Next Article in Journal
A Generalized Stress State and Temperature Dependent Damage Indicator Framework for Ductile Failure Prediction in Heat-Assisted Forming Operations
Previous Article in Journal
Magnetic Properties of Novel Layered Disulfides CuCr0.99Ln0.01S2 (Ln = La…Lu)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Selective Doping in Silicon Carbide Power Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes for Efficient Thermal Neutron Detection

1
Ruđer Bošković Institute, Bijenička Cesta 54, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
2
Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova Cesta 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, 1233 Watanuki, Takasaki 370-1292, Japan
4
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, 1 New Illawarra Rd., Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(17), 5105; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175105
Submission received: 10 August 2021 / Revised: 30 August 2021 / Accepted: 3 September 2021 / Published: 6 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue SiC Based Technology for High Power Electronics)

Abstract

:
In this work, we present the improved efficiency of 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diodes-based detectors equipped with the thermal neutron converters. This is achieved by optimizing the thermal neutron converter thicknesses. Simulations of the optimal thickness of thermal neutron converters have been performed using two Monte Carlo codes (Monte Carlo N–Particle Transport Code and Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter). We have used 6LiF and 10B4C for the thermal neutron converter material. We have achieved the thermal neutron efficiency of 4.67% and 2.24% with 6LiF and 10B4C thermal neutron converters, respectively.

1. Introduction

Neutron detection is an integral part of the global effort to prevent the propagation as well as the illicit trafficking of nuclear material (U-233, U-235, and Pu-239) at international border crossings. Due to the global shortage of He-3, a detection medium in a gas-filled proportional counter, semiconductor-based detectors have been recognized as a promising alternative. Recently, SiC has attracted a lot of attention as an active material in semiconductor-based neutron radiation detectors [1,2,3,4].
We have recently demonstrated that simple detection devices based on 4H-SiC Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs), equipped with the thermal neutron converter films, have a measurable neutron response, which varies linearly with the incident neutron flux [1,5]. Moreover, the SiC-based detector response to various alpha emitters demonstrates an excellent linear behavior as a function of detector’s active area [6].
In this work, we present enhancement of the detector system design, which led to maximizing the neutron detection sensitivity of 4H-SiC SBD detector. We optimized the thickness of a thin neutron converter film to obtain the sufficiently high reaction probability combined with the high reaction product escape probability. The optimized converter layer is paired with the 4H-SiC SBD in a robust detector assembly, which can be vacuumed to maximize the detection efficiency of charged reaction products.
As already described in our previous work [6], a typical 4H-SiC-based detector has the structure of a SBD. Since neutrons can not be directly detected, their presence is deduced from detection of ionizing neutron reaction products, such as alpha particles and tritons. Detailed specifications of SiC-based detectors have been reported elsewhere by several authors [7,8,9].
The efficient thermal neutron detection can be achieved by using a converter layer rich in isotopes with large cross-section for neutrons with energy in the range of kBT at room temperature (with kB representing the Boltzmann constant). Possible choices are 6Li, 10B, 155Gd, 157Gd, 235U, and 239Pu. For a thermal neutron with kinetic energy En = 0.0253 eV (which corresponds to a velocity of 2200 m/s), its respective absorption cross-section is σa = 940, 3800, 61,000, 255,000, 681, and 1017 barn [10,11,12]. Gadolinium is not used for two reasons: it is extremely rare and reaction products are low-energetic gamma rays—155Gd (n, γ) and 157Gd (n, γ). Reaction products of interest for neutron detection are mainly low-energy-conversion electrons, mostly grouped around 70 keV.
Overall, detectors with either 10B or 6LiF are preferred mainly because the energetic charged-particle reaction products are much easier to discriminate from background radiations.
The findings of this work are based on the two well-known reactions:
L 6 i + n α   ( 2.05   MeV ) + H 3   ( 2.73   MeV ) ; Q = 4.78   MeV B 10 + n α   ( 1.47   MeV ) + L 7 i * ( 0.84   MeV ) ; Q = 2.31   MeV B 10 + n α   ( 1.78   MeV ) + L 7 i ( 1.01   MeV ) ; Q = 2.79   MeV  
where 7Li represents an excited state of 7Li (94%), and 7Li represents the ground state (6%).
The thickness of the neutron converter plays a crucial role in the detector efficiency. The maximum achievable efficiency, for detectors with single converter film positioned in front of the detector, peaks at 4.4% for the 6LiF converter film and 4% for the 10B converter film [13,14,15]. Elemental 6Li offers the highest achievable efficiency of 11.5%, but it is readily avoided because of its reactivity and flammability, among other properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes

n-type SBDs were produced on nitrogen-doped (up to 5 × 1014 cm−3) 4H-SiC epitaxial layers, approximately 25 µm thick [1]. The epitaxial layer was grown on the silicon face (8° off) of 350 µm thick silicon carbide substrate without the buffer layer. The Schottky barrier was formed by thermal evaporation of nickel through a metal mask with patterned square apertures of 3 mm × 3 mm, while Ohmic contacts were formed on the backside of the silicon carbide substrate by nickel sintering at 950 °C in the Ar atmosphere.

2.2. Electrical Characterization of 4H-SiC SBD’s

The 4H-SiC SBDs were characterized by temperature-dependent current–voltage (I–V) and capacitance–voltage (C–V) measurements, before and after the radiation tests. Measurements were carried out using Keithley 4200 Semiconductor characterization system (Keithley Instruments, Cleveland, OH, USA.
The depth profile of free carriers’ concentration, N*, was determined from capacitance curves using 1 / C 2 vs. V relationship, and by calculating d ( 1 / C 2 ) / dV as a function of voltage.

2.3. Monte Carlo Simulations

Simulations of the effect of the thermal neutron converter thickness on the detector response were performed using Monte Carlo-based MCNP6.2 (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code) and SRIM (Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter) [16,17] codes.
Using MCNP6.2 code, the energy deposition of alpha and triton particles in the active SiC volume was calculated using the F6 tally (averaged energy deposition over a cell). Signal-to-noise ratio and system resolution are strongly related to the energy deposition of reaction products in the SiC. Simulations were run with different neutron converters.
Results of SRIM and MCNP6.2 simulations show that the highest energy deposition rates are achieved with 10B4C thermal neutron converter films with a thickness of 2.6–3.14 µm and with 6LiF film that is 33 µm thick. Table 1 shows that there is good correlation of simulation data with both Monte Carlo codes.

2.4. Thermal Neutron Converters

Evaporation material, 6LiF, was obtained as a powder, enriched in 6Li at 95%, and then evaporated under vacuum onto two different substrates (soda-lime glass—10 mm diameter and 1.4 mm thickness, and aluminum (AlMgSi0.5)—10 mm diameter and 0.5 mm thickness). 6LiF was evaporated from Al203 crucible by tantalum heater. The pressure was kept in the range 5 × 10−5–2 × 10−4 mbar. The evaporation progress was monitored by means of the change in the oscillation frequency of a quartz crystal as the 6LiF was evaporated. Leybold Univex 300 thermal evaporation system (Leybold, Cologne, Germany) was used for thin film deposition.
Thin films of 10B4C were prepared by magnetron sputtering using a Kurt J. Lesker CMS-18 Sputtering system (Kurt J. Lesker, Jefferson Hills, PA, USA) and a 10B4C target, 76.5 mm in diameter, 3.2 mm thick, indium-bonded on a copper plate. The target was manufactured by RHP Technology (Seibersdorf, Austria). The mass fraction of isotope 10B is 96%. The 10B4C films were deposited on Al and Si substrate, dimensions 20 mm × 20 mm × 0.35 mm for the Al substrate and approximately 20 mm × 30 mm × 1.0 mm for the Si substrate.

2.5. Detector Read-Out System

For the 4H-SiC-based radiation detector read-out system, we used the following electrical components: charge-sensitive preamplifier (CREMAT CR-110, CREMAT, West Newton, MA, USA), Gaussian shaping amplifier (CREMAT CR-200-1µs, CREMAT, West Newton, MA, USA), and multichannel analyzer (AMPTEK MCA 8000D, AMPTEK, Bedford, MA, USA). Electrical power to the system was provided by a battery-powered power supply in order to minimize the level of electronic noise. The reverse bias was applied to detectors using a high-voltage DC-to-DC converter (XP Power CA05P-5, Mouser Electronics, Mansfield, TX, USA), also powered by the standalone power supply. The shaping time was 1.0 μs, and the reverse bias voltage was 100 V.

3. Results

The 4H-SiC SBDs were characterized by I–V and C–V measurements (Figure 1), before and after the irradiation tests. All selected SBDs showed excellent rectifying characteristics. The measured ideality factor, n, was 1.02 and 1.03 before and after the irradiation tests, respectively. The free carrier concentration was uniform across the whole tested depth, and it was around 5 × 1014 cm−3.
As shown in Figure 1, thermal neutron radiation tests did not introduce any change in the free carrier concentration.

Neutron Response of the Detectors

Testing the response of the 4H-SiC prototype detector to thermal neutrons was carried out in the JSI TRIGA reactor. More details are given elsewhere [13]. The Dry Chamber is an irradiation chamber within the concrete reactor body, suitable for the radiation hardness testing of detectors and electronic components [18,19]. The detectors and preamplifiers were installed in the Dry Chamber, and signal and power cables were routed to the reactor platform, where the remaining components were located.
Neutron flux, φtot, in the Dry Chamber of JSI TRIGA reactor at 250 kW is 1.6 × 107 n cm−2 s−1. Neutron flux within the neutron energy interval of 0–5 eV, φ0–5eV, is 8.8 × 106 n cm−2 s−1, relevant for the 6Li(n, α)3H and 10B(n, α)7Li reactions.
For measurements, we used a 4H-SiC detector with the active area of 3 mm × 3 mm in combination with the following thermal neutron converters: 6LiF (1.4 µm, 2.94 µm, 3.96 µm, 7.24 µm, 9.12 µm, and 26.54 µm) and 10B4C (1.0 µm, 1.4 µm, 2.0 µm, and 3.0 µm). Each pair of detectors and converters was placed in a custom-designed vacuum-sealed casing maintaining a low vacuum of p = 1 × 10−3 bar.
Figure 2 shows the response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector equipped with 6LiF thermal neutron converters with different thicknesses to the neutron field at a reactor power of 250 kW.
Two maxima are expected, one for alpha particles at 2050 keV and the other for tritons at 2730 keV. Those maxima are clearly visible from our spectra. There is an excellent correlation with simulated data. From the simulation data, we obtained the range for alpha particles of 5.82 μm and for tritons of 32.5 μm in 6LiF. For the 6LiF thermal neutron converters of 7.24 μm and thicker, we can observe that there is no longer an alpha peak as the particles are fully absorbed by the film. With the film thickness increasing, the shape of spectra is changing as well, mainly because of the absorption of alpha particles of lower energy and subsequently lower range than that of tritons.
Although we might expect that the energies of the charged particles from 6Li(n, α)3H reaction correspond to the energies of the maximum, this is not the case here for all thin film thicknesses. The most ionization happens at the end of the motion of detected charged particle. If we compare the results for the thinnest converter (1.4 µm), with the Monte Carlo simulations (Table 1), it is noticeable that most of the newly formed charged particles stop in the epitaxial layer of the Schottky diode. In Figure 2., we can distinguish three different regions: 1100–1500, 1500–2000, and 2400–2750 keV. The region for the highest energy can be attributed to tritium particles. The curve is Gaussian, the maximum is clearly defined, and the moment when all the energy is deposited in the epitaxial layer corresponds to the tritium energy for the stated reaction. The second region corresponds to the energy of alpha particles, and with the approximation of the Bragg curve, we can also conclude that the moment when all the energy is deposited in the epitaxial layer corresponds to the energy of alpha particles formed by 6Li(n, α)3H reaction. The first region belongs to the tritium particles or to low-energetic alpha particles. Tritium particles are more likely because throughout the energy range, it is this energy that is gradually deposited, and the shape of the curve corresponds to the Bragg curve for triton particles.
In the case of the thicker converters, we notice that the first region increases and the second decreases: the layer thickness increases and fewer and fewer alpha particles of maximum energy pass through the converter layer. At a converter thickness of 7.24 µm, we no longer see the end of the Bragg curve for alpha particles, but the second region merges with the third, that is, with that attributed to tritium. This corresponds to our assumptions because at this thickness, all particles of maximum energy should be deposited in the converter layer. By analyzing the response of a 4H-SiC SBD with a converter with maximum thickness, we notice only one region, and it, in combination with Monte Carlo simulations, can be attributed with great certainty to the tritium formed in 6Li(n, α)3H. The first region continuously grows through all the thicknesses of the converter, and a very high plateau can be noticed when the thickest converter responds. The amplitude of the maximum attributed to tritium particles is higher than the amplitude of the maximum attributed to alpha particles because heavier alpha particles have energy deposited in fewer interactions compared to lighter tritium. Since in the thickest converter there is a full deposition of alpha particle energy in the neutron converter layer, there is no pronounced maximum but a slow loss of energy through the thickness of the thin film is manifested by a high plateau. This interpretation of the spectrum has already been reported earlier in the literature [4,20].
Figure 3 shows the response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector with 10B4C thermal neutron converters layers with different thicknesses to the neutron field at reactor power of 250 kW.
For the detector with 10B4C neutron converter, calibration obtained from Am-241 measurement was applied as well. Due to a high ratio for the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction in the excited state (94%), two maxima are observed as well, one for alpha particles at 1470 keV and the other for 7Li at 840 keV. From the simulation data, we obtained the range of alpha particles at 3.14 µm and 1.58 µm for 7Li, respectively. For both film thicknesses we can observe a spectral shoulder due to 7Li particles and a maximum due to alpha particles. In the spectra of thicker film, there is obvious absorption of the 7Li particles as the thickness of 1.58 μm is reached. There is no difference in the height of the alpha peak in two recorded spectra.
The selection of the converter thicknesses was made so that most of the charged particles should pass through the converter and stop in the epitaxial layer of the 4H-SiC SBD. Again, we notice three different regions in which energy maxima occur: 400–850, 850–1500, and 1500–1800 keV). By analyzing the 4H-SiC SBDs’ response, we find both the reaction products for the excited state reaction and one reaction product for the ground state reaction. Due to the low representation of the reaction in the ground state (6%) and the shading of other particles found in this part of the energy spectrum, it is not possible to distinguish the 7Li nucleus with an energy of 1.02 MeV. It is interesting to note that the ratio of the amplitude of the maximum, which is attributed to the alpha particles in the ground and excited states, corresponds to the ratio of the representation of individual reactions (6% and 94%). As the thickness of the converter layer increases, the energy maximum of the alpha particles overshadows that of the 7Li core, and it is to be expected that a further increase in the layer thickness would show only one maximum, namely, that for alpha particles of 1.47 MeV energy would attenuate all particles formed by transmutation of the converter material. Here, we do not notice an increase in the energy maximum amplitude for alpha particles as a function of the thickness of the converter layer, as was the case with the maximum tritium energy amplitude in the 6LiF converter.
We prepared thin film converters of 6LiF on both glass (1.4 mm thick) and aluminum (0.5 mm thick) substrates, and we found no influence on the detector response whatsoever.
To obtain additional information on 4H-SiC detector response, we compared the 4H-SiC SBDs with different active areas. Figure 4 shows a correlation of thickness for both 6LiF and 10B4C converter layers with normalized surface area of three different detector sizes (1 × 1, 2 × 2, and 3 × 3). Yield rate per unit detector area is the function of the 6LiF converter layer thickness and does not depend on detector active area (Figure 4) as expected. This is not the case for 10B4C converter layer (Figure 4), where we observe differences in calculated yield rates for different detector sizes.
The detection efficiency of the device can be simply evaluated starting from the total counts above 500 keV [15,21]. The neutron detection efficiency limitation is a consequence of reaction product self-absorption. Maximum reported efficiency for the single-coated detectors is 5% for the thermal neutrons [13,14,15,21,22,23].
Table 2 shows calculated detector efficiency for different thermal neutron converter thicknesses.
Although the low vacuum in detector–converter casing does not change detector yield, the peak resolution (sharpness, definition) is better in the vacuum compared to no vacuum. Sharper maximums are observed in vacuum, and the spectra is shifted to the higher energies due to the fact that less energy is deposited in the air. The range of charged particles in air is 4.35 mm for the 7Li, resulting from the 10B(n, α)7Li reaction, and up to 63.2 mm for 3H, resulting from the 6Li(n, α)3H. During the irradiations in the Dry Chamber, the distance between the thermal neutron converter film and the active detector surface was not more than 2 mm. In the used detector system, even without vacuum conditions, all the charged particles that were produced in the converters had reached the detector; dissipation of the kinetic energy of the emitted charged particles is not of a particular importance in this case.

4. Conclusions

This paper presents findings on development and efficiency optimization of the thermal neutron converter films as an important part of the 4H-SiC SBD neutron detector. In our previous studies [1,6,24,25,26], we have reported results on 4H-SiC material radiation hardness, and response to ionizing particles (alpha and gamma radiation). We have successfully assembled a set of electronic components for read-out, detectors, and thermal neutron converters to develop a fully functional, portable, battery-powered thermal neutron detector.
Here, we present a newly developed 4H-SiC-based detector prototype with the active surface area of 3 mm × 3 mm equipped with thermal neutron converter films prepared by thermal evaporation (6LiF) and magnetron sputtering (10B4C). The most effective thermal neutron converter films are the thickest ones, 26.54 μm and 3 μm for 6LiF and 10B4C, respectively. There is an evident difference in the response of the detector using the 6LiF over the 10B4C neutron converter (4.67 and 2.24 respectively). The reason for such a deviation is not yet known and will be the subject of our further research.
We have reached the highest reported efficiency [13,14,15,21,22] for the 4H-SiC-based neutron detector of almost 5% for the thermal neutrons.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, R.B. and L.B.; investigation, R.B., I.C., L.B., V.R. and Ž.P.; resources, T.M., T.O., V.R. and L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B. and I.C.; writing—review and editing, R.B., I.C., L.B., V.R., L.S., Ž.P., T.O. and T.M.; supervision, I.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The present work was financially supported by the NATO Science for Peace and Security Programme, project no. G5674. The RBI project team would like to acknowledge financial support from the European Regional Development Fund for the Center of Excellence for Advanced Materials and Sensing Devices (Grant No. KK.01.1.1.01.0001).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Hidekazu Tsuchida and Norihiro Hoshino Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry for the supply of SiC substrates with epitaxially grown 4H–SiC single-crystal layers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Radulović, V.; Yamazaki, Y.; Pastuović, Ž.; Sarbutt, A.; Ambrožič, K.; Bernat, R.; Ereš, Z.; Coutinho, J.; Ohshima, T.; Capan, I.; et al. Silicon carbide neutron detector testing at the JSI TRIGA reactor for enhanced border and port security. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2020, 972, 164122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nava, F.; Vanni, P.; Bruzzi, M.; Lagomarsino, S.; Sciortino, S.; Wagner, G.; Lanzieri, C. Minimum ionizing and alpha particles detectors based on epitaxial semiconductor silicon carbide. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2004, 51, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruddy, F.H.; Seidel, J.G.; Chen, H.; Dulloo, A.R.; Ryu, S.H. High-resolution alpha-particle spectrometry using silicon carbide semiconductor detectors. IEEE Nucl. Sci. Symp. Conf. Rec. 2005, 3, 1231–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sedlačková, K.; Zaťko, B.; Šagátová, A.; Necas, V. The effect of the LiF film topology on detection properties of thermal neutron semiconductor detectors. In Proceedings of the APCOM 2017: 23rd International Conference on Applied Physics of Condensed Matter, Štrbské Pleso, Slovak, 12–14 June 2017; pp. 125–129. [Google Scholar]
  5. Coutinho, J.; Torres, V.J.B.; Capan, I.; Brodar, T.; Ereš, Z.; Bernat, R.; Radulović, V. Silicon carbide diodes for neutron detection. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A 2020, 986, 164793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bernat, R.; Capan, I.; Bakrač, L.; Brodar, T.; Makino, T.; Ohshima, T.; Pastuović, Ž.; Sarbutt, A. Response of 4h-sic detectors to ionizing particles. Crystals 2021, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruddy, F.H.; Dulloo, A.R.; Seidel, J.G.; Palmour, J.W.; Singh, R. The charged particle response of silicon carbide semiconductor radiation detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 505, 159–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Flammang, R.W.; Seidel, J.G.; Ruddy, F.H. Fast neutron detection with silicon carbide semiconductor radiation detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2007, 579, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lioliou, G.; Chan, H.K.; Gohil, T.; Vassilevski, K.V.; Wright, N.G.; Horsfall, A.B.; Barnett, A.M. 4H-SiC Schottky diode arrays for X-ray detection. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2016, 840, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hagiwara, K.; Yano, T.; Tanaka, T.; Reen, M.S.; Das, P.K.; Lorenz, S.; Ou, I.; Sudo, T.; Yamada, Y.; Mori, T.; et al. Gamma-ray spectrum from thermal neutron capture on gadolinium-157. Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2019, 2019, 23D01. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Knoll, G.F. Radiation Detection and Measurement, 4th ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  12. Landsberger, S.; Tsoulfanidis, N. Measurement & Detection of Radiation, 4th ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; ISBN 9781482215489. [Google Scholar]
  13. McGregor, D.S.; Hammig, M.D.; Yang, Y.H.; Gersch, H.K.; Klann, R.T. Design considerations for thin film coated semiconductor thermal neutron detectors—I: Basics regarding alpha particle emitting neutron reactive films. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003, 500, 272–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kim, H.S.; Ho Ha, J.; Park, S.H.; Lee, S.W.; Moon, M.K.; Sun, G.M.; Lee, C.H. Characteristics of fabricated neutron detectors based on a sic semiconductor. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2011, 48, 1343–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Manfredotti, C.; Lo Giudice, A.; Fasolo, F.; Vittone, E.; Paolini, C.; Fizzotti, F.; Zanini, A.; Wagner, G.; Lanzieri, C. SiC detectors for neutron monitoring. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2005, 552, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ziegler, J.F.; Biersack, J.P. The Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter. In Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1985; pp. 93–129. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ziegler, J.F.; Ziegler, M.D.; Biersack, J.P. SRIM—The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2010, 268, 1818–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mandić, I.; Cindro, V.; Kramberger, G.; Krištof, E.S.; Mikuž, M.; Vrtačnik, D.; Ullan, M.; Anghinolfi, F. Bulk damage in DMILL npn bipolar transistors caused by thermal neutrons versus protons and fast neutrons. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2004, 51, 1752–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mandié, I.; Cindro, V.; Gorišek, A.; Kramberger, G.; Mikuž, M. Online integrating radiation monitoring system for the ATLAS detector at the large hadron collider. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2007, 54, 1143–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gerhardt, R. Properties and Applications of Silicon Carbide; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; ISBN 0886-4470. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lo Giudice, A.; Fasolo, F.; Durisi, E.; Manfredotti, C.; Vittone, E.; Fizzotti, F.; Zanini, A.; Rosi, G. Performances of 4H-SiC Schottky diodes as neutron detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2007, 583, 177–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sedlačková, K.; Zat’ko, B.; Šagátová, A.; Nečas, V.; Boháček, P.; Sekáčová, M. Comparison of semi-insulating GaAs and 4H-SiC-based semiconductor detectors covered by LiF film for thermal neutron detection. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 461, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Uher, J.; Holý, T.; Jakůbek, J.; Lehmann, E.; Pospíšil, S.; Vacík, J. Performance of a pixel detector suited for slow neutrons. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2005, 542, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Brodar, T.; Capan, I.; Radulović, V.; Snoj, L.; Pastuović, Ž.; Coutinho, J.; Ohshima, T. Laplace DLTS study of deep defects created in neutron-irradiated n-type 4H-SiC. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B Beam Interact. Mater. Atoms 2018, 437, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Capan, I.; Brodar, T.; Coutinho, J.; Ohshima, T.; Markevich, V.P.; Peaker, A.R. Acceptor levels of the carbon vacancy in $4H$-SiC: Combining Laplace deep level transient spectroscopy with density functional modeling. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 124, 245701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Capan, I.; Brodar, T.; Pastuović, Z.; Siegele, R.; Ohshima, T.; Sato, S.I.; Makino, T.; Snoj, L.; Radulović, V.; Coutinho, J.; et al. Double negatively charged carbon vacancy at the h- and k-sites in 4H-SiC: Combined Laplace-DLTS and DFT study. J. Appl. Phys. 2018, 123, 161597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (a) I–V characteristics and (b) 1/C2–V characteristics for the 4H-SiC SBD, before and after radiation test.
Figure 1. (a) I–V characteristics and (b) 1/C2–V characteristics for the 4H-SiC SBD, before and after radiation test.
Materials 14 05105 g001
Figure 2. Response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) equipped with 6LiF thermal neutron converter layers with different thicknesses to the neutron field of the JSI TRIGA reactor at 250 kW.
Figure 2. Response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) equipped with 6LiF thermal neutron converter layers with different thicknesses to the neutron field of the JSI TRIGA reactor at 250 kW.
Materials 14 05105 g002
Figure 3. Response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) equipped with 10B4C thermal neutron converter layers with thicknesses of 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, and 3.0 μm to the neutron field of the JSI TRIGA reactor at 250 kW.
Figure 3. Response of the 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) equipped with 10B4C thermal neutron converter layers with thicknesses of 1.0, 1.4, 2.0, and 3.0 μm to the neutron field of the JSI TRIGA reactor at 250 kW.
Materials 14 05105 g003
Figure 4. A correlation of thickness for both 6LiF and 10B4C converter layers with normalized surface area of three different detector sizes (1 mm × 1 mm, 2 mm × 2 mm, and 3 mm × 3 mm). The total count rate is shown on the y-axis.
Figure 4. A correlation of thickness for both 6LiF and 10B4C converter layers with normalized surface area of three different detector sizes (1 mm × 1 mm, 2 mm × 2 mm, and 3 mm × 3 mm). The total count rate is shown on the y-axis.
Materials 14 05105 g004
Table 1. Correlation of Monte Carlo simulation codes.
Table 1. Correlation of Monte Carlo simulation codes.
Monte Carlo CodeSimulated Thermal Neutron Converter Thickness for the Highest Range of Selected Particles
α in 6Li(n, α)3H3H in 6Li(n, α)3Hα in 10B(n, α)7Li7Li in 10B(n, α)7Li
MCNP6.25.8 µm33 µm2.6 µm*
SRIM5.82 µm32.5 µm3.14 µm1.58 µm
* Not simulated due to MCNP6.2 limitations for transport of heavy particles.
Table 2. 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) efficiency for different thermal neutron converter thicknesses.
Table 2. 4H-SiC SBD detector (3 mm × 3 mm) efficiency for different thermal neutron converter thicknesses.
ConverterThickness (μm)Sensitivity (Counts s−1 per n cm−2s−1)Efficiency (%)
10B4C1.01.23 × 10−31.36
10B4C1.41.66 × 10−31.84
10B4C2.01.78 × 10−31.97
10B4C3.02.02 × 10−32.24
6LiF1.45.64 × 10−40.63
6LiF2.941.31 × 10−31.46
6LiF3.961.59 × 10−31.76
6LiF7.242.35 × 10−32.61
6LiF9.122.64 × 10−32.93
6LiF26.544.20 × 10−34.67
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bernat, R.; Bakrač, L.; Radulović, V.; Snoj, L.; Makino, T.; Ohshima, T.; Pastuović, Ž.; Capan, I. 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes for Efficient Thermal Neutron Detection. Materials 2021, 14, 5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175105

AMA Style

Bernat R, Bakrač L, Radulović V, Snoj L, Makino T, Ohshima T, Pastuović Ž, Capan I. 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes for Efficient Thermal Neutron Detection. Materials. 2021; 14(17):5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bernat, Robert, Luka Bakrač, Vladimir Radulović, Luka Snoj, Takahiro Makino, Takeshi Ohshima, Željko Pastuović, and Ivana Capan. 2021. "4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes for Efficient Thermal Neutron Detection" Materials 14, no. 17: 5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175105

APA Style

Bernat, R., Bakrač, L., Radulović, V., Snoj, L., Makino, T., Ohshima, T., Pastuović, Ž., & Capan, I. (2021). 4H-SiC Schottky Barrier Diodes for Efficient Thermal Neutron Detection. Materials, 14(17), 5105. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14175105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop