Toward Improving Working Conditions to Enhance Professionalism of Convention Workers: Focusing on the Difference between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance According to Professionalism Perception
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Professionalism Perception of Convention Workers
2.2. Job Satisfaction
2.3. Job Performance
3. Methods
3.1. Research Questions
- Q1.
- Is the job satisfaction of convention workers different among groups of professionalism perception?
- Q2.
- Is the job performance of convention workers different among groups of professionalism perception?
- Q3.
- Are the demographics of convention workers different among groups of professionalism perception?
3.2. Generation of Questionnaire Items
3.3. Data Collection and Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Profile of Respondents
4.2. Verification of Reliability and Validity of Fprofessionalism Perception and Job Performance of Convention Industry Workers
4.3. Cluster Analysis Based on the Professionalism Perception of the Converntion Workers
4.4. Difference of Job Satisfaction and Job Performance by Cluster
4.5. Cross Tabulation of Professionalism Perception Segmentation and Demographic Characteristics
5. Discussion and Implications
5.1. Discussion of Results
5.2. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- BECA. The Value of Business Events to Australia; BECA: Sydney, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Events Industry Council (EIC). Economic Significance of Meetings to the USEconomy; Events Industry Council: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- McCartney, G. The CAT (Casino Tourism) and the MICE (Meetings, Incentives, Conventions, Exhibitions): Key Development Considerations for the Convention and Exhibition Industry in Macao. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2008, 9, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Crouch, G.; Louviere, J. The determinants of convention site selection: A logistic choice model from experimental data. J. Travel Res. 2004, 43, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weber, K. Meeting planners’ perceptions of hotel chain practices and benefits: An importance/performance analysis. Cornell Hotel Restaur. Adm. Q. 2000, 41, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, W.; Malek, K. Understanding the relationship among motivation to attend, satisfaction, and loyalty of medical convention attendees. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2017, 18, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jotikasthira, N.; Bhutibhunthu, S.; Chuaychoo, I. Competency-based hiring as a tool to improve the Thai meeting and convention industry: A sales executive perspective. Impact Assess. Tour. Econ. 2016, 107, 141–156. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, H.J.; Gatling, A.; Kim, J. The impact of supervisory support on organizational commitment, career satisfaction, and turnover intention for hospitality frontline employees. J. Hum. Resour. Hosp. Tour. 2015, 14, 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inelmen, K.; Kirant-Yozcu, Ö. An Investigation of Potential MICE Sector Employees’ Work Values; Department of Tourism Administration, Bogazici University: Bebek, Turkey, 2016; pp. 15–18. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, H.S. A semantic network analysis of big data regarding food exhibition at convention center. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2017, 23, 257–270. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S.H.; Fenich, G.G. Perceived fairness of room blocks in the Meetings, Incentives, Convention, and Exhibition industry. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2016, 17, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akgunduz, Y.; Kizilcalioglu, G.; Sanli, S.C. The effects of job satisfaction and meaning of work on employee creativity: An investigation of EXPO 2016 exhibition employees. Tour. Int. Interdiscip. J. 2018, 66, 130–147. [Google Scholar]
- Grutterink, H.; Van der Vegt, G.S.; Molleman, E.; Jehn, K.A. Reciprocal expertise affirmation and shared expertise perceptions in work teams: Their implications for coordinated action and team performance. Appl. Psychol. 2013, 62, 359–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newell, S.J.; Belonax, J.J.; McCardle, M.W.; Plank, R.E. The effect of personal relationship and consultative task behaviors on buyer perceptions of salesperson trust, expertise, and loyalty. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mody, M.; Gordon, S.; Lehto, X.; So, S.I.A.; Li, M. The augmented convention offering: The impact of destination and product images on attendees’ perceived benefits. Tour. Anal. 2016, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sandy Sou, K.I.; McCartney, G. An assessment of the human resources challenges of Macao’s meeting, incentive, convention, and exhibition (MICE) industry. J. Hum. Resour. Hosp. Tour. 2015, 14, 244–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hunt, M.M. Employees’ Perceptions of Sustainability Programs: A Multiple US Convention Center Case Study. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Buathong, K.; Lai, P.C. Perceived Attributes of Event Sustainability in the MICE Industry in Thailand: A Viewpoint from Governmental, Academic, Venue and Practitioner. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berridge, G. Events Design and Experience; Routledge: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Silvers, J.R. Professional Event Coordination; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Atir, S.; Rosenzweig, E.; Dunning, D. When knowledge knows no bounds: Self-perceived expertise predicts claims of impossible knowledge. Psychol. Sci. 2015, 26, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Holyoak, K.J. 12 Symbolic connectionism: Toward third-generation theories of expertise. In Toward a General Theory of Expertise: Prospects and Limits; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1991; Volume 301. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, J.R. Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychol. Rev. 1982, 89, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosenbloom, P.; Newell, A. Learning by chunking: A production system model of practice. In Production System Models of Learning and Development; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1987; pp. 221–286. [Google Scholar]
- Shiffrin, R.M.; Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ottati, V.; Price, E.D.; Wilson, C.; Sumaktoyo, N. When self-perceptions of expertise increase closed-minded cognition: The earned dogmatism effect. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 61, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijks, M.A.; Brummer, L.; Kostons, D. The anonymous reviewer: The relationship between perceived expertise and the perceptions of peer feedback in higher education. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2018, 43, 1258–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McCabe, V.S. Developing and sustaining a quality workforce: Lessonsfrom the convention and exhibition industry. J. Conv. Event Tour. 2012, 13, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Treem, J.W.; Leonardi, P.M. Recognizing expertise: Factors promoting congruity between individuals’ perceptions of their own expertise and the perceptions of their coworkers. Commun. Res. 2017, 44, 198–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, Y.; Ritzhaupt, A.D. A job announcement analysis of educational technology professional positions: Knowledge, skills, and abilities. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2015, 43, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kianto, A.; Vanhala, M.; Heilmann, P. The impact of knowledge management on job satisfaction. J. Knowl. Manag. 2016, 20, 621–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilmer, H.; Crissy, W.J.E.; Glaser, R.; Gregg, L.W. Industrial Psychology; Von Haller Gilmer, B., Ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
- Locke, E.A. Goal setting and strategy effects on complex tasks. Res. Organ. Behav. 1990, 12, 73–109. [Google Scholar]
- Mathieu, C.; Fabi, B.; Lacoursière, R.; Raymond, L. The role of supervisory behavior, job satisfaction and organizational commitment on employee turnover. J. Manag. Organ. 2016, 22, 113–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sasser, W.E.; Schlesinger, L.A.; Heskett, J.L. Service Profit Chain; Simon and Schuster: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Steers, R.M.; Porter, L.W. Motivation and Work Behavior; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1983. [Google Scholar]
- Lawler, E.E., III; Porter, L.W. The effect of performance on job satisfaction. Ind. Relat. J. Econ. Soc. 1967, 7, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perrone, K.; Webb, L. Relationships Between Parental Attachment, Workand Family Roles, and Life Satisfaction. Career Dev. Q. 2007, 55, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Therasa, C.; Vijayabanu, C. The impact of Big Five personality traits and positive psychological strengths towards job satisfaction: A review. Period. Polytech. Soc. Manag. Sci. 2015, 23, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pouramini, Z.; Fayyazi, M. The relationship between positive organizational behavior with job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and employee engagement. Int. Bus. Res. 2015, 8, 57–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raziq, A.; Maulabakhsh, R. Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 23, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalidass, A.; Bahron, A. The relationship between perceived supervisor support, perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and employee turnover intention. Int. J. Bus. Adm. 2015, 6, 82–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jung, H.S.; Yoon, H.H. The impact of employees’ positive psychological capital on job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors in the hotel. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 27, 1135–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atmojo, M. The influence of transformational leadership on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and employee performance. Int. Res. J. Bus. Stud. 2015, 5, 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bin, A.S. The relationship between job satisfaction, job performance and employee engagement: An explorative study. Issues Bus. Manag. Econ. 2015, 4, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Bae, J.; Lawler, J. Organizational performance and HRM in Korea: Impacton firm performance in an emerging economy. Acad. Manag. J. 2000, 43, 502–517. [Google Scholar]
- Guthrie, J. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity:Evidence from New Zealand. Acad. Manag. J. 2001, 44, 180–190. [Google Scholar]
- Tett, R.P.; Meyer, J.P. Job satisfaction, Organizational commitment, turnover intention and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Pers. Psychol. 1993, 46, 259–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Latham, G.P.; Pinder, C.C. Work motivation theory and research at theDawn of the Twenty-First century. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2005, 56, 485–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silvers, P. Effects of disposition on hospitality employee job satisfaction and commitment. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2006, 18, 317–328. [Google Scholar]
- Patiar, A.; Wang, Y. The effects of transformational leadership and organizational commitment on hotel departmental performance. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 586–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarigan, V.; Ariani, D.W. Empirical study relations job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention. Adv. Manag. Appl. Econ. 2015, 5, 21–35. [Google Scholar]
- Ayazlar, G.; Güzel, B. The effect of loneliness in the workplace on organizational commitment. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 131, 319–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pelit, E.; Dinçer, F.İ.; Kılıç, İ. The effect of nepotism on organizational silence, alienation and commitment: A study on hotel employees in turkey. J. Manag. Res. 2015, 7, 82–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lee, S.S.; Park, E.M. A Study on the infant educare teacher’s recognition of professionalism and professional development level. J. Early Child. Educ. Educ. Welf. 2014, 18, 437–460. [Google Scholar]
- Lim, D.J.; Ha, H.S.; Kim, H.Y. A Study on the Effect of Professional Worker’s Professional Perception of Hotel Restaurant on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior. J. Tour. Leis. Res. 2017, 29, 197–212. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, M.H.; Chang, H.J. A Study on the Effect of the Organizational Trust of Convention Employees on the Job Satisfaction and Organizational Performance. Int. J. Tour. Manag. Sci. 2015, 30, 375–399. [Google Scholar]
- Sohn, S.A. Study on the Influence of the Communication Competence of the Convention Planners on the Job Performance. Master’s Thesis, KyungHee University, Seoul, Korea, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D.M. QuickPass Paper Statistical Analysis. 2019. Available online: https://qpassthesis.tistory.com/ (accessed on 30 April 2022).
Item | Frequency | Ratio | Item | Frequency | Ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Male | 131 | 54.1 | Age | 20s | 98 | 40.5 |
Female | 111 | 45.9 | 30s | 96 | 39.7 | ||
Monthly income | less than 2 million | 80 | 33.1 | 40s | 38 | 15.7 | |
2 million | 91 | 37.6 | Over 50 | 10 | 4.1 | ||
3 million | 42 | 17.4 | Position | Employee | 57 | 23.6 | |
4 million | 18 | 7.4 | Chief | 33 | 13.6 | ||
Over 5 million | 11 | 4.5 | Deputy | 63 | 26 | ||
Working years | less than 2 years | 47 | 19.4 | Manager | 56 | 23.1 | |
2~less than 4 years | 63 | 26.0 | Director or higher | 33 | 13.6 | ||
4~less than 6 years | 52 | 21.5 | Education | high school diploma or under | 16 | 6.6 | |
6~less than 8 years | 33 | 13.6 | college graduation | 28 | 11.6 | ||
8~less than 10 years | 22 | 9.1 | University graduation | 156 | 64.5 | ||
Over 10 years | 25 | 10.3 | Postgraduate or above | 42 | 17.4 |
Factor | Mean | Factor Loading | Eigen Values | Explained Variance | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1: Vocational expertise | 6.029 | 30.147 | 0.830 | ||
Participation in outside activities is needed to improve professionalism | 4.17 | 0.808 | |||
Qualification standards for job related certificates have to be strengthened to improve professionalism | 4.14 | 0.798 | |||
Dedicated organization is needed to improve welfare and professionalism | 4.24 | 0.770 | |||
Academic degree related to the job is required | 3.96 | 0.726 | |||
Factor 2: Work autonomy | 2.421 | 12.105 | 0.894 | ||
The importance of tasks of convention workers is acknowledged | 4.05 | 0.872 | |||
Convention management is left to the convention workers | 4.07 | 0.866 | |||
Convention workers take responsibility for incidents that have occurred during the convention | 4.02 | 0.712 | |||
Factor 3: Social contribution | 1.764 | 8.819 | 0.802 | ||
The job contributes to the cultural development of the local society | 4.32 | 0.779 | |||
The job contributes to the economic development of the local society | 4.31 | 0.748 | |||
The job contributes to development of future society | 4.20 | 0.712 | |||
The job requires social contribution over economic gains | 3.98 | 0.630 | |||
Factor 4: Social status | 1.502 | 7.511 | 0.800 | ||
Working condition is fine | 2.54 | 0.901 | |||
Have better incomes compared to other occupations of similar academic background | 2.60 | 0.823 | |||
Job security of the industry is stable | 2.59 | 0.794 | |||
Factor 5: Job ethics | 1.201 | 6.004 | 0.705 | ||
Subcontractors are respected, and their differences are accepted | 4.26 | 0.841 | |||
There are beliefs in work that mediate and manage affairs like convention hosting, organizing, operating, etc. | 4.26 | 0.769 | |||
Moral obligations are well followed | 4.21 | 0.580 | |||
Factor 6: Work functionality | 1.117 | 5.584 | 0.625 | ||
Voluntary participation in various educations is required | 4.20 | 0.797 | |||
High-level of work performance is required | 4.18 | 0.703 | |||
Continuous research about method of mediation and management of works such as international conference hosting, organizing, operating is needed. | 4.24 | 0.659 |
Factor | Mean | Factor Loading | Eigen Values | Explained Variance | Cronbach’s α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor 1: salary satisfaction | |||||
Satisfied with the decision procedure of wage, bonus, and allowance | 2.70 | 0.895 | 3.443 | 34.430 | 0.890 |
The effort matches the wage | 2.71 | 0.875 | |||
Wage is enough for living | 2.78 | 0.866 | |||
Satisfied with welfare | 2.81 | 0.832 | |||
Factor 2: work contents satisfaction | |||||
The job is valuable | 4.33 | 0.862 | 2.757 | 27.566 | 0.831 |
The job provokes constant interest | 4.28 | 0.829 | |||
Feel sense of accomplishment from the job | 4.43 | 0.821 | |||
Factor 3: relationship with coworkers’ satisfaction | |||||
Coworkers are helpful | 4.16 | 0.808 | 1.144 | 11.445 | 0.752 |
My boss evaluates me fairly | 3.77 | 0.792 | |||
Satisfied with relation with coworkers | 4.04 | 0.778 |
Vocational Expertise | Work Autonomy | Social Contribution | Social Status | Job Ethics | Work Functionality | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K-means cluster analysis | cluster 1 (n = 111) | 4.33 | 4.52 | 4.48 | 3.11 | 4.34 | 4.24 |
cluster 2 (n = 61) | 3.59 | 2.84 | 3.52 | 2.40 | 3.88 | 3.98 | |
cluster 3 (n = 70) | 4.28 | 4.35 | 4.35 | 1.87 | 4.41 | 4.35 | |
F | 42.030 *** | 238.378 *** | 73.285 *** | 84.911 *** | 21.858 | 9.763 *** |
Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F | p | Post-Hoc Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vocational expertise | 1 | 4.327 | 0.050 | 42.030 | 0.000 | 1 < 3 < 1 |
2 | 3.590 | 0.068 | ||||
3 | 4.282 | 0.063 | ||||
Work autonomy | 1 | 4.523 | 0.048 | 238.378 | 0.000 | 2 < 3 < 1 |
2 | 2.836 | 0.065 | ||||
3 | 4.352 | 0.060 | ||||
Social contribution | 1 | 4.482 | 0.048 | 73.285 | 0.000 | 2 < 3 < 1 |
2 | 3.525 | 0.065 | ||||
3 | 4.346 | 0.061 | ||||
Social status | 1 | 3.111 | 0.060 | 84.911 | 0.000 | 3 < 2 < 1 |
2 | 2.404 | 0.081 | ||||
3 | 1.871 | 0.076 | ||||
Job ethics | 1 | 4.342 | 0.048 | 21.858 | 0.000 | 2 < 1 < 3 |
2 | 3.880 | 0.064 | ||||
3 | 4.410 | 0.060 | ||||
Work functionality | 1 | 4.243 | 0.047 | 9.763 | 0.000 | 2 < 1 < 3 |
2 | 3.978 | 0.063 | ||||
3 | 4.348 | 0.059 |
Function | Eigen Value | Dispersion (%) | Canonical Correlation | Wilks Lambda | df | χ2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.584 | 80.2 | 0.849 | 0.170 | 8 | 420.541 *** |
2 | 0.639 | 19.8 | 0.624 | 0.610 | 3 | 117.381 *** |
cluster title | cluster 1 (n = 111) | cluster 2 (n = 61) | cluster 3 (n = 70) | Total | ||
High-level | 101 (91.0%) | 3 (4.9%) | 1 (1.4%) | 111 | ||
Low-level | 1 (0.9%) | 57 (93.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 61 | ||
Moderate-level | 9 (8.1%) | 1 (1.6%) | 69 (98.6%) | 70 |
Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F | p | Post-Hoc Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Salary satisfaction | 1 | 4.52 | 0.44 | 28.13 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 3 < 1 |
2 | 3.93 | 0.64 | ||||
3 | 4.42 | 0.47 | ||||
Work contents satisfaction | 1 | 3.11 | 0.80 | 28.39 | 0.000 *** | 3 < 2 < 1 |
2 | 2.72 | 0.84 | ||||
3 | 2.21 | 0.71 | ||||
Satisfaction with Relationship with coworkers | 1 | 4.09 | 0.56 | 15.84 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 1 < 3 |
2 | 3.62 | 0.64 | ||||
3 | 4.16 | 0.64 |
Function | Cluster | Mean | S.D. | F | p | Post-Hoc Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Job performance | 1 | 4.42 | 0.44 | 35.026 | 0.000 *** | 2 < 3 < 1 |
2 | 3.82 | 0.51 | ||||
3 | 4.33 | 0.47 |
Characteristic | Professionalism Perception of the Convention Workers | χ2 | p | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cluster 1 | Cluster 2 | Cluster 3 | ||||
Education | High school graduation | 7 (6.3%) | 1 (1.6%) | 8 (11.4%) | 17.003 | 0.009 ** |
College graduation | 13 (11.7%) | 3 (4.9%) | 12 (17.1%) | |||
University graduation | 67 (60.4%) | 51 (83.6%) | 38 (54.3%) | |||
Postgraduate or above | 24 (21.6%) | 6 (9.8%) | 12 (17.1%) | |||
Position | Employee | 24 (21.6%) | 23 (37.7%) | 10 (14.3%) | 15.188 | 0.056 |
Chief | 15 (13.5%) | 8 (13.1%) | 10 (14.3%) | |||
Deputy | 27 (24.3%) | 16 (26.2%) | 20 (28.6%) | |||
Manager | 32 (28.8%) | 7 (11.5%) | 17 (24.3%) | |||
Director or higher | 13 (11.7%) | 7 (11.5%) | 13 (18.6%) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yan, W.; Kim, E.; Jeong, S.; Yoon, Y. Toward Improving Working Conditions to Enhance Professionalism of Convention Workers: Focusing on the Difference between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance According to Professionalism Perception. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105829
Yan W, Kim E, Jeong S, Yoon Y. Toward Improving Working Conditions to Enhance Professionalism of Convention Workers: Focusing on the Difference between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance According to Professionalism Perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(10):5829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105829
Chicago/Turabian StyleYan, Wenyan, Eunjin Kim, Soyeon Jeong, and Yeonghye Yoon. 2022. "Toward Improving Working Conditions to Enhance Professionalism of Convention Workers: Focusing on the Difference between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance According to Professionalism Perception" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 10: 5829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105829
APA StyleYan, W., Kim, E., Jeong, S., & Yoon, Y. (2022). Toward Improving Working Conditions to Enhance Professionalism of Convention Workers: Focusing on the Difference between Job Satisfaction and Job Performance According to Professionalism Perception. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5829. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105829