QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Background and Literature Review
2.1. Quality Function Deployment
2.2. Kano Model
2.3. PUGH Concept Selection
2.4. Smart Home Product Design for the Elderly
2.5. User Experience Design for Seniors
2.6. Research Gap
3. Methods
3.1. Kano Model
3.1.1. User Requirements Acquisition
3.1.2. Importance of User Requirements
3.2. Quality Function Deployment
3.2.1. Define Design Requirements
3.2.2. Building House of Quality Model
3.3. PUGH Concept Selection
3.3.1. Design Solutions Generation
3.3.2. Program Evaluation
4. Case Study
4.1. Kano Model
4.1.1. User Requirements Acquisition
4.1.2. Importance of User Needs
4.2. Quality Function Deployment
4.2.1. Define Design Requirements
4.2.2. Build a Quality House Model
4.3. PUGH Concept Selection
4.3.1. Design Solutions Generation
4.3.2. Schemes Evaluation
5. Discussion
6. Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design Strategies for Smart Refrigerators for the Elderly
6.1. Morphological Design Strategy
6.2. Functional Design Strategy
6.3. Emotional Design Strategies
6.4. Interface Layout Design Strategy
6.5. Use-Level of Design Strategies
7. Implications and Limitations of the Study
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- The UN Sustainable Development Goals 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ (accessed on 20 April 2021).
- Donizzetti, A.R.; Lagacé, M. COVID-19 and the Elderly’s Mental Illness: The Role of Risk Perception, Social Isolation, Loneliness and Ageism. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gauthier, A.; Lagarde, C.; Mourey, F.; Manckoundia, P. Use of Digital Tools, Social Isolation, and Lockdown in People 80 Years and Older Living at Home. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gupta, S.; Giri, S.; Srivastava, T.; Agarwal, P.; Sharma, R.; Agrawal, A. Smart Refrigerator based on ‘Internet of Things’. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering, Greater Noida, India, 4–5 March 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 436–439. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, A.; Sarkar, A.; Ibrahim, A.; Sharma, R.K. Smart Refri: SMART REFRIGERATOR for Tracking Human Usage and Prompting Based on Behavioral Consumption. In Emerging Technologies for Smart Cities; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 45–54. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, H.H.; Chuang, Y.T. Low-cost smart refrigerator. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing, Honolulu, HI, USA, 25–30 June 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 228–231. [Google Scholar]
- Dekoninck, E.; Barbaccia, F. Streamlined assessment to assist in the design of internet-of-things (IoT) enabled products: A case study of the smart fridge. In Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, Delft, The Netherlands, 5–8 August 2019; pp. 3721–3730. [Google Scholar]
- Marsot, J. QFD: A methodological tool for integration of ergonomics at the design stage. Appl. Ergon. 2005, 36, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xu, Q.; Jiao, R.J.; Yang, X.; Helander, M.; Khalid, H.M.; Opperud, A. An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis. Des. Stud. 2009, 30, 87–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulrich, K.; Eppinger, S. Product Design and Development, 5th ed.; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 143–163. [Google Scholar]
- Shil, N.C.; Ali, M.A.; Paiker, N.R. Robust customer satisfaction model using QFD. Int. J. Prod. Qual. Manag. 2010, 6, 112–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hauser, J.R.; Clausing, D. The House of Quality. In Harvard Business Review; Harvard Business Publishing: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1988; Volume 66, pp. 53–73. [Google Scholar]
- Ali, M.A.M.; Omar, A.R.; Saman, A.M.; Othman, I.; Hadi, I.H.A. Assimilating Quality Function Deployment (QFD) with QUEST® analysis for facility layout redesign of Handwork Section. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 5–7 December 2010; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 985–990. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, T.; Xu, X. Evaluation of master templates for process protocols based on quality function unfolding. Robot Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2010, 16, 1183–1188. [Google Scholar]
- Rao, Y. Research on QFD-Based e-Government Online Service Quality Optimization Model. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 15 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Sousa-Zomer, T.T.; Miguel, P.A.C. A QFD-based approach to support sustainable product-service systems conceptual design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2017, 88, 701–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bajčetić, S.; Tica, S.; Živanović, P.; Milovanović, B.; Đorojević, A. Analysis of public transport users’ satisfaction using quality function deployment: Belgrade case study. Transport 2018, 33, 609–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wu, Y. Rural retail service innovation based on quality function. China Circul. Econ. 2013, 27, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, A.K.; Rawani, A.M. Industry oriented quality management of engineering education: An integrated QFD-TOPSIS approach. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2022, 13, 904–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, A. Investigating design targets for effective performance management system: An application of balance scorecard using QFD. J. Adv. Manag. Res. 2020, 18, 353–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kano, N. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu Qual. J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control. 1984, 14, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
- Sireli, Y.; Kauffmann, P.; Ozan, E. Integration of Kano’s model into QFD for multiple product design. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2007, 54, 380–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tontini, G. Integrating the Kano model and QFD for designing new products. Total Qual. Manag. 2007, 18, 599–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.C.; Chuang, M.C. Integrating the Kano model into a robust design approach to enhance customer satisfaction with product design. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2008, 114, 667–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, Z.; Che, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, L. Research on bicycle modeling requirements based on Kansei Engineering and Kano model. Mech. Des. 2017, 34, 113–118. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, Y.; Tang, L.; Li, X. Research on shape design of plant protection UAV Based on Kano model. Mech. Des. 2019, 36, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, J.; Yu, S. Research on product green evaluation based on analytic hierarchy process and Brinell matrix. Environ. Sci. Manag. 2016, 41, 177–181. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Chen, T.; Liang, Q. Research on the application of Pugh concept selection method in product design. Packag. Eng. 2018, 39, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, G.; Liu, M.; Wan, Z. Variant design of shredder cutter based on evolutionary tree. Mech. Des. 2019, 36, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
- Clausing, D.; Pugh, S. Enhanced quality function deployment. In Proceedings of the Design and Productivity International Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA, 6–8 February 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Pandit, S. New hand-cart for Old-Delhi whole sale market designed and engineered using generic product development process. Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 2020, 58, 698–705. [Google Scholar]
- Tapia, E.M.; Intille, S.S.; Larson, K. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In International Conference on Pervasive Computing; Springer: Singapore, 2004; pp. 158–175. [Google Scholar]
- Portet, F.; Vacher, M.; Golanski, C.; Roux, C.; Meillon, B. Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: Acceptability and objection aspects. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2013, 17, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pérez-Espinosa, H.; Martínez-Miranda, J.; Espinosa-Curiel, I.; Rodríguez-Jacobo, J.; Avila-George, H. Using acoustic paralinguistic information to assess the interaction quality in speech-based systems for elderly users. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 2017, 98, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Epelde, G.; Valencia, X.; Carrasco, E.; Posada, J.; Abascal, J.; Diaz-Orueta, U.; Husodo-Schulz, C. Providing universally accessible interactive services through TV sets: Implementation and validation with elderly users. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2013, 67, 497–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Courtney, K.L.; Demeris, G.; Rantz, M.; Skubic, M. Needing smart home technologies: The perspectives of older adults in continuing care retirement communities. Inform. Prim. Care 2008, 16, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tural, E.; Lu, D.; Austin Cole, D. Safely and actively aging in place: Older adults’ attitudes and intentions toward smart home technologies. Gerontol. Geriatr. Med. 2021, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodd, C.; Athauda, R.; Adam, M. Designing user interfaces for the elderly: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Information Systems 2017, Hobart, Australia, 4–6 December 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, H.; Li, Y. Research on the design of electronic products for the elderly based on user experience. Packag. Eng. 2014, 14, 37–41. [Google Scholar]
- Hashizume, A.; Yamanaka, T.; Kurosu, M. Real user experience of ICT devices among elderly people. In International Conference on Human Centered Design; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 227–234. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X. Research on User Experience Design of Young and Old People Using Smartphones. Ph.D. Thesis, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 1 May 2021. [Google Scholar]
- He, R.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L. User experience optimization design of elderly vehicle information system based on QFD. Packag. Eng. 2022, 43, 164–170+202. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, J.; Kamarudin, K.M.; Liu, Y.; Zou, J. Developing pandemic prevention and control by ANP-QFD approach: A case study on urban furniture design in China communities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W. The fourth of the seven new QC tools: KJ method. China Health Qual. Manag. 2018, 05, 137–139. [Google Scholar]
- Yadav, H.C.; Jain, R.; Singh, A.R.; Mishra, P.K. Kano integrated robust design approach for aesthetical product design: A case study of a car profile. J. Intell. Manuf. 2017, 28, 1709–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Liu, F.; Li, L. Method for determining the importance of personalized product attribute indicators based on Kano-QFD. Comput. Integr. Manuf. Syst. 2014, 20, 2697–2704. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Zhou, J.; Zhu, L. Research on user experience evaluation of electronic products for the elderly based on Taguchi’s quality view. Mech. Des. 2020, 37, 131–137. [Google Scholar]
- Shen, D.; Wang, J. Elderly furniture design from the perspective of safety. Packag. Eng. 2020, 41, 351–354. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, C. Research on Intelligent Product Design to Guide Future Consumption and Public Aesthetics. Master’s Thesis, Jilin University, Jilin, China, 1 June 2020. [Google Scholar]
- McLeod, S. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Simply Psychol. 2007, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J.; Wang, S.; Lei, C. Research on age appropriate smart wearable products under multi sensory experience. Art. Des. Theory 2021, 10, 96–98. [Google Scholar]
- Mei, X. Research on the Visual Design of Smart Phone Shopping Application Interface for Elderly Users Based on Perceptual Engineering Design Theory. Master’s Thesis, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China, 1 May 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, H.; Zhao, B. Research on the design of leisure and entertainment products for the elderly based on user experience. Design 2022, 35, 126–128. [Google Scholar]
- Han, B. Research on Refrigerator Design for the Elderly Based on User Experience. Master’s Thesis, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China, 17 June 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, M. Research on the Impact of Environmental Protection Policy Publicity on Environmental Protection Behavior of Middle-Aged and Elderly People. Master’s Thesis, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China, 1 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
User Requirements | Reverse Questions | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Questions | Very Satisfied | Right and Proper | Indifferent | Reluctantly Accepted | Dissatisfaction | |
Very satisfied | Q | A | A | A | O | |
Right and proper | R | I | I | I | M | |
Indifferent | R | I | I | I | M | |
Reluctantly accepted | R | I | I | I | M | |
Dissatisfaction | R | R | R | R | Q |
User Requirements | A | M | O | I | R | Demand Type | Original Weights | Adjustment Factor | Adjusted Proportion | Weights |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C11 Beautiful appearance | 22 | 10 | 8 | 19 | 0 | A | 0.053 | 1.5 | 0.080 | 0.082 |
C12 Soft color matching | 19 | 9 | 15 | 11 | 0 | A | 0.053 | 1.5 | 0.080 | 0.082 |
C13 Simple and beautiful control panel or app interface elements | 12 | 13 | 26 | 8 | 0 | O | 0.058 | 1 | 0.058 | 0.059 |
C21 Food health management | 27 | 2 | 14 | 14 | 0 | A | 0.054 | 1.5 | 0.081 | 0.083 |
C22 Diet plan management | 31 | 1 | 5 | 21 | 0 | A | 0.051 | 1.5 | 0.077 | 0.079 |
C23 Easy to recognize fonts and icons | 11 | 18 | 15 | 15 | 0 | M | 0.055 | 0.5 | 0.028 | 0.029 |
C24 High level of intelligence | 14 | 21 | 12 | 11 | 1 | M | 0.052 | 0.5 | 0.026 | 0.027 |
C25 Simple structure | 12 | 9 | 6 | 27 | 3 | I | 0.049 | 0 | - | - |
C31 Clear and simple control panel or app interface content and hierarchy | 11 | 23 | 17 | 7 | 0 | M | 0.057 | 0.5 | 0.029 | 0.030 |
C32 Function notes | 14 | 11 | 12 | 22 | 0 | I | 0.054 | 0 | - | - |
C33 Voice guidance and reminders | 23 | 4 | 11 | 21 | 0 | A | 0.050 | 1.5 | 0.075 | 0.077 |
C41 Safety and health | 1 | 16 | 40 | 2 | 0 | O | 0.062 | 1 | 0.062 | 0.064 |
C42 Compliant with human–machine requirements | 8 | 11 | 26 | 13 | 0 | O | 0.058 | 1 | 0.058 | 0.059 |
C51 Low power consumption | 12 | 11 | 33 | 3 | 0 | O | 0.059 | 1 | 0.059 | 0.061 |
C52 Outstanding freshness | 12 | 12 | 29 | 5 | 0 | O | 0.061 | 1 | 0.061 | 0.063 |
C53 Moderate price | 18 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 1 | A | 0.054 | 1.5 | 0.081 | 0.083 |
C61 Easy to operate | 8 | 11 | 34 | 6 | 0 | O | 0.061 | 1 | 0.061 | 0.063 |
C62 Easy to learn and easy to maintain | 13 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 0 | O | 0.058 | 1 | 0.058 | 0.059 |
First-Level Design Requirements | Second-Level Design Requirements |
---|---|
D1 Visual design | D11 CMF Design (Color; Material; Finishing) D12 Modeling design D13 Color scheme of the interface D14 Layout design of the interface D15 Brightness design of the interface |
D2 Functional system design | D21 Multi-functional personalized design D22 Text design of the interface D23 Icon graphic design of the interface |
D3 Emotional design | D31 Voice control design D32 Interface navigation design D33 Functional classification design of the interface D34 Layout design of icons and functional modules |
D4 Safety design | D41 Human–machine design D42 Structural design |
D5 Practical design | D51 Power design D52 Inverter technology application D53 Overall volume |
D6 Experience design | D61 Semantic design of the interface D62 Modular design D63 Manual touch screen design |
Level of Importance | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D11 | D12 | D13 | D14 | D15 | D21 | D22 | D23 | D31 | D32 | D33 | D34 | D41 | D42 | D51 | D52 | D53 | D61 | D62 | D63 | |||
C1 | C11 | 0.082 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
C12 | 0.082 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||
C13 | 0.059 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
C2 | C21 | 0.083 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
C22 | 0.079 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
C23 | 0.029 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
C24 | 0.027 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
C3 | C31 | 0.030 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | |||||||||||
C33 | 0.077 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||
C4 | C41 | 0.064 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||||||||||
C42 | 0.059 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |||||||
C5 | C51 | 0.061 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
C52 | 0.063 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
C53 | 0.083 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | |||||||||||||
C6 | C61 | 0.063 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 5 | |
C62 | 0.059 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||
Level of importance | 1.295 | 1.341 | 1.130 | 0.692 | 1.141 | 2.355 | 1.021 | 1.495 | 1.469 | 1.261 | 1.452 | 1.369 | 2.032 | 0.806 | 1.256 | 1.308 | 0.804 | 1.340 | 1.157 | 1.915 | ||
Order of Importance | 11 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 15 | 1 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 18 | 13 | 10 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
Design Requirements | Level of Importance | Alternative Schemes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | D | ||
D11 CMF Design | 1.295 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D12 Modeling design | 1.341 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D13 Color scheme of the interface | 1.130 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
D14 Layout design of the interface | 0.692 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
D15 Brightness design of the interface | 1.141 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
D21 Multi-functional personalized design | 2.355 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
D22 Text design of the interface | 1.021 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D23 Icon graphic design of the interface | 1.495 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 4 |
D31 Voice control design | 1.469 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
D32 Interface navigation design | 1.261 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
D33 Functional classification design of the interface | 1.452 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
D34 Layout design of icons and functional modules | 1.369 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D41 Human–machine design | 2.032 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D42 Structural design | 0.806 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D51 Power design | 1.256 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
D52 Inverter technology application | 1.308 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
D53 Overall volume | 0.804 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
D61 Semantic design of the interface | 1.340 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
D62 Modular design | 1.157 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
D63 Manual touch screen design | 1.915 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Total Score | 117.358 | 96.415 | 85.511 | 113.259 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Y.; Ghazilla, R.A.R.; Abdul-Rashid, S.H. QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113742
Li Y, Ghazilla RAR, Abdul-Rashid SH. QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(21):13742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113742
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Yongchuan, Raja Ariffin Raja Ghazilla, and Salwa Hanim Abdul-Rashid. 2022. "QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 21: 13742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113742
APA StyleLi, Y., Ghazilla, R. A. R., & Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2022). QFD-Based Research on Sustainable User Experience Optimization Design of Smart Home Products for the Elderly: A Case Study of Smart Refrigerators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192113742