Reducing Loneliness in Stationary Geriatric Care with Robots and Virtual Encounters—A Contribution to the COVID-19 Pandemic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Type of Study
2.2. Sampling
2.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria of the Participants
2.4. Procedure
2.5. Study Variables
2.6. Ethical Aspects
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ong, A.D.; Uchino, B.N.; Wethington, E. Loneliness and Health in Older Adults: A Mini-Review and Synthesis. Gerontology 2016, 62, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bekhet, A.K.; Zauszniewski, J.A. Mental Health of Elders in Retirement Communities: Is Loneliness a Key Factor? Arch. Psychiatr. Nurs. 2012, 26, 214–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Verbeek, H.; Gerritsen, D.L.; Backhaus, R.; de Boer, B.S.; Koopmans, R.T.C.M.; Hamers, J.P.H. Allowing Visitors Back in the Nursing Home During the COVID-19 Crisis: A Dutch National Study Into First Experiences and Impact on Well-Being. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 900–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hwang, T.J.; Rabheru, K.; Peisah, C.; Reichman, W.; Ikeda, M. Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2020, 32, 1217–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Li, T.; Barbarino, P.; Gauthier, S.; Brodaty, H.; Molinuevo, J.L.; Xie, H.; Sun, Y.; Yu, E.; Tang, Y.; et al. Dementia care during COVID-19. Lancet 2020, 395, 1190–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, L.; Tong, Y.; Ren, R.; Leung, K.S.; Lau, E.H.; Wong, J.Y.; et al. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus—Infected Pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- van Doremalen, N.; Bushmaker, T.; Morris, D.H.; Holbrook, M.G.; Gamble, A.; Williamson, B.N.; Tamin, A.; Harcourt, J.L.; Thornburg, N.J.; Gerber, S.I.; et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1564–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, J.R.; Cook, A.R.; Park, M.; Sun, Y.; Sun, H.; Lim, J.T.; Tam, C.; Dickens, B.L. Interventions to mitigate early spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore: A modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 678–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Giordano, G.; Blanchini, F.; Bruno, R.; Colaneri, P.; Di Filippo, A.; Di Matteo, A.; Colaneri, M. Modelling the COVID-19 epidemic and implementation of population-wide interventions in Italy. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 855–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kissler, S.M.; Tedijanto, C.; Goldstein, E.; Grad, Y.H.; Lipsitch, M. Projecting the transmission dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 through the postpandemic period. Science 2020, 368, 860–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leirós-Rodríguez, R.; Romo-Pérez, V.; García-Soidán, J.L.; Soto-Rodríguez, A. Prevalence and Factors Associated with Functional Limitations during Aging in a Representative Sample of Spanish Population. Phys. Occup. Ther. Geriatr. 2018, 36, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leirós-Rodríguez, R.; Romo-Perez, V.; Soto Rodríguez, A.; Soidán, J.L. Prevalence of functional limitations during aging in a representative sample of Spanish population and its relationship with body mass index. Retos 2018, 36, 200–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brooks, S.K.; Webster, R.K.; Smith, L.E.; Woodland, L.; Wessely, S.; Greenberg, N.; Rubin, G.J. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 2020, 395, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gale, C.R.; Westbury, L.; Cooper, C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing 2018, 47, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Holt-Lunstad, J.; Smith, T.B.; Layton, J.B. Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review. PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, D.; Peplau, L.A.; Cutrona, C.E. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, M.E.; Waite, L.J.; Hawkley, L.C.; Cacioppo, J.T. A Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys: Results From Two Population-Based Studies. Res. Aging 2004, 26, 655–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- de Jong-Gierveld, J.; Fokkema, T.; van Tilburg, T. Alleviating loneliness among older adults: Possibilities and constraints of interventions. In Safeguarding the Convoy: A Call to Action from the Campaign to End Loneliness; Age UK Oxfordshire: Abingdon, UK, 2011; pp. 41–45. [Google Scholar]
- Tsai, H.H.; Tsai, Y.F. Changes in Depressive Symptoms, Social Support, and Loneliness Over 1 Year After a Minimum 3-Month Videoconference Program for Older Nursing Home Residents. J. Med. Internet Res. 2011, 13, e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdi, J.; Al-Hindawi, A.; Ng, T.; Vizcaychipi, M.P. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e018815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Teixeira, A.; Hämäläinen, A.; Avelar, J.; Almeida, N.; Németh, G.; Fegyó, T.; Zainkó, C.; Csapó, T.; Tóth, B.; Oliveira, A.; et al. Speech-centric Multimodal Interaction for Easy-to-access Online Services—A Personal Life Assistant for the Elderly. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2014, 27, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadkhoda, K. COVID-19: An Immunopathological View. mSphere 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tanioka, T. Nursing and Rehabilitative Care of the Elderly Using Humanoid Robots. J. Med. Investig. 2019, 66, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hirukawa, H. Overview of Robotic Devices for Nursing Care Project. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2017, 242, 449–456. [Google Scholar]
- Sapci, A.H.; Sapci, H.A. Innovative Assisted Living Tools, Remote Monitoring Technologies, Artificial Intelligence-Driven Solutions, and Robotic Systems for Aging Societies: Systematic Review. JMIR Aging 2019, 2, e15429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, T.; Jai, X.; Shi, H.; Niu, J.; Yin, X.; Xie, J.; Wang, X. Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2021, 281, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jacobs, T.; Graf, B. Practical evaluation of service robots for support and routine tasks in an elderly care facility. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), Munich, Germany, 21–23 May 2012; IEEE: Munich, Germany, 2012; pp. 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, E.; Seligman, M.E. Very Happy People. Psychol. Sci. 2002, 13, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Epley, N.; Waytz, A.; Akalis, S.; Cacioppo, J.T. When We Need A Human: Motivational Determinants of Anthropomorphism. Soc. Cogn. 2008, 26, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Epley, N.; Schroeder, J.; Waytz, A. Motivated Mind Perception: Treating Pets as People and People as Animals. In Objectification and (De)Humanization; Gervais, S.J., Ed.; Nebraska Symposium on Motivation; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; Volume 60, pp. 127–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherman, G.D.; Haidt, J. Cuteness and Disgust: The Humanizing and Dehumanizing Effects of Emotion. Emot. Rev. 2011, 3, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duffy, B.R. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2003, 42, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onnasch, L.; Roesler, E. Anthropomorphizing Robots: The Effect of Framing in Human-Robot Collaboration; Technische Universität Berlin: Berlin, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fussell, S.R.; Kiesler, S.; Setlock, L.D.; Yew, V. How people anthropomorphize robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Robot Interaction—HRI’08, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 12–15 March 2008; ACM Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; p. 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Question | Hardly Ever | Some of the Time | Often |
---|---|---|---|
How often do you feel that you lack companionship? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
How often do you feel left out? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
How often do you feel isolated from others? | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Demographic | Study Groups | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | Gender | Total | Intervention | Total | |||||
Male | Female | TEMI | Non-Contact | Alternative | |||||
Heinsberg | 83.6 | 8 | 32 | 40 | 31 | 0 | 135 | 166 | |
Study sites | Aachen | 80.4 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 32 | 77 | 0 | 109 |
Euskirchen | 82.5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 71 | 195 | 32 | 298 | |
stotal | 82.6 | 19 | 51 | 70 | 134 | 272 | 167 | 573 |
Role | Benefits and Other Expressed Issues |
---|---|
Users | Capability to contact friends and family members frequently |
No risk of infection | |
Embodiment of the visitor by the humanoid-resembling robot | |
Maintaining social contacts | |
Entertainment aspects of the robot (autonomous driving, speaking, etc.) | |
Exciting event preventing boredom | |
Voice control offers good operating comfort/high usability | |
Possibility to show objects or their rooms during video telephony | |
Relatives | Continue to be in contact, despite the ban on visits |
Direct contact with nursing staff possible | |
Feeling informed and can get a picture of the current state of health | |
Fulfilment of the “duty” with simultaneous time saving | |
No risk of infection | |
No travel expenses (both financially and in terms of health) | |
Nursing staff | Direct contact with relatives |
Easier to handle than a tablet | |
Temi can drive autonomously into quarantine rooms | |
Temi can be left alone with the elderly: no supervision necessary. | |
Temi surface able to be disinfected | |
Entertainment capabilities (e.g., by providing YouTube content or music) | |
Facility | Increasing the attractiveness of employers (use of digitization products) |
Temi used in everyday life (temi as a part of the community) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Follmann, A.; Schollemann, F.; Arnolds, A.; Weismann, P.; Laurentius, T.; Rossaint, R.; Czaplik, M. Reducing Loneliness in Stationary Geriatric Care with Robots and Virtual Encounters—A Contribution to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094846
Follmann A, Schollemann F, Arnolds A, Weismann P, Laurentius T, Rossaint R, Czaplik M. Reducing Loneliness in Stationary Geriatric Care with Robots and Virtual Encounters—A Contribution to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(9):4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094846
Chicago/Turabian StyleFollmann, Andreas, Franziska Schollemann, Andrea Arnolds, Pauline Weismann, Thea Laurentius, Rolf Rossaint, and Michael Czaplik. 2021. "Reducing Loneliness in Stationary Geriatric Care with Robots and Virtual Encounters—A Contribution to the COVID-19 Pandemic" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 9: 4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094846
APA StyleFollmann, A., Schollemann, F., Arnolds, A., Weismann, P., Laurentius, T., Rossaint, R., & Czaplik, M. (2021). Reducing Loneliness in Stationary Geriatric Care with Robots and Virtual Encounters—A Contribution to the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18094846