16 December 2017; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ho, T. The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. IEEE Trans. 1998, 20, 832–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Keasberry, J.; Scott, I.; Sullivan, C.; Staib, A.; Ashby, R. Going digital: A narrative overview of the clinical and organisational impacts of eHealth technologies in hospital practice. Aust. Health Rev. Publ. Aust. Hosp. Assoc. 2017, 41, 646–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Protocol workflow.
Figure 1. Protocol workflow.
Ijerph 18 13278 g001
Figure 2. Customized briefcase to carry the medical sensor set.
Figure 2. Customized briefcase to carry the medical sensor set.
Ijerph 18 13278 g002
Figure 3. Medical sensor, hub, and android tablet connections.
Figure 3. Medical sensor, hub, and android tablet connections.
Ijerph 18 13278 g003
Figure 4. Microservices software architecture for anticipated diagnosis of infectious diseases.
Figure 4. Microservices software architecture for anticipated diagnosis of infectious diseases.
Ijerph 18 13278 g004
Figure 5. Vital signs evolution of one resident with ARI.
Figure 5. Vital signs evolution of one resident with ARI.
Ijerph 18 13278 g005
Figure 6. Vital signs evolution of one resident with UTI.
Figure 6. Vital signs evolution of one resident with UTI.
Ijerph 18 13278 g006
Figure 7. Vital signs evolution of one resident with SSTI.
Figure 7. Vital signs evolution of one resident with SSTI.
Ijerph 18 13278 g007
Figure 8. Relative frequency of correct classifications per variable.
Figure 8. Relative frequency of correct classifications per variable.
Ijerph 18 13278 g008
Figure 9. Success ratio detecting infectious diseases. (a) Orange: ITU, (b) Gary: PB, (c) Blue: ARI.
Figure 9. Success ratio detecting infectious diseases. (a) Orange: ITU, (b) Gary: PB, (c) Blue: ARI.
Ijerph 18 13278 g009
Table 1. Monitored population and resources.
Table 1. Monitored population and resources.
PopulationCardenal CisnerosFrancisco de VitoriaTotal
Residents127316443
Participants204060
Participants (%)16%13%14%
Participants who developed disease73340
Minimum age796767
Maximum age94101101
Average age88.789.789.5
Std. deviation5.17.06.6
Medical staff41418
Start collecting24 March 20184 April 2018
End collecting11 March 201911 March 2019
Table 2. Vital signs to monitor and life-compatible ranges.
Table 2. Vital signs to monitor and life-compatible ranges.
Vital SignValid RangeOut of Range
Body temperature (T)34 °C < T < 42 °CT < 34 °C, T > 42 °C
Electrodermal activity (EDA)EDA > 0.2 µSEDA < 0.2 µS
Oxygen saturation (SPO2)70% < SPO2 < 100%SPO2 < 70%
Heart Rate (HBR)HBR > 30 bpmHBR < 30 bpm
Blood pressure (DIA)DIA > 30 mmHgDIA < 30 mmHg
Blood pressure (SYS)SYS > 60 mmHgSYS < 60 mmHg
Table 3. Time (h:min:s) required for training and taking one sample.
Table 3. Time (h:min:s) required for training and taking one sample.
ActivityMeanStd. Deviation
Learning process0:07:000:02:10
Process execution:
Sensors deployment on the body0:01:550:00:49
APP initialization0:00:330:00:38
Sensors delay0:01:120:00:33
Upload the data to the cloud and resume0:00:350:00:22
Total time consumed per resident0:04:150:01:14
Table 4. Workload testing report for EIM-1-FB 20/50. The time measurement is the average in ms.
Table 4. Workload testing report for EIM-1-FB 20/50. The time measurement is the average in ms.
LabelSamplesResp. TimeAvg. Hit/s90% Line99% Line#ErrorAvg. LatencyUsers
ALL29,939782257555247025220
MS114,977811137675151028020
MS214,962752137195311022320
ALL29,227200324186313,759058250
MS114,625199112186313,439062750
MS214,602201612187114,079053850
Table 5. Workload testing report for EIM-2-FB 20/50. The time measurement is the average in ms.
Table 5. Workload testing report for EIM-2-FB 20/50. The time measurement is the average in ms.
LabelSamplesResp. TimeAvg. Hit/s90% Line99% Line#ErrorAvg. LatencyUsers
ALL34566785315,48738,9116352020
MS117336777115,29537,3755364520
MS217236794115,48740,7031358220
ALL215,82516418053104779,9448550
MS1107,9251479056104739,9739050
MS2107,9001829049104739,9717950
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garcés-Jiménez, A.; Calderón-Gómez, H.; Gómez-Pulido, J.M.; Gómez-Pulido, J.A.; Vargas-Lombardo, M.; Castillo-Sequera, J.L.; Aguirre, M.P.; Sanz-Moreno, J.; Polo-Luque, M.-L.; Rodríguez-Puyol, D. Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413278

AMA Style

Garcés-Jiménez A, Calderón-Gómez H, Gómez-Pulido JM, Gómez-Pulido JA, Vargas-Lombardo M, Castillo-Sequera JL, Aguirre MP, Sanz-Moreno J, Polo-Luque M-L, Rodríguez-Puyol D. Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(24):13278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garcés-Jiménez, Alberto, Huriviades Calderón-Gómez, José M. Gómez-Pulido, Juan A. Gómez-Pulido, Miguel Vargas-Lombardo, José L. Castillo-Sequera, Miguel Pablo Aguirre, José Sanz-Moreno, María-Luz Polo-Luque, and Diego Rodríguez-Puyol. 2021. "Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 24: 13278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413278

APA Style

Garcés-Jiménez, A., Calderón-Gómez, H., Gómez-Pulido, J. M., Gómez-Pulido, J. A., Vargas-Lombardo, M., Castillo-Sequera, J. L., Aguirre, M. P., Sanz-Moreno, J., Polo-Luque, M. -L., & Rodríguez-Puyol, D. (2021). Medical Prognosis of Infectious Diseases in Nursing Homes by Applying Machine Learning on Clinical Data Collected in Cloud Microservices. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13278. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop