Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials, Methods, Results and Discussion
3.1. Materials and Methods Used
3.2. Analysis, Results and Discussion on the Situation of Energy Resources in the World
3.3. Results and Discussions Regarding the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Resources and Consumption in the European Union
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Ibáñez-Luzón, L.; Usman, M.; Shahbaz, M. The environmental Kuznets curve, based on the economic complexity, and the pollution haven hypothesis in PIIGS countries. Renew. Energy 2022, 185, 1441–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morina, F.; Lyroudi, K.; Balomenou, C. The Economic Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-2019): Implications for the Energy Sector. In Energy Transition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 193–213. [Google Scholar]
- Erokhin, V.; Tianming, G. Renewable Energy as a Promising Venue for China-Russia Collaboration. In Energy Transition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 73–101. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, T.; Zhang, D. A critical review of comparative global historical energy consumption and future demand: The story told so far. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 1973–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armeanu, D.Ş.; Gherghina, Ş.C.; Pasmangiu, G. Exploring the causal nexus between energy consumption, environmental pollution and economic growth: Empirical evidence from central and Eastern Europe. Energies 2019, 12, 3704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Armeanu, D.S.; Joldes, C.C.; Gherghina, S.C.; Andrei, J.V. Understanding the multidimensional linkages among renewable energy, pollution, economic growth and urbanization in contemporary economies: Quantitative assessments across different income countries’ groups. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 142, 110818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Popescu, G.H.; Mieila, M.; Nica, E.; Andrei, J.V. The emergence of the effects and determinants of the energy paradigm changes on European Union economy. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 768–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrowolski, Z. Energy and local safety: How the administration limits energy security. Energies 2021, 14, 4841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sułkowski, Ł.; Dobrowolski, Z. The role of supreme audit institutions in energy accountability in EU countries. Energy Policy 2021, 156, 112413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kufel, T.; Kufel, P.; Błażejowski, M. Do COVID-19 lock-downs affect business cycle? Analysis using energy consumption cycle clock for selected European countries. Energies 2022, 15, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mbah, R.E.; Wasum, D.F. Russian-Ukraine 2022 War: A review of the economic impact of Russian-Ukraine crisis on the USA, UK, Canada, and Europe. Adv. Soc. Sci. Res. J. 2022, 9, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neacșa, A.; Panait, M.; Mureșan, J.D.; Voica, M.C.; Manta, O. The Energy Transition between Desideratum and Challenge: Are Cogeneration and Trigeneration the Best Solution? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joița, D.; Dobrotă, C.E. Aspects of European funding for the energy transition-Just transition. Ovidius Univ. Ann. Ser. Econ. Sci. 2022, 22, 289–297. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández-González, R.; Puime-Guillén, F.; Pérez-Vas, R. The New Wind Energy Boom in Spain: Are Large Companies Once Again Dominating the Market? In Energy Transition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 135–163. [Google Scholar]
- Neacsa, A.; Rehman Khan, S.A.; Panait, M.; Apostu, S.A. The Transition to Renewable Energy—A Sustainability Issue? In Energy Transition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 29–72. [Google Scholar]
- Popescu, C.; Panait, M.; Palazzo, M.; Siano, A. Energy Transition in European Union—Challenges and Opportunities. In Energy Transition; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 289–312. [Google Scholar]
- Apostu, S.A.; Panait, M.; Vasile, V. The energy transition in Europe—A solution for net zero carbon? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 71358–71379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khan, S.A.R.; Panait, M.; Guillen, F.P.; Raimi, L. Energy Transition. Economic, Social and Environmental Dimensions; Springer: Singapore, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Bouzarovski, S.; Thomson, H.; Cornelis, M. Confronting energy poverty in Europe: A research and policy agenda. Energies 2021, 14, 858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurtu, A.; Searcy, C.; Jaber, M.Y. A framework for reducing global manufacturing emissions. J. Environ. Dev. 2016, 25, 159–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Balsalobre-Lorente, D.; Shahbaz, M.; Roubaud, D.; Farhani, S. How economic growth, renewable electricity and natural resources contribute to CO2 emissions? Energy Policy 2018, 113, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Martins, F.; Felgueiras, C.; Smitková, M. Fossil fuel energy consumption in European countries. Energy Procedia 2018, 153, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flores, J.; Cavique, M.; Seixas, J. Energy Sustainability—Rebounds Revisited Using Axiomatic Design. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, S.; Hao, Y.; Xu, L.; Wu, H.; Ba, N. Digitalization and energy: How does internet development affect China’s energy consumption? Energy Econ. 2021, 98, 105220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobrowolski, Z. Internet of things and other e-solutions in supply chain management may generate threats in the energy sector—The quest for preventive measures. Energies 2021, 14, 5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, U.; Radulescu, M.; Rahim, S.; Isik, C.; Yousaf, Z.; Ionescu, S.A. Do Environment-Related Policy Instruments and Technologies Facilitate Renewable Energy Generation? Exploring the Contextual Evidence from Developed Economies. Energies 2021, 14, 690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahanger, A.; Usman, M.; Murshed, M.; Mahmood, H.; Balsalobre-Lorente, D. The linkages between natural resources, human capital, globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: The moderating role of technological innovations. Resour. Policy 2022, 76, 102569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrei, J.; Andreea, I.R. A trade-off between economics and environment requirements on energy crops vs. food crops in Romanian agriculture. Custos E Agronegocio Line 2018, 14, 61–82. [Google Scholar]
- Platon, V.; Frone, S.; Constantinescu, A.; Jurist, S. Current Perspectives and Challenges of Biofuel Production and Consumption. Rom. J. Econ. 2010, 31, 107–128. [Google Scholar]
- Kirikkaleli, D.; Adebayo, T.S. Do public-private partnerships in energy and renewable energy consumption matter for consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in India? Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 30139–30152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahbaz, M.; Raghutla, C.; Song, M.; Zameer, H.; Jiao, Z. Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: The role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ. 2020, 86, 104664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dobrowolski, Z.; Drozdowski, G. Does the Net Present Value as a Financial Metric Fit Investment in Green Energy Security? Energies 2022, 15, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acheampong, A.O.; Boateng, E.; Amponsah, M.; Dzator, J. Revisiting the economic growth–energy consumption nexus: Does globalization matter? Energy Econ. 2021, 102, 105472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adebayo, T.S.; Rjoub, H.; Akinsola, G.D.; Oladipupo, S.D. The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: New evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 29, 1875–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albulescu, C.T.; Boatca-Barabas, M.E.; Diaconescu, A. The asymmetric effect of environmental policy stringency on CO2 emissions in OECD countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 27311–27327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Armeanu, D.S.; Gherghina, S.C.; Andrei, J.V.; Joldes, C.C. Evidence from the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model on the asymmetric influence of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic on energy markets. Energy Environ. 2022, 0, 0958305X221087502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Butnaru, G.I.; Haller, A.P.; Clipa, R.I.; Ștefănică, M.; Ifrim, M. The nexus between convergence of conventional and renewable energy consumption in the present European Union states. Explorative study on parametric and semi-parametric methods. Energies 2020, 13, 5272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Druică, E.; Goschin, Z.; Ianole-Călin, R. Energy poverty and life satisfaction: Structural mechanisms and their implications. Energies 2019, 12, 3988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dusmanescu, D. Solar Energy Potential as Support for Sustainable Development of Romanian Economy. In Agricultural Management Strategies in a Changing Economy; IGI Global: Pennsylvania, SUA, 2015; pp. 225–252. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, T.; Yu, Y.; Jahanger, A.; Balsalobre-Lorente, D. Structural emissions reduction of China’s power and heating industry under the goal of “double carbon”: A perspective from input-output analysis. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 31, 346–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.K.; Khan, M.I.; Rehan, M. The relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and carbon dioxide emissions in Pakistan. Financ. Innov. 2020, 6, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, S.A.R.; Ponce, P.; Yu, Z. Technological innovation and environmental taxes toward a carbon-free economy: An empirical study in the context of COP-21. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 298, 113418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lange, S.; Pohl, J.; Santarius, T. Digitalization and energy consumption. Does ICT Reduce Energy Demand? Ecol. Econ. 2020, 176, 106760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marinaș, M.C.; Dinu, M.; Socol, A.G.; Socol, C. Renewable energy consumption and economic growth. Causality relationship in Central and Eastern European countries. PloS ONE 2018, 13, e0202951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shahbaz, M.; Nasreen, S.; Ahmed, K.; Hammoudeh, S. Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels. Energy Econ. 2017, 61, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raza, S.A.; Shah, S.H.; Yousufi, S.Q. The impact of public-private partnerships Investment in Energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from nonparametric causality-in-quantiles. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 23182–23192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahzad, M.; Bilan, Y.; Krajňáková, E.; Streimikiene, D.; Gędek, S. Renewable energy in the electricity sector and GDP per capita in the European Union. Energies 2019, 12, 2520. [Google Scholar]
- Sharma, G.D.; Tiwari, A.K.; Erkut, B.; Mundi, H.S. Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: Evidence from panel estimations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 146, 111152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simionescu, M.; Păuna, C.B.; Diaconescu, T. Renewable Energy and Economic Performance in the Context of the European Green Deal. Energies 2020, 13, 6440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waheed, R.; Sarwar, S.; Wei, C. The survey of economic growth, energy consumption and carbon emission. Energy Rep. 2019, 5, 1103–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q. The relationship of renewable energy consumption to financial development and economic growth in China. Renew. Energy 2021, 170, 897–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaharia, M.; Pătrașcu, A.; Gogonea, M.R.; Tănăsescu, A.; Popescu, C. A cluster design on the influence of energy taxation in shaping the new EU-28 economic paradigm. Energies 2017, 10, 257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cristea, M.; Dobrota, C.E. Green Energy for Sustainable Development in Romania’s Economy. Rev. Chim. 2017, 68, 1375–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahbaz, M.; Raghutla, C.; Chittedi, K.R.; Jiao, Z.; Vo, X.V. The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from the renewable energy country attractive index. Energy 2020, 207, 118162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Pinar, M.; Stengos, T. Determinants of renewable energy consumption: Importance of democratic institutions. Renew. Energy 2021, 179, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Real-Time World Statistics. Available online: https://www.worldometers.info/ (accessed on 12 June 2022).
- Khaskheli, A.; Jiang, Y.; Raza, S.A.; Khan, K.A.; Qureshi, M.A. Financial development, international trade, and environmental degradation: A nonlinear threshold model based on panel smooth transition regression. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 26449–26460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.; Radulescu, M.; Ma, H.; Dagar, V.; Hussain, I.; Khan, M.K. The impact of globalization, energy use, and trade on ecological footprint in Pakistan: Does environmental sustainability exist? Energies 2021, 14, 5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, W.; Apergis, N.; Bashir, M.F.; Ghosh, S.; Doğan, B.; Shahzad, U. Investigating the role of globalization, and energy consumption for environmental externalities: Empirical evidence from developed and developing economies. Renew. Energy 2022, 183, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eurostat. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat (accessed on 12 June 2022).
Crt. No. | Source | U.M. | Indicator | Periods | Volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Electricity | kWh | consumption | daily | 283,197,500 |
2 | non-renewable | kWh | consumption | daily | 241,332,792 |
3 | regenerator | kWh | consumption | daily | 41,864,708 |
5 | Oil | barrel | consumption | daily | 58,312,700 |
6 | Oil | barrel | remaining reserves | until exhaustion | 1,436,099,720,310 |
7 | Oil | day | days until exhaustion | until exhaustion | 14,627 |
8 | Natural gases | bep | total reserves | until exhaustion | 1,081,518,350,200 |
9 | Natural gases | day | days until exhaustion | until exhaustion | 56,922 |
10 | Coal | bep | reservations | until exhaustion | 4,294,609,821,700 |
11 | Coal | day | days until exhaustion | until exhaustion | 148,090 |
2005 | 2010 | 2015 | 2019 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
European Union—28 countries | 96.6 | 91.9 | 88.9 | 82.6 |
Belgium | 99.9 | 91.8 | 90.7 | 85.6 |
Bulgaria | 104 | 117.4 | 111.6 | 97.1 |
Czech Republic | 89.6 | 83.6 | 79.4 | 73.7 |
Denmark | 93.3 | 87.8 | 72.9 | 63.2 |
Germany | 94.5 | 93.2 | 94.9 | 86.5 |
Estonia | 95.5 | 99.6 | 101.8 | 79.8 |
Ireland | 100 | 90.9 | 87.4 | 79.5 |
Greece | 99.6 | 94.7 | 85.2 | 74.9 |
Spain | 102 | 87.4 | 88.5 | 79.8 |
French | 94.5 | 89.1 | 80.6 | 79.5 |
Croatia | 101.8 | 96.5 | 90.4 | 86.6 |
Italy | 97.7 | 92.1 | 87.5 | 82.2 |
Cyprus | 106.4 | 103.9 | 101.1 | 95 |
Latvia | 92.6 | 96 | 85.6 | 83.8 |
Lithuania | 98.5 | 124.5 | 105.3 | 102.6 |
Luxembourg | 108.7 | 104.5 | 96.5 | 92.3 |
Hungary | 89.9 | 83.9 | 78.5 | 77.3 |
Malta | 90.1 | 87.3 | 72.7 | 58.8 |
The Netherlands | 96.8 | 97.3 | 99 | 92.4 |
Austria | 102.9 | 90.2 | 83.3 | 83.7 |
Poland | 99.4 | 93.3 | 92.3 | 84.2 |
Portugal | 98.8 | 84.9 | 86.9 | 78.7 |
Romania | 97.2 | 86.3 | 93.3 | 85.4 |
Slovenia | 96.6 | 99.9 | 91.2 | 89.8 |
Slovakia | 95.5 | 89.1 | 82.6 | 77.7 |
Finland | 94 | 99.8 | 75.8 | 69.7 |
Sweden | 90.8 | 91.1 | 79.1 | 68.2 |
Iceland | 98.1 | 56 | 48.6 | 44.8 |
Norway | 91 | 85.8 | 92.4 | 87.9 |
UK | 98.7 | 98.1 | 89.5 | 81.8 |
Dependent Variable | Independent Variable | r | R-Squared | F-Statistic | Prob (F-Statistic) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total production (PR) | Renewable Energy (RG) | 0.8226 | 0.6768 | 39.7915 | 0.000005 |
Consumption (CS) | Renewable Energy (RG) | −0.8584 | 0.7369 | 53.2353 | 0.000001 |
Indicator | Value |
---|---|
= Volume of final consumption in 2020 | 906.80 |
= Volume of renewable energy in 2020 | 200.30 |
= Annual average index of change in final consumption | 0.9921 |
= Annual average renewable energy change index | 1.0451 |
CS | PR | RG | |
---|---|---|---|
R-squared | 0.721344 | 0.651295 | 0.995655 |
Adj. R-squared | 0.582016 | 0.476942 | 0.993482 |
Sum sq. resids | 8038.181 | 26995.46 | 97.14411 |
S.E. equation | 25.88143 | 47.43017 | 2.845232 |
F-statistic | 5.177300 | 3.735506 | 458.2555 |
Log likelihood | −84.41126 | −95.92019 | −42.46152 |
Akaike AIC | 9.622238 | 10.83370 | 5.206476 |
Black SC | 9.970189 | 11.18166 | 5.554427 |
Mean dependent | 999.3684 | 1569.135 | 146.3679 |
S.D. dependent | 40.03209 | 65.58129 | 35.24167 |
Year | CS | PR | RG |
---|---|---|---|
2020 | 906.8 | 1564.1 | 200.3 |
2050 | 835.4 | 1773.5 | 328.8 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Anghelache, C.; Anghel, M.G.; Iacob, Ș.V.; Pârțachi, I.; Rădulescu, I.G.; Brezoi, A.G. Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union. Energies 2023, 16, 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031338
Anghelache C, Anghel MG, Iacob ȘV, Pârțachi I, Rădulescu IG, Brezoi AG. Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union. Energies. 2023; 16(3):1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031338
Chicago/Turabian StyleAnghelache, Constantin, Mădălina Gabriela Anghel, Ștefan Virgil Iacob, Ion Pârțachi, Irina Gabriela Rădulescu, and Alina Gabriela Brezoi. 2023. "Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union" Energies 16, no. 3: 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031338
APA StyleAnghelache, C., Anghel, M. G., Iacob, Ș. V., Pârțachi, I., Rădulescu, I. G., & Brezoi, A. G. (2023). Analysis of the Situation of Renewable and Non-Renewable Energy Consumption in the European Union. Energies, 16(3), 1338. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031338