Next Article in Journal
Experimental Study on the Strengthen Heat Transfer Performance of PCM by Active Stirring
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Biorefinery Co-Products, Market Proximity and Feedstock Environmental Footprint in Meeting Biofuel Policy Goals for Winter Barley-to-Ethanol
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pinecone-Derived Activated Carbons as an Effective Medium for Hydrogen Storage

by
Sara Stelitano
1,2,
Giuseppe Conte
1,
Alfonso Policicchio
1,3,4,*,
Alfredo Aloise
5,
Giovanni Desiderio
4,6 and
Raffaele G. Agostino
1,3,4,6
1
Dipartimento di Fisica, Università della Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci cubo 31C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
2
RINA Consulting - CSM S.p.A., Zona Industriale San Pietro Lametino SNC, 88046 Lamezia Terme (CZ), Italy
3
CNISM - Consorzio Nazionale Interuniversitario per le Scienze fisiche della Materia, Via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Rome (RM), Italy
4
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Nanotecnologia (Nanotec) – UoS Cosenza, Via Ponte P. Bucci, Cubo 31C, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
5
Dipartimento Ingegneria per l’Ambiente e il Territorio e Ingegneria Chimica, Università della Calabria, Via Ponte P. Bucci, Cubo 42A, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
6
DeltaE s.r.l., c/o Università della Calabria, Via Pietro Bucci cubo 31D, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2020, 13(9), 2237; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092237
Submission received: 12 March 2020 / Revised: 9 April 2020 / Accepted: 24 April 2020 / Published: 3 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Section D1: Advanced Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
Pinecones, a common biomass waste, has an interesting composition in terms of cellulose and lignine content that makes them excellent precursors in various activated carbon production processes. The synthesized, nanostructured, activated carbon materials show textural properties, a high specific surface area, and a large volume of micropores, which are all features that make them suitable for various applications ranging from the purification of water to energy storage. Amongst them, a very interesting application is hydrogen storage. For this purpose, activated carbon from pinecones were prepared using chemical activation with different KOH/precursor ratios, and their hydrogen adsorption capacity was evaluated at liquid nitrogen temperatures (77 K) at pressures of up to 80 bar using a Sievert’s type volumetric apparatus. Regarding the comprehensive characterization of the samples’ textural properties, the measurement of the surface area was carried out using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, the chemical composition was investigated using wavelength-dispersive spectrometry, and the topography and long-range order was estimated using scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, respectively. The hydrogen adsorption properties of the activated carbon samples were measured and then fitted using the Langmuir/ Töth isotherm model to estimate the adsorption capacity at higher pressures. The results showed that chemical activation induced the formation of an optimal pore size distribution for hydrogen adsorption centered at about 0.5 nm and the proportion of micropore volume was higher than 50%, which resulted in an adsorption capacity of 5.5 wt% at 77 K and 80 bar; this was an increase of as much as 150% relative to the one predicted by the Chahine rule.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The European Commission’s Directive 2009/28/EC (renewable energy sources (RES) directive) has established that at least 20% of energy consumption must come from RES by 2020, and EU countries have agreed to a target of 27% by 2030 [1].
Thus RES, such as solar or wind, will play a significant role in electric power generation. The most prominent disadvantage of RES is their variability, which needs to be balanced for electric grid stability purposes. Consequently, long-term and large-capacity electricity storage is required, as well as reserve production capacity. Current storage systems present low energy densities or limited storage potential. There are different paths for the conversion of energy produced from RES into gaseous or liquid fuels. The power to gas (PtG) processes represent one of the aforementioned alternatives. A PtG process connects the electrical network to the gas network by converting excess energy into gas through the conversion and storage of hydrogen (H2) [2]. The challenge for PtG systems is the momentary H2 storage. Compressed and liquid forms are not considered economically viable options for H2 storage, while storage using solid-state materials could represent an interesting third solution [3,4].
Among different solid materials, carbon-based materials have attracted interest for their unique features (excellent stability, adjustable porosity, good electronic conductivity, etc.) that allow them to assume key functions in various technologies [5], such as gas and energy storage [4,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], water treatment [13], and/or carbon dioxide (CO2) capture [14].
However, these carbon materials are generally products of fossil-fuel-based precursors (e.g., methane (CH4), phenol, and pitch) that are created using methods that are dangerous and expensive for the natural environment. Biomass-derived carbon-based materials represent an efficient, greener, and low-cost alternative [15,16,17,18]. These display physicochemical characteristics [19], such as being suitable for obtaining carbon-based materials with desired properties for different applications [20,21,22].
Consequently, natural, organic, and agricultural wastes, such as corncob [23], wood [24], rice husks [25], olive stones [26], sucrose [27], and jute [28], have been explored as biomass sources for the production of activated carbons (ACs) [29] with high specific surface areas (SSAs) that are connected to a very determined porosity, both of which are basic parameters for H2 storage [30].
Generally, ACs are the result of a gradual process in which a pulverization phase is followed by the carbonization of the material in an inert gas atmosphere with an appropriate temperature trend. Subsequently, chemical or physical activation is performed [31]. The chemical activation process consists of the mixing of the carbon source with a chemically active agent. Among several chemically active agents [32], potassium hydroxide (KOH) has been extensively utilized to activate the carbon as it allows for obtaining porous carbon with a well-defined micropore size distribution and a high SSA (≤3000 m2 g−1), which give rise to excellent storage properties [12,33,34,35].
It is commonly thought that ACs’ porous structure is the crucial characteristic for H2 adsorption capacity. More specifically, a high SSA and a large volume of micropores, with diameters in the range of 6–8 Å, are necessary for an efficient performance as an H2 storage material. In this field, the strategy is now dedicated to going beyond the so-called Chahine rule: the maximum adsorption capacity scales with the specific surface area at a rate of 1 wt% per 500 m2/g, i.e., 6 H2 molecules/nm2 of the pore surface [36,37,38].
Pinecones, a widely available biomass, are mostly composed of cellulose and lignin [39,40], which means that it represents an interesting carbon source. Once pulverized, it has a porous structure that represents an excellent platform that can interact with and capture several chemical species, leading to an optimization of the structure in the final products. To date, as a porous carbon source, pinecones have been largely investigated as electrodes for supercapacitors and lithium-ion batteries [41] and for water treatment [42]; however, no reports on their use as an adsorbent for hydrogen storage has been reported. Toward this aim, new motivation was recently provided by the report of Blankenship et al. [43] on cellulose-acetate-derived microporous carbons with high SSAs and pore volumes, according to which, a high oxygen content noticeably improves the H2 adsorption capacity.
Based on the above, the objective of this work was to demonstrate that the modification of the morphology and textural properties of biomass-based porous carbons from pinecones synthesized using a chemical activation procedure represents a useful and convenient method for obtaining high-performance hydrogen storage materials. In particular, the focus of the study was on the effects of different KOH/pinecone powder weight ratios used during the synthesis procedure on the sample’s porosity. Furthermore, detailed microstructure analysis using density function theory (DFT) and an evaluation of the hydrogen storage performance using a Sievert’s type apparatus, as well as their correlation, was investigated and is reported herein.

2. Experimental

2.1. Material and Sample Preparation

Pinecones from stone pine (Pinus pinea) (Figure 1), collected from the local area of Sila, Italy, were used as raw materials. Distilled water was used to repeatedly wash all the cones to remove soluble impurities; they were then dried for 12 h at 353 K. After drying, the cleaned cones were milled using a blender. The obtained pinecone powder (PC) was heated at 453 K for 5 h to remove the unwanted moisture [42] and the resultant powder was denoted as dehydrated pinecone powder (DPC). Then, the DPC was dissolved in 100 mL of demineralized water with KOH/DPC ratios equal to 0.5, 1, and 3. After stirring for 24 h at 353 K, the black-colored mixture was dried at 373 K until the moisture was removed; then, using a ceramic crucible, it was transferred to a tubular furnace under a 100 mL/min helium flow (99.999% purity Helium). The sample was slowly heated to 1173 K at a heating rate of 5 K/min and remained at this temperature for 2 hours. The steps of the transformation process of PC into porous carbons are schematically reported below in Figure 1.
In the final step, distilled water was once again used to wash the resulting dark solid material until a pH = 7 condition was reached; then, the material was kept at 353 K for drying in an electric oven in air. The resultant powder was labeled ADPCx (activated carbonized pinecone), where “x” denotes the KOH/DPC ratio, as shown in Table 1.

2.2. Characterization

Morphological scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were recorded using an FEI Quanta 200 FEG, a field emission SEM, using an electron beam of 20 keV to track any change in the morphology of the samples after the activation process. A chemical composition estimation was obtained using a JEOL JXA-8230 electron probe micro-analyzer (EPMA) equipped with five wavelength-dispersive spectrometers (WDS).
The phase structure of the samples was examined using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns acquired in reflection mode on a Philips PW 1830 diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα (40 kV, 40 mA) filtered radiation. All patterns were recorded in the 2θ range from 2° to 70°, with steps of 0.02° and a counting time of 1 s per step, at room temperature (RT ≈ 298 K); the sample stage effect was taken into consideration.
A Micromeritics ASAP 2460 apparatus was used to measure the N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K to evaluate the sample’s textural properties. All samples were subjected to a thermal treatment at 473 K for 12 h in a vacuum before each adsorption test. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method [44] was applied in the 0.05–0.15 relative pressure range to extrapolate the specific surface area of each sample, while VT, the total pore volume, was assessed by recording the N2 uptake at a relative pressure P/P0 of 0.995. Density functional theory (DFT), considering slit-shaped pores [45], was used to calculate the total micropore volume (Vmicro) and the pore size distributions (PSDs) to estimate the trends in the porosity changes. The H2 adsorption capacity at 77 K was evaluated for different pressure ranges, in particular from 0 to 1 bar and from 0 to 80 bar, using the Micromeritics ASAP 2460 instrument and a Sieverts’ type apparatus (fPcT) [46], respectively. Before each adsorption/desorption measurements, all investigated materials were treated at high temperature (≈473 K) overnight. The gas storage uptake (wt%—weight percent of adsorbed gas per gram of adsorbent) was established through an analysis of the adsorption isotherms.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surface and Structure Analysis

SEM images of the DPC and ADPC samples are shown below in Figure 2. Figure 2a clearly shows the smooth surface of the carbonized sample containing few micropores, while a sponge-like morphology with a heterogeneous distribution of pores was present for the activated ones (Figure 2b–d). The pores were larger for higher KOH/DPC ratios, leading to the presence of a microporous structure on the walls separating the macropores, which is shown in the insets. Here, we confirm that the formation of porous cavities in the material was produced by the KOH activation process [33,34,35].
In Figure 3, the XRD patterns in the 15–35° 2θ range of all samples are reported. The DPC sample showed a broad peak centered at 2θ = 23° (002), denoting the typical amorphous graphite structure [24,31,47]. The (002) peak disappeared in the activated samples, confirming the amorphous and non-graphitic nature of the ADPCs samples. The pore network was an outcome of the activation process, i.e., a series of redox reactions between the carbon material and the potassium compounds, as well as at the temperature evolution timing during the next carbonization process, led to the selective dissolution of the species on the carbon framework surface, [24,25,27,34].
WDS analysis (Supplementary Table S1) showed that the samples mainly consisted of carbon and oxygen, with 81.3 at% and 17.7 at%, respectively, and 1 at% of other elements. The O/C atomic ratios were comparable with those recently obtained by Blankenship et al. [43].

3.2. Textural Properties Analysis

Figure 4 shows the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms as measured at the liquid nitrogen temperature. Here, as later, for the sake of clarity, only the curves of the most significant samples are shown. As expected, the DPC sample did not show an appreciable N2 uptake (here not shown), indicating that the sample had a very low porosity and confirming the SEM analysis results. According to the IUPAC classification [48], the shapes of the isotherms were of types I and IV. This was related to a developed mesopore structure coexisting with a microporous framework. The N2 uptake rapidly increased at a very low relative pressure (P/P0 < 0.01) for all the measured isotherms, which is as an indication of their microporous character; an indication of their micropore capacity was connected to the quasi-horizontal plateau in the range P/P0 > 0.1, and a hysteresis loop at the relative pressure range of 0.4–1.0, which was associated with the capillary condensation that occurred in mesopores.
By looking at the curves’ details, it can be noted that the ADPC0.5 sample had a narrower isothermal knee and a less extensive hysteresis loop than the other samples, indicating mainly microporous structures with a lower mesoporosity. On the contrary, the other samples showed a much more considerable amount of adsorbed N2 at low pressures, which is symptomatic of a higher microporosity; furthermore, the more extensive broadening of the isotherm flection point, as well as of the hysteresis loop, was representative of both an increase of the micropore width and the development of mesoporosity, as already shown in the SEM investigation. In particular, the ADPC3 sample exhibited the greatest knee widening, which was indicative of a greater mesoporosity (Table 1). This can be linked to the micropores removal and the development of the mesopores due to the excessive KOH content [33,34,35]. The examination of the adsorption isotherms and PSDs allowed us to quantify these structural differences, as reported in Table 1.
The PSDs were evaluated using DFT and the cumulative volume, as shown in Figure 5, clearly shows that the activation process increased the size of the micropores and generated mesopores. All the PSD plots (Figure S2) exhibited a significant peak in the ultra-microporous region centered around 0.5 nm and series of peaks in the microporous region, whereas the pore size range extended into the mesoporous area only for the samples with a KOH/DPC ratio higher than 0.5. The porosity was therefore homogenous and concentrated in a narrow range (<1 nm), which is a crucial feature for effective H2 adsorption. All these observations point out that KOH/PC ratio was a critical factor in the development of porosity during the activation process. More specifically, increasing the impregnation ratio increased the microporosity (Figure 6), which reached its highest value when the KOH/DPC ratio was equal to 1. At higher KOH/DPC ratios, we observed the development of the mesoporosity of ACs in the 20–200 Å range, which is an essential characteristic for their application in different fields [49]. Furthermore, when comparing the cumulative volume curve for the ADPC3 and ADPC1 samples, a rigid shift was evident showing that while the latter had a dominant microporous character (pore dimensions were essentially confined below 30 Å), the former developed a mesoporous character. In fact, calculating the difference between the cumulative volume of ADPC1 and that of ADPC3 (Figure S3), it is noted that this tended to increase up to a maximum of around 15 Å and then decreased, thus highlighting the greater microporous character of the first sample relative to the second, as well as the ability of this process to finely tune the material porosity. Furthermore, the probed pinecone AC samples presented a higher micropore fraction relative to other biomass activated carbons [7,23,25,27,33].
The textural properties, as recovered via the analysis of the N2 adsorption isotherms, are summarized in Table 1, where the fractions of ultra-micropores, super-micropores, and mesopores were evaluated in accordance with the pore classification given by IUPAC [48]. As seen, the KOH/PC ratio influenced the textural properties (Figure S4), in particular the microporous fraction (Fmicro), which decreased as the KOH/PC ratio increased. The increase of the KOH/PC ratio involved damage to the structure, which reduced Fmicro, and at the same time, increased the mesoporous fraction. By increasing the KOH/DPC ratio, more KOH was retained into the raw material; this is an advantage because the activation reaction proceeded more effectively with more micropores being created in the raw material. On the other hand, as a drawback, the same process produced damage in the already produced porous structure.
ADPC0.5 showed the highest microporous fraction, confirming the microporous nature of this sample, although the total micropore volume was very low. ADPC1 presented the highest micropore volume (0.383 cm3/g) and BET surface area (1173 m2/g). These parameters decreased when the KOH/DPC ratio increased above 1.
Comparing the obtained results with the literature [23,24,25,27,28,33,43], while the PSD was similar and both the VT and SSA showed lower values, the ADPCs had both a higher oxygen content and microporous fraction, showing that the synthesis of highly microporous carbon for H2 uptake can take advantage of the use of pinecones as biomass precursors, while the optimization of the activation procedure parameters could further improve this feature.

3.3. Hydrogen Adsorption

To have a preliminary estimation and comparison of the H2 storage capacity of all the analyzed samples, hydrogen adsorption/desorption measurements (see Figure 7) were undertaken at liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) in the 0–1 bar range.
The H2 uptake was as low as 0.38 wt% in the DPC sample, while higher storage capacities were observed for the activated samples. This trend was expected [23,30,33], as we have reported that a larger SSA and micropore volume boosts the H2 absorption [35]. To illustrate this, Figure 8, using the data of Table 1, shows the trend of absorption as a function of the micropore volume and the SSA for the different samples. It is evident from Figure 8 that the H2 uptake increased with the increase of the aforementioned textural properties. This behavior occurred because carbon materials with a high micropore volume maximize the interaction potential between the hydrogen molecules and the carbon surface due to the overlap between potential fields, leading to the pore filling and therefore higher H2 adsorption.
The highest H2 uptake was obtained for the ADPC1 sample (1.6 wt%) and it was comparable to the literature data [33], taking into account the differences in the textural parameters and their compensation effects. The ADPC3 sample showed a similar absorption capacity at 1 bar, as expected due to their textural properties. To estimate the trend of the samples’ adsorption properties, the experimental data were fitted using the Töth equation [50]:
w t % = w t % m a x ( K P e q ) ( 1 + ( K P e q ) t ) 1 t ,
where t is the Töth parameter, which is a measure of the degree of homogeneity of the pore surface; wt%max is the absorption capacity of H2 that is asymptotically reached at high pressures; and K is the kinetic equilibrium constant that represents the energy interaction between gas molecules and pore surfaces. The latter takes into account the affinity of the samples toward the binding of hydrogen molecules on the surface, as well as the occupancy rate of the adsorption sites. The values of these parameters are given in Table 2.
The t parameter was similar, within the error, for all the analyzed samples, which indicated an equal and low homogeneity (t ≈ 0.25) of the surface adsorption sites. Notably, the K values of ADPC1 and ADPC3 samples were very close, indicating their similar adsorption sites and adsorption mechanism (Table 2). This is also clearly visible by examining the curvature of the isotherms (Figure 7). Exceptionally, the ADPC0.5 sample showed higher K values compared to the other samples, indicating a much quicker saturation at the adsorption sites.
From the analysis reported in Figure 7, it is quite evident that the adsorption isotherms of the different samples did not approach saturation, which suggests that a higher uptake was possible by increasing the pressure. Consequently, the H2 adsorption measurements were performed at liquid nitrogen temperatures (77 K) up to 80 bar.
The 77 K isotherms showed a maximum storage capacity at 80 bar (Figure 9) that moved from a minimum value of ≈1.8 wt% for the ADPC0.5 sample to a maximum value of ≈5.5 wt% for ADPC1. Cycles following the first cycle led to a slight lowering of the maximum adsorption capacity that could be quickly recovered using a mild thermal treatment at 473 K for 12 h (Figure S5). The faint trapping of the H2 molecules by the ADPCs pores suggested that a weak physisorption process was involved in the interaction between the sorbent and adsorbate, allowing for a completely reversible isotherm, which is different from ultra-microporous commercial ACs [51].
It is important to highlight that the H2 uptake trend when moving to a higher pressure (see Figure 10) was the same as that observed at 1 bar (Figure 8), confirming the relationship between absorption and the textural properties. Our results show the non-universality of the Chahine rule [30,36,37] for the ultra-microporous samples with a high oxygen content. In fact, the ADPC1 sample, whose SSA was equal to 1173 m2/g, showed an asymptotic uptake (Figure 10a) close to 5.5 wt%, i.e., 14 H2 molecules/nm2, which was more than double that of the expected value. Similar results were found for all the analyzed samples. Furthermore, we note that the H2 uptake was also proportional to the micropore volume (Figure 10b). Consequently, although the SSA of the analyzed sample was not very large compared to that of similar ACs [26,39], the H2 uptake of the analyzed samples attained high and remarkable values.

4. Conclusions

Activated microporous carbon suitable for H2 storage applications were successfully prepared from stone pine (Pinus pinea) collected from the local area of Sila, Calabria, Italy, using KOH activation processes. All samples showed a pore size distribution centered around 0.5 nm, a fraction micropore volume higher than 50%, and an atomic O/C ratio close to 20%. The highest micropore volume, 0.383 cm3 g−1, was obtained when the ratio between the dehydrated pinecones biomass and KOH was 1:1. This sample showed the best H2 storage capacity values at 77 K: 1.6 wt% at 1 bar and 5.25 wt% at 80 bar. These results went well beyond the Chahine rule with an increase of more than 150% relative to the expected values. In conclusion, this work demonstrated that by using pinecone biomass as raw material, together with a small amount of KOH and using a simple process, it was possible to produce activated carbon with a high microporosity and a residual oxygen content. Furthermore, we showed that the activated carbon’s porosity could be tuned by modifying the production parameters, allowing for tailoring it for several uses, such as adsorbed natural gas applications, gas separation through molecular sieving, and CO2 capture.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/9/2237/s1, Figure S1: XRD pattern, Table S1: Percentual Chemical Composition of ADPC samples, Figure S2: PSD of all samples, Figure S3: Difference between ADPC1 and ADPC3 Cumulative Volume, Figure S4: Textural properties vs. KOH/PC Ratio (a) SBET; (b) VT; (c) PSD and (d) Fraction of mesopore volume. See table 1 for acronyms, Figure S5: H2 uptake as function of equilibrium pressure at 77K in (a) ADPC0.5 (b) ADPC1 and (c) ADPC3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.; Methodology, S.S.; Validation, G.C., S.S., and A.P.; Formal Analysis, S.S., G.C., and A.P.; Investigation, G.D., A.A., G.C., and A.P.; Data Curation, G.C., S.S., and A.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.S., A.P., and G.C.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.S., A.P., G.C., and R.G.A.; Supervision, A.P., and R.G.A.; Project Administration, R.G.A.; Funding Acquisition, R.G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the PON03PE_00092_1 (EOMAT).

Acknowledgments

The authors want to deeply thank Mariano Davoli from Dipartimento di Biologia, Ecologia e Scienze della Terra – Università della Calabria (Italy) for providing the WDS analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Zervos, A.; Boer, C.L.; Tesniere, L. Mapping Renewable Energy Pathways towards 2020—EU Roadmap; European Renewable Energy Council: Brussels, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  2. Götz, M.; Kolb, T.; Reimert, R. Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 1371–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Niaz, S.; Manzoor, T.; Pandith, H.A. Hydrogen storage: Materials, methods and perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ren, J.; Nicholas, M.; Shijun, L. Current research trends and perspectives on materials-based hydrogen storage solutions: A critical review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 289–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Burchell, T.D. Carbon Materials for Advanced Technologies; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Peng, S.; Li, L.; Tian, L.L.; Adams, S. Electrospun carbon nanofibers and their hybrid composites as advanced materials for energy conversion and storage. Nano Energy 2016, 22, 361–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Policicchio, A.; Maccallini, E.; Ciuchi, F.; Giordano, G. Higher methane storage at low pressure and room temperature in new easily scalable large-scale production activated carbon for static and vehicular applications. Fuel 2013, 104, 813–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pantò, F. Electrospun C/GeO2 paper-like electrodes for flexible Li-ion batteries. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 28102–28112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Faye, O.; Szpunar, J.A. An Efficient Way To Suppress the Competition between Adsorption of H2 and Desorption of nH2–Nb Complex from Graphene Sheet: A Promising Approach to H2 Storage. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 28506–28517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Faye, O.; Tanveer, H.; Amir, K.; Jerzy, S. Tailoring the capability of carbon nitride (C3N) nanosheets toward hydrogen storage upon light transition metal decoration. Nanotechnology 2018, 30, 075404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gajdics, M.S.T.; Kovács Kis, V.; Béke, F.; Novák, Z.; Schafler, E.; Révész, Á. Microstructural Investigation of Nanocrystalline Hydrogen-Storing Mg-Titanate Nanotube Composites Processed by High-Pressure Torsion. Energy 2020, 13, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gadipelli, S. Superior Multifunctional Activity of Nanoporous Carbons with Widely Tunable Porosity: Enhanced Storage Capacities for Carbon-Dioxide, Hydrogen, Water, and Electric Charge. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 1903649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Belaustegui, Y.; Zorita, S.; AntonuccI, P.; Panto, F. Electro-spun graphene-enriched carbon fibres with high nitrogen-contents for electrochemical water desalination. Desalination 2018, 428, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, J.; Yue, L.; Hu, X.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, Y. Efficient CO2 Capture by Porous Carbons Derived from Coconut Shell. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 4287–4293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Titirici, M.-M.; White, R.J.; Brun, N. Sustainable carbon materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 250–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, J.; Ding, B.; Dong, S.Y.; Hao, X.D. Biomass derived carbon for energy storage devices. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2411–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schröder, E.; Oechsler, K.T.B.; Herberger, S. Activated Carbon from Waste Biomass. In Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Production; Shaukat, S.S., Ed.; IntechOpen, University of Karachi: Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  18. Khalil, H.P.S.A.; Jawaid, M. Activated Carbon from Various Agricultural Wastes by Chemical Activation with KOH: Preparation and Characterization. J. Biobased Mater. Bioenergy 2013, 7, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, F.; Li, G.-D.; Chen, J.-S. Effects of raw material texture and activation manner on surface area of porous carbons derived from biomass resources. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 327, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Deng, J.; Li, M.; Wang, Y. Biomass-derived carbon: Synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 4824–4854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gao, Z. Biomass-derived renewable carbon materials for electrochemical energy storage. Mater. Res. Lett. 2017, 5, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.; Yu, W.; Shi, J.; Mao, N. Biomass derived hierarchical porous carbons as high-performance anodes for sodium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 188, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, C.; Geng, Z.; Cai, M.; Zhang, J. Microstructure regulation of super activated carbon from biomass source corncob with enhanced hydrogen uptake. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2013, 38, 9243–9250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xiao, Y.; Dong, H.; Long, C.; Zheng, M.T. Melaleuca bark based porous carbons for hydrogen storage. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 11661–11667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Heo, Y.-J.; Park, S.-J. Synthesis of activated carbon derived from rice husks for improving hydrogen storage capacity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 31, 330–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bader, N.; Ouederni, A. Optimization of biomass-based carbon materials for hydrogen storage. J. Energy Storage 2016, 5, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Choi, Y.-K.; Park, S.-J. Preparation and characterization of sucrose-based microporous carbons for increasing hydrogen storage. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 28, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ramesh, T.; Rajalakshmi, N.; Dhathathreyan, K.S. Synthesis and characterization of activated carbon from jute fibers for hydrogen storage. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2017, 2, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Manocha, S. Activated carbon from biomass. AIP Conf. Proc. 2013, 1538, 120–123. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jiménez, V.; Paula, S. Hydrogen storage in different carbon materials: Influence of the porosity development by chemical activation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2012, 258, 2498–2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Min, S.; Bao, S.; Jin, R.; Xiao, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhong, Z.; Huang, Y.J. The comparison of two activation techniques to prepare activated carbon from corn cob. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 48, 250–256. [Google Scholar]
  32. Härmas, M. Microporous–mesoporous carbons for energy storage synthesized by activation of carbonaceous material by zinc chloride, potassium hydroxide or mixture of them. J. Power Sources 2016, 326, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sethia, G.; Sayari, A. Activated carbon with optimum pore size distribution for hydrogen storage. Carbon 2016, 99, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, J.; Kaskel, S. KOH activation of carbon-based materials for energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 23710–23725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Minoda, A. Synthesis of KOH-activated porous carbon materials and study of hydrogen adsorption. J. Alloy. Compd. 2013, 580, S301–S304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Masika, E.; Mokaya, R. Hydrogen Storage in High Surface Area Carbons with Identical Surface Areas but Different Pore Sizes: Direct Demonstration of the Effects of Pore Size. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 25734–25740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gogotsi, Y. Importance of pore size in high-pressure hydrogen storage by porous carbons. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2009, 34, 6314–6319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cabria, I.; López, M.J.; Alonso, J.A. The optimum average nanopore size for hydrogen storage in carbon nanoporous materials. Carbon 2007, 45, 2649–2658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sangchoom, W.; Mokaya, R. Valorization of Lignin Waste: Carbons from Hydrothermal Carbonization of Renewable Lignin as Superior Sorbents for CO2 and Hydrogen Storage. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2015, 3, 1658–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yang, H.; Yan, R.; Chen, H. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007, 86, 1781–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bello, A. Renewable pine cone biomass derived carbon materials for supercapacitor application. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 1800–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Duman, G. Production of Activated Carbon from Pine Cone and Evaluation of Its Physical, Chemical, and Adsorption Properties. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 2197–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Blankenship Ii, T.S.; Balahmar, N.; Mokaya, R. Oxygen-rich microporous carbons with exceptional hydrogen storage capacity. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Brunauer, S.; Emmett, P.H.; Teller, E. Adsorption of Gases in Multimolecular Layers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1938, 60, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Seaton, N.A.; Walton, J.P.R.B.; Quirke, N. A new analysis method for the determination of the pore size distribution of porous carbons from nitrogen adsorption measurements. Carbon 1989, 27, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Policicchio, A. Volumetric apparatus for hydrogen adsorption and diffusion measurements: Sources of systematic error and impact of their experimental resolutions. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2013, 84, 103907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Qu, D. Investigation of Hydrogen Physisorption Active Sites on the Surface of Porous Carbonaceous Materials. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sing, K.S.W.; Haul, D.H.E.L.; Pierotti, R.A.; Rouquerol, J.; Siemieniewska, T. Reporting Physisorption Data for Gas/Solid Systems. In Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim, Germania, 2008; pp. 1217–1230. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xin, W.; Song, Y. Mesoporous carbons: Recent advances in synthesis and typical applications. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 83239–83285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Toth, J. Adsorption Theory, Modeling and Analysis; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  51. Minuto, F.D.; Aloise, A.; Policicchio, A. Liquid-like hydrogen in the micropores of commercial activated carbons. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 14562–14572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic procedure for the preparation of the activated porous carbons from pinecones.
Figure 1. Schematic procedure for the preparation of the activated porous carbons from pinecones.
Energies 13 02237 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) DPC, (b) ADPC0.5, (c) ADPC1, and (d) ADPC3. The insets in (a), (b), (c), and (d) show further magnified images.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a) DPC, (b) ADPC0.5, (c) ADPC1, and (d) ADPC3. The insets in (a), (b), (c), and (d) show further magnified images.
Energies 13 02237 g002aEnergies 13 02237 g002b
Figure 3. XRD pattern of samples between 2θ = 15° and 37°. The complete spectrum is shown in Figure S1.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of samples between 2θ = 15° and 37°. The complete spectrum is shown in Figure S1.
Energies 13 02237 g003
Figure 4. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K.
Figure 4. N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms at 77 K.
Energies 13 02237 g004
Figure 5. Cumulative pore volume of the analyzed samples.
Figure 5. Cumulative pore volume of the analyzed samples.
Energies 13 02237 g005
Figure 6. Micropore volume fractions (see Table 1 for the acronym definitions).
Figure 6. Micropore volume fractions (see Table 1 for the acronym definitions).
Energies 13 02237 g006
Figure 7. H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K up to 1 bar.
Figure 7. H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K up to 1 bar.
Energies 13 02237 g007
Figure 8. (a) H2 uptake at 1 bar and 77 K vs. SSA. (b) H2 uptake at 1 bar and 77 K vs. Vmicro.
Figure 8. (a) H2 uptake at 1 bar and 77 K vs. SSA. (b) H2 uptake at 1 bar and 77 K vs. Vmicro.
Energies 13 02237 g008
Figure 9. H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K up to 80 bar. The magnitude of the error is the size of the symbol itself. Solid lines represent fits to the Töth equation.
Figure 9. H2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K up to 80 bar. The magnitude of the error is the size of the symbol itself. Solid lines represent fits to the Töth equation.
Energies 13 02237 g009
Figure 10. (a) H2 uptake at 80 bar and 77 K vs. SSA. (b) H2 uptake at 80 bar and 77 K vs. Vmicro.
Figure 10. (a) H2 uptake at 80 bar and 77 K vs. SSA. (b) H2 uptake at 80 bar and 77 K vs. Vmicro.
Energies 13 02237 g010
Table 1. Textural properties and H2 adsorption properties of the samples.
Table 1. Textural properties and H2 adsorption properties of the samples.
SampleKOH/DPCa SBET (m2/g)b VT (cm3/g)c Vmicro (cm3/g)DFT Cumulative Pore Volume (cm3/g)f Vmeso (cm3/g)g Vmacro (cm3/g)h F micro (%)i H2 (wt%)l H2 (wt%)
d Ultra-Microporese Super-Micropores
DPC00.420.0030.000100.00010.00010.002830.000.00
ADPC0.50.54410.16330.15060.09930.05130.00870.0041920.731.79
ADPC1111730.45130.38360.18540.19820.06300.0048851.575.25
ADPC3310500.44870.32540.14790.17750.12040.0030731.283.40
a SBET: Specific surface area (SSA) as a result of the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method applied in the 0.05–0.15 relative pressure range. b VT: Estimated total pore volume with a relative pressure of P/P0 = 0.99. c Vmicro: Micropore volume extracted from the cumulative volume. d Ultramipores: Volume of pores with less than a 7 Å width. e Supermicropores: Volume of pores with less than a 20 Å width. f Vmeso: Pore volume with a diameter lower than 500 Å in width. g Vmacro: Macropore volume as the rest of the total pore volume once the micropore and mesopore volumes were subtracted. h Fmicro: Micropore volume fraction = (micropore volume/total pore volume) × 100. i H2 uptake: Hydrogen storage capacity at 77 K and 1 bar. l H2 uptake: Hydrogen storage capacity at 77 K and 80 bar. DPC: Dehydrated pinecone powder, ADPC: Activated carbonized pinecone, DFT: Density function theory.
Table 2. Töth equation fitting parameters for the activated samples.
Table 2. Töth equation fitting parameters for the activated samples.
Samplewt%max ± Δwt%t ± ΔtK ± ΔK
ADPC0.51.634 ± 0.20.254 ± 0.0054.401 ± 0.03
ADPC15.435 ± 0.20.244 ± 0.0052.858 ± 0.03
ADPC34.980 ± 0.20.242 ± 0.0052.587 ± 0.03

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Stelitano, S.; Conte, G.; Policicchio, A.; Aloise, A.; Desiderio, G.; Agostino, R.G. Pinecone-Derived Activated Carbons as an Effective Medium for Hydrogen Storage. Energies 2020, 13, 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092237

AMA Style

Stelitano S, Conte G, Policicchio A, Aloise A, Desiderio G, Agostino RG. Pinecone-Derived Activated Carbons as an Effective Medium for Hydrogen Storage. Energies. 2020; 13(9):2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Stelitano, Sara, Giuseppe Conte, Alfonso Policicchio, Alfredo Aloise, Giovanni Desiderio, and Raffaele G. Agostino. 2020. "Pinecone-Derived Activated Carbons as an Effective Medium for Hydrogen Storage" Energies 13, no. 9: 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092237

APA Style

Stelitano, S., Conte, G., Policicchio, A., Aloise, A., Desiderio, G., & Agostino, R. G. (2020). Pinecone-Derived Activated Carbons as an Effective Medium for Hydrogen Storage. Energies, 13(9), 2237. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13092237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop