Next Article in Journal
RAD-Seq Data Point to a Distinct Split in Liriodendron (Magnoliaceae) and Obvious East–West Genetic Divergence in L. chinense
Next Article in Special Issue
Iterative Models for Early Detection of Invasive Species across Spread Pathways
Previous Article in Journal
Contrasting Effects of Chinese Fir Plantations of Different Stand Ages on Soil Enzyme Activities and Microbial Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Subcontinental Analysis of Forest Fragmentation Effects on Insect and Disease Invasion
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/f10010012
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of the Invasive Bark Beetle Phloeosinus aubei on Common Juniper Trees in the Czech Republic

by
Tomáš Fiala
* and
Jaroslav Holuša
Department of Forest Protection and Entomology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcka 1176, 16500 Prague 6, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2019, 10(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010012
Submission received: 28 November 2018 / Revised: 20 December 2018 / Accepted: 20 December 2018 / Published: 25 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impacts of Nonnative Species on the Health of Natural and Planted Forests)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The small cypress bark beetle Phloeosinus aubei is considered an invasive pest in several central European countries, and we have determined its current distribution on common juniper trees (Juniperus communis) in the Czech Republic. The results indicated that P. aubei is widely distributed in the country but is more common in the east than in the west. The beetle was mainly detected on older, damaged trees and on stems with diameters > 3 cm. The apparently widespread and abundant populations of P. aubei could explain infestations of the beetle on Thuja spp. and Juniperus spp. in gardens (three confirmed cases during the last 10 years). We consider P. aubei to be a potential pest on older, naturally occurring J. communis in protected areas where its population density could increase on weakened and damaged trees. We suggest that P. aubei can be monitored via simple inspection of dying and dead J. communis trees in the field.

1. Introduction

Bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) are among the most damaging pests of trees, because the adults and larvae tunnel beneath the bark; such tunnelling can eventually girdle and kill hosts. Most bark beetles breed in recently felled trees and especially in trees weakened by drought, defoliation by other insects, or diseases [1,2,3]. Many bark beetles are invasive and are easily transported with wood products, wooden packaging materials, nursery stock, and bonsai trees [4,5].
The small cypress bark beetle (sometimes referred to as the eastern juniper bark beetle or the cedar bark beetle) Phloeosinus aubei (Perris, 1855) (syn. P. bicolor Brullé) is a Mediterranean species that occurs mainly in northern Africa, the Near and Far East, and in southern Europe [6,7,8,9,10,11]. The main hosts of this phloeo- and xylophagous beetle are cypresses (Cupressus spp.), junipers (Juniperus spp.), and thujas (Thuja spp.) [9,12,13]. The number of generations per year ranges from two to four in the Mediterranean and Pontic areas [14,15,16], where the beetle overwinters as adults [14] and larvae [16] and begins to swarm when the temperature increases to 12 °C in the spring [15]. In Central Europe, in contrast, P. aubei has only one generation per year [17,18], overwinters mainly in the adult stage [18,19], and begins to swarm when temperatures exceed 20 °C [20]. In the Mediterranean area, P. aubei is an important pest, because it attacks and can kill host trees [21].
In the 1980s, the northern edge of the P. aubei range was in Central Europe, i.e., in northern Austria, southern Moravia (Czech Republic), southern Slovakia, and southwestern Hungary [7,9,17,22,23]. This invasive beetle was subsequently detected further north, i.e., in Brandenburg in 2001 [22,24], in the Netherlands in 2004 [25], in eastern Slovakia in 2007 [26], and in Poland in 2014 [20].
In Mediterranean countries, where P. aubei has been responsible for large areas of deforestation, its primary native host is the Italian cypress Cupressus sempervirens L., 1753 (Cupressaceae). The primary symptoms of infestation by this pest are dry branches or dry stems. The tunnelling activity of P. aubei in the woody parts of trees facilitates infection by the fungus that causes cypress canker, Seiridium cardinale (W.W. Wagener) B. Sutton & I.A.S. Gibson, 1972, and it is cypress canker that eventually kills the host [14,27]. As vectors, bark beetles primarily transfer ophiostomatoid fungi [28,29,30].
In addition to attacking forest trees, P. aubei can damage trees in gardens [20,25,31,32,33,34]. These cases mainly involved Thuja trees and other exotic species. The occurrence of P. aubei on the common juniper Juniperus communis L., 1753, which is native to Central Europe, has not been reported. Given the rapid spread of P. aubei, its effects on J. communis should be assessed.
Juniperus communis is of conservation concern in that part of its range where it is failing to regenerate [35], and is considered to be a “near-threatened” species in the Czech Republic [36]. Although J. communis is not threatened with extinction globally in any of its forms (subspecies or varieties) [37], the species is struggling to survive in those areas where changes in land-use and site management have reduced plant survival and recruitment [35].
Many J. communis populations are aging in the Czech Republic our study area, and this is thought to reduce reproductive vigor [38]. Moreover, diffuse pollution has been shown to interrupt pollination, fertilization, and embryo development [39]. Nitrogen deposition, sulphur deposition, and increased temperatures can have similar effects [40,41,42,43]. These factors, together with a wide array of non-bark beetle arthropods that attack J. communis, including the mite Trisetacus quadrisetus Thomas, 1889, and the chalcid wasp Megastigmus bipunctatus Swederus, 1795 [38,40], are weakening this highly valued tree species. Because P. aubei prefers weakened hosts, we hypothesized that its frequency of occurrence is increasing on J. communis in the Czech Republic.
The goals of the current study were to determine the distribution of P. aubei on J. communis in the Czech Republic, and to identify factors associated with its occurrence.

2. Materials and Methods

Field data were collected throughout the Czech Republic from January to October 2018 in 27 localities in protected areas and forests with >10% of one or more of the following J. communis habitats (Figure 1): T3.4A (broad-leaved dry grasslands with orchids and J. communis), T3.4B (broad-leaved dry grasslands with few or no orchids and with J. communis), T8.1A (dry lowland and colline heaths with J. communis), and T8.2A (secondary submontane and montane heaths with J. communis). The areas and forests with these habitats were selected based on the updated mapping of Natura 2000 [44] from the years 2007–2018. Each plot (one plot per locality) was surveyed only one time.
In each of the 27 plots, which ranged in area from 0.1 to 103.5 ha (habitat boundaries), we checked all J. communis trees with dry twigs (Figure 2). We debarked the trunk of such trees and checked the exposed wood and bark for galleries and beetles typical of Phloeosinus spp. The removed bark was 50 cm long on the vertical plane and included the entire circumference (Figure 2). Any bark beetles present were removed with tweezers, stored in alcohol, and identified to species by examination with a dissecting microscope (Bresser Advanced ICD Microscope 10x – 160x; Bresser GmbH, Rhede, Germany). The detection of a specimen of P. aubei was considered to indicate that P. aubei was present in the locality; the detection of galleries alone was not considered evidence of P. aubei. We also recorded the time required to detect the first P. aubei specimen (the ‘finding time’) in a plot; the finding time was considered an indicator of P. aubei abundance.
Data from private collections and museum collections were also summarized. Data from “Finding Database of Agency of Protection Nature and Landscape ČR” [45] are included as well as data from unpublished entomological reports.
The relationship between the presence/absence of P. aubei and longitude was analysed using a logistic model (Quassi-Newton method of estimation). Mann–Whitney U-tests were used to compare the following variables between localities with and without P. aubei: altitude, locality area, distance of the locality from the nearest J. communis locality, and population density of junipers. GLM analyses (Poisson distribution, LN link function) were used to determine the relationships between the ‘finding time’ and the locality characteristics indicated in the previous sentence plus locality management (managed vs. unmanaged). As noted earlier, finding time served as a surrogate measure of P. aubei population density. All tests were performed with Statistica 12.0 sofware (StatSoft CR, s.r.o.; Prague, Czech Republic).

3. Results

P. aubei was found in 16 of the 27 localities studied in 2018; the localities with P. aubei in 2018 were scattered throughout the Czech Republic and over a wide range of altitudes (160 to 720 m) (Figure 1). All localities with P. aubei in 2018 also contained Phloeosinus thujae (Perris, 1855). Phloeosinus aubei was found in all localities in the eastern part of the Czech Republic but in only about half of the localities in the western part of the country (Figure 3); this trend was statistically significant (χ2 = 14.89; p < 0.001). The habitats were also different in eastern vs. western parts of the country: protected areas were regularly maintained by grazing or cutting in the eastern localities but were overgrown with Frangula alnus Mill., 1768, Prunus spinosa L., 1753, Rosa spp., and other species in the western localities (Figure 4, Appendix A). The probability of P. aubei detection was not related to locality altitude (z = 0.87; p > 0.05), locality area (z = 1.66; p > 0.10), distance of the locality to the nearest juniper (z = −0.30; p > 0.05), or juniper population density in the locality (z = 1.73; p > 0.10) (Figure 5). Across all localities, the mean (±standard deviation) finding time was 14 (±16.6) min. Finding time was unrelated to locality altitude, locality area, distance of the locality to the nearest juniper, juniper population density in the locality, or locality management (F = 0.76; p > 0.10).
In addition to being found in 16 localities in 2018, P. aubei was previously found in 8 other localities (Figure 1). In all 24 localities where P. aubei has been detected, the host tree was usually J. communis, although the host tree was not indicated in some earlier reports and was Thuja spp. in one earlier report (Appendix A). Across all 24 localities, P. aubei was mainly found on J. communis stems thicker than 3 cm (Appendix A). In the one case in which P. aubei was found on P. thujae, the beetle was also found on branches thinner than 1 cm. In all localities where P. aubei was detected on J. communis, the trees had been damaged by cattle or game (Figure 2).

4. Discussion

The small cypress bark beetle P. aubei is native to the Caucasus, Asia Minor, and the Mediterranean area [6] from Israel [27] to southwest France [46]. Over the last 100 years or so, P. aubei has been spreading north from the Mediterranean area into Central Europe, where it has been reported as an alien pest [24,25,32,47,48,49,50,51,52].
The presence of P. aubei in the Czech Republic was first mentioned in the literature by Pfeffer [17], who referred to a single specimen captured by J. Picka. Although the details regarding that specimens are few, we do know that it was collected in the southeastern part of the country (i.e., in the historical country of Moravia) and probably in the village of Čejč. Its year of collection is unknown, but it was probably collected in the 1960s. The first dated finding of P. aubei in the Czech Republic was in 1947, and that specimen was found in the east-central part of the country (i.e., in the historical country of Bohemia) (current study). Previous studies had reported the detection of P. thujae [53,54] in the Czech Republic but not P. aubei. In the 1990s, P. aubei was reported from southern Moravia [55] and from Bohemia [56]; the latter report concerned outbreaks in several places in Prague and central Bohemia on Juniperus spp., Chamaecyparis spp., Thuja spp., and Cupressus x leylandii A.B. Jacks & Dallim., 1926.
In the Czech Republic, P. aubei has perhaps been spreading west (Figure 1), because P. aubei detection decreased from east to west (Figure 3). All studied variables (altitude, locality area, distance of the locality to the nearest juniper, and juniper population density) had large ranges in values in localities with and without P. aubei occurrence (Figure 5). Accordingly, these variables cannot be used to predict where the beetle will spread to, and only the presence of host trees appears to be important. A strong influence of host is typical for bark beetles [57]. That P. aubei is able to detect its host is confirmed by the fact that the ‘finding time’ was unrelated to host variables (area, distance of the nearest juniper, and density). Phloeosinus bark beetles have strong dispersal capabilities and can fly over 24 km [58,59]. The abilities to disperse and to detect hosts promote the spread of invading populations in a landscape matrix [60].
The increased spread of P. aubei in the Czech Republic corresponds with recent findings of increased spread of P. aubei in Germany [22,24], the Netherlands [25], and Poland [20]. This increase in P. aubei spread is probably a result of climate change [61,62,63,64,65] and increases in global trade [66,67,68,69,70,71].
The severe drought of 2003 possibly increased the susceptibility of juniper trees in Central Europe to bark beetles. For Western Europe, climate change models predict increasing summer drought and heat waves, which will increase the susceptibility of trees to secondary insect pests such as Phloeosinus spp. [25,72]. The finding of P. aubei in 1996 in the United Kingdom can be attributed to global trade, because P. aubei was found on Thuja spp. imported from Italy [52].
The main host of P. aubei in the Czech Republic is the common juniper, J. communis, which is listed in the ICUN Red List as near-threatened in the country [36]. Given the fragmented and small populations of J. communis (see Figure 1), gene flow is probably limited, with potential implications for the tree’s long-term fitness and survival even where viable seed production occurs [73,74,75]. In such places, P. aubei can be considered a threat to the tree. This beetle kills J. communis trees that are weakened by drought or damaged by cattle grazing or antler rubbing by game [76,77]. Older stands of J. communis in the Czech Republic are in poor condition, and in many places they are overgrown (Figure 4). Factors that weaken the trees increase the spread of P. aubei and P. thujae, but precise quantification of both beetles is difficult because their galleries are very similar.
The frequent occurrence of P. aubei in many regions of the Czech Republic could lead to attack on thujas and junipers in ornamental gardens and cities, as has already occurred in the towns of Písek and Mariánské Lázně (Appendix A) and in Prague and other places in central Bohemia [56]. In contrast to P. aubei, P. thujae has not been reported on thujas and junipers in ornamental gardens and cities. In addition, P. aubei is a vector of pathogens and especially of the causal agent of cypress canker, S. cardinale ([18,51,78].
The monitoring of invasive bark beetle is necessary [79]. The use of pheromone trapping for monitoring P. aubei is not currently possible, because P. aubei pheromones have yet to be identified [23]. At present, P. aubei populations can be monitored by the debarking of symptomatic juniper and thuja trees in the field. Such field monitoring can be conducted throughout the year, because P. aubei adults and larvae are present under the bark throughout the year [19,34].
Expansion of either the true range or the outbreak range is observed in several model species/groups of major insect guilds in boreal and temperate biomes. Effects of climate change on forest insects are demonstrated for a number of species and guilds, although generalizations of results available so far are difficult because of species-specific responses to climate change. There is evidence that recent warmer temperatures have permitted the expansion of bark beetle outbreaks to higher latitudes and elevations than in the past [80].
Climate and weather can have direct effects on trees, as drought and storms can weaken trees and predispose them to attack by bark beetles and pathogens. Climate can also have direct effects on insects as they are small poikilotherms with limited thermoregulation ability [81]. P. aubei is a typical case of this pattern and may be followed by other species from Mediterranean countries. Climate change could also result in the spread of insect species from the opposite direction. Ips duplicatus (C.R. Sahlberg, 1836), a native bark beetle on Norway spruce in Scandinavia, currently is spreading to Central, Eastern, and Southern Europe. The outbreak is supported by the planting of spruce out of its original distribution, physiological weakness of the tree, and the consequent occurrence of fungal pathogens on host trees [82].
On the contrary, the spread direction of alien bark beetles in Europe could be different. Bark beetles mainly travel in wood and in wooden packing materials such as crating, dunnage, and pallets [83], so the places of introduction can be different. A North American species, Gnathotrichus materiarius (Fitch, 1858), and an East Asian species, Xylosandrus germanus (Blandford, 1894), currently occur in the Czech Republic, but they have been spreading from west to east from Germany [84].

5. Conclusions

The small cypress bark beetle has probably been present in the Czech Republic since the 1950s, and we have determined its current distribution on common juniper trees. The results indicate that P. aubei is widely distributed in the country but is more common in the east than in the west. The apparently widespread and abundant populations of P. aubei could explain infestations of the beetle on Thuja spp. and Juniperus spp. in gardens. We consider P. aubei to be a potential pest on older, naturally occurring J. communis in protected areas where its population density could increase on weakened and damaged trees.

Author Contributions

Data curation, T.F. and J.H.; Formal analysis, J.H.; Methodology, T.F.; Writing—original draft, T.F. and J.H.; Writing—review and editing, T.F. and J.H.

Funding

This research was supported by the grant “Advanced research supporting the forestry and wood-processing sector’s adaptation to global change and the 4th industrial revolution”, No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000803 financed by OP RDE.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Bruce Jaffee (U.S.A.) for editorial and linguistic improvement of manuscript. The authors also thank Dušan Čudan (Křemže) and Václav Týr (Žihle) for providing data from their private collections, Lukáš Skořepa (Peč) for providing data from his private collection and the photograph of the Rajchéřov locality, and Jiří Hájek (National Museum Prague) for providing details concerning the specimen in the National Museum in Prague.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Details of localities in the Czech Republic where P. aubei was detected in the current study (2018) and in earlier studies.
Table A1. Details of localities in the Czech Republic where P. aubei was detected in the current study (2018) and in earlier studies.
LocalityCoordinatesYear of Detection/CollectionSourceHost TreeDetail of Collections (Dimension of Trees and Management of Localities)
Čejč48.9443903N, 16.9784694EunknownNational Museum PragueUnknowncollection of Jaroslav Picka
Drahoňův Újezd49.8775892N, 13.7380344E2018T.FialaJuniperus communison 3-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 6 adults
Horní Jelení50.0603294N, 16.0870206E1947V.TýrUnknown
Horní Němčí48.9209667N, 17.6396400E2018T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 3 adults
Horní Pole49.2055956N, 15.2880703E2018L.SkořepaJ. communis
Hutisko-Solanec49.4359167N, 18.2234289E2018T.FialaJ. communison 3-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 1 adult
Klatovec49.2176503N, 15.3003911E2009[85]J. communis
Kunžak49.1225056N, 15.1698425E2009, 2018[86], T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in an overgrown locality, 2 adults
Lednice48.8028108N, 16.8508247E2006[45]unknownwindow trap on Ulmus spp.
Mariánské Lázně49.9489864N, 12.7076350E2017T.FialaJ. communison 4-cm-d stems of dead trees in a garden
Matějovec49.0640136N, 15.2587572E2018L.SkořepaJ. communis
Mikulov48.8063058N, 16.6477686E1996[55]unknown
Mohelno49.1153328N, 16.1991564E2018[45]J. communis
Nedašov49.1015664N, 18.0897692E2018T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 2 adults
Nový Svět49.0820736N, 15.2574772E2011,2018[45], L.SkořepaJ. communis
Odolenov49.2413858N, 13.4837028E2018T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 1 adult
Olší49.1620167N, 15.3748231E2010[87]J. communis
Písek49.3011936N, 14.1422844E2017D.ČudanThuja spp.abundantly infested dead trees in a garden
Prostiboř49.6638825N, 12.9095417E2018T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 2 adults
Rajchéřov48.9623267N, 15.1974642E2009,2018[88], T.FialaJ. communison 3-cm-d stems in an overgrown locality, 1 adult
Valašské Klobouky49.1395381N, 18.0633761E2018T.FialaJ. communison 4-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 1 adult
Valtínov49.0978514N, 15.2517989E2009,2018[89], T.FialaJ. communison 3-cm-d stems in an overgrown locality, 2 adults
Záborná Lhota49.7680669N, 14.3120808E2018T.FialaJ. communison 3-cm-d stems in an overgrown locality, 5 adults
Zděchov49.2726797N, 18.1021503E2018T.FialaJ. communison 5-cm-d stems in a managed locality, 2 adults
Coordinates of localities without P. aubei occurrence: Bezděkov (49.7843667N, 12.7571769E), Doubravka (49.5852244N, 12.7634050E), Čečín (49.5915397N, 12.7508308E), Černýšovice (49.3151389N, 14.5270231E), Domanín (48.9584072N, 14.7393708E), Nechalov (49.7270689N, 14.2398522E), Vrbička (50.1882300N, 13.2770272E), Úhošť (50.3576158N, 13.2384503E), Ústí (49.8126472N, 12.7664183E), Zdebořice (49.3679767N, 13.4133169E), Žebrák (49.8847200N, 13.9121225E).

References

  1. Rouault, G.; Candau, J.-N.; Lieutier, F.; Nageleisen, L.-M.; Martin, J.-C.; Warzée, N. Effects of drought and heat on forest insect populations in relation to the 2003 drought in Western Europe. Ann. For. Sci. 2006, 63, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lieutier, F.; Mendel, Z.; Faccoli, M. Bark beetles of mediterranean conifers. In Insects and Disease of Mediterranean Forest Systems; Paine, T.D., Lieutier, F., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 105–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Schwenke, W. Die Forstschädlinge Europas. Band 2, Käfer; Parey: Berlin, Germany; Hamburg, Germany, 1974; p. 500. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brockerhoff, E.G.; Bain, J.; Kimberley, M.; Knížek, M. Interception frequency of exotic bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytinae) and relationship with establishment in New Zealand and worldwide. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haack, R.A. Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: Recent establishments and interceptions. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36, 269–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Balachowsky, A. Faune de France 50. Coléoptères Scolytides; Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences: Paris, France, 1949; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  7. Endrodi, S. Szúbogarak—Scolytidae. (Bark beetles—Scolytidae) Fauna Hungariae No. 9.; Akadémiai Kiadó (Publishing House of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences): Budapest, Hungary, 1959; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wood, S.L.; Bright, D.E. A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part 2: Taxonomic Index; Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 13; Brigham Young University: Provo, UT, USA, 1992; p. 1553. ISBN 978-0842523103. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pfeffer, A. Zentral- und Westpaläarktische Borken- und Kernkäfer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae); Pro Entomologia, c/o Naturhistorisches Museum: Basel, Switzerland, 1995; p. 310. ISBN 3-9520840-6-9. [Google Scholar]
  10. Knížek, M. Scolytinae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera. Vol. 7, Curculionoidea I.; Löbl, I., Smetana, A., Eds.; Apollo Books: Stenstrup, Denmark, 2011; pp. 204–251. ISBN 978-87-88757-93-4. [Google Scholar]
  11. Beaver, R.A.; Ghahari, H.; Sanguansub, S. An annotated checklist of Platypodinae and Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Iran. Zootaxa 2016, 4098, 401–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pfeffer, A. Notulae Ipidologicae VI. Symbolae ad cognitionem genesis Phloeosinus Chapp. Příspěvek k poznání rodu Phloeosinus Chapp. Entomol. Listy 1943, 6, 103–118. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schedl, K.E. Bestimmungstabellen palaearktischer Borkenkäfer VI. Phloeosinus aubei Perr. Entomol. Nachrich. Oesterreich. Schweiz. Entomol. 1950, 2, 96–97. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mendel, Z. Life history of Phloeosinus armatus Reiter and P. aubei Perris (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in Israel. Phytoparasitica 1984, 12, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bel Habib, R.; Ben Jamâa, M.L.; Nouira, S. Biological charakteristics of the Cypress bark beetle Phloeosinus aubei in the Kessra Forest, Center of Tunisia. Tunisian J. Plant Prot. 2007, 2, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  16. Nikulina, T.; Martynov, V. Bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) of Donetsk industrial-urban agglomeration. 1. Annotated list of species. Ind. Bot. 2016, 15, 191–201. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pfeffer, A. Kůrovcovití Scolytidae a jádrohlodovití Platypodidae; Academia: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1989; p. 137. ISBN 80-200-0089-5. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tiberi, R.; Panzavolta, T.; Bracalini, M.; Ragazzi, A.; Ginetti, B.; Moricca, S. Interactions between insects and fungal pathogens of forest and ornamental trees. Ital. J. Mycol. 2016, 45, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bozsik, G.; Szöcs, G. Phenology, behavior and infestation levels of the invasive small cypress bark beetle, Phloeosinus aubei, on some cultivars of Thuja and Juniper spp., in Hungary. Phytoparasitica 2017, 45, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nowak, W.; Niedźwiecka, K.; Witkowski, R.; Bełka, M.; Mazur, A. First records of mediterranean cypress bark beetle Phloeosinus aubei (Perris, 1855) (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) from Poland. Acta Sci. Pol. Silvarum Colendarum Ratio Ind. Lignaria 2017, 16, 195–198. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mendel, Z. Major pests of man-made forests in Israel: Origin, bilogy, damage and control. Phytoparasitica 1987, 15, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lehmann, M. Befallsentwicklung bei Thuja- und Wacholderborkenkäfern (Phloeosinus spp.) in Brandenburg. Tagungsbericht 2009, 152–154. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bozsik, G.; Tröger, A.; Francke, W.; Szöcs, G. Thuja occidentalis: Identification of volatiles and electroantennographic response by the invasive cedar bark beetle, Phloeosinus aubei. J. Appl. Entomol. 2016, 140, 434–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sobczyk, T.; Lehmann, M. Zur Ausbreitung des Zweifarbigen Thuja- borkenkäfers Phloeosinus aubei (Perris, 1855) in Ostdeutschland mit Anmerkungen zu Phloeosinus thujae (Perris, 1855) und Phloeosinus rudis Blandford, 1894 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Märk. Entomol. Nachrich. 2007, 9, 55–60. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moraal, L.G. Infestations of the cypress bark beetles Phloeosinus rudis, P. bicolor and P. thujae in the Netherlands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Entomol. Berich. 2010, 70, 140–145. [Google Scholar]
  26. Suvák, M. Lykokaz borievkový (Phloeosinus aubei (Perris, 1855)) v Košiciach a okolí. In Zborník Referátov z Vedeckej Konferencie: Dendrologické dni v Arboréte Mlyňany SAV 2009; Bárta, M., Konôpková, J., Eds.; Arborétum Mlyňany SAV: Vieska nad Žitavou, Slovakia; pp. 230–231.
  27. Schedl, K.E. The bark and timber beetles (Scolytidae) of Israel 268. Contribution to the morfology and taxonomy of Scolytoidea. Israel J. Entomol. 1969, 4, 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  28. Davydenko, K.; Vasaitis, R.; Menkis, A. Fungi associated with Ips acuminatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in Ukraine with a special emphasis on pathogenicity of ophiostomatoid species. Eur. J. Entomol. 2017, 114, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gebhardt, H.; Begerow, D.; Oberwinkler, F. Identification of the ambrosia fungus of Xyleborus monographus and X. dryographus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Mycol. Prog. 2004, 3, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Basset, Y.; Favaro, A.; Springate, N.D.; Battisti, A. Observations on the relative effectiveness of Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham) and Scolytus pygmaeus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) as vectors of the Dutch elm disease. Mitt. Schweiz. Entomol. Gesellsch. 1992, 65, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rakk, Z.S.; Bürgés, G.Y. On the damage of the Juniperus bark-beetle (Coleoptera; Scolytidae: Phloeosinus aubei Perris). Növényvédelem 1994, 30, 7–10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Reiderné-Saly, K.; Podlussány, A. Spread, host range and biology of Juniperus bark-beetle (Phloeosinus aubei Perris, 1855). Növényvédelem 1994, 30, 23–24. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bozsik, G.; Zsolnai, B.; Szöcs, G. What kind of role does the host plant play in the reproduction of the cedar bark beetle? Növényvédelmi Tudományos Napok 2014, 60, 88. [Google Scholar]
  34. Bozsik, G.; Zsolnai, B.; Gy, B.; Szöcs, G.; Francke, W. Observations on the overwintering of the bark beetle, Phloeosinus aubei, its spread in Hungary, and on the role of Thuja volatiles. Növényvédelem 2014, 50, 209–213. [Google Scholar]
  35. Juniperus communis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: E.T42229A2963096. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/42229/2963096 (accessed on 16 November 2018).
  36. Grulich, V. Červený seznam cévnatých rostlin ČR. In Červený Seznam Ohrožených Druhů České Republiky. Cévnaté Rostliny; Grulich, V., Chobot, K., Eds.; Příroda 35; Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny ČR: Praha, Czech Republic, 2017; pp. 75–132. ISBN 978-80-88076-47-6. [Google Scholar]
  37. Farjon, A.; Filer, D. An Atlas of the World’s Conifers: An Analysis of Their Distribution, Biogeography, Diversity and Conservation Status; Brill: Leiden, The Netherlands, 2013; p. 512. ISBN 978-9004211803. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ward, L.K. The conservation of juniper: Longevity and old age. J. Appl. Ecol. 1982, 19, 917–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mugnaini, S.; Nepi, M.; Guarnieri, M.; Piotto, B.; Pacini, E. Pollination drop in Juniperus communis: Response to deposited material. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100, 1475–1481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. García, D. Effects of seed dispersal on Juniperus communis recruitment on a Mediterranean mountain. J. Veg. Sci. 2001, 12, 839–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Verheyen, K.; Adriaenssens, S.; Gruwez, R.; Michalczyk, I.M.; Ward, L.K.; Rosseel, Y.; Van den Broeck, A.; García, D. Juniperus communis: Victim of the combined action of climate warming and nitrogen deposition? Plant Biol. 2009, 11, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ward, L.K. Variation in ripening years of seed cones of Juniperus communis L. Watsonia 2010, 28, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gruwez, R.; Frenne, P.D.; Schrijver, A.D.; Leroux, O.; Vangansbeke, P.; Verheyen, K. Negative effects of temperature and atmospheric depositions on the seed viability of common juniper (Juniperus communis). Ann. Bot. 2014, 113, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vrstva Mapování Biotopů. Rozšíření Přírodních a Přírodě Blízkých Stanovišť na Území ČR. [Elektronická Georeferencovaná Databáze]. Verze 2018. Praha. Agentura Ochrany Přírody a Krajiny ČR. Available online: https://portal.nature.cz/publik_syst/ctihtmlpage.php?what=3&nabidka=hlavni (accessed on 30 October 2018).
  45. Nálezová Databáze Ochrany Přírody. Praha. Agentura Ochrany Přírody a Krajiny ČR. Available online: https://portal.nature.cz/publik_syst/ctihtmlpage.php?what=3&nabidka=hlavni (accessed on 5 March 2018).
  46. Calwers, C.G. Käferbuch: Naturgeschichte der Käfer Europas: Zum Handgebrauche für Sammler; Vierte Auflage: Stuttgart, Germany, 1893; p. 668. [Google Scholar]
  47. Both, G.; Farkas, I. Juniper bark beetle is a serious threat. Növényvédelem 2005, 41, 305–306. [Google Scholar]
  48. Karamaouna, F.; Kontodimas, D.C. New threat from an insect borer in urban trees in Greece. Hellenic Plant Prot. J. 2010, 3, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  49. Nikulina, T.; Mandelshtam, M.; Petrov, A.; Nazarenko, V.; Yunakov, N. A survey of the weevils of Ukraine. Bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Platypodinae and Scolytinae). Zootaxa 2015, 3912, 1–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Olenici, N.; Mitroiu, M.-D.; Knížek, M.; Olenici, V. Parasitoids of Phloeosinus aubei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) from Romania. Acta Zool. Bulgarica 2015, 67, 293–295. [Google Scholar]
  51. Roganović, D. Contribution to the knowledge of alien insects species of Montenegro. In Alien Arthropods in South East Europe—Crossroad of Three Continents; University of Forestry: Sofia, Bulgaria, 2007; pp. 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  52. Winter, T. Phloeosinus aubei (Perris) (Scolytidae) in Surrey, the first record of this bark beetle in Britain. Coleopterist 1998, 7, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  53. Formánek, R. Kůrovci (Ipidae) v Čechách a na Moravě žijící; Česká Společnost Entomologická: Prague, Czech Republic, 1907; p. 56. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pfeffer, A. Fauna ČSR. Svazek 6. Kůrovci—Scolytoidea (Řád: Brouci—Coleoptera); Československá Akademie Věd: Praha, Czechoslovakia, 1955; p. 324. [Google Scholar]
  55. Pfeffer, A.; Knížek, M. Coleoptera: Curculionoidea 2. In Terrestrial Invertebrates of the Pálava Biosphere Reserve of UNESCO; Rozkošný, R., Vaňhara, J., Eds.; III. Folia Facultatis Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Masarykianae Brunensis, Biologia: Brno, Czech Republic, 1996; Volume 94, pp. 601–607. [Google Scholar]
  56. Mertelík, J.; Kloudová, K.; Knížek, M. Přemnožení kůrovce na cypřišovitých rostlinách. Zahradnictví 2007, 11, 46. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bussler, H.; Bouget, C.; Brustel, H.; Brändle, M.; Riedinger, V.; Brandl, R.; Műller, J. Abundance and pest classificationof scolytid species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae) follow different patterns. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 1887–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Furniss, M.M.; Furniss, R.L. Scolytids (Coleoptera) on snowfields above timberline in Oregon and Washington. Can. Entomol. 1972, 104, 1471–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Škůdci Okrasných Jehličnanů II. Available online: http://web2.mendelu.cz/af_291_projekty2/vseo/files/67/7408.pdf (accessed on 29 November 2017).
  60. Chase, K.D.; Kelly, D.; Liebhold, A.M.; Bader, M.K.-F.; Brockerhoff, E.G. Long-distance dispersal of non-native pine bark beetles from host resources. Ecol. Entomol. 2017, 42, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kozar, F.; Sheble, D.A.F.; Fowjhan, M.A. Study on the further spread of Pseudaulacaspis pentagona (Homoptera: Coccoidea: Diaspididae) in Central Europe. Isr. J. Entomol. 1995, 29, 161–164. [Google Scholar]
  62. Musolin, D.L. Insects in a warmer world: Ecological, physiological and life-history responses of truebugs (Heteroptera) to climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2007, 13, 1565–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Dukes, J.S.; Pontius, J.; Orwig, D.; Garnas, J.R.; Rodgers, V.L.; Brazee, N.; Cooke, B.; Theoharides, K.A.; Stange, E.E.; Harrington, R.; et al. Responses of insects pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: What can we predict? Can. J. For. Res. 2009, 39, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hlásny, T.; Zajíčková, L.; Turčáni, M.; Holuša, J.; Sitková, Z. Geographical variability of spruce bark beetle development under climate change in the Czech Republic. J. For. Sci. 2011, 57, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Keszthelyi, S.; Nowinszky, L.; Puskás, J. The growing abundance of Helicoverpa armigera in Hungary and its areal shift estimation. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2013, 8, 756–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haack, R.A. Intercepted Scolytidae (Coleoptera) at U.S. ports of entry: 1985–2000. Integr. Pest Manag. Rev. 2001, 6, 253–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Westphal, M.I.; Browne, M.; MacKinnon, K.; Noble, I. The link between international trade and global distribution of invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions 2008, 10, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hulme, P.E. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Skarpaas, O.; Økland, B. Timber import and the risk of forest pest introductions. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Roques, A. Alien forest insects in a warmer world and a globalised economy: Impacts of changes in trade, tourism and climate on forest biosecurity. N. Z. J. For. Sci. 2010, 40, S77–S94. [Google Scholar]
  71. Flø, D.; Krokene, P.; Økland, B. Importing decidous woodchips from North America to northern Europe—The risk of introducing bark- and wood-boring insects. Scand. J. For. Res. 2014, 29, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Faragó, T.; Lang, I.; Csete, L. Climate Change and Hungary: Mitigating the Hazard and Preparing for the Impacts (The “VAHAVA” Report); MTA: Budapest, Hungary, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  73. Van der Merwe, M.; Winfield, M.O.; Arnold, G.M.; Parker, J.S. Spatial and temporal aspects of the genetic structure of Juniperus communis populations. Mol. Ecol. 2000, 9, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Provan, J.; Beatty, G.E.; Hunter, A.M.; McDonald, R.A.; McLaughlin, E.; Preston, S.J.; Wilson, S. Restricted gene flow in fragmented populations of a wind- pollinated tree. Conserv. Genet. 2008, 9, 1521–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Vanden-Broeck, A.; Gruwez, R.; Cox, K.; Adriaenssens, S.; Michalczyk, I.M.; Verheyen, K. Genetic structure and seed-mediated dispersal rates of an endangered shrub in a fragmented landscape: A case study for Juniperus communis in northwestern Europe. BMC Genet. 2011, 12, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kubíková, J. Acidofilní travinná a keříčková společenstva. In Péče o Chráněná Území. I. Nelesní Společenstva; Petříček, V., Ed.; Agentura Ochrany Přírody a Krajiny ČR: Praha, Česká Republika, 1999; pp. 237–244. ISBN 80-86064-42-5. [Google Scholar]
  77. Cukor, J.; Havránek, F.; Rohla, J.; Bukovjan, K. Stanovení početnosti jelení zvěře v západní části Krušných hor. Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu 2017, 62, 288–295. [Google Scholar]
  78. Gatti, E. I Coleotteri Scolitidi e Platipodidi della Sardegna (Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Platypodidae). In Biodiversity of Marganai and Montimannu (Sardinia). Research in the framework of the ICP Forests Network; Conservazione Habitat Invertebrati; Corpo forestale dello stato. Centro nazionale per lo studio e la conservazione della biodiversità forestale “Bosco Fontana”: Marmirolo, Italy, 2011; Volume 5, pp. 609–639. [Google Scholar]
  79. Wiggins, G.J.; Grant, J.F.; Lambdin, P.L.; Merten, P.; Nix, K.A.; Hadziabdic, D.; Windham, M.T. Discovery of Walnut Twig Beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis, Associated with Forested Black Walnut, Juglans nigra, in the Eastern U.S. Forests 2014, 5, 1185–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pureswaran, D.S.; Roques, A.; Battisti, A. Forest Insects and Climate Change. Curr. For. Rep. 2018, 4, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Huey, R.B.; Berrigan, D.; Gilchr, G.W.; Herron, J.C. Testing the adaptive significance of acclimation: A strong inference approach. Am. Zool. 1999, 39, 323–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Holuša, J.; Lubojacký, L.; Knížek, M. Distribution of double-spined spruce bark beetle Ips duplicatus in the Czech Republic: Spreading in 1997–2009. Phytoparasitica 2010, 38, 435–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Haack, R.A.; Petrice, T.R. Bark- and wood-borer colonization of logs and lumber after heat treatment to ISPM 15 specifications: The role of residual bark. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 1075–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Knížek, M. Faunistic records from the Czech Republic—27. Klapalekiana 2009, 45, 22. [Google Scholar]
  85. Křivan, V.; Jelínek, A. Průzkum Vybraných Skupin Bezobratlých na Lokalitě Pastvina pod Klátovcem; Depon. in Městský úřad Telč: Telč, Czech Republic, Unpublished work; 2009; 19p. [Google Scholar]
  86. Křivan, V.; Jelínek, A. Závěrečná Zpráva k Provedenému Entomologickému Průzkumu PP Jalovce u Kunžaku; Depon. in Krajský úřad Jihočeského kraje: České Budějovice, Czech Republic, Unpublished work; 2009; 14p. [Google Scholar]
  87. Křivan, V.; Jelínek, A. Zoologický Průzkum Lokality Olešský Rybník; Depon. in Městský úřad Telč: Telč, Czech Republic, Unpublished work; 2010; 29p. [Google Scholar]
  88. Křivan, V.; Jelínek, A. Závěrečná Zpráva k Provedenému Entomologickému Průzkumu PR Hadí Vrch; Depon. in Krajský úřad Jihočeského kraje: České Budějovice, Czech Republic, Unpublished work; 2009; 19p. [Google Scholar]
  89. Křivan, V.; Jelínek, A. Závěrečná zpráva k Provedenému Entomologickému Průzkumu PP Jalovce u Valtínova; Depon. in Krajský úřad Jihočeského kraje: České Budějovice, Czech Republic, Unpublished work; 2009; 15p. [Google Scholar]
Forests 10 00012 g001 550
Figure 1. Occurrence of Phloeosinus aubei in the Czech Republic. Positive detections as documented in records before 2017 are indicated by small black circles (with detection year), and positive detections in 2018 are indicated by large black circles. Negative detections in 2018 are indicated by empty circles. Small green circles indicate juniper habitats (T3.4A, T3.4B, T8.1A, and T8.2A) according to Natura 2000 mapping in the Czech Republic (see Materials and Methods for details).
Figure 1. Occurrence of Phloeosinus aubei in the Czech Republic. Positive detections as documented in records before 2017 are indicated by small black circles (with detection year), and positive detections in 2018 are indicated by large black circles. Negative detections in 2018 are indicated by empty circles. Small green circles indicate juniper habitats (T3.4A, T3.4B, T8.1A, and T8.2A) according to Natura 2000 mapping in the Czech Republic (see Materials and Methods for details).
Forests 10 00012 g001
Forests 10 00012 g002 550
Figure 2. Dying junipers (Juniperus communis) in the Rajchéřov locality (a, the dying trees are red), galleries of Phloeosinus aubei on J. communis in the Mariánské Lázně locality (b), and a juniper tree damaged by antler rubbing in the Vrbička locality (c).
Figure 2. Dying junipers (Juniperus communis) in the Rajchéřov locality (a, the dying trees are red), galleries of Phloeosinus aubei on J. communis in the Mariánské Lázně locality (b), and a juniper tree damaged by antler rubbing in the Vrbička locality (c).
Forests 10 00012 g002
Forests 10 00012 g003 550
Figure 3. Logistic model for the probability of detecting Phloeosinus aubei in the Czech Republic as related to longitude. On the y-axis, 0 and 1 indicate that P. aubei was not detected or was detected, respectively.
Figure 3. Logistic model for the probability of detecting Phloeosinus aubei in the Czech Republic as related to longitude. On the y-axis, 0 and 1 indicate that P. aubei was not detected or was detected, respectively.
Forests 10 00012 g003
Forests 10 00012 g004 550
Figure 4. Junipers overgrown by Prunus spinosa and Rosa spp. (a), and a juniper habitat regularly maintained by grazing at the Vrbička locality (b).
Figure 4. Junipers overgrown by Prunus spinosa and Rosa spp. (a), and a juniper habitat regularly maintained by grazing at the Vrbička locality (b).
Forests 10 00012 g004
Forests 10 00012 g005 550
Figure 5. Relationships between the presence and absence of Phloeosinus aubei and the following characteristics of the localities: altitude, area, distance from the nearest juniper, and juniper population density. Small squares indicate medians, boxplots indicate the 25% and 75% quartiles, and lines indicate minimum and maximum values.
Figure 5. Relationships between the presence and absence of Phloeosinus aubei and the following characteristics of the localities: altitude, area, distance from the nearest juniper, and juniper population density. Small squares indicate medians, boxplots indicate the 25% and 75% quartiles, and lines indicate minimum and maximum values.
Forests 10 00012 g005

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fiala, T.; Holuša, J. Occurrence of the Invasive Bark Beetle Phloeosinus aubei on Common Juniper Trees in the Czech Republic. Forests 2019, 10, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010012

AMA Style

Fiala T, Holuša J. Occurrence of the Invasive Bark Beetle Phloeosinus aubei on Common Juniper Trees in the Czech Republic. Forests. 2019; 10(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fiala, Tomáš, and Jaroslav Holuša. 2019. "Occurrence of the Invasive Bark Beetle Phloeosinus aubei on Common Juniper Trees in the Czech Republic" Forests 10, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010012

APA Style

Fiala, T., & Holuša, J. (2019). Occurrence of the Invasive Bark Beetle Phloeosinus aubei on Common Juniper Trees in the Czech Republic. Forests, 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop