Next Article in Journal
Prevalence of Multiple Antibiotics Resistant (MAR) Pseudomonas Species in the Final Effluents of Three Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities in South Africa
Next Article in Special Issue
Secondary Leukemia Associated with the Anti-Cancer Agent, Etoposide, a Topoisomerase II Inhibitor
Previous Article in Journal
Scenario Simulation-Based Assessment of Trip Difficulty for Urban Residents under Rainstorm Waterlogging
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Pathway: A Key Component of the microRNA-Mediated AML Signalisome
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/ijerph9062075
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanism of Generation of Therapy Related Leukemia in Response to Anti-Topoisomerase II Agents

by
Ian G. Cowell
* and
Caroline A. Austin
Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear NE2 4HH, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9(6), 2075-2091; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062075
Submission received: 2 May 2012 / Revised: 23 May 2012 / Accepted: 29 May 2012 / Published: 31 May 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Leukemia Arising from Chemical Exposures and Chemotherapeutic Drugs)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Type II DNA topoisomerases have the ability to generate a transient DNA double-strand break through which a second duplex can be passed; an activity essential for DNA decatenation and unknotting. Topoisomerase poisons stabilize the normally transient topoisomerase-induced DSBs and are potent and widely used anticancer drugs. However, their use is associated with therapy-related secondary leukemia, often bearing 11q23 translocations involving the MLL gene. We will explain recent discoveries in the fields of topoisomerase biology and transcription that have consequences for our understanding of the etiology of leukemia, especially therapy-related secondary leukemia and describe how these findings may help minimize the occurrence of these neoplasias.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Drugs targeting TOP2 (TOP2 poisons) are important and effective anti-cancer agents, but they are associated with serious side effects including the development of therapy related acute leukemia (t-AL), especially acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML). The incidences of therapy related leukemia are increasing due to better survival rates and the use of more intensive chemotherapy regimens to treat primary cancers and t-AML generally has a poorer prognosis than de novo AML [1,2]. t-AML accounts for ~15% of all acute myeloid leukemia cases [1] and occurs after treatment for hematological and non-hematological malignancies. AML is the most common secondary cancer to occur following treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for example, where it appears with short latency in a proportion of cases who achieve a first complete remission [3]. t-AML also remains a late complication following treatment of solid tumors including in breast cancer patients treated with epirubicin or mitoxantrone, especially those of a younger age at the time of diagnosis [4,5,6]. Thus t-AML is an important clinical problem. Understanding the mechanisms that cause t-AML may suggest ways to reduce its occurrence.
Two classes of anti-cancer agents are associated with t-AML; these are alkylating agents and TOP2 poisons. Both types of agent are cytotoxins widely used in cancer therapy, and achieve their anti-cancer activity by generating DNA damage leading to cell death. Alkylating agents chemically react with DNA to form inter-strand crosslinks and other DNA adducts. In contrast, as described in more detail below and shown in Figure 1, TOP2 poisons interfere with the religation step in the topoisomerase II reaction cycle, leading to the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The occurrence of t-AML presumably reflects non-lethal genetic damage induced by these agents in hematopoietic precursor cells, but t-AML cases associated with alkylating agents are biologically and clinically distinct from those associated with TOP2 poisons (see Table 1), suggesting different mechanisms of pathogenesis.
Ijerph 09 02075 g001 1024
Figure 1. TOP2 mechanism. TOP2 cleaves both strands of a duplex DNA segment (brown, 1–2). A second DNA duplex (blue) passes through the transient enzyme-coupled break (2–3). The first duplex is then re-ligated and the products of the reaction are released from the enzyme (4).
Figure 1. TOP2 mechanism. TOP2 cleaves both strands of a duplex DNA segment (brown, 1–2). A second DNA duplex (blue) passes through the transient enzyme-coupled break (2–3). The first duplex is then re-ligated and the products of the reaction are released from the enzyme (4).
Ijerph 09 02075 g001
Monosomy for chromosome 5 or 7 or loss of 5q or 7q chromosome arms are characteristic of alkylating agent-associated t-AML/t-MDS, while karyotypic abnormalities in TOP2 poison associated t-AML are typically balanced chromosome translocations [7] that generate novel fusion genes. Translocations involving the mixed lineage leukemia locus (MLL) at 11q23 are the most frequent type of balanced translocation in t-AML [8,9] and acute leukemias with this translocation appear with a short latency period following chemotherapy with TOP2 poisons [7,10]. Other recurrent t-AML translocations include t(15,17)(PML-RARA), t(8,21)(AML-ETO) and inv(16)(MYH11-CBFB) [6]. Chromosome translocations represent a crucial early event in the development of these leukemias and the resulting fusion genes, for example MLL-AF9, are able to transform hematopoietic precursors and induce leukemia in animal models [11]. Cytotoxic drugs such as TOP2 poisons are often administered in complex regimens with other drugs, and this can make it difficult to assess the leukemogenic effect of individual agents. A notable exception to this is the use of mitoxantrone monotherapy to treat multiple sclerosis, where secondary leukemia with PML-RARA translocations has been reported as a complication [12,13,14,15,16,17]. How the chromosome translocations observed in t-AL occur and why the same translocations are seen repeatedly has puzzled clinicians and scientists for decades. We will focus on TOP2 poison associated t-AL, starting with the mechanism of action of TOP2 and TOP2 poisons and leading on to recent discoveries in topoisomerase biology that are relevant to the etiology of therapy-related secondary leukemia.
Table
Table 1. Typical biological and clinical characteristics of t-AML cases associated with alkylating agents and TOP2 poisons.
Table 1. Typical biological and clinical characteristics of t-AML cases associated with alkylating agents and TOP2 poisons.
TOP2 poison * associated(* such as etoposide, teniposide mitroxantrone, epirubicin)Alkylating agent $ associated($ such as cyclophosphamide, melphalan, chlorambucil, and nitrosoureas)
Latency periodShort, <2 years2–8 years
Chromosome abnormalitiesRecurrent translocations especially involving MLL at 11q23 and t(15;17)(PML-RARA), t(8,21)(AML-ETO)Deletions involving Chr 5 and 7
Complex KaryotypeRareFrequent
Preceded by myelodisplastic syndromeRareFrequent
Age associationYoungerOlder

2. TOP2 and TOP2 Poisons

DNA topoisomerase II, referred to as TOP2, is essential for cell survival and plays a role in replication, transcription, chromosome condensation and segregation [18,19,20,21,22]. It allows one double-stranded DNA segment to pass through another, thus altering DNA topology. This is achieved by introducing a TOP2-bridged double-strand break into one DNA duplex, where each monomer of the dimeric enzyme remains covalently attached to the ends of the DSB via a 5’-phosphotyrosyl linkage (Figure 1 and Figure 2). A second DNA segment is then passed through the enzyme-bridged DNA gate, and the break is re-ligated. The enzyme-bridged gate is normally a short lived intermediate, but TOP2 poisons inhibit the religation step, resulting in the formation of an unusual type of DSB called a cleavage complex, in which the topoisomerase protein remains covalently coupled to the DNA (Figure 2 and Figure 3). These breaks are cytotoxic, hence the utility of TOP2 in cancer therapy. Unfortunately, TOP2 poisons also have genotoxic side effects, including the formation of leukemogenic chromosome translocations. Humans and other vertebrates possess two type II topoisomerase paralogs, TOP2A and TOP2B, encoded by genes on chromosomes 17 and 3, respectively. TOP2B is the predominant form in quiescent and terminally differentiated cells, while TOP2A and TOP2B are both abundant in cycling cells [23,24].
Ijerph 09 02075 g002 1024
Figure 2. TOP2 DNA cleavage. TOP2-catalyzed strand cleavage involves a reversible, covalent enzyme–DNA adduct formed through the TOP2 active site tyrosine residue. Topoisomerase poisons inhibit the reverse reaction (re-ligation) resulting in stabilization of the 5’ phosphotyrosyl-DNA complex (cleavage complex) which contains a TOP2-linked strand breaks. The TOP2 protein molecule is represented by the thick grey line. Only one TOP2 monomer and one strand of the DNA duplex are shown.
Figure 2. TOP2 DNA cleavage. TOP2-catalyzed strand cleavage involves a reversible, covalent enzyme–DNA adduct formed through the TOP2 active site tyrosine residue. Topoisomerase poisons inhibit the reverse reaction (re-ligation) resulting in stabilization of the 5’ phosphotyrosyl-DNA complex (cleavage complex) which contains a TOP2-linked strand breaks. The TOP2 protein molecule is represented by the thick grey line. Only one TOP2 monomer and one strand of the DNA duplex are shown.
Ijerph 09 02075 g002
Ijerph 09 02075 g003 1024
Figure 3. TOP2 Poisons, downstream events. TOP2 poisons inhibit the religation step of the TOP2 reaction cycle, leading to accumulation of covalent TOP2-DNA cleavage complexes. These lesions are cytotoxic and lead to activation of the DNA damage response and potentially apoptosis. Alternatively these lesions are repaired, largely through the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Translocations observed in therapy-related leukemia are presumed to occur as a result of mis-repair, joining two heterologous ends.
Figure 3. TOP2 Poisons, downstream events. TOP2 poisons inhibit the religation step of the TOP2 reaction cycle, leading to accumulation of covalent TOP2-DNA cleavage complexes. These lesions are cytotoxic and lead to activation of the DNA damage response and potentially apoptosis. Alternatively these lesions are repaired, largely through the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Translocations observed in therapy-related leukemia are presumed to occur as a result of mis-repair, joining two heterologous ends.
Ijerph 09 02075 g003
Clinically relevant TOP2 poisons fall into several chemical classes including epipodophyllotoxins, acridines, anthracylines, the anthacenedione mitoxantrone and the benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloid NK314 (which is also reported to down-regulate non homologous end-joining) [25,26,27] (Table 2). Antibacterial quinolones such as ciprofloxacin act through poisoning of the bacterial type II DNA topoisomerase (DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV) and recently voreloxin, a quinolone derivative that targets human TOP2 was described [28].
Table
Table 2. TOP2 poisons, those that are or have been used clinically in cancer therapy are in bold.
Table 2. TOP2 poisons, those that are or have been used clinically in cancer therapy are in bold.
Chemical classExamples
EpipodophyllotoxinsEtoposide, Teniposode
AnthracylinesDoxorubicin, Epirubicin, Daunorubicin, Idarubicin, Aclarubicin
AnthacenedioneMitoxantrone
Acridinesm-AMSA (amsacrine), m-AMCA, AMCA, DACA
QuinalonesVoreloxin
Benzo[c]phenanthridine alkaloidNK314
In addition a number of naturally occurring compounds including selenite, curcumin, digitoxin, dietary flavonoids and the green-tea constituent EGCG inhibit TOP2 or induce TOP2-DNA complexes in cell culture studies [29,30,31,32,33,34] and it has been suggested that flavonoids and catechins derived from the maternal diet may contribute to in utero MLL translocations underlying neonatal leukemias through their activity as topoisomerase poisons II [29,30,35,36]. As discussed below, MLL translocations found in neonatal acute leukemia cases share molecular features with those in t-AML.
The anthracyclines doxorubicin, daunorubicin and idarubicin and the anthracenedione, mitoxantrone differ from the epipodophyllotoxin TOP2 poisons (etoposide and teniposide) in that they are strong DNA intercalators. In addition to direct TOP2 poisoning and intercalation, ROS stimulated formaldehyde production, leads to the formation of anthracycline and mitoxantrone DNA adducts and crosslinks [37,38,39,40,41], which are presumably cytotoxic in their own right [42].

3. TOP2 Poisons and Chromosome Translocations

TOP2 is a well validated anti-cancer target and TOP2 poisons are widely used and effective therapeutic agents; but, as discussed above, they are associated with the occurrence of late complications, including therapy-related acute leukemia. It is hoped that a better understanding of the events leading to t-AL, in particular the mechanism by which t-AL recurrent translocations occur may help minimize these side effects. Detailed analysis of translocation breakpoints (the position in a derivative chromosome where the two heterologous chromosome segments are fused) and aspects of TOP2 biology have begun to shed light on the mechanisms by which these translocations occur. For some of the genes involved, including MLL, PML, RARA and AML1 (RUNX1) a relatively large number of translocation breakpoints from de novo and therapy related leukemia cases have been determined at the base pair level. What has emerged from this is that while t-AL related breakpoints fall within previously identified breakpoint clusters (BCRs), their distribution can be skewed compared to the distribution of de novo AML breakpoints. This is particularly noticeable for the MLL gene. Chromosomal breakpoints involved in MLL translocations in acute leukemia fall within an 8-Kb breakpoint cluster region (BCR), but breakpoints reported from t-AL and neonatal acute leukemia cases (<1 year) are concentrated in the most telomeric 1 Kb of this region, while breakpoints from de novo cases cluster towards the centromeric end of this region (Figure 4) [43,44,45]. Similarly, for the PML gene, reported acute promyelocytic leukemia breakpoints fall into BCRs in introns three and six, but in leukemia cases associated with mitoxantrone treatment, there is a remarkably tight clustering of PML breakpoints within an 8 bp region of intron 6 [12,14]. This includes five cases of secondary leukemia following mitoxantrone treatment for multiple sclerosis [15] (see above). Returning to the MLL gene, the similar distribution of t-AL and neonatal acute lymphoblastic leukemia MLL translocation breakpoints [44] is intriguing since MLL translocations are particularly common in infant acute leukemia [46] and it has been suggested that TOP2 poisons acting in utero may play a role in the etiology of infant leukemias [30,35,44,47]. The telomeric end of the MLL BCR also contains an area of DNase I hypersensitivity [48,49], cryptic promoter activity and binding by the transcription factor CTCF (see Figure 4) [50]. DNase I hypersensitivity results from increased chromatin accessibility and is characteristic of promoters and other transcriptional regulatory elements. Intriguingly, amongst reported t-AML and neonatal acute leukemia MLL translocations that have been described at the DNA sequence level there is a breaksite hotspot [51,52,53] that coincides with the peak of DNase I hypersensitivity and CTCF binding (Figure 4). It has been suggested that an unusual chromatin structure and/or cryptic promoter activity contributes to MLL translocation in t-AL and possibly neonatal acute leukemia [49,50,54]. Furthermore, DNase I hypersensitive sites are also associated with BCRs of other genes that are rearranged in t-AML translocations including AF9 and AF4 (common MLL translocation partners), and in the AML1/RUNX1 and ETO genes [48,55].
Ijerph 09 02075 g004 1024
Figure 4. MLL translocations. Top: Genomic organization of the MLL gene, exons are numbered. Horizontal rectangle, breakpoint cluster region (BCR). Bottom: Enlarged segment of the MLL locus encompassing the breakpoint region. SCI and SCII denote BCR subclusters in which de novo AML and t-AL/neonatal translocation breakpoints are concentrated respectively [45]. The asterisk denotes a “hotspot” where nine tightly clustered therapy related or neonatal breakpoints have been reported. The red-boxed region highlights a peak of CTCF binding and DNase I hypersensitivity observed in the publically available ENCODE data (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGatewa [56,57,58]).
Figure 4. MLL translocations. Top: Genomic organization of the MLL gene, exons are numbered. Horizontal rectangle, breakpoint cluster region (BCR). Bottom: Enlarged segment of the MLL locus encompassing the breakpoint region. SCI and SCII denote BCR subclusters in which de novo AML and t-AL/neonatal translocation breakpoints are concentrated respectively [45]. The asterisk denotes a “hotspot” where nine tightly clustered therapy related or neonatal breakpoints have been reported. The red-boxed region highlights a peak of CTCF binding and DNase I hypersensitivity observed in the publically available ENCODE data (http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgGatewa [56,57,58]).
Ijerph 09 02075 g004
Recently, it has emerged that TOP2B has a role in transcription, being involved in the transcriptional response to estrogen and other nuclear hormones in a manner that appears to involve transient DSB induction [59,60,61,62,63]. In addition, inhibitor studies suggest that etoposide-induced TOP2B cleavage complexes are proteolytically processed to reveal DSBs in a transcription-linked mechanism [64]. Furthermore, TOP2 is also thought to relieve positive supercoiling ahead of elongating RNA polymerase [65] and to be required for efficient transcription on chromatin templates [21], although this process may involve TOP2A rather than TOP2B. DNase I hypersensitivity and cryptic promoter activity, together with the connections between TOP2B and transcription led us to suggest that DSBs introduced by TOP2B during transcription (and stabilized by a TOP2 poison) are the causative DSBs in chromosomal translocations in therapy related leukemia with anti-TOP2 drugs [66].
When considering mechanisms that facilitate recurrent chromosome translocations, the processes that generate DSBs are only part of the story. For translocation to occur the participating genes must also be in the same nuclear vicinity to allow interaction and aberrant end-joining. Processes that bring these genes together or facilitate their interaction would be expected to increase the risk of a translocation between them. Interphase genomes are non-randomly arranged in the nuclear space and the average distance between genes appears to affect translocation frequency [67]. While the processes that organize the chromosomes in the interphase nucleus are not well understood, a contributing factor and one that could be relevant to chromosome translocations especially in relation to t-AML is the now well accepted concept of transcription factories (see Figure 5).
Ijerph 09 02075 g005 1024
Figure 5. Clustering of transcription into transcription factories could facilitate chromosome translocation. Segments of two juxtaposed chromosomes are shown in red and blue. Transcription factories can contain active genes located on different chromosomes where these chromosomes come into contact and potentially intermingle [68]. Ongoing transcription in a shared transcription factory can maintain two heterologous chromosome segments in juxtaposition for the length of the transcription cycle (circled area, top part of the diagram) and it is hypothesized that this facilitates translocation when DNA breaks are induced. In the case of t-AML related translocations breaks are introduced by the action of TOP2 poisons.
Figure 5. Clustering of transcription into transcription factories could facilitate chromosome translocation. Segments of two juxtaposed chromosomes are shown in red and blue. Transcription factories can contain active genes located on different chromosomes where these chromosomes come into contact and potentially intermingle [68]. Ongoing transcription in a shared transcription factory can maintain two heterologous chromosome segments in juxtaposition for the length of the transcription cycle (circled area, top part of the diagram) and it is hypothesized that this facilitates translocation when DNA breaks are induced. In the case of t-AML related translocations breaks are introduced by the action of TOP2 poisons.
Ijerph 09 02075 g005
Transcription occurs at dynamic structures called factories or hubs [69] consisting of multiple active RNA polymerase complexes each engaged with a transcription unit (gene) [70]. The dynamic association of genes with these focal sites of transcription results in looping and loops are presumed to form as transcription initiates, remain associated while transcription proceeds and then redistribute as transcription terminates (Figure 5). Since interphase chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the nucleus [68], transcription units derived from proximal regions of the same chromosome are likely to share transcription factories with the greatest frequency. However, high resolution FISH has demonstrated significant intermingling of chromatin between adjacent chromosome territories [68]. As a result genes residing on different chromosomes can simultaneously associate with common transcription factories, as has been demonstrated using RNA FISH to visualize sites of ongoing transcription [71,72]. In the context of hematological malignancies, the Igh and Myc genes (which are involved in translocations in B-cell lymphoma such that the proto-oncogene Myc is driven by the active Igh promoter) frequently share sites of transcription in stimulated mouse B cells [73]. Thus, sharing of transcription factories combined with transcription-associated TOP2-poison mediated DSBs could provide both the DSBs and the juxtaposition required for chromosome translocation (see Figure 5) in therapy related leukemias.
A key question concerning the etiology of the specific translocations observed in therapy related acute leukemia is why the MLL breakpoints occur in such a restricted genomic region in t-AL and neonatal acute leukemia compared to de novo AML (see Figure 4). This region is sensitive to etoposide-induced cleavage in cell line studies [49,50,74]; however, two distinct mechanisms have been implicated as sources of this sensitivity. The first is direct TOP2-mediated cleavage (as illustrated in Figure 3) and the second is related to early CAD-mediated apoptotic fragmentation [74,75,76]. The former model appears the simplest, and base-pair resolution mapping revealed etoposide-induced TOP2-mediated cleavage and DNA breaks in the SCII region of the MLL BCR, but notably it did not demonstrate preferential TOP2 mediated cleavage at the translocation hotspot referred to above [50,74] (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Higher order chromatin fragmentation occurring during TOP2 poison induced apoptosis was proposed as an alternative mechanism for initiation of t-AL–associated chromosomal translocations in cells that ultimately evade apoptosis and divide [74,75,76]. Base-pair resolution mapping revealed a major apoptotic cleavage region in MLL exon 12, however this is downstream of the BCR and more than 200 bp from the hotspot of MLL breaksites [74] (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Thus, the clustering of t-AML breakpoints cannot be explained simply by direct TOP2-mediated or apoptotic higher order cleavage patterns alone, but might result from interactions between these processes in conjunction with end-resection and other events associated with aberrant repair, or as discussed above, with transcription.
Interestingly, the hotspot of t-AL break sites described above is centered on an ATTA motif that is also found in the etoposide-stabilized TOP2B-associated cleavage site reported in the pS2/TFF1 promoter (Figure 6) [59]. Although there is no strong consensus for optimum TOP2 cleavage sites [77], there is an apparent preference for A/T residues in the +1 to +4 positions which correspond to the 5’-overhang generated by TOP2 cleavage (Figure 6). TOP2 cleavage events at sites in two translocation partner genes could generate homologous 4 bp single-stranded overhangs (after cleavage complex processing, see below) that anneal to form junction sequences that are repaired by non-homologous end joining in an aberrant repair reaction (Figure 5). This type of reciprocal cleavage followed by aberrant joining between TAATTA sequences may account for a minority of MLL-AF9 translocation events [52], but analysis of translocation junction sequences suggests that aberant joining typically involves resection to reveal microhomologies in the partner chromosomes [53,78]. It should be noted that the precise biochemical steps in the normal repair process through which TOP2 complexes are processed to yield DNA ends that can be ligated are not fully understood. For TOP2B, this process can include transcription dependent proteasomal degradation of covalently coupled TOP2B [64], which may be followed by additional “end polishing” steps. This type of processing would be compatible with direct aberrant joining of the resulting staggered ends or resection to reveal microhomologies prior to joining.
Ijerph 09 02075 g006 1024
Figure 6. MLL translocation hotspot. MLL breakpoint sequences (der 11) from t-AL cases that form a “hotspot” near the telomeric end of the MLL BCR. The ATTA sequence is aligned with the same 4bp sequence identified in the etoposide-induced cleavage site described in the pS2 promoter [59].
Figure 6. MLL translocation hotspot. MLL breakpoint sequences (der 11) from t-AL cases that form a “hotspot” near the telomeric end of the MLL BCR. The ATTA sequence is aligned with the same 4bp sequence identified in the etoposide-induced cleavage site described in the pS2 promoter [59].
Ijerph 09 02075 g006

4. Conclusions and Possible Approaches to Reducing T-AML Associated Chromosome Translocations

TOP2 poisons are useful and effective anti-cancer drugs, but they are associated with therapy-related secondary leukemia, often bearing 11q23 translocations involving the MLL gene. The distribution of MLL chromosomal breakpoints in t-AL cases differs from that observed for de novo AML with clustering at the 3’-region of intron 11 associated with a region of DNase I hypersensitivity and CTCF binding (Figure 4 and Figure 6). Neither direct TOP2-mediated cleavage nor early apoptotic processes alone appear to explain the distribution of MLL break sites. Instead, interaction between these processes and/or with events downstream of initial DNA cleavage and other factors such as chromatin accessibility and ongoing transcription may influence t-AML translocation [48,49,50]. For drugs such as etoposide, TOP2A appears to be the most important of the two TOP2 isoforms with regard to induced cytotoxicity and therefore anti-cancer activity [26]. Despite this, we and others have found that etoposide-induced genotoxicity is largely dependent on TOP2B [30,66,79]. Recent data has revealed an important and unexpected role for TOP2B in transcription [59,60,61] and transcription dependent processing of TOP2B cleavage complexes to DSBs. The possibility that this is connected to the apparent genotoxic potential of TOP2B in the presence of TOP2 poisons provides an intriguing area for further study which will provide a better understanding of the events that trigger chromosome translocations in t-AL and could lead to strategies to minimize the occurrence of leukemia after treatment for a primary malignancy. One such strategy is specific TOP2 poison targeting of TOP2A, since genotoxic effects appear to be mostly mediated by TOP2B [66]. In fact, the TOP2 poisons shown in Table 1 are not identical in their relative activities against TOP2A and TOP2B and TOP2 poisons have been described that preferentially target one or the other isoform [26,80,81]. Similarly, if transcription-dependent, TOP2B mediated DSBs trigger t-AL translocations as suggested above, then harmful genotoxic effects may be minimized by employing anti-cancer regimens in which a transcriptional inhibitor precedes administration of a TOP2 poison. Notably transcription inhibitors are currently under investigation as potential anti-cancer agents in their own right [82]. As understanding of the molecular events leading to TOP2 poison associated t-AL improves we are optimistic that strategies can be identified that will minimize the occurrence of secondary effects such as therapy related leukemia following use of this extremely useful class of anti-cancer agent.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by Leukemia and Lymphoma Research, London, U.K. http://leukemialymphomaresearch.org.uk (Formerly the Leukemia Research Fund) on a Specialist Program Grant, Number 07038.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mauritzson, N.; Albin, M.; Rylander, L.; Billstrom, R.; Ahlgren, T.; Mikoczy, Z.; Bjork, J.; Stromberg, U.; Nilsson, P.G.; Mitelman, F.; Hagmar, L.; Johansson, B. Pooled analysis of clinical and cytogenetic features in treatment-related and de novo adult acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes based on a consecutive series of 761 patients analyzed 1976–1993 and on 5,098 unselected cases reported in the literature 1974–2001. Leukemia 2002, 16, 2366–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kern, W.; Haferlach, T.; Schnittger, S.; Hiddemann, W.; Schoch, C. Prognosis in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and impact of karyotype. J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 2510–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hijiya, N.; Hudson, M.M.; Lensing, S.; Zacher, M.; Onciu, M.; Behm, F.G.; Razzouk, B.I.; Ribeiro, R.C.; Rubnitz, J.E.; Sandlund, J.T.; Rivera, G.K.; Evans, W.E.; Relling, M.V.; Pui, C.H. Cumulative incidence of secondary neoplasms as a first event after childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA 2007, 297, 1207–1215. [Google Scholar]
  4. Praga, C.; Bergh, J.; Bliss, J.; Bonneterre, J.; Cesana, B.; Coombes, R.C.; Fargeot, P.; Folin, A.; Fumoleau, P.; Giuliani, R.; Kerbrat, P.; Hery, M.; Nilsson, J.; Onida, F.; Piccart, M.; Shepherd, L.; Therasse, P.; Wils, J.; Rogers, D. Risk of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome in trials of adjuvant epirubicin for early breast cancer: Correlation with doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. J. Clin. Oncol. 2005, 23, 4179–4191. [Google Scholar]
  5. Le Deley, M.C.; Suzan, F.; Cutuli, B.; Delaloge, S.; Shamsaldin, A.; Linassier, C.; Clisant, S.; de Vathaire, F.; Fenaux, P.; Hill, C. Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, radiotherapy, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: Risk factors for leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2007, 25, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
  6. Leone, G.; Fianchi, L.; Pagano, L.; Voso, M.T. Incidence and susceptibility to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2010, 184, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rowley, J.D.; Olney, H.J. International workshop on the relationship of prior therapy to balanced chromosome aberrations in therapy-related myelodysplastic syndromes and acute leukemia: Overview report. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2002, 33, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marschalek, R. Mechanisms of leukemogenesis by MLL fusion proteins. Br. J. Haematol. 2011, 152, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meyer, C.; Kowarz, E.; Hofmann, J.; Renneville, A.; Zuna, J.; Trka, J.; Ben Abdelali, R.; Macintyre, E.; De Braekeleer, E.; De Braekeleer, M.; Delabesse, E.; de Oliveira, M.P.; Cave, H.; Clappier, E.; van Dongen, J.J.; Balgobind, B.V.; van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M.M.; Beverloo, H.B.; Panzer-Grumayer, R.; Teigler-Schlegel, A.; Harbott, J.; Kjeldsen, E.; Schnittger, S.; Koehl, U.; Gruhn, B.; Heidenreich, O.; Chan, L.C.; Yip, S.F.; Krzywinski, M.; Eckert, C.; Moricke, A.; Schrappe, M.; Alonso, C.N.; Schafer, B.W.; Krauter, J.; Lee, D.A.; Zur Stadt, U.; Te Kronnie, G.; Sutton, R.; Izraeli, S.; Trakhtenbrot, L.; Lo Nigro, L.; Tsaur, G.; Fechina, L.; Szczepanski, T.; Strehl, S.; Ilencikova, D.; Molkentin, M.; Burmeister, T.; Dingermann, T.; Klingebiel, T.; Marschalek, R. New insights to the MLL recombinome of acute leukemias. Leukemia 2009, 23, 1490–1499. [Google Scholar]
  10. Super, H.J.; McCabe, N.R.; Thirman, M.J.; Larson, R.A.; Le Beau, M.M.; Pedersen-Bjergaard, J.; Philip, P.; Diaz, M.O.; Rowley, J.D. Rearrangements of the MLL gene in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia in patients previously treated with agents targeting DNA-topoisomerase II. Blood 1993, 82, 3705–3711. [Google Scholar]
  11. Krivtsov, A.V.; Twomey, D.; Feng, Z.; Stubbs, M.C.; Wang, Y.; Faber, J.; Levine, J.E.; Wang, J.; Hahn, W.C.; Gilliland, D.G.; Golub, T.R.; Armstrong, S.A. Transformation from committed progenitor to leukaemia stem cell initiated by MLL-AF9. Nature 2006, 442, 818–822. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasan, S.K.; Ottone, T.; Schlenk, R.F.; Xiao, Y.; Wiemels, J.L.; Mitra, M.E.; Bernasconi, P.; Di Raimondo, F.; Stanghellini, M.T.; Marco, P.; Mays, A.N.; Dohner, H.; Sanz, M.A.; Amadori, S.; Grimwade, D.; Lo-Coco, F. Analysis of t(15;17) chromosomal breakpoint sequences in therapy-related versus de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia: Association of DNA breaks with specific DNA motifs at PML and RARA loci. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2010, 49, 726–732. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ottone, T.; Hasan, S.K.; Montefusco, E.; Curzi, P.; Mays, A.N.; Chessa, L.; Ferrari, A.; Conte, E.; Noguera, N.I.; Lavorgna, S.; Ammatuna, E.; Divona, M.; Bovetti, K.; Amadori, S.; Grimwade, D.; Lo-Coco, F. Identification of a potential “hotspot” DNA region in the RUNX1 gene targeted by mitoxantrone in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;21) translocation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2009, 48, 213–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mays, A.N.; Osheroff, N.; Xiao, Y.; Wiemels, J.L.; Felix, C.A.; Byl, J.A.; Saravanamuttu, K.; Peniket, A.; Corser, R.; Chang, C.; Hoyle, C.; Parker, A.N.; Hasan, S.K.; Lo-Coco, F.; Solomon, E.; Grimwade, D. Evidence for direct involvement of epirubicin in the formation of chromosomal translocations in t(15;17) therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2009, 15, 326–330. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hasan, S.K.; Mays, A.N.; Ottone, T.; Ledda, A.; La Nasa, G.; Cattaneo, C.; Borlenghi, E.; Melillo, L.; Montefusco, E.; Cervera, J.; Stephen, C.; Satchi, G.; Lennard, A.; Libura, M.; Byl, J.A.; Osheroff, N.; Amadori, S.; Felix, C.A.; Voso, M.T.; Sperr, W.R.; Esteve, J.; Sanz, M.A.; Grimwade, D.; Lo-Coco, F. Molecular analysis of t(15;17) genomic breakpoints in secondary acute promyelocytic leukemia arising after treatment of multiple sclerosis. Blood 2008, 112, 3383–3390. [Google Scholar]
  16. Mistry, A.R.; Felix, C.A.; Whitmarsh, R.J.; Mason, A.; Reiter, A.; Cassinat, B.; Parry, A.; Walz, C.; Wiemels, J.L.; Segal, M.R.; Ades, L.; Blair, I.A.; Osheroff, N.; Peniket, A.J.; Lafage-Pochitaloff, M.; Cross, N.C.; Chomienne, C.; Solomon, E.; Fenaux, P.; Grimwade, D. DNA topoisomerase II in therapy-related acute promyelocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar]
  17. Voltz, R.; Starck, M.; Zingler, V.; Strupp, M.; Kolb, H.J. Mitoxantrone therapy in multiple sclerosis and acute leukaemia: a case report out of 644 treated patients. Mult. Scler. 2004, 10, 472–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Barthelmes, H.U.; Grue, P.; Feineis, S.; Straub, T.; Boege, F. Active DNA topoisomerase IIa is a component of the salt-stable centrosome core. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 38823–38830. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vos, S.M.; Tretter, E.M.; Schmidt, B.H.; Berger, J.M. All tangled up: How cells direct, manage and exploit topoisomerase function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12, 827–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cuvier, O.; Hirano, T. A role of topoisomerase II in linking DNA replication to chromosome condensation. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mondal, N.; Parvin, J.D. DNA topoisomerase IIa is required for RNA polymerase II transcription on chromatin templates. Nature 2001, 413, 435–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yang, L.; Wold, M.S.; Li, J.J.; Kelly, T.J.; Liu, L.F. Roles of DNA topoisomerases in simian virus 40 DNA replication in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 950–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Padget, K.; Pearson, A.D.; Austin, C.A. Quantitation of DNA topoisomerase IIa and b in human leukaemia cells by immunoblotting. Leukemia 2000, 14, 1997–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Prosperi, E.; Negri, C.; Marchese, G.; Ricotti, G.C. Expression of the 170-kDa and 180-kDa isoforms of DNA topoisomerase II in resting and proliferating human lymphocytes. Cell Prolif. 1994, 27, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Onda, T.; Toyoda, E.; Miyazaki, O.; Seno, C.; Kagaya, S.; Okamoto, K.; Nishikawa, K. NK314, a novel topoisomerase II inhibitor, induces rapid DNA double-strand breaks and exhibits superior antitumor effects against tumors resistant to other topoisomerase II inhibitors. Cancer Lett. 2008, 259, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Toyoda, E.; Kagaya, S.; Cowell, I.G.; Kurosawa, A.; Kamoshita, K.; Nishikawa, K.; Iiizumi, S.; Koyama, H.; Austin, C.A.; Adachi, N. NK314, a topoisomerase II inhibitor that specifically targets the alpha isoform. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 23711–23720. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hisatomi, T.; Sueoka-Aragane, N.; Sato, A.; Tomimasu, R.; Ide, M.; Kurimasa, A.; Okamoto, K.; Kimura, S.; Sueoka, E. NK314 potentiates anti-tumor activity with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma cellsby inhibition of dual targets on topoisomerase IIα and DNA-dependent protein kinase. Blood 2011, 117, 3575–3584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hawtin, R.E.; Stockett, D.E.; Byl, J.A.W.; McDowell, R.S.; Tan, N.; Arkin, M.R.; Conroy, A.; Yang, W.; Osheroff, N.; Fox, J.A. Voreloxin is an anticancer quinolone derivative that intercalates DNA and poisons topoisomerase II. PLoS ONE 2010, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Austin, C.A.; Patel, S.; Ono, K.; Nakane, H.; Fisher, L.M. Site-specific DNA cleavage by mammalian DNA topoisomerase II induced by novel flavone and catechin derivatives. Biochem. J. 1992, 282, 883–889. [Google Scholar]
  30. Azarova, A.M.; Lin, R.-K.; Tsai, Y.-C.; Liu, L.F.; Lin, C.-P.; Lyu, Y.L. Genistein induces topoisomerase IIb- and proteasome-mediated DNA sequence rearrangements: Implications in infant leukemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 399, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lopez-Lazaro, M.; Calderon-Montano, J.M.; Burgos-Moron, E.; Austin, C.A. Green tea constituents (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) and gallic acid induce topoisomerase I- and topoisomerase II-DNA complexes in cells mediated by pyrogallol-induced hydrogen peroxide. Mutagenesis 2011, 26, 489–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lopez-Lazaro, M.; Willmore, E.; Austin, C.A. Cells lacking DNA topoisomerase IIb are resistant to genistein. J. Nat. Prod. 2007, 70, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lopez-Lazaro, M.; Willmore, E.; Austin, C.A. The dietary flavonoids myricetin and fisetin act as dual inhibitors of DNA topoisomerases I and II in cells. Mutat. Res. 2010, 696, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  34. Habermeyer, M.; Fritz, J.; Barthelmes, H.U.; Christensen, M.O.; Larsen, M.K.; Boege, F.; Marko, D. Anthocyanidins modulate the activity of human DNA topoisomerases I and II and affect cellular DNA integrity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2005, 18, 1395–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ross, J.A. Dietary flavonoids and the MLL gene: A pathway to infant leukemia? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 4411–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani, S.; Janssen, J.; Maas, L.M.; Godschalk, R.W.L.; Nijhuis, J.G.; van Schooten, F.J. Dietary flavonoids induce MLL translocations in primary human CD34+ cells. Carcinogenesis 2007, 28, 1703–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zeman, S.M.; Phillips, D.R.; Crothers, D.M. Characterization of covalent Adriamycin-DNA adducts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11561–11565. [Google Scholar]
  38. Swift, L.P.; Rephaeli, A.; Nudelman, A.; Phillips, D.R.; Cutts, S.M. Doxorubicin-DNA adducts induce a non-topoisomerase II-mediated form of cell death. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 4863–4871. [Google Scholar]
  39. Bilardi, R.A.; Kimura, K.I.; Phillips, D.R.; Cutts, S.M. Processing of anthracycline-DNA adducts via DNA replication and interstrand crosslink repair pathways. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 83, 1241–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Parker, B.S.; Cutts, S.M.; Cullinane, C.; Phillips, D.R. Formaldehyde activation of mitoxantrone yields CpG and CpA specific DNA adducts. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 982–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Parker, B.S.; Buley, T.; Evison, B.J.; Cutts, S.M.; Neumann, G.M.; Iskander, M.N.; Phillips, D.R. A molecular understanding of mitoxantrone-DNA adduct formation: Effect of cytosine methylation and flanking sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 18814–18823. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gewirtz, D. A critical evaluation of the mechanisms of action proposed for the antitumor effects of the anthracycline antibiotics adriamycin and daunorubicin. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999, 57, 727–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Broeker, P.L.; Super, H.G.; Thirman, M.J.; Pomykala, H.; Yonebayashi, Y.; Tanabe, S.; Zeleznik-Le, N.; Rowley, J.D. Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within the MLL breakpoint cluster region in de novo acute leukemia and in treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia: Correlation with scaffold attachment regions and topoisomerase II consensus binding sites. Blood 1996, 87, 1912–1922. [Google Scholar]
  44. Cimino, G.; Rapanotti, M.C.; Biondi, A.; Elia, L.; Lo Coco, F.; Price, C.; Rossi, V.; Rivolta, A.; Canaani, E.; Croce, C.M.; Mandelli, F.; Greaves, M. Infant acute leukemias show the same biased distribution of ALL1 gene breaks as topoisomerase II related secondary acute leukemias. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 2879–2883. [Google Scholar]
  45. Reichel, M.; Gillert, E.; Angermuller, S.; Hensel, J.P.; Heidel, F.; Lode, M.; Leis, T.; Biondi, A.; Haas, O.A.; Strehl, S.; Panzer-Grumayer, E.R.; Griesinger, F.; Beck, J.D.; Greil, J.; Fey, G.H.; Uckun, F.M.; Marschalek, R. Biased distribution of chromosomal breakpoints involving the MLL gene in infants versus children and adults with t(4;11) ALL. Oncogene 2001, 20, 2900–2907. [Google Scholar]
  46. De Braekeleer, M.; Morel, F.; Le Bris, M.J.; Herry, A.; Douet-Guilbert, N. The MLL gene and translocations involving chromosomal band 11q23 in acute leukemia. Anticancer Res. 2005, 25, 1931–1944. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alexander, F.E.; Patheal, S.L.; Biondi, A.; Brandalise, S.; Cabrera, M.E.; Chan, L.C.; Chen, Z.; Cimino, G.; Cordoba, J.C.; Gu, L.J.; Hussein, H.; Ishii, E.; Kamel, A.M.; Labra, S.; Magalhaes, I.Q.; Mizutani, S.; Petridou, E.; de Oliveira, M.P.; Yuen, P.; Wiemels, J.L.; Greaves, M.F. Transplacental chemical exposure and risk of infant leukemia with MLL gene fusion. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 2542–2546. [Google Scholar]
  48. Strissel, P.L.; Strick, R.; Tomek, R.J.; Roe, B.A.; Rowley, J.D.; Zeleznik-Le, N.J. DNA structural properties of AF9 are similar to MLL and could act as recombination hot spots resulting in MLL/AF9 translocations and leukemogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2000, 9, 1671–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Strissel, P.L.; Strick, R.; Rowley, J.D.; Zeleznik-Le, N.J. An in vivo topoisomerase II cleavage site and a DNase I hypersensitive site colocalize near exon 9 in the MLL breakpoint cluster region. Blood 1998, 92, 3793–3803. [Google Scholar]
  50. Scharf, S.; Zech, J.; Bursen, A.; Schraets, D.; Oliver, P.L.; Kliem, S.; Pfitzner, E.; Gillert, E.; Dingermann, T.; Marschalek, R. Transcription linked to recombination: A gene-internal promoter coincides with the recombination hot spot II of the human MLL gene. Oncogene 2006, 26, 1361–1371. [Google Scholar]
  51. Langer, T.; Metzler, M.; Reinhardt, D.; Viehmann, S.; Borkhardt, A.; Reichel, M.; Stanulla, M.; Schrappe, M.; Creutzig, U.; Ritter, J.; Leis, T.; Jacobs, U.; Harbott, J.; Beck, J.D.; Rascher, W.; Repp, R. Analysis of t(9;11) chromosomal breakpoint sequences in childhood acute leukemia: Almost identical MLL breakpoints in therapy-related AML after treatment without etoposides. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003, 36, 393–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Raffini, L.J.; Slater, D.J.; Rappaport, E.F.; Lo Nigro, L.; Cheung, N.K.; Biegel, J.A.; Nowell, P.C.; Lange, B.J.; Felix, C.A. Panhandle and reverse-panhandle PCR enable cloning of der(11) and der(other) genomic breakpoint junctions of MLL translocations and identify complex translocation of MLL, AF-4, and CDK6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 4568–4573. [Google Scholar]
  53. Whitmarsh, R.J.; Saginario, C.; Zhuo, Y.; Hilgenfeld, E.; Rappaport, E.F.; Megonigal, M.D.; Carroll, M.; Liu, M.; Osheroff, N.; Cheung, N.K.; Slater, D.J.; Ried, T.; Knutsen, T.; Blair, I.A.; Felix, C.A. Reciprocal DNA topoisomerase II cleavage events at 5'-TATTA-3' sequences in MLL and AF-9 create homologous single-stranded overhangs that anneal to form der(11) and der(9) genomic breakpoint junctions in treatment-related AML without further processing. Oncogene 2003, 22, 8448–8459. [Google Scholar]
  54. Strick, R.; Zhang, Y.; Emmanuel, N.; Strissel, P.L. Common chromatin structures at breakpoint cluster regions may lead to chromosomal translocations found in chronic and acute leukemias. Hum. Genet. 2006, 119, 479–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, Y.; Strissel, P.; Strick, R.; Chen, J.; Nucifora, G.; Le Beau, M.M.; Larson, R.A.; Rowley, J.D. Genomic DNA breakpoints in AML1/RUNX1 and ETO cluster with topoisomerase II DNA cleavage and DNase I hypersensitive sites in t(8;21) leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 3070–3075. [Google Scholar]
  56. Dreszer, T.R.; Karolchik, D.; Zweig, A.S.; Hinrichs, A.S.; Raney, B.J.; Kuhn, R.M.; Meyer, L.R.; Wong, M.; Sloan, C.A.; Rosenbloom, K.R.; Roe, G.; Rhead, B.; Pohl, A.; Malladi, V.S.; Li, C.H.; Learned, K.; Kirkup, V.; Hsu, F.; Harte, R.A.; Guruvadoo, L.; Goldman, M.; Giardine, B.M.; Fujita, P.A.; Diekhans, M.; Cline, M.S.; Clawson, H.; Barber, G.P.; Haussler, D.; James Kent, W. The UCSC Genome Browser database: Extensions and updates 2011. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D918–D923. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rosenbloom, K.R.; Dreszer, T.R.; Long, J.C.; Malladi, V.S.; Sloan, C.A.; Raney, B.J.; Cline, M.S.; Karolchik, D.; Barber, G.P.; Clawson, H.; Diekhans, M.; Fujita, P.A.; Goldman, M.; Gravell, R.C.; Harte, R.A.; Hinrichs, A.S.; Kirkup, V.M.; Kuhn, R.M.; Learned, K.; Maddren, M.; Meyer, L.R.; Pohl, A.; Rhead, B.; Wong, M.C.; Zweig, A.S.; Haussler, D.; Kent, W.J. ENCODE whole-genome data in the UCSC Genome Browser: Update 2012. Nucl. Acids Res. 2012, 40, D912–D917. [Google Scholar]
  58. Celniker, S.E.; Dillon, L.A.; Gerstein, M.B.; Gunsalus, K.C.; Henikoff, S.; Karpen, G.H.; Kellis, M.; Lai, E.C.; Lieb, J.D.; MacAlpine, D.M.; Micklem, G.; Piano, F.; Snyder, M.; Stein, L.; White, K.P.; Waterston, R.H. Unlocking the secrets of the genome. Nature 2009, 459, 927–930. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  59. Ju, B.G.; Lunyak, V.V.; Perissi, V.; Garcia-Bassets, I.; Rose, D.W.; Glass, C.K.; Rosenfeld, M.G. A topoisomerase IIb-mediated dsDNA break required for regulated transcription. Science 2006, 312, 1798–1802. [Google Scholar]
  60. Perillo, B.; Ombra, M.N.; Bertoni, A.; Cuozzo, C.; Sacchetti, S.; Sasso, A.; Chiariotti, L.; Malorni, A.; Abbondanza, C.; Avvedimento, E.V. DNA oxidation as triggered by H3K9me2 demethylation drives estrogen-induced gene expression. Science 2008, 319, 202–206. [Google Scholar]
  61. Haffner, M.C.; Aryee, M.J.; Toubaji, A.; Esopi, D.M.; Albadine, R.; Gurel, B.; Isaacs, W.B.; Bova, G.S.; Liu, W.; Xu, J.; Meeker, A.K.; Netto, G.; De Marzo, A.M.; Nelson, W.G.; Yegnasubramanian, S. Androgen-induced TOP2B-mediated double-strand breaks and prostate cancer gene rearrangements. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 668–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McNamara, S.; Wang, H.; Hanna, N.; Miller, W.H., Jr. Topoisomerase IIb negatively modulates retinoic acid receptora function: A novel mechanism of retinoic acid resistance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28, 2066–2077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Francis, G.E.; Berney, J.J.; North, P.S.; Khan, Z.; Wilson, E.L.; Jacobs, P.; Ali, M. Evidence for the involvement of DNA topoisomerase II in neutrophil-granulocyte differentiation. Leukemia 1987, 1, 653–659. [Google Scholar]
  64. Mao, Y.; Desai, S.D.; Ting, C.-Y.; Hwang, J.; Liu, L.F. 26 S proteasome-mediated degradation of topoisomerase ii cleavable complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 40652–40658. [Google Scholar]
  65. Liu, L.F.; Wang, J.C. Supercoiling of the DNA template during transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 7024–7027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cowell, I.G.; Sondka, Z.; Smith, K.; Lee, K.C.; Manville, C.; Sidorczuk-Lesthuruge, M.; Rance, H.A.; Padget, K.; Jackson, G.H.; Adachi, N.; Austin, C.A. A model for MLL translocations in therapy-related leukemia involving topoisomerase IIβ mediated DNA strand breaks and gene proximity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Meaburn, K.J.; Misteli, T.; Soutoglou, E. Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2007, 17, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Branco, M.R.; Pombo, A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cook, P.R. A model for all genomes: The role of transcription factories. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 395, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Faro-Trindade, I.; Cook, P.R. Transcription factories: Structures conserved during differentiation and evolution. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Osborne, C.S.; Chakalova, L.; Brown, K.E.; Carter, D.; Horton, A.; Debrand, E.; Goyenechea, B.; Mitchell, J.A.; Lopes, S.; Reik, W.; Fraser, P. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 2004, 36, 1065–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schoenfelder, S.; Sexton, T.; Chakalova, L.; Cope, N.F.; Horton, A.; Andrews, S.; Kurukuti, S.; Mitchell, J.A.; Umlauf, D.; Dimitrova, D.S.; Eskiw, C.H.; Luo, Y.; Wei, C.-L.; Ruan, Y.; Bieker, J.J.; Fraser, P. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 2010, 42, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
  73. Osborne, C.S.; Chakalova, L.; Mitchell, J.A.; Horton, A.; Wood, A.L.; Bolland, D.J.; Corcoran, A.E.; Fraser, P. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mirault, M.E.; Boucher, P.; Tremblay, A. Nucleotide-resolution mapping of topoisomerase-mediated and apoptotic DNA strand scissions at or near an MLL translocation hotspot. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2006, 79, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Betti, C.J.; Villalobos, M.J.; Diaz, M.O.; Vaughan, A.T. Apoptotic triggers initiate translocations within the MLL gene involving the nonhomologous end joining repair system. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4550–4555. [Google Scholar]
  76. Stanulla, M.; Wang, J.; Chervinsky, D.S.; Thandla, S.; Aplan, P.D. DNA cleavage within the MLL breakpoint cluster region is a specific event which occurs as part of higher-order chromatin fragmentation during the initial stages of apoptosis. Mol. Cell Biol. 1997, 17, 4070–4079. [Google Scholar]
  77. Capranico, G.; Binaschi, M. DNA sequence selectivity of topoisomerases and topoisomerase poisons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1400, 185–194. [Google Scholar]
  78. Lovett, B.D.; Lo Nigro, L.; Rappaport, E.F.; Blair, I.A.; Osheroff, N.; Zheng, N.; Megonigal, M.D.; Williams, W.R.; Nowell, P.C.; Felix, C.A. Near-precise interchromosomal recombination and functional DNA topoisomerase II cleavage sites at MLL and AF-4 genomic breakpoints in treatment-related acute lymphoblastic leukemia with t(4;11) translocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 9802–9807. [Google Scholar]
  79. Azarova, A.M.; Lyu, Y.L.; Lin, C.P.; Tsai, Y.C.; Lau, J.Y.; Wang, J.C.; Liu, L.F. Roles of DNA topoisomerase II isozymes in chemotherapy and secondary malignancies. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11014–11019. [Google Scholar]
  80. Gao, H.; Huang, K.-C.; Yamasaki, E.F.; Chan, K.K.; Chohan, L.; Snapka, R.M. XK469, a selective topoisomerase IIb poison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 12168–12173. [Google Scholar]
  81. Errington, F.; Willmore, E.; Tilby, M.J.; Li, L.; Li, G.; Li, W.; Baguley, B.C.; Austin, C.A. Murine transgenic cells lacking DNA topoisomerase IIb are resistant to acridines and mitoxantrone: Analysis of cytotoxicity and cleavable complex formation. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999, 56, 1309–1316. [Google Scholar]
  82. Stellrecht, C.M.; Chen, L.S. Transcription inhibition as a therapeutic target for cancer. Cancers 2011, 3, 4170–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cowell, I.G.; Austin, C.A. Mechanism of Generation of Therapy Related Leukemia in Response to Anti-Topoisomerase II Agents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2075-2091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062075

AMA Style

Cowell IG, Austin CA. Mechanism of Generation of Therapy Related Leukemia in Response to Anti-Topoisomerase II Agents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2012; 9(6):2075-2091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062075

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cowell, Ian G., and Caroline A. Austin. 2012. "Mechanism of Generation of Therapy Related Leukemia in Response to Anti-Topoisomerase II Agents" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 9, no. 6: 2075-2091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062075

APA Style

Cowell, I. G., & Austin, C. A. (2012). Mechanism of Generation of Therapy Related Leukemia in Response to Anti-Topoisomerase II Agents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(6), 2075-2091. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9062075

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop