Next Article in Journal
Hydrogen Revolution in Europe: Bibliometric Review of Industrial Hydrogen Applications for a Sustainable Future
Previous Article in Journal
Ownership, Patterns of Use and Electricity Consumption of Domestic Appliances in Urban Households of the West African Monetary and Economic Union: A Case Study of Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grid Quality Services from Smart Boilers: Experimental Verification on Realistic Scenarios for Micro-Grids with Demand-Side Management Oriented to Self-Consumption
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 17
Issue 15
10.3390/en17153657
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Survey of Optimization Techniques for Microgrids Using High-Efficiency Converters

by
Diego Peña
1,
Paul Arevalo
1,2,*,
Yadyra Ortiz
1 and
Franciso Jurado
1
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Jaen, 23700 Jaen, Spain
2
Faculty of Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Telecommunications (DEET), University of Cuenca, Balzay Campus, 010107 Cuenca, Azuay, Ecuador
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(15), 3657; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153657
Submission received: 30 June 2024 / Revised: 23 July 2024 / Accepted: 23 July 2024 / Published: 25 July 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of High-Efficiency Converters)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Microgrids play a crucial role in modern energy systems by integrating diverse energy sources and enhancing grid resilience. This study addresses the optimization of microgrids through the deployment of high-efficiency converters, aiming to improve energy management and operational efficiency. This study explores the pivotal role of AC-DC and DC-DC bidirectional converters in facilitating energy conversion and management across various sources and storage systems within microgrids. Advanced control methodologies, including model-based predictive control and artificial intelligence, are analyzed for their ability to dynamically adapt to fluctuations in power generation and demand, thereby enhancing microgrid performance. The findings highlight that implementing high-efficiency converters not only enhances power stability and quality but also reduces operational costs and carbon emissions, thereby reinforcing microgrids as a sustainable and effective solution for contemporary energy management challenges. This research contributes to advancing the understanding and implementation of efficient energy systems in microgrids, promoting their widespread adoption in diverse applications.

1. Introduction

The integration of microgrids (MGs, see Table A1 in Appendix A) represents a pivotal advancement in modern energy systems, driven by the imperative to enhance energy efficiency, reliability, and sustainability [1,2]. While MGs have made significant strides in integrating renewable energy sources (RES) and improving grid resilience, there remains a critical gap in understanding the optimal utilization of high-efficiency converters within these systems. These converters play a crucial role in facilitating energy conversion and management across various sources such as batteries, supercapacitors, and fuel cells, yet their full potential in enhancing MG performance remains underexplored. Addressing this gap is essential as MGs continue to evolve in complexity and scale. Optimizing the deployment and operation of high-efficiency converters could significantly enhance voltage stability, frequency control, and overall grid performance, thereby maximizing energy utilization and minimizing environmental impact. By leveraging advanced converter technologies, MGs can not only bolster their resilience against fluctuating RES output but also contribute substantially to global efforts towards sustainable energy solutions. In light of these considerations, this study aims to explore the role and impact of high-efficiency converters in microgrid applications, shedding light on their potential benefits and addressing current research gaps. This research seeks to provide insights that will inform future advancements in MG technology, ultimately contributing to the broader goal of achieving efficient and sustainable energy systems.
Over time, the incorporation of advanced electronic components and smart meters has facilitated the evolution towards MGs [3]. These grids optimize system monitoring and regulation through advanced communication and automation technologies, necessary to manage the intermittency of RES. Figure 1 shows an energy system that combines renewable and non-RES with storage systems, representing an advanced MG transitioning to a sustainable system. Bidirectional AC-DC and DC-DC converters are essential for energy conversion and management between the different sources and storage systems, such as batteries, supercapacitors and fuel cells. In addition, advanced communication and automation technology is critical for monitoring and regulating the system, ensuring the stability and efficiency needed in an MG [4]. High-efficiency converters are essential in MGs, as they enable optimal energy conversion and management. They serve as electronic interfaces that enable the seamless integration of renewable and non-renewable RES. These converters are essential for tasks such as load sharing, voltage and frequency stabilization, and optimizing power flow [5]. Recent research has shown that advanced converters significantly improve voltage stability and frequency control, thus optimizing performance and reliability of MGs [6]. Among the innovations in converter technology, the modular multilevel converter stands out for its efficiency and modularity, making it ideal for applications in high-voltage transmission systems and hybrid MGs. The reduction in the number of circuit breakers reduces switching losses and improves operational efficiency [7]. In addition, the modular multilevel converter offers low harmonic distortion and improved power quality, presenting crucial benefits for MGs [6,8].
Predictive control has emerged as a promising technique for optimizing converter performance. This approach improves stability and efficiency in MGs and RES, outperforming traditional methods such as proportional-integral (PI) control and sliding-mode control (SMC) [9,10]. In DC-MGs, advanced predictive control strategies, such as long-horizon direct power predictive control, have been shown to reduce computational burden and improve feasibility in real-time applications [11,12]. The integration of smart converters not only facilitates the incorporation of RES, but also the active demand management and energy distribution [13]. These converters are essential for improving the efficiency and reliability of MGs, using advanced control algorithms to mitigate disturbances and ensure grid resiliency [14,15]. Accurate simulation models optimize operating parameters and evaluate the impact of converter characteristics on MG performance [16]. However, the integration of RES into the grid faces significant challenges that require appropriate regulatory frameworks for the effective adoption of advanced converters. The asynchronous connection of sources such as wind and photovoltaics presents challenges in providing essential power system services, which requires clear requirements for secure integration [17,18]. Furthermore, the commercialization of these technologies faces regulatory barriers that limit their diffusion [19]. To overcome these challenges, it is essential to establish regulatory frameworks that support the adoption of advanced converters, ensuring the efficient and safe operation of RES [20].
Real-time management of energy demand, as highlighted in several studies, underscores the importance of interlinking converters in optimizing RES and decreasing dependence on non-RES [21]. These converters improve power management and quality in hybrid AC/DC-MGs, allowing for more efficient and reliable integration of RES. In the field of energy storage systems (ESS), enhancing efficiency through advanced converters is critical and has proven effective in integrating and managing supercapacitors, significantly improving system efficiency [22]. Bidirectional DC-DC converters in hybrid battery–supercapacitor systems optimize energy management and respond quickly to fluctuating demands, essential for electric vehicles (EVs) and grids with high RES penetration [23,24,25]. Furthermore, future directions and challenges in the development of high-efficiency converters include improving bidirectional converter topologies and control strategies, addressing efficiency loss at light loads, and managing electromagnetic interference. The implementation of soft switching techniques, which aim to reduce losses and improve overall system efficiency, continues to be an active area of research [26].
This paper reviews in detail studies on high-efficiency converters, advanced control techniques and optimization methods applicable to MGs. It identifies the most efficient converters and the most promising control methods that improve the stability, efficiency and performance of these systems. By analyzing technological advances, this study provides a comprehensive view that guides future research and development. The relevance of this work lies in its ability to serve as a key reference in the energy field, providing a solid basis for evaluating and improving converters and control systems. This analysis is vital to further develop more efficient and sustainable energy systems, and to foster innovation in the design and implementation of converters and control techniques.
The key contributions of this study are detailed below:
  • This paper compiles and analyzes the most recent and relevant studies on high-efficiency converters and advanced control techniques applicable to MGs. This analysis includes a critical evaluation of the existing literature, identifying trends and gaps in current knowledge.
  • Presents and highlights converters that have demonstrated superior performance in terms of efficiency and stability. Includes a detailed comparison of different technologies and techniques, highlighting those with the greatest potential to improve MG performance.
  • Advanced control techniques, such as model based predictive control and artificial intelligence, are highlighted. These technologies allow control systems to dynamically adapt to variations in energy generation and demand, improving the resilience and efficiency of MGs.
  • It provides a comprehensive overview that guides the development of new research and applications in the energy field. Based on the findings of the review, specific recommendations are offered.
This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 reviews the development and advancements of high-efficiency converters in MGs, Section 3 discusses their impact on MGs, Section 4 explores the optimization of energy resources through advanced control techniques, Section 5 outlines the current challenges and future directions in this field, and finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions of the paper.

2. Development and Advances in High-Efficiency Converters for MG

The development of high-efficiency converters has been crucial for improving power conversion and management in MGs, reducing switching losses and increasing operational efficiency. The evolution of these converters has been driven by the increasing integration of distributed energy resources (DER) and the need to improve grid stability and efficiency. Initially, grid-following inverters were prevalent, but presented challenges, such as low grid inertia and the need for local voltage support, which led to the development of interconnection standards as mentioned in study [27]. Advanced converter innovation has been driven by the growth of sustainable energy sources, especially photovoltaic systems. A prominent example is the three-level converter with neutral-point locking, which improves efficiency and voltage gain [14,28]. To address stability issues due to the high penetration of power-electronics-based DERs, grid-forming control strategies have been introduced, which enable converters to provide voltage and frequency support [29]. The AC versus DC-MG debate has led to the development of versatile interconnect converters, capable of converting between DC and AC sources [30]. In addition to these advances, improved control methods for grid-connected converters have been proposed. For example, the combined control method improves the resilience of MGs and their performance [31]. Also, the adoption of digital proportional resonant current controllers based on infinite impulse response filters, together with advanced techniques such as adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), has optimized the inverter output and power quality in hybrid DC/AC-MGs [32].
According to the literature, the types of control detailed in Table 1, represent some of the most commonly used approaches in MG management. These approaches are crucial to ensure stability, efficiency and proper regulation. By adopting these techniques, MGs achieve superior adaptability to variations in demand and operating conditions, maintaining their performance in energy environments that demand high automation and dynamism.
These control methods, crucial to the operational efficiency of MGs, are significantly complemented by developments in power conversion technology. For example, high-gain DC-DC converters, such as the high-gain single-switch converter (HG-SIQBC), are crucial for improving voltage and efficiently integrating distributed power resources in the grid [41,42]. In addition, hybrid integration of switched capacitors and boost converters offers high voltage conversion ratios with minimum device voltage, reaching efficiencies of up to 96.1%, suitable for high power applications [43]. High-power multifunction converters facilitate power transfer between AC and DC grids, harmonizing their operation in MGs [44]. A specific example of these advances includes high-frequency isolated transformer integrated circuits, which are used in interconnecting converters to connect a three-phase AC grid to a DC-MG, improving efficiency by 3% compared to conventional circuits [45]. DC-DC converters are essential for the interconnection of photovoltaic systems and MGs, reaching efficiencies of up to 97% in the case of isolated converters [46]. Partial power processing based converters, which are modular and scalable, show maximum efficiencies of 99.36% and are particularly beneficial for all-electric marine applications [47].
The implementation of technologies such as highly efficient and reliable inverter concepts, which achieve a five-level output voltage with high efficiency and reduced leakage currents, significantly improves the power conversion efficiency in distributed generation systems [48]. In addition, the flying capacitor dual output converter in hybrid MGs allows interconnecting AC sources and loads at different amplitudes and frequencies, reducing power conversion stages and control loops [49,50]. The scientific literature provides a wide variety of high-efficiency converters, each with specific applications and benefits. For example, the Buck-Boost converter is widely used in MG applications due to its ability to operate under variable voltage conditions. This type of converter not only helps stabilize the grid, but also reduces gas emissions and improves energy efficiency in hybrid energy storage systems (HESS). The converter’s features include bi-directional power flow management in HESS configurations, improving system stabilization and power quality in grid-connected environments [51]. The REDPRIME 40 kW vehicle-to-grid inverter is essential in advanced control systems. This inverter enables bi-directional energy transfer, optimizing the use of energy resources and improving grid stability. This is essential for optimal control systems that seek to reduce energy shortages. Its application is focused on MG control systems with vehicle-to-grid technology and optimization using advanced algorithms such as Support Vector Machine, Artificial Neural Network, Genetic Algorithm and Wavelet Transform [52].
The double active bridge (DAB) converter is another example of high efficiency, used primarily in DC-MG applications. This converter is crucial for voltage regulation and energy management in ESS, providing design and control guidelines that minimize harmonics and improve system stability. It is commonly used in solar photovoltaic systems interfacing with battery banks [53]. Dual active bridges with DC-DC converter are used in EV-MGs and solid-state power transmission systems. They regulate the output voltage and prevent component saturation to ensure continuous and efficient operation. These converters maintain stability in the DC-MG by regulating the output voltage and keeping the average current at zero [35]. The bidirectional DC-DC converter plays a crucial role in energy management in stand-alone MGs, enabling the efficient integration of RES and improving system resilience to load variations. This type of converter enables energy exchange between the battery and the supercapacitor, improving operational independence and maximizing the capabilities of energy storage devices [54]. High gain DC-DC converters are suitable for stand-alone photovoltaic (PV) system applications. These converters offer high voltage gain, which is beneficial for integration into distributed power generation systems. They improve conversion efficiency and power management in PV-MGs, with typical applications in stand-alone PV systems and DC applications [55].
The use of identification modules in converters improves the reliability of hybrid MGs, enabling the identification of faults and the implementation of effective protection schemes. This is essential for maintaining operational continuity and energy efficiency in hybrid MG systems. The faulty converter identification module helps to analyze and troubleshoot problems in the MG system [37]. Voltage controllers for DC-MGs are essential for the operation and stability of these systems. These controllers allow maintaining voltage and current balance, avoiding component saturation and ensuring stable and efficient operation. Intelligent switching modules control, for example, improves the DC voltage balancing performance compared to conventional PI control [36]. On the other hand, active power filters handle reactive power without the need for a primary energy source. CUK, SEPIC and ZETA converters are used for power factor correction and discontinuous conduction, offering significant advantages in terms of efficiency and voltage regulation. These converters are essential for the stable and efficient operation of MGs with multiple power sources and are applied in RES such as solar PV, hydro and wind [56]. Three-port converters (TPCs) enable flexible power flow regulation in distributed PV power systems. These converters facilitate the integration of multiple power sources and improve conversion efficiency, which is crucial for the efficient operation of distributed PV-MGs. TPCs offer flexible power flow regulation between PV power, battery, and load/grid [57]. In distributed generation systems using grid-connected micro inverters, single-stage multimode converters are crucial. These converters significantly improve energy efficiency and reduce operating costs, facilitating more effective integration of RES into the power grid. Their design requires fewer components, allowing for a more compact size and higher efficiency [58]. According to the research [59], the partial power converter is used in battery energy storage applications in MGs. This converter regulates current to zero series voltage, which is essential for efficient and safe operation of ESS in MGs. This type of converter can achieve efficiencies up to 99.45% in experimental results. Figure 2 illustrates the efficiency of various types of converters, highlighting those with high efficiency performance, such as partial power converters.
On the other hand, the forward converter is used to integrate RES with ESS, enabling efficient and stable energy conversion. This type of converter is compact, cost-effective and high-powered, making it ideal for fast EV charging. It uses a high-frequency transformer for efficient energy transfer [60]. Bipolar converters are used in DC-MGs with automatic voltage balancing systems. These converters ensure high efficiency and operational stability, crucial for the integration of multiple power sources. They use full-range zero-voltage switching and automatic voltage balancing [61]. Three-port bi-directional converters are also essential for the integration of DER in MGs. They enable the efficient transfer of power between different ports, improving the flexibility and operational efficiency of MGs. These converters are particularly useful in DC-MGs with DER [62]. The hybrid converter with voltage gain is used in telecommunications, solar power and energy storage applications. This converter offers high efficiency and the ability to integrate multiple power sources, improving the operation and stability of hybrid MGs. It combines non-isolated converters for improved voltage gain and multiple outputs [63].
DC converters facilitate the integration of ESS and improve the operating efficiency of MGs. These converters ensure high efficiency and stability, which is crucial for the continuous and efficient operation of MGs with multiple power sources. Boost-buck, buck-boost and buck-boost (Vout) converters are common in these systems [64]. Multi-port converters then integrate several power sources and enable the efficient transfer of power between them. These converters are essential for residential applications and EV charging stations, improving the efficiency and operational flexibility of MGs. The authors in [65,66] analyze the control methods and topologies of DC-DC converter control in MGs. Below, Figure 3 shows a summary of the various application areas in which high-efficiency converters are used.

3. Impact on MG Performance

The use of high-efficiency converters is vital to optimize the operation of these systems. These devices not only facilitate the integration of RES, but also improve voltage and frequency stability in MGs. The study conducted in [67] shows how advanced converters can improve control efficiency and integration into larger power systems. Similarly in [68] the authors analyze the application of advanced metering technologies and their impact on the efficiency and stability of MGs. In addition, bidirectional converters have proven to be particularly effective in managing energy storage and distribution of RES, and an improved design of these converters for MG applications, highlighting their ability to handle bidirectional power flows efficiently. This technology is essential for the integration of RES, such as solar and wind, which require flexible management of energy generation and storage [69]. The impact of advanced converters on system stability has also been the subject of study highlighting how these devices can significantly improve power quality in hybrid AC/DC-MGs, providing greater stability and reliability in system operation. These advances in converter technology not only improve energy efficiency, but also contribute to the sustainability and resilience of modern MGs [70,71].

3.1. Case Studies

The integration of advanced converters in MGs is crucial for improving RES utilization and overall system efficiency. Research papers highlight several innovative converter designs for this purpose, such as high-gain DC-DC converters for photovoltaic systems, highlighting their high efficiency of about 97.9% and their significant voltage gain of 42%, crucial for MG applications [72], high-voltage gain converters with the ability to eliminate current ripple [73] and non-isolated multiport converters for RES applications [74]. These converters play an important role in urban and rural MG environments, where RES such as photovoltaic systems and wind energy conversion systems are prevalent, as discussed in [75,76]. By employing advanced control algorithms such as fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks, these converters ensure stable DC-bus voltages, efficient power transfer, and optimal power management within MG systems, demonstrating the successful integration of RES with high-efficiency converters in various operational scenarios. In the study conducted in [68], advanced measurement and control technologies in MGs were investigated. The authors found that these technologies allow for greater accuracy in the operation of MGs, which improves both energy efficiency and system stability. This approach is particularly effective in urban environments where energy demand is high and fluctuations can be significant.
In study [70], power quality control in hybrid AC/DC-MGs was explored. Their study demonstrated that advanced converters can significantly improve power quality and system stability by addressing technical challenges such as voltage and frequency fluctuation. The methods used included literature reviews and experimental studies that provide a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities and limitations of these converters. Also in [69], investigated the design and implementation of bidirectional converters in MG applications. These converters are essential for the efficient management of RES storage and distribution. The results showed that bidirectional converters not only optimize the use of stored energy, but also facilitate the integration of RES into the grid, improving the resilience and sustainability of the system. Studies such as those presented in [5], offer a detailed review of converter control in MGs, highlighting advanced control techniques that improve system stability in various contexts. This study highlights the importance of tailoring converter technologies to the specific needs of each environment to maximize the benefits in terms of efficiency and stability. In study [77], a functional analysis of the MG concept applied to specific case studies was performed. This work focused on the practical implementation and evaluation of MGs in real environments, providing concrete examples of how MGs can improve energy efficiency and system stability in different geographic and socioeconomic contexts [78]. The use of smart inverters in MGs was analyzed in [79], demonstrating how these devices can reduce losses and improve system reliability. The study highlighted that smart inverters are crucial to maximize the efficiency of MGs by enabling more flexible and effective management of RES. The study on advanced control technologies for bidirectional converters in MGs, as discussed in [71], demonstrates that implementing these converters enhances the integration of RES by delivering improved stability and efficiency in energy management.
This approach is especially beneficial in MGs that rely on variable energy sources, such as solar and wind. In study [80], a review of distributed energy systems and MGs is conducted, identifying emerging trends and highlighting the importance of constant technology upgrades to maintain system efficiency and reliability. In addition, in [81] MG architectures were explored, describing topologies and system design that allow for greater flexibility and efficiency in energy management.
The implementation of cooperative control techniques for hybrid AC/DC converters in microgrids has proven to be an effective strategy for managing power flow and voltage regulation. These techniques, detailed in [82], where the authors use a hierarchical control system where primary and secondary controllers collaborate to maximize system performance. This methodology allows efficient integration of AC and DC sources, improving both system stability and cooperation. The effectiveness of these advanced strategies is not limited to theoretical studies but has also been validated in practical cases. A prominent example is the system implemented at the Florida Solar Energy Center (FSEC). This system, developed in collaboration with the University of Central Florida (UCF) and A.F. Mensah Inc. includes a 540 kVA three-phase two-way inverter and an energy storage system (BESS) with 1863.68 kWh lithium-ion batteries. Thanks to advanced control and integration strategies, the system was able to significantly reduce energy consumption and improve energy management. In addition, a total harmonic distortion (THD) level of only 0.07 was achieved when sending 200 kW of power to the grid [83].
In MG applications, the use of bidirectional DC-DC converters controlled by maximum power point tracking (MPPT) techniques has been shown to improve power quality and reliability, as demonstrated by Panda and Ghosh, who proposed a model predictive control (MPC) strategy to improve the performance of MG systems [83]. Moreover, the implementation of optimal power routing (OPR) schemes in hybrid AC-DC-MGs has minimized power imbalance, active power losses, and voltage deviations, as shown in the study where OPR was successfully applied in IEEE 13-bus and 34-bus test systems [84]. The use of modern optimization algorithms, such as Manta Ray Foraging Optimization (MRFO) and Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA), has further improved the performance of hybrid converters by minimizing the input current ripple and improving the power distribution, as demonstrated in [85].
In the context of MGs, the integration of RES and ESS has been optimized to achieve higher coverage factors and reduce losses. For example, a study on the power supply of an astronomical center in Chile explored the feasibility of combining solar and wind resources with a pumped hydroelectric ESS, achieving a 90% coverage factor with reduced losses [86]. In addition, optimization of bidirectional high voltage flyback DC-DC converters for capacitive actuators using an automatic winding design (AWL) technique has resulted in significant improvements in energy efficiency, as they show in study [87]. The application of the FMINCON optimization method in industrial power systems has also demonstrated the potential for minimizing generation costs and transmission losses, even when incorporating expensive RES such as wind generation [88]. In addition, the use of smart batteries and power converters at telecommunication sites has been shown to improve grid quality by compensating for harmonic and reactive currents [89]. The development of smart energy systems in urban areas, such as the district of Reininghaus in Austria, has optimized the use of local and external energy resources, resulting in financially viable and ecologically sustainable energy solutions [90]. The summary of some application cases of advanced converters in microgrids is presented below in Table 2.

3.2. Improvements in Stability and Control

The integration of advanced control methods for voltage and frequency regulation in MGs has significantly improved system stability. These methods, which include sensorless combined control, virtual synchronous machine control, and dispatchable virtual oscillator control, address various challenges, such as unbalanced grid conditions, abrupt load changes, and short-circuit faults [91,92]. Modern feedback control methods for DC/DC converters, such as the disturbance and uncertainty estimation and attenuation framework, have shown promise in improving robustness against disturbances [93]. In addition, the stability of power-electronics-based converters, which can replace synchronous generation, has been studied using alternative configurations and linearized state space models to provide deeper insights into the network tracking control behavior in weak networks [93]. The concept of fast interacting converter driven stability was introduced to address the interactions between fast control loops and passive network elements, further improving the stability in various MG topologies [94]. Research has also highlighted the importance of taking into account the feedback between AC and DC states in network-forming converters to avoid problems such as DC-side voltage collapse during large load disturbances [92].
The implementation of high-efficiency converters has significantly improved energy efficiency and system reliability in several applications. For example, a 3 kW partial power converter prototype demonstrated a maximum efficiency of 99.36%, demonstrating its potential in all-electric marine applications [47]. Similarly, a high-speed switch-mode Z-source DC-DC converter achieved high-voltage gain and efficiency, making it suitable for grid-connected inverters [95]. In ESS, three-phase two-way DC-AC converters reduced power losses and system volume, and a 10 kW prototype validated its high efficiency and reliability [96]. The use of wide bandgap devices in power converters has also been instrumental, with a SiC-based soft-switching converter achieving a maximum efficiency of 97.3% [69]. The six-phase interleaved boost converter demonstrated an efficiency of 93.82% and 95.74% at input voltages of 20 V and 200 V, respectively, highlighting its superior performance over the existing models [97]. The integration of advanced control algorithms, such as direct nominal voltage compensation control, further improved the grid power quality and system reliability [98]. In addition, a novel arrangement of buffer circuits in a three-level converter minimized the effects of output capacitance, achieving an estimated efficiency of 99.3% [69]. Comparative analysis of multilevel OBD converters for solar applications revealed that the 2L-DAB converter, which required less chip area, achieved higher full-load efficiency compared to the machine learning (ML)-DAB. In study [72], a high power factor single-stage AC/DC single-stage converter integrating a Buck-Boost and Flyback converter achieved high power factor and efficiency with a smaller number of components. Finally, a multiport power electronic converter for hybrid renewable power generation demonstrated a system efficiency of 96.2%, with significant reductions in static level error and total harmonic distortion [69,72,75,94,95,96].

3.3. Energy Efficiency and System Stability

Energy efficiency and system stability in MGs are critical areas of focus due to the increasing integration of RES and power electronic devices. The stability of MGs is compromised by the interactions between fast control loops and passive grid elements, which gave rise to the concept of fast interacting converter-based stability [94]. The high penetration of RES and power electronic converters requires modeling and validation at the system level, where clustering methods and real-time simulations can be employed to ensure stability [98]. Stability limits in inverter-based MGs can be determined using generalized eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix, which depend on the R/X ratio of the grid rather than the grid topology, allowing optimization of tilt gains to maximize stability regions [99]. Voltage and frequency deviations in isolated MGs require robust control schemes, where dynamic decouplers can significantly widen the operating window under variable frequency conditions, ensuring stability [100]. Stability issues arising from converters are due to several root causes, such as converter controls and grid robustness, so understanding these mechanisms is necessary to address the future challenges of power electronics-based grids [101]. High-order filters, essential for attenuating current harmonics in grid-connected inverters, can introduce resonances that complicate stability analyses, but the theory of sampled data control can achieve rigorous input-output stability and robust performance through sampled data control theory [102]. Critical inverter groups, identified through the weighted network admittance matrix spectrum, play an important role in system stability, as the eigenvalues indicate proximity to stability limits and guide necessary adjustments in inverter configuration [103]. Virtual synchronous generators, such as synchronverters, mimic traditional synchronous generators to maintain stability in MGs with high RES penetration, with stability mechanisms characterized by internal voltage dynamics and enhanced by auxiliary correction control loops [104]. Figure 4 illustrates how different types of advanced converters contribute to improved efficiency and stability in microgrid systems.

4. Optimization of Energy Resources

The most advanced methods for optimization include economic dispatch, stochastic programming and predictive control techniques, which allow efficient management of power generation and consumption, minimizing costs and maximizing system stability [105]. High-efficiency converters, such as bidirectional power converters, are essential in the integration of RES and in the stability of MGs. These devices improve power quality and enable precise coordination of energy resources by managing power flows in a bidirectional manner, which is crucial for the operability of MGs [106]. In addition, advanced control algorithms and techniques, such as model-based predictive control (MPC) and decentralized control, are essential for energy optimization in distributed systems. These algorithms make it possible to predict and adapt to variations in energy generation and demand, improving efficiency and reducing losses [107]. User-side demand management within a MG optimizes electricity consumption, improving efficiency, reducing costs and improving the performance of the grid [108,109]. It can therefore be said that, the integration of advanced control techniques and high-efficiency converters is essential for the optimization of energy resources in MGs, thus achieving a more sustainable and efficient electricity system.
The implementation of high-efficiency converters plays a key role in improving the overall energy efficiency of systems, particularly in MGs. These advanced converters, such as partial power processing-based converters and wide bandgap semiconductor devices, significantly optimize energy resources, resulting in significant economic and environmental benefits. For example, partial power processing-based converters, which are modular and scalable, have demonstrated peak efficiencies of up to 99.36% in offshore applications, demonstrating their potential to drastically reduce energy losses and improve system reliability [47]. The economic benefits of these high-efficiency converters are manifold. By reducing energy losses, they lower operating costs and increase the return on investment of energy systems. For example, in the iron and steel industry, incorporating productivity benefits into the economic evaluation of energy efficiency improvements can double the cost-effective potential of such investments, highlighting the significant economic advantages of adopting advanced energy efficiency technologies [110]. In addition, energy-efficient snubber circuits, which recycle switching energy instead of dissipating it as heat, further improve the overall efficiency of power converters, which contributes to reduced energy consumption and operating costs [111]. From an environmental perspective, high-efficiency converters contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants by optimizing the use of energy resources. The integration of energy-efficient technologies in buildings, for example, not only reduces energy consumption, but also plays a key role in combating energy poverty and improving living standards without compromising environmental sustainability [112]. Moreover, the adoption of energy-efficient technologies in various sectors, including health care and traditional architecture, underscores the broad applicability and environmental benefits of these advances.
Case studies from different industries and applications consistently demonstrate significant improvements in energy efficiency achieved through the use of advanced converters. For example, dynamic voltage optimization in high-temperature superconductors under varying electromagnetic conditions has yielded promising results in improving the energy efficiency of superconducting applications [112,113]. The deployment of high-efficiency converters in MGs and other energy systems offers significant economic and environmental benefits. By optimizing energy resources, these advanced technologies not only reduce operating costs and improve system reliability, but also contribute to global efforts to mitigate climate change and promote sustainable development. Consistent results from several case studies underscore the transformative potential of high-efficiency converters to improve overall energy efficiency across diverse applications [47,114].

Optimization Models

The optimization of energy systems, especially photovoltaic MGs and hybrid renewable energy systems, is crucial to improve efficiency, reduce costs and meet technical and sustainability challenges. This field has been enriched by the development of various algorithms and techno-economic models that enable more effective management of energy resources. The optimal configuration of PV-MGs has been extensively investigated. For example, the use of dynamic programming and the improved ant colony optimization algorithm (IACODP) has been shown to be highly effective in improving operational efficiency and reducing costs, achieving an increase in efficiency of 15% over traditional methods [115]. Other studies have implemented the particle swarm algorithm for optimal sizing of hybrid RES, highlighting its ability to improve both efficiency and economic viability by 20% [116]. Minimizing operating costs in MGs is also a key area. The modified frog hopping algorithm (MFLA) has been used to significantly reduce operating costs in MGs with hybrid energy resources, obtaining a 25% reduction in operating cost [117]. This method optimizes the use of energy resources, achieving a more efficient and economical management. Additionally, the use of genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization has been effective in reducing operating costs by 18% and improving energy efficiency by 22% [118,119].
Microgrid control and management have been topics of interest, using strategies such as droop control to improve system stability and reliability, resulting in a 30% stability improvement [120]. Optimization techniques, including predictive control and robust control, have been employed to effectively manage fluctuations in power generation and demand, ensuring system stability and reducing fluctuations by 28% [106,121]. An innovative approach is the scaled arithmetic optimization algorithm with sine augmentation (SASAOA), applied in the optimization of energy systems. This method has demonstrated remarkable efficiency in solving complex optimization problems, improving the convergence and accuracy of the results by 35% [122]. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms in energy management systems has improved demand prediction and optimization of system operation, increasing the accuracy of predictions by 40% [123,124]. Optimization of hybrid renewable energy systems involves the use of advanced techniques such as the particle swarm algorithm and other heuristic methods. These methods have enabled optimal sizing and efficient management of energy resources, improving both the efficiency and economic viability of the systems by 25% [125,126]. The integration of different renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, has been optimized using stochastic programming and robust optimization techniques, increasing the reliability and flexibility in system operation by 30% [127,128].
Techno-economic models play a crucial role in the optimization of energy systems. These models allow evaluating the performance and economic viability of different system configurations, facilitating informed decision making and reducing operating costs by 15% [129]. The economic evaluation of renewable energy projects has been improved by using life cycle analysis and multiobjective optimization methods, increasing efficiency by 20% [130,131]. Energy efficiency and cost reduction are key objectives in the optimization of energy systems. Several studies have shown that the use of advanced algorithms can significantly improve operational efficiency and reduce associated costs. For example, the use of optimization techniques based on genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization has allowed optimizing the operation of MGs, reducing energy costs by 18% and improving sustainability by 22% [132,133]. In addition, the implementation of energy storage systems has been optimized to maximize efficiency and minimize costs, using optimization algorithms and predictive models that have achieved a 20% cost reduction [134,135].
In another approach, the energy management strategy using the Bald Eagle Search (BES) optimizer for MGs with renewable energy sources and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles has been shown to be effective in reducing operating costs by 20% and mitigating pollutant emissions by 25% [136]. In addition, the application of a super-retorted sliding mode controller based on particle swarm optimization has shown promising results in energy balancing in smart MGs using dynamic pricing, achieving an operating cost reduction by 18% and improving system stability by 22% [137]. Optimization methods and techniques in the context of microgrids and renewable energy systems are diverse and advanced. The use of algorithms such as IACODP, MFLA, and SASAOA, together with control strategies and techno-economic models, has enabled significant improvements in efficiency, cost reduction and energy resource management. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning techniques has revolutionized energy management, providing more accurate and efficient tools for the optimization of complex systems. A summary of optimization methods and their main characteristics is presented in Figure 5.
In addition, several studies have investigated the optimization of MGs to minimize electricity costs. Table 3 shows how various methods have been used to optimize generation and storage capacity, load balancing, and energy management. These approaches have achieved efficient configurations that significantly reduce operating costs and improve system performance and stability.

5. Future Perspectives

High-efficiency MG converters face several major challenges, mainly due to the complex and dynamic nature of MG systems. One of the main issues is the integration of RES, which are inherently variable and can impact the reliability of power supply. This requires robust and intelligent control systems, as well as effective energy storage solutions to maintain stable and efficient power supply [147]. The operation of hybrid AC/DC-MGs (HM) is particularly challenging due to non-convex system models, which require advanced data-driven convex models to linearize the efficiency behavior of bidirectional converters and ensure high computational efficiency [53]. Future prospects for high-efficiency converters include the design of a PI controller optimized for fast reference tracking, the implementation of a SEPIC converter, and the future extension of the project work with a type-3 controller and a P&O-based MPPT algorithm [148]. These converters are incorporated into a DC-MG, showing different modes of operation of the MG. High-efficiency converters, such as those mentioned above, play a crucial role in improving the power permanence and efficiency in MGs.
Reactive power compensation, key devices include the static synchronous compensator (STATCOM), the distribution static compensator (DSTATCOM), the custom power devices (CPD), the unified power quality conditioner (UPQC) and the unified power flow controller (UPFC). These devices provide or absorb reactive power to maintain the stability of the power system and improve power quality [149]. The CPDs are especially useful for addressing specific power quality problems, while the UPQC combines active and reactive power correction functions. Optimization of MGs is crucial for improving energy efficiency and energy management. Hybridization of optimization algorithms presents a promising avenue for future research. As MGs involve multiple power sources, loads, and storage systems with different operational constraints, hybridization of multiple algorithms can provide more efficient solutions. In addition, the development of distributed optimization algorithms can increase the flexibility and resilience of MG systems, reducing the risk of failures [150].
Future prospects also include evaluating the effects of different operating parameters on fuel cell performance and the recovery and utilization of the heat generated by these cells. The exergoeconomic analysis and multiobjective algorithms are essential to determine the most efficient and cost-effective system with lower emissions [151]. With respect to protection, the development of adaptive and robust schemes is essential to address the unique characteristics of DCMGs, such as bidirectional current flow and the absence of phasor parameters. Further, ML-based predictive maintenance techniques are crucial to improve the accuracy of equipment monitoring, real-time fault detection and diagnosis, and to contribute to the efficiency and reliability of MGs [152]. In addition, the development of adaptive and robust schemes is crucial to address the unique characteristics of DCMGs, such as bidirectional current flow and the absence of phasor parameters [153]. Implementing ML can increase reliability and reduce operating costs of MGs, consolidating their role as a sustainable and efficient solution for energy management. Table 4 provides an overview of future perspectives and challenges in advancing high-efficiency converters for MGs, highlighting the evolving landscape and critical areas for improvement.

6. Conclusions

This review study underscores the critical importance of high-efficiency converters in MGs, essential for the optimal integration of renewable sources such as solar panels and wind turbines. Leveraging advanced semiconductors like GaN, these converters not only effectively manage variable power flows but also enhance system reliability by significantly reducing energy losses. Significant advancements include the application of advanced control strategies such as MPC and SMC, which improve power quality and stability in MGs. Devices like STATCOM and UPQC play a crucial role in reactive power compensation, ensuring grid stability amidst dynamic fluctuations. Hybridization of optimization algorithms and exergoeconomic analysis in fuel cell systems are pivotal for maximizing energy efficiency and minimizing emissions in MGs. These advanced approaches, supported by AI-based predictive maintenance techniques, enhance operational reliability and optimize costs associated with MG maintenance and operation. In summary, this review highlights how technological advancements in high-efficiency converters and energy management systems are paving the way for more efficient, sustainable, and resilient MGs. These developments are crucial in addressing dynamic challenges associated with RES integration and continuous optimization of energy resources in MG environments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P. and Y.O.; methodology, P.A.; software, D.P.; validation, Y.O., P.A. and F.J.; formal analysis, Y.O.; investigation, Y.O.; resources, D.P.; data curation, Y.O.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P.; writing—review and editing, Y.O.; visualization, D.P.; supervision, P.A.; project administration, P.A.; funding acquisition, F.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Universidad de Cuenca (UCUENCA), Ecuador, for easing access to the facilities of the Micro-Grid Laboratory of the Centro Científico Tecnológico y de Investigación Balzay (CCTI-B), for allowing the use of its equipment, and for authorizing members of its staff to provide the technical support necessary to carry out the experiments described in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Abbreviations and Their Meanings.
Table A1. Abbreviations and Their Meanings.
AbbreviationMeaningAbbreviationMeaning
ACAlternating CurrentILCInterlinking Converters
Ant Colony AlgorithmAnt Colony AlgorithmIoTInternet of Things
APFActive Power FilterISMSliding Mode Control
AWLAutomatic Winding LayoutKVAKilovolt-Ampere
BDCBidirectional ConverterMEXAMixing and Exploring Algorithm
BESSBattery Energy Storage SystemMFLAModified Frog Leaping Algorithm
Boosted WOABoosted Whale Optimization AlgorithmMLMachine Learning
Search for HarmonyHarmony SearchMMCModular Multilevel Converter
CPDCustom Power DevicesMPCModel Predictive Control
Cuckoo SearchCuckoo SearchMPIBCMultiphasic Interleaved Boost Converter
DCDirect CurrentMPAMarine Predators Algorithm
DERDistributed Energy ResourcesMRFOManta Ray Foraging Optimization
DPMPCDirect Power Model Predictive ControlOPROptimal Power Routing
DSTATCOMDistribution Static CompensatorP&OPerturb and Observe
DUEADisturbance and Uncertainty Estimation and AttenuationPIProportional-Integral
EVElectric VehiclePROPromoted Remora Algorithm
ESSEnergy Storage SystemPRProportional Resonant Controllers
FCDOFlying Capacitor Dual OutputPSOParticle Swarm Optimization
FICDSFast Interaction Converter-Driven StabilityPVPhotovoltaic
Firefly AlgorithmFirefly AlgorithmSASAOAScaled Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm with Sine Augmentation
FSECFlorida Solar Energy CenterSEPICSingle-Ended Primary Inductor Converter
Fuzzy Neural Networks + Modified PSOFuzzy Neural Networks + Modified PSOSiCSilicon Carbide
GAGenetic AlgorithmSMCSliding Mode Control
GaNGallium NitrideSPVSolar Photovoltaic Systems
GFMGrid-FormingSSTSolid-State Transformers
GFLGrid-FollowingSTATCOMStatic Synchronous Compensator
GOAGrasshopper Optimization AlgorithmTHDTotal Harmonic Distortion
GSA-PSGravitational Search Algorithm and Pattern Search Hybrid AlgorithmTPCThree-Port Converters
HESSHybrid Energy Storage SystemUCFUniversity of Central Florida
HG-SIQBCHigh Gain Single-Inductor Quadratic Boost ConverterUPFCUnified Power Flow Controller
HMHybrid MicrogridsUPQCUnified Power Quality Conditioner
HVDCHigh Voltage Direct CurrentV2GVehicle to Grid
IACODPImproved Ant Colony Optimization with Dynamic ProgrammingVSGVirtual Synchronous Generators
IIRInfinite Impulse ResponseWBGWide Bandgap Devices
ILPInteger Linear ProgrammingWTWavelet Transform

References

  1. Badal, F.R.; Sarker, S.K.; Nayem, Z.; Moyeen, S.I.; Das, S.K. Microgrid to smart grid’s evolution: Technical challenges, current solutions, and future scopes. Energy Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 874–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sarathkumar, D.; Raj, R.A. Development of smart grid from microgrids: Components and applications. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovative Sustainable Computational Technologies, CISCT 2022, Dehradun, India, 23–24 December 2022; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  3. Khalid, M. Smart Grids and renewable energy systems: Perspectives and grid integration challenges. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 51, 101299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Campagna, N.; Castiglia, V.; Miceli, R.; Caruso, M. Modelling, simulation and characterization of a supercapacitor in automotive applications. IEEE 2020, 58, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hu, J.; Shan, Y.; Cheng, K.W.; Islam, S. Overview of power converter control in microgrids—Challenges, advances, and future trends. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 9907–9922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bashir, S.B.; Ismail, A.A.A.; Elnady, A.; Farag, M.M.; Hamid, A.K.; Bansal, R.C.; Abo-Khalil, A.G. Modular multilevel converter-based microgrid: A critical review. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 65569–65589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Luo, Y.; Jia, Z.; Xu, L.; Li, Q.; Song, Y. A Reduced Switching Frequency Capacitor Voltage Balancing Control for Modular Multilevel Converters. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 142, 108272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xiao, Q.; Mu, Y.; Jia, H.; Jin, Y.; Yu, X.; Teodorescu, R.; Guerrero, J.M. Novel Modular Multilevel Converter-Based Five-Terminal MV/LV Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids with Improved Operation Capability under Unbalanced Power Distribution. Appl. Energy 2022, 306, 118140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sai Sampath Kumar, P.; Suresh, P.; Lenine, D. Performance Improvement of Predictive Voltage Control for Interlinking Converters of Integrated Microgrid. Meas. Sens. 2024, 33, 101196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rezayof Tatari, F.; Banejad, M.; Akbarzadeh Kalat, A.; Iwanski, G. A Long-Horizon Move-Blocking Based Direct Power Model Predictive Control for Dynamic Enhancement of DC Microgrids. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2024, 15, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yadegar, M.; Zarei, S.F.; Meskin, N.; Massoud, A. An Adaptive Voltage Control Compensator for Converters in DC Microgrids under Fault Conditions. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 156, 109697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Q.; Bahri, I.; Diallo, D.; Berthelot, E. Model Predictive Control and Linear Control of DC–DC Boost Converter in Low Voltage DC Microgrid: An Experimental Comparative Study. Control Eng. Pract. 2023, 131, 105387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Frivaldsky, M.; Morgos, J.; Prazenica, M.; Takacs, K. System Level Simulation of Microgrid Power Electronic Systems. Electronics 2021, 10, 644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Alkhaledi, K.; Cheema, K.M.; Elbarbary, Z.M.S.; Park, W.H.; El-Sherbeeny, A.M. Multilevel Converter to Access Maximum Power from Distributed Energy Source Based Smart Grids. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1125461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, I.A.; Muyeen, S.M. Application of Power Electronics Converters in Smart Grids and Renewable Energy Systems; MDPI-Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute: Basel, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, L.; Bento, A.; Paraiso, G.; Costa, P.; Pinto, S.; Silva, J.F. Novel Topology of Modular-Matrix-Converter-Based Smart Transformer for Hybrid Microgrid. In Proceedings of the IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference), Toronto, ON, Canada, 13–16 October 2021; IEEE Computer Society: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  17. Blaabjerg, F.; Yang, Y.; Kim, K.A.; Rodriguez, J. Power electronics technology for large-scale renewable energy generation. Proc. IEEE 2023, 111, 335–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yiasoumas, G.; Berbakov, L.; Janev, V.; Asmundo, A.; Olabarrieta, E.; Vinci, A.; Baglietto, G.; Georghiou, G.E. Key aspects and challenges in the implementation of energy communities. Energies 2023, 16, 4703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Juszczyk, O.; Juszczyk, J.; Juszczyk, S.; Takala, J. Barriers for renewable energy technologies diffusion: Empirical evidence from Finland and Poland. Energies 2022, 15, 527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barceló, E.; Dimić-Mišić, K.; Imani, M.; Spasojević Brkić, V.; Hummel, M.; Gane, P. Regulatory paradigm and challenge for blockchain integration of decentralized systems: Example—Renewable energy grids. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Oleiwi Shami, H.; Basem, A.; Al-Rubaye, A.H.; Sabzevari, K. A Novel Strategy to Enhance Power Management in AC/DC Hybrid Microgrid Using Virtual Synchronous Generator Based Interlinking Converters Integrated with Energy Storage System. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Davalos Hernandez, F.; Parsegov, S.; Rosas-Caro, J.C.; Bhatnagar, P.; Martin Ibanez, F. Optimal number of supercapacitors per submodule in the energy storage system based on a modular multilevel converter with embedded balance control. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 159, 110030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Khan, N.; Ooi, C.A.; Alturki, A.; Amir, M.; Shreasth; Alharbi, T. A Critical review of battery cell balancing techniques, optimal design, converter topologies, and performance evaluation for optimizing storage system in electric vehicles. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 4999–5032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Luo, H.; Cao, S. Advanced energy flexibility enhancement via the novel resources of wave energy converter reservoirs and electric storages for a hybrid wave-wind energy supported hotel energy system. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 60, 105167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lencwe, M.J.; Olwal, T.O.; Chowdhury, S.D.; Sibanyoni, M. Nonsolitary Two-Way DC-to-DC Converters for hybrid battery and supercapacitor energy storage systems: A comprehensive survey. Energy Rep. 2024, 11, 2737–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Alam, M.A.; Minai, A.F.; Bakhsh, F.I. Isolated bidirectional DC-DC converter: A topological review. e-Prime Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2024, 8, 100594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Leon, J.D.V.; Tarraso, A.; Candela, J.I.; Rocabert, J.; Rodriguez, P. Grid-forming controller based on virtual admittance for power converters working in weak grids. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron. 2023, 4, 791–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Blaabjerg, F. An interlinking converter for renewable energy integration into hybrid grids. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 2499–2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Casey, L.; Enslin, J.H.; Joos, G.; Siira, M.; Borowy, B.; Sun, C. Advanced inverter interactions with electric grids. IEEE Power Electron. Mag. 2023, 10, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kojonsaari, A.R.; Palm, J. The development of social science research on smart grids: A semi-structured literature review. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2023, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Eslahi, M.S.; Vaez-Zadeh, S.; Heydari, R.; Rodriguez, J. Resiliency enhancement control of converter fed smart renewable micro grids against multiple risks. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2023, 38, 1028–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hollweg, G.V.; Khan, S.A.; Chaturvedi, S.; Fan, Y.; Wang, M.; Su, W. Grid-connected converters: A brief survey of topologies, output filters, current control, and weak grids operation. Energies 2023, 16, 3611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sreekanth, N.V.; Ashok, L.; Jebasingh, D.N. Dual input single output quadratic boost converter for dc microgrid. e-Prime Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2024, 4, 100683. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vijayan, M.; Udumula, R.R.; Mahto, T.; Ravi, R.E. A Novel Multi-Port High-Gain Bidirectional DC–DC Converter for Energy Storage System Integration with DC Microgrids. J. Energy Storage 2024, 87, 111431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Esteban, F.D.; Serra, F.M.; De Angelo, C.H. Feedback linearization control to avoid saturation of the high frequency transformer of a dual active bridge DC–DC converter for a DC microgrid. Control Eng. Pract. 2024, 149, 105974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Araujo, L.S.; Callegari, J.M.S.; Cardoso Filho, B.J.; Brandao, D.I. Heterogeneous Microgrids: Centralized control strategy with distributed grid-forming converters. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 158, 109950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Afkar, M.; Gavagsaz-Ghoachani, R.; Phattanasak, M.; Pierfederici, S. Voltage-balancing of two controllers for a dc-dc converter-based dc microgrid with experimental verification. Math. Comput. Simul. 2024, 221, 159–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yang, W.; Miao, S.; Liu, Z.; Han, J.; Xiong, Y. Control of parallel bidirectional converters under unbalanced conditions in an ac/dc hybrid microgrid. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2024, 226, 109952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, Y.; Wang, W.; Tang, F.; Wu, X. Adaptive virtual admittance control of bidirectional DC/DC converters for dc bus voltage ripple suppression in dc microgrids. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 159, 110045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, Z.; Qin, J.; Hao, T.; Li, X.; Tse, C.K.; Lu, P. Distributed cooperative control of dc microgrid cluster with multiple voltage levels. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 159, 109996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sunddararaj, S.P.; Rangarajan, S.S.; Nallusamy, S.; Subramaniam, U.; Collins, E.R.; Senjyu, T. Design of novel hg-siqbc-fed multilevel inverter for standalone microgrid applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 9347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mehmed-Hamza, M.E.; Filipov, A.B.; Ivanova, M.D. Types of Smart Systems and Their Application in Power Grids. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1216, 012003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Qin, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, S.; Huang, Y.; Tan, S.C.; Hui, S.Y. A High-Efficiency DC/DC Converter for High-Voltage-Gain, High-Current Applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2020, 8, 2812–2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wu, T.F.; Huang, Y.H.; Lin, T.H. Multi-Function High-Power Converters for smart-grid applications. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 27 November 2018; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Chiang, G.T.; Tanemura, K.; Tomura, S. Proposal of a high-frequency integrated power converter for renewable energy-grid-bes interactive applications. IEEJ J. Ind. Appl. 2023, 12, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ortíz-Marín, J.; Gallo-Reyes, D.; Ruiz-Robles, D.; Venegas-Rebollar, V. Analyzing power losses and performance of an isolated dc-dc converter for renewable energies systems. Electronics 2023, 12, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Anzola, J.; Garayalde, E.; Urkizu, J.; Alacano, A.; Lopez-Erauskin, R. High efficiency converters based on modular partial power processing for fully electric maritime applications. Electronics 2023, 12, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lv, M.; Wang, P.; Wei, Y.; Wen, C.; Li, J.; Jia, P.; Wei, Q. An input-series-output-parallel cascaded converter system applied to dc microgrids. Symmetry 2023, 15, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Syasegov, Y.Y.; Farhangi, M.; Barzegarkhoo, R.; Siwakoti, Y.P.; Li, L.; Lu, D.D.C.; Aguilera, R.P.; Pou, J. A 5-Level HERIC Active-clamped inverter with full reactive power capability for grid-connected applications. IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2023, 4, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Jayan, V.; Ghias, A.M.Y.M. Computationally-efficient model predictive control of dual-output multilevel converter in hybrid microgrid. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 5898–5910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shyni, R.; Kowsalya, M. HESS-based microgrid control techniques empowered by artificial intelligence: A systematic review of grid-connected and standalone systems. J. Energy Storage 2024, 84, 111012. [Google Scholar]
  52. Blazek, V.; Vantuch, T.; Slanina, Z.; Vysocky, J.; Prokop, L.; Misak, S.; Piecha, M.; Walendziuk, W. A Novel Approach to Utilization Vehicle to Grid Technology in Microgrid Environment. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2024, 158, 109921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Joarder, S.; Ghosh, A.; Banerjee, S.; Sain, C.; Ahmad, F. Harmonic Modelling and Control of Dual Active Bridge Converter for DC Microgrid Applications. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 52–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ramu, S.K.; Vairavasundaram, I.; Palaniyappan, B.; Bragadeshwaran, A.; Aljafari, B. Enhanced Energy Management of DC Microgrid: Artificial Neural Networks-Driven Hybrid Energy Storage System with Integration of Bidirectional DC-DC Converter. J. Energy Storage 2024, 88, 111562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Satyanarayana, K.V.V.; Maurya, R. Unified Control of High Gain DC-DC Converter for PV-Battery Hybrid System in a Standalone and DC-Microgrid Applications. J. Energy Storage 2024, 88, 111475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jagadeesh, I.; Indragandhi, V. Solar Photo Voltaic Based Hybrid CUK, SEPIC, ZETA Converters for microgrid applications. e-Prime Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy 2023, 6, 100364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, G.; Wen, H.; Xu, P.; Liu, W.; Zhou, J.; Yang, Y. A Comprehensive review of integrated three-port dc-dc converters with key performance indices. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 6391–6408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bayindir, A.B.; Sharida, A.; Bayhan, S.; Abu-Rub, H. Grid connected microinverter based on single leg multimode converter. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, SGRE 2024, Doha, Qatar, 8–10 January 2024. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hassanpour, N.; Chub, A.; Yadav, N.; Blinov, A.; Vinnikov, D. High-Efficiency Partial Power Converter for Integration of Second-Life Battery Energy Storage Systems in DC Microgrids. IEEE Open J. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2024, 3389466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Bidram, A.; Reno, M.J.; Abadi, S.A.G.K.; Aparicio, M.J.; Bauer, D. Trends in Dc Microgrids: From the control and protection perspective. IEEE Electrif. Mag. 2024, 12, 33–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Firoz, S.M.; Madichetty, S.; Banda, M.K. Design and implementation of isolated dc-dc low voltage and high power converter. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Smart Systems for Applications in Electrical Sciences (ICSSES), Tumakuru, India, 3 May 2024; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  62. Lin, Y.; Zhou, F.; Xu, G.; Xiong, W.; Ning, G. Bipolar Current-Fed DC-DC Converter With Automatic Voltage Balance and Full Range ZVS for Bipolar DC System. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 4248–4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. De Oliveira Costa Neto, A.; Soares, A.L.; Barbosa, V.F.; Rodrigues, D.B.; Freitas, L.C.G.; De Lima, G.B. Analysis and Development of a Bidirectional Three-Phase Hybrid Rectifier for DC Microgrids with Distributed Energy Resources. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2024, 12, 1468–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mahafzah, K.A.; Obeidat, M.A.; Mansour, A.; Sanseverino, E.R.; Zizzo, G. A New Smart Grid Hybrid DC–DC Converter with Improved Voltage Gain and Synchronized Multiple Outputs. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rahman, M.J.; Tafticht, T.; Doumbia, M.L. Power Converters Analyzed in Energy Storage Systems to Enhance the Performance of the Smart Grid Application. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. 2024, 15, 913–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sarvi, M.; Zohdi, H.Z. A Comprehensive Overview of DC-DC Converters Control Methods and Topologies in DC Microgrids. Energy Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 2017–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Henninger, S.; Jaeger, J. Advanced classification of converter control concepts for integration in electrical power systems. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2020, 123, 106210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Saldaña-González, A.E.; Sumper, A.; Aragüés-Peñalba, M.; Smolnikar, M. Advanced Distribution Measurement Technologies and Data Applications for Smart Grids: A Review. Energies 2020, 13, 3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Punna, S.; Mailugundla, R.; Salkuti, S.R. Design, Analysis and Implementation of Bidirectional DC–DC Converters for HESS in DC Microgrid Applications. Smart Cities 2022, 5, 433–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Nejabatkhah, F.; Li, Y.W.; Tian, H. Power Quality Control of Smart Hybrid AC/DC Microgrids: An Overview. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 52295–52318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Xu, Q.; Vafamand, N.; Chen, L.; Dragicevic, T.; Xie, L.; Blaabjerg, F. Review on Advanced Control Technologies for Bidirectional DC/DC Converters in DC Microgrids. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2021, 9, 1205–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kulasekaran, P.S.; Dasarathan, S. Design and Analysis of Interleaved High-Gain Bi-Directional DC–DC Converter for Microgrid Application Integrated with Photovoltaic Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 5135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hidalgo, H.; Orosco, R.; Huerta, H.; Vázquez, N.; Hernández, C.; Pinto, S. A High-Voltage-Gain DC–DC Boost Converter with Zero-Ripple Input Current for Renewable Applications. Energies 2023, 16, 4860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Aljafari, B.; Devarajan, G.; Subramani, S.; Vairavasundaram, S. Intelligent RBF-Fuzzy Controller Based Non-Isolated DC-DC Multi-Port Converter for Renewable Energy Applications. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ullah, Q.; Busarello, T.D.C.; Brandao, D.I.; Simões, M.G. Design and Performance Evaluation of SMC-Based DC–DC Converters for Microgrid Applications. Energies 2023, 16, 4212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rajendran, S.; Thangavel, V.; Krishnan, N.; Prabaharan, N. DC Link Voltage Enhancement in DC Microgrid Using PV Based High Gain Converter with Cascaded Fuzzy Logic Controller. Energies 2023, 16, 3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sirviö, K.; Kauhaniemi, K.; Memon, A.A.; Laaksonen, H.; Kumpulainen, L. Functional analysis of the microgrid concept applied to case studies of the sundom smart grid. Energies 2020, 13, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Duque, M.; Cando, E.; Aguinaga, A.; Llulluna, F.; Jara, N.; Moreno, T. Micro-grid platform based on node.js architecture, implemented in electrical network instrumentation. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Hangzhou, China, 18–21 October 2015; Institute of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  79. Arbab-Zavar, B.; Palacios-Garcia, E.J.; Vasquez, J.C.; Guerrero, J.M. Smart inverters for microgrid applications: A review. Energies 2019, 12, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Souza Junior, M.E.T.; Freitas, L.C.G. Power electronics for modern sustainable power systems: Distributed generation, microgrids and smart grids—A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jadav, K.A.; Karkar, H.M.; Trivedi, I.N. A Review of microgrid architectures and control strategy. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. B 2017, 98, 591–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Jasim, A.M.; Jasim, B.H.; Bures, V.; Mikulecky, P. A Novel cooperative control technique for hybrid ac/dc smart microgrid converters. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 2164–2181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Gullu, S.; Djaho, A.C.; Rezaii, R.; Elrais, M.T.; Safayatullah, M.; Mensah, A.; Batarseh, I. Advanced systems integration of 540 kva inverter and 1.86 mwh battery energy storage system for microgrid application: A case study. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Renewable Energy Congress, IREC 2022, Hammamet, Tunisia, 13–15 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
  84. Panda, S.K.; Ghosh, A. A Computational analysis of interfacing converters with advanced control methodologies for microgrid application. Technol. Econ. Smart Grids Sustain. Energy 2020, 5, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nusair, K.; Alasali, F.; Holderbaum, W.; Vinayagam, A.; Aziz, A. High hybrid power converter performance using modern-optimization-methods-based PWM strategy. Electronics 2022, 11, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Abos, H.; Ave, M.; Martínez-Ortiz, H. A case study of a procedure to optimize the renewable energy coverage in isolated systems: An astronomical center in the north of Chile. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2017, 7, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Thummala, P.; Schneider, H.; Zhang, Z.; Ouyang, Z.; Knott, A.; Andersen, M.A.E. Efficiency optimization by considering the high-voltage flyback transformer parasitics using an automatic winding layout technique. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 5755–5768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Othman, N.A. A Case Study on Most Optimal Power Flow Solutions to Supply Power to a New Residential Compound Load Located at the Outskirts of an Industrial Area by Using the Optimization Tools. Master’s Thesis, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011. Available online: https://rshare.library.torontomu.ca/articles/thesis/A_case_study_on_most_optimal_power_flow_solutions_to_supply_power_to_a_new_residential_compound_load_located_at_the_outskirts_of_an_industrial_area_by_using_the_optimization_tools/14652777 (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  89. Dimd, B.; Midtgård, O.-M. Power Converters as Smart Instruments and Actuators in a Smarter Grid. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2015. Available online: https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2368121 (accessed on 22 July 2024).
  90. Maier, S. Smart energy systems for smart city districts: Case study reininghaus district. Energy Sustain. Soc. 2016, 6, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Eslahi, M.S.; Vaez-Zadeh, S.; Rodriguez, J. Resiliency Enhancement and Power Quality Optimization of Converter-Based Renewable Energy Microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2023, 38, 7785–7795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gao, Y.; Ren, H.-P.; Li, J. Grid-forming converters control based on DC voltage feedback. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2009.05759. [Google Scholar]
  93. Lamrani, Y.; Huang, L.; Colas, F.; Guillaud, X.; Blaajberg, F.; Cardozo, C.; Prevost, T. Grid following converters stability study and control enhancements using an improved test setup. In Proceedings of the IET Conference Publication, Glasgow, UK, 1–3 March 2023. [Google Scholar]
  94. Saridaki, G.; Paspatis, A.G.; Kotsampopoulos, P.; Hatziargyriou, N. An Investigation of Factors Affecting Fast-Interaction Converter-Driven Stability in Microgrids. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2023, 223, 109610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kumar, R.; Kannan, R.; Singh, N.S.S.; Abro, G.E.M.; Mathur, N.; Baba, M. An efficient design of high step-up switched z-source (HS-SZSC) DC-DC converter for grid-connected inverters. Electronics 2022, 11, 2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Jeong, S.G.; Kim, K.S.; Kwon, J.M.; Kwon, B.H. High-Efficiency Three-Phase Bidirectional Dc–Ac Converter for Energy Storage Systems. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 2031–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sampath, S.; Rahiman, Z.; Chenniappan, S.; Sundaram, E.; Subramaniam, U.; Padmanaban, S. Efficient Multi-Phase Converter for E-Mobility. World Electr. Veh. J. 2022, 13, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Song, Y.; Sahoo, S.; Yang, Y.; Blaabjerg, F.; Li, Y.W. Aggregated emulation of multiple converters with heterogeneous dynamics in low-voltage microgrids—A clustering approach. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2022, Detroit, MI, USA, 9–13 October 2022. [Google Scholar]
  99. Gorbunov, A.; Peng, J.C.H.; Bialek, J.W.; Vorobev, P. Identification of stability regions in inverter-based microgrids. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2022, 37, 2613–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Rohten, J.; Villarroel, F.; Pulido, E.; Muñoz, J.; Silva, J.; Perez, M. Stability analysis of two power converters control algorithms connected to micro-grids with wide frequency variation. Sensors 2022, 22, 7078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Kong, L.; Xue, Y.; Qiao, L.; Wang, F. Review of small-signal converter-driven stability issues in power systems. IEEE Open Access J. Power Energy 2022, 9, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Koiwa, K.; Kuribayashi, T.; Zanma, T.; Liu, K.Z.; Natori, K.; Sato, Y. Stability and robust performance analysis of grid-connected inverter with high-order filter: Resonances beyond the nyquist frequency. IET Control Theory Appl. 2021, 15, 1818–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Gorbunov, A.; Vorobev, P.; Peng, J.C.-H. Identification and stabilization of critical clusters in inverter-based microgrids. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2020, 189, 106731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Zhang, Y.; Mou, J.; Zhang, F.; Huang, N. Modeling and stability analysis based on internal voltage dynamics in synchronverter. Electronics 2023, 12, 700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Khan, M.R.; Haider, Z.M.; Malik, F.H.; Almasoudi, F.M.; Alatawi, K.S.S.; Bhutta, M.S. A Comprehensive review of microgrid energy management strategies considering electric vehicles, energy storage systems, and AI techniques. Processes 2024, 12, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Thirunavukkarasu, G.S.; Seyedmahmoudian, M.; Jamei, E.; Horan, B.; Mekhilef, S.; Stojcevski, A. Role of optimization techniques in microgrid energy management systems—A review. Energy Strategy Rev. 2022, 43, 100899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tkac, M.; Kajanova, M.; Bracinik, P. A Review of advanced control strategies of microgrids with charging stations. Energies 2023, 16, 6692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Al-Imran, S.M.; Fuad, M.A.R.; Ahmed, T.; Ali, M.R.; Maruf, M.N.I. Optimization of distributed energy resources to balance power supply and demand in a smart grid. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Green Energy and Technology, ICGET 2015, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 11 September 2015. [Google Scholar]
  109. Mathur, A.; Kumari, R.; Meena, V.P.; Singh, V.P.; Azar, A.T.; Hameed, I.A. Data-driven optimization for microgrid control under distributed energy resource variability. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 10806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Worrell, E.; Laitner, J.A.; Ruth, M.; Finman, H. Productivity Benefits of Industrial Energy Efficiency Measures. Energy 2003, 28, 1081–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Energy Efficient Snubber Networks; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 9781728133492. [Google Scholar]
  112. Pendić, Z.; Pendić-Polak, S.; Jakovljević, B.; Polak, M.; Živković, M.; Marković, Ž. Energy Efficiency: Examples of Which Less Talk. Tehnika 2019, 74, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Farooq, H.; Khalid, H.A.; Khalid, M.U.; Syed, S.A. Efficiency Analysis of GaN Based LLC Resonant Converter for PV Applications. Eng. Proc. 2022, 20, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Trianni, A.; Merigó, J.M.; Bertoldi, P. Ten years of energy efficiency: A bibliometric analysis. Energy Effic. 2018, 11, 1917–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Li, S.; Deng, N.; Lee, X.; Yan, S.; Chen, C. Optimal Configuration of Photovoltaic Microgrid with Improved Ant Colony Dynamic Programming. J. Energy Storage 2024, 83, 110714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Chakraborty, A.; Ray, S. Operational cost minimization of a microgrid with optimum battery energy storage system and plug-in-hybrid electric vehicle charging impact using slime mould algorithm. Energy 2023, 278, 127842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Araoye, T.O.; Ashigwuike, E.C.; Mbunwe, M.J.; Bakinson, O.I.; Ozue, T.G.I. Techno-economic modeling and optimal sizing of autonomous hybrid microgrid renewable energy system for rural electrification sustainability using HOMER and grasshopper optimization algorithm. Renew. Energy 2024, 229, 120712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hernández-Mayoral, E.; Madrigal-Martínez, M.; Mina-Antonio, J.D.; Iracheta-Cortez, R.; Enríquez-Santiago, J.A.; Rodríguez-Rivera, O.; Martínez-Reyes, G.; Mendoza-Santos, E. A comprehensive review on power-quality issues, optimization techniques, and control strategies of microgrid based on renewable energy sources. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Khadanga, R.K.; Das, D.; Kumar, A.; Panda, S. Sine Augmented Scaled Arithmetic Optimization Algorithm for Frequency Regulation of a Virtual Inertia Control Based Microgrid. ISA Trans. 2023, 138, 534–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Mousa, H.H.H.; Ali, A.; Shaaban, M.F.; Ismeil, M.A. Optimal allocation of multiple capacitors in a hybrid ac/dc microgrid for power quality improvement. SN Appl. Sci. 2023, 5, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Alzahrani, A.; Sajjad, K.; Hafeez, G.; Murawwat, S.; Khan, S.; Khan, F.A. Real-time energy optimization and scheduling of buildings integrated with renewable microgrid. Appl. Energy 2023, 335, 120640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tooryan, F.; HassanzadehFard, H.; Collins, E.R.; Jin, S.; Ramezani, B. Optimization and energy management of distributed energy resources for a hybrid residential microgrid. J. Energy Storage 2020, 30, 101556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Majeed, M.A.; Phichisawat, S.; Asghar, F.; Hussan, U. Optimal energy management system for grid-tied microgrid: An improved adaptive genetic algorithm. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 117351–117361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dey, B.; Raj, S.; Mahapatra, S.; Márquez, F.P.G. Optimal scheduling of distributed energy resources in microgrid systems based on electricity market pricing strategies by a novel hybrid optimization technique. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2022, 134, 107419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sowmiya, T.; Venkatesan, T. Energy management system in smart microgrid using multi objective grey wolf optimization algorithm. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 2022, 9, 3426. [Google Scholar]
  126. Li, N.; Su, Z.; Jerbi, H.; Abbassi, R.; Latifi, M.; Furukawa, N. Energy management and optimized operation of renewable sources and electric vehicles based on microgrid using hybrid gravitational search and pattern search algorithm. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 75, 103279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shezan, S.A.; Kamwa, I.; Ishraque, M.F.; Muyeen, S.M.; Hasan, K.N.; Saidur, R.; Rizvi, S.M.; Shafiullah, M.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A. Evaluation of different optimization techniques and control strategies of hybrid microgrid: A review. Energies 2023, 16, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Repalle, N.B.; Sarala, P.; Mihet-Popa, L.; Kotha, S.R.; Rajeswaran, N. Implementation of a novel tabu search optimization algorithm to extract parasitic parameters of solar panel. Energies 2022, 15, 4515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Liu, G.; Ollis, T.B.; Ferrari, M.F.; Sundararajan, A.; Tomsovic, K. Robust scheduling of networked microgrids for economics and resilience improvement. Energies 2022, 15, 2249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Ullah, K.; Jiang, Q.; Geng, G.; Rahim, S.; Khan, R.A. Optimal power sharing in microgrids using the artificial bee colony algorithm. Energies 2022, 15, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Nallolla, C.A.; Vijayapriya, P.; Chittathuru, D.; Padmanaban, S. Multi-objective optimization algorithms for a hybrid ac/dc microgrid using res: A comprehensive review. Electronics 2023, 12, 1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Twaisan, K.; Bar, N. Integrated Distributed energy resources (DER) and microgrids: Modeling and optimization of DERs. Electronics 2022, 11, 2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wang, S.; Tan, Q.; Ding, X.; Li, J. Efficient microgrid energy management with neural-fuzzy optimization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 64, 269–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Gamarra, C.; Guerrero, J.M. Computational optimization techniques applied to microgrids planning: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Güven, A.F.; Yörükeren, N.; Samy, M.M. Design optimization of a stand-alone green energy system of university campus based on jaya-harmony search and ant colony optimization algorithms approaches. Energy 2022, 253, 124089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Eluri, H.; Naik, M.G. Challenges of RES with integration of power grids. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. 2021, 11, 8104. [Google Scholar]
  137. Fathy, A. Bald Eagle Search Optimizer-Based Energy Management Strategy for Microgrid with Renewable Sources and Electric Vehicles. Appl. Energy 2023, 334, 120688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ileberi, G.R.; Li, P. Integrating Hydrokinetic Energy into Hybrid Renewable Energy System: Optimal Design and Comparative Analysis. Energies 2023, 16, 3403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Recioui, A.; Dekhandji, F.Z. Technical and Economic Feasibility Study of a Hybrid Hydrogen-based Renewable Energy System. Alger. J. Signals Syst. 2023, 8, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Abeg, A.I.; Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.A.; Ishraque, M.F.; Islam, M.R.; Hossain, M.J. Capacity and Operation Optimization of Hybrid Microgrid for Economic Zone Using a Novel Meta-Heuristic Algorithm. J. Energy Storage 2024, 94, 112314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Li, D.; Feng, W.; Fathi, M. Microgrids efficiency improvement for national electricity network leveraging beluga whale optimization. Heliyon 2024, e30018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Gholami, M.; Muyeen, S.M.; Lin, S. Optimizing microgrid efficiency: Coordinating commercial and residential demand patterns with shared battery energy storage. J. Energy Storage 2024, 88, 111485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Zhang, H.; Ma, Y.; Yuan, K.; Khayatnezhad, M.; Ghadimi, N. Efficient design of energy microgrid management system: A promoted remora optimization algorithm-based Approach. Heliyon 2024, 10, e23394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Anastasiadis, A.G.; Lekidis, A.; Pierros, I.; Polyzakis, A.; Vokas, G.A.; Papageorgiou, E.I. Energy Cost Optimization for Incorporating Energy Hubs into a Smart Microgrid with RESs, CHP, and EVs. Energies 2024, 17, 2827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Kazemtarghi, A.; Mallik, A. Techno-economic microgrid design optimization considering fuel procurement cost and battery energy storage system lifetime analysis. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2024, 235, 110865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Xiong, B.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Cheng, L. Optimizing electricity demand scheduling in microgrids using deep reinforcement learning for cost-efficiency. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2023, 17, 2535–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Liang, Z.; Dong, Z.; Li, C.; Wu, C.; Chen, H. A data-driven convex model for hybrid microgrid operation with bidirectional converters. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2023, 14, 1313–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Us Salam, I.; Yousif, M.; Numan, M.; Billah, M. Addressing the challenge of climate change: The role of microgrids in fostering a sustainable future—A comprehensive review. Renew. Energy Focus 2024, 48, 100538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Akter, A.; Zafir, E.I.; Dana, N.H.; Joysoyal, R.; Sarker, S.K.; Li, L.; Muyeen, S.M.; Das, S.K.; Kamwa, I. A review on microgrid optimization with meta-heuristic techniques: Scopes, trends and recommendation. Energy Strategy Rev. 2024, 51, 101298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tariq, A.H.; Kazmi, S.A.A.; Hassan, M.; Muhammed Ali, S.A.; Anwar, M. Analysis of fuel cell integration with hybrid microgrid systems for clean energy: A comparative review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 52, 1005–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Kumar, K.; Kumar, P.; Kar, S. A review of microgrid protection for addressing challenges and solutions. Renew. Energy Focus 2024, 49, 100572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Arafat, M.Y.; Hossain, M.J.; Alam, M.M. Machine learning scopes on microgrid predictive maintenance: Potential frameworks, challenges, and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 190, 114088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Abbassi, A.; Mehrez, R.B.; Abbassi, R.; Jerbi, H.; Saidi, S.; Jemli, M. Eco-feasibility study of a distributed power generation system driven by renewable green energy sources. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2022, 44, 3981–3999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Energies 17 03657 g001
Figure 1. Hybrid MG schematic with bidirectional converters.
Figure 1. Hybrid MG schematic with bidirectional converters.
Energies 17 03657 g001
Energies 17 03657 g002
Figure 2. Efficiency of different types of converters in MGs.
Figure 2. Efficiency of different types of converters in MGs.
Energies 17 03657 g002
Energies 17 03657 g003
Figure 3. Use of high-efficiency converters.
Figure 3. Use of high-efficiency converters.
Energies 17 03657 g003
Energies 17 03657 g004
Figure 4. Efficiency of converters applied in case studies.
Figure 4. Efficiency of converters applied in case studies.
Energies 17 03657 g004
Energies 17 03657 g005
Figure 5. Optimization methods and their characteristics.
Figure 5. Optimization methods and their characteristics.
Energies 17 03657 g005
Table 1. Types of control for MGs.
Table 1. Types of control for MGs.
RefControl TypeOperating PrincipleAdvantages
[33]Closed Loop Control with PI ControllersAdjustment based on the difference between desired and actual states, using PI controllers for voltage and current stability.Precise and stable adjustment, maintaining system stability.
[34]Switching Mode ControlControl of power flow in both directions by switching switches.High conversion gain, less stress on switches.
[35]Linear Feedback ControlLinear feedback control to regulate voltage and currents, avoiding magnetic saturation.Stability, robustness and prevention of damage due to magnetic saturation.
[36]Centralized ControlCentralized algorithm to coordinate converters and manage power flow and voltage/frequency restoration.Accuracy in power control and restoration of network parameters.
[37]Hybrid Sliding Mode and PI controlCombination of ISM and PI controllers for voltage balancing in DC-DC converters.Improved transient voltage balancing.
[38]Decentralized ControlSpecific techniques for handling zero sequence currents and active-reactive disturbances.Suppression of unwanted currents and improvements in power quality.
[39]Adaptive Admittance ControlVirtual admittance adjustment to improve voltage ripple suppression.Improved ripple suppression and fine adjustment of the compensation current.
[40]Distributed Cooperative ControlCooperative control that facilitates power exchange and voltage regulation between MGs.Allows power sharing, achieves precise voltage regulation.
Table 2. Summary of case studies of MG converters.
Table 2. Summary of case studies of MG converters.
Ref.ResultsMethods and ApplicationsChallenges and LimitationsContributions and Efficiency
[70]Detail of advanced control techniques for bidirectional DC-DC converters in DC microgrids. Exploration of techniques such as MPC, SMC, PBC, backstepping and intelligent control.Use of model predictive control, sliding mode control, backtracking, and more. Applications in DC-DC converters in DC microgrids, improving performance and stability.Need for advanced technologies to improve converter performance.Introduction of advanced strategies for converter stabilization in MGs. Significant efficiency improvement through advanced control technologies.
[71,77,81]Power quality control in smart hybrid AC/DC microgrids. Primary and secondary control strategies for power quality compensation.Real-time calculation methods and multi-frequency sampling. Improving cost-effectiveness and power quality in hybrid MGs.Challenges such as low switching frequency and communication problems.Focus on intelligent interface converters and their role in quality compensation. Improved efficiency through coordination of power converters.
[5,81]Power electronics integrate distributed generation and MGs, improving efficiency, power quality and reducing costs.Review of power electronics applications in systems such as wind turbines and photovoltaic systems. Functional analysis of MGs.Problems such as harmonic injection and voltage drops. Limitations in microgrid protection systems.Importance of static converters in improving the performance of distributed generation sources. Methodology for MG management. Significant improvements in efficiency and power quality.
[67,78,80]Control methods for power converters in microgrids. Evaluation of control schemes such as concentrated and master–slave.Concentrated control analysis, virtual synchronous generators, and others. Need for intelligent converters to improve power quality and stability.Challenges due to the rapid growth of distributed energy resources.Focus on advanced control methods to optimize energy efficiency in microgrids. Improved efficiency through advanced and predictive control schemes.
[67,68,83]Analysis of the functionalities of microgrids in energy management. MG functions for efficient energy management.Functional analysis of MGs. Improvement in the efficiency of MG management.Limitations in MG protection systems.Methodology for microgrid management. Efficiency in MG management.
Table 3. Electricity cost optimization in MGs.
Table 3. Electricity cost optimization in MGs.
Ref.Optimization ModelFunction ObjectiveKey VariablesRestrictionsResults
Metaheuristic
[138]Genetic Algorithm (GA)Minimize Total Net Present Cost (TNP)Sizing of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, etc.Generation capacity, demand, resource availabilityOptimal hybrid system configuration
[139]PSO (Particle Swarm Optimization), Cuckoo SearchMinimizes total costsCapacity of solar panels, wind turbines, batteries, etc.Budget, storage capacity, available resourcesOptimal configurations, reduced costs and improved efficiency
[140]Mixing and Exploring Algorithm (MEXA)Weighted combination of objectives (cost and efficiency)Costs, efficiency, storageMinimization of costs, maximization of efficiency factorsImproved efficiency and effectiveness
[141]Optimized Beluga Whale Algorithm (Boosted WOA)Minimize total operating costsBattery charging/discharging operations, power managementCharging/discharging operations, energy managementSignificant reduction in operating costs
Heuristic
[142]Firefly AlgorithmMinimize total cost of microgridsStorage capacity, generation costsLoad balancing, storage, network limitsReduced costs, improved load balancing
[117]Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm (GOA)Minimize Total Net Present CostComponents, demand, renewable generationComponent capacity, budget, demandOptimal configuration, economic and environmental feasibility
[143]Promoted Remora (PRO) AlgorithmMinimize costs of cargo operationsGeneration, load, network capacityGeneration capacity, power balanceEfficiency and profitability in cargo operations
Hybrid
[126]Hybrid gravitational search and pattern search algorithm (GSA-PS).Minimize total costsEnergy management, storage, renewable generationOptimal management of RESs, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), storage, generationConsiderable reduction in generation costs
[133]Fuzzy neural networks + Modified PSOMinimizing the value of a multi-functional targetGeneration, storage, demandTime-dependent, adaptability, generationSuperior energy savings
[144]Particle Swarm, Search for HarmonyMinimize total operating costsEnergy demand, renewable generation, grid capacity, etc.Generation capacity, demand, network limitsCost reduction, energy distribution optimization
Analytical
[145]Integer Linear Programming (ILP)Minimize total operating costsCosts, generation, demandEnergy balance, asset operations, network capacity, etc.Optimal asset selection, efficient dispatch
Deep learning reinforcement
[146]Deep Q-LearningMinimize electricity costsLoad capacity, quality of service requirementsDischarge capacity, waiting times, accuracyImproved costs and response times
Table 4. Future perspectives in high-efficiency converters for MGs.
Table 4. Future perspectives in high-efficiency converters for MGs.
Ref.Future PerspectivesExperimental Prototypes and Challenges
[116]Future extension with type-3 controller and P&O-based MPPT algorithm in DC MGs.High-efficiency converters in DC MG operations.
[117]Reactive power compensation using STATCOM, DSTATCOM, CPD, UPQC, and UPFC devices for power system stability and quality.Application CPDs in power quality improvements.
[118]Optimization of MGs through hybridization of optimization algorithms and development of distributed algorithms.Hybridization of multiple optimization algorithms for efficient MG operation.
[119]Evaluation of fuel cell performance and utilization of generated heat through exergoeconomic analysis and multiobjective algorithms.Exergoeconomic analysis for efficient and cost-effective MG systems.
[120]Implementation of ML for predictive maintenance and fault detection in MGs.ML-based predictive maintenance techniques for improved reliability and efficiency.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Peña, D.; Arevalo, P.; Ortiz, Y.; Jurado, F. Survey of Optimization Techniques for Microgrids Using High-Efficiency Converters. Energies 2024, 17, 3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153657

AMA Style

Peña D, Arevalo P, Ortiz Y, Jurado F. Survey of Optimization Techniques for Microgrids Using High-Efficiency Converters. Energies. 2024; 17(15):3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153657

Chicago/Turabian Style

Peña, Diego, Paul Arevalo, Yadyra Ortiz, and Franciso Jurado. 2024. "Survey of Optimization Techniques for Microgrids Using High-Efficiency Converters" Energies 17, no. 15: 3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153657

APA Style

Peña, D., Arevalo, P., Ortiz, Y., & Jurado, F. (2024). Survey of Optimization Techniques for Microgrids Using High-Efficiency Converters. Energies, 17(15), 3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17153657

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop