Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model Results
4.2. Structural Equation Model Results
4.3. Mediation Effect Results
4.4. Multi-Group Results
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhang, H.; Sun, C.; Wang, Z.; Che, B. Seafood consumption patterns and affecting factors in urban China: A field survey from six cities. Aquac. Rep. 2021, 19, 100608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, M.; Msangi, S.; Batka, M.; Vannuccini, S.; Dey, M.M.; Anderson, J.L. Fish to 2030: The role and opportunity for aquaculture. Aquqcult. Econ. Manag. 2015, 19, 282–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pang, X.; Ren, L.; Wu, S.; Ma, W.; Yang, J.; Di, L.; Li, J.; Xiao, Y.; Kang, L.; Du, S.; et al. Cold-chain food contamination as the possible origin of COVID-19 resurgence in Beijing. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2020, 7, 1861–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dangelico, R.M.; Nonino, F.; Pompel, A. Which are the determinants of green purchase behaviour? A study of Italian consumers. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 2600–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javid, M.A.; Abdullah, M.; Ali, N.; Shah, S.A.H.; Joyklad, P.; Hussain, Q.; Chaiyasarn, K. Extracting Travelers’ Preferences toward Electric Vehicles Using the Theory of Planned Behavior in Lahore, Pakistan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, S.; Singhal, S.; Jain, N.K.; Bhaskar, K. Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behavior, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The Theory of Planned behaviour. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Madden, T.J. Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioural control. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 22, 453–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, B.; Li, Y. Consumers’ Intention to Bring a Reusable Bag for Shopping in China: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onel, N.; Mukherjee, A. Why do consumers recycle? A holistic perspective encompassing moral considerations, affective responses, and self-interest motives. Psychol. Mark. 2017, 34, 956–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leeuw, A.D.; Valois, P.; Ajzen, I.; Schmidt, P. Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015, 42, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Zhong, C. Factors driving consumption behavior for green aquatic products: Empirical research from Ningbo, China. Br. Food J. 2017, 119, 1442–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L.; Zhong, Y.; Shan, L.; Qin, W. Public risk perception of food additives and food scares. The case in Suzhou, China. Appetite 2013, 70, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teng, C.-C.; Lu, C.-H. Organic food consumption in Taiwan: Motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty. Appetite 2016, 105, 95–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shim, M.; You, M. Cognitive and affective risk perceptions toward food safety outbreaks: Mediating the relation between news use and food consumption intention. Asian J. Commun. 2015, 25, 48–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, G.-W.; Jang, Y.-S. The influence of consumer knowledge on seafood attitudes and purchase intentions-focus on consumers visiting to discount stores. Korean Soc. Fish. Bus. Adm. 2013, 44, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shukla, S. A study on millennial purchase intention of green products in India: Applying extended theory of planned behavior model. J. Asia-Pac. Bus. 2019, 20, 322–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Son, J.; Nam, C.; Diddi, S. Emotion or Information: What Makes Consumers Communicate about Sustainable Apparel Products on Social Media? Sustainability 2022, 14, 2849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinsuwan, A.; Suwonsichon, S.; Chompreeda, P.; Prinyawiwatkul, W. Sensory Drivers of Consumer Acceptance, Purchase Intent and Emotions toward Brewed Black Coffee. Foods 2022, 11, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.; Cude, B.J.; Zhao, H. Determinants of Chinese consumers’ purchase intentions for luxury goods. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2020, 62, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhidari, A.M.; Almeshal, S.A. Determinants of purchase intention in Saudi Arabia: A moderating role of gender. J. Econ. Manag. Trade 2017, 17, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berki-Kiss, D.; Menrad, K. The role emotions play in consumer intentions to make pro-social purchases in Germany–An augmented theory of planned behavior model. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 29, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ting, H.; Tan, S.R.; John, A.N. Consumption intention toward ethnic food: Determinants of Dayak food choice by Malaysians. J. Ethn. Food. 2017, 4, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, A.; Ali, S.; Azeem, M.A.; Akbar, M.; Danish, M. Understanding the antecedents of organic food consumption in Pakistan: The moderating role of food neophobia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Shi, K.; Vos, J.D.; Cheng, L.; Yang, Y.; Witlox, F. The influence of the built environment on online purchase of intangible services: Examining the mediating role of online purchase attitudes. Transp. Policy 2021, 114, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kühner, S.; Lau, M.; Addae, E.A. The mediating role of social capital in the relationship between Hong Kong children’s socioeconomic status and subjective well-being. Child Indic. Res. 2021, 14, 1881–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matos, C.A.D.; Krielow, A. The effects of environmental factors on B2B e-services purchase: Perceived risk and convenience as mediators. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 2019, 34, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Novita, N.; Rowena, J. Determinant factors of Indonesian people’s fish purchase intention. Br. Food J. 2021, 123, 2272–2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, S.A.; Islam, S.B.; Sheikh, A.H. Evaluating the influence of consumer demographics on online purchase intention: An E-Tail Perspective. Paradigm 2021, 25, 141–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, S.H.G.; Chau, K.Y. Cultural differences between Asians and non-Asians affect buying attitudes and purchasing behaviours towards green tourism products. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2021, 14, 241–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doan, H.Q. Critical factors affecting consumer buying behaviour of organic vegetables in Vietnam. J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus. 2021, 8, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Riv. Econ. Agrar. 2015, 70, 121–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I.; Kruglanski, A.W. Reasoned action in the service of goal pursuit. Psychol. Rev. 2019, 126, 774–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, J.C.; Gerbing, D.W. Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 1988, 103, 411–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 2008, 40, 879–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, Q.; Xu, Q.; Shen, X.; Chen, B.; Esfahani, S.S. The Mechanism of Household Waste Sorting Behaviour—A Study of Jiaxing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ramírez-Correa, P.; Rondán-Cataluña, F.J.; Moulaz, M.T.; Arenas-Gaitán, J. Purchase Intention of Specialty Coffee. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Latip, M.S.A.; Noh, I. Individual green consideration model: A Conceptual Study. Int. J. Manag. 2020, 11, 849–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, Y.H.; Jung, S.E.; Im, J.; Severt, K. Applying an extended theory of planned behavior to examine state-branded food product purchase behavior: The moderating effect of gender. J. Foodserv. Bus. Res. 2020, 23, 358–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brossard, D. New media landscapes and the science information consumer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 14096–14101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Martín-Consuegra, D.; Díaz, E.; Gómez, M.; Molina, A. Examining consumer luxury brand-related behavior intentions in a social media context: The moderating role of hedonic and utilitarian motivations. Phys. Behav. 2019, 200, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, M.-F.; Huang, C.-H. The impacts of the food traceability system and consumer involvement on consumers’ purchase intentions toward fast foods. Food Control 2013, 33, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Núñez-Fernández, M.; Pérez-Villarreal, H.H.; Mayett-Moreno, Y. Comparing Models with Positive Anticipated Emotions, Food Values, Attitudes and Subjective Norms as Influential Factosrs in Fast-Food Purchase Intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Two Channels: Restaurants and Mobile Apps. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, P.-C.; Wang, H.-M.; Huang, H.-L.; Ho, C.-W. Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward rooftop photovoltaic installation: The roles of personal trait, psychological benefit, and government incentives. Energy Environ. 2020, 31, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos-Morcillo, A.J.; Moreno-Martínez, F.J.; Hernández Susarte, A.M.; Hueso-Montoro, C.; Ruzafa-Martínez, M. Social Determinants of Health, the Family, and Children’s Personal Hygiene: A Comparative Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Won, K.J.; Young, N. The effects of food O2O quality on consumer trust, attitude, and purchase intention: Focused on the moderating effect of purchase frequency and age. Korean J. Hosp. Tour. 2018, 27, 55–73. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Index | Items 1 | Source |
---|---|---|---|
Attitude (ATT) | ATT1 | Acknowledge that the epidemic is a factor in the safety of CCAP | (Ajzen and Kruglanskis [33]) |
ATT2 | Acknowledge that the epidemic has caused people to lack confidence in the safety of domestic CCAP | ||
ATT3 | Acknowledge that the epidemic has caused people to lack confidence in the safety of foreign CCAP | ||
Subjective norms (SN) | SN1 | The opinions of my family will affect my purchase of CCAP | (Ajzen [32]) |
SN2 | The opinions of colleagues and friends will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
SN3 | Reports from the official media will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
SN4 | Traditional media reports will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
SN5 | New media reports will affect my purchase of CCAP | ||
Perceived behavior control (PBC) | PBC1 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering the aquatic product wholesale market | (Ajzen [32]) |
PBC2 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering a supermarket | ||
PBC3 | Be sure to take personal protection when entering the community | ||
PBC4 | Be sure to take personal protection when buying CCAP online and receiving goods | ||
PBC5 | Be sure to take personal protection when handling aquatic products | ||
Emotional response (EM) | EM1 | Shocked by the CCAP epidemic | (Jain et al. [6]) |
EM2 | In the future, we will focus on the health impact of the CCAP outbreak | ||
EM3 | Concerns about the spread of the outbreak in the cold chain fish market and the health implications | ||
Purchase intention (BI) | BI1 | The next month will reduce the consumption of CCAP | (Ajzen [32]) |
BI2 | The consumption of CCAP will be reduced in the next 3 months | ||
BI3 | The consumption of CCAP will be reduced in the next 6 months | ||
BI4 | If the consumption of CCAP is reduced, the consumption of aquatic products will be reduced | ||
BI5 | If the consumption of CCAP is reduced, the consumption of freshwater products will be reduced |
Variable | Index | Quantity | Proportion | Variable | Index | Quantity | Proportion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 369 | 47.13% | Regional distribution | North-east | 112 | 14.30% |
Female | 414 | 52.87% | North China | 134 | 17.11% | ||
Age | 18~25 | 202 | 25.80% | East China | 302 | 38.57% | |
26~40 | 338 | 43.17% | Northwest | 52 | 6.64% | ||
41~60 | 233 | 29.76% | Southwest | 41 | 5.24% | ||
Over 60 | 10 | 1.27% | Central South | 142 | 18.14% | ||
Marriage | Married | 510 | 65.13% | Average monthly income in the past year (yuan) | 1000 and below | 25 | 3.19% |
Unmarried | 273 | 34.87% | 1001~3000 | 68 | 8.69% | ||
Have children | Yes | 495 | 63.22% | 3001~6000 | 174 | 22.22% | |
No | 288 | 36.78% | 6001~9000 | 127 | 16.22% | ||
Urban–rural distribution | City | 641 | 81.86% | 9001~15,000 | 160 | 20.43% | |
Rural | 142 | 18.14% | Over 15,001 | 229 | 29.25% |
Latent Variable | Observed Variable | Factor Loading | Cronbach’s Alpha | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | ATT1 | 0.851 | 0.763 | 0.864 | 0.679 |
ATT2 | 0.858 | ||||
ATT3 | 0.760 | ||||
SN | SN1 | 0.824 | 0.919 | 0.939 | 0.755 |
SN2 | 0.842 | ||||
SN3 | 0.883 | ||||
SN4 | 0.914 | ||||
SN5 | 0.879 | ||||
PBC | PBC1 | 0.864 | 0.923 | 0.938 | 0.751 |
PBC2 | 0.847 | ||||
PBC3 | 0.879 | ||||
PBC4 | 0.830 | ||||
PBC5 | 0.909 | ||||
EM | EM1 | 0.820 | 0.625 | 0.787 | 0.608 |
EM2 | 0.586 | ||||
EM3 | 0.811 | ||||
BI | BI1 | 0.926 | 0.912 | 0.936 | 0.749 |
BI2 | 0.948 | ||||
BI3 | 0.935 | ||||
BI4 | 0.848 | ||||
BI5 | 0.631 |
ATT | BI | EM | PBC | SN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT | 0.679 | ||||
BI | 0.364 | 0.749 | |||
EM | 0.194 | 0.319 | 0.608 | ||
PBC | 0.065 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.751 | |
SN | 0.268 | 0.332 | 0.250 | 0.021 | 0.755 |
Path | Path Coefficient | T Statistics | p-Value | Hypothesis | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATT -> BI | 0.342 *** | 9.614 | 0.000 | H1 | Supported |
SN -> BI | 0.253 *** | 6.588 | 0.000 | H2 | Supported |
PBC -> BI | −0.014 | 0.489 | 0.632 | H3 | Refused |
EM -> ATT | 0.440 *** | 13.525 | 0.000 | H4 | Supported |
EM -> SN | 0.500 *** | 16.990 | 0.000 | H5 | Supported |
EM -> PBC | −0.026 | 0.385 | 0.700 | H6 | Refused |
EM -> BI | 0.287 *** | 8.306 | 0.000 | H7 | Supported |
Independent Variable | Mediating Variable | Dependent Variable | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | Overall Effect | VAF | Result | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H8a | EM | ATT | BI | 0.287 *** (8.337) | 0.151 *** (7.716) | 0.438 | 34.47% | Supported |
H8b | EM | SN | BI | 0.287 *** (8.337) | 0.127 *** (5.873) | 0.414 | 30.68% | Supported |
Gender (H9) | Marriage (H10) | Age (H11) | Residence (H12) | Frequency (H13) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | Yes | No | Youth | Middle | Urban | Rural | Low | High | |
n = 350 | n = 402 | n = 495 | n = 257 | n = 516 | n = 236 | n = 618 | n = 134 | n = 579 | n = 173 | |
H1 | 0.28 *** | 0.41 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.31 *** | 0.41 *** | 0.31 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.34 *** | 0.35 *** | 0.26 ** |
H2 | 0.29 *** | 0.21 *** | 0.27 *** | 0.18 ** | 0.29 *** | 0.23 *** | 0.25 *** | 0.27 ** | 0.22 *** | 0.33 *** |
H4 | 0.47 *** | 0.36 *** | 0.46 *** | 0.39 *** | 0.46 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.40 *** | 0.53 *** |
H5 | 0.52 *** | 0.44 *** | 0.50 *** | 0.53 *** | 0.49 *** | 0.52 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.45 *** | 0.51 *** | 0.48 *** |
H7 | 0.31 *** | 0.26 *** | 0.27 *** | 0.34 *** | 0.22 *** | 0.33 *** | 0.25 *** | 0.25 ** | 0.31 *** | 0.24 ** |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shen, X.; Cao, X.; Esfahani, S.S.; Saleem, T. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084903
Shen X, Cao X, Esfahani SS, Saleem T. Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(8):4903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084903
Chicago/Turabian StyleShen, Xin, Xun Cao, Sonia Sadeghian Esfahani, and Tayyaba Saleem. 2022. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 8: 4903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084903
APA StyleShen, X., Cao, X., Esfahani, S. S., & Saleem, T. (2022). Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase Intention on Cold Chain Aquatic Products under COVID-19: An Investigation in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4903. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084903