Next Article in Journal
Usefulness of Eurasian Magpies (Pica pica) for West Nile virus Surveillance in Non-Endemic and Endemic Situations
Next Article in Special Issue
Inhibition of L. monocytogenes Biofilm Formation by the Amidase Domain of the Phage vB_LmoS_293 Endolysin
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Variability of Chikungunya Virus in Southern Mexico
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expanding the Diversity of Myoviridae Phages Infecting Lactobacillus plantarum—A Novel Lineage of Lactobacillus Phages Comprising Five New Members
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/v11080715
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of the Phage Lysin Ply5218 in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Infection in Piglets

by
Zhaofei Wang
1,†,
Jingjiao Ma
1,†,
Jian Wang
2,
Denghui Yang
1,
Licheng Kong
1,
Qiang Fu
1,
Yuqiang Cheng
1,
Hengan Wang
1,
Yaxian Yan
1,* and
Jianhe Sun
1,*
1
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (South), Ministry of Agriculture, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
2
Shanghai Animal Disease Control Centre, Shanghai 201103, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2019, 11(8), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080715
Submission received: 24 June 2019 / Revised: 1 August 2019 / Accepted: 2 August 2019 / Published: 5 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Impact and Applications of Phages in the Food Industry and Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Streptococcus suis (S. suis) is a gram-positive bacterium and zoonotic pathogen. Currently it poses a serious problem in the swine industry due to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Thus, novel antimicrobials against S. suis infections are urgently needed. In the previous study, a cell wall hydrolase or lysin derived from Streptococcus prophage phi5218, termed Ply5218, was identified. This lysin showed strong bacteriolytic activity against S. suis. In the current study, the in vitro data showed that after incubation with pig serum, the bacteriolytic efficacy of Ply5218 declined in a time-dependent manner. The in vivo assays indicated that a Ply5218 triple treatment (6, 24, and 48 h post infection) was effective against various serotypes of S. suis in a murine infection model. This regimen also alleviated streptococcal-induced clinical symptoms in piglets and significantly reduced the bacterial burden and levels of interleukin 6, a proinflammatory cytokine. This study indicates that Ply5218 shows strong antibacterial activity in pigs and has the potential to be used as a treatment for infectious diseases caused by S. suis.

1. Introduction

Streptococcus suis serotype 2 (SS2) is a major zoonotic pathogen worldwide, being the causative agent of meningitis, arthritis, endocarditis, sepsis, pneumonia, and sudden death in both swine and humans [1,2]. S. suis causes persistent infections in pigs, and the pathogen can be found in the nostrils, tonsils, and genital tracts of healthy pigs [1,2,3,4]. Thus far, 33 serotypes have been identified, among which SS2 is the most frequently reported and the most virulent serotype worldwide [1,5]. In swine, SS2 causes severe multiorgan infections which requires complex treatment. Without timely treatment, SS2 infections in humans may be fatal [6]. In the past, the treatment of SS2 infections mainly depended on the use of antibiotics [7]. However, overuse of antibiotics and the emergence of bacterial multidrug resistance in recent years now pose a major challenge to the treatment of clinical SS2 infections worldwide [8,9,10].
Given the resistance to traditional antibiotics, with the lagging of developing new antibiotics, researchers are focusing on the potential of bacteriophages, commonly known as phages, as alternative antimicrobial agents [11,12,13]. Lysins are phage encoded peptidoglycan hydrolases that act at the end of viral infection to lyse bacterial host for virion progeny release [14,15]. Lysins contribute to the powerful bactericidal effect of phages via digestion of the bacterial cell wall peptidoglycan [16]. Compared to conventional antimicrobial chemotherapy, lysin therapies may present several advantages: (a) lysin can specifically lyse target pathogens without disturbing commensal flora; (b) to date, bacterial resistance to lysins has not been reported, as lysins directly target the peptidoglycan network that is crucial for bacterial viability and fitness; and (c) some lysins destabilize bacterial biofilms [16,17]. Thus, the potential of lysins as an antimicrobial agent has been investigated for various biomedical applications, including food science and microbiological diagnostics [17,18,19]. Their use for the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in animal models has been intensively studied [18,20,21] and a few clinical trials have demonstrated that phage lysins have enormous potential to be used as therapeutics in humans [22,23].
Previous studies investigated the efficacy of different phage lysins against Streptococcus-induced infections in murine models [24,25,26,27]. However, the bacteriolytic effect of lysin targeting serotype SS2 has not been studied in piglets, which are natural host of SS2. In our previous study, we identified a novel S. suis lysin, Ply5218, and this lysin exhibited broad spectrum activity against various serotypes of S. suis [27]. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of Ply5218 in piglets, thereby highlighting its therapeutic potential to control S. suis infection in these animals.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The SS2 strain-HA9801 was kindly provided by Professor Chengping Lu, Nanjing Agricultural University, China. The Streptococcus suis serotype 7 (SS7) strains-SS-7 and serotype 9 (SS9) strains-SS-9 were stored in our laboratory which have been isolated from diseased pigs between 1998 and 2005 in China [28]. All of the S. suis strains were cultured aerobically in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth in a shaker (180 rpm) at 37 °C. The bacterial burden, given as the number of CFUs of S. suis, was measured in BHI agar supplemented with 5% (vol/vol) fresh sheep blood under static conditions at 37 °C. The Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains used for gene cloning and production of recombinant proteins were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth with shaking at 37 °C.

2.2. Expression and Purification of Ply5218

The Ply5218 lysin was characterized previously in our laboratory and shown to lyse S. suis efficiently. The expression and purification of Ply5218 were carried out as described previously, with some modifications [20,27]. Briefly, the Ply5218 gene of prophage phi5218 (accession number: KC348600.1) was amplified by PCR using primers Ply5218-BamHI (5′- CCGGGATCCATGAGTAATCTAGGACTTAAAATG-3′) and Ply5218-XhoI (5′-GGACTCGAGCTATTTTACATTGCCCCAC-3′) and cloned into the expression vector pET-28a (containing His-tag) to obtain pET28a-Ply5218. The recombinant expression vector pET28a-Ply5218 was then transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) competent cells. The positive clones were identified by specific PCR. The bacterial cells expressing Ply5218 were then cultured in the LB broth at 37 °C until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.6. After cooling, 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside was added to induce the production of Ply5218 and then put into a shaker at 27 °C for 5 h. The induced cells were washed, resuspended, and homogenized using a sonicator. After centrifugation, the protein was purified by affinity chromatography with Ni-NTA columns (GE Healthcare BioSciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). To obtain a recombinant protein for use in the animal experiments, endotoxin was removed using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.1% Triton X-114 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) to elute protein from Ni-NTA columns [29].

2.3. Determination of the Minimum Enzyme Concentration (MEC) of Ply5218 In Vitro

To determine the minimum concentration for the activity of Ply5218 against S. suis, its MEC was measured using a 96-well plate assay, as described by Nelson et al., with minor modifications [30]. Briefly, the S. suis strains SS2, SS7, and SS9 were freshly cultured in a shaker at 37 °C and adjusted to an OD600 of 0.6 (3 × 108 CFU/mL) with PBS as the target bacteria, respectively. The MEC of Ply5218 was monitored by adding 100 µL of the bacterial suspension to 100 µL of Ply5218 at different final concentrations (1.25, 2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 µg/mL) on a 96-well microtiter plate. The OD600 values were monitored with incubation time of 15, 30, 45, and 60 min.

2.4. Impact of Piglet Serum on Ply5218 Activity

To determine the lytic activity of Ply5218 in pig blood serum, a 96-well plate assay in vitro was performed. In the assay, 10 µL of the Ply5218 at 100 µg/mL were mixed with 90 µL of serum collected from healthy piglets, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 0.5, 1, 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 h. As a positive control, the same amount of the Ply5218 was mixed with 90 µL of PBS, followed by incubation at 37 °C for 48 h. Subsequently, the mixture was incubated with 100 µL of exponentially growing cells of S. suis adjusted to an OD600 of 2.0 (1 × 109 CFU/mL) with PBS in a 96-well plate at 37 °C. The OD600 values were monitored with an incubation time of 30 min. The turbidity was calculated by the OD600 after 30 min/original OD600 of the mixture, indicating the bacterial concentration after incubation.

2.5. Murine Model of S. suis Infection Treated with Ply5218

Female BALB/c 6-week-old mice were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. The S. suis strains SS2, SS7, and SS9 were cultured in BHI broth to exponential phase (about 1 × 109 CFU/mL) in a shaker at 37 °C, harvested by centrifugation at 5000× g for 5 min, washed 3 times in PBS, and resuspended in PBS, respectively. The mice were randomly divided into different groups, with sixteen mice in each group (ten mice were for survival rate and six mice were tested for bacterial burden). A lethal dose (5 × 108 CFU/mouse) of SS2, SS7, or SS9 was injected unilaterally into the abdominal cavities of the mice, and Ply5218 (150 µg) was injected once into the other side either at 0, 1, or 2 h (150 µg) post infection, respectively. In a separate group (triple treatment group) the mice were treated with Ply5218 at 6, 24, and 48 h post infection (50 µg each time). The infected mice treated with PBS were served as an untreated control group. Mice were observed for 7 d post infection. The survival rates were calculated with untreated, 0 hours post infection (hpi), triple, and uninfected groups. The CFU burden in blood (facial vein) and spleen were determined at 2 and 4 d post infection of all groups. Each spleen was homogenized in 1 mL of PBS, and the homogenized spleen or blood was 10-time serially diluted in sterile PBS for quantitative culturing on a BHI agar plates. All cultures were incubated (37 °C) for 24 h, and the resulting colonies were enumerated as CFU/g (for spleen) or CFU/mL (for blood).

2.6. Piglet Model of S. suis Infection Treated with Ply5218

Fourteen 10-week-old piglets with no history of S. suis infection were purchased from Hangtou pig breeding (nursery) farm (Shanghai, China). After 1 week adaptation, the piglets were randomly divided into three groups, with four piglets in each group, and one mock control group (n = 2). Both challenge and treatment were applied intramuscularly. The piglets in the challenge groups were inoculated with the HA9801 strain (recovered from piglet) suspended in 10 mL of PBS (5 × 109 CFU per piglet) by an intramuscular injection on the left-hand side of the neck, and Ply5218 or PBS were inoculated by an intramuscular injection on the right-hand side of the neck. After inoculation, the following doses and regime of the lysin or PBS were administered to the piglets:
Group 1 (n = 4): Purified lysin (450 µg/kg) was administered with three doses of 150 µg/kg at 6, 24, and 48 h post bacterial challenge (Triple treatment group).
Group 2 (n = 4): PBS (lysin equivalent volume) was given at 6, 24 and 48 h post bacterial challenge (Untreated group).
Group 3 (n = 4): Purified lysin (450 µg/kg) was administered at 6, 24, and 48 h with three doses of 150 µg/kg to uninfected piglets (Uninfected group).
Group 4 (n = 2): PBS was administered at each side of piglet’s neck (bacteria and lysin equivalent volumes, respectively) as a control (Uninfected and untreated group).
During the study, the body temperatures (rectal) of the animals and clinical symptoms were recorded daily until 7 d post infection. Clinical symptoms including impaired mental states and claudication were scored. Scores of 0 to 3 were used, where 0 = normal; 1 = mild depression and signs of lack of coordination visible only after manipulation of the piglet; 2 = moderate depression and obvious signs of a lack of coordination; and 3 = severe depression and signs of asynergia or lethargy. Locomotive disorder symptoms were scored as follows: 0 = normal, 1 = the animal avoided movement on the leg, and 2 = the animal was reluctant to stand. Recovery was considered as a rectal temperature below 39.5 °C, as well as both mental state and locomotive disorder scores ≤ 1.
The bacterial burdens in blood collected from the anterior vena cava of the piglets were examined. Serum levels of proinflammatory cytokines were also determined. To test the CFU counts, blood was 10-times serially diluted in sterile PBS for quantitative culturing on BHI agar plates. All cultures were incubated (37 °C) for 24 h, and the colonies were enumerated as CFU/mL. Commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used to evaluate the serum levels of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) post infection and after Ply5218 treatment. The cytokine levels were measured in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.7. Ethical Statement

All the animal experiments were approved at 03/01/2017 by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Approval no. 20170103) and were performed in accordance with the Animal Care and Use Guidelines made by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

For all experiments, data points were plotted using GraphPad Prism (v. 7.01) software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The data are presented as mean values ± standard errors of the means (SEM). For the analysis of the data obtained in the experiments, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test was used. A P value of < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Expression, Purification and In Vitro MEC of Ply5218

Ply5218 was successfully produced in E. coli BL-21 (DE3). The purified Ply5218 protein migrated as 37.6 kDa polypeptide in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Figure 1). The purified protein concentration was 3.43 mg/mL. A turbidity reduction assay was performed to examine the MEC of the Ply5218 protein against S. suis. The results revealed a significant decrease in activity within 15 min, and there was no observable change within the next 60 min. The MEC of Ply5218 against SS2, SS7, and SS9 was 5 µg/mL, 5 µg/mL, and 10 µg/mL, respectively (Figure 2). The MEC of Ply5218 was higher than that found in a previous study [27]. This might be due to the lysin being purified before the test by Triton X-114 and then eluted from Ni-NTA columns.

3.2. Impact of Piglet Blood Serum on Lytic Activity of Ply5218

To study the effect of pig serum on Ply5218 activity, serum was collected from healthy piglets and incubated with Ply5218 for different periods at 37 °C. As shown in Figure 3, the endolysin activity slowly decreased during its incubation in serum. Decline of the enzyme lytic capacity was particularly evident after 24 h incubation. The bacterial turbidity (the OD600 after 30 min/original OD600) was less than 50% within the first 24 h of incubation but more than 50% after 24 h of incubation. These data indicated that the bacteriolytic effect of Ply5218 in pig serum appeared to decline after 24 h.

3.3. Application of Ply5218 in the Treatment of S. suis Infection in Mice

Prior to study the therapeutic efficacy of Ply5218 in piglets, we studied the effect of Ply5218 in mice to optimize the therapeutic dosage. The results showed significantly higher survival rates for the mice treated at 0 h (80% for mice infected with SS2, 90% for mice infected with SS7, and 80% for mice infected with SS9) and the mice receiving the triple treatment (80% for mice infected with SS2, 80% for mice infected with SS7 and 70% for mice infected with SS9) than that of the control groups (20% for SS2-infected mice, 20% for SS7-infected mice, and 10% for SS9-infected mice) after 7 days post infection (Figure 4). To examine the bacterial load in the organs and blood of mice after Ply5218 therapy, the mice were sacrificed at 2 and 4 d post infection. The results showed that the bacterial burden in blood of all the Ply5218-treated mice was significantly lower than that in the Ply5218-untreated control mice at 2 and 4 d post infection (Figure 5). At four days post infection, regardless of whether the mice were infected with SS2, SS7, or SS9, the bacterial burden in both the triple treatment group and the treatment at 0 h group was significantly lower than that of the blood and spleen of the groups treated at 1 and 2 h post infection (Figure 5). These findings indicated that triple or immediate treatment with Ply5218 effectively antagonized murine bacteremia caused by different serotypes of S. suis.

3.4. Application of Ply5218 in the Treatment of S. suis Infection in Piglets

No clinical signs of S. suis infection were observed in piglets during the adaptation period prior to challenge. All the piglets in the untreated group (group 2) showed obvious clinical symptoms of the infection caused by S.suis, such as fever (higher than 40 °C through 7 days), an obvious lack of coordination, and severe claudication (Figure 6A–C). In contrast, in the triple treatment group (group 1), the piglets showed fewer clinical signs, such as fever until the third day of the treatment. In addition, the health status of the piglets in group 1 had returned to almost normal at 7 d post infection.
The bacterial burden in blood samples of the triple treatment group (group 1) was significantly reduced as compared with that in the untreated (group 2). Furthermore, the CFU counts decreased drastically during the treatment in group 1 (Figure 6D). The bacterium was no longer detectable 7 d post infection in this group. In contrast, CFU counts in the untreated (group 2) remained detectable until the end of the study (Figure 6D). The level of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 in group 2 increased during the first 3 d post infection and then started to decrease after day 4 (Figure 6E). Meanwhile, the level of IL-6 in the triple treatment group decreased throughout the study. Compared to group 2, the level of IL-6 in group 1 was significantly lower at most post infection days. The level of IL-6 in the lysin only group (group 3) were similar to those in the control group (group 4, uninfected and untreated).

4. Discussion

SS2 is the most virulent serotype of S. suis [1]. Antibiotics have been the standard treatment for SS2 infection for many years. The large-scale use of antibiotics in humans and animals has placed selective pressure on pathogenic microorganisms, including Streptococcus species, and led to drug-resistant S. suis [8,9]. Thus, interest has grown in the potential of phage lysins as novel antimicrobials [31,32,33]. Only a few lysins (Ly7917, Ply5218, and LySMP) that specifically targeted SS2 have been reported [27,28,34]. Among those, Ply5218 showed the highest lytic activity and efficacy against SS2 in vitro [27]. Since no study has focused on the application of this lysin against SS2 infections in pigs, the present study explored the potential of Ply5218 as an antimicrobial in piglets.
Studies have showed that lysins were effectively against mice infections caused by S. suis [20,24]. In this study, murine bacteremia model was used to assess the bactericidal effect of Ply5218. The bacterial burden in murine blood in the group that received the Ply5218 treatment immediately after the bacterial challenge (0 h) was significantly lower than that in the other infected groups (Figure 5). This finding is in accordance with previous studies employing lysins in murine models [35]. These studies found that the lysins activity to eradicate bacteria was the highest when administered shortly after a bacterial challenge. In this context, another study suggested that the superior therapeutic effect of lysins administered directly after a bacterial challenge may be due to their effect on local infections and the prevention of diffusion of bacteria [20,36]. Interestingly, in the present study, mice mortality and bacterial burden were comparable in the triple (50 µg each time) and immediate (150 µg of single dose) treatment groups, being significantly lower when compared with the other groups. This indicates that triple treatment provided efficient protection against streptococcal infections. In this study, the piglets in the triple treatment group received three doses (150 µg/kg each time) of Ply5218 on consecutive days. As expected, the condition of the piglets in this group was better than that in the untreated group, with improved health status, a reduced bacterial load, and lower levels of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 (Figure 6).
Previous studies have demonstrated that lysins provide prophylaxis against bacterial infections when administered prior to infection [37,38]. To provide such protection, lysins must remain active in the target animal for a number of days. As shown by the in vitro study, Ply5218 showed bacteriolytic activity after incubation with serum for 24 h (Figure 3). Therefore, Ply5218 appears to remain active in piglets for at least 24 h. However, in humans most proteins smaller than 60-65 kDa tend to be rapidly eliminated by the renal system [39]. Thus, the pretreatment of lysin may not provide solid prophylaxis in vivo.
Side effects are occasionally associated with bactericidal agents. These include the release of large amounts of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, which are recognized by toll-like receptors and result in the induction of proinflammatory cytokines in mammals [40]. In the present study, there was no differences in the expression of proinflammatory cytokine (IL-6) in the uninfected piglets treated with Ply5218 compared to those in the control group throughout the study (Figure 6E). Furthermore, the Ply5218 treatment was not associated with clinical signs of fever, lethargy, or claudication. Therefore, Ply5218 appears to have had no obvious side effects. The researchers believe that, irrespective of the administration route, lysins make the host produce antibodies against lysins, which may affect the bacteriolytic activity of lysins in vivo [16]. However, Zhang et al. suggested that antibodies against lysins may not affect the bacteriolytic efficiency of lysins in vitro or in vivo, as these antibodies may not always bind to the enzymatic activity region of lysins [41]. If lysins are administered within one week of the detection of infection, the antibodies that are produced may be insufficient to influence the lytic activity of lysins. The results of our study support this idea, with Ply5218 maintaining a bacteriolytic effect against S. suis in vivo in the triple treatment group (Figure 6D).
The findings of the present study indicate that Ply5218 exhibits lytic activity against various serotypes of S. suis. Furthermore, Ply5218 provided protection against SS2, SS7, and SS9 challenge in both mice and piglets. Some caveats need to be considered in terms of the therapeutic efficacy of Ply5218, for example, it must be administered shortly after infection. Nevertheless, Ply5218 shows great potential as an alternative to antibiotics.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W., H.W., Y.Y. and J.S.; Data curation, Z.W., J.W., D.Y. and Y.C.; Formal analysis, Z.W. and L.K.; Funding acquisition, Y.Y. and J.S.; Investigation, Z.W., D.Y. and L.K.; Methodology, Z.W., J.M. and Q.F.; Project administration, J.W.; Resources, J.W.; Supervision, J.W., H.W., Y.Y. and J.S.; Validation, Z.W., J.M. and D.Y.; Writing—original draft, Z.W. and J.M.; Writing—review & editing, Z.W., J.M., Y.Y. and J.S.

Funding

This study was funded by the Shanghai Agriculture Applied Technology Development Program, China (Grant No. T20180205 and G2016060201), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (Grant No. 18391901900 and 16391903400 ), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772744 and 31571932).

Acknowledgments

We appreciate Chengping Lu at the Nanjing Agricultural University for sharing the Streptococcus suis strains (HA9801 wildtype strains).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haas, B.; Grenier, D. Understanding the virulence of Streptococcus suis: A veterinary, medical, and economic challenge. Med. Mal. Infect. 2017, 48, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Segura, M.; Fittipaldi, N.; Calzas, C.; Gottschalk, M. Critical Streptococcus suis virulence factors: Are they all really critical? Trends Microbiol. 2017, 25, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Goyette-Desjardins, G.; Auger, J.P.; Xu, J.; Segura, M.; Gottschalk, M. Streptococcus suis, an important pig pathogen and emerging zoonotic agent-an update on the worldwide distribution based on serotyping and sequence typing. Emerg. Microb. Infect. 2014, 3, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Segura, M.; Zheng, H.; de Greeff, A.; Gao, G.F.; Grenier, D.; Jiang, Y.; Lu, C.; Maskell, D.; Oishi, K.; Okura, M.; et al. Latest developments on Streptococcus suis: An emerging zoonotic pathogen: Part 2. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Liu, Z.; Zheng, H.; Gottschalk, M.; Bai, X.; Lan, R.; Ji, S.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Development of multiplex PCR assays for the identification of the 33 serotypes of Streptococcus suis. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e72070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Higgins, R.; Gottschalk, M. Distribution of Streptococcus suis capsular types in 1999. Can. Vet. J. La Rev. Vet. Can. 2000, 41, 414. [Google Scholar]
  7. Van Samkar, A.; Brouwer, M.C.; Schultsz, C.; van der Ende, A.; van de Beek, D. Streptococcus suis Meningitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2015, 9, e0004191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huang, J.; Chen, L.; Li, D.; Wang, M.; Du, F.; Gao, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, L. Emergence of a vanG-carrying and multidrug resistant ICE in zoonotic pathogen Streptococccus suis. Vet. Microbiol. 2018, 222, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hernandez-Garcia, J.; Wang, J.; Restif, O.; Holmes, M.A.; Mather, A.E.; Weinert, L.A.; Wileman, T.M.; Thomson, J.R.; Langford, P.R.; Wren, B.W.; et al. Patterns of antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus suis isolates from pigs with or without streptococcal disease in England between 2009 and 2014. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 207, 117–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Hout, J.; Heuvelink, A.; Gonggrijp, M. Monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus suis in the Netherlands, 2013–2015. Vet. Microbiol. 2016, 194, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oliveira, H.; Pinto, G.; Oliveira, A.; Oliveira, C.; Faustino, M.A.; Briers, Y.; Domingues, L.; Azeredo, J. Characterization and genome sequencing of a Citrobacter freundii phage CfP1 harboring a lysin active against multidrug-resistant isolates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 10543–10553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Forde, A.; Hill, C. Phages of life—the path to pharma. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 412–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, Z.; Zheng, P.; Ji, W.; Fu, Q.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J. SLPW: A virulent bacteriophage targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in vitro and in vivo. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Catalao, M.J.; Gil, F.; Moniz-Pereira, J.; Sao-Jose, C.; Pimentel, M. Diversity in bacterial lysis systems: Bacteriophages show the way. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 554–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fernandes, S.; Sao-Jose, C. Enzymes and mechanisms employed by tailed bacteriophages to breach the bacterial cell barriers. Viruses 2018, 10, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rios, A.C.; Moutinho, C.G.; Pinto, F.C.; Del Fiol, F.S.; Jozala, A.; Chaud, M.V.; Vila, M.M.; Teixeira, J.A.; Balcao, V.M. Alternatives to overcoming bacterial resistances: State-of-the-art. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 191, 51–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lin, D.M.; Koskella, B.; Lin, H.C. Phage therapy: An alternative to antibiotics in the age of multi-drug resistance. World J. Gastrointest. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 8, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shen, Y.; Barros, M.; Vennemann, T.; Gallagher, D.T.; Yin, Y.; Linden, S.B.; Heselpoth, R.D.; Spencer, D.J.; Donovan, D.M.; Moult, J.; et al. A bacteriophage endolysin that eliminates intracellular streptococci. eLife 2016, 5, e13152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Verbree, C.T.; Datwyler, S.M.; Meile, S.; Eichenseher, F.; Donovan, D.M.; Loessner, M.J.; Schmelcher, M. Identification of peptidoglycan hydrolase constructs with synergistic staphylolytic activity in cow’s milk. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03445-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Kong, L.; Liu, Y.; Fu, Q.; Cui, Z.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J. A phage lysin fused to a cell-penetrating peptide kills intracellular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in keratinocytes and has potential as a treatment for skin infections in mice. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 84, e00380-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Raz, A.; Serrano, A.; Lawson, C.; Thaker, M.; Alston, T.; Bournazos, S.; Ravetch, J.V.; Fischetti, V.A. Lysibodies are IgG Fc fusions with lysin binding domains targeting Staphylococcus aureus wall carbohydrates for effective phagocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 4781–4786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chang, Y.; Ryu, S. Characterization of a novel cell wall binding domain-containing Staphylococcus aureus endolysin LysSA97. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maciejewska, B.; Olszak, T.; Drulis-Kawa, Z. Applications of bacteriophages versus phage enzymes to combat and cure bacterial infections: An ambitious and also a realistic application? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 2563–2581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tang, F.; Li, D.; Wang, H.; Ma, Z.; Lu, C.; Dai, J. Prophage lysin Ply30 protects mice from Streptococcus suis and Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus infections. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 7377–7384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gilmer, D.B.; Schmitz, J.E.; Thandar, M.; Euler, C.W.; Fischetti, V.A. The phage lysin PlySs2 decolonizes Streptococcus suis from murine intranasal mucosa. PloS ONE 2017, 12, e0169180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schmelcher, M.; Powell, A.M.; Camp, M.J.; Pohl, C.S.; Donovan, D.M. Synergistic streptococcal phage lambdaSA2 and B30 endolysins kill streptococci in cow milk and in a mouse model of mastitis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 8475–8486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, H.; Zhang, C.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.X.; Sun, J. A novel prophage lysin Ply5218 with extended lytic activity and stability against Streptococcus suis infection. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363, fnw186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Meng, X.; Shi, Y.; Ji, W.; Meng, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, C.; Sun, J.; Yan, Y. Application of a bacteriophage lysin to disrupt biofilms formed by the animal pathogen Streptococcus suis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 8272–8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aida, Y.; Pabst, M.J. Removal of endotoxin from protein solutions by phase separation using Triton X-114. J. Immunol. Methods 1990, 132, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nelson, D.; Loomis, L.; Fischetti, V.A. Prevention and elimination of upper respiratory colonization of mice by group A streptococci by using a bacteriophage lytic enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 4107–4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Love, M.J.; Bhandari, D.; Dobson, R.C.J.; Billington, C. Potential for bacteriophage endolysins to supplement or replace antibiotics in food production and clinical care. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sao-Jose, C. Engineering of phage-derived lytic enzymes: Improving their potential as antimicrobials. Antibiotics 2018, 7, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gerstmans, H.; Criel, B.; Briers, Y. Synthetic biology of modular endolysins. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 624–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ji, W.; Huang, Q.; Sun, L.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J. A novel endolysin disrupts Streptococcus suis with high efficiency. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, fnv205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oliveira, H.; Sao-Jose, C.; Azeredo, J. Phage-derived peptidoglycan degrading enzymes: Challenges and future prospects for in vivo therapy. Viruses 2018, 10, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Thandar, M.; Lood, R.; Winer, B.Y.; Deutsch, D.R.; Euler, C.W.; Fischetti, V.A. Novel engineered peptides of a phage lysin as effective antimicrobials against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 2671–2679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gutierrez, D.; Fernandez, L.; Rodriguez, A.; Garcia, P. Are phage lytic proteins the secret weapon to kill Staphylococcus aureus? mBio 2018, 9, e01923-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pastagia, M.; Euler, C.; Chahales, P.; Fuentes-Duculan, J.; Krueger, J.G.; Fischetti, V.A. A novel chimeric lysin shows superiority to mupirocin for skin decolonization of methicillin-resistant and -sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 738–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Maack, T.; Johnson, V.; Kau, S.T.; Figueiredo, J.; Sigulem, D. Renal filtration, transport, and metabolism of low-molecular-weight proteins: A review. Kidney Int. 1979, 16, 251–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kelesidis, T. The interplay between daptomycin and the immune system. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Li, X.; Hu, L.; Cheng, M.; Xia, F.; Gong, P.; Wang, B.; Ge, J.; Zhang, H.; et al. LysGH15 kills Staphylococcus aureus without being affected by the humoral immune response or inducing inflammation. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 11 00715 g001 550
Figure 1. Analysis of purified lysin from Streptococcus prophage phi5218 (Ply5218) by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) assay and Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Lane 1, ladder; lane 2, crude protein extracted from IPTG-induced E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells producing Ply5218; lane 3, purified Ply5218 protein (37.6 kDa, 31.1 kDa of Ply5218 plus 6.5 kDa of tag in pET 28a).
Figure 1. Analysis of purified lysin from Streptococcus prophage phi5218 (Ply5218) by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) assay and Coomassie brilliant blue staining. Lane 1, ladder; lane 2, crude protein extracted from IPTG-induced E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells producing Ply5218; lane 3, purified Ply5218 protein (37.6 kDa, 31.1 kDa of Ply5218 plus 6.5 kDa of tag in pET 28a).
Viruses 11 00715 g001
Viruses 11 00715 g002 550
Figure 2. The turbidity reduction of Streptococcus suis (A) S. suis serotype 2 (SS2), (B) S. suis serotype 7 (SS7), and (C) S. Suis serotype 9 (SS9) after treatment with the indicated concentrations of Ply5218. The data shown are means ± SEMs for at least three independent experiments.
Figure 2. The turbidity reduction of Streptococcus suis (A) S. suis serotype 2 (SS2), (B) S. suis serotype 7 (SS7), and (C) S. Suis serotype 9 (SS9) after treatment with the indicated concentrations of Ply5218. The data shown are means ± SEMs for at least three independent experiments.
Viruses 11 00715 g002
Viruses 11 00715 g003 550
Figure 3. Turbidity (the OD600 after 30 min/original OD600) reduction of S. suis cell suspensions (strain HA9801) after preincubation of Ply5218 in piglet serum. Serum was collected from healthy piglets and incubated with Ply5218 at 37 °C. Turbidity reduction of HA9801 treated with the Ply5218/serum mixture was measured after 30 min incubation. The data shown are means ± SEMs from at least three independent experiments.
Figure 3. Turbidity (the OD600 after 30 min/original OD600) reduction of S. suis cell suspensions (strain HA9801) after preincubation of Ply5218 in piglet serum. Serum was collected from healthy piglets and incubated with Ply5218 at 37 °C. Turbidity reduction of HA9801 treated with the Ply5218/serum mixture was measured after 30 min incubation. The data shown are means ± SEMs from at least three independent experiments.
Viruses 11 00715 g003
Viruses 11 00715 g004 550
Figure 4. Survival curves of mice infected with S. suis and treated with Ply5218. A lethal dose (5 × 108 CFU/mouse) of SS2, SS7 or SS9 was injected into the abdominal cavities of the mice, and Ply5218/PBS on the other side. In one group, Ply5218 was administrated immediately (0 h) post infection. In the other treatment group, mice were treated with Ply5218 at 6, 24, and 48 h post infection (triple treatment group). The infected mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) served as an untreated group. The uninfected mice treated with Ply5218 served as an uninfected group. hpi: hours post infection.
Figure 4. Survival curves of mice infected with S. suis and treated with Ply5218. A lethal dose (5 × 108 CFU/mouse) of SS2, SS7 or SS9 was injected into the abdominal cavities of the mice, and Ply5218/PBS on the other side. In one group, Ply5218 was administrated immediately (0 h) post infection. In the other treatment group, mice were treated with Ply5218 at 6, 24, and 48 h post infection (triple treatment group). The infected mice treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) served as an untreated group. The uninfected mice treated with Ply5218 served as an uninfected group. hpi: hours post infection.
Viruses 11 00715 g004
Viruses 11 00715 g005 550
Figure 5. The bacterial burden in murine blood and spleen (2 and 4 d post infection) following bacterial challenge with SS2 (A), SS7 (B), and SS9 (C). Ply5218 was administered at 0, 1, or 2 h post infection. In the triple treatment group, mice were treated with Ply5218 at 6, 24, and 48 h post infection. PBS was administered to infected mice in the untreated group. The results are shown as means ± SEM from triplicate experiments. For each sampling time, means with different letters on a given day are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Figure 5. The bacterial burden in murine blood and spleen (2 and 4 d post infection) following bacterial challenge with SS2 (A), SS7 (B), and SS9 (C). Ply5218 was administered at 0, 1, or 2 h post infection. In the triple treatment group, mice were treated with Ply5218 at 6, 24, and 48 h post infection. PBS was administered to infected mice in the untreated group. The results are shown as means ± SEM from triplicate experiments. For each sampling time, means with different letters on a given day are statistically different (p < 0.05).
Viruses 11 00715 g005
Viruses 11 00715 g006 550
Figure 6. Rectal temperature (A), clinical scores for claudication (B), mental status (C), bacterial load (D), and proinflammatory cytokine (E), levels in blood or serum of piglets in different treatment groups after challenge with S. suis strain HA9801. Group 1, triple treatment after bacterial inoculation (triple treatment group); group 2, bacterial challenge and PBS treatment (untreated group); group 3, Ply5218 administration with no bacterial challenge (uninfected group); and group 4, uninfected and untreated piglets. Ten milliliters of blood were collected from each piglet at different time points after the treatment and assayed for bacterial burden or IL-6 (sera) using commercial ELISA kits. In D and E, the asterisks indicate that both the CFU counts and the serum level of IL-6 in triple treatment group (group 1) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that in group 2 (untreated), respectively. Signs of infection and mental status were monitored for 7 d post infection. Recovery was considered as a rectal temperature below 39.5 °C, as well as both mental state and claudication symptom scores ≤1. Samples collected from each piglet were tested in triplicates. The data shown are means ± SEMs.
Figure 6. Rectal temperature (A), clinical scores for claudication (B), mental status (C), bacterial load (D), and proinflammatory cytokine (E), levels in blood or serum of piglets in different treatment groups after challenge with S. suis strain HA9801. Group 1, triple treatment after bacterial inoculation (triple treatment group); group 2, bacterial challenge and PBS treatment (untreated group); group 3, Ply5218 administration with no bacterial challenge (uninfected group); and group 4, uninfected and untreated piglets. Ten milliliters of blood were collected from each piglet at different time points after the treatment and assayed for bacterial burden or IL-6 (sera) using commercial ELISA kits. In D and E, the asterisks indicate that both the CFU counts and the serum level of IL-6 in triple treatment group (group 1) were significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that in group 2 (untreated), respectively. Signs of infection and mental status were monitored for 7 d post infection. Recovery was considered as a rectal temperature below 39.5 °C, as well as both mental state and claudication symptom scores ≤1. Samples collected from each piglet were tested in triplicates. The data shown are means ± SEMs.
Viruses 11 00715 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, D.; Kong, L.; Fu, Q.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y.; Sun, J. Application of the Phage Lysin Ply5218 in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Infection in Piglets. Viruses 2019, 11, 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080715

AMA Style

Wang Z, Ma J, Wang J, Yang D, Kong L, Fu Q, Cheng Y, Wang H, Yan Y, Sun J. Application of the Phage Lysin Ply5218 in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Infection in Piglets. Viruses. 2019; 11(8):715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080715

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhaofei, Jingjiao Ma, Jian Wang, Denghui Yang, Licheng Kong, Qiang Fu, Yuqiang Cheng, Hengan Wang, Yaxian Yan, and Jianhe Sun. 2019. "Application of the Phage Lysin Ply5218 in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Infection in Piglets" Viruses 11, no. 8: 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080715

APA Style

Wang, Z., Ma, J., Wang, J., Yang, D., Kong, L., Fu, Q., Cheng, Y., Wang, H., Yan, Y., & Sun, J. (2019). Application of the Phage Lysin Ply5218 in the Treatment of Streptococcus suis Infection in Piglets. Viruses, 11(8), 715. https://doi.org/10.3390/v11080715

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop