Evaluation of Different Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Hybrid Microgrid: A Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Evolutions and Advancements of Renewable Energy Resources to Achieve Zero Emission Power Technologies
3. Optimization of IHMS
3.1. The Evolution of IHMS Optimization Methods
3.1.1. Optimization by Heuristic Methods
3.1.2. Optimization by Deterministic Methods
3.2. Reliability Analysis in IHMS
4. Control Strategies of Solar-Wind IHMS
5. Correlation between Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Solar-Wind IHMS by Implementing the Dispatch Strategies
6. Evolution of Dispatch Strategies in Microgrid Optimization
7. Conclusions and Future Scope
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Khare, V.; Nema, S.; Baredar, P. Solar–wind hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, A.; Saini, R. A review on Integrated Renewable Energy System based power generation for stand-alone applications: Configurations, storage options, sizing methodologies and control. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 38, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishaq, S.; Khan, I.; Rahman, S.; Hussain, T.; Iqbal, A.; Elavarasan, R.M. A review on recent developments in control and optimization of micro grids. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 4085–4103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vadi, S.; Padmanaban, S.; Bayindir, R.; Blaabjerg, F.; Mihet-Popa, L. A review on optimization and control methods used to provide transient stability in microgrids. Energies 2019, 12, 3582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Falahi, M.D.; Jayasinghe, S.; Enshaei, H. A review on recent size optimization methodologies for standalone solar and wind hybrid renewable energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 143, 252–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Chandel, S. Review of software tools for hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, G.; Konstantinou, G.; Townsend, C.D.; Pou, J.; Vazquez, S.; Demetriades, G.D.; Agelidis, V.G. A review of power electronics for grid connection of utility-scale battery energy storage systems. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2016, 7, 1778–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, T.; Yang, H.; Lu, L. A feasibility study of a stand-alone hybrid solar–wind–battery system for a remote island. Appl. Energy 2014, 121, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hossen, M.D.; Islam, M.F.; Ishraque, M.F.; Shezan, S.A.; Arifuzzaman, S. Design and Implementation of a Hybrid Solar-Wind-Biomass Renewable Energy System considering Meteorological Conditions with the Power System Performances. Int. J. Photoenergy 2022, 2022, 8792732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shezan, S.A.; Ishraque, M.F.; Paul, L.C.; Sarkar, M.R.; Rana, M.M.; Uddin, M.; Hossain, M.B.; Shobug, M.A.; Hossain, M.I. Assortment of dispatch strategies with the optimization of an islanded hybrid microgrid. MIST Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2022, 10, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al Busaidi, A.S.; Kazem, H.A.; Al-Badi, A.H.; Khan, M.F. A review of optimum sizing of hybrid PV–Wind renewable energy systems in oman. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, S.; Chandel, S. Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for solar photovoltaic–wind based hybrid energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 755–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagh, S.; Walke, P. Review on wind-solar hybrid power system. Int. J. Res. Sci. Eng. 2017, 3, 71–76. [Google Scholar]
- Aghamohammadi, M.R.; Abdolahinia, H. A new approach for optimal sizing of battery energy storage system for primary frequency control of islanded microgrid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2014, 54, 325–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhasnawi, B.N.; Jasim, B.H. A Novel Hierarchical Energy Management System Based on Optimization for Multi-Microgrid. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. 2020, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathima, A.H.; Palanisamy, K. Optimization in microgrids with hybrid energy systems—A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 431–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zhuang, P.; Liang, H.; Peng, J.; Huang, Z. Distributed economic dispatch in microgrids based on cooperative reinforcement learning. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 2018, 29, 2192–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, G.; Jiang, T.; Ollis, T.B.; Zhang, X.; Tomsovic, K. Distributed energy management for community microgrids considering network operational constraints and building thermal dynamics. Appl. Energy 2019, 239, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, L.; Zhang, C.; Tang, Y.; Zhong, W.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, P.; Zhai, B.; Lan, H.; Li, Z. Hierarchical model predictive control strategy based on dynamic active power dispatch for wind power cluster integration. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 4617–4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wen, Y.; Chung, C.; Liu, X.; Che, L. Microgrid dispatch with frequency-aware islanding constraints. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 2465–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X.; Deng, F.; Song, X. Optimal dispatch of hybrid energy islanded microgrid considering V2G under TOU tariffs. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2019; Volume 107, p. 02007. [Google Scholar]
- Dou, C.; An, X.; Yue, D.; Li, F. Two-level decentralized optimization power dispatch control strategies for an islanded microgrid without communication network. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2017, 27, e2244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdullah, M.A.; Muttaqi, K.M.; Sutanto, D.; Agalgaonkar, A.P. An effective power dispatch control strategy to improve generation schedulability and supply reliability of a wind farm using a battery energy storage system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2014, 6, 1093–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, B.; Xue, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J. An MAS based energy management system for a stand-alone microgrid at high altitude. Appl. Energy 2015, 143, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadrdan, M.; Wu, J.; Jenkins, N.; Ekanayake, J. Operating strategies for a GB integrated gas and electricity network considering the uncertainty in wind power forecasts. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 5, 128–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Gatsis, N.; Giannakis, G.B. Robust energy management for microgrids with high-penetration renewables. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2013, 4, 944–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vergara, P.P.; Rey, J.M.; Shaker, H.R.; Guerrero, J.M.; Jørgensen, B.N.; Da Silva, L.C. Distributed strategy for optimal dispatch of unbalanced three-phase islanded microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 10, 3210–3225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qu, B.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Wu, M.; Suganthan, P.N.; Liang, J.J. A survey on multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for the solution of the environmental/economic dispatch problems. Swarm Evol. Comput.n 2018, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bogdanov, D.; Ram, M.; Aghahosseini, A.; Gulagi, A.; Oyewo, A.S.; Child, M.; Caldera, U.; Sadovskaia, K.; Farfan, J.; Barbosa, L.D.S.N.S.; et al. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 2021, 227, 120467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoang, A.T.; Nižetić, S.; Olcer, A.I.; Ong, H.C.; Chen, W.H.; Chong, C.T.; Thomas, S.; Bandh, S.A.; Nguyen, X.P. Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the global energy system and the shift progress to renewable energy: Opportunities, challenges, and policy implications. Energy Policy 2021, 154, 112322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arias, I.; Cardemil, J.; Zarza, E.; Valenzuela, L.; Escobar, R. Latest developments, assessments and research trends for next generation of concentrated solar power plants using liquid heat transfer fluids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 168, 112844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, N.; Gong, Y.; Wang, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X. Critical review of perovskite-based materials in advanced oxidation system for wastewater treatment: Design, applications and mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 424, 127637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, J.; Lim, E.L.; Tan, L.; Wei, Z. Ink Engineering in Blade-Coating Large-Area Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12, 2200975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, R.; Torres-Aguilar, C.; Xamán, J.; Zavala-Guillén, I.; Bassam, A.; Ricalde, L.J.; Carvente, O. Digital twin models for optimization and global projection of building-integrated solar chimney. Build. Environ. 2022, 213, 108807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ibrahim, M.; Alsheikh, A.; Awaysheh, F.M.; Alshehri, M.D. Machine learning schemes for anomaly detection in solar power plants. Energies 2022, 15, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Z.; Wu, L.; Pang, Y.; Zhang, W.; Yang, R. Strategies for effectively harvesting wind energy based on triboelectric nanogenerators. Nano Energy 2022, 100, 107522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maienza, C.; Avossa, A.M.; Picozzi, V.; Ricciardelli, F. Feasibility analysis for floating offshore wind energy. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2022, 27, 796–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Wang, H.; Lian, J. Review of integrated installation technologies for offshore wind turbines: Current progress and future development trends. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 255, 115319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Liu, X.; Zhao, D.; Post, S.; Chen, J. Overview of the development and application of wind energy in New Zealand. Energy Built Environ. 2022, in press. [CrossRef]
- Mousavi, Y.; Bevan, G.; Kucukdemiral, I.B.; Fekih, A. Sliding mode control of wind energy conversion systems: Trends and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 167, 112734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kong, K.; Dyer, K.; Payne, C.; Hamerton, I.; Weaver, P.M. Progress and Trends in Damage Detection Methods, Maintenance, and Data-driven Monitoring of Wind Turbine Blades—A Review. Renew. Energy Focus 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, K.; Luo, P.; Liu, P.; Kim, J.S.; Wang, Y.; Xu, W.; Li, H.; Gong, Y. Improving complementarity of a hybrid renewable energy system to meet load demand by using hydropower regulation ability. Energy 2022, 248, 123535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ercan, E.; Kentel, E. Optimum daily operation of a wind-hydro hybrid system. J. Energy Storage 2022, 50, 104540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amjith, L.; Bavanish, B. A review on biomass and wind as renewable energy for sustainable environment. Chemosphere 2022, 293, 133579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bui, V.G.; Bui, T.M.T.; Ong, H.C.; Nižetić, S.; Nguyen, T.T.X.; Atabani, A.; Štěpanec, L.; Hoang, A.T. Optimizing operation parameters of a spark-ignition engine fueled with biogas-hydrogen blend integrated into biomass-solar hybrid renewable energy system. Energy 2022, 252, 124052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, G.T.; Pereira, D.F.; Taheri, S.I.; Khan, K.S.; Salles, M.B.; Guerrero, J.M.; Carmo, B.S. Optimized Configuration of Diesel Engine-Fuel Cell-Battery Hybrid Power Systems in a Platform Supply Vessel to Reduce CO2 Emissions. Energies 2022, 15, 2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Dai, S.; Dai, S.; Ji, C.; Collu, M.; Yuan, Z.; Incecik, A. Energy conversion and hydrodynamic analysis of multi-degree-of-freedom wave energy converters integrated into a semi-submersible platform. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 252, 115075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arul, P.; Ramachandaramurthy, V.K.; Rajkumar, R. Control strategies for a hybrid renewable energy system: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, B.; Lee, K.T.; Lee, G.Y.; Cho, Y.M.; Ahn, S.H. Optimization of hybrid renewable energy power systems: A review. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2015, 2, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, P.; Pasha, J.; Moses, R.; Sobanjo, J.; Ozguven, E.E.; Dulebenets, M.A. Development of exact and heuristic optimization methods for safety improvement projects at level crossings under conflicting objectives. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 220, 108296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abualigah, L.; Elaziz, M.A.; Khasawneh, A.M.; Alshinwan, M.; Ibrahim, R.A.; Al-qaness, M.A.; Mirjalili, S.; Sumari, P.; Gandomi, A.H. Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for solving real-world mechanical engineering design problems: A comprehensive survey, applications, comparative analysis, and results. Neural Comput. Appl. 2022, 34, 4081–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reddy, A.K.V.K.; Narayana, K.V.L. Meta-heuristics optimization in electric vehicles-an extensive review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 160, 112285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, A.; Pourfayaz, F. Optimal sizing of autonomous hybrid photovoltaic/wind/battery power system with LPSP technology by using evolutionary algorithms. Sol. Energy 2015, 115, 471–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Q.; Shahidehpour, M.; Li, Z.; Che, L.; Alabdulwahab, A.; Abusorrah, A. Compartmentalization strategy for the optimal economic operation of a hybrid ac/dc microgrid. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 35, 1294–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, A.; Khajeh, M.G.; Rosen, M.A. Weather forecasting for optimization of a hybrid solar-wind–powered reverse osmosis water desalination system using a novel optimizer approach. Energy 2016, 114, 1120–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, T.; Sun, W. Optimization of battery–supercapacitor hybrid energy storage station in wind/solar generation system. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2014, 5, 408–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, C.; He, J.; Cheng, P.; Chen, J. Analysis of consensus-based distributed economic dispatch under stealthy attacks. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 64, 5107–5117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, R.; Li, Q.; Li, G.; Liu, H. A gossip-based distributed algorithm for economic dispatch in smart grids with random communication link failures. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 67, 4635–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, V.; Nema, S.; Baredar, P. Optimisation of the hybrid renewable energy system by HOMER, PSO and CPSO for the study area. Int. J. Sustain. Energy 2017, 36, 326–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maleki, A.; Ameri, M.; Keynia, F. Scrutiny of multifarious particle swarm optimization for finding the optimal size of a PV/wind/battery hybrid system. Renew. Energy 2015, 80, 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Athari, M.; Ardehali, M. Operational performance of energy storage as function of electricity prices for on-grid hybrid renewable energy system by optimized fuzzy logic controller. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 890–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fetanat, A.; Khorasaninejad, E. Size optimization for hybrid photovoltaic–wind energy system using ant colony optimization for continuous domains based integer programming. Appl. Soft Comput. 2015, 31, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, T.C.; Hong, C.M. Dynamic operation and control of microgrid hybrid power systems. Energy 2014, 66, 314–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belmili, H.; Haddadi, M.; Bacha, S.; Almi, M.F.; Bendib, B. Sizing stand-alone photovoltaic–wind hybrid system: Techno-economic analysis and optimization. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 30, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siddaiah, R.; Saini, R. A review on planning, configurations, modeling and optimization techniques of hybrid renewable energy systems for off grid applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 376–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.; Ngo, T.G.; Dao, T.K.; Nguyen, T.T.T. Microgrid Operations Planning Based on Improving the Flying Sparrow Search Algorithm. Symmetry 2022, 14, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TT Tran, Q.; Luisa Di Silvestre, M.; Riva Sanseverino, E.; Zizzo, G.; Pham, T.N. Driven primary regulation for minimum power losses operation in islanded microgrids. Energies 2018, 11, 2890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, Q.N.U.; Ahmed, A.; Abdullah, S.M. Optimized controller design for islanded microgrid using non-dominated sorting whale optimization algorithm (NSWOA). Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 3677–3689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Askarzadeh, A.; dos Santos Coelho, L. A novel framework for optimization of a grid independent hybrid renewable energy system: A case study of Iran. Sol. Energy 2015, 112, 383–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mirjalili, S. Genetic algorithm. In Evolutionary Algorithms and Neural Networks; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Katoch, S.; Chauhan, S.S.; Kumar, V. A review on genetic algorithm: Past, present, and future. Multimed. Tools Appl. 2021, 80, 8091–8126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Husain, D.; Upreti, N.; Gupta, D. Genetic Algorithm: Review and Application. 2010. Available online: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3529843 (accessed on 25 December 2022). [CrossRef]
- Marini, F.; Walczak, B. Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2015, 149, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lazinica, A. Particle Swarm Optimization; BoD–Books on Demand: Paris, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Bilal, B.O.; Sambou, V.; Ndiaye, P.; Kébé, C.; Ndongo, M. Optimal design of a hybrid solar–wind-battery system using the minimization of the annualized cost system and the minimization of the loss of power supply probability (LPSP). Renew. Energy 2010, 35, 2388–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkar, T.; Bhattacharjee, A.; Samanta, H.; Bhattacharya, K.; Saha, H. Optimal design and implementation of solar PV-wind-biogas-VRFB storage integrated smart hybrid microgrid for ensuring zero loss of power supply probability. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 191, 102–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papadimitrakis, M.; Giamarelos, N.; Stogiannos, M.; Zois, E.; Livanos, N.I.; Alexandridis, A. Metaheuristic search in smart grid: A review with emphasis on planning, scheduling and power flow optimization applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 145, 111072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Askarzadeh, A. A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm. Comput. Struct. 2016, 169, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karaboga, D.; Gorkemli, B.; Ozturk, C.; Karaboga, N. A comprehensive survey: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2014, 42, 21–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, W.; Liu, S.; Huang, L. A global best artificial bee colony algorithm for global optimization. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2012, 236, 2741–2753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blum, C. Ant colony optimization: Introduction and recent trends. Phys. Life Rev. 2005, 2, 353–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dorigo, M.; Stützle, T. Ant colony optimization: Overview and recent advances. In Handbook of Metaheuristics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 311–351. [Google Scholar]
- Di Caprio, D.; Ebrahimnejad, A.; Alrezaamiri, H.; Santos-Arteaga, F.J. A novel ant colony algorithm for solving shortest path problems with fuzzy arc weights. Alex. Eng. J. 2022, 61, 3403–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baghdadi, F.; Mohammedi, K.; Diaf, S.; Behar, O. Feasibility study and energy conversion analysis of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2015, 105, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W.; Lou, C.; Li, Z.; Lu, L.; Yang, H. Current status of research on optimum sizing of stand-alone hybrid solar–wind power generation systems. Appl. Energy 2010, 87, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Zhou, W.; Lu, L.; Fang, Z. Optimal sizing method for stand-alone hybrid solar–wind system with LPSP technology by using genetic algorithm. Sol. Energy 2008, 82, 354–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nema, P.; Nema, R.; Rangnekar, S. A current and future state of art development of hybrid energy system using wind and PV-solar: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2096–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Wei, Z.; Chengzhi, L. Optimal design and techno-economic analysis of a hybrid solar–wind power generation system. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shezan, S.; Saidur, R.; Ullah, K.; Hossain, A.; Chong, W.T.; Julai, S. Feasibility analysis of a hybrid off-grid wind–DG-battery energy system for the eco-tourism remote areas. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2015, 17, 2417–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shezan, S.; Al-Mamoon, A.; Ping, H. Performance investigation of an advanced hybrid renewable energy system in Indonesia. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2018, 37, 1424–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Celik, A.N. Optimisation and techno-economic analysis of autonomous photovoltaic–wind hybrid energy systems in comparison to single photovoltaic and wind systems. Energy Convers. Manag. 2002, 43, 2453–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chong, W.; Naghavi, M.; Poh, S.; Mahlia, T.; Pan, K. Techno-economic analysis of a wind–solar hybrid renewable energy system with rainwater collection feature for urban high-rise application. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4067–4077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Sharafi, A.; Sahin, A.Z.; Ayar, T.; Yilbas, B.S. Techno-economic analysis and optimization of solar and wind energy systems for power generation and hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, A.M.; Singal, S.K. Economic analysis of integrated renewable energy system for electrification of remote rural area having scattered population. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2018, 8, 258–265. [Google Scholar]
- Maleki, A. Design and optimization of autonomous solar-wind-reverse osmosis desalination systems coupling battery and hydrogen energy storage by an improved bee algorithm. Desalination 2018, 435, 221–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalinci, Y.; Dincer, I.; Hepbasli, A. Energy and exergy analyses of a hybrid hydrogen energy system: A case study for Bozcaada. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 2492–2503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rana, M.M.; Rahman, A.; Uddin, M.; Sarkar, M.R.; Shezan, S.A.; Ishraque, M.F.; Rafin, S.S.H.; Atef, M. A Comparative Analysis of Peak Load Shaving Strategies for Isolated Microgrid Using Actual Data. Energies 2022, 15, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishraque, M.F.; Shezan, S.A.; Rashid, M.; Bhadra, A.B.; Hossain, M.A.; Chakrabortty, R.K.; Ryan, M.J.; Fahim, S.R.; Sarker, S.K.; Das, S.K. Techno-economic and power system optimization of a renewable rich islanded microgrid considering different dispatch strategies. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 77325–77340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishraque, M.F.; Shezan, S.A.; Nur, J.N.; Islam, M.S. Optimal sizing and assessment of an islanded photovoltaic-battery-diesel generator microgrid applicable to a remote school of Bangladesh. Eng. Rep. 2021, 3, e12281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Longe, O.M.; Ouahada, K.; Ferreira, H.C.; Chinnappen, S. Renewable Energy Sources microgrid design for rural area in South Africa. In Proceedings of the ISGT 2014, Washington, DC, USA, 19–22 February 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hasarmani, T.; Holmukhe, R.; Tamke, S. Performance analysis of grid interfaced photovoltaic systems for reliable agri-microgrids using PVsyst. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Information and Communications Technology (ICOIACT), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 24–25 July 2019; pp. 894–898. [Google Scholar]
- Ahirwar, P.; Kori, A.K.; Kapoor, S. Pre-Installation Analysis via “PVsyst” & “HOMER Pro” to Design & Simulate a 50kWp Solar Grid-Tied PV System for Rural Area Electrification, India. In Proceedings of the 2021 5th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer Technologies and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT), Mysuru, India, 11–12 December 2021; pp. 388–394. [Google Scholar]
- Arefin, S.S. Optimization techniques of islanded hybrid microgrid system. In Renewable Energy-Resources, Challenges and Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ramli, M.A.; Bouchekara, H.; Alghamdi, A.S. Optimal sizing of PV/wind/diesel hybrid microgrid system using multi-objective self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm. Renew. Energy 2018, 121, 400–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jatzeck, B.; Robinson, A. WATSUN-PV 4.0 modifications to include wind turbine generator, AC load shedding, and operation with zero-capacity diesel generator. In Proceedings of the 1996 Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Calgary, AB, Canada, 26–29 May 1996; Volume 2, pp. 655–658. [Google Scholar]
- Sheriff, F.; Turcotte, D.; Ross, M. PVTOOLBOX: A Comprehensive Set of PV System Components for the Matlab/Simulink Environment. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the Solar Energy Society of Canada Inc., Kingston, ON, Canada, 18–20 August 2003; Volume 20. [Google Scholar]
- Best, S.R.; Rodiek, J.A.; Brandhorst, H.W. Comparison of solar modeling data to actual PV installations: Power predictions and optimal tilt angles. In Proceedings of the 2011 37th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 19–24 June 2011; pp. 001994–001999. [Google Scholar]
- Rodiek, J.; Best, S.; Still, C.; Brandhorst, H. Auburn University’s Solar Photovoltaic Array Tilt Angle and Tracking Performance Experiment. In Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit, Nashville, TN, USA, 25–28 July 2010; p. 7098. [Google Scholar]
- Pöchacker, M.; Khatib, T.; Elmenreich, W. The microgrid simulation tool RAPSim: Description and case study. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies-Asia (ISGT ASIA), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 20–23 May 2014; pp. 278–283. [Google Scholar]
- Jdeed, M.; Sharma, E.; Klemenjak, C.; Elmenreich, W. Smart grid modeling and simulation—Comparing GridLAB-D and RAPSim via two Case studies. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Energy Conference (ENERGYCON), Limassol, Cyprus, 3–7 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Newbolt, T.M.; Mandal, P.; Wang, H. Implementation of Battery EVs and BESS into RAPSim Software to Enrich Power Engineering Education in DER-Integrated Distribution Systems. In Proceedings of the 2021 North American Power Symposium (NAPS), College Station, TX, USA, 14–16 November 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Psomopoulos, C.S.; Ioannidis, G.C.; Kaminaris, S.D.; Mardikis, K.D.; Katsikas, N.G. A comparative evaluation of photovoltaic electricity production assessment software (PVGIS, PVWatts and RETScreen). Environ. Process. 2015, 2, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moya, D.; Paredes, J.; Kaparaju, P. Technical, financial, economic and environmental pre-feasibility study of geothermal power plants by RETScreen–Ecuador’s case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 92, 628–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhu, T.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, J. Feasibility analysis on distributed energy system of Chongming County based on RETScreen software. Energy 2017, 130, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, F.A.; Pal, N.; Saeed, S.H. Optimization and sizing of SPV/Wind hybrid renewable energy system: A techno-economic and social perspective. Energy 2021, 233, 121114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kavadias, K.A.; Triantafyllou, P. Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems’ Optimisation. A Review and Extended Comparison of the Most-Used Software Tools. Energies 2021, 14, 8268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, M.; Dampage, U.; Das, B.K.; Nasif, O.; Borowski, P.F.; Mohamed, M.A. Investigating the impact of economic uncertainty on optimal sizing of grid-independent hybrid renewable energy systems. Processes 2021, 9, 1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, B.K.; Hassan, R.; Tushar, M.S.H.; Zaman, F.; Hasan, M.; Das, P. Techno-economic and environmental assessment of a hybrid renewable energy system using multi-objective genetic algorithm: A case study for remote Island in Bangladesh. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 230, 113823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, K.M. Optimization analysis of microgrid using HOMER—A case study. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual IEEE India Conference, Hyderabad, India, 16–18 December 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Çetinbaş, İ.; Tamyürek, B.; Demirtaş, M. Design, analysis and optimization of a hybrid microgrid system using HOMER software: Eskisehir osmangazi university example. Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev.-IJRED 2019, 8, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Montuori, L.; Alcázar-Ortega, M.; Álvarez-Bel, C.; Domijan, A. Integration of renewable energy in microgrids coordinated with demand response resources: Economic evaluation of a biomass gasification plant by Homer Simulator. Appl. Energy 2014, 132, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sawle, Y.; Gupta, S.; Kumar Bohre, A. PV-wind hybrid system: A review with case study. Cogent Eng. 2016, 3, 1189305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Mitra, J.; Wang, T.; Mu, L. Evaluation of operational reliability of a microgrid using a short-term outage model. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2014, 29, 2238–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khare, V.; Nema, S.; Baredar, P. Reliability analysis of hybrid renewable energy system by fault tree analysis. Energy Environ. 2019, 30, 542–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokoka, O.K.; Awodele, K.O. Reliability evaluation of distribution networks using NEPLAN & DIgSILENT power factory. In Proceedings of the 2013 Africon, Pointe aux Piments, Mauritius, 9–12 September 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Nale, R.; Biswal, M.; Kishor, N. A Transient Component Based Approach for Islanding Detection in Distributed Generation. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2019, 10, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petreus, D.; Etz, R.; Patarau, T.; Cirstea, M. An islanded microgrid energy management controller validated by using hardware-in-the-loop emulators. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 106, 346–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdelsamad, A.; Lubkeman, D. Reliability Analysis for a Hybrid Microgrid based on Chronological Monte Carlo Simulation with Markov Switching Modeling. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Power & Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, USA, 18–21 February 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulkarim, A.; Faruk, N.; Oloyede, A.O.; Olawoyin, L.A.; Akorede, M.F.; Madugu, I.S.; Abdelkader, S.; Morrow, J.; Adediran, Y.A. Reliability study of stand-alone hybrid renewable energy microgrids. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. 2019, 43, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhong, W.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Hou, S. Reliability evaluation and improvement of islanded microgrid considering operation failures of power electronic equipment. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2019, 8, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qi, X.L.; Zhang, S.C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Reviews of Modern Physics 2011, 83, 1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, Y.; Suganthan, P.; Srikanth, N. Ensemble methods for wind and solar power forecasting—A state-of-the-art review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 50, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lei, M.; Shiyan, L.; Chuanwen, J.; Hongling, L.; Yan, Z. A review on the forecasting of wind speed and generated power. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 915–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobson, M.Z.; Delucchi, M.A.; Cameron, M.A.; Frew, B.A. Low-cost solution to the grid reliability problem with 100% penetration of intermittent wind, water, and solar for all purposes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 15060–15065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Wang, H.; Sangwongwanich, A.; Blaabjerg, F. Design for reliability of power electronic systems. In Power Electronics Handbook; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1423–1440. [Google Scholar]
- Albarbar, A.; Teay, S.; Batunlu, C. Smart sensing system for enhancing the reliability of power electronic devices used in wind turbines. Int. J. Smart Sens. Intell. Syst. 2017, 10, 407–424. [Google Scholar]
- Olatomiwa, L.; Mekhilef, S.; Ismail, M.S.; Moghavvemi, M. Energy management strategies in hybrid renewable energy systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 821–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhandari, B.; Poudel, S.R.; Lee, K.T.; Ahn, S.H. Mathematical modeling of hybrid renewable energy system: A review on small hydro-solar-wind power generation. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf.-Green Technol. 2014, 1, 157–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Palazoglu, A.; El-Farra, N.H. Operational optimization and demand response of hybrid renewable energy systems. Appl. Energy 2015, 143, 324–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishna, K.S.; Kumar, K.S. A review on hybrid renewable energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.; Wu, Q.; Hu, S.; Xu, H.; Rasmussen, C.N. Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support. Appl. Energy 2015, 137, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahesh, A.; Sandhu, K.S. Hybrid wind/photovoltaic energy system developments: Critical review and findings. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 1135–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nehrir, M.; Wang, C.; Strunz, K.; Aki, H.; Ramakumar, R.; Bing, J.; Miao, Z.; Salameh, Z. A review of hybrid renewable/alternative energy systems for electric power generation: Configurations, control, and applications. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2011, 2, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, B.; Li, W.; Chan, K.W.; Cao, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merabet, A.; Ahmed, K.T.; Ibrahim, H.; Beguenane, R.; Ghias, A.M. Energy management and control system for laboratory scale microgrid based wind-PV-battery. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2016, 8, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufo-Lopez, R.; Cristobal-Monreal, I.R.; Yusta, J.M. Stochastic-heuristic methodology for the optimisation of components and control variables of PV-wind-diesel-battery stand-alone systems. Renew. Energy 2016, 99, 919–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, K.; Babu, N.R.; Prabhu, K. Design and analysis of an integrated Cuk-SEPIC converter with MPPT for standalone wind/PV hybrid system. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. (IJRER) 2017, 7, 96–106. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J.; Xiong, R.; Yang, Q.; Liang, F.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, W. Design/test of a hybrid energy storage system for primary frequency control using a dynamic droop method in an isolated microgrid power system. Appl. Energy 2017, 201, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Yang, Q.; Robinson, F.; Liang, F.; Zhang, M.; Yuan, W. Design and test of a new droop control algorithm for a SMES/battery hybrid energy storage system. Energy 2017, 118, 1110–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Powell, K.M.; Rashid, K.; Ellingwood, K.; Tuttle, J.; Iverson, B.D. Hybrid concentrated solar thermal power systems: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 80, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ciocan, A.; Balan, M.; Pislaru, M.; Rizoiu, A.; Constantin, A. A hybrid energy storage system and control strategy for stand-alone applications using renewable energy sources. Smart Energy Sustain. Environ. 2017, 20, 79. [Google Scholar]
- Derrouazin, A.; Aillerie, M.; Mekkakia-Maaza, N.; Charles, J.P. Multi input-output fuzzy logic smart controller for a residential hybrid solar-wind-storage energy system. Energy Convers. Manag. 2017, 148, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trifkovic, M.; Marvin, W.A.; Daoutidis, P.; Sheikhzadeh, M. Dynamic real-time optimization and control of a hybrid energy system. AIChE J. 2014, 60, 2546–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishraque, M.F.; Shezan, S.A.; Ali, M.; Rashid, M. Optimization of load dispatch strategies for an islanded microgrid connected with renewable energy sources. Appl. Energy 2021, 292, 116879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shezan, S.A.; Hasan, K.N.; Rahman, A.; Datta, M.; Datta, U. Selection of appropriate dispatch strategies for effective planning and operation of a microgrid. Energies 2021, 14, 7217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koti Reddy, B.; Singh, A.K. Optimal Operation of a Photovoltaic Integrated Captive Cogeneration Plant with a Utility Grid Using Optimization and Machine Learning Prediction Methods. Energies 2021, 14, 4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishraque, M.F.; Shezan, S.A.; Rana, M.S.; Muyeen, S.; Rahman, A.; Paul, L.C.; Islam, M.S. Optimal sizing and assessment of a renewable rich standalone hybrid microgrid considering conventional dispatch methodologies. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barley, C.D.; Winn, C.B. Optimal dispatch strategy in remote hybrid power systems. Sol. Energy 1996, 58, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, Y.; Ai, Q. Demand-side response strategy of multi-microgrids based on an improved co-evolution algorithm. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 2021, 7, 903–910. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Yue, D.; Dou, C.; Hancke, G. PBI based multi-objective optimization via deep reinforcement elite learning strategy for micro-grid dispatch with frequency dynamics. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2022, 38, 488–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, L.; Geng, X. Research on optimal Dispatching Strategy of micro-grid based on Particle Swarm optimization algorithm. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Jakarta, Indonesia, 25–26 September 2021; Volume 647, p. 012046. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Zeng, Y.; Lu, Z. Decomposition and coordination calculation of economic dispatch for active distribution network with multi-microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 135, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moretti, L.; Meraldi, L.; Niccolai, A.; Manzolini, G.; Leva, S. An innovative tunable rule-based strategy for the predictive management of hybrid microgrids. Electronics 2021, 10, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, Y.; Hu, J.; Liu, H. A holistic power management strategy of microgrids based on model predictive control and particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021, 18, 5115–5126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, N.; Wu, X.; Chen, W.; Guo, M.; Hou, D. Development of Renewable Energy Consumption Strategies for Microgrids Based on CNN and ORB Image Matching Methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference (iSPEC), Nanjing, China, 23–25 December 2021; pp. 3792–3797. [Google Scholar]
- Das, B.K.; Hassan, R.; Islam, M.S.; Rezaei, M. Influence of energy management strategies and storage devices on the techno-enviro-economic optimization of hybrid energy systems: A case study in Western Australia. J. Energy Storage 2022, 51, 104239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, B.; Raj, S.; Mahapatra, S.; Márquez, F.P.G. Optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources in microgrid systems based on electricity market pricing strategies by a novel hybrid optimization technique. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 134, 107419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ashari, M.; Nayar, C. An optimum dispatch strategy using set points for a photovoltaic (PV)–diesel–battery hybrid power system. Sol. Energy 1999, 66, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nosrat, A.; Pearce, J.M. Dispatch strategy and model for hybrid photovoltaic and trigeneration power systems. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 3270–3276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, G.; Zhang, R.; Jiang, T.; Chen, H.; Bai, L.; Cui, H.; Li, X. Optimal dispatch strategy for integrated energy systems with CCHP and wind power. Appl. Energy 2017, 192, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toopshekan, A.; Yousefi, H.; Astaraei, F.R. Technical, economic, and performance analysis of a hybrid energy system using a novel dispatch strategy. Energy 2020, 213, 118850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishraque, M.F.; Hussain, M.S.; Rana, M.S.; Roni, M.H.K.; Shezan, S.A. Design and Assessment of a Standalone Hybrid Mode Microgrid for the Rohingya Refugees Using Load Following Dispatch Strategy. In Proceedings of the 2021 6th International Conference on Development in Renewable Energy Technology (ICDRET), Dhaka, Bangladesh, 28–30 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Shezan, S.A.; Ishraque, M.F.; Muyeen, S.; Arifuzzaman, S.; Paul, L.C.; Das, S.K.; Sarker, S.K. Effective dispatch strategies assortment according to the effect of the operation for an islanded hybrid microgrid. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 14, 100192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aziz, A.S.; Tajuddin, M.F.N.; Zidane, T.E.K.; Su, C.L.; Alrubaie, A.J.K.; Alwazzan, M.J. Techno-economic and environmental evaluation of PV/diesel/battery hybrid energy system using improved dispatch strategy. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 6794–6814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uwineza, L.; Kim, H.G.; Kleissl, J.; Kim, C.K. Technical Control and Optimal Dispatch Strategy for a Hybrid Energy System. Energies 2022, 15, 2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energy Source | Power Generation in TWh Year | |
---|---|---|
2019–2020 | 2020–2021 | |
Hydro-Electric | 114 | 140 |
Bio Energy | 40 | 72 |
Solar Energy | 153 | 145 |
Wind Energy | 175 | 275 |
Optimization Techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages | Convergence Rate | Complexity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Genetic Algorithm [70,71,72] | Can take care of issues with different arrangements, effortlessly transferable to existing re-enactments and models. Solve issues with numerous arrangements; accessible in MATLAB tool kit. | The convergence rate is slower than other stochastic calculations; it cannot guarantee consistent advancement reaction times and so on. | Faster | Simple |
Particle Swarm Optimization [73,74] | The speed of the examination is quick; computation in PSO is straightforward in contrast with different techniques; it can be finished effortlessly. | It cannot work out the issues of the non-facilitated framework; effectively experiences the fractional good faith and so on. | Faster | Simple |
Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) [75,76] | Easy to understand; more focused on a single system | Difficult to investigate; complex; less writing accessible. | Slower | Relatively Complex |
Metaheuristic search method [77,78] | Upgrades the exhibition of nearby pursuit; quick calculation. | Complex process. | Slower | Relatively Complex |
Artificial Bee colony [79,80] | The calculation has a neighborhood look and worldwide hunt capacity; actualized with a few enhancement issues; simple to utilize; accessible for hybridization mix with different calculations | Irregular statement: the calculation has a few parameters. | Relatively faster | Complex |
Ant colony algorithm [81,82,83] | The calculation has the quality in both neighborhood and worldwide pursuits; executed with a few improvement issues. | Arbitrary installation: calculation has a few parameters; parameters should be tuned; probabilistic methodology in the neighborhood search. | Relatively faster | Complex |
Investigation | Sizing Restraint | Yield |
---|---|---|
Probabilistic [85,86,87] | Loss of Power Supply Probability (LPSP) | Probabilistic analysis with optimal sizes of solar PV and BESS, COE, and NPC calculation |
Techno-economic [88,89,90] | Total Cost/kWh, level of self-rule | The best and worst case in terms of LCOE, LNPC, and minimum CO2 emissions. |
Economic [91,92] | Net Present Value (NPV) | Lowest NPV and the best renewable energy combination for remote and decentralized areas. |
Techno-economic [93,94] | Total cost and load energy requirement | Proper load supply management with minimum cost and environment friendly. |
Probabilistic [95,96] | Vitality file of dependability | Calculation of probabilistically advanced IHMS for decentralized hospital and school. |
Economical [59] | Lack of life cycle cost, power supply probability | Optimal sizes of solar PV, wind, DG, and BESS; cost analysis of electricity production. |
Software Used for Optimization | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
HYBRID 2 [100] | The model’s specialized precision is exceedingly high | The model cannot advance the vitality framework |
PVSYST [101,102] | It permits assurance of PV size and battery limit | Confinement for sustainable vitality sources |
INSEL [103] | Adaptability in making a framework model and setup | Does not perform framework streamlining |
SOLSIM [103,104] | The measurement system used to determine life cycle costs | Not able to locate the ideal size of the hybrid framework |
WATSUN-PV [105,106] | The model for DC engines is a straightforward correlation between the voltage and current provided by the cluster and the engine’s torque and rakish speed | Engines and siphons are not included in the database |
PV-DESIGN PRO [107,108] | The database as of now incorporates most data required for the PV framework plan | The module and atmosphere of the database are extremely complete |
RAPSIM [109,110,111] | The control elements that determine the diesel generator’s on-off patterns | The effect of the battery SoC and DoD |
RETScreen [112,113,114] | Battery life cycle cost, energy timeline | Complex calculation and high simulation time |
PHOTO [115,116] | Different control systems can likewise be considered | High simulation time |
SOMES [117,118] | The model includes an enhancement method that searches for the framework with the lowest power consumption. | SOMES does not provide an optimum operative approach |
HOMER [119,120,121] | This instrument offers an amazing UI and exact measuring with a detailed examination of the framework | HOMER has a low level of specialized precision since its segmental scientific models are straight and do not include any amendment variables |
RAPSYS [103,122] | This product can re-enact a wide scope of sustainable framework segments that might be remembered for a half-and-half framework setup | Usually, this tool cannot optimize the size of the components |
Optimization Techniques | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Linear programming optimization (LPO) | Less complex mathematics and easy to understand | LPO does not include the back-energy storage at battery or DG |
Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) | Parallel factor issues are doable for an ideal arrangement. The model was valuable for policymakers in tropical nations to assess a natural savvy eco-town | The model is progressively sensible and essentially expands the trouble in order to comprehend it |
Non-linear programming (NLP) | A numerical methodology-based model empowers the arrangement of a mind-boggling issue with an incredible number of basic tasks | The numerical strategy required multiple cycle operation |
Mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) | MINLP can evaluate numerical and binary variable problems in both | Complex and more iterative |
Objective | Method | Main Contribution |
---|---|---|
A data logger and remote control of IHMS | By data logger and model predictive controller | Examination of the vitality creation and execution of IHMS is contemplated in detail |
Maximizing hybrid availability |
| Ampere hour gathering offers noteworthy pay over-voltage-based techniques for framework control for IHMS |
Microprocessor-based control of IHMS | Microprocessor-based, Motorola 6800, ‘C’ Programming | The life expectancy of the battery is expanded by controlling the condition of the charge of the battery |
Power control of an IHMS | By archetype system strategy | 1. The framework has a few task modes: ordinary activity, control dispatching, and control normal to facilitate the control of the battery vitality stockpiling framework 2. The BESS functions as a power cushion to smoothly transition away from fossil fuels without stopping and starting to recharge batteries. |
Control of microgrid and optimal sizing | RHAPSODY Software, Linear Programming | 1. This investigation enables the client to consider the association between financial, activity, and ecological factors. 2. It offers a valuable apparatus for the plan and investigation of IHMS. |
Petri-nets control design of IHMS | Petri-nets controller | A supervisory control technique streamlines the vitality exchange as indicated by the source control variety and the heap attributes |
Dynamic control of IHMS | Particle swarm optimization (PSO) | A numerical model is produced and another PSO calculation because of the uniform outline and idleness change is utilized to illuminate the scientific model that is used to control the activity of PV-wind IHMS |
Design and control of smart IHMS | Genetic Algorithm (GA) and direct design control | Using modified GA, a useful tool for selecting the section of the energy framework is developed with two important selection criteria (price and number) |
Digital signal controlling of Wind-PV IHMS | MATLAB/embedded emulator | This IHMS can withstand sudden fluctuations under typical circumstances and muffles the effect of variation on the voltage under the acceptable range |
Authors | Hybrid System | Control Techniques |
---|---|---|
Sara Ghaem et al. [147,148] | PV-Wind-Engine-Battery | TRANSYS and Dispatch strategy control algorithm |
Nicu Bizon et al. [149] | PV-Wind-Fuel Cell | LF Strategy and MEPT loops with Matlab Simulink |
L. Suganthi et al. [150] | PV-Wind-Biomass-Engine-Battery | Fuzzy Logic controller with MATLAB |
Narsa Reddy et al. [151] | PV-Wind-Battery | DC link voltage regulation control |
Dan Wu et al. [152] | PV-Wind-Battery | Smooth switching droop control |
Communication-Based Control | Prospective Advantages | Prospective Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Concentrated control |
|
|
Master/Slave control |
|
|
Distributed control |
|
|
Droop Strategy-Based Control | Benefits | Shortcomings |
---|---|---|
Conventional frequent droop control | Expandability, modularity, and flexibility are high | Voltage and frequency regulation is very poor |
VPD/FQB droop control | The implementation is easy without communication | Can be affected by the physical parameters |
Complex line impedance | Active and reactive controls can be decoupled | Line impedances and X/R ratio are required to be known earlier |
Angle droop control | Frequency regulation is constant | Poor performance in power-sharing |
Simulated output impedance control | Improved and upgraded performance in power-sharing and system stability | Requires higher bandwidth for a controller |
Adaptive voltage droop control | Improved voltage regulation | The physical parameters need to be known earlier |
Q-V dot control technique | Robust communication delay | Depends on the initial conditions |
Common variable-based control technique | Accurate reactive power-sharing | Due to the large distance it is hard to measure the common voltage |
Droop control with the constant power band | Avoid voltage limit violation | Micro-source requires despatched abilities |
Signal injection method | Can handle nonlinear and linear loads | Causes harmonic distortion of the voltage |
Reference | Year | Contribution | Research Gap |
---|---|---|---|
C.D. Barley, C.B. Winn in [158] | 1996 | Proposed an idealized predictive dispatch strategy and compared dispatch strategies according to costs in, a quasi-state time series model. | A diesel generator has been used but no environmental impact (such as emissions) was considered. |
M. Ashari, C. V. Nayar in [168] | 1999 | Using ‘set points’, optimum dispatch strategies have been proposed for a hybrid PV- diesel generator-battery system. A program has been developed for the control of the generator operation for overall cost minimization. | The system had low efficiency and the inverter used had a larger size. No environmental impact was considered in the study. |
A. Nosrat, J.M. Pearce in [169] | 2011 | A new simulation method and dispatch strategy applicable for PV-combined cooling, heating, and a power system based (CCHP) hybrid system. The dispatch strategy has been named the PV-CCHP dispatch strategy. For developing the dispatch methodology, MATLAB coding platform has been utilized. Thus, a new simulation algorithm and dispatch strategy for modeling hybrid PC-CCHP systems is developed. A comparison with HOMER-provided results to the proposed technique is also presented, showing a negligible difference between them. | The implementation of the proposed system should cover more geographic locations considering various variable load profiles to validate its significance. Although a comparison with HOMER is shown, other established optimization techniques and various dispatch strategies should have been compared with the proposed work. |
G. Li et al. in [170] | 2017 | An optimal dispatch strategy has been proposed for integrated hybrid energy systems utilizing wind power and CCHP. In this case, the optimization model has been designed to minimize the total operation cost. In addition, in this research work, the natural gas network and CCHP are mathematically modeled. According to case studies, the suggested approach may successfully cut costs in the PJM 5-bus power system with seven node gas system and the IEEE 118-bus power system with a Belgian natural gas network. | To validate the proposed strategy’s performance, a comparison between the proposed method and other established methods could have been studied. |
Toopshekan et al. in [171] | 2020 | A PV/wind/diesel/battery-based on-grid microgrid performance has been evaluated by using MATLAB coding for load following and cycle charging dispatch strategies. The proposed strategy also performs better than HOMER’s pre-defined Load-following and Cycle Charging strategies. In addition, sensitivity analysis is presented in the study considering various sensitive parameters. | Off-grid or islanded mode operation of the proposed microgrid with the proposed dispatch control could have been studied. In addition, other dispatch strategies, such as HOMER predictive strategy, Combined Dispatch strategy, and Generator Order dispatch strategy, could have been taken into consideration. |
Ishraque et al. in [154] | 2021 | An integrated hybrid microgrid system was proposed, considering five default dispatch strategies offered by HOMER. Load Following, Cycle Charging, Combined Dispatch, HOMER predictive dispatch, and Generator Order dispatch strategies have been taken into consideration. The best and worst strategies for a certain location (considered for four divisional areas in Bangladesh) have been determined by comparing the dispatch strategies’ performances. | The consideration of a multiyear analysis or sensitivity analysis would enrich the study. The study could be taken to a further level if grid-connected microgrids had been considered. |
Fatin et al. in [98] | 2021 | A techno-economic and power system response (voltage, frequency) based assessment of the designed microgrid (off-grid) on top of dispatch strategy-based control has been discussed. HOMER has been utilized for designing the microgrid and MATLAB/Simulink has been utilized for the power system response assessment. The best and the worst strategies for the proposed test sites have been found in the study according to their performances, showing a relative comparison between the strategies as well as with the work of other researchers. | Only HOMER optimizer has been utilized in the work. Although the HOMER optimizer is a well-accepted optimizer, a comparison with other techniques such as PSO or some other intelligent approaches such as ANN, etc., would enrich the contribution of this study. |
Ishraque et al. [172] | 2021 | A load following dispatch strategy-based upgradation of a previous microgrid design by different researchers utilizing HOMER optimizer for the same location has been shown. A significant amount of reduction is obtained in terms of different costs and harmful gas emissions than in the previous study. | Sensitivity analysis, multiyear analysis, grid performance, etc., were not considered in the study. In addition, the integration of biomass-based energy production would greatly impact the research domain. |
Shezan et al. in [173] | 2022 | The optimized design and performance evaluation based on optimal sizing, system costing, and power system performances and a reliability study of a free-standing microgrid using four dispatch controls is presented in the study. As the simulation platform, HOMER Pro and DIgSILENT PowerFactory, were used. Three-phase short circuit fault has been implemented and analyzed according to different dispatch strategies. | Grid-connected mode analysis has been skipped in the research work. In addition, the impact of sensitive parameters has not been evaluated. A demonstration of the proposed design on basis of multiyear performances would be appreciated. |
Aziz et al. in [174] | 2022 | An improved and new dispatch strategy has been proposed by using MATLAB and HOMER, which offers a 12-h foresight on the load demand and solar irradiation (improved cycle charging strategy). In addition, a comparison of the newly proposed algorithm and default Cycle Charging strategy is shown to demonstrate a better performance of the new strategy. The proposed algorithm offers better battery management (charging/discharging cycle) as the future irradiation profile is already predicted. | An off-grid Diesel-PV-Battery hybrid system has been investigated in this study. A grid-connected microgrid could also have been taken into consideration. The upgrade to other default dispatch strategies such as load following or generator order strategies available in HOMER could be a new research topic. |
Laetitia et al. in [175] | 2022 | A new dispatch strategy utilizing a Matlab control link file compatible with HOMER Pro offers better performance than Cycle Charging and Load Following strategies, which are two default strategies available in HOMER. Fuel cells have been considered to offer maximum usage compared to any other components in the proposed microgrid. | A PV/battery/fuel cell hybrid system was considered. A system considering more renewable sources could have been integrated to overcome the intermittency issue of renewable sources. A grid-connected microgrid could also have been analyzed considering the other default dispatch methodologies. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shezan, S.A.; Kamwa, I.; Ishraque, M.F.; Muyeen, S.M.; Hasan, K.N.; Saidur, R.; Rizvi, S.M.; Shafiullah, M.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A. Evaluation of Different Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Hybrid Microgrid: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041792
Shezan SA, Kamwa I, Ishraque MF, Muyeen SM, Hasan KN, Saidur R, Rizvi SM, Shafiullah M, Al-Sulaiman FA. Evaluation of Different Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Hybrid Microgrid: A Review. Energies. 2023; 16(4):1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041792
Chicago/Turabian StyleShezan, Sk. A., Innocent Kamwa, Md. Fatin Ishraque, S. M. Muyeen, Kazi Nazmul Hasan, R. Saidur, Syed Muhammad Rizvi, Md Shafiullah, and Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman. 2023. "Evaluation of Different Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Hybrid Microgrid: A Review" Energies 16, no. 4: 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041792
APA StyleShezan, S. A., Kamwa, I., Ishraque, M. F., Muyeen, S. M., Hasan, K. N., Saidur, R., Rizvi, S. M., Shafiullah, M., & Al-Sulaiman, F. A. (2023). Evaluation of Different Optimization Techniques and Control Strategies of Hybrid Microgrid: A Review. Energies, 16(4), 1792. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16041792