Next Article in Journal
Precise Deposition of Carbon Nanotube Bundles by Inkjet-Printing on a CMOS-Compatible Platform
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel NDT Scanning System Based on Line Array Fast Neutron Detector and D-T Neutron Source
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

pH-Dependent Photophysical Properties of Metallic Phase MoSe2 Quantum Dots

Division of Advanced Materials Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan 330-717, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(14), 4945; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144945
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 30 June 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 15 July 2022

Abstract

:
Fluorescence properties of quantum dots (QDs) are critically affected by their redox states, which is important for practical applications. In this study, we investigated the optical properties of MoSe2-metallic phase quantum-dots (MoSe2-mQDs) depending on the pH variation, in which the MoSe2-mQDs were dispersed in water with two sizes (Φ~3 nm and 12 nm). The larger MoSe2-mQDs exhibited a large red-shift and broadening of photoluminescence (PL) peak with a constant UV absorption spectra as varying the pH, while the smaller ones showed a small red-shift and peak broadening, but discrete absorption bands in the acidic solution. The excitation wavelength-dependent photoluminescence shows that the PL properties of smaller MoSe2-mQDs are more sensitive to the pH change compared to those of larger ones. From the time-resolved PL spectroscopy, the excitons dominantly decaying with an energy of ~3 eV in pH 2 clearly show the shift of PL peak to the lower energy (~2.6 eV) as the pH increases to 7 and 11 in the smaller MoSe2-mQDs. On the other hand, in the larger MoSe2-mQDs, the exciton decay is less sensitive to the redox states compared to those of the smaller ones. This result shows that the pH variation is more critical to the change of photophysical properties than the size effect in MoSe2-mQDs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Two-dimensional (2D) layered transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have been extensively studied [1,2,3,4,5] and their quantum dots (mQDs) have attracted interest because of their potential applications [6,7,8,9]. In the TMDs structures, there are two different phases, semiconducting and metallic (1T/1T’), exhibiting miscellaneous changes in electronic and optical properties [5,7,8,9,10,11,12]. In general, semiconducting TMDs-QDs show a broadening of excitonic absorption peaks and a higher quantum yield compared to flakes [7,8,9], while the metallic phase TMDs-QDs (TMDs-mQDs) have features of high charge transfer efficiency and photocatalytic and electrocatalytic capabilities [9,13]. Recently, the photophysical properties of two-sized TMDs-mQDs were demonstrated to have different charge excitation and decay pathways, which was ascribed to defect states and valence band splitting [14]. Also, the optical energy band structure of the TMDs-mQDs was reported to be predominantly affected by edge oxidation [15]. Because the defect and the edge oxidation of atomically thin TMDs-mQDs strongly depends on the environmental conditions [16,17,18,19], to study the photophysical properties as changing the pH of solution and the size relating to defects is essential for the practical applications.
Studies of the effects of redox on TMDs flakes have largely been for tuning optical and physical properties, however, the pH dependence of TMDs’ PL is still suggestive and speculative based on the results measured from TMDs flakes. So far, the pH-dependent optical properties of TMDs-mQDs have been rarely studied compared to those of semiconducting TMDs-QDs [9,20,21,22]. This is because the 1T/1T’ metallic phase of TMDs is known to be less stable than the 2H semiconducting phase, in addition to having a large band gap and high surface to volume ratios. Semiconducting TMDs-QDs have been reported to exhibit different quantum yields with varying emission wavelengths depending on their size, surrounding conditions, and edge functionalization [4,9,23,24,25,26,27]. Mishra et al. showed that semiconducting MoS2-QDs had a pH-dependent fluorescence switching behavior, which was mainly ascribed to the surface-absorbed functional groups [26]. For tin disulfide quantum dots, the quantum yield (QY) was higher in pH~1 (QY~5.32%) compared to that (QY~1.17%) in pH~12, and it was proposed that this effect was due to the protonation and deprotonation of edge functional groups. Several research groups including ours have developed a synthesis process for TMDs-(m)QDs and studied their optical properties (Figure 1a, see details in [5,10]) [5,14]. In the process, the TMDs were co-intercalated alkali metal-organic compounds and exfoliated to be mQDs showing an exotic exciton dynamics [14,25,28]. The PL shift in TMDs-(m)QDs is thought to be due to the size-dependent quantum confinement effect and the localized (delocalized) states theoretically related to the vacancy and oxidation defects. The as-prepared MoS2-mQDs were also examined for bio-imaging applications and showed biocompatibility with bright luminescence [29]. However, TMDs-mQDs have usually been studied in the neutral state, how environmental influences such as acidic or alkaline solution combined with the size effect on the TMDs-mQDs has not been thoroughly probed yet.
In the present work, we investigate the effect of redox states on the photophysical properties of two sizes (Φ~3 nm and ~12 nm) of MoSe2-mQDs. The separately collected two sizes MoSe2-mQDs were re-dispersed in water with three different pH of ~2, 7, and 11; and their photoluminescence (PL), UV-absorbance, excitation wavelength-dependent PL (PLE), and time-resolved PL (TRPL) were measured. For the PLE, the excitation wavelength (λex) changed from 250 nm to 550 nm, showing that the emission wavelengths red-shifted as the λex increased. From the TRPL spectra of smaller MoSe2-mQDs depending on pH, the exciton radiatively decayed with a weak red-shift of peak position in pH 2, while it increased the red-shift as the pH increased. On the other hand, the larger ones did not clearly show the red-shift of PL peak as varying the pH.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Bulk MoSe2 was purchased from 4 sicence (iNexus, Inc., Seoul, Korea). Potassium sodium tartrate was purchase from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Chemicals including NaOH, HCl, ethanol, methanol, and acetone were purchase from Chemicals Duksan corp. and used without further purification.

2.2. Preparation of MoSe2-mQDs and Dispersion

Potassium sodium tartrate was selected in order to synthesize metallic phase MoSe2-mQDs at low temperature to minimal damage [5,14,29]. The detail for fabrication can be consulted in [14]. Briefly, the initial was the mixing and grinding of potassium sodium tartrate (200 mg) with MoSe2 (20 mg). Then, the ground homogeneous mixtures reacted with the autoclave vessel at 250 °C for 12 h then instantly exfoliated in water with sonication. The sizes of the MoSe2-mQDs were controlled by AAO (20 nm) filtration following the filtration (10,000 and 8000 NMWL, Amicon Ultra-15) methods, and then dialyzed in dialysis tubing, which simultaneously removed the remaining salts. Finally, the MoSe2-mQDs were obtained as dispersed solution in water. After being dried, the MoSe2-mQDs were re-dispersed in 10 mL of water with pH 2, 7, and 11.

2.3. Characterization

The morphology of MoSe2-mQDs was analyzed using an atomic force microscope (AFM, SPA400, SⅡ, Chiba, Japan) in tapping mode under ambient conditions. UV-Vis spectra (Shimadzu UV-3101PC spectrometer, EVISA, Switzerland), fluorescence spectra (Perkin-Elmer LS 55 luminescence spectrometer, Waltham, MA, USA), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tiatan cubed G2 60-300, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) analyses were conducted. TEM samples were prepared by drying a droplet of the MoSe2-mQDs suspensions on a carbon grid. The photoluminescence (PL) measurements were carried out using a 325 nm He-Cd continues-wave (CW) laser, a monochromatic light from a 300 W-xenon lamp, and UV spectrometers (Maya2000, Ocean Optics, Dunedin, FL, USA) as a PL detector at room temperature. The PL excitations were measured by monochromatic light from a 300 W Xenon lamp and a highly sensitive photomultiplier tube as a PL detector. In order to elucidate the recombination dynamics, we carried out time-resolved PL experiments. A mode-locked femto-second pulsed Ti: sapphire laser (Coherent, Chameleon Ultra II, Santa Clara, CA, USA) system was used as an excitation source, and the five wavelengths of the pulsed Ti:sapphire laser (266 nm, 300 nm, 350 nm, 400 nm, and 450 nm) were employed. A streak camera (Hamamatsu, Japan, C7700-01) was utilized to measure the decay profile of the PL spectra at room temperature.

3. Results

3.1. Preparation and Structural Characterization

To study the photophysical properties of TMDs-mQDs depending on their redox states, we synthesized and separately collected two different sizes of MoSe2-mQDs (Φ~3 nm, MoSe2-mQDs-S and 12 nm, MoSe2-mQDs-L) and re-dispersed them in the water with pH 2, 7, and 11 (Figure 1a). Figure 1b shows transmission electron microscope (TEM) images of MoSe2-mQDs with average sizes of ~3 nm and ~12 nm. From the AFM images (Figure 1c), the height of the quantum dots is 1~2 nm, corresponding to a thickness of less than three layers of MoSe2. The detailed structural properties of the MoSe2-mQDs were reported in [14].

3.2. Photoluminescence (PL) and UV Absorbance

Figure 2a,b shows the PL spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S and MoSe2-mQDs-L, respectively, measured with an excitation wavelength (λex) of 325 nm. For the MoSe2-mQDs-S (Figure 2a), the PL peak positioned at 418 nm with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 0.79 eV in pH 2, which is slightly red-shifted (Δλ~7 nm) and enlarged (ΔFWHM~0.07–8 eV) at pH 7 and 11. On the other hand, the PL peak of MoSe2-mQDs-L appears at 437 nm with a FWHM of 0.84 eV, which further red-shifts to 461 nm (Δλ~24 nm) and broadens to 1.07 and 1.08 eV of FWHM (ΔFWHM~0.23, 0.24 eV) in pH 7 and 11 (Figure 2b). By comparing the PL spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S and MoSe2-mQDs-L, the pH variation was determined to have more effectively changed the PL spectrum than the size effect. Figure 2c,d shows the UV-vis absorbance spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S and MoSe2-mQDs-L, respectively, according to the variation in pH. The absorbance spectrum of MoSe2-mQDs-S in pH 2 appears to have discrete absorption energy bands, however, this dimmed in pH 7 and 11. On the other hand, the MoSe2-mQDs-L shows a monotonically increasing absorbance at excitation energies lower than 4 eV, which is a feature of the metallic state QDs [14]. At excitation energies higher than 4 eV, the slope of absorbance similarly changed in both of MoSe2-mQDs. In addition, the absorbance of MoSe2-mQDs-L started to increase at a lower excitation energy than that of MoSe2-mQDs-S, regardless of pH. This analysis implies that the protonation besides the size effect enforces the quantum confinement in the MoSe2-mQDs, which is obviously observed in the MoSe2-mQDs-S with a size close to the Bohr exciton diameter [30]. The quantum yields (QY) of MoSe2-mQDs-S were 3.7%, 5.2%, and 5% at pH 2, 7, and 11, respectively, as measured using an absolute PLQY measurement system with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. The PLQY could not be estimated in MoSe2-mQDs-L due to the low quantum efficiency. The values of peak position, FWHM, and QYs are listed on Table 1. These results imply that the oxidation of MoSe2-mQDs relieves the localization of the excited charges and the quantum confinement effect. On the other hand, the protonation of MoSe2-mQDs induces the energy band structure to be more discrete, which might be a cause of the low quantum efficiency, suggesting that the partial oxidation enhances the quantum efficiency of MoSe2-mQDs through forming sub-bands, which assists the intraband transition of charges.

3.3. Excitation Wavelength Dependent PL (PLE)

To examine the variation in optical energy band structure depending on pH, we measured the excitation wavelength (λex)-dependent PL (PLE) from MoSe2-mQDs in pH 2, 7, and 11. Figure 3 is the PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S (a, b, and c) and MoSe2-mQDs-L (d, e, and f) as a function of λex. Similar to WS2, MoS2, and pristine MoSe2-GQs [14,25,28], the MoSe2-mQDs showed a red-shift in the PLE peak as the λex increased for all pH values. The PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S in pH 2 (Figure 3a) exhibited a peak shift from ~410 nm to ~490 nm (Δλ~80 nm) as the λex varied from 250 nm to 450 nm. When the pH increased to 7 and 11, the peak shift went up to 535 nm (Δλ~125 nm) at λex~450 nm, which is a 45 nm further red-shift compared to that in pH 2. This phenomena has been similarly observed in WS2-QDs due the size effect, and in MoS2-QDs due to the pH effect [25,26]. However, it is important to note that the PLE peak intensity of MoSe2-mQDs-S sharply decreased in the range of λex larger than ~310 nm in pH 2, while it slowly decreased with increasing λex in pH 7 and 11. This indicates that in MoSe2-mQDs-S the pH variation does critically affect the decay pathway of excitons, most likely due to the formation of sub-bands related to the redox state of MoSe2-mQDs. The oxidation can induce an extension of band-edge, resulting in some excited charges transiting to the lower energy state. This is in accordance with the analysis of results shown in Figure 2 and Table 1. A peak shift in the PLE spectra was similarly observed in MoSe2-mQDs-L (Figure 3d–f). In pH 2, the PLE peak positions of MoSe2-mQDs-L depending on the λex were similar to those of MoSe2-mQDs-S at pH 2, supporting the idea that the protonation of MoSe2-mQDs enforces the exciton decay at the intrinsic energy states. However, in pH 7 and 11, the PLE peaks at λex~250–310 nm appeared at ~460 nm, which are red-shifted as much as ~50 nm compared to those in pH 2. The PLE peak position at the λex~450 nm was ~550 nm (Δλ~90 nm) compared to that at λex~250 nm, which is a smaller peak shift compared to that (Δλ~125 nm) shown in MoSe2-mQDs-S. This means that the effect of pH variation in MoSe2-mQDs-L is weaker than that in MoSe2-mQDs-S, although it is stronger than the size effect.

3.4. Time Resolved PL (TRPL)

Figure 4 is the time resolved PL (TRPL) spectra depending on the pH of MoSe2-mQDs-S (Figure 4a–c) and MoSe2-mQDs-L (Figure 4d–f) measured at λex~266 and 310 nm, respectively, from 0 ns to 42 ns with six steps of time interval. The cumulative spectra of MoSe2-mQDs-S for the PL measurement time interval showed a similar trend in peak shift at the three pHs as time went on (Figure 4a–c). However, the peak shift was much clearer in pH 7 and 11, from ~415 nm to ~465 nm, indicating that the charge delocalization and migration to the lower energy states easily occur when the MoSe2-mQDs are oxidized. This is in line with the analysis in Figure 3 that the decay pathway of excitons has an intrinsic bandgap in the protonated MoSe2-mQDs-S, while the band edge changes as the pH increases. In comparison, the MoSe2-mQDs-L does not show a distinct peak shift in all pHs, although the PL peak position in pH 2 is ~430 nm and shifts to ~465 nm in pH 7 and 11. Because the PL peaks of MoSe2-mQDs-L in pH 2 are closer to the values (~415 nm) of MoSe2-mQDs-S than the values (~465 nm) in pH 7 and 11, the size effect looks to be weaker than the pH effect. This again confirms that the protonation of MoSe2-mQDs enhances the exciton decay at the band states with an intrinsic bandgap.

4. Discussion

This result we analysed above implies that in low pH the protonation of MoSe2-mQDs enhances the quantum confinement via the localization of the energy band, while the high pH induces the extension of the band edge, resulting in the large PL peak shift. The high pH of the solution can be attributed to the oxidation of MoSe2-mQDs, which makes a difference in electron density on MoSe2-mQDs in pH 2 and pH 11. Moreover, the higher electro negativity can block the interaction of MoSe2-mQDs with water molecules, causing the PL quenching. The analysis of PLE and TRPL results indicates that the variation of pH is more effective on the change of PL properties in MoSe2-mQDs than the size effect. On the other hand, as the size of MoSe2-mQDs increases to be larger than the exciton Bohr diameter, the extrinsic band structures related to the structural and oxidation defects become the dominant decay pathway of excitons.

5. Conclusions

We synthesized two different sized metallic phase MoSe2-QDs and investigated their photophysical properties depending on pH. The MoSe2-mQDs-S showed narrow PL spectra in all pH compared to MoSe2-mQDs-L and a higher quantum yield in pH 7 and 11 than that in pH 2 and the MoSe2-mQDs-L. The PLE spectra showed that as the λex increased, the PL peaks of MoSe2-mQDs-S more red-shifted in pH 7 and 11 than in pH 2. However, in MoSe2-mQDs-L, the red-shift of the PL peak was less than those in MoSe2-mQDs-S. From the TRPL results, the excitons in MoSe2-mQD dominantly decayed with an intrinsic energy bandgap in pH 2, while in pH 7and 11 they clearly migrated into the lower energy states. The PL peaks of MoSe2-mQD- showed a small red-shift compared to those shown in MoSe2-mQD-S. Consequently, the variation of pH is more effective on the photophysical properties of MoSe2-mQD than the size effect. We expect these findings to expand the understanding of photophysical properties of MoSe2-mQD, which will be helpful for potential applications.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through the contributions of all authors. S.H.S. conceptualized the experiments and wrote the manuscript. B.K. and J.A. conducted the data analysis and discussion of the results. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1A6A1A03032988 and NRF2020R1I1A3071628). Also, this research was supported by UNDERGROUND CITY OF THE FUTURE program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT. This research was supported by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0017012, Human Resource Development Program for Industrial Innovation).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2019R1A6A1A03032988 and NRF2020R1I1A3071628). Also, this research was supported by UNDERGROUND CITY OF THE FUTURE program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT. This research was supported by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) grant funded by the Korea Government (MOTIE) (P0017012, Human Resource Development Program for Industrial Innovation).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, S.; Ross, I.M.; Ong, A.C.; Allwood, D.A. Fabrication of luminescent monolayered tungsten dichalcogenides quantum dots with giant spin-valley coupling. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 8214–8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kang, Y.; Najmaei, S.; Liu, Z.; Bao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Halas, N.J.; Nordlander, P.; Ajayan, P.M.; Lou, J. Plasmonic hot electron induced structural phase transition in a MoS2 monolayer. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6467–6471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lin, Y.-C.; Dumcenco, D.O.; Huang, Y.-S.; Suenaga, K. Atomic mechanism of the semiconducting-to-metallic phase transition in single-layered MoS 2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014, 9, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gan, Z.; Liu, L.; Wu, H.; Hao, Y.; Shan, Y.; Wu, X.; Chu, P.K. Quantum confinement effects across two-dimensional planes in MoS2 quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 233113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Song, S.H.; Kim, B.H.; Choe, D.H.; Kim, J.; Kim, D.C.; Lee, D.J.; Kim, J.M.; Chang, K.J.; Jeon, S. Bandgap widening of phase quilted, 2D MoS2 by oxidative intercalation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3152–3158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ding, X.; Peng, F.; Zhou, J.; Gong, W.; Slaven, G.; Loh, K.P.; Lim, C.T.; Leong, D.T. Defect engineered bioactive transition metals dichalcogenides quantum dots. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, X.; Sun, G.; Li, N.; Chen, P. Quantum dots derived from two-dimensional materials and their applications for catalysis and energy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2239–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Xu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.L.; Lv, F.; Guo, S. Recent progress in two-dimensional inorganic quantum dots. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 586–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Q.; Cai, W.; Li, W.; Sreeprasad, T.S.; He, Z.; Ong, W.-J.; Li, N. Two-dimensional quantum dots: Fundamentals, photoluminescence mechanism and their energy and environmental applications. Mater. Today Energy 2018, 10, 222–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Voiry, D.; Mohite, A.; Chhowalla, M. Phase engineering of transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2702–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Tan, S.J.; Abdelwahab, I.; Ding, Z.; Zhao, X.; Yang, T.; Loke, G.Z.; Lin, H.; Verzhbitskiy, I.; Poh, S.M.; Xu, H. Chemical stabilization of 1T′ phase transition metal dichalcogenides with giant optical Kerr nonlinearity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2504–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, H.; Fan, X.; Singh, D.J.; Zheng, W.T. Recent progress of TMD nanomaterials: Phase transitions and applications. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 1247–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tan, C.; Luo, Z.; Chaturvedi, A.; Cai, Y.; Du, Y.; Gong, Y.; Huang, Y.; Lai, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, L. Preparation of High-Percentage 1T-Phase Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanodots for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, B.-H.; Jang, M.-H.; Yoon, H.; Kim, H.J.; Cho, Y.-H.; Jeon, S.; Song, S.-H. Metallic phase transition metal dichalcogenide quantum dots showing different optical charge excitation and decay pathways. NPG Asia Mater. 2021, 13, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Srivastava, R.R.; Mishra, H.; Singh, V.K.; Vikram, K.; Srivastava, R.K.; Srivastava, S.; Srivastava, A. pH dependent luminescence switching of tin disulfide quantum dots. J. Lumin. 2019, 213, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thomas, A.; Jinesh, K.B. Excitons and Trions in MoS2 Quantum Dots: The Influence of the Dispersing Medium. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 6531–6538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Komsa, H.-P.; Kotakoski, J.; Kurasch, S.; Lehtinen, O.; Kaiser, U.; Krasheninnikov, A.V. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides under electron irradiation: Defect production and doping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 035503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Y.; Ling, X.; Yu, L.; Huang, S.; Hsu, A.L.; Lee, Y.-H.; Kong, J.; Dresselhaus, M.S.; Palacios, T. Dielectric screening of excitons and trions in single-layer MoS2. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 5569–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Choi, J.; Zhang, H.; Du, H.; Choi, J.H. Understanding solvent effects on the properties of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 8864–8869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bayat, A.; Saievar-Iranizad, E. Synthesis of blue photoluminescent WS2 quantum dots via ultrasonic cavitation. J. Lumin. 2017, 185, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, K.; Fu, L.; Zhang, W.; Pan, H.; Sun, Y.; Ge, C.; Du, Y.; Tang, N. Ultrasmall and Monolayered Tungsten Dichalcogenide Quantum Dots with Giant Spin–Valley Coupling and Purple Luminescence. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 12188–12194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jin, H.; Ahn, M.; Jeong, S.; Han, J.H.; Yoo, D.; Son, D.H.; Cheon, J. Colloidal single-layer quantum dots with lateral confinement effects on 2D exciton. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 13253–13259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Loh, G.; Pandey, R.; Yap, Y.K.; Karna, S.P. MoS2 quantum dot: Effects of passivation, additional layer, and h-BN substrate on its stability and electronic properties. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dhanabalan, S.C.; Dhanabalan, B.; Ponraj, J.S.; Bao, Q.; Zhang, H. 2D–Materials-Based Quantum Dots: Gateway Towards Next-Generation Optical Devices. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1700257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Luan, C.-Y.; Xie, S.; Ma, C.; Wang, S.; Kong, Y.; Xu, M. Elucidation of luminescent mechanisms of size-controllable MoSe2 quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 073105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mishra, H.; Umrao, S.; Singh, J.; Srivastava, R.K.; Ali, R.; Misra, A.; Srivastava, A. pH dependent optical switching and fluorescence modulation of molybdenum sulfide quantum dots. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2017, 5, 1601021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Van Tuan, D.; Yang, M.; Dery, H. Coulomb interaction in monolayer transition-metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 125308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Caigas, S.P.; Santiago SR, M.; Lin, T.-N.; Lin, C.-A.J.; Yuan, C.-T.; Shen, J.-L.; Lin, T.-Y. Origins of excitation-wavelength-dependent photoluminescence in WS2 quantum dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2018, 112, 092106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Park, K.H.; Yang, J.Y.; Jung, S.; Ko, B.M.; Song, G.; Hong, S.-J.; Kim, N.C.; Lee, D.; Song, S.H. Metallic phase transition metal dichalcogenide quantum dots as promising bio-imaging materials. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Doolen, R.; Laitinen, R.; Parsapour, F.; Kelley, D. Trap state dynamics in MoS2 nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 3906–3911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of MoSe2-mQD [15]. (a). Schematic illustration of synthetic process of MoSe2-mQD and digital images of dispersed MoSe2-mQD in water with ph 2, 7, and 11. (b). TEM images of MoSe2-mQD-L (right) and MoSe2-mQD-S (left). (c). AFM images of MoSe2-mQD-S (left) and MoSe2-mQD-L (right) with height profiles.
Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of MoSe2-mQD [15]. (a). Schematic illustration of synthetic process of MoSe2-mQD and digital images of dispersed MoSe2-mQD in water with ph 2, 7, and 11. (b). TEM images of MoSe2-mQD-L (right) and MoSe2-mQD-S (left). (c). AFM images of MoSe2-mQD-S (left) and MoSe2-mQD-L (right) with height profiles.
Materials 15 04945 g001
Figure 2. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra and UV-vis absorbance. (a,b). PL spectra of MoSe2-mQD-S (a) and MoSe2-mQD-L (b) measured with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. (c,d). UV absorbance of MoSe2-mQD-S (left) and MoSe2-mQD-L (right).
Figure 2. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra and UV-vis absorbance. (a,b). PL spectra of MoSe2-mQD-S (a) and MoSe2-mQD-L (b) measured with an excitation wavelength of 325 nm. (c,d). UV absorbance of MoSe2-mQD-S (left) and MoSe2-mQD-L (right).
Materials 15 04945 g002
Figure 3. Excitation wavelength-dependent Photoluminescence (PLE) spectra. (ac). PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQD-S excited by λEx~250 (black), 270 (red), 290 (blue), 310 (dark cyan), 330 (Magenta), 350 (dark yellow), 370 (navy), 390 (wine), 410 (pink), 430 (olive), 450 (royal) nm, respectively, at pH 2 (a), pH 7 (b), and pH 11 (c). The gap between excitation wavelengths is 20 nm. (df). PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQD-L excited by λEx~250–470 nm at pH 2 (d), pH 7 (e), and pH 11 (f). The gap between excitation wavelengths is 20 nm.
Figure 3. Excitation wavelength-dependent Photoluminescence (PLE) spectra. (ac). PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQD-S excited by λEx~250 (black), 270 (red), 290 (blue), 310 (dark cyan), 330 (Magenta), 350 (dark yellow), 370 (navy), 390 (wine), 410 (pink), 430 (olive), 450 (royal) nm, respectively, at pH 2 (a), pH 7 (b), and pH 11 (c). The gap between excitation wavelengths is 20 nm. (df). PLE spectra of MoSe2-mQD-L excited by λEx~250–470 nm at pH 2 (d), pH 7 (e), and pH 11 (f). The gap between excitation wavelengths is 20 nm.
Materials 15 04945 g003
Figure 4. Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL). (ac). TRPL spectra measured from MoSe2-mQD-S at pH 2 (a), pH 7 (b), and pH 11 (c) with λex~266 nm. (df). TRPL spectra measured from MoSe2-mQD-L at pH 2 (d), pH 7 (e), and pH 11 (f) with λex~310 nm. Each PL spectrum has the intensity accumulated for 0–2 (black), 2–6 (red), 6–12 (blue), 12–20 (green), 20–30 (magenta), and 30–42 (dark yellow) ns.
Figure 4. Time-resolved photoluminescence (TRPL). (ac). TRPL spectra measured from MoSe2-mQD-S at pH 2 (a), pH 7 (b), and pH 11 (c) with λex~266 nm. (df). TRPL spectra measured from MoSe2-mQD-L at pH 2 (d), pH 7 (e), and pH 11 (f) with λex~310 nm. Each PL spectrum has the intensity accumulated for 0–2 (black), 2–6 (red), 6–12 (blue), 12–20 (green), 20–30 (magenta), and 30–42 (dark yellow) ns.
Materials 15 04945 g004
Table 1. Phtotophysical parameters of MoSe2-mQD.
Table 1. Phtotophysical parameters of MoSe2-mQD.
MaterialsSize
(nm)
pHPeak
(nm/eV)
FWHM
(eV)
QY
(%)
Abs @
325 nm
MoSe232418.30.793.70.326
7427.50.95.20.374
11425.30.950.352
122437.60.84
7461.31.070.40.689
11461.91.08
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ko, B.; Ahn, J.; Song, S.H. pH-Dependent Photophysical Properties of Metallic Phase MoSe2 Quantum Dots. Materials 2022, 15, 4945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144945

AMA Style

Ko B, Ahn J, Song SH. pH-Dependent Photophysical Properties of Metallic Phase MoSe2 Quantum Dots. Materials. 2022; 15(14):4945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ko, Boemjin, Jaegyu Ahn, and Sung Ho Song. 2022. "pH-Dependent Photophysical Properties of Metallic Phase MoSe2 Quantum Dots" Materials 15, no. 14: 4945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144945

APA Style

Ko, B., Ahn, J., & Song, S. H. (2022). pH-Dependent Photophysical Properties of Metallic Phase MoSe2 Quantum Dots. Materials, 15(14), 4945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144945

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop