Next Article in Journal
Transient Liquid Phase Diffusion Bonding of Ni3Al Superalloy with Low-Boron Nickel-Base Powder Interlayer
Next Article in Special Issue
Cross-Linking Characteristics, Morphology, Dynamics, and Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Polychloroprene/Polybutadiene/Nano-Zinc (CR/BR/nZn) Compositions with Reduced Fire Hazard
Previous Article in Journal
Chemical Dissolution-Assisted Ultrafine Grinding for Preparation of Quasi-Spherical Colloids of Zinc Oxide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance of CoSb3 Thin Films by Ag and Ti Co-Doping
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advancement and Structural Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Alkali Metal Ions Batteries

1
Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Lodz, Tamka 12, 90-403 Lodz, Poland
2
School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(7), 2559; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072559
Submission received: 21 February 2023 / Revised: 14 March 2023 / Accepted: 21 March 2023 / Published: 23 March 2023

Abstract

:
Currently, transition metal dichalcogenides-based alkaline metal ion batteries have been extensively investigated for renewable energy applications to overcome the energy crisis and environmental pollution. The layered morphologys with a large surface area favors high electrochemical properties. Thermal stability, mechanical structural stability, and high conductivity are the primary features of layered transition metal dichalcogenides (L-TMDs). L-TMDs are used as battery materials and as supporters for other active materials. However, these materials still face aggregation, which reduces their applicability in batteries. In this review, a comprehensive study has been undertaken on recent advancements in L-TMDs-based materials, including 0D, 1D, 2D, 3D, and other carbon materials. Types of structural engineering, such as interlayer spacing, surface defects, phase control, heteroatom doping, and alloying, have been summarized. The synthetic strategy of structural engineering and its effects have been deeply discussed. Lithium- and sodium-ion battery applications have been summarized in this study. This is the first review article to summarize different morphology-based TMDs with their intrinsic properties for alkali metal ion batteries (AMIBs), so it is believed that this review article will improve overall knowledge of TMDs for AMIBS applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The current rate of depletion of available energy sources and increasing demands for daily energy needs can easily lead to the conclusion that, in the near future, the world will require power sources of about 30 TW (1012) [1]. These energy crises and related environmental issues have created great pressure on researchers to develop sustainable and renewable sources for the fulfillment of modern society’s needs [2,3,4,5,6]. In this regard, fuel cells, solar cells, biomass, and wind-based energy sources are playing significant roles. However, a low-cost, environmentally benign, and highly efficient system is required for the storage and complete utilization of these renewable sources of energy [7,8]. The most appropriate energy storage system (ESS) is a battery because of its low maintenance, long cycle life, and high efficiency for energy conversion [9,10,11,12]. In this regard, during the last two decades rechargeable Li-ion batteries have been extensively studied for daily life uses such as cell phones, hybrid electric vehicles, and laptops [7,9,13,14,15,16]. However, materials in greater amounts are needed to develop secondary batteries for the construction of this smart-grid ESS. As a result, these primary aspects, including cost, power density, energy density, life, and safety, must be well balanced for these secondary batteries [17,18,19,20]. Less quantity (20 ppm) of Li in the earth’s crust, continuous demand for LIB, and raising prices hinder its practical application for energy storage systems (ESS) [21,22,23,24,25]. However, the similar chemical behavior of K, Na, and Li, along with their abundance, low price, and small atoms, give them a competitive edge over lithium for their use as active materials in potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) and sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) as ESS [26,27,28,29,30,31]. The rocking-chair mechanism of these LIBs, SIBs, and PIBs causes a reversible exchange of alkali metals between electrodes, where the anode plays a primary role in the performance of batteries. Thus, abundant, cheap, stable, and eco-friendly anode materials are of primary interest for cost-effective, extensive, and long-life applications [32].
The high conductivity, flexibility, surface area, and functionality with other molecules provide graphene special potential to be used in a supercapacitor, fuel cells, photovoltaic devices, and LIBs [33,34,35,36]. The layered morphology of graphene with such great potential gives motivation to researchers to study layered morphology-based inorganic materials, such as (L-TMDs) SnSe2, SnS2, MoSe2, MoS2, and WS2 [37,38,39,40,41]. L-TMDs with the MX2 formula (M = Hf, Ti, Zr, Mo, Sn, W, V Ta, Nb, etc., and X = Te, Se, S, etc.) exhibited graphite-like morphology and performances. The X atoms are arranged in the outer layer, which sandwiches the hexagonally closed-packed arranged metals as X-M-X, where the M-X bond is covalent and the bond between layers is van der Waals force. Their crystalline structure varies from orthorhombic (WTe2) to hexagonal (WS2). This arrangement and morphology give prime attention to L-TMDs to be applied in the field of energy conversion and storage devices due to their distinctive electronic, chemical, and physical properties [42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51]. The intercalation of alkali metal ions (K+, Na+, Li+) is supported by interlayered weak van der Waals forces [46,47,52]. Whittingham’s seminal work showed that Li ions can be reversibly inserted/extracted in the layers of TiS2 at a high potential of 1.5 V with a high speed of diffusion [53,54]. Similarly, 2D-base MoS2 showed high efficiency as a host for the insertion of Mg ions [29]. In addition, the conversion of one atom of MX2 requires four atoms of alkali metal, which exhibits a high theoretical capacity and has therefore been extensively studied as auspicious anode materials for AIMBs [55,56,57,58]. However, these anode materials still face challenges such as aggregation and volume change during charge/discharge, which result in low cycling life [32,59,60]. The electrochemical performance of anode material may be enhanced through phase control, surface defects, interlayer spacing expansion, and especially alloying and heteroatom doping to overcome the above problems [60,61,62,63,64,65,66].
In this review, the synthesis, modification, and application of sodium- and lithium-ion batteries have been summarized. In the first part, synthetic approaches for the development of 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D morphology-based TMDs as electrocatalysts for AIMBs are discussed. In the second part, intrinsic modification and/or structural engineering, which can further improve the battery application of TMDs, have been discussed. In the last part, the electrochemical applications of lithium and sodium ion batteries are discussed.

2. Preparative Strategies for L-TMDs Based Composites

The active and exposed surface of anode materials governs the charge storage competencies for alkali metal ion batteries. The 2D morphology and large surface area of the L-TMDs make them special materials for ESS due to their large exposed surface area. The van der Waals force causes restacking of nearby 2D layers during battery cycling processes, which reduces the surface area of the 2D morphology and diminishes its significance with respect to electrochemical applications. In this regard, the most efficient approach is the hybridization of other proficient materials with L-TMDs to retain their unique morphology and characteristics on a larger surface area with an enriched electrochemical response. Recently, the hybridization of TMDs has been extensively studied and developed with 0D nanoparticles (NPs), 1D, 2D, and 3D morphologies.

2.1. 0D (NPs) Based L-TMDs Composites

During reversible storage of charge, L-TMDs show restacking of layers to reduce active surface area and conductivity, which limit their electrochemical applications. The incorporation of 0D NPs, such as metal/metal oxide or noble metal, in between the layer of TMDs will offer charge carriers that may boost their conductivity and proficiently hinder the restacking of layers. This is one of the possible ways to control the surface area and improve the conductivity of L-TMDs during the cycling process [67,68,69,70,71]. The incorporated NPs are used as spacers to support the materials and to allow the access of electrolytes for alkaliation/de-alkaliation between the active layers of TMDs. This improves their electrochemical application for SIBs and LIBs. Recent studies showed that the amalgamation of noble metals (Pt, Au, Pd, and Ag) has been determined to be the best option for enhancing the intrinsic conductivity of L-TMDs [72,73,74,75]. In this regard, Li et al. [67] obtained MoS2-C nanosheets from thiourea, Na2MoO4·2H2O, and glucose as raw materials through hydrothermal and Ar atmospheric pyrolysis. The as-obtained materials were again subjected to hydrothermal reactions with Sn precursors, followed by Ar calcination to obtain a MoS2 layer embedded with Sn NPs. These NPs work as spacers to avoid agglomeration and improve the electrochemical performance of the materials. Similarly, Chen et al. [70] decorated nanosheets of MoS2 with ultrasmall NPs of Fe3O4 via a two-step hydrothermal process. Their study concluded that the flexible and elastic features of MoS2 NSs make it a suitable substrate, as compared to reduced graphene oxide (rGO), for electrochemical applications. As well known, L-TMDs tend to agglomerate and become crumpled. Thus, the use of Fe3O4 NPs will act as spacers for the sheets of MoS2, hinder their collapsing during the charge/discharge processes of batteries, and enhance their cycling performance and reversible capacity. While Pan et al. [72] used a multifunctional organic ligand to anchor Ag NPs onto nanosheets of MoS2 via coordination. The NPs of Au were used as spacers to stop the restacking of layers of MoS2, and their high characteristics of conductivity also boosted the conductivity of the study materials. In addition, the composite structure remained effectively conserved due to the low deformability and high inflexibility of Au NPs. However, it is well known that the performance of bimetallic materials is better than monometals. In this regard, the reversible capacity and high conductivity of monometallic materials may be further enhanced via the co-doping of bimetals in L-TMDs. For instance, Pan et al. [71] used a one-step scheme to prepare a ternary heterostructure (Ag/Fe3O4/MoS2). In this research study, the author used THF (tetrahydrofuran) as the reaction medium and mixed MoS2 NSs with Ag and Fe3O4 NPs under magnetic stirring. The surfaces of the MoS2 layers were spontaneously decorated with metal NPs due to their van der Walls bond (Figure 1). The intrinsic conductivity and lithium storage reversibility were enhanced correspondingly by Ag and iron oxide NPs. Although there have been extensive studies, controlling the number of layers, especially monolayer TMDs, during hydrothermal synthesis is still a big challenge and a hot topic for research among scientists. This is because it not only offers an additional and transformational site for Na and Li storage but also frequent interfacial Na and Li storage sites [60].

2.2. 1D Based L-TMDs Composites

The L-TMDs NSs were also hybridized with 1D morphology in the anode materials in order to improve their reversible charge storage. In this regard, multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and/or single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) attract extensive research attention to be doped with L-TMDs in the field of electrochemical application based on their excellent electronic and mechanical properties. The CNTs are considered an excellent substrate to be used for L-TMDs NSs growth because, with their 1D nature, they offer a good pathway for the conduction of electricity during the cycling process [76,77,78,79]. Furthermore, during the charge/discharge process, the materials of the electrode cause expansion that can be accommodated by CNTs due to their great flexibility. In this regard, extensive research has been made to develop L-TMDs NSs decorated on CNT as 1D electrode materials. Ding et al. [79] used Na2MoO4·6H2O, glucose, and thiourea to develop CNTs ornamented with MoS2 NSs via a simple hydrothermal method. The synthesis method confirmed that the surface of CNT is homogeneously covered with MoS2, and glucose pyrolysis produces a well-developed conductive network. The data also confirmed the excellent interaction of MoS2 NSs with the CNT backbone. Recently, biomolecular synthetic strategies have been used to prepare different effective nanostructure-based materials [78,80]. The special structure of L-cysteine is due to numerous functional groups, such as -COOH, -SH, and -NH2, which make it a promising material among different biomolecules. L-cysteine can be used as a source of S during the hydrothermal synthesis process. In this regard, CNTs were treated with acid and then hydrothermally reacted with L-cysteine and sodium molybdate dehydrate and finally annealed to obtain CNTs-MoS2 as the required materials [78]. The ornamentation of SnS2 on MWCNT is due to the electrostatic interaction of the Sn4+ ion with the negative charge of MWCNTs, which is followed by the nucleation of SnS2 for the growth of 2D morphology as shown in Figure 2 [77]. In addition to TMDs-based hybrid composites, multi- and/or single-layered CNT, carbon nanofiber (CNF), nitrogen-doped CNTs (N-CNTs), and N-CNF embedded with MoS2 have also been extensively studied and reported [81,82,83]. Kong et al. [81] developed MoS2 embedded in graphitic CNTs; the hollow CNTs are made up of rolled graphene that hold MoS2 inside the CNTs. One of the excellent strategies for developing single-layer NSs of L-TMDs is the electrospinning method, in which nanoplates of WS2 with a single-layer morphology have been developed via electrospinning and then homogeneously ornamented on N-CNF [83].
Similarly, 1D structures of non-carbon substrate have also been used to decorate the NSs of L-TMDs. Nanotubes/nanobelts/nanowires of TiO2 have been used as substrates for the decoration of MoS2 NSs via solvothermal and/or hydrothermal strategies [84,85]. Li et al. [86] developed NSs of MoS2 on the surface of TiO2 nanowires from glucose via hydrothermal, which is a cost-effective route. The NSs of MoS2 were grown and nucleated on TiO2, which act as an effective template due to its robust nature, resulting in a nanocomposite with hierarchical morphology. The homogeneity of MoS2 NSs in the obtained composite is attributed to the roughness features of glucose and TiO2. However, one of the biggest challenges is achieving controlled and uniform deposition of MoS2 on a TiO2 surface due to their chemical reactions and poor affinities.

2.3. 2D Based L-TMDs Composites

The accommodation of L-TMDs on the surface of a 2D substrate may further enhance their excellent performance in electrochemical applications. The honeycomb-like morphology and π-conjugation, along with its extraordinary electrochemical performance, make graphene a tremendous substrate material for the decoration of L-TMDs. Graphene also exhibits high flexibility, outstanding mechanical properties, high conductivity, and a large surface area. The hybridization of L-TMDs with graphene may further boost their electrochemical applications due to their well-developed inherent conductivity, which provides a better pathway for the conduction of electrons, increases the electrochemical active surface area, facilitates the diffusion of mass, and improves the electrolyte interface. Graphene-based multi- and/or single-layered L-MoX2 (X = S, Se) composites can be easily synthesized via wet chemical or surfactant-assisted hydrothermal methods [87,88,89,90]. Change et al. [80] developed a MoS2/graphene hybrid composite via a novel synthetic approach (the L-cysteine-abetted solution-phase method). The authors used GO with L-cysteine and sodium molybdate as starting materials, followed by an annealing treatment to obtain the final composite. Similarly, MoS2/GNS hybrid materials have been synthesized via a wet chemical approach. In this method, hydrazine was used to reduce GO sheets, followed by the addition of (NH4)2MoS4 in the presence of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). The resulting mixture was then heated in an N2 atmosphere to obtain the required product [90]. Other cation-based surfactants, such as dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB), tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB), and octocyltrimethylammonium bromide (OTAB), have also been applied during the synthesis of layered MoS2/GNS composites [91]. The type and concentration of cationic surfactant not only control the resulting product morphology but also determine the number and modified nature of MoS2 layers, thereby controlling the electrochemical performance of hybrid composite materials [92].
The wrinkled and highly rough surface of nitrogen-doped graphene (NG) exhibits a great number of defected sites, including an increased number of vacancies, which enhanced electrochemical reactions. These features of NG make it a suitable substrate for the growth of nanomaterials, allowing for the development of electrodes with nanomorphology. Cheng et al. [93] used a two-step approach for the synthesis of the MoS2/NG composite. In the first step, the author used elevated temperature to react L-cysteine as a source of S with NG for doping of S, followed by the nucleation growth of NSs of MoS2 as shown in liquid phase exfoliation (alongside with hydrothermal/wet chemical strategy). This is a scalable approach that can be applied to the synthesis of MoS2-rGO composites. According to this technique, NSs of MoS2 were first synthesized in the presence of PVP via hydrothermal method at low temperature. In the next step, an ultrasonic exfoliation approach was applied to obtain MoS2-rGO composites with a flower-like morphology [94]. MoS2 with a maximum of 1~3 layers was embedded in rGO in layer-by-layer morphology through exfoliation and chemical lithiation strategies to develop MoS2/rGO hybrid composites [95].
The electrochemical application of SnX2 (X = S, Se) base L-TMDs has also been improved through their hybridization with graphene. The SnX2 has also been synthesized through the same approach (the wet chemical method) and as applied for the preparation of MoX2 [96,97,98,99]. The method of solution chemistry was used to prepare a few-layer SnS2/graphene (FL-SnS2/G)-based composite in the presence of L-cysteine, which acts as a source of sulfur and as a reducing and complexing agent [100]. SnS2/rGO with a morphology of sheet-on-sheet has also been synthesized via a 1-step microwave-supported technique that exhibited highly improved photocatalytic and electrochemical applications, as shown in Figure 3 [101]. In addition, the SnS2-graphene-based composites have also been developed through the CVD method. The synthetic approach for 2D graphene-based SnS2 composites consisted of two steps: in the first step, graphene layers were decorated with NPs of SnO2 through a solution method, which was then converted to SnS2 via a simple CVD technique [102]. Similarly, WS2 supported on the surface of graphene layered (WS2-graphene composite) has been developed and deeply studied for electrochemical applications. WS2 base composite exhibited higher conductivity with better electrochemical activity as compared to MoS2 [103,104,105]. A solution-phase approach for the development of a few layered FL-WS2-rGO has been reported, in which the hydrazine hydrate is used to reduce GO into rGO under reflux [106].

2.4. 3D (2D Graphene) Based L-TMDs Composites

Although graphene-based L-TMDs nanocomposite demonstrated better electrochemical application, however, during the battery’s cycling process, the NS layers of L-TMDs and graphene cause aggregation due to their non-intimate interaction between L-TMDs and graphene, which later causees contact resistance among various reactive NSs. Recently, CNF and graphene-based MoX2 (X = Se, S) with 3D morphology have been reported [107,108,109,110]. NSs of GO and MoS2 are used as building blocks for the synthesis of 3D porous morphology by hydrothermal reaction based on a bottom-up synthetic route, and the composite demonstrated that NSs of MoS2 were restricted in 3D graphene as shown in Figure 4 [111]. In addition, oxidized MWCNT (o-MWCNT) along with graphene were simultaneously applied with MoS2 for the synthesis of 3D flower-like MoS2 (f-MoS2) for the hierarchical morphology of the f-MoS2/RGO/o-MWCNT composite [109]. The flower-like morphology of the composite may be attributed to the addition of o-MWCNT, which also avoided restacking of rGO. In addition to MoS2, the hydrothermal synthetic approach was used for the first time to develop MoSe2/rGO foam with 3D mesoporous morphology and apply it to LIBs as anode materials [110]. Similarly, the electrochemical application of composites consisting of WS2 and SnS2 with porous 3D morphology has also been studied, which showed improvement in their performance after their hybridization [112,113,114]. Recently, L-cysteine, SnCl4·5H2O, and NSs of GO were used as starting materials to develop SnS2 nanosheets homogeneously in the 3D framework of graphene. The author used two steps for the synthesis of composites: in the first step, the water bath method was used to decorate NPs of SnO2 on 3D graphene [115]. In the second step, L-cysteine was used as sulfur and a reducing source to convert SnO2 into SnS2 [116].
Similarly, Huang et al. used the low temperature hydrothermal method to decorate WS2 on graphene with interconnected 3D morphology; the author applied the composite materials for hydrogen evolution reactions and LIB [117]. In addition to the carbon-based 3D structure of MoS2, recently TiO2-supported MoS2 with 3D morphology has also been synthesized, and their data showed improved electrochemical response for LIBs. A hydrothermal method consisting of two steps was used to embed the NSs of MoS2 in firework-shaped TiO2 (F-TiO2) microspheres, which act as templates. The composite material was used as an anode material for LIBs and showed improved electrochemical performance [118].

2.5. 3D (Bulk Materials) Based L-TMDs Composites

An anode material may also be developed using 3D graphene instead of 2D graphene. The best method for the successful synthesis of 3D graphene networks (3DGNs) is the CVD technique; the as-synthesized 3DGNs can act as substrates for the growth of functional nanomaterials to develop active and efficient composites [119,120]. The 3DGNs exhibit both features, such as excellent conductivity and a high surface area of graphene. A precursor solution of (NH4)2MoS4 in dimethylformamide (DMF) was used to coat flakes of MoS2 on the surface of 3DGNs through a CVD synthetic approach [121]. Similarly, activated carbon fiber (ACF) was used as supporting material to deposit NSs of MoS2. Wang et al. used pre-annealed ACF and DMF solutions of (NH4)2MoS4 as precursor materials to synthesize ultrathin NSs of MoS2 on an ACF surface through a two-step mechanism. The precursors of ACF and DMF solutions were subsequently annealed in an atmosphere of 5% H2/Ar [122].

2.6. Non-Crytalline Carbon Based L-TMDs Composites

The L-TMDs have also been decorated on the surfaces of amorphous carbon [123,124,125]. Chang et al. [126] used a simple hydrothermal method and then applied calcination at high temperatures to develop MoS2/amorphous carbon-based composite. Similarly, glucose, Se powder, and Na2MoO4·2H2O were used as precursors to synthesize MoSe2/C composite with sheet-like morphology through a solution-phase strategy followed by heat treatment. The carbon not only hinders the stacking of sheets but also maintains the integrity of the structure [127]. Recently, NSs of L-TMDs have also been grown on the surfaces of hollow carbon structures such as porous hollow carbon spheres (PHCS) and N-doped hollow carbon nanoboxes (N-HCNB). These N-HCNB and PHCS not only reduced the aggregation of NSs in L-TMDs but also boosted nanocomposite conductivity during battery application [128,129]. A four-step method was used to decorate MoS2 on N-HCNB. The N-HCND can accommodate the strain, hinder the aggregation of NSs of MoS2, and enhance the composite conductivity during battery application and cycling processes.

3. Structural Engineering in L-TMDs

3.1. Interlayer Spacing Engineering

Van der Waals (vdW) force/interaction play a vital role in diffusion energy, as ReS2 has a lower vdW as compared to MoS2. Thus, lithium ion diffusion energy is lower for ReS2 as compared to MoS2, even with the same interlayer spacing. This vdW can be reduced by expanding the interlayer spacing, which also provides more sites for alkali ion storage with lower diffusion kinetics [130,131]. It is confirmed that increasing the interlayer space from 13 to 18 Å can reduce the diffusion barrier from 1.14 to 0.20 eV for sodium ions in MoS2 [132]. The same response is obtained for lithium and potassium ions [133]. Bottom-up or top-down-based strategies such as solvothermal, exfoliation-restacking, chemical vapor transport, and template intercalation can be used for interlayer spacing. In the solvothermal process, foreign species such as ammonium ions, carbon, and oxygen are formed from the precursor, which plays a vital role in the interlayer space, because these species settle down on the surface of L-TMDs and create/increase interlayer space. However, it is important to know that the interlayers space is dependent on reaction temperature, time, and precursors, which can release these foreign species during the reaction [32]. In this regard, a study showed that, increasing the concentration of thiourea from 14 to 60 mmol, the interlayer space increased from 0.63 to 0.91 nm [134].
The same response has been recorded for carbon; as organic compound concentration decreases or reaction temperature (for oxygen also) increases, it may lead to a decrease in the interlayer space of L-TMDs [91,135,136]. Similarly, in bottom-up methods such as the chemical vapor transport method, reaction time, temperature, and precursor ratio play vital roles in the final interlayer space. The main reason for interlayer spacing in this method is carbon, which has the same response as in the solvothermal [132]. In the exfoliation method, the layers of L-TMDs are exfoliated, and organic polymer is introduced in between. The polymer adsorbs on the surface and acts as an intercalation agent to increase interlayer space [137]. Ammonium ions or octylamine can be used instead of polymers to increase interlayer space. Octylamine can absorb polyaniline, while ammonium ions can be replaced with other organic compounds, such as sugar, which produce carbon during the annealing process [138,139]. A general scheme for interlayer spacing engineering is shown in Figure 5.

3.2. Surface Defect Engineering

A previous study confirmed that long diffusion pathways, insufficient channels, and high diffusion energy strongly reduce the battery application of L-TMDs. Surface defect engineering is the best approach to reduce these issues and improve L-TMD’s application for batteries. Surface engineering improves diffusion kinetics as it provides an extra pathway for alkali ion diffusion. TMDs-based catalysts (MoS2) exhibited seven kinds of surface defects, such as S single vacancy, Mo single vacancy, S double vacancies, a vacancy complex of Mo and three nearby S2 pairs, antisite defects where Mo substitutes S, a vacancy complex of Mo and nearby three S, and S substituting Mo [140]. Surface defects are developed in two ways. Post-treatment such as hydrogen/oxygen treatment or modulating solvothermal methods can be used to create a surface defect to facilitate an insertion channel, which ultimately reduces the alkali ion diffusion pathway and improves its electrochemical application [141,142,143]. In this regard, MoS2 was heated in air at a high temperature to oxidize its surface and create vacancies with grain boundaries. Surface-defect MoS2 showed better kinetics with high current density for sodium ion diffusion as compared to un-defect MoS2 as shown in Figure 6. Surface defects also improve capacitance and durability [144,145]. On the other hand, adsorption factor, reaction time, and temperature played vital roles in the surface defect of active materials during the solvothermal strategy. Thiourea is the most commonly used material for adsorption factors [32,134,146,147,148]. The main concept behind these defects is the adsorption of thiourea on the surface of active materials, which hinders further attachment of active material to the nucleation center. It may attach to the active spot of the materials during synthesis, and later, during the annealing process, it may dissociate, release, and leave a defect in the structure [149].
MoS2 with defect-rich synthesis via the solvothermal method showed a large surface area for lithium ion diffusion with excellent recyclability and rate performance. The research study also confirmed that 1,6-hexanediamine and carbon disulfide have also exhibited an adsorption-controlling effect for surface defects [150,151]. It is worth noting that while this approach to surface engineering can increase defects, it can also adversely affect the electrical properties of catalysts. Therefore, a major challenge is to create a surface defect that balances ionic diffusion with high electrical conductivity.

3.3. Phase Controlling Engineering

Intrinsic properties also play a significant role in the electrochemical application of catalysts. Thus, phase control or conversion of TMDs from semiconductor to metallic not only increased their battery application but also improved their structural stability [152,153]. Phase control is also possible via solvothermal, chemical vapor transportation, exfoliation, and 2H phase template-based strategies. Generally, in solvothermal methods, 2H (semiconditive) phase energy is favorable as compared to 1T (metallic) phase [154].
In order to obtain the 2H phase, it is necessary to hinder phase transformation from 1T -> 2H or lower the ground energy state of 1T [155]. In this regard, ammonium ions, carbon, and graphene hinder the 2H phase and lead to the 1T phase, as confirmed by Zhou et al. Additionally, reaction temperature also plays a vital role as it increases the favorability of phase transformation from 1T to 2H [156,157,158]. While Ding et al. [159] confirmed that strong magnetic fields favor 1T phase as magnetic fields reduce 1T phase energy due to its paramagnetic characteristic. This study confirmed that the 1T phase increased from 24.7% to 100% as the magnetic field increased from 0 to 9 T, as shown in Figure 7. On the other hand, high reaction temperatures during chemical vapor transport reactions favor the 2H phase [160]. In the case of exfoliation and the 2H phase template method, the introduction of foreign species favors S vacancies, which lead to the 1T phase of TMDs [161].

3.4. Doping Engineering

The introduction of heteroatom to TMDs as doped atoms has also gained extensive research attention. Various atoms can be doped, which increases their conductivity and diffusion kinetics for ions.
Sun et al. [162] found that the adsorption of alkali metal significantly reduced from −1.24 V for doped base TMDs. Qin et al. [163] developed N-doped MoS2 from thiourea and MoCl5 via the annealing method. It is also reported that TMDs can be prepared first and then treated with ammonia at high temperatures to develop N-doped TMDs [164]. The solvothermal method can be applied for doping of S, Se, and other metals (Fe, Sr, Co, Ni, Cr, Mn, etc.) in TMDs [165,166,167,168,169]. Doping TMDs with heteroatoms improved their conductivity due to synergism and hybridization of the heteroatom’s orbital with TMD’s orbital. This hybridization and/or synergism increase TMD’s electronic cloud with a configuration that gives a metallic feature to the catalyst, as shown in Figure 8.

3.5. Alloy Engineering

The introduction of metal in TMDs under certain conditions increases its conductivity from semiconductor to metallic, and this improvement is due to the hybridization of TMDs’ orbitals with introductory metals’ orbitals which strongly modify their electronic configuration [32]. In this regard, Cai et al. [171] introduce Se into MoS2 to produce alloys via the solvothermal method. Similarly, Wang et al. [172] and Jia et al. [173] introduce Se to MoS2 via chemical vapor transport and an annealing method. The alloy-TMDs exhibited metallic properties, which increase their electrochemical battery applications. Alloying engineering in catalysts for battery application can also reduce ions diffusion energy for the pathway, as shown in Figure 9. This engineering may increase its functionality, as discussed before.

4. Prospective Application of L-TMDs Based Composite

Increasing demand for energy and depletion of resources cause energy crises, which cause a great challenge for researchers to store the available sustainable and green energy. Recently, facile and novel materials have been developed to meet the need for energy and resolve the challenges. In the field of energy storage devices, L-TMDs have led the way in materials research due to their excellent electrochemical performance and physical properties. Here, the potential application of L-TMDs’ based composites will be briefly reviewed for SIBs and LIBs performances.

4.1. Lithium-Ion Batteries (LIBs)

The source of power in portable electronic devices such as hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), electric vehicles (EVs), notebooks, mobile phones, and laptops is rechargeable LIBs, which are extensively applied due to their durable cycle life, high energy density, and no effect on memory [2,3,10]. Graphite has also been extensively applied as anode materials for batteries, but its low rate capability and specific capacity (372 mAh g−1) hinder its practical application for the demand of HEVs and EVs. The performance of LIBs may be enhanced with the use of NSs of L-TMDs instead of graphite, as L-TMDs exhibit a high surface area and a specific capacity with a short distance for the reaction of Li+, which may play a key role in practical application. However, their low intrinsic conductivity, weak cycle life, deprived rate capability, and layers restacking during charge/discharge of the batteries are the serious challenges [175]. The best solution to these challenges and to improve rate performance, cycle ability, and reversible capacity of LIBs is the hybridization of 0D (metal, metal oxide, noble metal NPs), 1D (nanobelts, nanotubes, nanowire, CNT, CNF), 2D (TiO2, graphene NSs), and 3D (ACF, 3D graphene, 3D porous architectures) based materials with NSs of L-TMDs for their practical application.
In this regard, 2D graphene-based L-TMDs NSs composites have been extensively studied as anode materials for LIBs [102,103,104,105,106,176]. MoS2/G is a typical example of a 2D graphene-based L-TMDs NSs composite that is developed through a solution-phase synthetic route. The as-synthesized composite was used as anode materials for LIBs, and the data exhibited excellent specific capacity of 1100 mAh g−1 at a current density of 0.1 A g−1 with improved cycle stability up to 100 cycles. The data confirmed excellent rate capability with a specific capacity of 900 mAh g−1 at a current density of 1.0 A g−1 [80]. This is the synergism of GNS and L-TMDs, which have improved the electrochemical application of these composites. The role of GNS in the composites is to minimize the electrode contact resistance and maintain the electronic conductivity of the composites. In addition, the GNS absorbed the peak of induced stress during the cycling process due to their flexible nature.
In this regard, graphene-based SnSe2, SnS2, and WS2 composites have been applied as anode materials for LIBs with improved performance [97,98,99,100,101]. The conductivity of graphene may be further enhanced via doping strategies, which can increase the storage capacity of Li in the anode of batteries. In this regard, N-G is the high-conductive kind of GNS, which has also been applied to develop N-GNS-based MS2 (M = W, Mo) composites [93,104]. The doping of N causes defect sides in the graphene and maximizes the vacancies for Li+; the active spots are further increased during the cycling process, which may increase the cycling stability and capacity of the composite and improve their performance [93]. In this regard, the rate capability and reversible capacity for LIBs of MoS2/N-G are much higher than those of MoS2 and MoS2/G composite. This obviously confirmed that gradual increases in vacancies or defect-based active sites may facilitate a greater number of Li+ being inserted in NG based materials during batteries charge/discharge.
L-TMDs based on 2D graphene and/or porous CNF composites with 3D interconnected porous morphology have also been applied as anode materials for LIBs [107,108,109,110,111,112]. The porous morphology provides a high surface area and a cushion toward the volume expansion of NSs of L-TMDs during the process of charge/discharge. In addition, the porous morphology also facilitates the access of electrolytes and charge transfer at a rapid rate due to the increased and continuous channels. These features of the 3D interconnected porous morphology of materials will deliver outstanding cyclic performance, excellent specific capacity, and ultrahigh-rate capability. Recently, the hydrothermal method was applied to develop MoS2 on the surface of graphene with a 3D porous structure. The as-synthesized composite was used as an anode material for LIBs and showed high performance as it exhibited a retention capacity of 1200 mAh g−1 even after 3000 cycles. Additionally, the composite showed excellent rate capability at 140 °C with a capacity of 270 mAh g−1 [107]. Similarly, MoS2/3DGN was synthesized using the CVD method, and the MoS2 was deposited on the surface of 3DGN. The composite materials were applied in LIB as anode materials and delivered a specific capacity of 665 mAh g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1. The sample was run for 50 cycles, and again their specific capacity was studied at 4 A g−1 of current density; the sample showed a specific capacitance of 466 mAh g−1, as shown in Figure 10 [121]. The hybridization of NSs of L-TMDs with CNT [77,78,79,177], CNF [81,82,83], and amorphous carbon [123,126,127,128,129] has been deeply studied for anode materials of LIBs. These carbon-based materials also exhibit high conductivity and a large surface area. The deposition of L-TMDs NSs on these supporting materials dramatically boosted their outstanding cycling stability, reversible capacity, and rate performance as compared to their individual counterparts. Kong et al. synthesized NSs of MoS2 embedded in a nanocable of graphene (MoS2@G), which provided excellent reversible capacity with outstanding cycling stability. After 160 cycles, the sample delivered a capacitance of 1150 mAh g−1 at a current density of 0.5 A g−1. The rate capability of the composite was outstanding, as it delivered 700 mAh g−1 at 10 A g−1. Amazingly, this hybrid composite exhibited an extended cycle life (700 cycles) with excellent capacity of 900 mAh g−1 at a current density of 5 A g−1 [81].
High expansion of volume and weak conductivity are the two prime issues of nanostructures that limit their practical application as anode materials for LIBs. These nanostructured anode based materials initially deliver a very high capacity for charge/discharge, but rapid loss of their capacity hinders their long-term utilization for practical application. During the process of lithiation/delithiation in the material of the electrode, SEI layer formation occurs, which expands the volume of materials and, as a result, the capacity of the anode is directly dropped from its initial capacity value. The synthesis of TMDs with a single layer or the deposition of TMDs on the surface of various carbon base supporters with a flexible nature may accommodate the strains, which may reduce the limitation of anode materials. The limitation of anode materials may also be minimized to facilitate the intercalation of ions during the cycling process. Single-layered TMDs exhibited a short way of diffusion for Li+, extra storage of interfacial Li, a large surface area, and can accommodate changes in volume. These features give superior advantages to single-layered TMDs over multi-layered TMDs [82,83]. Zhu et al. [82] used the electrospinning method to decorate a single-layered nanoplate of ultrasmall MoS2 on the CNF, which delivered outstanding performance for LIBs. The CNF-supported ultrasmall size and single-layered morphology of MoS2 were confirmed from the TEM images. At a current density of 0.1 A g−1, the composite exhibited charge/discharge capacities of 1267 mAh g−1 and 1712 mAh g−1, respectively. The composite at current densities of 10, 30, and 50 A g−1 deliver specific capacities of 637, 548, and 374 mAh g−1, correspondingly. After 1000 cycles, the composite delivered a capacity of 661 mAh g−1 (10 A g−1 after), which confirmed the outstanding stability of the sample. Obviously, several factors are involved in the enhancement of the electrochemical performance of CNF-based composites, such as providing a number of sites for interfacial storage and offering different sites to be used for conversion and insertion of Li storage. In addition, the CNF hinders the aggregation of NPs and restacking of TMD layers during the cycling process. Similarly, carbon-based supporter networks reduce volume expansion and facilitate Li+ access, and their high conductivity enhanced their batteries applications, which may be further enhanced with the help of N-doping in CNF.
In addition to carbon based supporting materials, metal oxide, metal, and noble metal have also been used as supporting materials to decorate MoS2 to develop anode materials for LIBs with improved performance [67,68,69,70,71]. The flexible and elastic nature and large surface area of the NSs of MoS2 make them an ideal supporter to hinder NPs restacking and cushion the change in volume due to the charge/discharge process. The presence of NPs in between the NSs of MoS2 acts as a spacer, which stops the restacking of NSs of MoS2 during battery cycling processes and may enhance the retention of capacity. In addition, the diffusion pathway of Li+ is short, which gives superior rate capabilities and capacities to anode materials [72]. Recently, MoS2-supported 1D TiO2 nanobelt/nanowire/nanotube-based composites have been extensively studied as alternative materials for LIBs anode [84,85,86]. The composite delivered improved stability for rate capacity and cycling process, which may be due to less change in volume during the process of cycling with a high operation potential of 1.7 V (comparative to Li+/Li). However, the loose surface contact that interconnected the nanostructure of MoS2 and 1D TiO2 may cause self-aggregation during the process of charge/discharge, and it may limit their performances and practical application. Moreover, a TiO2/MoS2-based hollow porous 3D structure has been synthesized to be applied as anode materials in LIBs. The composite MoS2 is homogenously supported on the surface of TiO2, which dramatically shortens the length of the diffusion path and improves the stability of the structure for Li+ and electrons. TiO2/MoS2 with 3D morphology demonstrated superior rate capability with excellent cycling performance [118,150]. Less than 4 layers of MoS2-based NSs were coated on the surface of NSs of TiO2 to develop a 3D core-shell nanostructure (3D FL-MoS2@TiO2), which was used as an anode material for LIBs [150]. The composite delivered a capacity of 713.7 mAh g−1 (0.1 A g−1) even after 100 cycles, confirming its stable cycling performance. Similarly, Chen et al. [178] synthesized MoS2 on the surface of a carbon nanotube and applied for LIBs. The MoS2/CNTs showed a high capacity of 800 mAh g−1 at a current density of 5 A g−1. The materials also showed excellent rate performance, and this excellent response was due to the CNT presence, which improved the overall conductivity due to the structural stability of the composite at the same time.

4.2. Sodium Ion Batteries (SIBs)

LIBs have the potential to solve the growing energy crisis and meet the energy needs of society by providing energy systems for portable electrical devices and EVs. Currently, LIBs fulfill the demand for electrical energy storage in emerging markets, but the Li availability in the Earth’s crust must be considered. The abundance of Li is low and, thus, high prices and non-renewable resources are the basic limitation of LIBs. In comparison to Li, the abundance of Na is high and its price is low. Additionally, Al can also be used as a current collector in SIBs, as there is no report on the binary alloy of Al and Na. These are the features that make the SIB a highly promising alternative battery for LIBs [25,26,179]. However, the theoretical volumetric and gravimetric capacity of SIBs is much lower due to their weak electrochemical response as compared to LIBs. These characteristics and limitations of Na may be due to their heavier ion as compared to Li+, causing sluggish diffusion in the bulk of the electrode. Similarly, the high expansion of volume may result in low stability for the cyclic process and rate capability. Secondly, the lower value of volumetric and gravimetric energy densities may be due to the lower operating potential caused by the lower ionization potential of sodium. The development of unique crystalline and porous structures that exhibited large insertion channels for the facilitation of sodiation/de-sodiation may help to overcome these limitations. Recently, terrific research has been collected to study the feasibility of SIB as an anode in the field of ESS. The research from recent years has recommended NSs L-TMDs-based composites as suitable materials for SIBs anodes. As with LIBs, graphene-based L-TMDs have also been applied as anodes for the study of SIBs with/without binder [87,94,96,180]. In this regard, Zhang et al. [87] developed MoSe2/graphene composites with hierarchical morphology and applied them as anodes in SIBs. The composite delivers specific capacities of 380 and 430 mAh g−1 at current densities of 1 and 0.5 A g−1, respectively. The synergism interaction between GNS and MoSe2 is attributed to this excellent electrochemical performance. Carbon-based materials ornamented with L-TMDs have also been studied for SIB applications [76,82,125,129].
Zhu et al. developed CNF decorated with nanoplates of single-layered MoS2 and applied them for SIBs electrochemical applications. The composite delivered excellent cyclic stability and rate capability during SIB’s anode, as at current densities of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, 30, and 50 A g−1, the composite delivered specific capacities of 854, 700, 623, 436, 331, 224, 155, and 75 mAh g−1, respectively. The composite exhibited good performance even after 100 cycles, and at current densities of 1 and 10 A g−1, the composite delivered specific capacities of 484 and 253 mAh g−1, respectively. This is the best composite for SIBs reported up to now, and the outstanding performance of composite can be dedicated to single-layered MoS2 with its ultrasmall morphology [82]. Similarly, a three step method was applied to the synthesized NSs of MoSe2-based PHCS composites for the study of electrochemical application of SIBs [129]. At a current density of 0.2 A g−1, the composite delivered a specific capacity of 580 mAh g−1. The specific capacity of the sample remains at 400 mAh g−1 at current density of 1.5 A g−1 even after 100 cycles. The stress was accommodated by NSs of MoSe2 on the PHCS composite during the process of charge/discharge, as shown in Figure 11. A conductive atmosphere in the composite was created by PHCS, while NSs of MoSe2 facilitate the path of Na in SIBs [129]. Similarly, carbon-based MoS2 composite [125] and MWCNT-based MoSe2 composite [76] have also been developed and applied as anode materials for SIBs and delivered excellent performance. MoSe2@MWCNT delivered a specific capacity of 459 mAh g−1 at a current density of 200 mA g−1 over 90 cycles. At the current rate of 2000 mAh g−1, MoSe2@MWCNTs showed a specific capacity of 385 mAh g−1. This performance confirmed that MWCNT-based L-TMDs are excellent composites for SIBs, and this is due to the special structure and chemistry of MWCNTs, which facilitate electron passage and avoid agglomeration to retain a high surface area.

5. Conclusions and Future Perspective

AMIBs are a promising choice to meet energy demand, overcome the energy crisis, and address environmental issues as they provide energy to portable devices. Recently, L-TMDs-based materials have been extensively investigated for AMIBs due to their high electrochemical performance, high conductivity, mechanical, thermal, and chemical stability as compared to their bulk materials. TMD-based 0D, 1D, 2D, and 3D composites showed excellent performance for AMIBs. TMDs exhibited excellent performance for AMIBs in 2D morphology due to their morphology and large surface area, which were available for electrochemical reactions. However, the battery applications of 3D TMD composites showed outstanding performance due to the low agglomeration or stacking of active materials, which increased the surface area for electrochemical reactions. Additionally, precise control and improvements in the intrinsic feature can further improve its properties for application. Surface defects can increase active spots for reactions and reduce diffusion kinetics to enhance TMD’s properties for batteries. Interlayers space may help to avoid agglomeration, which leads to the retention of a large surface area and again reduces the diffusion pathway and kinetics. Phase control, alloying, and doping improve its intrinsic properties, electronic cloud, and electronic configuration, which ultimately increase batteries applications. However, it needs a lot of care and optimization studies to control this surface engineering. In the future, these materials for battery application must be prepared with 3D morphology to avoid agglomeration and utilize their maximum surface area. It is also very important to carry out these surface engineering techniques under precise conditions to optimize engineering for improved applications. It is also recommended to focus on other L-TMD-based electrocatalysts to be developed for extended battery applications. Multimetals and multichalcogenides are needed to investigate the high performance of alkali metal storage, long recycling, and high rate capability. The 3D morphology, which provides a short pathway for diffusion, fast kinetics for diffusion, large surface area for reaction, and alkali metal storage, are needed to investigate with the required surface engineering to further improve its application. Other supporting materials, especially boron nitride or boron-doped carbon nitride with 3D morphology, are needed to be developed and applied with TMDs for composite synthesis and battery applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.S.; methodology, N.U. and S.A.S.; investigation, N.U. and S.A.S.; resources, A.Y. and S.A.S.; data curation, N.U. and S.A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, N.U. and S.A.S.; writing—review and editing, N.U., D.G., A.Y. and S.A.S.; visualization, N.U.; supervision, S.A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vesborg, P.C.; Jaramillo, T.F. Addressing the terawatt challenge: Scalability in the supply of chemical elements for renewable energy. Rsc. Adv. 2012, 2, 7933–7947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mahmood, N.; Hou, Y. Electrode nanostructures in lithium-based batteries. Adv. Sci. 2014, 1, 1400012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Croguennec, L.; Palacin, M.R. Recent achievements on inorganic electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 3140–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Reddy, M.V.; Subba Rao, G.; Chowdari, B. Metal oxides and oxysalts as anode materials for Li ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 5364–5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Kintner-Meyer, M.C.; Lu, X.; Choi, D.; Lemmon, J.P.; Liu, J. Electrochemical energy storage for green grid. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 3577–3613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Palacin, M.R. Recent advances in rechargeable battery materials: A chemist’s perspective. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2565–2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Palomares, V.; Serras, P.; Villaluenga, I.; Hueso, K.B.; Carretero-González, J.; Rojo, T. Na-ion batteries, recent advances and present challenges to become low cost energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5884–5901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Armand, M.; Tarascon, J.-M. Building better batteries. Nature 2008, 451, 652–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bruce, P.G.; Freunberger, S.A.; Hardwick, L.J.; Tarascon, J.-M. Li–O2 and Li–S batteries with high energy storage. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 19–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Scrosati, B.; Hassoun, J.; Sun, Y.-K. Lithium-ion batteries. A look into the future. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 3287–3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhamu, A.; Chen, G.; Liu, C.; Neff, D.; Fang, Q.; Yu, Z.; Xiong, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Jang, B.Z. Reviving rechargeable lithium metal batteries: Enabling next-generation high-energy and high-power cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5701–5707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Chen, L.; Huang, X. Research on advanced materials for Li-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4593–4607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Brutti, S.; Gentili, V.; Menard, H.; Scrosati, B.; Bruce, P.G. TiO2-(B) nanotubes as anodes for lithium batteries: Origin and mitigation of irreversible capacity. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, C.-M.; Kim, J.-H.; Kim, H.; Sohn, H.-J. Li-alloy based anode materials for Li secondary batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 3115–3141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Goodenough, J.B.; Park, K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: A perspective. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1167–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zaghib, K.; Dontigny, M.; Guerfi, A.; Charest, P.; Rodrigues, I.; Mauger, A.; Julien, C.M. Safe and fast-charging Li-ion battery with long shelf life for power applications. J. Power Sources 2011, 196, 3949–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goodenough, J.B. Electrochemical energy storage in a sustainable modern society. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Baker, J. New technology and possible advances in energy storage. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 4368–4373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chalk, S.G.; Miller, J.F. Key challenges and recent progress in batteries, fuel cells, and hydrogen storage for clean energy systems. J. Power Sources 2006, 159, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yaksic, A.; Tilton, J.E. Using the cumulative availability curve to assess the threat of mineral depletion: The case of lithium. Resources 2009, 34, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meister, P.; Jia, H.; Li, J.; Kloepsch, R.; Winter, M.; Placke, T. Best practice: Performance and cost evaluation of lithium ion battery active materials with special emphasis on energy efficiency. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 7203–7217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pan, H.; Hu, Y.-S.; Chen, L. Room-temperature stationary sodium-ion batteries for large-scale electric energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2338–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pramudita, J.C.; Sehrawat, D.; Goonetilleke, D.; Sharma, N. An initial review of the status of electrode materials for potassium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kundu, D.; Talaie, E.; Duffort, V.; Nazar, L.F. The emerging chemistry of sodium ion batteries for electrochemical energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3431–3448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yabuuchi, N.; Kubota, K.; Dahbi, M.; Komaba, S. Research development on sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11636–11682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Luo, W.; Shen, F.; Bommier, C.; Zhu, H.; Ji, X.; Hu, L. Na-ion battery anodes: Materials and electrochemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hu, X.; Zhang, W.; Liu, X.; Mei, Y.; Huang, Y. Nanostructured Mo-based electrode materials for electrochemical energy storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2376–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peng, L.; Zhu, Y.; Chen, D.; Ruoff, R.S.; Yu, G. Two-dimensional materials for beyond-lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mei, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hu, X. Nanostructured Ti-based anode materials for Na-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 12001–12013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zeng, L.; Luo, F.; Chen, X.; Xu, L.; Xiong, P.; Feng, X.; Luo, Y.; Chen, Q.; Wei, M.; Qian, Q. An ultra-small few-layer MoS2-hierarchical porous carbon fiber composite obtained via nanocasting synthesis for sodium-ion battery anodes with excellent long-term cycling performance. Dalton Trans. 2019, 48, 4149–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chen, B.; Chao, D.; Liu, E.; Jaroniec, M.; Zhao, N.; Qiao, S.-Z. Transition metal dichalcogenides for alkali metal ion batteries: Engineering strategies at the atomic level. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 1096–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Srivastava, M.; Singh, J.; Kuila, T.; Layek, R.K.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, J.H. Recent advances in graphene and its metal-oxide hybrid nanostructures for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 4820–4868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Fan, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based electrodes. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5979–6004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Raccichini, R.; Varzi, A.; Passerini, S.; Scrosati, B. The role of graphene for electrochemical energy storage. Nat. Mater. 2015, 14, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Savjani, N.; Lewis, E.A.; Bissett, M.A.; Brent, J.R.; Dryfe, R.A.; Haigh, S.J.; O’Brien, P. Synthesis of lateral size-controlled monolayer 1 H-MoS2@oleylamine as supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Mater. 2016, 28, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jing, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Cabrera, C.R.; Chen, Z. Graphene, inorganic graphene analogs and their composites for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 12104–12122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pumera, M.; Sofer, Z.; Ambrosi, A. Layered transition metal dichalcogenides for electrochemical energy generation and storage. J.Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 8981–8987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xu, M.; Liang, T.; Shi, M.; Chen, H. Graphene-like two-dimensional materials. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 3766–3798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, D.; Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Ji, G.; Chang, K.; Lee, J.Y. Graphene-like layered metal dichalcogenide/graphene composites: Synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Mater. Today 2014, 17, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rao, C.; Nag, A. Inorganic analogues of graphene. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 4244–4250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kang, W.; Wang, Y.; Xu, J. Recent progress in layered metal dichalcogenide nanostructures as electrodes for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 7667–7690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Butler, S.Z.; Hollen, S.M.; Cao, L.; Cui, Y.; Gupta, J.A.; Gutiérrez, H.R.; Heinz, T.F.; Hong, S.S.; Huang, J.; Ismach, A.F. Progress, challenges, and opportunities in two-dimensional materials beyond graphene. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 2898–2926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wang, H.; Yuan, H.; Hong, S.S.; Li, Y.; Cui, Y. Physical and chemical tuning of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2664–2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Q.H.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kis, A.; Coleman, J.N.; Strano, M.S. Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Xu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, W.; Lee, C.S. Interlayer nanoarchitectonics of two-dimensional transition-metal dichalcogenides nanosheets for energy storage and conversion applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Choi, W.; Choudhary, N.; Han, G.H.; Park, J.; Akinwande, D.; Lee, Y.H. Recent development of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides and their applications. Mater. Today 2017, 20, 116–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chhowalla, M.; Shin, H.S.; Eda, G.; Li, L.-J.; Loh, K.P.; Zhang, H. The chemistry of two-dimensional layered transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 263–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ko, Y.N.; Choi, S.; Park, S.; Kang, Y. Hierarchical MoSe2 yolk–shell microspheres with superior Na-ion storage properties. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 10511–10515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. André, B.; Gustavsson, F.; Svahn, F.; Jacobson, S. Performance and tribofilm formation of a low-friction coating incorporating inorganic fullerene like nano-particles. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2012, 206, 2325–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hwang, H.; Kim, H.; Cho, J. MoS2 nanoplates consisting of disordered graphene-like layers for high rate lithium battery anode materials. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4826–4830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Zhang, H. Metal dichalcogenide nanosheets: Preparation, properties and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 1934–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Whittingham, M.S. Electrical energy storage and intercalation chemistry. Science 1976, 192, 1126–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Whittingham, M.S. Chemistry of intercalation compounds: Metal guests in chalcogenide hosts. Prog. Solid. State Chem. 1978, 12, 41–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lin, L.; Lei, W.; Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wallace, G.G.; Chen, J. Two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides in supercapacitors and secondary batteries. Energy Stor. Mater. 2019, 19, 408–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, B.; Meng, Y.; Sha, J.; Zhong, C.; Hu, W.; Zhao, N. Preparation of MoS2/TiO2 based nanocomposites for photocatalysis and rechargeable batteries: Progress, challenges, and perspective. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 34–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Wang, T.; Chen, S.; Pang, H.; Xue, H.; Yu, Y. MoS2-based nanocomposites for electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Stephenson, T.; Li, Z.; Olsen, B.; Mitlin, D. Energy Environ. Science 2014, 7, 209–231. [Google Scholar]
  59. Wang, H.; Lan, X.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Zhong, H.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, Y. Sodium storage and transport properties in pyrolysis synthesized MoSe2 nanoplates for high performance sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 283, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yousaf, M.; Mahmood, A.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Ma, Z.; Han, R.P. Advancement in layered transition metal dichalcogenide composites for lithium and sodium ion batteries. J. Electr. Eng 2016, 4, 58–74. [Google Scholar]
  61. Huang, X.; Tan, C.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, H. 25th Anniversary article: Hybrid nanostructures based on two-dimensional nanomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2185–2204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Huang, X.; Qi, X.; Boey, F.; Zhang, H. Graphene-based composites. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 666–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Lei, Z.; Zhan, J.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Recent development of metallic (1T) phase of molybdenum disulfide for energy conversion and storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1703482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, H.; Jia, X.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Metallic transition-metal dichalcogenide nanocatalysts for energy conversion. Chem 2018, 4, 1510–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Jiao, Y.; Hafez, A.M.; Cao, D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Ma, Y.; Zhu, H. Metallic MoS2 for high performance energy storage and energy conversion. Small 2018, 14, 1800640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhu, C.R.; Gao, D.; Ding, J.; Chao, D.; Wang, J. TMD-based highly efficient electrocatalysts developed by combined computational and experimental approaches. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4332–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, Q.-Y.; Pan, Q.-C.; Yang, G.-H.; Lin, X.-L.; Yan, Z.-X.; Wang, H.-Q.; Huang, Y.-G. Synthesis of Sn/MoS2/C composites as high-performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 20375–20381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Deng, Z.; Hu, Y.; Ren, D.; Lin, S.; Jiang, H.; Li, C. Reciprocal hybridization of MoO2 nanoparticles and few-layer MoS2 for stable lithium-ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 13838–13841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chen, Y.; Lu, J.; Wen, S.; Lu, L.; Xue, J. Synthesis of SnO2/MoS2 composites with different component ratios and their applications as lithium ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 17857–17866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Chen, Y.; Song, B.; Tang, X.; Lu, L.; Xue, J. Ultrasmall Fe3O4 nanoparticle/MoS2 nanosheet composites with superior performances for lithium ion batteries. Small 2014, 10, 1536–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pan, L.; Zhu, X.-D.; Xie, X.-M.; Liu, Y.-T. Delicate ternary heterostructures achieved by hierarchical co-assembly of Ag and Fe3O4 nanoparticles on MoS2 nanosheets: Morphological and compositional synergy in reversible lithium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 2726–2733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pan, L.; Liu, Y.T.; Xie, X.M.; Zhu, X.D. Coordination-driven hierarchical assembly of silver nanoparticles on mos2 nanosheets for improved lithium storage. Chem. Asian J. 2014, 9, 1519–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Kim, J.; Byun, S.; Smith, A.J.; Yu, J.; Huang, J. Enhanced electrocatalytic properties of transition-metal dichalcogenides sheets by spontaneous gold nanoparticle decoration. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2013, 4, 1227–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Huang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Bao, S.; Wang, M.; Qi, X.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, H. Solution-phase epitaxial growth of noble metal nanostructures on dispersible single-layer molybdenum disulfide nanosheets. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Shahar, C.; Levi, R.; Cohen, S.R.; Tenne, R. Gold nanoparticles as surface defect probes for WS2 nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. lett. 2010, 1, 540–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, Z.; Yang, X.; Fu, Y.; Du, K. Ultrathin molybdenum diselenide nanosheets anchored on multi-walled carbon nanotubes as anode composites for high performance sodium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 296, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhai, C.; Du, N.; Zhang, H.; Yu, J.; Yang, D. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes anchored with SnS2 nanosheets as high-performance anode materials of lithium-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 4067–4074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Park, S.-K.; Yu, S.-H.; Woo, S.; Quan, B.; Lee, D.-C.; Kim, M.K.; Sung, Y.-E.; Piao, Y. A simple L-cysteine-assisted method for the growth of MoS2 nanosheets on carbon nanotubes for high-performance lithium ion batteries. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 2399–2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ding, S.; Chen, J.S.; Lou, X.W. Glucose-assisted growth of MoS2 nanosheets on CNT backbone for improved lithium storage properties. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13142–13145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Chang, K.; Chen, W. L-cysteine-assisted synthesis of layered MoS2/graphene composites with excellent electrochemical performances for lithium ion batteries. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 4720–4728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kong, D.; He, H.; Song, Q.; Wang, B.; Lv, W.; Yang, Q.-H.; Zhi, L. Rational design of MoS2@graphene nanocables: Towards high performance electrode materials for lithium ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 3320–3325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhu, C.; Mu, X.; van Aken, P.A.; Yu, Y.; Maier, J. Single-layered ultrasmall nanoplates of MoS2 embedded in carbon nanofibers with excellent electrochemical performance for lithium and sodium storage. Angew. Chem. 2014, 126, 2184–2188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Yu, S.; Jung, J.-W.; Kim, I.-D. Single layers of WS2 nanoplates embedded in nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11945–11950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Xu, X.; Fan, Z.; Ding, S.; Yu, D.; Du, Y. Fabrication of MoS2 nanosheet@ TiO2 nanotube hybrid nanostructures for lithium storage. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5245–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Mao, M.; Mei, L.; Guo, D.; Wu, L.; Zhang, D.; Li, Q.; Wang, T. High electrochemical performance based on the TiO2 nanobelt@ few-layered MoS2 structure for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 12350–12353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Li, X.; Li, W.; Li, M.; Cui, P.; Chen, D.; Gengenbach, T.; Chu, L.; Liu, H.; Song, G. Glucose-assisted synthesis of the hierarchical TiO2 nanowire@MoS2 nanosheet nanocomposite and its synergistic lithium storage performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 2762–2769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhang, Z.; Fu, Y.; Yang, X.; Qu, Y.; Zhang, Z. Hierarchical MoSe2 nanosheets/reduced graphene oxide composites as anodes for lithium-ion and sodium-ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical performance. ChemNanoMat 2015, 1, 409–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ma, L.; Zhou, X.; Xu, L.; Xu, X.; Zhang, L.; Chen, W. Ultrathin few-layered molybdenum selenide/graphene hybrid with superior electrochemical Li-storage performance. J. Power Sources 2015, 285, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chang, K.; Chen, W. Single-layer MoS2/graphene dispersed in amorphous carbon: Towards high electrochemical performances in rechargeable lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 17175–17184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wang, Z.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.; Chang, K.; Ma, L.; Huang, G.; Chen, D.; Lee, J.Y. CTAB-assisted synthesis of single-layer MoS2–graphene composites as anode materials of Li-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 2202–2210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Huang, G.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Chang, K.; Ma, L.; Huang, F.; Chen, D.; Lee, J.Y. Graphene-like MoS2/Graphene composites: Cationic surfactant-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical reversible storage of lithium. Small 2013, 9, 3693–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Wang, Z.; Ma, L.; Chen, W.; Huang, G.; Chen, D.; Wang, L.; Lee, J.Y. Facile synthesis of MoS2/graphene composites: Effects of different cationic surfactants on microstructures and electrochemical properties of reversible lithium storage. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 21675–21684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Chang, K.; Geng, D.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Tang, Y.; Cai, M.; Li, R.; Sun, X. Ultrathin MoS2/nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets with highly reversible lithium storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 2013, 3, 839–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Sahu, T.S.; Mitra, S. Exfoliated MoS2 sheets and reduced graphene oxide-an excellent and fast anode for sodium-ion battery. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Jing, Y.; Ortiz-Quiles, E.O.; Cabrera, C.R.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, Z. Layer-by-layer hybrids of MoS2 and reduced graphene oxide for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 147, 392–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Qu, B.; Ma, C.; Ji, G.; Xu, C.; Xu, J.; Meng, Y.S.; Wang, T.; Lee, J.Y. Layered SnS2-reduced graphene oxide composite–A high-capacity, high-rate, and long-cycle life sodium-ion battery anode material. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 3854–3859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhuo, L.; Wu, Y.; Wang, L.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, F. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of SnS2/graphene composites as anode material for highly efficient rechargeable lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5084–5087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Choi, J.; Jin, J.; Jung, I.G.; Kim, J.M.; Kim, H.J.; Son, S.U. SnSe2 nanoplate–graphene composites as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 5241–5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Jiang, Z.; Wang, C.; Du, G.; Zhong, Y.; Jiang, J. In situ synthesis of SnS2@graphene nanocomposites for rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 9494–9496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Chang, K.; Wang, Z.; Huang, G.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; Lee, J.Y. Few-layer SnS2/graphene hybrid with exceptional electrochemical performance as lithium-ion battery anode. J. Power Sources 2012, 201, 259–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, P.; Su, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y. Interconnected tin disulfide nanosheets grown on graphene for Li-ion storage and photocatalytic applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 12073–12082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Luo, B.; Fang, Y.; Wang, B.; Zhou, J.; Song, H.; Zhi, L. Two dimensional graphene–SnS2 hybrids with superior rate capability for lithium ion storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 5226–5230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Li, H.; Yu, K.; Fu, H.; Guo, B.; Lei, X.; Zhu, Z. Multi-slice nanostructured WS2@ rGO with enhanced Li-ion battery performance and a comprehensive mechanistic investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 29824–29833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Chen, D.; Ji, G.; Ding, B.; Ma, Y.; Qu, B.; Chen, W.; Lee, J.Y. In situ nitrogenated graphene–few-layer WS2 composites for fast and reversible Li+ storage. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 7890–7896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Xu, X.; Rout, C.S.; Yang, J.; Cao, R.; Oh, P.; Shin, H.S.; Cho, J. Freeze-dried WS2 composites with low content of graphene as high-rate lithium storage materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 14548–14554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Shiva, K.; Matte, H.R.; Rajendra, H.; Bhattacharyya, A.J.; Rao, C. Employing synergistic interactions between few-layer WS2 and reduced graphene oxide to improve lithium storage, cyclability and rate capability of Li-ion batteries. Nano Energy 2013, 2, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gong, Y.; Yang, S.; Liu, Z.; Ma, L.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Graphene-network-backboned architectures for high-performance lithium storage. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3979–3984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Miao, Y.-E.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, W.; Lai, F.; Liu, T. Electrospun porous carbon nanofiber@ MoS2 core/sheath fiber membranes as highly flexible and binder-free anodes for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 11093–11101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Lingappan, N.; Van, N.H.; Lee, S.; Kang, D.J. Growth of three dimensional flower-like molybdenum disulfide hierarchical structures on graphene/carbon nanotube network: An advanced heterostructure for energy storage devices. J. Power Sources 2015, 280, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Yao, J.; Liu, B.; Ozden, S.; Wu, J.; Yang, S.; Rodrigues, M.-T.F.; Kalaga, K.; Dong, P.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, Y. 3D nanostructured molybdenum diselenide/graphene foam as anodes for long-cycle life lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Gong, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhan, L.; Ma, L.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. A bottom-up approach to build 3D architectures from nanosheets for superior lithium storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Shen, J.; Fan, K.; Li, C. In situ assembly of graphene sheets-supported SnS2 nanoplates into 3D macroporous aerogels for high-performance lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2013, 237, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Su, D.; Dou, S.; Wang, G. WS2@graphene nanocomposites as anode materials for Na-ion batteries with enhanced electrochemical performances. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 4192–4195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Peng, X. Homogeneously assembling like-charged WS2 and GO nanosheets lamellar composite films by filtration for highly efficient lithium ion batteries. Nano Energy 2014, 7, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Huang, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Han, S.; Lv, L.; Zhang, F.; Feng, X. Amphiphilic polymer promoted assembly of macroporous Graphene/SnO2 frameworks with tunable porosity for high-performance lithium storage. Small 2014, 10, 2226–2232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tang, H.; Qi, X.; Han, W.; Ren, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhong, J. SnS2 nanoplates embedded in 3D interconnected graphene network as anode material with superior lithium storage performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 355, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Huang, G.; Liu, H.; Wang, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, B.; Chen, H.; Xu, M. Hierarchical architecture of WS2 nanosheets on graphene frameworks with enhanced electrochemical properties for lithium storage and hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 24128–24138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Guo, B.; Yu, K.; Fu, H.; Hua, Q.; Qi, R.; Li, H.; Song, H.; Guo, S.; Zhu, Z. Firework-shaped TiO₂ microspheres embedded with few-layer MoS₂ as an anode material for excellent performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6392–6401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chen, Z.; Ren, W.; Gao, L.; Liu, B.; Pei, S.; Cheng, H.-M. Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Cao, X.; Yin, Z.; Zhang, H. Three-dimensional graphene materials: Preparation, structures and application in supercapacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 1850–1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Cao, X.; Shi, Y.; Shi, W.; Rui, X.; Yan, Q.; Kong, J.; Zhang, H. Preparation of MoS2-coated three-dimensional graphene networks for high-performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Small 2013, 9, 3433–3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Wang, C.; Wan, W.; Huang, Y.; Chen, J.; Zhou, H.H.; Zhang, X.X. Hierarchical MoS2 nanosheet/active carbon fiber cloth as a binder-free and free-standing anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5351–5358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Das, S.K.; Mallavajula, R.; Jayaprakash, N.; Archer, L.A. Self-assembled MoS2–carbon nanostructures: Influence of nanostructuring and carbon on lithium battery performance. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 12988–12992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Hu, S.; Chen, W.; Zhou, J.; Yin, F.; Uchaker, E.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, G. Preparation of carbon coated MoS2 flower-like nanostructure with self-assembled nanosheets as high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 7862–7872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, Y.-X.; Seng, K.H.; Chou, S.-L.; Wang, J.-Z.; Guo, Z.; Wexler, D.; Liu, H.-K.; Dou, S.-X. Reversible sodium storage via conversion reaction of a MoS2–C composite. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 10730–10733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Chang, K.; Chen, W.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Li, H.; Huang, F.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Lee, J.-Y. Graphene-like MoS2/amorphous carbon composites with high capacity and excellent stability as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 6251–6257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Liu, Y.; Zhu, M.; Chen, D. Sheet-like MoSe2/C composites with enhanced Li-ion storage properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 11857–11862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Yu, X.Y.; Hu, H.; Wang, Y.; Chen, H.; Lou, X.W. Ultrathin MoS2 nanosheets supported on N-doped carbon nanoboxes with enhanced lithium storage and electrocatalytic properties. Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 7503–7506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Fu, Y.; Li, Q. Porous hollow carbon spheres decorated with molybdenum diselenide nanosheets as anodes for highly reversible lithium and sodium storage. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 10198–10203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Tongay, S.; Sahin, H.; Ko, C.; Luce, A.; Fan, W.; Liu, K.; Zhou, J.; Huang, Y.-S.; Ho, C.-H.; Yan, J. Monolayer behaviour in bulk ReS2 due to electronic and vibrational decoupling. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Zhang, Q.; Tan, S.; Mendes, R.G.; Sun, Z.; Chen, Y.; Kong, X.; Xue, Y.; Rümmeli, M.H.; Wu, X.; Chen, S. Extremely weak van der waals coupling in vertical ReS2 nanowalls for high-current-density lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2616–2623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Zhao, C.; Yu, C.; Qiu, B.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, M.; Huang, H.; Wang, B.; Zhao, J.; Sun, X.; Qiu, J. Ultrahigh rate and long-life sodium-ion batteries enabled by engineered surface and near-surface reactions. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1702486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Li, Y.; Wu, D.; Zhou, Z.; Cabrera, C.R.; Chen, Z. Enhanced Li adsorption and diffusion on MoS2 zigzag nanoribbons by edge effects: A computational study. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 2221–2227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xu, Y.; Bahmani, F.; Zhou, M.; Li, Y.; Zhang, C.; Liang, F.; Kazemi, S.H.; Kaiser, U.; Meng, G.; Lei, Y. Enhancing potassium-ion battery performance by defect and interlayer engineering. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019, 4, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Lu, Y.; Yao, X.; Yin, J.; Peng, G.; Cui, P.; Xu, X. MoS2 nanoflowers consisting of nanosheets with a controllable interlayer distance as high-performance lithium ion battery anodes. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7938–7943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Jing, L.; Lian, G.; Niu, F.; Yang, J.; Wang, Q.; Cui, D.; Wong, C.-P.; Liu, X. Few-atomic-layered hollow nanospheres constructed from alternate intercalation of carbon and MoS2 monolayers for sodium and lithium storage. Nano Energy 2018, 51, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Li, Y.; Liang, Y.; Hernandez, F.C.R.; Yoo, H.D.; An, Q.; Yao, Y. Enhancing sodium-ion battery performance with interlayer-expanded MoS2–PEO nanocomposites. Nano Energy 2015, 15, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Chen, L.; Chen, F.; Tronganh, N.; Lu, M.; Jiang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Jiao, Z.; Cheng, L.; Zhao, B. MoS2/graphene nanocomposite with enlarged interlayer distance as a high performance anode material for lithium-ion battery. J. Mater. Res. 2016, 31, 3151–3160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Jiang, H.; Ren, D.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Guo, S.; Yuan, H.; Hu, P.; Zhang, L.; Li, C. 2D monolayer MoS2–carbon interoverlapped superstructure: Engineering ideal atomic interface for lithium ion storage. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3687–3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Sun, X.; Wang, Z.; Fu, Y.Q. Defect-mediated lithium adsorption and diffusion on monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Ye, G.; Gong, Y.; Lin, J.; Li, B.; He, Y.; Pantelides, S.T.; Zhou, W.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M. Defects engineered monolayer MoS2 for improved hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 1097–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Ai, K.; Ruan, C.; Shen, M.; Lu, L. MoS2 nanosheets with widened interlayer spacing for high-efficiency removal of mercury in aquatic systems. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26, 5542–5549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Xie, J.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Grote, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, R.; Lei, Y.; Pan, B.; Xie, Y. Controllable disorder engineering in oxygen-incorporated MoS2 ultrathin nanosheets for efficient hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17881–17888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chao, D.; Liang, P.; Chen, Z.; Bai, L.; Shen, H.; Liu, X.; Xia, X.; Zhao, Y.; Savilov, S.V.; Lin, J. Pseudocapacitive Na-ion storage boosts high rate and areal capacity of self-branched 2D layered metal chalcogenide nanoarrays. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 10211–10219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yao, K.; Xu, Z.; Huang, J.; Ma, M.; Fu, L.; Shen, X.; Li, J.; Fu, M. Bundled defect-rich MoS2 for a high-rate and long-life sodium-ion battery: Achieving 3D diffusion of sodium ion by vacancies to improve kinetics. Small 2019, 15, 1805405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Zhang, L.; Fan, W.; Liu, T. A flexible free-standing defect-rich MoS2/graphene/carbon nanotube hybrid paper as a binder-free anode for high-performance lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 43130–43140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Chen, B.; Liu, E.; Cao, T.; He, F.; Shi, C.; He, C.; Ma, L.; Li, Q.; Li, J.; Zhao, N. Controllable graphene incorporation and defect engineering in MoS2-TiO2 based composites: Towards high-performance lithium-ion batteries anode materials. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Zhang, L.; Fan, W.; Tjiu, W.W.; Liu, T. 3D porous hybrids of defect-rich MoS2/graphene nanosheets with excellent electrochemical performance as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 34777–34787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Chen, B.; Liu, E.; He, F.; Shi, C.; He, C.; Li, J.; Zhao, N. 2D sandwich-like carbon-coated ultrathin TiO2@ defect-rich MoS2 hybrid nanosheets: Synergistic-effect-promoted electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries. Nano Energy 2016, 26, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Chen, B.; Lu, H.; Zhao, N.; Shi, C.; Liu, E.; He, C.; Ma, L. Facile synthesis and electrochemical properties of continuous porous spheres assembled from defect-rich, interlayer-expanded, and few-layered MoS2/C nanosheets for reversible lithium storage. J. Power Sources 2018, 387, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wang, J.; Luo, C.; Gao, T.; Langrock, A.; Mignerey, A.C.; Wang, C. An advanced MoS2/carbon anode for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Small 2015, 11, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zhang, X.; Lai, Z.; Ma, Q.; Zhang, H. Novel structured transition metal dichalcogenide nanosheets. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 3301–3338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Zhang, L.; Sun, D.; Wei, Q.; Ju, H.; Feng, J.; Zhu, J.; Mai, L.; Cairns, E.J.; Guo, J. Understanding the electrochemical reaction mechanism of VS2 nanosheets in lithium-ion cells by multiple in situ and ex situ x-ray spectroscopy. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 494001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Zhang, S.; Chowdari, B.; Wen, Z.; Jin, J.; Yang, J. Constructing highly oriented configuration by few-layer MoS2: Toward high-performance lithium-ion batteries and hydrogen evolution reactions. ACS Nano 2015, 9, 12464–12472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Voiry, D.; Mohite, A.; Chhowalla, M. Phase engineering of transition metal dichalcogenides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 2702–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Zheng, X.; Wang, S.; Xiong, C.; Hu, G. In situ growth of 1T-MoS2 on liquid-exfoliated graphene: A unique graphene-like heterostructure for superior lithium storage. Carbon 2018, 133, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Geng, X.; Jiao, Y.; Han, Y.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Yang, L.; Zhu, H. Freestanding metallic 1T MoS2 with dual ion diffusion paths as high rate anode for sodium-ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lu, J.; Xia, G.; Gong, S.; Wang, C.; Jiang, P.; Lin, Z.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Chen, Q. Metallic 1T phase MoS2 nanosheets decorated hollow cobalt sulfide polyhedra for high-performance lithium storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12613–12622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ding, W.; Hu, L.; Dai, J.; Tang, X.; Wei, R.; Sheng, Z.; Liang, C.; Shao, D.; Song, W.; Liu, Q. Highly ambient-stable 1T-MoS2 and 1T-WS2 by hydrothermal synthesis under high magnetic fields. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 1694–1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Li, P.; Yang, Y.; Gong, S.; Lv, F.; Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Luo, M.; Xing, Y.; Wang, Q.; Guo, S. Co-doped 1T-MoS2 nanosheets embedded in N, S-doped carbon nanobowls for high-rate and ultra-stable sodium-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2019, 12, 2218–2223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cai, L.; He, J.; Liu, Q.; Yao, T.; Chen, L.; Yan, W.; Hu, F.; Jiang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Hu, T. Vacancy-induced ferromagnetism of MoS2 nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 2622–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Sun, X.; Wang, Z. Adsorption and diffusion of lithium on heteroatom-doped monolayer molybdenum disulfide. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 455, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Qin, S.; Lei, W.; Liu, D.; Chen, Y. Advanced N-doped mesoporous molybdenum disulfide nanosheets and the enhanced lithium-ion storage performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 1440–1445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Cai, Y.; Yang, H.; Zhou, J.; Luo, Z.; Fang, G.; Liu, S.; Pan, A.; Liang, S. Nitrogen doped hollow MoS2/C nanospheres as anode for long-life sodium-ion batteries. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 327, 522–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, Y.; Von Lim, Y.; Huang, S.; Ding, M.; Kong, D.; Pei, Y.; Xu, T.; Shi, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, H.Y. Enhanced sodium storage kinetics by volume regulation and surface engineering via rationally designed hierarchical porous FeP@C/rGO. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 4341–4351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Xu, S.; Zhu, Q.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.; Ye, J.; Huang, J. Hydrothermal synthesis of Co-doped-MoS2/reduced graphene oxide hybrids with enhanced electrochemical lithium storage performances. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 219, 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Chu, J.; Yu, Q.; Yang, D.; Xing, L.; Lao, C.-Y.; Wang, M.; Han, K.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Du, W. Thickness-control of ultrathin bimetallic Fe–Mo selenide@N-doped carbon core/shell “nano-crisps” for high-performance potassium-ion batteries. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 13, 344–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Zheng, T.; Li, G.; Dong, J.; Sun, Q.; Meng, X. Self-assembled Mn-doped MoS2 hollow nanotubes with significantly enhanced sodium storage for high-performance sodium-ion batteries. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2018, 5, 1587–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sakthivel, M.; Sukanya, R.; Chen, S.-M.; Dinesh, B. Synthesis of two-dimensional Sr-Doped MoSe2 nanosheets and their application for efficient electrochemical reduction of metronidazole. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 12474–12484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, Y.; Tao, H.; Li, T.; Du, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, X. Vertically Oxygen-Incorporated MoS2 Nanosheets Coated on Carbon Fibers for Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 35206–35215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Cai, G.; Peng, L.; Ye, S.; Huang, Y.; Wang, G.; Zhang, X. Defect-rich MoS2(1−x)Se2x few-layer nanocomposites: A superior anode material for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 9837–9843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wang, S.; Liu, B.; Zhi, G.; Gong, X.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, J. Relaxing volume stress and promoting active sites in vertically grown 2D layered mesoporous MoS2(1-x)Se2x/rGO composites with enhanced capability and stability for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 268, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Jia, G.; Chao, D.; Tiep, N.H.; Zhang, Z.; Fan, H.J. Intercalation Na-ion storage in two-dimensional MoS2−xSex and capacity enhancement by selenium substitution. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 14, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ersan, F.; Gökoğlu, G.; Aktürk, E. Adsorption and Diffusion of Lithium on Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides (MoS2(1–x)Se2x) Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 28648–28653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Xiao, J.; Choi, D.; Cosimbescu, L.; Koech, P.; Liu, J.; Lemmon, J.P. Exfoliated MoS2 nanocomposite as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 4522–4524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Chang, K.; Chen, W. In situ synthesis of MoS 2/graphene nanosheet composites with extraordinarily high electrochemical performance for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4252–4254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Shi, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wong, J.I.; Tan, A.Y.S.; Hsu, C.-L.; Li, L.-J.; Lu, Y.-C.; Yang, H.Y. Self-assembly of hierarchical MoSx/CNT nanocomposites (2< x< 3): Towards high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2169. [Google Scholar]
  178. Yun, Q.; Li, L.; Hu, Z.; Lu, Q.; Chen, B.; Zhang, H. Layered transition metal dichalcogenide-based nanomaterials for electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1903826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sawicki, M.; Shaw, L.L. Advances and challenges of sodium ion batteries as post lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 53129–53154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. David, L.; Bhandavat, R.; Singh, G. MoS2/graphene composite paper for sodium-ion battery electrodes. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1759–1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of (a) Liquid-phase exfoliation of MoS2 powder into nanosheets in NMP by sonication; (b) mixing of MoS2 nanosheets with Fe3O4@OA and Ag@ODA NPs (c) spontaneous hierarchical co-assembly of NPs on MoS2 nanosheets through van der Waals interactions. Reproduce with permission of ref. [71]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of (a) Liquid-phase exfoliation of MoS2 powder into nanosheets in NMP by sonication; (b) mixing of MoS2 nanosheets with Fe3O4@OA and Ag@ODA NPs (c) spontaneous hierarchical co-assembly of NPs on MoS2 nanosheets through van der Waals interactions. Reproduce with permission of ref. [71]. Copyright 2015, Royal Society of Chemistry.
Materials 16 02559 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration and TEM images for the growth process of the SnS2 NS@MWCNTs coaxial nanocables: (a) schematic illustration; TEM image of the product sonicated at different times (b) 0 h (pure MWCNT); (c) 20 min; (d) 6 h. Reproduced with permission of ref. [77]. Copyright 2011. American Chemical Society.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration and TEM images for the growth process of the SnS2 NS@MWCNTs coaxial nanocables: (a) schematic illustration; TEM image of the product sonicated at different times (b) 0 h (pure MWCNT); (c) 20 min; (d) 6 h. Reproduced with permission of ref. [77]. Copyright 2011. American Chemical Society.
Materials 16 02559 g002
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the growth process and applications of SnS2–RGO sheet-on-sheet nanostructure. Reproduced with permission of ref. [101]. Copyright 2013. American Chemical Society.
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of the growth process and applications of SnS2–RGO sheet-on-sheet nanostructure. Reproduced with permission of ref. [101]. Copyright 2013. American Chemical Society.
Materials 16 02559 g003
Figure 4. Schematic illustration for the construction of 3D MoS2-graphene architectures. It mainly involves three steps: (1) fabrication of MoS2 and graphene oxide nanosheets via liquid exfoliation and Hummers methods, respectively; (2) hydrothermal treatment of the mixed dispersion of MoS2 and GO nanosheets in IPA (isopropyl alcohol)/water (1:2, v/v) at 180 °C for 12 h; (3) chemical reduction of GO to generate 3D MoS2-graphene architectures. Reproduced with permission of ref. [111]. Copyright 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Figure 4. Schematic illustration for the construction of 3D MoS2-graphene architectures. It mainly involves three steps: (1) fabrication of MoS2 and graphene oxide nanosheets via liquid exfoliation and Hummers methods, respectively; (2) hydrothermal treatment of the mixed dispersion of MoS2 and GO nanosheets in IPA (isopropyl alcohol)/water (1:2, v/v) at 180 °C for 12 h; (3) chemical reduction of GO to generate 3D MoS2-graphene architectures. Reproduced with permission of ref. [111]. Copyright 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany.
Materials 16 02559 g004
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations of methods for synthesis of the interlayer-expanded MX2. (a) hydro-/solvo-thermal; (b) chemical vapor transport (CVT); (c) exfoliation–restacking; (d) template intercalation method. Reproduced with permission of ref. [32]. Copyright 2020. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations of methods for synthesis of the interlayer-expanded MX2. (a) hydro-/solvo-thermal; (b) chemical vapor transport (CVT); (c) exfoliation–restacking; (d) template intercalation method. Reproduced with permission of ref. [32]. Copyright 2020. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Materials 16 02559 g005
Figure 6. The pathways of the lowest Na+ diffusion barrier across (a) the indefective MoS2 monolayer, (b) defective MoS2 with one vacancy, and (c) two vacancies and their corresponding potential energy curves. The purple, yellow, and green balls represent Mo, S, and Na, respectively. Reproduced with permission of ref. [145]. Copyright 2019. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 6. The pathways of the lowest Na+ diffusion barrier across (a) the indefective MoS2 monolayer, (b) defective MoS2 with one vacancy, and (c) two vacancies and their corresponding potential energy curves. The purple, yellow, and green balls represent Mo, S, and Na, respectively. Reproduced with permission of ref. [145]. Copyright 2019. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Materials 16 02559 g006
Figure 7. (a) XPS results of the as-synthesized MoS2 processed under different magnetic fields in magneto-hydrothermal processing. (b) Phase percentage of MoS2 from deconvolution of XPS spectra. Reproduced with permission of ref. [159]. Copyright 2019. American Chemical Society.
Figure 7. (a) XPS results of the as-synthesized MoS2 processed under different magnetic fields in magneto-hydrothermal processing. (b) Phase percentage of MoS2 from deconvolution of XPS spectra. Reproduced with permission of ref. [159]. Copyright 2019. American Chemical Society.
Materials 16 02559 g007
Figure 8. (a) CV curves of the OMSCF-400 electrode at 0.05 mV s–1. (b) Galvanostatic discharge–charge profiles of OMSCF-400 for the first three cycles at 0.1 A g–1. Cycling performance of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500 at (c) 0.1 A g–1 and (e) 1 A g–1. (d) Rate performance of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500. (f) EIS curves, and (g) the relationship between Z′ and ω–1/2 in the low-frequency range of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500. (h) EIS of the OMSCF-400 electrode after various cycles. All impedance measurements were made at the fully charged state. (i) Equivalent circuit used to describe the Na+ insertion/extraction process for the electrodes (A) before and (B) after cycling. Reproduced with permission of ref. [170]. Copyright 2018. American Chemical Society.
Figure 8. (a) CV curves of the OMSCF-400 electrode at 0.05 mV s–1. (b) Galvanostatic discharge–charge profiles of OMSCF-400 for the first three cycles at 0.1 A g–1. Cycling performance of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500 at (c) 0.1 A g–1 and (e) 1 A g–1. (d) Rate performance of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500. (f) EIS curves, and (g) the relationship between Z′ and ω–1/2 in the low-frequency range of MSCF, OMSCF-300, OMSCF-400, and OMSCF-500. (h) EIS of the OMSCF-400 electrode after various cycles. All impedance measurements were made at the fully charged state. (i) Equivalent circuit used to describe the Na+ insertion/extraction process for the electrodes (A) before and (B) after cycling. Reproduced with permission of ref. [170]. Copyright 2018. American Chemical Society.
Materials 16 02559 g008
Figure 9. Lowest energy diffusion paths of a single lithium atom and calculated energy profiles along the paths for one Li atom adsorbed on the TMDs monolayer. Reproduced with permission of ref. [174]. Copyright 2015. American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Lowest energy diffusion paths of a single lithium atom and calculated energy profiles along the paths for one Li atom adsorbed on the TMDs monolayer. Reproduced with permission of ref. [174]. Copyright 2015. American Chemical Society.
Materials 16 02559 g009
Figure 10. (A) Charge/discharge voltage profiles of MoS2/3DGN composite at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cycles. (B) Representative cyclic voltammograms of MoS2/3DGN composite at the first 3 cycles at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1 between 0.01 V and 3 V. (C) Cycling performance of MoS2/3DGN composites at a current density of 100 mA g−1. (D) Cycling stability of MoS2/3DGN composite at various current densities. Reproduced with permission of ref. [121]. Copyright 2013. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 10. (A) Charge/discharge voltage profiles of MoS2/3DGN composite at the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cycles. (B) Representative cyclic voltammograms of MoS2/3DGN composite at the first 3 cycles at a scan rate of 0.5 mV s−1 between 0.01 V and 3 V. (C) Cycling performance of MoS2/3DGN composites at a current density of 100 mA g−1. (D) Cycling stability of MoS2/3DGN composite at various current densities. Reproduced with permission of ref. [121]. Copyright 2013. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Materials 16 02559 g010
Figure 11. Electrochemical performance of the MoSe2@ PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets for lithium batteries (the capacities were calculated based on MoSe2 mass). (a) Cyclic voltammogram profiles of the MoSe2@PHCS composite at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1. (b) Discharge/charge voltage profiles of the MoSe2@PHCS composite. (c) Cycling performance and Coulombic efficiency of the MoSe2@PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets within a voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V. (d) The capacity of the MoSe2@PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets under different current densities between 0.01 and 3.0 V. Reproduced with permission of ref. [129]. Copyright 2015. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 11. Electrochemical performance of the MoSe2@ PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets for lithium batteries (the capacities were calculated based on MoSe2 mass). (a) Cyclic voltammogram profiles of the MoSe2@PHCS composite at a scan rate of 0.2 mV s−1. (b) Discharge/charge voltage profiles of the MoSe2@PHCS composite. (c) Cycling performance and Coulombic efficiency of the MoSe2@PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets within a voltage range of 0.01–3.0 V. (d) The capacity of the MoSe2@PHCS composite and MoSe2 nanosheets under different current densities between 0.01 and 3.0 V. Reproduced with permission of ref. [129]. Copyright 2015. Royal Society of Chemistry.
Materials 16 02559 g011
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ullah, N.; Guziejewski, D.; Yuan, A.; Shah, S.A. Recent Advancement and Structural Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Alkali Metal Ions Batteries. Materials 2023, 16, 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072559

AMA Style

Ullah N, Guziejewski D, Yuan A, Shah SA. Recent Advancement and Structural Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Alkali Metal Ions Batteries. Materials. 2023; 16(7):2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072559

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ullah, Nabi, Dariusz Guziejewski, Aihua Yuan, and Sayyar Ali Shah. 2023. "Recent Advancement and Structural Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Alkali Metal Ions Batteries" Materials 16, no. 7: 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072559

APA Style

Ullah, N., Guziejewski, D., Yuan, A., & Shah, S. A. (2023). Recent Advancement and Structural Engineering in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides for Alkali Metal Ions Batteries. Materials, 16(7), 2559. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16072559

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop