1. Introduction
The design of concrete structure must have durability, safety, aesthetics and serviceability for entire life duration. Consequently, the most significant aspects of a construction material success are mechanical and durability of the concrete’s performance [
1]. In the global construction industry, the major apprehension about reinforced concrete structure is its early deterioration as a result of corrosion of the reinforcement [
2,
3]. The existence of corrosion in concrete structures is due to the steel surface’s depassivation, and this occurs throughout the penetration of reinforced concrete by one or both of the factors; chloride ions (Cl
−) or carbon dioxide (CO
2), and such issues result in major costs in concrete structures maintenance globally [
4,
5].
Amongst the most corrosive factors, concrete carbonation is one of the significant reasons that have a negative impact on the concrete’s durability. This process takes place when the CO
2 gas dissolved in water or from the atmosphere is reacting with free hydroxides, which are mainly made up of Ca(OH)
2 (calcium hydroxide) in concrete, to develop calcium carbonate [
5,
6]. Besides, CO
2 gas also reacts with calcium–silicate–hydroxide gel in the concrete matrix thus further forming calcium carbonate [
7]. Since the majority of concrete structures are in contact with the atmosphere, corrosion due to carbonation is a significant worry. In brief, the carbonation process occurs by the following stages: (i) diffusion of CO
2 into the concrete, (ii) reaction of the CO
2 with Ca(OH)
2 (calcium hydroxide) in the presence of moisture, (iii) a reduction in pH from around 12.5 to 8.0 and (iv) de-passivation of the steel at this lowered pH.
To control such defects, varied prevention strategies have been proposed, all aimed to stop, delay or slow down the corrosion mechanism including cathodic protection systems [
8], stainless steel bars [
9], treatment of concrete surface using low permeability concrete [
10] and galvanized steel bars [
11]; and is also used in silica fumes [
12], fibre glass [
13], epoxy-coatings [
14,
15], super-hydrophobic anti-corrosion coating [
16], adding lauric acid into concrete [
17] and corrosion inhibitors [
18,
19].
One of the renowned ways of controlling and reducing the corrosion rate of the low carbon steel is to apply organic inhibitors [
15,
20,
21,
22,
23,
24,
25,
26,
27]. These organic corrosion inhibitors are either simple or mixtures that are added to the aggressive environments in low quantities in order to reduce, control or even hinder reactions from occurring between the metal and its surroundings [
28]. The effectiveness of organic corrosion inhibitors is due to the presence of N, O or S atoms that are the core of the formation of adsorption process; of which that prevents the active sites of metals from corrosive media exposure thus decreasing the corrosion rate [
29,
30,
31,
32]. However, avoiding the use of commercial corrosion inhibitors to protect the mild steel in harsh environments is related to their being hazardous to the environment and highly toxic [
31,
33,
34,
35]. Consequently, due to safety concerns, the researchers have focused extensively on developing effective organic inhibitors from natural ingredients, such as extracts from fruits, plants and peels, that are eco-friendly and harmless, which are also known as green corrosion inhibitors. Several studies have been conducted and published on the application of natural products as corrosion inhibitors on mild steel in different harsh environments such as,
Artemisia pallens [
34],
Neolamarckia cadamba [
36],
Rhizophora apiculate [
37],
Musa paradisiac [
38], aloe vera [
29], apricot juice [
39],
Juglans regia [
40], Asafoetida [
41] and Pomelo [
42]. Results have shown that the organic green corrosion inhibitors have an inhibition efficiency of 65–97%. The inhibitive impact of natural compounds is ascribed to the ability of green inhibitor molecules to adsorb over metal surfaces thus, formation of a thin preventive layer and blocking the active sites.
Pertaining to the application of green inhibitor upon the reinforced concrete (RC), Abdulrahman and Ismail [
43,
44] have studied the effects whereby 2–4% of the green inhibitor known as
Bambusa Arundinacea is applied onto contaminated concrete by sulfate and chloride. Loto et al. [
45] have also studied the effects of another green inhibitor,
Vernonia amygdalina (bitter leaf extract) with concentrations of 25–100% being applied onto steel reinforcement in concrete with exposure to 3.5% sodium chloride. The results have shown that the bitter leaf extract has fair corrosion inhibition concentrations of 50% and 75%. While the optimum inhibition efficiency of 90% was achieved when the inhibitor concentration examined is at its lowest at 25%. Meanwhile, the effect of another corrosion inhibitor,
Vernonia amygdalina was studied by Eyu et al. [
46] along with sodium and calcium nitrate onto steel-reinforced concrete exposed to 3.5% NaCl solution for 70 days. The authors noted that the
Vernonia amygdalina inhibitor is more effective compared to calcium or sodium nitrate in terms of reduction of corrosion rate for steel within concrete for the duration of the immersion. Another study by Okeniyi et al. [
47] was conducted where admixtures of different concentration levels of
Anthocleista djalonensis leaf extract were incorporated into steel reinforced concrete exposed to the saline medium. They detected that the maximum inhibition efficiency of 97.43% was achieved at 0.4167% of a green inhibitor concentration. Our research team successfully reported the incorporation of 5%
Elaeis guineensis/AgNPs into the reinforced concrete that found resulting in improving inhibition efficiency up to 95% [
48]. This is due to the formation of additional C-S-H gel, which is responsible for blocking the pores within the concrete matrix. Gular et al. [
49] investigated the impact of incorporation of different percentages (0.5, 1 and 1.5%) of nanomaterials in the concrete matrix such as nano-Fe
2O
3, nano-TiO
2, nano-Al
2O
3 and nano-SiO
2 on mechanical properties. They concluded that the presence of 1.5% of nano-Al
2O
3, and nano-SiO
2 indicated enhanced mechanical properties of concrete by up to 22% at 28 days in comparison with other nanoparticles. Moreover, several [
50,
51,
52,
53,
54,
55,
56] authors have been studying the effect of nanoparticles on mechanical properties and corrosion of reinforced concrete with a variety of percentages (1–5%), and they found that adding the nanoparticles of concrete can be increased the mechanical properties and the concrete durability at different ages.
In continuation of our earlier investigation, the present study reports Arabic gum-nanoparticles as corrosion inhibitors for reinforced steel in concrete that exposed over carbonated environment. Gum Arabic (GA) investigated was extracted in the form of exudate from the stem and branches of the trees,
Acacia senegal tree [
57,
58]. The GA consists of mixture of biopolymers, which includes amphiphilic polysaccharide-protein complexes that leads to the stabilisation and formation of emulsions [
59,
60]. As a hydrocolloid, GA has low-viscosity when its concentration is high with exceptional water solubility in comparison with other gums [
61,
62]. GA was one of the earliest biopolymers being applied in both food and non-food products especially within the cosmetics and medicine industries as thickening, stabiliser and emulsifier agents due to its beneficial properties such as pH stability, non-toxic, renewability, biocompatibility, gelling, low cost and high solubility [
63,
64]. Additional application of GA includes the synthesis and modification of numerous metallic nanoparticles (metal oxides, gold and silver nanoparticles) [
65]. Further, GA has been reported as a green corrosion inhibitor that displays inhibition efficiency of 97% for mild steel being exposed to acidic substances [
66,
67,
68,
69]. However, to the best knowledge to date, there has been no study of the inhibition efficiency on the GA upon reinforced concrete. Hence, the present study is attempted to analyse the corrosion inhibition potential of GA-nanoparticles on reinforced steel in concrete structures that are exposed to carbon dioxide environment. Standard techniques like weight loss, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, pH and carbonation depth tests were carried out to study the mechanism of corrosion inhibition for reinforced concrete specimens exposed to CO
2 environment. Further, morphology of steel reinforcement surfaces was screened via SEM and AFM and also the morphology of concrete specimens was examined by SEM, EDX, XRD and TGA. Finally, the powder of GA-NPs was characterized via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to detect the particle size.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Green GA-NPs Inhibitor Preparation
The dried Gum Arabic (GA) specimens were procured from
Acacia Senegal trees exuded was locally available and directly purchased from Alsaadi Company for Aromatics and spices, Basra, Iraq, was kindly provided by Dr. Mohammad Ali Asaad (Iraq University College, Basra, Iraq), and ground into powder. In order to obtain the fine size of extracted (nanoparticles), 1000 g of resultant powder was dissolved in 4000 mL distilled water for 24 h at ambient temperature (28 ± 2 °C). Afterward, the suspension was stirred for 3 h at 45 °C and then filtered using filtration paper (Whatman) grade 1 (Whatman, Taufkirchen, Germany). Lastly, the resulting mixture was centrifuged (Hettich, EBA 21 Model, Tokyo, Japan) at 4500× g rpm for 30 min to achieve the GA-nanoparticles inhibitor. The characteristics of
Acacia Senegal (gum Arabic) are listed in
Table 1 [
70]. According to Ali et al. [
71], the arabinogalactan is the most component of the GA with 88.4% in total. The arabinogalactan possesses a low molecular mass and low protein content of 3.8 × 10
5 (g/mol) and 0.35% respectively. The molecular structure of arabinogalactan is depicted in
Figure 1 [
67].
2.2. Transmission Electron Microscope (TEM)
The morphology (shape and size) of the GA-NPs powder was determined using BIO-TEM, model Hitachi-HT 7700, Tokyo, Japan. Distilled water was used to disperse the nanoparticles of the green GA inhibitor under ultrasonic treatment, and then a drop of the solution was placed onto the carbon-coated copper grids (Hitachi-HT 7700, Tokyo, Japan) and was investigated at 120 kV accelerated voltage.
2.3. Materials and Concrete Specimens Preparation
First phase, OPC—ordinary Portland cement (type I) (Falcon Cement Company, Hafirah, Bahrain) was prepared in accordance with ASTM C 150 [
72] as a concrete component and used for all mixes design. The physical property and chemical composition of such OPC were summarised in our earlier studied [
48]. River sand (Al-faw, Basra, Iraq) having a specific gravity of 2.55, a density of 1630 kg/m
3 and fineness modulus of 2.57 was sieved by sieve (W.S. Tyler, Mentor, OH, USA) number of 4.57 mm and used as a fine aggregate. The crushed stone (Al-faw, Basra, Iraq) had a minimum and maximum particle size as well as bulk density of 5 mm, 9.5 mm and 2700 kg/m
3 respectively, was used as coarse aggregate. Normal fresh water in a w/c ratio of 0.55 and water content of 217 kg/m
3 was used in all concrete mixtures.
Second phase, a concrete slab with dimensions of 200 mm (length), 180 mm (width) and 66 mm (thickness) was designed for corrosion examinations. Steel reinforcement bars (Ransheng Steel, Tianjin, China) specimens of 225 mm in length and 16 mm diameter acting as a working electrode were cut by metal cutting machine (Jiangsu Goldmoon Industry Co., Jiangsu, China) and then polished using different grades (600, 800, 1000, 1200 and 1600) of emery papers (Jiangsu Goldmoon Industry Co., Jiangsu, China). Next, the steel bars specimens were degreased with concentrated acetone (70%) (Qrëc, Chonburi, Thailand), washed in distilled water, air-dried and then embedded in the middle of the concrete slab, thus a 25 mm of concrete cover was provided around the steel bar on both sides and from the base, in order to provide limited corrosion prevention for steel reinforcement.
In the third phase, based on the mass of cement, GA-NPs (3%) were mixed with water and added into concrete mix components during the mixing process and then cast into desired moulds (Ransheng steel, Tianjin, China). The mix proportion of concrete specimens was indicated in
Table 2. In order to protect the steel bars from crevice corrosion after concrete casting, the protrusion of steel bar (5 cm—the rest of working electrode) was isolated with silicone sealant (McCoy Soudal, Delhi, India). Furthermore, concrete cube specimens of dimension 100 mm
3 were also cast, which were further used to investigate the influence of green GA-NPs inhibitor on accelerated carbonation and carbonation depth. Finally, after one day of casting, all concrete specimens were demoulded, and then cured in fresh water at 25 °C and relative humidity of 75% ± 5% for 28-day prior to move to CO
2 gas chamber (MR, Sharjah, U.A.E). The compressive strength of concrete was designed for 30 MPa at 28 days using 1:1.73:2.8 concrete mix design.
2.4. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Test
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) (Ametek Scientific Instruments, Seattle, WA, USA) was conducted in a three electrode cell comprising of saturated calomel (SCE), steel specimens and platinum wire as reference, working and counter electrodes respectively, while NaCl of 3.5% (Green Research scientific, Basra, Iraq) was used as an electrolyte for EIS experiments. Every measurement was examined using an electrochemical workstation model VersaStat 3 (Princeton, Singapore) at 25 ± 2 °C, following the E
OCP—open-circuit potential was stabilised for 30 min over perturbation of 10 mV (AC sine wave, peak-to-peak), a frequency range of 1000–100 Hz. Next, ZSimpWin software 3.2 was utilised for fitting impedance data with several sets of equivalent circuit. Furthermore, the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy parameters were calculated by inserting the following data: the density and the equivalent weight of rebar specimens is 7.85 (g·cm
−3), and 27.92 (g) respectively, while the area of exposure of steel reinforcement is 68.36 (cm
2). In addition, the EIS test were carried out for steel reinforcing bars in concrete that subjected to CO
2 gas environment for 28, 90 and 180-day in the absence and presence of 3% GA-NPs inhibitor. The charge transfer resistance (R
s) and double-layer capacitance (C
dl) data were obtained from the diameter of the semicircles of the Nyquist plot. Based on the charge transfer resistance (R
ct) data, the inhibition efficiency (IE%) of reinforced concrete was calculated from the following formula [
73]:
where
and
denote the charge transfer resistance of reinforcing steel with and without GA-NPs inhibitor respectively.
2.5. Gravimetric Measurements for Concrete Slab
Gravimetric or weight loss measurements was carried out to determine the corrosion rate and inhibitor efficiency of concrete slabs exposed to CO
2 gas at 28, 90 and 180 days. The slabs were broken using the splitting tensile machine (3000 kN capacity NL Scientific, Selangor, Malaysia). Afterward, the steel specimens extracted from the slabs and cleaned using cleaning solution in accordance with ASTM G1 [
74], which is consisted of 500 mL of 37% (concentrated grade) HCl acid (Quality Research Chemicals, Selangor, Malaysia) with 3.5 g of hexamethylenetetramine (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) added with distilled water to make the volume up to 1000 mL. Each specimen was cleaned several times, after which the weight loss was evaluated by calculating the difference between the initial and final weights of the specimens. From the results, the inhibitor efficiency (IE%), corrosion rate (CR, mm/year) and surface coverage (θ) were obtained using the following equations respectively [
32]:
where W
i and W
o are the weight loss values of reinforcement bar in the presence and in the absence and GA-NPs.
where W is the weight loss of the rebar (g), ρ is the rebar density (7.85 g·cm
−3), t is the time of exposure (h) and A is the rebar surface area (cm
2).
The term “surface coverage ()” refers to the “inhibitory zone/area over the metal surface” covered by the inhibitor via the adsorption process.
2.6. Carbonation Depth Test
After 28-day of curing the specimens in normal water, all the concrete cube specimens were removed and placed in the chamber. In line with the recommendations outlined by Sawada et al. [
75], concrete specimens were subjected to accelerated carbonation by creating an atmosphere of 65–75 relative humidity (RH) in enclosed plastic tanks (MR, Sharjah, U.A.E), passing through carbon dioxide (CO
2) gas (Almansour, Basra, Iraq) for a period of 30 min, conducting this two times each day at a temperature of 25–30 °C. A pressure gauge was affixed to the carbon dioxide gas cylinder to observe the pressure inside the chamber. Next, the chamber was tightly closed and vacuumed for 2 min under a pressure of around 600 mmHg. Then, CO
2 gas was allowed to pass to the chamber at a pressure of 750 Psi. A regulator (Tianjin Sure Instrument Co., Tianjin, China) was affixed to the CO
2 gas cylinder to control the pressure of CO
2 inside the chamber. The specimens were subjected to this treatment for 28, 90 and 180 days. Once the carbon dioxide exposure had been completed, three specimens of untreated and treated concrete with GA inhibitor were subjected to splitting at 28, 90 and 180 days and their centres were sprayed with phenolphthalein solution to evaluate carbonation. Here, carbonation depth was identified as being the length of space between the coloured area’s edge and the outer surface of the concrete, the indicator of carbonation depth serves as a useful marker of the degradation that the specimens have incurred from carbonation attacks [
76]. Whereas normal concrete treated with 1% of phenolphthalein solution will turn pinkish purple in colour, concrete that has undergone carbonation will show no colour change [
77]. A 1% solution of phenolphthalein (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was prepared by dissolving 1 mg of phenolphthalein indicator powder in 90 cc of 2-propanol (Iso-propanol, Qrëc, Chonburi, Thailand) and distilled water was added to make the solution volume up to 100 cc. The concrete specimens were split into two parts and instantly sprayed via phenolphthalein solution. The depth of the uncoloured (carbonated) layer below the external surface was measured to the nearest mm at four locations, and the mean value was recorded.
2.7. PH Measurement
The alkalinity variation of carbonated concrete specimens was evaluated by calibrating the pH value of concrete powder at depths of 2–20 mm at 180-day of exposure to CO2. The concrete specimens were drilled from the external to the internal surfaces, and 1 g of powder at each different depth was collected. Next, the collected powder was added to 50 mL of distilled water as a solvent and the entire mixture was stirred for 24 h at 25 °C. A pH meter (Mettler-Toledo AG, Columbus, OH, USA) was used to calibrate the pH value of specimens exposed to carbon dioxide at different depths.
2.8. Morphological Analysis of Rebar Surface
The surface morphology of steel reinforcement specimens in the absence and presence of 3% GA-NPs was carried out using SEM-scanning electron microscope model Jeol, JSM-IT300, Tokyo, Japan, and atomic force microscope (AFM) model Nano-Wizard 3, Tokyo, Japan. Following 180 days of exposure to CO2, the concrete slabs were split and the embedded carbon steel bars were carefully removed, rinsed in distilled water, air-dried, cut into small pieces with 16 mm in diameter and 10 mm thickness, and then used for morphologies scanned.
2.9. Morphological Analysis of Concrete
2.9.1. Thermal Gravimetric Analysis (TGA)
Following 180 days of exposure to CO
2 gas, concrete specimens were broken and small pieces of dimensions 10 × 10 × 7 mm were extracted from the core of specimens and then ground into powder. The powder specimens in the presence and absence of GA-NPs inhibitor were subjected to TGA/DTA thermograms analyser model TGA–Q 500, Cincinnati, OH, USA in order to detect the percentage of weight loss during the thermal degradation. Next, concrete powder of 2 g was placed in a ceramic pan having a height and diameter of 5 and 6 mm, respectively, and then subjected to heating at a temperature of 30–1000 °C. The decomposition of Ca(OH)
2 concentrates was observed at temperature range of 400 to 500 °C and the C-S-H dehydration was also resulted in the weight loss at temperature range of 600–700 °C [
78,
79]. In addition, the percentages of the presence of both C-S-H gel (calcium silicate hydrate) due to the dehydroxylation of Ca(OH)
2 and calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)
2 content in the concrete matrix were determined according to the following formula [
80]:
whereas LOI
CH represents the dehydration of Ca(OH)
2 at a temperature of 400–550 °C, and LOI
CC represents the loss of CO
2 at a temperature of 600–750 °C range. According to Singh et al. [
81] the amount of CH (calcium hydroxide) can be determined precisely from the TGA curve according to the formula:
whereas MW
H and MW
CH represent the molecular weights of water (18 g/mol) and CH (74 g/mol), respectively, while WL
CH represents the weight loss of CH dehydration.
2.9.2. SEM and XRD Analysis for Concrete
SEM (Jeol, JSM-IT300, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with EDX-energy dispersive spectroscopy, was utilised to examine the morphology of concrete specimens with and without GA-NPs inhibitor after 180-day of exposure to CO2. Small pieces of crushed carbonated concrete having a dimension of 14 mm × 14 mm × 5 mm were collected from the core of concrete cubes after subject them to split. Then, the specimens were transferred to vacuum environment up to 50 °C, till the constant mass of specimens was observed. Finally, the specimens were placed on cylinder stub and subjected to an automated platinum sputter coater (Model-Quorum (Q150R), Henan, China) for 1.5 min prior to testing.
The XRD pattern for concrete specimens treated and untreated with GA-NPs inhibitor was measured using model Rigaku, SmartLab 3 kW, Tokyo, Japan. The specimens were collected and ground into powder using a grinding machine (Panasonic, Osaka, Japan). The powder was located on the sample holder, run at (30 mA/40 kV), scanned at 2-theta angle from 20–80° by scanning rate of 5°/min, and X-rays of (k = 1.5406 Å) created by a Cu Kα source.