Next Article in Journal
Landsenses in Green Spaces
Next Article in Special Issue
Development of Integrated Control for Verticillium Wilt of Smoke Trees in Beijing
Previous Article in Journal
Changes in Soil Chemistry and Microbial Communities in Rhizospheres of Planted Gastrodia elata on a Barren Slope and under a Forest
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antagonistic Activity and Potential Mechanisms of Endophytic Bacillus subtilis YL13 in Biocontrol of Camellia oleifera Anthracnose
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrate from Endophytic Fungus Nectria balsamea E282 and Its Fractions against Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae

1
Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
2
Forest Protection Research Center, Vietnamese Academy of Forest Sciences, Hanoi 11910, Vietnam
3
Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Bioresources, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea
4
Tree Pathology and Mycology Laboratory, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Republic of Korea
5
Department of Environment and Forest Resources, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea
6
Department of Forest Environmental Resources, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2024, 15(2), 332; https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020332
Submission received: 30 December 2023 / Revised: 3 February 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 8 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Management of Forest Pests and Diseases—2nd Edition)

Abstract

:
A key role that fungal endophytes play in interacting with their host plant can be defined by the fact that they promote the growth of plants and enhance the tolerance of the host against plant pathogens using bioactive compounds that they produce. Several studies utilizing endophytic fungi as a source of biological control against plant pathogens were conducted, and a representative example includes Aureobasidium protae from common wheat (Triticum aestivum), which inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum, causal agents of Fusarium head blight disease. Our previous study indicated that three endophytic fungal isolates, E089 (Daldinia childiae), E282 (Nectria balsamea), and E409 (Colletotrichum acutatum), showed antifungal activities against D. quercus-mongolicae, an ascomycetous fungus that is reported to be associated with oak mortality in South Korea. The objectives of this study were to optimize and evaluate antifungal efficiency for these endophytic fungi against D. quercus-mongolicae, and this was achieved using culture filtrate retrieved from the three above-mentioned endophytes and fractions isolated from the culture filtrate. Of those, the culture filtrate from E282 showed higher mycelial growth and sporulation inhibitions on PDA medium where D. quercus-mongolicae was grown. In addition, three fractions, including hexane, CHCl3, Et2O, and H2O, were tested for antifungal activities against D. quercus-mongolicae. The results revealed that the Et2O fraction showed higher mycelial growth and sporulation inhibition rates. Taking these results together, the endophytic fungus, N. balsamea, which exhibited high antifungal efficiency, can be effectively used as a biocontrol agent for the management of oak wilt disease in the country.

1. Introduction

Endophytic fungi reside in the internal living tissue in most of plants, where they may balance their symbiotic relationship with host species [1]. Fungal endophytes play an important role in promoting the growth of plants and enhancing the tolerance of the host to plant pathogens [2,3]. In interaction with their host plants, endophytic fungi produce bioactive compounds to support their hosts’ adaptation to abiotic and biotic stress [4,5]. In addition, endophytic fungi produce ligninolytic enzymes, which have been applied in bioethanol production [5,6]. Fungal endophytes are transmitted to their host plant in two ways: majorly through airborne spores to the new host plant and, in some cases, seed-borne to the next generations [1,7]. The diversity of endophytic fungi has been reported from various plant species and plant organs, such as leaves, stems, roots, etc. [3,5,8]. There are an estimated 1 million species of fungal endophytes worldwide [8]; however, the number of endophytic fungi reported mostly belongs to about 800 genera, and dominant genera were identified as Alternaria, Aspergillus, and Colletotrichum [3].
Applying endophytic fungi to control pathogen displacement by antimicrobials is one of the major fields in endophytic research [9]. For instance, Phomopsis longicolla, an endophytic fungus isolated from Bostrychia radicans, produced antibacterial compounds against Gram-positive bacteria, namely Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus saprophyticus [10]. Five isolates of Aureobasidium protae from common wheat (Triticum aestivum) inhibited the mycelial growth of Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium culmorum, causing Fusarium head blight disease from 22.5% to 38.0% and 20.5% to 30.5%, respectively, while two isolates of Chaetomium globosum showed higher antifungal activities against these two pathogens with inhibition rates of 48.5% to 51.0% and 39.5% to 41.0%, respectively [11]. A fungal endophyte identified as Pezicula sporulosa isolated from red spruce (Picea rubens) produced antifungal compounds such as cryptosporiopsin, 5-hydroxycryptosporiopsin, and mullein [12]. An endophytic fungus, Phoma sp., isolated from the cinnamon tree (Cinnamomum mollissimum), produced 5-hydroxyramulosin, a polyketide compound that had antifungal activity against the fungal pathogen Aspergillus niger [13]. In general, fungal endophytes are prolific producers of bioactive compounds [1]. However, secondary metabolites obtained from endophytic fungi might be influenced by culture conditions such as synthetic medium, pH, culture temperature, and period [14,15]. Hence, optimization of culture conditions can enhance bioactive products during the fermentation of fungal endophytes [16].
Since 2004, when oak wilt mortality was first observed in South Korea, it has been reported that Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae is partly responsible for this syndrome, especially the death of Quercus mongolica [17,18,19]. Among those investigated to see whether endophytes isolated from pine and oak tree have antifungal activity against a putative pathogen associated with oak wilt disease [20,21], it was shown that three isolates, including E089 (Daldinia childiae), E282 (Nectria balsamea), and E409 (Colletotrichum acutatum), strongly inhibited the mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae in vitro. In this regard, this study aimed to optimize the cultural period of endophytic fungi and see whether their culture filtrates inhibit the mycelial growth as well as sporulation and spore germination of D. quercus-mongolicae. Fractionation of the culture filtrate for the potential strain was then conducted, and antifungal activities of its fractions were tested as the foundation for identifying the active compound.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Culture Filtrate and Experimental Design

Culture filtrate was prepared following the protocol mentioned in previous studies [21,22]. The oak wilt fungus and endophytic fungal isolates were molecularly identified based on sequence analysis of different gene regions such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS), large subunit (LSU), translation elongation factor-1 alpha (TEF-1α), β-tubulin 2 (BT2), and RNA polymerase II (RPB2) in previous studies [22,23]. Three fungal endophytes, E089 (Daldinia childiae), E282 (Nectria balsamea), and E409 (Colletotrichum acutatum), with 100% similarities of ITS sequences from the GenBank accession numbers JX658462, HM484540, and EF464594, respectively, were inoculated into 500 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 200 mL Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) medium and cultured with constant shaking at 150 rpm at 25 °C for two different periods: two weeks and three weeks. Culture suspensions were then filtered through membrane filters with a pore size of 0.45 µm. Culture filtrates obtained from culture suspensions were stored in the fridge at 4 °C for further study.
Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) medium was autoclaved and then mixed with culture filtrates or sterilized water (control) at a 1:1 ratio. After cooling, 100 mg/L streptomycin sulfate was added to the mixtures before transferring them to Petri plates. The culture filtrate test was conducted with six treatments and a control in five replications, as follows: (1) Control: PDA were amended with sterilized water, (2) E089; 2-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E089 obtained after a 2-week culture period, (3) E089; 3-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E089 obtained after a 3-week culture period, (4) E282; 2-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E282 obtained after a 2-week culture period, (5) E282; 3-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E282 obtained after a 3-week culture period, (6) E409; 2-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E409 obtained after a 2-week culture period, (7) E409; 3-week culture filtrate: PDA were amended with a culture filtrate of E409 obtained after a 3-week culture period.

2.2. Assessment of Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrates against D. quercus-mongolicae

A mycelial plug of actively growing oak wilt fungus was placed in the center of a Petri plate containing PDA amended with culture filtrates or sterilized water, and then inoculated in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days. After that, all Petri plates were placed at room temperature until day 12 for sporulation. The mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae was measured as colony diameter for every plate of treatments and control from 3 to 12 days. The rate of mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) was calculated after incubating for 6 days when the mycelia of the oak wilt fungus had grown fully in the control plates. Formula (1) was used to compute the MGI rate, where C is the mycelial growth of the oak wilt fungus in the control plate, and T is the mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae in the treated plate.
Inhibition   rate = C T C   ×   100 %
After measuring the mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae on the 12th day, 10 mL of sterilized water was added to all plates, and the spores were harvested by scraping with a sterilized glass spreader. Miracloth was used to filter spore suspensions, and spore concentrations were checked using a Haemacytometer under a compound light microscope (Nikon U-III, FDX-35, Tokyo, Japan). The sporulation inhibition (SI) rate was calculated using Formula (1), where C is the number of spores in the control plate, and T is the number of spores in the treated plate.
For spore germination assessment, 500 µL of spore suspension (102 cells/mL) of the oak wilt fungus was evenly spread on treated and control plates. All plates were then incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days to check for germinated spores. The spore germination inhibition (SGI) rate was calculated according to Formula (1), where C is the number of colonies in the control plate, and T is the number of colonies in the treated plate.

2.3. Extraction and Isolation of Fractions from Nectria balsamea E282

Based on the antifungal activities of culture filtrates, the endophytic fungus Nectria balsamea E282 was used for further study due to the strongest inhibitions against D. quercus-mongolicae. This fungus was shake-cultured in PDB at 25 °C for 3 weeks to obtain a culture filtrate. Two liters of this culture filtrate were extracted with methanol (2 L) over 2 days at room temperature. The filtrate was then concentrated at 40 °C using a rotary vacuum evaporator (N-1200A, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan) connected to a low-temperature circulator (CCA-1111, EYELA, Tokyo, Japan). The crude methanol extract was suspended in methanol–H2O (1:1), and successively partitioned with hexane, chloroform (CHCl3), diethyl ether (Et2O), and H2O. The resulting fractions were concentrated under decreased pressure to give residues of hexane fraction (9.1 mg), CHCl3 fraction (34.2 mg), Et2O fraction (56.4 mg), and H2O fraction (30.4 g).

2.4. Assessment of Antifungal Activity of Fractions

Residues of the hexane fraction (9.1 mg), CHCl3 fraction (34.2 mg), and Et2O fraction (56.4 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL of acetone. The residue of the H2O fraction (30.4 g) was dissolved in 30.4 mL of sterilized water. Antifungal activities of fractions were assessed based on the inhibition rates in mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination of D. quercus-mongolicae.
For mycelial growth inhibition, 40 µL of each fraction was dropped onto the center of a 9 cm diameter PDA plate and gently spread on the surface using a sterilized glass rod. After acetone was completely volatilized in a laboratory laminar flow hood overnight, an active mycelial plug (5 mm) of oak wilt fungus was taken from a 5-day-old PDA culture plate and inoculated in the center of the PDA plates. For the control treatment, 40 µL of sterilized water was used instead of fractions. The experiment was conducted in triplicate for each treatment. All plates were incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days to measure the mycelial growth of the oak wilt fungus on each plate of fraction treatments and compare it with the control. The calculation of mycelial growth inhibition (MGI) was performed, as described above.
To assess sporulation inhibition, all plates from the experiment of mycelial growth inhibition were kept for more than 5 days at room temperature. Spore suspensions were collected, and the calculation of sporulation inhibition (SI) was performed, as described above.
For spore germination inhibition, PDA plates containing fractions and control plates were prepared similarly to the mycelial growth inhibition assay. After that, 0.5 mL of spore suspension of D. quercus-mongolicae (102 cells/mL) was evenly spread on each plate. The experiment was conducted in three replications, and all plates were then incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days. The calculations of spore germination inhibition (SGI) were performed, as described above.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test differences between treatments and control in mycelial growth according to the cultured period. The differences in MGI, SI, and SGI rates among treatments were indicated by one-way ANOVA. Tukey’s honestly significant difference (Tukey’s HSD) was used as post hoc tests to evaluate statistical significance at a 5% probability level. All statistical analyses and computations were performed in IBM SPSS statistics version 24 for Windows.

3. Results

3.1. Mycelial Growth of D. quercus-mongolicae on Culture Filtrates

The mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae had significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments according to the cultured time. Mycelium growth of the fungus on 2-week culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those on 3-week culture filtrates, and all of them were significantly smaller (p < 0.05) than those in control (Figure 1). Mycelium growth in the control spread fully across the Petri dish on day 6, with 81.0 mm. In general, mycelial growth increased during the cultured period in almost all treatments except for the culture filtrate of E282 obtained after incubating for 3 weeks (Figure 1). There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in each isolate between the two cultured periods. Mycelial growth of isolate E282 increased from 11.8 mm (day 3) to 81.0 mm (day 12) in the case of a 2-week culture filtrate, while that on a 3-week culture filtrate had no growth during incubation (Figure 1). For isolate E089, mycelial growth rose from 2.0 mm (day 3) to 45.4 mm (day 12) in 2-week culture filtrate and from 5.6 mm (day 3) to 49.8 mm (day 12) in 3-week culture filtrate (Figure 1). Similarly, mycelia growth of isolate E409 at day 3 was 3.4 mm and 2.0 mm in 2-week and 3-week culture filtrates, respectively, while those at day 12 were 62.0 mm and 47.8 mm (Figure 1).

3.2. Inhibition Activities of Culture Filtrates against D. quercus-mongolicae

Mycelial growth inhibition rates were calculated after incubating for 6 days when the mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae in the control plates reached maximum value. MGI rates of endophytic fungi had significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments (Figure 2). MGI rates of three isolates E089, E282, and E409 in 3-week culture filtrates were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in 2-week culture filtrates (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The highest antifungal activity against D. quercus-mongolicae was found in the 3-week culture filtrate of E282 with an MGI rate of 100%, while the lowest MGI rate was shown in the 2-week culture filtrate of E282 with 47.4% (Figure 2). Antifungal activities of E089 and E409 also significantly differed (p < 0.05) between 2-week and 3-week culture filtrates with MGI rates of 73.3% and 80.0%, 82.2% and 85.0%, respectively (Figure 2).
Sporulation inhibition rates had significant differences (p < 0.05) among treatments. The SI rate of E282 in the 3-week culture filtrate was the highest with a percentage of 100% and significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of 2-week culture filtrate with a rate of 80.1% (Figure 4). The SI rate of E089 also had a significant difference (p < 0.05) between 2-week and 3-week culture filtrates with 81.6% and 93.3%, respectively (Figure 4). Although the SI rate of E409 in the 3-week culture filtrate was higher than that in the 2-week culture filtrate, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the two culture periods with 92.1% and 91.9%, respectively (Figure 4). The SI rate of E282 had a significant difference (p < 0.05) compared with E089 and E409 in the 3-week culture filtrate, while the SI rate of E409 significantly differed (p < 0.05) with E089 and E282 in the 2-week culture filtrate (Figure 4).
There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments in the spore germination inhibition rate (Figure 5). SGI rates of E282 in both the 2-week and 3-week culture filtrates reached the highest inhibition of 100% (Figure 3 and Figure 5). SGI rates of E089 and E409 had a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the 2-week and 3-week culture filtrates (Figure 5). Of these, the SGI rate of E089 was also 100% in the 3-week culture filtrate and about twice as high in the 2-week culture filtrate with a rate of 52.3% (Figure 3 and Figure 5), while E409 showed a higher SGI rate in the 2-week culture filtrate compared to the 3-week culture filtrate with 47.6% and 33.1%, respectively (Figure 3 and Figure 5). These results indicated that the cultured period did not affect the SGI rate of E282, but the influences might be seen in the SGI rates of E089 and E409 (Figure 3 and Figure 5).

3.3. Inhibition Activities of Fractions from Nectria balsamea E282 against D. quercus-mongolicae

The three-week culture filtrate of Nectria balsamea E282 completely inhibited mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination of D. quercus-mongolicae. Hence, a 3-week culture filtrate of this fungus was selected for antifungal assessment of fractions. Fractions, hexane, CHCl3, Et2O, and H2O showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in mycelial growth inhibition rates against D. quercus-mongolicae (Figure 6). The Et2O fraction completely inhibited mycelial growth of the fungus with an MGI rate of 100%, while the MGI rate of the hexane fraction was 80.6% (Figure 6 and Figure 7). The lower MGI rates were presented for CHCl3 and H2O fractions with 36.0% and 12.4%, respectively (Figure 6 and Figure 7).
Similarly to MGI rates, sporulation inhibition had a significant difference (p < 0.05) among fractions. SI rates of fractions decreased in the order of Et2O, hexane, CHCl3, and H2O (Figure 8). The highest SI was observed in the Et2O fraction with a rate of 100%, followed by the hexane fraction with an SI rate of 83.0%, while CHCl3 and H2O fractions showed lower inhibitions with SI rates of 38.1% and 3.5%, respectively (Figure 8).
Spore germination of D. quercus-mongolicae was checked based on the number of colonies on the PDA medium containing fractions. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) among fractions in spore germination inhibition, but no significant difference (p > 0.05) was indicated between CHCl3 and hexane fractions (Figure 9). The Et2O fraction had the highest SGI rate of 83.2%, while the H2O fraction had the lowest SGI rate of 10.4%. The SGI rates of hexane and CHCl3 fractions were 54.0% and 44.2%, respectively (Figure 7 and Figure 9).

4. Discussion

It was confirmed in this study that the antifungal activities of endophytic fungal isolates against D. quercus-mongolicae were significantly influenced by cultured periods. Culture filtrates of endophytic fungi obtained after incubating for 3 weeks showed higher inhibition rates than those of 2 weeks, except for SGI rates of E282 and E409 (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The SGI rate of E282 was not affected by culture periods when culture filtrates obtained in both culture conditions completely inhibited spore germination of the fungus with an SGI rate of 100% (Figure 5 and Figure 6). The culture filtrate of E282 was also not influenced by the heating condition in the inhibition of spore germination of this pathogen [22]. Our results indicated that E282 (Nectria balsamea) had stronger antifungal activities against D. quercus-mongolicae than E409 (Colletotrichum acutatum) and E089 (Daldinia childiae). The present study also showed the optimal culture period of endophytic fungi, demonstrating that the 3-week culture filtrate of Nectria balsamea E282 completely inhibited mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination of D. quercus-mongolicae (Figure 2, Figure 4 and Figure 5). The antifungal activities of its fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae were significantly different. All fractions had the capacity to inhibit mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination of the oak wilt fungus. However, MGI, SI, and SGI rates of the H2O fraction were not significantly different (p > 0.05) compared with the controls (Figure 6, Figure 8 and Figure 9). The Et2O fraction completely inhibited mycelial growth and sporulation of D. quercus-mongolicae and had extreme activity in inhibiting spore germination (Figure 6, Figure 8 andFigure 9). Thus, this endophytic fungus is a potential biocontrol agent against D. quercus-mongolicae, which is reported to be associated with oak wilt disease in South Korea.
N. balsamea was recognized and specified earlier in 1884; however, it was then revised and illustrated as Thyronectria balsamea in 1940 [24]. T. balsamea caused canker disease on stems and branches of Abies fraseri in the United States [25]. N. balsamea was also found on the Hayata cone of Pinus taiwanensis in Taiwan [26]. To date, information associated with N. balsamea as an endophytic fungus is still limited. However, the family Nectriaceae has been identified as dominant endophytes in several plants, and some species belonging to the genus Nectria might produce bioactive compounds against plant pathogens [27,28,29,30,31]. For instance, the endophytic fungus Nectria haematococca, isolated from branches of cacao trees, might inhibit Crinipellis perniciosa, the Witches’ Broom pathogen on Theobroma cacao [27]. N. haematococca accounted for 18.2% of endophytic fungi isolated from the roots of Panax ginseng, and this fungus produced saponins (the main medicinal product of P. ginseng) with concentrations ranging from 0.063 to 0.115 mg/mL [29]. Nectria pseudotrichia 120-1NP, an endophytic fungus isolated from Gliricidia sepium, released nectrianolins A (C22H32O5), B (C26H38O7), C (C15H26O), and these secondary metabolites exhibited cytotoxic activity [32]. The fungal endophyte N. pseudotrichia, isolated from Caesalpinia echinata, also produced several leishmanicidal compounds such as xylaric acid D, piliformic acid, hydroheptelidic acid, cytochalasin D, and so on [31]. Two new polyketides, nectriacids B and C, which exhibit α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, were obtained from the culture of Nectria sp. HN001, an endophytic fungus isolated from Sonneratia ovata (a mangrove plant) in China [30].
To control the fungal pathogen, Dryadomyces quercivora, reported as a causal agent for oak wilt disease in Japan, a new compound, 13-hydroxylmacrophorin, was synthesized from the endophyte Microdiplodia sp. TT-12. However, this compound weakly inhibited the Japanese oak wilt pathogen [33]. On the other hand, chemical controls using Alamo® fungicide have been applied to prevent oak wilt disease caused by Bretziella fagacearum in the United States [34]. In Korea, oak wilt management by tree injection of a culture suspension of the antifungal actinomycete, S. blastmyceticus, showed significant preventive efficacy against D. quercus-mongolicae. However, this microorganism’s antifungal activity was slightly lower than that of Alamo fungicide treatment [35]. Hence, our findings in this study could provide a potential endophyte source as a biological control agent for oak wilt disease in Korea. Evaluating the antifungal efficiency of the culture filtrate of N. balsamea E282 in planta, as well as identifying bioactive compounds, should be conducted in further studies.

5. Conclusions

Culture filtrates of endophytic fungi were significantly influenced by culture periods in the inhibitions of mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination against D. quercus-mongolicae. Culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 obtained three weeks after cultivation had higher MGI, SI, and SGI rates than those obtained at weeks, except for the SGI rates of E282 and E409. The three-week culture filtrate of Nectria balsamea E282 completely inhibited mycelial growth, sporulation, and spore germination of the oak wilt fungus. The antifungal activities of its fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae were significantly different, with the Et2O fraction completely inhibiting mycelial growth and sporulation of D. quercus-mongolicae. It could be developed as a potential biocontrol agent against D. quercus-mongolicae.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H.N., J.K.L., D.-H.L. and K.S.; methodology, M.H.N., I.-K.P., J.K.L., D.-H.L. and K.S.; software, M.H.N. and K.S.; validation, M.H.N., J.K.L. and K.S.; formal analysis, M.H.N.; investigation, M.H.N. and I.-K.P.; resources, M.H.N.; data curation, M.H.N. and J.K.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.N.; writing—review and editing, J.K.L., D.-H.L. and K.S.; supervision, J.K.L., D.-H.L. and K.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), grant number No. RS-2023-00250589.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding authors. The data are not publicly available due to institutional policy.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Joo-Hyun Yong for providing endophytic fungal isolates.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests related to personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this study.

References

  1. Aly, A.H.; Debbab, A.; Proksch, P. Fungal endophytes: Unique plant inhabitants with great promises. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 1829–1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Paul, N.C.; Yu, S.H. Endophytic Fungi from Medicinal Plants in Korea; Lap Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken, Germany, 2011; ISBN 978-3-8473-0777-8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rashmi, M.; Kushveer, J.S.; Sarma, V.V. A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 2019, 10, 798–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Guo, B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Tang, K. Bioactive natural products from endophytes: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2008, 44, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rana, K.L.; Kour, D.; Sheikh, I.; Dhiman, A.; Yadav, N.; Yadav, A.N.; Rastegari, A.A.; Singh, K.; Saxena, A.K. Endophytic fungi: Biodiversity, ecological significance, and potential industrial applications. In Recent Advancement in White Biotechnology through Fungi; Yadav, A.N., Mishra, S., Singh, S., Gupta, A., Eds.; Fungal Biology; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–62. ISBN 978-3-030-10479-5. [Google Scholar]
  6. Plácido, J.; Capareda, S. Ligninolytic enzymes: A biotechnological alternative for bioethanol production. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2015, 2, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hartley, S.E.; Gange, A.C. Impacts of plant symbiotic fungi on insect herbivores: Mutualism in a multitrophic context. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009, 54, 323–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sun, X.; Guo, L.-D. Endophytic fungal diversity: Review of traditional and molecular techniques. Mycology 2012, 3, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arora, J.; Ramawat, K.G. An introduction to endophytes. In Endophytes: Biology and Biotechnology; Maheshwari, D.K., Ed.; Sustainable Development and Biodiversity; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; Volume 1, pp. 1–23. ISBN 978-3-319-66541-2. [Google Scholar]
  10. Erbert, C.; Lopes, A.A.; Yokoya, N.S.; Furtado, N.A.J.C.; Conti, R.; Pupo, M.T.; Lopes, J.L.C.; Debonsi, H.M. Antibacterial compound from the endophytic fungus Phomopsis longicolla isolated from the tropical red seaweed Bostrychia radicans. Bot. Mar. 2012, 55, 435–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Comby, M.; Gacoin, M.; Robineau, M.; Rabenoelina, F.; Ptas, S.; Dupont, J.; Profizi, C.; Baillieul, F. Screening of wheat endophytes as biological control agents against Fusarium head blight using two different in vitro tests. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 202, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. McMullin, D.R.; Green, B.D.; Prince, N.C.; Tanney, J.B.; Miller, J.D. Natural products of Picea endophytes from the Acadian forest. J. Nat. Prod. 2017, 80, 1475–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Santiago, C.; Fitchett, C.; Munro, M.H.G.; Jalil, J.; Santhanam, J. Cytotoxic and antifungal activities of 5-hydroxyramulosin, a compound produced by an endophytic fungus isolated from Cinnamomum mollisimum. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 689310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhalkar, B.N.; Bedekar, P.A.; Patil, S.M.; Patil, S.A.; Govindwar, S.P. Production of camptothecine using whey by an endophytic fungus: Standardization using response surface methodology. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 62828–62835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bhalkar, B.N.; Patil, S.M.; Govindwar, S.P. Camptothecine production by mixed fermentation of two endophytic fungi from Nothapodytes nimmoniana. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 873–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nishad, J.H.; Singh, A.; Gautam, V.S.; Kumar, D.; Kumar, J.; Kharwar, R.N. Endophytic fungi: A cryptic fountainhead for biodiversity, functional metabolites, host stress tolerance, and myco-mediated nanoparticles (Nps) synthesis. In Endophytes and Secondary Metabolites; Jha, S., Ed.; Reference Series in Phytochemistry; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1–29. ISBN 978-3-319-76900-4. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, K.-H.; Choi, Y.-J.; Seo, S.-T.; Shin, H.-D. Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae sp. nov. associated with Platypus koryoensis on oak in Korea. Mycotaxon 2009, 110, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lee, D.-H.; Son, S.-Y.; Seo, S.-T.; Lee, J.K. Investigation of the mating-type distribution of Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae in South Korea. For. Pathol. 2020, 50, e12590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Beer, Z.W.; Procter, M.; Wingfield, M.J.; Marincowitz, S.; Duong, T.A. Generic boundaries in the Ophiostomatales reconsidered and revised. Stud. Mycol. 2022, 101, 57–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lee, S.H.; Lee, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, C.K.; Kim, K.H.; Yi, Y.S. Antifungal property of microorganisms against Korea oak wilt pathogen, Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae. Korean J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 40, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hong, A.R.; Yun, J.H.; Yi, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Seo, S.T.; Lee, J.K. Screening of antifungal microorganisms with strong biological activity against oak wilt fungus, Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2018, 34, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nguyen, M.H.; Yong, J.H.; Sung, H.J.; Lee, J.K. Screening of endophytic fungal isolates against Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae causing oak wilt disease in Korea. Mycobiology 2020, 48, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yong, J.H. Diversity Analysis of Endophytic Fungi Isolated from Pine and Oak Trees in Korea. Master’s Thesis, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Booth, C. Studies of pyrenomycetes: IV Nectria (Part 1). Mycol. Pap. 1959, 73, 1–117. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wenner, N.G.; Merrill, W.; Moody, J.T. Thyronectria balsamea on Abies fraseri in Pennsylvania and North Carolina. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guu, J.-R.; Ju, Y.-M.; Hsieh, H.-J. Nectriaceous fungi collected from forests in Taiwan. Bot. Stud. 2007, 48, 187–203. [Google Scholar]
  27. Rubini, M.R.; Silva-Ribeiro, R.T.; Pomella, A.W.V.; Maki, C.S.; Araújo, W.L.; dos Santos, D.R.; Azevedo, J.L. Diversity of endophytic fungal community of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) and biological control of Crinipellis perniciosa, causal agent of witches’ broom disease. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2005, 1, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lin, X.; Huang, Y.J.; Zheng, Z.H.; Su, W.J.; Qian, X.M.; Shen, Y.M. Endophytes from the pharmaceutical plant, Annona squamosa: Isolation, bioactivity, identification and diversity of its polyketide synthase gene. Fungal Divers. 2010, 41, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, H.; Yang, H.-Y.; You, X.-L.; Li, Y.-H. Diversity of endophytic fungi from roots of Panax ginseng and their saponin yield capacities. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, H.; Liu, Y.; Nie, Y.; Liu, Z.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Z.; Lu, Y.; He, L.; Huang, X.; She, Z. Polyketides from the mangrove-derived endophytic fungus Nectria sp. HN001 and their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cota, B.B.; Tunes, L.G.; Maia, D.N.B.; Ramos, J.P.; de Oliveira, D.M.; Kohlhoff, M.; de Almeida Alves, T.M.; Souza-Fagundes, E.M.; Campos, F.F.; Zani, C.L.; et al. Leishmanicidal compounds of Nectria pseudotrichia, an endophytic fungus isolated from the plant Caesalpinia echinata (Brazilwood). Memórias Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2018, 113, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ariefta, N.R.; Kristiana, P.; Nurjanto, H.H.; Momma, H.; Kwon, E.; Ashitani, T.; Tawaraya, K.; Murayama, T.; Koseki, T.; Furuno, H.; et al. Nectrianolins A, B, and C, new metabolites produced by endophytic fungus Nectria pseudotrichia 120-1NP. Tetrahedron Lett. 2017, 58, 4082–4086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shiono, Y.; Koyama, H.; Murayama, T.; Koseki, T. New sesquiterpenes from the endophyte Microdiplodia sp. TT-12 and their antimicrobial activity. Phytochem. Lett. 2015, 14, 143–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Koch, K.A.; Quiram, G.L.; Venette, R.C. A review of oak wilt management: A summary of treatment options and their efficacy. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, J.H.; Hong, A.R.; Yun, J.H.; Seo, S.T.; Lee, J.K. Prevention of oak wilt by tree injection of culture suspension of an antifungal microorganism, Streptomyces blastmyceticus against oak wilt fungus, Raffaelea quercus-mongolicae. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2018, 34, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates during the cultured time (in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and at room temperature for 6 days).
Figure 1. Mycelial growth of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates during the cultured time (in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and at room temperature for 6 days).
Forests 15 00332 g001
Figure 2. Mycelial growth inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates against D. quercus-mongolicae after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 2. Mycelial growth inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates against D. quercus-mongolicae after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g002
Figure 3. Mycelial growth (above) and spore germination (below) of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates (a): 2-week culture filtrates; (b): 3-week culture filtrates after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and 5 days, respectively.
Figure 3. Mycelial growth (above) and spore germination (below) of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing culture filtrates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates (a): 2-week culture filtrates; (b): 3-week culture filtrates after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and 5 days, respectively.
Forests 15 00332 g003
Figure 4. Sporulation inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates with different cultured periods against D. quercus-mongolicae at 12 days after inoculation (in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and at room temperature for 6 days). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 4. Sporulation inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates with different cultured periods against D. quercus-mongolicae at 12 days after inoculation (in the dark at 25 °C for 6 days and at room temperature for 6 days). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g004
Figure 5. Spore germination inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates with different cultured periods against D. quercus-mongolicae in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days after inoculation. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 5. Spore germination inhibition rates of E089, E282, and E409 isolates with different cultured periods against D. quercus-mongolicae in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days after inoculation. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g005
Figure 6. Mycelial growth inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 6. Mycelial growth inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g006
Figure 7. Mycelial growth (above) and spore germination (below) of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days.
Figure 7. Mycelial growth (above) and spore germination (below) of D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days.
Forests 15 00332 g007
Figure 8. Sporulation inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae at 10 days after inoculation (in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days and at room temperature for 5 days). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 8. Sporulation inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae at 10 days after inoculation (in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days and at room temperature for 5 days). Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g008
Figure 9. Spore germination inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 9. Spore germination inhibition rates of fractions against D. quercus-mongolicae on PDA medium containing 40 µL of fractions after incubating in the dark at 25 °C for 5 days. Different letters indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05) among treatments by Tukey’s HSD test.
Forests 15 00332 g009
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nguyen, M.H.; Park, I.-K.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, D.-H.; Shin, K. Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrate from Endophytic Fungus Nectria balsamea E282 and Its Fractions against Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae. Forests 2024, 15, 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020332

AMA Style

Nguyen MH, Park I-K, Lee JK, Lee D-H, Shin K. Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrate from Endophytic Fungus Nectria balsamea E282 and Its Fractions against Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae. Forests. 2024; 15(2):332. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nguyen, Manh Ha, Il-Kwon Park, Jong Kyu Lee, Dong-Hyeon Lee, and Keumchul Shin. 2024. "Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrate from Endophytic Fungus Nectria balsamea E282 and Its Fractions against Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae" Forests 15, no. 2: 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020332

APA Style

Nguyen, M. H., Park, I. -K., Lee, J. K., Lee, D. -H., & Shin, K. (2024). Antifungal Activity of Culture Filtrate from Endophytic Fungus Nectria balsamea E282 and Its Fractions against Dryadomyces quercus-mongolicae. Forests, 15(2), 332. https://doi.org/10.3390/f15020332

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop