Next Article in Journal
Open Fault Detection and Tolerant Control for a Five Phase Inverter Driving System
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Temperature, Chemically Grown Titanium Oxide Thin Films with a High Hole Tunneling Rate for Si Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Integrally Molded Bipolar Plates for All-Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries
Previous Article in Special Issue
How the Chlorine Treatment and the Stoichiometry Influences the Grain Boundary Passivation in Polycrystalline CdTe Thin Films
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

How the Starting Precursor Influences the Properties of Polycrystalline CuInGaSe2 Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering and Selenization

1
Thin Film Laboratory, Department of Physics and Earth Sciences, University of Parma, Parco Area delle Scienze 7/A, Parma 43124, Italy
2
Computer Science Department, University of Verona, Ca’ Vignal 1, Strada Le Grazie 15, Verona 37134, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2016, 9(5), 354; https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050354
Submission received: 22 January 2016 / Revised: 8 April 2016 / Accepted: 27 April 2016 / Published: 10 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Key Developments in Thin Film Solar Cells)

Abstract

:
Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS)/CdS thin-film solar cells have reached, at laboratory scale, an efficiency higher than 22.3%, which is one of the highest efficiencies ever obtained for thin-film solar cells. The research focus has now shifted onto fabrication processes, which have to be easily scalable at an industrial level. For this reason, a process is highlighted here which uses only the sputtering technique for both the absorber preparation and the deposition of all the other materials that make up the cell. Particular emphasis is placed on the comparison between different precursors obtained with either In2Se3 and Ga2Se3 or InSe and GaSe as starting materials. In both cases, the precursor does not require any heat treatment, and it is immediately ready to be selenized. The selenization is performed in a pure-selenium atmosphere and only lasts a few minutes at a temperature of about 803 K. Energy conversion efficiencies in the range of 15%–16% are reproducibly obtained on soda-lime glass (SLG) substrates. Similar results are achieved if commercial ceramic tiles are used as a substrate instead of glass. This result is especially useful for the so-called building integrated photovoltaic. Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based solar cells grown directly on ceramic tiles are ideal for the fabrication of ventilated façades in low impact buildings.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The price of photovoltaic (PV) systems has decreased by about 75% in the last 10 years. Nowadays, PV appears as a cost-competitive, reliable, and sustainable electricity source [1]. Thin-film solar cells are one of the most promising technologies for the production of “clean” and low-cost energy. This is due to a greatly reduced consumption of semiconductor material and to the fact that solar cells can be manufactured on inexpensive large-area substrates. In this way, PV modules with a final cost well below US $0.50 per peak Watt (Wp) can be produced.
One of the most promising thin-film solar cells is represented by the CuIn1−XGaXSe2-based cell because it has a high optical absorption coefficient in the visible part of the solar light and a tunable band gap that varies from 1.04 eV (for CuInSe2) to 1.68 eV (for CuGaSe2) [2]. As Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS)-based solar cells are normally built in substrate configuration, the substrate must not necessarily be transparent, and this device structure makes it possible to use different substrates in addition to the typical soda-lime glass (SLG). CIGS-based devices have been successfully grown on opaque substrates such as ceramic tiles and on flexible substrates such as polymers and thin metal sheets (stainless steel, titanium, tantalum, copper, aluminum, molybdenum) [3,4].
Recently, Solar Frontier has announced a record efficiency of 22.3% on a 0.5 cm × 0.5 cm CIGS-based cell. This result represents a world record for all thin-film solar cells [5].
Here, we review the latest work performed by our Thin Film Laboratory (ThiFiLab) and, in particular, the comparison between devices obtained with different starting precursors, namely, In2Se3 and Ga2Se3 versus InSe and GaSe. In both cases, the precursors are deposited by sputtering and selenized immediately afterward. The selenization stage is performed in a pure Se atmosphere, which makes this technique environmentally sustainable.
The work’s main objective is to identify which particular sequences of precursor layers—crucial agents for the formation of a CIGS absorber film—yield the highest value for both solar cell photovoltage and photocurrent. One such sequence of starting layers, which was found to bring about a V-shaped distribution of Ga inside the CuInGaSe2 film, has been discovered and examined. The following points summarize the benefits of this special Ga distribution:
  • The greater the concentration of gallium is, and the larger the gap of CuInGaSe2.
  • A high-gap material in the junction region ensures a high built-in potential allowing for greater photovoltage.
  • Where the concentration of gallium is lower, the energy gap of the material is also narrower, increasing its ability to absorb photons with longer wavelengths. As a result, a higher photocurrent can be achieved.
  • A high-gap material at the back contact could repel the minority carriers back into the grains, increasing their lifetime.
If all these requirements are complied with, the resulting solar cells will exhibit energy conversion efficiencies well above 16%. This process can effectively yield high-efficiency solar cells, and it is easily scalable at an industrial level. The devices fabricated on commercial ceramic tiles obtained similar results, with efficiencies as high as 14%. The PV tiles are particularly suitable for the production of ventilated walls, widely used in the construction of low energy-consumption buildings.

2. Process Description and Experimental Results

2.1. The In2Se3, Ga2Se3, and Cu System

The CIGS solar cell fabrication starts with a direct current (DC) magnetron sputtering deposition in an argon atmosphere of amolybdenum back contact on a 4-mm-thick SLG substrate. Then, an In2Se3, Ga2Se3, and Cu sequence is deposited on top of the molybdenum film in the same sputtering chamber without breaking the vacuum [6].
In particular, this process involves a radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering deposition of a 1000-nm-thick In2Se3 film at a substrate temperature of about 670 K, with 3.3 W/cm2 power density at a deposition rate of 1 nm/s under a 0.5 Pa argon pressure (this deposition rate was measured with a quartz micro-balance, while film thickness was measured with a profilometer) [7]. On top of the In2Se3 layer, a 330-nm-thick Ga2Se3 film is deposited by RF magnetron sputtering, at a substrate temperature of about 720 K, with a 1.8 W/cm2 power density at a deposition rate of 0.4 nm/s under a 0.2 Pa argon pressure. Immediately after, a 180-nm-thick Cu film is deposited by d.c. magnetron sputtering, at a substrate temperature of about 620 K, with a 1.8 W/cm2 power density at a deposition rate of 0.6 nm/s under a 0.2 Pa argon pressure (Figure 1a). The difference between the deposition temperatures of these layers is due to the high reactivity and diffusivity of copper. Its diffusion increases as temperature rises. Cu reactivity is so strong that it induces surface segregation of secondary phases and partial separation of the crystalline grains, which negatively affect film uniformity. This problem can be avoided by depositing Cu on top of the Ga2Se3 film at low substrate temperature (≤620 K). By performing a further annealing in vacuum at a temperature of 670 K, a uniform film with enhanced single-phase crystallization is finally obtained. The compositional uniformity of the precursor material allows the selenization process, which is performed in a pure-selenium atmosphere for 10 min at a temperature of about 800 K.
The CIGS absorber material prepared according to this method displays a uniform morphology throughout the whole substrate area, as can be seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
This material can be obtained with a similar morphology and composition even when a vacuum annealing is not performed before the selenization stage with the great benefit of a strong reduction in the process time. The highest photovoltaic parameters exhibited by solar cells produced with this absorber material are the following: open-circuit voltage VOC = 530 mV, short-circuit current density JSC = 35.16 mA/cm2, fill-factor FF = 58%, and efficiency η = 10.81%. Measurements were performed at 298 K under 100 mW/cm2 air mass (A.M.) 1.5 filtered light (standard conditions) (Current Density-Voltage (J-V) curve in Figure A1, sample #2012). It is possible, in these thermodynamic conditions, that a CuInSe2 (CIS) matrix with a more ideal crystal structure can form, preventing the lattice defects from trapping the photo-generated carriers and allowing them to be collected and transported more effectively through the junction.
In order to obtain CIGS-based solar cells of higher efficiency, a proper distribution of a Ga concentration within the absorber material is needed. In particular, an accurately tailored double-graded Ga concentration may allow for the engineering of a specific energy gap (EG) design (Figure 4). If this design is followed, a back grading will provide an additional drift field for the minority electrons, and this will in turn improve carrier collection and reduce back-contact recombination [8,9,10]. A second Ga grading will appear near the CIGS/CdS interface where the Ga concentration will be made higher towards the p-n junction. This superficial grading region must be kept thin enough, well below 20 nm, to let carriers overcome this barrier or pass through it by a tunnel mechanism. This makes it possible to increase the VOC. In order to increase, as much as possible, the amount of solar photons absorbed inside the space charge region, a low EG layer has to be produced inside the absorber. This layer, with a thickness of about 1000 nm, can increase the long wavelength absorption and thus supply a higher amount of photo-generated carriers [11,12].
Unfortunately, the precursors prepared with the aforementioned procedure that were thought to result in a CIGS absorber layer with enhanced photovoltaic properties did not produce the desired result, as can be seen in the in-depth profile analysis obtained with secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) (Figure 5).
Ga2Se3 is not the ideal Ga-based starting material to allow the Ga to react correctly with the other elements because it does not release enough Ga during the reaction of Cu and In with selenium. As a result, an In-rich absorber layer is obtained instead of a Ga-rich surface layer.
With the aim to produce solar cells of higher performance, the reactivity of the starting materials has to be adjusted to obtain an improved Ga distribution within the absorber layer. To achieve this condition, In2Se3 and Ga2Se3 precursors have to be replaced with other materials, which can interact more effectively with one another. For this purpose, In2Se3 was replaced with InSe, whereas Ga2Se3 was replaced with GaSe.

2.2. The InSe, GaSe, and Cu System

By using the process conditions already optimized for the method described above, In2Se3 was replaced with InSe to obtain a more effective interaction with the other constituents [7,13]. As InSe is more reactive than In2Se3, it can probably release In into the absorber material in a more uniform way. InSe allows for the formation of a better CIS matrix with the correct stoichiometry on a larger portion of the absorber, enhancing both its optical and electronic properties. The InSe film is deposited at a 670 K substrate temperature, by RF. magnetron sputtering with a 3.3 W/cm2 power density discharge, under a 0.5 Pa argon pressure (1.2 nm/s deposition rate).
As mentioned, Ga2Se3 was replaced with GaSe. This material exhibits a lower melting point and decomposes at a lower temperature with respect to Ga2Se3. It could release Ga atoms more easily, allowing for a better interaction with the other elements, especially with copper. Furthermore, GaSe was found to have a thermal stability similar to that of Ga2Se3, and uniform and homogeneous polycrystalline GaSe films can be successfully obtained at deposition temperatures that are as low as 670 K. GaSe is deposited by RF magnetron sputtering, with a 1.8 W/cm2 power density under a 0.5 Pa argon pressure (0.3 nm/s deposition rate). InSe, GaSe, and Cu were deposited in sequence as described above (Figure 1b). In this case, Cu can be sputtered onto GaSe at the same deposition temperature (about 670 K) without causing any collateral issues inside the precursor, while improving surface uniformity. The XRD spectra of the as-deposited precursor layers and of the same film after the selenization process are showed in Figure 6a,b respectively [14].
SEM images (Figure 7) show the superficial uniformity of the precursor stack and of the absorber layer immediately after the selenization step. This CIGS film is more compact and dense when compared with the CIGS film that was prepared starting with Ga2Se3 and In2Se3, and exhibits an average grain size larger than 1 μm.
The highest photovoltaic parameters exhibited by solar cells produced with this absorber material are: VOC = 560 mV, JSC = 34.92 mA/cm2, FF = 64%, and η = 12.51%. Measurements were performed at standard conditions (J-Vcurve in Figure A1, sample #3097).
The unexpectedly low values found for VOC and FF were attributed to the fact that gallium, which is less reactive than indium, tends to diffuse towards the bottom and ends up being drained away from the film surface.

2.2.1. The InSe, GaSe, Cu, and GaSe Layers Sequence

In order to have more gallium near the surface, a change was proposed in the sequence of the layer deposition. The new sequence consists in depositing films of InSe (900 nm), GaSe (150 nm), Cu (230 nm), and GaSe (250 nm) again (Figure 1c) on top of the initial Mo layer.
In order to eliminate the influence of individual sputter targets, whose behavior varies based on different choices of procurement, on the physical properties of the sputtered layers (stoichiometry, adhesion, thermal stability, optical and electrical behavior, etc.) the deposition parameters were changed after every target substitution. In other words, the sputtering parameters were not fixed but they were continually adjusted to obtain the desired film deposition, and this operation was carried out for all sputter targets. This was the only way to make sure the precursors films were deposited reproducibly.
The precursors are then selenized in the standard way. An analysis of the in-depth profile, performed with SIMS spectroscopy (Figure 8), shows that this new absorber layer includes more gallium in proximity of the surface. Moving away from the surface, the Ga concentration decreases and then increases again when approaching the back contact.
The highest performing solar cells obtained with this method displayed the following parameters: VOC = 576 mV, JSC = 38.13 mA/cm2, FF = 0.74 and η = 16.25%. Measurements were carried out in standard conditions (J-V characteristic in Figure A1, sample #4025) [15].
When the optimized stack of precursor layers (the one with an extra GaSe layer in the third method) is used, an enhanced performance of the solar cells exhibiting energy conversion efficiencies above 15%–16% is reproducibly obtained. This is probably due to the V-shaped Ga distribution, which helps to maximize both the photovoltage and the photocurrent of the solar cell. A good control of the Ga concentration is the key to engineering the profile of the energy gap of the absorbing material, which in turn plays a fundamental role in the operation of a solar cell, as explained in this article’s introduction. The detailed analysis of Ga concentration as a function of absorber layer thickness will be the subject of future studies. In particular, the optimization of the thickness of the lower Ga-concentration layer should be addressed in order to maximize the absorbing properties of the CIGS film.

2.2.2. The Ceramic Substrate

The ceramic tiles used in this work are covered with glassy enamel which has a composition similar to that of SLG. In this way, the tile surface becomes smoother, making this substrate suitable for thin film deposition. The opaque glassy enamel have typical thicknesses ranging from 300 μm up to 1000 μm. They are deposited starting from wet powders and are processed on the ceramic surface at a temperature between 1210 K and 1250 K [16].
The structure of the precursor is composed of a 1500-nm-thick InSe film, a 200–300-nm-thick GaSe film, a 350–400-nm-thick Cu film, and, finally, a 400–500-nm-thick GaSe film as it was for the samples deposited on SLG. All the materials are deposited at a substrate temperature of 670 K, and the precursor is selenized at high temperature (790 K) in a pure-Se atmosphere. In other words, the process developed on SLG was simply transposed to the ceramic substrate, and the resulting precursor seemed to maintain a morphology of the same quality (Figure 9).
The highest performing solar cells obtained with this method yielded the following parameters: VOC = 610 mV, JSC = 36.79 mA/cm2, FF = 0.61, and η = 13.69%. Measurements were acquired at standard conditions (J-V characteristic in Figure A1, sample #1113).
All cell parameters refer to an area of around 1 cm2 (if not expressly stated otherwise). The photovoltaic parameters were collected over 20 samples for every method. Each sample included 4 cells; therefore, we tested about 80 cells for each method to make sure that the whole fabrication process was indeed reproducible (as the standard deviation indicates). At any rate, we here reported the PV parameters of solar cells representative of each method. Generally, we have chosen to show the photovoltaic parameters of devices made with layers on which morphological, structural, and compositional investigations were carried out.
As one can see from the data in Table 1, the photocurrent of solar cells grown on ceramic tiles is lower than the photocurrent obtained by solar cells grown on SLG. A possible explanation is that commercially available ceramic tiles are characterized by a high number of macroscopic surface defects. Voids and prominences are larger than the combined thickness of all the deposited films, which cannot fill or cover them completely. If the ceramic surface is covered by glassy enamel, with a composition similar to the SLG, the surface is much smoother, making the ceramic a suitable substrate for a thin-film deposition. The residual defectiveness requires the use of a material poorer in Cu, as compared with CIGS grown on SLG, to avoid a deleterious segregation of binary phases, such as Cu2Se, inside the surface non-uniformities of the ceramic substrates. A Cu-poor material is obtained by increasing the In concentration. However, this has a negative influence on the Ga-concentration profile as more indium makes it flatter, inevitably leading to a loss of the benefits that come from a V-shape distribution.

3. Conclusions

By using RF sputtering for the deposition of chalcogenide precursors and their selenization in a pure Se atmosphere, high-efficiency CIGS-based solar cells were produced. We showed how different compounds were tested as starting materials. We described the process based on In2Se3–Ga2Se3 and its evolution towards the InSe–GaSe system, which granted us better control of the Ga-concentration profile inside the absorber layer. By following this method, a fine-tuning of the absorber material energy gap is achieved, and devices with an efficiency of 15%–16% were assembled on SLG. This process can also be extended to ceramic substrates and leads to the production of PV tiles with efficiencies in the range of 13%–14%, which are particularly suitable for the fabrication of ventilated walls in near-zero-energy buildings. Moreover, this process can be easily transposed to flexible thin-film solar cells using flexible thin metal sheets as a substrate. By using simple deposition techniques for all the materials constituting the solar cell, this process could be easily scaled up to the industrial level.

Author Contributions

Alessio Bosio: growth, deposition, and selenization equipment design and installation, sputtering target preparation, project coordination; Greta Rosa and Daniele Menossi: sputtering deposition and materials characterization, device modeling and processing; Nicola Romeo: electrical characterization, lab coordination. All together: critical interpretation of the measurement results.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

This figure summarizes the results obtained with absorber layers realized by using different precursor stacked layers. It highlights the conclusive meaning of the results.
Figure A1. Comparison between the J-V characteristics of four different solar cells all grown on a SLG substrate, except for the CIGS film. #1113: grown on a ceramic substrate; #2012: first method—(In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu); #3097: second method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu); #4025: third method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe); #1113: third method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe). Measurement performed at 298 K under 100 mW/cm2 air mass (A.M.) 1.5 filtered light (standard conditions).
Figure A1. Comparison between the J-V characteristics of four different solar cells all grown on a SLG substrate, except for the CIGS film. #1113: grown on a ceramic substrate; #2012: first method—(In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu); #3097: second method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu); #4025: third method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe); #1113: third method—(InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe). Measurement performed at 298 K under 100 mW/cm2 air mass (A.M.) 1.5 filtered light (standard conditions).
Energies 09 00354 g010

References

  1. Solar Power Europe—Global Market Outlook for Solar Power 2015–2019. Available online: http://www.solarpowereurope.org/home/ (accessed on 12 January 2016).
  2. Bube, R.B. Copper Indium Diselenide And Other I-III-VI Materials. In Photovoltaic Materials, 1st ed.; Newman, R.C., Ed.; Imperial College Press: London, UK, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 184–214. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kessler, F.; Herrmann, D.; Powalla, M. Approaches to flexible CIGS thin-film solar cells. Thin Solid Films 2004, 480–481, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Reinhard, P.; Chirila, A.; Blosch, P.; Pianezzi, F.; Nishiwaki, S.; Buechelers, S.; Tiwari, A.N. Review of progress toward 20% efficiency flexible CIGS solar cells and manufacturing issues of solar modules. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2013, 3, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Solar Frontier Hits 22.3% on CIGS Cell. Available online: http://www.pv-magazine.com/news/details/beitrag/solar-frontier-hits-223-on-cigs-cell_100022342/#axzz3weK2S0hj (accessed on 8 January 2016).
  6. Romeo, N.; Bosio, A.; Mazzamuto, S.; Menossi, D.; Romeo, A. CIGS thin films prepared by sputtering and selenization by using In2Se3, Ga2Se3 and Cu as sputtering targets. In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Honolulu, HI, USA, 20–25 June 2010; pp. 786–788.
  7. Menossi, D.; Bosio, A.; Romeo, N. Fabrication of a Cu(In,Ga)Se2/CdS thin-film solar cell. In Key Developments in CuInGaSe2 Thin Film Solar Cell, 1st ed.; LAP Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2014; pp. 39–84. [Google Scholar]
  8. Gloeckler, M.; Sites, J.R. Band-gap grading in Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2015, 66, 1891–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Contreras, M.A.; Tuttle, J.; Gabor, A.M.; Tennant, A.; Ramannathan, K.; Asher, S.; Franz, A.; Keane, J.; Wang, L.; Scofield, J.; et al. High efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2-based solar cells: Processing of novel absorber structures. In Proceedings of the Conference Record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 19–24 May 2002. [CrossRef]
  10. Gorji, N.E.; Perez, M.D.; Reggiani, U.; Sandrolini, L. A New Approach to Valence and Conduction Band Grading in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cells. Int. Assoc. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 2012, 4, 573–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dullweber, T.; Rau, U.; Contreras, M.A.; Noufi, R.; Schock, H. Photogeneration and carrier recombination in graded gap Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 2000, 47, 2249–2254. [Google Scholar]
  12. Romeo, N.; Bosio, A.; Menossi, D.; Catellani, C.; Dharmadasa, R.; Romeo, A. High efficiency Cu(In,Ga)Se2/CdS thin-film solar cells obtained with precursors sputtered from InSe, GaSe and Cu targets. Thin Solid Films 2013, 535, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chirilă, A.; Buecheler, S.; Pianezzi, F.; Bloesch, P.; Gretener, C.; Uhl, A.R.; Fella, C.; Kranz, L.; Perrenoud, J.; Seyrling, S.; et al. Highly efficient Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells grown on flexible polymer films. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 857–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bosio, A.; Menossi, D.; Romeo, A.; Romeo, N. Polycrystalline Cu(InGa)Se2/CdS Thin Film Solar Cells Made by New Precursors. In Solar Cells Research and Application Perspectives, 1st ed.; Morales-Acevedo, A., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013; pp. 79–106. [Google Scholar]
  15. Bosio, A.; Menossi, D.; Rosa, G. I risultati sperimentali. In Il Fotovoltaico di Seconda Generazione Diventa Competitivo, 1st ed.; Aracne Editrice: Rome, Italy, 2015; pp. 169–189. [Google Scholar]
  16. Bosio, A.; Menossi, D.; Rosa, G.; Romeo, N. Key developments in CIGS thin-film solar cells on ceramic substrates. Cryst. Res. Technol. 2014, 49, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The different precursor layers and sequences used to obtain the absorber material reviewed in this article: (a) first method: deposition in sequence of In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu; (b) second method: deposition in sequence of InSe–GaSe–Cu; (c) third method: deposition in sequence of InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe.
Figure 1. The different precursor layers and sequences used to obtain the absorber material reviewed in this article: (a) first method: deposition in sequence of In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu; (b) second method: deposition in sequence of InSe–GaSe–Cu; (c) third method: deposition in sequence of InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe.
Energies 09 00354 g001
Figure 2. SEM image of the: (a) morphology of the as-deposited In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu precursor sequence; and (b) the resulting Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) layer after selenization.
Figure 2. SEM image of the: (a) morphology of the as-deposited In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu precursor sequence; and (b) the resulting Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) layer after selenization.
Energies 09 00354 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum of the CIGS layer after selenization, obtained using In2Se3, Ga2Se3, and Cu as starting materials.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectrum of the CIGS layer after selenization, obtained using In2Se3, Ga2Se3, and Cu as starting materials.
Energies 09 00354 g003
Figure 4. Band diagram of an optimized Ga double-graded CIGS absorber material [9].
Figure 4. Band diagram of an optimized Ga double-graded CIGS absorber material [9].
Energies 09 00354 g004
Figure 5. (a) Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SINS) in-depth profile spectrum of the CIGS layer, after selenization of In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu stacked layers. To make the spectrum more legible, the Mo signal was removed; (b) detail of the Ga/(In+Ga) ratio along the CIGS layer thickness.
Figure 5. (a) Secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SINS) in-depth profile spectrum of the CIGS layer, after selenization of In2Se3–Ga2Se3–Cu stacked layers. To make the spectrum more legible, the Mo signal was removed; (b) detail of the Ga/(In+Ga) ratio along the CIGS layer thickness.
Energies 09 00354 g005
Figure 6. Grazing incidence XRD spectra of: (a) InSe–GaSe–Cu-based precursor layers and (b) the same sample after selenization.
Figure 6. Grazing incidence XRD spectra of: (a) InSe–GaSe–Cu-based precursor layers and (b) the same sample after selenization.
Energies 09 00354 g006
Figure 7. SEM images of the: (a) morphology of the as-deposited InSe–GaSe–Cu precursor sequence; and (b) the resulting CIGS layer after selenization.
Figure 7. SEM images of the: (a) morphology of the as-deposited InSe–GaSe–Cu precursor sequence; and (b) the resulting CIGS layer after selenization.
Energies 09 00354 g007
Figure 8. (a) SIMS in-depth profile spectrum of the CIGS layer after selenization of InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe stacked layers. To make the spectrum more legible, the Mo signal was removed; (b) Detail of the Ga/(In+Ga) ratio along the CIGS layer thickness.
Figure 8. (a) SIMS in-depth profile spectrum of the CIGS layer after selenization of InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe stacked layers. To make the spectrum more legible, the Mo signal was removed; (b) Detail of the Ga/(In+Ga) ratio along the CIGS layer thickness.
Energies 09 00354 g008
Figure 9. SEM images showing the morphology of the: (a) precursor made by depositing in sequence InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe on ceramic substrate; and (b) same sample after selenization.
Figure 9. SEM images showing the morphology of the: (a) precursor made by depositing in sequence InSe–GaSe–Cu–GaSe on ceramic substrate; and (b) same sample after selenization.
Energies 09 00354 g009
Table 1. Comparison between the photovoltaic parameters of 1 cm2 CIGS-based solar cells, fabricated with the different methods on glass and ceramic substrates at the ThiFiLab, whose characteristics are reported in Figure A1. Soda-lime glass: SLG.
Table 1. Comparison between the photovoltaic parameters of 1 cm2 CIGS-based solar cells, fabricated with the different methods on glass and ceramic substrates at the ThiFiLab, whose characteristics are reported in Figure A1. Soda-lime glass: SLG.
Layerthickness (nm)SampleSubstrateVOC (mV)JSC (mA/cm2)FF (%)Eta 1 (%)
In2Se3Ga2Se3Cu#2012SLG53035.160.5810.81
1000330180
InSeGaSeCu#3097SLG56034.920.6412.51
1000320220
InSeGaSeCuGaSe#4025SLG57638.130.7416.25
900150230250
InSeGaSeCuGaSe#1113Ceramic61036.790.6113.79
1000250350450
1 Measure performed at 298 K under 100 mW/cm2 A.M. 1.5 filtered light (standard conditions).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rosa, G.; Bosio, A.; Menossi, D.; Romeo, N. How the Starting Precursor Influences the Properties of Polycrystalline CuInGaSe2 Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering and Selenization. Energies 2016, 9, 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050354

AMA Style

Rosa G, Bosio A, Menossi D, Romeo N. How the Starting Precursor Influences the Properties of Polycrystalline CuInGaSe2 Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering and Selenization. Energies. 2016; 9(5):354. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050354

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rosa, Greta, Alessio Bosio, Daniele Menossi, and Nicola Romeo. 2016. "How the Starting Precursor Influences the Properties of Polycrystalline CuInGaSe2 Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering and Selenization" Energies 9, no. 5: 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050354

APA Style

Rosa, G., Bosio, A., Menossi, D., & Romeo, N. (2016). How the Starting Precursor Influences the Properties of Polycrystalline CuInGaSe2 Thin Films Prepared by Sputtering and Selenization. Energies, 9(5), 354. https://doi.org/10.3390/en9050354

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop