Next Article in Journal
Understanding and Balancing Generalist-Specialist Approaches in Dementia Research and Care Practice, Qualitative Research with 44 Dementia Professors in The Netherlands
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Heterogeneity and Regional Clustering of Factors Influencing Chinese Adolescents’ Physical Fitness
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 20
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph20053820
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases

by
João Marcello Furtado
1,2,*,†,
Arthur Gustavo Fernandes
3,4,†,
Juan Carlos Silva
5,
Sandra Del Pino
1 and
Carolina Hommes
1
1
Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC 20037, USA
2
Division of Ophthalmology, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto 14015-010, Brazil
3
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo 04023-062, Brazil
4
Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
5
Independent Researcher, Bogota 110111, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(5), 3820; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053820
Submission received: 11 January 2023 / Revised: 13 February 2023 / Accepted: 18 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Making Indigenous Eye Health More Visible)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Review of the burden of vision impairment and blindness and ocular disease occurrence in Indigenous Peoples of the Americas. We systematically reviewed findings of the frequency of vision impairment and blindness and/or frequency of ocular findings in Indigenous groups. The database search yielded 2829 citations, of which 2747 were excluded. We screened the full texts of 82 records for relevance and excluded 16. The remaining 66 articles were examined thoroughly, and 25 presented sufficient data to be included. Another 7 articles derived from references were included, summing a total of 32 studies selected. When considering adults over 40 years old, the highest frequencies of vision impairment and blindness in Indigenous Peoples varied from 11.1% in high-income North America to 28.5% in tropical Latin America, whose rates are considerably higher than those in the general population. Most of the ocular diseases reported were preventable and/or treatable, so blindness prevention programs should focus on accessibility to eye examinations, cataract surgeries, control of infectious diseases, and spectacles distribution. Finally, we recommend actions in six areas of attention towards improving the eye health in Indigenous Peoples: access and integration of eye services with primary care; telemedicine; customized propaedeutics; education on eye health; and quality of data.

1. Introduction

Vision impairment and blindness are estimated to affect more than 339 million people worldwide, with 43.3 million people blind and 295.3 million people having moderate to severe visual impairment (MSVI), representing a prevalence of 5.25 cases of blindness per 1000 persons (95% CI: 4.58–5.87) and 35.8 cases of MSVI per 1000 persons (95% CI: 32.4–39.2) [1]. Cataract, glaucoma, under-corrected refractive errors, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy are the main causes of blindness, while the main causes of MSVI are uncorrected refractive errors, cataract, age-related macular degeneration, glaucoma, and diabetic retinopathy [2]. In the Americas, the estimates vary substantially across the different Global Burden of Disease (GBD) regions, with blindness estimates ranging from 1.93 cases per 1000 people in southern Latin America (i.e., Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay) to 7.40 cases per 1000 in tropical Latin America (i.e., Brazil and Paraguay) [1].
Most global estimates, however, do not include data from Indigenous Peoples and other ethnic groups, even though those groups are expected to present higher frequencies of ocular diseases and vision loss [3,4,5]. As a result, the burden of vision impairment and blindness may be underestimated, and the public health policies derived from it may insufficiently attend the demand in those minority groups. Including those groups in population-based sample sizes is often challenging due to the low number of individuals in comparison with the overall population and/or due to the low response from those specific groups even when they are included in the sampling [6,7]. Developing and implementing services designed to prioritize reaching groups in situations of vulnerability, as with Indigenous Peoples, with quality and affordable eye services was recently listed as one of the main challenges in global eye health [8].
Indigenous individuals can, on certain occasions, be considered one of the most disadvantaged and marginalized populations worldwide [9]. A recent systematic review of vision loss among Indigenous populations has shown a lack of data on the burden of vision loss in most countries and has pointed out the importance of improving the quality and number of research about eye health and eye care in Indigenous communities [10]. Different Indigenous groups from different nations have unique characteristics in language, culture, environmental risk factors, and political autonomy, yet, as a result of the colonization process, many face similar health disparities and social disadvantages [11]. Indigenous groups currently account for around 17% of those living in extreme poverty in Latin America, even though they represent less than 8% of the population [12].
It is estimated that in 2010 there were at least 44.8 million Indigenous persons in Latin America, representing 826 Indigenous Peoples mainly concentrated in Mexico (seventeen million people) and Peru (seven million), followed by Guatemala and Bolivia (six million in each) [13]. While they are the majority of the population in Bolivia (62%) and Guatemala (60%), they represent less than 2% in Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, and the Caribbean [14,15]. In the United States (USA), 6.6 million Alaskan Natives and Native American Indians (2% of the general population) live in 567 tribes, and 326 Indian reserves are officially recognized by the federal government [16]. In Canada, 5% of the total population is identified as Indigenous, summing 1.8 million individuals from First Nations, Métis, and Inuit groups [17].
The purpose of the current study is to conduct a review of the burden of vision impairment and blindness and ocular disease occurrence in the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas while comparing it to the estimates based on non-indigenous populations and identifying gaps in the literature.

2. Materials and Methods

We systematically reviewed findings on frequencies of vision impairment and blindness or frequencies of ocular findings such as cataract, under-corrected refractive errors, glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, pterygium, trachoma, and onchocerciasis in Indigenous populations in Americas. We searched for any study evaluating eye health not limiting the sources to population-based data. The search combined terms related to three concept areas: population (Indigenous), outcome (vision impairment/blindness and ocular findings), and study site (the Americas). Term selection was based on previous systematic reviews and combined key terms adapted for each database and medical subject headings (MeSH) as applicable. We searched for studies in any language, indexed from 1 January 2000 to 1 November 2022.
We screened the selected papers in terms of (1) reporting frequencies of vision impairment or blindness or frequencies of ocular diseases; (2) reporting results for an indigenous population; and (3) reporting data from populations resident in any region of the Americas. We excluded articles that did not include an Indigenous group, were iterations, were program evaluations or experimental studies, not primary studies, were from the gray literature, or used identical data sources as prior studies. Because many studies on Indigenous Peoples have not reported response rates, we did not impose any minimum response rate limit. Self-reported outcome data were not included.
The following information was extracted from each selected study: author, year of publication, country, Indigenous group, study design, sample size, individuals age, main outcome, method for visual acuity and definitions for vision impairment and blindness, frequency of vision impairment and blindness, and/or frequency of ocular diseases. The results were presented separately according to the GBD regions classification (Table 1).
We presented the results as descriptive tables for frequencies of vision impairment and blindness and for frequencies of ocular diseases in the population. As most of the studies adopted different criteria for definitions of vision impairment and blindness and varied the measurement method (i.e., uncorrected, presenting vision, and best-corrected vision acuity), we could not standardize estimates and summarize the findings per region and therefore presented descriptive data along with the specificities of each estimate.

3. Results

The database search yielded 2829 citations, of which 2747 were excluded. We screened the full texts of 82 records for relevance and excluded 16. The remaining 66 articles were examined thoroughly, and 25 presented sufficiently data to be included in the current review. Another 7 articles derived from references were included, summing a total of 32 studies selected. Figure 1 shows the flowchart of records selection.
Out of the 32 selected studies, 14 (43.75%) were conducted in tropical Latin America (13 in Brazil and 1 in Paraguay), 12 (37.50%) in high-income North America (8 in the USA and 4 in Canada), 4 (12.50) in central Latin America (2 in Colombia, 1 in Mexico, and 1 in Venezuela), 1 (3.12%) in Andean Latin America (Ecuador), and 1 (3.12%) in the Caribbean (Haiti). No studies from southern Latin America were included.
A total of 11 studies (34.37%) reported frequencies of vision impairment and blindness, with most of them from high-income North America. No studies from Andean Latin America, the Caribbean, or southern Latin America presented data on vision impairment and blindness. A great variability of vision acuity measurement methods, as well as vision impairment and blindness definitions, was observed. Table 2 shows the frequencies of vision impairment and blindness according to the GBD region along with study population Indigenous group and age, and categories’ definitions.
Despite the differences in the vision impairment and blindness definitions, it is a clear significant difference in the frequencies between high-income North America and tropical Latin American countries. When considering adults over 40 years old and the BCVA method, the highest frequencies of vision impairment and blindness in high-income North America sum 11.1% [27] while in the tropical Latin America it can reach 28.5% [19].
A total of 26 studies (81.25%) reported frequencies of ocular diseases, with most of them from tropical Latin America and high-income North America. Trachoma was the main condition evaluated, discussed in nine studies (34.61%), with six in tropical Latin America and three in Central America. Cataract was evaluated in seven studies (26.92%), three in high-income North America, three in tropical Latin America, and one in the Caribbean. Interestingly, the six studies evaluating diabetic retinopathy (23.07%) were from high-income North America. Pterygium was evaluated in five studies (19.23%), with four from tropical Latin America and one from the Caribbean. Table 3 shows the frequencies of ocular diseases according to the GBD region along with study population Indigenous group and ages.

4. Discussion

This study presents an overall panorama of the ocular health in Indigenous Peoples in the America. The main limitation, however, is the shortage of data. The low number of records retrieved from our literature review reflects the scarcity of studies focused on eye health in Indigenous populations in the Americas. Out of the 33 countries in the Americas, only 7 (21%) had data on vision impairment/blindness and/or ocular disease in Indigenous groups. The lack of studies is particularly more evident in Andean Latin America, where a high percentage of the population self-identify as Indigenous and yet is underrepresented [14]. No studies were found for southern Latin America, which is the sub-region with the lowest frequencies of Indigenous Peoples in the general population. The most recent worldwide estimates of vision impairment and blindness, however, have included data from most countries in the Americas, indicating availability of population-based surveys and therefore reinforcing the misrepresentation of Indigenous Peoples in these calculations. While part of these studies might have included Indigenous groups in their samples, most of them have used the RAAB (Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness) methodology, which is a format that does not disaggregate information on ethnicity further limiting the analysis of burden of disease in Indigenous populations specifically and the comparisons between Indigenous and non-indigenous groups [50].
Most studies on frequency of vision impairment and blindness were conducted in high-income North America. According to the GBD, the prevalence of moderate to severe vision impairment (MSVI: VA < 20/63 to VA ≥ 20/400) and blindness (VA < 20/400) in the general population aged 50 years and older in the region was 3.28% and 0.40%, respectively [1]. Despite the different criteria for classification, the frequency of vision impairment and blindness in the Indigenous populations evaluated were higher than those presented by the GBD, with values in older adults ranging from 3.10% [28] to 12.80% [25] for vision impairment and 0.30% [28] to 1.90% [27] for blindness.
Tropical Latin America is one of the sub-regions with the highest estimated rates of MSVI (10.60%) and blindness (2.71%) in older adults in the Americas [1]. A recent study performed with residents from the Xingu Indigenous Park in Brazil following the same GDB criteria of classification has shown frequencies of MSVI and blindness substantially higher than those calculated for the general population, reaching 22.58% and 5.92%, respectively, in adults 45 years and older [19].
The only study from central Latin America evaluated individuals 20 years and older in Mexico and found a prevalence of presenting vision acuity <20/60 in 10% of the population [18]. The estimates for MSVI and blindness considering best-corrected vision acuity in adults 50 years and older in the region were 10.70% and 1.83% [1], but due to the different criteria of measurement and definitions, we are not able to make direct comparisons.
The general estimates of vision impairment and blindness for Andean Latin America (MSVI: 13.00%; blindness: 2.20%), the Caribbean (MSVI: 8.22%; blindness: 1.74%), and southern Latin American (MSVI: 6.59%; blindness: 0.66%) could not be compared to Indigenous Peoples due to the lack of studies on these groups in those specific countries [1].
In 2020, cataract and under-corrected refractive error composed 50% of all global blindness and 75% of all global MSVI [2]. Other causes included glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, and diabetic retinopathy, being the five conditions mostly studied in the general population. Diabetic retinopathy was the smallest contributor to blindness in 2020 among those, however, it was the only cause of blindness that showed a global increase in prevalence from 1990 to 2020, particularly in the high-income North America sub-region [2]. While the data retrieved from studies using Indigenous populations cover extensive age ranges and do not necessarily represent the disease frequency or the cause of MSVI and blindness, a differential pattern of disease focus is observed among the sub-regions. While 66.7% of the studies from high-income North America have presented data on diabetic retinopathy, none of the studies from the other region have evaluated this condition.
The cataract rates in older adults, regardless of vision acuity status, have varied from 12.2% in Northwestern and Alaskan Natives in the USA [28] to 54.5% in groups from the Xingu Indigenous Park in Brazil [19]. These values are sensitive to the population’s access to cataract surgeries, which may explain the high frequency of disease in Indigenous populations with limited access to specialized eye health services. Few studies evaluated refractive errors, with rates reaching up to 62% in Brazilian communities [43]. The effective cataract surgical coverage (eCSC) and the effective refractive error coverage (eREC) are indicators requested by the WHO in order to meet the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals [51]. eCSC refers to the proportion of people who have received cataract surgery and have a resultant good quality outcome relative to the number of people in need of cataract surgery [52]. Similarly, eREC refers to the proportion of people who have received refractive correction and have a resultant good quality outcome relative to the number of people in need of refractive correction [53]. These indicators are ideal to not only track changes in the uptake and quality of eye care services, but also to contribute to monitoring progress towards universal health care in general [54]; however, none of the studies using Indigenous populations in the Americas have reported eCSC or eREC. A previous analysis of Indigenous versus non-indigenous groups in Australia has shown that eCSC was significantly better in non-indigenous Australians than in Indigenous Australians (88.5% vs. 51.6%) [55].
Pterygium is a condition commonly evaluated in the studies as its occurrence is associated with geographic locations characterized by low latitude and high ultraviolet exposure. In that sense, studies from the Caribbean, central and tropical Latin America have reported frequencies from 12.8% [40] to 27.1% [43]. The population profile is a determinant for pterygium development, so people who have an outdoor lifestyle tend to be more likely to develop the disease due to the direct UV exposure. The disease is also highly prevalent in non-indigenous populations in equatorial areas with prevalence reaching up to 58.8% [56].
Ocular infectious diseases are highly associated with living style, access to clean water, and basic sanitation, and therefore can be highly prevalent in Indigenous communities [57]. Trachoma and onchocerciasis were evaluated in 73% of the studies from central and tropical Latin America reflecting the concern about such conditions in these regions. Onchocerciasis was identified in two studies in Brazil, affecting up to 68.6% of a Yanomami community [35]. Trachoma was identified in both central and tropical Latin America with frequencies ranging from 6.9% [31] to 41.8% [34]. Moreover, one study in Brazil evaluated parasitic keratitis in Arawak, Tukano, and Maku peoples finding a frequency of 17.2% [43].
Historically, onchocerciasis was formerly prevalent in 13 foci in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, and Venezuela [58]. In response, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) established the Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA) in 1992 with the main purpose to guide countries to achieve the goal of eliminating onchocerciasis in Latin America [59]. In general, the strategy included six-monthly mass administration of ivermectin (Mectizan®, Merck & Co. Inc., Rahway/NJ, USA) with coverage equal to or higher than 85% of the eligible population [59]. The onchocerciasis elimination program in Latin American countries has been ongoing since 1996 [60]. To date, onchocerciasis transmission has been eliminated from 11 of the 13 previously endemic disease foci in Latin America, and four out of six endemic countries have been verified as eliminated by PAHO (Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, and Mexico) [61].
Trachoma is the world’s leading infectious cause of blindness and is endemic in several parts of the world [62]. Mexico was the first country in the Americas to eliminate trachoma as a public health problem, as validated by PAHO in 2017, but this is still a concern in four countries in Andean, central, and tropical Latin America: Brazil, Colombia, Guatemala, and Peru [63,64]. PAHO/WHO support countries to implement the SAFE strategy (i.e., surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental improvement), a program that consists of surgery to treat advanced trachoma (trichiasis), antibiotics (azithromycin) to clear the agent of infection, facial hygiene, and environmental improvements to reduce transmission from one person to another [63]. While the strategy adherence might be more challenging in Indigenous communities, the example from Mexico reinforces the importance of partnership with local leader authorities who will enhance the population’s trust in the program and improve the outcomes [64].
Other conditions observed in the reviewed studies include glaucoma and under-corrected refractive errors. Glaucoma was present in a relatively small proportion of the populations of Brazil and the USA but at a high frequency of 19.1% in Haiti [30]. The high frequency of glaucoma in Haiti could be influenced by the nonvariation in race and the higher environment temperature [30,65]. In general, the high rates of cataract and under-corrected refractive errors reflect the poor access of the Indigenous populations to specialized care. The access is likely associated with education and economic status, which are factors that could not be evaluated in the current revision due to the lack of information in the selected studies [66,67].
There are significant disparities in the number and distribution of ophthalmologists in American countries as they tend to be concentrated in more developed cities, leaving remote areas, where most Indigenous Peoples are concentrated, with a low density of ophthalmologists [66]. Due to a lack of access to and utilization of eye care services, Indigenous Peoples in the Amazon may combine several social determinants of blindness and visual impairment, such as ethnicity, place of residence (rural remote areas), socioeconomic status (poverty), and education (low levels of schooling). In Guatemala, with a high percentage of Indigenous population and high prevalence of blindness [67], the determinant “place of living” might not be as important as in the Amazon, but others are present among Indigenous groups. More recently, social, political, and economic crises have motivated intense migratory movements and refugee requests in Latin American countries, with an increasing number of Indigenous individuals living in public or self-managed shelters or even on the street in extreme poverty. These conditions represent an extra challenge to address, not only visual, but the general health care needs of such groups [68,69,70].
Improving Indigenous eye health in the Americas is particularly challenging and mainly due to limited access and inequalities in care. More than achieving universal health coverage in a country, equity should be prioritized, otherwise, socially advantaged groups will be more likely to use the new or improved services [71,72]. Specific actions include the following: (1) access: increasing the number of clinic sites, rural locations, and eye care sessions, not only with ophthalmologists, but also with other eye health practitioners as optometrists, ophthalmic technologists, and/or trained nurses should improve the number of patient seen, dispensing spectacles, and surgery referrals [72,73]; (2) integration with family medicine/primary care: several communities have general health programs with systemic condition screening and could include ocular health screening tools into their practice to detect and timely refer cases of vision impairment and blindness for specialized care [19,72,74]; (3) telemedicine: several telemedicine protocols in ophthalmology focused on diabetes retinopathy, glaucoma, and cataract have been shown to be effective in populations living in remote areas and should be used as models towards Indigenous population groups [75,76,77]; (4) customized propaedeutics: specific techniques should be indicated to populations living in remote areas, for example, manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) techniques in resource-constrained health care settings such as Indigenous communities [78]; (5) education on eye health: by promoting basic knowledge on eye health, the population can better understand the importance of seeking timely treatment, improving visual outcomes [79,80]; (6) quality data: more studies focused on Indigenous population’s eye health should be performed with appropriate methodology and collection of key indicators such as eCSC and eREC, and studies performed in the general population should collect data on the participants’ ethnicity/race [52,53].

5. Conclusions

Despite the shortage of data, our findings show a higher frequency of vision impairment and blindness in the Indigenous population when compared to worldwide estimates for all sub-regions in the Americas. Most of the ocular diseases reported are preventable and/or treatable, so blindness prevention programs should focus on accessibility to eye examinations, cataract surgeries, control of infectious diseases, and spectacles distribution. Finally, more epidemiological studies with Indigenous populations using higher methodologic quality and consistent indicators are recommended in order to understand the burden of diseases and optimize developed programs focused on these groups.

Author Contributions

J.M.F., A.G.F. and C.H. contributed to the study design; J.M.F. and A.G.F. contributed to data collection; A.G.F. analyzed the data; J.M.F. and A.G.F. wrote the first draft of the report; J.M.F., A.G.F., J.C.S., S.D.P. and C.H. contributed to the report’s final version; J.M.F. and C.H. oversaw the research. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Authors hold sole responsibility for the views expressed in the manuscript, which may not necessarily reflect the opinion or policy of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO)/World Health Organization (WHO).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e130–e143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators. Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: The right to sight: An analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e144–e160. [Google Scholar]
  3. Asleh, S.A.; Chowers, I. Ethnic background as a risk factor for advanced age related macular degeneration in Israel. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2007, 9, 656–658. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilbert, C.E.; Shah, S.P.; Jadoon, M.Z.; Bourne, R.; Dineen, B.; Khan, M.A.; Johnson, G.J.; Khan, M.D.; Pakistan National Eye Survey Study Group. Poverty and blindness in Pakistan: Results from the Pakistan national blindness and visual impairment survey. BMJ 2008, 336, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Fisher, D.E.; Shrager, S.; Shea, S.J.; Burke, G.L.; Klein, R.; Wong, T.Y.; Klein, B.E.; Cotch, M.F. Visual impairment in white, Chinese, black, and Hispanic participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis cohort. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015, 22, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Redwood, S.; Gill, P.S. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research–call for action. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2013, 63, 342–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Gill, P.S.; Plumridge, G.; Khunti, K.; Greenfeld, S. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in cardiovascular research: A semi-structured interview study. Fam. Pract. 2013, 30, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ramke, J.; Evans, J.R.; Habtamu, E.; Mwangi, N.; Silva, J.C.; Swenor, B.K.; Congdon, N.; Faal, H.B.; Foster, A.; Friedman, D.S.; et al. Grand Challenges in global eye health: A global prioritisation process using Delphi method. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022, 3, e31–e41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Stephens, C.; Porter, J.; Nettleton, C.; Willis, R. Disappearing, displaced, and undervalued: A call to action for indigenous health worldwide. Lancet 2006, 367, 2019–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Foreman, J.; Keel, S.; van Wijngaarden, P.; Bourne, R.A.; Wormald, R.; Crowston, J.; Taylor, H.R.; Dirani, M. Prevalence and causes of visual loss among the indigenous peoples of the world: A systematic review. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gracey, M.; King, M. Indigenous health part 1: Determinants and disease patterns. Lancet 2009, 374, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pan-American Health Organization. Policy on Ethnicity and Health. Available online: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/34447/CSP29-7-e.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  13. Pan-American Health Organization Strategy and Plan of Action on Ethnicity and Health (PAHO, 2019–2025). Available online: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/51744/PAHOEGC19002_eng.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  14. Montenegro, R.A.; Stephens, C. Indigenous health in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet 2006, 367, 1859–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barreto, S.M.; Miranda, J.J.; Figueroa, J.P.; Schmidt, M.I.; Munoz, S.; Kuri-Morales, P.P.; Silva, J.B. Epidemiology in Latin America and the Caribbean: Current situation and challenges. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2012, 41, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Census Bureau. American Indians by the Numbers from the U.S. Available online: http://www.infoplease.com/spot/aihmcensus1.html (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  17. StatsCan. Component of Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 11-001-X. Available online: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/daily-quotidien/220921/dq220921a-eng.pdf?st=Chav4tPD (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  18. Corona, A.J.; Corona, M.E.J.; Ponce-de-Leon, S.; Chavez-Rodriguez, M.; Graue-Hernandez, E.O. Social Determinants and Their Impact on Visual Impairment in Southern Mexico. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2015, 22, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fernandes, A.G.; Alves, M.; Nascimento, R.A.E.; Valdrighi, N.Y.; de Almeida, R.C.; Nakano, C.T. Vision impairment and blindness in the Xingu Indigenous Park-Brazil. Int. J. Equity Health 2021, 20, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Carter, M.J.; Lansingh, V.C.; Schacht, G.; Río del Amo, M.; Scalamogna, M.; France, T.D. Visual acuity and refraction by age for children of three different ethnic groups in Paraguay. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2013, 76, 94–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Salum, T.G.B.; Rodrigues, M.L.V. Saúde ocular dos povos indígenas do Brasil. Medicina 2012, 49, 265–272. [Google Scholar]
  22. Redher, J.R.; Sobral Neto, H.; Carvalho, F.; Lima, V.L.; Pereira, R.; Barreiro, J.; Angelucci, R.I. Prevalência e causas de cegueira e baixa acuidade visual entre grupos indígenas da Amazônia Legal. Arq. Méd. ABC 2001, 25, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  23. Woodward, M.A.; Hughes, K.; Ballouz, D.; Hirth, R.A.; Errickson, J.; Newman-Casey, P.A. Assessing Eye Health and Eye Care Needs Among North American Native Individuals. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022, 140, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aljied, R.; Aubin, M.J.; Buhrmann, R.; Sabeti, S.; Freeman, E.E. Prevalence and determinants of visual impairment in Canada: Cross-sectional data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 53, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. McClure, T.M.; Choi, D.; Becker, T.; Cioffi, G.A.; Mansberger, S.L. The effect of visual impairment on vision-related quality of life in American Indian/Alaska Natives. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2009, 16, 128–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Harvey, E.M.; Dobson, V.; Miller, J.M. Prevalence of high astigmatism, eyeglass wear, and poor visual acuity among Native American grade school children. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2006, 83, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lee, E.T.; Russell, D.; Morris, T.; Warn, A.; Kingsley, R.; Ogola, G. Visual impairment and eye abnormalities in Oklahoma Indians. Arch. Ophthalmol. 2005, 123, 1699–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mansberger, S.L.; Romero, F.C.; Smith, N.H.; Johnson, C.A.; Cioffi, G.A.; Edmunds, B.; Choi, D.; Becker, T.M. Causes of visual impairment and common eye problems in Northwest American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am. J. Public Health 2005, 95, 881–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Del Brutto, O.H.; Mera, R.; Recalde, B.Y.; Rumbea, D.A.; Costa, A.F.; Viteri, E. Hypertensive Retinopathy and All-Cause Mortality in Older Adults of Amerindian Ancestry. A Population-based Longitudinal Prospective Study. High Blood Press. Cardiovasc. Prev. 2021, 28, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duong, H.V.; Westfield, K.C.; Jones, L.S.; Mitchell, J.; Carr, T. A survey of ocular diseases in an isolated rural Haitian community: A retrospective evaluation. J. Natl. Med. Assoc. 2012, 104, 536–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. López, Y.A.; Talero, S.L.; León Donado, J.P.; Álvarez, Á.M.; Magris, M.; Hernández, T.; Bermúdez, M.; Villalobos, N.; Saboyá-Díaz, M.I. Trachoma Rapid Assessments in Venezuela, an Example of the Integration of Data Gathering with Service Delivery in Hard-to-reach Populations. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022, 29, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Miller, H.A.; López de Mesa, C.B.; Talero, S.L.; Meza Cárdenas, M.; Ramírez, S.P.; Moreno-Montoya, J.; Porras, A.; Trujillo-Trujillo, J. Prevalence of trachoma and associated factors in the rural area of the department of Vaupés, Colombia. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0229297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Miller, H.; Gallego, G.; Rodríguez, G. Evidencia clínica de tracoma en indígenas colombianos del departamento de Vaupés [Clinical evidence of trachoma in Colombian Amerindians of the Vaupés Province]. Biomedica 2010, 30, 432–439. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Freitas, H.S.; Medina, N.H.; Lopes, M.F.; Soares, O.E.; Teodoro, M.T.; Ramalho, K.R.; Caligaris, L.S.; Mörschbächer, R.; de Menezes, M.N.; Luna, E.J. Trachoma in Indigenous Settlements in Brazil, 2000–2008. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2016, 23, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Herzog-Neto, G.; Jaegger, K.; Nascimento, E.S.; Marchon-Silva, V.; Banic, D.M.; Maia-Herzog, M. Ocular onchocerciasis in the Yanomami communities from Brazilian Amazon: Effects on intraocular pressure. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2014, 90, 96–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Neto, G.H.; Jaegger, K.; Marchon-Silva, V.; Calvão-Brito, R.H.; Vieira, J.B.; Banic, D.M.; Maia-Herzog, M. Eye disease related to onchocerciasis: A clinical study in the Aratha-ú, Yanomami Tribe, Roraima State, Brazil. Acta Trop. 2009, 112, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Cruz, A.A.; Medina, N.H.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Souza, R.M.; Gomes, U.A.; Goncalves, G.F. Prevalence of trachoma in a population of the upper Rio Negro basin and risk factors for active disease. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008, 15, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Piccinin, M.R.M.; Cunha, J.F.; Almeida, H.P.; Bach, C.C.; de Oliveira Dossa, A.C.; da Silva, R.F.; Pessoa, V.F. Baixa prevalência de discromatopsia, pela 4a edição do teste pseudoisocromático HRR (Hardy, Rand e Rittler), da população indígena de etnia terena da aldeia lalima na região de Miranda: Mato Grosso do Sul [Low prevalence of dyschromatopsia using the fourth edition of HRR (Hardy, Rand and Rittler) pseudoisochromatic plate test among the Indian population of Lalima village, Terena]. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2007, 70, 259–269. [Google Scholar]
  39. Paula, J.S.; Thorn, F.; Cruz, A.A. Prevalence of pterygium and cataract in indigenous populations of the Brazilian Amazon rain forest. Eye 2006, 20, 533–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Reis, A.C.P.P.; Chaves, C.; Cohen, J.M.; Belfort, F.; Oliveira, N.P.; Belfort Jr, R. Detecção de tracoma e doenças corneanas em índios da região do Alto Rio Negro. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2002, 65, 79–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Paula, J.S.; Medina, N.H.; Cruz, A.A. Trachoma among the Yanomami Indians. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2002, 35, 1153–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Alves, A.P.; Medina, N.H.; Cruz, A.A. Trachoma and ethnic diversity in the Upper Rio Negro Basin of Amazonas State, Brazil. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002, 9, 29–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Garrido, C.; Campos, M. First report of presumed parasitic keratitis in Indians from the Brazilian Amazon. Cornea 2000, 19, 817–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fonda, S.J.; Bursell, S.E.; Lewis, D.G.; Clary, D.; Shahon, D.; Silva, P.S. Prevalence of Diabetic Eye Diseases in American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) as Identified by the Indian Health Service’s National Teleophthalmology Program Using Ultrawide Field Imaging (UWFI). Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2022, 29, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maple-Brown, L.J.; Cunningham, J.; Zinman, B.; Mamakeesick, M.; Harris, S.B.; Connelly, P.W.; Shaw, J.; O’Dea, K.; Hanley, A.J. Cardiovascular disease risk profile and microvascular complications of diabetes: Comparison of Indigenous cohorts with diabetes in Australia and Canada. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2012, 11, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Rudnisky, C.J.; Wong, B.K.; Virani, H.; Tennant, M.T.S. Risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy in Alberta First Nations communities. Can. J Ophthalmol. 2017, 52, S19–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Butt, A.L.; Lee, E.T.; Klein, R.; Russell, D.; Ogola, G.; Warn, A.; Kingsley, R.M.; Yeh, J. Prevalence and risks factors of age-related macular degeneration in Oklahoma Indians: The Vision Keepers Study. Ophthalmology 2011, 118, 1380–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. McClure, T.M.; Choi, D.; Wooten, K.; Nield, C.; Becker, T.M.; Mansberger, S.L. The impact of eyeglasses on vision-related quality of life in American Indian/Alaska Natives. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2011, 151, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Maberley, D.; Cruess, A.F.; Barile, G.; Slakter, J. Digital photographic screening for diabetic retinopathy in the James Bay Cree. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2002, 9, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mactaggart, I.; Limburg, H.; Bastawrous, A.; Burton, M.J.; Kuper, H. Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness: Looking back, looking forward. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 103, 1549–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. World Health Organization. Report of the 2030 Targets on Effective Coverage of Eye Care. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1469482/retrieve (accessed on 23 December 2022).
  52. Ramke, J.; Gilbert, C.E.; Lee, A.C.; Ackland, P.; Limburg, H.; Foster, A. Effective cataract surgical coverage: An indicator for measuring quality-of-care in the context of Universal Health Coverage. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. McCormick, I.; Mactaggart, I.; Bastawrous, A.; Burton, M.J.; Ramke, J. Effective refractive error coverage: An eye health indicator to measure progress towards universal health coverage. Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 2020, 40, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Fernandes, A.G.; Ferraz, A.N.; Lemos, R.S.; Watanabe, S.E.S.; Berezovsky, A.; Salomão, S.R. Trends in cataract surgical treatment within the Brazilian national public health system over a 20-year period: Implications for Universal Eye Health as a global public health goal. PLoS Glob. Public Health 2022, 2, e0000328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Keel, S.; Xie, J.; Foreman, J.; Taylor, H.R.; Dirani, M. Population-based assessment of visual acuity outcomes following cataract surgery in Australia: The national eye health survey. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 102, 1419–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fernandes, A.G.; Salomão, S.R.; Ferraz, N.N.; Mitsuhiro, M.H.; Furtado, J.M.; Muñoz, S.; Cypel, M.C.; Cunha, C.C.; Vasconcelos, G.C.; Sacai, P.Y.; et al. Pterygium in adults from the Brazilian Amazon Region: Prevalence, visual status and refractive errors. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 104, 757–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ali, S.H.; Foster, T.; Hall, N.L. The Relationship between Infectious Diseases and Housing Maintenance in Indigenous Australian Households. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. World Health Organization. Progress towards eliminating onchocerciasis in the WHO Region of the Americas: Elimination of transmission in the north-east focus of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 2017, 92, 617–623. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sauerbrey, M. The Onchocerciasis Elimination Program for the Americas (OEPA). Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2008, 102, 25–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Nicholls, R.S.; Duque, S.; Olaya, L.A.; López, M.C.; Sánchez, S.B.; Morales, A.L.; Palma, G.I. Elimination of onchocerciasis from Colombia: First proof of concept of river blindness elimination in the world. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lakwo, T.; Oguttu, D.; Ukety, T.; Post, R.; Bakajika, D. Onchocerciasis Elimination: Progress and Challenges. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2020, 11, 81–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Saboyá-Díaz, M.I.; Betanzos-Reyes, A.F.; West, S.K.; Muñoz, B.; Castellanos, L.G.; Espinal, M. Trachoma elimination in Latin America: Prioritization of municipalities for surveillance activities. Rev. Panam. Salud Publica 2019, 43, e93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Pan-American Health Organization. Trachoma in the Americas. 2019. Available online: https://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=13660:tracomaamericas-publico-general&Itemid=40721&lang=en (accessed on 15 November 2022).
  64. Quesada-Cubo, V.; Damián-González, D.C.; Prado-Velasco, F.G.; Fernández-Santos, N.A.; Sánchez-Tejeda, G.; Correa-Morales, F.; Domínguez-Zárate, H.; García-Orozco, A.; Saboyá-Díaz, M.I.; Sánchez-Martín, M.J. The elimination of trachoma as a public health problem in Mexico: From national health priority to national success story. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Weale, R.A. Ethiniticy and glaucoma: Higher environmental temperature may accelerate the onset, and increase the prevalence, of primary open angle glaucoma. Med. Hypotheses 2007, 69, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hong, H.; Mújica, O.J.; Anaya, J.; Lansingh, V.C.; López, E.; Silva, J.C. The Challenge of Universal Eye Health in Latin America: Distributive inequality of ophthalmologists in 14 countries. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e012819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Chávez, G.M.S.; de Barrios, A.R.S.; Pojoy, O.L.F.; de Reyes, A.R.M.H.; Melgar, M.Y.; Melgar, J.F.Y.; Régil, M.L.; Hernandez, C.A.M.; Chanquin, V.A.M.; Diaz, E.; et al. National survey of blindness and visual impairment in Guatemala, 2015. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. 2019, 82, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ponce, P.; Muñoz, R.; Stival, M. Pueblos indígenas, VIH y políticas públicas en Latinoamérica: Una exploración en el panorama actual de la prevalencia epidemiológica, la prevención, la atención y el seguimiento oportuno. Salud Colect. 2017, 13, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. De Macedo, J.N.; Sousa Júnior, O.V.; Biazussi, H.M.; Pereira, B.G. Venezuelanos no Brasil: Direitos dos Imigrantes e a Saúde Pública Local. Interfaces Cient. Direito 2019, 7, 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  70. Abreu, I.N.; Lopes, F.T.; Lima, C.N.C.; Barbosa, A.D.N.; de Oliveira, L.R.; Fujishima, M.A.; Freitas, F.B.; Dos Santos, M.B.; de Lima, V.N.; Cayres-Vallinoto, I.M.V.; et al. HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Infection Among Warao Indigenous Refugees in the Brazilian Amazon: Challenges for Public Health in Times of Increasing Migration. Front. Public Health. 2022, 10, 833169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gwatkin, D.R.; Ergo, A. Universal health coverage: Friend or foe of health equity? Lancet 2011, 377, 2160–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Burton, M.J.; Ramke, J.; Marques, A.P.; Bourne, R.R.A.; Congdon, N.; Jones, I.; Ah Tong, B.A.M.; Arunga, S.; Bachani, D.; Bascaran, C.; et al. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: Vision beyond 2020. Lancet Glob. Health 2021, 9, e489–e551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Napper, G.; Fricke, T.; Anjou, M.D.; Jackson, A.J. Breaking down barriers to eye care for Indigenous people: A new scheme for delivery of eye care in Victoria. Clin. Exp. Optom. 2015, 98, 430–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Spurr, S.; Bullin, C.; Bally, J.; Trinder, K.; Khan, S. Nurse-led diabetic retinopathy screening: A pilot study to evaluate a new approach to vision care for Canadian Aboriginal peoples. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 2018, 77, 1422670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Avidor, D.; Loewenstein, A.; Waisbourd, M.; Nutman, A. Cost-effectiveness of diabetic retinopathy screening programs using telemedicine: A systematic review. Cost Eff. Resour. Alloc. 2020, 18, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Gan, K.; Liu, Y.; Stagg, B.; Rathi, S.; Pasquale, L.R.; Damji, K. Telemedicine for Glaucoma: Guidelines and Recommendations. Telemed. J. E-Health 2020, 26, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Askarian, B.; Ho, P.; Chong, J.W. Detecting Cataract Using Smartphones. IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med. 2021, 9, 3800110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Bernhisel, A.; Pettey, J. Manual small incision cataract surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2020, 31, 74–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Muir, K.W.; Santiago-Turla, C.; Stinnett, S.S.; Herndon, L.W.; Allingham, R.R.; Challa, P.; Lee, P.P. Health literacy and adherence to glaucoma therapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2006, 142, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Williams, A.M.; Muir, K.W.; Rosdahl, J.A. Readability of patient education materials in ophthalmology: A single-institution study and systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016, 16, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Ijerph 20 03820 g001 550
Figure 1. Systematic search and selection of eligible studies.
Figure 1. Systematic search and selection of eligible studies.
Ijerph 20 03820 g001
Table
Table 1. Countries in the Americas by region.
Table 1. Countries in the Americas by region.
RegionCountries
Andean Latin AmericaBolivia, Ecuador, Peru
The CaribbeanAntigua and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Grenada, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Puerto Rico, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago
Central Latin AmericaColombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Venezuela
High-Income North AmericaCanada, Greenland, United States of America
Southern Latin AmericaArgentina, Chile, Uruguay
Tropical Latin AmericaBrazil, Paraguay
Table
Table 2. Frequency of vision impairment and blindness.
Table 2. Frequency of vision impairment and blindness.
Author, YearCountryIndigenous GroupStudy DesignSample SizeAgeV.A. methodV.I. DefinitionPrevalence V.I.(95% CI)Blindness DefinitionPrevalence Blindness (95%CI)
Andean Latin America
No data available
Caribbean
No data available
Central Latin America
Corona,
2015 [18]		MexicoNon-SpecifiedSurvey51220+PVAVA < 20/60 toVA ≥ 20/20010.00 (6.90–14.40)VA ≤ 20/2000.00
Tropical Latin America
Fernandes, 2021 [19]BrazilKalapalo, Kamaiura, Ikpeng, YawalapitiSurvey20990–17BCVAVA < 20/32 toVA ≥ 20/4000.24VA < 20/4000.03
18–441.840.25
45+22.585.92
Carter,
2013 [20]		ParaguayMaccaSurvey1170–17PVAVA < 20/405.98
Salum,
2012 [21]		BrazilKadiweusSurvey171all agesPVAVA < 20/2525.15
Rehder,
2001 [22]		BrazilBororo, Karaja, XavantesSurvey9001–94BCVAVA < 20/40 toVA ≥ 20/2002.00VA ≤ 20/2002.67
High-Income North America
Woodward, 2021 [23]USAAmerican Indian, Native Alaskan, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific IslanderSurvey177,100all agesBCVA≤20/321.48 (1.42–1.53)
Aljied,
2018 [24]		CanadaNon-SpecifiedSurvey35745–84BCVAVA < 20/406.50
McClure, 2009 [25]USAAmerican Indian, Alaska NativesSurvey41440+PVAVA < 20/40 toVA > 20/20012.80 (9.60–16.00)VA ≤ 20/2000.50 (0.10–1.54)
Harvey,
2006 [26]		USATohono O’odhamSurvey13275–16BCVAVA < 20/4034.90
Lee,
2005 [27]		USAOklahoma NativeSurvey101948–59BCVAVA < 20/40 toVA ≥ 20/2001.20VA < 20/2000.50
60–691.900.50
70–826.100.90
Mansberger, 2005 [28]USANorthwest and Alaska NativeSurvey28840+BCVAVA < 20/32 toVA ≥ 20/2003.10 (1.00–5.00)VA < 20/2000.30 (0.00–1.00)
Southern Latin America
No data available
Legend: VA—visual acuity; PVA—presenting visual acuity; BCVA—best-corrected visual acuity; V.I.—vision impairment; USA—United States of America; CI—confidence interval.
Table
Table 3. Frequency of ocular diseases.
Table 3. Frequency of ocular diseases.
AuthorCountryIndigenous GroupStudy
Design		Sample SizeAgeDiseaseFrequency in the Population (95% CI)
Andean Latin America
Del Brutto,
2021 [29]		EcuadorAtahualpaSurvey24160+Hypertensive Retinopathy17.80
Caribbean
Duong,
2012 [30]		HaitiLascahobasSurvey37020–92Under-corrected Refractive Error53.27
Cataract26.50
Glaucoma19.07
Pterygium14.56
Age-Related Macular Degeneration1.32
Central Latin America
Lopez,
2022 [31]		VenezuelaYanomamiSurvey11821–9Trachoma6.92
Miller,
2020 [32]		ColombiaCubea, Desana, Tucana, Guanana, SirianaSurvey45291–9Trachoma23.90
Miller,
2010 [33]		ColombiaMakuSurvey1141+Trachoma18.42
Tropical Latin America
0–17Cataract2.86
18–442.67
45+54.46
Fernandes,
2021 [19]		BrazilKalapalo, Kamaiura, Ikpeng, YawalapitiSurvey20990–17Under-corrected Refractive Error37.14
18–4450.00
45+21.28
0–17Pterygium0.00
18–4413.00
45+26.30
Freitas,
2016 [34]		BrazilGeneralPooled data9582all agesTrachoma41.80
Herzog-Neto,
2014 [35]		BrazilYanomamiSurvey869–74Onchocerciasis68.60
Salum,
2012 [21]		BrazilKadiweusSurvey177allPterygium14.69
Neto,
2009 [36]		BrazilYanomamiSurvey830–20Onchocerciasis12.10
21–4014.50
41–608.40
Cruz,
2008 [37]		BrazilNon-SpecifiedSurvey3111–10Trachoma9.00
Piccinin,
2007 [38]		BrazilTerenaSurvey22610–45Dichromatopsia0.00
Paula,
2006 [39]		BrazilArawak, Tukano, Maku, YanomamiSurvey62418+Cataract18.27
Pterygium18.43
Reis,
2002 [40]		BrazilTukano, MakuSurvey179all agesTrachoma55.00
Pterygium12.80
Paula,
2002 [41]		BrazilYanomamiSurvey613all agesTrachoma30.34
Alves,
2002 [42]		BrazilHupde, Tukano, DawSurvey333all agesTrachoma44.44
Garrido,
2000 [43]		BrazilArawak, Tukano, MakuSurvey395all agesParasitic Keratitis17.22
Under-corrected Refractive Error62.03
Trachoma32.66
Pterygium27.09
Cataract20.25
Glaucoma5.57
High-Income North America
Fonda,
2022 [44]		USAAmerican Indians, Alaska NativesSurvey53,90020+Diabetes Retinopathy28.60 (28.20–29.00)
Diabetic Macular Edema3.00 (2.80–3.10)
Woodward, 2021 [23]USAAmerican Indian, Native Alaskan, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific IslanderSurvey177,100all agesUnder-corrected Refractive Error17.21 (17.03–17.39)
Cataract30.06 (29.83–30.28)
Age-Related Macular Degeneration 7.13 (6.99–7.26)
Glaucoma11.86 (11.70–12.02)
Maple-Brown,
2012 [45]		CanadaOji-CreeSurvey12410+Diabetes Retinopathy25.00
Rudnisky, 2012 [46]CanadaNon-SpecifiedSurvey98014–92Non-Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy18.26
Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy2.45
Butt,
2011 [47]		USAOklahoma NativeSurvey98648–59Age-Related Macular Degeneration30.60
60–6932.60
70–8246.10
McClure,
2011 [48]		USAAmerican Indian, Native AlaskanSurvey10218+Under-corrected Refractive Error25.49
Lee,
2005 [27]		USAOklahoma NativeSurvey101948–82Cataract39.60
Age-Related Macular Degeneration 33.60
Diabetes Retinopathy20.10
Glaucoma5.60
Pinguecula42.40
Dermatochalasis30.10
Mansberger, 2005 [28]USANorthwest and Alaskan NativeSurvey28840+Under-corrected Refractive Error18.10 (13.60–22.60)
Age-Related Macular Degeneration 18.30 (12.50–24.10)
Cataract12.20 (8.30–16.10)
Glaucoma6.20 (2.60–7.80)
Non-Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy4.20 (1.80–6.60)
Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy1.80 (0.20–3.40)
Maberley, 2002 [49]CanadaCreeSurvey10024–82Non-Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy24.00
Diabetic Macular Edema5.00
Proliferative Diabetes Retinopathy2.00
Southern Latin America
No data available
Legend: USA—United States of America; CI—confidence interval.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Furtado, J.M.; Fernandes, A.G.; Silva, J.C.; Del Pino, S.; Hommes, C. Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053820

AMA Style

Furtado JM, Fernandes AG, Silva JC, Del Pino S, Hommes C. Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023; 20(5):3820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053820

Chicago/Turabian Style

Furtado, João Marcello, Arthur Gustavo Fernandes, Juan Carlos Silva, Sandra Del Pino, and Carolina Hommes. 2023. "Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 5: 3820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053820

APA Style

Furtado, J. M., Fernandes, A. G., Silva, J. C., Del Pino, S., & Hommes, C. (2023). Indigenous Eye Health in the Americas: The Burden of Vision Impairment and Ocular Diseases. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3820. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20053820

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop