Next Article in Journal
Gemmamyces piceae Bud Blight Damage in Norway Spruce (Picea abies) and Colorado Blue Spruce (Picea pungens) Forest Stands
Next Article in Special Issue
Spatial Variations in Fine Root Turnover, Biomass, and Necromass of Two Vegetation Types in a Karst Ecosystem, Southwestern China
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Stand Density, Biodiversity, and Spatial Structure on Stand Basal Area Increment in Natural Spruce-Fir-Broadleaf Mixed Forests
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mechanism and Evolution of Soil Organic Carbon Coupling with Rocky Desertification in South China Karst
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low Frequency of Plants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixers Exhibits High Frequency of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria: A Study in Karst Shrub Ecosystems of Southwest China

1
Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural and Resources & Guangxi Zhuangzu Autonomy Region, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Science, Guilin 541004, China
2
Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China
3
Huanjiang Observation and Research Station for Karst Eco-Systems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hechi 547000, China
4
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Theory and Technology for Environmental Pollution Control, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China
5
College of Environment and Resource, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2022, 13(2), 163; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020163
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 13 January 2022 / Accepted: 19 January 2022 / Published: 21 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant–Soil Interactions in Karst Regions)

Abstract

:
Plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers and soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria are good indicators for detecting the source of nitrogen in natural ecosystems. However, the community composition and diversity of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers and soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in karst shrub ecosystems remain poorly known. The community composition and diversity of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria and plants, as well as the soil physical–chemical properties were investigated in 21 shrub plots (including different topographies and plant types). The frequency of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers was found to be low in the 21 shrub plots. The soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure varied among the 21 shrub soils. Based on a variance partitioning analysis, topography, plant type, and soil pH explained 48.5% of the observed variation in bacterial community structure. Plant type had a predominant effect on community structure, and topography (aspect and ascent) and soil pH had minor effects. A negative correlation between the abundance of the soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community and the richness index for plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers was observed. The result of the low frequency of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers highlights the importance of sources of fixed nitrogen by soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the nitrogen limitation shrub ecosystem of the karst regions.

1. Introduction

Nitrogen is an important limiting factor for plant growth [1,2]. It is particularly limited during the early stages of the natural recovery of degraded soils. Similarly, in the karst shrub ecosystem, nitrogen is considered a key limiting factor for shrub growth [3,4]. The primary source of soil nitrogen is biological nitrogen fixation by nitrogen-fixing bacteria [5], which plays a critical role in nitrogen cycling.
Nitrogen-fixing bacteria are highly diverse and are divided into two groups: free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., Azotobacter, Azospirillum, and Pseudomonas) and symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., Rhizobia and Frankia; [6]). Approximately 80% of the total biological nitrogen fixation is fixed by rhizobia symbiotic association with leguminous plants [5]. The fixation of atmospheric nitrogen by free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria is significant in a few types of soil [7,8] and is the most important nitrogen source for natural ecosystems [9,10]. Therefore, in nitrogen-limited natural ecosystems lacking legumes, soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria may be particularly important nitrogen sources for plant functioning.
Karst shrub growth is more severely restricted by low nitrogen content compared with forest and primary forest [4]. Simultaneously, less nitrogen fixation by rhizobia symbiotic association with leguminous plants makes the condition worse [11]. Therefore, soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria play important roles in karst shrub growth and may be useful for shrub restoration. Shrubs are widely distributed in the karst region of southwest China and are uniquely adapted for survival in conditions of drought, rocky establishments, and excessive calcium [12,13]. Accordingly, they have important applications for karst vegetation restoration [11,14].
Nitrogen-fixing bacteria are influenced by many factors, such as plant type [15,16], soil nutrients [17,18,19], and soil pH [20]. However, these parameters have usually been treated as independent environmental factors that affect communities of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria [10,21,22]. Few studies have explored the effects of composite factors on soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities in a given ecosystem [23]. In karst shrub ecosystems, soil properties and plant type show higher levels of spatial heterogeneity compared with forest and primary forest ecosystems [24]. This indicates that factors influencing soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria are more complex. However, the specific factors driving changes in the community structure of free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in shrub ecosystems are poorly known; symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria are well-documented [11]. Our previous study reported that vegetation types impacted this bacterial community, along with the vegetation restoration [15]. Therefore, we hypothesized that plant type had the greatest effect on this bacterial community structure in the karst shrub ecosystem and that a lower frequency of plant association with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers would result in a higher frequency of free-living N-fixing bacteria. Soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities were analyzed by quantitative PCR and T-RFLP in 21 shrub soils collected from the karst shrub ecosystems in the present study. Our objectives were to (1) characterize the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria and plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers in karst shrub ecosystems; (2) identify the critical parameters affecting the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This study site was laid at Huanjiang County in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, southwestern China (107°51′ to 108°43′ E, 24°44′ to 25°33′ N). This region is a subtropical mountainous monsoon climate. The mean annual rainfall and the mean annual air temperature are 1389 mm and 18.5 °C, respectively. The wet season starts in April and lasts until August, accounting for 70% of the annual precipitation [25]. Soil average depth in depressions and on hillslopes is 50–80 cm and 10–30 cm, respectively.

2.2. Survey of Plant and Collecting of Soil Sample

In June 2012, 21 shrub plots were established in Huanjiang County. The plot establishment considered environmental factors (i.e., slope position, aspect, and ascent (As); Table S1). Each plot (10 m × 10 m) was divided into four subplots (5 m × 5 m) for plant surveys. For the shrub vegetation survey, the subplot was divided into the shrubby layer and the herbaceous layer. All the individual trees with DBH > 1 cm were identified. Simultaneously, plant height, cover, and density were measured. Each potential plant associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers was surveyed for nodules during the plant surveys. Briefly, all small roots and 1/4 of the large roots of individuals were surveyed. The surface soil around roots was gently removed, and then we observed plants for nodules.
The plant diversity is calculated according to Ma et al. described in reference [26]. The Shannon–Wiener diversity (H′) and evenness indices (E) were applied to calculate the plant diversity index. The equations were as follow:
H = i = 1 S P i log 2 P i ,   E = H / H max = H / ln S
In these equations, S indicates total plant species in each community and is referred to as the plant species richness. P represents the importance value (IV), and thus Pi is the importance value (IV) of the ith plant species. The equation of importance value (IV) was as follow: IV = (relative height + relative abundance + relative coverage)/3. A coverage percentage of trees is the proportion of the elliptical area of the tree crown within all the covered areas to the area of a quadrat.
Each plot was divided into four subplots (5 m × 5 m), and five soil cores (diameter, 5 cm) in each subplot were collected. A total of 20 soil cores (depth, 0–15 cm) were collected from each plot and thoroughly mixed to form one composite soil sample. Twenty-one soils were sampled in the shrub ecosystems. Soil samples were removed from stones, animals, roots, and plant material through 2-mm sieves. The sieved soil sample was divided into two portions. One portion was kept at −70 °C for molecular analysis. The other portion was air-dried for soil physicochemical properties analysis.

2.3. Extraction and Purification of Soil DNA

Soil microbial DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of freeze-dried soil using the sodium dodecyl sulfate-guanidine isothiocyanate-polyethylene glycol (SDS-GITC-PEG) method according to Liang et al. described in reference [15]. The 50 μL of sterilized water was used to dissolve soil DNA. The concentration of DNA was measured using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop; PeqLab, Erlangen, Germany). The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C for further use.

2.4. Amplification of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Analyses of Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP)

The nifH gene, encoding a subunit of the nitrogenase enzyme, has been widely applied to study the distribution and diversity of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria [27]. The primer pair PolF (5′TGCGAYCCSAARGCBGACTC3′) and PolR (5′ATSGCCATCATYTCRCCGGA3′) was used to amplify nifH [10] to determine this bacterial community structure by T-RFLP. The 5′ end of the forward primer was labeled with 6-carboxy-fluorescein (FAM; Invitrogen, Shanghai, China). The 50 μL of PCR reaction mixtures contained: 25 μL 2× PCR Premix (0.5 mM deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTPs); 0.1 U of Prime STAR HS DNA polymerase), 1 μL genomic DNA (20 ng), 1 μL each primer (10 pM), and 19 μL H2O. The PCR conditions were as follows [10]: 95 °C for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 60 s, and 72 °C for 60 s; and a final extension of 10 min for 72 °C. The PCR products were purified with QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Tiangen Biotech Ltd., Beijing, China) and quantified with NanoDrop ND-1000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Approximately 200 ng of PCR products were digested with HaeIII enzymes and then sent to the Sunny Company (Shanghai, China) for T-RFLP analysis with an automated sequencer (model 373A; Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany).
T-RFLP data were analyzed using GeneScan Analysis Software (version 2.1; Applied Biosystems). Peak areas of terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs < 2 bp) were summed and defined as a T-RF. A T-RF relative abundance (RA) was calculated as follow: RA = (ni/N) × 100, where ni represents a T-RF peak area, and N represents total T-RFs peak areas in each sample. During the statistical analyses, the relative abundance of a peak area ˂1% was considered a minor peak, which was deleted as background noise [28]. The database T-RFLP was established based on 40 nifH sequences from karst regions (accession numbers KF859859 to KF859898), which was applied to identify taxa of free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria according to the Aldrich-Wolfe et al. described in reference [29].

2.5. Abundance of nifH Genes

The abundance of the nifH gene was measured by quantitative PCR (qPCR; ABI 7900, ABI, Foster City, CA, USA) with the PolF/PolR primers. The PCR reaction mixture with 10 μL included: 5 μL 1× Synergy SYBR Premix ExTaq (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), 0.2 μL each primer (10 pM; Invitrogen, China), 1 μL DNA template (5 ng μL−1), 0.2 μL Rox (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan), and 3.4 μL sterilized water. The PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 20 s; 5 cycles each of 95 °C for 15 s, 64 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 15 s; 35 cycles each of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 25 s, and 72 °C for 15 s. This PCR condition was slightly modified according to Poly et al. [10]. A standard curve (ranging from 102 to 108 μL−1) was generated using a plasmid from Bradyrhizobium sp. ISA1601 (KF859886) containing the nifH gene. The reactions in a single 384-well plate concluded soil DNA samples, positive control samples (plasmid samples for standard curve), and negative control samples without template DNA. Each sample concluded four technical replicates. The data were automatically processed with SDS 2.3 software containing the real-time PCR system. The amplification efficiency and R2 value for the standard curve was 99% and 0.99, respectively.

2.6. Determination of Soil Physicochemical Parameters

Soil pH was measured using a pH meter (Delta 320; Mettler-Toledo Instruments Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a soil/deionized water ratio of 1:2.5 (w/v). Olsen-P was extracted with sodium bicarbonate (0.5 M) and determined using the Mo-Sb colorimetric method [30]. Soil organic carbon was measured by oxidation with K2Cr2O7-H2SO4 and then titration with FeSO4. The total nitrogen was determined using a flow injection analyzer (FIAstar 5000, FOSS Company, Stockholm, Sweden) according to the Kjeldahl method [31]. Nitrate N (NO3-N) and ammonium N (NH4+-N) were extracted with 2 M KCl and measured with a flow injection analyzer.

2.7. Analyses of Statistics

The SPSS 19.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data analyses. The level of significance was defined as p < 0.05 with the least significant difference (LSD) test. Data were prior to log(x+1)-transformed without being normally distributed by SPSS 19.0. The Pearson correlation analysis was used to evaluate relationships between environmental factors and nifH gene abundance. Ordination techniques were used in a correspondence analysis (CA) to assess bacterial community structure (CANOCO 5.0; Microcomputer Power, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA). Forward selections, using redundancy analysis (RDA; CANOCO 5.0, Microcomputer Power, Inc., Ithaca, NY, USA), were applied to choose the significant environment parameters effect on bacterial community structure. Following the forward selection, the contribution of individual and interaction significant parameters to the bacterial community structure variation was determined by a variance partitioning analysis with CANOCO 5.0. A path analysis (using the plspm package in R) was applied to explore all significant parameters directly and indirectly influencing bacterial structure.

3. Results

3.1. Composition Community of Soil Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria from Different Plot Soils in Karst Shrub Ecosystems

A total of 27 T-RFs for soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria were obtained (Figure 1). The dominant T-RFs (≥3%) included 180, 157, 75, and 66 bp, accounting for 75% of the bacterial T-RFs in different plot soils. The dominant T-RFs of 180, 157, and 75 bp were closely related to Bradyrhizobium japonicum, Bradyrhizobium sp. ISA1601, and Bradyrhizobium sp. CCBAU 101065, respectively.

3.2. Factors Influencing Soil Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacterial Community Structure in Karst Shrub Ecosystems

The low frequency of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers was observed in 21 shrub plots (Table 1). Based on the correspondence analysis, the structure of the soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community varied among the 21 shrub soils (Figure 2). The Shannon diversity index (F = 3.7, p = 0.002) and richness index (F = 2.9, p = 0.007) for all plants; Shannon diversity index for plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers (F = 2.0, p = 0.049), aspect (F = 2.6, p = 0.019), ascent (F = 2.3, p = 0.039), and pH (F = 2.1, p = 0.047) contributed remarkably to soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure (Figure 3).
Variance partitioning showed that up to 43.9% of the variation in soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure was explained by pH, the richness index for all plants, Shannon diversity index for all plants and plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers, aspect, and ascent (p ˂ 0.05; Figure 4). Plant type had a predominant effect on soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure, and topography (aspect and ascent), and soil pH had minor effects. Additionally, the direct contribution of the main factors to soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure was larger than their interaction effects.
A path analysis indicated that plant type positively influenced soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure, while soil parameters negatively affected bacterial structure (Figure 5). Topography indirectly affected nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure via plants and soil (Figure 5).

3.3. Factors Influencing the Community Abundance of Free-Living Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in the Karst Shrub Ecosystems

The free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance ranged from 4.69 × 105 to 5.01 × 107 (Table 2). Significant negative relationships were observed between the abundance of nitrogen-fixing bacterial community and soil Olsen-P (F = −0.561, p < 0.05), pH (F = −0.719, p < 0.01), and the richness index for plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers (F = −0.443, p < 0.05; Table 3). This bacterial abundance was positively correlated with C/N (F = 0.475, p < 0.05), NH4+-N (F = 0.574, p < 0.01).

4. Discussion

The genus Bradyrhizobium is dominant in karst shrub regions, although the T-RFLP technique is limited in identifying the taxon. This result is at odds with a previous study on the same karst region based on a high-throughput sequencing technique [32]. Bradyrhizobium is highly adaptable [33], thus it is widely distributed and dominates in the karst and non-karst regions [11,34]. Additionally, Bradyrhizobium could import nitrogen through symbiotic and non-symbiotic relationships with plants [11,34]. Therefore, understanding the role of Bradyrhizobium can provide a basis for alleviating nitrogen limitations in karst shrub ecosystems.
In the present study, soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community composition was related to the Shannon diversity and richness indices of the total plant community. The results were consistent with many previous studies [15,25,35]. Two possible reasons can explain this. Firstly, nitrogen-fixing bacteria can promote plant growth and maintain the productivity and diversity of plants by directly impacting nitrogen availability [36]. Secondly, higher plant diversity is accompanied by greater root exudates and leaf litter input into soils [37], which would increase diazotrophic diversity. Therefore, the feedback between plants and soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria drives change for these bacteria and plant diversity in the karst shrub ecosystem. Besides plant diversity, plant functional groups (such as plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers and plants not associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers) could also influence soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities. Growing plants can consume carbohydrates, which are mainly derived from photosynthesis. The fate of photosynthesized C is influenced by N input [38,39]. The contribution of photosynthesized C to SOC pools is closely related to plant species [40]. In natural ecosystems, the primary source of nitrogen is biological nitrogen fixation by legume–rhizobium symbiosis [5]. Inefficient N use due to too few N2-fixing plant species in a given ecosystem is related to weakening photosynthetic capability by decreasing chlorophyll and Rubisco activity [41,42], both of which are involved in photosynthesis.
This would reduce carbon translocation from plants to belowground communities and rhizodeposition, resulting in limited plant growth. In the present study, a negative correlation between the richness of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers and free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance was observed in the karst shrub ecosystem. Few plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers existed in the karst shrub ecosystem, and thus provided less nitrogen and carbon input for plant growth. In this condition, soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance increased and enhanced nitrogen/carbon input. The plant growth would be promoted by nitrogen and carbon transfer from root-to-root contact or mycorrhizal networks. Therefore, the importance of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria as a pathway of nitrogen and carbon translation from plants to soil was observed in the karst shrub ecosystem, suggesting these bacteria play key roles in the vegetation restoration of the karst region.
Soil physicochemical properties also influence soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities [17,35,43]. Among the measured soil physicochemical parameters, pH was the most significant factor influencing the composition and abundance of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the present study, consistent with previous reports [34,43]. Soil pH influences microbes by affecting the pH homeostasis of microbial cells or regulating soil nutrient availability. Therefore, soil pH might exert stress indirectly on free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Soil pH ranged from 6.5 to 8.0 in the present study, and other physicochemical conditions varied, thus shaping soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structures. The result was in agreement with a previous study [43], in which soil pH ranged from 5.08 to 5.53 and was much narrower than the range of soil pH values in our study. Additionally, soil C/N was also a key factor affecting soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance. Soils with low C/N have high rates of nitrogen mineralization [44] and provide more nutrients for soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial use.
Topography plays a key role in the distribution of microbial communities. This may be explained by the effects of topography on water distribution, leaching infiltration, and runoff potential [45,46], as well as its effects on the erosion and redistribution of fine soil particles and thus the partial redistribution of plants. Therefore, topography indirectly influences microbial communities mainly by affecting soil physicochemical properties [47,48] and plant communities [49,50,51]. This is partially consistent with our previous research reporting that the composition and abundance of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria are strongly influenced by differences in soil pH and plant diversity among topographies. Karst is characterized by a distinctive topography, the action of acidic water on carbonate bedrock, steep geological features, leading to a distinctive composition of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria. High-throughput sequencing will be used to identify the taxa of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the future.
Additionally, the unexplained variation in soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure may be explained by factors that were not considered in this study. For example, rock exposure is greater in the karst region than in other regions. The exposed rocks can form different rain-funneling structures. These rain-funneling structures can produce heterogeneous soil nutrients from rocks to open soil [52] and thereby affect the soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure.
Previous studies have shown that soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure can be shaped by multiple environmental conditions, including soil parameters [20], geography [19], and plant type [15]. The positive effect of plant type on soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure is found in the present study, while soil parameters negatively influence these bacteria. This result is not in agreement with a previous study on the karst region by Xiao et al. [32]. They have reported that the effect of plant species on soil dominant nitrogen-fixing bacterial taxa is little compared with soil property. The possible reason for this is that the study by Xiao et al. [32] is based on an artificial experiment, and only two leguminous plants were introduced. It is interesting that soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance is negatively corrected with the richness index for plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers. According to our present study result, a lower frequency of plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers was observed. This indicated that nitrogen fixation by soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria was the most important nitrogen source for karst shrub ecosystems. Thus, these bacteria play an important role in relieving the nitrogen-limited karst shrub ecosystem. Except for plants, soil parameter, i.e., soil molybdenum content, has a greater effect on soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities [53]. This could explain why nearly half of the observed variation in the free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria community structure has not been explained by the environmental variables measured in this study. Additionally, the effect of a single parameter (i.e., plant species) on soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structures was greater than their interaction effects, similar to a previous study of microbial community structure [54]. This may mean the dominant genus Bradyrhizobium in our study could form a symbiotic association with leguminous plants [11].

5. Conclusions

This study was a large-scale investigation of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities in the karst shrub ecosystems of southwestern China. The genus Bradyrhizobium is dominant in the karst shrub ecosystems. The topography, plant type, and soil pH were key factors shaping the soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure. This is the first step toward the quantitative evaluation of the relative contributions of environmental parameters to the observed distribution of these bacteria. The environmental factors examined in this study accounted for approximately half of the observed variations of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure. Plant type and topography were particularly important factors for the soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial distribution in the karst shrub ecosystems of southwestern China. The important sources of fixed nitrogen by soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria as a pathway of restoration vegetation in the karst regions is clearly demonstrated by the negative correlation between soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance and the richness index for plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f13020163/s1, Table S1: Plot basic information.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L., X.H. and Y.S.; methodology, Y.L., X.C., L.H. and F.P.; formal analysis, Y.L. and F.P.; investigation, Y.L., X.H. and F.P.; data curation, methodology, Y.L., X.C. and F.P.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and Y.S.; supervision, Y.S.; project administration, Y.S.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and Y.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was funding by the Guangxi Innovation Driven Development Special Fund Project of China (AA20302018-9), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U20A2011, 41907208: 31800441; 31870503), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2017GXNSFAA198241), the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ISA2021102), and the Opening Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics (KDL & Guangxi202102).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. LeBauer, D.S.; Treseder, K.K. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 2008, 89, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Vitousek, P.M.; Howarth, R.W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? Biogeochemistry 1991, 13, 87–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pan, F.J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, S.J.; Li, D.J.; Wang, K.L. Leaf N: P stoichiometry across plant functional groups in the karst region of southwestern China. Trees Struct. Funct. 2015, 29, 883–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, W.; Zhao, J.; Pan, F.J.; Li, D.J.; Chen, H.S.; Wang, K.L. Changes in nitrogen and phosphorus limitation during secondary succession in a karst region in southwest China. Plant Soil 2015, 391, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peoples, M.B.; Herridge, D.F.; Ladha, J.K. Biological nitrogen fixation: An efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production? Plant Soil 1995, 174, 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shridhar, B.S. Review: Nitrogen fixing microorganisms. Int. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 3, 46–52. [Google Scholar]
  7. Burgmann, H.; Widmer, F.; Von Sigler, W.; Zeyer, J. New molecular screening tools for analysis of free-living diazotrophs in soil. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2004, 70, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kahindi, J.H.P.; Woomer, P.; George, T.; de Souza Moreira, F.M.; Karanja, N.K.; Giller, K.E. Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and ecosystem function in the tropics: The role of nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl. Soil Ecol. 1997, 6, 55–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lovell, C.R.; Piceno, Y.M.; Quattro, J.M.; Bagwell, C.E. Molecular analysis of diazotroph diversity in the rhizosphere of the smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 3814–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Poly, F.; Ranjard, L.; Nazaret, S.; Goirbiere, F.; Monrozier, L.J. Comparison of nifH gene pools in soils and soil microenvironments with contrasting properties. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 2255–2262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, L.; He, X.Y.; Wang, K.L.; Xie, Y.J.; Xie, Q.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Chen, C.Y. The Bradyrhizobium-legume symbiosis is dominant in the shrubby ecosystem of the Karst region, Southwest China. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2015, 68, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lan, A.J.; Zhang, B.P.; Xiong, K.N.; An, Y.L. Spatial pattern of the fragile karst environment in southwest Guizhou province. Geogr. Res. 2003, 22, 733–741. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Tu, Y.L. A analysis of flora and ecological characteristics of karst scrubs in Guizhou province. J. Guizhou Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 1995, 13, 1–8. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Pan, F.J.; Liang, Y.M.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, J.; Wang, K.L. Enhanced nitrogen availability in karst ecosystems by oxalic acid release in the rhizosphere. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liang, Y.M.; Pan, F.J.; He, X.Y.; Chen, X.B.; Su, Y.R. Effect of vegetation types on soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen-fixing bacterial communities in a karst region. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2016, 23, 18482–18491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mao, Y.; Yannarell, A.C.; Mackie, R.I.; Davis, S.C.; Mackie, R.I. Changes in N-transforming archaea and bacteria in soil during the establishment of bioenergy crops. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Coelho, M.R.R.; Marriel, I.; Jenkins, S.N.; Lanyon, C.; Seldin, L.; O’Donnell, A.G. Molecular detection and quantification of nifH gene sequences in the rhizosphere of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) sown with two levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2009, 42, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Tai, X.S.; Mao, W.L.; Liu, G.X.; Chen, T.; Zhang, W.; Wu, X.K.; Long, H.Z.; Zhang, B.G.; Zhang, Y. High diversity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the upper reaches of the Heihe River, northwestern China. Biogeosciences 2013, 10, 5589–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Zhang, Y.G.; Li, D.Q.; Wang, H.M.; Xiao, Q.M.; Liu, X.D. Molecular diversity of nitrogen-fixing bacteria from the Tibetan Plateau, China. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 260, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Nelso, D.R.; Mele, P.M. The impact of crop residue amendments and limes on microbial community structure and nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the wheat rhizosphere. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2006, 44, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Collavino, M.M.; Tripp, H.J.; Frank, I.E.; Vidoz, M.L.; Calderoli, P.A.; Donato, M.; Zehr, J.P.; Aguilar, O.M. NifH pyrosequencing reveals the potential for location-specific soil chemistry to influence N2-fixing community dynamics. Environ. Microb. 2014, 16, 3211–3223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Kou, Y.; Wang, J.; Tu, B.; Li, H.; Li, X.; Wang, C.; Yao, M. Soil pH is a major driver of soil diazotrophic community assembly in Qinghai-Tibet alpine meadows. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Y.S.; Li, C.N.; Shen, Z.H.; Rui, J.P.; Jin, D.C.; Li, J.B.; Li, X.Z. Community assemblage of free-living diazotrophs along the elevational gradient of Mount Gongga. Soil Ecol. Lett. 2019, 1, 136–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zhang, W.; Chen, H.S.; Wang, K.L.; Hou, Y.; Zhang, J.G. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon and available phosphorus in a typical Karst depression, northwest of Guangxi. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 5168–5175. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. He, X.Y.; Wang, K.L.; Zhang, W.; Chen, Z.H.; Zhu, Y.G.; Chen, H.S. Positive correlation between soil bacterial metabolic and plant species diversity and bacterial and fungal diversity in a vegetation succession on Karst. Plant Soil 2008, 307, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, K.P.; Huang, J.H.; Yu, S.L.; Chen, L.Z. Plant community diversity in Dongling Mountain Beijing, China, species richness, evenness and species diversity. Acta Ecol. Sin. 1995, 15, 268–277. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Hsu, S.F.; Buckley, D.H. Evidence for the functional significance of diazotroph community structure in soil. ISME J. 2008, 3, 124–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lukow, T.; Dunfield, P.F.; Liesack, W. Use of the T-RFLP technique to assess spatial and temporal changes in the bacterial community structure with in an agricultural soil planted with transgenic and no transgenic potato plants. FEMS Microbial. Ecol. 2000, 32, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Aldrich-Wolfe, L. Distinct mycorrhizal communities on new and established hosts in a transitional tropical plant community. Ecology 2007, 88, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Colwell, J.D. The estimation of phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 1963, 3, 190–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bremner, J.M. Total nitrogen. In Methods of Soil Analysis; Black, C.A., Ed.; American Society of Agronomy, Inc.: Madison, WI, USA, 1965; Volume 2, pp. 1149–1178. [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiao, D.; Tan, Y.J.; Liu, X.; Yang, R.; Zhang, W.; He, X.Y.; Xu, Z.H.; Wang, K.L. Responses of soil diazotrophs to legume species and density in a karst grassland, southwest China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2020, 288, 106707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koponen, P.; Nygren, P.; Domenach, A.M.; Le Roux, C.; Saur, E.; Roggy, J.C. Nodulation and dinitrogen fixation of legume trees in a tropical freshwater swamp forest in French Guiana. J. Trop. Ecol. 2003, 19, 655–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pereira e Silva, M.C.; Schloter-Hai, B.; Schloter, M.; van Elsas, J.D.; Salles, J.F. Temporal Dynamics of Abundance and Composition of Nitrogen-Fixing Communities across Agricultural Soils. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e74500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Legay, N.; Baxendale, C.; Grigulis, K.; Krainer, U.; Kastl, E.; Schloter, M.; Bardgett, R.; Arnoldi, C.; Bahn, M.; Dumont, M. Contribution of above-and below-ground plant traits to the structure and function of grassland soil microbial communities. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1011–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Van der Heijden, M.G.; Bardgett, R.D.; van Straalen, N.M. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 296–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Paul, E.A. The nature and dynamics of soil organic matter: Plant inputs, microbial transformations, and organic matter stabilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2016, 98, 109–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kuzyakov, Y.; Biryukova, O.; Kuznetzova, T.; Molter, K. Carbon partitioning in plant soil, carbon dioxide fluxes and enzyme activities as affected by cutting ryegrass. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2002, 35, 348–358. [Google Scholar]
  39. Atere, C.T.; Ge, T.D.; Zhu, Z.K.; Tong, C.L.; Jones, D.L.; Shibistova, O.; Guggenberger, G.; Wu, J.S. Rice rhizodeposition and carbon stabilization in paddy soil are regulated via dry-rewetting cycles and nitrogen fertilization. Biol. Fert. Soils 2017, 53, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kuzyakov, Y.; Domanski, G. Carbon input by plant into the soil. Review. Z. Pflanzenernahr. Bodenkd. 2000, 163, 421–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, M.; Shi, S.; Lin, F.; Hao, Z.Q.; Jiang, P.; Dai, G.H. Effects of soil water and nitrogen on growth and photosynthetic response of Manchurian Ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) seedlings in Northeastern China. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Lin, Y.; Hu, Y.G.; Ren, C.Z.; Guo, L.C.; Wang, C.L.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, X.J.; Phendukani, H.; Zeng, Z.H. Effects of nitrogen application on chlorophyll fluorescence parameter and leaf gas exchange in naked oat. J. Integ. Agric. 2013, 12, 2164–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Reardon, C.L.; Gollany, H.T.; Wuest, S.B. Diazotroph community structure and abundance in wheat–fallow and wheat–pea crop rotations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 69, 406–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Osler, G.H.R.; Sommerkorn, M. Toward a complete soil C and N cycle, incorporating the soil fauna. Ecology 2007, 88, 1611–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Senthilkumar, S.; Kravchenko, A.N.; Robertson, G.P. Topography influences management system effects on total soil carbon and nitrogen. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2009, 73, 2059–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wiaux, F.; Cornelis, J.T.; Cao, W.; Vanclooster, M.; Van Oost, K. Combined effect of geomorphic and pedogenic processes on the distribution of soil organic carbon quality along an eroding hillslope on loess soil. Geoderma 2014, 216, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, S.Z.; Su, Y.R.; Zhang, W.; Chen, X.B.; He, X.Y. Effects of slope position and soil horizon on soil microbial biomass and abundance in karst primary forest of Southwest China. Environ. Sci. 2015, 36, 3832–3838. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Gotsch, S. Land cover and slope position affect water use and microclimate in the tropical montane cloud forests of Central Veracruz, Mexico. In Proceedings of the New Frontiers in Tropical Biology: The Next 50 Years (A Joint Meeting of ATBC and OTS), San Jose, Costa Rica, 23–27 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  49. Brewer, S.W.; Rejmanek, M.; Webb, M.A.H.; Fine, P.V.A. Relationships of phytogeography and diversity of tropical tree species with limestone topography in Southern Belize. J. Biogeogr. 2003, 30, 1669–1688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Burke, A. Classification and ordination of plant communities of the Naukluft Mountain, Namibia. J. Veg. Sci. 2001, 12, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, Z.H.; Hu, G.; Ni, J. Effects of topographical and edaphic factors on the distribution of plant communities in two subtropical karst forests, southwestern China. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Göransson, H.; Edwards, P.J.; Perreijn, K.; Smittenberg, R.H.; Venterink, H.O. Rocks create nitrogen hotspots and N: P heterogeneity by funnelling rain. Biogeochemistry 2014, 121, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Jean, M.E.; Phalyvong, K.; Forest-Drolet, J.; Belleng, J.P. Molybdenum and phosphorus limitation of asymbiotic nitrogen fixation in forests of Eastern Canada: Influence of vegetative cover and seasonal variability. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 67, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Y.; Jia, Z.J.; Sun, Q.Y.; Zhan, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, D. Ecological restoration alter microbial communities in mine tailings profiles. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The average relative abundance of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria based on terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs, HaeIII enzymes digestion) in different plot soils. The numbers of 1, 2, 3, …, 21 represented the plot1, plot 2, plot 3, …, plot 21, respectively.
Figure 1. The average relative abundance of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria based on terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs, HaeIII enzymes digestion) in different plot soils. The numbers of 1, 2, 3, …, 21 represented the plot1, plot 2, plot 3, …, plot 21, respectively.
Forests 13 00163 g001
Figure 2. CA analysis of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structures in the shrub ecosystems based on T-RFLP profiles using HaeIII enzymes. The numbers of 1, 2, 3, …, 21 represent the plot1, plot 2, plot 3, …, plot 21, respectively.
Figure 2. CA analysis of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structures in the shrub ecosystems based on T-RFLP profiles using HaeIII enzymes. The numbers of 1, 2, 3, …, 21 represent the plot1, plot 2, plot 3, …, plot 21, respectively.
Forests 13 00163 g002
Figure 3. RAD analysis of environment factors influencing structures of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the shrub ecosystems. The bacterial distributions were shown in the figure based on T-RFLP profiles using HaeIII enzymes.
Figure 3. RAD analysis of environment factors influencing structures of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the shrub ecosystems. The bacterial distributions were shown in the figure based on T-RFLP profiles using HaeIII enzymes.
Forests 13 00163 g003
Figure 4. Topographical factor, plant and soil physicochemical properties of each significant parameter to the proportion of variation explained (%) for the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria by pH, all of plant richness index (R), all of plant Shannon diversity index (H), Shannon diversity index of plants associated with symbiotic Nitrogen-fixers (H_ N2), aspect (Asp) and ascent (As).
Figure 4. Topographical factor, plant and soil physicochemical properties of each significant parameter to the proportion of variation explained (%) for the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria by pH, all of plant richness index (R), all of plant Shannon diversity index (H), Shannon diversity index of plants associated with symbiotic Nitrogen-fixers (H_ N2), aspect (Asp) and ascent (As).
Forests 13 00163 g004
Figure 5. Path model analysis of plant, soil physicochemical parameters, and topography directly and indirectly affect the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the karst shrub ecosystems. Value in the arrow is a path coefficient and indicates the independent variable directly influencing the dependent variable.
Figure 5. Path model analysis of plant, soil physicochemical parameters, and topography directly and indirectly affect the community structure of soil free-living nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the karst shrub ecosystems. Value in the arrow is a path coefficient and indicates the independent variable directly influencing the dependent variable.
Forests 13 00163 g005
Table 1. Dominant plants and plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers from all sample plots.
Table 1. Dominant plants and plants associated with symbiotic nitrogen-fixers from all sample plots.
PlotDominant SpeciesPlants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-FixersRichness of all PlantShannon Diversity ofall PlantRichness of N2-Fixing PlantShannon Diversity of N2-Fixing Plant
Plot1Croton lachnocarpus, Mahonia fortunei, Ficus tinctoriaBauhinia hypochrysa, Dalbergia hancei424.6920.6
Plot2Loropetalum chinense, Cyclobalanopsis glauca, Croton lachnocarpusBauhinia acuminata, Bauhinia hypochrysa, Pterolobium punctatum, Albizia odoratissima, Derris fordii564.9150.67
Plot3Sinosideroxylon pedunculatum, Derris fordii, Chukrasia tabularisBauhinia hypochrysa, Pterolobium punctatum, Albizia odoratissima, Derris fordii504.9540.5
Plot4Litsea coreana, Pyrus calleryana, Syzygium championii-384.1100
Plot5Viburnum triplinerve, Loropetalum chinense, Pyrus calleryanaCampylotropis delavayi, Sophora tonkinensis314.5120.11
Plot6Pyracantha fortuneana, Rosa laevigata, Mallotus repandusBauhinia championii, Indigofera atropurpurea535.0020.15
Plot7Pterolobium punctatum, Alchornea trewioides, Xylosma controversumBauhinia hypochrysa, Pterolobium punctatum685.5220.56
Plot8Bauhinia hypochrysa, Millettia pachycarpa, Ficus tinctoriaMillettia pachycarpa, Bauhinia hypochrysa, Pterolobium punctatum615.2030.73
Plot9Chaydaia rubrinervis, Sinoadina racemosa, Xylosma controversumBauhinia hypochrysa, Pterolobium punctatum615.4520.42
Plot10Litsea coreana, Pittosporum tonkinense, Syzygium championiiMillettia pachycarpa, Bauhinia championii, Albizia odoratissima484.4030.12
Plot11Loropetalum chinense, Pittosporum tonkinense, Syzygium championiiIndigofera atropurpurea344.4310.13
Plot12Loropetalum chinense, Litsea coreana, Syzygium championiiCampylotropis delavayi, Albizia odoratissima404.7820.14
Plot13Syzygium championii, Pyracantha fortuneana, Viburnum triplinerveMillettia eurybotrya, Campylotropis delavayi495.2120.09
Plot14Pittosporum tonkinense, Syzygium championii, Litsea coreanaBauhinia championii, Indigofera atropurpurea, Campylotropis delavayi504.9930.18
Plot15Litsea coreana, Pittosporum tonkinense, Itea chinensisBauhinia championii354.4710.22
Plot16Loropetalum chinense, Pyracantha fortuneana, Pyrus calleryanaAlbizia odoratissima, Gelsemium elegans414.7420.21
Plot17Loropetalum chinense, Litsea coreana, Pyrus calleryanaDendrolobium triangulare,404.3600
Plot18Loropetalum chinense, Viburnum fordiae, Viburnum triplinerve-474.5700
Plot19Alangium chinense, Pyracantha fortuneana, Alchornea trewioidesDendrolobium triangulare, Gelsemium elegans, Bauhinia championii615.0930.28
Plot20Loropetalum chinense, Pyrus calleryana, Pyracantha fortuneanaGelsemium elegans, Campylotropis delavayi364.4620.25
Plot21Loropetalum chinense, Pyracantha fortuneana, Pistacia weinmannifoliaPterolobium punctatum344.3410.06
Table 2. Soil physicochemical properties and nifH gene abundance in all sample plots.
Table 2. Soil physicochemical properties and nifH gene abundance in all sample plots.
PlotOlsen-P (mg·kg−1)pHTotal Nitrogen (g·kg−1)Soil Organic Carbon (g·kg−1)C/NNH4+-N (mg·kg−1)NO3-N (mg·kg−1)nifH Gene Abundance
Plot17.167.612.53120.79.6334.234.553.80 × 106
Plot25.437.324.7157.112.1117.255.634.78 × 106
Plot35.597.388.7787.429.9729.534.874.07 × 106
Plot43.487.145.3555.8910.4518.565.571.61 × 106
Plot55.347.444.1265.1615.8123.244.985.29 × 105
Plot65.37.814.3263.0914.5922.684.696.65 × 105
Plot74.787.924.4658.7313.1724.846.454.04 × 106
Plot85.437.326.7678.2111.5627.474.323.89 × 106
Plot94.027.883.9957.5414.4219.545.861.51 × 106
Plot104.567.595.7866.7811.5523.465.025.34 × 106
Plot116.447.85.5667.9412.2323.525.452.27 × 106
Plot125.467.826.2664.7510.3424.485.125.27 × 106
Plot136.577.984.9371.4514.524.894.861.32 × 106
Plot146.757.876.2572.8611.6625.354.682.98 × 106
Plot156.247.836.3575.5311.8926.464.562.42 × 106
Plot165.227.774.3565.6715.0925.685.361.19 × 107
Plot173.747.273.7656.515.0118.5653682.87 × 107
Plot182.796.522.5445.3717.8446.365.875.01 × 107
Plot194.737.784.157.351424.875.965.36 × 105
Plot203.717.953.1650.0915.8616.786.544.98 × 106
Plot214.168.034.5169.2115.3625.455.674.69 × 105
Table 3. Pearson correlations among diversity of all plants and plants associated with symbiotic N-fixers, soil physicochemical properties, free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance.
Table 3. Pearson correlations among diversity of all plants and plants associated with symbiotic N-fixers, soil physicochemical properties, free-living nitrogen-fixing bacterial abundance.
nifH AbundanceShannon Diversity Index of Plants Associated with Symbiotic N-FixersRichness Index of Plants Associated with Symbiotic N-FixersShannon Diversity Index of all PlantsRichness Index of all PlantsC/NSOCTNpHAPNO3-N
NH4+-N0.574 **nsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
NO3-Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns-
AP−0.516 *nsnsnsns−0.534 *0.727 **0.662 **ns-
pH−0.719 *nsnsnsnsnsnsns-
TNns0.468 *nsnsns0.796 **0.686 **-
SOCnsnsnsnsns−0.61 **-
C/N0.475 *nsnsnsns-
Richness index of all plantsns0.602 *0.502 *0.857 **-
Shannon diversity index of all plantsns0.601 *0.509 *-
Richness index of plants associated with symbiotic N-fixers−0.443 *0.676 *-
Shannon diversity index of plants associated with symbiotic N-fixersns-
nifH abundance-
Note: ns means not significant; significance levels are indicated by asterisks: * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, Y.; He, X.; Chen, X.; Su, Y.; Pan, F.; Hu, L. Low Frequency of Plants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixers Exhibits High Frequency of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria: A Study in Karst Shrub Ecosystems of Southwest China. Forests 2022, 13, 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020163

AMA Style

Liang Y, He X, Chen X, Su Y, Pan F, Hu L. Low Frequency of Plants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixers Exhibits High Frequency of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria: A Study in Karst Shrub Ecosystems of Southwest China. Forests. 2022; 13(2):163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Yueming, Xunyang He, Xiangbi Chen, Yirong Su, Fujing Pan, and Lening Hu. 2022. "Low Frequency of Plants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixers Exhibits High Frequency of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria: A Study in Karst Shrub Ecosystems of Southwest China" Forests 13, no. 2: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020163

APA Style

Liang, Y., He, X., Chen, X., Su, Y., Pan, F., & Hu, L. (2022). Low Frequency of Plants Associated with Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixers Exhibits High Frequency of Free-Living Nitrogen Fixing Bacteria: A Study in Karst Shrub Ecosystems of Southwest China. Forests, 13(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop