Next Article in Journal
The New Reliable pH Sensor Based on Hydrous Iridium Dioxide and Its Composites
Next Article in Special Issue
Residual Stress Measurement Techniques for Metal Joints, Metallic Coatings and Components in the Railway Industry: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Low Temperature Magnetic Transition of BiFeO3 Ceramics Sintered by Electric Field-Assisted Methods: Flash and Spark Plasma Sintering
Previous Article in Special Issue
Some Slippage Issues in High-Pressure Torsion Using Cu and Ti Samples as an Example
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 1
10.3390/ma16010191
Review Report
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Deformation Behavior under Tension with Pulse Current of Ultrafine-Grain and Coarse-Grain CP Titanium

Materials 2023, 16(1), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010191
by Vladimir Stolyarov 1,*, Oleg Korolkov 1, Alexander Pesin 2 and George Raab 2
Reviewer 1:
Hong-wu Song
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2023, 16(1), 191; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010191
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 20 December 2022 / Accepted: 22 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances on Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Features of Alloy/Steel)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Electroplastic effec  for UFC and CG commercial pure Titanium was studied and compared. However, the novelty is not enough. As the EPE had been studied by the author for UFC titanium alloys ten years ago. This study gave no new finds or understanding of the phenomenon. It is suggested to give a thorough analysis about the mechanism of the difference on EPE of UFC CP Ti and CG CP Ti, and with a comprasion with pre studied titanium alloys.

 

the main problem of the paper is similar results had been published by the author for Titanium alloy which is not listed in the references and no comparison was did with this research. I recommend reject, and if the author want to improve the paper, it is sugguest to give a through analysis about the mechanism for EFP effect of CP Ti, if it is the same or different with the pre-published titanium alloy.    

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors,

 the paper contains interesting analysis. However, here are some suggestions to improve the manuscript:

L 51-53: “Here we note that…” please provide adequate references for this statement

Please describe the origin of Figure 1. If it is your work, please explain the metallographic preparation, the equipment used, the conditions, the microscope, etc.

Also clarify where the data listed in Table 1 come from. Did you get them from the manufacturer or did you do the analysis yourself? If you did the analysis yourself, describe which ones, how, etc

L 155: “..electron microscope Tescan Mira 3 LMU showed..” you should add numerical data to prove this statement. Also edx spectruum would be useful.

L 214: 3.3. Instead Fructure it should be Fracture

Based on conclusions, please outline a possible future research.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors try to modify the manuscript and the response seems fine.

Back to TopTop