Next Article in Journal
A Blockchain Secured Pharmaceutical Distribution System to Fight Counterfeiting
Previous Article in Journal
The Relationship between Exercise and Mental Health Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: From the Perspective of Hope
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 19
Issue 7
10.3390/ijerph19074089
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Succession and Driving Factors of Periphytic Community in the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Division (Henan, China)

by
Xiaonuo Chen
1,
Xiaojun Wang
2,
Yuying Li
1,*,
Yinlei Yao
1,
Yun Zhang
1,
Yeqing Jiang
1,
Xiaohui Lei
3,
Han Liu
1,
Naicheng Wu
1,4 and
Nicola Fohrer
1,4
1
International Joint Laboratory of Watershed Ecological Security and Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Security for Water Source Region of Middle Route Project of South-North Water Diversion in Henan Province, College of Water Resource and Environment Engineering, Nanyang Normal University, Nanyang 473061, China
2
Qushou Branch Bureau of Construction and Administration Bureau of South-to-North Water Division Project, Nanyang 473000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China
4
Department of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, Kiel University, 24098 Kiel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(7), 4089; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074089
Submission received: 15 January 2022 / Revised: 4 March 2022 / Accepted: 7 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Water Science and Technology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The Middle Route Project of the South-to-North Water Diversion is an artificially independent system that does not connect to other surface waters. Excessive periphyton proliferation causes a series of environmental problems in the canal. In this study, the periphyton community and environmental factors on the left and right banks of the canal in the algal growing area were investigated and sampled six times (June, September, and November of 2019 and 2020). The succession pattern of the attached organism community in the artificial canal was analyzed, and the key factors affecting the algal community were analyzed using RDA and GAM. The results showed that the seasonal variability of the environmental factors was more significant than the spatial variability. A total of 114 taxa of periphytic algae were found, belonging to seven phyla and 69 genera, and mainly composed of Bacillariophyta. Species richness was ranked as Bacillariophyta (60 taxa), Chlorophyta (31 taxa) and Cyanobacteria (15 taxa), and higher in autumn than in summer. The dominant taxa were Cymbella sp., Fragilaria sp., Navicula sp. and Diatoma sp. The abundance of periphytic algal varied from 0.07 × 105 to 8.99 × 105 ind./cm2, with trends similar to that of species richness. The redundancy analysis and generalized additive model showed that water temperature and nutrient concentration were the key factors influencing the structure of the algal community, followed by discharge rate and velocity, which were the determinants of the spatial and temporal patterns of the algal community. In view of the influence of discharge and velocity on the structure of algal communities, it is suggested that ecological scheduling could be used to regulate the structure of the algal community on the canal wall in the operation of later water division projects to ensure the safety of water division.

1. Introduction

Periphytic algae are an important chemical regulator in aquatic ecosystems [1]. Studies have shown that during growth they can absorb not only N and P, but also heavy metals and other chemical elements in the aquatic ecosystem [2,3,4]. Periphytic algae are sensitive to environmental changes and their growth sites are relatively fixed. Hence, their biomass, biodiversity and community structure are important biological indicators for water quality monitoring [5,6]. However, excessive proliferation of periphytic algae may lead to a series of water environment problems [7]. Abnormal proliferation of algae might increase the risk of algae bloom. When the periphytic algae dies, they will be washed away and will be decomposed into organic debris particles. Under the action of flocculation, the organic debris particles and the suspended sediment particles bind to each other to form granular algae residues. The particles of these algae residues diffuse with the water, thus affecting the safety of water quality [8].
The Middle Route Project (MRP) of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD) Project is the largest inter-basin water division project in the world. It is a major strategic basic project to realize the optimal allocation of water resources in China, promote sustainable social development, and ensure the improvement of people’s livelihoods. Since the water supply in 2014, it has become the lifeline, ecological line, and economic line for 140 million people in water-receiving areas. Its water quality status has always attracted special attention because it provides domestic and industrial water to northern China, and the water quality in the MRP is required to meet the Grade II Chinese Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water (GB3838-2002). The MRP is primarily an open channel. The slope and bottom of the canal are made of concrete. There were few effective sun shelters such as trees on both sides of the canal. The canal water is clear and transparent, and sunlight passes through the canal bottom during the day, providing sufficient light for algae growth. The aquatic ecosystem of the canal is at the initial stage of formation. Although the nutrient content of the canal is relatively dynamic and stable, previous studies have found that a large number of periphytic algae bred on the canal wall of the local canal section at a specific time [8]. Algae residues formed by rapid growth of algae diffuse in the aquatic ecosystem and are easy to deposit at the sudden expansion sections such as sluice and diversion sluice, which affect the discharge and operation safety of water supply. In recent years, there have been some related studies on the relationship between the bacterioplankton [9], the phytoplankton [10,11] and the phytoplankton-water quality relationships [12] in the MRP. However, there are few studies on the community structure of periphytic algae in the canal of the MRP.
The main aim of the research was to determine the pattern of periphytic algae community in terms of time and space, as it may have an impact on water quality. In order to understand the succession pattern of the periphyton community and the response mechanism to environmental factors such as hydrological regulation and nutrients in the canal of the MRP in Henan province, the community structure of periphyton and environmental factors were investigated six times from 2019 to 2020, including June, September, and November, along the three canal sections of Diaohe, Fangcheng and Yuzhou according to the ecological location of the canal. The objectives of this study were to answer the following questions. (1) How does the periphyton community change in response to hydrological conditions and seasonal changes? (2) What are the key factors that influence the periphytic algae community in the MRP? The answers to these questions could help us to reveal the cause of periphyton accumulation, which may provide a scientific theoretical basis of ensuring the safe operation and sustainable management of the MRP.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site and Sampling Period

The 1432 km MRP of SNWD (32.68°~39.99°N, 111.72°~116.27°E) went into service in 2014 and transferred 46 billion m3 water from the Danjiangkou Reservoir to Henan and Hebei Provinces, and Beijing and Tianjin Municipalities. The main channel is high in the south and low in the north, and the water conveyance mode is mainly an open channel and a partial pipe culvert. The designed discharge at the channel head is 350 m3/s, and the increased discharge is 420 m3/s. The discharge in the canal is continuous throughout the year to accommodate the water demands of a large population, and the water transportation volume tends to fluctuate with the amount of artificial withdrawal.
The Henan section spans the subtropical monsoon humid climate zone and temperate monsoon climate zone, characterized by four distinct seasons, simultaneous rain, and heat. The results of previous investigations showed that the areas with strong algae growth were all located in Henan Province. The areas where the main algae grow vigorously bend near the head of the main canal, the relatively flat and straight section in Fangcheng County of Nanyang City, the right bend in Yexian County of Pingdingshan City, and the relatively flat straight section in Yuzhou city in Pingdingshan City. Based on the preliminary survey of algae growth and the ecological location characteristics of the canal, three sampling points were selected from the south to the north along the Henan section canal [13]. The sampling points of Diaohe (DH) canal section in Dengzhou City, Fangcheng (FC) canal section in Nanyang City, and canal section in Yuzhou (YZ) City were selected as sampling sites, respectively (Figure 1).
Samples of both water and periphytic algae were collected at the beginning of each month in summer (June), early autumn (September) and late autumn (November), from June 2019 to November 2020.

2.2. Algae Sample Collection and Identification

The collection of periphytic algae is according to the sampling method of EPA [14], and was conducted in the areas where the algae grew on the slope of the canal at each site (10–80 cm from the water surface). An area of 400 cm2 was randomly selected, and a knife and brush was used to sample the algae. The samples were washed into a wide-mouth plastic bottle with 500 mL distilled water, and fixed with 4% formalin for identification. The samples were shaken well, and 0.1 mL of the sample was placed in the counting frame. Species identification [15,16,17] and counting were carried out under a microscope at 400× magnification. The number of cells per unit area was converted from the concentration times, and the number of cells was calculated as the abundance of the algae (ind./m2) [18]. The biomass of the algae was calculated according to the “Freshwater Plankton Research Methods” [19], and the unit was mg/m2.

2.3. Physical and Chemical Parameters Collection and Determination

According to the standard methods [20], water chemistry samples were collected at 0.5 m below the water surface at each sample site with a column water collector, and each sample was collected three times in parallel, sealed, and transported back to the laboratory for measurement. A portable multi-parameter water analyzer (YSI Professional Plus, Yellow Springs, USA) was used to determine the water temperature (WT), pH, turbidity (Tur), electrical conductivity (Cond), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), and dissolved oxygen (DO). Discharge, velocity of flow (Vel) and depth were provided by the management office of the MRP.
Total phosphorus (TP) was analyzed by ammonium molybdate spectrophotometric method. Total nitrogen (TN) was measured by the alkaline potassium persulfate digestion-UV spectrophotometric method. Ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) was determined by Nessler’s Reagent Spectrophotometry. Nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) was determined by UV spectrophotometry. Chemical oxygen demand (CODMn) was determined by a permanganate index. The determination methods were based on the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater in China [21].

2.4. Data Collation and Analysis

2.4.1. Dominance Index

The McNaughton dominance index was used to determine the composition of dominant species, y > 0.02 then the dominant species (y) equation was as follows (Equation (1)).
y = (ni/N)fi
where fi is the frequency of occurrence of the specie i at each point, ni is the total number of individuals of species i, N is the total number of species.

2.4.2. Statistical Analysis

The relevant data were collated using Excel 2019 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). The spatial distribution of sample sites was plotted using ArcGIS 10.7 (ESRI Redlands, Redlands, CA, USA). Hydrological variability was plotted using Origin 9.0 software (Origin Lab, Northampton, MA, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of environmental factors among the different sampling sites with a significance level of p < 0.05 was used in SPSS 25 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA).
The principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to analyze the spatial and temporal variation in environmental factors among sites. The main environmental factors were standardized prior to all analyses. Correlation heatmap analysis was used to describe the relationship between environmental factors and dominant species. To choose a suitable model to fit the periphyton-environment relationship in the MRP canal, detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) of dominant species abundance data was used to determine whether linear or unimodal ordination methods should be applied. The dominant species of the algae were divided into two groups, one including diatoms and other including Chlorophyta, Cyanobacteria and Euglenophyta. The DCA results showed that the longest lengths were less than 3, and the linear redundancy analysis (RDA) could better explain the species-environment relationship. The above analyses were carried out in R (version 3.6.2) software (The R Programming Language, The University of Auckland, New Zealand) using vegan package [22], pheatmap package [23], and ggplot2 package [24].
Generalized additive models (GAMs) have been used to reveal the nonlinear relationship between response variables and explanatory variables in a highly flexible non-parametric smoothing method [25]. The GAM was used to analyze the effects of environmental variables on the biomass of algae in the Henan section of the MRP. The GAM equation was constructed using 10 environmental factors (WT, Tur, Cond, ORP, DO, TP, TN, NH4+-N, NO3−-N, and CODMn) as the explanatory variables, and biomass as the response variable (Equation (2)).
Biomass = s(factor) + ε
where Biomass indicates periphytic algae biomass, s denotes regression spline fit smoothing function, ε is a random error term. All GAMs were executed using the mgcv package in R program [26].

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Hydrological and Environmental Factors in the MRP

3.1.1. Dynamic Changes of Hydrological Factors

The hydrological changes in DH, FC, and YZ from June 2019 to November 2020 are shown in Figure 2. The average depth in DH, FC and YZ were 7.75 m, 7.89 m, and 6.71 m, respectively (Figure 2a). The water depth fluctuated significantly during the survey period, with the minimum water depth in June 2019 and the maximum water depth in June 2020, which was consistent among the sampling sites (Figure 2a). The discharge of the MRP was at a minimum of 145.66 m3/s in June 2019 and reached a maximum of 390.48 m3/s in June 2020. The MRP was at a high discharge (350 m3/s) for the first time in August 2019, and at a higher discharge (420 m3/s) for the second time from May to June 2020. The variation in Vel was from 0.55~1.11 m/s, with an annual average value of 0.83 m/s, a trend which was the same as that of discharge. (Figure 2b).

3.1.2. Principal Component Analysis of Environmental Factors

The results of PCA analysis showed that the PC1 axis explained 27.5% and the PC2 axis explained 25.4% of the variation (Figure 3). The analysis revealed the temporal variability of the environmental factors was greater than the spatial variability, indicating that the seasonal variability of the environmental factors in the samples was more evident. The environmental factors in June 2019 and June 2020 were relatively similar, the environmental factors in September 2019 and September 2020 were different, whereas the environmental factors in November 2019 and November 2020 were different.

3.1.3. Physical and Chemical Properties of the Canal

From June 2019 to November 2020, the measured physicochemical factors of the MRP showed that the concentrations of physicochemical parameters displayed certain monthly variations (Table 1). The WT ranged from 14.5 to 28.1 °C, and peaked in September. The DO in June and November was significantly higher than that in September (p < 0.05). The CODMn concentration ranged from 1.3 to 3.1 mg/L, and its maximum value occurred in September. The TN concentrations ranged from 0.94 to 1.69 mg/L, with a mean value of 1.13 mg/L, the lowest in June and the highest in September (p < 0.05). NO3−-N concentrations in November were significantly higher than those in the other months (p < 0.05). TP concentrations ranged from 0.01 to 0.03 mg/L, with June significantly higher than in September and November. ORP was significantly different among months (p < 0.05). Other parameters were not significantly different in the three months. During the research period, there were no obvious differences in the spatial distribution of the physical and chemical indices.

3.2. Community Characteristics of Algal Species along the Canal

3.2.1. Species Composition of Periphytic Algae along the Canal

From June 2019 to November 2020, 114 taxa of periphytic algae were identified in the Henan section of the MRP. These belonged to seven phyla, 69 genera and 72 species (including varieties) (Figure 4). Bacillariophyta (diatoms) were the most abundant phylum in terms of cell density, with 60 species (varieties) accounting for 52.63% of the total number of species. The next most common species was Chlorophyta (green algae), with 31 taxa (21.06%). Cyanobacteria, with 15 species (13.16%). Most Cyanobacteria detected were filamentous. Euglenozoa, Miozoa and Ochrophyta accounted for 6.14%, 4.39% and 0.87%, respectively.
On a spatial scale, the number of periphytic species was higher at DH (81 species), followed by FC (64 species), and YZ (61 species). All the sampling sites were dominated by diatoms, including Cymbella sp., Synedra sp., Navicula sp. and Diatoma sp. The Charophyta were mainly Cosmarium sp. and Spirogyra sp. On a temporal scale, the fewest species were present in June 2020 (35 species), and the species number was comparable at other times (Figure 5b). The species in the MRP presented in the following descending order: Bacillariophyta, Chlorophyta, Cyanobacteria. During the study period, 58 species of six phyla were found in June, with half of the diatom species and a quarter of the Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria each. In September, the proportion of diatoms remained the same, while the number of Chlorophyta increased to one-third and the number of Cyanobacteria decreased. In November, the number of diatom species increased to two-thirds, the proportion of Chlorophyta was the same as in June, and the proportion of Cyanobacteria decreased. The results showed that the community structure of the MRP canal has spatial and temporal heterogeneity.

3.2.2. Changes in Abundance of Algae in Canals

From June 2019 to November 2020, the abundance of periphytic algae in the Henan section of the MRP varied from 0.07 × 105 to 8.99 × 105 ind./cm2 with a mean value of 3.24 × 105 ind./cm2. The highest periphyton abundance (7.93 × 105 ind./cm2) was observed in YZ, while the lowest abundance (0.84 × 105 ind./cm2) was observed in DH. The average abundance of algae in FC was the highest at 4.12 × 105 ind./cm2, followed by YZ (3.56 × 105 ind./cm2), and DH (2.35 × 105 ind./cm2) (Figure 6). There were interannual differences and temporal variations in algae abundance. In June 2019, the abundance of all stations was higher than that of the same period in 2020, whereas in September 2019, the abundance of all stations was lower than that of the same period in 2020. Maximum average abundance of periphyton 4.5 × 105ind./cm2 was observed in September. November ranked second after September, with an average abundance of 4.5 × 105ind./cm2. The mean abundance of algae was the lowest in June (0.97 × 105 ind./cm2). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the abundance of algae was significantly different at different time scales (p < 0.05), but not in spatial distribution (p < 0.05).

3.2.3. Dominant Species

The periphyton community of the Henan section of the MRP was identified 27 dominant species (Table 2), with Cymbella aspera (dominance 0.709) being the first dominant species. The periphyton communities of all sample sites were dominated mainly composed of diatoms, including Cymbella sp., Synedra sp., Navicula sp., and Diatoma sp. The dominant Chlorophyta were mainly Cosmarium sp. and Spirogyra sp. In June, diatoms, Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta were the dominant groups. Among them Anabaena sp. and Dolichospermum circinal of the Cyanobacteria and Diatoma sp. of the Diatoms were the unique dominant species in June. The dominant groups in FC were similar in YZ, and Euglena sp., Oscillatoria sp., Aulacoseira granulata were dominant only in DH. Diatoms, Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta were the dominant groups in September and November. Among them, Chroococcus sp., Microcystis sp., Encyonema sp., Diploneis sp. and Achnanthes sp. were the dominant species in September. Encyonema sp. and Achnanthes sp. were dominant in DH, FC and YZ, Chroococcus sp. was dominant in FC and YZ, Microcystis sp. was dominant only in FC, and Diploneis sp. was dominant only in DH. Pseudanabaena sp. was the dominant species in YZ only in November.

3.3. Relationship between Community Structure and Environmental Factors of Algal Species

3.3.1. Relationship between Community Structure and Environmental Factors

RDA was performed to reveal the relationship between environmental changes and periphyton community structure in a water body. The RDA ordination diagram including 11 environmental factors and the dominant species of diatoms is presented in Figure 7a. RDA axes 1 and axes 2 explained 45.21% and 27.64% of the total variation in the periphyton -environment relationships, respectively. Monte Carlo permutation tests showed that WT (F = 5.00, p < 0.001), TP (F = 5.09, p < 0.01), ORP (F = 3.93, p < 0.01) and NH4+-N (F = 2.94, p < 0.05) were the main environmental factors jointly driving the succession of the first group of algal communities. Cyanobacteria (Chroococcus sp., Microcystis sp.) and Chlorophyta (Scenedesmus sp.) were positively correlated with the WT and Tur. Anabaena sp., Merismopedia punctata and Euglena sp. were positively associated with TP and ORP, and negatively associated with CODMn and discharge. Oscillatoria sp. and Pseudanabaena sp. were positively correlated with NH4+-N concentration and pH (Figure 7a).
The RDA ordination diagram including 11 environmental factors and dominant species of nondiatoms, is presented in Figure 7b. The first two explained 93.1% of the total variability in the periphyton-environment relationships (RDA1 = 78.14% and RDA2 =14.96%). Monte Carlo permutation tests showed that CODMn (F = 20.18, p < 0.001), pH (F = 17.61, p < 0.001), DO (F = 9.19, p < 0.001), WT (F = 7.56, p < 0.01) and TP (F = 4.03, p < 0.01) were the most significant environmental factors influencing the changes in the dominant diatom community. Cymbella aspera was positive correlated with NH4+-N. Cymbella sp. showed a positively association with CODMn, WT, and TN. Aulacoseira granulate and Diatoma sp. were positively correlated with discharge and NH4+-N. Navicula sp. was positively correlated with WT and NO3−-N, and negatively correlated with DO (Figure 7b).
To further understand the influence of environmental factors on the composition of the dominant algae community, correlation analysis was performed between the abundance of dominant species and environmental factors. As shown in Figure 8a, Chroococcus sp. and Scenedesmus sp. were positively correlated with WT (p < 0.05), while Anabaena sp. was negatively correlated with WT (p < 0.05). Anabaena sp., Dolichospermum circinalis and Merismopedia tranquilla showed a positive association with TP (p < 0.05), Oscillatoria sp. showed negative correlations with TP (p < 0.01), conductivity and with NO3−-N (p < 0.01), as well as positive correlation with NH4+-N (p < 0.05). Anabaena sp. showed a significant negative correlation with discharge and Vel (p < 0.05).
Most of the diatom taxa were significantly correlated with many environmental factors Figure 8b, Synedra sp., Aulacoseira granulate and Diatoma sp. showed significant positive correlations with NH4+-N (p < 0.05). Eunotia sp. was negatively correlated with discharge and Vel (p < 0.05). There was a negative correlation between Synedra sp. Discharge (p < 0.05). The abundance of other dominant diatom taxa was not significantly correlated with discharge and Vel. Cymbella sp. was positively correlated with WT (p < 0.01). Aulacoseira granulate and Synedra sp. were negatively correlated with WT (p < 0.05). Achnanthes sp., Fragilaria sp. Diatoma vulgareis were positively correlated with the TN (p < 0.01). Ulnaria ulna., Achnanthes sp., Fragilaria sp., Cymbella sp., Gomphonema gracile, Navicula sp., Diatoma sp. and Encyonema sp. showed significantly positive associations with CODMn. Synedra sp., Achnanthes sp., Fragilaria sp., Cymbella sp., Navicula sp. and Encyonema sp. were negatively correlated with DO levels. The results of the correlation analysis were consistent with the RDA results (Figure 7), proving the high reliability of the correlation analysis.

3.3.2. Effect of Different Water Environment Factors on the Biomass of the Periphytic Algae

The results of the multi-factor GAM analysis of the MRP with environmental factors are shown in Table 3, with a coefficient of determination of 0.83 and an explanation of variance of 90.9%. The degrees of freedom of Cond, TP, ORP and CODMn were greater than 1, indicating that they were non-linearly related to the biomass of algae, whereas the degrees of freedom of WT, DO, Tur, TN, pH, NH4+-N and NO3−-N were all 1, indicating that they were linearly related to the biomass of algae. By comparing the F-values of the 10 environmental factors, they were ranked as follows: Cond > TP > NH4+-N > ORP > DO > CODMn. The F-values of Cond, TP, NH4+-N and ORP contributed more to the model, with F-values of 18.22, 16.14, 14.91 and 14.15, respectively, which were significantly correlated with the biomass of algae (p < 0.001). DO and CODMn had different effects on biomass, with F-values of 11.06 and 4.29. DO was significantly correlated with biomass (p < 0.001) and CODMn was significantly correlated with biomass (p < 0.01).
The relationships for all explanatory variables and the response variable (biomass) are shown in Figure 9. The relationship between Tur, TN, pH and NO3−-N and the biomass was linear, with no significant changes in the biomass values as the values of the explanatory variables changed. Relative biomass increased in WT, TP, and CODMn. The change in TP was obvious, when the TP concentration was less than 0.01 mg/L, the biomass increased slowly. However, the biomass rapidly increased when the TP concentration exceeded 0.015 mg/L. With an increase in WT, biomass increased more slowly. With an increase in CODMn concentration, the biomass first decreased and then increased, and the biomass appeared to monotonically increase when the CODMn concentration was more than 2.5 mg/L. Cond and ORP showed a trend of increasing and then decreasing, with a small increase in Cond from 220 to 230 μS/cm, a steep decrease from 230 to 260 μS/cm, and a slow increase when Cond exceeded 260 μS/cm. With an increase in ORP, the biomass effect value first increased and then decreased. These effects of DO and NH4+-N on biomass decreased with increasing values.

4. Discussion

4.1. Structure and Process of Algal Community

It has been shown that in natural, unpolluted rivers, the species composition of periphytic algae is mainly diatoms, with small amounts of Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria [27]. During the study period, diatoms dominated the algae composition at each site of the MRP, with more than 50% of the algae, followed by Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria (Figure 4). This was the same as the predominance of diatom species in the diatom community of rivers such as the Xiangxi River [28], a tributary of the Three Gorges Reservoir, and the Niyang River in Tibet [29]. The algal composition of the sampling sites in the Henan section of the MRP canal was similar to that of a naturally clean river, indicating that the water quality of the canal was relatively good. The periphyton community of the canal was similar to that of the Danjiangkou Reservoir [30], indicating that the delivery of water from the Danjiangkou Reservoir was also an important factor affecting the structure of the algal community. The regular pattern of periphyton community establishment was as follows: (i) particles or dissolved organic substances are electrostatically adsorbed on the substrate, (ii) bacteria grow, providing conditions for other organisms to attach and grow, (iii) pinnate diatoms are adsorbed on the parent substrate, (iv) upright, short-stemmed, or long-stemmed algae are rosetted or mucilaginous on the substrate, and (v) upright filamentous algae are attached [31,32]. Both Cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae were present in the Henan section of the MRP, and some filamentous algae were common (Table 2). After 4 years of water transfer, the biological community of the MRP was relatively mature.
The general rule of evolution of the algal community is that diatoms living at low temperatures are dominant in spring and autumn, whereas diatoms, Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria are dominant in summer. The species and quantity of algae are relatively low in winter [10]. Likewise, the seasonal variation in the algal community in the MRP canal was as follows: June was the beginning of summer, with diatoms, Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria accounting for a quarter of the total, respectively. In September, at the end of summer and the beginning of autumn, the proportion of Bacillariophyta remained the same, whereas the number of Chlorophyta species increased and the number of Cyanobacteria decreased. In November, the number of diatom species increased in late autumn and early winter, the number of Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria decreased (Figure 5). Other studies reported seasonal variation in the phytoplankton community in the canal, in agreement with our results [10]. Spatially, there was no significant difference between the communities of the sampling sites, which is consistent with the results of the PCA ranking analysis of the main environmental factors (Figure 3). Similar physical and chemical parameters would lead to a similar algal community [33,34]. In this study, we found that the communities at the sampling sites were similar. Although there were distances between them, the main environmental factors were not significantly different. This was probably due to the continuous and rapid flow of the water in the canal, and the algae migration and nutrients with the water during the process of the water transfer.

4.2. Influence of Environmental Factors on the Community of the Periphytic Algae

Algal growth is affected by hydrodynamic processes, nutrients, light and feeding, which determine the growth state, community structure and spatial distribution of algae [35]. The results of the RDA (Figure 7) and correlation analysis (Figure 8) showed that the main environmental factors that influenced the change in algal communities were WT, TP, CODMn, NH4+-N, ORP, pH and DO. The influence of changes the algal community was similar to that of other aquatic bodies, indicating that the aquatic ecosystem in the MRP canal had some properties of natural water bodies.
The composition of periphytic algae is closely related to the water temperature. Temperature change directly affects the growth of algae by controlling the enzymatic reaction of algal photosynthesis or respiration, and indirectly affects the growth of algae by controlling the dissociation, dissolution, and decomposition of various substances [36]. Here, the WT in the canal ranged from 14.5 to 28.1 °C, the average WT in September was 27.35 °C, while in November was 19.38 °C, and the WT at each point in September was significantly higher than in the other two periods (Table 1). Chlorophyta had the highest species richness in September, whereas diatoms had the highest species richness in November (Figure 5). In general, Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta are suitable for growth at higher water temperature, while diatoms were suitable for living at low water temperatures [37]. Correlation analysis showed that Chroococcus sp. and Microcystis sp. of Cyanobacteria and Scenedesmus sp. of Chlorophyta had a significant positive correlation with WT (p < 0.05). Fragilaria sp., Navicula sp., Aulacoseira granulate and Synedra sp. of the Bacillariophyta were negatively correlated with WT (p < 0.05) (Figure 8). The results of the GAM fit showed a positive correlation between the total biomass and water temperature (Figure 9). Therefore, water temperature influenced and determined the evolution of algal biomass and dominant taxa in the canal.
Nutrients are the material basis for algal survival and important environmental factors that affect algal changes. Among these, N and P are important factors that affect the cell density and community structure of algae [38]. The GAM results showed that the NH4+-N and TP concentrations were significantly correlated with biomass. Meanwhile, as the optimum phosphorus concentration for diatom growth was low (0.002~0.01 mg/L), the relative abundance of Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta decreased, and diatoms gradually became dominant as the phosphorus concentration in the water column decreased [39]. A study of the South Finland River showed that TP was a key factor affecting diatom growth [40]. The concentration of TN in the canal was 0.9~1.69 mg/L and the concentration of TP was 0.01~0.03 mg/L. The nitrogen concentration was high, the phosphorus concentration was low, and the N/P ratio was much higher than 16, which showed that phosphorus limitation and nutrient condition were more suitable for the growth of diatoms [41]. The RDA results showed that CODMn, which is an indicator of organic matter content in water, was also a nutrient factor affecting the diatom community in the MRP canal. This organic matter was probably mineralized by microorganisms, providing nutrients to periphytic algae. The study by Deng Peiyan et al. is consistent with a similar study in the Dongjiang River basin [42].
Discharge and velocity affect the composition of algal communities and the evolution of dominant taxa [43]. In general, Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta are more suitable for growth in static or weakly turbulent waters, whereas diatoms can gain a greater proliferation advantage in flowing or turbulent environments [44]. The MRP is not a natural river, and the hydrodynamic conditions are influenced by the overlap of runoff processes and the regulation of the entire artificial canal. The canal has a continuous discharge throughout the year with velocities ranging from 0.5 to 1.11 m/s, with an average velocity of 0.88 m/s. It has a higher discharge than other water bodies; therefore, diatoms were the dominant taxa. Water disturbance significantly altered the algal community, resulting in a rapid decrease in biomass according to the study on the Danube floodplain [45]. The lowest number of algal species was found in June 2019, which had the lowest velocity in the canal. The abundance of Anabaena sp. was negatively correlated with velocity and discharge (p < 0.05), suggesting that the increase in velocity had an inhibitory effect on the growth of Cyanobacteria. Furthermore, the other study showed that the stability of filamentous Cyanobacteria colonization was susceptible to water flow conditions [46,47]. The correlation between diatom abundance and flow velocity was not significant. Compared with other periphytic algae, diatoms showed a higher tolerance to changes in the hydrological regime, and adapted more easily to different environmental conditions [48], especially those algae with large specific surface areas and strong adaptability to low light, such as Cymbella sp. [49]. Diatoms have good environmental adaptability and can easily become the dominant taxa in high-velocity water bodies. Therefore, it has become the dominant species on the studied section of the canal throughout the year. Compared with June 2019, the species richness and abundance of algae were significantly reduced during the high discharge of water transfer in June 2020, suggesting that hydrological changes affected the properties of the resident algal community. Hydraulic structures along the MRP have many basic conditions for algae control, which can effectively prevent and control algal blooms by optimizing operation and management to regulate hydrodynamic conditions and destroy the conditions for sudden algal blooms. It has been confirmed that changes in hydrodynamic conditions, such as discharge and velocity of flow could affect the spatial and temporal distribution of nutrients in the water body and change the dynamic response between algal growth and nutrients [50].

5. Conclusions

The main canal of the MRP is an engineered system in which the aquatic ecosystem is still in its early stages of formation. Despite the presence of algae in the canals, there is a lack of monitoring and research. Therefore, it is very important and urgent to investigate areas where algae grow vigorously and analyze the key factors affecting the growth of MRP algae. In this study, through monitoring and analysis of algae and hydrology, the changing pattern of algal community and the main factors affecting the changes in algal community were analyzed.
From June 2019 to November 2020, 114 taxonomic units of 114 species of periphytic algae belonging to seven phyla were identified in the Henan section of the MRP. Diatoms were the main species, followed by Chlorophyta and Cyanobacteria. The temporal effects of the changes in the structure of the host algal community were more significant than their spatial effects.
The RDA analysis showed that CODMn, pH, DO, WT and TP were the most significant environmental factors influencing changes in the diatom community. WT, TP, ORP and NH4+-N were the main environmental factors that jointly drove the succession of Cyanobacteria and Chlorophyta communities. The GAM fitted the response mechanism of environmental factors on the biomass of the attached algae and showed that Cond, TP, NH4+-N and ORP were the main factors influencing the biomass of the periphytic algae in the Henan section of the MRP of the SNWD.
The turbulent water flow in the canal is not conducive to the proliferation of algae forming water blooms such as cyanobacteria and green algae, but it has a positive effect on the diversity and abundance of periphytic diatoms. This is advantageous in terms of the intended use of the water transported through the canal, which is largely used for human consumption.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.C. and Y.L.; methodology, X.C., Y.Z., Y.Y. and Y.J.; software, X.C.; validation, X.C., Y.Z. and Y.Y.; formal analysis, X.C.; investigation, Y.L.; resources, X.W.; data curation, X.C. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation X.C. and Y.L.; writing—review and editing N.W. and N.F.; visualization, X.C. and H.L.; supervision, X.L. and H.L.; project administration, X.L., X.W. and Y.L.; funding acquisition, Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Partial-financial support was received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51879130, 42077449), the higher discipline innovation and talent introduction base of Henan Province (No. CXJD2019001), and Special Project on Water Quality Guarantee and Environmental Impact of the Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer Project (JZ0205A222018).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Drainage Head Branch of the South–North Diversion Central Line Construction Authority for its support and assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, J.K. Advanced Aquatic Biology; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lan, B. Ecological Study of the Periphyton of Lake Erhai. Master’s Thesis, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lishani, W.; Wu, N.C.; Nicola, F.; Tenna, R. Epiphytic biofilms in freshwater and interactions with macrophytes: Current understanding and future directions. Aquat. Bot. 2022, 176, 103467. [Google Scholar]
  4. Liang, X. Effect of Periphyton on Water Environment and Its Application in Water Quality Treatment. Ph.D. Thesis, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cattaneo, A. Periphyton in Lakes of Different Trophy. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1987, 44, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yi, R.; Cai, D.S.; Zhang, Y.X. Benthic diatom assemblages distribution in Longjiang River, in relation to environmental factors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 38, 8. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee, Y.O.; Park, J.H.; Park, J.K. Microbial Characterization of Excessive Growing Biofilm in Sewer Lines Using Molecular Technique. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 15, 938–945. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu, D. Study on the Movement Characteristics of Algae Debris Particles. Master’s Thesis, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Z.J.; Chen, H.Y.; Li, Y.Y. Community structure and influencing factors of bacterioplankton in the Main Cancel of the Midline Project of South-to-North Water Division in sections of Henan Province. China Environ. Sci. 2017, 37, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, C.M.; Zhu, Y.X.; Song, G.F.; Mi, W.J.; Bi, Y.H. Spatiotemporal pattern of phytoplankton community structure and its determining factors in the channel of the middle route of South-to-North Water Diversion Project. J. Lake Sci. 2021, 33, 675–686. [Google Scholar]
  11. Yi, X.; Lin, J.Q.; Jin, Q.; Lei, X.; Yuan, R. A study on the phytoplankton community structure in the Diaohe River section of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in winter. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2020, 21, 959–970. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nong, X.Z.; Shao, D.G.; Shang, Y.M.; Liang, J.K. Analysis of spatio-temporal variation in phytoplankton and its relationship with water quality parameters in the South-to-North Water Diversion Project of China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2021, 193, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, J.; Lei, X.H.; Quan, J.; Yue, X. Algae Growth Distribution and Key Prevention and Control Positions for the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. Water 2019, 11, 1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Peck, D.V.; Herlihy, A.T.; Hill, B.H.; Hughes, R.M.; Kaufmann, P.R. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program: Surface Waters. Western Pilot Study: Field Operations Manual for Wadeable Streams. 2006. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235943200_Environmental_Monitoring_and_Assessment_Program-Surface_Waters_Western_Pilot_Study_Field_Operations_Manual_for_Wadeable_Streams (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  15. Hu, H.J.; Wei, Y.X. The Freshwater Algae of China: Systematics, Taxonomy and Ecology; Beijing Science Press: Beijing, China, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. Resources, T.M.O.W. Map of Common Algae in Chinese Inland Waters; Changjiang Press: Wuhan, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Shi, Z.X. Flora Algarum Sinicarum Aquae Dulcis; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sun, J.; Liu, D.; Qian, S. Study on phytoplankton biomass I. Phytoplankon measurement biomass from cell volime or plasma volume. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 1999, 21, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang, Z.S.; Huang, X.F. Research Methods of Freshwater Plankton; Beijing Press: Beijing, China, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  20. China, M.E.A.E. Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water. 2002. Available online: https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/standards/water_environment/quality_standard/200710/t20071024_111792.shtml (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  21. Administration, S.E.P. Methods for Monitoring and Analysis of Water and Wastewater, 4th ed.; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  22. Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F.G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; Minchin, P.R.; O’Hara, R.B.; Simpson, G.L.; Solymos, P.; Stevens, M.H.H.; Wagner, H. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. 2020. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  23. Kolde, R. Pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps. 2019. Available online: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pheatmap (accessed on 14 January 2022).
  24. Wickham, H. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hastie, T.J.; Tibshirani, R.J. Generalized Additive Models; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; ISBN 9780412343902. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wood, S.N. Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 2011, 73, 3–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Feng, T.Y.; Song, C.; Chen, J.Z. Environmental Indication Function of Aquatic Algae. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2011, 27, 257–265. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ja, X.H.; Wu, N.C.; Tang, T.; Cai, Q.H. Spatiotemporal variation of epilithic algae in Xiangxi River system. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 19, 881–886. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu, H.P.; Ye, S.W.; Yang, X.F. Spatio-temporal dynamics of aquatic organism community and their relationships to environment in Niyang River, Tibet:2. periphytic algae. J. Lake Sci. 2013, 6, 907–915. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zheng, B.H.; Zhu, J.Y.; Xu, X.; Xin, Y. Community structure of periphyton algae and water quality in the Danjiangkou Reservoir. J. Henan Norm. Univ. 2018, 46, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hao, B.B.; Wu, H.P.; Cao, Y.; Xing, W.; Jeppesen, E. Comparison of periphyton communities on natural and artificial macrophytes with contrasting morphological structures. Freshw. Biol. 2017, 62, 1783–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Casartelli, M.R.; Ferragut, C. The effects of habitat complexity on periphyton biomass accumulation and taxonomic structure during colonization. Hydrobiologia 2018, 807, 233–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodríguez-Alcalá, O.; Blanco, S.; García-Girón, J.; Jeppesen, E. Large-scale geographical and environmental drivers of shallow lake diatom metacommunities across Europe. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 707, 135887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roder, H.L.; Olsen, N.M.C.; Whiteley, M.; Burmolle, M. Unravelling interspecies interactions across heterogeneities in complex biofilm communities. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 22, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Dunck, B.; Schneck, F.; Rodrigues, L. Patterns in species and functional dissimilarity: Insights from periphytic algae in subtropical floodplain lakes. Hydrobiologia 2016, 763, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Engle, V.D.; Summers, J.K.; Macauley, J.M. Dissolved Oxygen Conditions in Northern Gulf of Mexico Estuaries. Environ. Monit. Assess. 1999, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Trombetta, T.; Vidussi, F.; Mas, S.; Parin, D.; Mostajir, B. Water temperature drives phytoplankton blooms in coastal waters. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e214933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Zhu, Y.Q.; Jun, L.; Li, Q.; Zhang, X.L. Seasonal variation of phytoplankton community and its relationship with environment in subtropical reservoirs: A comparison between two methods of functional groups classification. J. Appl. Ecol. 2019, 30, 2079–2086. [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang, W.; Deng, D.G.; Meng, X.L.; Zhang, S. Temporal and Spatial Variations of Phytoplankton Community Structure in Lake Erhai, a Chinese Plateau Lake, with Reference to Environmental Factors. Russ. J. Ecol. 2019, 50, 352–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Soininen, J.; Könönen, K. Comparative study of monitoring South-Finnish rivers and streams using macroinvertebrate and benthic diatom community structure. Aquat. Ecol. 2004, 38, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Güsewell, S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: Variation and functional significance. New Phytol. 2010, 164, 243–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Deng, P.Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.T. The effects of water quality on epilithic diatoms communities of Dongjiang river basin. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 35, 1852–1861. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, M.; Wu, H.; Ma, J. Causes, and characteristics of the euterophication in large reservoirs in the Yangtze basin. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2004, 13, 477–481. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, P.F.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H.P. imulation experiment on the effect of flow velocity on phytoplankton growth and composition. J. Lake Sci. 2015, 27, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  45. Pfeiffer, T.Z.; Mihaljević, M.; Maronić, D.; Stević, F. The disturbance driven changes of periphytic algal communities in a Danubian floodplain lake. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ec. 2015, 416, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Flynn, K.F.; Asce, M.; Chapra, S.C.; Asce, F. Evaluating Hydraulic Habitat Suitability of Filamentous Algae Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler. J. Environ. Eng. 2020, 146, 4019126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wellnitz, T.; Poff, N.L. Current-mediated periphytic structure modifies grazer interactions and algal removal. Aquat. Ecol. 2012, 46, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bichoff, A.; Osório, N.C.; Dunck, B.; Rodrigues, L. Periphytic algae in a floodplain lake and river under low water conditions. Biota Neotrop. 2016, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Li, Y. Spatial and Temporal Succession Characteristics of Phytoplankton Functional Groups and their Relationship with Environmental Factors in Dianshan Lake. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang, Z.H.; Yang, S.C.; Li, D.; Bai, F.P. Numerical simulation of eutrophication and its test of ecological operation schedule in Xiaojiang River, the tributary of Three Gorges Reservoir. J. Lake Sci. 2016, 28, 755–764. [Google Scholar]
Ijerph 19 04089 g001 550
Figure 1. Distribution of sampling sites along the canal of the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD, China.
Figure 1. Distribution of sampling sites along the canal of the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD, China.
Ijerph 19 04089 g001
Ijerph 19 04089 g002 550
Figure 2. Hydrological changes in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD: (a) Depth; (b) Flow velocity and discharge.
Figure 2. Hydrological changes in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD: (a) Depth; (b) Flow velocity and discharge.
Ijerph 19 04089 g002
Ijerph 19 04089 g003 550
Figure 3. PCA of water environmental factors in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD. (1 represents the left bank of the canal and 2 represents the right bank of the canal, 3 represents the bend section of the canal).
Figure 3. PCA of water environmental factors in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD. (1 represents the left bank of the canal and 2 represents the right bank of the canal, 3 represents the bend section of the canal).
Ijerph 19 04089 g003
Ijerph 19 04089 g004 550
Figure 4. Evolutionary tree of species of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Figure 4. Evolutionary tree of species of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Ijerph 19 04089 g004
Ijerph 19 04089 g005 550
Figure 5. Spatial and temporal variation in species richness of periphytic algae by phyla in the sampling sites of MRP of SNWD: (a) Temporal variation in percentage composition of species richness during the sampling periods; (b) Temporal variation in total species richness during the sampling periods.
Figure 5. Spatial and temporal variation in species richness of periphytic algae by phyla in the sampling sites of MRP of SNWD: (a) Temporal variation in percentage composition of species richness during the sampling periods; (b) Temporal variation in total species richness during the sampling periods.
Ijerph 19 04089 g005
Ijerph 19 04089 g006 550
Figure 6. Temporal variation in abundance of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Figure 6. Temporal variation in abundance of algae in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD.
Ijerph 19 04089 g006
Ijerph 19 04089 g007 550
Figure 7. RDA ordination of algae community and environmental factors in Henan section of MRP of SNWD: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Figure 7. RDA ordination of algae community and environmental factors in Henan section of MRP of SNWD: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Ijerph 19 04089 g007
Ijerph 19 04089 g008 550
Figure 8. Heatmap of correlation between dominant species of periphytic algae and environmental variables: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Figure 8. Heatmap of correlation between dominant species of periphytic algae and environmental variables: (a) Cyanobacteria, Chlorophyta and Euglenophyta; (b) Bacillariophyta.
Ijerph 19 04089 g008
Ijerph 19 04089 g009a 550Ijerph 19 04089 g009b 550
Figure 9. Illustration of the GAM for the effect of environmental factors on the biomass of the periphytic algae. (a) WT; (b) DO; (c) Comd; (d) Tur; (e) TN; (f) TP; (g) pH; (h) ORP; (i) NH4+-N; (j) NO3−-N; (k) CODMn.
Figure 9. Illustration of the GAM for the effect of environmental factors on the biomass of the periphytic algae. (a) WT; (b) DO; (c) Comd; (d) Tur; (e) TN; (f) TP; (g) pH; (h) ORP; (i) NH4+-N; (j) NO3−-N; (k) CODMn.
Ijerph 19 04089 g009aIjerph 19 04089 g009b
Table
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters analyzed in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD in different sampling periods.
Table 1. Physicochemical parameters analyzed in the Henan section of the MRP of SNWD in different sampling periods.
ParametersJuneSeptemberNovember
WT (°C)20.32 ± 3.11a27.35 ± 0.4b19.38 ± 0.57a
pH8.68 ± 0.12a8.88 ± 0.29b8.84 ± 0.15ab
DO (mg/L)9.47 ± 1.01b6.43 ± 1.38a9.33 ± 1.83b
Cond (μS/cm)262.21 ± 9.3b258.08 ± 2.56b224.97 ± 3.33a
ORP (mV)203.65 ± 75.64c58.87 ± 33.92a143.62 ± 72.63b
Tur (NTU)7.64 ± 6.164.8 ± 3.624.94 ± 3.99
NO3−-N (mg/L)0.05 ± 0.02a0.07 ± 0.05a0.14 ± 0.1b
NH4+-N (mg/L)0.71 ± 0.130.69 ± 0.090.69 ± 0.24
TN (mg/L)1.14 ± 0.2a1.69 ± 0.63b1.51 ± 0.37ab
TP (mg/L)0.022 ± 0.008b0.012 ± 0.003a0.011 ± 0.004a
CODMn (mg/L)2.18 ± 0.26a3.16 ± 0.73b2.44 ± 0.33a
Note: Values were shown as arithmetic means ± standard deviations. Different lowercase letters represented significant differences by ANOVA at p < 0.05. Means with the same letter were not significantly different.
Table
Table 2. Dominant species and dominant degree of periphytic algae in Henan section of MRP of SNWD.
Table 2. Dominant species and dominant degree of periphytic algae in Henan section of MRP of SNWD.
PhylumDominant SpeciesAbbreviationJuneSeptemberNovember
CyanobacteriaAnabaena sp.Ana sp.0.333——
Dolichospermum circinalDcir0.088——
Chroococcus sp.Chr sp.—0.026—
Merismopedia punctataMpun0.049——
Microcystis sp.Mir sp.—0.034—
Oscillatoria sp.Osc sp.0.052—0.034
Pseudanabaena sp.Pse sp.——0.025
ChlorophytaScenedesmus sp.Sce sp.0.2370.0730.075
BacillariophytaAchnanthes sp.Ach sp.—0.032—
Cyclotella sp.Cyc sp.0.3360.0770.107
Cymbella sp.Cym sp.0.3730.1750.307
C. aspera Casp0.6770.9040.546
Diatoma sp.Dia sp.0.5—0.18
D. vulgareis Dvul0.1670.026—
Diploneis sp.Dip sp.—0.022—
Encyonema sp.Enc sp.—0.374—
Eunotia sp.Eun sp.0.022——
Fragilaria sp.Fra sp.0.180.0870.14
Gomphonema sp.Gom sp.0.026——
G. gracile Ggra—0.024—
Aulacoseira granulataAgra0.1660.0240.169
Navicula sp.Nav sp.0.3490.2740.287
Stauroneis sp.Sta sp.—0.025—
Surirella sp.Sur sp.—0.02—
Synedra sp.Syn sp.0.06—0.027
Ulnaria ulnaUuln—0.0590.1
EuglenophytaEuglena sp.Eug sp.0.073——
Note: —indicates dominance <0.02. Numbers indicates the dominance index.
Table
Table 3. Fitting results of GAM between algal biomass and environmental factors in the MRP of SNWD.
Table 3. Fitting results of GAM between algal biomass and environmental factors in the MRP of SNWD.
ParametersdfRef.dfFP
WT1.0001.0000.7780.388
DO1.0001.00011.0590.003 **
Cond2.8672.98218.2160.000 ***
Tur1.0001.0001.3360.261
TN1.0001.0000.1240.728
TP2.5412.82416.1430.000 ***
pH1.0001.0002.4350.134
ORP2.9742.99914.1520.000 ***
NH4+-N1.0001.00014.9120.001 ***
NO3−-N1.0001.0000.830.373
CODMn2.6292.8934.2870.025 *
Note: * indicated variable significant at 0.05 level, ** indicated variable significant at 0.01 level, and *** indicated variable significant at 0.001 level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Lei, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, N.; Fohrer, N. Succession and Driving Factors of Periphytic Community in the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Division (Henan, China). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074089

AMA Style

Chen X, Wang X, Li Y, Yao Y, Zhang Y, Jiang Y, Lei X, Liu H, Wu N, Fohrer N. Succession and Driving Factors of Periphytic Community in the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Division (Henan, China). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(7):4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Xiaonuo, Xiaojun Wang, Yuying Li, Yinlei Yao, Yun Zhang, Yeqing Jiang, Xiaohui Lei, Han Liu, Naicheng Wu, and Nicola Fohrer. 2022. "Succession and Driving Factors of Periphytic Community in the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Division (Henan, China)" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 7: 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074089

APA Style

Chen, X., Wang, X., Li, Y., Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Jiang, Y., Lei, X., Liu, H., Wu, N., & Fohrer, N. (2022). Succession and Driving Factors of Periphytic Community in the Middle Route Project of South-to-North Water Division (Henan, China). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19074089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop