Next Article in Journal
Mechanism of Shrinkage in Compacted Graphite Iron and Prediction of Shrinkage Tendency
Previous Article in Journal
Decay Resistance of Surface Carbonized Wood
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Polymer Composition on the Hydrolytic and Enzymatic Degradation of Polyesters and Their Block Copolymers with PDMAEMA
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials

Centre of Polymer and Carbon Materials, Polish Academy of Sciences, 41-819 Zabrze, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(23), 8411; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238411
Submission received: 18 November 2022 / Accepted: 22 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials)
Commonly used traditional polymeric materials have many advantages, although their resistance to biological agents causes a negative impact on the environment. Therefore, the use of (bio)degradable polymers with a minimal carbon footprint should become widespread due to the growing interest in sustainability, organic recycling, environmental issues, and healthcare. From the sustainability perspective, (bio)degradable polymers represent an interesting and fairly versatile alternative to conventional polymers. There is also increasing demand for (bio)degradable polymers that have been designed as materials for multi-faceted applications with a specific lifetime. Currently, there are challenges related to the design of materials that are stable in use and at the same time susceptible to microbial attack during organic recycling. Materials intended for specific applications must not only perform specific functions but also meet acceptable standards of safety during use and exhibit both chemical and physical stability [1]. An interesting issue in the field of the lifecycle of polyester materials is tests in real conditions in which the actual degradation time can be verified. These studies should take into account climatic and environmental conditions, including, for example, soil composition, and the degradation time may even be up to several years, depending on the structure of the starting material and environmental humidity [2,3,4].
These challenges are driving many scientists around the world to focus their research in this area. This has led to the development of many technologies for obtaining (bio)degradable polymers from both renewable and petrochemical raw materials. Various natural, bio-based, and synthetic (bio)degradable polymers such as poly(1,4-butylene adipate-co-1,4-butylene terephthalate) (PBAT), polylactide (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (P3HB), and poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) are now used in many fields. Although consumers are changing their behavior and increasingly expect ecoproducts, the broad introduction of the (bio)degradable polymeric materials to the market must be preceded by a number of other changes, such as improving composting infrastructure, the development of new technology, financial capacity, and bioplastics- and (bio)degradable-polymer-related policies. Nevertheless, in the coming years, an increase in (bio)degradable polymer applications can be expected, as the development of new possibilities in different areas is predicted to lead to an increase in the market for them and also for bio-based materials such as natural fillers, whose addition to compositions with (bio)degradable polymers is intended to improve the properties of the materials, as well as reduce prices [5,6].
The need to reduce the cost of the materials from (bio)degradable polymers forces the development of research towards the creation of biocomposites with cheaper fillers. However, maintaining a high-quality material with repeated mechanical properties is quite a challenge. Therefore, when choosing natural fibers as fillers for biocomposites, one should take into account not only their geometric features, but also, e.g., the growth conditions of the plants they come from. The repeatability of properties may also accompany biocomposites in which waste from, e.g., the agricultural industry, is used as a filler [7]. Since the additives can be made using post-consumer wood resulting from the processing of wood products, the reuse of secondary raw materials for the production of biocomposites can be an environmentally friendly way to minimize and/or manage the amount of solid waste. Bioactive materials, which contain small amounts of antimicrobial additives, are also very attractive solutions for the packaging industry [8]. The specificity of (bio)degradable polymers, their interactions with the additives or fillers used, and the variety of degradation mechanisms, depending on the environment, extend the possibilities of their applications in niche areas.
The use of (bio)degradable polymers, especially in medical applications, requires a proper understanding of their properties and behavior in different environments. Structural elements made of such polymers can be exposed to changing environmental conditions, which can cause defects. Although the degradation of (bio)degradable polyesters has been extensively reported, less information is available on the degradation of a large group of copolymers with various types of degradable and non-degradable building blocks such as water-soluble poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), poly(propylene glycol) (PPG), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) that modulate biodegradability of polyesters by adjusting the hydrophilicity. Such copolymers are also electrically neutral at all pH values, which is why it is so important to determine the effect of, for example, processing conditions on polymer properties and also their subsequent behavior during degradation [9,10]. In broadly understood healthcare, (bio)degradable polymers are used not only as a medical device, but also in the treatment process itself, enabling appropriate control of drug delivery.
In recent years, there has been considerable development in both synthetic and natural drug-release materials for use in drug-delivery systems. Most such systems are based on synthetic polymers, such as polyesters, polyphosphazene, or poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA), due to their desirable pharmacokinetics and controllable hydrolytic degradation profiles [11]. Although safe, their properties and processing requirements limit their use in certain areas of sustained delivery, such as protein therapeutics, where product stability may be an issue. Silk fibroin is a biocompatible, non-toxic, mechanically tough protein used as a material for biomedical applications, which has also gained particular interest as a drug carrier vehicle [12]. Drug release systems gaining great popularity in medicine open up new possibilities for their use also outside this area.
Conventional agrochemical formulations can pollute the environment, particularly in the case of intensive cultivation. Additionally, in modern agriculture, there is a growing tendency to use environmentally friendly release systems as carriers of active substances, which are aimed to improve efficiency and limit the cost of application and minimize negative environmental effects. The active substance should be gradually released from the (bio)degradable polymer matrix throughout the growth season of plants at a level that ensures optimal growth of crop plants while destroying the target weeds. At the same time, environmentally friendly polymeric carriers should be biodegradable in soil without creating non-degradable residues [13,14,15].
This Special Issue aims to provide a contemporary overview of recent developments in the field of (bio)degradable polymer or composites applications covering aspects of the current trends in the expansion of polymer material applications.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all the authors for submitting their papers to the Special Issue “Applications of novel biodegradable polymeric materials”, as well as all the reviewers and editors for their contributions to improving these submissions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sikorska, W.; Musioł, M.; Zawidlak-Węgrzyńska, B.; Rydz, J. Compostable Polymeric Ecomaterials: Environment-Friendly Waste Management Alternative to Landfills. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Martínez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 2733–2764. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rudnik, E.; Briassoulis, D. Degradation behaviour of poly(lactic acid) films and fibres in soil under mediterranean field conditions and laboratory simulations testing. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 33, 648–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Puchalski, M.; Siwek, P.; Panayotov, N.; Berova, M.; Kowalska, S.; Krucińska, I. Influence of various climatic conditions on the structural changes of semicrystalline pla spun-bonded mulching nonwovens during outdoor composting. Polymers 2019, 11, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Giełdowska, M.; Puchalski, M.; Szparaga, G.; Krucińska, I. Investigation of the influence of PLA molecular and supramolecular structure on the kinetics of thermal-supported hydrolytic degradation of wet spinning fibres. Materials 2020, 13, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rydz, J.; Musiol, M.; Zawidlak-Wegrzyńska, B.; Sikorska, W. Chapter 14—Present and Future of Biodegradable Polymers for Food Packaging Applications. In Handbook of Food Bioengineering; Biopolymers for food design; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 431–467. [Google Scholar]
  6. Han, J.; Shi, J.; Xie, Z.; Xu, J.; Guo, B. Synthesis, Properties of biodegradable poly(butylene succinate-co-butylene 2-methylsuccinate) and application for sustainable release. Materials 2019, 12, 1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Jurczyk, S.; Kurcok, P.; Musioł, M. Multifunctional Composite Ecomaterials and Their Impact on Sustainability. In Handbook of Ecomaterials; Martínez, L.M.T., Kharissova, O.V., Kharisov, B.I., Eds.; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 3193–3222. [Google Scholar]
  8. Musioł, M.; Jurczyk, S.; Sobota, M.; Klim, M.; Sikorska, W.; Zięba, M.; Janeczek, H.; Rydz, J.; Kurcok, P.; Johnston, B.; et al. (Bio)degradable polymeric materials for sustainable future—Part 3: Degradation studies of the PHA/wood flour-based composites and preliminary tests of antimicrobial activity. Materials 2020, 13, 2200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Rydz, J.; Włodarczyk, J.; Gonzalez Ausejo, J.; Musioł, M.; Sikorska, W.; Sobota, M.; Hercog, A.; Duale, K.; Janeczek, H. Three-dimensional printed PLA and PLA/PHA dumbbell-shaped specimens: Material defects and their impact on degradation behavior. Materials 2020, 13, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kupczak, M.; Mielańczyk, A.; Neugebauer, D. The influence of polymer composition on the hydrolytic and enzymatic degradation of polyesters and their block copolymers with PDMAEMA. Materials 2021, 14, 3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Mao, S.; Guo, C.; Shi, Y.; Li, L.C. Recent advances in polymeric microspheres for parenteral drug delivery—Part 1. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2012, 9, 1161–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Opálková Šišková, A.; Kozma, E.; Opálek, A.; Kroneková, Z.; Kleinová, A.; Nagy, Š.; Kronek, J.; Rydz, J.; Eckstein Andicsová, A. Diclofenac embedded in silk fibroin fibers as a drug delivery system. Materials 2020, 13, 3580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pérez-de-Luque, A.; Rubiales, D. Nanotechnology for parasitic plant control. Pest. Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lewicka, K.; Dobrzynski, P.; Rychter, P. PLAGA-PEG-PLAGA Terpolymer-based carriers of herbicides for potential application in environment-friendly, controlled release systems of agrochemicals. Materials 2020, 13, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lewicka, K.; Rychter, P.; Pastusiak, M.; Janeczek, H.; Dobrzynski, P. Biodegradable blends of grafted dextrin with PLGA-block-PEG copolymer as a carrier for controlled release of herbicides into soil. Materials 2020, 13, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rydz, J.; Musioł, M. Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials. Materials 2022, 15, 8411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238411

AMA Style

Rydz J, Musioł M. Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials. Materials. 2022; 15(23):8411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rydz, Joanna, and Marta Musioł. 2022. "Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials" Materials 15, no. 23: 8411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238411

APA Style

Rydz, J., & Musioł, M. (2022). Applications of Novel Biodegradable Polymeric Materials. Materials, 15(23), 8411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15238411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop