Next Article in Journal
Effect of Nitrogen on Growth and Optical Properties of Single-Crystal Diamond Synthesized by Chemical Vapor Deposition
Next Article in Special Issue
State of the Art Review for Titanium Fluorine Glasses and Glass Ceramics
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Bilayer Heterogeneous MOFs in pH and Heat-Triggered Systems for Controllable Fragrance Release
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation of Ceramic Fiber Threads with Enhanced Abrasion Resistance Performance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Forming Intragranular Structure

1
Chaozhou Branch of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory, Chaozhou 521000, China
2
Hubei Technology Innovation Center for Advanced Composites, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3
State Key Lab of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and Processing, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2024, 17(6), 1309; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061309
Submission received: 5 February 2024 / Revised: 8 March 2024 / Accepted: 9 March 2024 / Published: 12 March 2024

Abstract

:
The distribution of second phase particles in the microstructure of composite ceramics affects the mechanical properties, and the intragranular structures often result in better properties compared to the intergranular structures. However, it is difficult to obtain composite ceramics with intragranular structure by conventional route. To produce composite ceramics with an intragranular structure in a simpler route. In this work, starting powders with different phase compositions were obtained by the co-precipitation method, and zirconia toughened alumina (ZTA) composite ceramics were prepared with these starting powders by spark plasma sintering (SPS). The results show that it is easier to fabricate ZTA composite ceramics with an intragranular structure by using composite powders containing amorphous or transition phase Al2O3 as starting materials. The phase composition of the powder prepared by the co-precipitation method after calcination at 1100 °C is θ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2, and the average grain size after sintering at 1500 °C is 1.04 ± 0.28 µm, and the maximum Vickers hardness and fracture toughness of the specimens reach 19.37 ± 0.43 GPa and 6.18 ± 0.06 MPa·m1/2, respectively. The ZrO2 particles were the core of crystallization and grow together with the Al2O3 matrix, forming the intragranular structure of ZTA ceramics. This work may provide a new idea for preparing composite ceramics with intragranular structure.

1. Introduction

Alumina (Al2O3) ceramics are widely used in a variety of advanced technologies due to its high hardness, strength, corrosion resistance and thermal shock resistance, however, the high brittleness restricts some of its applications [1,2]. In general, Al2O3-based composite ceramics possess better properties than single-phase Al2O3 ceramics [3,4,5,6]. Zirconia, especially stabilized t-ZrO2 (tetragonal zirconia), possess a high fracture toughness due to the phase transformation (tetragonal zirconia to monoclinic zirconia) toughening effect [7,8,9]. Ipek et al. [10]. added 10% zirconia to alumina, the Vickers hardness and fracture toughness of ceramics increased from 11.6 GPa and 3.2 MPa m1/2 to 16.8 GPa and 4.9 MPa m1/2, respectively. Therefore, composite ceramics of Al2O3 and ZrO2 exhibit both high hardness and high fracture toughness, commonly considered for the application of cutting tools [11,12], dies [13] and orthopedic implants [14], this composite ceramic material is known as ZTA (zirconia toughen alumina) ceramic.
Sintering is the key process for the preparation of ZTA ceramics. The SPS technique enables rapid densification of nano powders through the application of pressure and high-intensity currents, making it a commonly employed method for the preparation of ZTA ceramics. It was known that SPS sintering enables high heating rate and short holding time thus lead to ceramics with a refined microstructure and resulting good mechanical properties [15]. Besides, the phase transformation assisted sintering is also an effective sintering technique [16].The phase transformation from metastable to stable phase easily occurs during the sintering process of starting powders with compositions of metastable phase, which promotes atomic diffusion and particle rearrangement, and facilitates efficient densification into a fully dense structure at lower temperatures without severe grain growth [17]. Eliko et al. [15] used porous γ-Al2O3 as the raw material and obtained alumina ceramics with a relative density of 99% by SPS sintering at 1550 °C, but applying pressure at high temperatures led to rapid grain growth with an average grain size of 8.5 µm. Xu et al. [16] prepared amorphous composite powders composed of 60 mol% alumina and 40 mol% stabilized zirconia using the sol-gel method, ZTA composite ceramics were obtained by hot pressing and the amorphous powders were used as starting powders. The results show that amorphous powders can be sintered into dense composite ceramics at much lower temperatures, and that the easier densification of amorphous powders is because of the higher free energy and finer particle size of their metastable states. Therefore, the phase composition of the starting powder has an important effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties of the ceramics. To better compare the effects of starting powders with different phase compositions on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics, in this study, starting powders with different phase compositions were prepared using the co-precipitation method, which requires only a change in the calcination temperature to obtain powders with different phase compositions, and SPS was used to achieve rapid sintering of these powders.
The microstructure of the grains in composite ceramics is also an important factor affecting the mechanical properties. Previous research shows that preparing composite ceramics with intragranular structure could improve their mechanical properties. Niihara [18] classified nanocomposites into three types based on the position of SiC in the Al2O3 matrix: intragranular type (the ZrO2 grains are located in the interior of the Al2O3 grains), intergranular type (the ZrO2 grains are located in the boundaries of the Al2O3 grains) and intergranular/intergranular type. If most of the SiC was located inside the Al2O3 grains, the mechanical properties of the composites are significantly improved. Verma et al. [19] prepared zirconia reinforced alumina ceramics with intragranular structure by sintering powders obtained through sol-gel method, which improved hardness and wear resistance as compared to the conventional works. Du et al. [20] prepared ZTA ceramics with a large amount of intragranular structure by microwave sintering, with relative densities, flexural strengths, fracture toughness, and Vickers hardness of 99.07%, 520.21 MPa, 7.64 MPa·m1/2, and 18.79 GPa, respectively. However, there is no systematic discussion on the formation conditions of the composite ceramics with intragranular structure. The content of the second phase, the dispersion of the starting powder and the mixing uniformity of each phase may affect the formation of the intragranular structure. Therefore, it is difficult to prepare composite ceramics with a large amount of intragranular structure, the usual process for mixing the matrix powder and the second phase powder directly for sintering often results in composites with an intergranular structure. How to stably control the formation of a large amount of intragranular structure is a problem worth studying.
In this paper, a new and simple route is used to prepare ZTA ceramics containing a large number of intragranular structures, which does not require a powder mixing step: starting powders with different phase compositions were obtained at different calcination temperatures in the co-precipitation method, ZTA composite ceramics with intragranular structures were prepared by SPS using powders with different phase compositions. Amorphous and transition phase powders are much easier to the formation of intragranular structure in the SPS sintering of ZTA ceramics, the mechanical properties and formation mechanism were presented.

2. Materials and Experimental Methods

Al2O3-ZrO2 composite powders were prepared by co-precipitation method with composition of 85 wt.% Al2O3 and 15 wt.% ZrO2. Ammonium aluminum sulfate dodecahydrate (AlNH4(SO4)2·12H2O, AR, 99.0%), zirconyl chloride octahydrate (ZrOCl2·8H2O, AR, 99.0%) and ammonium bicarbonate (NH4HCO3, AR, 99.0%) were used as the raw materials, all these materials were provided by Innochem Technology, Beijing, China.
In powder production, the precipitant solution of NH4HCO3 was first prepared by dissolving in deionized water, the metal salt solution of AlNH4(SO4)2·12H2O and ZrOCl2·8H2O were also prepared by dissolving in deionized water and stirred for 60 min using a stirrer. Then, the metal salt solution was added drop wise into the constantly stirred precipitant solution for precipitation at 45 °C. At the end of precipitation, the solution was stirred for an additional hour to ensure full reaction completion. After the reaction, the precipitate was aged in the original solution for 24 h and washed three times with deionized water to remove impurity ions and then washed twice with ethanol to replace the deionized water. Finally, the ethanol washed precipitate was calcinated at 700–1300 °C in a muffle furnace for 2 h after dried at 60 °C for 24 h. After calcination, the powders were compacted by SPS to 10 mm diameter discs at 1500 °C for 10 min with heating rate of 100 °C/min and axial pressure of 50 MPa.

3. Characterization Methods

Phase analysis of powders and sintered samples were performed by Rigaku instrument by using Cu Kα radiation X Ray diffraction (XRD, SmartLab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan), in the 2θ range of 10–80°. To determine the temperature of thermal decomposition and phase transformations of powders in calcination. Thermal Gravimetry (TG) and Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC, Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland) measurements of dried powders were performed in a temperature range of 40–1400 °C at a scanning rate of 20 K/min in N2 (nitrogen).
The morphology and particle size of powders were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM, Regulus8100, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). In order to observe the surface and microstructure of sintered samples, the surface of each sample was grounded and polished through polishing machine using a diamond paste and put in a box furnace for heat treatment at 1300 °C for 30 min. The microstructure was observed through SEM. Based on the SEM images, the grain size of sintered samples was measured by linear intercept method in Nano Measurer software (Version 1.2), and 100 grains were measured for each sample. The density of all sintered samples was evaluated by Archimedes method. The Vickers hardness of the polished samples was evaluated by a hardness tester (430SVD, Wolpert, Norwood, MA, USA) under a load of 49 N for 15 s with 10 points, and calculated by the follow formula [21]:
H = 0.18544 P d 2
where, P is the applied load, and d is the average length of the two diagonal lines of the indentation.
The fracture toughness of sintered samples was examined by indentation method (IM) and calculated by the follow formula [22]:
K I C = 0.016 ( E H ) 1 / 2 ( P c 3 / 2 )
In this formula, KIC is fracture toughness, E is Young’s Modulus (348 GPa in this work, obtained by measuring the sound velocity of the samples), H is Vickers hardness, c is half length of crack, P is the load.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Powder Preparation

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the precipitate and ZTA powders calcinated at different temperature, the phase evolutions are presented. For the precipitate, only X-ray peaks of ammonium aluminum carbonate hydroxide (AlNH4(OH)2CO3, AACH) were present, indicating that the components containing zirconium were amorphous cause the Zirconium hydroxide (Zr(OH)4) precipitates were amorphous. After calcinated at 700 °C, the XRD pattern was composed of only broad maxima with no obvious peaks, indicating that both Al2O3 and ZrO2 were amorphous. Diffraction of γ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2 appeared when the calcination temperature raised to 900 °C because of the crystallization from the amorphous powders. The phase transformation from γ-Al2O3 to θ-Al2O3 took place at the calcination temperature of 1100 °C. The diffraction peaks of α-Al2O3 were detected in the powders after calcinated at 1300 °C because of the phase transformation from θ-Al2O3 to α-Al2O3. Due to the stabilization of Y2O3, ZrO2 has only tetragonal form and the diffraction peaks of m-ZrO2 (monoclinic zirconia) were not found at all calcination temperature.
The TG-DSC curves of the precipitate are displayed in Figure 2. There was a large endothermic peak at about 227 °C and showed a large weight loss on the TG curve due to the decomposition of carbonate and hydroxide in the precipitate. There were two small exothermic peaks at 895.6 °C and 1297.3 °C was detected on the DSC curves. Based on the previous work on the phase transformation process of amorphous ZTA powders and the DSC curves of γ-Al2O3 [23,24], the peaks at 895.6 °C and 1297.3 °C on the DSC curves in this study could be attributed to the phase transformation of amorphous phase to γ-Al2O3 and θ-Al2O3 to α-Al2O3, respectively. Since the γ to θ phase transformation of Al2O3 is a non-reconstructive transition, there is no significant DSC signal detected. The temperature of the phase transformation to α-Al2O3 is about 1200 °C in pure Al2O3, which is lower than this work, indicating that the existence of ZrO2 hinders the phase transformation to α-Al2O3. In fact, it can be considered that the transformation to α-Al2O3 is inhibited by ZrO2 based on the work and conclusions of Ipek et al. [10] who synthesized Al2O3-ZrO2 composite powder by a co-precipitation method. Therefore, to study the influence of powders with different phase of Al2O3 on mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics through SPS sintering, the powders with calcination temperatures of 700 °C, 900 °C, 1100 °C and 1300 °C were selected as the starting powders for SPS sintering. The phase composition of the starting powders is listed in Table 1.
Figure 3 shows the SEM images of ZTA powders calcinated at different temperature. According to these images, the powders with the calcination temperature of 700 °C (C700 powders) was composed of extremely small particles, and there was no obvious boundary between the particles. The powders still agglomerated and the size has increased at the calcination temperature of 900 °C. When the calcination temperature rises to 1100 °C, the powder presents a better spherical shape and good dispersion with the size of about 50 nm. After calcination at 1300 °C, the Al2O3 particles grow rapidly and presented worm-like morphology with a larger size of about 500 nm. It is clear that smaller spherical ZrO2 particles are embedded on the surface and within the larger worm-like Al2O3 in Figure 3d. During the powder calcination stage before sintering, large amount of ZrO2, as the second phase, has been enveloped by large Al2O3 particles, forming an internal crystalline phase.

4.2. Microstructure of the ZTA Ceramics

XRD patterns of samples sintered at 1500 °C are shown in Figure 4. Samples sintered from C700, C900 and C1100 powders consist solely of t-ZrO2 and α-Al2O3, whereas the sample sintered from C1300 powder contains a small quantity of m-ZrO2, this indicates that the Al2O3 matrix in the samples sintered from C1300 powders does not effectively bind the ZrO2 grains, and part of the t-ZrO2 to m-ZrO2 phase transformation occurred during the cooling process, resulting in the formation of m-ZrO2. Smuk et al. [25] reported that the t-ZrO2 is an important factor in improving the fracture toughness of ZTA composite ceramics. The transformation from the t-ZrO2 to m-ZrO2 absorbs the energy required for crack propagation, causes volume change, and inhibits crack propagation, increasing the fracture toughness of ZTA composite ceramics.
The microstructure of sintered samples was depicted in Figure 5, and the EDS mapping images was shown in Figure 6. According to the SEM and EDS images, the light regions belong to the phase enriched in Zr and Y while the dark phase were Al2O3 grains. In the samples sintered from C700, C900 and C1100 powders, the ZrO2 grains present two distribution states: intragranular type (the ZrO2 grains are located in the interior of the Al2O3 grains) and intergranular type (the ZrO2 grains are located in the boundaries of the Al2O3 grains). However, less amount of intragranular type ZrO2 was found in the samples sintered form C1300 powders, which indicates that the intragranular structure is more easily formed by SPS sintering of powder before the transformation to α-Al2O3 and the growth of the Al2O3. According to Niihara [18], the second phase particles are the core of crystallization, and the matrix and the second phase particles grow together to form the internal intragranular structure. In this work, zirconia particles can be considered as the crystal nucleus of Al2O3 phase transformation and crystallization. There is no systematic study on the formation mechanism of intragranular structures in composite ceramics, but it seems possible to fabricate composite ceramics with an intragranular structures by controlling the phase composition of the Al2O3 in the starting composite powder.
Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of Al2O3 grain sizes in sintered samples. The grain size initially increases and then decreases as the starting powder calcination temperature increases. The average grain sizes of Al2O3 in the samples were 1.68 ± 0.57 µm, 1.82 ± 0.42 µm, 1.04 ± 0.28 µm, and 0.82 ± 0.23 µm, correspondingly. This indicates that the grain size after sintering of amorphous and transition phase powders is much larger than that after sintering of crystalline powders. According to the research of Lee et al. [26], due to high driving force and the existence of singular boundaries of sintered body, amorphous alumina powders show abnormal grain growth after SPS sintering above 1500 °C and the number of abnormally grown grains increases with the duration of holding time, which does not occur in SPS sintering of crystalline powders. The metastable powders typically have higher sintering activity [27], in his work, C700, C900 and C1100 powders contains metastable Al2O3, which prone to the increasing of grain size during the sintering process.

4.3. Mechanical Properties of the ZTA Ceramics

Figure 8 demonstrates influence of different calcination temperature of starting powders on relative density, hardness and fracture toughness after SPS sintering. The relative densities of the sintered samples first increased and then decreased with the increase of calcination temperature. The sample sintered from C700 powders shows low densities of 4.14 g/cm3 due to the fact that the powders were amorphous with very small particle size and need to undergo crystallization (amorphous → γ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2) and phase transformations (γ-Al2O3 → θ-Al2O3 → α-Al2O3) in a very short sintering time, so the pores cannot be eliminated. Meanwhile, the severe agglomeration of the starting powders also makes it difficult to achieve densification. Due to the small particle size (50 nm) and good dispersion of the starting powders, the sample sintered form C1100 powders was densified with a higher relative density of 4.25 g/cm3. Because of the worm-like morphology and lager particle size of the powders with calcination temperature of 1300 °C, it is easier to form pores in sintering process, showing a lower relative density of 4.18 g/cm3, such pores are difficult to remove even after sintering at higher temperatures. The Vickers hardness and fracture toughness of the samples initially rise and then decline as the calcination temperature increases. The samples sintered from C700 and C900 powders exhibit lower hardness because of their bigger grain size and low densities. The sample sintered form C1100 powders displays significantly higher Vickers hardness of 19.37 ± 0.43 GPa and fracture toughness of 6.18 ± 0.06 MPa·m1/2. In comparison, the sample sintered from C1300 powders shows the Vickers hardness of 19.21 ± 0.44 GPa and extremely low fracture toughness of 4.79 ± 0.05 MPa·m1/2. This is due to fact that part of the t-ZrO2 in the sample cannot achieve effect of phase transformation toughening, resulting in lower fracture toughness than other samples. First, the intragranular structure can better bind the Al2O3 matrix to the ZrO2 particles and keep ZrO2 particles in the tetragonal phase, and the intragranular ZrO2 particles inhibit crack expansion, making the expansion path more tortuous and consuming a large amount of fracture energy to achieve the toughening effect. Second, the nano-composite effect could improve the hardness and fracture toughness of the material. Du et al. [20] supposed that the toughening mechanism of intragranular structure mainly results from local stresses surrounding the intragranular organization, which strengthens the primary grain boundaries and induces perforation fracture. Additionally, there is crack deflection, bridging, and the intragranular ZrO2 particles’ pulling out during the fracture process, as well as the t-ZrO2 to m-ZrO2 phase transformation contribute to the toughening effect [28]. Meanwhile, the presence of the intragranular structure leads to the appearance of sub grain boundaries within the Al2O3 grain, which is similar to the refinement of the structure and achieves the effect of fine-grained strengthening.
To better compare the mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics, the information from previous studies was summarized in Table 2. The fracture toughness values mostly ranged from 4 to 7 MPa·m1/2, while the Vickers hardness values ranged from 17 to 20 GPa. Obviously, ZTA ceramics with intragranular structure typically exhibit higher fracture toughness, indicating that intragranular structure effectively improved the fracture toughness of ZTA ceramics, but its relationship with hardness was not obvious. Noted that Vickers hardness and fracture toughness are affected by multiple factors, and that the highest hardness and fracture toughness values can be achieved through a combination of fine grains, high relative densities and specific microstructures [29]. The C1100 powders (starting powders with a phase composition of θ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2) possess the best mechanical properties after sintering due to the small particle size, good dispersion, and proper sintering activity. θ-Al2O3 as a transition Al2O3 contributes to the formation of the intragranular structure, resulting in relatively high Vickers hardness and fracture toughness of ceramics. Thus, the starting powders with a phase composition of θ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2 possess relatively high Vickers hardness and fracture toughness after sintering due to its small particle size, good dispersion and suitable sintering activity.
The equations for calculating fracture toughness as follow [34,36]:
K I C = 0.0309 × E H 0.4 × P c 1.5
K I C = 0.16 H a c a 3 2 , f o r c a > 1.8
where, a is half of the indentation diagonal.

5. Conclusions

In this work, a new and simple route was employed to produce ZTA ceramics with intragranular structures. Al2O3–ZrO2 composite powders with different phase compositions were fabricated by controlling the calcination temperature using the co-precipitation method and the phase evolutions in calcination process are given. The effect of starting powders with different phase compositions on mechanical properties and microstructure of ZTA ceramics were investigated. The phase composition of the starting powders has an important influence on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ZTA composite ceramics. Using composite powders that contain amorphous or transition phase Al2O3 as starting materials makes it easier to fabricate ZTA composite ceramics with an intragranular structure but the grain size is larger compared to sintering the crystalline powder. Starting powders with a phase composition of θ-Al2O3 and t-ZrO2 sintered by SPS achieved hardness and fracture toughness of 19.37 ± 0.43 GPa and 6.18 ± 0.06 MPa·m1/2, respectively. The ZrO2 particles were the core of crystallization and grow together with the Al2O3 matrix, forming the intragranular structure of ZTA ceramics. This work could provide new guidance for fabricating intragranular structure composite ceramics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., G.L. and R.T.; methodology, J.L., Q.C., X.Z., X.G. and R.D.; software, Q.C.; validation, X.Z., X.G. and R.D.; formal analysis, Q.C.; investigation, Q.C. and X.Z.: resources, J.L., G.L., Q.S. and R.T.; data curation, Q.C. and X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.C.; writing—review and editing, J.L. and G.L.; visualization, Q.C.; supervision, J.L. and G.L.; project administration, J.L., G.L., Q.S. and R.T.; funding acquisition, J.L. and G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (2021B0707050001); Chaozhou City, the second batch of special plans for science and technology (202202ZD01); Guangdong Major Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research (2021B0301030001); National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFB3802300).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data, models, and code generated or used during the study appear in the submitted article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Chaozhou Branch of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory and Wuhan University of Technology (WHUT) for the support provided for this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abyzov, A.M. Aluminum Oxide and Alumina Ceramics (Review). Part 1. Properties of Al2O3 and Commercial Production of Dispersed Al2O3. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2019, 60, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khalid, M.W.; Kim, Y.I.; Haq, M.A.; Lee, D.; Kim, B.S.; Lee, B. Microwave Hybrid Sintering of Al2O3 and Al2O3–ZrO2 Composites, and Effects of ZrO2 Crystal Structure on Mechanical Properties, Thermal Properties, and Sintering Kinetics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 9002–9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chai, J.; Zhu, Y.; Gao, X.; Shen, T.; Niu, L.; Li, S.; Jin, P.; Cui, M.; Wang, Z. Effects of Residual Stress and Intragranular Particles on Mechanical Properties of Hot-Pressed Al2O3/SiC Ceramic Composites. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 23258–23265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kosyanov, D.Y.; Liu, X.; Vornovskikh, A.A.; Zavjalov, A.P.; Zakharenko, A.M.; Kosianova, A.A.; Fedorets, A.N.; Shichalin, O.O.; Leonov, A.A.; Li, W.; et al. Al2O3–Ce:YAG Composite Ceramics for High Brightness Lighting: Cerium Doping Effect. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 887, 161486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Khalile, N.; Petit, C.; Meunier, C.; Valdivieso, F. Microwave Sintering of Zirconia Toughened Alumina—Influence of the Type and Content of Doping in Zirconia. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 36218–36224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pligovka, A.; Lazavenka, A.; Zakhlebayeva, A. Electro-Physical Properties of Niobia Columnlike Nanostructures via the Anodizing of Al/Nb Layers. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO), Cork, Ireland, 23–26 July 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  7. Liu, L.; Maeda, K.; Onda, T.; Chen, Z.-C. Effect of YSZ with Different Y2O3 Contents on Toughening Behavior of Al2O3/Ba-β-Al2O3/ZrO2 Composites. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 18037–18043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arab, A.; Ahmad, Z.A.; Ahmad, R. Effects of Yttria Stabilized Zirconia (3Y-TZP) Percentages on the ZTA Dynamic Mechanical Properties. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2015, 50, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Meunier, C.; Zuo, F.; Peillon, N.; Saunier, S.; Marinel, S.; Goeuriot, D. In Situ Study on Microwave Sintering of ZTA Ceramic: Effect of ZrO2 Content on Densification, Hardness, and Toughness. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 100, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ipek, M.; Zeytin, S.; Bindal, C. An Evaluation of Al2O3–ZrO2 Composites Produced by Coprecipitation Method. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 486–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prajapati, P.K.; Biswas, P.; Singh, B.K.; Bapanapalle, C.O.; Ghosh, R.; Mandal, N. Reinforcing Potential of MWCNTs on Mechanical and Machining Performance of Hot-Pressed ZTA-MgO Ceramic Cutting Inserts. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2023, 138, 110202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Norfauzi, T.; Hadzley, A.; Azlan, U.; Afuza, A.; Faiz, M.; Naim, M. Fabrication and Machining Performance of Ceramic Cutting Tool Based on the Al2O3-ZrO2-Cr2O3 Compositions. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2019, 8, 5114–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sktani, Z.D.I.; Rejab, N.A.; Ahmad, Z.A. Tougher and Harder Zirconia Toughened Alumina (ZTA) Composites through in Situ Microstructural Formation of LaMgAl11O19. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2019, 79, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Terrizzi, A.R.; Fersini, M.; Contaldi, V.; Kunjalukkal Padmanabhan, S.; Einarsrud, M.-A.; Licciulli, A. Mechanical and Tribological Properties of Injection Molded Zirconia-Alumina for Orthopedic Implants. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 31211–31222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tõldsepp, E.; Schoenstein, F.; Amamra, M.; Saar, R.; Feldbach, E.; Kanaev, A.; Kirm, M. Spark Plasma Sintering of Ultra-Porous γ-Al2O3. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 11709–11715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, X.; Su, X.; Liu, J. Low-Temperature Preparation of Al2O3-ZrO2 Nanoceramics via Pressureless Sintering Assisted by Amorphous Powders. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 783, 806–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Azar, M.; Palmero, P.; Lombardi, M.; Garnier, V.; Montanaro, L.; Fantozzi, G.; Chevalier, J. Effect of Initial Particle Packing on the Sintering of Nanostructured Transition Alumina. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 28, 1121–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Niihara, K. New design concepts of structural ceramics–ceramic nanocomposites. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 1991, 99, 974–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yi, M.; Wang, J.; Bai, X.; Xu, Y.; Xiao, G.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, J.; Chen, H.; Xu, C. Synthesis and Properties Characterization of an Al2O3-Based Ceramic Materials with Intragranular Self-Lubricating Nanostructure. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2022, 104, 105800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, W.; Ai, Y.; He, W.; Chen, W.; Liang, B.; Lv, C. Formation and Control of “Intragranular” ZrO2 Strengthened and Toughened Al2O3 Ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 8452–8461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moraes, M.C.C.D.S.E.B.D.; Elias, C.N.; Duailibi Filho, J.; Oliveira, L.G.D. Mechanical Properties of Alumina-Zirconia Composites for Ceramic Abutments. Mater. Res. 2004, 7, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sagar, K.G.; Suresh, P.M. A Critical Evaluation of Indentation Techniques for Measuring the Hardness vs Toughness: A Review. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2018), Karnataka, India, 19–20 April 2018; p. 020073. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, A.; Geng, H.; Ren, S.; Tao, X.; Liu, J. Enhanced Plasticity by Nanocrystallite in Bulk Amorphous Al2O3–ZrO2–Y2O3. Int. J. Plast. 2016, 79, 314–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lamouri, S.; Hamidouche, M.; Bouaouadja, N.; Belhouchet, H.; Garnier, V.; Fantozzi, G.; Trelkat, J.F. Control of the γ-Alumina to α-Alumina Phase Transformation for an Optimized Alumina Densification. Bol. Soc. Esp. Cerámica Vidr. 2017, 56, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Smuk, B.; Szutkowska, M.; Walter, J. Alumina Ceramics with Partially Stabilized Zirconia for Cutting Tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2003, 133, 195–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, K.T.; Cha, S.I.; Kim, K.T.; Lee, K.H.; Hong, S.H. Sintering Behavior, Microstructural Evolution, and Mechanical Properties of Ultra-Fine Grained Alumina Synthesized via in-Situ Spark Plasma Sintering. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 4290–4297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, X.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, R.; Zhu, S.; Bai, Y.; Fang, C.; Li, J.; Chen, C.; Zheng, Y. Pressureless Sintering Behaviour of Al2O3/ZrO2 Amorphous/Solid Solution Powder with Ultra-Fine ZrO2 Nanoparticle Precipitation. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 39886–39897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patil, S.; Patil, D.R.; Jung, I.C.; Ryu, J. Effect of Cooling Rates on Mechanical Properties of Alumina-Toughened Zirconia Composites. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 21048–22105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Li, J.; Zhong, X.; Luo, G.; Cai, Q.; Shen, Q.; Tu, R.; Guo, X.; Ding, R. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dense ZTA Ceramics with High Cr2O3 Solution. J. Mater. Sci. 2023, 58, 7868–7879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, W.; Ai, Y.L.; Liu, C.H.; Zhang, J.P.; Ding, J.Y. Microstructure and Properties of Al2O3-ZrO2(n) Composite Ceramics Prepared by Microwave Sintering. Adv. Mater. Res. 2010, 177, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yu, W.; Zheng, Y.; Yu, Y.; Su, X. Combustion Synthesis Assisted Water Atomization-Solid Solution Precipitation: A New Guidance for Nano-ZTA Ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 4313–4321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sommer, F.; Landfried, R.; Kern, F.; Gadow, R. Mechanical Properties of Zirconia Toughened Alumina with 10–24vol.% 1.5mol% Y-TZP Reinforcement. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 3905–3910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xia, J.-F.; Nian, H.-Q.; Liu, W.; Wang, X.-G.; Jiang, D.-Y. Effect of Cr2O3 Derived from Cr(NO3)3·9H2O Precursor on the Densification and Mechanical Properties of Zirconia-Toughened Alumina (ZTA) Composites. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 9116–9124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, Z.; Liu, W.; Wu, H.; Huang, R.; He, R.; Jiang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Ji, X.; Tian, Z.; Wu, S. Research into the Mechanical Properties, Sintering Mechanism and Microstructure Evolution of Al2O3-ZrO2 Composites Fabricated by a Stereolithography-Based 3D Printing Method. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 207, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, G.; Xie, Z.; Wu, Y. Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of Homogeneous Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Cyclic Solution Infiltration and in Situ Precipitation. Mater. Des. 2011, 32, 3440–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Niihara, K.; Morena, R.; Hasselman, D.P.H. Evaluation of KIc of Brittle Solids by the Indentation Method with Low Crack-to-Indent Ratios. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 1982, 1, 13–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the precipitate and ZTA powders calcinated at different temperature.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the precipitate and ZTA powders calcinated at different temperature.
Materials 17 01309 g001
Figure 2. TG-DSC curves of the precipitate powders.
Figure 2. TG-DSC curves of the precipitate powders.
Materials 17 01309 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Figure 3. SEM images of (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Materials 17 01309 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Materials 17 01309 g004
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the polished surface of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Figure 5. SEM micrographs of the polished surface of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Materials 17 01309 g005
Figure 6. EDS mapping images for Al, O, Zr, Y elements of sample sintered from C1100 powders.
Figure 6. EDS mapping images for Al, O, Zr, Y elements of sample sintered from C1100 powders.
Materials 17 01309 g006
Figure 7. Al2O3 grain size distribution of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Figure 7. Al2O3 grain size distribution of samples sintered from (a) C700, (b) C900, (c) C1100, and (d) C1300 powders.
Materials 17 01309 g007
Figure 8. Influence of different calcination temperature of starting powders on relative density, hardness and fracture toughness after SPS sintering.
Figure 8. Influence of different calcination temperature of starting powders on relative density, hardness and fracture toughness after SPS sintering.
Materials 17 01309 g008
Table 1. Phase composition of the starting powders.
Table 1. Phase composition of the starting powders.
Sample IdentityCalcination Temperature (°C)Phase Composition
C700700amorphous
C900900t-ZrO2 and γ-Al2O3
C11001100t-ZrO2 and θ-Al2O3
C13001300t-ZrO2 and α-Al2O3
Table 2. The mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics and related comparisons.
Table 2. The mechanical properties of ZTA ceramics and related comparisons.
MaterialZrO2 ContentKIC
(MPa·m1/2)
Equation Type of IMHv (GPa)ZrO2 DistributionSintering
This work25.0 wt.%6.18 ± 0.06 (IM)Anstis, Equation (2)19.30 ± 0.43Intragranular/intergranularSPS
Al2O3/ZrO2 [30]15.0 wt.%6.41 (IM)Anstis, Equation (2)N/AIntragranular/intergranularSPS
Al2O3/ZrO2 [31]34.9 wt.%6.72 ± 0.30 (SENB)N/A17.21 ± 0.25Intragranular/intergranularHP
Al2O3/ZrO2 [32]17.0 wt.%5.7 (IM)Niihara, Equation (3)18.26Intragranular/intergranularHP
Al2O3/ZrO2/Cr2O3 [33]15.0 wt.%4.67 ± 0.03 (IM)Anstis, Equation (2)18.10 ± 0.15IntergranularPS
Al2O3/ZrO2 [10]10.0 wt.%4.90 ± 0.10 (IM)Anstis, Equation (2)16.80 ± 0.40IntergranularPS
Al2O3/ZrO2 [34]20.0 wt.%5.20 (IM)Evans and Charles, Equation (4)17.60Intergranular3D printing
Al2O3/ZrO2 [35]12.5 wt.%5.40 ± 0.40 (IM)Anstis, Equation (2)18.30 ± 0.40IntergranularPS
IM: indentation method, SENB: single-edge notched beam method, SPS: spark plasma sintering, HP: hot press, PS: pressureless sintering.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J.; Cai, Q.; Luo, G.; Zhong, X.; Shen, Q.; Tu, R.; Guo, X.; Ding, R. Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Forming Intragranular Structure. Materials 2024, 17, 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061309

AMA Style

Li J, Cai Q, Luo G, Zhong X, Shen Q, Tu R, Guo X, Ding R. Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Forming Intragranular Structure. Materials. 2024; 17(6):1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Junguo, Qiwang Cai, Guoqiang Luo, Xinyu Zhong, Qiang Shen, Rong Tu, Xiaoping Guo, and Renchi Ding. 2024. "Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Forming Intragranular Structure" Materials 17, no. 6: 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061309

APA Style

Li, J., Cai, Q., Luo, G., Zhong, X., Shen, Q., Tu, R., Guo, X., & Ding, R. (2024). Zirconia Toughened Alumina Ceramics via Forming Intragranular Structure. Materials, 17(6), 1309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma17061309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop