Next Article in Journal
Do Nuclear Energy, Renewable Energy, and Environmental-Related Technologies Asymmetrically Reduce Ecological Footprint? Evidence from Pakistan
Previous Article in Journal
Energy Prices Impact on Inflationary Spiral
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Multi-Skin Adaptive Ventilated Facade: A Review

Institute of Civil Engineering, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195251 Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(9), 3447; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093447
Submission received: 13 April 2022 / Revised: 30 April 2022 / Accepted: 5 May 2022 / Published: 9 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section G: Energy and Buildings)

Abstract

:
Multi-skin ventilated facades with integrated building elements that respond to climatic conditions (mechanized openings and automatic shading with intelligent control) present the potential of improving overall annual energy savings by adapting the thermal properties of buildings. This paper presents a literature review on multi-skin adaptive ventilated facades. Additionally, this article presents a literature review on building envelopes that contain inner-air layers. The operation modes of the air layer used in building enclosure structures are classified and summarized and the thermal performance and benefits of climate-adaptive facades are discussed and reviewed. The existing operation modes of the air layer used in building envelopes are summarized, outlined and roughly classified into the following types: the enclosed type, the naturally ventilated type and the mechanically ventilated type. One of the sustainable development trends is the investigation and application of energy-efficient climate-adaptive facades. In this study, the energy modeling of a high-rise office building was calculated using the Green Building Studio. The annual energy, the annual CO2 emissions, and life cycle energy for the following three types of facade were estimated: a single-layer facade made of three-layer glass with argon, a double ventilated facade, and a triple ventilated facade with a double chamber. The calculation results show that the annual energy of the building with an adaptive triple-skin facade could be reduced by 15% compared with buildings with a single skin facade.

1. Introduction

A variety of factors will shape the future of buildings and cities. Among the most influential drivers that will affect the way we design and operate buildings is the need for decarburization as well as for supplying energy from clean and renewable sources. Globally, all energy produced is consumed by several main sectors: the residential sector, the commercial sector, the industrial sector, and the transport sector [1]. The built environment is partly responsible for the current situation and offers opportunities for new solutions to address the societal challenges of climate change and sustainable development [2,3]. The United Nations Environment Program [4] has determined that buildings consume 30–40% of the world’s total primary energy costs. With the acceleration of urbanization and the constant improvement in residents’ standard of living, the construction sector will continue to dominate the process of energy conservation and emission reduction. Reducing environmental pollution (CO2 emissions) throughout the life cycle (production, operation, and disposal) of buildings is an urgent and important problem. The European Commission (EC) has identified the building sector as a key enabler in its long-term decarburization strategy by targeting a reduction in CO2 emissions of at least 80% by the year 2050 [5,6,7].
The loss of thermal energy through the external enclosing structures of buildings is one of the main components in the structure of the costs of thermal energy spent on heating and cooling and accounts for 30–50% of all heat energy loss [8]. The loss of thermal energy directly depends on the thermal characteristics of the external enclosing structures.
The thermal conductivity, the thermal resistance and thermal transmittance are very important parameters in the evaluation of the energy efficiency of buildings. In this work, the authors offer a method for determining the thermal characteristics based on cooling measurements, using a multiple regression mode. The results show that the model can be used to define the thermal characteristics of building structures [9]. Development U-value of window and glazing facade is illustrated at Figure 1.
To improve the energy efficiency of facade systems it is possible to use the air layers as an internal structural layer of a building’s enclosing structures. The use of enclosing structures with air layers has gained popularity [10,11].
The concept of double skin facades (DSF) was first proposed in the early 1900s [12]. DSF is gaining popularity as an architectural element as more translucent facades are used in modern office buildings. A double-ventilated facade consists of an outer facade layer, an inner layer, and an air layer between them. The outer layer (tempered glass) protects the building from external conditions and provides additional sound insulation from external noise, while the inner layer consists of either double glass or thermal insulation material. The width of the air space between the two shells, called the air channel, ranges from 20 mm to more than 1 m [13]. An adjustable shading device (blinds) can be installed in the air channel to protect from the sun and control solar radiation [14]. DSF can work both in the mode of an absence of air convection (closed air layer) and in the mode of natural or forced convection (with air ventilation). The closed air layer mode provides additional thermal insulation of the outer shells to reduce heat transfer in winter. The mode with air ventilation solves the problems of overheating in summer, removes moisture from the insulation materials, and helps to achieve energy savings in winter. Several different facade systems are characterized by the presence of one or more air layers between the exterior cladding and thermal insulation (which is continuous throughout the entire height of the facade). There is a growing interest in triple ventilated facades consisting of outer, middle, and inner layers separated by two air layers [15].
The use of convective air movement in ventilated channels of facades provides several advantages for the entire building, such as passive cooling, room heating, natural ventilation, a fresh air supply to the room, and the prevention of insulation destruction. Numerous studies and publications have detailed the effects of using air layers in the enclosing structures of buildings. Several studies have been conducted on passive energy saving in buildings [16,17], the energy efficiency and thermal characteristics of ventilated facades with double cladding triple-ventilated facades [18,19,20,21], closed cavity facade, ventilated facades using phase-change materials (PCM), ventilated facades with solar photovoltaic (PV) panels [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] and convective currents in air layers [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42].
In this study, the accumulation of thermal energy was applied to the building structure using the intelligent heat accumulation of materials with a high thermal mass. The research is directed towards the introduction of materials for storing latent heat, which, if used correctly, can have a real effect in reducing energy costs without taking up the space needed for accumulation. The authors review the heat energy accumulation of passive systems that have been integrated in building structures, and classify them [43].
The simulation results can help designers make the right choice in terms of the location of PCM wall panels, the planned ventilation rate at night and the maximum melting point value for a particular PCM.
This study explored a fencing system that uses 50% recycled polystyrene foam (EPS) to generate lightweight foam concrete panels. A comprehensive study was performed to define the embodied energy of these panels. A comparable study that was performed using a single-storey building and different materials indicated that a prefabricated foam concrete panel is a good component and can be considered as the main enclosing material. This article presents research defining changes in the physical characteristics of expanded polystyrene supplemented with graphite when subjected to solar radiation. When subjected to a higher intensity of synthetic solar radiation, the extensible force improved and the materials absorption increased. The material subjected to a higher rate of solar radiation had a higher compressive strength than the material subjected to a lower rate of solar radiation [44].

2. Scientometric Literature Analysis

A scientometric analysis of the literature over the last 5 years was carried out using the Scopus database. Visualization of the scientific landscape was made possible by using the VOS Viewer program. In Figure 2, a map based on keywords in the literature on enclosure structures is presented. The analysis shows that the research-relevant topics for building enclosing structures are energy efficiency, sustainable development, photovoltaic cells, and intelligent buildings. However, with a detailed analysis of the literature, it becomes clear that the research mainly focuses on the external adaptive elements of buildings. Overheating from solar radiation is solved primarily by using intelligent climate-adaptive dynamic facades. The purpose of dynamic facades is to promote the development of sustainable architecture. Dynamic facades act as filters between the room and the street, providing appropriate shade, sunlight, ventilation, and visual unification. However, according to the authors, a modern facade should be developed as a flexible and efficient shell that responds to external climatic conditions while simultaneously determining internal requirements by controlling the movement of airflows in the air channels between the facade shells. The creation of multi-skin ventilated facades with controlled modes of air currents under various climatic conditions is a promising research avenue.
The Topic Prominence percentile for topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation» (Scopus Database) is equal to 94.7% (Figure 3).
The most active institutions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation» are shown at Figure 4.
The most active Countries/Regions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation» are shown at Figure 5.
The most active Authors for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation» are shown at Figure 6.
The most active Authors for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation» are shown at Figure 7.

3. Classification of Ventilated Facades

Figure 8 shows the classification of ventilated facades.

3.1. Different Connection Types of Ventilated Facades

The ventilated facades are classified into different connection types according to the type of airflow system, such as the Box-window, the Shaft-box, the Corridor, and the Multi-story system [45]. Connection types for ventilated facades are presented at the Table 1.
Ventilated facades can be classified into facades (a) with open rusts (seams) and (b) with closed rusts or without rusts. Ventilated facades with open rusts provide free air circulation between the air chamber and the external environment through the seams between the exterior cladding panels. In facades of this type, air enters the chamber from the outside through the rust of the lower part of the facade and then exits through the upper joints [46,47]. The energy efficiency of the facade was explored by developing numerical models, CFD [48], and experimentally using non-intrusive methods to measure the airflow [49].
There are no open rusts between the parts of the exterior cladding in ventilated facades with a closed connection, so air enters the chamber through a hole or grate located in the lower part of the facade and exits through a vent in the upper part of the facade. The thermal characteristics of ventilated facades with a closed connection were studied using computational fluid dynamics modeling [50] and energy modeling [51].

3.2. Working Air Modes of the Ventilated Facade

Free and forced convection processes can develop in the building structure. Natural convection in a permeable and porous medium occurs when there is a temperature or pressure gradient and, accordingly, different air densities at different points of the thermal insulation material. Modes of ventilation of the air layers of the façade is presented at Table 2.
Forced convection in a porous medium occurs if the directional movement (flow) of air relative to the boundary surface in the space bordering the material and the boundary is permeable.
Facade systems can be classified according to the mode of ventilation of the air space (Figure 9), as follows:
(1)
Air from the room;
(2)
Outside air;
(3)
Supply air from the ventilation-conditioning system;
(4)
Combined air supply.
Figure 9 presents a scheme of facade systems ventilated with indoor air from a room. Air from the room passes into the interstitial space and is then removed through the exhaust duct or directly into the environment.
The heated air between the glazing layers is extracted through the cavity; thereby, the inner layer of glazing performs cooling. The outer layer of insulating glass minimizes heat-transfer losses.
The amount of heat from the outside air and solar radiation during the warm season is reduced, which significantly reduces the load of the cooling system. Part of the heat of the air removed from the room is utilized during the cold season, which reduces the load of heating systems.
The heat input from the outside air and solar radiation decreases in hot climates and during solar radiation, and the load of cooling systems of buildings is reduced. The shading blinds are often installed in the interstitial space for ventilated translucent structures in hot climates. Blinds shade the room and absorb the heat from solar radiation.
The translucent structures ventilated with air from the room have an internal surface temperature equal to the indoor air temperature, which increases indoor comfort.
Figure 10 shows schematic diagrams of facade systems ventilated by outdoor air. Internal air enters the air cavity from the room and is removed through the exhaust ventilation duct or directly into the environment. The interstitial space is connected with the outdoor air in the upper and lower parts.
During the cold season, the heat leaving the room through the interstitial space heats the air entering the room for further use in ventilation systems. The amount of heat required to compensate for the room’s heat loss is reduced. Such facade systems are rational to use in hot climates.
Figure 11 presents the principal scheme of facade systems integrated with the ventilation system. Air is passed between the windows before it is fed into the room from the supply channels of the ventilation systems. It is supposed to carry out air heating of buildings in winter and air conditioning in summer.
Air enters from the environment into the cavity and then into the building through the facade or ventilation system. It becomes possible to update the indoor air with fresh air from the environment.
Figure 12 illustrates that another type of ventilation of the air space is possible if air enters the cavity from the premises of the building and then is removed. In this scheme, the exhaust air is removed from the premises.
Figure 13 shows the principal scheme of a facade with a closed air cavity. The complete tightness of the facade characterizes this type of facade. The air cavity forms a buffer zone between the environment and the premises and the cavity is not ventilated. The low coefficient of thermal conductivity of the air (λ = 0.024 W/m·K) allows for the use of air as a thermal insulation layer. Air is an excellent heat insulator if it is in a stationary state.
Multi-skin facade systems can take into account climatic conditions due to configurable and controlled airflow modes to reduce heat loss and increase the comfort of the room.
The multi-skin facade consists of three glass panels bounding a U-shaped channel (Figure 14). The air flow is controlled by forced or mixed convection connected to the air exhaust system from the building (mechanical or natural) [52,53].
The incoming air moves down between the two panel, rises between the second and third panels, and enters the heated space. The incoming outdoor air is preheated because of heat-loss recovery and absorbed solar energy. Such an effect reduces energy costs.
A triple ventilated facade filled with PCM material can effectively prevent the phenomenon of overheating and has advantageous characteristics for heat preservation and insulation [54,55].
In a different study, the authors proposed a ventilated translucent structure for exhaust ventilation with triple glazing [56]. The structure presents three panels, air cavities, and built-in blinds. The study results show that the proposed design can significantly reduce heat loss/heat inflow through the window during peak winter and summer days, respectively.
The combined ventilation schemes increase the comfort level in the room, protection from hypothermia in the cold season and protection from overheating in the warm season.

4. Type of Multi-Skin Ventilated Facades

4.1. Single Skin Facade

A single skin facade presents a double-glazed unit (DGU) or triple-glazed unit (TGU). The facade can include internal blinds and a low-E coating on the glass.

4.2. Double Skin Facade

Double skin facades present outside a double-glazed unit and inside a single-glazing unit form an air cavity. The blinds can be used in a ventilated air cavity.

4.3. Closed Cavity Facade

A closed cavity facade is a double-skin facade present on the outside of a single-glazing unit or inside a DGU or TGU. It forms a ventilated cavity where blinds can be integrated.

4.4. D3 Facade

A D3 facade consists of two separated, closed or ventilated air cavities, which are supplied with clean and dry air and prevents condensation. The dry and clean-faced cavities are equipped with a high-quality, robust, and automated solar-shading and air mode system, which can be operated individually based on climate zones and boundaries. The benefit is a unique architectural feature—the visual appearance of the facade changes in line with the position of the solar shading (e.g., summer or winter appearance).
A D3 facade dynamically adapts to the varying external weather conditions, the comfort of building occupants, and energy needs. The shading system behavior can be designed for each specific building in moderate climates using project-specific control algorithms and building-users can override such possibilities. Furthermore, a D3 facade provides energy savings in combination with natural light transmittance and thermal comfort for the occupants. It contributes to achieving high scores in energy rating systems (BREAM, LEED, etc.) [57].

4.5. Ventilated PV Facades

Photovoltaic (PV) panels are commonly used in buildings to produce energy from solar radiation [58]. A photovoltaic system can be integrated into the building. A photovoltaic system that consist of a building enclosure structure and PV panels can create electricity and reduce the heating costs in winter and cooling costs in summer [52,53]. The energy efficiency of the photovoltaic system can be estimated with different ventilation modes (non-ventilated, naturally ventilated, and recovery ventilated mode).
Figure 15 illustrates a passive ventilated facade with photovoltaic panels [59]. The photovoltaic panels are combined with a double-glazed facade. The facade system can implement different operation modes for summer and winter depending on the adjustment of the ventilation openings on the external and internal panels.
Figure 16 presents an active ventilated PV facade, which combines the benefits of a BIPV system and a solar thermal system [60].
This facade is designed to achieve the most efficient activity of the photovoltaic panels by generating electricity and by solar air heating.
The results of the investigation indicate that a PV–TSF system with a narrow air cavity (50 mm wide and 20% perforations) can provide suitable thermal performance for buildings in hot climates, achieving a significantly lower solar heat gain than wider PV-DSF systems, without a significant loss of natural daylight in indoor spaces. For countries such as India where land prices are very high, the PV–TSF system provides better performance at a 50 mm air cavity as compared to the PV–DSF system operated at a 200 mm air cavity to reduce the energy consumption of the building [61].
In their study, the authors found that the triple-skin facade with PV modules with a narrow air cavity (50 mm wide and 20% perforation) can ensure appropriate thermal characteristics in the buildings. The triple-skin facade with a PV-modules system ensures better thermal characteristics with a 50 mm air cavity compared to the system with a 200 mm air cavity [62].
In another study, the authors found that the succession of PCM configuration layers significantly affects the thermal characteristics of building enclosing structures, and the developed model provides a perspective with which to optimize PCM envelope configurations [63].
Types of multi-skin ventilated facades is presented at Table 3.

5. Adaptive Ventilated Facades with Controlled Thermal Characteristics

Adaptive facades provide buildings with flexibility so that they can respond to varying weather conditions and occupant preferences. It is increasingly recognized as a promising option for achieving a high indoor environmental quality while offering the potential for low-energy building operation.
Ventilated facades with integrated building elements that respond to climatic conditions (mechanized openings and automatic shading with intelligent control) present promising potential in improving the overall annual energy savings by adapting the thermal properties of the structure to contradictory climatic conditions throughout the year.
Figure 17 introduces an example of an automated mode of control of the thermal properties of the facade depending on the climate.

6. Methods of Thermomechanical Calculation

The existing methods of thermomechanical calculation are as follows: (1) a method based on solving the heat balance equation in a ventilated interlayer; (2) a method based on solving a system of heat balance equations on the glass surface; (3) a method of calculation using empirical formulas; and (4) Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling (CFD) methods.

6.1. Calculation Using Equation of Heat Balance in a Ventilated Layer

Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation using the heat balance equation in a ventilated layer is illustrated at Figure 18.
The heat balance equations are as follows [56]:
d Q 1 + d Q 2 = d Q 3 d Q 1 = k int ( t int t ) d x d Q 2 = k e x t ( t e x t t ) d x d Q 3 = c G d t
d Q 1 and d Q 2 are heat transferred through the inner and outer parts of the fence, c is the heat capacity of air, G is the mass flow rate of air,
k int and k e x t are internal and external heat transfer coefficients of the structure.
The following differential equation can be used:
( k int + k e x t ) ( t c o n s t t ) d x = c G d t
Air temperatures at a distance x from the entrance to the layer are calculated as follows:
t = t c o n s t + ( t 0 t c o n s t ) e K x .
t c o n s t is the constant air temperature in the interlayer, which is established at a certain distance x and does not depend on the air temperature at the inlet to the interlayer.
k = ( k int + k e x t ) / c G
Relative heat transfer coefficient of the ventilated facade is illustrated at Figure 19.
The calculation is not suitable for facades with numerous large interlayers, such as triple glazing.

6.2. Calculation Using the System of Heat Balance Equations on Glass Surfaces

This method of computer calculation for ventilated facades was developed in Canada [57]. Each glass is represented as node i with temperature T i . Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation according to the heat balance equations on glass surfaces is illustrated at Figure 20.
The heat balance equation for each zone is established by taking into account long-wave radiative heat exchange with the following connected surfaces: a weather-side radiosity Q r . e x t and a room-side radiosity Q r . int , convection between solid zones and adjacent air Q c and absorbed solar radiation Q s o l .
For the surface of the outer glass, the heat balance equation is written as follows:
Q r . e x t 3 + Q r . int 5 Q r . int 4 Q r . e x t 4 + α k 34 ( t 3 t 4 ) + α k 45 ( t 5 t 4 ) + Q s o l 4 = 0 .
The thermal balance on the surface of the middle glass can be calculated as follows:
Q r . e x t 2 + Q r . int 4 Q r . int 3 Q r . e x t 3 + α k 34 ( t 4 t 3 ) + q e x t + Q s o l 3 = 0 .
The thermal balance on the surface of the inner glass can be calculated follows:
Q r . e x t 1 + Q r . int 3 Q r . int 2 Q r . e x t 2 + α k 12 ( t 1 t 2 ) + q int + Q s o l 2 = 0 .
α k 12 , α k 34 , α k 45 are heat transfer coefficients on the inner and outer surface of the facade and the glass surfaces inside the double-glazed facade; q e x t is heat transferred from the inner glass to the airflow of the ventilated layer, q int is heat transferred from the airflow to the middle glass.
The radiant heat flux from the design nodes towards the room and towards the outside air can be calculated using the following formulas:
Q r . int ( i ) = ε σ T i 4 + ( 1 ε τ ) Q r . e x t ( i 1 ) + τ Q r . int ( i + 1 ) Q r . e x t ( i ) = ε σ T i 4 + ( 1 ε τ ) Q r . int ( i + 1 ) + τ Q r . e x t ( i 1 ) Q s o l ( i ) = I s o l α i .
where ε is a emissivity of the glass, τ is transmissivity of the glass, σ is Stefan-Boltzmann’s constant, I s o l is the incident solar radiation; α i is the absorptance of the outer glass pane.
Because of the joint solution of equations, it is possible to obtain average temperatures and heat flux densities for all glasses in an exhaust ventilated facade. Using the same method, the authors propose to model the thermal characteristics of conventional non-ventilated and ventilated facades. The calculation methods have sufficient computational complexity.

6.3. Calculation by Empirical Formulas

To quickly assess the heat-shielding properties of ventilated windows, various researchers have proposed semi-empirical formulas for calculating the heat transfer coefficient obtained based on experimental data.
The following formula is proposed for calculating the heat transfer coefficient of an exhaust ventilated window with double glazing [64]:
k = 0.02 ω + 0.0015 ( 10 t e x t ) .
The value k depends linearly on the air velocity in the interlayer and the calculated outside air temperature. A method for calculating the heat transfer coefficient of an exhaust window with triple glazing was proposed. According to the Figure 21, the increment of the heat transfer coefficient can be determined, and, further, the value of the heat transfer coefficient of the ventilated façade is as follows:
k = k 0 Δ k int .
The following formula is used to determine the value Δ k int [42]:
Δ k int = 0.24 c γ L 1 e ( 1 k 0 0.24 c γ L .
The calculation makes it possible to obtain only average values of physical parameters characterizing heat transfer in glazing systems.

6.4. Numerical Calculation Methods, Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling

The numerical solution method of the following equations describes the movement and heat transfer of air in the cavity: continuity Equation (1), Navier–Stokes Equations (2) and (3), and energy conservation Equation (4).
For the equations used in the calculation procedure, the following assumptions are usually made: the physical properties of air are assumed as constant; the compressibility and viscous dissipation for air are not taken into account (Boussinesq approximation).
The Boussinesq approximation p ρ + g d z = 0 is as follows:
u x + v y = 0
u τ + u u x + v u y = v 2 u x 2 + 2 u y 2 p ρ x
v τ + u v x + v v y = v 2 v x 2 + 2 v y 2 p ρ y + g β ( T T e v g )
T τ + u T x + v T y = a 2 T x 2 + 2 T y 2
The finite difference method divides the calculated cavity into finite elements, whereby with a greater number of elements, a more accurate solution can be obtained. However, an increase in the number of grid nodes dividing the cavity into elements leads to an increase in the computation time of the task on the computer.

7. Energy Modeling of a Building with Different Type of Ventilated Facades

To determine energy efficiency and thermal characteristics, three different configurations of ventilated facades were adopted, which have been discussed above in the article, including Single-skin facades, Double-skin facades and D3 facades. The heat transfer resistances for the facades’ U-value are presented in Table 4. To calculate the energy efficiency of the building, the energy consumption and thermal energy costs of an office building was modeled with the Autodesk Revit. A model of a high-rise building is shown in Figure 22.
The modeled high-rise building was exported from Autodesk Revit to the Green Building Studio software. The results of calculations in the Green Building Studio software for various configurations discussed above are presented in Table 4, Figure 23, Figure 24 and Figure 25. Figure 23, Figure 24 and Figure 25 illustrate the energy consumption of the high-rise building.
Based on the results of energy modeling, it can be concluded that the cost of thermal energy for office buildings with climate-adaptive triple facade structures decreased by 15%, and CO2 emissions decreased by 16%.
Thus, the study of climate-adaptive facade structures presents great potential for the further study of energy efficiency and a reduction in CO2 emissions, and constitutes an urgent topic of research.
The annual energy cost of the high-rise office building with different facade types was estimated using the Green Building Studio to determine the energy efficiency of a multi-skin adaptive facade. For comparison, the annual energy cost calculation was performed for a single-layer facade made of three-layer glass with argon, a double ventilated facade, and a triple ventilated facade with a double chamber. The calculation results are summarized in Table 4.
The calculation results show that the annual energy use of the building with an adaptive triple-skin facade was reduced by 15% compared to the same building with a single-skin facade.

8. Discussion

In this study, a review and analysis of the literature have illustrated the scientific problem, due to the lack of methods and calculations, associated with determining the influence of various parameters (climatic, geometric, etc.) on the thermal characteristics of facade structures, leading to the absence of scientific and technical evidence of the effectiveness of the use of multi-zone structures with triple glazing with adjustable thermal characteristics by the climatic zone. There is great potential to create an algorithm for controlling convective airflows to control thermal characteristics.
Thermal conductivity, thermal resistance and thermal transmittance are essential parameters in the evaluation of the energy efficiency of buildings. For buildings with a Trombe envelope, the annual energy heating cost is about 20%. With electrical heating, the energy payback period is 8 years [6].
The authors in the research compare the energy characteristics of a ventilated facade with a double air cavity and flow control device with a conventional ventilated facade system with a closed join. The thermal and hydrodynamic characteristics of the proposed system and the conventional ventilated facade system with a closed joint, at different climate conditions, were investigated. The results present that the proposed system can increase efficiency by 38% in summer time, and 333% in winter, compared with a ventilated facade with a closed joint [12].
The authors found that the triple-skin facade with PV modules with a narrow air cavity (50 mm wide and 20% perforation) can ensure appropriate thermal characteristics of the buildings. The triple-skin facade with a PV module system ensures better thermal characteristics with a 50 mm air cavity compared to the system with a 200 mm air cavity.
An assessment of the thermal characteristics of the building with a double-skin facade with PV panels with shading blinds and without shading blinds was carried out.
The results show that the energy savings in summer of the double skin facade with PV panels is about 12.16% compared to the double skin facade with shading blinds and 25.57% without them [65,66,67].
The authors of the study demonstrated that the succession of PCM configuration layers significantly affects the thermal characteristics of building enclosing structures, and the developed model provides a perspective with which to optimize PCM envelope configurations [8].
The application of a PCM in the air cavity of a double skin facade with a PV layer can reduce energy consumption by 20–30%. The performance of electricity increases by 5–8% [68]. DSF with PCM reduces the energy consumption by 11.5% in the winter period and by 5.6% in the summer period compared to a DSF without PCM [68,69].
The DSF with PCM effectively collects solar energy. The use of DSF with PCM reduces energy use by more than 50% compared to a traditional facade in the warm period [70].
This article presents a comprehensive study of the effectiveness of PCM wall panels to improve summer thermal comfort in existing lightweight buildings. The study is based on dynamic modeling conducted using the Energy Plus software on a sample office building [71]. The authors reviewed the phase change materials used in passive heat thermal energy storage systems and provided an overview of how these solutions are associated with the energy efficiency of buildings. The numerical simulation of heat transfer using phase change and heat transfer improvement methods was discussed. Studies on dynamic energy modeling in buildings were reviewed. Life cycle assessments were also discussed. This research illustrates that passive construction solutions with PCM provide the opportunity to reduce energy costs and increase thermal comfort in the building [72,73].
For comparison the results of a multi-skin adaptive facade obtained by the authors were reviewed [74,75]. The total heat transfer resistance of a triple-skin facade was calculated with CFD modeling and equaled U = 0.55 W/m2·C, which is close to the value obtained by other authors. The triple facade can recuperate and efficiently use the energy from the extracted air, reduce the inflow and loss of heat through the window and improve the thermal comfort of the air-conditioned room. During the warm season, absorbing solar panels absorb thermal energy from the sun, and the flow of outside air, in turn, cools the glass. This prevents overheating in the room. The heated “exhaust” air between the glazing layers is extracted through the cavity, thereby cooling the inner glazing layer, while the outer layer of insulating glass minimizes heat-transfer losses. In the warm season, the amount of heat from the outside air and solar radiation is reduced, which significantly reduces the load on the cooling systems. In the cold season, part of the heat of the air removed from the room is utilized, which reduces the load on the heating systems. For warm climates, it is recommended to install solar panels around the perimeter of the building, as well as shading devices [76,77,78,79,80].
Despite the fact that a lot of work has been conducted to investigate the performance of multi-skin adaptive facades, there are still many problems that need to be solved during their application and development.

9. Conclusions

In this paper, a literature review on building envelopes that contain inner air layers was presented. The operation modes of the air layer used in building envelopes were roughly classified and summarized and the thermal performances and benefits of the climate-adaptive facade were discussed and summarized. One of the sustainable development trends is the investigation and application of energy-efficient climate-adaptive facades.
The results of the review and analyses are as follows:
  • The existing operation modes of the air layer used in building envelopes were summarized and outlined. The operation modes of the air layer used in building envelopes were roughly classified into the following types: the enclosed type, the naturally ventilated type and the mechanically ventilated type. The enclosed type acts as an extra insulation layer; the naturally ventilated air layer is often adopted in passive cooling systems and some of the space-heating systems; and the mechanically ventilated type is applied in space-heating systems or the ventilated facades in which the flow resistance is larger than the buoyancy effect.
  • A scientometric analysis was conducted using the tools SciVal and VosViewer and revealed some trends. The theme was «Climate-adaptive facades», and «Facades, Blinds, Natural Ventilation» represents a trend in China according to the level and number of publications from Chinese organizations and institutions.
  • The energy calculation results derived using the Green building Studio software show that the annual energy usage of a building with an adaptive triple-skin facade reduced by 15% compared to the same building with a single-skin facade.
  • In a building with Trombe walls, the annual final energy savings in heating is about 20%. For the electrical heating and optimum core thickness, the energy ratio is around 6 and the energy payback period is 8 years.
  • Our analysis of research works on facades shows that multi-skin adaptive facades with PV panels are more energy efficient than other traditional systems. The energy resources required for air conditioning the building is reduced by 15–20%.
  • The literature review shows that integrating PCM layers in multi-skin facades with PV panels will significantly affect the thermal performance of building envelopes, effectively reduce the cooling load and increase the conversion efficiency of solar energy into electrical energy.
Using the multi-skin climate-adaptive facade with PV panels and PCM materials, multiple benefits can be achieved, including a reduction in the thermal load of a building, the provision of auxiliary heating for the indoor air and improved indoor thermal comfort and indoor air quality. This review outlined the current state of research, existing gaps and possible future research directions for air-layer technologies in building envelopes.
The investigation of multi-skin climate-adaptive facades with PV panels and PCM materials provides great potential for the further study of energy efficiency, increased thermal resistance of enclosure structures and a reduction in CO2 emissions, thereby representing an urgent topic for further study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A. and D.N.; methodology, E.K.; software, E.K.; resources, D.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.; writing—review and editing, D.A.; visualization, E.K.; supervision, D.N.; project administration, E.K.; funding acquisition, D.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation under grant 21-79-10283, date 29 July 2021. https://rscf.ru/project/21-79-10283/ (accessed on 12 April 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia, for valuable and profound comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Masoso, O.T.; Grobler, L.J. The Dark Side of Occupants’ Behaviour on Building Energy Use. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhang, T.; Tan, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhang, X. The Application of Air Layers in Building Envelopes: A Review. Appl. Energy 2016, 165, 707–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ginestet, S.; Marchio, D.; Morisot, O. Improvement of Buildings Energy Efficiency: Comparison, Operability and Results of Commissioning Tools. Energy Convers. Manag. 2013, 76, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. UNEP—UN Environment Programme. Available online: https://www.unep.org/ (accessed on 19 January 2022).
  5. Zhou, H.; Fransson, Å.; Olofsson, T. Influence of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) on the Thermal Performance of Building Envelopes. E3S Web Conf. 2020, 172, 21002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bojić, M.; Johannes, K.; Kuznik, F. Optimizing Energy and Environmental Performance of Passive Trombe Wall. Energy Build. 2014, 70, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Guo, W.; Qiao, X.; Huang, Y.; Fang, M.; Han, X. Study on Energy Saving Effect of Heat-Reflective Insulation Coating on Envelopes in the Hot Summer and Cold Winter Zone. Energy Build. 2012, 50, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, L.; Bai, H.; Mao, S. Potential Application of Glazed Transpired Collectors to Space Heating in Cold Climates. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014, 77, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pokorska-Silva, I.; Nowoświat, A.; Fedorowicz, L. Identification of Thermal Parameters of a Building Envelope Based on the Cooling Process of a Building Object. J. Build. Phys. 2019, 43, 503–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Baldinelli, G. Double Skin Facades for Warm Climate Regions: Analysis of a Solution with an Integrated Movable Shading System. Build. Environ. 2009, 44, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gratia, E.; de Herde, A. Guidelines for Improving Natural Daytime Ventilation in an Office Building with a Double-Skin Facade. Sol. Energy 2007, 81, 435–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santa Cruz Astorqui, J.; Porras-Amores, C. Ventilated Facade with Double Chamber and Flow Control Device. Energy Build. 2017, 149, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Raman, P.; Mande, S.; Kishore, V.V.N. A Passive Solar System for Thermal Comfort Conditioning of Buildings in Composite Climates. Sol. Energy 2001, 70, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Campagna, L.M.; Carlucci, F.; Russo, P.; Fiorito, F. Energy Performance Assessment of Passive Buildings in Future Climatic Scenarios: The Case of Study of the Childcare Centre in Putignano (Bari, Italy). J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2069, 012146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kuru, A.; Oldfield, P.; Bonser, S.; Fiorito, F. Performance Prediction of Biomimetic Adaptive Building Skins: Integrating Multifunctionality through a Novel Simulation Framework. Sol. Energy 2021, 224, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gloriant, F.; Joulin, A.; Tittelein, P.; Lassue, S. Using Heat Flux Sensors for a Contribution to Experimental Analysis of Heat Transfers on a Triple-Glazed Supply-Air Window. Energy 2021, 215, 119154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, S.; Zou, K.; Sun, G.; Zhang, X. Simulation Research on the Dynamic Thermal Performance of a Novel Triple-Glazed Window Filled with PCM. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 40, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. de Gracia, A.; Navarro, L.; Castell, A.; Ruiz-Pardo, Á.; Alvárez, S.; Cabeza, L.F. Experimental Study of a Ventilated Facade with PCM during Winter Period. Energy Build. 2013, 58, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, M.K.; Preet, S.; Mathur, J.; Chowdhury, A.; Mathur, S. Parametric Analysis of Factors Affecting Thermal Performance of Photovoltaic Triple Skin Facade System (PV-TSF). J. Build. Eng. 2021, 40, 102344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zondag, H.A. Flat-Plate PV-Thermal Collectors and Systems: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2008, 12, 891–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Tyagi, V.V.; Panwar, N.L.; Rahim, N.A.; Kothari, R. Review on Solar Air Heating System with and without Thermal Energy Storage System. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 2289–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Michael, J.J.; Iniyan, S.; Goic, R. Flat Plate Solar Photovoltaic-Thermal (PV/T) Systems: A Reference Guide. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 51, 62–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chow, T.T. A Review on Photovoltaic/Thermal Hybrid Solar Technology. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 365–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Loonen, R.C.G.M. Approaches for Computational Performance Optimization of Innovative Adaptive Facade Concepts. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, C.; Gang, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Du, Q. Numerical and Experimental Study on the Thermal Performance Improvement of a Triple Glazed Window by Utilizing Low-Grade Exhaust Air. Energy 2019, 167, 1132–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Defraeye, T.; Blocken, B.; Carmeliet, J. Convective Heat Transfer Coefficients for Exterior Building Surfaces: Existing Correlations and CFD Modelling. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011, 52, 512–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yu, T.; Zhao, J.; Zhou, J.; Lei, B. Experimental and Numerical Studies on Dynamic Thermal Performance of Hollow Ventilated Interior Wall. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 180, 115851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nore, K.; Blocken, B.; Thue, J.V. On CFD Simulation of Wind-Induced Airflow in Narrow Ventilated Facade Cavities: Coupled and Decoupled Simulations and Modelling Limitations. Build. Environ. 2010, 45, 1834–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Teodosiu, C.; Kuznik, F.; Teodosiu, R. CFD Modeling of Buoyancy Driven Cavities with Internal Heat Source—Application to Heated Rooms. Energy Build. 2014, 68, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gagliano, A.; Nocera, F.; Aneli, S. Thermodynamic Analysis of Ventilated Facades under Different Wind Conditions in Summer Period. Energy Build. 2016, 122, 131–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Petrichenko, M.; Vatin, N.; Nemova, D.; Kharkov, N.; Korsun, A. Numerical Modeling of Thermogravitational Convection in Air Gap of System of Rear Ventilated Facades. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 672–674, 1903–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vatin, N.; Petrichenko, M.; Nemova, D. Hydraulic Methods for Calculation of System of Rear Ventilated Facades. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 633–634, 1007–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Elarga, H.; Goia, F.; Zarrella, A.; Dal Monte, A.; Benini, E. Thermal and Electrical Performance of an Integrated PV-PCM System in Double Skin Facades: A Numerical Study. Sol. Energy 2016, 136, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Alqaed, S. Effect of Annual Solar Radiation on Simple Facade, Double-Skin Facade and Double-Skin Facade Filled with Phase Change Materials for Saving Energy. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 51, 101928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. de Gracia, A.; Navarro, L.; Castell, A.; Ruiz-Pardo, Á.; Álvarez, S.; Cabeza, L.F. Thermal Analysis of a Ventilated Facade with PCM for Cooling Applications. Energy Build. 2013, 65, 508–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sanjuan, C.; Sánchez, M.N.; del Rosario Heras, M.; Blanco, E. Experimental Analysis of Natural Convection in Open Joint Ventilated Facades with 2D PIV. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 2314–2325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sanjuan, C.; Sánchez, M.N.; Enríquez, R.; del Rosario Heras Celemín, M. Experimental PIV Techniques Applied to the Analysis of Natural Convection in Open Joint Ventilated Facades. Energy Procedia 2012, 30, 1216–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. la Pica, A.; Rodonò, G.; Volpes, R. An Experimental Investigation on Natural Convection of Air in a Vertical Channel. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1993, 36, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hernández-Pérez, I.; Álvarez, G.; Xamán, J.; Zavala-Guillén, I.; Arce, J.; Simá, E. Thermal Performance of Reflective Materials Applied to Exterior Building Components—A Review. Energy Build. 2014, 80, 81–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shih, T.H.; Liou, W.W.; Shabbir, A.; Yang, Z.; Zhu, J. A New K-ϵ Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows. Comput. Fluids 1995, 24, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fleck, B.A.; Meier, R.M.; Matović, M.D. A Field Study of the Wind Effects on the Performance of an Unglazed Transpired Solar Collector. Sol. Energy 2002, 73, 209–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Haddad, J.; Elmahdy, A.H. Comparison of the Monthly Thermal Performance of a Conventional Window and a Supply-Air Window. Available online: http://web.mit.edu/parmstr/Public/NRCan/nrcc41020.pdf (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  43. Niall, D.; Mccormack, S.; Griffiths, P. Thermal Energy Storage in Building Integrated Thermal Systems: A Review. Part 2. Integration as Passive System. J. Renew. Energy 2015, 85, 1334–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nowoświat, A.; Krause, P.; Miros, A. Properties of Expanded Graphite Polystyrene Damaged by the Impact of Solar Radiation. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 34, 101920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, S.Y.; Song, K.D. Determining Photosensor Conditions of a Daylight Dimming Control System Using Different Double-Skin Envelope Configurations. Indoor Built Environ. 2007, 16, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, S. Prediction of Airflow Rate through a Ventilated Wall Module. Energy Build. 2014, 82, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Peng, J.; Lu, L.; Yang, H.; Ma, T. Comparative Study of the Thermal and Power Performances of a Semi-Transparent Photovoltaic Facade under Different Ventilation Modes. Appl. Energy 2015, 138, 572–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. SciVal. Available online: https://www.scival.com/landing (accessed on 27 April 2022).
  49. Closed Cavity Facades: The Future of Curtain Walls—Gb&d. Available online: https://gbdmagazine.com/closed-cavity-facades/ (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  50. Zhang, C.; Gang, W.; Wang, J.; Xu, X.; Du, Q. Experimental Investigation and Dynamic Modeling of a Triple-Glazed Exhaust Air Window with Built-in Venetian Blinds in the Cooling Season. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 140, 73–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Michaux, G.; Greffet, R.; Salagnac, P.; Ridoret, J.B. Modelling of an Airflow Window and Numerical Investigation of Its Thermal Performances by Comparison to Conventional Double and Triple-Glazed Windows. Appl. Energy 2019, 242, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fossa, M.; Ménézo, C.; Leonardi, E. Experimental Natural Convection on Vertical Surfaces for Building Integrated Photovoltaic (BIPV) Applications. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2008, 32, 980–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Peng, J.; Lu, L.; Yang, H. An Experimental Study of the Thermal Performance of a Novel Photovoltaic Double-Skin Facade in Hong Kong. Sol. Energy 2013, 97, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alkilani, M.M.; Sopian, K.; Alghoul, M.A.; Sohif, M.; Ruslan, M.H. Review of Solar Air Collectors with Thermal Storage Units. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1476–1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Skandalos, N.; Karamanis, D. PV Glazing Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 49, 306–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fang, Y.; Memon, S.; Peng, J.; Tyrer, M.; Ming, T. Solar Thermal Performance of Two Innovative Configurations of Air-Vacuum Layered Triple Glazed Windows. Renew. Energy 2020, 150, 167–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. D3 Facade (Dual, Dynamic and Durable): Novel Facade Type for Sustainable Buildings | Glassonweb.Com. Available online: https://www.glassonweb.com/news/d3-facade-dual-dynamic-and-durable-novel-facade-type-sustainable-buildings (accessed on 23 March 2022).
  58. Bandaru, S.H.; Becerra, V.; Khanna, S.; Radulovic, J.; Hutchinson, D.; Khusainov, R. A Review of Photovoltaic Thermal (Pvt) Technology for Residential Applications: Performance Indicators, Progress, and Opportunities. Energies 2021, 14, 3853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bogoslovsky, V.N. Building Thermal Physics; Higher School: Moscow, Russia, 1982; p. 415. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tonui, J.K.; Tripanagnostopoulos, Y. Performance Improvement of PV/T Solar Collectors with Natural Air Flow Operation. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sharma, M.K.; Preet, S.; Mathur, J.; Chowdhury, A.; Mathur, S. Exploring the Advantages of Photo-Voltaic Triple Skin Facade in Hot Summer Conditions. Sol. Energy 2021, 217, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Carlucci, F.; Cannavale, A.; Fiorito, F. Electrochromic Window Integration in Adaptive Building Envelopes in Different Climates: A Genetic Optimization of Switchable Glazing Parameters to Reduce Energy Consumptions in Office Buildings. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 2069, 012131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Jakob, M.; Madlener, R. Riding down the Experience Curve for Energy-Efficient Building Envelopes: The Swiss Case for 1970–2020. Int. J. Energy Technol. Policy 2004, 2, 153–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Basurto Davila, C.; Fiorito, F. On the Combined Use of Laser-Cut Panel Light Redirecting Systems and Horizontal Blinds for Daylighting and Solar Heat Control, a Focus on Visual Comfort Objectives. Sol. Energy 2021, 230, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Luo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, X.; Xie, L.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J.; Zhang, Y.; He, X. A Comparative Study on Thermal Performance Evaluation of a New Double Skin Facade System Integrated with Photovoltaic Blinds. Appl. Energy 2017, 199, 281–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yang, S.; Fiorito, F.; Prasad, D.; Sproul, A.; Cannavale, A. A Sensitivity Analysis of Design Parameters of BIPV/T-DSF in Relation to Building Energy and Thermal Comfort Performances. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 41, 102426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Sergeev, V.; Vatin, N.; Kotov, E.; Nemova, D.; Khorobrov, S. Slug Regime Transitions in a Two--phase Flow in Horizontal Round Pipe. Cfd Simulations. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Roversi, R.; Cinquepalmi, F.; Cumo, F.; Pennacchia, E. Experimental Envelopes and Their Integration in the Building Information Modeling Energy Simulation Process. Int. J. Energy Prod. Manag. 2018, 3, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Harmati, N.; Jakšić, Z.; Vatin, N. Energy Consumption Modelling via Heat Balance Method for Energy Performance of a Building. Procedia Eng. 2015, 117, 786–794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Goia, F.; Perino, M.; Serra, V. Experimental Analysis of the Energy Performance of a Full-Scale PCM Glazing Prototype. Sol. Energy 2014, 100, 217–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Evola, G.; Marletta, L. The Effectiveness of PCM Wallboards for the Energy Refurbishment of Lightweight Buildings. Energy Procedia 2014, 62, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Soares, N.; Costa, J.J.; Gaspar, A.R.; Santos, P. Review of Passive PCM Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage Systems towards Buildings’ Energy Efficiency. Energy Build. 2013, 59, 82–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ascione, F.; Bianco, N.; de Rossi, F.; Iovane, T.; Mauro, G.M. Energy Refurbishment of an Office Building by Addition of a Second Skin: Improvement of Thermal Behavior, Energy Performance and Possible Conversion by PV. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies, SpliTech, Bol and Split, Croatia, 8–11 September 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Petrichenko, M.R.; Nemova, D.V.; Kotov, E.V.; Tarasova, D.S.; Sergeev, V.V. Ventilated Facade Integrated with the HVAC System for Cold Climate. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 77, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Petritchenko, M.R.; Kotov, E.V.; Nemova, D.V.; Tarasova, D.S.; Sergeev, V.V. Numerical Simulation of Ventilated Facades under Extreme Climate Conditions. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 77, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sergeev, V.V.; Petrichenko, M.R.; Nemova, D.V.; Kotov, E.V.; Tarasova, D.S.; Nefedova, A.V.; Borodinecs, A.B. The Building Extension with Energy Efficiency Light-Weight Building Walls. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 84, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Petrichenko, M.R.; Sergeev, V.V.; Nemova, D.; Kotov, E.V.; Andreeva, D.S. CFD Simulation of the Convective Flows in the Vertical Caverns. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2019, 92, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Ascione, F.; de Masi, R.F.; Mastellone, M.; Ruggiero, S.; Tariello, F.; Vanoli, G.P. Energy Performance of Buildings: Improvements, Limits and Future Perspectives during the Last Twenty Years of Energy and Sustainability Policies. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies, SpliTech, Bol and Split, Croatia, 8–11 September 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cumo, F.; Piras, G.; Pennacchia, E.; Cinquepalmi, F. Optimization of Design and Management of a Hydroponic Greenhouse by Using BIM Application Software. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. Plan. 2020, 15, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dissanayake, D.M.K.W.; Jayasinghe, C.; Jayasinghe, M.T.R. A Comparative Embodied Energy Analysis of a House with Recycled Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) Based Foam Concrete Wall Panels. Energy Build. 2017, 135, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Development U-value of window and glazing façade.
Figure 1. Development U-value of window and glazing façade.
Energies 15 03447 g001
Figure 2. Visualization of scientific landscapes by indexed keywords, SCOPUS (VOS Viewer).
Figure 2. Visualization of scientific landscapes by indexed keywords, SCOPUS (VOS Viewer).
Energies 15 03447 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of scientific landscapes by indexed keywords.
Figure 3. Visualization of scientific landscapes by indexed keywords.
Energies 15 03447 g003
Figure 4. Most active institutions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Figure 4. Most active institutions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Energies 15 03447 g004
Figure 5. Most active Countries/Regions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Figure 5. Most active Countries/Regions for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Energies 15 03447 g005
Figure 6. Most active Authors for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Figure 6. Most active Authors for the topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Energies 15 03447 g006
Figure 7. Most active Scopus Sources for topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Figure 7. Most active Scopus Sources for topic «T.18162 Facades; Blinds; Natural Ventilation».
Energies 15 03447 g007
Figure 8. Classification of ventilated facades.
Figure 8. Classification of ventilated facades.
Energies 15 03447 g008
Figure 9. Facade systems with ventilation of the interstitial space with internal air (internal air curtain).
Figure 9. Facade systems with ventilation of the interstitial space with internal air (internal air curtain).
Energies 15 03447 g009
Figure 10. Facades with ventilated air gap by external air (external air curtain).
Figure 10. Facades with ventilated air gap by external air (external air curtain).
Energies 15 03447 g010
Figure 11. Facade systems with air mode.
Figure 11. Facade systems with air mode.
Energies 15 03447 g011
Figure 12. Facade systems with exhaust mode.
Figure 12. Facade systems with exhaust mode.
Energies 15 03447 g012
Figure 13. Facade systems with closed air layers (buffer zones).
Figure 13. Facade systems with closed air layers (buffer zones).
Energies 15 03447 g013
Figure 14. Triple ventilated facade with U-shaped airflow.
Figure 14. Triple ventilated facade with U-shaped airflow.
Energies 15 03447 g014
Figure 15. Scheme of ventilated passive PV facade.
Figure 15. Scheme of ventilated passive PV facade.
Energies 15 03447 g015
Figure 16. Scheme of ventilated active PV facade.
Figure 16. Scheme of ventilated active PV facade.
Energies 15 03447 g016
Figure 17. Adaptive ventilated facades with controlled thermal characteristics. (a) summer daytime, (b) summer night, (c) winter.
Figure 17. Adaptive ventilated facades with controlled thermal characteristics. (a) summer daytime, (b) summer night, (c) winter.
Energies 15 03447 g017
Figure 18. Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation using the heat balance equation in a ventilated layer.
Figure 18. Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation using the heat balance equation in a ventilated layer.
Energies 15 03447 g018
Figure 19. Relative heat transfer coefficient of the ventilated facade: 1—double glazing, 2—triple glazing.
Figure 19. Relative heat transfer coefficient of the ventilated facade: 1—double glazing, 2—triple glazing.
Energies 15 03447 g019
Figure 20. Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation according to the heat balance equations on glass surfaces.
Figure 20. Scheme of a ventilated facade for calculation according to the heat balance equations on glass surfaces.
Energies 15 03447 g020
Figure 21. Dimensionless increment of the heat transfer coefficient of a ventilated facade with triple glazing.
Figure 21. Dimensionless increment of the heat transfer coefficient of a ventilated facade with triple glazing.
Energies 15 03447 g021
Figure 22. A model of an office high-rise building with a height of 121.7 m with the Autodesk Revit program.
Figure 22. A model of an office high-rise building with a height of 121.7 m with the Autodesk Revit program.
Energies 15 03447 g022
Figure 23. Annual costs of Single skin facade (Green Building Studio).
Figure 23. Annual costs of Single skin facade (Green Building Studio).
Energies 15 03447 g023
Figure 24. Annual costs of Double skin facade (Green Building Studio).
Figure 24. Annual costs of Double skin facade (Green Building Studio).
Energies 15 03447 g024
Figure 25. Annual costs of D3 facade (Green Building Studio).
Figure 25. Annual costs of D3 facade (Green Building Studio).
Energies 15 03447 g025
Table 1. Connection types for ventilated facades.
Table 1. Connection types for ventilated facades.
TypeFacadeSectionPlanConstructionAir Circulation
Box Energies 15 03447 i001 Energies 15 03447 i002 Energies 15 03447 i003Horizontal and vertical splitThrough horizontal and vertical rusts
Shaft-box Energies 15 03447 i004 Energies 15 03447 i005 Energies 15 03447 i006Combined splitCombined
Corridor Energies 15 03447 i007 Energies 15 03447 i008 Energies 15 03447 i009Horizontal splitThrough horizontal rusts
Multi-story Energies 15 03447 i010 Energies 15 03447 i011 Energies 15 03447 i012No divisionThrough the air channel over the entire height
Table 2. Modes of ventilation of the air layers of the facade.
Table 2. Modes of ventilation of the air layers of the facade.
Air ModeDescriptionPrincipal Scheme
Ventilated air gapOutside airThe internal air enters the air cavity from the room and is removed through the exhaust ventilation duct or directly into the environment. Energies 15 03447 i013
Internal airThe air from the room passes into the interstitial space and is then removed through the exhaust duct or directly into the environment. Energies 15 03447 i014
Air supply by the ventilation system(a) Air is passed between the panes before it is fed into the room from the supply channels of the ventilation systems.
(b) Air enters the cavity from the premises of the building and is then ejected outside.
Energies 15 03447 i015 Energies 15 03447 i016
CombinedFor multi-skin façade. Energies 15 03447 i017 Energies 15 03447 i018
Non-Ventilated air gapClosed cavity facadeThe cavities form a buffer zone between the street and the premises, the cavities are not ventilated. Energies 15 03447 i019
Table 3. Types of multi-skin ventilated facades.
Table 3. Types of multi-skin ventilated facades.
Principal SchemeAir GapDescription
1 Energies 15 03447 i020Single glazing with a distance of 250–900 mm from each other. Shading device.Increased thermal insulation and sound insulation properties of the structure, protection from solar radiation.
2 Energies 15 03447 i021The outer layer of insulating glass minimizes heat transfer losses.Increased thermal insulation and sound insulation properties of the structure, protection from solar radiation.
3 Energies 15 03447 i022The thermal insulation properties of the inner layer minimize heat loss.Natural ventilation.
4Hybrid systemA combination, or variation, of any of the previous.Multi-skin façade.
Table 4. Design characteristics of the multi-skin facade.
Table 4. Design characteristics of the multi-skin facade.
SpecificationsSingle Skin FacadeDouble Skin FacadeD3 Facade
U value, W/m2·K1.340.710.5
Annual Energy Cost, $93,68882,95882,336
Annual CO2 emissions (the equivalent of a large off-road vehicle)6.8 off-road vehicle/year5.7 off-road vehicle/year5.8 off-road vehicle/year
Annual energy (electric, kWh/fuel, MJ)548,299/1,358,111489,719/1,147,359484,715/1,156,228
Life cycle energy (electricity, kW/fuel, MJ)16,448,973/40,743,33014,691,570/34,420,77014,541,459/34,686,840
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andreeva, D.; Nemova, D.; Kotov, E. Multi-Skin Adaptive Ventilated Facade: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093447

AMA Style

Andreeva D, Nemova D, Kotov E. Multi-Skin Adaptive Ventilated Facade: A Review. Energies. 2022; 15(9):3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093447

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andreeva, Darya, Darya Nemova, and Evgeny Kotov. 2022. "Multi-Skin Adaptive Ventilated Facade: A Review" Energies 15, no. 9: 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093447

APA Style

Andreeva, D., Nemova, D., & Kotov, E. (2022). Multi-Skin Adaptive Ventilated Facade: A Review. Energies, 15(9), 3447. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15093447

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop