Next Article in Journal
Experimental Investigations of Ni–Ti–Ru System: Liquidus Surface Projection and 1150 °C Isothermal Section
Previous Article in Journal
Time-Dependent Rheological Properties of Cemented Aeolian Sand-Fly Ash Backfill Vary with Particles Size and Plasticizer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effective Combination of the Metal Centers in MOF-Based Materials toward Sustainable Oxidation Catalysts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 16
Issue 15
10.3390/ma16155298
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalysis of a Diels–Alder Reaction between Azachalcones and Cyclopentadiene by a Recyclable Copper(II)-PEIP Metal-Organic Framework

by
Eleni Hadjikyprianou
,
Sotiris Petrides
,
Andreas Kourtellaris
,
Anastasios J. Tasiopoulos
and
Savvas N. Georgiades
*
Department of Chemistry, University of Cyprus, 1 Panepistimiou Avenue, Aglandjia, 2109 Nicosia, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(15), 5298; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155298
Submission received: 28 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Chemistry and Applications of Metal-Organic Frameworks)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted considerable interest as emerging heterogeneous catalysts for organic transformations of synthetic utility. Herein, a Lewis-acidic MOF, {[Cu3(PEIP)2(5-NH2-mBDC)(DMF)]·7DMF}∞, denoted as Cu(ΙΙ)-PEIP, has been synthesized via a one-pot process and deployed as an efficient heterogeneous catalyst for a Diels–Alder cycloaddition. Specifically, the [4 + 2] cycloaddition of 13 substituted azachalcone dienophiles with cyclopentadiene has been investigated. MOF-catalyzed reaction conditions were optimized, leading to the selection of water as the solvent, in the presence of 10% mol sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) to address substrate solubility. The Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst showed excellent activity under these green and mild conditions, exhibiting comparable or, in some cases, superior efficiency to a homogeneous catalyst often employed in Diels–Alder reactions, namely, Cu(OTf)2. The nature of the azachalcone substituent played a significant role in the reactivity of the dienophiles, with electron-withdrawing (EW) substituents enhancing conversion and electron-donating (ED) ones exhibiting the opposite effect. Coordinating substituents appeared to enhance the endo selectivity. Importantly, the Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst can be readily isolated from the reaction mixture and recycled up to four times without any significant reduction in conversion or selectivity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted significant research attention over the last few decades due to their highly porous structures [1] and large surface areas [2,3], as well as the presence of metal cations that may exhibit interesting physical properties and/or act as Lewis acidic sites [4]. As anticipated, MOFs have been proven to be versatile platforms for applications in diverse areas, including gas storage and separation [5,6,7], magnetism [8], sensing [9,10], and catalysis [11,12]. During the last few years, there has been a growing interest on the use of MOFs in catalysis due to their unique features, including: (i) their crystalline nature and high-yield synthesis from low-cost starting materials; (ii) their hybrid organic-inorganic nature and the existence of both Lewis acidic and basic sites in their structures [12]; (iii) their extraordinary structural and architectural diversity and the variety of pore shapes and dimensions that render them ideal hosts for a series of substrates; (iv) the capability to modify/tailor their structures [13] to achieve selected applications; and (v) their chemical and thermal stability that allows their reactivation and reuse for multiple catalytic cycles [14].
For these reasons, MOFs, among various other types of nanomaterials [15,16], have been examined as heterogeneous catalysts and have shown very promising results for several organic transformations, including Knoevenagel condensations [17,18], Friedel-Crafts [19,20], C-N cross-coupling [21], and ‘click’ reactions [22,23]. Another type of reaction that has been explored using MOF catalysts is the Diels–Alder (D-A) cycloaddition, however, there are still limited studies in this area [24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. In particular, Cu(II), Cr(III), Fe(III), Zr(IV), and mixed Fe(II)/Ni(II)-based MOFs with various ligands and structural architectures have been examined as D-A catalysts for a series of diene and dienophile substrate combinations, exhibiting mixed results in terms of conversion and selectivity. Notably, previous studies employing MOFs have not investigated the formation of bridged bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene-type D-A adducts, while many of them employed high boiling point organic solvents and/or required high reaction temperatures [24,28,29].
The [4 + 2] cycloaddition, commonly known as the Diels–Alder reaction [31,32], is one of the most emblematic pericyclic reactions in organic chemistry and, deservedly, one of the most frequently employed in organic synthesis, due to its synthetic reliability and atom-economic nature for the facile construction of complex 6-membered ring systems, most notably (fused) cyclic scaffolds of natural products [33,34]. In many cases, the reaction requires elevated temperature, organic solvent, and a Lewis-acidic catalyst [35]. Generation of valuable D-A adducts via MOF catalysis would bypass time- and resource-consuming purification steps that are needed after homogeneous catalysis to separate the product from the catalyst.
In the present work, a MOF material previously reported by one of our group [36], referred to as Cu(II)-PEIP, is assessed for the first time as a heterogeneous catalyst. This MOF formed in a simple high-yield, one-pot reaction of a Cu(II) salt (Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O) and a Schiff base ligand generated in situ from the condensation of 5-amino-isophthalic acid (5-NH2-mBDCH2) and 4-pyridine-carboxaldehyde (4-PyrCA). Cu(II)-PEIP is a microporous 3D MOF containing coordinatively unsaturated Cu(II) sites, multiple N-donor atoms, and free -NH2 groups. Based on previous findings [36], Cu(II)-PEIP displays an appreciable BET area of 1785 m2.g−1 and demonstrates high CO2 uptake (reaching 4.75 mmol.g−1 at 273 K and 1 bar) and good CO2/CH4 selectivity (8.5 at zero coverage and 273 K). Interestingly, these values are higher than the corresponding ones of other high-surface area MOFs, including MOF-5, MOF-200 and MOF-210. The high porosity of Cu(II)-PEIP, in combination with the presence of unsaturated Cu(II) sites and the existence of multiple functional groups, which are potentially useful for interaction with substrates, render this MOF a suitable candidate for Lewis acid catalysis. For these reasons, Cu(II)-PEIP was chosen to be investigated as a heterogeneous catalyst for a [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction.
Herein, we report the catalytic activity of the Cu(II)-PEIP material for a D-A cycloaddition between a family of azachalcones (i.e., substituted (pyridinyl)propenones) and cyclopentadiene, to generate synthetically valuable bicyclo[2.2.1]hept-2-ene products. The building units investigated were selected mainly on the basis of their capability to coordinate the MOF’s metal centers as well as be involved in hydrogen bond-type interactions. This mild, room-temperature catalytic process has been optimized by selecting a green, non-toxic solvent (water) and achieves near-quantitative transformation for most of the substrates, in the presence of a surfactant (sodium dodecyl sulfate, SDS). Cu(II)-PEIP displays excellent activity under these conditions at low catalyst loading (2% mol), and can be recycled up to four times, as indicated by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) studies, indicating the potential of this material for use in sustainable processes.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General

Reagent grade chemicals (purity > 97%) were obtained from commercial sources (Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), Alfa Aesar (Haverhill, MA, USA), TCI Europe N.V. (Zwijndrecht, Belgium) and used without further purification. Millipore (double-distilled) water was in-house prepared. Organic solvents used for reactions, obtained from Carlo Erba Reagents (Milano, Italy), were anhydrous, unless otherwise stated. Organic solvents used for chromatography, obtained from Merck (Burlington, MA, USA), were of analytical grade. All synthetic procedures were conducted under air, unless otherwise specified.
Flash chromatographic purifications were performed in glass columns, using silica gel 60 (0.063–0.2 mm) from Merck as stationary phase. Thin layer chromatography (TLC), to monitor reaction progress, was performed on aluminum plates covered with silica gel 60 (F254) from Merck, which allowed compound visualization under a UV lamp (254 nm) as dark spots on a green background. TLC staining was performed with vanillin (TCI Europe N.V.) where necessary.
Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance III 500 Ultrashield Plus spectrometer (at 500 MHz for 1H NMR and 125 MHz for 13C NMR, at 25 °C). Chemical shift calibration was based on the NMR solvent’s residual peak. Deuterated solvents were obtained from Merck or TCI Europe N.V.
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was performed on a RIGAKU Miniflex 6th g diffractometer (Neu-Isenburg, Germany), using Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å).

2.2. Cu(II)-PEIP MOF Preparation

The Cu(II)-PEIP MOF was prepared by means of a variation of the previously described protocol [36], which involved in situ synthesis of the PEIPH2 ligand via condensation of 5-amino-isophthalic acid (5-NH2-mBDCH2) and 4-pyridinecarboxaldehyde (4-PyrCA) (see structures in Figure 1). The two components, 5-NH2-mBDCH2 (0.08 g, 0.44 mmol) and 4-PyrCA (43 μL, 0.45 mmol), were dissolved in 5 mL of N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) in a 20 mL screw-cap vial. After 5 min of sonication, solid Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O (0.08 g, 0.34 mmol) was added to the solution. The mixture was sonicated for 5 more minutes and then heated, without stirring, at 100 °C for 24 h. During this period, bright green polyhedral crystals of Cu(II)-PEIP were formed. The crystals were thoroughly washed with DMF to remove unreacted starting materials from the pores of the MOF. Subsequently, they were washed several times with acetone and dried under vacuum. The yield was approximately 70%. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was used to confirm the purity and crystallinity of the batch product. Digestion of a representative sample of the MOF with HCl and subsequent 1H NMR analysis confirmed the complete removal of DMF from the pores of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF (Figure S2, Supporting Information).

2.3. Synthesis of Azachalcone Dienophile Building Units

Thirteen (13) azachalcone dienophiles with various substituents (1a–m, Scheme S1, Supporting Information) were synthesized via aldol reaction of the corresponding aromatic aldehydes with an enolate generated from 2-acetylpyridine under basic conditions, followed by in situ dehydration. For this transformation, various literature protocols were applied, depending on aldehyde substrate reactivity [37,38,39,40] (see Table S1, Supporting Information). The azachalcone products were isolated via filtration or via chromatography, depending on product solubility in the reaction solvent, and characterized by 1H and 13C NMR prior to use in the D-A reaction (>95% purity).

2.4. Screening of Conditions for [4 + 2] Cycloaddition (Diels–Alder Reaction)

Various solvent systems were tested prior to selecting an optimal one for the MOF-catalyzed D-A reaction on a model system involving the mother (unsubstituted) azachalcone structure (1a, 0.25 mmol) and freshly-distilled cyclopentadiene (2, 2.5 mmol) in 1 mL of solvent (Scheme 1). The Cu(II) equivalents from the MOF in all trials were kept at 2% mol (relative to 1a) and the reactions were carried out with gentle stirring on a combi-chem fixed-speed Stuart SB2 rotator (Cole-Parmer UK, Cambridgeshire, UK) to achieve reproducible mixing and avoid MOF attrition and degradation. Solvents which were found useful in previous catalytic studies with MOF materials were included in this screening. Tested solvents were acetonitrile (CH3CN), dichloromethane (DCM), tert-butyl methyl ether (BME), N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol (MeOH), ethanol (EtOH), and water (H2O), while aqueous systems containing adducts (NaCl, sodium dodecyl sulfate-SDS) were also tested on the model system, after it become obvious that some of the substituted azachalcone substrates required an adduct in order to become fully soluble in water. For optimization, we required high to quantitative reaction conversion (>95%), as well as the ability of the MOF to remain insoluble (>95% recovery) in the solvent, in order to serve as a heterogeneous catalyst (results shown in Table 1). Conversion was assessed based on product isolation, after reaction on the model system was allowed to proceed for 24 h at room temperature. Determination of the insoluble MOF mass was conducted by recovering the MOF after the reaction via filtration, washing with diethyl ether and acetone, and drying. The selected conditions were then applied in the MOF-catalyzed D-A reactions on all azachalcone substrates (see Section 2.6).

2.5. Control Experiments for Assessing the Effect of Individual MOF Components in Catalysis and Control Reactions with a Homogeneous Copper(II) Catalyst, Cu(OTf)2

Once appropriate reaction conditions had been selected, as described in Section 2.4, a number of control experiments were conducted on the model substrate combination 1a (unsubstituted azachalcone, 0.25 mmol) + 2 (cyclopentadiene, 2.5 mmol), under comparable reaction conditions to the optimal ones (1 mL of solvent, r.t., 24 h), to detect any catalytic effect of each of the individual MOF components/ligands (5-NH2-mBDCH2 and PEIPH2) as well as the free copper salt (Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O) employed in the self-assembly process of MOF formation (results in Table 2). Products were isolated after extraction to organic solvent and column chromatography.
Additionally, control D-A reactions, promoted by a homogeneous catalyst (5% mol Cu(II)), were conducted for all actual azachalcone substrates (dienophiles) included in this study (1a–m, 0.25 mmol) in combination with diene 2 (2.5 mmol) in 1 mL of solvent. Specifically, the Lewis-acidic catalyst Cu(OTf)2, a standard Diels–Alder catalyst, was employed in order to have a comparison to the heterogeneous D-A reactions catalyzed by the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF material (results discussed in Section 3.4). Products were isolated after extraction to EtOAc and column chromatography.

2.6. Procedure for Cu(II)-PEIP MOF-Catalyzed [4 + 2] (Diels–Alder) Cycloaddition

All D-A reactions were carried out in parallel format at least 3 times each, to check reproducibility, in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube scale. To a mixture containing the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF (3 mg, 2% mol Cu(II) loading) in water (1 mL), we added SDS (0.0072 g, 0.025 mmol, 0.1 equiv.), and the mixture was agitated gently by hand to create a fine suspension. Subsequently, an azachalcone dienophile (0.25 mmol, 1 equiv.) was added, followed by an excess of freshly-distilled cyclopentadiene (2, 2.5 mmol, 10 equiv.). The resulting mixtures were rotated at fixed speed at room temperature on a combi-chem Stuart SB2 rotator for 18 h. The heterogeneous catalyst (MOF) was subsequently filtered and washed with distilled water, diethyl ether, and acetone. The aqueous filtrate (and wash solvent) was transferred to a separatory funnel and extracted with EtOAc (x3). The combined organic phase was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. After removal of the drying agent, the crude mixture was exhaustively dried on the rotary evaporator, weighted, and characterized by 1H NMR to determine conversion and endo:exo product molar ratio. For most cases, NMR revealed the absence of any organic impurities. In one case, which was not quantitative, the D-A adduct (3i) was separated from the unreacted dienophile precursor (1i) after column chromatography, and its purity was confirmed by 1H NMR. Conversions and endo:exo ratios are discussed in Section 3.4.

2.7. Assessment of MOF’s Structural Integrity under D-A Conditions, and after each Catalytic Cycle

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) was employed as a method of choice to assess the structural integrity of the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF material. Initially, a control experiment was conducted where the MOF was submitted to the optimal D-A conditions for various times, in the absence of any substrate, then recovered, washed (distilled water, diethyl ether, acetone), dried and examined by PXRD, to provide an idea of whether it maintained its original structure (see Figure S3, Supporting Information).
Similarly, PXRD on the recovered MOF after each round of D-A catalysis on the model substrates system (1a + 2), considered to be representative of all the substrates tested, was employed to determine the number of cycles allowed before the MOF begins to show signs of deterioration (results discussed in Section 3.5).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Suitability of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF for Catalysis

The MOF, Cu(II)-PEIP, was prepared by a slight variation of a method in the previous literature [36], which involved in situ formation (via condensation) of an imine ligand (PEIPH2) from aniline 5-NH2-mBDCH2 and aldehyde 4-PyrCA, and the subsequent self-assembly of the MOF. The synthesized MOF (Figure 2a) comprises both the 5-NH2-mBDC2− and PEIP2− ligands connecting four and five Cu(II) ions, respectively (Figure 2b,c), giving rise to a 3D structure.
The 3D pores of this material are of appropriate dimensions [36] to accommodate substrates and bridged D-A adducts, such as the ones included in the current study, while the availability of Lewis-acidic Cu(II) centers was deemed promising for D-A catalysis. An exhaustive wash of the generated MOF material with a volatile, weakly coordinating solvent, such as acetone, ensured that excess/uncoordinated reaction solvent (DMF), trapped in the pores during MOF synthesis, was efficiently removed to free up space. Small amounts of DMF, detected by 1H NMR in the washed material after acidic digestion (see Figure S2, Supporting Information), can be attributed to copper-coordinated DMF molecules, which are also evident in the crystal structure (Figure 2d).
The presence of dinuclear paddle-wheel secondary building units, [Cu2(RCOO)4(DMF)2] within the structure of Cu(II)-PEIP (Figure 2d) is of great interest for this specific application due to the fact that solvent molecules (DMF) are weakly coordinated to the metal centers (see Figure S1a, Supporting Information) and can be readily exchanged upon contact with (Lewis-basic) substrates capable of coordination, such as the azachalcone dienophiles employed in this study. The latter are present in the reaction in excess relative to the copper(II) sites. Therefore, the paddle-wheel copper(II) sites contribute the expected catalytic centers of the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF material for the D-A reaction. The presence of free aniline NH2 groups, in proximity to the Cu(II) sites (see Figure S1b, Supporting Information), could potentially contribute to the positioning of dienophiles.
The aforementioned features of this MOF led to its selection for the catalysis of D-A reactions between azachalcones and cyclopentadiene. It is worth mentioning that it is the first time that the formation of bridgehead D-A cycloadducts exhibiting a 3D structural element has been reported by means of MOF catalysis, which is allowed due to the large pore size of the Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst.

3.2. Selection of Reaction Solvent for D-A Cycloaddition

Investigations on the effect of the solvent, as the most important parameter for optimization of the D-A cycloaddition, were carried out in the presence of MOF at 2% mol of Cu(II). The purpose of the solvent screening was two-fold: (i) to identify a solvent in which the MOF maintains its structural integrity (i.e., exhibits lack of solubility, based on its recovered mass), and (ii) to ensure that, in the selected solvent, the model dienophile 1a is fully converted to the desired D-A adduct (3a) in the presence of excess diene (cyclopentadiene, 2). All other parameters (reaction scale, substrate concentration, temperature, and reaction time) were kept fixed.
In all solvent systems tested on the model substrates combination 1a + 2 (Scheme 1), the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF remained insoluble to the desired extent (>95% based on mass recovery), while conversions were significantly higher in aqueous solvents (based on isolated product mass and 1H NMR analysis) (Table 1), possibly due to a contribution from the hydrophobic effect. Focusing on the need to select an environmentally-benign solvent system, we selected an aqueous system for the actual D-A reactions, which also appeared to afford near-quantitative conversion (~99%). In the process of testing the substituted azachalcone dienophiles, it was found that some of them (specifically the more hydrophobic ones) required the addition of a surfactant, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), in order to become entirely soluble in water, and, therefore, SDS modified conditions were added to the original screening set. Eventually, we selected water with 10% mol SDS as the ideal conditions for the application of the heterogeneous Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst in D-A reactions.
It is noted that the stability of the MOF catalyst, after 2–72 h agitation in the selected solvent system, in the absence of any substrate was confirmed by examining the isolated MOF by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD). The PXRD pattern suggested no significant structural deterioration (Figure S3, Supporting Information), and, therefore, the selected solvent was considered compatible with the MOF. This was also confirmed from the 1H NMR spectra of the supernatant liquid of MOF material treated in the experiment’s aqueous conditions (D2O/10% mol SDS) for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, which indicated the absence of leaching of the organic ligands (Figure S4, Supporting Information).

3.3. Ability of Individual Components of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF to Catalyze a Model D-A Reaction

A series of control D-A reactions, assessing the conversion of model substrates 1a + 2, were performed in solution in the selected solvent system (H2O containing 10% mol SDS) and under similar conditions as in the optimization (r.t., 24 h). These control reactions were carried out in the absence of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF but in the presence of either Cu(II) cations or one of the MOF’s constituent ligands (PEIPH2 or 5-NH2-mBDCH2) in their neutral form (Table 2). The additive-free D-A reaction, involving reactants only, was also studied. The purpose of these control experiments was to determine whether the entire MOF or its individual components serve as the catalyst in D-A, or if a catalyst is required at all.
As evident from the results, summarized in Table 2, the individual components, as well as the additive-free (uncatalyzed) reaction, all afforded low conversions to the D-A adduct (3a). Among these, Cu(II) cations from Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O (Entry 1) afforded the highest conversion (35%) in the same aqueous system selected for the MOF-catalyzed reactions, albeit with no observed diastereoselectivity (endo:exo = 1:1). In the case of the free ligands (Brønsted-acidic), even lower yields were obtained (Entry 2: PEIPH2, 25%; Entry 3: 5-NH2-mBDCH2, 29%), with a similar lack of diastereoselectivity. Finally, in the uncatalyzed case (Entry 4), only trace product was observed (<2%). This confirms that the MOF in its entity is the main Lewis acid catalyst in the MOF-containing reaction systems (see Section 3.4).

3.4. Investigation of Azachalcone Dienophile Scope in Cu(II)-PEIP-Catalyzed D-A

After the optimal conditions of solvent and temperature were determined, and after adopting a shorter than 24 h but sufficient reaction duration (18 h), the selected protocol was applied on the full range of thirteen (13) azachalcone dienophile substrates (1a–m), always using cyclopentadiene (2) as the diene, for parallel Cu(II)-PEIP-catalyzed D-A reactions (Scheme 2). Some of the dienophiles comprised a phenyl ring, either unsubstituted (1a) or monosubstituted with a range of chemical functionalities (1b–j), while in others the phenyl ring was substituted for a pyridine (1k,l) or furan ring (1m). This range of substrates provided an opportunity to study the electron-withdrawing and the electron-donating effects on D-A reaction conversion and selectivity.
After completion of a typical D-A reaction, the MOF material could be readily separated and recovered by filtration, while the supernatant was extracted to ethyl acetate (to remove SDS), exhaustively dried (to remove excess cyclopentadiene, 2), and analyzed directly by 1H NMR spectroscopy without a need for further purification, since most substrates afforded >98% conversion (except for the case of substrate 1i, where chromatography was needed; and 1j, where no product was observed).Meticulous 1H and 13C NMR analysis ensured structural characterization of each isolated product (for the data, see Section S1 of Supporting Information). The molar ratio of endo-to-exo D-A adducts obtained from each substrate was determined by relative peak integration in 1H NMR, while conversion was calculated based on the mass of isolated organic material. With the exception of 1i and 1j reaction crudes, which contained azachalcone starting material, the rest of the products did not contain any detectable organic impurity. The conversions and endo-to-exo molar ratios under Cu(II)-PEIP catalysis (heterogeneous conditions) are summarized in Scheme 2.
The diverse set of substrates employed in this study demonstrated a dual behavior in the D-A reaction catalyzed by the Cu(II)-PEIP MOF. The reaction afforded quantitative conversions with the electron-deficient 4-carboxy- (1b), 4-methylester- (1c), 4-chloro- (1d), 4-nitro- (1e), 3-nitro- (1f), and 4-trimethylammonium-phenyl (1g) azachalcone substrates, as well as with the 4- and 2-pyridyl ones (1k and 1l, respectively), revealing an excellent efficiency of the MOF catalyst when used in combination with a range of electron acceptor-substituted dienophiles. The behaviour of this dienophile sub-set is consistent with predictions of Fukui’s Frontier Molecular Orbital (FMO) theory, which correlates the success of normal electron demand Diels–Alder reactions with a small FMO gap between the energies of the diene’s HOMO and the dienophile’s LUMO [41]. Electron-withdrawing groups on the dienophile lower the dienophile’s LUMO energy level, leading to a small FMO gap and facilitating the reaction. The unsubstituted substrate (1a), the weak electron donor-substituted 4-methyl-phenyl (1h), and especially the π-extended 2-furyl one (1m) gratifyingly exhibited similar quantitative conversion to the corresponding D-A adducts, suggesting a permissive FMO gap. Moderate or poor catalytic efficiency was observed only for two strongly electron-rich dienophiles, namely, the 4-methoxy-phenyl (1i, 50% conversion) and 4-dimethylamino-phenyl (1j, no conversion). This was not surprising, considering the contribution of the electron donor in raising the dienophile’s LUMO energy level, resulting in a mismatch with the diene’s HOMO, which manifests as poor conversion.
Importantly, the heterogeneous Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst (at 2% mol Cu(II) loading) afforded, in almost all of the studied cases, comparable or even higher conversions compared to a (standard for D-A) homogeneous Lewis-acidic catalyst (Cu(OTf)2), employed herein as a control catalytic system, at 5% mol Cu(II) in the same solvent (H2O, containing 10% mol SDS) and with same reaction duration (18 h). Conversions and endo-to-exo results with Cu(OTf)2 (homogeneous control conditions) are also included in Scheme 2 for comparison with the MOF case.
Another interesting finding was a significant difference in endo-to-exo selectivity observed between dienophiles with different electronic features. In particular, dienophiles bearing an additional Lewis-basic moiety with coordinating ability, such as 1b (CO2H in anionic form) and 1m (2-furyl), exhibited the most enhanced endo selectivity, manifested as an absence of the exo D-A adduct. Following a similar trend, substrate 1l (2-pyridyl) demonstrated a higher endo-to-exo selectivity (8:1) compared to other substrates without coordinating ability. In these cases, the coordinating moiety could potentially promote an additional interaction to a Cu(II) center within the MOF, thus affecting substrate orientation in the transition state and playing an active role in controlling diastereoselectivity in favor of the endo adduct. To gain further insight into the effect of coordinating moieties, dienophile 1c was included in the study, in which the carboxy-moiety was protected to a methyl ester (CO2Me). As expected, the endo-to-exo selectivity declined to 7:1, which may be indicative of the coordinating role of the carboxy-anion in related substrate 1b. Substrate 1k (4-pyridyl) appears to violate this observed trend. This may be attributed to the misplacement of the nitrogen atom, which in the pyridine’s 4-position is unable to synergize with the azachalcone’s carbonyl or 2-pyridine when it comes to metal center coordination. Finally, the unusual trimethylammonium-phenyl dienophile (1g) also exclusively afforded the endo product (3g), implying a role of electrostatic or steric repulsions with MOF components, or alternatively a potential association with the MOF catalyst’s Lewis-basic residues via cation-dipole interaction. However, the study of an extended series of analogues is necessary, supported by computational methods, to draw more systematic conclusions, and this is planned at a later stage.
It is noteworthy that the endo selectivity results obtained with Cu(II)-PEIP, especially in the cases of 3b (CO2H), 3g (NMe3+), and 3m (2-furyl), where the endo is the exclusive product, rivaled those obtained with the homogeneous catalyst Cu(OTf)2 (Scheme 2). In some other cases, the two catalytic systems were comparable.

3.5. Recyclability of Cu(II)-PEIP Catalyst

One of the potential advantages of using MOFs as heterogeneous catalysts is their recyclability. The Cu(II)-PEIP MOF that was recovered after the first D-A reaction on model substrates 1a + 2 was re-submitted to new reaction several times (will be referred to as cycles) in order to check whether it retains its ability to catalyze the reaction. By visual inspection, it was found that the external appearance of Cu(II)-PEIP after each of the first four reaction cycles was unchanged, which was an indication of crystallinity retention. The conversion of substrates to D-A adduct in the first four reaction cycles appeared to remain high (>95%), while only after the fifth cycle did it start to diminish. The retention of the crystallinity and the structural integrity of the recycled Cu(II)-PEIP MOF was also supported by the PXRD patterns of the MOF material after each of the first four catalytic cycles (Figure 3).
Furthermore, different batches of the model MOF-catalyzed D-A reaction (1a + 2), using Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst that was treated under the selected aqueous conditions for up to 72 h prior to the actual D-A reaction, revealed reproducible and quantitative conversion of model dienophile 1a to the corresponding product 3a, independently of the time of the pre-treatment of the MOF (Figure S5, Supporting Information). The obtained 1H NMR spectra are indicative of both product purity and the retention of the catalytic activity of the MOF at the applied reaction conditions.

4. Conclusions

A MOF material, Cu(II)-PEIP, produced in a one-pot self-assembly process, is demonstrated for the first time to efficiently catalyze a [4 + 2]-cycloaddition between a range of azachalcone dienophiles and cyclopentadiene. This reaction is green, given that it takes place quantitatively in water in the presence of a surfactant, and nearly eliminates the use of harmful organic solvents in the workup. The MOF catalyst has shown excellent efficiency (>98% conversions) along with remarkable endo-to-exo selectivities, especially in cases of electron-deficient dienophiles bearing carboxy and trimethylammonium substituents. These results point towards an underlying role of strategically positioned Lewis-basic or Lewis-acidic moieties in the structure of the (dienophile) substrates, which enable the development of additional key interactions with the MOF catalyst, thus promoting a productive transition state. The high porosity of this MOF catalyst was essential for allowing the formation of bulky, bicyclic Diels–Alder adducts, which are reported for the first time in relation to MOF catalysis. Furthermore, the observed retention of crystallinity of the MOF by PXRD, after four reaction cycles, renders this material a potentially recyclable and precious new catalyst for Diels–Alder transformations, comparable to or even more efficient than standard homogeneous Cu(II) catalysts. Undoubtedly, this material will be useful for a number of applications in the field of D-A catalysis, where an elevated interest in material-based catalysts has been registered in recent years [42]. Finally, this MOF catalyst could be of broader scope by potentially extending its use to other organic transformations that require Lewis acid catalysis, such as addition and conjugate addition to carbonyls, carbonyl-ene reaction, various 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions leading to valuable 5-member N,O-heterocycles, and inverse electron demand D-A, among others.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma16155298/s1, Synthetic procedures and characterization data for all dienophiles employed in this study; Scheme S1: Aldol/dehydration reaction for azachalcones (1a–m) formation; Scheme S2: [4+2] (Diels-Alder) cycloadditions between azachalcones (1a–m) and cyclopentadiene (2), catalyzed by Cu(II)-PEIP MOF (heterogeneous) or Cu(OTf)2 (homogeneous, control); Table S1: Conditions employed in the aldol/dehydration reaction, to form azachalcones 1a–m; Figure S1: (a) Paddle-wheel structure of the Cu(II) coordination sites in the MOF, showing short Cu-O (RCO2) bonds and long Cu-O (DMF) bonds. (b) Distance of a free NH2 from a Cu(II) catalytic site is comparable to the dimensions of the dienophile; Figure S2: 1H NMR of Cu(II)-PEIP, digested in HCl/DMSO: (a) As synthesized, prior to acetone wash. (b) After extensive wash with acetone and drying; Figure S3: Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst, after exposure to optimized Diels-Alder reaction conditions (H2O/10% mol SDS), in the absence of substrates, for various times; Figure S4: 1H NMR spectra of the supernatant liquid, after submission of the Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst to optimized Diels-Alder reaction conditions (D2O/10% mol SDS), in the absence of substrates, for various times (24 h, 48 h, 72 h); Figure S5: Comparison of 1H NMR spectra of different batches of product 3a, obtained from dienophile 1a and diene 2 via Cu(II)-PEIP-catalyzed Diels-Alder reaction. (a–d) The Cu(II)-PEIP MOF catalyst was exposed to the selected aqueous conditions (D2O/10% mol SDS), for 0 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively, prior to being used in the D-A reaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.N.G. and A.J.T.; synthetic methodology, E.H., S.P. and A.K.; product isolation and characterization, E.H. and S.P.; data curation, E.H. and S.N.G.; writing—original draft preparation, E.H.; writing—review and editing, S.N.G. and A.J.T.; supervision and project administration, S.N.G. and A.J.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ioakeim Antoniou (Department of Chemistry, UCY) for assistance with NMR and Vasiliki Kaikiti (Department of Chemistry, UCY) for assistance with LC-MS (ES-API).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Eddaoudi, M.; Moler, D.B.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Reineke, T.M.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Modular Chemistry:  Secondary Building Units as a Basis for the Design of Highly Porous and Robust Metal−Organic Carboxylate Frameworks. Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 319–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zulkifli, Z.I.; Lim, K.L.; Teh, L.P. Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) and Their Applications in CO2 Adsorption and Conversion. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Liu, X.; Hanna, S.L.; Wang, X.; Taheri-Ledari, R.; Maleki, A.; Li, P.; Farha, O.K. A Historical Overview of the Activation and Porosity of Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 7406–7427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hu, Z.; Zhao, D. Metal–Organic Frameworks with Lewis Acidity: Synthesis, Characterization, and Catalytic Applications. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 4066–4081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Morris, R.E.; Wheatley, P.S. Gas Storage in Nanoporous Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4966–4981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rosi, N.L.; Eckert, J.; Eddaoudi, M.; Vodak, D.T.; Kim, J.; O’Keeffe, M.; Yaghi, O.M. Hydrogen Storage in Microporous Metal-Organic Frameworks. Science 2003, 300, 1127–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Li, H.; Wang, K.; Sun, Y.; Lollar, C.T.; Li, J.; Zhou, H.-C. Recent Advances in Gas Storage and Separation Using Metal–Organic Frameworks. Mater. Today 2018, 21, 108–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kourtellaris, A.; Moushi, E.E.; Spanopoulos, I.; Trikalitis, P.N.; Pissas, M.; Papaefstathiou, G.S.; Sanakis, Y.; Tasiopoulos, A.J. A Microporous Co(II)-Based 3-D Metal Organic Framework Built from Magnetic Infinite Rod-Shaped Secondary Building Units. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4056–4062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Panagiotou, N.; Moscoso, F.G.; Lopes-Costa, T.; Pedrosa, J.M.; Tasiopoulos, A.J. 2-Dimensional Rare Earth Metal–Organic Frameworks Based on a Hexanuclear Secondary Building Unit as Efficient Detectors for Vapours of Nitroaromatics and Volatile Organic Compounds. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2022, 9, 4850–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kourtellaris, A.; Lafargue-Dit-Hauret, W.; Massuyeau, F.; Latouche, C.; Tasiopoulos, A.J.; Serier-Brault, H. Tuning of Thermometric Performances of Mixed Eu–Tb Metal–Organic Frameworks through Single-Crystal Coordinating Solvent Exchange Reactions. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10, 2200484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Li, Z.; Garcia, H. Catalysis and Photocatalysis by Metal Organic Frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 8134–8172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bavykina, A.; Kolobov, N.; Khan, I.S.; Bau, J.A.; Ramirez, A.; Gascon, J. Metal–Organic Frameworks in Heterogeneous Catalysis: Recent Progress, New Trends, and Future Perspectives. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 8468–8535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cirujano, F.G.; Martin, N.; Wee, L.H. Design of Hierarchical Architectures in Metal–Oganic Frameworks for Catalysis and Adsorption. Chem. Mater. 2020, 32, 10268–10295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, F.; Yan, R.; Shu, Y.; Cao, Q.; Zhang, L. Strategies for the Application of Metal–Organic Frameworks in Catalytic Reactions. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 10114–10125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Huang, B.; Xu, H.; Jiang, N.; Wang, M.; Huang, J.; Guan, L. Tensile-Strained RuO2 Loaded on Antimony-Tin Oxide by Fast Quenching for Proton-Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9, 2201654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guan, D.; Shi, C.; Xu, H.; Gu, Y.; Zhong, J.; Sha, Y.; Hu, Z.; Ni, M.; Shao, Z. Simultaneously Mastering Operando Strain and Reconstruction Effects via Phase-Segregation Strategy for Enhanced Oxygen-Evolving Electrocatalysis. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 82, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, S. A Novel 3D MOF with Rich Lewis Basic Sites as a Base Catalysis toward Knoevenagel Condensation Reaction. J. Mol. Struct. 2018, 1167, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Heidenreich, N.; Lenzen, D.; Stock, N. Knoevenagel Condensation Reaction Catalysed by Al-MOFs with CAU-1 and CAU-10-Type Structures. CrystEngComm 2017, 19, 4187–4193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Phan, N.T.S.; Le, K.K.A.; Phan, T.D. MOF-5 as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Reactions. Appl. Catal. Gen. 2010, 382, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghosh, S.; Nagarjun, N.; Alam, M.; Dhakshinamoorthy, A.; Biswas, S. Friedel-Crafts Alkylation Reaction Efficiently Catalyzed by a Di-Amide Functionalized Zr(IV) Metal-Organic Framework. Mol. Catal. 2022, 517, 112007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Diyali, N.; Rasaily, S.; Biswas, B. Metal–Organic Framework: An Emergent Catalyst in C–N Cross-Coupling Reactions. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 469, 214667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hoffmann, P.; Lherbet, C.; Fabing, I.; Barthélémy, M.-C.; Borjon-Piron, Y.; Laurent, C.; Vigroux, A. A Mesoporous Metal–Organic Framework used to Sustainably Release Copper(ii) into Reducing Aqueous Media to Promote the CuAAC Click Reaction. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 26825–26833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lu, B.-B.; Yang, J.; Che, G.-B.; Pei, W.-Y.; Ma, J.-F. Highly Stable Copper(I)-Based Metal−Organic Framework Assembled with Resorcin[4]arene and Polyoxometalate for Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysis of Azide−Alkyne “Click” Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 2628–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qi, C.; Ramella, D.; Wensley, A.M.; Luan, Y. A Metal-Organic Framework Brønsted Acid Catalyst: Synthesis, Characterization and Application to the Generation of Quinone Methides for [4 + 2] Cycloadditions. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2016, 358, 2604–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tanaka, K.; Nagase, S.; Anami, T.; Wierzbicki, M.; Urbanczyk-Lipkowska, Z. Enantioselective Diels–Alder Reaction in the Confined Space of Homochiral Metal–Organic Frameworks. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 111436–111439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Abbasnia, M.; Sheykhan, M.; Bahmani, M.; Taghizadeh, P. MOFs Come up to Scratch: An Environmentally Benign Route to Oxidative [4 + 2] Cycloaddition on Maleimides Solely via MOFs in Water. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 3216–3228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rechac, V.L.; Cirujano, F.G.; Corma, A.; Llabrés i Xamena, F.X. Diastereoselective Synthesis of Pyranoquinolines on Zirconium-Containing UiO-66 Metal-Organic Frameworks. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 2016, 4512–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Feng, D.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Chen, Y.-P.; Park, J.; Wei, Z.; Sun, Y.; Bosch, M.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, H.-C. A Highly Stable Porphyrinic Zirconium Metal–Organic Framework with Shp-a Topology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17714–17717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Johnson, J.A.; Petersen, B.M.; Kormos, A.; Echeverría, E.; Chen, Y.-S.; Zhang, J. A New Approach to Non-Coordinating Anions: Lewis Acid Enhancement of Porphyrin Metal Centers in a Zwitterionic Metal–Organic Framework. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 10293–10298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, L.; Cai, P.; Zhang, L.; Xu, X.; Yakovenko, A.A.; Wang, Q.; Pang, J.; Yuan, S.; Zou, X.; Huang, N.; et al. Ligand-Directed Conformational Control over Porphyrinic Zirconium Metal-Organic Frameworks for Size-Selective Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 12129–12137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gregoritza, M.; Brandl, F.P. The Diels–Alder Reaction: A Powerful Tool for the Design of Drug Delivery Systems and Biomaterials. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2015, 97, 438–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Funel, J.-A.; Abele, S. Industrial Applications of the Diels–Alder Reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3822–3863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Takao, K.; Munakata, R.; Tadano, K. Recent Advances in Natural Product Synthesis by Using Intramolecular Diels−Alder Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4779–4807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hsung, R.P.; Ma, Z.-X.; Fang, L.; Feltenberger, J.B. Diels–Alder Cascades in Natural Product Total Synthesis. In Efficiency in Natural Product Total Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 159–189. ISBN 978-1-118-94022-8. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vermeeren, P.; Hamlin, T.A.; Fernández, I.; Bickelhaupt, F.M. How Lewis Acids Catalyze Diels–Alder Reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 6201–6206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kourtellaris, A.; Moushi, E.E.; Spanopoulos, I.; Tampaxis, C.; Charalambopoulou, G.; Steriotis, T.A.; Papaefstathiou, G.S.; Trikalitis, P.N.; Tasiopoulos, A.J. A Microporous Cu2+ MOF Based on a Pyridyl Isophthalic Acid Schiff Base Ligand with High CO2 Uptake. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 1527–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Mukherjee, S.; Mondal, S.; Patra, A.; Gonnade, R.G.; Biju, A.T. N-Heterocyclic Carbene-Catalyzed Diastereoselective Synthesis of β-Lactone-Fused Cyclopentanes Using Homoenolate Annulation Reaction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 9559–9562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Basler, S.; Studer, S.; Zou, Y.; Mori, T.; Ota, Y.; Camus, A.; Bunzel, H.A.; Helgeson, R.C.; Houk, K.N.; Jiménez-Osés, G.; et al. Efficient Lewis-Acid Catalysis of an Abiological Reaction in a De Novo Protein Scaffold. Nat. Chem. 2021, 13, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mukkala, V.-M.; Helenius, M.; Hemmilä, I.; Kankare, J.; Takalo, H. Development of Luminescent Europium(III) and Terbium(III) Chelates of 2,2′:6′,2″-Terpyridine Derivatives for Protein Labeling. Helv. Chim. Acta 1993, 76, 1361–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhang, Z.; Dong, Y.-W.; Wang, G.-W. Efficient and Clean Aldol Condensation Catalyzed by Sodium Carbonate in Water. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 966–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fukui, K. Theory of Orientation and Stereoselection; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, J.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, M. Self-Assembled Single-Walled Metal-Helical Nanotube (M-HN): Creation of Efficient Supramolecular Catalysts for Asymmetric Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 15629–15635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 16 05298 g001 550
Figure 1. Structures of constituent components and in situ generated ligand (PEIPH2) employed in the synthesis of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF.
Figure 1. Structures of constituent components and in situ generated ligand (PEIPH2) employed in the synthesis of Cu(II)-PEIP MOF.
Materials 16 05298 g001
Materials 16 05298 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Model Diels–Alder cycloaddition employed for the evaluation of various solvent systems.
Scheme 1. Model Diels–Alder cycloaddition employed for the evaluation of various solvent systems.
Materials 16 05298 sch001
Materials 16 05298 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Representation of the 3D Cu(II)-PEIP MOF material along the a axis. (b,c) Coordination modes of 5-NH2-mBDC2− and PEIP2− ligands, respectively. (d) Dinuclear paddle-wheel secondary building unit [Cu2(RCOO)4(DMF)2], believed to be the catalytic site. [H atoms are omitted for clarity].
Figure 2. (a) Representation of the 3D Cu(II)-PEIP MOF material along the a axis. (b,c) Coordination modes of 5-NH2-mBDC2− and PEIP2− ligands, respectively. (d) Dinuclear paddle-wheel secondary building unit [Cu2(RCOO)4(DMF)2], believed to be the catalytic site. [H atoms are omitted for clarity].
Materials 16 05298 g002
Materials 16 05298 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Parallel Diels–Alder reactions of azachalcone dienophiles 1a–m (1 equiv.) with diene 2 (10 equiv.), catalyzed by Cu(II)-PEIP MOF. A representative set of electron-deficient and electron-rich dienophiles were included to assess the scope of the MOF-catalyzed D-A (data in red). Control reactions were performed in solution, with homogeneous catalyst Cu(OTf)2 for comparison (data in blue). Inset: Structures of obtained products (major = endo D-A adduct, racemic), reaction conversions, and endo:exo molar ratios, as determined by 1H NMR. The Cu(II)-PEIP affords excellent conversions (~99%) for most substrates and remarkable endo selectivities, rivaling those of the homogeneous catalyst.
Scheme 2. Parallel Diels–Alder reactions of azachalcone dienophiles 1a–m (1 equiv.) with diene 2 (10 equiv.), catalyzed by Cu(II)-PEIP MOF. A representative set of electron-deficient and electron-rich dienophiles were included to assess the scope of the MOF-catalyzed D-A (data in red). Control reactions were performed in solution, with homogeneous catalyst Cu(OTf)2 for comparison (data in blue). Inset: Structures of obtained products (major = endo D-A adduct, racemic), reaction conversions, and endo:exo molar ratios, as determined by 1H NMR. The Cu(II)-PEIP affords excellent conversions (~99%) for most substrates and remarkable endo selectivities, rivaling those of the homogeneous catalyst.
Materials 16 05298 sch002
Materials 16 05298 g003 550
Figure 3. Comparison of the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the pristine Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst (red) with the simulated from single crystal X-ray diffraction data pattern, and with the ones from each of the first four D-A reaction cycles.
Figure 3. Comparison of the powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) pattern of the pristine Cu(II)-PEIP catalyst (red) with the simulated from single crystal X-ray diffraction data pattern, and with the ones from each of the first four D-A reaction cycles.
Materials 16 05298 g003
Table
Table 1. Effect of various solvents/additives on MOF solubility, and conversion of the model D-A reaction between substrates 1a and 2. The reactions were monitored qualitatively by TLC, and quantitatively by product isolation, mass determination, and 1H NMR analysis. The highlighted entry (#12) indicates the reaction conditions chosen for heterogeneous catalysis on all D-A substrates. [Fixed parameters: r.t., 24 h, 2% mol Cu(II) from MOF, dienophile C = 0.25 M, diene:dienophile molar ratio = 10:1, solvent V = 1 mL].
Table 1. Effect of various solvents/additives on MOF solubility, and conversion of the model D-A reaction between substrates 1a and 2. The reactions were monitored qualitatively by TLC, and quantitatively by product isolation, mass determination, and 1H NMR analysis. The highlighted entry (#12) indicates the reaction conditions chosen for heterogeneous catalysis on all D-A substrates. [Fixed parameters: r.t., 24 h, 2% mol Cu(II) from MOF, dienophile C = 0.25 M, diene:dienophile molar ratio = 10:1, solvent V = 1 mL].
EntrySolvent/AdditiveSolubility of Cu(II)-PEIPConversion (%)
1CH3CNInsoluble8
2CH3CN/H2O (1:10 v/v)Insoluble63
3H2OInsoluble99
4DCMInsoluble29
5MeOHInsoluble28
6Sat. aqueous NaClInsoluble10
7NMPInsolubletrace
8BMEInsoluble7
9EtOHInsoluble10
10DMFInsolubletrace
11H2O/25% mol SDSInsoluble99
12H2O/10% mol SDSInsoluble99
13H2O/5% mol SDSInsoluble99
Table
Table 2. Control D-A reactions in solution on the model substrates system 1a + 2 in the absence of MOF in H2O/10% mol SDS at r.t. for 24 h, assessed in order to detect any ability of the individual MOF components (Entries 1–3) to serve as catalysts. The additive-free, uncatalyzed reaction (substrates only, Entry 4) was also included.
Table 2. Control D-A reactions in solution on the model substrates system 1a + 2 in the absence of MOF in H2O/10% mol SDS at r.t. for 24 h, assessed in order to detect any ability of the individual MOF components (Entries 1–3) to serve as catalysts. The additive-free, uncatalyzed reaction (substrates only, Entry 4) was also included.
EntryMOF ComponentConversion (%)Endo:Exo
1Cu(NO3)2·2.5H2O351:1
2PEIPH2251:1
35-NH2-mBDCH2291:1
4NonetraceN/D
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hadjikyprianou, E.; Petrides, S.; Kourtellaris, A.; Tasiopoulos, A.J.; Georgiades, S.N. Catalysis of a Diels–Alder Reaction between Azachalcones and Cyclopentadiene by a Recyclable Copper(II)-PEIP Metal-Organic Framework. Materials 2023, 16, 5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155298

AMA Style

Hadjikyprianou E, Petrides S, Kourtellaris A, Tasiopoulos AJ, Georgiades SN. Catalysis of a Diels–Alder Reaction between Azachalcones and Cyclopentadiene by a Recyclable Copper(II)-PEIP Metal-Organic Framework. Materials. 2023; 16(15):5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155298

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hadjikyprianou, Eleni, Sotiris Petrides, Andreas Kourtellaris, Anastasios J. Tasiopoulos, and Savvas N. Georgiades. 2023. "Catalysis of a Diels–Alder Reaction between Azachalcones and Cyclopentadiene by a Recyclable Copper(II)-PEIP Metal-Organic Framework" Materials 16, no. 15: 5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155298

APA Style

Hadjikyprianou, E., Petrides, S., Kourtellaris, A., Tasiopoulos, A. J., & Georgiades, S. N. (2023). Catalysis of a Diels–Alder Reaction between Azachalcones and Cyclopentadiene by a Recyclable Copper(II)-PEIP Metal-Organic Framework. Materials, 16(15), 5298. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16155298

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop