3.1. MFI and Physical Properties
Polypropylene is one of the lightest polymers, with a density below the density of water. Adding the rice husk and olive pit fibers into the PP matrix resulted in a slight increase in its melt and solid densities, p
m and p
s, respectively, as shown in
Table 4. The density increase is to be expected due to the partial collapse of the cellulose cells and the lumen of the fibers under the high pressure of the injection molding [
14]. A notable reduction in MFI was observed with the addition of rice husk and olive pits. Compared to PPv (
Table 4), the melt flow index of PPrh decreased by approximately 18% and 38% with an increase in the rice husk content. A similar trend was verified for PPop, where the reduction in MFI was approximately 21% and 36%. These findings follow previous research which attributes this phenomenon to the restriction of the polymer matrix flow due to fiber loading [
19]. The fibers effectively act as a thickening agent, reducing the fluidity of the PP polymer matrix in the vicinity of the fillers. As can be seen from
Table 4, the linear shrinkage of all the PPrh and PPop composites in the flow direction was lower than that of neat PP. The lowest shrinkage was observed for PPrh, constituting a decrease of 49% and 35%, respectively, for 30% and 20% rice husk content, as compared to PPv. Meanwhile, PPop also showed a significant but more moderate reduction in linear shrinkage, down to 23% and 30%, respectively, for 20% and 30% olive pit contents.
3.2. Thermal Properties
Compared to the virgin PP, the inclusion of the cellulosic fillers into the polymer matrix does not alter the melting (T
m) and crystallization (T
c) temperatures of the composites in a statistically significant way, independently of the type and content of the fillers, as shown in
Table 5. The enthalpy of fusion (H
m) was slightly lower for the composites compared to the PPv, which is expected, as the amount of PP matrix is lower. However, their crystalline content increased and was directly correlated with the amount of filler, regardless of its type, rising by 23% and 41% for PPrh and 23% and 40% for PPop. These findings corroborate the data reported in the literature [
4,
23], attributing the rise in crystal content to the interaction between the filler and PP matrix, promoting the nucleation of PP crystals around the rice husk and olive pit particles. A higher crystallinity indicates material stiffness [
37], suggesting that all the tested composites possessed a higher elastic modulus and decreased ductility.
3.3. Morphology Assessment
Based on the SEM micrographs (
Figure 1) of the fractured cross-sections of the tensile specimens, it becomes evident that the distribution of the fibers is not uniform. Additionally, there are indications of clamping, suggesting poor reinforcement/matrix adhesion and, consequently, lower performance of these composites during tensile tests, as seen in
Table 6, with lower values for the strain at break compared to the virgin PP. The non-uniform distribution and clamping were more pronounced in the case of olive pit NFCs (
Figure 1c,d), where dark areas (voids) resulted from the pulling of the fibers from the PP matrix. In contrast, in the rice husk specimens, it is evident that the NFCs showed a relatively more uniform distribution, particularly in PP30%rh (
Figure 1b).
Although the SEM micrographs provide a morphology assessment of high accuracy, they required destructive preparation of the samples, and the area under analysis was restricted. Micro CT X-ray inspection is a valuable, non-destructive technique to obtain insight into the anisotropy of the fillers’ distribution and the granulometry of the incorporated fibers. The fillers are identifiable at the cross sections of the 3D reconstruction of the micro-CT scans (
Figure 2). The non-uniformity of the olive pit particles’ distribution throughout the part thickness is evident in
Figure 2c,d while the distribution of the rice husk fibers (
Figure 2a,b) is more uniform. To quantitatively access the granulometry and fillers’ distribution through the thickness, three cross-section slices of the area, highlighted in the white box, in
Figure 2a, were analyzed using the particle analysis module of the ImageJ software. The analyzed scans were designated further in the text as the top, bottom, and middle, where the top and bottom were at 0.2 mm from the part’s surface and the middle indicated its center (
Figure 3).
The parts under analysis were obtained through injection molding, as described previously. As can be depicted from
Figure 4a,c,d,f, the clustering of the larger olive pit particles, independent of the fillers’ load, is consistent with the higher viscosity of the polymer melt, leading to larger particle retention in the vicinity of the mold wall. The declared maximum granulometry of the olive pit particles before compounding was 0.5 mm. However, the histogram of the olive pit particles’ size (
Figure 5) and X-ray diffraction micrographs (
Figure 1) show a significant variation in the particles’ dimensions, with many smaller particles. The latter is to be expected. First, it happens during grinding, then due to a higher mixing intensity during extrusion and injection molding and subsequent friction within the particles, leading to further size reductions and quantity increases, especially evident for granulometry between 15 and 215 µm equivalent diameter (De) (
Figure 5). There are more small-size particles in the middle of the part (
Figure 5), as well as lesser particle clustering (
Figure 4b,e). Due to lower polymer melt viscosity farther from the mold walls, smaller olive pit particles represent lesser resistance to the polymer flow, gravitating to the hotter middle of the part. The latter was more pronounced for olive pit contents higher than 30%. Nevertheless, there were few particles with granulometries ranging from 500 µm to 915 µm, possibly due to some olive pit particle grinding and sieving inefficiency. The particles’ aggregation and a large amount of the dispersed small-size particles leading to a larger interface area may explain the inferior mechanical performance of the PPop compared with PPrh (
Table 6 and
Table 7) due to poor bonding at the filler–matrix interface region and a decrease in the stress transfer from the matrix to the filler [
12].
The rice husk fibers had higher surface-to-area volume ratios and a more irregular shape than the olive pit particles, as shown in
Figure 6. Thus, their quantitative evaluation was limited to their relative orientation and assessment of the projected area in the different planes throughout the thickness (
Figure 7). The rice husk fibers were aligned along the part wall, as shown in
Figure 6a,c,d,f. The through-thickness projections of the rice husk fibers at the part surface were more extensive than in the middle (
Figure 6 and
Figure 7), where the fibers became more randomly oriented (
Figure 6b,e) for both PP20%rh and PP30%rh. The alignment of the rice husk fibers along the part wall increased the tensile and flexural moduli (
Table 6 and
Table 7) and decreased the shrinkage of these composites (
Table 4).
In addition, for PP30%rh, the rice husk fibers’ alignment along the mold wall was conducive to a higher flexural strength (31.44 MPa) compared to PPv (30.94 MPa), corroborating the conclusions of this material’s mechanical performance in the bending mode. The fibers’ alignment near the wall provided better fiber/matrix interlocking under compressive stresses. In addition, the mixing during extrusion and injection molding did not cause a significant reduction in the rice husk fibers’ size or the dispersion of small-size fibers in the PP matrix (
Figure 1a,b), contrary to that observed for olive pit particles (
Figure 1c,d). It should be noted that despite the declared maximum particle granulometry of 0.5 mm, many rice husk fibers with much larger dimensions were especially evident at the surface layers, sometimes reaching close to 1 mm in length (
Figure 6). In addition to some inefficiency in the sieving process, the high aspect ratio and irregular shape of the rice husk fibers may have contributed to this more significantly than specified granulometry variation, as the fibers may have passed through the sieve oriented perpendicularly to their smaller dimension.
3.4. Mechanical Properties
As shown in
Table 6, the elastic modulus (E) increased in all the composites when compared to PPv, with PP20%rh showing the highest increase (35%) and PP30%op exhibiting a lesser improvement (22%). The lower performance of PPop may be attributed to the olive pit particles’ agglomeration and a large amount of the dispersed small-size particles (
Figure 4), leading to a larger interface area of weak PP/filler interaction. Meanwhile, the rice husk fibers had higher surface-to-area volume ratios, which favored interlocking with the PP matrix.
The slight decrease in elastic moduli with an increase in filler content may be explained by an increase in the polymer matrix/filler interface area, as illustrated in
Figure 4 and
Figure 6, resulting in inadequate fiber-matrix adhesion and non-uniform stress transmission. The overall elastic modulus improvement indicates an increase in the composites’ rigidity, and the difference between the rice husk and olive pit composites may be due to the availability of more area for the rice husk particles to interact with the PP matrix [
23,
38]. The ultimate tensile strength (σ
u) also increased, showing a 21% improvement for PPrh independently of the fiber content. The ultimate tensile strength of PPop underwent a more moderate increase for PP20%op, while for the higher filler content (30%), there was almost no difference (1%) when compared to neat PP. Finally, the stiffness of the composites was reflected in a significant decrease in the tensile strain at break (ε
b), with the specimens rupturing at minimal elongation almost immediately after yielding. The deterioration of these properties can be directly linked to the higher content of the lignocellulosic fibers, their non-uniform distribution, and insufficient fiber wetting by the matrix [
7]. The reason for the latter may be associated with several functional groups, mainly the hydroxyl present at the fiber surface, which, in combination with the hydrophobic polymer matrices, results in a weak interfacial interaction [
39]. Such a phenomenon, in turn, leads to failure under load. Compared to PPv, the ductility losses were 96% for the NFCs with 20% filler content and 97% for the NFCs with 30% filler content, independently of the filler type (
Table 6). The discussed results corroborate the data shared by other researchers [
1,
4,
14,
22].
Table 6.
Tensile properties of the materials.
Table 6.
Tensile properties of the materials.
Material | E (MPa) | E↑ * (%) | σu (MPa) | σu ↑ * (%) | εb (%) | εb ↓ ** (%) |
---|
PPv | 1020.90 ± 67.00 | - | 16.28 ±0.74 | - | 238.2 ±136.3 | - |
PP20%rh | 1377.02 ± 198.2 | 35 | 19.65 ± 0.44 | 20.7 | 8.55 ± 1.19 | 96 |
PP30%rh | 1322.58 ± 170.63 | 30 | 19.64 ± 0.63 | 20.6 | 8.33 ± 1.40 | 97 |
PP20%op | 1305.80 ± 217.75 | 28 | 18.60 ± 0.53 | 14.3 | 9.93 ± 1.68 | 96 |
PP30%op | 1249.57 ± 239.78 | 22 | 16.59 ± 0.33 | 1.0 | 6.80 ± 1.05 | 97 |
The flexural modulus (E
f) increased for all the composites, as demonstrated in
Table 7. A more pronounced improvement was achieved using a higher concentration of olive pits and rice husk, with the latter showing more potential for enhancing the flexural modulus. Compared with virgin PP, E
f increased by 21% and 50% for PP20%rh and PP30%rh, respectively. On the other hand, PPop showed more moderate improvement. These results align with the trend reported by other researchers [
3,
23]. In the case of flexural strength (σ
f), a slight decrease was observed for most composites (
Table 7), particularly notable for PPop. The deterioration of flexural strengths may be attributed to agglomerations of fillers in the matrix, filler moisture retention, and weak interlocking between the matrix and filler [
1]. Meanwhile, there was one exception to this trend: PP30%rh displayed a slight improvement of about 1.6% in flexural strength due to better interlocking of the PP matrix and the rice husk fibers and their alignment along the mold wall (
Figure 6).
Table 7.
Flexural properties of the materials.
Table 7.
Flexural properties of the materials.
Material | Ef (MPa) | Ef ↑ * (%) | σf (MPa) | σf Variation (%) |
---|
PPv | 1045.30 ± 42.84 | - | 30.94 ± 0.94 | - |
PP20%rh | 1263.42 ± 77.10 | 21 | 30.29 ± 0.83 | −2.1 |
PP30%rh | 1572.39 ± 66.97 | 50 | 31.44 ± 0.88 | +1.6 |
PP20%op | 1170.49 ± 47.33 | 12 | 28.61 ± 0.84 | −7.5 |
PP30%op | 1356.54 ± 95.49 | 30 | 28.97 ± 1.44 | −6.4 |
In addition, an increase in stiffness is conducive to lower shrinkage [
15]; therefore, the higher content of the rice husk is directly correlated with a higher modulus and inversely correlated with the shrinkage, which noticeably decreased in comparison to PPv, down to 49% for PPrh (shrinkage 0.67%) and 30% for PPop (shrinkage 0.85%), as shown in
Figure 8. The same trend was also verified for PPop but was less pronounced.
3.5. Chemical Composition
Figure 9 and
Figure 10 show the EDS spectra and the respective zones of the samples under analysis. The samples’ chemical compositions are listed in
Table 8. It should be noted that the equipment used did not detect elements with an atomic number less than 3. The X–ray diffraction analysis of PPrh (
Figure 9a,b) shows the presence of carbon, oxygen, and silica. The former two elements are present in all lignocellulosic fibers, mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin, and carbon also originates from the PP matrix (
Figure 9c). The presence of silica is a contribution from the rice husk, especially abundant at the protuberances on the outer and the inner epidermis adjacent to the rice kernel, as has been reported by other authors [
3,
40].
Considering that the primary molecular compounds of olive pits are mainly hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen, in the case of PPop (
Figure 10), only carbon and oxygen were detected. As shown in
Figure 9b and
Figure 10b and
Table 8, the amount of oxygen rose with an increase in the fiber load, proportionally to a decrease in the amount of carbon. The same observation was valid for silica, which more than doubled with the increased rice husk content, shown in
Figure 9b.
3.6. Short-Term Water Absorption
The greatest problem when using lignocellulosic filler in composite materials is its strong sensitivity to water, which is detrimental to their mechanical performance and durability [
41]. To explore the potential applicability of the rice husk and olive pit PP-based composites for use in humid conditions, a 24 h immersion test was carried out, the results of which are shown in
Table 9 and
Figure 11. As was expected, the water absorption in PPv was less than 0.02% due to its intrinsic hydrophobicity. The inclusion of rice husk and olive pit in the PP matrix led to a significant increase in the water uptake, 0.27% for PPrh and 0.17% for PPop, the value increasing with the filler load independently of its type. It must be mentioned that the thicker specimens (FS) showed lower water absorption, as depicted in
Figure 11, corroborating the data reported in earlier research [
42] regarding to the short-term water immersion. For all the composites, higher water absorption occurred at higher filler loading due to the hydrophilic nature of the cellulosic fibers. The presence of hydroxyl (OH) groups between the macromolecules of the cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin fiber cell walls promotes the interaction with the water molecules through hydrogen bond formation and reduces the interfacial adhesion between the fiber and the matrix [
24,
42,
43,
44,
45].
For the rice husk composites, the amount of water absorbed in 24 h was several times lower than reported by Erdogan et al. [
3] for PP rice husk composites with similar fiber loads obtained through compression molding. The different processing methods may explain this discrepancy, as the injection-molded specimens were more densely packed when solidifying while constrained under a high pressure. This may have made them less susceptible to water absorption.
The higher water absorption of PPrh compared to PPop may be attributed to various factors such as filler composition, fiber porosity, and the fibers’ orientations in the PP matrix [
36]. Considering that the leading causes of water absorption in cellulosic fibers are, by order of importance, hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin [
43], the amount of hemicellulose in the rice husk is significantly higher than that in the olive pit, as shown in
Table 10, promoting the higher water sorption. Moreover, the surface-to-area volume ratios of the rice husk fibers (
Figure 6) are larger than that of the olive pits (
Figure 4). A larger-interface area of the rice husk particles with the PP matrix and its high porosity [
46] leads to a higher water uptake than that of PPop.