Next Article in Journal
One-Dimensional Heterogeneous Reaction Model of a Drop-Tube Carbonator Reactor for Thermochemical Energy Storage Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Phase Change Material Storage on the Dynamic Performance of a Direct Vapor Generation Solar Organic Rankine Cycle System
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Challenges and Opportunities of Renewable Energy Source (RES) Penetration in Indonesia: Case Study of Java-Bali Power System

by
Handrea Bernando Tambunan
1,
Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam
1,2,*,
Iswan Prahastono
1,
Anita Pharmatrisanti
1,
Andreas Putro Purnomoadi
1,
Siti Aisyah
1,
Yonny Wicaksono
3 and
I Gede Ryan Sandy
3
1
PLN Research Institute, PT. PLN (Persero), Jakarta 12760, Indonesia
2
School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
3
PLN Load Dispatch Center, Gandul 16514, West Java, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(22), 5903; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225903
Submission received: 27 October 2020 / Revised: 6 November 2020 / Accepted: 10 November 2020 / Published: 12 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems)

Abstract

:
Nowadays, the integration of renewable energy sources, especially grid-connected photovoltaic, into electrical power systems, is increasing dramatically. There are several stimulants especially in the Java-Bali power system, including huge solar potential, a national renewable energy (RE) target, regulation support for prosumers, photovoltaic technology development, and multi-year power system planning. However, significant annual photovoltaic penetration can lead to critical issues, including a drop of netload during the day, ramping capability, and minimal load operation for thermal power plants. This study analyses the duck curve phenomenon in the Java-Bali power system that considers high shares of the baseload power plant and specific scenarios in photovoltaic (PV) penetration and electricity demand growth. This study also analyses future netload, need for fast ramping rate capability, and oversupply issues in the Java-Bali power system. The results showed that the duck curve phenomenon appears with a significant netload drop in the middle of the day because of high power generation from grid-connected PV. Furthermore, the need for fast ramp rate capability is critical for a higher peak load combined with the lowest netload valley. Moreover, the significant load growth with high grid-connected PV penetration level caused unit commitment issues for thermal power plants as baseload operators.

1. Introduction

Energy plays a critical role in the global economy. While conventional energy from fossil fuels is increasingly limited, primarily to address climate change and other environmental issues, the use of renewable energy is widely encouraged for the same reasons. In the electrical power field, Renewable Energy Sources (RES), such as geothermal, biomass, hydro, tidal, wind, and solar, generate electricity. One popular type of RES with the highest global potential is solar energy from the sun [1,2]. The major stimulant regarding solar energy is that of reducing global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In general, conversion technologies can be grouped into two categories: Solar photovoltaic (PV) technology and solar thermal technology. Solar PV technology uses semiconductors to directly convert the electromagnetic energy in sunlight into electricity through the PV module [3]. Solar thermal technology uses Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) with high-magnification mirrors to concentrate solar energy into heat energy [4].
Indonesia is an archipelago country spanning the equator. This country has a tropical climate where sunlight shines virtually every day of the year. This favourable condition offers great potential to integrate RES, especially from solar energy to electrical power systems. Some factors that make the country’s solar resource so substantial include latitude, longitude, variation, geographic variation, season and climate, as these responsible for the level of solar irradiance distribution that passes through the atmosphere [5]. Indonesia’s national energy policy sets the ambitious national target for an optimal power mix of 23% RES sources in 2025 and 31% RES sources by 2050 [6]. Based on the electricity supply business plans from the national electric company (PLN), Indonesia has a great potential to generate more than 207 GW from solar energy [6].
Furthermore, several conditions will play an important role for massive PV growth in Indonesia: PV technology improvement; decreasing materials costs; electricity ratio targets for remote areas; and significant development programs in the next few years to achieve the national RES mandate. There are several reasons for the significant development of electrical generation from solar energy in Indonesia, including great solar potential, national RE target, regulatory support for prosumers, PV technology development, and also power system planning from RES [1,6].
The intersection between electricity price and PV levelised cost of energy (LcoE) will eventually reach grid parity, meaning that PV rooftop systems economically compete with electrical generating by utility companies [7]. Five cities in China and cities in Southern and Central Italy will reach grid parity over the next few years [8,9], and several cities in Indonesia will also achieve grid parity over a similar timescale [2,10]. This condition can also increase PV utilisation into the distribution system.
Today, trends to install grid-connected PV have been significantly increasing all over the world. However, grid-connected PV fundamentally changes the nature of power system operation in terms of steady-state and transient stability performance. Indonesia’s power generation sector has been dominated by the use of fossil fuels, particularly coal-fired power plants. This type of thermal power plant is typically used to provide daily baseload, which has a low ramping rate to respond to load fluctuation [11,12]. Studies in several power systems showed the impact of very high penetration levels of solar PV. These studies capture stability and reliability issues, such as voltage stability (rising, fluctuations, and unbalance) [13,14,15], frequency stability (grid inertia and intermittency) [16,17], and reverse power flow phenomena [18,19]. Another study shows the importance of PV in a hybrid energy system to achieve the most economically feasible option in providing the lowest system net present cost, operating cost and cost of energy [20]. However, it is important to note that the application of distributed generation, i.e., PV, diesel generators, and wind turbines, also brings many drawbacks, such as voltage drops and power losses [15].
The California Independent System Operator (CAISO) is the first power system operator to publish the duck curve phenomenon, i.e., the daily netload chart on a spring day with a significant drop in mid-day caused by high PV generation [21]. This chart shows that the grid operator faces a new challenge to prepare the high ramp rate ability to accommodate the fully utilised solar PV energy during the daytime. This condition results in an overgeneration potential because of the very high penetration level of PV in the system. Like CAISO, several systems in different countries with high PV penetration are also concerned by this issue. Beside supporting ancillary services, some studies also offer mitigation to deal with the duck curve by enhancing power system flexibility, including optimal dispatch based on flexible resources [22], optimal thermal unit commitment [23,24], demand-side management [25], power curtailment [26], and pumped hydro energy storage [27,28]. Some studies offer mitigation using supporting ancillary services from electric vehicles (EV) to the grid [29,30] and advanced battery energy storage systems [31,32,33] to support the grid system.
The power system operator must mitigate the massive growth of grid-connected PV into the grid system. This condition has changed the behaviour of the electrical power system. The high generation from solar energy during the day potentially leads to the duck curve phenomena. This condition will be a critical issue for power systems with high shares of thermal power plants providing baseload in the energy mix.
Therefore, this study aims to investigate the future challenges of integrating high penetration levels from grid-connected PV into the electrical power system in the Indonesia power grid as a representative of developing countries with a high share of thermal power plants in the future energy mix. The condition of Indonesia’s electrical power system, including national power system planning, the Java-Bali power system as the most extensive system in Indonesia, the needs of system flexibility, thermal power plant development planning, RE potency especially from solar energy, and netload curve, due to the impact of PV penetration levels, are explained in Section 2. The methodology and several case studies are discussed in Section 3. Next, Section 4 explains the power system simulation results, including the netload analysis, ramping capability analysis, and baseload analysis. Section 5 summarises the findings from this study. There are previous studies that examined the characteristics and the modelling of the Java-Bali as in References [34,35,36,37]. Based on the literature review conducted by the authors, this paper is the first study to analyse the duck curve phenomenon in the Java-Bali power system that considers high shares of a baseload power plant and specific scenarios in PV penetration and electricity demand growth. This study also analyses future netload, need for fast ramping rate capability, and oversupply issues in the Java-Bali power system.

2. Energy Mix Indonesia’s Electricity Supply Business Plans

This section explains the national energy policy and Indonesia’s electricity supply business plans book (RUPTL) from the PLN about the present power system condition and energy mix in Indonesia, RES potency, planning, and impact, especially from solar PV integration into the grid system.

2.1. Electricity Supply Business Plans

This subsection looks at the power system planning condition in Indonesia with emphasis on the Java-Bali power system, the available system flexibility, and the existing thermal power plant rundown planning to integrate into the grid.

2.1.1. Power System Planning

As the largest archipelago country, Indonesia’s system planning is usually island-based, such as Java-Bali, Sumatera, Kalimantan, Sulawesi, Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, Papua, and other smaller systems. Today, power grid systems are commonly inter-area connected with 500 kV, 275 kV, and 150 kV lines. Electrical demand is strongly correlated to economic development, population growth, and consumer lifestyle [34]. PLN, as the electrical state-owned enterprise, has a monopoly on transmission and distribution. Indonesia’s electric power development is guided by RUPTL, i.e., the book of electricity supply business plans of Indonesia for the next ten years.
One of the significant parameters for demand forecasting is economic growth with expectations of 6–7% per year, so the load projection is relatively high [38]. The adequacy of future demand and power supply is supported by PLNs long-term guarantee through Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) for Independent Power Producers (IPPs). Due to the financial crisis, power plant planning from IPPs is dominated by thermal power plant technology with PPAs take-or-pay (TOP) commercial clauses [12]. Unfortunately, economic growth did not meet expectations. In contrast, PLN also receives a mandate to achieve the share of new and RE (23% in 2025 and at least 31% in 2050). This condition will lead to oversupply risk in several systems and overpaying for power generation with low/unutilised operation.

2.1.2. Java-Bali Power System

The Java-Bali interconnected power system is the most extensive power system in Indonesia, comprising approximately 70% of the national capacity (Figure 1). This condition is driven by a larger population and higher economic activities compared to the other islands. The Java-Bali load system consists of five areas: Jakarta; West Java; Central Java; East Java; and Bali. The western to the eastern region is interconnected via 500 kV transmission lines (blue lines). The inter-area from the most western to easternmost parts is interconnected via a 150 kV transmission line (red line). The Java power system is interconnected to the Bali system by 150 kV submarine cables (red line) [37]. The Java-Bali power system is operated by the transmission system operator (TSO) in Gandul, West Java. The peak load is approximately 27 GW.
The power generation fuel mix year 2019 includes coal (70.92%), gas (21.33%), including liquefied natural gas (LNG), gas fuel (BBG), and compressed natural gas (CNG), and marine fuel oil (MFO) and high speed diesel (HSD), both accounting for approximately 0.14%, as shown in Figure 2. Currently, the power supply is mainly generated from geothermal and thermal power plants as baseload operation. Thermal coal forms the largest share of the fuel mix in 2020 compare to other energy sources (72.61%) and is set to account for 57.56% of the energy share in 2028. From 2019 to 2028, the capacity of a coal power plant will be increasing, but the percentage of the energy mix will be decreasing. Regarding RES, geothermal (4.82%) and hydro (2.89%) contribute the largest shares, with other RES, such as wind, biomass, ocean, and especially solar, still accounting for a lower share of the energy mix than fossil fuel. Over the next few years, PLN aims to achieve the national RE target (23% of the total energy mix) [6]. Several big projects are carried out to build RE power plants, especially PV power plants.
Indonesia’s RUPTL have identified four different categories of consumers: Residential (households); commercial (private business); industrial (large business, usually mining or extensive industrial process); and public (for example government sector and street lighting), as shown in Table 1. Most consumers dominate the residential category, but the substantial load comes from the industrial category. In the next few years, consumers, especially from the residential category, will be able to produce their own energy, for example via home PV rooftop installations. This kind of relatively new consumer is called ‘prosumers’. In the future, prosumers will significantly increase because of support from government policy and the PLN.

2.1.3. System Flexibility

The operational flexibility of power plants plays an essential role in accommodating the variability in supply and demand. Constraints include higher ramp-rate capability, shorter start-up time and lower start-up costs, shorter minimum uptime and runtime, and lower minimum load [39]. A high ramp rate can make the power plant quickly produce the power in line with system needs. Shorter start-up times resulted in a power plant to reach full load quickly and reduce the minimum time after start-up so that power plants can react rapidly. For thermal systems, especially coal-fire based plant and power plants with a large share of Combined Heat and Power (CHP), operational flexibility depends on some crucial parameters, such as degrees of pressure, flow rate, main devices temperature, and the degree of feedwater bypass [40]. Operating thermal power plants at lower loads increases the range of their operation and also improves flexibility.
The flexibility characteristic of various power plant technologies is summarised in Table 2. Some power plant technologies are designed for baseload operations. This includes geothermal plants, nuclear power plants, coal-fired power plants, steam turbines with oil or gas as boiler fuel, and gas turbine combined cycle plants. These are all called non-flexible power plant. This type needs time for start-up and ramping operations. In contrast, the flexible power plant is designed for load following, i.e., flexible coal-fired power plants, biomass, biogas, and many more. (Power plant technologies that can adjust their generation level in a moderate period to compensate for power supply and load variations.) Moreover, power plants that can adjust their generation level in a short time compensate for the variability are called high flexible power plants, including reservoir hydro, combustion engines, and simple gas turbines. Indonesia’s power plants are dominated by non-flexible generation from thermal power plants, especially coal-fired-based power plants [12].

2.1.4. Thermal Power Plant

The Java-Bali power system currently has specific power system characteristics, i.e., oversupplying issues from thermal power plants and potential significant penetration levels from grid-connected PV. Indonesia, especially the Java-Bali power system, plans to build coal-fired thermal power plants over the next few years, as shown in Table 3. Based on RUPTL, coal-fired thermal power plant capacity continues to grow annually. The plans indicate that the coal power plant will account for approximately 57.44% of the total energy mix in 2028 [6]. Various power plant technologies are used to generate power in Indonesia’s power systems, but thermal power plants produce the most power generation, with the majority coal-fired based. Coal-fired thermal power plant characteristics are constant power output and low ramping rate. Therefore, the coal power plant cannot be adjusted to respond to Variable Renewable Energy (VRE), notably intermittency, peak load preparation, and demand fluctuations. This condition has resulted in a coal-fired thermal power plant being operated as a baseload power plant. The burning of coal fires the boiler to generate very high-temperatures and produce high-pressure steam, which is then used to drive a steam turbine attached to a generator to generate electricity.

2.2. Renewable Energy Source (RES)

2.2.1. Renewable Energy Planning

In the process of utilising solar energy, three methods are currently commonly used to generate electricity and other uses, as shown in Figure 3 [42]. In Indonesia, the subject is the process of direct solar irradiation conversion using solar cells or PV modules into electrical energy.
Electricity from RES, especially from solar PV, is growing worldwide. The leading countries for cumulative solar PV capacity are China, the United States, Japan, Germany, and India. China has the most installed solar PV power plant in the world [43]. Their national RE target predominantly causes the growth of electrical generation from RES globally. Government policies support RE targets in most countries. Such government policy objectives are to reduce the carbon emissions of GHGs in the power sector and encourage new generation from RES. Likewise, the Indonesian Government’s plans to achieve the RES targets regarding the total primary energy mix of 23 and 31 percent by 2025 and 2050, respectively. As Table 4 shows, RES potency in Indonesia derives from a broad range of renewable technologies and fuels. However, to date, this vast potential has not been accessed properly.

2.2.2. PV Power Planning

PLN is employing various efforts to improve the share of RES in the total primary energy mix. One way is via solar power plant development planning from 2019 to 2028, as in Table 5.
Java-Bali has significant solar potential in each region. The potential capacity of solar energy in several provinces of Java-Bali island is shown in Table 6. This study assumes the PV power plant generation planning, prosumer growth in distribution level, and solar energy potency according to RUPTL 2019 to 2028 [6].

2.2.3. Netload Power

From the TSO perspective, assume the electrical load consumption data for several days denoted by a set D divided into several time slots denoted by a set T . The netload power on day d at time slots t can be expressed using Equation (1) where P l o a d ( d , t ) is the actual load power and P P V ( d , t ) is the total PV power output on day d at time slot t [44].
P n e t ( d , t ) = P l o a d ( d , t ) P P V ( d , t ) ,   d D , t T
The availability of solar energy resources on the ground surface is an essential factor in utilising PV systems. This depends on solar irradiation as the amount of solar energy over an area in a specific time expressed in kWh/m2. The Java-Bali region consists of Jakarta in West Java, Semarang in Central Java, Surabaya in East Java, and Denpasar in Bali. At one time frame, the easternmost area in Java island is the first area to experience both sunrise and sunset compared to the most western area. Based on solar irradiation databases, the energy potency in some regions in Java-Bali is shown in Figure 4a. Due to the geographical aspect, Java-Bali extends from west to east, so there will be differences in solar irradiance in each region. The solar output model in this study involves the solar comparison of different locations based on the geographic location of the Java-Bali power system. The Java and Bali islands are interconnected by the transmission line system. Therefore, we could model the solar irradiance of the Java-Bali power system as in Figure 4b. The interannual data of Java-Bali island, located at −6.1748 latitude and 106.7863 longitude, are based on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) predictions of global energy resource (POWER) database. The monthly maximum solar irradiance is in December 2014, where the maximum solar daily irradiance is on 17 December.

3. Methodology

To analyse the high penetration level impact of grid-connected solar PV into power systems regarding the proportion of thermal power plants in the energy mix, the proposed method conducted in this study is portrayed in Figure 5. Basically, this methodology has three stages: (1) System parameters of power grid and PV power plants; (2) thermal power plants and PV output; and (3) analysis.
The analysis integrating grid-connected PV into the Java-Bali power system consists of four case studies, as shown in Table 7. The simulations are combined with power system load growth and PV penetration level to analyse the sensitivity analysis of each case. The simulations also consider the integration of a new thermal power plant onto the system.
Scenario I is a scenario where peak load growth and PV capacity growth are considered to be optimistic. The peak load is considered to meet the power system planning target so that the daily load profile will be scaled according to the system plan. PV capacity growth is set to be optimistic according to the time plan, solar energy potential is optimally utilised, and solar home PV rooftop massively integrates to the system in accordance with the growth of household customers.
Scenario II is a scenario where peak load growth is considered to be pessimistic or not in accordance with the power system planning. The peak load is considered not to meet the planning target so that the typical load profile of the system will be scaled based on the average sales realisation of the last five years (4.62%). However, PV capacity growth is said to be non-optimal because of late construction, solar energy potential is not optimally utilised, and solar home PV rooftop grows slowly.
Scenario III is a scenario where peak load growth and PV capacity growth are considered to be optimistic. The peak load is considered to meet the power system planning target so that the daily load profile will be scaled according to the system plan. However, PV capacity growth is said to be non-optimal because of late construction, solar energy potential is not optimally utilised, and solar home PV rooftop grows slowly.
Scenario IV is a scenario where peak load growth is considered to be pessimistic or not in accordance with the power system planning. The peak load is considered not to meet the planning target so that the typical load profile of the system will be scaled based on the average sales realisation. On the other hand, PV capacity growth is set to be optimistic according to the time plan, solar energy potential is optimally utilised, and solar home PV rooftop massively integrates to the system in accordance with the growth of household customers.
The typical daily load profile chosen is used as the model of system load. The typical hourly electricity load profile for the Java-Bali power system is shown in Figure 6a,b. Figure 6a is the load curve of the Java-Bali system with significant load growth for the years 2019–2028, while Figure 6b is the load curve of the Java-Bali power system with relatively low load growth. Load data were recorded on the 6 January 2019. Electricity consumption fluctuates throughout the day. The electricity consumption at night is higher than electricity consumption during the day time. The peak load typically occurred at 18:00 to 19:00, as a result of residential activities.
Based on the representation model of solar irradiance in the Java-Bali power system, the annual PV power generation during the day is illustrated in Figure 7. Figure 7a is the high PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system, while Figure 7b shows the low PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system. The PV power output is a summary of the prosumer, solar power plant roadmap planning, and also the capacity of solar potential reported from each province in Java-Bali. The growth of home solar PV rooftop is assumed to increase 0.01 percent every year from 5500 VA customers of the residential category.

4. Simulation Results

This section discusses the system conditions from 2019 until 2028 as planned years, including netload analysis, ramp rate analysis, and baseload operation analysis in the Java-Bali power system.

4.1. Netload Analysis

Simulation results show a belly in the daily load profile that represents that the PV power output is at maximum, where the netload is at the lowest, as shown in Figure 8a–d. This phenomenon, called the Java-Bali duck curve–which the belly grows–depends on the grid-connected PV penetration level. PV power plants produce the highest output in midday depending on sunlight availability. Therefore, the duck curve significantly drops in middle day netload conditions. Both loads with significant growth, as shown in Figure 8b,d, experience the same phenomenon. Netload shows a significant drop during mid-day, as shown in Figure 8a,d, while for Figure 8b,c, it drops lower. The belly typically slowly occurs to the lowest from 05:30 to 11:00. and slowly increases from 11:00 to 17:30 in west Indonesia times.

4.2. Ramping Capability Analysis

According to the simulation results in Figure 8, the load dispatch centre must balance the supply and demand in the power system to meet the upcoming ramps down in the morning when the sun begins to shine and ramps up in the late afternoon when the sun begins to set, as shown in Figure 9a–d. The first challenge is in the morning hours when the system operator faces low demand combined with increasing generation from PV. The morning ramp requires decreasing output from power plants. Ramp down capability is vital for power plants to respond to this situation. The second challenge is in the late afternoon hours when the system operator prepares for peak load combined with decreasing generation from PV. The late afternoon ramp requires the fast ramp-up from power plants as load followers.
Figure 9a,d show the need for fast ramp capability to respond to the high penetration level of grid-connected PV. The higher peak load combined with, the lower belly results in need for fast ramp rate performance, which is important and essential for the power system, as shown in Figure 9a rather than Figure 9b–d.
The need for a fast ramp rate, especially a range of fast ramp-ups for all possible scenarios is summarised in Table 8. In 2028, the system operator must prepare 1555 MW to 2097 MW to meet the system peak load. The system operator must operate fast response power plant resources, such as hydro, gas turbines, and also diesel to follow the peak load.

4.3. Baseload Operation Analysis

According to the simulation results in Figure 10a–d, there is overgeneration in all scenarios, especially from thermal power plants as the baseload power plant. The majority of thermal power plants in the Java-Bali power system operate with the TOP commercial clause, also known as must-run power plants. Therefore, the power system operator faced challenges to reduce the generation from conventional power plants with the TOP scheme. The issues are technical and economic limits from thermal power plants to reduce the power output. The critical condition, as shown in Figure 10b,d, is that of significant supply combined with the slow growth of demand. The power generation from thermal power plants will be absorbed by consumers if the electricity demand reaches the load growth target Figure 10a,c shows the case study with significant load growth and high PV penetration which also cause Unit Commitment (UC) issues.

5. Discussion

As we can see from the simulations above, the belly stiffness in the Java-Bali power system is due to grid-connected PV integration from 2019 to 2028. There is a large gap between the peak load and the off-peak load. Simulation results for netload analysis reveal the curve in the shape of a duck in the daily load profile. This phenomenon is called the Java-Bali duck curve. This condition causes the risk of overgeneration occurrence where the supply of power could over exceed the demand by a large proportion, and therefore, causes inefficiency. During these conditions, the system operators must reduce the power output from conventional power plants by either turning off the plant or reducing power plant generation levels. The duck curve condition causes several technical challenges and economic impacts in power system dispatch during high grid-connected PV penetration level conditions. The generators will experience more cycling, starting up and shutting down. In addition, the power system dispatcher needs to reduce and add the generation in short periods to balance demand and supply [45,46]. Simulation results for netload power also identified the need for a flexible generation with sufficient ramping capability to balance the system at morning ramp with low demands and peak load during large amounts of PV penetration. The power plant and system operator must respond to the ramp-up or down periods during these critical times. For the future operational system, this study provides some insights for the Indonesian national electrical company to consider the flexibility power options and also calculate the penetration level, especially from grid-connected PV [47,48,49].

6. Conclusions

This study presents a multi-year netload analysis of high grid-connected PV penetration levels into one of the largest power systems in Indonesia. The analysis and evaluation of power system planning were proposed. A combination of load growth and grid-connected PV penetration level was also proposed, including netload analysis, ramping capability analysis, and baseload operation analysis. The results showed that the duck curve phenomenon appears with a significant netload drop in the middle of the day because of high power generation from grid-connected PV. Increased grid-connected PV annually will change the netload shape in the middle of the day. Furthermore, the higher peak load combined with the lowest netload valley results in the need to increase ramp rate capability, and this is very important to face morning and late afternoon ramps. Moreover, the significant load growth with high grid-connected PV penetration level caused the UC issues for thermal power plants as baseload operators. However, the national electrical company, especially the system operators in the load dispatch centre, should carry out proper planning to deal with this condition.
Future works could calculate the grid parity in Indonesia to improve the penetration level of grid-connected PV penetration into the power system, explore with different daily loads, investigate the technical and economic impact for a minimum load operation, and explore the flexibility option.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.B.T.; Data curation, Y.W. and I.G.R.S.; Formal analysis, H.B.T. and A.P.P.; Investigation, H.B.T.; Methodology, H.B.T.; Project administration, D.F.H.; Resources, Y.W. and I.G.R.S.; Software, H.B.T.; Supervision, A.P., A.P.P. and I.P.; Validation, Y.W. and I.G.R.S.; Visualization, H.B.T.; Writing—original draft, H.B.T.; Writing—review & editing, D.F.H., A.P., A.P.P., S.A., Y.W. and I.G.R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BBGBahan bakar gas–gas fuel
CNGCompressed natural gas
CSPConcentrated solar power
EVElectric vehicle
GHGGreenhouse gas emission
GWElectrical power unit used for active power–giga watt
HSDHigh speed diesel
IPPIndependent power provider
kVElectrical power unit used for voltage–kilovolt
LCoELevelised cost of energy
LNGLiquefied natural gas
MFOMarine fuel oil
MWElectrical power unit used for active power–mega watt
NASAThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration
PLNPerusahaan listrik negara–national electric company
POWERPrediction of worldwide energy resources provided by NASA
PPAPower purchase agreement
PVPhotovoltaic
RERenewable energy
RESRenewable energy resources
TOPTake or pay agreement
TSOTransmission system operator
UCUnit commitment
VREVariable renewable energy

References

  1. Maulidia, M.; Dargusch, P.; Ashworth, P.; Ardiansyah, F. Rethinking renewable energy targets and electricity sector reform in Indonesia: A private sector perspective. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 101, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Veldhuis, A.J.; Reinders, A.H.M.E. Reviewing the potential and cost-effectiveness of grid-connected solar PV in Indonesia on a provincial level. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Anani, N.; Ibrahim, H. Adjusting the Single-Diode Model Parameters of a Photovoltaic Module with Irradiance and Temperature. Energies 2020, 13, 3226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Q.; Chang, P.; Bai, R.; Liu, W.; Dai, J.; Tang, Y. Mitigation Strategy for Duck Curve in High Photovoltaic Penetration Power System Using Concentrating Solar Power Station. Energies 2019, 12, 3521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kabir, E.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, S.; Adelodun, A.A.; Kim, K.-H. Solar energy: Potential and future prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 894–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. PLN. Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik 2019–2028; PLN: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Breyer, C.; Gerlach, A. Global overview on grid-parity. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2013, 21, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zou, H.; Du, H.; Brown, M.A.; Mao, G. Large-scale PV power generation in China: A grid parity and techno-economic analysis. Energy 2017, 134, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Orioli, A.; Gangi, A.D. Six-years-long effects of the Italian policies for photovoltaics on the grid parity of grid-connected photovoltaic systems installed in urban contexts. Energy 2017, 130, 55–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fairuz, R.; Setiawan, E.A.; Hernanda, I. Mapping and Analysis of Initial cost Against Levelized Cost of Energy for Residential PV Rooftoop in Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2018, 67, 01024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hakam, D.F.; Arif, L.; Fahrudin, T. Sustainable energy production in Sumatra power system. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Power Engineering and Renewable Energy (ICPERE), Bali, Indonesia, 3–5 July 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Hakam, D.F.; Asekomeh, A.O. Gas Monetisation Intricacies: Evidence from Indonesia. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2018, 8, 9. [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, D.; Mather, B.A.; Seguin, R.; Hambrick, J.; Broadwater, R.P. Photovoltaic (PV) Impact Assessment for Very High Penetration Levels. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2016, 6, 295–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, Y.; Bebic, J.; Kroposki, B.; Bedout, J.; de Ren, W. Distribution System Voltage Performance Analysis for High-Penetration PV. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Energy 2030 Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA, 17–18 November 2008; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  15. Vita, V.; Alimardan, T.; Ekonomou, L. The Impact of Distributed Generation in the Distribution Networks’ Voltage Profile and Energy Losses. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE European Modelling Symposium (EMS), Madrid, Spain, 6–8 October 2015; pp. 260–265. [Google Scholar]
  16. Tielens, P.; Van Hertem, D. Grid Inertia and Frequency Control in Power Systems with High Penetration of Renewables. In Proceedings of the Young Researchers Symposium in Electrical Power Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands, 16–17 April 2012. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, Y.; Silva, V.; Lopez-Botet-Zulueta, M. Impact of high penetration of variable renewable generation on frequency dynamics in the continental Europe interconnected system. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2016, 10, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mortazavi, H.; Mehrjerdi, H.; Saad, M.; Lefebvre, S.; Asber, D.; Lenoir, L. A Monitoring Technique for Reversed Power Flow Detection with High PV Penetration Level. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 6, 2221–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hasheminamin, M.; Agelidis, V.G.; Salehi, V.; Teodorescu, R.; Hredzak, B. Index-Based Assessment of Voltage Rise and Reverse Power Flow Phenomena in a Distribution Feeder under High PV Penetration. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2015, 5, 1158–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al Ghaithi, H.M.; Fotis, G.P.; Vita, V. Techno-Economic Assessment of Hybrid Energy Off-Grid System—A Case Study for Masirah Island in Oman. Int. J. Power Energy Res. 2017, 1, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Denholm, P.; O’Connell, M.; Brinkman, G.; Jorgenson, J. Overgeneration from Solar Energy in California. A Field Guide to the Duck Chart; Technical Report; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Denver West Parkway, CO, USA, 2015.
  22. Feng, J.; Yang, J.; Wang, H.; Ji, H.; Okoye, M.O.; Cui, J.; Ge, W.; Hu, B.; Wang, G. Optimal Dispatch of High-Penetration Renewable Energy Integrated Power System Based on Flexible Resources. Energies 2020, 13, 3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Howlader, H.O.R.; Adewuyi, O.B.; Hong, Y.-Y.; Mandal, P.; Mohamed Hemeida, A.; Senjyu, T. Energy Storage System Analysis Review for Optimal Unit Commitment. Energies 2019, 13, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Palmintier, B.; Webster, M. Impact of unit commitment constraints on generation expansion planning with renewables. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Detroit, MI, USA, 24–28 July 2011; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma, O.; Alkadi, N.; Cappers, P.; Denholm, P.; Dudley, J.; Goli, S.; Hummon, M.; Kiliccote, S.; MacDonald, J.; Matson, N.; et al. Demand Response for Ancillary Services. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2013, 4, 1988–1995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tonkoski, R.; Lopes, L.A.C.; El-Fouly, T.H.M. Coordinated Active Power Curtailment of Grid Connected PV Inverters for Overvoltage Prevention. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2011, 2, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, J.; Yi, C.; Gao, S. Prospect of new pumped-storage power station. Glob. Energy Interconnect. 2019, 2, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rehman, S.; Al-Hadhrami, L.M.; Alam, M.M. Pumped hydro energy storage system: A technological review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 44, 586–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sortomme, E.; El-Sharkawi, M.A. Optimal Scheduling of Vehicle-to-Grid Energy and Ancillary Services. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2012, 3, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Moya, F.D.; Torres-Moreno, J.L.; Álvarez, J.D. Optimal Model for Energy Management Strategy in Smart Building with Energy Storage Systems and Electric Vehicles. Energies 2020, 13, 3605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castillo, A.; Gayme, D.F. Grid-scale energy storage applications in renewable energy integration: A survey. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 87, 885–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Esteban, M.; Portugal-Pereira, J.; Mclellan, B.C.; Bricker, J.; Farzaneh, H.; Djalilova, N.; Ishihara, K.N.; Takagi, H.; Roeber, V. 100% renewable energy system in Japan: Smoothening and ancillary services. Appl. Energy 2018, 224, 698–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sharma, R.; Karimi-Ghartemani, M. Addressing Abrupt PV Disturbances, and Mitigating Net Load Profile’s Ramp and Peak Demands, Using Distributed Storage Devices. Energies 2020, 13, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Rachmatullah, C.; Aye, L.; Fuller, R.J. Scenario planning for the electricity generation in Indonesia. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 2352–2359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hakam, D.F. Mitigating the risk of market power abuse in electricity sector restructuring: Evidence from Indonesia. Util. Policy 2019, 56, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hakam, D.F. Nodal Pricing: The Theory and Evidence of Indonesia Power System. Int. J. Energy Econ. Policy 2018, 8, 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pramono, E.Y.; Isnandar, S. Criteria for integration of intermittent renewable energy to the Java Bali Grid. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on High Voltage Engineering and Power Systems (ICHVEPS), Sanur, Indonesia, 2–5 October 2017; pp. 91–94. [Google Scholar]
  38. McNeil, M.A.; Karali, N.; Letschert, V. Forecasting Indonesia’s electricity load through 2030 and peak demand reductions from appliance and lighting efficiency. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2019, 49, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. IRENA. Innovation Landscape Brief: Flexibility in Conventional Power Plants; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu, Dhabi, 2019; ISBN 978-92-9260-148-5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, M.; Chong, D.; Yan, J. Improving operational flexibility by regulating extraction steam of high-pressure heaters on a 660 MW supercritical coal-fired power plant: A dynamic simulation. Appl. Energy 2018, 212, 1295–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gonzalez-Salazar, M.A.; Kirsten, T.; Prchlik, L. Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas- and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 1497–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Labouret, A.; Villoz, M.; Bal, J.L.; Hamand, J. Solar Photovoltaic Energy; Energy Engineering Series; Institution of Engineering and Technology: Herts, UK, 2010; ISBN 978-1-84919-154-8. [Google Scholar]
  43. REN21. Renewables 2020 Global Status Report; REN21 Secretariat: Paris, France, 2020; ISBN 978-3-948393-00-7. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang, F.; Li, K.; Wang, X.; Jiang, L.; Ren, J.; Mi, Z.; Shafie-khah, M.; Catalão, J. A Distributed PV System Capacity Estimation Approach Based on Support Vector Machine with Customer Net Load Curve Features. Energies 2018, 11, 1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Richter, M.; Oeljeklaus, G.; Görner, K. Improving the load flexibility of coal-fired power plants by the integration of a thermal energy storage. Appl. Energy 2019, 236, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. den Bergh, K.V.; Delarue, E. Cycling of conventional power plants: Technical limits and actual costs. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 97, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lannoye, E.; Flynn, D.; O’Malley, M. Evaluation of Power System Flexibility. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2012, 27, 922–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ulbig, A.; Andersson, G. Analyzing operational flexibility of electric power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2015, 72, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nosair, H.; Bouffard, F. Flexibility Envelopes for Power System Operational Planning. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2015, 6, 800–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Java-Bali interconnected power system.
Figure 1. Java-Bali interconnected power system.
Energies 13 05903 g001
Figure 2. Percentage of the energy mix from 2019 to 2028.
Figure 2. Percentage of the energy mix from 2019 to 2028.
Energies 13 05903 g002
Figure 3. Process of utilising solar energy.
Figure 3. Process of utilising solar energy.
Energies 13 05903 g003
Figure 4. (a) Solar irradiance in Jakarta (nearby West Java), Semarang (Central Java), Surabaya (East Java), and Denpasar (Bali); (b) representation model of solar irradiance in Java-Bali.
Figure 4. (a) Solar irradiance in Jakarta (nearby West Java), Semarang (Central Java), Surabaya (East Java), and Denpasar (Bali); (b) representation model of solar irradiance in Java-Bali.
Energies 13 05903 g004
Figure 5. The flowchart of grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) penetration level.
Figure 5. The flowchart of grid-connected photovoltaic (PV) penetration level.
Energies 13 05903 g005
Figure 6. (a) Java-Bali system with significant load growth; (b) Java-Bali system with slow load growth.
Figure 6. (a) Java-Bali system with significant load growth; (b) Java-Bali system with slow load growth.
Energies 13 05903 g006aEnergies 13 05903 g006b
Figure 7. (a) High PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system; (b) low PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system.
Figure 7. (a) High PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system; (b) low PV penetration level in the Java-Bali power system.
Energies 13 05903 g007aEnergies 13 05903 g007b
Figure 8. (a) Case study I: Netload analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Netload analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Netload analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Netload analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Figure 8. (a) Case study I: Netload analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Netload analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Netload analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Netload analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Energies 13 05903 g008aEnergies 13 05903 g008b
Figure 9. (a) Case study I: Ramp rate analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Ramp rate analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Ramp rate analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Ramp rate analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Figure 9. (a) Case study I: Ramp rate analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Ramp rate analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Ramp rate analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Ramp rate analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Energies 13 05903 g009aEnergies 13 05903 g009b
Figure 10. (a) Case study I: Baseload analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Baseload analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Baseload analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Baseload analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Figure 10. (a) Case study I: Baseload analysis on significant load growth with high PV penetration level; (b) case study II: Baseload analysis on slow load growth with low PV penetration level; (c) case study III: Baseload analysis on significant load growth with low PV penetration level; (d) case study IV: Baseload analysis on slow load growth with high PV penetration level.
Energies 13 05903 g010aEnergies 13 05903 g010b
Table 1. The number of customers per category (in thousand).
Table 1. The number of customers per category (in thousand).
YearsResidentialCommercialPublicIndustrial
201913,5842628141074
202047,6572763150077
202148,0382915159780
202248,4423069170384
202348,8353224181687
202449,2053382193691
202549,5823541206595
202649,9193711220799
202750,24539012361104
202850,56140912526109
Table 2. Typical flexibility characteristics of various power plant technologies [41].
Table 2. Typical flexibility characteristics of various power plant technologies [41].
Power Plant
Technology
Minimum Load
(% Full Load)
Ramping Rate
(% Full Load/Minutes)
Hot Start Up Time
(Hours)
Hydro Reservoir5150.1
Simple Cycle Gas Turbine15200.16
Geothermal1551.5
Gas Turbine Combined Cycle2082
Concentrated Solar Power2562.5
Steam Plants (gas, oil)3073
Coal Power3063
Bionergy5083
Lignite5046
Nuclear50224
Table 3. Thermal power plant planning.
Table 3. Thermal power plant planning.
YearsCapacity (MW)
2019315
20204827
20212000
2022924
20232000
20241660
2025660
20261000
2027660
20280
Total14,046
Table 4. Renewable energy potency in Indonesia.
Table 4. Renewable energy potency in Indonesia.
EnergyPotencyUtilisation
Geothermal29,544 MW4.9%
Hydropower75,091 MW6.4%
Mini-micro hydropower19,385 MW1.0%
Bioenergy32,654 MW5.1%
Solar power207,898 MW
(4.8 kWh/m2/day)
0.04%
Wind power60,647 MW
(≥4 m/s)
0.01%
Ocean17,989 MW0.002%
Table 5. Solar power plant roadmap planning by the national electric company.
Table 5. Solar power plant roadmap planning by the national electric company.
YearsCapacity (MW)
201963
202078
2021219
2022129
2023160
20244
2025250
2026-
20272
20282
Total908
Table 6. Solar energy potential per province in Jawa-Bali island (Java-Bali and Sumatra power systems are two of the largest power systems in Indonesia. Electricity Subsystem boundaries for the Java-Bali power system, in detail, could be found in Reference [35], while electricity subsystem boundaries for Sumatra power system could be found in Reference [36]).
Table 6. Solar energy potential per province in Jawa-Bali island (Java-Bali and Sumatra power systems are two of the largest power systems in Indonesia. Electricity Subsystem boundaries for the Java-Bali power system, in detail, could be found in Reference [35], while electricity subsystem boundaries for Sumatra power system could be found in Reference [36]).
SubsystemRegionPotential Capacity (MW)
West JavaSaguling220
Bekasi600
Cirata145
Bogor1
Cianjur4
Jatiluhur100
Jatigede100
Indramayu10
Subang150
Central JavaTegal220
Gajahmungkur100
Kedung Ombo100
Pemalang40
East JavaTuban140
Karangkates100
Pasuruan40
BaliWest Bali50
East Bali50
Table 7. The scenario of load growth and PV penetration level.
Table 7. The scenario of load growth and PV penetration level.
Case StudyScenario
ISignificant load growth with a high PV penetration level
IISlow load growth with a low PV penetration level
IIISignificant load growth with a low PV penetration level
IVSlow load growth with a high PV penetration level
Table 8. Ramp rate needs issues.
Table 8. Ramp rate needs issues.
YearsRamp Rate (MW/hours)
2019781.27–969.76
2020832.81–1044.70
2021897.98–1140.69
2022959.27–1234.50
20231051.48–1368.39
20241159.94–1522.70
20251254.98–1657.05
20261352.53–1794.56
20271452.71–1941.94
20281555.61–2097.53
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tambunan, H.B.; Hakam, D.F.; Prahastono, I.; Pharmatrisanti, A.; Purnomoadi, A.P.; Aisyah, S.; Wicaksono, Y.; Sandy, I.G.R. The Challenges and Opportunities of Renewable Energy Source (RES) Penetration in Indonesia: Case Study of Java-Bali Power System. Energies 2020, 13, 5903. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225903

AMA Style

Tambunan HB, Hakam DF, Prahastono I, Pharmatrisanti A, Purnomoadi AP, Aisyah S, Wicaksono Y, Sandy IGR. The Challenges and Opportunities of Renewable Energy Source (RES) Penetration in Indonesia: Case Study of Java-Bali Power System. Energies. 2020; 13(22):5903. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225903

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tambunan, Handrea Bernando, Dzikri Firmansyah Hakam, Iswan Prahastono, Anita Pharmatrisanti, Andreas Putro Purnomoadi, Siti Aisyah, Yonny Wicaksono, and I Gede Ryan Sandy. 2020. "The Challenges and Opportunities of Renewable Energy Source (RES) Penetration in Indonesia: Case Study of Java-Bali Power System" Energies 13, no. 22: 5903. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225903

APA Style

Tambunan, H. B., Hakam, D. F., Prahastono, I., Pharmatrisanti, A., Purnomoadi, A. P., Aisyah, S., Wicaksono, Y., & Sandy, I. G. R. (2020). The Challenges and Opportunities of Renewable Energy Source (RES) Penetration in Indonesia: Case Study of Java-Bali Power System. Energies, 13(22), 5903. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225903

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop