Modified Transceiver Antenna for NQR Detection of Explosive Objects in Demining Conditions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods of Geometric and Spatial Simulation of a Modified Antenna
2.1. Statement of the Research Problem
2.2. Substantiation of Geometry and Development of the Spiral-Coil Model in Comsol Multiphysics
3. Discussion of Results
3.1. Analysis of Simulation Results
3.2. Experimental Studies
4. Conclusions
- A numerical model of the coil geometry was synthesized in COMSOL Multiphysics, which allowed the expansion of the working area compared to the classical version of the spiral coil. This was achieved by compensating for the weakening of the magnetic induction at the edges of the coil.
- The zones of sufficient field homogeneity (10–15%) on both sides of the geometric center of the coil shaped as half of a Fermat spiral were studied. It was established that the zones of permissible field inhomogeneity on both sides of the geometric center of the antenna in the form of the Archimedean spiral were ±14 mm and ±18 mm, at distances of 20 mm and 40 mm from its surface, respectively. For the modified antenna, these values were approximately ±29 mm for the two locations of the measuring sensor.
- The obtained magnetic-induction-distribution diagrams also showed that the volume of the working area did not significantly depend on the distance of the object of study, and the topology of the EM field did not depend on the orientation of the sample relative to the radial-symmetry axis observed in the planar antennas.
- The results obtained by simulating the frequency dependences of the lumped-port impedance indicate that, the near-doubling of the inductance, the quality factor of the modified coil increased from 905 to 1531, which contributed to an increase in the sensitivity of the input circuit of the radio-receiving path of the detector in the NQR signal-reception mode.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- September 2001 Test Results of an Acoustic Instrumented Prodder. Available online: https://www.gichd.org/fileadmin/GICHD-resources/rec-documents/Russell.37-2.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2022).
- Apih, T.; Rameev, B.; Mozzhukhin, G.; Barras, J. Magnetic resonance detection of explosives and illicit materials. In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Khusnutdinov, R.R.; Mozzhukhin, G.V.; Konov, A.B. Two-frequency planar gradiometer for distant NQR detection of explosives. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2021, 52, 1787–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Monea, C.; Iana, G.V.; Ionita, S.; Ionesku, L.M.; Zaharia, S.A.; Ilie, S.; Bizon, N. An optimized NQR spectrometer for detection of prohibited substances. Measurement 2020, 151, 107158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasser, R.; Thomas, T.H. Prodding to detect mines: A technique with a future. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on the Detection of Abandoned Land Mines, Edinburgh, UK, 12–14 October 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Samila, A.; Haliuk, S.; Krulikovskyi, O. Structural and functional synthesis of the radioelectronic means of a pulsed NQR. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference DAS, Suceava, Romania, 2–4 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sorte, E.G. Aerial Crosspolarized NQR-NMR: Buried Explosive Detection From a Safe Distance; Technical Report; Sandia National Lab.: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otagaki, Y.; Barras, J.; Kosmas, P. Improving detection of a portable NQR system for humanitarian demining using machine learning. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2022, 60, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samila, A.; Hotra, O.; Majewski, J. Implementation of the configuration structure of an integrated computational core of a pulsed NQR sensor based on FPGA. Sensors 2021, 21, 6029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Samila, A.P.; Politansky, L.F.; Hotra, O.Z. A portable digital multipulse NQR spectrometer for the study of the sensory properties, structure and defects in layered semiconductors. In Proceedings of the International Conference TCSET 2020, Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine, 25–29 February 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Fenglong, H.; Gengguang, X.; Xueyi, H. Study of RF coil in NQR explosive detection system. Procedia Eng. 2012, 43, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hemnani, P.; Rajarajan, A.K.; Joshi, G.; Ravindranath, S.V.G. Design of probe for NQR/NMR detection. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 2020, 10, 3468–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samila, A. Simulation of magnetic field topology in a saddle-shaped coil of nuclear quadrupole resonance spectrometer. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2015, 56, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schneider, H.; Dullenkopf, P. Slotted tube resonator: A new NMR probe head at high observing frequencies. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1977, 48, 68–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grechishkin, V.S.; Sinyavskiĭ, N.Y. Remote nuclear quadrupole resonance in solids. Phys. Usp. 1993, 36, 980–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez, J.M.; Carbonell, J.M.; Jonsén, P. Numerical methods for the modelling of chip formation. Arch. Computat. Methods Eng. 2020, 27, 387–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vovchuk, D.; Khobzei, M.; Filonov, D. Naked eye direction of arrival estimation with a Fresnel lens. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glukhenkyi, O.I.; Goryslavets, Y.M.; Tokarevskyi, A.V. Three-dimensional simulation of single-phase electromagnetic stirrer of liquid metal. Tech. Electrodyn. 2013, 5, 77–84. [Google Scholar]
- Understand, Predict, and Optimize Real-World Designs, Devices, and Processes with Simulation. Available online: https://www.comsol.com/comsol-multiphysics (accessed on 18 June 2022).
- Hussain, I.; Woo, D.K. Self-inductance calculation of the Archimedean spiral coil. Energies 2022, 15, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farantatos, P.; Barras, J.; Poplett, I.; Kosmas, P. Electromagnetic design of a spiral surface RF-coil transceiver for NQR-based explosive detection in the humanitarian demining setting. In Proceedings of the 2018 COMSOL Conference in Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 22–24 October 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Jover, J.; Aissani, S.; Guendouz, L.; Thomas, A.; Canet, D. NQR detection of sodium nitrite recrystallized in wood. In NATO Science for Peace and Security Series B: Physics and Biophysics; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Majewski, A.; Walker, M. Design of Impedance Matching Networks for NMR and NQR Studies in the HF Band. Available online: http://www.phys.ufl.edu/~majewski/letters/match.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2022).
- Moisiuk, O.; Samila, A. Features of using the Comsol Multiphysics software for modeling a spiral antenna of an NQR detector. In Proceedings of the International Conference TCSET 2022, Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine, 22–26 February 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Hotra, O.; Samila, A. A low-cost digital pulsed coherent spectrometer for investigation of NQR in layered semiconductor GaSe and InSe crystals. Electronics 2020, 9, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Description | Name | Expression | Value |
---|---|---|---|
Initial spiral radius | a1 | 9 | 9 mm |
Final spiral radius | Af | 75 | 75 mm |
Spiral growth rate | b1 | (af − a1)/(2 × pi × n1) | 1.1671 r.u. |
Updated growth rate | b2 | (gap + thick)/(2 × pi) | 1.1671 r.u. |
Turn-to-turn distance | Distance | (af − a1)/n1 | 7.3333 r.u. |
Gap distance | Gap | distance-thick | 4.3333 r.u. |
Number of turns | n1 | 9 | 9 |
Initial angle | Theta_0 | 0 | 0 deg |
Final angle | Theta_f | (af − a1)/b1 | 56.549 deg |
Thickness of the spiral | Thick | 3 | 3 mm |
Fermat Spiral Coil | Archimedean Spiral Coil | |
---|---|---|
Coil inductance | L = 8.386 uH | L = 4.955 uH |
Lumped element capacitance | C = 140 pF | C = 237 pF |
Frequency | F = 4.645 MHz | F = 4.645 MHz |
Characteristic impedance of resonant circuit | ρ = 244.745 ohms | ρ = 144.593 ohms |
Coil resistance | R = 0.15983 ohms | R = 0.15983 ohms |
Quality factor of resonant circuit | Q = 1531 | Q = 905 |
Frequency, MHz | Archimedean Spiral Coil | Fermat Spiral Coil | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Inductive Reactance XL, ohms | Capacitive Reactance XC, ohms | Full Impedance |ZLC|, ohms | Inductive Reactance XL, ohms | Capacitive Reactance XC, ohms | Full Impedance |ZLC|, ohms | |
4.6100 | 143.52 | −145.67i | 9741.1 | 242.86 | −246.60i | 16,035 |
4.6150 | 143.68 | −145.51i | 11,407 | 243.13 | −246.33i | 18,689 |
4.6200 | 143.84 | −145.35i | 13,758 | 243.39 | −246.07i | 22,393 |
4.6250 | 143.99 | −145.20i | 17,324 | 243.65 | −245.80i | 27,920 |
4.6300 | 144.15 | −145.04i | 23,377 | 243.92 | −245.53i | 37,057 |
4.6350 | 144.30 | −144.88i | 35,908 | 244.18 | −245.27i | 55,051 |
4.6400 | 144.46 | −144.73i | 77,307 | 244.44 | −245.00i | 1.0691 × 105 |
4.6450 | 144.61 | −144.57i | 5.0980 × 105 | 244.71 | −244.74i | 1.8131 × 106 |
4.6500 | 144.77 | −144.42i | 59,373 | 244.97 | −244.48i | 1.2135 × 105 |
4.6550 | 144.92 | −144.26i | 31,538 | 245.23 | −244.22i | 58,741 |
4.6600 | 145.08 | −144.11i | 21,479 | 245.50 | −243.95i | 38,764 |
4.6650 | 145.24 | −143.95i | 16,289 | 245.76 | −243.69i | 28,934 |
4.6700 | 145.39 | −143.80i | 13,122 | 246.02 | −243.43i | 23,086 |
4.6750 | 145.55 | −143.64i | 10,988 | 246.29 | −243.17i | 19,208 |
4.6800 | 145.70 | −143.49i | 9452.2 | 246.55 | −242.91i | 16,448 |
Investigation Type | Working Area of the Archimedean Spiral Coil | Working Area of the Fermat Spiral Coil | Ratio | Increase |
---|---|---|---|---|
Simulation, distance 20 mm | 36 mm | 50 mm | 1.39 | 14 mm |
Simulation, distance 40 mm | 44 mm | 50 mm | 1.14 | 6 mm |
Experimental, distance 20 mm | 24 mm | 58 mm | 2.42 | 34 mm |
Experimental, distance 40 mm | 36 mm | 58 mm | 1.61 | 22 mm |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Samila, A.; Hotra, O.; Moisiuk, O.; Khobzei, M.; Kazemirskiy, T. Modified Transceiver Antenna for NQR Detection of Explosive Objects in Demining Conditions. Energies 2022, 15, 7348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197348
Samila A, Hotra O, Moisiuk O, Khobzei M, Kazemirskiy T. Modified Transceiver Antenna for NQR Detection of Explosive Objects in Demining Conditions. Energies. 2022; 15(19):7348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197348
Chicago/Turabian StyleSamila, Andrii, Oleksandra Hotra, Oleksandr Moisiuk, Mykola Khobzei, and Taras Kazemirskiy. 2022. "Modified Transceiver Antenna for NQR Detection of Explosive Objects in Demining Conditions" Energies 15, no. 19: 7348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197348
APA StyleSamila, A., Hotra, O., Moisiuk, O., Khobzei, M., & Kazemirskiy, T. (2022). Modified Transceiver Antenna for NQR Detection of Explosive Objects in Demining Conditions. Energies, 15(19), 7348. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197348