Next Article in Journal
Improved Determination of Q Quality Factor and Resonance Frequency in Sensors Based on the Magnetoelastic Resonance Through the Fitting to Analytical Expressions
Next Article in Special Issue
Rigid Polyurethane Foams Reinforced with POSS-Impregnated Sugar Beet Pulp Filler
Previous Article in Journal
Thermoelectric Properties of Sb-S System Compounds from DFT Calculations
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Eco-Friendly Biochar and Valuable Bio-Oil from Caragana korshinskii: Pyrolysis Preparation, Characterization, and Adsorption Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 21
10.3390/ma13214709
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Hemp Shives Impregnated with Selected Plant Oils on Mechanical, Thermal, and Insulating Properties of Polyurethane Composite Foams

by
Sylwia Członka
1,*,
Anna Strąkowska
1 and
Agnė Kairytė
2
1
Institute of Polymer & Dye Technology, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2
Laboratory of Thermal Insulating Materials and Acoustics, Institute of Building Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Linkmenu st. 28, LT-08217 Vilnius, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(21), 4709; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214709
Submission received: 4 October 2020 / Revised: 20 October 2020 / Accepted: 20 October 2020 / Published: 22 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmentally Friendly Polymeric Blends from Renewable Sources)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polyurethane (PUR) foams reinforced with 2 wt.% hemp shives (HS) fillers were successfully synthesized. Three different types of HS fillers were evaluated—non-treated HS, HS impregnated with sunflower oil (SO) and HS impregnated with tung oil (TO). The impact of each type of HS fillers on cellular morphology, mechanical performances, thermal stability, and flame retardancy was evaluated. It has been shown that the addition of HS fillers improved the mechanical characteristics of PUR foams. Among all modified series, the greatest improvement was observed after the incorporation of non-treated HS filler—when compared with neat foams, the value of compressive strength increased by ~13%. Moreover, the incorporation of impregnated HS fillers resulted in the improvement of thermal stability and flame retardancy of PUR foams. For example, the addition of both types of impregnated HS fillers significantly decreased the value of heat peak release (pHRR), total smoke release (TSR), and limiting oxygen index (LOI). Moreover, the PUR foams containing impregnated fillers were characterized by improved hydrophobicity and limited water uptake. The obtained results confirmed that the modification of PUR foams with non-treated and impregnated HS fillers may be a successful approach in producing polymeric composites with improved properties.

1. Introduction

Recently, the synthesis and development of polyurethane (PUR) composites containing natural fillers have attracted increased attention in industry and academia [1,2,3]. The application of natural fillers as reinforcing materials in the production of PUR foams has both ecological and economic advantages. Among the natural materials, cellulosic compounds have significant advantages, mostly due to their low density, high stiffness, biodegradability, unlimited availability, and low price. Previous studies have shown that the incorporation of organic and inorganic materials into the polymer matrix may successfully improve the mechanical characteristics of PUR composites [4,5,6] (Table 1). For example, the basalt waste has been used as a reinforcing filler for the production of rigid PUR foams by Kurańska et al. [7]. Due to the incorporation of 3–40 wt.% of the powdered basalt filler, the resulting PUR composite foams were characterized by improved mechanical performances. Similar results have been reported by Paciorek-Sadowska et al. [8] in the case of PUR composite foams containing 30–60 wt.% rapeseed filler. PUR composites with increased apparent density and enhanced mechanical properties were produced. The improvement of mechanical and thermal performances was also observed after the incorporation of egg-shells [9]. The addition of 20 wt.% egg-shells resulted in a significant improvement of the abovementioned properties. Interesting results were presented by Olszewski et al. [3] in the case of PUR foams containing glass and sisal fibers—the flexural strength, impact strength, and hardness of materials have been improved by the addition of both kinds of fibers. The effect of waste sludge particles on the physical and mechanical properties of PUR foams was studied by Kairyte et al. [10]. The authors reported that the addition of 20 wt.% of the fillers results in the production of the PUR materials with improved characteristics, while the higher content of the filler slightly deteriorates the properties of the foams. Interesting results were presented by de Avila Delucis et al. [11] who synthesized PUR foams reinforced with different ratios (1, 5, and 10 wt.%) of forest-derivatives fillers, e.g., bark, pine trees needles, kraft lignin, and paper sludge. Among the modified samples, the most promising materials were PUR foams reinforced with 1 and 5 wt.% wood, which exhibited improved mechanical and hygroscopic performance.
Among different organic fillers, the chemical composition of hemp shives have great potential as sustainable reinforcements for novel polyurethane composite foams. The basic unit of hemp shives is composed of cellulose microfibrils, which are combined by an interphase mixture of different pectins, hemicellulose, and other low-molecular polysaccharides [29]. The hydrogen bonds between different chemical components provide stiffness and mechanical strength of hemp shives. For example, hemicellulose determines the thermal degradation and moisture absorption, while the lignin content determines the UV degradation of the hemp shives [30,31]. Hemp shives offer several advantages, such as sufficient reactive functional groups, high carbon content, compatibility with diverse industrial chemicals, good stability and mechanical properties due to the presence of aromatic rings, and good rheological and viscoelastic properties, making it a potential candidate to be used as reinforcing material in polymer composites.
Nevertheless, the application of cellulosic materials as reinforcement of polymeric composite materials presents some limitations. As for mechanical strength, chemical or physical treatment of cellulose surface may improve the mechanical and thermal properties of polymer composites [32,33,34]. In previous works, a chemical modification, such as acetylation [35], alkalization [36], benzoylation [37] of cellulosic compounds, has been reported. For example, Du et al. have reported an improvement of interfacial compatibility between polyimide matrix and wood fibers treated by 3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane [38]. Such reinforced composites were characterized by improved abrasive and tensile properties. Alkali-treated coir fibers were developed by Valášek et al. [39]. Due to the improved interphase adhesive, epoxy composites reinforced with alkali-treated coir fibers exhibited improved mechanical properties. Similar results have been shown in the case of epoxy composites reinforced with palm fibers chemically treated with sodium hydroxide [40]. Improvement of wear characteristics and mechanical performances of composites was observed due to the addition of the fibers. Chemical treatments of oil palm fibers, such as latex coating, acetylation, or acrylonitrile grafting have been evaluated by Sreekala et al. [41]. The authors have shown that phenol formaldehyde composites containing modified fibers were characterized by better flexural characteristics and improved impact resistance.
Many previous works have studied the impact of natural fillers on the mechanical and thermal characteristics of polymeric composites; however, no studies have been devoted to the examination of the polyurethane foam composites reinforced with physically-treated hemp shives. Keeping in view the advantageous properties of hemp shives, it seems logical to use hemp shives as a reinforcing filler for new bio-based polyurethane composite foams. The preparation of novel materials from hemp shives products may improve the mechanical properties of the polyurethane materials as well as possibly solve the problem of their waste disposal. Therefore, the impact of hemp shives impregnated with sunflower oil and tung oil on morphological, mechanical, and thermal properties of polyurethane foam composites was examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

PUR foams were synthesized using polyether polyol (Stapanpol PS-2352) and polymeric diphenylmethane diisocyanate (Purocyn B). As catalysts, Kosmos 75 and Kosmos 33 (potassium octoate and potassium acetate, respectively) were used. Silicone surfactant (Tegostab B8513) was used for stabilizing the foam’s structure and the mixture of pentane and cyclopentane (50:50 v/v%) was selected as a blowing agent in forming cellular structure. Hemp shives, sunflower oil, and tung oil were obtained from a local company.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Impregnation of Hemp Shives (HS) with Sunflower Oil and Tung Oil

Hemp shives were milled and wetted with selected oil (sunflower/tung oil). The mixture was thoroughly mixed and poured into cups. Subsequently, the cups with the mixture were put into the vacuuming dish and the vacuuming process proceeded until 0.01 MPa of pressure was achieved. Then, the green handle of the vacuum dish was screwed and the vacuum was left for another 30 min. A total of 10 cycles were done for the mixtures and, after that, all mixtures were thermally treated at 70 °C for 24 h. After the thermal treatment, the mixtures were left to cool down at 23 ± 5 °C temperature and 50 ± 5% humidity conditions.

2.2.2. Synthesis of PUR Foams

PUR foams were produced by a one-shot method according to the procedure reported in the previous works. In brief, the synthesis of PUR foams modified with the addition of HS was as follows (Figure 1): To form a polyol premix, the calculated amounts of polyol (Stepanpol), catalysts (Kosmos 75 and Kosmos 33), blowing agent (the mixture of pentane and cyclopentane), and surfactant (Tegostab) were placed in a plastic cup and intensively mixed at 1500 rpm by a mechanical stirrer for 60 s. Then, the previously impregnated HS fillers were added to the cup and mixed for another 60 s to form a homogenous dispersion. A calculated amount of isocyanate (Purocyn) was added to the reaction mixture and thoroughly mixed for 10 s. The free rise PUR composite foam was left at room temperature for 24 h to provide complete curing of composites. A schematic procedure for the synthesis of PUR foams is shown in Figure 2. PUR foams were synthesized following the formulations presented in Table 2.

2.2.3. Sample Characterization

The dynamic viscosity of polyol premixes was examined following ISO 2555 [42] using Viscometer DVII+. (Viscometer DVII+, Brookfield, Berlin, Germany). The cellular structure of PUR foams was evaluated using a scanning electron microscope using JSM-5500 LV (JEOL JSM 5500 LV, JEOL Ltd., Peabody, MA, USA). The cell sizes of PUR foams was determined by ImageJ software (Java 1.8.0, Media Cybernetics Inc., Rockville, MD, USA). The average pore diameters, pore size distribution, and the closed-cell content were identified based on SEM micrographs using the binarization threshold—an average of 400 individual measurements was reported. The apparent density of PUR foams was calculated as the ratio between the weight and volume of the samples according to ISO 845. The number of closed-cells was evaluated according to the ISO 4590 standard. Thermal conductivity (λ) of PUR foams was measured at 25 °C by using LaserComp 50. The mechanical performances of PUR foams were performed using a Zwick Z100 Testing Machine (Zwick/Roell Group, Germany). Compressive strength was examined parallel to the foam rise direction according to the ISO 844 [43] standard. Flexural and impact strength of PUR foams were evaluated according to the ISO 178 [44] and ISO 180 [45] standards. The dynamic–mechanical characteristic (DMA) was performed using an ARES rheometer (ARES, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) under the selected parameters (applied deformation of 0.1% and a frequency of 1 Hz, temperature range of 0–250 °C). The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) test was performed in the function of temperature (0–600 °C) using an STA 449 F1 Jupiter Analyzer (Netzsch Group, Selb, Germany). The fire behavior of PUR foams was evaluated using a cone calorimeter apparatus according to ISO 5660 in S.Z.T.K. “TAPS”—Maciej Kowalski Company (Lodz, Poland).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Topography and an Average Size of HS Fillers

The external morphology of HS, and impregnated HS fillers (HS/SO and HS/TO), is presented in Figure 3. Comparing non-treated HS and impregnated HS fillers, it is clear that the oil impregnation affects an external morphology of the filler. After the impregnation with sunflower and tung oils, the fillers possess a similar structure; however, the particles tend to agglomerate, forming the bigger clusters of filler particles. The size of HS particles ranges from 400 to 800 nm, while, after the impregnation with sunflower oil, the average size of particles increases and it ranges from 3 to 5 µm. A similar relationship is observed for HS impregnated with tung oil—the average diameter ranges from 3 nm to 6 µm. Moreover, the addition of HS fillers increases the viscosity of the PUR systems (Table 3). Among all modified systems, the greatest viscosity is observed for PUR systems containing impregnated HS fillers. The viscosity increases rapidly from 840 (for neat PUR system) to 1800 and 2200 mPa·s after the addition of HS fillers impregnated with sunflower and tung oil, respectively. This result is not surprising, considering a high tendency of the filler to agglomeration and formation of coarse domains, as presented in Figure 3.

3.2. Reactivity of PUR Foam Formulations

The reactivity of PUR systems was investigated by measuring the start time, free rise time, and tack-free time during the foaming process (Table 3). Incorporation of HS, HS/SO, and HS/TO decreased the reactivity of the PUR systems. When compared to neat PUR_0, the foaming reaction rate was lower as HS fillers were introduced, probably due to the steric hindrance effects of hydroxyl groups (-OH) of HS filler. On the other hand, the presence of hydroxyl groups of HS filler can affect the proper stoichiometry of PUR synthesis due to the reaction between hydroxyl groups of HS filler and isocyanate groups. Consequently, the higher number of isocyanate groups is consumed and the reduced amount of carbon dioxide is produced, slowing down the foaming behavior of PUR systems. The extended processing times may be also connected with increased viscosity of the PUR dispersion containing HS fillers, which affect the expansion of PUR systems, extending the free rise time of PUR foams. Comparing PUR systems containing HS fillers, the highest values of processing times are observed for PUR_HS/TO, which may be connected with the higher viscosity of PUR systems containing HS/TO and the presence of bigger aggregates of HS particles. Similar results have been also found in previous works [46].

3.3. Morphology, Apparent Density and Thermal Conductivity of PUR Foams

Figure 4 presents the SEM images of PUR foams containing HS fillers without and with oil impregnation. The morphology of neat PUR_0 is smooth and regular. With the incorporation of HS fillers, the cellular shape is more irregular with the formation of a higher number of open cells. It can be seen that, with the incorporation of impregnated HS/SO and HS/TO, some agglomerates of the fillers are visible in the cell struts. The alteration in cellular morphology may be connected with increased viscosity of PUR systems containing HS fillers. As a result, the formation and expansion of air bubbles are hindered, which results in the creation of a more heterogeneous structure of PUR foams. When compared to neat PUR_0, the overall shape of cells becomes more irregular after the incorporation of HS fillers. All series of modified PUR foams possess a poor structure with a higher number of open cells. This effect is more prominent in the case of PUR foams containing both types of impregnated HS fillers. Similar dependence was also observed in previous works and was connected with the attachment of the filler particles to the cell walls leading to the rupturing and collapsing of foam’s cells and ultimately to the weakening of the modified foam’s structure [47]. The addition of HS fillers affects average cell size and this effect is more prominent after the incorporation of impregnated HS fillers (Figure 4). In general, neat PUR_0 possess an average cell size of 450 µm. The addition of HS fillers results in the formation of more inhomogeneous PUR foams with an average size in the range of 380–620 µm for each series of modified foams. Moreover, the addition of HS fillers decreases the content of closed-cell—the value decreases from 91.4% (for neat PUR_0) to 89.2, 88.6, and 85.6% for PUR_HS, PUR_HS/SO, and PUR_HS/TO, respectively. Previous studies have shown that the opening of cells due to the incorporation of organic filler may be connected with poor interphase adhesion between polyurethane matrix and filler surface, which results in disruption of the foaming process and more defective morphology of modified PUR foams [48]. Such an explanation may be found in our study as well. According to SEM results, some particles of HS fillers are localized in empty pores and they are not completely built in the foams’ struts. This confirms the poor compatibility between the filler and PUR matrix, leading to the cell collapsing and formation of PUR foams with open-pore structure [47]. Moreover, with the addition of HS fillers, the gas may form additional nucleation sites on the surface of HS filler particles, providing heterogeneous centers for the formation of air bubbles, which in turn increase the cell number of the PUR foam structure. As reported previously, the viscosity of PUR systems containing HS fillers is increased, and the expansion of the cells is reduced. Because of this, the HS fillers react with isocyanate groups, forming an interpenetrating cross-linked network, which in turn disturbs the gas release, reducing the size of cells.
The cellular structure affects the apparent density of PUR foams (Table 4). Due to the incorporation of HS, HS/SO, and HS/TO, the value of apparent density increases by 6, 16, and 17%, respectively. A greater apparent density of PUR foams containing HS fillers should be attributed to the increased viscosity and limited expansion of modified PUR systems. Moreover, the apparent density of modified PUR foams is further enhanced by the molecular weight of HS fillers.
Thermal conductivity (λ) is an important parameter that defines the thermal insulation properties of PUR foams [10]. The value of λ measured for neat PUR_0 is 0.025 W m−1 K−1 (Table 4). The addition of HS filler has no significant influence on the value of λ; however, the incorporation of impregnated HS/SO and HS/TO increases the value of λ by about 20 and 24%, respectively. In general, the value of λ involves the thermal conductivity of the gas captured in the foam cells (λgas), solid backbone of the foams (λsolid), heat transfer between foam cells (λsolid), and gas convection (λconvection). With the addition of HS fillers, a greater number of filler particles are built in the polymer matrix, thus the value of λsolid increases. As mentioned previously, due to the increased viscosity of modified PUR foams, the functional groups of filler particles are involved in the reaction with isocyanate groups. This results in an increased crosslinking degree (Figure 5) of PUR molecular chains and formation of PUR foams with smaller cells and a greater apparent density, which additionally increases the value of λsolid. Besides this, all series of PUR foams are in line with commercial requirements for commercial thermal insulation boards [49].
Another important parameter determining the further use of PUR foams as construction materials is water uptake. Previous studies reported that the cellular structure of PUR foams and the hydrophobic nature of the filler affects the water uptake of porous materials [11,50,51]. The results of the water uptake of PUR foams containing HS fillers are presented in Table 4. When compared with neat PUR_0, the addition of HS filler increases the water uptake of PUR_HS—the value increases from 21.5 to 23.8%. Increased absorption of water may be connected with a less uniform structure of PUR_HS and a greater number of open cells. Moreover, the particles of HS filler tend to agglomerate, creating a “pathway” that facilitates water penetration into the foam structure [11,50,51,52]. Surprisingly, an opposite effect has been observed for PUR foams containing impregnated HS/SO and HS/TO—the water uptake slightly decreases by ~6% due to the hydrophobic character of impregnated RC fillers, which was also confirmed by a decreased value of the contact angle (θ) (Table 4).

3.4. Mechanical Characteristics of PUR Foams

The mechanical properties of porous materials mostly depend on their cellular structure [11]. The compressive strength–strain graph measured during the external loading is presented in Figure 6a. All samples are characterized by analog plots—the linear region refers to the elastic response of PUR foams, while the second region (which presents a plateau region) refers to the plastic deformation and cell’s rupture. When compared with neat PUR_0, in the case of foams containing HS fillers, the transition from elastic to plateau region is more abrupt, while the elongation at break decreases, indicating the more rigid structure of modified foams. A similar trend has been found in previous studies as well [53,54].
Depending on the type of HS filler, the compression strength increases by ~12, ~6, and ~8% for PUR_HS, PUR_HS/SO, and PUR_HS/TO, respectively (Figure 7a). Previous studies have shown that the value of compression strength depends on the crosslinking density of PUR foams, which refers to the content of hard segments (urethane groups) [55,56]. It may be concluded that the incorporation of HS fillers affects the crosslinking density of PUR foams. After the incorporation of cellulosic HS fillers, active groups of HS (i.e., hydroxyl groups of cellulose and lignin) are involved in the reaction with isocyanate groups, increasing the number of urethane groups and creating a more dense structure of PUR foams. An increased number of urethane groups provides additional crosslinking points, increasing the number of hard segments and enhancing the mechanical performances of PUR foams.
A different trend is observed in the case of measuring the flexural and impact strength (Figure 7b). The addition of HS fillers affects both parameters, decreasing their values. Depending on the HS filler type, the value of flexural strength decreases by 3–13%, while the value of impact strength decreases by 3–7%. The higher content of hard segments makes the PUR foams harder but more brittle. Thus, the values of flexural and impact strength decrease when the HS fillers are added. Besides, some aggregates of HS particles, which are localized in the PUR structure, can act as stress concentrations, promoting the cracking of the samples and deteriorating the mechanical performances of PUR foams. As presented on the stress–elongation graph (Figure 6b), all modified PUR foams exhibit a similar mechanical performance, which involves elastic and plastic deformation; however, the value of elongation at break decreases when the HS fillers are added. The aggregates of HS particles act as additional defects, promoting the cracking of the sample under an external force.

3.5. Dynamic–Mechanical Properties of PUR Foams

The dynamic–mechanical properties of PUR foams are presented in Figure 8. The modification of PUR foams with HS fillers affects the glass transition temperature (Tg), determined as a maximum peak of the curve loss tangent (tanδ) in the function of the temperature. When compared with neat PUR_0, the addition of HS fillers increases the value of Tg. Among all series of PUR foams, the highest value of Tg is observed for PUR foams containing impregnated HS fillers—the value of Tg increases from 128 to 148 °C for PUR_HS/SO and PUR_HS/TO. The results confirm that the addition of impregnated HS fillers results in the formation of PUR foams with a greater cross-linking density, limiting the mobility of polymer chains. Besides, HS filler particles that are built into the foam structure can act as additional blockages, increasing the amount of energy that is required to achieve the Tg. Moreover, when compared to neat PUR_0, the addition of each type of HS filler results in the improvement of the storage modulus of PUR foams. The greatest improvement is observed for PUR foams containing impregnated HS fillers. This may be connected with an increased viscosity of PUR systems containing HS/SO and HS/TO, which limits the mobility of polymer chains, leading to the formation of PUR foams with higher stiffness. In addition, the filler particles can act as reinforcing centers, effectively transferring the external stresses from particles to the PUR matrix. Similar results have been reported in previous works as well [57,58].

3.6. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) of PUR Foams

Figure 9a,b present the TG/DTG curves of HS fillers. The first loss of mass occurs at ~100 °C and refers to the release of water accommodated in the fillers. A second loss occurs in the range of 300–400 °C and is mostly connected with the decomposition of the cellulosic derivatives—cellulose and lignin, respectively [34,59]. Similar TG curves have been observed in the case of other cellulosic fillers [60].
Figure 9c,d present TG and DTG curves of PUR foams. The resulting data are depicted in Table 5. Only slight shifts in the level of each curve are observed, which correspond to the weight loss. However, a meaningful change in the position of the main peak connected with the decomposition temperature of PUR can be observed. When compared with neat PUR_0, the addition of HS fillers results in the production of PUR foams with higher values of T2%, which refers to the release of volatile products presented in the HS fillers. Previous studies have reported that cellulosic fillers tend to degrade in the range of lower temperatures, thus a higher value of T2% should be attributed to the partial crosslinking between functional groups of HS fillers and isocyanate groups [61]. The second degradation of mass loss occurs in the range of 309–326 °C and refers to the thermal decomposition of hard segments—urethane bonds [62,63]. A slower degradation of mass is observed when HS fillers are added and confirms a higher crosslinking degree of modified PUR foams. The third stage, which occurs at nearly 590 °C, refers to the degradation of cellulose and lignin. The thermal degradation mechanism of PUR foams modified with HS fillers seems similar to PUR_0. The addition of HS fillers results in a slight increase in mass loss of PUR foams, because of the presence of lignocellulosic compounds and incomplete miscibility of soft and hard segments of PUR [64]. Moreover, the rigid structure of cellulosic HS fillers can cause them to act as additional cross-linker centers between PUR matrices, improving the heat resistance of modified PUR foams—the value of mass residue at 600 °C increases from 23.8% (for PUR_0) to 26.2 and 26.5% for PUR_HS/SO and PUR_HS/TO, respectively. An analog trend has been shown previously in the case of PUR foams containing another type of cellulosic filler [65,66]. For example, Tian et al. [61] have stated that the reduced thermal decomposition PUR foams enhanced with soy-protein filler refer to the higher degree of crosslinking of PUR foams, due to the reaction between functional groups of soy-protein and PUR systems. More cross-linked structure of PUR foams limits the number of volatile products that are generated and released during the thermal degradation process, reducing the thermal decomposition of PUR foams. A similar explanation may be found in our study as well.

3.7. Flammability of PUR Foams

The addition of RC fillers significantly affects the flame retardancy of PUR foams. The results of the cone calorimeter test are presented in Figure 10 and Table 6.
When compared to neat PUR_0, the addition of HS fillers increases the ignition time (IT) and this trend is more prominent in the case of PUR foams containing impregnated HS/SO and HS/TO fillers—the value of IT increases from 3 s to 5 and 6 s, respectively. The results presented in Figure 10a indicate that the value of heat peak release (pHRR) increases by ~8% when the non-treated HS filler is added. An opposite effect is observed for PUR foams containing impregnated RC fillers—the value of pHRR decreases by ~30 and 20% for PUR foams containing HS/SO and HS/TO, respectively. Such an improvement may be connected with the formation of a char layer, which effectively reduces the release of combustible gases. In general, the pHRR values of modified PUR foams are in the line with the regulations, which determines the accessible value of pHRR as 300 kW m−2 [67]. Below this value, the materials are approved for use as insulating materials for building construction. Moreover, the addition of impregnated HS fillers decreases the value of total smoke release (TSR) (Figure 10b). Compared to neat PUR_0, the value of TSR decreases by 15 and 27% for PUR_HS/SO and PUR_HS/TO, respectively. Moreover, due to the incorporation of HS fillers, the values of COY and CO2Y slightly decrease (Figure 10c,d). This may be connected with the fact that HS filler particles act as a physical barrier for flame spread, reducing the heat transfer through the PUR sample and decreasing the intensity of the flame.
The results of limiting oxygen index (LOI) are presented in Figure 11a. Similarly to the results of the cone calorimeter test (pHRR and TSR), the addition of non-treated HS filler decreases the LOI value from 20.2 to 19.8%. Increased value of LOI is observed for PUR foams containing impregnated HS fillers—the LOI increases to 20.8 and 21.6%, for PUR_HS/SO and PUR_HS/TO, respectively. Chan et al. [68] have reported similar results in the case of PUR foams enhanced with ramie fibers in the amount of 0.2–0.8 wt.%. It has been shown that the carbonization of the fibers during the combustion process results in the formation of pores, preventing the propagation of the flame through the PUR matrix and increasing the value of LOI.
The self-extinguish capacity was measured according to the UL-94 standard, which corresponds to the burning time measured after continuous ignitions of the samples. According to the UL-94 standard, neat PUR_0 was not classified under test standard, while PUR foam containing RC fillers achieved a V-0 rating. Moreover, the total time of burning was evaluated. According to the results presented in Figure 11b, the flame keeps longer in the case of neat PUR_0, for which the total time of burning was 32 s. The total time of burning decreases when the HS fillers were added. The most visible effect is observed in the case of PUR foams containing impregnated HS fillers—the value decreases to 22 and 21 s for PUR_HS/SO and PUR_HS/TO, respectively. The results of UL-94 are in agreement with the results of LOI. In summary, the highest standards among UL-94 and LOI tests are obtained for PUR foams containing impregnated HS fillers.

4. Conclusions

PUR foams were reinforced with 2 wt.% non-treated and impregnated HS fillers were successfully synthesized. It has been shown that each type of HS filler affects the morphology and further mechanical, thermal, and insulating properties of PUR foams. It has been shown that the addition of HS fillers improved the mechanical characteristics of PUR foams. Among all modified series, the greatest improvement was observed after the incorporation of non-treated HS filler—when compared with neat foams, the value of compressive strength increased by ~13%. Moreover, the incorporation of impregnated HS fillers resulted in the improvement of thermal stability and flame retardancy of PUR foams. For example, the addition of both types of impregnated HS fillers significantly decreased the value of heat peak release (pHRR), total smoke release (TSR), and limiting oxygen index (LOI). Moreover, the PUR foams containing impregnated fillers were characterized by improved hydrophobicity and limited water uptake. The obtained results confirmed that the modification of PUR foams with non-treated and impregnated HS fillers may be a successful approach in producing polymeric composites with improved properties.

Author Contributions

S.C.: Methodology, Investigation, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization; A.S.: Methodology, Investigation; A.K.: Methodology, Investigation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Silva, M.C.; Takahashi, J.A.; Chaussy, D.; Belgacem, M.N.; Silva, G.G. Composites of rigid polyurethane foam and cellulose fiber residue. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 117, 3665–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hayati, A.N.; Evans, D.A.C.; Laycock, B.; Martin, D.J.; Annamalai, P.K. A simple methodology for improving the performance and sustainability of rigid polyurethane foam by incorporating industrial lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2018, 117, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Olszewski, A.; Kosmela, P.; Mielewczyk-Gryń, A.; Piszczyk, Ł. Bio-based polyurethane composites and hybrid composites containing a new type of bio-polyol and addition of natural and synthetic fibers. Materials (Basel) 2020, 13, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Barczewski, M.; Kurańska, M.; Sałasińska, K.; Michałowski, S.; Prociak, A.; Uram, K.; Lewandowski, K. Rigid polyurethane foams modified with thermoset polyester-glass fiber composite waste. Polym. Test. 2020, 81, 106190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Matykiewicz, D.; Barczewski, M. On the impact of flax fibers as an internal layer on the properties of basalt-epoxy composites modified with silanized basalt powder. Compos. Commun. 2020, 20, 100360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Barczewski, M.; Mysiukiewicz, O.; Matykiewicz, D.; Kloziński, A.; Andrzejewski, J.; Piasecki, A. Synergistic effect of different basalt fillers and annealing on the structure and properties of polylactide composites. Polym. Test. 2020, 89, 106628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kurańska, M.; Barczewski, M.; Uram, K.; Lewandowski, K.; Prociak, A.; Michałowski, S. Basalt waste management in the production of highly effective porous polyurethane composites for thermal insulating applications. Polym. Test. 2019, 76, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Isbrandt, M.; Czupryński, B.; Apiecionek, Ł. The use of waste from the production of rapeseed oil for obtaining of new polyurethane composites. Polymers (Basel) 2019, 11, 1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Leszczyńska, M.; Ryszkowska, J.; Szczepkowski, L.; Kurańska, M.; Prociak, A.; Leszczyński, M.K.; Gloc, M.; Antos-Bielska, M.; Mizera, K. Cooperative effect of rapeseed oil-based polyol and egg shells on the structure and properties of rigid polyurethane foams. Polym. Test. 2020, 90, 106696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kairytė, A.; Kirpluks, M.; Ivdre, A.; Cabulis, U.; Vėjelis, S.; Balčiūnas, G. Paper waste sludge enhanced eco-efficient polyurethane foam composites: Physical-mechanical properties and microstructure. Polym. Compos. 2018, 39, 1852–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Avila Delucis, R.; Magalhães, W.L.E.; Petzhold, C.L.; Amico, S.C. Forest-based resources as fillers in biobased polyurethane foams. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. El-Shekeil, Y.A.; Sapuan, S.M.; Abdan, K.; Zainudin, E.S. Influence of fiber content on the mechanical and thermal properties of Kenaf fiber reinforced thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Mater. Des. 2012, 40, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, B.-L.; Wen, J.-L.; Sun, R.-C. Lignin-Based Rigid Polyurethane Foam Reinforced with Pulp Fiber: Synthesis and Characterization. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1474–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ribeiro da Silva, V.; Mosiewicki, M.A.; Yoshida, M.I.; Coelho da Silva, M.; Stefani, P.M.; Marcovich, N.E. Polyurethane foams based on modified tung oil and reinforced with rice husk ash II: Mechanical characterization. Polym. Test. 2013, 32, 665–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhu, M.; Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.; Khazabi, M.; Cai, H.; Correa, C.; Sain, M. Reinforcement of soy polyol-based rigid polyurethane foams by cellulose microfibers and nanoclays. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, X.; Sain, M.M. Semi-rigid biopolyurethane foams based on palm-oil polyol and reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Zieleniewska, M.; Leszczyński, M.K.; Szczepkowski, L.; Bryśkiewicz, A.; Krzyżowska, M.; Bień, K.; Ryszkowska, J. Development and applicational evaluation of the rigid polyurethane foam composites with egg shell waste. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 132, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Członka, S.; Bertino, M.F.; Strzelec, K. Rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with industrial potato protein. Polym. Test. 2018, 68, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Członka, S.; Bertino, M.F.; Strzelec, K.; Strąkowska, A.; Masłowski, M. Rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with solid waste generated in leather industry. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Członka, S.; Sienkiewicz, N.; Strąkowska, A.; Strzelec, K. Keratin feathers as a filler for rigid polyurethane foams on the basis of soybean oil polyol. Polym. Test. 2018, 72, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Soares, B.; Gama, N.; Freire, C.S.R.; Barros-Timmons, A.; Brandão, I.; Silva, R.; Neto, C.P.; Ferreira, A. Spent coffee grounds as a renewable source for ecopolyols production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2015, 90, 1480–1488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, G.; Wang, P. Effects of preparation conditions on properties of rigid polyurethane foam composites based on liquefied bagasse and jute fibre. Polym. Test. 2017, 60, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nam, S.; Netravali, A.N. Characterization of ramie fiber/soy protein concentrate (SPC) resin interface. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2004, 18, 1063–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mosiewicki, M.A.; Casado, U.; Marcovich, N.E.; Aranguren, M.I. Vegetable oil based-polymers reinforced with wood flour. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2008, 484, 509–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shan, C.W.; Idris, M.I.; Ghazali, M.I. Study of Flexible Polyurethane Foams Reinforced with Coir Fibres and Tyre Particles. Int. J. Appl. Phys. Math. 2012, 2, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Czupryński, B.; Borowicz, M.; Liszkowska, J. Rigid polyurethane–polyisocyanurate foams modified with grain fraction of fly ashes. J. Cell. Plast. 2020, 56, 53–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liszkowska, J.; Borowicz, M.; Paciorek-Sadowska, J.; Isbrandt, M.; Czupryński, B.; Moraczewski, K. Assessment of photodegradation and biodegradation of RPU/PIR foams modified by natural compounds of plant origin. Polymers 2020, 12, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Zhang, S.; Xiang, A.; Tian, H.; Rajulu, A.V. Water-Blown Castor Oil-Based Polyurethane Foams with Soy Protein as a Reactive Reinforcing Filler. J. Polym. Environ. 2018, 26, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Števulová, N.; Terpáková, E.; Čigášová, J.; Junák, J.; Kidalová, L. Chemically treated hemp shives as a suitable organic filler for lightweight composites preparing. Procedia Eng. 2012, 42, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Terzopoulou, Z.N.; Papageorgiou, G.Z.; Papadopoulou, E.; Athanassiadou, E.; Reinders, M.; Bikiaris, D.N. Development and study of fully biodegradable composite materials based on poly(butylene succinate) and hemp fibers or hemp shives. Polym. Compos. 2016, 37, 407–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Brazdausks, P.; Puke, M.; Rizhikovs, J.; Pubule, J. Evaluation of cellulose content in hemp shives after salt catalyzed hydrolysis. Energy Procedia 2017, 128, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zakaria, S.; Hamzah, H.; Murshidi, J.A.; Deraman, M. Chemical modification on lignocellulosic polymeric oil palm empty fruit bunch for advanced material. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2001, 20, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wolski, K.; Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Surface hydrophobisation of lignocellulosic waste for the preparation of biothermoelastoplastic composites. Eur. Polym. J. 2019, 118, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Cellulose fibers hydrophobization via a hybrid chemical modification. Polymers 2019, 11, 1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Borysiak, S. Fundamental studies on lignocellulose/polypropylene composites: Effects of wood treatment on the transcrystalline morphology and mechanical properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2013, 127, 1309–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Neto, J.S.S.; Lima, R.A.A.; Cavalcanti, D.K.K.; Souza, J.P.B.; Aguiar, R.A.A.; Banea, M.D. Effect of chemical treatment on the thermal properties of hybrid natural fiber-reinforced composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 136, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kabir, M.M.; Wang, H.; Lau, K.T.; Cardona, F. Chemical treatments on plant-based natural fibre reinforced polymer composites: An overview. Compos. Part B Eng. 2012, 43, 2883–2892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gang, D. The influence of surface treatment on the tensile and tribological properties of wood fiber-reinforced polyimide composite. Surf. Interface Anal. 2018, 50, 304–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Valášek, P.; D’Amato, R.; Müller, M.; Ruggiero, A. Mechanical properties and abrasive wear of white/brown coir epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 146, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Shalwan, A.; Yousif, B.F. Influence of date palm fibre and graphite filler on mechanical and wear characteristics of epoxy composites. Mater. Des. 2014, 59, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sreekala, M.S.; Kumaran, M.G.; Joseph, S.; Jacob, M. Oil Palm Fibre Reinforced Phenol Formaldehyde Composites: Influence of Fibre Surface Modifications on the Mechanical Performance. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2000, 7, 295–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Plastics—Resins in the Liquid State or as Emulsions or Dispersions—Determination of Apparent Viscosity by the Brookfield Test Method; ISO 2555; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1989.
  43. Preview Rigid Cellular Plastics—Determination of Compression Properties; ISO 844; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
  44. Plastics—Determination of Flexural Properties; ISO 178; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  45. Plastics—Determination of Izod Impact Strength; ISO 180; ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
  46. Lee, L.J.; Zeng, C.; Cao, X.; Han, X.; Shen, J.; Xu, G. Polymer nanocomposite foams. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 2344–2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Sung, G.; Kim, J.H. Influence of filler surface characteristics on morphological, physical, acoustic properties of polyurethane composite foams filled with inorganic fillers. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2017, 146, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gu, R.; Khazabi, M.; Sain, M. Fiber reinforced soy-based polyurethane spray foam insulation. Part 2: Thermal and mechanical properties. BioResources 2011, 6, 3775–3790. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kairytė, A.; Kizinievič, O.; Kizinievič, V.; Kremensas, A. Synthesis of biomass-derived bottom waste ash based rigid biopolyurethane composite foams: Rheological behaviour, structure and performance characteristics. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2019, 117, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Aranberri, I.; Montes, S.; Wesołowska, E.; Rekondo, A.; Wrześniewska-Tosik, K.; Grande, H.-J. Improved Thermal Insulating Properties of Renewable Polyol Based Polyurethane Foams Reinforced with Chicken Feathers. Polymers (Basel) 2019, 11, 2002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Sair, S.; Oushabi, A.; Kammouni, A.; Tanane, O.; Abboud, Y.; El Bouari, A. Mechanical and thermal conductivity properties of hemp fiber reinforced polyurethane composites. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 8, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Joanna, P.S.; Bogusław, C.; Joanna, L. Application of waste products from agricultural-food industry for production of rigid polyurethane-polyisocyanurate foams. J. Porous Mater. 2011, 18, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Mosiewicki, M.A.; Dell’Arciprete, G.A.; Aranguren, M.I.; Marcovich, N.E. Polyurethane foams obtained from castor oil-based polyol and filled with wood flour. J. Compos. Mater. 2009, 43, 3057–3072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Finlay, K.A.; Gawryla, M.D.; Schiraldi, D.A. Effects of fiber reinforcement on clay aerogel composites. Materials (Basel) 2015, 8, 5440–5451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Ciecierska, E.; Jurczyk-Kowalska, M.; Bazarnik, P.; Gloc, M.; Kulesza, M.; Kowalski, M.; Krauze, S.; Lewandowska, M. Flammability, mechanical properties and structure of rigid polyurethane foams with different types of carbon reinforcing materials. Compos. Struct. 2016, 140, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gu, R.; Konar, S.; Sain, M. Preparation and characterization of sustainable polyurethane foams from soybean oils. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2012, 89, 2103–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ye, L.; Meng, X.Y.; Ji, X.; Li, Z.M.; Tang, J.H. Synthesis and characterization of expandable graphite-poly(methyl methacrylate) composite particles and their application to flame retardation of rigid polyurethane foams. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2009, 94, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gama, N.V.; Silva, R.; Mohseni, F.; Davarpanah, A.; Amaral, V.S.; Ferreira, A.; Barros-Timmons, A. Enhancement of physical and reaction to fire properties of crude glycerol polyurethane foams filled with expanded graphite. Polym. Test. 2018, 69, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Superiority of cellulose non-solvent chemical modification over solvent-involving treatment: Solution for green chemistry (Part I). Materials 2020, 13, 2552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cichosz, S.; Masek, A. Thermal Behavior of Green Cellulose-Filled Thermoplastic Elastomer Polymer Blends. Molecules 2020, 25, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Tian, H.; Wu, J.; Xiang, A. Polyether polyol-based rigid polyurethane foams reinforced with soy protein fillers. J. Vinyl Addit. Technol. 2018, 24, E105–E111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mizera, K.; Ryszkowska, J.; Kurańska, M.; Prociak, A. The effect of rapeseed oil-based polyols on the thermal and mechanical properties of ureaurethane elastomers. Polym. Bull. 2020, 77, 823–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kurańska, M.; Polaczek, K.; Auguścik-Królikowska, M.; Prociak, A.; Ryszkowska, J. Open-cell rigid polyurethane bio-foams based on modified used cooking oil. Polymer (Guildf) 2020, 190, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gómez-Fernández, S.; Ugarte, L.; Calvo-Correas, T.; Peña-Rodríguez, C.; Corcuera, M.A.; Eceiza, A. Properties of flexible polyurethane foams containing isocyanate functionalized kraft lignin. Ind. Crops Prod. 2017, 100, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Luo, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wu, Q.; Zeng, J. Development of high-performance biodegradable rigid polyurethane foams using all bioresource-based polyols: Lignin and soy oil-derived polyols. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 115, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mahmood, N.; Yuan, Z.; Schmidt, J.; Xu, C. Preparation of bio-based rigid polyurethane foam using hydrolytically depolymerized Kraft lignin via direct replacement or oxypropylation. Eur. Polym. J. 2015, 68, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Qian, L.; Feng, F.; Tang, S. Bi-phase flame-retardant effect of hexa-phenoxy-cyclotriphosphazene on rigid polyurethane foams containing expandable graphite. Polymer (Guildf) 2014, 55, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Cheng, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, X.; Li, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Qu, W.; Wang, D.; Pang, X. Effects of flame-retardant ramie fiber on enhancing performance of the rigid polyurethane foams. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 3091–3098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 04709 g001 550
Figure 1. Hemp shives (HS) fillers used as reinforcing fillers: (a) non-treated hemp shives (HS), (b) hemp shives impregnated with sunflower oil (HS/SO), and (c) hemp shives impregnated with tung oil (HS/TO).
Figure 1. Hemp shives (HS) fillers used as reinforcing fillers: (a) non-treated hemp shives (HS), (b) hemp shives impregnated with sunflower oil (HS/SO), and (c) hemp shives impregnated with tung oil (HS/TO).
Materials 13 04709 g001
Materials 13 04709 g002 550
Figure 2. Synthesis of PUR foams reinforced with HS fillers.
Figure 2. Synthesis of PUR foams reinforced with HS fillers.
Materials 13 04709 g002
Materials 13 04709 g003 550
Figure 3. Topography and particle size of (a–c)—HS filler, (d–f)—HS/SO filler and (g–i)—HS/TO filler.
Figure 3. Topography and particle size of (a–c)—HS filler, (d–f)—HS/SO filler and (g–i)—HS/TO filler.
Materials 13 04709 g003
Materials 13 04709 g004 550
Figure 4. Optical image, SEM image and cell size distribution of (a–c) PUR_0, (d–f) PUR_HS, (g–i) PUR_HS/SO and (j–l) PUR_HS/TO.
Figure 4. Optical image, SEM image and cell size distribution of (a–c) PUR_0, (d–f) PUR_HS, (g–i) PUR_HS/SO and (j–l) PUR_HS/TO.
Materials 13 04709 g004
Materials 13 04709 g005 550
Figure 5. Crosslinking structure of (a) neat PUR foams and (b) PUR foams containing HS fillers.
Figure 5. Crosslinking structure of (a) neat PUR foams and (b) PUR foams containing HS fillers.
Materials 13 04709 g005
Materials 13 04709 g006 550
Figure 6. Mechanical behavior of PUR foams’ (a) compressive and (b) flexural behavior.
Figure 6. Mechanical behavior of PUR foams’ (a) compressive and (b) flexural behavior.
Materials 13 04709 g006
Materials 13 04709 g007 550
Figure 7. Mechanical characteristics of PUR foams containing HS fillers: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural and impact strength.
Figure 7. Mechanical characteristics of PUR foams containing HS fillers: (a) compressive strength, (b) flexural and impact strength.
Materials 13 04709 g007
Materials 13 04709 g008 550
Figure 8. The dynamic–mechanical properties of PUR foams containing HS fillers: (a)—tanδ and (b)—storage modulus results.
Figure 8. The dynamic–mechanical properties of PUR foams containing HS fillers: (a)—tanδ and (b)—storage modulus results.
Materials 13 04709 g008
Materials 13 04709 g009 550
Figure 9. TG and DTG results obtained for (a,b) HS fillers, and (c,d) PUR foams.
Figure 9. TG and DTG results obtained for (a,b) HS fillers, and (c,d) PUR foams.
Materials 13 04709 g009
Materials 13 04709 g010 550
Figure 10. Cone calorimeter results: (a) pHRR, (b) TSR, (c) COY and (d) CO2Y.
Figure 10. Cone calorimeter results: (a) pHRR, (b) TSR, (c) COY and (d) CO2Y.
Materials 13 04709 g010
Materials 13 04709 g011 550
Figure 11. (a) LOI and (b) total burning time of PUR foams.
Figure 11. (a) LOI and (b) total burning time of PUR foams.
Materials 13 04709 g011
Table
Table 1. Recent works on filler reinforced polyurethane foams—effect of different fillers on mechanical properties of polyurethane foams.
Table 1. Recent works on filler reinforced polyurethane foams—effect of different fillers on mechanical properties of polyurethane foams.
Filler UsedPercentage of FillerResults
Kenaf fibre20–50 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties [12]
Pulp fibre0–5 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties, improvement of thermal stability [13]
Rice husk ash0–5 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties and flame-retardancy, deterioration of thermal conductivity [14]
Cellulose microfibres0–2 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties [15]
Cellulose nanocrystals1–8 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties [16]
Egg shell waste20 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties and thermal stability [17]
Potato protein waste0.1–5 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties and thermal stability with increasing filler content [18]
Buffing dust waste0.1–5 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties and thermal stability with increasing filler content [19]
Keratin feathers0.1–1.5 wt.%Mechanical properties and thermal stability decrease with increasing filler content [20]
Forest based wastes10 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties and thermal conductivity, improvement of flame-retardancy [11]
Ground coffee2.5–15 wt.%No significant influence on the mechanical and thermal properties, reduced brittleness and aging process [21]
Jute fibre0.5–4 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties [22]
Ramie fiber0.2–0.8 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties, thermal stability, and flame-retardancy [23]
Rapeseed cake30–60 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties, thermal stability, and flame-retardancy [8]
Wood flour0–15 wt.%Deterioration of mechanical properties, improvement of thermal conductivity and thermal stability [24]
Coir fibre2.5 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties [25]
Fly ashes5–35 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties and fire resistance [26]
Cinnamon extract, green coffee extract, cocoa extract10 wt.%Improvement of susceptibility to biodegradation [27]
Soy protein2.4–9.6 wt.%Improvement of mechanical properties, deterioration of thermal stability [28]
Table
Table 2. Composition of PUR composite foams.
Table 2. Composition of PUR composite foams.
ComponentPUR_0PUR_HSPUR_HS/SOPUR_HS/TO
Parts by Weight (wt.%)
STEPANPOL PS-2352100100100100
PUROCYN B160160160160
Kosmos 756666
Kosmos 330.80.80.80.8
Tegostab B85132.52.52.52.5
Water0.50.50.50.5
Pentane/cyclopentane11111111
Hemp shives (HS)0200
Hemp shives/sunflower oil (HS/SO)0020
Hemp shives/tung oil (HS/TO)0002
Table
Table 3. The impact of HS fillers on viscosity and processing times of PUR systems.
Table 3. The impact of HS fillers on viscosity and processing times of PUR systems.
Dynamic Viscosity η (mPa·s)Processing Times (s)
0.5 RPM50 RPM100 RPMCream Time (s)Free Rise Time (s)Tack-Free Time (s)
PUR850 ± 10410 ± 8330 ± 942 ± 4280 ± 9350 ± 12
PUR_HS1100 ± 10980 ± 10420 ± 1250 ± 2320 ± 9345 ± 10
PUR_HS/SO1800 ± 111300 ± 10750 ± 1060 ± 1355 ± 8330 ± 8
PUR_HS/TO2200 ± 111550 ± 10850 ± 1066 ± 2370 ± 8320 ± 8
Table
Table 4. Selected properties of PUR foams containing HS fillers.
Table 4. Selected properties of PUR foams containing HS fillers.
SampleClosed-Cell Content
(%)		APPARENT Density
(kg m−3)		Thermal Conductivity
(W m−1 K−1)		Water Uptake
(%)		Contact Angle (°)
PUR_091.4 ± 0.537.2 ± 0.60.025 ± 0.00121.5 ± 0.6123 ± 1
PUR_HS89.2 ± 0.440.6 ± 0.70.026 ± 0.00123.8 ± 0.5120 ± 1
PUR_HS/SO88.6 ± 0.443.1 ± 0.60.030 ± 0.00119.2 ± 0.6129 ± 1
PUR_HS/TO85.6 ± 0.443.5 ± 0.60.031 ± 0.00120.1 ± 0.5130 ± 1
Table
Table 5. The results of TGA and DTG analysis of PUR foams.
Table 5. The results of TGA and DTG analysis of PUR foams.
SampleTmax (°C)Residue at 600 °C (wt.%)
1st Stage2nd Stage3rd Stage
PUR_021830958123.8
PUR_HS21731858423.1
PUR_HS/SO22032558626.2
PUR_HS/TO22232658926.5
Table
Table 6. Flammability parameter measured for PUR foams.
Table 6. Flammability parameter measured for PUR foams.
IT
[s]		pHRR
[kW m−2]		THR
[MJ m−2]		TSR
[m2 m−2]		COY
[kg kg−1]		CO2Y
[kg kg−1]
PUR_0426821.015500.2040.204
PUR_HS328822.517400.2380.238
PUR_HS/SO517220.213150.1470.147
PUR_HS/TO621119.411350.1220.122
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Członka, S.; Strąkowska, A.; Kairytė, A. The Impact of Hemp Shives Impregnated with Selected Plant Oils on Mechanical, Thermal, and Insulating Properties of Polyurethane Composite Foams. Materials 2020, 13, 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214709

AMA Style

Członka S, Strąkowska A, Kairytė A. The Impact of Hemp Shives Impregnated with Selected Plant Oils on Mechanical, Thermal, and Insulating Properties of Polyurethane Composite Foams. Materials. 2020; 13(21):4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214709

Chicago/Turabian Style

Członka, Sylwia, Anna Strąkowska, and Agnė Kairytė. 2020. "The Impact of Hemp Shives Impregnated with Selected Plant Oils on Mechanical, Thermal, and Insulating Properties of Polyurethane Composite Foams" Materials 13, no. 21: 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214709

APA Style

Członka, S., Strąkowska, A., & Kairytė, A. (2020). The Impact of Hemp Shives Impregnated with Selected Plant Oils on Mechanical, Thermal, and Insulating Properties of Polyurethane Composite Foams. Materials, 13(21), 4709. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13214709

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop