Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- -
- -
- The “one-dimensional” attributes are the most important from the point of view of customer satisfaction with the product or service. For example, sorting options or the number of filters a customer can select are a “one-dimensional” feature. The more filters, the easier and faster the customer can make a choice.
- -
- “Attractors” aim to attract a customer to a product or service because they exceed their requirements. Over time, they can turn into one-dimensional features and become mandatory or completely disappear, the trend will change. Poorly designed decoy features may go unnoticed by the customer. However, when they do appear, they bring joy to customers. They are extremely difficult to define, it is impossible to define them unequivocally, their popularity is very short-lived. When it comes to intelligent solutions, maybe all kinds of codes, applications, promotions that will convince residents to use intelligent solutions.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ahvenniemi, H.; Huovila, A.; Pinto-Seppä, I.; Airaksinen, M. What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities 2017, 60, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azevedo Guedes, A.; Carvalho Alvarenga, J.; dos Maurício, S.S.G.; Rodriguez y Rodriguez, M.; Pereira Soares, C. Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Alkandari. Smart Cities: Survey. Adv. Comput. Sci. Technol. Res. 2012, 2, 79. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z. On Smart Contracts and Organisational Performance: A Review of Smart Contracts through the Blockchain Technology. Rev. Econ. Bus. Stud. 2018, 11, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bakıcı, T.; Almirall, E.; Wareham, J. A Smart City Initiative: The Case of Barcelona. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bibri, S.E.; Krogstie, J. Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2017, 31, 183–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameri, R.P. Smart City Implementation: Creating Economic and Public Value in Innovative Urban Systems; Springer: Genoa, Italy, 2017; ISBN 978-3-319-45765-9. [Google Scholar]
- Cosgrave, E. The smart city: Challenges for the civil engineering sector. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Smart Infrastruct. Constr. 2017, 170, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allam, Z.; Newman, P. Redefining the Smart City: Culture, Metabolism and Governance. Smart Cities 2018, 1, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bibri, S.E. The IoT for smart sustainable cities of the future: An analytical framework for sensor-based big data applications for environmental sustainability. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 38, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dameri, R.P. Searching for Smart City definition: A comprehensive proposal. Int. J. Comput. Technol. 2013, 11, 2544–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delsing, J. Smart City Solution Engineering. Smart Cities 2021, 4, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, A.K.; Chin, H.C.; Haque, M.M.; Yuen, B. A methodological framework for benchmarking smart transport cities. Cities 2014, 37, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Komninos, N. Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks; Routledge: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Smart Cities Study. International Study on the Situation and Development of ICT, International Study on the Situation and Development of ICT, Innovation and Knowledge in Cities. Available online: https://issuu.com/uclgcglu/docs/smart_cities_2017_en (accessed on 17 June 2021).
- Lee, J.H.; Hancock, M.G.; Hu, M.-C. Towards an effective framework for building smart cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 89, 80–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tripathi, V. Achieving Urban Sustainability through Safe City. J. Hum. Ecol. 2017, 59, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hammi, M.T.; Hammi, B.; Bellot, P.; Serhrouchni, A. Bubbles of Trust: A decentralized blockchain-based authentication system for IOT. Comput Secur. 2018, 78, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharifi, A. A typology of smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mora, L.; Deakin, M. Untangling Smart Cities: From Utopian Dreams to Innovation Systems for a Technology-Enabled Urban Sustainability; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z.; Dhunny, Z.A. On big data, artificial intelligence and smart cities. Cities 2019, 89, 80–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bassoo, V.; Ramnarain-Seetohul, V.; Hurbungs, V.; Fowdur, T.P.; Beeharry, Y. Big data analytics for smart cities. In Internet of Things and Big Data Analytics toward Next-Generation Intelligence; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 33. [Google Scholar]
- Braun, T.; Fung, B.C.; Iqbal, F.; Shah, B. Security and privacy challenges in smart cities. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.; Xie, G.; Qu, Y.; Gao, L.; Yang, Y. Security and Privacy in Smart Cities: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 46134–46145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmaghraby, A.S.; Losavio, M.M. Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy. J. Adv. Res. 2014, 5, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fajrillah. Smart City vs. Smart Village. 2019. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/SMART-CITY-VS-SMART-VILLAGE-Fajrillah-Mohamad/eb14d43f336f65a70b05dc0af4008a034cf96bb5 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
- Fernandez-Anez, V.; Velazquez, G.; Perez-Prada, F.; Monzón, A. Smart City Projects Assessment Matrix: Connecting Challenges and Actions in the Mediterranean Region. J. Urban Technol. 2020, 27, 79–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacinák, M.; Ristvej, J. Smart City, Safety and Security. Procedia Eng. 2017, 192, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Fong, P.S.; Dai, S.; Li, Y. Towards sustainable smart cities: An empirical comparative assessment and development pattern optimization in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 215, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruoso, L.-E.; Plant, R. Building a conceptual framework for smarting an existing city in mauritius: The case of port louis. J. Biourbanism 2018, 7, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
- Samih, H. Smart cities and internet of things. J. Inf. Technol. Case Appl. Res. 2019, 21, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neirotti, P.; de Marco, A.; Cagliano, A.C.; Mangano, G.; Scorrano, F. Current trends in Smart City initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 2014, 38, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ianoş, I.; Sorensen, A.; Merciu, C. Incoherence of urban planning policy in Bucharest: Its potential for land use conflict. Land Use Policy 2017, 60, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huovila, A.; Bosch, P.; Airaksinen, M. Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when? Cities 2019, 89, 141–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunzmann, K.R. Urban challenges and darker sides of smart city development. In Ecocity, Knowlegde City, Smart City: Vers une Ville Écosoutenable? Ingallina, P., Appendino, F., Azar, E., Bottero, M., Eds.; Presses Universitaires du Septentrion: Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 2019; ISBN 9782757424605. [Google Scholar]
- Mohanty, S.P.; Choppali, U.; Kougianos, E. Everything you wanted to know about smart cities: The Internet of things is the backbone. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 2016, 5, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mosannenzadeh, F.; Bisello, A.; Vaccaro, R.; D’Alonzo, V.; Hunter, G.W.; Vettorato, D. Smart energy city development: A story told by urban planners. Cities 2017, 64, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patrão, C.; Moura, P.; de Almeida, A.T. Review of Smart City Assessment Tools. Smart Cities 2020, 3, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulin, A.A. Smart City Governance; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; ISBN 9780128162248. [Google Scholar]
- Sharifi, A. A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 233, 1269–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peerzado, M.B.; Magsi, H.; Sheikh, M.J. Land use conflicts and urban sprawl: Conversion of agriculture lands into urbanization in Hyderabad, Pakistan. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2019, 18, 423–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zygiaris, S. Smart City Reference Model: Assisting Planners to Conceptualize the Building of Smart City Innovation Ecosystems. J. Knowl. Econ. 2013, 4, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, L.; Huang, Z.; Wong, S.W.; Liao, S.; Lou, Y. A holistic evaluation of smart city performance in the context of China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 200, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, F.; Xu, J. Privacy Concerns in China’s Smart City Campaign: The Deficit of China’s Cybersecurity Law; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 2050–2680. [Google Scholar]
- Akande, A.; Cabral, P.; Gomes, P.; Casteleyn, S. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 44, 475–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albino, V.; Berardi, U.; Dangelico, R.M. Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. J. Urban Technol. 2015, 22, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chourabi, H.; Nam, T.; Walker, S.; Gil-Garcia, J.R.; Mellouli, S.; Nahon, K.; Pardo, T.A.; Scholl, H.J. Understanding Smart Cities: An Integrative Framework. In Proceedings of the 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS), Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Allam, Z. The Emergence of Anti-Privacy and Control at the Nexus between the Concepts of Safe City and Smart City. Smart Cities 2019, 2, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Allam; Yigitcanlar, T.; Kamruzzaman, M.; Buys, L.; Ioppolo, G.; Sabatini-Marques, J.; Da Costa, E.M.; Yun, J.J. Contextualising the smart city for sustainability and inclusivity. New Des. Ideas 2018, 81, 145–160. [Google Scholar]
- Alomair, B.; Poovendran, R. Efficient Authentication for Mobile and Pervasive Computing. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2014, 13, 469–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delsing, J. Local Cloud Internet of Things Automation: Technology and Business Model Features of Distributed Internet of Things Automation Solutions. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2017, 11, 8–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandez-Anez, V.; Fernández-Güell, J.M.; Giffinger, R. Smart City implementation and discourses: An integrated conceptual model. The case of Vienna. Cities 2018, 78, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gabrys, J. Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City. Environ. Plan D 2014, 32, 30–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Helfert, M.; Krempels, K.-H.; Klein, C.; Donellan, B.; Guiskhin, O. Smart Cities, Green Technologies, and Intelligent Transport Systems; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 579. [Google Scholar]
- Höjer, M.; Wangel, J. Smart sustainable cities: Definition and challenges. In ICT Innovations for Sustainability; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 310, p. 333. [Google Scholar]
- Komninos, N. The Age of Intelligent Cities: Smart Environments and Innovation-for-All Strategies; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; p. 78. [Google Scholar]
- Giffinger, R.; Haindlmaier, G.; Kramar, H. The role of rankings in growing city competition. Urban Res. Pract. 2010, 3, 299–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazaroiu, G.C.; Roscia, M. Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy 2012, 47, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma Ruoso, L.-E.; Plant, R. A retrival optimized surveillance video storage system for campus application scenarios. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2018, 7, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
- Deakin, M.; Al Waer, H. From intelligent to smart cities. Intell. Build. Int. 2011, 3, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Etezadzadeh, C. Smart City Made in Germany: Die Smart-City Bewegung als Treiber Einer; Morgan Kaufmann: Burlington, MA, USA, 2021; ISBN 978-3-658-27231-9. [Google Scholar]
- Dameri, R.P. Comparing smart. In Smart City; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Dalton, J. Kano Model. In Great Big Agile, 1st ed.; Dalton, J., McDermott, D., Eds.; Apress: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-4842-4205-6. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, J.-W. An Analysis on Customer Satisfaction Attributes of Spa Resort using Kano Model. J. Tour. Leis. Res. 2018, 30, 195–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bini, S.A. Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Deep Learning, and Cognitive Computing: What Do These Terms Mean and How Will They Impact Health Care? J. Arthroplast. 2018, 33, 2358–2361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barsi; Debnath, A.K.; Chin, H.C.; Haque, M.M.; Yuen, B. Beyond indicators, new methods in Smart city assessment. Smart Cities Reg. Dev. J. 2014, 37, 47–56. [Google Scholar]
- Bai, J.; Huawei Enterprise. Bulding an open platform for safe cities. In Safe City: The Road to Collaborative Public Safety; Huawei Online: Shenzhen, China, 2018; Volume 146, pp. 740–748. [Google Scholar]
- Hollands, R.G. Will the real smart city please stand up? City 2008, 12, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colombo. Industrial cloud-based cyber-physical systems. IMC-AESOP Approach 2014, 22, 4–5. [Google Scholar]
- Dameri, R.P. Urban tableau de bord: Measuring smart city performance. In From Information to Smart Society; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
- Halegoua, G.R. Smart Cities; The MIT Press: Cambridge, UK, 2020; ISBN 9780262356848. [Google Scholar]
- Mosenia, A.; Jha, N.K. A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 2017, 5, 586–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Dwyer, E.; Pan, I.; Acha, S.; Shah, N. Smart energy systems for sustainable smart cities: Current developments, trends and future directions. Appl. Energy 2019, 237, 581–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Paskaleva, K.A. Enabling the smart city: The progress of city e-governance in Europe. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 2009, 1, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hock, M.; Clauss, T. Knowledge Management Capabilities and the Role of Risk Taking for Business Model Innovation. Acad. Mang. Proc. 2017, 2017, 15800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, K. A Risk Management Model for Sustainable Smart City. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2018, 110, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kashef, M.; Visvizi, A.; Troisi, O. Smart city as a smart service system: Human-computer interaction and smart city surveillance systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 124, 106923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinin, M.; Krundyshev, V.; Zegzhda, P. Cybersecurity Risk Assessment in Smart City Infrastructures. Machines 2021, 9, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gorton, D. Using incident response trees as a tool for risk management of online financial services. Risk Anal. 2014, 34, 1763–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bjørner, T. The advantages of and barriers to being smart in a smart city: The perceptions of project managers within a smart city cluster project in Greater Copenhagen. Cities 2021, 114, 103187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moch, N.; Wereda, W. Smart Security in the Smart City. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, M.K. Role of Technology in Smart Governance: ‘Smart City, Safe City’. 2013. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2310465 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
- Melnick, E.L.; Everitt, B.S. Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Analysis and Assessment; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008; ISBN 9780470035498. [Google Scholar]
- Soane, E.; Jones, B.C.; Willman, P. The Risk Position Model: A Multilevel Framework for Managing Organizational Risk. Acad. Mang. Proc. 2016, 2016, 15622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saraff, S.; Kumar, R.; Mitra, A.; Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, S.; Das, S. Risk Assessment Model: Roadmap to Develop Kolkata into a Smart City. EAI Endorsed Trans. Smart Cities 2021, 5, 166545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallner, J. Cyber Risk Management. Stat. Ref. Online 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Łaźniewska, E. Istota koncepcji smart city. Aktywność miasta Poznania na drodze do smart city. Rozwój Regionalny i Polityka Regionalna 2020, 48, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nr | Attributes (Positive Attributes) |
---|---|
1 | A city with a clean image should have a well-organized and transparent website and applications. |
2 | Access to the application should be universal |
3 | Information about smart solutions should be up-to-date and complete. |
4 | Regulations should be accessible and understandable. |
5 | All data provided through the application should be safe and private. |
6 | The resident should be able to easily contact the order service in order to clarify any doubts. |
7 | The resident should be able to cancel the transaction before the end of the action. |
8 | Profiles and applications present content in several languages |
9 | Profile, the application allows logged in users to use the discount code offered. |
10 | The profile, applications and smart solutions are provided by free webinars |
11 | Regular app maintenance gives residents confidence that their actions are in place reliable. |
12 | Keeping your profiles safe prevents attacks on residents. |
13 | Loyalty programs should be introduced in applications for the ties of the local community |
14 | The applications make it possible to involve residents in the development of the city |
15 | The ability to hack the application—no sense of security |
16 | Electronic tickets—convenience of use |
17 | Consumption monitoring—saves money |
18 | Location monitoring—saves time |
19 | The sense of privacy in smart cities is essential for residents |
20 | Using the application should be easy to use |
21 | Smart solutions are widely available on pages in applications |
22 | The use of smart solutions brings benefits for users |
23 | The use of smart solutions poses security and privacy risks for users |
Distribution of Response | XY Pair | Location of the Point on the Graph |
---|---|---|
All attractive | 0 1 | Top left corner |
All one-dimensional | 1 1 | Top right corner |
Evenly split between attractive and one-dimensional | 0.5 1 | Middle of the top, halfway between attractive and one-dimensional |
All must-have | 1 0 | Bottom right corner |
Evenly split between one-dimensional and must-have | 1 0.5 | Middle of right edge, halfway between one-dimensional and must-have |
All indifferent | 0 0 | Bottom left corner |
Evenly split between must-have and indifferent | 0.5 0 | Middle of bottom edge, halfway between must-have and indifferent |
Evenly split between indifferent and attractive | 0 0.5 | Middle of left edge, halfway between indifferent and attractive |
Evenly split among attractive, one-dimensional, must-have, and indifferent | 0.5 0.5 | Exact middle of graph |
Evenly split between attractive and must-have | 0.5 0.5 | Exact middle of graph, halfway between attractive and must-have, without an influence of one-dimensional or indifferent |
Evenly split among attractive, one-dimensional, and must-have | 0.67 0.67 | Equally spaced between attractive and must- have, but influenced by one-dimensional |
Attribute-Number | Assessment of the Attribute | Satisfaction Index Dissatisfaction Index | Dissatisfaction Index |
---|---|---|---|
1 | M | 0.75 | −0.25 |
2 | M | 0.82 | −0.31 |
3 | O | 0.65 | −0.75 |
4 | A | 0.25 | −0.85 |
5 | O | 0.57 | −0.89 |
6 | M | 0.67 | −0.24 |
7 | M | 0.89 | −0.18 |
8 | M | 0.66 | −0.40 |
9 | O | 0.68 | −0.59 |
10 | A | 0.34 | −0.84 |
11 | A | 0.40 | −0.80 |
12 | A | 0.31 | −0.93 |
13 | A | 0.20 | −0.92 |
14 | M | 0.82 | −0.33 |
15 | O | 0.89 | −0.68 |
16 | A | 0.46 | −0.65 |
17 | O | 0.55 | −0.96 |
18 | O | 0.69 | −0.93 |
19 | O | 0.66 | −0.55 |
20 | M | 0.73 | −0.30 |
21 | I | 0.22 | −0.20 |
22 | R | 0.46 | −0.65 |
23 | M | 0.70 | −0.48 |
Nr | Smart City Elements | Threats | The Level of Threat |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Intelligent transport | Ecological city transport | 4 |
2 | Delays in urban transport | 5 | |
3 | Transport information | 3 | |
4 | Location and route information | 4 | |
5 | The ability to hack the application | 1 | |
6 | Electronic tickets | 4 | |
7 | intelligent energy/intelligent life | Scanning license plates | 1 |
8 | Face scanning | 1 | |
9 | Current monitoring | 5 | |
10 | Monitoring of consumption | 1 | |
11 | Privacy | 2 | |
12 | intelligent technology | Collecting large amounts of data | 2 |
13 | Processing large amounts of data | 4 | |
14 | Behavior Monitoring | 2 | |
15 | Location monitoring | 1 | |
16 | Vehicle registration systems | 2 | |
17 | Public transport management systems | 3 | |
18 | Supply networks and logistics in the city | 4 | |
19 | Smart citizens and education | City parking services | 3 |
20 | Population registration systems | 4 | |
21 | Registration systems for companies and other organizations | 1 | |
22 | Systems for registration and planning of municipal investments (integrated with the city geoportal) | 1 | |
23 | intelligent environment, smart economy | Regional spatial business community | 1 |
24 | Stationary exhaust gas analyzers | 1 | |
25 | Air monitoring systems | 1 | |
26 | Noise registration systems | 1 | |
27 | Tax calculation systems (especially ad valorem property taxes) | 1 | |
28 | smart government and safe city | Traffic monitoring systems (including traffic violation recording devices | 1 |
28 | City Geoportals | 1 |
Threat | Vulnerability (1–5) | Risk Level (Threat × Vulnerability) | Security Level | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Intelligent transport | 4 | 16 | 3 |
2 | 5 | 25 | ||
3 | 3 | 9 | ||
4 | 2 | 8 | ||
5 | 2 | 2 | ||
6 | 1 | 4 | ||
7 | intelligent energy/intelligent life | 2 | 2 | 2 |
8 | 2 | 2 | ||
9 | 3 | 15 | ||
10 | 2 | 2 | ||
11 | 2 | 4 | ||
12 | Intelligent technology | 1 | 2 | 4 |
13 | 1 | 2 | ||
14 | 5 | 10 | ||
15 | 2 | 2 | ||
16 | 1 | 2 | ||
17 | 3 | 9 | ||
18 | Smart citizens and education | 3 | 12 | 2 |
19 | 5 | 15 | ||
20 | 5 | 20 | ||
21 | 1 | 1 | ||
22 | 3 | 3 | ||
23 | intelligent environment, smart economy | 2 | 2 | 4 |
24 | 3 | 3 | ||
25 | 2 | 2 | ||
26 | 2 | 2 | ||
27 | smart government and safe city | 2 | 2 | 3 |
28 | 2 | 2 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Żywiołek, J.; Schiavone, F. Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety. Energies 2021, 14, 5511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175511
Żywiołek J, Schiavone F. Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety. Energies. 2021; 14(17):5511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175511
Chicago/Turabian StyleŻywiołek, Justyna, and Francesco Schiavone. 2021. "Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety" Energies 14, no. 17: 5511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175511
APA StyleŻywiołek, J., & Schiavone, F. (2021). Perception of the Quality of Smart City Solutions as a Sense of Residents’ Safety. Energies, 14(17), 5511. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14175511