Next Article in Journal
Heritage Trees as an Important Sanctuary for Saproxylic Beetles in the Central European Landscape: A Case Study from Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Analyses of the 4-Coumarate: CoA Ligase (4CL) Gene Family in Eucommia ulmoides
Previous Article in Journal
Motivations and Trade-Offs for Sustainability in Family Forestry and Tourism Firms: A Cross-National Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endogenous Hormones and Biochemical Changes during Flower Development and Florescence in the Buds and Leaves of Lycium ruthenicum Murr
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Forests
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/f13071127
forests-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influences of Shading on Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.)

by
Huixin Gang
†,
Danni Zhang
†,
Xiaojuan Sun
,
Junwei Huo
* and
Dong Qin
*
Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (Northeast Region), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, College of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Forests 2022, 13(7), 1127; https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071127
Submission received: 27 May 2022 / Revised: 10 July 2022 / Accepted: 15 July 2022 / Published: 17 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Physiological Responses of Trees to Biotic and Abiotic Stresses)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cultivation conditions may greatly affect fruit quality, especially in the accumulation of functional metabolites. Blackcurrant fruits (Ribes nigrum L.) have high ascorbic acid (AsA) concentrations. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the influence of different shading treatments (full sunlight, and 40% and 60% sunlight) on the fruits’ maturity, and on the levels of fruit firmness, soluble solid, AsA, and enzyme activity involved in AsA biosynthesis and recycling in two blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) cultivars, ‘Heifeng’ and ‘Adelinia’. Shading conditions of 40% and 60% sunlight delayed fruit ripening and increased fruit firmness in both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. Soluble solids in ‘Adelinia’ were markedly reduced by shading compared with ‘Heifeng’. Compared with full sunlight, the AsA content was significantly decreased in the ripe fruits under the 40% and 60% shading treatments. Additionally, the AsA content was decreased during the fruit development process under the 60% shading treatment, which was associated with the reduced activity of the enzymes monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR), dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR), glutathione oxidoreductase (GR), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and L-galactose dehydrogenase (GalDH) involved in the biosynthesis and recycling pathway of AsA. The correlation analysis results showed that the activity of MDHAR, DHAR, GR, APX, and GalDH was significantly positively correlated with AsA concentrations during the 60% shading treatment in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits, suggesting that AsA biosynthesis and recycling were affected and the two cultivars have similar mechanisms to deal with shading. Our results not only provide a better understanding of the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation under shading, but also provide a theoretical basis for taking effective cultivation measures aimed at the improvement of AsA levels in blackcurrant fruits.

1. Introduction

Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.) is a berry shrub species that has high cold tolerance and is natively distributed in the forests of Northern Hemisphere [1]. These berry shrubs are an important component of forest ecosystems in terms of productivity and diversity. They can drive ecosystem processes such as ecosystem carbon cycling, increase forest carbon sink, and reduce water loss and soil erosion [2]. Furthermore, forest animals rely on berry crops for foraging [3]. Blackcurrants have been a major economic crop in many European countries since the 1400s, and they originate from Northern Asia and Central and Eastern Europe. Additionally, this species is widely cultivated in the cooler- and humid-climate areas [4]. The ascorbic acid content of blackcurrant is about 200−400 mg/100 g fresh weight (FW), providing comprehensive powerful antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer activity [5,6]. L-Ascorbic acid (AsA), namely vitamin C, can be biosynthesized by plants and most animals, whereas primates lost this ability during evolution and, thus, have to obtain AsA through fruits and vegetables [7]. Therefore, it is essential to clarify the factors that affect the AsA content in plants, and this will help effectively increase the AsA content in harvestable plant organs.
AsA is synthesized from GDP-D-mannose via GDP-L-galactose, L-galactose, and L-galactono-1,4-lactone as intermediates [8] in apple, kiwi, tomato, and citrus fruits [9,10]. Similarly, Hancock et al. [11] reported that the ASA in blackcurrants is also synthesized through the L-galactose pathway. The AsA level in plants are maintained by an effective balance of the biosynthesis, regeneration, and degradation pathways. The regeneration pathway was described by Noctor and Foyer [12] as the ascorbic acid glutathione system (AsA-GSH). Monodehydroascorbic acid (MDHA) could be reduced to AsA by monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) or generate AsA and dehydroascorbic acid (DHA) through non-enzymatic disproportionation. Additionally, most DHA could be reduced to AsA using glutathione (GSH) as a reducing substrate by dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR). GSH could be regenerated from oxidized glutathione dimer (GSSG) by NADPH-dependent glutathione oxidoreductase (GR).
The AsA content in plants could be influenced by environmental factors. Walker et al. [13] revealed that growing season, location, air temperature, and solar radiation have significant effects on AsA accumulation in blackcurrant fruits. In addition, Sari et al. [14] found that the leaves under high light intensity had higher AsA content than those under shading. The negative effects of shading on AsA accumulation have also been described in apple peel [15,16], grape berries [17], kiwifruit [18], and tomato [19,20]. The AsA level in apple fruits exposed to sunlight was significantly higher than those on the shaded side [21]. This was mainly due to two reasons: Firstly, the glucose was synthesized through photosynthesis in leaves under light [22]. AsA could be synthesized from glucose and the AsA level was reported to be positively associated with the glucose and sucrose level [23,24]. Secondly, the large amount of H2O2 generated in the PSI system under light could be removed by the redox reaction process of AsA [25,26]. However, the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation in blackcurrant under shading is still unknown.
Shading affects fruit yield and quality, and the impact is closely associated with plant species and environmental conditions. In croton, the photosynthetic intensity was decreased, while plant height and leaf area were increased under 70% shading treatment [27]. Olives (Olea europaea) grown under 50% shading significantly increased the plant height and the number of leaves compared with those under full sunlight [14]. Seed yield and nutritional quality parameters were significantly improved in the slow growth stage and mature stage of oilseed peony trees treated with shading [28]. Qiao et al. [29] reported that shading intensity was positively correlated with the protein content, wet gluten content, dough development time, and dough stability time of wheat, but negatively correlated with the softening degree.
The fruits of blackcurrant are rich in AsA, which was higher than in apple, grape, kiwifruit, tomato, etc. [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Although the AsA content in these fruit has been reported, the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation in blackcurrant fruits, resulting from the changes in enzyme activity in AsA biosynthesis and recycling, remains unknown. Blackcurrant is a small shrub and is usually shaded by tall trees. Thus, it is essential to clarify the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation in blackcurrant under shading. In this work, we used two blackcurrant cultivars, ‘Heifeng’ and ‘Adelinia’, with different levels of AsA content in the fruits as materials. ‘Heifeng’ is a common blackcurrant cultivar with the characteristics of high yield but a low AsA content (144.79 ± 15.09 mg/100 g·FW). ‘Adelinia’ is a cold-resistant blackcurrant cultivar with large fruit and a high AsA content (274.15 ± 9.49 mg/100 g·FW) [30,31]. To further understand the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation in blackcurrant under shading, we systematically studied the AsA levels, enzyme activity, and AsA recycling in blackcurrant fruits under different light conditions. Our results provide a better understanding of the regulation mechanism of AsA accumulation and the theoretical basis for improving AsA levels in blackcurrant fruits.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

Ten-year-old ‘Adelinia’ (High AsA) and ‘Heifeng’ (Low AsA) plants were chosen for the study. The plants were grown in a chernozem soil with spacing of 1.0 m × 2.0 m in the blackcurrant germplasm resource garden at Northeast Agricultural University (Harbin, China, 44°04′ N, 125°42′ E). They were well watered under natural growing conditions using routine management.

2.2. Experimental Treatments

Nine blackcurrant trees, with each cultivar a similar size, were divided into three groups. Group 1 (T1) and group 2 (T2) were treated with about 40% and 60% shading rates, respectively. Group 3 (CK) was grown under full sunlight. All the trees were treated from April 25 and each treatment consisted of 3 replications. Shade nets were installed approximately 30 cm above the crown of each tree to provide shading treatment. The shade nets were cleaned daily to remove fouling organisms and debris. Fresh fruit without diseases and insect pests were collected every ten days from the young fruit stage to the ripe stage. The control group was collected 5 times while the treatment groups were collected 6 times as a result of delaying of the maturity period after shading in this experiment. The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further experiments.

2.3. Measurement of Fruit Quality

Thirty fruits were randomly selected for measurement. The soluble solid content of the fruits was determined using a digital refractometer BD-Z55. The firmness of the fruits was determined using a durometer GY-4.

2.4. Measurement of Components and Enzyme Activity in AsA Biosynthesis and Metabolism

The AsA, DHA, GSH, and GSSG contents were determined, according to the manufacturers’ protocols, using AsA, DHA, GSH, and GSSG detection kits (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The activity of DHAR, MDHAR, GR, and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) was determined using DHAR, MDHAR, GR, and APX activity detection kits (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The total AsA (T-AsA) content and total GSH (T-GSH) content were calculated as follows:
CT-AsA = CAsA + CDHA
CT-GSH = CGSH + CGSSG

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Shading on Maturity of Blackcurrant Fruits

Shading conditions delayed the ripening of blackcurrant fruit in both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. The trees were treated from 25 April, and the young fruit stages were recorded on 20 May in both shading treatments and the control. However, the fruit expanding stage was delayed by 10 days compared with the control group. Since then, the half-veraison stage, veraison fruit stage, and ripe fruit stage were all delayed by about 10 days under the 40% and 60% shading treatments (Table S1).

3.2. Effects of Shading on Firmness and Soluble Solid Level in Blackcurrant Fruits

The firmness of the ripe fruits was enhanced under both the 40% and 60% shading treatments (Table 1). The firmness of the ripe ‘Adelinia’ fruits under the treatment of 40% and 60% shading were about 1.97 and 2.36 times higher than that of the control fruit, respectively. The firmness of the ripe ‘Heifeng’ fruits under the treatment of 40% and 60% shading were 1.70 and 2.21 times higher than that of the control fruits, respectively. The firmness of the ‘Heifeng’ fruits was slightly higher than that of the ‘Adelinia’ fruits.
The effects of shading on soluble solid content were different between cultivars. The soluble solid content in the ripe fruits of ‘Adelinia’ without the shading treatment (18.9%) was higher than that of ‘Heifeng’ (17.4%). The shading treatment of 40% and 60% both reduced the soluble solid content in the ripe fruits of ‘Adelinia’. However, there was no significant difference in ‘Heifeng’ under 40% and 60% shading, compared with CK. As for ‘Heifeng’, our results show that soluble solid content was not affected by shading (Table 1).

3.3. Effects of Shading on AsA, DHA and T-AsA Levels in Blackcurrant Fruits

The AsA, T-AsA, and DHA contents in fruits were measured during fruit growth under different shading treatments. As shown in Figure 1, the AsA, T-AsA, and DHA contents showed a decreasing trend during fruit ripening under different shading treatments in both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. AsA had the same tendency as T-ASA in the two cultivars. The highest AsA and T-AsA concentrations were both observed at the young fruit stage. Compared with CK, a huge decline in T-AsA and AsA contents was found in the 60% shading treatment in both the ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits, while the T-AsA and AsA contents under 40% shading showed no significant differences in the young fruit stage and decreased in the ripe fruit stage.
The T-AsA and AsA contents in the ‘Adelinia’ fruits without shading were, on average, 1.64 and 2.03 times higher than those under 60% shading at the same fruit developmental stage, respectively. The T-AsA and AsA contents in the ‘Heifeng’ fruits without shading were, on average, 2.47 and 2.88 times higher than those under 60% shading at the same fruit developmental stage. Remarkably, the largest differences were observed at the fully ripe stage, and the T-AsA and AsA concentrations were 2.59 and 2.83 times higher in ‘Adelinia’ fruits treated with 60% shading than those of CK, respectively. Additionally, on average, they were 2.47 and 2.88 times higher in ‘Heifeng’ under 60% shading than those of CK.
The proportion of DHA present in the T-AsA pool is an indication of the degree of oxidative stress being experienced by the tissue. In the ‘Adelinia’ fruits, the DHA content decreased by 10.4% and 35.5% in mature fruits treated with 40% and 60% shading, indicating either a decreased level of oxidative stress or an improved capacity for AsA recycling. In addition, the change in DHA content in ‘Heifeng’ fruit was affected more by shading treatment than in ‘Adelinia’. The DHA content in ‘Heifeng’ decreased by 24.4% and 77.1% in mature fruits treated with 40% and 60% shading. DHA content decreased rapidly under shading treatments in ‘Heifeng’. Interestingly, the DHA content in ‘Adelinia’ fruits decreased rapidly at the young fruit stage, but slowly at the expansion stage when treated with shading.

3.4. Effects of Shading on GSH, GSSG, and T-GSH Levels in Blackcurrant Fruits

The contents of T-GSH, GSH, and GSSG in the ripe blackcurrant fruits of ‘Adelinia’, and the contents of T-GSH and GSH in ‘Heifeng’ were markedly decreased under the 60% shading treatment. Compared with the control, the highest T-GSH and GSH contents were detected in the fruits treated with 40% shading. However, the 40% shading treatment had little effect on the GSSG, GSH, and T-GSH contents in the fruits of ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ (Figure 2).
The T-GSH, GSH, and GSSG contents were also varied during fruit ripening (Figure 2). However, the T-GSH content had the same tendency as the GSH content, and the difference between the T-GSH and GSH contents was no more than 0.1 μmoL/g·FW in ‘Heifeng’ during fruit ripening for the same treatment. The lowest GSH in ‘Adelinia’ (0.12 μmoL/g·FW) and ‘Heifeng’ (0.18 μmoL/g·FW) and the lowest T-GSH content in ‘Adelinia’ (0.22 μmoL/g·FW) and ‘Heifeng’ (0.24 μmoL/g·FW) were both observed in the young fruits. In ‘Adelinia’, the peak values of the GSH and T-GSH contents were observed in the ripe fruit, which were 4.03 and 2.79 times higher than in the young fruits, respectively. In ‘Heifeng’, the peak values of the GSH and T-GSH contents were observed in the veraison fruits, which were 4.42 and 3.61 times higher than in the young fruits, respectively. The GSSG content in ‘Adelinia’ was not affected by shading since there was no significant variation compared with the control. Additionally, the GSSG content in the ripe fruit with three treatments was 0.09 μmol/g·FW, 0.10 μmol/g·FW, and 0.08 μmol/g·FW, respectively.
The concentrations of T-GSH, GSH, and GSSG differed between the two cultivars. The result showed that the GSH and T-GSH contents in the fruits of ‘Heifeng’ were higher than those in ‘Adelinia’. However, the GSSG content in ‘Adelinia’ fruits was obviously higher than ‘Heifeng’ during the entire growth stage of the fruits.

3.5. Effects of Shading on APX, DHAR, MDHAR, and GR Enzyme Activity in Blackcurrant Fruits

Compared with the control, the activity of MDHAR and GR in the fruits under the 40% and 60% shading treatments was slightly decreased, and DHAR and APX activity was significantly decreased (Figure 3). DHAR activity with the 40–60% shading treatment and MDHAR activity with the 40% shading treatment in mature fruits were significantly reduced, and became stronger as the shading intensity increased. DHAR activity in mature ‘Adelinia’ with 40%–60% shading was 1.97 and 2.82 times greater than in the control, and MDHAR activity with 40% shading was 2.73 times greater. As for APX and GR activity, they both significantly reduced with 40%–60% shading in ‘Adelinia’ and 40% shading in ‘Heifeng’ (Figure 4). GR activity in mature ‘Adelinia’ treated with 40%–60% shading was 12%, and 4% in young fruit. APX activity in mature ‘Heifeng’ treated with 40% shading was 8% in young fruit. Dramatic gaps in APX, MDHAR, and GR activity in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ were observed in the young fruit, while DHAR activity was observed in the mature fruit. Interestingly, APX activity specifically increased at the swelling stage in ‘Heifeng’ while decreased in ‘Adelinia’. Similarly, DHAR activity in ‘Heifeng’ increased at color transfer, while ‘Adelinia’ declined as well. GR activity in the young fruit of ‘Adelinia’ treated with 40%–60% shading did not show a significant decrease, at 0.044 μmoL/g·FW and 0.042 μmol/g·FW, respectively. However, whether under exposure to sun or treatment with shading, APX and GR activity in the fruits of ‘Adelinia’ was higher than that of ‘Heifeng’; the maximum enemy activity gaps were up to 1.14 and 2 times those of the same development stage.
The DHAR and MDHAR activity was highest at the fruit expanding stage and lowest at the ripe fruit stage in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. In ‘Adelinia’, the MDHAR and DHAR activity in the ripe fruits was decreased by 85.82% and 57.31% compared to those in the expanding fruits. In ‘Heifeng’, the MDHAR and DHAR activity in the ripe fruits was decreased by 90.89% and 42.58% compared to those in the expanding fruits. The highest GR and APX activity was observed at the young fruit stage both in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’.

3.6. Effects of Shading on GalDH Activity in Blackcurrant Fruits

The L-galactose dehydrogenase (GalDH) activity was highest in the young fruits and lowest in the veraison fruits, and the GalDH activity in the young fruits was 1.94 and 2.19 times higher than that in the veraison fruits of ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’, respectively.
The shading treatments decreased the GalDH activity in the fruits of both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ during blackcurrant fruit development and ripening, and the GalDH activity was decreased more under 60% shading than the 40% shading treatment. The largest influence on GalDH activity by shading treatment was observed in the ripe fruits in both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. Compared with the control, the GalDH activity in the ripe fruits of ‘Adelinia’ treated with 40% and 60% shading was decreased by 10.81% and 88.99%, respectively. Additionally, the GalDH activity in the ripe fruits of ‘Heifeng’ treated with 40% and 60% shading was decreased by 13.43% and 86.24 compared with the control (Figure 5). In addition, the GalDH activity declined more in the ripe fruits than in the veraison fruits under the 60% shading treatment, while GalDH activity showed an increasing trend in the ripe fruit under full sunlight and the 40% shading treatment.

3.7. The Correlation between AsA Content and Enzyme Activity

The changes in AsA concentrations during the shading process were partially reflected in the changes in enzyme activity (Table 2). The activity of MDHAR, DHAR, GR, APX, and GalDH was significantly positively correlated with AsA concentrations during the 60% shading treatment in the ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits, suggesting that the two cultivars have similar mechanisms to deal with shading. The recycling and biosynthesis processes of AsA were both affected by shading treatment, and the changes in these enzyme activities led to the differences in AsA content in the ripe fruits. The activity of MDHAR, DHAR, and GR was significantly positively correlated with AsA concentration during the 40% shading treatment in the ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits, suggesting that the recycling process of AsA played a more important role than the biosynthesis process of AsA under the 40% shading treatment. As expect, there was a negative correlation between the GSH content and the activity of MDHAR, DHAR, GR, APX and GalDH in the blackcurrant fruit of the two cultivars. Most of these enzyme activities were significantly negatively correlated with GSH content under the 40% and 60% shading treatments in the ‘Heifeng’ fruits, but not in the ‘Adelinia’ fruits. Additionally, these differences might lead to the different patterns of GSH content during the fruits’ ripening and shading treatments.

4. Discussion

AsA levels in plant cells vary among species and even between genotypes of a given species, and they are highly correlated with developmental processes [11]. In the present study, the AsA levels in blackcurrant fruits were found to be highest during the young fruit stage, and declined progressively during fruit development and ripening. These results indicate that AsA accumulation occurred mainly in young blackcurrant fruits, which is similar to kiwifruit [32]. We also observed that the activity of enzymes, including APX, MDHAR, DHAR, and GR, in fruits before the expansion stage were high. This suggests that the immature fruits had a stronger capability for AsA recycling and biosynthesis than mature fruits, which is consistent with strawberry [33], and sweet berry [34]. AsA was involved in cell division and enlargement [7] and, thus, the young fruits had a higher AsA concentration and biosynthesis ability than the mature fruits. AsA concentration decreased as the fruit matured. This is presumably due to the slowing of AsA biosynthesis and dilution with cell expansion. Moreover, The AsA accumulation pattern varies during fruit ripening in different plant species, suggesting that differential and specific regulation mechanisms may operate for the AsA concentration in different genotypes.
AsA in plants could alter their defense potential against reactive oxygen species, and protect plant cells from abiotic stress such as wounding, ozone, high salinity, drought, extreme temperatures, and irradiation stress [35,36]. AsA regulates the antioxidant defense system by scavenging ROS and controlling cellular redox potential, finally inducing tolerance to stress conditions [37]. Light is an indispensable key factor for plant growth and development. Light intensity has an impact not only on plant photosynthesis, but also on the antioxidant capacity of plants [38]. Under high-light-intensity stress, the increased light-driven production of ROS in photosynthesis leads to an increased AsA level in the leaf and fruit [14]. Meanwhile AsA levels have been found to decrease under low light conditions, as the synthesis of AsA could be influenced via photosynthetic electron transport through light [39]. Here, we investigated two blackcurrant varieties with large differences in AsA content under different shading conditions (0, 40%, and 60%). The results show that the AsA, DHA, and T-AsA contents were decreased during fruit development in both cultivars (Figure 1). It was noticeable that the 60% shading treatment markedly reduced AsA accumulation in the fruits (Figure 1). Similarly, AsA-related enzyme activity was also affected by shading. AsA translocation from source-to-sink tissues has also been demonstrated in a range of plants, including Arabidopsis, Medicago sativa [40], and Solanum tuberosum [41]. In the present study, the decrease in T-AsA and AsA contents in sink fruits might be influenced by the shading of the source tissues. AsA biosynthesis in situ is considered to be the primary mechanism of AsA accumulation in most plants, including peach [42], kiwifruit [8], apple [43], and strawberry [44]. GalDH is a key enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of l-ascorbate (AsA) in plants. Mieda et al. [45] reported that GalDH gene expression and GalDH enzyme activity in spinach leaves were significantly decreased under shading compared with the control. Consistent with this, we found that changes in GalDH activity showed a similar trend, with changes in AsA content, and GalDH activity showed an extremely significant correlation (p < 0.01) with AsA content under the 60% shading treatment (Figure 5). Thus, we speculated that the reduced GalDH activity in blackcurrant fruits led to the decrease in AsA content under shading.
In addition to the biosynthesis of AsA, AsA recycling also plays an important role in the regulation of AsA concentration in tissues. Previously, numerous works of research have demonstrated that over-expressing enzymes involved in the recycling of oxidized AsA, such as DHAR [46] and MDHAR [47], could enhance AsA content. Qin et al. [48] reported that the overexpression of StDHAR1 and StDHAR2 enhanced the accumulation of AsA in potato tubers and green organs, respectively. Similarly, AsA regeneration in kiwi fruit was dependent on DHAR and MDHAR activity as well [49]. In Arabidopsis, leaves grown under low light conditions contained low activity of DHAR and MDHAR compared with those grown in high light conditions [50]. APX plays an important role in AsA metabolism, which uses AsA as the electron donor. GR genes encode enzyme that catalyze GSH generation in the AsA recycling pathway. Similarly, Wang et al. observed that APX and GR activity was continuously decreased in cauliflower (Brassica oleracea) with an increase in shading [51]. In apple, the fruits in the sun-exposed side contained higher activity of AsA–GSH cycle enzymes and a higher content of AsA compared with the shaded side [21]. Additionally, similar results were observed in the present study. The activity of AsA–GSH cycle enzymes (MDHAR, DHAR, GR, APX) was significantly reduced in blackcurrant fruits, with changes in AsA levels under the 40% and 60% shading treatments for 40 days (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The results indicate that the capacity for recycling AsA from its oxidized forms was affected by light exposure in fruits, and the recycling systems are crucial to maintaining the cellular AsA pool in the reduced state. In addition, DHAR and MDHAR activity in ‘Heifeng’ was higher than in ‘Adelinia’ under shading, indicating that ‘Heifeng’ had higher capability for AsA recycling under shading. Thus, the AsA synthesis pathway might provide greater contributions than regeneration to maintain AsA content under shading. A simplified graphic illustration of the processes that regulate AsA levels is shown in Figure 6.
The changes in light conditions could have impacts on plant growth and development. Here, we found that shading treatments could delay blackcurrant ripening and reduce fruit firmness compared with the control. Similar results were reported by by Cangi et al. [52], whereby a black shading net providing a 50% treatment delayed harvest by 13 days compared with the control. This may be owing to the low sugar content in fruits under shading, and the down-regulation of genes related to AsA biosynthesis and metabolism such as APX and DHAR [53]. Moreover, soluble solids in ‘Adelinia’ showed relatively low content when treated with shading compared with the control (Table 1), which might ameliorate the fruit flavor. However, ‘Heifeng’ contained similar soluble solids compared with the control fruit. This was similar to the results in apples. Light intensity is known for playing an important role in the soluble solid accumulation of various horticultural fruit crops [54], and shading may delay maturity by lowering the soluble solid content [55]. The different phenotypes and contents observed in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ might be due to the different genotypes between the two cultivars. A similar result was observed in the total phenolic and anthocyanin contents of five blackcurrant varieties treated with shading [56]. Moreover, ‘Heifeng’ may be more adaptable than ‘Adelinia’ to low light levels. When plants are cultivated in an environmental condition that differs from their native habitat, their ability to grow and develop will mainly depend on their capacity to adapt to such changes at the level of photosynthesis [57]. Di et al. [58] reported that the antioxidant properties of different genotypes of wheat varied in response to environmental fluctuations. Similarly, Franc found that the ‘Sajonia’ variety displayed more efficiency in using light for fixating biomass than ‘Cayutúe’ and ‘Tirol’ in response to low light conditions in murta [59].

5. Conclusions

In this study, Two blackcurrant varieties ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ were treated with 40%, 60% and full sunlight conditions. The results showed that shading conditions delayed fruit ripening and increased fruit firmness in both ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’. AsA and T-AsA contents in the two blackcurrant varieties were decreased during fruit development and under 60% shading treatment, which was associated with the reduced activity of the MDHAR, DHAR, GR, APX, and GalDH. Although differential and specific regulation mechanisms may operate for the AsA concentration in different genotypes, they have similar mechanisms to deal with shading.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/f13071127/s1, Table S1: Effect of shading on the fruiting phenology of ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.Q. and J.H.; investigation and data curation, X.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFD100200), Academic Backbone Project of Northeast Agricultural University (20XG04), China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-29-10), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022MD713724).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hummer, K.E.; Dale, A. Horticulture of Ribes. For. Pathol. 2010, 40, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chen, Y.; Cai, X.; Zhang, Y.; Rao, X.; Fu, S. Dynamics of Understory Shrub Biomass in Six Young Plantations of Southern Subtropical China. Forests 2017, 8, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Suring, L.H.; Goldstein, M.I.; Howell, S.; Nations, C.S. Effects of spruce beetle infestations on berry productivity on the Kenai Peninsula, Alaska. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 227, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gođevac, D.; Tesevic, V.; Vajs, V.; Milosavljevic, S.; Zdunić, G.; Đorđević, B.; Stankovic, M. Chemical Composition of Currant Seed Extracts and Their Protective Effect on Human Lymphocytes DNA. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, C779–C783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schoenfeld, J.D.; Sibenaller, Z.A.; Mapuskar, K.A.; Wagner, B.A.; Cramer-Morales, K.L.; Furqan, M.; Sandhu, S.; Carlisle, T.L.; Smith, M.C.; Hejleh, T.A.; et al. O2 and H2O2-Mediated Disruption of Fe Metabolism Causes the Differential Susceptibility of NSCLC and GBM Cancer Cells to Pharmacological Ascorbate-ScienceDirect. Cancer Cell 2017, 31, 487–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gęgotek, A.; Jarocka-Karpowicz, I.; Skrzydlewska, E. Cytoprotective Effect of Ascorbic Acid and Rutin against Oxidative Changes in the Proteome of Skin Fibroblasts Cultured in a Three-Dimensional System. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Davey, M.W.; Montagu, M.V.; Inze, D.; Sanmartin, M.; Kanellis, A.; Smirnoff, N.; Benzie, I.J.J.; Strain, J.J.; Favell, D.; Fletcher, J. Plant L-ascorbic acid: Chemistry, function, metabolism, biovailability and effects of processing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2000, 80, 825–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wheeler, G.L.; Jones, M.A.; Smirnoff, N. The biosynthetic pathway of vitamin C in higher plants. Nature 1998, 393, 365–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Alós, E.; Rodrigo, M.J.; Zacarías, L. Differential transcriptional regulation of l-ascorbic acid content in peel and pulp of citrus fruits during development and maturation. Planta 2014, 239, 1113–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, M.; Ma, F.; Liang, N.; Li, J.; Wang, Y. Ascorbate Biosynthesis during Early Fruit Development Is the Main Reason for Its Accumulation in Kiwi. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e14281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hancock, R.D.; Walker, P.G.; Pont, S.D.; Marquis, N.; Vivera, S.; Gordon, S.L.; Brennan, R.M.; Viola, R. L-Ascorbic acid accumulation in fruit of Ribes nigrum occurs by in situ biosynthesis via the L-galactose pathway. Funct. Plant Biol. 2007, 34, 1080–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Noctor, G.; Foyer, C.H. Ascorbate and Glutathione: Keeping Active Oxygen Under Control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 49, 249–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Walker, P.G.; Viola, R.; Woodhead, M.; Jorgensen, L.; Gordon, S.L.; Brennan, R.M.; Hancock, R.D. Ascorbic acid content of blackcurrant fruit is influenced by both genetic and environmental factors. Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 4, 40–52. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sari, A.P.; Triadiati, T. Effects of shading and fertiliser on the growth and antioxidant content of olives (Olea europaea L.). Pertanika J. Trop. Agric. Sci. 2017, 40, 269–278. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, M.; Ma, F.; Shang, P.; Zhang, M.; Hou, C.; Liang, D. Influence of light on ascorbate formation and metabolism in apple fruits. Planta 2009, 230, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ma, F.; Cheng, L. The sun-exposed peel of apple fruit has higher xanthophyll cycle-dependent thermal dissipation and antioxidants of the ascorbate–glutathione pathway than the shaded peel. Plant Sci. 2003, 165, 819–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Melino, V.J.; Hayes, M.A.; Soole, K.L.; Ford, C.M. The role of light in the regulation of ascorbate metabolism during berry development in the cultivated grapevine Vitis vinifera L. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 1712–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, M.; Ma, F.; Liu, J.; Li, J. Shading the whole vines during young fruit development decreases ascorbate accumulation in kiwi. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 140, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Massot, C.; Bancel, D.; Lopez Lauri, F.; Truffault, V.; Baldet, P.; Stevens, R.; Gautier, H. High Temperature Inhibits Ascorbate Recycling and Light Stimulation of the Ascorbate Pool in Tomato despite Increased Expression of Biosynthesis Genes. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e84474. [Google Scholar]
  20. Massot, C.; Stevens, R.; Génard, M.; Longuenesse, J.-J.; Gautier, H. Light affects ascorbate content and ascorbate-related gene expression in tomato leaves more than in fruits. Planta 2011, 235, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, L.S.; Li, P.; Cheng, L. Effects of high temperature coupled with high light on the balance between photooxidation and photoprotection in the sun-exposed peel of apple. Planta 2008, 228, 745–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ilić, Z.S.; Koukounaras, A.; Milenković, L.; Kevrešan, Ž.; Bajić, A.; Šunić, L.; Kovac, R.; Fallik, E.; Mastilović, J. Grafting and Shading—The Influence on Postharvest Tomato Quality. Agriculture 2020, 10, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tiitinen, K.M.; Yang, B.; Haraldsson, G.G.; Jonsdottir, S.; Kallio, H.P. Fast Analysis of Sugars, Fruit Acids, and Vitamin C in Sea Buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) Varieties. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 2508–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zheng, J.; Yang, B.; Tuomasjukka, S.; Ou, S.; Kallio, H. Effects of Latitude and Weather Conditions on Contents of Sugars, Fruit Acids, and Ascorbic Acid in Black Currant (Ribes nigrum L.) Juice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 2977–2987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yabuta, Y.; Motoki, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Takeda, T.; Ishikawa, T.; Shigeoka, S. Thylakoid membrane-bound ascorbate peroxidase is a limiting factor of antioxidative systems under photo-oxidative stress. Plant J. 2002, 32, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang Hong, G.J. Analysis of Nutritional Components of Different Pomegranate Varieties. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2006, 3, 460–477. [Google Scholar]
  27. Alvarenga, A.A.D.; Castro, E.M.D.; Lima Junior, É.D.C.; Magalhães, M.M. Effects of different light levels on the initial growth and photosynthesis of Croton urucurana Baill. in southeastern Brazil. Rev. Rvore 2003, 27, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, C.J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.B.; Dong, H.Z. Seed development and nutrient accumulation as affected by light shading in oilseed peony (Paeonia ostii ‘Feng Dan’). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 251, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qiao, X.; Sai, L.; Chen, X.; Xue, L.; Lei, J. Impact of fruit-tree shade intensity on the growth, yield, and quality of intercropped wheat corresponding. PLoS ONE 2009, 14, e0203238. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, F.; Qin, D.; Li, S.; Zhan, G.; Huo, J.; Wang, H.; Yi, Z.; Wei, H.; Rengzhi, B. Ascorbic acid content and difference of related enzyme activities in fruit of blackcurrant. J. South. Agric. 2014, 52, 98–110. [Google Scholar]
  31. Qin Dong, H.J.; Wei, S. Breeding of Adrienaya, a new cold-resistant large fruit variety of black currant. China Fruit Tree 2012, 1, 10–12. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hou, C.; Li, M.; Ma, F.; Liang, D. Changes of Product Accumulation and Related Enzyme Activities in AsA Metabolism During Kiwifruit Growth and Development. Acta Hortic. Sin. 2009, 36, 1269–1276. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bingxiu, Z.; Zhugang, L.; Yuan, G.; Dan, L.; Qingyu, G. Relationship between DHAR and ASA accumulation in strawberry and genetic transformation of DHAR RNAi. J. South. Agric. 2012, 43, 7. [Google Scholar]
  34. Xia, H.; Lin, L.; Gao, F.; Ni, Z.; Gao, L.; Liang, D. Changes of AsA Content and Related Enzyme Activities in Sweet Cherry ’Satonishiki’ Fruit during Development. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2016, 36, 7. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hossain, M.A.; Munné-Bosch, S.; Burritt, D.J.; Diaz-Vivancos, P.; Fujita, M.; Lorence, A. Ascorbic Acid in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 177–200. [Google Scholar]
  36. Viviani, A.; Fambrini, M.; Giordani, T.; Pugliesi, C. L-Ascorbic acid in plants: From biosynthesis to its role in plant development and stress response. Agrochim.-Pisa 2021, 65, 151–170. [Google Scholar]
  37. Broad, R.C.; Bonneau, J.P.; Hellens, R.P.; Johnson, A.A. Manipulation of Ascorbate Biosynthetic, Recycling, and Regulatory Pathways for Improved Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Hao, C.; Fan, R.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Chen, W.; Chen, Z. Physiological response of Monimopetalum chinense to light stress under habitat fragmentation. Plant Soil Environ. 2010, 56, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yabuta, Y.; Mieda, T.; Rapolu, M.; Nakamura, A.; Motoki, T.; Maruta, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Shigeoka, S. Light regulation of ascorbate biosynthesis is dependent on the photosynthetic electron transport chain but independent of sugars in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2661–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Franceschi, V.R.; Tarlyn, N.M. l-Ascorbic Acid Is Accumulated in Source Leaf Phloem and Transported to Sink Tissues in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2002, 130, 649–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tedone, L.; Hancock, R.D.; Alberino, S.; Haupt, S.; Viola, R. Long-distance transport of L-ascorbic acid in potato. BMC Plant Biol. 2004, 4, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Imai, T.; Ban, Y.; Terakami, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Moriguchi, T. l-Ascorbate biosynthesis in peach: Cloning of six l-galactose pathway-related genes and their expression during peach fruit development. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 136, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Li, M.; Chen, X.; Wang, P.; Ma, F. Ascorbic Acid Accumulation and Expression of Genes Involved in Its Biosynthesis and Recycling in Developing Apple Fruit. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2011, 136, 231–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Aragüez, I.; Cruz-Rus, E.; Botella, M.; Medina-Escobar, N.; Valpuesta, V. Proteomic analysis of strawberry achenes reveals active synthesis and recycling of l-ascorbic acid. J. Proteom. 2013, 83, 160–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Mieda, T.; Yabuta, Y.; Rapolu, M.; Motoki, T.; Takeda, T.; Yoshimura, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Shigeoka, S. Feedback Inhibition of Spinach l-Galactose Dehydrogenase by l-Ascorbate. Plant Cell Physiol. 2004, 45, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, Z.; Young, T.E.; Ling, J.; Chang, S.C.; Gallie, D.R. Increasing vitamin C content of plants through enhanced ascorbate recycling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 3525–3530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Eltayeb, A.E.; Kawano, N.; Badawi, G.H.; Kaminaka, H.; Sanekata, T.; Shibahara, T.; Inanaga, S.; Tanaka, K. Overexpression of monodehydroascorbate reductase in transgenic tobacco confers enhanced tolerance to ozone, salt and polyethylene glycol stresses. Planta 2007, 225, 1255–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qin, A.; Shi, Q.; Yu, X. Ascorbic acid contents in transgenic potato plants overexpressing two dehydroascorbate reductase genes. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2010, 38, 1557–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Han, W. Cloning and Quantitative Expression Analysis of Ascorbic Acid Synthase-Related Genes in Actinidia Chinensis. Master Thesis, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bartoli, C.G.; Yu, J.; Gomez, F.; Fernández, L.; McIntosh, L.; Foyer, C.H. Inter-relationships between light and respiration in the control of ascorbic acid synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bingliang, Z.; Min, X.; Qionqiu, Q.; Qinghua, S.; Jiashu, C. Effect of shading on curd growth and antioxidant system in early cauliflower. J. Zhejiang Univ. Agric. Life Sci. Ed. 2005, 31, 535–540. [Google Scholar]
  52. Cangi, R.; Yagcı, A.; Akgul, S.; Kesgin, M.; Yanar, Y. Effects of shading and covering material application for delaying harvest on gray mold disease severity. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 12182–12187. [Google Scholar]
  53. Nishikawa, F.; Kato, M.; Hyodo, H.; Ikoma, Y.; Sugiura, M.; Yano, M. Effect of sucrose on ascorbate level and expression of genes involved in the ascorbate biosynthesis and recycling pathway in harvested broccoli florets. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 409, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Feng, F.; Li, M.; Ma, F.; Cheng, L. Effects of location within the tree canopy on carbohydrates, organic acids, amino acids and phenolic compounds in the fruit peel and flesh from three apple (Malus × Domestica) cultivars. Hortic. Res. 2014, 1, 14019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Bergqvist, J.; Dokoozlian, N.; Ebisuda, N. Sunlight Exposure and Temperature Effects on Berry Growth and Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2001, 52, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  56. Šavikin, K.; Mikulič-Petkovšek, M.; Djordjević, B.; Zdunić, G.; Janković, T.; Djurović, D.; Veberič, R. Influence of shading net on polyphenol profile and radical scavenging activity in different varieties of black currant berries. Sci. Hortic. 2013, 160, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pastenes, C.; Santa-María, E.; Infante, R.; Franck, N. Domestication of the Chilean guava (Ugni molinae Turcz.), a forest understorey shrub, must consider light intensity. Sci. Hortic. 2003, 98, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Di Silvestro, R.; Di Loreto, A.; Bosi, S.; Bregola, V.; Marotti, I.; Benedettelli, S.; Segura-Carretero, A.; Dinelli, G. Environment and genotype effects on antioxidant properties of organically-grown wheat varieties. A 3-year study. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 97, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Franck, N.; Winkler, S.; Pastenes, C.; Infante, R. Acclimation to sun and shade of three accessions of the Chilean native berry-crop murta. Agrofor. Syst. 2007, 69, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Forests 13 01127 g001 550
Figure 1. Influence of shading on Adelinia AsA (a), Heifeng AsA (b), Adelinia DHA (c), Heifeng DHA (d), Adelinia T-AsA (e), Heifeng T-AsA (f) contents in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits during fruit growth and development. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia 60% shading. The standard bars indicated standard deviation. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). AsA: ascorbic acid; DHA: dehydroascorbic acid; T-AsA: total ascorbic acid.
Figure 1. Influence of shading on Adelinia AsA (a), Heifeng AsA (b), Adelinia DHA (c), Heifeng DHA (d), Adelinia T-AsA (e), Heifeng T-AsA (f) contents in ‘Adelinia’ and ‘Heifeng’ fruits during fruit growth and development. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia 60% shading. The standard bars indicated standard deviation. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). AsA: ascorbic acid; DHA: dehydroascorbic acid; T-AsA: total ascorbic acid.
Forests 13 01127 g001
Forests 13 01127 g002 550
Figure 2. Influence of light on Adelinia GSH (a), Heifeng GSH (b), Adelinia GSSG (c), Heifeng GSSG (d), Adelinia T-GSH (e), and Heifeng T-GSH (f) contents during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). GSH: glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; T-GSH: total glutathione.
Figure 2. Influence of light on Adelinia GSH (a), Heifeng GSH (b), Adelinia GSSG (c), Heifeng GSSG (d), Adelinia T-GSH (e), and Heifeng T-GSH (f) contents during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). GSH: glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; T-GSH: total glutathione.
Forests 13 01127 g002
Forests 13 01127 g003 550
Figure 3. Influence of light on Adelinia DHAR (a), Heifeng DHAR (b), Adelinia MDHAR (c), Heifeng MDHAR (d), Adelinia GR (e) and Heifeng GR (f) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). DHAR: dehydroascorbate reductase; MDHAR: dehydroascorbic reductase; GR: glutathione oxidoreductase.
Figure 3. Influence of light on Adelinia DHAR (a), Heifeng DHAR (b), Adelinia MDHAR (c), Heifeng MDHAR (d), Adelinia GR (e) and Heifeng GR (f) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). DHAR: dehydroascorbate reductase; MDHAR: dehydroascorbic reductase; GR: glutathione oxidoreductase.
Forests 13 01127 g003
Forests 13 01127 g004 550
Figure 4. Influence of light on Adelinia APX (a) and Heifeng APX (b) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). APX: ascorbate peroxidase.
Figure 4. Influence of light on Adelinia APX (a) and Heifeng APX (b) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). APX: ascorbate peroxidase.
Forests 13 01127 g004
Forests 13 01127 g005 550
Figure 5. Influence of light on Adelinia GalDH (a) and Heifeng GalDH (b) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). GalDH: L-galactose dehydrogenase.
Figure 5. Influence of light on Adelinia GalDH (a) and Heifeng GalDH (b) activity during fruit growth and development of blackcurrant fruits. Square: Heifeng/Adelinia control under natural light; round: Heifeng/Adelinia, 40% shading; point: Heifeng/Adelinia, 60% shading. Values shown by different letters for each stage are significantly different at p < 0.05 (Student’s t−test). GalDH: L-galactose dehydrogenase.
Forests 13 01127 g005
Forests 13 01127 g006 550
Figure 6. A simplified graphic illustration of the processes that regulate AsA levels in plant tissues. The biosynthetic pathway that accounts for AsA found in plants is highlighted in yellow and the recycling pathway is highlighted in green. Dotted line means effect of shading influence, and solid line represent transport of AsA synthesis. Enzymes and compounds in red color are the most correlated with AsA content. Enzymes presented are: GalDH—L-galactose dehydrogenase; APX—ascorbate peroxidase; MDHAR—monodehydroascorbate reductase; GR—glutathione reductase; and DHAR—dehydroascorbate reductase. Chemical compounds are illustrated as follows: MDHA—monodehydroascorbate; DHA—dehydroascorbate; GSH—glutathione; and GSSG—oxidized glutathione.
Figure 6. A simplified graphic illustration of the processes that regulate AsA levels in plant tissues. The biosynthetic pathway that accounts for AsA found in plants is highlighted in yellow and the recycling pathway is highlighted in green. Dotted line means effect of shading influence, and solid line represent transport of AsA synthesis. Enzymes and compounds in red color are the most correlated with AsA content. Enzymes presented are: GalDH—L-galactose dehydrogenase; APX—ascorbate peroxidase; MDHAR—monodehydroascorbate reductase; GR—glutathione reductase; and DHAR—dehydroascorbate reductase. Chemical compounds are illustrated as follows: MDHA—monodehydroascorbate; DHA—dehydroascorbate; GSH—glutathione; and GSSG—oxidized glutathione.
Forests 13 01127 g006
Table
Table 1. Influence of shading on the firmness and soluble solid content of ripe fruits.
Table 1. Influence of shading on the firmness and soluble solid content of ripe fruits.
CultivarTreatmentFirmness (kg/cm2 × (105 Pa))Soluble Solid (%)
AdeliniaCK2.44 ± 0.36 c18.9 ± 0.46 a
T14.81 ± 0.45 b17.8 ± 0.15 b
T25.77 ± 0.29 a17.5 ± 0.33 b
HeifengCK2.93 ± 0.59 c17.4 ± 0.12 a
T14.99 ± 0.32 b17.3 ± 0.26 a
T26.48 ± 0.16 a17.4 ± 0.19 a
Note: The different letters a, b, c represent significant differences (p <0.05, Student’s t−test). CK: fruits were grown under full sunlight; T1: fruits were treated with about 40% shading rates; T2: fruits were treated with about 60% shading rates.
Table
Table 2. Correlation analysis of AsA content, GSH content, and enzyme activity in blackcurrant.
Table 2. Correlation analysis of AsA content, GSH content, and enzyme activity in blackcurrant.
CultivarsMDHAR
μmoL/g·FW		DHAR
μmoL/g·FW		GR
μmoL/g·FW		APX
μmoL/g·FW		GalDH
μmoL/g·FW
AsA μmoL/g·FWAdelinia CK0.7720.928 *0.965 **0.6570.590
Adelinia T10.833 *0.983 **0.962 **0.7030.559
Adelinia T20.969 **0.987 **0.995 **0.985 **0.990 **
Heifeng CK0.894 *0.5320.938 *0.8770.872
Heifeng T10.950 **0.856 *0.816 *0.813 *0.922 **
Heifeng T20.942 **0.941 **0.925 **0.891 *0.963 **
GSH μmoL/g·FWAdelinia CK−0.950 *−0.606−0.847−0.820−0.817
Adelinia T1−0.894 *−0.847 *−0.759−0.596−0.541
Adelinia T2−0.641−0.797−0.785−0.726−0.770
Heifeng CK−0.673−0.236−0.845−0.758−0.913 *
Heifeng T1−0.883 *−0.831 *−0.782−0.879 *−0.994 **
Heifeng T2−0.899 *−0.906 *−0.869 *−0.846 *−0.906 *
* and ** represent significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively (Pearson test). CK: fruits were grown under full sunlight; T1: fruits were treated with about 40% shading rates; T2: fruits were treated with about 60% shading rates. AsA: ascorbic acid; GSH: glutathione.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gang, H.; Zhang, D.; Sun, X.; Huo, J.; Qin, D. Influences of Shading on Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.). Forests 2022, 13, 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071127

AMA Style

Gang H, Zhang D, Sun X, Huo J, Qin D. Influences of Shading on Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.). Forests. 2022; 13(7):1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gang, Huixin, Danni Zhang, Xiaojuan Sun, Junwei Huo, and Dong Qin. 2022. "Influences of Shading on Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.)" Forests 13, no. 7: 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071127

APA Style

Gang, H., Zhang, D., Sun, X., Huo, J., & Qin, D. (2022). Influences of Shading on Ascorbic Acid Biosynthesis of Blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum L.). Forests, 13(7), 1127. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13071127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop