Karlova, P.; Serdechnova, M.; Blawert, C.; Lu, X.; Mohedano, M.; Tolnai, D.; Zeller-Plumhoff, B.; Zheludkevich, M.L.
Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach. Materials 2022, 15, 6315.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315
AMA Style
Karlova P, Serdechnova M, Blawert C, Lu X, Mohedano M, Tolnai D, Zeller-Plumhoff B, Zheludkevich ML.
Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach. Materials. 2022; 15(18):6315.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315
Chicago/Turabian Style
Karlova, Polina, Maria Serdechnova, Carsten Blawert, Xiaopeng Lu, Marta Mohedano, Domonkos Tolnai, Berit Zeller-Plumhoff, and Mikhail L. Zheludkevich.
2022. "Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach" Materials 15, no. 18: 6315.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315
APA Style
Karlova, P., Serdechnova, M., Blawert, C., Lu, X., Mohedano, M., Tolnai, D., Zeller-Plumhoff, B., & Zheludkevich, M. L.
(2022). Comparison of 2D and 3D Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation (PEO)-Based Coating Porosity Data Obtained by X-ray Tomography Rendering and a Classical Metallographic Approach. Materials, 15(18), 6315.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186315
