Optimization of a Marker Gas for Analyzing and Predicting the Spontaneous Combustion Period of Coking Coal
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Coal Samples
2.2. Programmed-Temperature-Rise Test
2.3. Test of Thermal Property Parameters during Spontaneous Combustion of Coal
3. Results
3.1. Spontaneous Combustion Characteristics of Coking Coal
3.1.1. O2 Concentration
3.1.2. CO and CO2 Gas Concentrations
3.1.3. Hydrocarbon Gas Concentrations
3.1.4. Chain Alkane Ratio and Olefin–Alkane Ratio
3.2. Principal-Component-Analysis-Based Optimization of Marker Gas for Analyzing Spontaneous Combustion of Coal
3.3. Natural Ignition Period of Coal Seams
3.3.1. Thermal Property Parameters of Coal
3.3.2. Calculation of Natural Ignition Period of Coal Seams
- (1)
- Specific heat capacity of coal
- (2)
- Water evaporation from coal
- (3)
- Gas desorption of coal
- (4)
- Exothermic rates of coal
4. Discussion
4.1. Analysis of the Spontaneous Combustion Characteristics of Coking Coal
4.2. Optimization of Marker Gas for Analyzing Spontaneous Combustion of Coal
4.3. Analysis of the Natural Ignition Period of the Coal Seam
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- Coking coal violently and spontaneously oxidizes near the ignition point of the coal when the environmental temperature is above 200 °C, and fire prevention measures for controlling coking coal should be implemented below 200 °C. The starting temperature at which CO appears in the oxidation process of coking coal rises with decreasing O2 concentration. The temperature at which CO is first detected rises by 10–15 °C for each reduction in the O2 concentration. The minimum critical oxygen concentration required for the spontaneous ignition of the Hex coking coal seam at Ping Coal is identified as 8%;
- (2)
- During the programmed-temperature-rise test, the oxygen consumption rate of the Hex coking coal seam at Ping Coal increased with rising coal temperature. The critical temperature range for accelerated oxidation is 50–60 °C, where the CO and CO2 productions accelerated. The dry-cracking temperature of the coking coal is in the range 100–120 °C, and this stage is accompanied by the production of C2H4 gas. The coking coal particle size has a negligible effect on the generation of CO, CO2, CH4, C2H4, and C2H6 gases;
- (3)
- We quantitatively analyzed and comprehensively evaluated the experimental data for the oxidation heat by constructing a multi-index weight model. CO and C2H4 were identified as the primary indicator gases for determining the spontaneous combustion stage of the Hex coking coal seam at Ping Coal. Additionally, C2H6 and the C2H4/C2H6 ratio were used as secondary indicators for the auxiliary analysis. That is, when the CO concentration increases slowly, the coal temperature is below 50–60 °C. When the CO concentration increases significantly faster, the coal temperature exceeds 50–60 °C. When the CO concentration increases extremely fast and C2H4 and C2H6 gases are detected while the C2H4/C2H6 ratio is not 0, the coal temperature in the mining area exceeds 120 °C. Then, the risk of spontaneous combustion is already very high, and it is necessary to take fire prevention measures;
- (4)
- The concentration of each gas during the temperature rise of the coal samples was measured using the programmed-temperature-rise test, and the thermal property parameters from the oxidation of the coal samples to the occurrence of spontaneous combustion were obtained by measuring the thermal property parameters of the coal during spontaneous combustion. Utilizing the enhanced mathematical model for determining the shortest spontaneous combustion period of coal seams, in conjunction with a programmed-temperature test device, experimental calculations were conducted to ascertain the adiabatic spontaneous combustion period. Additionally, the intensity of the exothermic reaction during the later stages of coal-sample heating was calculated quantitatively, resulting in a substantial reduction in the error of the calculation model. The results indicate that the natural ignition period for the Hex coking coal seam at Ping Coal is approximately 60 days, representing a brief timeframe, and the coal seam is characterized by a high risk of spontaneous combustion.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Coal Temperature (°C) | CP | λ | WP | q(t) | q(t1) | μ | τ (s) | τ (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | 1140 | 1200 | 0.00 | 62,599 | 0.010 | 6.10 | 2,405,999 | 27.85 |
40 | 1249 | 1240 | 0.16 | 1,316,839 | 0.025 | 9.02 | 991,353 | 11.47 |
50 | 1254 | 1210 | 0.46 | 2,191,457 | 0.047 | 17.33 | 537,435 | 6.22 |
60 | 1267 | 1200 | 0.62 | 4,329,587 | 0.070 | 30.90 | 365,282 | 4.23 |
70 | 1303 | 1210 | 1.14 | 5,457,058 | 0.107 | 41.17 | 246,915 | 2.86 |
80 | 1333 | 1190 | 1.82 | 9,401,904 | 0.162 | 65.31 | 167,284 | 1.94 |
90 | 1371 | 1200 | 2.76 | 13,121,998 | 0.218 | 89.24 | 127,105 | 1.47 |
100 | 1387 | 1190 | 2.08 | 17,151,520 | 0.298 | 103.82 | 94,521 | 1.09 |
110 | 1420 | 1200 | 0.80 | 24,287,484 | 0.380 | 120.15 | 76,054 | 0.88 |
120 | 1453 | 1210 | 0.37 | 28,422,203 | 0.455 | 144.25 | 65,083 | 0.75 |
130 | 1490 | 1220 | 0.14 | 34,708,331 | 0.599 | 148.05 | 50,607 | 0.59 |
140 | 1524 | 1230 | 0.00 | 48,432,512 | 0.905 | 156.11 | 34,144 | 0.40 |
150 | 1549 | 1240 | 0.00 | 77,221,549 | 1.326 | 161.01 | 23,641 | 0.27 |
160 | 1569 | 1230 | 0.00 | 106,933,209 | 1.748 | 155.15 | 18,126 | 0.21 |
170 | 1583 | 1240 | 0.00 | 135,809,171 | 1.123 | 163.66 | 14,247 | 0.16 |
Total natural ignition period (days): | 60.39 |
Coal Temperature (°C) | CP | λ | WP | q(t) | q(t1) | μ | τ (s) | τ (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | 1140 | 1200 | 0.00 | 124,789 | 0.010 | 5.83 | 2,412,688 | 26.96 |
40 | 1249 | 1240 | 0.16 | 1,250,808 | 0.023 | 9.07 | 1,069,079 | 12.37 |
50 | 1254 | 1210 | 0.46 | 2,002,431 | 0.042 | 20.23 | 601,848 | 6.97 |
60 | 1267 | 1200 | 0.62 | 3,821,391 | 0.062 | 34.00 | 417,085 | 4.83 |
70 | 1303 | 1210 | 1.14 | 4,750,798 | 0.105 | 42.61 | 251,033 | 2.91 |
80 | 1333 | 1190 | 1.82 | 9,865,272 | 0.173 | 64.19 | 156,956 | 1.82 |
90 | 1371 | 1200 | 2.76 | 14,139,775 | 0.231 | 92.38 | 120,080 | 1.39 |
100 | 1387 | 1190 | 2.08 | 17,908,566 | 0.296 | 104.66 | 95,161 | 1.10 |
110 | 1420 | 1200 | 0.80 | 23,253,017 | 0.379 | 122.86 | 76,201 | 0.88 |
120 | 1453 | 1210 | 0.37 | 29,359,646 | 0.464 | 145.44 | 63,715 | 0.74 |
130 | 1490 | 1220 | 0.14 | 35,128,737 | 0.624 | 146.11 | 48,578 | 0.56 |
140 | 1524 | 1230 | 0.00 | 51,479,097 | 0.944 | 159.02 | 32,723 | 0.38 |
150 | 1549 | 1240 | 0.00 | 79,646,017 | 1.307 | 157.07 | 23,972 | 0.28 |
160 | 1569 | 1230 | 0.00 | 101,944,069 | 1.645 | 156.23 | 19,258 | 0.22 |
170 | 1583 | 1240 | 0.00 | 126,537,061 | 1.056 | 158.96 | 15,143 | 0.18 |
Total natural ignition period (days): | 61.58 |
Coal Temperature (°C) | CP | λ | WP | q(t) | q(t1) | μ | τ (s) | τ (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
30 | 1140 | 1200 | 0.00 | 124,804 | 0.010 | 6.42 | 2,306,654 | 26.70 |
40 | 1249 | 1240 | 0.16 | 1,314,065 | 0.026 | 9.42 | 957,429 | 11.08 |
50 | 1254 | 1210 | 0.46 | 2,318,600 | 0.046 | 19.25 | 553,901 | 6.41 |
60 | 1267 | 1200 | 0.62 | 4,009,094 | 0.079 | 33.75 | 326,646 | 3.78 |
70 | 1303 | 1210 | 1.14 | 6,936,384 | 0.129 | 40.66 | 205,465 | 2.38 |
80 | 1333 | 1190 | 1.82 | 10,919,864 | 0.181 | 67.02 | 150,033 | 1.74 |
90 | 1371 | 1200 | 2.76 | 14,195,463 | 0.228 | 88.09 | 121,735 | 1.41 |
100 | 1387 | 1190 | 2.08 | 17,412,007 | 0.295 | 106.58 | 95,471 | 1.10 |
110 | 1420 | 1200 | 0.80 | 23,619,084 | 0.380 | 125.13 | 76,041 | 0.88 |
120 | 1453 | 1210 | 0.37 | 29,109,057 | 0.447 | 141.56 | 66,129 | 0.77 |
130 | 1490 | 1220 | 0.14 | 33,017,323 | 0.587 | 148.37 | 51,576 | 0.60 |
140 | 1524 | 1230 | 0.00 | 48,562,573 | 0.901 | 161.10 | 34,284 | 0.40 |
150 | 1549 | 1240 | 0.00 | 76,600,534 | 1.309 | 158.53 | 23,946 | 0.28 |
160 | 1569 | 1230 | 0.00 | 105,192,463 | 1.669 | 159.47 | 18,982 | 0.22 |
170 | 1583 | 1240 | 0.00 | 126,632,361 | 1.057 | 162.11 | 15,136 | 0.18 |
Total natural ignition period (days): | 57.91 |
References
- Xu, J.P.; Gao, W.; Xie, H.P.; Dai, J.Q.; Lv, C.W.; Li, M.H. Integrated tech-paradigm based innovative approach towards ecological coal mining. Energy 2018, 151, 297–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Y.B. Experimental investigation of applyingMgCl2 and phosphates to synergistically inhibit the spontaneous combustion of coal. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 91, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.T.; Zhang, Y.B.; Li, Y.Q.; Li, Q.P.; Zhang, J.; Yang, C.P. Study on the characteristics of coal spontaneous combustion during the development and decaying processes. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2020, 138, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Ren, T.; Liang, Y.T.; Wang, Z.W. A review on numerical solutions to self-heating of coal stockpile: Mechanism, theoretical basis, and variable study. Fuel 2016, 182, 80–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rao, Z.H.; Zhao, Y.M.; Huang, C.L.; Duan, C.L.; He, J.F. Recent developments in drying and dewatering for low rank coals. Prog. Energy Combust. 2015, 46, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.F.; Zhang, Y.L.; Xue, S.; Wu, J.M.; Tang, Y.B.; Chang, L.P. Assessment of spontaneous combustion status of coal based on relationships between oxygen consumption and gaseous product emissions. Fuel Process. Technol. 2018, 179, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Z.Y.; Kuenzer, C. Coal fires in China over the last decade: A comprehensive review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2014, 133, 72–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, W.; Guo, B.L.; Qi, G.S.; Cheng, W.M.; Yang, W.Y. Experimental study on the effect of preinhibition temperature on the spontaneous combustion of coal based on an MgCl2 solution. Fuel 2020, 265, 117032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; He, Y.Z.; Fan, H.H.; Shang, B. Study of the coal secondary spontaneous combustion behavior under different pre-heating oxygen concentrations. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2021, 146, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Li, Q.W.; Xiao, Y.; Wen, H. The effect of oxygen concentration on the non-isothermal combustion of coal. Thermochim. Acta 2017, 653, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, W.Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X.L.; Sun, L.L. Study on low temperature oxidation characteristics of oil shale based on temperature programmed system. Energies 2018, 11, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Zhang, W.; Xin, H.H.; Wang, D.M.; Di, C.C.; Liu, L. Characteristics of pyrolysis and low oxygen combustion of long flame coal and reburning of residues. Energies 2021, 14, 2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, D.J.; Norman, F.; Schmidt, M.; Vanierschot, M.; Verplaetsen, F.; Berghmans, J.; Bulck, E.V.D. Numerical investigation on the self-ignition behavior of coal dust accumulations: The roles of oxygen, diluent gas and dust volume. Fuel 2017, 188, 500–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perdochova, M.; Derychova, K.; Veznikova, H.; Bernatika, A.; Pitt, M. The influence of oxygen concentration on the composition of gaseous products occurring during the self-heating of coal and wood sawdust. Process. Saf. Environ. Protect. 2015, 94, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.Y.; Li, Q.Z.; Zhang, H.J.; Xin, H.H. Thermodynamic characteristics of coal reaction under low oxygen concentration conditions. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, F.; Jia, Z.; Qin, M.L.; Mu, X.G.; Teng, Y.F.; Li, Y.D.; Bai, Q.H. Effects of organic sulfur on oxidation spontaneous combustion characteristics of coking coal. Energy Explor. Exploit. 2022, 40, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, L.M.; Smith, A.C. CO and CO2 emissions from spontaneous heating of coal under different ventilation rates. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2011, 88, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baris, K.; Kizgut, S.; Didari, V. Low-temperature oxidation of some Turkish coals. Fuel 2012, 93, 423–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Hu, L.H.; Sun, W.L.; Fan, H.H. Influences of the pre-oxidation time on coal secondary spontaneous combustion behaviors by temperature-programmed technique. Int. J. Coal Prep. Util. 2022, 43, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, C.K.; Deng, J.; Cao, K.; Ma, L.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, L.F. A random forest approach for predicting coal spontaneous combustion. Fuel 2018, 223, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, J.; Xiao, Y.; Li, Q.W.; Lu, J.H.; Wen, H. Experimental studies of spontaneous combustion and anaerobic cooling of coal. Fuel 2015, 157, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Wen, H.; Zheng, X.Z.; Liu, Y.; Cheng, X.J. A method for evaluating the spontaneous combustion of coal by monitoring various gases. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 126, 223–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.Y.; Deng, C.B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.S. Formation law of hydrocarbon index gases during coal spontaneous combustion in an oxygen-poor environment. Energy Sources Part A 2019, 41, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, H.; Yu, Z.J.; Fan, S.X.; Zhai, X.W.; Liu, W.Y. Prediction of spontaneous combustion potential of coal in the gob area using CO extreme concentration: A case study. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2017, 189, 1713–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.Q.; Sun, L.L.; Liu, Z.Y.; Wang, G.; Ma, J.Y. Effects of air volume and pre-oxidation on re-ignition characteristics of bituminous coal. Energy 2023, 265, 126124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.N.; Shu, P.; Deng, J.; Duan, Z.X.; Li, L.L.; Zhang, L.L. Analysis of oxidation pathways for characteristic groups in coal spontaneous combustion. Energy 2022, 254, 124211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GB/T 482-2008; Sampling of coal seams. Standardization Administration of of the P.R.C.: Beijing, China, 2008.
- GB/T 474-2008; Method for preparation of coal sample. Standardization Administration of of the P.R.C.: Beijing, China, 2008.
- Sun, X.G.; Xu, C.F.; Yao, H.F.; Zhang, Q.; Wu, H.J. Experimental Studying of the Shortest Natural Spontaneous Combustion Period of 3-1 Coal Seam of Menkeqing Coal Mine. Coal Min. Technol. 2016, 21, 130–133. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.F.; Qin, Y.P.; Li, J.H. Experimental Study on the Shortest Spontaneous Combustion Time of 2nd Coal in XueCun Coal Mine. China Min. Mag. 2007, 16, 74–76. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar]
- Niu, Y.D.; Zheng, W.C. Experimental study on test method of coal seam spontaneous combustion period. Energy Technol. Manag. 2011, 3, 30–32. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.G.; Huang, Z.C.; Yue, C.P. Mathematic model for calculating the shortest coal spontaneous combustion time. J. China Coal Soc. 2001, 5, 516–519. (in Chinese). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Moisture Mad/% | Ash Ad/% | Volatile Vdaf/% | Sulfur Std/% | Phosphorus Pd/% | Heat Generation Qbd/% | Colloid Layer Thickness Y/mm | Adhesion Index G |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 10–20 | 27.13 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 27.21–30.90 | 11–37 | 64–74 |
Fineness (mesh) | Particle Size (mm) | Quality (mg) | Diameter (mm) | Thickness (mm) | Experimental Temperature (°C) | Heating Rate (°C/min) | Air Flow (mL/min) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 | 0.074 | 160 | 12.83 | 0.94 | 30–170 | 1 | 100 |
Number | Coal Temperature (°C) | Specific Heat Capacity (J/(g·°C)) | Thermal Diffusion Coefficient (mm2/s) | Thermal Conductivity (W/(m·°C)) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 20 | 1.089 | 0.102 | 0.127 |
2 | 30 | 1.078 | 0.098 | 0.12 |
3 | 40 | 1.187 | 0.091 | 0.124 |
4 | 50 | 1.192 | 0.089 | 0.121 |
5 | 60 | 1.205 | 0.087 | 0.12 |
6 | 70 | 1.241 | 0.085 | 0.121 |
7 | 80 | 1.271 | 0.082 | 0.119 |
8 | 90 | 1.309 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
9 | 100 | 1.325 | 0.078 | 0.119 |
10 | 110 | 1.358 | 0.078 | 0.12 |
11 | 120 | 1.391 | 0.076 | 0.121 |
12 | 130 | 1.428 | 0.075 | 0.122 |
13 | 140 | 1.462 | 0.074 | 0.123 |
14 | 150 | 1.487 | 0.073 | 0.124 |
15 | 160 | 1.507 | 0.072 | 0.123 |
16 | 170 | 1.521 | 0.071 | 0.124 |
17 | 180 | 1.594 | 0.07 | 0.128 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lu, P.; Huang, Y.; Jin, P.; Yang, S.; Wang, M.; Wang, X. Optimization of a Marker Gas for Analyzing and Predicting the Spontaneous Combustion Period of Coking Coal. Energies 2023, 16, 7802. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237802
Lu P, Huang Y, Jin P, Yang S, Wang M, Wang X. Optimization of a Marker Gas for Analyzing and Predicting the Spontaneous Combustion Period of Coking Coal. Energies. 2023; 16(23):7802. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237802
Chicago/Turabian StyleLu, Peizhong, Yuxuan Huang, Peng Jin, Shouguo Yang, Man Wang, and Xiaochuan Wang. 2023. "Optimization of a Marker Gas for Analyzing and Predicting the Spontaneous Combustion Period of Coking Coal" Energies 16, no. 23: 7802. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237802
APA StyleLu, P., Huang, Y., Jin, P., Yang, S., Wang, M., & Wang, X. (2023). Optimization of a Marker Gas for Analyzing and Predicting the Spontaneous Combustion Period of Coking Coal. Energies, 16(23), 7802. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16237802