Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Previous Experience in the Field of Cooperation with a Pharmacist
3.2. Current Experience in the Field of Cooperation with a Pharmacist
3.3. Future Expectations of Working with a Pharmacist
3.4. Pharmaceutical Care Implementation Process
4. Discussion
5. Limitation of the Study
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hepler, C.D.; Strand, L.M. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1990, 47, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berenguer, B.; La Casa, C.; de la Matta, M.J.; Martín-Calero, M.J. Pharmaceutical care: Past, present and future. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004, 10, 3931–3946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayorinde, A.A.; Porteous, T.; Sharma, P. Screening for major diseases in community pharmacies: A systematic review. Int. J. Pharm. Pract. 2013, 21, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.rynekzdrowia.pl/Farmacja/Rynek-aptek-wedlug-GUS-placowek-jest-wiecej-niz-10-lat-temu,228467,6.html (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Farmaceuta w Polsce. Ogólnopolskie Badania Wizerunkowe. Warszawa. 2019. Available online: https://www.nia.org.pl/2019/04/11/po-pierwsze-farmaceuta-ruszyla-kampania-wizerunkowa-zawodu-farmaceuty/raport_farmaceuta_w_polsce_2019/ (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Waszyk-Nowaczyk, M.; Simon, M. Problemy związane z wdrażaniem opieki farmaceutycznej w Polsce. Farm. Pol. 2009, 65, 713–716. [Google Scholar]
- Williams, A.; Manias, E.; Walker, R. Interventions to improve medication adherence in people with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2008, 63, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelly, D.V.; Bishop, L.; Young, S.; Hawboldt, J.; Phillips, L.; Keough, T.M. Pharmacist and physician views on collaborative practice: Findings from the community pharmaceutical care project. Can. Pharm. J. 2013, 146, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matzke, G.R.; Moczygemba, L.R.; Williams, K.J.; Czar, M.J.; Lee, W.T. Impact of a pharmacist-physician collaborative care model on patient outcomes and health services utilization. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2018, 75, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vinterflod, C.; Gustafsson, M.; Mattsson, S.; Gallego, G. Physicians’ perspectives on clinical pharmacy services in Northern Sweden: A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2018, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albassam, A.; Almohammed, H.; Alhujaili, M.; Koshy, S.; Awad, A. Perspectives of primary care physicians and pharmacists on interprofessional collaboration in Kuwait: A quantitative study. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236114. [Google Scholar]
- Hwang, A.Y.; Gums, T.H.; Gums, J.G. The benefits of physician-pharmacist collaboration. J. Fam. Pract. 2017, 66, E1–E8. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, A.N.; Khan, M.U.; Shoaib, M.H.; Yousuf, R.I.; Mir, S.A. Practice Nurses and Pharmacists: A Perspective on the Expectation and Experience of Nurses for Future Collaboration. Oman Med. J. 2014, 29, 271–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Informacja dla Pielęgniarek Uprawnionych do Wystawiania Recept na Leki, Środki Spożywcze Specjalnego Przeznaczenia Żywieniowego Oraz Wyroby Medyczne Refundowane. Available online: https://nipip.pl/dla-pielegniarek-i-poloznych/informacja-dla-pielegniarek-poloznych-uprawnionych-wystawiania-recept-leki-srodki-spozywcze-specjalnego-przeznaczenia-zywieniowego-oraz-wyroby-medyczne-refundowane (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Pielęgniarki Mogą Już Udzielać Porad i Wystawiać Recepty. Available online: https://www.prawo.pl/zdrowie/porada-pielegniarska-od-1-sierpnia-2020-r-nowe-przpisy,502095.html (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Santschi, V.; Wuerzner, G.; Chiolero, A.; Burnand, B.; Schaller, P.; Cloutier, L.; Paradis, G.; Burnier, M. Team-based care for improving hypertension management among outpatients (TBC-HTA): Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2017, 17, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henneman, E.A.; Tessier, E.G.; Nathanson, B.H.; Plotkin, K. An evaluation of a collaborative, safety focused, nurse-pharmacist intervention for improving the accuracy of the medication history. J. Patient Saf. 2014, 10, 88–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghorbani, A. Demand for Health and Healthcare. In Healthcare Access; Agrawal, A., Kosgi, S., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2021; Available online: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/77622 (accessed on 21 August 2022). [CrossRef]
- Cipolle, R.J.; Strand, L.M.; Morley, P.C. Chapter 4. Patient-Centeredness in Pharmaceutical Care. In Pharmaceutical Care Practice: The Patient-Centered Approach to Medication Management Services, 3rd ed.; Cipolle, R.J., Strand, L.M., Morley, P.C., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2012; Available online: https://accesspharmacy.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=491§ionid=39674904 (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Miszewska, J.; Wrzosek, N.; Zimmermann, A. Extended Prescribing Roles for Pharmacists in Poland-A Survey Study. Int. J. Env. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piecuch, A.; Kozłowska-Wojciechowska, M.; Makarewicz-Wujec, M. Pharmacist-physician relationships from the pharmacist’s perspective in Poland. Int. J. Clin. Pharm. 2013, 35, 491. [Google Scholar]
- Pojskic, N.; MacKeigan, L.; Boon, H.; Ellison, P.; Breslin, C. Ontario family physician readiness to collaborate with community pharmacists on drug therapy management. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 2011, 7, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fletcher, J.; Hogg, W.; Farrell, B.; Woodend, K.; Dahrouge, S.; Lemelin, J.; Dalziel, W. Effect of nurse practitioner pharmacist counseling on inappropriate medication use in family practice. Can. Fam. Physician 2012, 58, 862–868. [Google Scholar]
- Segal, E.M.; Bates, J.; Fleszar, S.L.; Holle, L.M.; Kennerly-Shah, J.; Rockey, M.; Jeffers, K.D. Demonstrating the value of the oncology pharmacist within the healthcare team. J. Oncol. Pharm. Pr. 2019, 25, 1945–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setter, S.M.; Corbett, C.F.; Neumiller, J.J.; Gates, B.J.; Sclar, D.A.; Sonnett, T.E. Effectiveness of a pharmacist-nurse intervention on resolving medication discrepancies for patients transitioning from hospital to home health care. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2009, 66, 2027–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Briggs, M.; Closs, S.J.; Marczewski, K.; Barratt, J. A feasibility study of a combined nurse/pharmacist-led chronic pain clinic in primary care. Qual. Prim. Care 2008, 16, 91–94. [Google Scholar]
- Schellack, N.; Pretorius, R.; Messina, A.P. “Esprit de corps”: Towards collaborative integration of pharmacists and nurses into antimicrobial stewardship programmes in South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 2016, 106, 973–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- McLean, D.L.; McAlister, F.A.; Johnson, J.A.; King, K.M.; Makowsky, M.J.; Jones, C.A.; Tsuyuki, R.T.; SCRIP-HTN Investigators. A randomized trial of the effect of community pharmacist and nurse care on improving blood pressure management in patients with diabetes mellitus: Study of cardiovascular risk intervention by pharmacists-hypertension (SCRIP-HTN). Arch. Intern Med. 2008, 168, 2355–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fairbanks, R.J.; Hildebrand, J.M.; Kolstee, K.E.; Schneider, S.M.; Shah, M.N. Medical and nursing staff highly value clinical pharmacists in the emergency department. Emerg. Med. J. 2007, 24, 716–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- PGEU—Supply of Medicines Services. Available online: https://pgeu-annual-report.eu/community-pharmacy-services.html (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Raport z Prac Zespołu ds. Opieki Farmaceutycznej Powołanego Przez Ministra Zdrowia na Podstawie Zarządzenia z Dnia 8 Lipca 2020 r. (Dziennik Urzędowy Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 9 lipca 2020 r., Warszawa). Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/zdrowie/opieka-farmaceutyczna---raport (accessed on 24 January 2022).
- Hughes, C.M.; Lapane, K.L. Pharmacy interventions on prescribing in nursing homes: From evidence to practice. Adv. Drug Saf. 2011, 2, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Współpraca Kluczem Efektywnej Opieki Zdrowotnej. Available online: https://paga.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/raport_wspolpraca_internet.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2022).
Opinion of a Responder Whether: | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a pharmacist is a reliable advisor for clinical information about the drug (n = 87) | 26.4% | 34.5% | 23.0% | 12.6% | 3.4% |
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the safety and proper use of medications (n = 65) | 10.8% | 21.5% | 35.4% | 13.8% | 18.5% |
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the advisability of using other over-the-counter medications that should be taken in conjunction with prescribed medications (n = 65) | 7.7% | 30.8% | 33.8% | 13.8% | 13.8% |
a pharmacist should conduct pharmacy practices such as measuring blood pressure or blood glucose level (n = 124) | 24.2% | 30.6% | 19.4% | 13.7% | 12.1% |
a pharmacist is a reliable advisor for general information about the drug (n = 124) | 38.7% | 41.9% | 8.1% | 6.5% | 4.8% |
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the proper storage of drugs (n = 124) | 25.8% | 34.7% | 18.5% | 11.3% | 9.7% |
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the advisability of using and the mechanism of action of the prescribed drugs (n = 124) | 14.5% | 29.0% | 31.5% | 15.3% | 9.7% |
Characteristics of Participants n (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grading Scale | 1 Strongly Disagree | 2 Disagree | 3 Neither Agree nor Disagree | 4 Agree | 5 Strongly Agree | Average |
a pharmacist is a reliable advisor in the field of clinical information about the drug (n = 87) | ||||||
Number of pharmacists working with a nurse | ||||||
0 | 2 (3.1) | 10 (15.4) | 18 (27.7) | 21 (32.3) | 14 (21.5) | 4.3 |
1 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (40.0) | 6 (60.0) | 4.5 |
2 | 1 (20.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (20.0) | 2 (40.0) | 1 (20.0) | 3.4 |
3 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (66.7) | 1 (33.3) | 4.3 |
>3 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 1 (25.0) | 3.5 |
p = 0.036, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the safety and proper use of medications (n = 65) | ||||||
Education | ||||||
Higher—master’s degree | 8 (18.2) | 7 (15.9) | 14 (31.8) | 10 (22.7) | 5 (11.4) | 2.9 |
Higher—bachelor’s degree | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 8 (53.3) | 3 (20.0) | 3 (20.0) | 3.5 |
Medical secondary | 4 (66.6) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1.5 |
p = 0.017, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist routinely consults patients on the advisability of using other over-the-counter drugs that should be taken in conjunction with prescribed drugs (n = 65) | ||||||
Education | ||||||
Higher—master’s degree | 5 (11.4) | 7 (15.9) | 12 (27.3) | 17 (38.6) | 3 (6.8) | 3.1 |
Higher—bachelor’s degree | 0 (0.0) | 1 (6.7) | 9 (60.0) | 2 (13.3) | 3 (15.0) | 3.5 |
Medical secondary | 4 (66.6) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1.7 |
p = 0.022, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist should conduct pharmacy practices such as blood pressure or blood glucose measurement (n = 124) | ||||||
Gender | ||||||
Women | 15 (13.0) | 15 (13.0) | 24 (20.9) | 35 (30.4) | 26 (22.6) | 3.4 |
Men | 0 | 1 (12.5) | 0 | 3 (37.5) | 4 (50.0) | 4.3 |
p = 0.049, Two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test |
Opinion of a Responder Whether Pharmacist in a Community Pharmacy Should: | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
take personal responsibility for solving his/her patients’ drug problems | 21.8% | 17.7% | 16.9% | 32.3% | 11.3% |
a be a specialist in the field of pharmacology | 58.9% | 26.6% | 11.3% | 2.4% | 0.8% |
educate patients on the advisability of using and the mechanism of action of the recommended drugs | 50.8% | 37.1% | 6.5% | 4.8% | 0.8% |
monitor the response to treatment of patients’ and inform of any problems | 31.5% | 27.4% | 27.4% | 12.1% | 1.6% |
educate patients about the symptoms and course of the patient’s disease | 30.6% | 26.6% | 19.4% | 20.2% | 3.2% |
Characteristics of Participants n (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grading Scale | 1 Strongly Disagree | 2 Disagree | 3 Neither Agree nor Disagree | 4 Agree | 5 Strongly Agree | Average |
pharmacist takes personal responsibility for solving patients’ drug problems (n = 124) | ||||||
age [years] | ||||||
≤30 | 1 (3.3) | 10 (33.3) | 5 (16.7) | 9 (30.0) | 5 (16.7) | 3.2 |
31–40 | 3 (27.3) | 5 (45.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (18.2) | 1 (9.0) | 2.4 |
41–50 | 8 (18.2) | 15 (34.0) | 8 (18.2) | 5 (11.4) | 8 (18.2) | 2.8 |
>50 | 3 (6.1) | 13 (26.5) | 12 (24.5) | 5 (10.2) | 16 (32.7) | 3.5 |
p = 0.035, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison | ||||||
pharmacist educates patients on the advisability of using and the mechanism of action of the recommended drugs (n = 124) | ||||||
City size [inhabitants] | ||||||
≤50,000 | 1 (4.0) | 4 (16.0) | 1 (4.0) | 9 (36.0) | 10 (40.0) | 3.9 |
50,000–100,000 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.7) | 9 (25.7) | 24 (68.6) | 4.6 |
>100,000–500,000 | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.7) | 3 (8.6) | 16 (45.7) | 14 (40.0) | 4.2 |
>500,000 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (7.1) | 11 (39.3) | 15 (53.6) | 4.5 |
p = 0.027, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison | ||||||
pharmacist educates the patients about the symptoms of the disease the patient suffers from (n = 124) | ||||||
Workplace | ||||||
Hospital | 4 (3.5) | 25 (21.9) | 23 (20.2) | 29 (25.5) | 33 (28.9) | 3.5 |
Other place | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (11.1) | 3 (33.3) | 5 (55.6) | 4.4 |
p = 0.034, Kruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s pairwise comparison |
Opinion of a Responder Whether Pharmacist’s Should in the Future: | Strongly Agree | Agree | Neither Agree nor Disagree | Disagree | Strongly Disagree |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
provide pharmaceutical care in a community pharmacy | 39.5% | 30.6% | 24.2% | 2.4% | 3.3% |
have access to patient’s medical records | 21.0% | 25.8% | 21.8% | 21.0% | 10.5% |
be allowed to perform drug reviews in a community pharmacy | 39.5% | 37.1% | 17.7% | 3.2% | 2.4% |
be available by telephone to patients when they have questions about medications | 32.3% | 41.1% | 12.1% | 9.7% | 4.8% |
be remunerated for work on patient’s correct therapy | 50.8% | 25.0% | 18.5% | 3.2% | 2.4% |
Characteristics of Participants n (%) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Grading Scale | 1 Strongly Disagree | 2 Disagree | 3 Neither Agree nor Disagree | 4 Agree | 5 Strongly Agree | Average |
a pharmacist should provide pharmaceutical care in a community pharmacy (n = 65) | ||||||
Education | ||||||
Higher–master | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 9 (20.4) | 16 (36.4) | 19 (43.2) | 4.2 |
Higher–bachelor’s degree | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (33.3) | 6 (40.0) | 4 (26.7) | 3.9 |
Medical secondary | 2 (33.2) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 1 (16.7) | 2.7 |
p = 0.032, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s Pairwise Comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist should have access to the patient’s medical records (n = 124) | ||||||
age [years] | ||||||
≤30 | 1 (3.3) | 5 (16.7) | 6 (20.0) | 10 (33.3) | 8 (26.7) | 3.6 |
31–40 | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 3 (25.0) | 3 (25.0) | 3 (25.0) | 3.6 |
41–50 | 5 (11.4) | 16 (36.4) | 9 (20.4) | 10 (22.7) | 4 (9.1) | 2.8 |
>50 | 7 (18.4) | 3 (7.9) | 9 (23.7) | 8 (21.1) | 11 (28.9) | 3.3 |
p = 0.037, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s Pairwise Comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist should be able to perform drug checkups in a community pharmacy (n = 124) | ||||||
age [years] | ||||||
≤30 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.3) | 3 (10.0) | 15 (50.0) | 11 (36.7) | 4.2 |
31–40 | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (9.1) | 1 (9.1) | 9 (81.8) | 4.7 |
41–50 | 1 (2.3) | 2 (4.5) | 14 (31.8) | 14 (31.8) | 13 (29.6) | 3.8 |
>50 | 2 (5.3) | 1 (2.6) | 4 (10.5) | 15 (39.5) | 16 (42.1) | 4.1 |
p = 0.013, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s Pairwise Comparison | ||||||
a pharmacist should be remunerated for working on the correct therapy of the patient (n = 124) | ||||||
Workplace | ||||||
Hospital | 3 (3.0) | 3 (3.0) | 19 (19.2) | 27 (27.3) | 47 (47.5) | 4.1 |
Other place | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 8 (100.0) | 5.0 |
p = 0.004, Kruskal-Wallis equality-of-populations rank test, Dunn’s Pairwise Comparison |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Waszyk-Nowaczyk, M.; Guzenda, W.; Dragun, P.; Olsztyńska, L.; Liwarska, J.; Michalak, M.; Ferlak, J.; Drozd, M.; Sobiechowska, R. Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811713
Waszyk-Nowaczyk M, Guzenda W, Dragun P, Olsztyńska L, Liwarska J, Michalak M, Ferlak J, Drozd M, Sobiechowska R. Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(18):11713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811713
Chicago/Turabian StyleWaszyk-Nowaczyk, Magdalena, Weronika Guzenda, Paweł Dragun, Laura Olsztyńska, Julia Liwarska, Michał Michalak, Jan Ferlak, Mariola Drozd, and Renata Sobiechowska. 2022. "Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 18: 11713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811713
APA StyleWaszyk-Nowaczyk, M., Guzenda, W., Dragun, P., Olsztyńska, L., Liwarska, J., Michalak, M., Ferlak, J., Drozd, M., & Sobiechowska, R. (2022). Interdisciplinary Cooperation between Pharmacists and Nurses—Experiences and Expectations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11713. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811713