1. Introduction
Foreign-born Latinos, from countries such as Cuba, Puerto Rico, Mexico, and Central and South America, are more likely to be diagnosed with cancer at an advanced stage when compared to non-Latino whites [
1,
2,
3]. In addition, foreign-born Latinos have specific existential [
4] and communication needs [
5,
6]. An advanced cancer diagnosis can cause physical, emotional, psychosocial, and existential stress not only for the patient but also for the caregiver [
7,
8,
9,
10]. Cancer as a significant stressor has been treated with several psychotherapeutic interventions designed to address this existential suffering and communication need. Specifically, Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) and Communication Skills Training (CST) have shown an effect by targeting the specific psycho-spiritual needs of patients with advanced cancer and enhancing a sense of meaning, peace, and purpose as they face an advanced diagnosis [
11,
12,
13], while CST targets communication skills with patients and caregivers coping with cancer [
14].
William Breitbart developed Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (MCP) as an intervention to address the existential distress often experienced by patients with advanced cancer [
13]. What differentiates MCP from other types of psychotherapy is its direct approach to identifying sources of meaning in the patient’s life through a set list of strategies grounded in the work of Viktor Frankl [
13]. A clinical trial comparing Individual Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy (IMCP), Supportive Psychotherapy (SP), and Enhanced Usual Care (EUC), or standard care, showed IMCP had significant treatment effects compared to EUC and some modest differences when compared to SP [
13]. Patients with advanced cancer are not the only ones who could benefit from MCP. Informal caregivers are also at risk of suffering distress from anxiety, depression, and existential concerns, including “guilt, issues with role changes, sense of identity, and responsibility to the self [
15,
16]”. A caregiver-focused MCP intervention addresses existential burdens [
15,
16] and has been found to be feasible and acceptable [
17].
Communication between patients and their caregivers is crucial after a diagnosis of advanced cancer, as themes regarding the patient’s values and end-of-life care may surface [
18], leading to issues involving death [
19], which is still taboo in Hispanic/Latino society [
20] and distressing for patients. Given that Hispanics/Latinos are a heterogeneous culture, there are many reasons why death is a taboo subject: fear of expediting the process [
21], denial [
18], religious matters [
21], and sociocultural factors [
22]. Skillfully navigating this initial conversation requires a high dexterity in communication on behalf of the provider [
23,
24]. Some recent studies have focused on communication coaching for patients before appointments with providers [
25,
26,
27]. However, a lesser-studied element is the communication between the patient and their family caregiver. Patient-family communication is an integral part of adapting to the new diagnosis, as family members may take on new roles as informal caregivers and patients adjust to a newly uncertain future. Because dysfunctional communication can be a source of distress for both members of this unique dyad, recent studies have focused on communication skills between patient and caregiver [
28,
29], and interventions that address communication are being developed [
14].
A meta-analytic review has shown that culturally adapted treatments tailored for a specific cultural group are four times more effective than interventions provided to participants from a variety of cultural backgrounds, and those conducted in Latino participants’ native language are twice as effective as interventions conducted in English [
30]. Though several psychotherapeutic interventions are designed for advanced cancer patients [
11,
12,
13,
31,
32,
33,
34,
35,
36], only one has been adapted for Latino patients. Nevertheless, interventions have yet to be explicitly adapted for Latino patients and caregivers.
Literature underscores the importance and impact of MCP and communication for advanced cancer patients and their caregivers. Moreover, it highlights the need for culturally adapted interventions. The team used a quantitative approach with patients and caregivers coping with advanced cancer to identify the accepted concepts of Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy and Communications Skills Training. This paper aims to evaluate the importance of MCP concepts and communication concepts among Latino patients and caregivers coping with cancer. The results of this study will be used to inform the topics to be discussed in the psychosocial intervention for advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers.
2. Materials and Methods
Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy is grounded in the work of Dr. Breitbart and aims to target the specific psycho-spiritual needs of patients with advanced cancer [
11]. Its primary goal is to help patients enhance a sense of meaning, peace, and purpose as they approach the end of life. The intervention focuses on meaningful concepts such as: maintaining hope, making sense of the cancer experience, having a purpose in life, reflecting on their heritage, having a purpose in life after a cancer diagnosis, changing their attitude, and being responsible for themselves and others after the cancer diagnosis. Moreover, the intervention addresses experiential sources of meaning, such as love, humor, and beauty.
Using the Communication Skills Training approach [
14], the team hypothesizes that the MCP intervention will be enhanced by/including taught coping skills. The coping skills training approach was adapted for non-spousal patients’ caregivers by eliminating spousal terms (e.g., taking care of your partner–spouse) and using general caregiving terms (e.g., taking care of your significant other). The concepts related to CST involve learning how to share thoughts about cancer, express feelings regarding a cancer diagnosis, learn strategies to accept others’ perspectives, and acquire communication strategies to accept and validate others [
14].
Participants for this study comprised patients and caregivers who were recruited as dyads from an oncology clinic in the southern area of Puerto Rico between October 2020 and September 2021. The Ponce Research Institute Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethical Committee approved all the study procedures. An IRB-approved introductory letter to familiarize potential participants with the study. Patients’ inclusion criteria included: (1) patients with solid stage III or IV tumors, (2) age 21 or older, and (3) self-reported Latino. Eligible family caregivers included those who were: (1) a caregiver with a family member diagnosed with solid stage III or IV tumors referred by the advanced cancer patient, (2) age 21 or older, and (3) self-reported Latino. Patients’ exclusion criteria included: (1) diagnosed with a major disabling medical or psychiatric condition, (2) unable to understand the consent procedure, or (3) too ill to participate, reported by the patient and determined by the PI’s judgment. After completing the screening process, those eligible and interested were consented and scheduled to complete the questionnaire. Following informed consent, patients, and family caregivers (FCs) were assigned a subject number and administered the survey and self-report assessment to evaluate the patients’ and FCs’ perspectives and psychosocial needs.
The cross-sectional survey in Spanish included rating the importance of the goals and concepts of MCP and CST. In addition, the survey included general demographic questions (age, education, and gender) and a series of standardized scales described in the protocol paper [
37]. Participants were given USD 15 as compensation for their time and effort.
All analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics 21. The database was checked for coding errors and missing data using descriptive statistics. The analyses included descriptive statistics and frequency analysis for the survey to rate the importance of the goals and concepts of MCP and CST. The study was properly powered to use the findings in this formative work. The G Power statistical program [
38] was used to determine the sample size. The study had a power of 0.80 (
p < 0.05) to detect a medium-sized effect (Cohen’s d = 0.50) [
38]. Based on the analysis, the team recruited a sample of 114 participants (57 advanced cancer patients; 57 family caregivers).
4. Discussion
When patient and caregiver dyads were asked about the concepts of MCP and CST, the majority of participants favorably rated all of the concepts. The acceptance of MCP concepts ranged from 73.75% to 95.5%, while CST ranged from 81.6% to 91.2%. Comparable results were seen in the adaptation of MCP for a Latino population, where patients expressed a need to integrate communication skills as well as accepted MCP concepts in the process of adapting to their cancer diagnosis [
37,
39]. Some of the many MCP concepts included finding meaning in family and loved ones, maintaining hope, taking responsibility to care for oneself, finding meaning in life after a diagnosis, maintaining a love for life, and preserving a sense of humor. Moreover, the literature acknowledges the efficacy of interventions designed to improve dyadic communication among cancer patients and caregivers [
40]. However, studies with Latino patient-caregiver dyads are lacking. A portion of CST concepts includes having problem-solving skills, worrying about each other, demonstrating companionship through the journey, learning to talk about a cancer diagnosis, and acquiring communication strategies.
Results indicate that participants favored love for their loved ones to cope with their diagnosis, which is consistent with studies that underscore how many patients lean on family for support as a coping mechanism during a cancer diagnosis [
41]. Additionally, family is an important value to Latinos [
42], which could explain why many participants consider it important to take care of others after a cancer diagnosis. Latino patients have reported the desire for assistance in finding hope and meaning in life [
43]. Given that participants were also caregivers, many regarded maintaining hope as essential. These results are congruent with literature where caregivers used hope and prayer while caring for a family member with cancer [
20]. However, while patients may use hope as a coping mechanism, it can become a difficult topic when discussing end-of-life [
19]. The current literature regarding Latino cancer patients and meaning highlights the use of positive reframing and meaning to cope with a cancer diagnosis [
41]. Additionally, in the same study, some of the participants integrated the value of life with purpose into their experience with cancer. These results are congruent with the participants’ selection of the concepts of finding meaning, creating meaning, and finding purpose in their life. MCP attempts to assist participants in the search for meaning and purpose through experiential sources of meaning. Moreover, participants favor the discussion of “making sense”, which is seen in advanced cancer patients as an attempt to make sense of and understand the terminality of an advanced cancer diagnosis experience [
44].
Many of the participants indicated that reflecting on the changes in one’s life after receiving a cancer diagnosis was important. Even though the MCP concept of change after a diagnosis focuses on general life, hope, and experiences, Latino participants might also reflect on changes attributed to physical changes [
45,
46], sexuality [
46], work [
47], or overall quality of life [
48]. Regarding responsibility for oneself after a cancer diagnosis, many participants found this to be required within the cancer trajectory. These results are seen in the literature where Latino cancer patients take responsibility for their part in the cancer trajectory [
49]. Concerning humor as a coping mechanism, a study with Hispanic male cancer survivors yielded how the survivors used humor as one of many coping mechanisms during their diagnosis and treatment process [
50]. Even though our sample includes men, women, patients, and caregivers, most selected humor to cope with their diagnosis.
Some Latinos would rather not discuss the end-of-life stage [
18] or death [
19]; however, dyads within this study ranked different communication skills as essential. These results could be attributed to integrating cultural factors and values in adapting interventions [
51]. The integration of cultural values within interventions has been shown to be successful [
52]. For instance, communication interventions aimed at Latinos and their caregivers with a chronic illness (diabetes) yield positive results. Firstly, dyads with good relationships had better care routines, considered the program successful in managing the disease at home, and had better social support [
53]. Couples’ CST results underscore the benefits of communication between the advanced cancer patient and partner. Some benefits include: the desire not to be seen as a “patient” and “caregiver,” symptom management, support for a partner, decision making, conflict resolution, and preparation for death [
14]. These results are seen within the team’s sample, with participants favoring problem-solving skills and companionship throughout the process. Delivering tailored communication interventions proves to be acceptable and beneficial for the patient and caregiver [
54]. Thus, it is highly imperative that caregiver–patient dyads are provided with the necessary skills to discuss thoughts about cancer, express their feelings about cancer, and acquire the necessary communication skills they might need in their daily lives.